Game Detail
Players
Alice (Virgin) Bob (Spy) Charlie (Empath) David (Imp) Eve (Mayor) Frank (Soldier) Grace (Investigator) Heidi (Drunk)
Token Usage
| Team | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Cost (USD) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Good | 260,808 | 35,722 | $0.9565 |
| Evil | 85,805 | 10,478 | $0.2969 |
Event Transcript
π
The game has started.
π
Storyteller
β
Bob
You are the Minion. The Demon is David.
π
Storyteller
β
David
Minions are: Bob. Your safe bluffs are: Librarian, Fortune Teller, Chef
π
Storyteller
β
Grace
Good evening Grace. You are the Investigator. You learn no information tonight.
π
Storyteller
β
Charlie
Good evening Charlie. You are the Empath. You sense that 2 of your neighbors is evil!
π
Storyteller
β
Bob
Good evening Bob. You are the Spy. You can secretly see information about all players: - Alice: Virgin (good), Alive - Bob: Spy (evil), Alive - Charlie: Empath (good), Alive - David: Imp (evil), Alive - Eve: Mayor (good), Alive - Frank: Soldier (good), Alive - Grace: Investigator (good), Alive - Heidi: Drunk (good), Alive (Told they are Monk)
Day 1
π
Storyteller
Welcome to the village of Ravenswood Bluff. Please take this time to get to know your fellow villagers. Feel free to move around and have private conversations. Be wary, for a Demon hides among you!
π€
Heidi
β
Alice
,David
,Grace
Hi, I am Heidi. Want to swap roles and any starting info in confidence. Also, who do you think is an information role we should try to keep alive tonight and I will coordinate protection next night.
π§
Start a trusted info web early. Get first-night info/claims, cross-check for consistency, and identify an info role to keep alive with Monk protection on night two.
π€
Charlie
β
Bob
,David
Hey, can I get your role claim and any starting info you got, if any? I am trying to piece together outsider and minion possibilities early. Also, are you comfortable going public with your claim later?
π§
Get early private claims from my neighbors without revealing I am Empath yet; look for a demon-like bluff or a minion-style support role.
π€
Alice
β
Heidi
,David
,Grace
Hi. I am Alice and I am the Virgin. I like a controlled plan where a trusted Townsfolk nominates me early tomorrow so we can confirm them by my trigger. If anyone has a strong info role, protect them over me tonight.
π§
Respond promptly, build a trusted mini-circle, and propose a Virgin confirmation plan that can mechanically clear a Townsfolk and create an early execution on a safe target.
π€
Eve
β
David
,Frank
,Alice
Hey, quick check in. I have no starting info. What are you claiming and did you get any night one info or see anything about outsiders or minions? I am trying to build a consistent world early.
π§
Start a small info network without exposing that I am Mayor; collect role/outsider and any N1 info to build early worlds.
π€
David
β
Charlie
Hey Charlie. I am the Chef. I got zero as my number, so I do not think there are any adjacent evil pairs. I am fine going public with that later if it helps, but I am happy to keep it quiet for now too.
π§
Build trust with Charlie using a safe bluff and a plausible Chef number that does not implicate our team, while staying noncommittal about public claims.
π€
Bob
β
Charlie
I am happy to share a claim. I am going to say I am the Chef and my number is zero, so no adjacent evil pairs. I am fine going public with that later if it helps.
π§
Give Charlie a believable early claim that builds trust and provides low-risk info, while keeping Demon David off the radar and setting up Drunk/poison cover if needed.
π€
Frank
β
Eve
,David
,Alice
I am Soldier. No night one info, just passive protection. I did not hear anything about outsiders or minions yet. What are you all claiming, and did anyone get a Washerwoman, Librarian, Investigator, or Chef ping we can cross check?
π§
Respond promptly to Eveβs query, establish an early consistent claim, and gather othersβ starting info to start mapping worlds before nominations.
π€
Grace
β
Heidi
,Alice
,David
I am Grace and I am the Investigator. Night zero I got no Investigator info at all, which feels like poisoning or something weird, so I do not have a minion pair yet. For protection, prioritize other strong info roles like Chef or Empath over me. I will stay quiet publicly for now unless needed.
π§
Share my odd Investigator non-info privately to a trusted cluster so they can adjust protection plans and we can track possible poisoning/drunkenness early.
π€
Heidi
β
Charlie
Hi Charlie, I am Heidi. What are you claiming and do you have any starting info? Also, Alice says she is the Virgin and wants a trusted Townsfolk to nominate her early tomorrow to confirm them. Any thoughts on who should do that?
π§
Get more role claims to decide who to protect on N2 and set up a clean Virgin confirmation plan before nominations start.
π€
Charlie
β
Heidi
,Alice
I am Empath. Night zero I got a two on my neighbors Bob and David, which would make them the two evils if I am sober. Also, both separately told me they are Chef with zero. For the Virgin test, do not have Bob or David nominate Alice; pick someone else like you, Grace, or Frank. What are your claims?
π§
Share my strong N0 info with a small trusted group, steer Virgin nomination to a likely-good player, and set up day 1 execution between Bob and David.
π€
Alice
β
Charlie
,Heidi
I am the Virgin. Agree do not let Bob or David nominate me. If we want a hard confirm today, I suggest Frank nominates me in nomination phase. If it triggers, Frank is confirmed Townsfolk and we can pressure Bob or David next.
π§
Coordinate a controlled Virgin nomination and share my role to align with Charlieβs strong Empath info, while avoiding giving Bob or David leverage and setting up a mechanical confirm.
π€
Eve
β
David
,Alice
,Frank
Thanks. I can share I am a role with no starting info as well. David and Alice, what are you claiming and did you get any N1 pings like Washerwoman, Librarian, Investigator, or Chef? Also, has anyone heard an Outsider claim yet?
π§
Collect early mechanical info and role claims from Alice and David, and set up cross-checks against Frankβs Soldier claim and any first-night info.
π€
David
β
Bob
,Eve
Bob, I am bluffing Chef with a zero result. Let us keep our public stories consistent and avoid sitting as an obvious pair. Eve, I am Chef and got zero adjacent evil pairs; no outsider claims yet. I am fine going public later if needed.
π§
Coordinate with Bob and maintain my Chef bluff to multiple players, while subtly steering protection and day plans away from catching the real evil pair.
π€
Bob
β
David
,Eve
I already told Charlie I am Chef with a zero result. If you also go Chef we will double-claim. Real roles: Alice Virgin, Charlie Empath, Eve Mayor, Frank Soldier, Grace Investigator, Heidi is Drunk (thinks Monk). Please pick a different bluff.
π§
Prevent an immediate double-claim with David and share full grimoire info so evil can pick safe bluffs and coordinate day one narrative.
π€
Frank
β
Grace
,Heidi
,Bob
Hey, quick check in from me. I am Soldier, so no starting info. What are you claiming, and did you get any night one ping like Washerwoman, Librarian, Investigator, or Chef? Also, has anyone claimed an Outsider yet?
π§
Get independent claims and any N1 pings from people not in my current chat, so I can cross-check worlds and narrow demon candidates before nominations.
π€
Grace
β
Frank
I am claiming Investigator. Night zero I got no minion pair at all, which makes me think I was poisoned or I am the Drunk. I have not heard any Outsider claim yet. Have you heard a Librarian, Chef, or Empath claim?
π§
Answer Frank to build trust, gather early role/Outsider data, and flag my missing Investigator info as potential poisoning or Drunk so we can solve setup.
π€
Heidi
β
Frank
,Alice
,Grace
I am Monk, no starting info. No Outsider claims heard yet. Charlie privately claims Empath and got a two on Bob and David; he says both Bob and David told him they are Chef with zero. I like Frank nominating Alice for the Virgin test. Tonight I can protect Charlie if we agree.
π§
Share my Monk claim and Charlie's Empath info with a tight trusted group, coordinate a Virgin confirmation and set protection priority for night 1 to lock in reliable info.
π€
Charlie
β
Frank
,Grace
Hey. I am Empath. Night zero I got TWO on my neighbors Bob and David. Also both separately claimed Chef with zero to me. Alice claims Virgin and wants a Townsfolk to nominate her to confirm. What are your claims, and would you be willing to do that nom if needed?
π§
Get more trustworthy anchors and coordinate a Virgin nomination so we can safely pressure Bob and David without handing the demon an easy kill target.
π€
Alice
β
Frank
,Eve
I am Virgin. Proposal for noms: Frank, please nominate me this phase for the Virgin test. If it triggers, you are confirmed Townsfolk. Also note Charlie says he is Empath and got a two on Bob and David, and both told him they are Chef with zero.
π§
Coordinate a low-risk Day 1 Virgin nomination to mechanically confirm a Townsfolk and share key contradictions about Bob/Davidβs identical Chef claims.
π€
Eve
β
Alice
,Frank
,Charlie
I support the Virgin test: Frank, please nominate Alice asap. Charlie, can you go public with Empath two on Bob and David and push them to explain the double Chef zero? If your two is real, Bob and David are our prime suspects.
π§
Coordinate a strong D1 plan: confirm Virgin via Frank nomination, pressure the Chef double-claim, and focus suspicion on Bob/David if Empath 2 holds.
π€
David
β
Bob
,Charlie
Bob, got it, I will not be Chef. I will claim Librarian instead, likely saying I saw zero Outsiders in play. Charlie, heads up my claim will be Librarian with a zero Outsider result if asked.
π§
Avoid Chef double-claim with Bob, align our stories, and create a clean Librarian0 bluff that can later discredit outsider claims and steer executions.
π€
Bob
β
Frank
I am planning to claim Chef. My number is zero, so no adjacent evil pairs. No other starting pings for me. I have not heard any Outsider claim yet.
π§
Answer Frank quickly with a plausible Chef claim, seed a clean setup (no adjacent evils), and keep attention off David while building credibility with a trusted-sounding Townsfolk.
π€
Frank
β
Alice
,Charlie
,Eve
I will nominate Alice for the Virgin test as soon as noms open. I am Soldier. Charlie, please be ready to go public with your Empath two on Bob and David and the double Chef zero; it is consistent if Bob and David are the two evils.
π§
Lock in the Virgin test to mechanically confirm good players, then use the result to steer public discussion and narrow demon candidates among Bob and David vs a poisoned Empath world.
π€
Grace
β
Charlie
,Heidi
,Frank
I am Investigator but got zero info night zero, so I suspect Poisoner hit me or I am the Drunk. If Charlie is sober, your Empath two means Bob and David are both evil and their Chef zero claims are bluffs. I like doing the Alice Virgin test first with Frank nominating, then we should strongly consider executing Bob or David.
π§
Coordinate quickly with key info/protection players: share my Investigator anomaly, validate the Virgin test plan, and flag Bob/David as high-priority suspects depending on Empath reliability.
Nominations β Day 1
π
Storyteller
Nominations are now open.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
I am the Empath. Night zero I got a two on my neighbors Bob and David, so if I am sober that means they are both evil. Also, both told me they were the Chef with zero. I strongly support the Virgin test now with Frank nominating Alice, and then we should focus on Bob or David next.
π§
Get my Empath info on record, steer the town to a high-value Virgin confirmation today, and frame Bob and David as primary suspects for tomorrow if we spend todayβs execution on the Virgin test.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
I am Heidi, I am the Monk. I really want the Virgin test today: Frank, please nominate Alice now. If it fires, Frank is hard confirmed Townsfolk and we can pressure Bob or David tomorrow. Tonight I plan to protect Charlie the Empath unless we hear a higher priority target.
π§
Push the highest-value mechanical confirm now: Frank nominating Alice. Preserve my Monk life for night protection, and set up a clear D2 execute between Bob and David if Empath holds.
π¬
Alice
β
All
Frank, if you are ready, please nominate me right now for the Virgin test. Everyone else, if it does not trigger, please do not rush a vote on me today. The point is just to see whether it fires.
π§
Push the planned Virgin test immediately before the day ends, creating mechanical confirmation or at least a strong data point to focus tomorrowβs execution.
π¬
Eve
β
All
I agree with the Virgin test. Frank, please nominate Alice now so we get the confirmation. Everyone else, if it does not fire, do not panic vote Alice. After that, we should be ready to focus on Bob or David based on Charlieβs Empath two and the double Chef claim.
π§
Keep us from wasting Day 1, secure a mechanical confirmation via Virgin test, and set up a focused Bob or David execute path based on Charlieβs info.
βοΈ
Bob
β
Alice
I will nominate Alice for the Virgin test right now so we can get clarity and not waste the day.
π§
Preempt the Virgin confirmation by nominating Alice myself so it cannot hard-confirm Frank; absorb suspicion/execution if needed to shield David and create confusion.
π
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Alice. 4 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
Please do not vote Alice here. This was meant to be a Virgin test from Frank, not from Bob. If Bob is evil the ability will not fire and we could wrongly execute Alice. Let this fail and we reassess Bob and David.
π§
Prevent an accidental execution on Alice from a suspicious nominator, preserve the Virgin test value, and keep pressure on Bob and David.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
Do not vote here. Bob was not the planned nominator, and if Alice is Virgin we could waste the day or execute her for no reason. Let this nomination die, then we can run the Virgin test properly tomorrow and focus on Bob or David.
π§
Prevent an accidental execution of a likely Virgin due to the wrong nominator, and keep pressure on Bob and David while preserving our best confirmation tool.
π¬
Alice
β
All
Do not vote me here. This nomination tells us nothing because Bob was not the controlled Virgin test. If my ability does not fire, it does not clear Bob. Let this die with zero votes, and tomorrow we do a clean test with Frank, then we push Bob or David.
π§
Prevent accidental execution of a good Virgin off a bad test, preserve ability, and keep pressure on Bob and David.
π¬
Eve
β
All
Do not vote Alice here. This nomination was not the planned Virgin test, so an execution gains us nothing and could just kill a good player. Let it die, then we interrogate Bob and David about the Empath two and the double Chef claim.
π§
Prevent an unnecessary D1 execution on Alice, keep pressure on Bob and David, and preserve a clean Virgin test plan for tomorrow.
π¬
Bob
β
All
I agree, nobody should vote Alice here. This nomination was a mistake on my part. After this, can we get David and Grace to restate their exact info publicly? And Charlie, are you open to the idea you might be drunk or poisoned?
π§
Stop an unnecessary vote on Alice, appear reasonable, and begin undermining Charlieβs Empath certainty while buying time for David to survive into night.
β
Frank
Frank waits.
π§
Do not contribute to an unplanned and low-information execution. Preserve Alice, keep votes for a better-targeted nomination, and reassess Bob and David after this fails.
π¬
Grace
β
All
I am not voting Alice. This nomination gives us no clean info. After it ends, can Bob and David each state their exact role and number publicly, and why both told Charlie Chef zero? Also, I am Investigator with no night zero info, so treat that as possibly poisoned or Drunk.
π§
Prevent a pointless Day 1 execution on a likely good player and steer town into a structured info-gathering plan focused on Bob and David contradictions.
π¬
David
β
All
I am not voting Alice. This nomination is not a clean Virgin test. Charlie, I hear you, but I would also like to sanity check whether you could be drunk or poisoned, since an Empath two on day one is huge. Grace, what exactly do you mean by no Investigator info?
π§
Do not vote Alice, look cooperative, steer discussion to possible poisoning/drunkness and away from a clean mechanical solve that nails me tomorrow.
β
Charlie
Charlie waits.
π§
Do not contribute votes to a low-information, high-risk execution. Preserve Alice, keep powder dry, and pivot to extracting consistent public claims from Bob and David.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
No vote on Alice. After this ends, I want Bob and David to each state their exact role and info publicly, and why they both told Charlie Chef zero. Grace, please also explain what you mean by getting no Investigator info.
π§
Prevent a pointless execution today and pivot the group into extracting clean public claims that help identify the evil pair.
β
Alice
Alice waits.
π§
Do not vote on my own nomination; preserve the Virgin test for a controlled nominator and avoid an uninformative Day 1 execution.
β
Eve
Eve waits.
π§
Do not spend votes executing Alice on a non-informative nomination; preserve execution equity and keep focus on resolving the Bob and David and Chef and Empath contradictions.
π¬
Bob
β
All
No vote on Alice. Publicly, I am the Chef and I got zero. I told Charlie that in a whisper. David matching me was just cover. Grace, if you truly got no Investigator info, that strongly suggests the Drunk is in play, so Charlieβs two might not be reliable.
π§
Prevent an accidental Alice execution, keep David safe by muddying the Empath-two logic, and use Graceβs βno infoβ to sell that Charlie or Grace is the Drunk.
π¬
Frank
β
All
No vote from me on Alice. This was not the clean Virgin test we wanted. After this, I want David to state his exact role and number publicly, and explain why he told Charlie Chef zero. Then we can plan tomorrow cleanly.
π§
Avoid an info-poor D1 execution and keep the planned Virgin confirmation path. Then force clear public statements from Bob and David to resolve the Empath two versus Chef zero conflict.
β
Grace
Grace waits.
π§
Do not waste Day 1 on a non-informative execution. Preserve town consensus to let this nomination die, then collect Davidβs public claim and reconcile the Chef double-claim with Charlieβs Empath read.
β
David
David waits.
π§
Do not raise suspicion by voting against consensus; keep Alice alive, keep focus muddy, and preserve my credibility for a Librarian bluff post-vote.
π
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
π³οΈ
Nominee Alice did not reach threshold.
π
Storyteller
Alice did not receive enough votes (0/4).
π¬
Charlie
β
All
Okay, we need clarity. Bob says he is Chef with zero. David, you also told me Chef zero in private earlier. Please state your exact role and any starting info publicly, and explain why you matched Bob to me. Grace, also explain what you mean by no Investigator info.
π§
Use my strong Empath read to force Bob and David into detailed public claims now, creating contradictions we can act on tomorrow, without rushing a misexecution today.
βοΈ
Heidi
β
David
Charlieβs Empath read of two points at you and Bob, and you still have not given a full public role claim and starting info. You also told Charlie Chef zero privately. Please state your exact role and explain that mismatch.
π§
We have almost no time left today. Nominating David forces a public role claim and explanation for the double Chef story, and gives town a chance to execute a likely evil if the room agrees.
π
Storyteller
Voting starts now for David. 4 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
β
Charlie
Charlie raised their hand
π§
Cast a strong day one vote on the most mechanically indicated suspect to secure an execution and test my Empath world; leaves Bob as next-step if needed.
β
Heidi
Heidi raised their hand
π§
Apply pressure for David to give a full public role and info, and be willing to execute a top suspect if town agrees.
β
Alice
Alice raised their hand
π§
Push through an execution on the best available suspect (David), since my Virgin test is already blown and Davidβs behavior plus Empath2 makes him a high-value elimination.
β
Eve
Eve raised their hand
π§
We already have three votes; my vote executes David. The mechanical chain Empath 2 plus Chef 0 strongly points to Bob and David as the evil pair, so executing David is high value.
π¬
Bob
β
All
I do not want to vote David today. This is still day one and we have possible Drunk in play already. We can do a clean Virgin test tomorrow and compare claims after a night of info. A day one execute here is too swingy.
π§
Stop the vote on our Demon by arguing it is premature and that Drunk/poisoning makes D1 executes risky; push for postponing and doing a clean Virgin test tomorrow.
β
Frank
Frank raised their hand
π§
We already have enough votes, but adding mine helps lock the execution on the most suspicious non-claim who matched a false Chef whisper and fits the Empath2 world.
β
Grace
Grace raised their hand
π§
Secure Davidβs execution while votes are open. Even if others already have the majority, adding my vote signals my read and reduces the chance of last-second vote shenanigans.
π¬
David
β
All
Okay, I will full claim now. I am the Librarian and I got zero Outsiders in play. I told Charlie Chef zero earlier as cover because Bob said he was Chef and I did not want to out my role in a messy day one. With Grace saying she got no Investigator info, I think we could have drunk or poison. Please pull your vote down and let us do the clean Virgin test tomorrow.
π§
Stop the day one execution on me by giving a coherent Librarian claim and framing the Chef mismatch as intentional cover, while amplifying uncertainty around Charlie and Grace.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
Please do not pull votes down. David told me earlier he would claim Librarian with zero Outsiders, and now he has. Also he lied Chef zero as cover. With my Empath two on Bob and David, this is our best day one execute.
π§
Keep votes on David and prevent a late unvote. His preplanned Librarian 0 claim plus earlier cover lie makes him the best mechanical execute to test my Empath and pressure Bob next.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
I am keeping my vote up. David has two red flags: Charlie has an Empath two on Bob and David, and David admitted a deliberate false Chef claim. Also Librarian with zero Outsiders does not fit our player count. I want David executed today.
π§
Keep pressure on the Bob David pair from the Empath two and punish proven deception; resolve contradictions early and set up clear protection targets tonight.
π¬
Alice
β
All
I am keeping my vote up. In an eight player game we should have one Outsider, so Librarian seeing zero Outsiders does not fit. Plus David admitted a deliberate lie. I think we execute David today, then do a clean Virgin test tomorrow if needed.
π§
Keep pressure on the strongest mechanical inconsistency. If Davidβs claim cannot fit setup, executing him is a high value test and may hit evil immediately.
π¬
Eve
β
All
I am keeping my hand up. In eight players we expect an Outsider, so Librarian seeing zero is a big problem unless you are drunk or lying. Plus you admitted a deliberate false Chef claim. I would rather execute you today and then reassess Bob tomorrow.
π§
Lock in a Day 1 execution on the most mechanically inconsistent player, preserve momentum, and set clear next steps if we are wrong.
π¬
Bob
β
All
Everyone, please slow down. Day one executions off a single Empath two are how good teams lose. We already have evidence someone is getting bad info with Grace seeing nothing. If Charlie or David is drunk or poisoned, this whole case collapses. Let us stand down and do a clean Virgin test tomorrow.
π§
Prevent Davidβs execution by creating enough doubt to make at least three voters pull hands down; reframe today as information-gathering and push tomorrowβs Virgin test.
π¬
Frank
β
All
I am keeping my hand up. In an eight player game we expect one Outsider, so Librarian seeing zero is a big mechanical clash unless you are drunk or poisoned. You also admitted a deliberate false Chef claim. If you die and we later have no Outsider claim at all, I will revisit this.
π§
Keep pressure on the clearest mechanical inconsistency. Encourage town to commit to a coherent plan after the execution, especially tracking whether Outsider claims appear.
π¬
Grace
β
All
I am keeping my vote on David. In eight players we expect one Outsider, so Librarian seeing zero is a big clash unless you are drunk or lying, and you also admitted a deliberate false Chef claim. My Investigator getting no info suggests I might be the Drunk, but that does not fix your mismatch.
π§
Lock in a high-information Day 1 execution on the mechanically inconsistent claimant, while explaining my Investigator oddity and aligning town on a clear plan for tomorrow based on the result.
π¬
David
β
All
Everyone, please consider the risk here. Day one, we already have Grace saying she got no Investigator info, so we know bad info is on the table. If Charlie is also drunk or poisoned, the Empath two is meaningless. My cover lie is not alignment. If you want a safer path, do no execution and tomorrow we do a clean Virgin test and pressure Bob again.
π§
Talk votes down by making the execution look mechanically premature and pointing at Bob as more likely evil if info is compromised.
π
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
π³οΈ
New execution leader: David with 6 votes. They will be executed when nominations close unless tied or surpassed by another nominee.
π
Storyteller
The vote passes. David is now on the block with 6 votes and will be executed when nominations close, unless another nominee receives equal or more votes.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
We are basically out of time. I do not want a last second scramble or a tie. David has a mechanical mismatch and admitted a coordinated cover lie. Please keep your votes where they are and let David go today, then we pressure Bob tomorrow.
π§
With one tick left, prevent a last second derail or tie. Reinforce that Davidβs claims clash mechanically and that executing him is the strongest D1 path, then reassess Bob.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
Before this closes, does anyone want to claim an Outsider right now. If nobody does, Davidβs Librarian zero looks very wrong for eight players. Combined with the coordinated Chef zero cover story, I think we should let David go and sort Bob and Charlie tomorrow.
π§
Lock in the execution and prompt any Outsider to claim now to resolve the Librarian mismatch before nominations close.
π¬
Alice
β
All
Last call before close. Does anyone claim an Outsider right now, Saint or Recluse or Butler or Drunk? If nobody does, David claiming Librarian with zero Outsiders is a big mismatch in eight. I think we let this stand and recheck Bob and Charlie tomorrow.
π§
Lock in the current execution and solicit any last-second Outsider claim to resolve the Librarian mismatch without creating a risky tie.
π¬
Eve
β
All
Last call, please. If anyone is an Outsider, Saint, Recluse, Butler, or Drunk, say it now. If nobody claims, then Librarian seeing zero is very hard to justify and I am fine letting David die today.
π§
Push for immediate Outsider claims to resolve the Librarian zero mismatch and lock in the best execution before nominations close.
π¬
Bob
β
All
If people are convinced by Charlieβs Empath two, then nominate me right now and put the votes on me instead of David. That tests the same world without risking a Day one Demon hit. I am asking for it. Someone who can still nominate, please do it now.
π§
Save David by redirecting execution onto me via a last-second nomination, leveraging Empath=2 to make it plausible and urgent.
π¬
Frank
β
All
I do not want a last second nomination on Bob. That risks a tie and no execution. We already have six on David and his Librarian zero Outsiders in eight plus the cover lie is enough for day one. Let David go, then we come hard at Bob and recheck Charlie tomorrow.
π§
Prevent a last second tie or no execution. Keep focus on executing an Empath-suspect with a strong mechanical mismatch, then reassess Bob and Charlie tomorrow.
π¬
Grace
β
All
I do not want a last second swap to Bob. It risks a tie and no execution. If anyone is an Outsider, please say so right now. Otherwise I think we let David be executed and tomorrow we hard check Bob and the Chef claims.
π§
Stop a last second tie, lock in a meaningful D1 execution, and force Outsider claims now so we can evaluate whether Davidβs Librarian zero is mechanically possible tomorrow.
βοΈ
David
β
Bob
Bob is at the center of the Empath two with Charlie and admitted the Chef zero story first. If you believe Charlie, executing Bob tests that world without ending the game if David is wrong. Move your votes to Bob now.
π§
Only way to survive is to put another player on the block with equal or more votes. Bob is already widely suspected and asked for a nomination; I will nominate him and push all votes there now.
π
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Bob. 7 votes needed for execution or 6 votes to tie. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
Do not vote on Bob. Six votes ties David and we get no execution, which helps evil. Keep David going today. If David dies and my Empath was right, we hard push Bob tomorrow.
π§
Prevent a tie that results in no execution. Keep David executed today; we can execute Bob tomorrow if needed.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
I am not voting Bob. Six votes ties and we get no execution, which is great for evil. Unless you are absolutely sure we can hit seven, keep your hands down and let David be the execution today.
π§
Prevent a last second tie that yields no execution. Preserve the current 6 vote execution on David, then reassess Bob and Charlie tomorrow with more info.
π¬
Alice
β
All
I am not voting Bob. Six votes ties and gives us no execution, which helps evil. Unless you are sure we can reach seven, keep hands down and let David be today. We can execute Bob tomorrow if needed.
π§
Prevent an accidental tie and no execution. Keep the strong mechanical case on David as todayβs execution, then reassess Bob and Charlie tomorrow.
π¬
Eve
β
All
I am not voting Bob here. Unless you are certain we can hit seven, keep your hand down. Six ties David and we get no execution, which is great for evil. Let David be the execution today, then we reassess Bob and Charlie tomorrow.
π§
Prevent a tie that leads to no execution. Keep momentum on David today; we can revisit Bob tomorrow with more info from deaths and claims.
π¬
Bob
β
All
If you are set on a day one execute, please put it on me, not David. I am the one in Charlieβs Empath two. Davidβs Librarian zero could easily be explained by a hidden Drunk or someone misregistering. Seven votes kills me and we still learn a lot tomorrow.
π§
Try to pull votes onto me to reach 7 and save David. If not, at least seed doubt about the Lib0 mismatch and normalize a swap/tie.
π¬
Frank
β
All
Keep your hand down on Bob. We are not getting seven, and six ties David so we get no execution. Let David be the execute today, then we can come for Bob tomorrow if needed.
π§
Prevent a tie that causes no execution, which strongly benefits evil. Preserve the locked-in execution on David and keep town coordinated.
π¬
Grace
β
All
I am not voting on Bob. We are not hitting seven, and six just ties David and gives us no execution. Keep your hands down, let David be the execution today, and we can come back to Bob tomorrow.
π§
Prevent an accidental tie leading to no execution. Reinforce that the safest line for good is to keep hands down on Bob and let David be executed today.
β
David
David raised their hand
π§
I am on the block. Raising for Bob is my only chance to reach a tie and prevent my execution; no-execution benefits evil and keeps the Demon alive.
β
Charlie
Charlie waits.
π§
Keep my hand down to avoid a tie/no-execution outcome, which would waste Day 1 and benefit evil; preserve the confirmed execution on David and reassess tomorrow.
β
Heidi
Heidi waits.
π§
Do not vote on Bob to prevent a tie and guarantee todayβs execution on David, which gives good a concrete datapoint and avoids helping evil with no execution.
β
Alice
Alice waits.
π§
Do not risk a 6-vote tie that removes todayβs execution. Preserve the current plan to execute David and use tomorrow to resolve Bob versus Charlie with more info.
β
Eve
Eve waits.
π§
Keep my hand down so we avoid a tie that causes no execution. Let the current David execution stand, then reassess tomorrow with more info.
π¬
Bob
β
All
If anyone truly thinks Charlie is right, then seven on me is the clean test and it does not risk killing a maybe good Librarian. If we cannot reach seven, then keep hands down, but please do not call today solved if David dies.
π§
Try to pull enough votes to reach 7 on me, sacrificing myself to save the Demon. If it fails, at least seed doubt about David for tomorrow.
β
Frank
Frank waits.
π§
Avoid an accidental 6-vote tie that causes no execution. Preserve the current plan: let David be executed today and reassess with new info tomorrow.
π¬
Grace
β
All
Please keep your hand down on Bob unless you are absolutely sure we can reach seven. Six ties David and gives us no execution, which is best for evil. Let David be today and we reassess tomorrow.
π§
Prevent an accidental tie that causes no execution, and keep pressure on the mechanically inconsistent David while preserving tomorrowβs solve on Bob or Charlie.
π¬
David
β
All
If anyone thinks Charlie might be right, then vote Bob. Seven executes him cleanly, and if we cannot reach seven, a tie at least tells us this vote was not a real solve. I do not want today decided on vibes.
π§
Get at least six votes on Bob to force a tie and no execution, saving me. Frame it as a clean test so good players feel justified voting.
π
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
π³οΈ
Nominee Bob did not reach threshold.
π
Storyteller
Bob did not receive enough votes (1/4).
π¬
Charlie
β
All
No more nominations. Let David be executed today. We avoid a tie and we get real information. Tomorrow, I want the town to focus hard on Bob and on why we have no Outsider claim in an eight player game.
π§
Prevent last second chaos that creates a tie and no execution. Lock in the execution on David and set a clear plan to scrutinize Bob and outsider count tomorrow.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
No more nominations, please. Do not risk a tie and a no execution. Let David go today so we get a clean day one. Tomorrow we hard sort Bob versus Charlie, and I want immediate morning claims on any Outsider and any info role that can confirm the execution.
π§
Lock in an execution today, avoid a tie and no-execution. Set clear tomorrow plan: scrutinize Bob and Charlie and resolve Outsider count mismatch.
π¬
Alice
β
All
Before day ends: I am the Virgin. Bob nominated me earlier and did not die, so either Bob is evil or I was poisoned when that happened. Please keep that in mind tomorrow when you sort Bob, Charlie, and the poisoning world.
π§
Lock in the mechanical implication of my failed Virgin trigger so town can solve Bob versus poisoning tomorrow and not overtrust David/Charlie claims.
π¬
Eve
β
All
No more nominations. Let David be the execution so we do not risk a tie and no execution. Tomorrow I want immediate Outsider claim, and we revisit Alice Virgin versus Bob, plus Charlie Empath two on Bob and David.
π§
Lock in David execution without risking a tie/no-exec, and set clear asks for tomorrow: Outsider claim, resolve Virgin test, and sort Bob versus Charlie.
π¬
Bob
β
All
Just to address Alice: if you are the Virgin, the reason I did not die could simply be that I am not a Townsfolk. I am the Butler. The Virgin only kills the nominator if they are a Townsfolk. So please do not treat that as a slam dunk on me.
π§
Defuse Alice Virgin accusation by giving a non-evil reason I did not die, while keeping focus on uncertainty and setting up tomorrow confusion.
π¬
Frank
β
All
No more nominations. Let David die so we do not risk a tie. Bob, if you are the Butler, say who you pick tonight and tomorrow only vote when they do, so we can confirm. Also, we still need an Outsider count that makes sense.
π§
Lock in Davidβs execution without tie risk, and set up clear mechanical checks for tomorrow, especially Bobβs Butler claim versus Outsider count and poison worlds.
π¬
Grace
β
All
Before we close day: tomorrow morning I want three things fast. One, any Outsider claim, because eight players should have one. Two, Undertaker check on what David was. Three, Bob, if you are the Butler, say clearly who you chose tonight and only vote with them tomorrow so we can verify.
π§
Lock in a concrete tomorrow plan: confirm David via Undertaker, force Outsider claims, and mechanically test Bobβs Butler claim so we can identify the remaining evil quickly.
π¬
David
β
All
If I die today, please do not treat it as a solved game. The whole case is just Outsider math plus me admitting a cover. Charlie has driven this vote and shut down pressure on Bob. Also Alice claiming Virgin at the end is not confirmable. Tomorrow, cross check Charlie and that Virgin claim before you auto execute Bob.
π§
I am about to be executed; I need to seed doubt about the townβs main logic chain and protect Bob by framing Charlie or the late Virgin claim as the real problem.
π
Storyteller
The guillotine blade falls. David has been executed.
π
David(Ghost)
David has died.
π
Game Over
Demon Dead
Winner: Good
Transcript
Paused
Copied