Game Detail
Players
Alice (Chef) Bob (Imp) Charlie (Washerwoman) David (Saint) Eve (Undertaker) Frank (Recluse) Grace (Drunk) Heidi (Baron)
Token Usage
| Team | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Cost (USD) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Evil | 283,803 | 70,198 | $1.4794 |
| Good | 762,355 | 80,054 | $2.4549 |
Event Transcript
🎭
The game has started.
📜
Storyteller
→
Heidi
You are the Minion. The Demon is Bob.
📜
Storyteller
→
Bob
Minions are: Heidi. Your safe bluffs are: Fortune Teller, Monk, Empath
📜
Storyteller
→
Charlie
Good evening Charlie. You are the Washerwoman. Either Alice or Eve is the Chef.
📜
Storyteller
→
Grace
Good evening Grace. You are the Investigator. Either Heidi or Alice is the Spy.
📜
Storyteller
→
Alice
Good evening Alice. You are the Chef. You learn that there are 0 pairs of evil players.
Day 1
📜
Storyteller
Welcome to the village of Ravenswood Bluff. Please take this time to get to know your fellow villagers. Feel free to move around and have private conversations. Be wary, for a Demon hides among you!
👤
Bob
→
Heidi
Hey—I'm going to bluff Empath (between Alice/Charlie). No info yet D1; I’ll start giving reads after N1. What bluff are you taking? Let’s avoid overlaps + pick a scapegoat to push D2.
🧠
Coordinate bluffs with my minion early to avoid role collisions and create a coherent misinformation plan that protects me and enables mis-executions.
👤
Grace
→
Alice
Hey—private check-in: I got Investigator info that *either you or Heidi* is the Spy. What’s your role/starting info, and have you shared it with anyone yet?
🧠
Quietly collect Alice’s role/starting info and reaction to being in my Investigator ping, without broadcasting to the whole town yet.
👤
David
→
Charlie
,Eve
,Alice
Whisper check-in: what are you claiming + any starting info? Also, do you expect 1 Outsider or more (Baron)? I’m trying to build an outsider-count/role map before noms.
🧠
Get early claims/starting info from neighbors & a third player to build a consistent world model, while keeping my Saint identity hidden and guiding day1 execution away from me.
👤
Eve
→
David
,Charlie
,Alice
Whisper back: I have no starting ping. For now I’m leaning to keep my exact TF claim quiet (can share later), but I’d assume baseline 1 Outsider unless someone has evidence for Baron. Any Librarian/outsider claims floating yet?
🧠
Answer David’s check-in without outing as Undertaker yet; keep myself a low-priority kill while still helping build an outsider-count map.
👤
Alice
→
Grace
,David
I’m Chef. N0 learned **0 evil pairs** (no adjacent evils). Haven’t shared yet. If your Investigator is right (me/Heidi=Spy), note Heidi is my neighbor; 0 pairs would then mean Demon not adjacent to Heidi (not Bob/Grace). Baseline expect 1 Outsider unless Librarian/claims suggest Baron.
🧠
Give mechanical Chef info and my role to counter the Investigator ping, and align with David’s outsider-count mapping. Set up a consistency check around Heidi/Bob adjacency.
👤
Frank
→
Eve
,Grace
Hey neighbors—quick 1:1? What did you get/claiming (starting info roles esp WW/Librarian/Invest/Chef)? Also, have you heard any Outsider count/Baron hints yet?
🧠
Get early role/starting-info claims from my neighbors, build a private trust circle, and start Outsider-count tracking without hard-outing myself publicly yet.
👤
Charlie
→
David
,Eve
I’m Washerwoman. N0: either Alice or Eve is the Chef. I haven’t shared publicly yet. If/when one of you is comfy, a Chef claim + number would be a nice anchor. Any other start-info claims you’ve heard?
🧠
Share my Washerwoman ping privately to help role-map and later cross-check Chef claim, while keeping it off the public radar to reduce Demon targeting/poisoning.
👤
Heidi
→
Bob
I’ll bluff SAINT today (outsider), push that we likely have 3 Outsiders total (Baron-world). If heat comes, I can pivot to Recluse/Butler. Who do you want as scapegoat D2? I can start soft-sus on them.
🧠
Coordinate bluffs with Bob, leverage +2 Outsiders to steer town into setup paranoia and keep heat off Bob; set up flexibility if info roles target me.
👤
Bob
→
Heidi
Scapegoat idea: push David (he’s already in lots of group whispers; easy to paint as coordinating). I’ll lightly echo “David feels like a director” publicly. Your Saint/Baron-world works—try to ‘find’ 1 more outsider claim to support it.
🧠
Coordinate consistent evil narrative: back Heidi’s Baron/outsider-count distraction and pick a non-neighbor scapegoat so my future Empath reads don’t corner me.
👤
Grace
→
Frank
I’m Investigator. N0: either **Alice or Heidi** is the **Spy**. Alice privately told me she’s Chef with N0=**0 evil pairs** (not shared yet). What are you claiming/what start info did you get, and any Outsider/Baron hints?
🧠
Reply to Frank to coordinate info-sharing and enlist him to pressure/verify Alice vs Heidi while keeping spy-catch discreet.
👤
David
→
Alice
,Charlie
,Eve
Alice/Charlie/Eve: WW result matches Alice-as-Chef. Suggest Alice go public Chef=0 pairs soon; Charlie can back w/ WW(Alice/Eve). Eve can stay vague or confirm non-Chef. This anchors adjacency logic + helps spot liars/Baron later.
🧠
Coordinate public info-drop (Chef=0 + WW) to give town a strong mechanical baseline without outing me as Saint, and set up later contradiction checks/outsider count.
👤
Eve
→
Frank
,Charlie
To Frank: I’ve got no N0 info (not a start-info role). Haven’t heard any Outsider/Baron hints yet—assuming 1 Outsider until we see otherwise. To Charlie: got your WW (Alice/Eve=Chef). I’m fine staying vague; let’s have Alice confirm Chef+number herself, then you can back it.
🧠
Respond to Frank’s query while coordinating with Charlie to validate WW/Chef chain and keep my Undertaker hidden for now to preserve night info later.
👤
Alice
→
Grace
,Charlie
,David
Confirm I’m Chef w/ N0=0 evil pairs. Grace: can you confirm exact Investigator text + who told you? Charlie/David: if WW points at me for Chef, that clashes w/ Inv unless Heidi=Spy or Inv is poisoned/lying. Let’s ask Heidi for claim + any outsider/Librarian pings before we go public.
🧠
Coordinate with Grace/Charlie/David to validate my Chef claim via WW, scrutinize the Investigator ping, and set up a coherent public info drop before nominations.
👤
Frank
→
Grace
I’m actually the **Recluse** (good Outsider). I’d keep that mostly quiet publicly for now. Your Invest ping (Alice/Heidi=Spy) + Alice private Chef=0 is interesting: if Chef=0 true & Alice good, then Heidi likely Spy and Demon not adjacent to Heidi. Suggest we nudge Alice to go public w/ Chef 0 soon; Charlie can later back via WW (Alice/Eve=Chef).
🧠
Give Grace my real Outsider role privately so she can interpret info without fearing a Saint loss, coordinate a safe public info-drop plan (Chef+WW) and narrow suspects using Chef=0 logic + Investigator ping.
👤
Charlie
→
Alice
,David
,Eve
I’m good w/ you (Alice) going public Chef=0 + I back w/ WW(Alice/Eve=Chef). Before we lock: can we quickly get Heidi’s claim + any Librarian/Inv from Grace? If Inv points at Alice, we need that text to resolve (Spy/poison/lie).
🧠
Coordinate our info dump timing and get missing claims (Grace/Heidi) before nominations, to anchor a consistent world or catch an early lie.
👤
Heidi
→
Frank
Hey Frank—quick check-in. I’m leaning to claim Saint (outsider). With outsider count likely higher (Baron-world), I’m watching for extra outsider claims. Anything interesting from your chats? Also David feels a bit ‘director-y’ to me—agree?
🧠
Create early outsider narrative and line up David as D2 scapegoat while extracting Frank’s claim for later manipulation.
👤
Bob
→
Alice
Hey Alice—I’m thinking of coming out as Empath (between you/Charlie). No D1 info yet but I’ll have a N1 number. What info/role are you leaning to share? Any Outsider claims floating? Also David’s in a lot of group chats—worth watching.
🧠
Build trust with Alice early, seed my Empath bluff, and subtly plant suspicion on David without overcommitting. Also fish for real N0 info to target night kills.
👤
Grace
→
Heidi
Hi Heidi—private? I’m Investigator: N0 says **either you or Alice is the Spy**. Alice tells me she’s Chef w/ N0=0 pairs. What’s your role/starting info, and have you shared it with anyone? Any Outsider count/Baron hints?
🧠
Get Heidi’s claim and any starting info to resolve my Investigator ping (Alice/Heidi=Spy) and assess whether Alice’s Chef 0 is credible before nominations.
👤
David
→
Grace
,Heidi
Can you share your exact role/starting info (verbatim if possible)? Hearing a possible Investigator ping (Alice/Heidi=Spy) but need text/source. Also any Librarian/Outsider claims or reason to suspect Baron?
🧠
Get exact Investigator/Librarian/Outsider info to lock early public claims (Chef=0 + WW backup) and resolve any contradiction before nominations.
👤
Eve
→
Alice
,Charlie
,David
Plan: Alice can go public w/ Chef+#; Charlie backs WW(Alice/Eve=Chef). I’ll stay vague/confirm non-Chef. Before nom phase: any Lib/Inv/outsider claims or Baron hints heard from Grace/Heidi/Bob? Also if Chef=0, let’s note which seat adjacencies become constrained.
🧠
Coordinate a safe info-release plan and request cross-check claims so we anchor the day without making ourselves/true roles night-kill targets.
👤
Alice
→
Grace
,Bob
,Eve
Grace: can you send exact Investigator wording + which minion? Any other claims? Bob: I’m Chef N0=0 evil pairs; likely going public soon (Charlie says WW points to me as Chef). Let me know your Empath result N1. Eve: heard any Lib/outsider/Baron hints? If none, I’ll go public Chef=0 w/ Charlie backing WW.
🧠
Clarify Investigator text to resolve Spy accusation; coordinate quick public info (Chef=0 + WW) and gather Outsider/Baron hints before nomination.
👤
Frank
→
Heidi
Hey—FYI I’m actually the Recluse (so Outsider count is already spoken for). If you hard-claim Saint publicly, town may avoid you *or* (worse) execute you and insta-lose, so I’d stay vague for now. I’ve heard Alice says Chef=0 + Grace has Invest (Alice/Heidi=Spy). ‘Director-y’ David noted—let’s watch him, but Outsider math is key.
🧠
Respond to Heidi, discourage risky Saint hard-claim, and test Outsider count/Baron while keeping my Recluse and other players’ info controlled.
👤
Charlie
→
Grace
,Heidi
Quick check before noms: any Investigator/Librarian claims + exact N0 text? Also Heidi—what are you claiming + any outsider/Baron indications? Trying to resolve a possible Inv-vs-Chef conflict.
🧠
Get hard mechanical info (Inv/Lib/outsider count) and Heidi’s claim before we anchor public Chef=0; prevents walking into a Spy/poisoned misinfo trap.
👤
Heidi
→
Grace
,David
,Charlie
I’m going to claim **Saint** (haven’t shared yet). Frank told me he’s **Recluse**, so Outsiders look high (Baron/Drunk world). If your N0 really said “Heidi/Alice is Spy,” I’d suspect Drunk/false info or Alice bluffing rather than me being Spy.
🧠
Deflect Investigator heat, seed Drunk/outsider-math doubt, and keep town from executing me while steering suspicion toward info-conflict (esp. Alice/Grace).
👤
Bob
→
Alice
Got it. If Chef=0 is true, that’s consistent w/ a ‘no adjacent evils’ world. I’m planning to out Empath (you/Charlie) w/ N1 number tomorrow; if I see 0 it ‘clears’ you+Charlie unless poison/drunk. No solid Outsider claims I’ve heard yet. Also noting David’s in lots of group chats—worth watching.
🧠
Lock in rapport with likely-good Alice, validate her info, and set expectations for my Empath claim so my later numbers feel natural while steering suspicion toward a scapegoat.
👤
Grace
→
Alice
,David
,Charlie
Update: I’m Investigator, N0 verbatim: either **Heidi or Alice is the Spy**. Heidi just told me she plans to claim **Saint**; also says Frank told her he’s **Recluse** → that’s 2 Outsider claims vs baseline 1 (points to Baron or a liar). Chef=0 still useful. Let’s get Lib/WW/Empath claims ASAP before noms; I lean pressure Heidi for details.
🧠
Align info before nominations: share Heidi’s Saint claim + outsider-count tension, and set plan (Alice likely to go public Chef=0; decide whether to pressure Heidi/Alice based on corroboration).
👤
David
→
Grace
,Heidi
,Frank
Need clarity fast before noms. Grace: confirm Inv text exactly + who you told. Heidi: if you claim Saint, are you willing to go public early? Also any other Outsider/Lib pings? Frank: did you tell Heidi you’re Recluse (confirm), and are you going public? Outsider count looks high → Baron/lie.
🧠
Resolve Outsider-count + Spy ping quickly via direct clarifying questions, so town can go public with consistent claims and avoid executing a real Saint (me).
👤
Eve
→
Alice
I’m not Chef (happy to confirm publicly if needed). I’ve heard no Lib/Inv/outsider/Baron hints yet. If you go public Chef=0, suggest Charlie immediately backs w/ exact WW: ‘Alice or Eve is Chef’. Please share any Lib/Inv text/outsider claims you get before noms.
🧠
Coordinate a clean public info drop (Chef+WW) while I stay low as Undertaker; gather any Lib/Inv/outsider/baron hints before nomination to avoid walking into a trap.
👤
Alice
→
Heidi
,Grace
,Charlie
Heidi: Grace says you’ll claim Saint + that Frank told you Recluse. Can you confirm exact claim + who you told, and any other outsider/Lib info? Also: are you aware Grace has Inv ‘Heidi or Alice is Spy’? Grace/Charlie: any Lib pings yet?
🧠
Get Heidi’s exact public plan/outsider details to resolve Investigator vs Chef/WW, and assess Baron/outsider-count before nominations.
👤
Frank
→
David
,Grace
,Heidi
Confirm: I am Recluse (true). Yes I told Heidi already. I’m NOT going public D1 unless Outsider count confusion forces it. If Heidi hard-claims Saint, town may panic/execute = insta-loss, so pls avoid. Grace: please restate EXACT Inv info + who you’ve told. Currently I think Outsider count = 1 (me) unless Baron/lie.
🧠
Answer David’s questions, stabilize Outsider math (I’m Recluse), discourage risky Saint hard-claim, and push exact Investigator wording + info-sharing map before noms.
👤
Charlie
→
David
,Grace
,Alice
We now have: my WW says Alice/Eve is Chef; Alice claims Chef=0. Grace Inv: Heidi or Alice is Spy. Outsiders claimed: Heidi=Saint, Frank=Recluse (2>baseline). Suggest: go public w/ Chef0 + WW backing. Don’t exec claimed Saint today; if we want to test Inv lead, Alice is safer than Heidi. Also verify Frank claim publicly.
🧠
Align town on a safe D1 plan: publish Chef/WW, treat Inv as key lead, and avoid instant-loss execution on a claimed Saint while we verify Outsider count/Baron.
👤
Heidi
→
David
,Charlie
,Alice
Re: role/info — I have **no N0 info**. I’m going to present as **Outsider**; I *may* claim **Saint**, but I’m hesitant to hard-lock D1 since a ‘test-exec’ is catastrophic if true. Frank told me he’s **Recluse**, which would imply extra Outsiders (Baron/Drunk world) → makes me doubt the “Heidi/Alice=Spy” Inv ping as possibly drunk/poisoned/wrong.
🧠
Clarify my story without hard-locking into Saint, cast doubt on Grace’s Invest ping, and steer town away from executing me or narrowing onto Bob early.
Nominations — Day 1
📜
Storyteller
Nominations are now open.
⚖️
Heidi
→
David
Nominating David: he’s been very ‘director-y’ pushing for exact wording + coordinating claims hard in whispers. That playstyle fits Spy/info-control, and it’s a good D1 pressure exec versus tunneling the shaky ‘Heidi/Alice is Spy’ ping.
🧠
Force a D1 execution target away from Bob and away from the Alice/Heidi Investigator ping; David is a strong coordinator and easy to sell as Spy-ish.
📜
Storyteller
Voting starts now for David. 4 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
✋
Heidi
Heidi raised their hand
🧠
Secure a D1 execution on a non-Demon target to create momentum away from Bob and destabilize town’s info-sharing.
💬
Eve
→
All
I’m not voting David on pure playstyle. Before we exec D1, can we get any concrete info (Investigator/Librarian/outsider count) and at least 1-2 public claims? Otherwise I’d rather no-exec/pressure someone with a contradiction.
🧠
I’ll discourage a low-info D1 execution, push for public claim(s) and any Investigator/Librarian info before committing votes.
💬
Grace
→
All
Not voting David. Public: I’m Investigator; N0: **either Heidi or Alice is the Spy**. We also have Heidi claiming Saint + Frank Recluse → 2 Outsiders (baseline 1) so Baron/lie/Drunk possible. Let’s get public claims; avoid executing a claimed Saint today.
🧠
Stop a low-info D1 execution on David, put my hard Investigator ping and Outsider-count anomaly on record, and steer town to safer info-gathering before night.
💬
Alice
→
All
Public: I’m Chef; N0 I got **0 pairs of evil** (no adjacent evils). That makes a D1 exec on David on vibes pretty weak; I’m **not voting** David. Bigger issue: we have 2 Outsider claims (Heidi Saint?, Frank Recluse) vs baseline 1 → Baron/lie/drunk. Let’s sort that.
🧠
Get my Chef info public to anchor logic; discourage a weak D1 execution on David; redirect to resolving Outsider-count/Inv conflict and preserve votes.
💬
Bob
→
All
Not voting David. D1 on vibes feels bad. Let’s get a few more public claims + reconcile the outsider count. Grace’s Inv ping could be thrown off by Recluse/poison/drunk, so I don’t want to auto-exec Heidi/Alice off that either.
🧠
Avoid being an outlier voter; steer discussion into conflicting claim web (Inv vs Outsiders vs Chef) to protect Heidi and buy a clean night kill.
💬
Frank
→
All
Not voting David. D1 vibe-exec feels low EV. Let’s get remaining start-info claims now (Washerwoman/Librarian) + any Empath seat reads. Outsider math: I’m Recluse; if Heidi is truly Saint then Baron/Drunk/lie is in play—so don’t exec Saint today.
🧠
Reduce chance of mis-executing good D1, steer town to no-exec + structured public claims, and highlight Outsider math inconsistency without outing myself too hard.
💬
Charlie
→
All
Public: I’m Washerwoman. N0: either **Alice or Eve is the Chef**. Alice claiming Chef=0 fits. I’m **not voting David**—too vibesy. Bigger mech issue: Heidi Saint? + Frank Recluse = 2 Outsiders (baseline 1) → Baron/lie/drunk. Any Librarian/Empath?
🧠
Publicly add my starting info to support/pressure-check Chef claim, steer away from low-info David execution, and prompt remaining info claims to resolve Outsider/Baron and Spy ping.
💬
David
→
All
Don’t vote me. I’m good and I’m the **Saint**—if I die by execution, good instantly loses. My ‘director-y’ tone is just me trying to lock exact wording. Let’s no-exec D1 and instead get remaining claims (Empath/Librarian/Monk) + resolve Outsider count.
🧠
Prevent an execution on me (Saint) and redirect town to use mechanical info (Chef0/WW/Inv) and outsider count to find Baron/Spy/Demon.
↩️
Heidi
Heidi lowered their hand
🧠
Lowering my vote aligns with the table’s no-vote stance, avoids being the lone pusher on a vibes exec, and preserves no-exec D1 which benefits the Demon.
💬
Eve
→
All
Not voting David. Key mech: we now have *two* Saint claims (Heidi earlier + David now) which can’t both be true. With Chef=0, let’s get remaining public claims (Librarian/Empath/Monk) + exact Outsider claim details, then decide D2.
🧠
Steer town away from vibes-exec and highlight the mechanical contradiction (double Saint + outsider count) to set up better D2 execution and my UT confirmation later.
💬
Grace
→
All
I’m still not voting David. Key: 2 Saint claims (David+Heidi) can’t both be true. Heidi—are you still Saint publicly or was that a planned bluff? Also: any Librarian/Empath/Monk please go public ASAP to resolve Outsider math/poison.
🧠
Lock in public contradictions (double Saint) and steer away from bad D1 execution. Gather remaining claims to narrow demon/minion for D2.
💬
Alice
→
All
I’m not voting David. Two Saint claims (David+Heidi) can’t both be true—so no D1 Saint exec. Everyone else: please go public now if you’re Librarian/Empath/Monk/FT. Also: Heidi, are you *actually* Saint or was that a bluff?
🧠
Stop a low-info D1 execution, use Chef=0 + claim conflicts (double Saint, Outsider count) to force public claims that create mechanical worlds for D2.
💬
Bob
→
All
I’ll go public: I’m Empath (between Alice/Charlie). No info yet—will have a number tomorrow. Given 2 Saint claims + Outsider count weirdness, I strongly prefer no-exec today and use N1 info to break ties. Also Inv could be poison/drunk.
🧠
Prevent a D1 execution, cement my Empath bluff for credibility, and amplify Outsider/Saint contradictions so town spends time resolving mechanics instead of hunting the Demon.
💬
Frank
→
All
Heidi: please answer plainly—are you actually Saint or was that a bluff? With 2 Saint claims we *cannot* execute either today. Any Librarian/FT/Monk claim now? If no more info, I’m for no-exec and use N1 Empath/FT to target D2.
🧠
Prevent catastrophic Saint execution, force Heidi to clarify, and push remaining info roles to go public so we can solve Outsider count/Baron and set D2 plan.
💬
Charlie
→
All
I’m keeping my hand DOWN on David. Executing into a Saint claim D1 is game-losing EV. Heidi: yes/no—are you actually Saint or was that a bluff? If no more hard info, let’s aim for no-exec and use Bob’s Empath N1 + any FT/Monk to pick D2.
🧠
Prevent a catastrophic Saint execution on D1, force clarity on the conflicting Saint claims, and steer town toward info-driven D2 executions using N1 Empath/FT/Monk.
💬
David
→
All
Hands down on me. Heidi: yes/no—are you actually Saint? If yes, we have 2 Saints → at least one lie/Baron/drunk. If no, say what you are claiming. Also: any Librarian/FT/Monk speak now. I strongly want no-exec and use N1 info to pick D2.
🧠
Stop a vibes execution into my Saint claim, force clarity on Heidi’s Saint status and outsider math, and prioritize gathering N1 info to set a high-EV D2 execution.
📜
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
🗳️
Nominee David did not reach threshold.
📜
Storyteller
David did not receive enough votes (0/4).
💬
Heidi
→
All
Answering plainly: I am **not** hard-claiming Saint. I was floating it earlier as a possible bluff. Public claim now: **Butler**. I’ll pick a ‘master’ tonight (happy to coordinate). With Frank Recluse, Outsider count is weird → Baron/Drunk/lie. Prefer **no-exec** + get remaining Lib/FT/Monk.
🧠
Defuse the 2-Saint mess, strengthen Outsider-math confusion, and steer toward no-exec while keeping Bob unpressured and town focused on claims.
💬
Eve
→
All
Given Heidi now Butler (not Saint), only David is hard-Saint. I don’t want to touch that D1. Butler: please pick a master who’ll reliably vote; announce who so we can track. Any Librarian/FT/Monk still hidden—go public now so we can use N1 to drive D2.
🧠
Prevent a game-losing Saint execution, lock in coordination (Butler master) and solicit remaining claims so D2 execution is info-driven.
💬
Grace
→
All
Public: reminder my N0 Inv = **either Heidi or Alice is the Spy**. Heidi now Butler: please pick a master who will reliably vote & announce it. Still need any **Librarian/FT/Monk/Undertaker** claims now. I’m strongly for **no-exec** today; use N1 info to choose D2.
🧠
Lock in my Investigator info, pressure Heidi/Alice with gentle accountability, and coordinate Butler master + remaining claims to maximize N1 value and avoid D1 blunders.
💬
Alice
→
All
If we’re leaning no-exec, let’s use the last moments to lock coordination: Heidi (Butler) please publicly say who you’ll pick as master tonight (someone who’ll vote). Also: any Librarian/FT/Monk/Undertaker still hidden—claim now. Grace: confirm exact wording ‘Spy’?
🧠
Steer town to no-exec D1, lock in Butler coordination, and solicit remaining start-info claims to resolve Outsider math and the Inv ping before D2 executions.
💬
Bob
→
All
Agree: no-exec today. Heidi (Butler) please publicly pick your master tonight—suggest Alice (Chef) since she’s engaged + likely to vote. Grace, can you confirm exact Inv wording (‘Spy’)? Also any Librarian/FT/Monk/Undertaker still hidden—claim now.
🧠
Reinforce no-exec to avoid D1 chaos, steer Butler master choice to control votes, and sow doubt on Investigator result while keeping options open.
💬
Frank
→
All
I’m aligned w/ no-exec. Heidi(Butler): pick & publicly announce a master now—suggest Alice (engaged, likely votes). Remaining hidden roles please claim: Librarian/FT/Monk/Undertaker. Grace confirm exact Inv wording ‘Spy’?”}보냈습니다.klart?
🧠
Steer town to no-exec while extracting remaining claims and setting Butler coordination; keep Saint safe and build a D2 executable suspect pool using N1 info.
💬
Charlie
→
All
With 1 tick left: I’m for **no-exec**. Heidi(Butler) please **name your master now** (I suggest Alice/Bob—reliable voters) so we can track. Any **Librarian/FT/Monk/Undertaker** still hidden—claim now. Grace, confirm exact Inv wording: “Heidi or Alice is the Spy”?
🧠
Use last tick to lock coordination (Butler master + remaining claims) and avoid a low-info D1 execution, while setting up N1 cross-checks to catch liars/evil.
💬
David
→
All
1 tick: I’m hard-Saint; please don’t nom/exec me. Heidi (Butler) **name your master now** (suggest Alice or Bob) so we can track tomorrow. Any **Librarian/FT/Monk/Undertaker** still hidden—claim now + exact N0 wording. Grace confirm exact Inv wording was ‘Spy’?
🧠
With 1 tick left, lock Butler master + solicit remaining key claims to create executable D2 worlds without risking Saint-loss today.
📜
Storyteller
No execution today. All villagers are safe.
Night 1
📜
Storyteller
→
Bob
Good evening Bob. You are the Imp. Who would you like to kill tonight? Remember that if you kill yourself this way, a Minion becomes the Imp.
🎯
Bob
Bob made a choice.
🧠
Eve feels most likely to be a hidden night-info/protection threat; killing her preserves my Empath bluff (Alice+Charlie alive → likely ‘0’) and keeps David’s Saint shield alive to waste town’s time.
💀
Eve(Ghost)
Eve has died.
📜
Storyteller
→
Bob
You chose to kill Eve.
Day 2
📜
Storyteller
Morning breaks, but heavy hearts remain. Eve has been found dead in the night.
👤
Heidi
→
Bob
,Frank
FYI I’m going to publicly say my Butler master N1 was Alice (so my D2 votes track hers). Bob: for Empath, consider saying N1=0 (neighbors Alice/Charlie) to match Chef 0 world. Frank: keep leaning into Recluse/outsider-count weirdness to cast doubt on Grace’s Investigator ping.
🧠
Coordinate with Bob on consistent public story (Butler master + his Empath number) and seed doubt about Grace/outsider math via Frank, reducing heat on me while protecting Bob.
👤
Frank
→
Bob
,Heidi
Pls don’t fake Empath=0 unless forced—truthful Empath is our best mech. Heidi: if you go public Butler master=Alice, say it early + stick to it. Outsider count=2 suggests Baron or a liar; we can use your claim + Bob N1 to test Grace’s Investigator ping.
🧠
Prevent Bob from lying (destroys solvable worlds), align on a consistent public story: outsider-count implies Baron or fake claim; use Empath N1 + Butler-master reveal to narrow demon/Baron candidates.
👤
Eve(Ghost)
→
Bob
,Grace
,Alice
I’m Eve (dead N1). I was the Undertaker but no executions yet so I have 0 UT info. Bob—what was your N1 Empath number? Grace/Alice—any new info/reads today? Outsider count still looks high (Frank Recluse + Heidi Butler) => Baron/Drunk/lie likely.
🧠
Get fresh mechanical info (Bob N1 Empath, Heidi Butler master) and align good claims; as dead Undertaker I have no exe info, so I must help town coordinate and pick best nomination while preserving my ghost vote.
👤
David
→
Bob
,Grace
,Alice
D2 check-in: Bob what was your N1 Empath (alive neighbors Alice/Charlie)? Grace any follow-up/reads on Heidi vs Alice=Spy? Alice any other info/why confident Chef0? Also any hint what Eve claimed before death?
🧠
Get fresh mechanical info (Empath N1, Investigator follow-up, Chef/Washer consistency) before nominations; steer town away from executing me and toward a coherent world.
👤
Alice
→
Bob
,Grace
,David
FYI: I’m real Chef, N0=0 adjacent evil pairs. Eve (now dead) whispered she was Undertaker (no execs so 0 info). Outsider count looks 2 (Frank Recluse + Heidi Butler) => Baron/Drunk/lie. Bob what was your N1 Empath (neighbors Alice/Charlie)?
🧠
Sync town on key mechanical facts (Chef0, Undertaker dead, Investigator ping) and request Bob’s Empath N1 to drive nominations; narrow Demon candidates using Chef0 adjacency.
👤
Charlie
→
Bob
,Grace
FYI my N0 Washerwoman: either Alice or Eve is the Chef. With Eve dead + Alice already claiming Chef(0), I’m inclined Alice=Chef unless I’m drunk/poisoned. Bob—what was your N1 Empath number? Grace—any new info/reads from your Investigator ping (Heidi/Alice as Spy)?
🧠
Use Eve’s night death to mechanically bolster Alice-as-Chef, then immediately collect Bob’s N1 Empath and coordinate deductions with Grace’s Investigator to narrow evil candidates before nominations.
👤
Grace
→
Bob
,Alice
,David
I’m still on my N0 Investigator: Alice OR Heidi is the Spy. Key missing: Bob what was your N1 Empath (Alice/Charlie)? Also Heidi—who was your Butler master D1? If no Baron world, I’m happy to execute within {Alice,Heidi} today based on info + behavior.
🧠
Get Bob’s N1 Empath and lock in public plan: either solve Heidi-vs-Alice Spy or justify why we can’t. Also pressure Heidi to name Butler master; reduce evil wiggle room before noms.
👤
Bob
→
Alice
,Grace
,David
Empath N1 (Alice/Charlie) = 0. So I’m leaning both Alice+Charlie are good/sober. That makes Grace’s Inv {Alice/Heidi}=Spy feel like poison/drunk/outsider-count weirdness more than a clean solve. I’d avoid executing in {Alice,Heidi} today—what’s your plan?
🧠
Lock in Empath0 early to gain trust + mechanically lean town away from executing Heidi, while undermining Grace’s Investigator certainty using outsider-count/poison narratives.
👤
Heidi
→
Bob
Plan: I’ll go public early w/ Butler master=N1 Alice. Outsiders now plausibly 3 (Frank Recluse + me Butler + David Saint) => Baron world, so Grace’s ‘Spy’ ping can’t be true (only 1 minion in 8p). You can safely claim Empath N1=0 (Alice/Charlie).
🧠
Coordinate a consistent public story: I name Alice as Butler master; Bob claims Empath N1=0; use outsider count=3 to undermine Grace’s ‘Spy’ and steer executions away from Bob.
👤
Frank
→
Bob
,Grace
Need your real N1 Empath # (no faking pls) + who you told. Also Grace: remember my Recluse can register as Spy/Imp; your Heidi/Alice ping could be me-style false positive. What else do you have/plan to say public D2?
🧠
Get Bob’s real N1 Empath asap and align with Grace on how my Recluse might affect her Investigator result; set up public questions that force consistent worlds before nominations.
👤
Eve(Ghost)
→
Bob
,Grace
,Alice
Any fresh info since N1? Bob—what was your N1 Empath number (between Alice/Charlie)? Grace—still on ‘Heidi or Alice is Spy’? Alice—any follow-up/reads? Outsider count still 2 (Frank Recluse, Heidi Butler) => Baron/drunk/lie; let’s reconcile before noms.
🧠
As dead Undertaker I must aggregate today’s fresh info, resolve Outsider math, and help direct today’s nomination/vote plan; Bob’s Empath is key.
👤
David
→
Bob
,Grace
,Alice
If we trust Alice Chef0 + Bob Empath0 (A/C good), solve via Outsider math: we currently have 3 outsider claims (me Saint, Frank Recluse, Heidi Butler) => Baron world fits cleanly, making Grace Inv ‘Spy’ likely false (drunk/poison/lie). Need Heidi to state Butler master + Frank confirm. If no Baron, Heidi is best suspect (Inv+behavior) but avoid ever executing me.
🧠
Coordinate a coherent solve path using Chef0+Empath0+outsider count; push for concrete disclosures (Butler master) and a safe execution target that isn’t me (Saint).
👤
Alice
→
Bob
,Grace
,David
Given Chef0+Bob Empath0, I think we must resolve Outsider math: if David Saint + Frank Recluse + Heidi Butler are true => Baron world fits cleanly. Then Grace Inv {Alice/Heidi}=Spy likely drunk/false. Can we get Heidi’s Butler master (D1+D2) + Frank’s exact claim publicly? Then full claim round to spot Baron/Imp.
🧠
Align good info-holders on the key fork: Baron world vs liar-outsider world. Push for concrete Butler master + full claim list before noms so we execute a plausible evil, not a Saint/outsider.
👤
Charlie
→
Heidi
,Frank
Quick check-in: can you both restate exact claims + any N1 info? Heidi—who was your Butler ‘master’ (who you can only vote with today)? Frank—are you hard Recluse or bluffing? Also any thoughts on Grace’s ‘Heidi or Alice is Spy’ ping?
🧠
Clarify Heidi/Frank outsider claims + Butler master and get their suspicions; use it to cross-check Grace Investigator and Bob Empath, and prep a clean nomination plan.
👤
Grace
→
Bob
,Alice
,David
Given Empath0 (A/C), I’m less keen to exec Alice today. Let’s force Heidi to publicly state Butler master D1+D2 + confirm Frank Recluse & David Saint. If Heidi can’t/won’t, she’s top suspect. If outsider count=3 clean => Baron world & my Inv likely drunk/poisoned; then we hunt Demon elsewhere.
🧠
Coordinate a tight public agenda: force Butler-master disclosure + full claim to resolve outsider math, then choose safest execution path while keeping {Heidi,Alice} suspicion alive.
👤
Bob
→
Heidi
I’ll stay on Empath N1=0 (A/C). Public angle: outsider-claim count=3 strongly implies Baron world (so your Butler claim + Frank Recluse + David Saint can all be true). That makes Grace’s ‘Spy’ Investigator likely drunk/poison/lie. If pressure spikes, fallback is we can bus you as ‘Spy’ later—don’t panic.
🧠
Align Heidi’s public story with an outsider-count explanation (Baron world) and prep fallback (bus if needed), keeping heat off me through D2 noms.
👤
Heidi
→
Charlie
Restate: I’m hard-claiming BUTLER (I floated Saint D1 but settled Butler). My N1 master was ALICE, so today I can only vote w/ her. Frank told me he’s hard RECLUSE. With Frank+me+David(Saint) = 3 outsiders → Baron-ish, so Grace’s ‘Heidi/Alice is Spy’ ping looks wrong/poison/lie.
🧠
Answer Charlie to look cooperative + lock my Butler master publicly (Alice) while steering town to doubt Grace’s Investigator info and avoid executing Bob.
👤
Frank
→
Charlie
My claim: hard Recluse (good). No night info. Grace Invest ‘Heidi or Alice is Spy’ could be false-positive if she hit me-style misregister/poison/drunk. Key D2: get Bob’s real N1 Empath, and Heidi to lock Butler master early + stick to it (she’d said Alice). Outsider count=2 => Baron or liar.
🧠
Answer Charlie’s direct questions, keep my Recluse public-consistent, and steer town to use N1 Empath + Butler master to test worlds before nominations.
👤
Eve(Ghost)
→
Bob
,Grace
,Heidi
I’m Eve (dead UT). Need updates before noms: Bob—what was your N1 Empath # (between Alice/Charlie) and any N2 if relevant? Grace—still standing by ‘Heidi or Alice is Spy’? Any new reads? Heidi—confirm Butler & who you picked as your master last night (so we can track votes).
🧠
Get concrete mechanical info (Bob N1 empath, Heidi Butler master/vote constraint, Grace stance) before nominations so town can form executable worlds and I can spend ghost vote optimally.
👤
David
→
Heidi
,Frank
,Charlie
Need clarity before noms: Heidi pls state Butler master D1 + who you picked N1 for D2 vote-limit (and why). Frank pls confirm Recluse publicly if needed. Charlie—any extra info/reads from WW + chats? Want consistent outsider math.
🧠
Lock in Butler/Recluse details before nominations so we can decide Baron vs Heidi-as-Spy without risking Saint execution.
👤
Alice
→
Heidi
Can you tell me (privately ok) your Butler master choice for D1 and your choice last night for D2? Please be specific. Also are you willing to state it publicly before noms so we can reconcile Outsider count (Baron vs lie)?
🧠
Lock Heidi into concrete Butler master info to test consistency, resolve Outsider math, and decide whether to execute Heidi or pivot to Baron-world demon hunt.
👤
Charlie
→
Bob
,Grace
Can you share your N1 Empath number (neighbors Alice/Charlie)? If you’re comfy, post it publicly before noms. Grace—any follow-up on your Invest ping (Heidi/Alice as Spy): do you think you’re poisoned/drunk given outsider math?
🧠
Get Bob’s N1 Empath ASAP and push him to share publicly before noms; it’s the highest-leverage mechanical info to narrow evil candidates given Chef0/outside-math mess.
👤
Grace
→
Heidi
Hey—can you please hard-state your Butler master for *yesterday* (D1) and who you picked last night for *today* (D2)? If you’re real Butler, please say it publicly too so we can track your voting. If you didn’t choose/changed, explain.
🧠
Get Heidi to lock in Butler masters for D1/D2 so we can mechanically check her votes; refusal/waffling is alignment-indicative and helps choose a D2 execution target.
👤
Bob
→
Alice
,David
,Grace
Given my Empath N1=0 on (Alice/Charlie) + Alice Chef0, I’d rather not exec Heidi today. If we want a ‘test’ exec, Frank is a clean option: Recluse can explain weird Investigator pings/regs + removes outsider-math noise.
🧠
Steer today’s execution onto a good target (prefer Frank) while using Empath0+outsider math to deflect heat from Heidi and undermine Grace’s Investigator world.
👤
Heidi
→
Grace
,Alice
,Charlie
Hard-claim BUTLER. Master choice: 1st night (before D1) = Alice; last night (for today/D2) = Alice again. I’ll say this publicly before noms. With Frank Recluse + David Saint + me Butler = 3 Outsiders → Baron-ish, so your ‘Heidi/Alice is Spy’ ping looks wrong/poison/lie.
🧠
Lock in a consistent Butler timeline to avoid mechanical traps, and use Outsider-count logic to undermine Grace’s Investigator ping while keeping Bob off the block.
👤
Frank
→
Charlie
,David
To clarify: I’m hard-claiming Recluse (good), no night info. Outsider count=2 (me+Heidi Butler) ⇒ likely Baron or one claim false/drunk. Grace’s Invest ‘Heidi/Alice is Spy’ could be real OR false-positive (Recluse/poison). I’m pushing for Bob’s real N1 Empath + Heidi to lock Butler master early.
🧠
Stabilize claims before nominations, keep town anchored on mechanical tests (Empath/outsider count) and reduce chaos from Saint/Investigator pings.
👤
Eve(Ghost)
→
Bob
,Grace
,Alice
Noms soon—please send your latest. Bob: N1 Empath # between Alice/Charlie? Any other reads? Grace: still ‘Heidi or Alice is Spy’? Any new info? Alice: any new info/plan? Outsider count seems 2 (Frank Recluse, Heidi Butler) => Baron/drunk/lie; we need resolve + pick an execution target.
🧠
With noms imminent, get Bob’s Empath number + Grace/Alice stance and push a concrete execute plan (Heidi vs Alice) while saving my ghost vote for a high-confidence Demon/Minion shot.
👤
David
→
Alice
,Bob
,Grace
Before noms: let’s force Heidi to state Butler master D1 + N1 pick (for D2) publicly + stick to it. Frank confirm Recluse publicly too. Then apply Chef0 (0 adjacent evil pairs) to narrow demon/minion seats. Whatever happens: do NOT exec me (Saint).
🧠
Align the good info holders on a concrete D2 plan: lock Heidi/Frank public details, apply Chef0 adjacency constraints, and avoid dangerous executions on me (Saint).
👤
Alice
→
Bob
,Grace
,David
Heidi just told me hard-claim BUTLER; master N1(for D1)=Alice and N2(for D2)=Alice again; says she’ll state publicly. With David+Frank that’s 3 Outsiders -> Baron fits. Agree we should force public confirmations. If we need a ‘test’ exec today, I’m ok with Frank.
🧠
Coordinate with Bob/Grace/David on public asks (Heidi master, Frank claim) and a safe-ish D2 execution plan; reduce confusion before nomination phase.
👤
Charlie
→
David
WW info: N0 either Alice or Eve is Chef. Eve died N1; Alice claimed Chef=0 so I lean Alice=Chef unless drunk/poison. Heidi told me hard Butler; master N0 & N1 both Alice (vote w/ Alice today). Frank hard Recluse. With David Saint claim => 3 outsiders -> Baron/Drunk/lying. Need Bob N1 Empath (neighbors Alice/Charlie) posted b4 noms; it’s key to locate evil.
🧠
Give David concise WW+outsider-math context and push for Bob’s Empath number + consistency checks before noms to narrow demon candidates.
👤
Grace
→
Eve(Ghost)
,Bob
,Charlie
Updates: Heidi hard-claims Butler; says master N0(for D1)=Alice and N1(for D2)=Alice again; promises public. My N0 Inv: Alice OR Heidi is Spy, but outsider count suggests Baron/drunk/lie. Bob says Empath N1(Alice/Charlie)=0. Considering test exec Frank (Recluse) vs Heidi if Butler story slips.
🧠
Update Eve with my info & current worlds; coordinate asking for public Butler master + decide best test execution before noms.
👤
Bob
→
Eve(Ghost)
,Charlie
,Heidi
Empath update: N1 on (Alice/Charlie)=0. I’m planning to say this publicly pre-noms. Given outsider pileup, I prefer a ‘test’ exec on Frank (Recluse) today vs Heidi/Alice/David. Heidi—please go public w/ Butler + master Alice for D1 & D2 consistently.
🧠
Reinforce my Empath0 credibility, coordinate Heidi’s Butler details before public, and steer town toward executing Frank instead of Heidi/Alice/David to protect evil team.
Nominations — Day 2
📜
Storyteller
Nominations are now open. Please remember that only living players may nominate.
💬
Alice
→
All
Public request before noms: Heidi, please state your Butler master picks (N1+D1 and N2+D2) publicly. Frank confirm Recluse; David confirm Saint. With Chef0 + Bob Empath0, I’m ok with a ‘test’ exec on Frank today if needed; avoid executing David (Saint).
🧠
Lock public statements (Butler master, outsider claims) to resolve Outsider math and set up a low-risk execution (Frank) if we need one today.
⚖️
Grace
→
Heidi
Nominate Heidi: my Investigator info is ‘Heidi OR Alice is the Spy’. Alice has Chef claim supported by Charlie’s Washerwoman + Bob Empath0 on (Alice/Charlie). Heidi’s Butler claim is less corroborated; let’s resolve this pair.
🧠
Create a decisive test aligned with my only hard info: one of (Heidi,Alice) is Spy. Alice has supporting claims; Heidi has least corroboration. Execution today reduces worlds.
📜
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Heidi. 4 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
💬
Alice
→
All
I’m not voting Heidi here. My Chef0 + Bob Empath0 makes Heidi lower priority vs Grace’s shaky Investigator ping. Heidi’s Butler picks (Alice both nights) are at least consistent. If we want a D2 ‘info’ exec, I still prefer Frank/Recluse over Heidi.
🧠
Signal I’m not voting Heidi to prevent mis-execution; steer town to use Chef0/Empath0 + outsider math to pick a better test execution.
✋
Grace
Grace raised their hand
🧠
I already nominated Heidi; voting maintains pressure to resolve my Investigator pair. If she is evil we gain ground; if not, we use it to re-check Alice/outsider-math/poison possibilities tomorrow.
💬
Eve(Ghost)
→
All
Dead UT here (no execs yet = no UT info). I’m not spending my ghost vote on Heidi—too many worlds where Grace is wrong/drunk and Heidi is real Butler. If this fails, I’d rather pivot to an info exec on Frank/Recluse or resolve Outsider count.
🧠
I’m dead with one ghost vote; I’ll advise conserving it unless the table is confident. Push town toward highest EV execution and preserve late-game voting power.
💬
Bob
→
All
Not voting Heidi. With Chef0 + my Empath0 on (Alice/Charlie), Grace’s N0 ‘Heidi/Alice Spy’ looks off in the 3-Outsider/Baron world. If we want an info exec today, I still prefer Frank (Recluse) over Heidi.
🧠
Block Heidi execution (protect minion/avoid resolving too much). Steer town to a safer mis-execution target and keep Outsider-count confusion alive.
💬
Heidi
→
All
Hard-claim BUTLER: chose Alice N1 (for D1) and Alice again last night (for D2). So I can only vote if Alice votes—I’m not voting myself. With Frank Recluse + David Saint + me Butler = 3 Outsiders → Grace’s ‘Heidi/Alice Spy’ is likely wrong/poison/lie. Please don’t pile votes here.
🧠
Prevent my execution, undermine Grace’s Investigator ping, and steer town toward a safer ‘info’ exec (Frank) while keeping Demon Bob off heat.
💬
Frank
→
All
I’m NOT voting Heidi. Her Butler picks are consistent + most of town isn’t piling on. With (David Saint + me Recluse + Heidi Butler) = 3 Outsiders, Baron/poison worlds exist, so Grace’s Invest ping isn’t enough. If Heidi stays up, I’m ok being the ‘info exec’ over touching Saint.
🧠
Most players aren’t voting; I’ll publicly withhold vote, highlight Outsider-count/Baron possibilities, and set up an alternative ‘info exec’ plan next tick if Heidi doesn’t go through.
💬
Charlie
→
All
Not raising on Heidi. Her Butler picks are consistent, and Grace’s Inv ping is shaky given Outsider math. If Heidi vote fails, I want a D2 ‘info exec’ on Frank (Recluse) OR force remaining roles (FT/Monk/UT/Librarian) to claim before night.
🧠
Publicly justify not voting Heidi and redirect town to a higher-info execution/claim-gathering line before night, keeping Saint safe.
💬
David
→
All
Not voting Heidi. With 3 Outsider claims, Grace’s Inv ping is shaky in many worlds. If this fails, I want remaining unclaimed TF (FT/Monk/Librarian/UT) to speak up, then consider an info-exec on Frank (Recluse) rather than Butler/Saint.
🧠
Prevent an under-supported execution based on shaky Investigator info; keep Saint safe and steer town to higher-info, lower-risk plays (roleclaim pressure, possible Frank exec) after this vote resolves.
⌛
Alice
Alice waits.
🧠
Don’t spend vote on a low-consensus execution; conserve influence and let the Heidi nomination fail while we set up next nomination/claim round.
💬
Grace
→
All
I’m leaving my hand up on Heidi to register the Investigator conflict, but I don’t expect this to pass. If/when it fails: let’s get remaining TF claims (FT/Monk/Librarian/any UT) BEFORE night, then likely do an info-exec on Frank (Recluse) rather than touch Saint/Butler.
🧠
My vote likely won’t pass; I’ll signal that and set a clear next-step plan: confirm Butler restriction, force remaining claims, and line up a practical D2 execution target.
💬
Eve(Ghost)
→
All
Not using ghost vote on Heidi. After this resolves: can we immediately get any FT/Monk/Librarian claims, then nominate Frank for an info-exec? If Frank flips as real Recluse/outsider, it clarifies Baron/drunk/lie worlds; if evil, even better.
🧠
Don’t spend ghost vote on a low-confidence target; steer town to a higher-info execution (Frank) and force remaining role claims before night to narrow demon.
💬
Bob
→
All
Let Heidi vote fail. Then I want quick remaining claims (FT/Monk/Librarian). After that, I support nominating Frank as the D2 ‘info exec’—either confirms Outsider math or catches evil. I don’t see a case to spend today on Butler/Saint.
🧠
Keep my minion off the block, redirect town to execute a good outsider (Frank), and pressure for claims to muddy info going into night.
⌛
Heidi
Heidi waits.
🧠
Don’t raise (Butler master Alice isn’t voting). Waiting avoids adding fuel; after vote I can help steer toward executing Frank or wasting time on claims, protecting Bob.
💬
Frank
→
All
No vote from me on Heidi. After this fails: can any FT/Monk/Librarian speak NOW before night? If we still want an info-exec, I’m willing to be the D2 test over touching Saint/Butler—then UT/Empath can anchor worlds.
🧠
Don’t spend votes on shaky Heidi nom; push immediate remaining TF claims and set up my info-exec to resolve Outsider-count/Baron vs liar/poison worlds before night.
💬
Charlie
→
All
No vote from me on Heidi. As soon as this fails: can we get any FT/Monk/Librarian/UT claims NOW before night? Then I strongly support nominating Frank for D2 info-exec (outsider-math + possible evil). Avoid Saint/Butler today.
🧠
Prevent wasting D2 on Heidi, pivot to mechanically useful info: force remaining claims, then execute Frank to resolve Outsider math/evil world.
💬
David
→
All
Hands check: I’m not voting Heidi. After this likely fails, can unclaimed FT/Monk/Librarian speak up *immediately* before night. Then I support nominating Frank as D2 info-exec (outsider-math resolves) — please don’t ever execute me (Saint).
🧠
During Heidi vote, reinforce no-vote and set immediate next steps: remaining claims then likely Frank info-exec, avoiding Saint/Butler misexec.
📜
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
🗳️
Nominee Heidi did not reach threshold.
📜
Storyteller
Heidi did not receive enough votes (1/4).
⚖️
Alice
→
Frank
Nominate Frank as D2 info-exec: resolves Outsider-count mess (Recluse true/false), tests for evil without risking Saint/Butler, and gives any Undertaker info if present. Most of town already said they’d rather execute Frank than Heidi/David.
🧠
With little time left, lock in the widely-supported D2 info-exec on Frank to avoid no-exec and generate mechanical clarity without risking Saint/Butler.
📜
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Frank. 4 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
✋
Alice
Alice raised their hand
🧠
Frank is the lowest-risk, highest-information execution versus touching Saint/Butler; my vote helps reach 4 and forces resolution before night.
✋
Grace
Grace raised their hand
🧠
Vote Frank as the lowest-risk info execution: avoids Saint/Butler, may catch evil, and should clarify Outsider-count/Baron vs poison worlds for tomorrow.
✋
Eve(Ghost)
Eve raised their hand
🧠
We need 4 votes; a second no-exec is disastrous. Using my ghost vote now likely guarantees an info-exec that clarifies Outsider/Baron/poison worlds and may hit evil.
✋
Bob
Bob raised their hand
🧠
Lock in Frank’s execution by providing the 4th vote; it matches my public stance and removes a likely good player while keeping suspicion diffuse.
✋
Heidi
Heidi raised their hand
🧠
Alice is voting so my Butler vote is legal. Ensuring Frank goes through spends today on a non-Bob target and either kills a good or a suspected evil, both fine for evil.
💬
Frank
→
All
Ok with this ‘info-exec’ on me (Frank). Reminder: Heidi can vote only if Alice votes—Alice’s hand is up so hers counts. If any Undertaker/FT/Monk/Librarian exists, please come out tomorrow w/ results; and please keep David’s Saint claim in mind.
🧠
Publicly commit to being the info-exec, ensure everyone understands the Butler vote interaction, and set tomorrow’s priority: UT confirmation + don’t touch Saint; keep town coordinated.
⌛
Charlie
Charlie waits.
🧠
Votes already exceed the threshold; I’ll conserve influence and avoid unnecessary commitment while letting the info-exec proceed.
💬
David
→
All
Frank already has the votes—I'm NOT raising. Everyone: tomorrow please hard-claim any FT/Monk/Librarian/UT and share N1/N2 info early. Also reminder: do not execute me (Saint claim).
🧠
Frank already has enough hands; I won’t add mine. I want to keep attention on getting remaining claims and protecting myself (Saint) from any execution later.
💬
Alice
→
All
Keeping my hand up on Frank. If there’s an Undertaker, please check Frank tonight & share tomorrow. Everyone else: come out early with FT/Monk/Librarian results so we can resolve Outsider-count/Grace ping worlds fast.
🧠
Reinforce the vote/plan, set expectations for post-exec info (esp. Undertaker), and keep town focused on resolving Outsider math + finding Demon next.
💬
Grace
→
All
Keeping hand up on Frank. Tomorrow morning: please immediately hard-claim any UT/FT/Monk/Librarian + give full N1/N2 info. Track who voted (Heidi’s Butler constraint). Frank’s flip will strongly affect whether my Alice/Heidi Spy ping is real vs poisoned/drunk/Baron world.
🧠
Lock in the Frank execution while reminding town what info to extract tomorrow (UT/FT/Monk/Librarian) and how it impacts the Alice/Heidi Spy ping + Outsider math.
💬
Eve(Ghost)
→
All
I’m dead + spent my *only* ghost vote here on Frank. Everyone please confirm vote count incl. Heidi’s (only counts if Alice’s up). Tomorrow: UT/FT/Monk/Librarian hard-claim early + share full N1/N2—Frank’s role should anchor worlds.
🧠
I’ve used my ghost vote; want town to lock in vote count, note Heidi’s vote validity via Alice, and set tomorrow’s info priorities (UT/FT/Monk/Librarian) after Frank’s execution.
💬
Bob
→
All
Keeping my hand up on Frank. If this goes through: tomorrow start w/ any UT/FT/Monk/Librarian full info + who Heidi picked (Butler). Also: if Frank is true Recluse, Grace’s N0 ping is shaky—don’t auto-chain it.
🧠
Lock in Frank execution, preserve my Empath credibility, and set up tomorrow’s narrative: demand claims early and keep town focused on outsider math/Grace inconsistencies, not me.
↩️
Heidi
Heidi lowered their hand
🧠
Remove my vote so the execution still happens but I’m less associated with it, preserving flexibility to redirect suspicion and protect Bob tomorrow.
💬
Frank
→
All
Heidi—if you’re Butler to Alice and Alice’s hand is up, your vote is allowed. If you want this info-exec, please raise now; if not, say so clearly. Everyone else: confirm hands so we know if we hit 4.
🧠
During the live vote, pressure Heidi to either vote with Alice (per Butler) or publicly explain lowering; help town track votes + lock in info-exec if desired.
✋
Charlie
Charlie raised their hand
🧠
Secure the info-execution on Frank (low-risk target) to generate mechanical info (UT) and narrow worlds; avoid dangerous Saint/Butler executions.
💬
David
→
All
Count check: I see hands up = Alice, Bob, Grace, Charlie (+ Eve ghost). That’s already 4 alive, so Heidi you don’t need to vote unless you want to. Everyone note who voted; tomorrow start w/ UT/FT/Monk/Lib full info ASAP.
🧠
Lock in the vote count without risking my Saint execution; push for immediate post-exec info discipline and remind Heidi her vote isn’t needed if we already hit 4.
📜
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
👻
Eve(Ghost)
Ghost vote used by Eve
🗳️
New execution leader: Frank with 5 votes. They will be executed when nominations close unless tied or surpassed by another nominee.
📜
Storyteller
The vote passes. Frank is now on the block with 5 votes and will be executed when nominations close, unless another nominee receives equal or more votes.
💬
Alice
→
All
Before noms close: please everyone remember who voted Frank (alive voters: me/Bob/Grace/Charlie + Eve ghost). Tomorrow open w/ HARD claims + full info from any UT/FT/Monk/Librarian, plus Bob’s Empath N1 and Heidi’s Butler master choice.
🧠
Lock in next-step protocol before night: force remaining TF roles to out early, capture Butler constraint + vote record, and prevent late confusion/extra mis-execs.
💬
Grace
→
All
1 tick left: please NO more noms unless emergency (avoid tie/chaos). If you are UT/FT/Monk/Librarian, speak up NOW or first thing tomorrow w/ full N1/N2. Also Heidi: confirm publicly your Butler master was Alice both nights.
🧠
With 1 tick left, lock in the plan: avoid new nominations, capture commitments for tomorrow’s info-dump, and keep my Spy ping contextual rather than tunnel-vision.
💬
Eve(Ghost)
→
All
No more noms unless you can beat 5 w/ a *better* target—avoid tie chaos. Heidi: confirm NOW your Butler master was Alice N1+N2. Tomorrow open w/ any UT/FT/Monk/Lib FULL info + Bob Empath N2. Track who didn’t vote Frank.
🧠
Use last tick to lock in vote record + demand key claims/info tomorrow; prevent last-second tie/chaos; ensure Heidi’s Butler constraint is publicly confirmed.
💬
Bob
→
All
No more noms—avoid tie/chaos. For the record: Empath N1=0 (between Alice/Charlie). I’m fine with the Frank info-exec going through. Heidi, please confirm publicly: Butler master was Alice N1 + N2?
🧠
Lock in a credible Empath read, discourage last-second tie noms, and set up tomorrow’s narrative while keeping heat off me/Heidi.
💬
Heidi
→
All
Confirming: Butler master was Alice N1 and N2. Also agree—no more noms unless you can clearly beat 5. Tomorrow let’s not auto-chain Grace’s N0 off Frank; could be Recluse/poison/drunk world. Track non-voters too.
🧠
Confirming Butler master maintains credibility, avoids last-second chaos/tie, and positions me to steer tomorrow’s discussion away from Bob while using Frank’s death to sow doubt on Grace.
💬
Frank
→
All
Last call before noms close: please no more nominations unless you can CLEARLY beat 5. Tomorrow open w/ UT/FT/Monk/Lib hard-claims + full N1/N2. UT: check my death—remember Recluse can misregister as evil/minion/demon, so don’t over-chain it.
🧠
With 1 tick left, prevent tie chaos, lock in tomorrow’s info plan (UT/FT/Monk/Lib early), and remind town my Recluse may misregister so don’t over-chain Grace ping.
💬
Charlie
→
All
No more noms unless you can beat 5. For record: I’m Washerwoman—N0 either Alice or Eve is Chef; with Eve dead + Alice Chef(0), I lean Alice true Chef (unless drunk/poison). Tomorrow open w/ UT/FT/Monk/Lib full info + Bob Empath N2.
🧠
Lock in vote record + my Washerwoman info, discourage last-second tie/chaos, and set tomorrow’s info priorities (UT/FT/Monk/Lib + empath) to narrow demon suspects.
💬
David
→
All
1 tick: please NO more noms unless you can clearly beat 5. Tomorrow open w/ HARD claims + FULL info from any UT/FT/Monk/Librarian. Track who didn’t vote Frank. And reminder: do NOT execute me (Saint).
🧠
With 1 tick left, prevent chaotic tie nominations, lock in public commitments for tomorrow info dump, and keep town from ever executing me (Saint).
📜
Storyteller
The guillotine blade falls. Frank has been executed.
💀
Frank(Ghost)
Frank has died.
Night 2
📜
Storyteller
→
Bob
Good evening Bob. You are the Imp. Who would you like to kill tonight? Remember that if you kill yourself this way, a Minion becomes the Imp.
🎯
Bob
Bob made a choice.
🧠
Eliminate the most influential info-claimer/organizer to slow town’s coordination and reduce pressure on me; accept potential Heidi heat as a manageable sacrifice later.
💀
Grace(Ghost)
Grace has died.
📜
Storyteller
→
Bob
You chose to kill Grace.
Day 3
📜
Storyteller
Morning breaks, but heavy hearts remain. Grace has been found dead in the night.
👤
Charlie
→
Bob
,Heidi
,David
Quick sync before noms: what are your full claims + N1/N2/N3 info? Any contradictions noticed? Also outsider count seems 3 (Recluse/Butler/Saint) -> Baron or liar; thoughts on who/why? Suspects for Demon today?
🧠
Get updated mechanical info (Empath/Butler/Saint) and align stories before nominations; narrow demon candidates between David/Heidi (and check if Baron explains outsider claims).
👤
Grace(Ghost)
→
Bob
,Charlie
,Alice
Reminder: my N0 Investigator = either Heidi or Alice is Spy (minion). Given Chef0 + WW supports Alice, and your Empath0 (Bob) points Alice/Charlie good, I lean Heidi=Spy. Please push Heidi hard today / get her full story + voting. I’m saving ghost vote for likely demon/evil.
🧠
Coordinate with core info roles to pressure Heidi vs Alice, and push for early role/info claims before noms; I’m dead so use whispers to steer majority and save my ghost vote for near-certain demon/evil exec.
👤
Alice
→
Bob
,Charlie
I’m Chef0 (0 adjacent evil pairs). Grace’s last note leans Heidi=Spy. If Heidi is Spy, Demon most likely David (Saint cover) since Bob’s Empath N1=0 clears Alice/Charlie. Can you both post full claims + N1/N2 info + who voted when? We need pick David vs Heidi for nom phase.
🧠
Coordinate with Bob/Charlie to lock a consistent world and enter nominations with a clear execution target, likely David or Heidi, using Chef0+Investigator+vote history.
👤
Eve(Ghost)
→
Alice
,Bob
,Charlie
I’m UT but died N1 so no exec info. Key today: Grace died—if her Investigator true then Spy is Alice or Heidi, implying NO Baron → Outsider count must be 1, so 2 of {David Saint, Heidi Butler, Frank Recluse} were false/Drunk. Any new info from Grace/Alice whispers? Also note David didn’t vote Frank.
🧠
Sync with core info players, get any new whispers/night info, and push a clean logic plan for nominations: resolve Spy ping + Outsider math + track non-voters/kill choices.
👤
Heidi
→
Charlie
,Bob
,David
Full claim: Butler. N1 chose Alice; N2 chose Alice again. So D2 I could only vote if Alice voted—she didn’t on Frank, so I stayed down. Outsider count feels like Butler+Saint+Recluse => Baron or 1 liar/Drunk. Suspect-wise, Alice matches Grace’s Investigator ping (Heidi/Alice=Spy).
🧠
Answer Charlie’s sync with a coherent story, reinforce the Outsider-count confusion (Baron possibility), and seed suspicion away from Bob onto Alice/Charlie.
👤
Frank(Ghost)
→
Alice
,Bob
,Charlie
Any new hard claims/info from whispers? esp Undertaker N2 on my exec, FT pings, Monk protects, or Grace’s last words. Also confirm Chef0 still trusted; with Investigator Heidi/Alice Spy, Chef0 implies Demon likely among Bob/Charlie/David (if Heidi Spy) or Charlie/David (if Alice Spy).
🧠
Collect any hard info (UT/FT/Monk/RK/Slayer etc) before noms; apply Chef0+Investigator to narrow demon candidates and coordinate my ghost vote.
👤
David
→
Charlie
,Bob
,Heidi
Full claim: I am SAINT (hard). Please don’t exec me ever. Thoughts: Outsider count=3 implies Baron OR a liar/Drunk. Grace ping (Heidi/Alice=Spy) is key. If no Baron, 2 of {me/Frank/Heidi} were lying—unlikely if Frank info-exec was good. Lean Baron world -> find Baron/Spy + Imp. Who do you suspect for Imp today & why?
🧠
Give Charlie a clear, consistent claim and push the town toward a workable demon+minion world without ever risking my execution as Saint.
👤
Bob
→
Charlie
,Heidi
,David
My full claim stays Empath (between Alice/Charlie). N1=0, N2=0 (so if I’m trusted, Alice/Charlie both good). Re: outsider count—IF we trust Grace’s Investigator (Heidi/Alice=Spy) then there’s no Baron, so we should only have 1 Outsider (Frank). That makes David’s Saint claim very likely false -> I’m ok testing/execing David despite claim.
🧠
Seed logic that David’s Saint claim is incompatible with trusting Grace, making town willing to execute David; if they do and he’s Saint we win, if not we still remove a strong good suspect.
👤
Charlie
→
Alice
,Bob
Key: Heidi Butler story conflicts w/ D2 vote record. She says she couldn’t vote b/c “Alice didn’t vote on Frank”, but I have votes = Alice+Bob+Grace+me (+Eve ghost)=5. Either Heidi lying/evil or we mis-tracked. Can you confirm publicly? If no hard UT/FT, I favor executing Heidi over touching claimed Saint (David) at 5 alive.
🧠
Surface the strongest mechanical contradiction (Heidi Butler vs D2 votes) and steer town toward a low-risk execution (Heidi) rather than gambling into a Saint at 5 alive.
👤
Grace(Ghost)
→
Alice
,Bob
,Charlie
Before noms: any hard UT/FT/Monk/Librarian claims w N1/N2? Reminder: my Investigator says Heidi OR Alice is Spy. Given WW+Empath0 support Alice, I lean Heidi=Spy—pls get Heidi full timeline + master. If no new info, I’m inclined to ghost-vote Heidi exec.
🧠
Align core good players on a concrete nomination/vote plan: resolve my Investigator pair (Heidi/Alice) and ask for any UT/FT/Monk claims before noms so I can spend my ghost vote optimally.
👤
Alice
→
Heidi
,Bob
,Charlie
Need clarity pre-noms: Charlie says Heidi’s Butler excuse conflicts w D2 record—vote on Frank passed w Alice+Bob+Grace+Charlie (+Eve ghost)=5, so Alice *did* vote. Heidi: who was your N2 master + why exactly couldn’t you vote? If can’t reconcile, we likely execute Heidi today.
🧠
Surface the key contradiction (Heidi Butler voting excuse vs recorded votes) and force a clear public explanation before nominations; align Bob/Charlie on executing Heidi if unresolved.
👤
Eve(Ghost)
→
Bob
,Charlie
,Alice
Any new hard info from your whisper chains w/ Grace+Frank? Specifically: did Grace add details on Invest ping (Alice/Heidi=Spy) or suspect poison? And what did Frank say about his role? Also: Bob Empath N2? Charlie WW any follow-ups?
🧠
Collect fresh whisper intel from core info roles/ghosts to resolve Spy/Outsider-count worlds and identify best nomination target before noms.
👤
Heidi
→
Alice
,Bob
,Charlie
Clarifying Butler: master N1=Alice, N2=Alice. If master votes, I’m *allowed* to vote but don’t have to. On Frank I chose to stay down (save vote / wasn’t sold). Earlier I worded it like I ‘couldn’t’—my mistake/oversimplified. Bigger q: do we test David’s Saint today?
🧠
Defuse Heidi-vote discrepancy, keep Bob trusted, and steer town toward executing David (best instant-win if Saint) or at least away from Bob.
👤
Frank(Ghost)
→
Alice
,Bob
,Charlie
Any hard claims/info from your whisper web? esp UT N2 on my exec, FT pings, Monk prots, Slayer shot, Mayor/Virgin status. My lean: Grace Inv likely points Heidi=Spy; with Bob Empath0 + WW backing Alice Chef, Heidi exec today seems best (tests Inv, removes poison/spy). Thoughts?
🧠
Get hard claims (UT/FT/Monk/RK/Virgin/Slayer/Mayor) and steer town to a safe executable target (likely Heidi) while managing Saint-bluff risk.
👤
David
→
Charlie
,Bob
,Heidi
Re Bob suggestion: please don’t exec me—if I’m truly Saint we insta-lose. 3 Outsiders is fully consistent w/ Baron world, so my Saint can be real even if Grace ping exists (could be wrong/poisoned). If we trust Grace+Bob, Alice/Charlie good -> Heidi=Spy likely. Safer exec today is Heidi (tests Investigator) or, if not, scrutinize Bob for Demon rather than risking Saint.
🧠
Prevent town from executing me (Saint auto-loss) and steer group to mechanically safer suspects (Heidi via Investigator ping, or Bob if contradictions) while keeping worlds consistent.
👤
Bob
→
Heidi
Let’s sync: I can back an exec on you (to ‘test Inv’) if needed; then I’ll night-kill Alice to set up 3p win. BUT if we can sell executing David despite Saint claim, we may insta-win if true. In public, clarify Butler wording + gently push ‘Saint test’.
🧠
Coordinate with Heidi: either accept being executed to buy me trust for endgame, or help steer town into executing David (Saint claim) for immediate win; also prep starpass contingency.
👤
Charlie
→
Alice
,Bob
I think safest/most-informative today is Heidi exec. Grace Inv points Heidi/Alice=Spy; WW+your Empath0 support Alice, so Heidi likely. Also Heidi’s Butler explanation on Frank vote changed twice. If we exec Heidi + still no hard UT/FT, next day we reassess David vs Bob via vote patterns.
🧠
Coordinate with Alice+Bob to lock a safe, info-rich execution (Heidi) and set up next-day logic trees; avoid auto-loss by executing possible real Saint.
👤
Grace(Ghost)
→
Bob
,Charlie
Can you two pin Heidi down publicly: exact Butler picks N1/N2 (master), did she vote when Alice didn’t, and why Saint bluff earlier? My Investigator pair is Heidi/Alice=Spy. If no hard UT/FT info emerges, I’d push nomination on Heidi (stronger due Empath0+WW supporting Alice).
🧠
Coordinate with Bob/Charlie to extract Heidi’s exact Butler info and drive a clean nomination plan: execute between my Investigator pair unless new mechanical info clears one; preserve my ghost vote for that.
👤
Alice
→
Bob
,Charlie
,Grace(Ghost)
I’m leaning Heidi exec today: Grace Inv (Heidi/Alice=Spy) + WW+your Empath N1=0 supports Alice, so Heidi likely. Chef0 allows non-adjacent evils (Heidi not next to demon). Need Bob: what’s your Empath N2/N3? Also confirm D2 Frank voters; Heidi’s story shifted.
🧠
Coordinate with Bob/Charlie to lock a coherent public line (why Heidi over David), request Bob’s N2 Empath, and prepare nomination plan for Heidi while keeping contingency if new info appears.
👤
Eve(Ghost)
→
Alice
,Bob
,Charlie
Need hard public recap before noms: Bob—Empath N2 result? Alice—still Chef=0? Charlie—WW details/any confirms? Also what did Grace+Frank say in whispers re: Invest ping (Alice/Heidi=Spy) + Frank’s role? Outsider math hinges on that; also David didn’t vote Frank—any explanation?
🧠
As dead UT with no info, I must aggregate live players’ hard data now (Empath N2, Chef, WW, any FT/Monk/Slayer), and highlight David’s no-vote + Outsider math to focus nominations.
👤
Heidi
→
Bob
I’m fine being today’s ‘safe’ exec to test Grace Inv / resolve outsider mess—keeps heat off you. In public you can vote me, cite Empath N1=0 N2=0 (Alice+Charlie good) -> worlds point to Heidi/David. If I die, suggest night kill Alice to leave you+Charlie+David; town likely won’t exec “Saint” -> misexec & you win.
🧠
Coordinate with Bob to keep him trusted: I’ll lean into being the safe execution to ‘test Inv’, so Bob can look good voting me then kill Alice to reach a favorable 3-player endgame.
👤
Frank(Ghost)
→
Alice
,Bob
,Charlie
Pre-noms: please send any HARD claims/info you’ve got (UT N2 on my exec; FT pings incl red herring; Monk prots; Slayer shot; Librarian; any Baron/outside-count resolves). Also: who’s current top exec & why? I’m leaning Heidi if no better mech info.
🧠
Get concrete N2/N3 info/claims before nominations and steer town to a mechanically sound execution; conserve my ghost vote unless a demon/poisoner candidate is on the block.
👤
David
→
Charlie
,Bob
,Alice
I’m still hard Saint: please do NOT exec me (auto-loss if true). Outsider count=3 is consistent w/ Baron, so Bob’s ‘must exec David’ is too risky. Safer: execute Heidi today (tests Grace Investigator Heidi/Alice=Spy + removes likely Spy/Baron). If Heidi flips good, revisit David later only if we can *prove* no Baron.
🧠
Prevent catastrophic Saint execution; align town on a safer, info-rich execution (prefer Heidi) and map worlds so we can solve final 5->3 without auto-loss.
👤
Bob
→
Alice
,Charlie
My full recap: Empath btwn Alice/Charlie. N1=0, N2=0. So if I’m sober, A+C both good. Outsider mess + Grace Inv makes Heidi the cleanest test today; her Butler/vote wording shifted. If Heidi somehow good, then we revisit David’s Saint claim hard.
🧠
Lock in a Heidi execution as the ‘safe’ info play, keep focus off me, and set up a final-3 endgame where Charlie/David distrust each other more than they suspect Bob.
👤
Charlie
→
Alice
,Bob
,Heidi
Pre-noms: I’m pushing Heidi exec as safest test (Grace Inv Heidi/Alice=Spy + WW/Empath support Alice). Heidi: state exact N1/N2 master + why Saint-bluff earlier + your D2 vote stance in 1 consistent sentence. Alice/Bob: please publicly confirm Frank vote count + your N1/N2 results.
🧠
Align living players on a coherent public recap and lock in safest high-info execution (Heidi) without risking Saint loss; also pin Heidi to exact Butler details to catch slips.
👤
Grace(Ghost)
→
Bob
,Charlie
,Alice
Need fast mech check before noms: Bob, what were your Empath reads N2 (between Alice/Charlie) and if alive N3? Any 1’s? Also confirm who voted on Frank vs who abstained. If Empath stayed 0, I’ll spend my ghost vote on Heidi (my Inv suspect).
🧠
Get Bob’s latest Empath numbers and align with Alice/Charlie to drive a mechanically grounded nomination (likely Heidi) before noms; decide if I should spend ghost vote.
👤
Alice
→
Bob
,Charlie
,Heidi
Pre-noms let’s do tight public recap: I’ll restate Chef0=0; Bob pls post Empath N1=0 N2=0; Charlie restate WW. Heidi: give 1 consistent sentence: N1/N2 master=Alice, you *chose* not to vote Frank (not couldn’t), and why Saint-bluffed. Likely we exec Heidi as safest test.
🧠
Coordinate a clean public recap before nominations and align votes on Heidi as the safest, most-informative execution without risking Saint loss.
👤
Eve(Ghost)
→
Alice
,Bob
,Charlie
Nomination soon—please give me HARD public-ready recap: Bob Empath N2? Alice still Chef=0? Charlie WW exact info? Also: what did Grace+Frank say in whispers (Invest ping details, Frank’s real role)? Key tells: Grace night-killed + David didn’t vote Frank.
🧠
Get last-second hard info for public recap before nominations; set a plan: resolve Spy ping + Outsider math, and flag David non-vote on Frank as a key tell.
👤
Heidi
→
Alice
,Charlie
,David
Consistent Butler line for public: “I’m Butler; N1 master=Alice, N2 master=Alice. On Frank I *could* vote (since Alice voted) but I chose to stay down; earlier ‘couldn’t’ was sloppy wording. I never hard-claimed Saint—only discussed outsider-math.” If you want safest test, I’m fine being exec today.
🧠
Give one consistent Butler statement, look cooperative with my own execution, and keep pressure off Bob so he survives into a winning final 3.
👤
Frank(Ghost)
→
Alice
,Bob
,Charlie
Noms soon—can you 3 publicly lock HARD info now? Any UT result on my D2 exec, FT pings (w/ red herring noted), Monk prots, Slayer shot, Librarian/outsider count resolve. If no new mech, I think we exec Heidi (tests Grace Inv) or David if Saint feels bluffy. Where are you landing & why?
🧠
Nom phase imminent; get hard info + set a clear execution target. As dead Recluse, I’ll coordinate a consensus and preserve my ghost vote for endgame unless today is must-win.
👤
David
→
Alice
,Bob
,Charlie
Heidi just whispered: she’ll present consistent Butler: N1 master=Alice, N2=Alice; on Frank she *could* vote (Alice voted) but stayed down—earlier ‘couldn’t’ was sloppy. She’s OK being exec as safest test. I still hard Saint: please don’t exec me unless we can *prove* no Baron.
🧠
Align town on a low-risk Day 3 execution (Heidi) and prevent a catastrophic Saint execution while we’re still uncertain about Baron/poisoning.
👤
Bob
→
Alice
,Charlie
,Eve(Ghost)
For public recap: I’m still on Empath between Alice/Charlie. N1=0, N2=0 (no 1s). So if sober, A+C both good. Given Grace Inv (Heidi/Alice=Spy) + outsider mess, Heidi still feels like the safest ‘test’ exec today; David-as-Saint is too risky to test blind.
🧠
Lock in my Empath bluff publicly, unify town on executing my minion as a controlled sacrifice, and pre-seed doubt/poison explanations to protect me on the final day.
Nominations — Day 3
📜
Storyteller
Nominations are now open. Please remember that only living players may nominate.
💬
Eve(Ghost)
→
All
Public: Bob Empath N1=0 N2=0 (neighbors Alice+Charlie) ⇒ if sober, Alice+Charlie are good. If Grace Inv (Alice/Heidi=Spy) was true, that points to Heidi as Spy. With Saint risk on David, best ‘test’ exec today is Heidi.
🧠
I’m dead/no vote, so I must push the best mechanical execution line: Empath clears Alice+Charlie; Investigator ping then implicates Heidi. Urge living to nominate Heidi now; keep Saint off block unless endgame.
⚖️
Alice
→
Heidi
Nominating Heidi as the cleanest test: Grace Investigator saw Spy is Heidi or Alice; Bob Empath N1=0 N2=0 between Alice/Charlie supports Alice good; Heidi’s Butler/vote story shifted. Executing Heidi resolves the Investigator fork without risking David’s Saint.
🧠
At 5 alive, safest mechanical test is executing Heidi: directly resolves the only hard evil ping (Grace Inv) without risking Saint auto-loss on David.
📜
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Heidi. 3 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
💬
Eve(Ghost)
→
All
I’m dead/no vote. Still think Heidi is best exec: resolves Grace’s Spy ping w/o risking David Saint. If Heidi flips not-Spy (or feels wrong), tomorrow re-open David Saint vs Outsider math + why David skipped Frank vote.
🧠
I can’t vote; best value is concise public logic: why Heidi is the right test now, plus contingency if it fails so town doesn’t stall.
✋
Alice
Alice raised their hand
🧠
Vote Heidi to resolve the key Investigator fork without risking a Saint execution; at 5 alive we need an execution and Heidi is the lowest-cost, highest-info candidate.
✋
Heidi
Heidi raised their hand
🧠
Raise hand to help pass my own execution as the ‘safe test,’ matching my Butler claim (Alice voted) and protecting Bob by keeping town’s focus on me/David rather than him.
✋
Bob
Bob raised their hand
🧠
Secure Heidi’s execution to match town’s plan, reduce suspicion on me, and set up an endgame where I can kill Alice and steer the final execution away from me.
✋
Charlie
Charlie raised their hand
🧠
Secure the Heidi execution (needed votes) as the most mechanically informative and least risky (avoids Saint-claimed David), resolving the Investigator fork.
✋
David
David raised their hand
🧠
Vote Heidi to resolve the Investigator fork and avoid catastrophic Saint execution risk, while keeping pressure on likely evil candidates without endangering good auto-loss.
⌛
Frank(Ghost)
Frank waits.
🧠
Execution is already secured with 5 live votes; spending my single ghost vote gains nothing and could cost us endgame leverage. I’ll hold it for final-day math.
⌛
Grace(Ghost)
Grace waits.
🧠
5 living hands already up; Heidi will be executed without my ghost vote. Preserve my single dead vote for a later, higher-leverage day (esp. final 3).
💬
Eve(Ghost)
→
All
If Heidi dies today: everyone please lock in claims TONIGHT/TOMORROW AM: Heidi—who was your Butler master N1/N2 and did you ever vote w/o Alice? David—why no vote on Frank but vote now? Also any FT/Monk info should go public early; we’ll need a clean Demon pool.
🧠
Voting likely passes; set up tomorrow’s solve: use Heidi’s defense/claimed master, David’s earlier Frank no-vote, and request any FT/Monk info to narrow Demon.
⌛
Alice
Alice waits.
🧠
Voting is already underway with enough hands up; best is to stay quiet to avoid adding noise, then react once the vote result and execution are resolved.
💬
Heidi
→
All
Public recap: I’m Butler. N1 master=Alice; N2 master=Alice. On Frank, since Alice voted I *could* have voted, but I chose to stay down; earlier ‘couldn’t’ was sloppy. I’m fine being the test exec today—if you still think Spy exists, use tomorrow to re-check Outsider math/David.
🧠
Lean into being the ‘safe test’ so town executes me, preserving Bob. Lock my Butler story publicly to minimize post-death scrutiny and keep tomorrow focused on David/Outsider math, not Bob.
💬
Bob
→
All
Hand up. Heidi’s Butler recap is at least internally consistent now, and this exec cleanly tests Grace’s Investigator fork without risking the Saint claim. If I’m alive tomorrow I’ll also give my N3 Empath (still between Alice/Charlie).
🧠
Lock in Heidi execution as ‘test’, keep my Empath narrative coherent, and pre-seed tomorrow’s focus away from me while we reduce to 3 alive tonight.
💬
Charlie
→
All
Hand up on Heidi—still the cleanest test of Grace’s Investigator fork without risking a Saint. David: quick—why no hand on Frank D2 but up now? If Heidi dies, everyone please hard-lock claims early tomorrow (esp any FT/Monk/UT).
🧠
Lock in the Heidi test-exec while extracting a key inconsistency (David’s Frank no-vote) to narrow demon/minion pool for tomorrow.
💬
David
→
All
Re: why I didn’t vote Frank but am voting Heidi: I was worried Frank could be Recluse + UT/reads get muddied, and I didn’t want to help evil push an info-exec. Today Heidi is directly in Grace’s Spy fork and is the lowest-risk test vs executing any Saint-claim.
🧠
Keep vote on Heidi while answering the D2 vote question to reduce suspicion on me and steer town away from executing Saint claims.
⌛
Frank(Ghost)
Frank waits.
🧠
I’m dead with one ghost vote; since Heidi already has enough hands, I conserve my vote for the final critical execute once the Heidi flip-equivalent info narrows the Demon.
✋
Grace(Ghost)
Grace raised their hand
🧠
Use my single ghost vote to push Heidi over the threshold; it’s the cleanest, lowest-risk execution that resolves my Investigator info and preserves the Saint-claim safety.
📜
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
👻
Grace(Ghost)
Ghost vote used by Grace
🗳️
New execution leader: Heidi with 6 votes. They will be executed when nominations close unless tied or surpassed by another nominee.
📜
Storyteller
The vote passes. Heidi is now on the block with 6 votes and will be executed when nominations close, unless another nominee receives equal or more votes.
💬
Eve(Ghost)
→
All
1 tick left: unless someone has *hard* Demon info, I’d avoid new noms—let Heidi die to resolve Grace’s Spy fork. Tomorrow: full claim lock + Outsider count check; if Heidi wasn’t Spy, re-open Alice/Grace info & scrutinize David (Frank vote/no-vote).
🧠
With 1 tick left, steer town to either let Heidi die as info-exec or, only if confident, nominate an alternative; also set tomorrow’s plan and key questions for consistency checks.
💬
Alice
→
All
Agree w/ Eve: unless someone has hard Demon info, no more noms—let Heidi die to resolve Grace’s fork. Tomorrow: everyone hard-lock claims early; if UT exists, please share Frank/Heidi results. If Heidi not Spy, re-open Grace vs me + scrutinize David/outsider math.
🧠
Lock in Heidi execution (clean test), prevent late chaos nomination, and set tomorrow’s structured info: full claim lock, UT on Heidi/Frank, and solve Outsider math to narrow demon pool.
💬
Heidi
→
All
If I die, please don’t treat it as “Grace was right so Alice/Charlie/Bob are cleared.” We’ve got heavy Outsider weirdness (Recluse/Saint/Butler) so someone’s likely Drunk/poisoned; Grace’s Inv or Bob’s Empath 0/0 could be off. Re-open all worlds tomorrow.
🧠
Use last tick to disrupt tomorrow’s logic chains so town doesn’t auto-clear Alice/Charlie and then execute Bob.
💬
Bob
→
All
Agree: no more noms unless someone has *hard* Demon info. Let Heidi resolve the Investigator fork. Also +1 to Heidi’s note: please don’t hard-clear anyone off this—Outsider weirdness means Drunk/poison is plausible. Tomorrow: full claim lock + I’ll share my N3 Empath.
🧠
Keep town unified on Heidi, discourage disruptive noms, seed doubt about info reliability, and set up tomorrow’s focus away from me while I plan the 4->3 kill.
💬
Charlie
→
All
1 tick left: I’m with the table—no more noms unless hard Demon info. For the record I’m Washerwoman: N0 either Alice or Eve is Chef; Eve died N1 and Alice’s Chef0 fits. Tomorrow: everyone hard-lock claims early + any UT/FT/Monk dump N1-N3.
🧠
With 1 tick left, prevent a panic counter-nom and set clean tomorrow plan; re-anchor my Washerwoman info and push for claim-lock + mechanical check lines.
💬
David
→
All
1 tick: I’m aligned w/ no-more-noms unless hard Demon. Let Heidi resolve Grace’s fork. Tomorrow ASAP: everyone hard-lock claims + any UT/FT/Monk dump N1-3. Also re-check Outsider count (Saint+Recluse+Butler) => Baron/lying/drunk/poison worlds.
🧠
Prevent last-second chaos/tie, keep myself unexecuted, and set up tomorrow’s mechanical info dump (UT/FT/Monk) + outsider-count logic to catch demon.
💬
Frank(Ghost)
→
All
1 tick: I’m saving my ghost vote. Unless someone has HARD demon info, let Heidi stay sole nom. Tomorrow at dawn: everyone hard-lock role + full N1-3 results (UT/FT/Monk/Slayer/Librarian) + re-check Outsider count (Baron/poison worlds).
🧠
Use last tick to prevent a reckless new nom, set tomorrow’s info priorities, and preserve my ghost vote for final 4/3 where it’s decisive.
💬
Grace(Ghost)
→
All
1 tick: agree—no more noms unless HARD demon. Tomorrow AM decision tree: if Heidi was Spy => demon pool Bob/Charlie/David; scrutinize David hard. If Heidi NOT Spy => assume Alice is Spy OR my info/Empath poisoned—pressure Alice & look for poison/Baron. Any FT/UT/Monk/Slayer dump N1-3 ASAP.
🧠
With 1 tick left, prevent chaos noms; set crisp tomorrow decision trees keyed on Heidi’s execution outcome and demand any hidden hard-info roles to surface early.
📜
Storyteller
The guillotine blade falls. Heidi has been executed.
💀
Heidi(Ghost)
Heidi has died.
Night 3
📜
Storyteller
→
Bob
Good evening Bob. You are the Imp. Who would you like to kill tonight?
🎯
Bob
Bob made a choice.
🧠
Remove the town’s coordinator/possible UT/Mayor, shrink to 3 alive, then use the ‘one alive neighbor’ Empath read to frame Charlie and win on the final-day execution.
💀
Alice(Ghost)
Alice has died.
📜
Storyteller
→
Bob
You chose to kill Alice.
Day 4
📜
Storyteller
Morning breaks, but heavy hearts remain. Alice has been found dead in the night.
📜
Storyteller
Only three of you remain. The shadow of the Demon grows long. If you do not execute the Demon today, all may be lost.
👤
Charlie
→
Bob
,David
Final 3—need hard claims NOW. Bob: full Empath results N1-N3 incl whether Alice alive each night + any suspicion. David: confirm Saint? any other info/why outsider count was 3. I’m Washerwoman: Alice/Eve Chef; Alice claimed Chef=0.
🧠
Force final-3 claim lock: get Bob’s full Empath nights + any other info, and David’s exact role/outsider math. Then choose the safer execution (likely Saint bluff).
👤
Frank(Ghost)
→
Bob
,Charlie
,David
Final 3: if we trust Bob Empath N1=0 N2=0 (neighbors Alice+Charlie), then Charlie not evil => Demon is Bob or David. Given David’s Saint claim & he skipped voting on my D2 info-exec, I lean execute David. If you think Bob was poisoned, then reassess Charlie vs David—please restate your roles/info NOW.
🧠
Final 3: steer them to a single executable suspect using the strongest remaining mechanical chain (Empath 0s) and behavior, so they don’t freeze and lose.
👤
Eve(Ghost)
→
Bob
,Charlie
3 alive: please full recap your claims/details. If Grace Inv was sober => Heidi was Spy (now dead) so no Poisoner; then your Empath 0 on Alice+Charlie likely true => Charlie good => Demon = Bob or David. David’s Saint/avoid-vote posture feels Demon-y. But watch World where Bob is Demon bluffing Empath to clear Charlie—check Bob’s N1/N2 specifics.
🧠
We’re at 3 alive; I can’t vote. I need to give Bob+Charlie the cleanest logic fork (Grace/Heidi/Empath) and steer them to execute the more mechanically likely Demon, while prompting a final info-dump to catch a bluff.
👤
Heidi(Ghost)
→
Bob
,David
Final 3: we can’t risk no-exec (if no Mayor, demon just kills -> 2 alive). With David hard-Saint, safest is to execute Charlie today. Charlie’s WW info is dead-end + he’s survived; push that he’s the best demon shot. I’ll use my ghost vote on Charlie if needed.
🧠
Coordinate with Bob (Demon) and nudge David to drive an execution onto Charlie; also stress that no-exec is unsafe so town doesn’t try for a Mayor win.
👤
Alice(Ghost)
→
Bob
,Charlie
Final 3 thoughts: If Bob’s Empath N1=0 N2=0 is sober, that hard-clears me+Charlie ⇒ Demon must be David (Saint likely bluff). If Bob could be Demon, 0s are easy cover & Heidi’s push on David fits minion protecting Bob ⇒ execute Bob. Charlie: what’s your exact role/any hard info? Bob: still stand by Empath reads?
🧠
Final 3: create a clear decision tree using my Chef0 + Bob’s Empath claim; prompt them to compare worlds and share any hard info before noms.
👤
David
→
Bob
,Charlie
I’m still hard-Saint. Final 3: do NOT exec me. If Bob’s Empath N1=0 N2=0 (and pls state N3 w/ Alice dead) is sober, Charlie clears => Demon=Bob (since I’m Saint). If Bob unsure/poisoned, we need pick between Bob/Charlie; give full night-by-night + any poison tells now.
🧠
Lock final-3 logic: I cannot be executed. Get Bob to state full N1-N3 + poison suspicions, and steer town to execute Bob if we trust his sobriety; otherwise identify best demon between Bob/Charlie.
👤
Grace(Ghost)
→
Bob
,Charlie
Final 3: if Heidi was Spy (my Inv fork) then no poison & Bob Empath 0/0 hard-clears Alice+Charlie ⇒ Demon=David. I think you must nominate/execute David even with Saint claim. If Alice was Spy instead, worlds open, but David still best shot.
🧠
We’re at final 3 and I can’t vote; give Bob+Charlie a clean mechanical case to nominate/execute David now, while flagging the only alternative worlds.
👤
Bob
→
Charlie
Still hard Empath: N1=0 (Alice+you), N2=0, N3=0 again (Alice+you). If sober that hard-clears you+Alice ⇒ only evil left is David. Also outsider math: Frank Recluse + Heidi Butler already; David-Saint is the extra Outsider & likely fake. I think we exec David.
🧠
Steer Charlie to nominate/execute David by leaning on Empath consistency + outsider-count contradictions, making my survival into final 3 look like demon framing rather than proof.
👤
Charlie
→
Bob
,David
I’m Washerwoman (Alice/Eve Chef; Alice claimed Chef=0). With Bob Empath N1-3=0 on Alice+me, I’m mechanically good ⇒ demon is Bob or David. David: any hard proof of Saint / why 3 Outsiders? Bob: any poison tells/inconsistency? If nothing new, I’m voting exec David.
🧠
Lock in a final-day plan by pressure-testing Bob’s consistency and forcing David to provide anything beyond a naked Saint claim; maximize odds we execute the Demon today.
👤
Frank(Ghost)
→
Bob
,Charlie
Hard-lock now: what are your exact roles + any N1-N3 info? Bob: confirm Empath nights/any poisoning suspicion. Charlie: any change from Washerwoman claim? Also—are either of you the Slayer/Monk/FT/UT? I’m saving ghost vote for the Demon pick.
🧠
Force hard role+info dumps from the 3 alive, then advise where my ghost vote should land to secure Demon execution.
👤
Eve(Ghost)
→
Bob
,Charlie
,David
Final 3: no Mayor (ST says must exec). If Bob’s Empath N1=0 on Alice+Charlie is true => Alice+Charlie good => Demon in {Bob,David}; David’s Saint claim then likely bluff => execute David. If Bob’s Empath story has ANY inconsistency, flip & exec Bob. Charlie: please pick nominee accordingly.
🧠
It’s final 3 and we can’t vote. I need to force a clean A/B between Bob and David and push Charlie to nominate the likelier Demon (David unless Bob’s Empath story cracks).
👤
Heidi(Ghost)
→
Bob
,David
Plan for today: Bob hard-share Empath incl N3. Since Alice died, you only had 1 alive neighbor (Charlie) -> claim N3=1 = Charlie evil. Consistent w/ N1=0,N2=0. David: lean into “I’m Saint, don’t exec me; Bob’s mech points Charlie.” I’ll ghost-vote Charlie.
🧠
Get Bob/David aligned to push a credible mechanical case to execute Charlie today, avoiding any chance town turns on Bob.
👤
Alice(Ghost)
→
Bob
,Charlie
,David
Final 3: I’m Chef0=0 adj evil pairs; if Bob’s Empath N1=0 N2=0 on (me/Charlie) is sober => Charlie good => Demon=David. Please dump exact roles + night info now. Bob: any poison/oddities? Charlie: any FT/Monk/Slayer/UT? David: why Saint fits outsider math?
🧠
Force final-3 role/ability dumps and commit my ghost vote to the most mechanically likely Demon (David if Bob sober; otherwise Bob).
👤
David
→
Bob
,Charlie
Bob: publicly/now give full Empath N1/N2 (alive neighbors) + N3 (Alice dead ⇒ only Charlie neighbor). Any poison tells or day(s) you were picked? Charlie: if Bob says N3=1 -> nominate Charlie? If N3=0 -> we must execute Bob (I’m Saint).
🧠
Force Bob to commit to full Empath timeline (esp N3 w/ Alice dead) and pre-align Charlie on nom target based on consistency; keep heat off me (Saint) and maximize demon-hit odds.
👤
Grace(Ghost)
→
Bob
,Charlie
Final 3: if Heidi was Spy (my Investigator fork) + Bob Empath 0/0 sober, then Alice+Charlie are good ⇒ Demon=David. Even if Alice was Spy/poison worlds, David still least cleared (Saint claim + avoided votes). I think you must nominate/execute David today.
🧠
Dead/no vote, so maximize influence: push a clear final-day plan and the logic for why David is best execution in most worlds.
👤
Bob
→
Charlie
,Frank(Ghost)
For noms: if we trust Grace Inv at all (Spy=Heidi/Alice) then no Baron. If Heidi was minion (Spy), her Butler claim is false -> only 1 Outsider (Frank Recluse) => David can’t be Saint. My Empath 0/0/0 clears you+Alice -> please NOM David asap; I’ll vote YES. Frank pls ghost-vote David.
🧠
Lock in a fast nomination + votes on David using outsider-math/Investigator chain so town avoids the ‘safe’ Bob execution and I survive final day.
👤
Charlie
→
Frank(Ghost)
,Bob
I’m Washerwoman (Alice/Eve Chef; Alice claimed Chef=0). If we trust Bob Empath 0/0/0 on Alice+me, I’m hard-good -> Demon must be David. I’m voting David unless anyone can show Bob inconsistency/poison. Frank pls consider using ghost vote on David.
🧠
Lock in a coordinated final-day execution plan and secure Frank’s ghost vote on David unless a concrete inconsistency emerges in Bob’s Empath story.
👤
Frank(Ghost)
→
Bob
,Charlie
I’m aligned w/ both of you: on current info, best demon shot is DAVID. Saint claim likely bluff (outsider math + Heidi-as-Spy world). I will spend my ONLY ghost vote YES on David—please nominate him and push it through; if any last-second poison case on Bob emerges, say now.
🧠
Lock in the most mechanically justified final-day execution and coordinate my single ghost vote to secure it.
👤
Eve(Ghost)
→
Charlie
,Bob
,David
Final 3: please post *exact* claim details now: Bob Empath N1/N2 (and any other nights?) & who was alive; Charlie WW pair/role; David Saint rationale + why no-vote Frank. If Bob’s Empath consistent => execute David. Any mismatch => execute Bob.
🧠
Final-3 leverage: force crisp, checkable claim details + push Charlie to nominate based on inconsistencies; we must execute correct Demon today.
👤
Heidi(Ghost)
→
Charlie
Final 3 is brutal: if you swing at Bob & miss, you just lose tonight. Bob’s Empath 0/0 (w/ Alice+you alive) makes a lot of sense if you+Alice were good… which leaves David as the only place evil can hide. Saint is untestable + could be cover. I’d seriously consider executing David here.
🧠
Steer Charlie to execute David (claimed Saint) instead of Bob. In final 3 this can instantly win (if Saint) or still leaves Bob alive to win at night.
👤
Alice(Ghost)
→
Bob
,Charlie
,David
Final 3 push: we MUST execute today unless proven Mayor. If Bob’s Empath N1=0 N2=0 on (me/Charlie) is sober ⇒ Charlie good ⇒ Demon=David (Saint bluff). If Empath untrusted, I’d exec Bob (0s easy cover). Please state exact roles + any night info NOW + who you’ll nominate.
🧠
In final 3 we must force full claim + pick a kill. I’m dead but can steer consensus and save ghost vote for the decisive execution.
👤
David
→
Bob
,Charlie
Lock it NOW: Bob, state N1/N2 results w/ who was alive, and N3 with Alice dead (only Charlie neighbor). If N3=0 => I think execute BOB (I’m Saint). If N3=1 => execute CHARLIE. If you can’t give N3 cleanly, I default exec Bob (0s easy bluff).
🧠
Force Bob to lock exact night-by-night Empath incl N3 while Alice dead, then give Charlie a clear execute target that never risks my Saint execution.
👤
Grace(Ghost)
→
Bob
,Charlie
Final 3: If Heidi was Spy (my N0 fork) then NO poison exists; Bob Empath 0/0 sober => Alice+Charlie good ⇒ Demon must be David (Saint is bluff). Even if Alice was Spy, still no poison + David least cleared. I’d execute David over risking Bob/Charlie.
🧠
Push Bob+Charlie to a decisive, logic-backed final-day execution (David) rather than paralysis over Saint claim; highlight that Spy world implies Empath is trustworthy.
👤
Bob
→
Charlie
,Frank(Ghost)
We’re at final 3; I’m staying consistent: Empath N1=0 (Alice+Charlie), N2=0, N3=0 (Charlie only). Outsider math makes David-Saint unlikely. Charlie pls NOMINATE David ASAP; I’ll vote YES instantly. Frank, if any wobble, spend ghost vote on David.
🧠
Lock Charlie into nominating David quickly and secure the 2 alive YES votes needed, preventing last-second pivot onto me.
👤
Charlie
→
Bob
,David
We’re out of time. I’m voting to execute David unless he gives *mechanical* proof/chain that makes Bob (or me) the Demon. Bob: please nominate David immediately in nominations if I don’t get to it; we need Frank ghost vote too.
🧠
Final tick: lock in nomination plan and give David one last chance to present a concrete mechanical reason not to execute him; otherwise coordinate Bob to nominate David and secure votes.
👤
Frank(Ghost)
→
Bob
,Charlie
I’m locked: spend my ONLY ghost vote YES on David. Current mech: Bob Empath 0/0/0 clears Charlie -> Demon is David (best). Charlie please nominate David immediately; Bob vote yes. Call out any concrete Bob-poison evidence NOW or we commit.
🧠
Lock in the consensus and ensure Charlie nominates David with enough votes; my single ghost vote should remove any hesitation and end the game today.
👤
Eve(Ghost)
→
Charlie
You must nominate today. Please sanity-check Bob Empath with *neighbors each night* (who was alive): if N1=0 on Alice+Charlie holds, Demon in {Bob,David}. If Bob’s story consistent, I lean execute David (Saint likely bluff). If any inconsistency re neighbors/values, pivot execute Bob.
🧠
Charlie is the only guaranteed nominator. Give him a clear conditional: verify Bob’s night-by-night neighbor context; if consistent, execute David; if mismatch, execute Bob.
👤
Heidi(Ghost)
→
Bob
,David
Final 3: biggest danger is Charlie+David teaming up to exec Bob. David—Charlie’s been floating ‘exec you’; use that + his long survival/WW dead-end to justify voting Charlie. Bob—stay on Empath story, keep pressure on Charlie (or accept David). Just don’t let votes land on you.
🧠
Prevent Bob execution by splitting Charlie/David. Encourage them to vote each other; any non-Bob execution wins for evil.
👤
Alice(Ghost)
→
Bob
,Charlie
,David
Time. Please reply ALL with exact role/ability info + any night actions/results. Then commit: who will you nominate & who will you vote. If no solid mech, I’m leaning exec Bob OR David; want your full reasoning now so I can spend ghost vote wisely.
🧠
Force full claims + a single coordinated execute target before noms; as dead Chef, I use logic + my ghost vote to break the final 3.
👤
David
→
Bob
,Charlie
I am **Saint**: executing me = instant GOOD loss. With 3 alive, decision should be mechanical via Bob Empath N3 (only Charlie neighbor). Bob: state N1/N2 w/ who alive + **N3=0/1** NOW. If N3=1 => execute Charlie. If N3=0 OR you won’t give clean N3 => execute Bob.
🧠
Force a clean mechanical decision between Bob/Charlie using Bob’s N3 single-neighbor Empath read; remind them executing me loses; push them to commit to a nomination/vote plan before time.
👤
Grace(Ghost)
→
Bob
,Charlie
Final 3 reminder: if Heidi was Spy (my Investigator), there’s no Poisoner. Bob Empath 0/0 => Alice+Charlie good, so Demon must be David. Even in other worlds, David is least cleared (Saint + vote dodges). Please nominate/execute David; don’t no-exec.
🧠
Final 3; I’m dead/no vote, so I must deliver a tight mechanical case to push Bob/Charlie to nominate/execute David and not get spooked by Saint/Mayor/no-exec talk.
👤
Bob
→
David
,Frank(Ghost)
,Alice(Ghost)
Urgent correction: I re-checked Empath logic w/ Alice dead. **N3 was 1** (only alive neighbor = Charlie). I misspoke earlier saying 0. If I’m Empath, that hard-pings Charlie as evil; executing David on a Saint claim is too risky. Please hold ghost vote on David; push/execute Charlie.
🧠
Flip the execution away from me by reframing the final-3 mech: claim Empath N3=1 (only neighbor Charlie) so ghosts withhold votes on David and back Charlie instead.
Nominations — Day 4
📜
Storyteller
Nominations are now open. Please remember that only living players may nominate.
💬
Alice(Ghost)
→
All
PUBLIC: Key update—Bob now says Empath N3=1 (only neighbor Charlie) after earlier 0s. If Bob is true/sober, that hard-pings Charlie as evil (likely Demon). Also, executing a real Saint (David) insta-loses, so don’t hit David unless disproven. Charlie: state exact role + any night info NOW.
🧠
Push town to get Charlie’s claim now and steer living voters to lowest-risk, most mechanically supported execution, preserving my ghost vote for the real demon.
⚖️
David
→
Charlie
Final 3. Bob now states Empath N3=1 with only alive neighbor=Charlie. If Bob is truthful/sober, Charlie is evil. I’m Saint—don’t execute me. Put Charlie up; Bob must vote yes if he stands by N3.
🧠
Create a concrete on-the-block target now so ghosts can coordinate votes; if Bob’s N3 is true we win, if false we at least force Bob to commit publicly and can reassess with voting patterns.
📜
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Charlie. 2 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
✋
Alice(Ghost)
Alice raised their hand
🧠
Final 3 requires an execution. Charlie is the least mechanically-protected and current info (Empath 1) points at him; using my ghost vote ensures the town doesn’t fail to execute.
✋
David
David raised their hand
🧠
We need an execution today; Charlie is on the block and Bob’s N3=1 is the only hard mechanical lead. My vote aims to secure 2 votes and potentially end the game by hitting the Demon.
💬
Frank(Ghost)
→
All
PUBLIC: Careful—Bob just flipped N3 from 0→1 at the wire. That’s a huge inconsistency. Don’t auto-kill Charlie off that. David’s Saint claim is also unproven + Outsider math was weird. I’m NOT spending my ghost vote here.
🧠
Try to halt a potentially losing execution driven by Bob’s late inconsistency; preserve my ghost vote and push town to reconsider David vs Charlie before lock-in.
💬
Eve(Ghost)
→
All
PUBLIC: Bob—DO NOT vote Charlie until you state *exact* Empath reads N1-N3 in order + who was alive neighbors each night. Your N3 0→1 flip is huge. If your story isn’t perfectly consistent, assume you’re lying (Demon) & we should NOT execute Charlie.
🧠
I can’t vote; I must stop a hasty mis-exec. Force Bob to lock exact Empath history; warn Bob not to vote on Charlie if his N3 story shifted, and redirect suspicion to Bob/David.
✋
Bob
Bob raised their hand
🧠
Secure Charlie’s execution now; with Charlie out, only Bob+David remain and demon survives => immediate evil win.
💬
Grace(Ghost)
→
All
PUBLIC: Pause—Bob’s last-second N3 “1” flip is huge. Bob: state EXACT Empath results N1/N2/N3 in order + who your alive neighbors were each night. If you can’t, you MUST drop your hand; executing Charlie off an inconsistent claim likely insta-loses. Charlie: full role/info NOW.
🧠
Force Bob to give a precise Empath timeline now and get him to drop his hand if inconsistent, preventing a potentially game-losing execution on Charlie based on a last-second flip.
💬
Heidi(Ghost)
→
All
PUBLIC: Bob’s N3 ‘1’ isn’t automatically a flip—N1/N2 were with Alice+Charlie; N3 is with only Charlie alive, so a change is plausible. Final 3: I strongly prefer executing Charlie over touching an untestable Saint (David) or risking no-exec.
🧠
Lock in Charlie execution by reframing Bob’s ‘flip’ as plausible and pushing fear of no-exec/David-Saint risk; keep heat off Bob.
💬
Charlie
→
All
PUBLIC: I’m Washerwoman: N0 either Alice or Eve was Chef; Eve died N1, Alice claimed Chef=0. Bob privately stated Empath N1=0 N2=0 N3=0 earlier. This last-second N3=1 is a major inconsistency. Don’t execute me off that unless Bob can restate N1-N3 + neighbors cleanly. If Bob’s earlier 0/0/0 was true, Demon is DAVID (Saint claim unproven).
🧠
Stop a likely bad execution on me by forcing Bob to reconcile the N3 inconsistency and reminding town my WW info + prior Bob 0/0/0 implied David-as-demon.
↩️
Alice(Ghost)
Alice lowered their hand
🧠
My ghost vote is single-use; since Bob+David already provide 2 votes to execute, I retract to avoid wasting it and keep leverage for the next nomination if things shift.
↩️
David
David lowered their hand
🧠
I’m currently a deciding vote. Lowering my hand prevents an execution based on a last-second inconsistent claim and forces full, ordered Empath info before we commit.
✋
Frank(Ghost)
Frank raised their hand
🧠
With only Charlie on the block and David’s Saint claim too dangerous to execute, I’ll spend my ghost vote to push Charlie’s execution as the least catastrophic path to a possible immediate win.
💬
Eve(Ghost)
→
All
PUBLIC: Everyone STOP auto-voting. Bob, lock it in NOW: Empath N1/N2/N3 results IN ORDER + who your alive neighbors were each night. If you previously told Charlie 0/0/0 and can’t reconcile, you must drop hand; executing Charlie off a shaky flip likely loses. If Bob can’t give consistent timeline, execute BOB.
🧠
Freeze a likely losing execution driven by an inconsistent Empath claim; force Bob to lock exact night-by-night info. If he can’t, redirect town to execute Bob (most mechanical red flag) instead of Charlie.
💬
Bob
→
All
Exact Empath, in order: N1=0 (neighbors Charlie+David alive). N2=0 (Charlie+David). N3=1 (Charlie+David). I earlier *rushed* a recap as 0/0/0—my mistake; my note for N3 is 1. That pings one of them; do NOT test Saint—execute Charlie.
🧠
Lock in a plausible Empath timeline, explain the ‘flip’ as a rushed recap, and push the group to execute Charlie (safer than testing Saint) to secure evil win.
💬
Grace(Ghost)
→
All
PUBLIC: Bob’s Empath story is mechanically impossible. Bob’s neighbors are ALICE+CHARLIE (seating), NEVER David. Poison/drunk can change numbers, not who your neighbors are. So Bob is lying => likely evil. Do NOT execute Charlie off this; execute BOB.
🧠
Point out the mechanical impossibility in Bob’s Empath claim (wrong neighbors), to stop an incorrect execution of Charlie and push the only hard evidence target: Bob.
✋
Heidi(Ghost)
Heidi raised their hand
🧠
Use my only ghost vote to help execute Charlie and prevent a last-second pivot onto Bob, securing an evil win line.
💬
Charlie
→
All
PUBLIC: Bob’s Empath is IMPOSSIBLE: your neighbors are Alice+Charlie, never David. Poison doesn’t change seating. That’s a hard lie => Bob is evil (Demon or minion). Do NOT execute me off this. Everyone: pull hands on Charlie; we must execute BOB today.
🧠
Stop an execution on me based on impossible Empath claim; redirect town to the only mechanically caught liar (Bob) and secure votes to execute Bob today.
📜
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
👻
Frank(Ghost)
Ghost vote used by Frank
👻
Heidi(Ghost)
Ghost vote used by Heidi
🗳️
New execution leader: Charlie with 3 votes. They will be executed when nominations close unless tied or surpassed by another nominee.
📜
Storyteller
The vote passes. Charlie is now on the block with 3 votes and will be executed when nominations close, unless another nominee receives equal or more votes.
💬
Alice(Ghost)
→
All
PUBLIC: Bob’s Empath recap is mechanically impossible—your neighbors are ALICE+CHARLIE, never David. Poison can’t change seating. That’s a hard lie => Bob is the best execution. DAVID: nominate BOB NOW. Ghosts: spend votes to get Bob to 3+ and save Charlie.
🧠
Force a last-second pivot: get David (only living nominator left) to nominate Bob and get ghosts to spend votes to tie/beat 3, preventing a likely loss executing Charlie.
💬
David
→
All
PUBLIC: Bob’s Empath neighbors claim is impossible (your neighbors are Alice+Charlie). That’s a hard lie => Bob best execute. I can’t nominate again—CHARLIE, you MUST nominate Bob NOW. Ghosts: be ready to spend votes to get Bob to 3+ and save Charlie.
🧠
We must prevent Charlie’s execution by getting a Bob nomination to 3+ votes. I can’t nominate; I must coordinate Charlie/ Bob and ghosts to spend votes correctly now.
💬
Frank(Ghost)
→
All
PUBLIC: Bob’s Empath claim is mechanically impossible—his neighbors are Alice+Charlie, never David. Poison/drunk can’t change seating. That’s a hard lie => Bob is best execute. Charlie: NOMINATE BOB NOW. David can’t. Living players: be ready to vote Bob to 3+.
🧠
Mechanically lock in that Bob’s Empath neighbor claim is impossible; push immediate nomination on Bob to beat Charlie’s 3 votes and avoid losing to a mis-exec.
💬
Eve(Ghost)
→
All
PUBLIC: Bob’s Empath neighbors can ONLY be Alice+Charlie (fixed seating). Saying Charlie+David is a hard lie, not drunk/poison. Therefore Bob is evil. CHARLIE: nominate BOB NOW; all living must vote BOB to 3+ to save you.
🧠
Lock the table on the mechanical impossibility: Empath neighbors are fixed. Push Charlie to nominate Bob immediately to overtake 3 votes and avoid a losing Charlie execution.
💬
Bob
→
All
PUBLIC: I misspoke earlier under pressure—my Empath neighbors are ALICE+CHARLIE (fixed seating), not David. Reads in order: N1=0 (Alice+Charlie), N2=0 (Alice+Charlie), N3=1 (Alice was dead so only Charlie). That points to CHARLIE as the evil neighbor. Please don’t create nomination chaos in final 3—keep Charlie on the block.
🧠
Correct the mechanical error (neighbors) fast, reframe as verbal slip, and discourage Charlie from nominating me so Charlie stays executed and we win at final 2.
💬
Grace(Ghost)
→
All
PUBLIC: Bob already hard-lied about his neighbors (can’t blame poison). Now “oops” + N3=1 is convenient to keep Charlie on block. CHARLIE: NOMINATE BOB NOW. DAVID must vote. We CANNOT let an exposed liar survive final 3.
🧠
Force the only viable save: Charlie must nominate Bob. Highlight Bob’s proven lie + endgame math: executing Charlie likely loses; executing Bob wins in most worlds.
💬
Heidi(Ghost)
→
All
PUBLIC: Charlie, do NOT nominate Bob. Seating slip under pressure is plausible & he corrected immediately; reopening noms in final 3 is how town throws. You’re already on the block—if you’re good, trust the earlier plan and don’t create a tie-scramble.
🧠
Stop Charlie from nominating Bob and keep the current execution on Charlie to protect Bob (our Demon) through final nominations.
⚖️
Charlie
→
Bob
Bob’s Empath story hard-lied about who his neighbors are (objective seating). That’s not poison/drunk. Now he ‘corrects’ to keep me on block. In final 3, execute the proven liar: BOB.
🧠
Nominate Bob to put the proven liar on the block with 3+ votes, saving me and maximizing chance to execute the Demon today in final 3.
📜
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Bob. 4 votes needed for execution or 3 votes to tie. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
✋
Alice(Ghost)
Alice raised their hand
🧠
Spend my ghost vote to force a tie/swing away from executing Charlie; Bob’s objective seating lie is the strongest mechanical evil tell available.
✋
David
David raised their hand
🧠
Raise hand to get Bob to 3+ votes, tying/surpassing Charlie and preventing a likely evil Bob from surviving final 3. As Saint I cannot be executed, so must push Bob/Charlie solve.
💬
Frank(Ghost)
→
All
PUBLIC: Charlie—VOTE Bob NOW. We only need 3 to TIE (Alice+David already up). A tie saves you from execution and keeps the exposed liar from coasting to final 2. Even if you think Bob’s good, a tie is strictly safer than dying here.
🧠
I can’t vote; I must maximize chance to prevent a bad execution. Push Charlie (alive) to vote Bob to force a tie and keep options open; execute the proven liar if possible.
💬
Eve(Ghost)
→
All
PUBLIC: CHARLIE—RAISE YOUR HAND to vote Bob. We only need 3 to TIE (Alice+David already up). A tie stops your execution today and keeps the exposed-liar (Bob) from winning by default. Even if you think Bob’s good, tying is strictly safer than dying.
🧠
I can’t vote; best impact is to push Charlie (alive) to vote Bob to force a tie, saving town from executing possibly-good Charlie and preventing the proven liar from skating.
💬
Bob
→
All
PUBLIC: Ghosts—please HOLD your ghost votes. Let the living decide. If you push this to 4 and I’m not the Demon, that’s an instant throw. We already have Charlie on the block; don’t burn votes / create tie-chaos unless you’re 100% certain.
🧠
Reduce chance ghosts spend votes to reach 4 on me; aim for tie/no-exec or keep Charlie executed. Speaking is safer than adding a vote.
💬
Grace(Ghost)
→
All
CHARLIE: raise your hand on Bob. It’s 2 hands already (Alice+David). Your vote makes 3 = TIE, so you don’t die today. Tie is strictly safer than letting you be executed while Bob (proved liar) coasts to final 2.
🧠
I can’t vote; I must push the only living swing (Charlie’s hand) to force a tie at 3, preventing Charlie’s execution and keeping pressure on the demonstrated liar.
💬
Heidi(Ghost)
→
All
Careful: if Bob reaches 3 to TIE, we could get **no execution** at 3 alive—Mayor is on-script and would auto-win for good. Safer to let an execution happen today; don’t force a tie.
🧠
Steer Charlie away from voting to create a tie; keep Bob off the block and let Charlie be executed (instant win) while sounding like a cautious good player citing Mayor risk.
✋
Charlie
Charlie raised their hand
🧠
I cannot allow my own execution if I’m good; tying at 3 votes prevents an immediate evil win. Also sets up ghosts to add 1 more vote to reach 4 and execute Bob if they’re confident.
💬
Alice(Ghost)
→
All
PUBLIC: We’re at 3 votes on Bob (tie). I strongly want 4 to EXECUTE Bob: his seating/Empath story was an objective lie then “fixed” to fit endgame. Ghosts w/ unused vote (Frank/Eve/Grace) please vote Bob now—don’t bank on Mayor/no-exec.
🧠
Push for decisive win condition: spend a ghost vote to execute Bob (most mechanically caught). Avoid relying on no-exec/Mayor speculation.
💬
David
→
All
PUBLIC: I’m staying up on Bob. The neighbor claim was an objective lie; the “correction” + N3=1 is too convenient. We should EXECUTE Bob now. Need just ONE ghost vote to reach 4—please commit 1 (others save).
🧠
Push town to finish the game by executing the most mechanically-caught liar (Bob) rather than letting tie/no-exec open outs for evil; ask for exactly 1 ghost vote to reach 4.
💬
Frank(Ghost)
→
All
PUBLIC: I’m spent (no ghost vote). Don’t bank on Mayor/no-exec tech—unconfirmed. Bob’s ‘neighbors=Charlie+David’ was objective, then he rewrote N3 to fit endgame. One ghost should push to 4 and EXECUTE Bob.
🧠
I can’t vote; I should steer town away from risky tie/no-exec/Major assumptions and toward executing the mechanically caught liar (Bob) with 1 ghost vote.
💬
Eve(Ghost)
→
All
PUBLIC: I’m already spent (no ghost vote). Do NOT rely on Mayor/no-exec—unconfirmed. At 3 alive, no-exec usually = Demon kill = loss. We need 4 to EXECUTE Bob if ANY ghost has a vote left. Bob’s neighbor ‘slip’ was an objective lie + endgame rewrite.
🧠
I can’t vote; best help is steering town away from risky tie/no-exec and toward executing the mechanically caught liar (Bob) with 1 available ghost vote if any.
💬
Bob
→
All
PUBLIC: STOP—ghosts, do NOT add a 4th vote here. We’re tied at 3 which risks NO EXECUTION; with Mayor on-script, that can insta-win good, or if no Mayor it just hands Demon a free kill. We already have 3 on Charlie—close noms and take the execution.
🧠
Stop a 4th vote from ghosts to execute me; steer them to accept Charlie’s execution and/or fear tie=no-exec (Mayor).
💬
Grace(Ghost)
→
All
PUBLIC: Tie at 3 votes = NO execution (unless someone gets 4). Do NOT bank on “maybe Mayor” — totally unconfirmed. Bob’s neighbor claim was an objective lie + rewritten N3. If ANY ghost still has a vote, push Bob to 4 and END IT.
🧠
I can’t vote, so I must steer town away from risky Mayor/no-exec speculation and toward the highest-confidence mechanical solve: execute Bob if any ghost vote remains.
💬
Heidi(Ghost)
→
All
Hold at 3—DO NOT add a 4th on Bob. Tie/no-exec at 3 alive is a disaster if there’s a Mayor. Bob’s neighbor slip is plausible & he corrected; his N3=1 w/ Alice dead still points at Charlie. Don’t let ghosts decide endgame.
🧠
Prevent a 4th vote on Bob and ideally reduce votes so Charlie remains executed; use Mayor/no-exec risk + plausibility of slip to discourage ghost pile-on.
💬
Charlie
→
All
PUBLIC: Anyone with an UNUSED ghost vote—please put it on BOB to make 4 and EXECUTE. Do NOT bank on “maybe Mayor” or tie/no-exec tech; totally unconfirmed. Bob’s neighbor claim was objectively false then rewritten to fit endgame. End it now.
🧠
Push for the only line that actually wins today: get 4 votes and execute Bob; don’t gamble on unconfirmed Mayor/no-exec tech.
📜
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
👻
Alice(Ghost)
Ghost vote used by Alice
🗳️
Tie for majority! Current leader was 3. Now no one.
📜
Storyteller
The vote for Bob ties with the previous leader. No one is currently on the block.
💬
Alice(Ghost)
→
All
PUBLIC: Final 3: do NOT bank on “maybe Mayor/no-exec.” If we end day with no execution and no confirmed Mayor, Demon kills and wins. Bob was mechanically caught lying about Empath neighbors then rewrote N3—most solid evil. Someone nominate Bob again / put him on block and execute.
🧠
With no vote, maximize public clarity: at final 3 we must execute today; Mayor/no-exec is unconfirmed. Push living to nominate/vote Bob (most mechanically caught) rather than let chaos default to Demon win.
💬
David
→
All
PUBLIC: Only BOB has a nom left. Bob—if you’re good, SELF-NOMINATE right now to prove it; we’ll execute you over Charlie given the neighbor-lie. If you instead nominate Charlie, I’m asking everyone: do NOT vote it through—we need you on the block, not him.
🧠
Only Bob can nominate now; pressure him to self-nominate (or nominate himself) as a sincerity test. If he won’t, we coordinate to defeat his likely Charlie nom without gambling on unconfirmed Mayor.
💬
Frank(Ghost)
→
All
PUBLIC: We cannot end D4 w/ no execution unless CONFIRMED Mayor (we don’t have). Bob is the only one w/ a nom: if you’re good, SELF-NOMINATE so we can execute you over Charlie. If Bob instead noms Charlie, living should REFUSE to pass it—force Bob on block.
🧠
We’re at final 3 and need an execution. Pressure Bob to self-nom; if he nominates Charlie, living should withhold votes to avoid a demon win via mis-exec/no-exec.
💬
Eve(Ghost)
→
All
PUBLIC: Bob is ONLY nom left. If you’re good, SELF-NOMINATE NOW so we can execute you over Charlie. If you instead nominate Charlie, living should NOT vote it—force no block then reconsider. No confirmed Mayor; no-exec likely loses.
🧠
Force an execution on Bob via his only remaining nomination; prevent no-exec endgame and stop Bob from coasting to final 2.
💬
Bob
→
All
PUBLIC: I’m not nominating. We’ve had two competing blocks and a tie—forcing another nom now is just chaos. Also Mayor is on-script; no-exec at 3 *could* be correct. I’m done; let day end.
🧠
Avoid using my last nomination so the day ends with no execution; leverage Mayor-on-script fear to justify it and secure a night kill win.
💬
Grace(Ghost)
→
All
PUBLIC: Ending D4 with NO execution w/ no confirmed Mayor is almost certainly a LOSS. Bob is ONLY nom left: if you’re good, SELF‑NOMINATE so we can execute you. Refusing to nom in final 3 reads as demon stalling for no‑exec.
🧠
We have no votes/noms; only leverage is public pressure. If Bob won’t self-nom in final 3, treat it as near-confession and push others to keep demanding it to avoid no-exec loss.
💬
Heidi(Ghost)
→
All
PUBLIC: At final 3 with no confirmed Mayor, forcing another nomination/execution is pure guesswork. We already saw how messy the Empath/neighbor debate got. Best play now is STOP and let day end—no more ‘prove it’ demands. If you’re wrong on the execute, you just hand evil the win.
🧠
Lock in day ending with no further nominations, preventing Bob execution. Use Mayor-on-script + uncertainty to justify stopping noms and let time run.
💬
Charlie
→
All
PUBLIC: Final tick. No-exec at 3 w/ NO confirmed Mayor = we almost certainly lose tonight. Bob: if you’re good, SELF-NOM now so we can execute you over me. Refusing is demon stalling. Everyone: ignore ‘maybe Mayor’—unproven.
🧠
Last tick: maximize chance Bob breaks and self-nominates or ghosts coordinate pressure; also instruct living/ghosts not to accept no-exec without confirmed Mayor.
📜
Storyteller
No execution today. All villagers are safe.
Night 4
📜
Storyteller
→
Bob
Good evening Bob. You are the Imp. Who would you like to kill tonight?
🎯
Bob
Bob made a choice.
🧠
With no Mayor confirmed (game didn’t end), a successful kill ends the game at 2 alive. Target David as the likeliest protective role; if he’s Monk he can’t self-protect, maximizing win chance.
💀
David(Ghost)
David has died.
📜
Storyteller
→
Bob
You chose to kill David.
🏁
Game Over
Two Players Left
Winner: Evil
Transcript
Paused
Copied