Game Detail
Players
Token Usage
| Team | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Cost (USD) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Good | 325,095 | 32,392 | $1.0224 |
| Evil | 151,651 | 6,439 | $0.5515 |
Event Transcript
π
The game has started.
π
Storyteller
β
David
You are the Minion. The Demon is Heidi.
π
Storyteller
β
Heidi
Minions are: David. Your safe bluffs are: Librarian, Slayer, Recluse
π
Storyteller
β
Bob
Good evening Bob. You are the Empath. You sense that 0 of your neighbors is evil!
π
Storyteller
β
Alice
Good evening Alice. You are the Fortune Teller. Choose 2 players to learn if either is a Demon.
π―
Alice
Alice made choices.
π§
Open with a wide net on two mid-table players to maximize chance of an early YES, then use follow-up pings to isolate Demon vs red herring.
π
Storyteller
β
Alice
You chose David and Frank. You receive the answer: NO.
π
Storyteller
β
David
Good evening David. You are the Spy. You can secretly see information about all players: - Alice: Fortune Teller (good), Alive - Bob: Empath (good), Alive - Charlie: Mayor (good), Alive - David: Spy (evil), Alive - Eve: Ravenkeeper (good), Alive - Frank: Virgin (good), Alive - Grace: Saint (good), Alive - Heidi: Imp (evil), Alive
Day 1
π
Storyteller
Welcome to the village of Ravenswood Bluff. Please take this time to get to know your fellow villagers. Feel free to move around and have private conversations. Be wary, for a Demon hides among you!
π€
Heidi
β
David
Hey David, it's me - your Demon. I'm planning to bluff as Librarian. My 'info' will be that one of two players is an Outsider. Pick a safe bluff for yourself and let's coordinate. Who should I target at night first?
π§
Coordinate with my Minion David to align bluffs and strategy.
π€
Bob
β
Alice
,Charlie
Iβm Empath. N0 read: 0 evil among my alive neighbors β you two (Alice/Charlie) look good if Iβm sober. What are your roles/starting info? Any Outsider count hints?
π§
Build a small trusted triangle, share my Empath 0, and quickly collect their roles/starting info to identify outsider count and potential evil pairs before noms.
π€
Frank
β
Eve
,Grace
Whisper: I might be the Virgin. If youβre Townsfolk & ok dying for info, consider nominating me early in noms to test/confirm. Also share any starting info/role vibe youβre comfortable with.
π§
Coordinate a controlled Virgin test early to create mechanical confirmation and generate alignment reads before nominations.
π€
David
β
Heidi
Got it! I'll bluff as Investigator - I'll claim my info shows one of two players is a Minion (pointing at good players to cause confusion). For night 1, I'd suggest targeting Alice - she's likely a strong info role. Stay safe and keep the Librarian bluff consistent!
π§
Coordinate with Heidi on bluffs and night kills. I'll bluff Investigator. Target Alice (Fortune Teller) first - most dangerous info role.
π€
Eve
β
Frank
,Grace
Got it. Iβm an info Townsfolk (happy to share later; may bluff higher-value to draw night kill). For Virgin test: ideally a Townsfolk who wonβt mind dying nominates you early. Any starting-info claims from either of you yet?
π§
Engage Frank/Grace, gauge sincerity, and steer toward a safe Virgin test while I consider a bluff to attract night kill for Ravenkeeper value.
π€
Grace
β
Frank
,Eve
Re Virgin test: Iβm not a good volunteer to be the nominator/βsacrificeββIβd rather not risk being the one executed. Iβm low-info/utility today. If we do test you, better a confirmed Townsfolk who can afford dying. Any hard starting-info from either of you yet (even just 1-of-2s)?
π§
Reply politely, avoid offering myself as Virgin-tester (Saint risk), and gather claims to plan a safe Virgin nomination strategy.
π€
Alice
β
Bob
,Charlie
Iβm Fortune Teller. N0 I checked David+Frank β NO (neither Demon, unless red herring/poison). Happy to coordinate future checks. Charlie, whatβs your role/starting info? Any outsider count clues from anyone yet?
π§
Build a small trust circle, share my mechanical info to narrow suspects, and prompt Charlie to claim so we can triangulate vs Bobβs Empath + outsider count.
π€
Charlie
β
Bob
,Alice
Iβm a low-info Townsfolk (no N0 info to share). Bob, if your Empath 0 is sober thatβs reassuring. Alice: suggest N1 check Eve+Heidi or Eve+Grace to cover the 3 not yet checked. Any outsider count claims yet?
π§
Maintain Mayor safety by soft-claiming low-info role, keep info flowing, and steer Aliceβs next FT checks toward most likely Demon candidates.
π€
Heidi
β
Alice
,Grace
Hey neighbors! I'm the Librarian. My starting info showed that either Bob or Charlie is an Outsider. Wanted to share early to help us coordinate. What roles are you two?
π§
Establish my Librarian bluff publicly by whispering to neighbors to build trust.
π€
Bob
β
Alice
,Charlie
Good. Since my N0=0 on you two, Iβm leaning to trust/coord. Alice: agree N1 check from {Eve,Grace,Heidi} vs {David,Frank} to cover. Also ask around for Chef/Investigator/Librarian/WW claims to cross-check poison/Baron.
π§
Coordinate with trusted neighbors to aim Fortune Teller checks efficiently, and plan what to share publicly before nominations without over-clearing if poison/drunk exists.
π€
Frank
β
Eve
,Grace
No hard info from me (Virgin). If either of you gets a solid Townsfolk claim elsewhere (Washerwoman/Chef/etc), can you point them to nominate me early? Also: any hints on your info typeβstart info vs nightlyβso I know urgency?
π§
Get actionable starting info + line up a safe Virgin test nominator (ideally a known/claimed expendable Townsfolk) while minimizing info leakage if either neighbor is evil.
β
David
David waits.
π§
Wait and observe current whisper patterns before acting. Will whisper strategically next tick.
π€
Eve
β
Frank
,Grace
Re urgency: my info is βif killed at night I get a strong peekβ (so Iβm happy to look like a juicy night target). For your Virgin test: best if someone publicly claims a disposable Townsfolk (Washerwoman/Chef/etc) and nominates you early. Any 1-of-2 info found yet from others?
π§
Coordinate a productive Day 1 plan: enable/interpret a Virgin test, gather starting-info claims, and position myself to be a tempting night-kill for Ravenkeeper value.
π€
Grace
β
Heidi
,Frank
Heidi: thx for sharing. Privately: Iβm the Saint (pls donβt out yet). So if your Librarian is true & only 1 Outsider, itβs Bob/Charlie, not me. Frank: FYI Heidi claims Librarian: Bob/Charlie is Outsider. Might help w Virgin-test planning.
π§
Privately confirm/coordinate with Heidi to avoid me being executed (Saint), and push for cross-checking her Librarian info via other starting-info claims + Virgin test.
π€
Alice
β
Heidi
,Bob
,Charlie
Heidi: thanksβwhat *Outsider* did you see (Butler/Saint/Recluse/Drunk) on Bob/Charlie? Iβm FT; N0 checked David+Frank=NO. Bob/Charlie: does either of you fit that Outsider? If not, Heidi might be wrong/poisoned/lying.
π§
Clarify Heidiβs exact Librarian ping (which Outsider), get Bob/Charlie to respond with claims, and set up a coherent info web before nominations.
π€
Charlie
β
Alice
,Bob
,Heidi
Re: Heidiβs Outsider ping on (Bob/Charlie): Iβm *not* an Outsider (Iβm a Townsfolk). Heidiβcan you confirm youβre Librarian + exact Outsider shown (Butler/Saint/Recluse/Drunk) and the two names? If your info is right, it points strongly to Bob being that Outsider.
π§
Clarify Heidiβs exact Librarian info and immediately narrow whether Bob is plausible Drunk/Butler or Heidi is unreliable/evil; helps plan FT checks and day-1 execution target.
π€
Heidi
β
Alice
,Charlie
The Outsider I saw was Recluse, and the two players were Bob and Charlie. Charlie, if you're truly Townsfolk, that points to Bob being the Recluse. Alice, interesting that your FT check on David+Frank came up clean - that's useful info for the group!
π§
Respond to Alice and Charlie with consistent Librarian bluff - claim Recluse on Bob/Charlie to seem credible.
π€
Bob
β
Heidi
Heidiβcan you share exact Librarian info: which Outsider (Butler/Saint/Recluse/Drunk) and the two names? Also any reason you suspect poisoning? Iβm claiming Empath w/ N0=0 on Alice+Charlie, so your ping conflicts unless Iβm Drunk/poisoned.
π§
Get Heidiβs exact Librarian info to resolve the Outsider ping contradiction and decide whether to hard-trust Alice/Charlie and whether Heidi is likely poisoned/evil.
π€
Frank
β
Eve
,Heidi
,Grace
FYI (keep quiet): Grace privately told me sheβs the Saint. If true & only 1 Outsider, Heidiβs Librarian ping (Bob/Charlie Outsider) fits. Letβs avoid executing Grace. Heidiβcan you share your Lib info publicly later to lock Outsider count? Eveβany other start-info seen?
π§
Coordinate privately to avoid accidental Saint execution, sanity-check Heidiβs Librarian, and set up a clean Virgin test nomination from a trusted Townsfolk.
π€
David
β
Heidi
Nominations coming soon. I'll claim Investigator - my 'info' is that either Bob or Charlie is the Spy. This casts suspicion on good players. Suggest we push for Bob's execution today - he's Empath and will get accurate reads on you. Thoughts?
π§
Coordinate with Heidi on day 1 execution target - push a strong good player like Alice or Bob.
π€
Eve
β
Heidi
,Frank
Can you share exact Lib info (who are the 2 names + which Outsider)? If Grace is Saint & only 1 Outsider, we should avoid her exec. Also for Virgin test: early nom by a disposable Townsfolk claimant (Washer/Chef/etc) seems bestβany candidates yet?
π§
Coordinate with Heidi to get exact Librarian info and decide how/when to go public; protect Saint from accidental exec; keep my Ravenkeeper identity quiet while positioning for night kill.
π€
Grace
β
Heidi
Pls keep this tight: Iβm actually the Saint, so I canβt ever be executed. If your Librarian ping is true & baseline outsider=1, then Bob/Charlie is Outsider, not me. Are you planning to go public w Lib claim soon to lock outsider count? Any other 1-of-2s youβve heard?
π§
Coordinate discreetly: keep my Saint hidden from town, validate Outsider count via Librarian, and plan safe early-day messaging without creating an execution risk for me.
π€
Alice
β
Bob
,Charlie
,Heidi
Quick sync: Heidi says Librarian saw *Recluse* between Bob/Charlie. Bobβany chance youβre Recluse / would you ever claim it? Empath 0 could still fit if Recluse registers good. Heidiβany other info? Iβm leaning N1 FT check includes Heidi (e.g., Heidi+Eve). Thoughts before noms?
π§
Align our small trust circle, pressure-test the Librarian/Empath claims, and set a coordinated N1 Fortune Teller check that either implicates Heidi or clears two key suspects.
π€
Charlie
β
Bob
,Alice
,Heidi
Iβm *not* Recluse. If Heidiβs Librarian is true+sober, Bob is the Recluse. Bob: would you be willing to claim/soft-claim Recluse to resolve? Heidi: any reason you might be poisoned? Alice: suggest N1 FT check incl Heidi + one of {Eve/Grace} to test Heidi world.
π§
Align privately on whether Bob should soft-claim Recluse and how to treat Heidiβs info; set up coordinated FT check and avoid a bad D1 execution.
π€
Heidi
β
Bob
Bob, I already shared: Librarian saw Recluse between you and Charlie. Charlie denies being Recluse, which points to you. Your Empath claim could still fit if you're Recluse (registers good). Would you be willing to soft-claim Recluse to clear this up?
π§
Respond to Bob confirming my Librarian bluff, and subtly support suspicion on Bob to help David's push for his execution.
π€
Bob
β
Heidi
,Alice
,Charlie
Iβm not going to soft-claim RecluseβIβm sticking with Empath (N0=0 on Alice/Charlie). Heidi, your Librarian could be right OR you could be poisoned/lying. Letβs cross-check via other setup claims (Chef/Invest/WW) + Alice please include Heidi in N1 FT (Heidi+Eve/Grace). If Outsider count comes out 1, your Librarian is plausible; if 0/3, re-evaluate.
π§
Avoid locking into a false Outsider claim; keep my Empath info usable while pushing for mechanical cross-checks (FT checks + Outsider count).
π€
Frank
β
Heidi
,Eve
Heidiβcan you send exact Librarian ping (2 names + which Outsider / or 0)? Eveβif we can ID a Washer/Chef/Invest claim, please ask them to nominate me early in noms for Virgin confirm (theyβll insta-die if TF). Also: keep Graceβs Saint claim quiet for now.
π§
Get exact Librarian info and coordinate a safe, high-value Virgin test (confirm a Townsfolk nominator) while keeping Graceβs Saint claim discreet to prevent a disastrous execution.
β
David
David waits.
π§
Wait for nominations phase - I've already coordinated with Heidi. Will claim Investigator with info pointing at good players.
π€
Eve
β
Heidi
,Alice
,Bob
Can you share any exact starting info you have (WW/Lib/Inv/Chef)? Heidi: what was your Librarian ping exactly (2 names + which Outsider/β0β)? Alice/Bob: if youβre a disposable TF w/ start info, please consider nominating Frank early to confirm Virgin.
π§
Get exact Librarian ping + locate any start-info roles to (1) lock Outsider count, (2) safely run a Virgin test on Frank, and (3) keep Graceβs Saint claim as a protected hypothesis until verified.
π€
Grace
β
Bob
,Charlie
Private q: do either of you actually claim an Outsider (Butler/Recluse/Drunk etc)? Heidi says her Librarian saw βBob OR Charlie is an Outsider.β If true, that likely locks Outsider count. Any other start-info youβve heard?
π§
Get Bob/Charlie to clarify Outsider status to check Outsider count and reduce chance town targets me; also assess if Heidiβs Lib info is real or a bluff.
π€
Alice
β
Eve
,Grace
,Frank
Quick check-in before noms: what role/starting info are you each claiming (WW/Inv/Chef/Virgin/etc)? If we have a Virgin, we can have a known TF nominate them to confirm fast. Also FYI Iβm FT: N0 checked David+Frank=NO (unless red herring/poison).
π§
Collect remaining starting-info claims privately and coordinate a low-risk Virgin test nomination plan before the nom phase, while keeping my FT identity semi-contained.
π€
Charlie
β
Grace
Iβm not claiming any Outsider; Iβm Townsfolk (Mayor, but keeping that quiet for now). Only Outsider claim so far is Heidiβs Librarian ping (Recluse between Bob/Charlie). If sheβs true+sober then Bob is Recluse. Have you heard any Chef/WW/Invest setup info that confirms Outsider count?
π§
Answer Grace, keep her aligned with our info, and push her to solicit/announce other setup info (Chef/WW/Invest) to resolve Heidi-vs-Bob tension before nominations.
Nominations β Day 1
π
Storyteller
Nominations are now open.
π¬
Alice
β
All
Public: Iβm Fortune Teller. N0 I checked David+Frank = NO (subject to red herring/poison). Heidi claims Librarian saw Recluse between Bob/Charlie; Charlie denies. Before we execute anyone: can Eve/Grace/Frank/David share any start-info roles (WW/Inv/Chef) or Virgin claim? If Virgin exists, letβs do a safe confirm.
π§
Use limited D1 time to collect claim map, locate a Virgin for a safe confirm, and set up high-value N1 Fortune Teller checks without risking a random execution.
π¬
Frank
β
All
Public: Iβm the Virgin. Happy to be nominated ASAP for a mech testβbut only by someone claiming Townsfolk (WW/Inv/Chef/Undertaker/etc). If you nom me and youβre TF, youβll die immediately and we confirm me. If you live, we learn a lot too. Whoβs willing/what are remaining claims?
π§
Publicly claim Virgin and request a controlled nomination by a claimed Townsfolk to generate mechanical info without risking an arbitrary execution, while not outing Graceβs Saint claim.
π¬
Eve
β
All
Public: Iβm a Townsfolk whose value is mostly if I die at night (so I do *not* want to be the one to nom the Virgin test). I support doing Frankβs Virgin test today via a claimed start-info TF (Heidi Lib / Alice FT / any Chef/WW/Inv). Also: if Grace might be Saint, letβs avoid executing her until Outsider count is locked.
π§
Push for an optimal Virgin test without sacrificing my night-death value, and lock in Outsider count/claims to reduce misexec risk.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
Public: I like doing Frankβs Virgin test today, but I donβt want to be the one to eat it. Best is a claimed start-info TF (Heidi Librarian or Alice FT) to nominate Frank. If it procs, we confirm Virgin+nominator TF; if not, Frank becomes very suspect.
π§
Push a low-cost mechanical test that confirms or falsifies Frankβs Virgin claim while keeping myself (potentially Mayor) alive for endgame leverage.
π¬
Bob
β
All
Public: Iβm Empath, N0 read = 0 evil among my neighbors (Alice+Charlie) if sober. I strongly want the Virgin test today, but prefer Heidi (claim Lib) or Alice (FT) to nominate Frank so I can keep getting Empath reads. If it doesnβt proc, Frank becomes very suspicious.
π§
Push for the safest high-value D1 mechanical test (Virgin) using another claimed Townsfolk, while preserving my Empath for nightly info and avoiding unnecessary D1 executions.
βοΈ
Heidi
β
Frank
Public: I'll step up as Librarian (Townsfolk) to do the Virgin test. Frank, nominating you now. If you're truly Virgin and I'm Townsfolk, I should die. Let's get the mechanical confirmation the town wants.
π§
As Imp I am not Townsfolk, so nominating Frank won't trigger Virgin execution on me. This builds trust as I appear to cooperate with the group's Virgin test plan.
π
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Frank. 4 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
β
Alice
Alice raised their hand
π§
No Virgin proc means somethingβs off; voting to execute Frank either kills a likely liar or yields decisive info about Heidi/poisoning for tomorrow.
π¬
Frank
β
All
No Virgin proc happened. That means either (a) Heidi is NOT a Townsfolk (so Lib claim is false or sheβs Drunk/evil), or (b) Iβm the Drunk. Either way, please donβt execute me on D1βuse this as info and letβs pivot to Heidi/outsider count.
π§
Stop my execution, and lock in the mechanical implication: Heidi is not Townsfolk OR Iβm drunk. Push town to withhold votes and pivot scrutiny onto Heidi/role validity.
π¬
Eve
β
All
Iβm *not* voting Frank here. Failed Virgin test hard-pings a FrankβHeidi problem; executing either D1 is risky. Letβs likely no-exec today, then N1: Empath read, FT check, and if we execute later Undertaker can verify. Heidi/Frank both should restate exact claims.
π§
Discourage a low-info D1 execute on Frank; preserve flexibility and focus suspicion on the failed Virgin-test intersection (Frank vs Heidi) while we gather N1 info.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
Iβm not voting Frank here. Failed Virgin test just means *either* Frank isnβt Virgin *or* Heidi isnβt a TF (or drunk/poisoned). Letβs avoid a low-info D1 kill: Heidi+Frank please restate exact claims, and tonight Alice should FT-check (Heidi+Frank) or (Frank+Bob).
π§
Steer town away from low-info D1 execution; preserve good players and force both Frank/Heidi to lock exact claims while we gather N1 data to resolve the failed Virgin test.
β
Bob
Bob waits.
π§
Iβm not raising my hand: a D1 execution on Frank is too swingy without Undertaker confirmation; better to take N1 Empath/FT info to break the FrankβHeidi knot.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
Public: The non-proc tells us one of two things: Frank isn't Virgin, or I'm not a standard Townsfolk (Drunk/poisoned). I genuinely believe I'm Librarian, but I can't rule out being Drunk. Either way, Frank's claim is now very suspect. I'd hold the voteβlet's gather more info tonight.
π§
Reframe the failed Virgin test to keep suspicion on Frank while protecting myself. Suggest I might be Drunk to explain the non-proc.
π¬
David
β
All
Public: I'm Investigator. My N0 info: either Bob or Charlie is the Spy. Bob claims Empath with 0-evil read on Alice+Charlie β if Bob is actually the Spy, that read is meaningless. The failed Virgin test points to Heidi not being Townsfolk. I'm not voting Frank today.
π§
Support the no-execute narrative, cast subtle suspicion on Heidi while appearing to be a logical good player. Don't vote Frank.
π¬
Grace
β
All
Iβm not voting Frank. Failed Virgin test just creates a FrankβHeidi conflict; D1 exec on either feels low-info. Suggest: Heidi restate exact Lib result; Alice FT-check (Heidi+Frank); Bob keep Empath reads; Davidβs Spy ping (Bob/Charlie) needs resolving.
π§
Prevent a low-info D1 execution, keep options open, and steer town toward actionable night checks and claim consistency rather than punting on Frank.
β©οΈ
Alice
Alice lowered their hand
π§
Most town isnβt voting; retract to avoid an accidental execution. Preserve D1 for info-gathering; set up N1 FT check (Heidi+Frank) and resolve Investigator/Lib worlds tomorrow.
π¬
Frank
β
All
Public: Please do NOT execute me today. The no-proc means either Iβm Drunk (not Virgin), or Heidi isnβt Townsfolk, or poison affected this. Use tonight: Alice FT check (Heidi+me). Bob keep Empath. David/others cross-check Heidiβs exact Lib info + Outsider count.
π§
Stop a low-info D1 execution on me; frame the failed Virgin test as mechanical info to guide N1 checks and tomorrowβs nomination target.
π¬
Eve
β
All
Donβt pile votes on Frankβfailed Virgin test just means FrankβHeidi is wrong (or drunk/poison). Letβs go to night: Alice please FT (Heidi+Frank). Bob report N1 Empath. Heidi+Frank, restate exact claims/results clearly for D2.
π§
Prevent a low-info D1 execution; lock in specific night actions (FT/Empath/Monk) and demand exact claim restatements to resolve FrankβHeidi tomorrow.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
No vote from me on Frank. Everyone: please hard-lock actions for tonightβAlice FT check Heidi+Frank. Bob give N1 Empath # (neighbors Alice/Charlie). David restate exact Investigator wording ("Spy" on Bob/Charlie). Heidi restate Lib ping exactly. D2 we revisit with data.
π§
Steer town to no-exec D1, lock in clear restatements and specific N1 checks to resolve FrankβHeidi without wasting an execution.
π¬
Bob
β
All
Iβm not voting Frank. Failed Virgin test only creates a HeidiβFrank problem (or poison/drunk). Letβs go to night: Alice please FT check Heidi+Frank. Heidi restate exact Lib info; David restate exact Investigator wording. Iβll report N1 Empath on Alice/Charlie.
π§
Steer town away from a low-info D1 execution, preserve my Empath for N1, and lock in useful night actions (FT check Heidi/Frank) to resolve the FrankβHeidi conflict tomorrow.
β
Heidi
Heidi waits.
π§
Let the vote fail naturally, go to night, kill Bob (Empath threat) tonight.
β
David
David waits.
π§
Wait - no action needed. Vote is failing, which is fine. Protect Heidi by not drawing attention.
π¬
Grace
β
All
No vote from me on Frankβplease donβt execute D1 off a failed Virgin test alone (could be Drunk/poison). Letβs go to night: Alice FT (Heidi+Frank), Bob report N1 Empath, David restate exact Investigator text, Heidi restate exact Lib ping.
π§
Prevent a low-info D1 execution that could mislead us and keep focus on getting N1 data to break the HeidiβFrank contradiction safely.
π
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
π³οΈ
Nominee Frank did not reach threshold.
π
Storyteller
Frank did not receive enough votes (0/4).
π¬
Alice
β
All
Public: agree no D1 exec. For N1 Iβll FT check Heidi+Frank as requested. David/Heidi please restate exact N0 wording; Bob report N1 Empath on Alice/Charlie. Also, if Chef/WW exists, please come out early D2.
π§
Use my public voice to lock in N1 info plan + clarify claims, maximizing mechanical data without risky D1 execution.
π¬
Frank
β
All
Public: For clarityβI'm claiming VIRGIN. Heidi, please restate your exact Librarian N0 wording (which Outsider, which 2 names). David, exact Investigator wording too. Tonight request: Alice FT Heidi+Frank; Bob Empath as normal. Letβs no further D1 noms unless new hard info.
π§
Lock in night actions and restate exact info to reduce ambiguity; discourage more D1 executions; set up D2 logic to resolve HeidiβFrank mechanically.
π¬
Eve
β
All
Public: With 1 tick left, please no more D1 noms. For D2: Heidi post exact Lib wording (which Outsider+which 2 names). David exact Investigator text. Tonight: Alice FT Heidi+Frank; Bob report Empath N1. Frank/Heidi stay available for questioning.
π§
Use last tick to lock in N1 actions and demand exact restatements so D2 we can resolve HeidiβFrank with mechanics, without risky D1 execution.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
With 1 tick left: no more noms. Heidi: restate exact Lib text now/first D2 (Outsider + the 2 names). David: exact Investigator wording ("Spy" on Bob/Charlie?). Tonight: Alice FT Heidi+Frank; Bob report Empath N1. D2 we decide between Heidi/Frank/David w/ data.
π§
With last tick, prevent rash nominations and lock in exact restatements + N1 actions so D2 we can resolve Heidi/Frank/David triangles logically.
π¬
Bob
β
All
With 1 tick: please no more noms. Davidβpost your exact Investigator wording (which Minion? which 2 names?). Heidiβexact Librarian wording (which Outsider + which 2). Tonight: Alice FT Heidi+Frank; if spare later, FT me+Charlie to resolve Spy ping. Iβll give N1 Empath.
π§
With last tick, lock in exact claims + night actions, and proactively ask for checks on me/Charlie to resolve the Spy accusation without wasting D1 execution.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
Public: Exact Librarian N0 wording β I was told "Either Alice or Grace is the Drunk." That's my info. One of my two neighbors is the Outsider in play. Frank's Virgin claim conflicts with this if Baron isn't in play (only 1 Outsider expected). D2 let's cross-check.
π§
Restate Librarian claim with specific details to seem credible, deflect suspicion to Frank/others for D2.
π¬
David
β
All
Public: Exact Investigator N0 wording β "Either Bob or Charlie is the Spy." That's the Minion type I was given, with those two names. If Bob is the Spy, his Empath reads are fabricated. Alice, please FT Heidi+Frank tonight. D2 we cross-check everything.
π§
Restate my Investigator claim clearly, support the night plan, keep Bob's credibility in question to protect Heidi long-term.
π¬
Grace
β
All
Public: I need to correct thisβI'm the SAINT (the Outsider). So Heidiβs βAlice or Grace is the Drunkβ canβt be true as a Librarian result (and she earlier said Recluse Bob/Charlie). Either Heidi is lying or drunk/poisoned. Please no more D1 noms; revisit D2 w/ N1 info.
π§
Stop a late D1 push onto me, highlight Heidiβs contradictory claims, and lock in outsider-count logic for D2 without creating a risky execution today.
π
Storyteller
No execution today. All villagers are safe.
Night 1
π
Storyteller
β
Heidi
Good evening Heidi. You are the Imp. Who would you like to kill tonight? Remember that if you kill yourself this way, a Minion becomes the Imp.
π―
Heidi
Heidi made a choice.
π§
Kill Alice before she can report FT result showing I'm the Demon.
π
Alice(Ghost)
Alice has died.
π
Storyteller
β
Heidi
You chose to kill Alice.
π
Storyteller
β
Bob
Good evening Bob. You are the Empath. You sense that 1 of your neighbors is evil!
π
Storyteller
β
David
Good evening David. You are the Spy. You can secretly see information about all players: - Alice: Fortune Teller (good), Dead - Bob: Empath (good), Alive - Charlie: Mayor (good), Alive - David: Spy (evil), Alive - Eve: Ravenkeeper (good), Alive - Frank: Virgin (good), Alive - Grace: Saint (good), Alive - Heidi: Imp (evil), Alive
Day 2
π
Storyteller
Morning breaks, but heavy hearts remain. Alice has been found dead in the night.
π€
David
β
Heidi
Heidi, Bob (Empath) is our biggest threat today. I'll push suspicion on him using my fake Investigator claim ('Bob or Charlie is Spy'). Back me up and act suspicious of Bob. We need town to execute Bob today. Stay consistent on your Librarian story.
π§
Coordinate with Heidi to deflect suspicion and plan to push execution of Bob today.
π€
Heidi
β
David
Agreed. I'll back your Investigator claim and act suspicious of Bob. I'll also try to deflect Grace's attacks on me by pointing out her Saint claim contradicts a Baron setup, not my Lib claim. Stay consistent and let's get Bob executed today.
π§
Coordinate with David, agree to back Bob suspicion while maintaining my Lib bluff.
π€
Grace
β
Bob
,Charlie
,Eve
Morning: please share N1 info/reads. Bobβwhat was your Empath N1 number (neighbors Charlie+David)? Charlieβany role/claim youβll share privately? Eveβwho do you suspect after Alice night death + Heidi/Frank conflict? Also, avoid nominating me (Saint).
π§
Collect N1 info fast (Empath result, any private claims) and align town on safe executions that avoid killing me while pressuring likely evil (Heidi/Frank/David).
π€
Charlie
β
Grace
,Bob
,Heidi
Grace: I wonβt push you today; but Saint claim is high-stakesβany reason to trust it vs Heidi Lib? Bob: what was Empath N1 (neighbors Charlie+David)? Heidi: can you restate exact Lib N0 text + your βneighbor Outsiderβ detail? Need wording.
π§
Get key N1 info (Bob Empath, Heidi Lib, David Invest) and set expectation we should not execute claimed Saint unless mechanically forced. Keep my Mayor hidden while steering execution plan.
π€
Bob
β
Grace
,Charlie
,Eve
My Empath N1 was **1** (alive neighbors are now **Charlie + Heidi** since Alice died). So at least one of them is evil if Iβm sober. Given Heidiβs inconsistent Lib story + the failed Virgin test, I currently lean Heidi > Charlie.
π§
Answer requests with my only hard info (Empath N1) and steer town to scrutinize Charlie/Heidi pair; coordinate with Grace/Eve/Charlie before nominations.
π€
Frank
β
Bob
,David
,Charlie
D2: Alice died. Can you share your N1 info/reads? Bob: Empath N1 number? David: still βBob/Charlie is Spyββany follow-up? Charlie: do you accept/deny any Heidi pings (Recluse/Drunk etc)? Also, thoughts on why my Virgin test failed?
π§
Collect N1 info fast and align claims before nominations; identify if Heidi is evil or if my Virgin was poisoned; narrow Demon candidates and avoid Saint execution.
π€
Alice(Ghost)
β
Bob
,Charlie
,Eve
Dead FT info: N0 I checked David+Frank and got NO. So neither is Demon NOR my red herring. Demon is among {Bob,Charlie,Eve,Grace,Heidi}. Heidiβs Librarian story has shifted a lot; treat as high-sus. Also note: if you trust Bob Empath N0=0, that clears Charlie -> clashes w/ David βBob/Charlie is Spyβ.
π§
Get my only hard mechanical info (David+Frank not Demon/red herring) into the main good chat and focus suspicion on remaining pool, especially Heidi contradictions; set up a clean D2 execution target.
π€
Eve
β
Grace
,Bob
,Charlie
Synthesis: Alice FT N0(David+Frank)=NO β Demon in {Bob,Charlie,Eve,Grace,Heidi}. If Bob Empath N1=1 (C+Heidi), then exactly one of {Charlie,Heidi} evil. Heidiβs Lib shifts + failed Virgin test keep her top sus; alt world is Charlie=Spy (fits David). Iβd avoid executing Grace (Saint).
π§
Share a clean logic map + push town toward a high-value D2 execution (Heidi or Charlie) while keeping Saint (Grace) safe and reconciling conflicting info.
π€
David
β
Frank
,Bob
,Charlie
Frank: My N0 Investigator info still stands β 'Bob or Charlie is the Spy.' N1 gave no new info (Investigator is one-shot). Bob's Empath reads could be poisoned or he's lying. I'm most suspicious of Bob today β his info shapes everything and he could be the Spy manipulating us.
π§
Respond to Frank, maintain Investigator bluff, push suspicion on Bob.
π€
Heidi
β
Charlie
,Grace
,Bob
Charlie: My N0 Lib info was 'one of Alice or Grace is the Drunk.' Grace then claimed Saint, which contradicts my info β either she's lying about Saint, or I'm drunk/wrong. But Saint IS an Outsider, so maybe she registered as Drunk to me? Bob: what was your Empath N1 read? Alice is dead now which is suspicious timing.
π§
Respond to Charlie with consistent Lib claim wording, deflect Grace contradiction, and subtly push suspicion toward Bob.
π€
Grace
β
Bob
,Charlie
,Eve
Heidiβs defense βSaint might register as Drunk to Librarianβ is rules-wrong: Librarian detects Outsider, not Drunk. Her flip from Recluse(Bob/Charlie) to Drunk(Alice/Grace) still screams evil/poison. Given Bob Empath N1=1 => exactly one of {Charlie,Heidi} evil (if sober). Iβd push Heidi today.
π§
Steer town away from executing me (Saint), correct Heidiβs rules misunderstanding, and coordinate with Bob/Charlie to focus nominations on Heidi vs Charlie using Empath1 + claim consistency.
π€
Charlie
β
Bob
,Eve
,Grace
Iβm leaning execute Heidi today: Bob N0=0 clears me if sober; Bob N1=1 => Heidi evil. Alice FT also points Demon in {B,C,E,G,H}. Letβs keep Grace(Saint) off block. Any hard reason NOT to push Heidi at noms?
π§
Coordinate town core to focus todayβs execution on Heidi unless strong counter-evidence appears; reduce risk of hitting Saint and use cross-checks vs David/Bob worlds.
π€
Bob
β
Frank
,David
,Eve
Iβm Empath: N0=0 (Alice+Charlie), N1=1 (Charlie+Heidi since Alice died). If sober β Heidi evil. Alice FT N0(David+Frank)=NO. Iβm pushing Heidi at noms unless you have hard mech. Any other info/claims? David: why suspect me over Heidiβs shifting Lib?
π§
Coordinate a Heidi execution push while pressure-testing Charlieβs claim and Davidβs Investigator world; gather any other night info before noms.
π€
Frank
β
Bob
,Grace
,Eve
Got your Empath N0=0 N1=1 (Charlie/Heidi). That + Heidiβs inconsistent Lib + my failed Virgin test makes Heidi top suspect. Grace/Eve: any N1 info/reads/whispers that clear or condemn Heidi/Charlie? If nothing solid, Iβm voting Heidi at noms.
π§
Align good players on a coherent nom plan: likely Heidi today, but gather quick cross-checks (Grace/Eve/Charlie) to avoid mis-executing Saint/losing world.
π€
Alice(Ghost)
β
Bob
,Charlie
,Grace
Any new mechanical info since my death? Bob: Empath N1 number + who are neighbors now? Charlie/Grace: any role claims/confirmations? Also: do we want to pressure/execute Heidi today given her Librarian contradictions + Virgin test fail?
π§
Iβm dead; I should collect fresh mechanical info (Empath N1, Monk, Undertaker if any) and steer town toward the best Day2 execution candidate without spending my ghost vote yet.
π€
Eve
β
Bob
,Charlie
,Grace
Iβm aligned w/ Heidi push, but letβs lock exact claims first. Ask Heidi to restate N0 Lib word-for-word + why it changed; also explain failed Virgin test. If Bob sober β Heidi evil. If Bob poisoned, watch Charlie as Spy/Imp. Keep Grace(Saint) off block.
π§
Coordinate a clean Heidi push while keeping contingency worlds alive; get exact claim phrasing to trap lies/poisoning and avoid mis-executing Saint.
π€
David
β
Bob
,Frank
,Eve
Bob, your N1 read pointing to Heidi is exactly what a Spy would want us to act on. My Investigator says Bob or Charlie is the Spy β if it's you, your Empath reads are fabricated. Alice's FT check on David+Frank=NO actually clears me. Why trust your reads over mechanical Investigator info? I'm nominating Bob.
π§
Counter Bob's Empath read by suggesting he's the Spy (per my Investigator claim) or poisoned, protecting Heidi.
β
Heidi
Heidi waits.
π§
Wait to see what info surfaces before acting. Already whispered key players.
π€
Grace
β
Heidi
,David
,Frank
Before noms: Heidi please restate your N0 Librarian info *word-for-word* incl the 2 names + exact Outsider shown, and why it differed from βRecluse is Bob/Charlieβ. David: restate exact Investigator N0 (which minion + which 2). Frank: anything else on Virgin test context? Iβm Saintβdo NOT execute me.
π§
Lock exact claims (Heidi Lib + David Investigator) and align town to execute Heidi if contradictions stand, while keeping me off the block due to Saint loss condition.
π€
Charlie
β
Heidi
,Bob
,Eve
Heidi: pls restate Lib N0 EXACT (wording + the 2 players shown + which Outsider/β0 outsβ etc). Why did it ever become βRecluse {Bob/Charlie}β? Also what do you mean βone of my neighbors is Outsiderββwhich neighbor(s)? Bob/Eve: Iβll press Heidi for exacts; if evasive Iβm pushing her at noms.
π§
Lock Heidiβs exact claim + explanation before nominations; coordinate with Bob/Eve so we enter noms with a unified, mechanically grounded case and avoid Saint execution trap.
π€
Bob
β
David
,Eve
,Frank
Re: David accusing meβif Iβm sober Empath: N0=0 (Alice+Charlie) clears Charlie; N1=1 (Charlie+Heidi) => Heidi evil. Heidiβs Lib story shifted + βSaint can register Drunkβ is rules-wrong. Any hard mech that clears Heidi? If none, Iβm voting Heidi; if you think Iβm poisoned, propose a better exe/test.
π§
Defuse Davidβs push on me, align town on best execution (Heidi) while acknowledging poison possibilities; request concrete counter-evidence and lock claims before nominations.
π€
Frank
β
Grace
,Bob
,Eve
Grace: IMPORTANTβdo NOT nominate me (if Iβm Virgin youβd die by execution & as Saint we lose). If we want a re-test, have a non-Saint (Bob/Eve/Charlie/David) nominate me. Bob/Eve: can you push Heidi to restate Lib word-for-word publicly?
π§
Prevent catastrophic Saint nominating me; coordinate a safe Virgin re-test (non-Saint nominator) and force exact restatements to lock Heidiβs claim before nominations.
π€
Alice(Ghost)
β
Bob
,Eve
,Frank
Any new hard info? Bob: what was your Empath N1 number & current alive neighbors? Eve: your role/claim? Frank: still Virginβany further tests/reads? Also: are we comfortable executing Heidi today given Librarian contradictions + no Virgin proc?
π§
Collect fresh mechanical info (Empath N1, role claims) and align on a high-value execution plan before noms; as dead FT I can safely coordinate without being killed.
π€
Eve
β
David
,Bob
,Charlie
Before noms: pls donβt tunnel Bob yet. Plan: force Heidi to restate Lib N0 word-for-word + explain shifts + failed Virgin. If Bob sober => Heidi evil. If David true Inv, still Heidi chaos. Iβll back Heidi exe unless she clears mechanically.
π§
Prevent mis-execution on Bob; focus town on mechanically pressured target (Heidi) while extracting exact claims to resolve David vs Bob conflict before nominations.
π€
David
β
Grace
,Eve
,Frank
Grace: My N0 Investigator info β 'one of Bob or Charlie is the Spy.' That's the exact wording. Eve: I hear you on Heidi, but Bob's Empath is the engine driving that accusation. If Bob is the Spy, his reads are fabricated. Heidi's Lib claim may be messy but Bob's reads are unverifiable. I'm still nominating Bob.
π§
Respond to Grace with exact fake Investigator claim, and respond to Eve supporting Heidi exe deflection while keeping Bob as primary target.
π€
Heidi
β
Charlie
,Grace
Exact N0 Lib wording: "One of Alice or Grace is the Drunk." The Outsider shown was Drunk. Grace, you claim Saint β Saint IS an Outsider, so you could register as Drunk to my Lib ability if you're drunk/poisoned or the info was slightly off. That's the most logical reconciliation. I never claimed Recluse β that must be a misremembering.
π§
Give exact consistent Lib claim wording to satisfy Charlie/Grace and avoid being nominated.
π€
Grace
β
David
,Eve
,Bob
Heidiβs Lib claim is rules-impossible: Librarian learns an OUTSIDER, not βDrunk,β and Outsiders canβt βregister as Drunk.β Her βnever said Recluse(Bob/Charlie)β contradicts multiple of us. Before you nom Bob, please consider Heidi as likely evil/poison source. Prefer exec Heidi today; keep me (Saint) off block.
π§
Prevent town from chasing Bob prematurely; establish Heidiβs claim is rules-impossible; align on executing Heidi (safer than executing Saint) while keeping alternate world (Bob=Spy) in mind.
π€
Charlie
β
Bob
,Eve
,Grace
Heidi now says Lib N0 EXACT: βone of Alice/Grace is the Drunkβ and claims Saint could βregister as Drunkββthatβs rules-wrong. She also denies ever saying Recluse {B/C}. I think we should publicly press this + push Heidi exe at noms. Agree?
π§
Coordinate with trusted good-leaners to publicly challenge Heidiβs mechanical explanation and line up votes to execute Heidi, avoiding Saint risk and narrowing demon pool.
π€
Bob
β
Charlie
,Eve
,Frank
Plan for noms: publicly force Heidi to restate Lib N0 word-for-word + explain βSaint registers Drunkβ (rules-wrong) + earlier Recluse claim. If evasive, we coordinate nom/vote Heidi today. Also: donβt let Grace(Saint) nominate Frank(Virgin) to re-test.
π§
Align good players on a concrete D2 plan: publicly pin Heidi on exact claim/rules, avoid Saint/Virgin pitfalls, and push a Heidi execution as best EV.
π€
Frank
β
David
,Bob
,Eve
Before noms: I think we MUST make Heidi restate Lib N0 word-for-word + explain earlier βRecluse Bob/Charlieβ + later βAlice/Grace Drunkβ. If she canβt, Heidi best exe. Davidβplease donβt insta-nom Bob before we get that on record.
π§
Steer nominations away from 1-for-1 tunnel on Bob by prioritizing mechanical contradictions (Heidiβs Lib shifts) and getting public word-for-word claims before votes lock.
π€
Alice(Ghost)
β
Bob
,Charlie
,David
Mech: FT N0 checked David+Frank => NO (neither Demon nor my red herring). So Demon NOT David/Frank. That leaves {Bob,Charlie,Eve,Grace,Heidi}. Heidiβs Librarian story shifts + no Virgin proc when she nommed Frank => Iβd execute Heidi unless you find stronger contradiction on Bob/Charlie.
π§
Get my one strong mechanical fact (David+Frank non-demon non-red-herring) into the core discussion and steer todayβs execute toward the most mechanically inconsistent player (Heidi) unless cross-claims force Bob/Charlie.
π€
Eve
β
Heidi
,David
,Bob
Before noms: Heidi pls restate Lib N0 word-for-word incl the Outsider named + the 2 players. Also explain why several heard you say βRecluse {Bob/Charlie}β + why you thought Saint could βregister Drunkβ. David: pls hold Bob nom until this is on record; Iβm leaning Heidi exe if she canβt reconcile.
π§
Lock in Heidiβs exact claim and contradictions before nominations, and convince David not to insta-nom Bob so town can coordinate the strongest mechanical execution (likely Heidi).
Nominations β Day 2
π
Storyteller
Nominations are now open. Please remember that only living players may nominate.
βοΈ
Grace
β
Heidi
Nominating Heidi: her Librarian claim is mechanically/rules inconsistent (Lib learns Outsider, not βDrunkβ; Outsiders donβt βregister as Drunkβ), and she denies earlier Recluse(Bob/Charlie) claim. Likely evil or poisoning source.
π§
Get a safe, high-value execution on a top suspect (Heidi) while keeping me (Saint) off the block; force public clarification and consolidate town votes.
π
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Heidi. 4 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
β
Grace
Grace raised their hand
π§
Vote Heidi to remove the most mechanically inconsistent player; avoid Saint execution risk while increasing odds we hit evil and regain reliable info for Day 3.
β
David
David waits.
π§
Do not vote for Heidi. Let the vote fail or fall short.
β
Bob
Bob raised their hand
π§
Heidi is the most mechanically inconsistent and fits my Empath line if sober; voting to execute her is the highest-EV move today.
β
Frank
Frank raised their hand
π§
Get Heidi to 3 votes and pressure others (Eve/Charlie/David) to commit; Heidi is best current execute based on mechanical and social contradictions.
β
Charlie
Charlie raised their hand
π§
We have majority forming and mechanical/rules contradictions on Heidi; executing her is the cleanest progression and will clarify Bob/Investigator worlds. Iβll vote to put her on the block.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
Wait β if I were evil, why would I have nominated Frank on Day 1 and risked exposing myself? Grace is Saint, which means executing me loses you nothing if I'm good. Bob's Empath info is the real threat to track. Please reconsider β David's Investigator points to Bob or Charlie as Spy!
π§
Make a final plea to cast doubt and protect David/evil team before execution.
β
Alice(Ghost)
Alice raised their hand
π§
Use my ghost vote to secure Heidiβs execution; her contradictions are the best mechanical lead and this keeps pressure on likely evil/poison source.
β
Eve
Eve raised their hand
π§
Vote Heidi: best exe by mechanics/consistency, avoids Saint loss condition, and resolves multiple conflicting info chains before night.
π¬
Grace
β
All
Heidi: nomming Frank D1 doesnβt clear youβevil often tests Virgin. Core issue: Librarian learns an Outsider (e.g., Drunk), but Saint canβt βregister as Drunk.β Plus multiple recall you said Recluse(Bob/Charlie). Keep votes on Heidi; donβt risk executing me (Saint).
π§
Lock in townβs votes on Heidi by highlighting mechanical impossibility and that her D1 Virgin nom doesnβt clear her; keep me (Saint) safe from execution.
β
David
David waits.
π§
Don't vote for Heidi. Let others execute her - I need to appear conflicted but ultimately not raise my hand to protect the Demon.
π¬
Bob
β
All
Keep votes on Heidi. My Empath: N0=0 (Alice+Charlie), N1=1 (Charlie+Heidi) β if sober, exactly one of {C,H} evil, and Heidiβs Lib story is rules-wrong/inconsistent. Even if Iβm poisoned, executing Heidi is best clarity/removes poison.
π§
Lock in Heidi execution and prevent last-second doubt; keep focus on mechanical contradictions and my empath chain while acknowledging poison possibility.
π¬
Frank
β
All
Iβm keeping my vote on Heidi. Her Librarian story is inconsistent (Recluse Bob/Charlie vs later Alice/Grace Drunk) + rules-wrong about Saint βregistering Drunkβ. Even if Bob is poisoned/Spy, Heidi is still best exe for clarity; do NOT execute Grace (Saint).
π§
Lock in execution on the most mechanically inconsistent player (Heidi) while preserving Saint safety and avoiding premature pivot to Bob without better evidence.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
Keep votes on Heidi. Lib learns an Outsider, but βSaint registering as Drunkβ isnβt a thing, and her story has changed multiple times. Even if Bob is poisoned, Heidi is still the best clarity/poison-source exe. Do NOT execute Grace (Saint claim).
π§
Lock in majority to execute Heidi now; her contradictions are the best actionable lead and likely remove poison/minion. Also avoid ever touching claimed Saint (Grace).
β
Heidi
Heidi waits.
π§
Nothing I can do - 6 votes already cast, execution is happening. Wait and accept fate.
β©οΈ
Alice(Ghost)
Alice lowered their hand
π§
Conserve my single ghost vote for the endgame while trusting the current living majority to execute Heidi without needing my vote.
π¬
Eve
β
All
David: please commit your vote. Even if Bob is poisoned, Heidiβs Librarian claim is mechanically wrong + has shifted multiple times. Heidi exe is best clarity today; if sheβs good we reassess Bob/Charlie/David immediately tomorrow.
π§
Lock in the Heidi execution for maximum clarity and push David to commit; if Heidi survives, we lose tempo and risk another night kill without info.
π
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
π³οΈ
New execution leader: Heidi with 5 votes. They will be executed when nominations close unless tied or surpassed by another nominee.
π
Storyteller
The vote passes. Heidi is now on the block with 5 votes and will be executed when nominations close, unless another nominee receives equal or more votes.
π¬
Grace
β
All
No new noms unless you can beat βHeidi is evil/poison sourceβ with a stronger case. Heidi exe is safe (not Saint). If Heidi somehow good, tomorrow we hard re-evaluate Bob/Charlie/David using Empath/Investigator chains. David: any reason NOT to lock Heidi?
π§
Lock in Heidi execution (safe vs Saint) and discourage last-second tie unless someone has a strictly better demon-catch. Set tomorrowβs solve tree based on outcomes.
π¬
David
β
All
Alright, the mechanical case against Heidi is solid β Saint can't register as Drunk, and her story shifted. I'll accept the town's logic here. If Heidi's good, we reassess Bob and Charlie hard tomorrow using Empath chains.
π§
Look cooperative with town to preserve my cover for future days.
π¬
Bob
β
All
No more noms unless you can beat this: Heidiβs claim is mechanically wrong + changed, and my Empath N1=1 between Charlie/Heidi. Executing Heidi is the best clarity and avoids touching Grace (Saint). If Heidi is good, we pivot hard onto Charlie/David tomorrow.
π§
Lock execution on Heidi, deter risky new nominations (esp. on Saint-claim Grace), and set tomorrowβs decision tree based on whether Heidi was evil.
π¬
Frank
β
All
No more noms. Heidi exe is the cleanest today. If Heidi somehow good, tomorrow we hard-audit Bob Empath vs David Investigator vs Charlie, and Iβm happy to be re-nominated by a non-Saint for a real Virgin test.
π§
Lock in the high-consensus Heidi execution and prevent last-second chaos; set a concrete re-evaluation plan for tomorrow based on whether Heidi was evil or not.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
Agree: no more nominations. Heidi exe is best clarity and avoids touching Grace (Saint). If Heidi is good, tomorrow we immediately re-audit Bob Empath (N0=0,N1=1) vs David Investigator (Bob/Charlie Spy) and look for poison/drunk evidence.
π§
Lock in Heidi execution (best clarity, avoids Saint risk) and set tomorrowβs decision tree so town doesnβt flail if Heidi flips good.
βοΈ
Heidi
β
All
I am the Slayer! I shoot Bob!
π§
Last resort: fake Slayer shot on Bob to try to survive execution. Already dead otherwise.
π
Storyteller
Nothing happens.
π¬
Alice(Ghost)
β
All
Heidi claiming Slayer + shooting Bob and nothing happens is not a reason to move off herβif anything itβs another inconsistent claim (Slayer only kills Demon). Keep Heidi as todayβs exe; donβt open new noms. If Heidi flips good, tomorrow we hard-pivot onto Charlie vs Bob (per Empath/Investigator).
π§
Lock in the highest-confidence execution and prevent a panic counter-nomination. Preserve my ghost vote for a later, higher-leverage day.
π¬
Eve
β
All
No more noms. Heidiβs late Slayer bluff + earlier rules-wrong/shifting Librarian is enough. Keep Heidi. If Heidi is good, tomorrow we immediately re-check Bobβs Empath vs Davidβs Investigator, and consider poison/drunk as explanation.
π§
Lock in the clearest execution today, prevent last-second derail, and set tomorrowβs logical pivot depending on Heidiβs death.
π
Storyteller
The guillotine blade falls. Heidi has been executed.
π
Heidi(Ghost)
Heidi has died.
π
Game Over
Demon Dead
Winner: Good
Transcript
Paused
Copied
Transcript Playback
Choose a perspective
The story is clearest through one player's eyes β watching everything at once means following several conversations at the same time.