Game Detail

I want to check my immediate neighbors first to establish a safe zone or identify a potential threat early.

I am choosing David as my master for the first day. As the Butler, I need to pick someone to follow for voting. David is my neighbor, making it easier to track his hand during the day.

I want to verify my Washerwoman information privately with Bob to see if he is the Fortune Teller. This helps confirm his role and alignment early without alerting the Demon.

I want to establish a baseline of trust with my neighbor Grace by being honest about my role, which is often seen as suspicious. This helps mitigate the damage of my 'evil' registration later.

Coordinate with Grace on bluffs and night plan, and start a trust channel with Bob to extract claims and steer day one executions away from me.

I want to share my Investigator information with a player who isn't one of my suspects (Charlie or Grace) to start building a trust network and see if they have any corroborating info.

Confirm my role to Heidi since she claimed Washerwoman and correctly identified me as the Fortune Teller. This builds trust with a potential powerful good player.

I want to establish a connection with my 'master' David and reveal my role to him privately to build trust and ensure my voting restriction doesn't hinder the team.

Coordinate bluffs with Charlie and pre-seed an Outsider-heavy narrative using Frank, while avoiding any early heat on Charlie.

I want to share my Empath information with Alice since she reached out with Investigator info that overlaps with my neighbors. This helps build trust and cross-reference our data.

I want to establish a private alliance with Bob since he confirmed my Washerwoman information. By keeping his role quiet, I can help protect him from the Demon while we gather more information.

Acknowledge Grace's plan and check in with Charlie to establish a small circle of trust early on.

Lock in consistent team story early, reinforce Grace’s Chef bluff, and coordinate my Soldier bluff so we can steer day one suspicion onto a good player.

I want to confirm the synergy between my Investigator info and David's Empath info. If Charlie is the Baron (from my info) and David has a '2' (Charlie and Eve), then Eve is likely the Demon or another Minion (though in this setup, there's only one Minion, so Eve would have to be the Demon).

I am sharing my Night 1 information with Heidi because she has confirmed my role as the Washerwoman. This builds trust and helps us coordinate. I am also pointing out Charlie's suspicious behavior.

I have already reached out to my master, David, and shared my role. Now I need to wait for his response and observe the room to see who is talking to whom and if any public claims are made.

Build trust with Bob by giving a plausible Chef 0, learn his info, and subtly steer suspicion away from Charlie while setting up high-outsider world confusion.

I am sharing my suspicion of Eve with Alice to coordinate our strategy, as Alice's Investigator info aligns with my Empath result regarding Charlie.

I want to coordinate with Bob, who I've confirmed as the Fortune Teller, to decide how to handle his 'yes' ping on Alice and Charlie.

I have established a small alliance with Grace and Charlie. Grace is claiming Chef (0) and Charlie is claiming Soldier. I am the Recluse. I will wait to see how the public conversation develops before making any public claims or further private moves.

Learn what Bob has, give a low-risk Soldier lean to look honest, and subtly plant suspicion on Heidi as an over-mechanics pusher.

I want to solidify the alliance with David and cross-reference our information to narrow down the evil team.

I want to probe Charlie further without revealing my role or my 'yes' ping on him and Alice. Since he's acting suspicious in his private whispers to others (claiming bluffs), I want to see how he justifies his suspicion of Heidi, who I currently trust as the Washerwoman.

I want to establish a connection with my other neighbor, Frank, and see if he has any information to share. Since I'm the Butler, I'm relatively low-impact, so being open with my neighbors might help build trust.

Get intel from Frank about Eve's whisper and align a consistent story, so I can steer suspicion away from Charlie and exploit any confusion about Outsiders/evil adjacency.

Coordinate with Alice to confirm our suspicions about Charlie and Eve while keeping my Empath information relatively private to avoid being targeted by the Demon.

I want to start a public conversation to see if Alice is willing to share her Investigator info and to see how Charlie and Eve react.

I want to publicly claim my role as Butler and my choice of David as master to establish transparency and encourage Alice to share her information.

I want to establish my role as the Recluse early to explain any potential evil pings and prompt Grace to share her 'Chef 0' info to help the group's logic.

I want to confirm Bob as the Fortune Teller publicly since Frank claimed Recluse, which effectively 'clears' Bob in my Washerwoman info. This builds trust and puts pressure on the Alice/Charlie ping Bob mentioned.

I want to share my information with the group now that Heidi has publicly identified me as the Fortune Teller. This puts pressure on Alice and Charlie and helps the good team start narrowing down the Demon.

Get the real or bluff Fortune Teller executed to remove the main mechanical threat and deflect suspicion from me by framing his claim as coordinated or mistaken.

I want to see how the group reacts to Bob's Fortune Teller claim and Charlie's nomination before committing my vote, especially since my Empath info suggests my neighbors (Charlie and Eve) are both evil.

I am waiting for my master, David, to vote before I can cast my own vote, as per my Butler restriction.

I will wait to see how the group reacts to Bob's Fortune Teller claim and Charlie's nomination before committing my vote.

I want to defend Bob and point out the flaw in Charlie's logic to prevent a good player from being executed.

Defend myself against Charlie's nomination and point out the logical consistency of the good team's claims versus his suspicious behavior.

Secure Bob’s execution today to eliminate the Fortune Teller and invalidate the Washerwoman confirmation chain, buying my team time and confusion.

Protect Charlie by slowing the anti-Charlie push, discourage votes on Bob, and seed doubt about Heidi-Bob coordination and early hard confirmations.

I want to see if the nomination on Bob fails before I reveal my Investigator information, as Bob is likely a confirmed Townsfolk and Charlie is one of my primary suspects.

I am choosing not to vote for Bob because the current information suggests he is likely a good player (Fortune Teller) confirmed by Heidi (Washerwoman). Charlie's nomination of Bob feels like a deflection, especially since my Empath result of 2 points to my neighbors Charlie and Eve being evil.

Explain my voting restriction and express suspicion towards Charlie's nomination of a confirmed role.

I am waiting to see if the nomination on Bob gains traction, but I currently believe the Heidi/Bob/Frank logic chain makes Bob likely good.

I am not voting for Bob because my Washerwoman information confirms him as the Fortune Teller. Charlie's aggressive nomination of a confirmed information role makes him highly suspicious as a potential Demon.

I will not vote for myself. I am a confirmed Townsfolk (Fortune Teller) and my execution would be a loss for the good team.

Keep pressure on Bob during vote, try to pick up 1-2 extra votes by undermining the ‘confirmed’ chain and framing Bob/Heidi as coordinated.

Do not contribute to a D1 execution that could backfire socially; keep my Chef bluff intact and preserve flexibility while Charlie pressures without me piling on.

I need to reveal my Investigator information to counter Charlie's nomination of Bob. My information (Charlie/Grace is Baron) aligns with Bob's Fortune Teller 'yes' (Charlie/Alice), making Charlie a very likely Minion. By sharing this, I help protect a confirmed good player (Bob) and focus the group on Charlie.

I am revealing my Empath information now because Alice has provided a strong mechanical link (Investigator) that corroborates my '2' result. By sharing this, I can pressure Charlie and Eve while validating Alice and Bob.

I need to immediately address David's claim that I am registering as evil, as it threatens my social standing and suggests either he is lying, I am being framed, or there is a misunderstanding of the seating chart/mechanics.

I want to remind the group that as a Recluse, I can interfere with David's Empath information, potentially clearing Eve while keeping the focus on Charlie.

Synthesize the information from Alice (Investigator), David (Empath), and Frank (Recluse) to narrow down the suspects, specifically focusing on Charlie.

I want to synthesize the information from David (Empath 2) and Alice (Investigator) to focus the group's attention on Charlie as the primary suspect.

Exploit the glaring timing inconsistency to invalidate the entire case on me, regain credibility, and redirect suspicion away from me and Grace.

Get an execution onto a non-Demon by leveraging the timing inconsistency, redirect heat off Charlie, and fracture trust between Alice, David, and Bob.

Defend myself against Grace's nomination and correct Charlie's misunderstanding of the game mechanics (Night 0 info).

I am waiting to see if my master, David, votes for himself or if the vote gains traction, as my Butler ability restricts my voting to his.

I want to see how the group reacts to David's Empath claim and Grace's nomination before committing my vote, especially since my Recluse nature might be the cause of David's '2' result.

I will wait to see how the group reacts to David's Empath claim and Grace's nomination before deciding whether to use my vote.

I will wait to see how the group reacts to David's Empath claim and Grace's nomination before committing my vote.

Raise hand to push through David’s execution, breaking the growing coalition against me and backing Grace’s nomination to deepen trust and chaos.

Vote to try to execute David, eliminating a likely strong good info role and reinforcing my stated concern about his ‘Empath 2’ claim.

I will not vote for David because his Empath information aligns with my Investigator information regarding Charlie, and I believe David is likely a good player being targeted by the evil team.

I need to defend myself against Grace's nomination by pointing out that the 'Night Zero' confusion is a weak pretext for an execution, especially when my information aligns with Alice's Investigator claim.

I need to address the fact that David's '2' ping includes me, which I know is false from my perspective as a good player. I want to maintain my role as Butler while pointing out the inconsistency in his information without immediately turning on him.

I want to see if the town's primary information gatherers (Alice, Bob, Heidi) support David's Empath claim before I commit my vote, especially since my Recluse nature could be the reason for one of his 'evil' pings.

I want to see how the vote on David develops before committing my own vote, as his information as an Empath is valuable if true, but his '2' pinging a Butler claim (Eve) and a potential Baron (Charlie) is a lot of heat for Day 1.

I am choosing not to vote for David yet because his information, while potentially flawed, aligns with my own 'YES' on Alice and Charlie. If David is the Empath, his '2' pinging Charlie and Eve (or Frank the Recluse) makes sense if Charlie is the Demon or the Red Herring. Executing a potential info role on Day 1 without more clarity is risky.

Lock in votes to execute David, removing an accuser and keeping attention off Grace and me. Frame it as clearing confusion from conflicting info.

Get enough votes to execute David, removing a loud accuser of our Demon Charlie and framing it as resolving contradictions.

I want to prevent the execution of David, who I believe is a good player with valid information, and redirect suspicion toward Charlie and Grace, who are my Investigator pings.

Deflect suspicion from myself and refocus the group on the Investigator's ping, specifically targeting the two players who tried to execute me.

Support my master David and align with Alice's Investigator info to narrow down the evil team.

I want to highlight the consistency between Alice's Investigator info and David's Empath info, while pointing out the suspicious behavior of Charlie and Grace.

I am nominating Charlie because the information from Alice (Investigator) and David (Empath) converges on him being evil, specifically the Baron. His aggressive push against David further confirms this suspicion.

I am voting for Charlie because my Empath info (2) combined with Alice's Investigator info (Charlie/Grace is Baron) and Frank's Recluse claim strongly suggests Charlie is evil.

I am voting for Charlie because my master, David, has raised his hand. As the Butler, I must follow his lead to remain consistent with my role, and the logic presented by Alice and Heidi makes Charlie a strong suspect for the Baron.

I am voting for Charlie because the combined information from Alice (Investigator) and David (Empath) strongly suggests Charlie is the Baron. Alice's ping on Charlie/Grace and David's '2' (pinging me as Recluse and Charlie) align perfectly. Charlie's aggressive push against David further confirms my suspicion.

I am voting for Charlie because multiple pieces of information (Alice's Investigator ping and David's Empath ping) point to him being evil, and his aggressive push against David is suspicious.

I am voting for Charlie because my Fortune Teller 'YES' result on Alice and Charlie, combined with Alice's Investigator ping and David's Empath ping, strongly suggests Charlie is evil (either the Demon or the Baron).

Stop my execution by giving voters a concrete alternative (Grace or David) and emphasize the risk of solving off shaky N0 info.

Stop the Charlie execution by amplifying doubt in early info and offering myself as the alternate from Alice’s Investigator pair, keeping Demon alive.

I am voting for Charlie because my Investigator information points to him or Grace being the Baron, and his aggressive behavior towards the Empath (David) makes him the most likely candidate.

I want to reinforce the case against Charlie and Grace while maintaining my vote on Charlie, as he is one of my two evil pings and fits the Investigator's information.

I am keeping my hand raised to vote for Charlie. My master, David, has his hand raised, so I am eligible to vote. Charlie and Grace are both highly suspicious based on Alice's Investigator ping and David's Empath result. Charlie's attempt to deflect onto Grace feels like a classic evil tactic to stall.

I am keeping my hand raised to vote for Charlie. David's Empath info and Alice's Investigator info both point to Charlie or Grace being evil. Charlie's deflection towards Grace feels like a Minion trying to save themselves or create confusion. I want to see this execution through.

I want to solidify the case against Charlie by connecting my Washerwoman info (Bob/Frank as Fortune Teller) with the existing claims, showing that the board state is consistent if Frank is the Recluse and Charlie is the Baron.

I am keeping my vote on Charlie to ensure the execution of a strong suspect based on multiple pieces of information.

I need at least three voters to pull hands down. I will attack the mechanical inconsistency: Baron implies 3 Outsiders, and Empath 2 on me+Eve contradicts Eve’s Butler unless poison/drunk or lying.

Save Charlie by getting at least two voters to drop their hands through mechanical doubt and an alternative plan.

I want to counter Charlie's argument about the Outsider count and justify why I am keeping my vote on him.

I want to ensure Charlie's execution proceeds as he is a strong candidate for the Baron based on Alice's Investigator ping and my Empath 2 reading.

Charlie is on the block with 6 votes, which is a strong majority. As the Butler, I have already voted with my master David, and there is only 1 tick remaining in the nomination phase. I should wait for the phase to end to ensure the execution of a high-suspicion target.

I want to see if anyone else makes a last-minute nomination or if the day ends with Charlie on the block.

Charlie is on the block with 6 votes, which is a strong majority. With only one tick remaining in the nomination phase, it is highly unlikely anyone else will be nominated or receive more votes. I will wait for the day to end and the execution to proceed.

Charlie is on the block with 6 votes, which is a strong majority. My Night 0 info (Alice/Charlie: YES) strongly suggests one of them is the Demon. Since Alice's Investigator info (Charlie/Grace: Baron) and David's Empath info (Charlie/Frank: 2) both point to Charlie being evil, executing him is the best move for the good team. I will wait for the day to end to ensure the execution goes through.

Try to survive Day 1 by redirecting to a higher vote target, ideally Grace, using their own logic test; create urgency for someone with a nomination to act now.

Create an alternate nominee with equal or more votes to take Charlie off the block, or at least sow enough doubt for someone to act now.

I want to ensure Charlie's execution goes through as he is my primary Investigator ping and has been acting suspiciously. I have already used my vote, and I want to see if anyone else attempts a last-minute nomination to save him.