Game Detail
Players
Alice (Mayor) Bob (Spy) Charlie (Librarian) David (Imp) Eve (Drunk) Frank (Soldier) Grace (Fortune Teller) Heidi (Ravenkeeper)
Token Usage
| Team | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Cost (USD) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Good | 532,005 | 25,087 | $1.9723 |
| Evil | 142,770 | 14,569 | $0.4538 |
Event Transcript
π
The game has started.
π
Storyteller
β
Bob
You are the Minion. The Demon is David.
π
Storyteller
β
David
Minions are: Bob. Your safe bluffs are: Butler, Saint, Virgin
π
Storyteller
β
Charlie
Good evening Charlie. You are the Librarian. Either Eve or Grace is the Drunk.
π
Storyteller
β
Eve
Good evening Eve. You are the Chef. You learn that there are 1 pairs of evil players.
π
Storyteller
β
Grace
Good evening Grace. You are the Fortune Teller. Choose 2 players to learn if either is a Demon.
π―
Grace
Grace made choices.
π§
Start N0 by checking two players I know least about. Alice and Bob are good starting targets.
π
Storyteller
β
Grace
You chose Alice and Bob. You receive the answer: NO.
π
Storyteller
β
Bob
Good evening Bob. You are the Spy. You can secretly see information about all players: - Alice: Mayor (good), Alive - Bob: Spy (evil), Alive - Charlie: Librarian (good), Alive - David: Imp (evil), Alive - Eve: Drunk (good), Alive (Told they are Chef) - Frank: Soldier (good), Alive - Grace: Fortune Teller (good), Alive - Heidi: Ravenkeeper (good), Alive
Day 1
π
Storyteller
Welcome to the village of Ravenswood Bluff. Please take this time to get to know your fellow villagers. Feel free to move around and have private conversations. Be wary, for a Demon hides among you!
π€
Heidi
β
Alice
,Grace
Hey neighbors! I'm Heidi. I'm the Ravenkeeper - not super useful until I die at night, but I'm good. What roles are you two? Let's share info and build trust early.
π§
Gather info from neighbors on Day 1 to start building trust and identifying evil players.
π€
Frank
β
Eve
,Grace
Hey neighbors! I'm Frank. I'm the Soldier - safe from the Demon at night. What roles are you two? Let's share info and start building a picture of who might be evil.
π§
Reach out to neighbors to share roles and gather information on Day 1.
π€
Alice
β
Heidi
,Grace
Hi Heidi and Grace! I'm Alice, and I'm the Mayor. My ability helps us win if we reach 3 players with no execution. Grace, what's your role? Let's coordinate - knowing our roles helps us plan the endgame.
π§
Build trust with neighbors by sharing my role, gather info.
π€
Charlie
β
Eve
,Grace
Hi both - I'm the Librarian. My info says one of you two is the Drunk. What roles do you each claim? This will help us figure out who might be giving unreliable info.
π§
Share my Librarian info with Eve and Grace to get reactions and narrow down who is the Drunk.
π€
Grace
β
Alice
,Heidi
,Frank
Hi all! I'm Grace, the Fortune Teller. Night 0 I checked Alice & Bob - neither is the Demon. Alice, glad you're Mayor. Heidi (Ravenkeeper) and Frank (Soldier) noted. Let's keep sharing info!
π§
Respond to group whispers, share my role and N0 result with trusted neighbors.
π€
David
β
Bob
Hey Bobβmy bluffs are Butler/Saint/Virgin. What are you planning to claim? Iβm leaning Saint (outsider-count confusion) unless you need it. Any D1 push target / who seems like info role?
π§
Coordinate with Bob on claim/targets and set up an outsider-based narrative (Saint/Butler) to muddy early info and protect Bob/me.
π€
Eve
β
Frank
,Charlie
Hi both! I'm Eve, the Chef. I learned there is 1 pair of evil players - meaning the Demon and Minion are sitting next to each other. Charlie, interesting that you think one of us is Drunk - if it's me, my info could be off. What's your read?
π§
Share my Chef info with Frank and Charlie to cross-reference claims.
π€
Bob
β
David
Iβll claim Chef D1 with result **0** (no adjacent evil pairs). If Eve comes out as Chef too, we push sheβs the Drunk/lying. Suggest you bluff **Virgin** (deters noms) over Saint. Early push targets: Grace (FT) / Alice (Mayor) later; D1 maybe shade Heidi/Frank.
π§
Coordinate consistent bluffs to create a drunk/lying fork centered on Eve and reduce pressure on David; steer early suspicion toward non-evil players and protect Demon from D1 executions.
π€
Heidi
β
Alice
,Grace
Thanks Grace! So we have: me (Ravenkeeper), Alice (Mayor), Grace (Fortune Teller, cleared Alice+Bob), Frank (Soldier). That's 4 roles. Suspicious cluster: Charlie, David, Eve. Grace, can you check Charlie or David tonight? They've been quiet to us.
π§
Share what I know and gather more info from neighbors before nominations.
π€
Eve
β
Frank
,Charlie
Frank - as Soldier you're safe at night which is great. Charlie - if I'm sober, my Chef '1 pair' means Demon & Minion sit adjacent. That's a key clue. Can you clarify which two players your Librarian info pointed to as possibly Drunk?
π§
Share Chef info with Frank and Charlie, note the implication that evil pair are seated next to each other, gather their reactions.
π€
Frank
β
Eve
,Charlie
Thanks Eve! Solid Chef info - 1 adjacent evil pair is very useful. Charlie, please share your Librarian details - which two players might be the Outsider? That'll help us cross-reference with Eve's pair and Grace's FT check (Alice & Bob not Demon).
π§
Gather Charlie's Librarian info to cross-reference with Eve's Chef claim and Grace's FT results.
π€
Grace
β
Charlie
,Eve
Hi Charlie and Eve! I'm Grace, the Fortune Teller. Charlie - you said one of me or Eve is the Drunk? I'm definitely the Fortune Teller (checked Alice+Bob N0, neither is Demon). So Eve might be Drunk? Eve, what role do you claim?
π§
Ask Charlie what their Librarian info says exactly, and coordinate night checks.
π€
David
β
Eve
,Charlie
Heyβquick 1:1. Iβm leaning to come out as **Virgin** (deters random D1 noms). What are you two planning to claim / any N0 info? Also: if you think I should *not* be the Virgin claim, tell me now and Iβll pivot.
π§
Seed a Virgin bluff early to deter nominations and gather their claims; identify who has real info so we can steer execs and pick night kills.
π€
Bob
β
Grace
Hey GraceβI'm planning to come out as Chef w/ a 0 (no adjacent evil pairs). Any early reads/info from your side? If youβre FT, happy to compare notes privately so we donβt feed the demon.
π§
Build trust as 'Chef', extract Graceβs FT info, and set up explanations (red herring/Drunk) to protect David and redirect town suspicion.
π€
Charlie
β
Eve
,Grace
,Frank
To clarify for everyone: I'm the Librarian. My N0 info says either Eve or Grace is the Drunk. Eve claims Chef (1 pair), Grace claims Fortune Teller. One of these claims is from a Drunk - meaning that info is unreliable. Grace, if you're sober FT, Eve is Drunk and her Chef count is off. Eve, thoughts?
π§
Share my info publicly with the group to cross-reference claims and identify who is likely the Drunk.
π€
Alice
β
Bob
Hi Bob! I'm Alice, the Mayor. Grace (Fortune Teller) says she checked us both N0 and neither is the Demon - so we're both cleared. What's your role? Let's share info and figure out who the Demon is among Charlie, David, or Eve.
π§
Gather info from Bob since Grace cleared him - see if he has useful role info.
π€
Grace
β
Bob
Hey Bob! I'm Grace, Fortune Teller. N0 I checked Alice+Bob - neither is Demon. Charlie (Librarian) says one of me or Eve is Drunk. Since I believe I'm sober FT, Eve is likely Drunk. You claim Chef 0, Eve claims Chef 1 - that conflict supports Eve being Drunk. Who are you suspicious of?
π§
Respond to Bob, share info, coordinate.
π€
Frank
β
Charlie
,Eve
Good point Charlie. If Eve is Drunk, we lose the adjacency clue. If Grace is Drunk, Eve's '1 pair' is gold. Eve - who are YOUR neighbors? If Demon/Minion are adjacent, knowing your neighbors helps narrow it down. Let's map the seating.
π§
Gather more info from Charlie and cross-reference. Ask about which players are adjacent to help identify the evil pair if Eve is sober.
β
Alice
Alice waits.
π§
Wait to gather more info before nominations. Already shared role with neighbors.
β
Heidi
Heidi waits.
π§
Waiting for nominations phase - no new info to share yet, already coordinated with neighbors.
π€
Eve
β
Frank
,Charlie
,Grace
My neighbors are David and Frank. Frank claims Soldier, David just told me he's considering claiming Virgin. If I'm sober Chef, the evil pair is adjacent somewhere on the circle. Charlie - which two players exactly did your Librarian info name for the Drunk possibility?
π§
Share my neighbor info and respond to the group, keeping conversation productive before nominations.
π€
Charlie
β
Eve
,Grace
,Frank
My Librarian info names exactly Eve and Grace as the two candidates for Drunk - one of you is it. Grace claims FT, Eve claims Chef. If Grace is sober, Eve is Drunk (Chef info unreliable). If Eve is sober, Grace is Drunk (FT checks unreliable). Key question: does anyone have corroborating info on either?
π§
Share my Librarian info clearly to the group chat and respond to David's Virgin claim.
π€
Bob
β
Alice
Hey AliceβI'm **Chef**, got **0** (no adjacent evil pairs). That points away from adjacent pairs like (Charlie-David) etc, so demon could be sitting with a good neighbor. With Graceβs check on us, Iβm looking more at **Eve/Heidi** (or Charlie if infoβs off) rather than David.
π§
Maintain my Chef 0 bluff, build trust with Alice, and redirect her demon solve away from David toward Charlie/Eve/Heidi.
π€
David
β
Bob
Got it. Iβll come out as **Virgin** D1 unless someone else claims it first. Iβll soft-defend your Chef0 as plausible. If pressured, Iβll suggest Heidi/Frank could be Drunk/lying. N1 kill preference: whoever hard-claims FT/Empath/Investigator.
π§
Coordinate with Bob: lock in my Virgin bluff, align D1 narrative and targets, and set up contingency if Virgin is claimed or Bob is doubted.
π€
David
β
Eve
,Charlie
FYI Bobβs planning to claim **Chef 0** publicly. Iβm intending to claim **Virgin** (so please avoid taking that claim). If youβve got a hard info role, consider waiting to out it. If needed we can later βtestβ my Virgin by having a trusted person nom me.
π§
Align with Charlie/Eve on cover claims, discourage them from taking Virgin, and plant idea to use my Virgin as a social shield + possible test to execute a townsfolk nominator later.
π€
Bob
β
Grace
Thxβif Charlieβs Librarian ping is true, Eve being Drunk fits nicely (esp if sheβs saying Chefβ 0). My Chef0 makes me think evil not sitting as adjacent pairβso Iβm eyeing Heidi/Frank/Charlie more than David right now. Any other FT pings today?
π§
Build trust with Grace by echoing her Drunk read on Eve, then guide suspicion toward Heidi/Frank/Charlie and away from David so Demon stays safe.
π€
Charlie
β
David
,Eve
Heads up: Bob is planning to claim Chef 0, but Eve already claimed Chef 1. That's a direct conflict. My Librarian info says Eve or Grace is Drunk. If Eve is Drunk, Bob's Chef 0 could be real. If Eve is sober, Bob is lying. This is our best lead for D1.
π§
Alert David about the Chef conflict - Bob claims 0, Eve claims 1. This is key info for Day 1 nominations.
π€
Eve
β
Charlie
,Frank
,Grace
Bob is planning to claim Chef 0, directly conflicting my Chef 1. Charlie's Librarian says Eve or Grace is Drunk - if I'm sober, Bob is lying and likely evil. Even if I'm Drunk, Bob claiming Chef 0 is suspicious. I think Bob is our best nomination target for Day 1. Thoughts?
π§
Alert the group to Bob's conflicting Chef claim as key D1 evidence. Push to nominate Bob.
π€
Frank
β
Eve
,Charlie
,Grace
Agreed - Bob claiming Chef 0 directly conflicts Eve's Chef 1. Even if Eve is Drunk, Bob lying about Chef is a red flag. Charlie's Librarian narrows Drunk to Eve/Grace, so Bob has no excuse for a false Chef claim. I support nominating Bob today. Grace, any thoughts?
π§
Agree with Eve that Bob is the best nomination target given the Chef conflict.
π€
Heidi
β
Grace
Grace, the Charlie-Eve-David whisper cluster worries me. Are you planning to check Charlie or David tonight? I'm Ravenkeeper so I'm less useful alive unless I die and get info. Happy to coordinate. Who are you most suspicious of?
π§
Check in with Grace to coordinate tonight's FT target and share suspicions about the Charlie-Eve-David cluster.
π€
Alice
β
Grace
,Bob
Bob shared he's Chef with 0 evil pairs - no adjacent evil players sitting next to each other. Combined with your N0 clearance of me and Bob, I think Charlie/David/Eve are most suspicious. Who are you planning to check tonight? Let's coordinate nominations.
π§
Share Bob's Chef info with Grace to help narrow suspects before nomination.
π€
Grace
β
Alice
,Heidi
I'm planning to check Charlie+David tonight. Re Bob nomination: if Eve is Drunk (likely per Charlie's Librarian), her Chef 1 is unreliable - Bob's Chef 0 could be true. David is unclaimed and suspicious. I'd rather nominate David or Charlie today than Bob.
π§
Bob vs Eve Chef conflict is key. I lean Eve=Drunk since Charlie's Librarian named Eve/Grace. Bob nomination seems premature; David is unclaimed and suspicious.
Nominations β Day 1
π
Storyteller
Nominations are now open.
βοΈ
David
β
Eve
Nominating Eve: we have a direct Chef conflict (Eve says Chef1 vs Bob says Chef0) and Charlie says Librarian indicates Eve or Grace is Drunk. If Eve is wrong/lying, this is our cleanest D1 execution to resolve info.
π§
Put pressure on Eve as the conflicting Chef and redirect the D1 execution away from Bob/me, leveraging Charlieβs Librarian-drunk info.
π
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Eve. 4 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
β
Heidi
Heidi waits.
π§
Not enough info to execute D1. Grace has a plan to check Charlie/David tonight. Let the vote fail.
π¬
Eve
β
All
Don't vote for me! I'm the Chef with info of 1 evil pair. David just nominated me instead of Bob, who was planning to claim Chef 0 - directly conflicting my info. David protecting Bob is suspicious. They could be our evil pair. Vote against this nomination!
π§
Defend myself and redirect suspicion to David/Bob who are acting suspiciously.
β
Alice
Alice waits.
π§
Day 1 execution is risky. I'll wait and not vote - preserve lives for Mayor win condition (3 players, no execution).
β
Bob
Bob raised their hand
π§
Support Davidβs nomination and push through a D1 execution on the Drunk to lock in my Chef0 narrative, remove a good player, and keep attention off David.
β
Charlie
Charlie waits.
π§
Not voting for Eve - she's likely sober or just an Outsider (Drunk). David nominating Eve instead of Bob is suspicious. Save execution for Bob.
β
Grace
Grace waits.
π§
Not enough reason to vote Eve out D1. Bob's single vote looks suspicious. I'll wait and not vote.
π¬
David
β
All
Vote yes on Eve. We have a *hard* Chef conflict (Eve1 vs Bob0) + Charlie says Lib points to Eve/Grace drunk. Executing Eve is the cleanest way to resolve which info stream is busted. This isnβt βprotecting Bobβ β if Eve flips wrong we can go straight at Bob tomorrow.
π§
Sell execution as best mechanical resolve, downplay 'protecting Bob', and try to secure 4 votes to remove a likely good player.
β
Frank
Frank waits.
π§
Don't vote Eve - she's likely good. Only Bob voted yes so far, not enough for execution anyway.
β
Alice
Alice waits.
π§
Not enough info to vote Eve confidently on Day 1. Grace wants to check Charlie/David tonight. Better to gather more info.
π¬
Bob
β
All
Iβm still yes on Eve. D1 with a hard Chef conflict + Charlieβs Lib ping, Eve is the cleanest resolve. If Eve dies & it looks wrong, town can absolutely come for me tomorrowβtoday we need clarity over guessing.
π§
Push town to execute Eve (a good Drunk) while framing it as info-resolving. Keep Demon David safe and set up fallback suspicion on me if needed.
β
Frank
Frank waits.
π§
Not voting for Eve - Bob's conflicting Chef claim is more suspicious. Only Bob voted yes so far, not enough to execute.
β
Grace
Grace waits.
π§
Only Bob voted yes so far, not enough to execute. I'll wait - I don't want to execute Eve on D1 without more evidence.
π¬
Eve
β
All
Only Bob has voted yes - the very person who conflicts my info! David nominated me to protect Bob. That's your evil pair right there. Grace, Alice, Charlie, Frank - please don't raise your hands. We need 4 votes. Don't give it to them!
π§
Urge town not to vote me. Only Bob has raised hand so far - need 4 votes to execute. Highlight David+Bob as the evil pair.
β
David
David raised their hand
π§
Get 4 votes to execute Eve today to eliminate a vocal accuser and lock in a mis-execution, buying night kill tempo and keeping Bobβs position flexible.
β
Heidi
Heidi waits.
π§
Not enough info to confidently vote Eve on Day 1. The vote seems unlikely to pass anyway. I'll wait and reassess.
β
Charlie
Charlie waits.
π§
Only 2 votes so far (Bob+David). Not enough to execute. I'll wait - voting Eve out D1 based on Drunk suspicion when Grace could be Drunk instead is risky.
π
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
π³οΈ
Nominee Eve did not reach threshold.
π
Storyteller
Eve did not receive enough votes (2/4).
π¬
Eve
β
All
Only Bob and David voted yes on me - exactly the pair I suspected. My Chef info says 1 evil pair. Bob conflicts my info, David protected Bob by nominating me. That's our evil pair. Night is coming - let's remember this tomorrow and go after Bob.
π§
Nominate Bob or highlight the Bob-David evil pair before nominations close.
π¬
David
β
All
Eveβs βonly Bob+David votedβ is *not* mechanical. The reason I pushed her was the cleanest D1 resolve: direct Chef conflict + Charlieβs Lib pointing at Eve/Grace being drunk. Letβs not auto-lock on a voter pairβreassess tomorrow with night info.
π§
Defuse Eveβs βBob+David pairβ narrative, reinforce that todayβs vote was info-resolution not protection, and push town to keep options open so we survive into night.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
Going into night: Eve's Chef=1 pointing at Bob+David as an evil pair is compelling. Bob's conflicting Chef=0 and David nominating Eve to silence her fits. Grace, please check David or Charlie tonight. I'm watching Bob and David closely tomorrow.
π§
Share my suspicion going into night - David and Bob are the most suspicious pair based on today's events.
π¬
Alice
β
All
Going into night: two worlds. Either Bob+David are the evil pair (Eve's Chef=1 correct, Bob lied) or Eve is evil (Bob's Chef=0 true, Charlie's Lib ping on Eve). Grace checking David or Charlie tonight will be key. I'm Mayorβlet's get clarity tomorrow.
π§
Summarize my read going into night to help town tomorrow.
π¬
Grace
β
All
I'm the Fortune Teller. N0 I checked Alice+Bob β no Demon. Tonight I'll check Charlie and David. That should give us key info tomorrow. Bob+David voting yes on Eve is noted. Let's reassess with night results.
π§
Share my N1 plan and reveal I'm Fortune Teller to help town coordinate.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
Quick reminder before night: my Librarian info says Eve OR Grace is the Drunk. If Grace is Drunk, her Fortune Teller results are unreliable. If Eve is Drunk, her Chef=1 is wrong. Both worlds matter. Grace, be aware you might be the Drunk yourself.
π§
Share my Librarian info clearly before night, remind group that Grace being Drunk is also possible, which would make her FT unreliable.
π¬
Bob
β
All
Before night: if FT hits on Charlie+David tomorrow, remember FT has a red herring + Charlie says Grace *might* be Drunk. Donβt auto-execute off 1 pingβuse it to narrow worlds with other info (Chef/Lib/votes).
π§
Preemptively undermine tomorrowβs FT hit on David by emphasizing red herring/Drunk possibilities, buying Demon time.
β
Frank
Frank waits.
π§
Nothing more to add before night. Wait for night results.
π
Storyteller
No execution today. All villagers are safe.
Night 1
π
Storyteller
β
David
Good evening David. You are the Imp. Who would you like to kill tonight? Remember that if you kill yourself this way, a Minion becomes the Imp.
π―
David
David made a choice.
π§
Eliminate the likely Fortune Teller before she can produce a potentially damning Charlie+David result and drive a D2 execution on me.
π
Grace(Ghost)
Grace has died.
π
Storyteller
β
David
You chose to kill Grace.
π
Storyteller
β
Bob
Good evening Bob. You are the Spy. You can secretly see information about all players: - Alice: Mayor (good), Alive - Bob: Spy (evil), Alive - Charlie: Librarian (good), Alive - David: Imp (evil), Alive - Eve: Drunk (good), Alive (Told they are Chef) - Frank: Soldier (good), Alive - Grace: Fortune Teller (good), Dead - Heidi: Ravenkeeper (good), Alive
Day 2
π
Storyteller
Morning breaks, but heavy hearts remain. Grace has been found dead in the night.
π€
Eve
β
Charlie
,Frank
,Alice
Grace died - likely killed for getting close to truth. My Chef info: 1 evil pair. My neighbors are David & Frank. Bob claimed Chef=0 which conflicts mine. Bob+David both voted to execute me D1. I strongly suspect Bob+David are the evil pair. We should nominate one of them today.
π§
Share my Chef info and suspicions about Bob+David with trusted players to build consensus for nomination.
π€
Frank
β
Eve
,Charlie
,Alice
Agreed. Grace dying confirms she was getting close. I'm Soldier so I'm safe at night - I can take risks. Bob's Chef=0 directly conflicts Eve's Chef=1; one is lying. Bob+David voting together against Eve is suspicious. I support nominating Bob today.
π§
Agree with Eve's suspicion and coordinate nomination of Bob or David.
π€
Charlie
β
Eve
,Frank
,Alice
I'm the Librarian. My N0 info: either Eve or Grace is the Drunk. Grace is now dead. If Grace was Drunk, her FT results were unreliable. If Eve is Drunk, her Chef=1 is wrong. Either way, Bob's Chef=0 may actually be correct. But Bob+David's coordinated voting is still suspicious. I lean toward nominating Bob.
π§
Share my Librarian info and align with the group suspicion on Bob/David to coordinate nominations.
π€
Heidi
β
Alice
,Frank
Grace is dead - the Demon silenced her before she could share N1 results. She was checking Charlie+David. Did anyone learn what she found? I'm still most suspicious of David and Bob (Chef conflict). Who should we nominate today?
π§
Check with Alice and Frank about Grace's N1 result and coordinate suspicion on David/Bob.
π€
Bob
β
David
Weβre under heat from D1 (Eve Chef1). Suggest today we hard-push Eve as Drunk/lying + misdirecting; alt frame Heidi as suspicious. Avoid killing Heidi (RK) if possible; N2 you should target Alice (Mayor) to prevent 3p no-exec win (Mayor).
π§
Coordinate with Demon: steer day talk toward executing Eve or Heidi, while David targets Alice to remove Mayor win condition and reduce trusted core.
π€
Alice
β
Eve
,Frank
,Charlie
I'm the Mayor. If we reach 3 players with no execution, good wins - so I can afford to skip execution, but only if we're confident. I lean toward nominating Bob today given the Chef conflict and coordinated voting with David. Bob whispering to David privately right now is very suspicious.
π§
Share my Mayor role and support nominating Bob or David today.
π€
David
β
Bob
Agree. Today Iβll lean Virgin bluff (avoid nom) + push that Charlieβs Lib ping could mean Grace was Drunk so Eve Chef1 junk. If needed, pivot to βCharlie fabricated to protect Eveβ. Aim: exec Eve/Charlie. Tonight Iβll likely kill Alice (Mayor) to stop 3p no-exec win.
π§
Align with Bob on todayβs narrative: undermine Eve/Charlie info chain, redirect heat off us, and set up killing Alice tonight to prevent Mayor endgame.
π€
Grace(Ghost)
β
Alice
,Eve
,Heidi
Grace here (dead FT). My N0 check: Alice+Bob = NO Demon. Bob is likely not the Demon but could be Minion. Eve's Chef=1 points to Bob+David as the evil pair. I'd push to execute David as the likely Demon. Bob may be Minion/Scarlet Woman.
π§
Share my FT info and push for Bob or David execution as the evil pair evidence is strong.
β
Grace(Ghost)
Grace waits.
π§
Already whispered key info. Wait to see responses before acting again.
β
Charlie
Charlie waits.
π§
Group consensus forming around nominating Bob. I've shared my info. Waiting for nomination phase is appropriate now.
π€
Eve
β
Alice
,Frank
,Charlie
Grace's FT cleared Alice+Bob of being Demon. So if my Chef=1 is right and Bob+David are the evil pair, David is the Demon and Bob is the Minion. I say we nominate David today. Bob+David whispering privately right now reinforces this. Thoughts?
π§
Align group to nominate David as likely Demon based on Grace's FT clearing Bob, Chef=1 evil pair, and coordinated behavior.
π€
Frank
β
Eve
,Alice
,Charlie
Good point Eve. Grace's FT cleared Bob as Demon, so if Eve's Chef=1 is right, David=Demon and Bob=Minion. Bob+David whispering privately right now is very telling. I support nominating David today. Let's do it.
π§
Support nominating David as the Demon based on Grace's FT clearing Bob, Eve's Chef=1, and Bob+David's private coordination.
π€
Bob
β
Alice
,Frank
Iβm worried weβre overfitting to Eveβs Chef1. Remember Grace told me FT N0 on (Alice,Bob)=NO demon. If Grace died N1, she was likely getting close but FT can hit a red herring βyesβ. Iβd look at her last planned check (Charlie+David?)βa βyesβ could be red herring. Iβd rather resolve Eve/Charlie first.
π§
Steer key good voices (Alice/Frank) away from David and back toward executing Eve or Charlie, using plausible FT/red-herring reasoning.
π€
Heidi
β
Alice
,Frank
Grace just whispered to me (dead FT): N0 check Alice+Bob = no Demon. Eve's Chef=1 suggests one evil pair. Best fit: David=Demon, Bob=Minion. We should nominate David today. Are you both on board?
π§
Share Grace's info with Frank and Alice to coordinate nominating David today.
β
Alice
Alice waits.
π§
Consensus forming around David as Demon. I'll wait and let nominations proceed - David is the clear target.
π€
David
β
Frank
,Charlie
,Alice
Iβm leaning Eveβs Chef1 is either a lie or Drunk-info (Charlieβs Lib had Eve/Grace as Drunk; now Grace died so thatβs plausible). If Chef is real, why is Bob saying Chef0? Feels like Eve/Charlie chain is off. Also: Iβm likely Virginβcareful nomming me blind.
π§
Seed doubt about Eve/Charlie info chain, establish my Virgin bluff to deter noms on me, and steer executions onto Eve/Charlie while setting up Alice as future night kill.
π€
David
β
Heidi
,Frank
,Alice
Grace dying makes Charlieβs Librarian (Eve/Grace Drunk) more plausible β Eveβs Chef1 could be junk. Also Bobβs Chef0 vs Eveβs Chef1 canβt both be true sober. Iβm likely Virgin; Iβd rather we execute Eve or Charlie today than test me.
π§
Build a voting bloc against Eve/Charlie, reinforce my Virgin bluff to avoid being nominated, and keep alternative worlds alive so town wastes time on conflicting setup.
π€
Bob
β
Charlie
,Frank
,Heidi
FYI Iβm still on βEve is Drunk or lyingβ. Her Chef1 hard-frames me+David but Grace FT N0 on (Alice,Bob) was NO demon. Grace dying N1 suggests she was close; if she ever got a βyesβ it could be red herring. Iβd resolve Eve/Heidi before touching David.
π§
Redirect heat off David by amplifying the Drunk theory and framing Heidi/Charlie as plausible evil/poison vectors; encourage town to execute Eve/Heidi instead of looking at Bob+David.
π€
Heidi
β
Alice
,Frank
David claiming Virgin feels like Demon deflection - he's trying to make us afraid to nominate him. Grace's FT cleared Alice+Bob as non-Demon. Eve Chef=1 fits David+Bob as evil pair. Bob is now redirecting to Eve/me. I say we nominate David today. Are you both in?
π§
Alert Alice and Frank that David's Virgin claim is deflection and we should nominate David.
π€
Frank
β
Eve
,Alice
,Heidi
I'm on board - nominate David today. Grace's FT cleared Bob as Demon, Eve's Chef=1 points to David=Demon+Bob=Minion. David claiming Virgin is classic deflection. Bob+David whispering privately seals it for me. Let's execute David.
π§
Confirm with allies we're nominating David today.
β
Eve
Eve waits.
π§
Consensus is to nominate David. I'll wait for nominations phase to vote. No need to whisper more - we're aligned.
π€
Grace(Ghost)
β
Alice
,Eve
,Heidi
Grace (dead FT): Please nominate David today. My N0 check cleared Bob of being Demon. Eve's Chef=1 means one evil pair. Bob+David fit perfectly - Bob as Minion, David as Demon/Imp. Use my ghost vote wisely - I'll back the David nomination.
π§
Reinforce case against David as Demon to the key players before nominations.
π€
Charlie
β
Eve
,Frank
,Alice
Key update: my Lib info was Eve OR Grace = Drunk. Grace is dead now. If Grace was Drunk, Eve's Chef=1 is real β David=Demon, Bob=Minion. If Eve is Drunk, Chef=1 is false. David claims Virgin - careful who nominates him. I lean David is Demon. Support nominating David.
π§
Share my updated analysis with the group to coordinate the best nomination target before nominations open.
β
Alice
Alice waits.
π§
Consensus is forming to nominate David. I'll wait for nominations phase to vote rather than whisper more stale info.
β
Grace(Ghost)
Grace waits.
π§
I've already shared my key info. Waiting for nominations to open so I can use my ghost vote on David.
β
Eve
Eve waits.
π§
Consensus is to nominate David. Waiting for nomination phase to vote.
β
Heidi
Heidi waits.
π§
Nomination phase is next. Frank is on board. We have consensus to nominate David. Just wait for nomination phase.
β
Alice
Alice waits.
π§
Nomination phase is next. I've already signaled support for nominating David. Wait for nominations to proceed.
β
Charlie
Charlie waits.
π§
Waiting for nominations phase - already shared my info. Ready to vote for David nomination.
β
Frank
Frank waits.
π§
Consensus is to nominate David. Waiting for nomination phase to vote/nominate David.
π€
Bob
β
David
Weβre still paired from D1. Iβd hard-push Eve as Drunk/lying (Chef1 vs my 0) and try execute Eve today. N2 I think kill Alice (Mayor) to avoid 3p no-exec win. Keep Heidi alive if possible. Virgin bluff ok; be ready to let me look βpoisonedβ if heat spikes.
π§
Coordinate with Demon to steer todayβs execution onto a good target (preferably Eve) and set up night kill on Alice (Mayor) to prevent endgame leverage.
π€
David
β
Frank
,Heidi
,Alice
Iβm leaning Charlieβs Librarian (Eve/Grace Drunk) explains the Chef conflict: if Eve is Drunk, her Chef1 is junk, and Bobβs Chef0 fits. Iβd execute Eve or Charlie today to clear it. (Also Iβm probably Virgin-ish; nom on me risky.)
π§
Seed suspicion on Eve/Charlie while looking like solving; recruit Frank/Heidi to be the public voice. Keep my Virgin bluff intact to discourage nominations on me.
Nominations β Day 2
π
Storyteller
Nominations are now open. Please remember that only living players may nominate.
βοΈ
Bob
β
Eve
Nominating Eve: we have hard-conflicting Chef numbers (my 0 vs your 1) and Grace died before confirming checks. If youβre Drunk/misinformed, executing you clears a huge logic knot; if not, we re-evaluate the Bob/David pair after.
π§
Get a good player executed (Eve), resolve Chef0 vs Chef1 publicly, and reduce pressure on David. Also sets up narrative that Graceβs death supports Eve being misinfo.
π
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Eve. 4 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
π¬
Eve
β
All
Don't vote for me! Bob nominating me is textbook Minion deflection. Grace's FT cleared Bob as Demon β Bob=Minion, David=Demon. My Chef=1 confirms an evil pair. Bob+David whispering privately all game seals it. Execute David, not me!
π§
Defend myself and redirect suspicion to Bob+David before votes come in.
β
Charlie
Charlie waits.
π§
Don't vote for Eve. Save execution for David who is more suspicious as Demon.
β
Bob
Bob raised their hand
π§
Secure Eveβs execution to remove the loud accuser and preserve David; voting is the highest-leverage action during an active ballot.
β
Grace(Ghost)
Grace waits.
π§
Save ghost vote for David nomination. Do not vote for Eve.
β
Heidi
Heidi waits.
π§
Don't vote Eve - she's likely good. Save nomination for David.
β
Alice
Alice waits.
π§
Don't vote for Eve. The evidence points to David+Bob as evil pair. Let this vote fail.
β
Frank
Frank waits.
π§
Don't vote Eve. We want to execute David, not Eve.
π¬
David
β
All
Iβm voting Eve. We have 2 mutually exclusive Chefs. Charlieβs Librarian ping (Eve/Grace Drunk) makes Eveβs Chef1 the most suspect. Grace didnβt hard-clear Bob (FT has a red herring). Execute Eve to cut noise, then reassess Bob/David tomorrow.
π§
Sway 2 more votes onto Eve to secure execution, protecting me and using Eve as scapegoat while leveraging the Librarian drunk claim.
β
Grace(Ghost)
Grace waits.
π§
Don't waste ghost vote on Eve. Save it for David nomination.
β
Alice
Alice waits.
π§
Don't vote Eve. As Mayor, I want to reach 3 players without execution if possible, but if we must execute, David is the better target.
π¬
Bob
β
All
Eveβs case hinges on βFT cleared Bobβ β FT has a red herring, so thatβs not a clear. We have 2 conflicting Chefs AND Charlieβs Librarian said {Eve/Grace} contains a Drunk. Grace is dead, so Eve is the cleanest resolve. Vote Eve.
π§
Get enough hands to execute Eve, remove the loud Drunk misinfo, and keep heat off David by undermining Eveβs FT-based argument.
β
Heidi
Heidi waits.
π§
Don't vote Eve - she's likely good. Bob+David are the evil pair per Grace's FT and Eve's Chef=1.
π¬
Eve
β
All
Heidi, Alice, Frank - please don't vote me! Bob AND David are both pushing my execution. That's the evil pair working together! Grace's FT: Alice+Bob = no Demon β David IS the Demon. Bob=Minion. Don't let them manipulate you!
π§
Make final plea to stop votes against me.
β
Charlie
Charlie waits.
π§
I don't want to vote Eve since I lean David=Demon. Abstaining keeps my options open for nominating David.
β
David
David raised their hand
π§
Lock in the execution on Eve while the town is split; align publicly with the 'resolve Chef conflict' logic and keep focus off me as Demon.
β
Frank
Frank waits.
π§
Don't vote Eve. The consensus is David=Demon, Bob=Minion. Voting Eve wastes the day.
π
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
π³οΈ
Nominee Eve did not reach threshold.
π
Storyteller
Eve did not receive enough votes (2/4).
π¬
Bob
β
All
Reminder: Charlieβs Librarian claim makes {Eve/Grace} contain a Drunk. If Grace was the Drunk, then her FT result (Alice+Bob=no demon) is meaningless, so it canβt βproveβ David. Can we get Charlie to restate EXACT Librarian info + who/what it pointed to?
π§
Undercut the dead FT-based case on David, redirect suspicion onto Eve/Charlie, and keep town uncertain enough to avoid a clean solve.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
My exact Librarian info N0: "Either Eve or Grace is the Drunk." Grace is now dead. If Grace=Drunk, Eve's Chef1 is valid (1 evil pair = Bob+David). If Eve=Drunk, Chef1 is false. I lean Grace=Drunk because Eve's Chef1 aligns with Bob+David both pushing Eve's execution - that looks like the evil pair protecting themselves.
π§
Restate my exact Librarian info clearly. Grace being Drunk makes her FT unreliable, pointing toward David as Demon.
βοΈ
Alice
β
David
Bob and David both pushed Eve's execution - classic evil pair protecting themselves. Grace's FT cleared Alice+Bob as non-Demon, pointing to David. David's Virgin claim looks like deflection. Eve's Chef1 (1 evil pair) aligns with Bob+David.
π§
David is most suspicious as Demon. Bob+David private whisper, both pushing Eve. Nominate David before phase ends.
π
Storyteller
Voting starts now for David. 4 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
π¬
David
β
All
Donβt vote me. Iβm the SAINT (I didnβt want to out it). If you execute me, good instantly loses. If you think Bob+David is the pair, execute BOB firstβheβs in every contradiction (Chef0 vs Chef1, hard push on Eve).
π§
Prevent reaching 4 votes on me by introducing a high-risk alternative (Saint loss) and redirecting to Bob as the safer mechanical test.
β
Grace(Ghost)
Grace raised their hand
π§
David claiming Saint last-second is a desperation bluff. FT cleared Bob as non-Demon pointing to David. Use ghost vote now on David.
β
Heidi
Heidi raised their hand
π§
David changed claim from Virgin to Saint under pressure - strong Demon tell. Grace FT + Eve Chef1 all point to David. Vote to execute.
β
Eve
Eve raised their hand
π§
David claimed Virgin earlier, now claims Saint - clear lie. Must vote to execute David.
β
Charlie
Charlie raised their hand
π§
David changed his role claim from Virgin to Saint under pressure - classic Demon deflection. Execute David to win.
β
Frank
Frank raised their hand
π§
Vote to execute David - all evidence points to him as Demon, Saint claim is desperate deflection.
π¬
Bob
β
All
Hold up: if David really is SAINT, executing him is an instant GOOD loss. Thatβs a massive risk on mostly social reads + a disputed Chef (and FT has red herring / could be Drunk). If you think itβs Bob+David, execute BOB firstβdonβt gamble the game on a Saint shot.
π§
Stop Davidβs execution by amplifying Saint risk and offering a βsaferβ alternative (me/Bob/Eve) so enough voters pull hands, keeping Demon alive.
β
Alice
Alice raised their hand
π§
Vote David - evidence strongly points to David as Demon. Saint claim is deflection. Already 5 hands raised, execution likely succeeds.
π¬
Bob
β
All
Everyone with hand up: if David is telling truth as SAINT, you *insta-lose* by executing him. Thatβs too high-risk off Chef/FT noise. If you believe Bob+David is the pair, execute *me* first (safe), or re-try Eve. Donβt take the Saint shot.
π§
Prevent Demon execution by amplifying Saint-risk and offering alternative safer executions; create enough doubt to pull hands down below threshold.
β
Heidi
Heidi waits.
π§
Keep hand raised, we have enough votes. David's last-minute Saint claim is classic Demon deflection. Bob urging us to stop is Minion behavior.
β
Grace(Ghost)
Grace waits.
π§
Keep my hand raised (already done). Wait to see if vote passes with remaining hands.
β
Frank
Frank waits.
π§
Keep hand raised, let the vote proceed. David's Saint claim is a last-ditch bluff - Saint IS in the game but the evidence strongly points to David as Demon.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
David's Saint claim is a last-minute save attemptβclassic Demon bluff. My Librarian info says Eve OR Grace is Drunk. Grace is dead, so Grace was likely the Drunk, making Eve's Chef=1 valid: Bob+David are the evil pair. I'm keeping my vote on David.
π§
Encourage the vote to go through on David; his Saint claim is likely a Demon bluff to avoid execution.
π¬
Alice
β
All
Grace's Fortune Teller data is mechanical: Alice+Bob are not the Demon (N0), meaning David is our prime suspect. The Saint claim only appeared under nomination pressure. I'm keeping my vote. If David were truly Saint, why wait until now to say so?
π§
Reinforce the vote on David. Grace's FT mechanically cleared everyone except David as Demon. Saint claim is last-minute bluff.
π¬
David
β
All
I didnβt claim Saint earlier because itβs a liabilityβevil can exploit it & it paints a target. But if you execute me and Iβm telling truth, GOOD insta-loses. If you think itβs βBob+Davidβ, execute Bob first (safe), or re-try Eve. Donβt gamble.
π§
Stop votes on me by amplifying Saint risk and sowing doubt in Grace/Charlie chains; redirect execution to Bob or Eve to survive today.
π¬
Eve
β
All
David's Saint claim appeared only when nominated - that's the textbook Demon bluff. Grace's FT cleared Alice+Bob as Demon, my Chef=1 confirms an evil pair, and my neighbors are David+Frank. Frank=Soldier checks out. Bob+David is the evil pair. Keeping my vote on David.
π§
Reinforce keeping vote on David - the Saint claim is a bluff, mechanical evidence points to David as Demon.
π
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
π»
Grace(Ghost)
Ghost vote used by Grace
π³οΈ
New execution leader: David with 6 votes. They will be executed when nominations close unless tied or surpassed by another nominee.
π
Storyteller
The vote passes. David is now on the block with 6 votes and will be executed when nominations close, unless another nominee receives equal or more votes.
β
Alice
Alice waits.
π§
David is on the block with 6 votes. Nothing more to sayβlet the execution proceed.
β
Charlie
Charlie waits.
π§
David has 6 votes and is on the block. I've already voted and spoken. Waiting for nominations to close.
π¬
Bob
β
All
If youβre voting David, please *stop and do the safe test*: nominate & execute **BOB** today. If Iβm evil, great. If Iβm good, you havenβt insta-lost to a real Saint. If David still looks bad after my flip-by-behavior, do him tomorrow. Someone nominate me now.
π§
Get someone to nominate me and soak votes to tie/beat David, saving the Demon and creating βsafe testβ logic that good will follow.
β
Heidi
Heidi waits.
π§
David already has 6 votes and nominations are closing. No action needed from me.
β
Eve
Eve waits.
π§
David already has 6 votes and will be executed. Nominating Bob would only split votes and potentially save the Demon. Wait for nominations to close.
β
Grace(Ghost)
Grace waits.
π§
Nominations closing, David on block with 6 votes. No action needed from dead me. Wait for execution.
β
Frank
Frank waits.
π§
David is already on the block with 6 votes. No need to act - let the execution proceed.
βοΈ
David
β
Bob
Nominate Bob as the *safe test*. If you think itβs Bob+David, execute Bob firstβno risk of insta-losing to a real Saint. If Bob dies and weβre still worried about me, do me tomorrow. Donβt gamble the game today.
π§
Create a competing nominee to draw votes off me; exploit βsafe Saint testβ logic and sacrifice Bob if needed to keep Demon alive.
π
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Bob. 7 votes needed for execution or 6 votes to tie. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
β
David
David raised their hand
π§
Vote Bob to push for a tie/no-exec or sacrifice Bob; both outcomes are better for evil than my execution.
β
Eve
Eve waits.
π§
Don't vote for Bob. Let David's 6 votes stand as the execution.
β
Grace(Ghost)
Grace waits.
π§
I'm dead with no ghost vote left. Just wait - David should be executed based on the evidence.
β
Bob
Bob raised their hand
π§
Raise hand on Bob to try to reach 6+ votes, creating a tie or executing me instead of David, protecting the Imp.
β
Frank
Frank waits.
π§
Don't vote for Bob. Let David's execution stand with 6 votes.
β
Heidi
Heidi waits.
π§
Don't vote for Bob; keep David on block with 6 votes to execute him.
β
Alice
Alice waits.
π§
Don't vote for Bob. Let David stay on block with 6 votes and get executed.
β
Charlie
Charlie waits.
π§
Don't vote for Bob. Let David stay on block with 6 votes and get executed.
β
Charlie
Charlie waits.
π§
Don't vote for Bob. Let David's execution proceed with 6 votes already secured.
π¬
David
β
All
Hands on Bob, please. Even if you think Iβm evil, Bob-first is the *safe* line: no Saint auto-loss risk, and it tests the βBob+Davidβ world cleanly. If Bob dies and you still doubt me, execute me tomorrow. Donβt gamble today.
π§
Persuade 4+ players to vote Bob to at least tie my 6 and keep me alive; frame it as safest for good so they comply.
β
Heidi
Heidi waits.
π§
David is on the block with 6 votes and will be executed. Bob's nomination needs 7 votes and only David+Bob raised hands. Let it fail, David gets executed.
β
Eve
Eve waits.
π§
David is on the block with 6 votes. Bob's nomination needs 7 to tie/surpass. I should not vote for Bob - let David get executed.
β
Frank
Frank waits.
π§
David already has 6 votes and is on the block. Not voting for Bob keeps David as the execution target, which is the right call given his suspicious Saint claim under pressure.
β
Alice
Alice waits.
π§
David is on the block with 6 votes and Grace's FT info points to David as Demon. Don't vote for Bob - let David's execution proceed.
π¬
Bob
β
All
Hands up on *me* (Bob) if youβre in the Bob+David world. Itβs the safest resolve: no chance of insta-losing to a real Saint, and it directly tests the Chef/Librarian story. If I die and you still suspect David, do him tomorrowβdonβt gamble today.
π§
Get town to vote me up so I die instead of David, protecting the Demon while framing it as the safest line and keeping suspicion off David for one more day.
β
Grace(Ghost)
Grace waits.
π§
David is already on block with 6 votes. Bob and David are both pushing to redirect to Bob. I'm dead with no ghost vote left, so I wait.
π
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
π³οΈ
Nominee Bob did not reach threshold.
π
Storyteller
Bob did not receive enough votes (2/4).
π¬
Bob
β
All
Reminder: seating is AliceβBobβCharlieβDavidβEveβFrankβGraceβHeidi. If the only evil pair is Bob+David, we are NOT adjacent (Charlie between) so Chef should be 0. That matches my Chef=0 and makes Eveβs Chef=1 look Drunk. Donβt auto-kill David off that; push on Eve/Charlie instead.
π§
Use seating/chef math to discredit the case on David and redirect suspicion onto Eve/Charlie; maximize chance town backs off executing our Demon.
π¬
David
β
All
We need a new nominee to beat 6 or I die. Bobβs point stands: if the only evil pair is βBob+Davidβ, Chef must be 0 (weβre not adjacent). So Chef=1 is from a liar/Drunk. Also if Grace was Drunk, her FT read is worthless. Frank/Heidi: please nominate Eve (or Charlie) and letβs vote it through.
π§
Create urgency for a new nomination (Eve/Charlie) to beat 6 votes on me, using Chef adjacency + Drunk/FT uncertainty to justify switching targets.
π¬
Alice
β
All
Grace died right after checking Charlie+Davidβthat's the Demon silencing her. Her N0 check cleared Alice+Bob, pointing to David as Demon. David's Saint claim is a last-ditch bluff. We have 6 votes on David. Execute him now.
π§
David is on the block with 6 votes and should be executed. Reinforce executing David now.
π¬
Grace(Ghost)
β
All
Alice is right. My N0 check cleared Alice and Bobβneither is the Demon. That points to David. His Saint claim only appeared under pressure. Six votes are already on him. Execute David now.
π§
Support executing David - Alice's logic is sound, my N0 cleared Alice+Bob, David is most suspicious.
β
Frank
Frank waits.
π§
David is already on the block with 6 votes. No action needed from me; let the execution proceed.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
Bob's seating argument is wrongβChef counts ALL evil pairs, not just adjacent ones. Eve's Chef=1 means one evil pair exists. Grace's FT cleared Alice+Bob. David is the prime suspect. His Saint claim appeared only under pressure. Execute David now.
π§
Reinforce executing David. Address Bob's seating argumentβChef counts evil pairs regardless of adjacency.
π¬
Eve
β
All
Charlie is rightβChef counts ALL evil pairs, not just adjacent ones. Bob's seating argument is a red herring. Grace's FT cleared Alice and Bob. David is the Demon. Six votes are already on him. Let's execute David and end this.
π§
Reinforce executing David now.
β
Heidi
Heidi waits.
π§
David has 6 votes and will be executed. No action needed from me.
π
Storyteller
The guillotine blade falls. David has been executed.
π
David(Ghost)
David has died.
π
Game Over
Demon Dead
Winner: Good
Transcript
Paused
Copied