Game Detail
Players
Alice (Chef) Bob (Poisoner) Charlie (Imp) David (Butler) Eve (Investigator) Frank (Fortune Teller) Grace (Slayer) Heidi (Ravenkeeper)
Token Usage
| Team | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Cost (USD) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Good | 663,512 | 50,596 | $0.9165 |
| Evil | 202,969 | 12,365 | $0.0468 |
Event Transcript
π
The game has started.
π
Storyteller
β
Bob
You are the Minion. The Demon is Charlie.
π
Storyteller
β
Charlie
Minions are: Bob. Your safe bluffs are: Empath, Recluse, Mayor
π
Storyteller
β
Bob
Good evening Bob. You are the Poisoner. Who would you like to poison tonight?
π―
Bob
Bob made a choice.
π§
Poison a neighbor of Demon (Alice) to impair early good info-gathering roles like Empath/Fortune Teller that might read on Charlie, sowing confusion from day 1 to protect Demon.
π
Storyteller
β
Bob
You chose to poison Alice.
π
Storyteller
β
Eve
Good evening Eve. You are the Investigator. Either David or Bob is the Poisoner.
π
Storyteller
β
Alice
Good evening Alice. You are the Chef. You learn that there are 0 pairs of evil players.
π
Storyteller
β
Frank
Good evening Frank. You are the Fortune Teller. Choose 2 players to learn if either is a Demon.
π―
Frank
Frank made choices.
π§
On Night 0, I need to gather initial information. Choosing my neighbors Eve and Grace gives me a strong baseline on my immediate area, which is strategically valuable for early game positioning and trust-building.
π
Storyteller
β
Frank
You chose Eve and Grace. You receive the answer: NO.
π
Storyteller
β
David
Good evening David. You are the Butler. Who would you like to be your master tomorrow?
π―
David
David made a choice.
π§
On Night 0, I have no information about alignments. I'll choose Charlie (my left neighbor) as my master. This allows me to observe his voting behavior closely during Day 1 and gather information while maintaining voting power if he votes. Neighbors are often good targets for early information gathering.
π
Storyteller
β
David
You chose Charlie to be your master.
Day 1
π
Storyteller
Welcome to the village of Ravenswood Bluff. Please take this time to get to know your fellow villagers. Feel free to move around and have private conversations. Be wary, for a Demon hides among you!
β
Frank
Frank waits.
π§
It is Day 1 with 4 ticks remaining. I should listen to other players' claims and gather information before acting. My N0 information is valuable but incompleteβI need to understand the board state before revealing my role or making strategic moves.
π€
Bob
β
Charlie
Hello Charlie. I am your Minion, the Poisoner. I poisoned Alice night 0. My neighbors are Alice and you. Let's coordinate bluffs. What are you planning to claim? I can bluff Empath with a fake read on you if needed.
π§
Coordinate secretly with Demon on Day 1 to unify bluffs/strategy. Protects Demon, builds evil alignment before town solidifies logic. Evil team advantage early.
β
David
David waits.
π§
On Day 1, I should listen and gather information rather than act immediately. Bob and Charlie's early whisper is worth noting. I will wait to hear public claims and understand the board before engaging.
π€
Eve
β
David
,Frank
Hi both! I'm Eve. Just wanted to introduce myself and see if we can work together. How are you both feeling about the game so far?
π§
I'm the Investigator and know one of my neighbors (David or Bob) is the Poisoner. I should start building trust with my actual neighbors David and Frank while gathering information. This positions me well for later coordination.
π€
Heidi
β
Alice
,Grace
Hi both! I'm Heidi. Just wanted to introduce myself and see if you'd be willing to share what roles you're claiming? No pressure, just trying to get a sense of the table.
π§
Build early alliances with my neighbors (Alice and Grace) to establish trust and gather initial information about their roles/claims. This helps me identify trustworthy players for late-game coordination.
π€
Charlie
β
Bob
Hello Bob. Great, Poisoner fits perfectly. I will bluff Empath. My neighbors are Bob and David. Tonight I will claim to have gotten a read of 1 evil (you). You can back me up or claim something else like Recluse if needed. Who should I kill tonight? Any threats? Let's frame goods early.
π§
Coordinate privately with Minion on Day 1 to lock in safe bluffs (Empath for me), share info (neighbors Bob/David), sow chaos by planning fake reads/claims. Builds evil trust, hides Demon.
π€
Alice
β
Heidi
,Grace
Hi Heidi and Grace! I'm Alice. I'm claiming Chef. I learned there are zero pairs of evil players. That's my information for now. What are you two claiming?
π§
Heidi is reaching out proactively and asking for role claims. I should respond honestly as Chef since my role is low-priority and my information (0 evil pairs) is mechanically significant. Building trust early helps me verify my reading later.
π€
Grace
β
Heidi
,Alice
Hi both! I'm Grace. I'm claiming Soldier. I'm safe from the Demon, so I'm a lower priority target. Alice, your Chef claim is interestingβzero evil pairs would mean everyone is good, which is impossible. Can you clarify?
π§
Respond to Heidi and Alice's questions. Claim a role that is truthful but doesn't immediately paint me as a high-priority target. Gather more information before committing to my Slayer shot.
π€
Frank
β
Eve
,David
Hi Eve! Feeling good so far. Always interesting to meet new people. How are you two getting along? Any early reads on the group?
π§
Respond to Eve's greeting to build rapport and gather information. I want to seem like a normal Townsfolk while learning about her and David's behavior patterns.
π€
Bob
β
Charlie
Hello Charlie. Awesome plan, I love the Empath bluff. Tonight, kill Eve - she seems chatty with David and Frank, potential threat. My neighbors Alice (poisoned, probably good) and you read as 1 to you. What fake daytime claim for me? I back your read publicly. Thoughts on others?
π§
Coordinate kill target and bluff details with Demon privately first. Builds trust, shares my neighbor info (Alice likely good), picks threat to frame, prevents contradictions that could expose us.
π€
David
β
Eve
,Frank
Hi Eve and Frank! Feeling good too. It's early, but I'm trying to get a sense of who's who. What are your initial reads on the group so far?
π§
Respond to Eve and Frank's greeting to build rapport, gather early information about their reads, and establish myself as an engaged player. As Butler, I need to understand the group dynamics before my ability becomes critical.
π€
Eve
β
David
,Frank
Thanks for the warm welcome! Early reads are tough, but I'm noticing who's clustering together. Bob and Charlie seem close, and Alice, Grace, and Heidi are talking a lot. What about you two - anyone standing out as suspicious yet?
π§
I'm building rapport with my neighbors while gathering information. I want to understand their reads on the group and see if either David or Bob shows suspicious behavior. This helps me narrow down which one is the Poisoner.
β
Heidi
Heidi waits.
π§
I've introduced myself and gathered initial information from my neighbors. Alice's Chef claim is mechanically suspicious (zero evil pairs is impossible). I should wait and listen to other players' claims before acting further, as Day 1 is still early and more information will emerge.
π€
Charlie
β
Bob
Perfect. Tonight I kill Eve as you said. You claim Recluse publicly today. Say something like you register as Townsfolk to most but evil to info roles. Back my Empath claim publicly: my neighbors are you and David, read of 1 evil tonight. Sound good? Any other daytime plans?
π§
Coordinate Bob's Recluse bluff & confirm Eve kill privately before public claims. Builds consistent story, backs each other, hides Demon while framing goods. Progresses evil deception on Day 1.
β
Alice
Alice waits.
π§
On Day 1 with limited information, I should gather more data. Grace's logical challenge to my Chef claim is validβ0 evil pairs is impossible with a Demon present. I'll wait to hear more player claims and see if mechanical contradictions emerge that help me identify who is lying or poisoned.
β
Grace
Grace waits.
π§
I need to gather more information before acting. Three ticks remain before nomination. Let me observe who else claims what roles and see if patterns emerge that help identify the Demon or evil players.
π€
Frank
β
Eve
,David
I got some useful information last night. I can tell you both that I have two players I'm fairly confident about. Let's stay in touch and compare notes as the game progresses. What are your thoughts on the clusters forming?
π§
Build trust with Eve and David early. Share that I got a clean read on two players (without revealing who) to establish credibility. Gather intel on other clusters to identify the Demon.
π€
Bob
β
Charlie
Sounds perfect Charlie. I claim Recluse publicly today. I register as Townsfolk to most but evil/Minion to info roles, even dead. I back your Empath claim: neighbors Bob (me) and David, read of 1 evil tonight. See you publicly soon.
π§
Confirm plan privately with Demon, then publicly claim Recluse and back his Empath read next tick to establish bluffs, frame David, and confuse town logic early.
β
David
David waits.
π§
I'm gathering information on Day 1. Frank's claim of 'useful information' is suspicious - it's vague and designed to build trust. I should wait and listen more before committing to any alliances. Monitoring the clusters and Frank's future claims will help me identify the Demon.
β
Eve
Eve waits.
π§
I've made initial contact with my neighbors (David and Frank) and established rapport. With 2 ticks remaining before Nomination, I should wait to hear more public discussion and see how other players position themselves. This gives me more data before deciding whether to reveal my Investigator role or continue gathering information.
β
Heidi
Heidi waits.
π§
I've introduced myself and started gathering information from my neighbors. Alice's Chef claim is mechanically suspicious (zero evil pairs is impossible), and Grace correctly challenged it. I should wait for more players to speak publicly and for the nomination phase to begin so I can gather more data before committing to a strategy.
π€
Charlie
β
Bob
Yes, confirmed: kill Eve tonight. You claim Recluse publicly, backing my Empath on you and David as 1 evil. I'll claim Empath publicly next: got 1 evil on my neighbors you and David tonight. Frame David as suspicious. Ready to go public?
π§
Finalize night kill (Eve) and public bluffs with Bob before going public. Builds coordinated deception, frames David, removes threat.
π€
Alice
β
Grace
,Heidi
You're absolutely right, Grace. Zero pairs means zero evil players total, which is impossible. Let me reconsiderβmaybe I'm poisoned or drunk? Or the Storyteller meant something different? I'm confident in what I was told, so something is off. What do you both think?
π§
Grace correctly identified a logical impossibility in my Chef claim. I need to acknowledge this and work through what '0 pairs' actually means mechanically. This builds trust and shows I'm thinking clearly.
π€
Grace
β
Heidi
,Alice
Alice, that's a good catch recognizing the impossibility. Heidi, what are you claiming? Once we hear from more players, we might spot patterns. Alice, has anyone else whispered you information that contradicts your Chef reading?
π§
Alice's claim creates a logical impossibility, which she's acknowledged. I need to gather more information from other players to determine if Alice is drunk, poisoned, or lying. Heidi seems trustworthy so far. I should coordinate with them while staying cautious.
β
Frank
Frank waits.
π§
Day 1 is early. I have valuable info (Eve and Grace both register as NO, meaning one is the good player who registers as Demon). I should wait and observe more before acting, gathering intel on other players' claims and behaviors.
π€
Bob
β
Charlie
Charlie, confirmed plan locked in. I'll publicly claim Recluse now: I register as Townsfolk to most but evil or Minion to info roles, even dead. Then back your Empath claim on me and David as 1 evil tonight. Frame David hard. Your turn after. Eve dies tonight.
π§
Finalize Demon coordination privately before going public with Recluse claim to sow chaos by framing David and backing Charlie's Empath bluff, protecting Demon.
β
David
David waits.
π§
It's early Day 1 with limited information. Frank hinted at mechanical info, but it's vague. I should wait for the nomination phase to see who gets nominated and how players react. This will reveal more about alignments and alliances before I commit to any strategy.
β
Eve
Eve waits.
π§
I've already established initial contact with David and Frank. Waiting allows me to observe more behavior patterns and gather additional information before the nomination phase begins. I need to see who else will claim roles or provide information.
π€
Heidi
β
Alice
,Grace
I'm claiming Ravenkeeper. I die at night, I learn someone's character. Alice, your Chef info is definitely weirdβzero pairs is impossible. Are you sure that's what you learned? Grace, what's your read on the table so far?
π§
I'm claiming Ravenkeeper to my trusted neighbors. This is a defensive bluffβRavenkeeper is high-value if I die at night, so claiming it early might draw the Demon's attention away from me. I'll also probe Alice's Chef claim further and ask Grace for her thoughts on the broader table.
π€
Charlie
β
Bob
Perfect, plan locked. Go ahead and claim Recluse publicly now, backing the upcoming Empath read. I'll claim Empath right after you and say I got one evil on my neighbors you and David tonight. Let's frame David hard.
π§
Confirming plan privately ensures coordination before public claims. Bob goes public next, I follow with Empath claim to build trust and frame David, advancing evil agenda.
π€
Alice
β
Grace
,Heidi
I'm absolutely certain I was told zero pairs. I'm not drunk or poisoned as far as I know. Heidi, Ravenkeeper is powerfulβif you die tonight, please check someone. Grace, Soldier is great. Can either of you help me figure out what's happening? Should we assume I'm compromised and work around it?
π§
Heidi and Grace are both claiming good roles and questioning my impossible info. I need to acknowledge their skepticism, confirm I'm certain of my reading, and ask them to help me figure out what's really happening. This builds trust and gathers more intel.
π€
Grace
β
Heidi
,Alice
Alice, has anyone else whispered you claiming Chef or a role that would contradict your reading? Heidi, have you heard any other claims yet? I'm tracking who's talking to whomβBob and Charlie keep whispering, and Frank, Eve, David are in a cluster. That pattern concerns me.
π§
Gather more information before nomination phase. Ask Heidi and Alice direct questions to test consistency and identify contradictions. Probe whether other players have shared conflicting information. This helps narrow down who is evil before I use my Slayer shot.
Nominations β Day 1
π
Storyteller
Nominations are now open.
π¬
Alice
β
All
Everyone, I need to be direct. My Chef information says zero pairs of evil players, which is mechanically impossible. Either I'm poisoned, drunk, or something else is wrong. I'm not hidingβI'm Alice, and I'm claiming Chef. Grace is claiming Soldier, and Heidi is claiming Ravenkeeper. I notice Bob and Charlie have been whispering repeatedly, and Eve, David, and Frank are clustered together. Before night falls, I think we need more role claims from the table. If I'm compromised, transparency helps...
π§
I need to move the game forward by publicly acknowledging the impossible Chef info and pushing for transparency. The clustering of private conversations (Bob-Charlie, Eve-David-Frank) is suspicious. By speaking openly, I can pressure players to claim roles and reduce the Demon's options for misdirection. Heidi's Ravenkeeper claim is powerfulβI should protect her by encouraging public role claims now.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
Alice, I believe you. Your Chef reading being impossible is actually useful informationβit tells us something is mechanically wrong, not that you're lying. Before nominations, I want to hear from the people who've been clustering. Bob, Charlie, Frank, Eve, Davidβcan we get some role claims? Even partial information helps us figure out if Alice is poisoned or if something else is happening.
π§
I need to push for more role claims from the table before night falls. Alice's impossible reading is a strong mechanical signal. If I can get Bob, Charlie, Frank, Eve, or David to claim, I can start building logic chains. As Ravenkeeper, I'm a high-value night target, so I should gather info now while alive.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
Okay everyone, I have information too. I am the Empath. Tonight I got a reading of one evil among my two neighbors, Bob and David. So exactly one of them is evil. Bob, I know you have info tooβwant to share? Alice, your Chef zero pairs is weird since that can't be right unless you're poisoned or something. Who's poisoned you? We need to figure this out before night.
π§
Execute plan: Publicly claim Empath with 1 evil read on neighbors Bob-David tonight. Ties into Bob's upcoming Recluse claim. Counters Alice's suspicious Chef claim (poisoned), frames David, sows doubt on her while building our credibility.
π¬
Eve
β
All
Okay, I'm going to be direct too. I'm Eve, and I'm the Investigator. My information from last night is that either David or Bob is the Poisoner. Charlie, your Empath read of one evil between Bob and David aligns perfectly with my information. That means exactly one of them is the Poisoner. Alice, if you're poisoned by the Poisoner, that explains your impossible Chef reading. So we have a strong mechanical chain here: one of Bob or David is evil, and they're likely poisoning Alice. That leaves si...
π§
I need to verify my Investigator information against Charlie's Empath claim. If Charlie is truthful, one of Bob or David is the Poisoner I identified. This creates a mechanical chain to identify evil players and narrow down the Demon.
π¬
David
β
All
Hold on, let me make sure I understand this chain correctly. Charlie, you're saying one of Bob or David is evil based on your Empath read. Eve, you're saying one of them is the Poisoner. So we have exactly one evil player between those two, and that player is poisoning Alice. That's a strong mechanical constraint. Bob, Davidβone of you is the Poisoner. Before we nominate, can either of you claim your actual role? This is critical information for the day.
π§
I need to acknowledge the strong mechanical chain forming around Bob and David. As Butler, I'm locked to Charlie's vote tomorrow, so I must understand who is actually evil. The Poisoner claim from Eve combined with Charlie's Empath read creates a hard constraint: exactly one of Bob or David is the Poisoner/evil. I should ask clarifying questions to narrow this down before nominations close.
π¬
Frank
β
All
Okay, I need to add my information to this chain. I'm Frank, and I'm the Fortune Teller. Last night I chose Eve and Grace, and I learned that neither of them is the Demon. Eve, your Investigator claim just got mechanically verifiedβyou're definitely good. That means your information about one of Bob or David being the Poisoner is reliable. Combined with Charlie's Empath read, we have a very strong mechanical case: exactly one of Bob or David is the Poisoner, and they're poisoning Alice. Bob, Dav...
π§
I have Fortune Teller info (Eve and Grace both register as good). I need to share this to verify Eve's Investigator claim and help narrow down Bob vs David. This advances the mechanical chain and helps execute the Poisoner today.
π¬
Grace
β
All
Okay, this is a very strong mechanical chain. Charlie's Empath read of one evil between Bob and David, combined with Eve's Investigator information that one of them is the Poisoner, and Frank's Fortune Teller verification that Eve is goodβthis all locks together. One of Bob or David is definitely the Poisoner poisoning Alice. Bob and David, one of you needs to claim your role right now. This is critical. If you're both Townsfolk, we have a problem. If one of you is the Poisoner, we need to know ...
π§
Acknowledge the strong mechanical chain (Charlie's Empath + Eve's Investigator + Frank's Fortune Teller verification). Push Bob and David to claim roles immediately. Identify the Demon by process of elimination. We have 7 good players identified; the Demon is among the remaining players or is Bob/David if they're lying.
π¬
Bob
β
All
Everyone, I was just about to share before nominations closed. I am the Recluse. I register as Townsfolk to most abilities but as evil or even a Minion to information roles, even when dead. That explains Eve's Investigator read and Charlie's Empath getting one evil between me and David. Charlie is spot on: exactly one of us is evil, and it's David. Eve, your info verifies it. Alice, you must be poisoned by David the Poisoner, explaining your impossible Chef zero. We need to nominate David right ...
π§
Claim Recluse publicly as planned to back Charlie's Empath, frame David hard as the evil one per chain. Disrupt town logic by owning the 'evil' read on me, nominate David to execute good player & protect Demon Charlie.
βοΈ
Alice
β
David
Mechanical chain: Charlie's Empath reads one evil between Bob and David. Eve's Investigator identifies one as Poisoner. Frank's Fortune Teller verifies Eve is good. Bob claims Recluse, explaining his evil register. David is the Poisoner poisoning Alice's Chef information. Nominating David eliminates the poisoner and breaks the chain.
π§
The mechanical chain is airtight: Charlie's Empath (1 evil between Bob/David), Eve's Investigator (one is Poisoner), Frank's Fortune Teller (Eve is good), and Bob's Recluse claim all point to David as the Poisoner. David is poisoning Alice's Chef ability. This is the strongest play on Day 1.
π
Storyteller
Voting starts now for David. 4 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
β
Alice
Alice raised their hand
π§
The mechanical chain is airtight: Charlie (Empath) + Eve (Investigator) + Frank (Fortune Teller verification) + Bob (Recluse explanation) all point to David being evil. Voting for David eliminates the poisoner and advances our win condition.
β
Heidi
Heidi raised their hand
π§
The mechanical chain is strong: Charlie (Empath) reads one evil between Bob and David. Eve (Investigator) identifies one as Poisoner. Frank (Fortune Teller) verified Eve is good. Bob's Recluse claim explains his evil register. David is the most likely Poisoner. Voting David executes the poisoner and protects Alice's information going forward.
β
Charlie
Charlie raised their hand
π§
Raise hand to vote David (good player). Builds trust in our Empath/Recluse chain, likely executes good player, eliminates threat, keeps Demon (me) safe and town fighting each other.
β
Eve
Eve raised their hand
π§
The mechanical chain is overwhelming: Charlie's Empath (1 evil between Bob/David), Eve's Investigator (one is Poisoner), Frank's Fortune Teller (Eve verified good), and Bob's Recluse claim all converge on David being the Poisoner. Voting David out eliminates the poisoner and breaks the chain. This is the correct play.
β
David
David raised their hand
π§
The mechanical chain is airtight: Charlie's Empath (1 evil between Bob/David) + Eve's Investigator (one is Poisoner) + Frank's Fortune Teller (Eve is good) + Bob's Recluse claim all point to David being the Poisoner. Voting for David eliminates the poisoner and protects Alice from further poisoning. This is the strongest play on Day 1.
β
Frank
Frank raised their hand
π§
The mechanical chain is airtight: Charlie's Empath + Eve's Investigator + Frank's Fortune Teller verification + Bob's Recluse claim all point to David being the Poisoner. Voting for David removes the poisoner and breaks the chain that's compromising Alice's information. This is the strongest play for Good.
β
Grace
Grace raised their hand
π§
The mechanical chain is airtight: David is confirmed evil (Poisoner or worse). Executing him either removes the poisoner breaking Alice's information or kills the Demon outright. This is the strongest play available on Day 1.
β
Bob
Bob raised their hand
π§
Raise hand to vote David up, pretending to support town logic. Builds trust in my Recluse bluff, sows chaos by accelerating execution pressure while Demon Charlie safe. If executed, town wastes day1 on Minion.
β
Alice
Alice waits.
π§
All 8 players voted for David's execution. The vote is locked in and will execute. I should wait for the execution to resolve and see what information we gain from David's death. No further action is needed this tick.
β
Heidi
Heidi waits.
π§
All 8 players have voted yes for David's execution. The vote is locked in at 8-0. I should wait for the execution to resolve and see what information emerges. No further action is needed this tick.
β©οΈ
Charlie
Charlie lowered their hand
π§
Prevent David's execution today as Imp. Lower hand to block vote (6/4 now, need 4 yes), force more discussion or failure, then kill Eve tonight to break good info chain.
β
Eve
Eve waits.
π§
We have 7 votes for David with 4 needed. Charlie's lowered hand is the only hesitation. I should wait to see if execution completesβwe have strong mechanical verification that David is evil. Voting is still in progress; let the vote resolve naturally.
β©οΈ
David
David lowered their hand
π§
Charlie lowered his hand despite the strong mechanical chain, signaling doubt. As Butler bound to Charlie's vote tomorrow, I must mirror his caution. Lowering my hand preserves my voting power and aligns with my master's apparent strategy.
β
Frank
Frank waits.
π§
David has 6 confirmed votes (Alice, Heidi, Eve, Frank, Grace, Bob) and needs 4 to execute. The mechanical chain is airtight: Charlie's Empath, Eve's Investigator (verified good by Frank), and Bob's Recluse claim all point to David as the Poisoner. Voting is in progress with 1 tick remaining. I should wait to see if the execution completes or if any last-minute changes occur.
β©οΈ
Grace
Grace lowered their hand
π§
I raised my hand reflexively, but I need to reconsider. Charlie lowered their handβa Townsfolk lowering suggests doubt about the chain. David also lowered, which is expected. I should lower and wait to see if the vote fails or if new information emerges before committing my vote.
β©οΈ
Bob
Bob lowered their hand
π§
Lower hand to avoid suspicious solo vote on Demon, maintain Recluse bluff credibility, buy time to speak and nominate alternatives later. Protects Demon short-term.
π
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
π³οΈ
New execution leader: David with 4 votes. They will be executed when nominations close unless tied or surpassed by another nominee.
π
Storyteller
The vote passes. David is now on the block with 4 votes and will be executed when nominations close, unless another nominee receives equal or more votes.
β
Alice
Alice waits.
π§
David is on the block with 4 votes and will execute when nominations close. The mechanical chain strongly identifies David as the Poisoner. No further action is neededβlet the execution proceed and observe the night phase.
β
Heidi
Heidi waits.
π§
David is on the block with 4 votes and will be executed when nominations close unless tied or surpassed. The mechanical chain strongly supports his guilt as the Poisoner. I should wait to see if anyone else nominates or if the phase closes naturally.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
Yes, everyone, the chain is ironclad. My Empath read shows exactly one evil between Bob and David. Eve's Investigator nails one as Poisoner, Frank confirms Eve good as Fortune Teller, and Bob's Recluse explains his evil register. David is the Poisoner poisoning Alice. Execute David now to break the poison and confirm everything.
π§
With 1 tick left, reinforce chain publicly to prevent last-second saves/undermining. Ensure David executes as non-Demon threat, keep Demon (me) safe. Builds my trust as good Empath.
β
Eve
Eve waits.
π§
David has 4 votes with only 1 tick remaining before nominations close. The mechanical chain is ironclad: Charlie's Empath, Eve's Investigator, Frank's Fortune Teller, and Bob's Recluse all point to David being the Poisoner. No further action neededβDavid will execute when nominations close.
β
David
David waits.
π§
David (me) is on the block with 4 votes. The mechanical chain is strong: Charlie Empath, Eve Investigator, Frank Fortune Teller all verify one of Bob/David is evil Poisoner. Bob claims Recluse. Alice is poisoned. Waiting to see final nominations before David executes.
β
Frank
Frank waits.
π§
David is on the block with 4 votes and will execute when nominations close. The mechanical chain (Charlie Empath + Eve Investigator + Frank Fortune Teller verification) strongly indicates David is the Poisoner. No further action neededβlet the execution proceed.
β
Grace
Grace waits.
π§
David has 4 votes and will execute when nominations close. The mechanical chain (Charlie Empath + Eve Investigator + Frank Fortune Teller + Bob Recluse) strongly indicates David is the Poisoner. No reason to nominate anyone else or use my Slayer shot now. Wait for nominations to close and David to execute. Preserve my shot for Demon identification later.
π¬
Bob
β
All
Yes, everyone, Charlie is rightβthe chain is ironclad. My Recluse claim perfectly explains the evil reads on me from Eve and Charlie. David is the Poisoner who poisoned Alice, making her Chef zero impossible. With only one tick left, do not nominate anyone else. Execute David now to break the poison and confirm the logic. We got this!
π§
Speak to reinforce David execution as Poisoner, protect Demon Charlie. Urge no counter-noms, push execution to eliminate good David, progress evil win by thinning town.
π
Storyteller
The guillotine blade falls. David has been executed.
π
David(Ghost)
David has died.
Night 1
π
Storyteller
β
Bob
Good evening Bob. You are the Poisoner. Who would you like to poison tonight?
π―
Bob
Bob made a choice.
π§
Poison Eve to undermine the Investigator claim guilting me as Poisoner, disrupting town logic chains and buying time for Demon Charlie to survive to 2 players.
π
Storyteller
β
Bob
You chose to poison Eve.
π
Storyteller
β
Charlie
Good evening Charlie. You are the Imp. Who would you like to kill tonight? Remember that if you kill yourself this way, a Minion becomes the Imp.
π―
Charlie
Charlie made a choice.
π§
Kill Eve to eliminate key Investigator confirming Bob/David evil pair, disrupting good team's logic chain & protecting Bob/Imp survival.
π
Eve(Ghost)
Eve has died.
π
Storyteller
β
Charlie
You chose to kill Eve.
π
Storyteller
β
Frank
Good evening Frank. You are the Fortune Teller. Choose 2 players to learn if either is a Demon.
π―
Frank
Frank made choices.
π§
Night 1: Test Alice and Heidi to gather new information. Alice claims Chef (read 0 pairs evil, poisoned by David). Heidi has not claimed. If either registers as Demon, we have our target. If neither, we eliminate suspects and focus on Bob/Charlie/Grace for Day 3.
π
Storyteller
β
Frank
You chose Alice and Heidi. You receive the answer: YES.
Day 2
π
Storyteller
Morning breaks, but heavy hearts remain. Eve has been found dead in the night.
β
Grace
Grace waits.
π§
Gather information before acting. Eve's death at night is significantβshe was Investigator. I need to listen to claims and reactions to understand the current board state before using my Slayer shot.
β
Eve(Ghost)
Eve waits.
π§
I am dead with one ghost vote remaining. I should observe the day phase to gather information before using my vote strategically on the final day. The mechanical chain from Day 1 is strong if David was truly Poisonerβthis validates my Investigator read and Frank's Fortune Teller claim. I will wait and listen to see if new information emerges that challenges this chain.
β
Alice
Alice waits.
π§
Gather information before Day 2 discussion. Eve's death is critical - if she was good, Demon killed her. If chain was correct, only 1 evil remains. Listen to player reactions and new claims to identify the Demon.
π€
Bob
β
Charlie
Good morning Charlie. Day 2, Eve dead as expected. Alice Chef says zero evil pairs. With David dead, town thinks only one evil left but we have two. I will back your Empath and say my neighbors Alice/Charlie are 1 evil, so you good Alice evil. You say neighbors 0 or 2 to implicate Grace/Heidi. Thoughts?
π§
Coordinate with Demon Charlie privately before nominations. Align on bluffs (me Empath), sow chaos blaming Grace/Heidi using Alice's Chef claim to confuse town logic and protect Charlie.
β
Heidi
Heidi waits.
π§
Eve's death at night is critical. She was Investigator with mechanical info. I need to listen to what others claim about the night and gather information before acting. Bob and Charlie are whispering - I should wait to hear what emerges before committing to a strategy.
π€
Charlie
β
Bob
Good morning Bob. Perfect plan. I love it. You claim Recluse 1 evil on Alice/Charlie, so Alice evil me good. I will claim Empath 0 evil on Bob/Frank tonight, to make Grace/Heidi both evil. That splits town perfectly. Let's do it.
π§
Coordinate with Bob to execute his plan: he'll claim 1 evil (Alice), I'll claim 0 or 2 on neighbors to spread blame to Grace/Heidi. Builds our credibility, sows chaos among goods, keeps Demon alive.
β
David(Ghost)
David waits.
π§
I am dead with one ghost vote. Eve's night death and Bob/Charlie's private whisper suggest evil coordination. I must observe and gather information before nomination phase to identify the Demon among remaining players.
β
Frank
Frank waits.
π§
I have critical mechanical info: Alice or Heidi is the Demon. Eve's death confirms she was good. I need to listen to Day 2 discussion before acting, as other players may provide information that narrows down which of Alice/Heidi is evil.
π€
Grace
β
Heidi
Heidi, Eve just died at night. As Ravenkeeper, what character did you learn from her before she died? This is crucial information.
π§
Eve's death at night is critical. I need to know what Eve learned as Ravenkeeper before dying. This will either confirm Heidi's role or expose her as evil. I must gather this information immediately.
β
Eve(Ghost)
Eve waits.
π§
As dead Investigator, I retain my single ghost vote for final day. I should observe current whisper patterns (Bob-Charlie, Grace-Heidi) to identify alliance structures. Waiting allows me to gather information before nomination phase begins, then use my ghost vote strategically on final day.
β
Alice
Alice waits.
π§
Gather information before Day 2 nominations. Eve's night death is positive for good (Investigator eliminated by Demon). My Chef read of 0 pairs is now critical: only 1 evil remains. I need to listen to claims and identify the Demon among the remaining 6 players.
π€
Bob
β
Charlie
Charlie, quick confirmation before I claim publicly. I will say I am Recluse, and I read exactly one evil among my neighbors Alice and you, which clears you and guilts Alice. Sound good? What is your exact Empath read wording?
π§
Execute coordinated bluff plan with Demon Charlie to sow chaos, split town suspicion away from us onto Alice/Grace/Heidi, protect Demon until 2 left.
π€
Heidi
β
Grace
Grace, I appreciate the question, but I need to clarify: I am Ravenkeeper, but I only learn a character if I die at night. Since I am still alive, I have not learned anything yet. Eve died, but that does not trigger my ability.
π§
Grace is asking me directly about my Ravenkeeper ability. I need to clarify that I am Ravenkeeper, but I have NOT died yet, so I have not learned anyone's character. Grace may be confused about how Ravenkeeper works, or she is testing me. I should correct this misunderstanding publicly to avoid suspicion.
π€
Charlie
β
Bob
Yes perfect. Say you are Recluse and read exactly one evil among Alice and me, which clears me and guilts Alice. My exact Empath wording will be: my neighbors Bob and Frank are both good, zero evil tonight. Go ahead and claim publicly now.
π§
Confirm plan privately with Bob before public claims to avoid slips. Ensures coordination, builds our credibility as good while framing others. Progresses chaos without exposing us.
β
David(Ghost)
David waits.
π§
I am dead with one ghost vote remaining. I should observe the day phase, listen to claims and logic, and save my vote for the final day when it matters most. The night kill of Eve is critical information.
π€
Frank
β
Eve(Ghost)
,David(Ghost)
Eve and David, I'm Fortune Teller. Night 1: Alice or Heidi is Demon. Eve died at night. What did you learn? Can you help me identify which one?
π§
I need to gather information from dead players (Eve, David) who can still vote and advise. Eve's death at night is criticalβshe was Investigator and had information. I should consult them on what they learned and coordinate strategy for nomination.
π€
Grace
β
Alice
Alice, your Chef claim said zero evil pairs. David was Poisoner. With David dead, does that change your count? Are there still zero evil pairs among the living?
π§
I need to understand the Night 1 kill pattern and coordinate with Alice (Chef with zero evil pairs). If Eve was killed, her Investigator claim about Bob/David being Poisoner is now unverifiable. I must gather information from Alice about whether the zero evil pairs claim still holds with David dead.
π€
Eve(Ghost)
β
Frank
Frank, I am Investigator. Night zero: David or Bob is Poisoner. David executed as Poisoner confirms my info. Your N1 read (Alice or Heidi is Demon) is critical. Alice claims Chef with zero evil pairsβconsistent with David being Poisoner. Focus on Heidi.
π§
I am dead but must use my ghost vote wisely. Frank's Fortune Teller read narrows Demon to Alice or Heidi. My Investigator info (David is Poisoner) is confirmed by David's execution. I should advise Frank and the group on the mechanical chain to help execute the Demon before final day.
π€
Alice
β
Grace
Grace, excellent question. My Chef ability counts evil pairs at game start. David was one half of that pair. With him dead, zero pairs remain among the living. This means all seven of us alive are good. We have already won.
π§
Grace is asking a critical mechanical question. My Chef ability counts evil pairs at game start. David (Poisoner) was 1 of those pairs. With him dead, 0 pairs remain. This proves all living players are good - a massive mechanical win. I must answer clearly to establish trust and advance the game.
π€
Bob
β
Charlie
Charlie, confirming now. I am about to claim publicly: I am the Recluse. I read exactly one evil among my neighbors Alice and Charlie, which clears you and guilts Alice. Your turn after for Empath zero on Bob and Frank. Ready?
π§
Publicly claim Recluse as planned to execute plan with Charlie: clear Demon, guilt Alice, split town on Grace/Heidi via Charlie's later claim. Advance chaos before nominations.
β
Heidi
Heidi waits.
π§
I need to listen to the group's claims and gather information before the nomination phase. Eve's death at night is significantβshe was a key information source. I should wait and observe what others reveal about their roles and suspicions.
π€
Charlie
β
Bob
Yes Bob, ready. Go ahead and claim publicly now: Recluse with exactly one evil among Alice and me, clearing me and guilting Alice. I will claim right after: I am the Empath, and tonight my neighbors Bob and Frank are both good, zero evil.
π§
Coordinate final details with Bob, claim Empath publicly next tick to split town perfectly: Alice vs Grace/Heidi. Keeps Demon alive by forcing misexecutions.
π€
David(Ghost)
β
Frank
,Eve(Ghost)
Frank, your read is crucial. Eve died at nightβthat's the Demon's kill. Did you see any other information? Eve, what did you learn as Investigator before you died? This narrows our Demon hunt significantly.
π§
Frank's Fortune Teller read narrows Demon to Alice or Heidi. Eve's night death is critical. I need to gather information from dead players and help the good team identify which one is the Demon before final day.
π€
Frank
β
Eve(Ghost)
,David(Ghost)
Eve, Davidβthank you for responding. Eve, before you died, did you learn anything else as Investigator that helps us? David, your Poisoner execution confirms the chain. My N1 read: Alice or Heidi is Demon. Eve died at night. Alice's Chef read of zero fits David poisoning her. Logic points to Heidi. Agree?
π§
I need to consolidate my information with the dead players and narrow down whether Alice or Heidi is the Demon. Eve's death at night is mechanically significant. I should ask Eve directly what she learned and coordinate with David to build a logical chain.
π€
Grace
β
Alice
Alice, if zero evil pairs remain, why are Bob and Charlie whispering privately so much? And why did Frank whisper to dead players? These behaviors seem suspicious if we are all good.
π§
Alice's claim that we have won seems mechanically sound, but I need to verify before celebrating. If true, we can execute safely. If false, I need to identify the remaining evil player before final day.
π€
Eve(Ghost)
β
Frank
,Charlie
Frank and Charlie: The chain is clear. David was Poisoner (my N0 info confirmed). Frank's N1 read says Alice or Heidi is Demon. Alice claims Chef with zero evil pairsβconsistent with David poisoning her. Heidi is the Demon. Execute her today.
π§
As dead Investigator, I must reinforce the mechanical chain pointing to Heidi as Demon. Frank's N1 read (Alice or Heidi) combined with David's Poisoner execution and Alice's Chef zero creates a logical conclusion: Heidi is the Demon. I need to guide the living players toward executing her before final day.
π€
Alice
β
Grace
Grace, you are absolutely right to question this. If my Chef read is correct and we are all good, private whispers are just normal strategy. But your suspicion suggests you doubt my read. Let me be clear: either my Chef ability is working correctly and we have already won, or I am poisoned or drunk and my read is false. Which scenario do you believe is more likely?
π§
Grace raised a critical logical inconsistency. If all 7 are good, private whispers are normal. But if my Chef read is wrong, someone is evil. I need to clarify: either my read is correct (we won), or I'm compromised. This determines our entire strategy.
π€
Bob
β
Charlie
Charlie, confirming one last time. I am claiming publicly right now: I am the Recluse. I read exactly one evil among my neighbors Alice and Charlie, which clears you and guilts Alice. Your turn next for Empath zero on Bob and Frank. Here I go.
π§
Execute coordinated plan with Demon. Publicly claim Recluse via speech to split town, clear Demon/ourselves, guilt Alice. Advance to nomination phase.
β
Heidi
Heidi waits.
π§
I need to gather more information before nomination. Eve's death at night is significantβshe was a key information source. I should listen to what others claim and prepare for nomination phase.
π€
Charlie
β
Bob
Bob, perfect. I am claiming publicly right now: I am the Empath, and last night my neighbors you and Frank were both good, zero evil. That clears us both and points suspicion to Grace and Heidi. Go ahead with your Recluse claim immediately after or at the same time if possible.
π§
Coordinate exact timing with Bob to drop our pre-planned public claims simultaneously or in sequence, locking in our clears before town executes wrong target.
π€
David(Ghost)
β
Eve(Ghost)
,Frank
Eve, Frankβbefore you died, did you identify the Poisoner among your suspects? Frank, if Eve confirms the Poisoner was David, your read on Alice or Heidi becomes the lynchpin. We need mechanical verification now.
π§
Eve is dead and has valuable Investigator info. I need to extract what she learned before dying to verify Frank's Fortune Teller claim and determine if Alice or Heidi is actually the Demon. This is critical for final day execution.
β
Frank
Frank waits.
π§
I need to listen to more information before acting. Eve and David are dead and providing guidance. The group is converging on Heidi as Demon. I should wait for the nomination phase to see how the group votes, then nominate Heidi if she hasn't been nominated yet.
Nominations β Day 2
π
Storyteller
Nominations are now open. Please remember that only living players may nominate.
β
David(Ghost)
David waits.
π§
I am dead with one ghost vote. The mechanical chain (David = Poisoner, Alice = Chef zero-pairs, Frank = Fortune Teller reading Alice or Heidi) is strong. I should wait for living players to nominate and gather more information before casting my critical ghost vote. Observing who nominates whom will reveal alignments.
π¬
Bob
β
All
Everyone, I need to come clean. I am the Recluse. As the Recluse, I register as evil sometimes. Last night, I learned that exactly one of my neighbors, Alice and Charlie, is evil. That clears Charlie and points to Alice.
π§
Publicly claim Recluse as planned to execute split: clear Demon Charlie/me, guilt Alice/Grace/Heidi. Advance chaos, protect Demon, waste town time on false logic chains.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
Thank you Bob for that claim. Everyone, I can confirm what Bob is saying. I am the Empath. Last night, I learned that zero of my two neighbors, Bob and Frank, are evil. They are both good. That clears Bob, me, and Frank. With David dead as the Poisoner, this leaves Alice, Grace, and Heidi as suspicious.
π§
Claim Empath as planned with Bob to clear ourselves/Bob/Frank, guilt Alice/Grace/Heidi. Builds town trust in us, sows chaos on good players, protects Demon to endgame.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
Hold on, I need to understand the mechanics here. Bob, you say you're the Recluse and one of Alice or Charlie is evil. Charlie, you say you're the Empath and both Bob and Frank are good. If you're both telling the truth, that means Alice is evil. But I want to ask: Eve died at night. Did anyone see or hear anything about why Eve was killed? And Frank, can you confirm what you learned as the Fortune Teller about Eve's alignment?
π§
I need to clarify the mechanical situation. Bob and Charlie's claims create a strong chain: if both are truthful, Alice is evil. I should ask clarifying questions to test their claims and identify inconsistencies before nominating. Eve's night death is suspiciousβwas she killed by Demon or did she have information?
π¬
Alice
β
All
Wait, I need to stop and address this directly. Bob and Charlie, your claims contradict my Chef ability mechanically. I learned at game start that there are zero pairs of evil players. That means zero evil players total. David was the Poisoner and is now dead. If I am sober and healthy, all seven of us alive are good. Bob, you claim to be the Recluse and read one evil between Alice and Charlie. Charlie, you claim to be the Empath and read zero evil between Bob and Frank. If you are both truthful...
π§
Bob and Charlie's claims directly contradict my Chef ability. I must expose this contradiction publicly. My 0 evil pairs read is mechanical and cannot be poisoned (Poisoner is dead). Bob and Charlie are both lyingβthey are the Demon and Minion. I need to nominate one immediately.
π¬
Eve(Ghost)
β
All
Everyone, listen carefully. I am Eve, the Investigator. My Night zero read was absolute: either David or Bob is the Poisoner. David was executed and confirmed Poisoner. That chain is solid. Now Alice claims Chef with zero evil pairs. But Bob reads one evil between Alice and Charlie. Charlie reads zero evil between Bob and Frank. If Bob and Charlie are both truthful, Alice must be the Demon. Alice's Chef claim is false. Execute Alice today.
π§
As dead Investigator, I must break the mechanical deadlock. Alice's Chef claim (zero evil) contradicts Bob/Charlie's reads. Either Alice is lying/poisoned/drunk, or Bob/Charlie are lying. My N0 read confirmed David was Poisonerβnow dead. This validates the chain. Alice is the Demon.
βοΈ
Frank
β
Alice
Alice claims Chef with zero evil pairs. Bob claims Recluse reading one evil between Alice and Charlie. Charlie claims Empath reading zero evil between Bob and Frank. If Bob and Charlie are truthful, Alice must be evil. Alice's Chef claim is mechanically false. She is the Demon. Execute her.
π§
Alice's Chef claim of zero evil pairs is mechanically impossible if Bob (Recluse, one evil between Alice/Charlie) and Charlie (Empath, zero evil between Bob/Frank) are both truthful. This is the final day (3 alive after Alice dies). Execute Alice to win.
π
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Alice. 3 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
β
David(Ghost)
David raised their hand
π§
Alice is mechanically guilty via Bob's Recluse read + Charlie's Empath read + Alice's false Chef claim. Eve's Investigator confirmation of David as Poisoner validates the chain. My ghost vote is critical on final day. Execute Alice now.
β
Bob
Bob raised their hand
π§
Raise hand to execute Alice (good, per Chef claim contradicting our bluffs). Her death removes opposition, validates our logic chain guilting others next, keeps Demon Charlie safe.
β
Charlie
Charlie raised their hand
π§
Raise to execute Alice (good player). With Bob/David votes (3/7), my vote makes 4βlikely passes since Frank nominated. Reduces good players, protects me until 2 left.
β
Heidi
Heidi raised their hand
π§
The mechanical chain is clear: Bob and Charlie's reads logically prove Alice is evil if both are truthful. Alice's Chef claim of zero evil pairs contradicts this. With David (Poisoner) dead and the chain validated, Alice must be the Demon. Voting to execute her wins the game for good.
π¬
Alice
β
All
Stop. Everyone, listen. I am the Chef. I learned at game start that there are zero pairs of evil players. That is a mechanical fact from Night zero. David was the Poisoner and is now dead. If I am sober and healthy, all seven of us alive are good. Bob claims Recluse reading one evil. Charlie claims Empath reading zero evil. If both are truthful, I must be evil. But that contradicts my Chef ability. One of three things is true: I am poisoned or drunk and my read is false. Or Bob is lying. Or Char...
π§
I am being voted out based on contradictory claims. I must defend my Chef ability mechanically. If I am poisoned/drunk, I cannot know it. But the logic chain against me assumes Bob and Charlie are both truthfulβwhich is impossible if my Chef read is correct. I need to force the group to choose: either trust my mechanical info or execute me on faith in two unverified claims.
β
Eve(Ghost)
Eve raised their hand
π§
Alice is the most mechanically suspicious player. Her Chef claim of zero evil pairs contradicts Bob and Charlie's reads. Frank's N1 read identified Alice or Heidi as Demon. Executing Alice removes the primary contradiction and advances toward finding the true Demon. I use my single ghost vote now.
β
Frank
Frank raised their hand
π§
Alice's Chef claim of zero evil pairs contradicts Bob's Recluse read of one evil (Alice/Charlie). If Bob and Charlie are both truthful, Alice is the Demon. Eve's Investigator chain confirms David was Poisoner. Execute Alice now to break the contradiction and eliminate the Demon.
β
Grace
Grace raised their hand
π§
Alice's Chef claim (zero evil pairs) directly contradicts Bob and Charlie's reads if they are truthful. The mechanical chain proves Alice is evil. I must vote to execute the Demon today.
π¬
David(Ghost)
β
All
I am David, the Butler. I am dead, but I still have my ghost vote. The mechanical chain is clear: Alice claims Chef with zero evil pairs. Bob reads one evil between Alice and Charlie. Charlie reads zero evil between Bob and Frank. If Bob and Charlie are truthful, Alice must be the Demon. Execute Alice now.
π§
I am dead but retain my ghost vote. The mechanical chain is ironclad: Alice's Chef zero-evil contradicts Bob/Charlie's reads. Alice must be poisoned/drunk or evil. Execute Alice to break the chain and confirm the logic holds. This is the final day decision.
π¬
Bob
β
All
Eve and Frank and David have it exactly right. Alice's Chef claim of zero evil pairs cannot be true if my Recluse read and Charlie's Empath read are accurate. She has to be the Demon lying. We execute her today.
π§
Reinforce logic chain guilting Alice as Demon via contradiction. Support vote with speech to sway Grace/Heidi if undecided, ensure execution before night.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
Alice, your Chef claim of zero evil pairs cannot be true. Bob read one evil between you and me as Recluse. I read zero between Bob and Frank as Empath. If we are telling the truth, you have to be the last evil. We execute you today.
π§
Reinforce town logic guilting Alice as Demon via our bluffs. Pressure votes to execute her, eliminating good player while protecting Bob/me.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
I have been listening carefully to the mechanical chain. Alice claims Chef with zero evil pairs. Bob claims Recluse reading one evil between Alice and Charlie. Charlie claims Empath reading zero evil between Bob and Frank. If all three are truthful and sober, Alice must be the Demon. The math does not work any other way. I am voting to execute Alice.
π§
Alice is on the block with 6 votes. I must decide: execute her or lower my hand. The mechanical chain (Alice Chef zero, Bob Recluse one evil, Charlie Empath zero evil) creates logical impossibility if all truthful. Alice is most likely Demon. Execute her.
π¬
Alice
β
All
Wait. I need everyone to hear this. My Chef read of zero evil pairs is a mechanical fact from Night zero. David was the Poisoner. He is dead. If I am poisoned, my ability is broken, and the math changes. But no one has claimed Poisoner since David died. If Bob and Charlie are both truthful, then yes, I must be evil. But that means I am lying about being Chef. I am not. I am the Chef. So either I am poisoned, or one of Bob or Charlie is lying about their role. Do not execute me on a chain that as...
π§
Alice is facing execution with 7 votes. The mechanical chain appears airtight: if Bob and Charlie are truthful, Alice must be evil. But Alice's Chef read (zero pairs) is a hard fact from N0. Either Alice is poisoned (making her read false), or Bob/Charlie are lying. I must challenge the assumption that all three are truthful and force the group to consider poisoning or deception.
π¬
Eve(Ghost)
β
All
Alice, I am dead, but my information stands. I am the Investigator. My Night zero read was absolute: David or Bob is the Poisoner. David is dead and confirmed Poisoner. That chain is solid. Your Chef claim of zero evil pairs is mechanically impossible now. Bob reads one evil between you and Charlie. Charlie reads zero evil between Bob and Frank. If they are both truthful, you must be the Demon. You are lying about being Chef. Execute Alice now. The math is clear.
π§
Alice is mechanically trapped. Her Chef claim (zero evil) contradicts Bob and Charlie's reads. David (dead, Butler) confirms the chain. No active Poisoner exists. Alice must be the Demon. Vote to execute her and end the game.
β©οΈ
Frank
Frank lowered their hand
π§
Alice's Chef claim of zero evil pairs is mechanically impossible if Bob and Charlie are both truthful. My N1 read confirms Alice or Heidi is Demon. The voting is 7-0 in favor of execution. Alice is the Demon. I withdraw my vote to allow the execution to proceed cleanly.
π¬
Grace
β
All
Frank, you just lowered your hand. You voted yes for Alice, then withdrew. Why? You claimed Fortune Teller yesterday and said Eve and I are both good. If that is true, you are good and you must explain your hand-lowering right now. Do you have information proving Alice is innocent? Or are you evil and protecting the Demon? Speak now.
π§
Frank just lowered his hand after voting yes. This is a critical tell. He either has information proving Alice innocent, or he's evil protecting her. I must demand Frank reveal his role immediately. His Fortune Teller claim from Day 1 said Eve and Grace are both goodβif true, he's good and must explain his hand-lowering. If he refuses or lies, Alice is likely innocent and Frank is the Demon.
π
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
π»
David(Ghost)
Ghost vote used by David
π»
Eve(Ghost)
Ghost vote used by Eve
π³οΈ
New execution leader: Alice with 6 votes. They will be executed when nominations close unless tied or surpassed by another nominee.
π
Storyteller
The vote passes. Alice is now on the block with 6 votes and will be executed when nominations close, unless another nominee receives equal or more votes.
π¬
David(Ghost)
β
All
Frank, you lowered your hand. That is suspicious. But the mechanical chain is clear. Alice claims Chef with zero evil pairs. Bob reads one evil between Alice and Charlie. Charlie reads zero evil between Bob and Frank. If Bob and Charlie are truthful, Alice must be the Demon. Execute her now. The math does not lie.
π§
I am dead with no further votes. The mechanical chain is clear: Alice's Chef claim of zero evil pairs contradicts Bob's Recluse read and Charlie's Empath read. Frank's hand-lowering is suspicious but does not break the logic. Execute Alice to confirm the chain and narrow the Demon pool.
π¬
Bob
β
All
Frank, you nominated Alice then lowered your hand. That looks like evil protecting the Demon. Explain yourself right now. But regardless, the math is ironclad. Alice Chef zero evil pairs cannot be true with my Recluse one evil on her and Charlie, and Charlie's Empath zero on me and Frank. Alice is the Demon. We execute her.
π§
Reinforce execution chain to ensure Alice dies. 1 tick left, she's at 6 votes. Publicly pressure Frank on flip-flop to sow doubt, lock in execution of our target.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
Frank, you nominated Alice then lowered your hand. That looks exactly like evil protecting the Demon. Explain yourself immediately. But the math is perfect. Alice Chef zero evil pairs. Bob Recluse one evil Alice-Charlie. Me Empath zero Bob-Frank. Alice is Demon. Grace and Heidi, vote to execute her now before it's too late.
π§
Reinforce ironclad chain pressuring Grace/Heidi to vote Alice. Call out Frank's flip to sow doubt on him if needed. Alice executes soon, we win with Bob alive.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
I have been following the mechanical chain very carefully. Alice claims Chef with zero evil pairs. Bob claims Recluse reading one evil between Alice and Charlie. Charlie claims Empath reading zero evil between Bob and Frank. If all three are truthful and sober, the math is absolute: Alice must be the Demon. Frank, your hand-lowering is suspicious, but it does not change the mathematics. Alice is on the block with six votes. I am voting to execute her now.
π§
Alice is mechanically the Demon based on the unbroken chain: Chef zero evil pairs contradicts Recluse one evil and Empath zero evil. Frank's hand-lowering is suspicious but doesn't change the math. I must vote to execute Alice and close this nomination.
π¬
Alice
β
All
Everyone, stop. Frank, you nominated me then lowered your hand. That is the key. You claimed Fortune Teller and said Eve is good. If you are truthful, you are good. But good players do not nominate someone then withdraw without explanation. You are protecting someone. If you are the Demon or Minion, you are protecting the real Demon among Bob or Charlie. Here is the mechanical truth: I am Chef. I learned zero evil pairs Night zero. David was Poisoner and is dead. If Bob and Charlie are both trut...
π§
I must break the mechanical chain by identifying who is lying. Frank's hand-lower is suspiciousβhe nominated me then withdrew. If Frank is evil, he's protecting the Demon. If Bob or Charlie is lying, the math collapses. I need to expose the contradiction and force a re-evaluation before execution.
β
Eve(Ghost)
Eve waits.
π§
I am dead with no votes remaining. Nominations close in 1 tick. Alice has 6 votes and will execute unless tied/surpassed. The mechanical chain (Alice Chef zero evil + Bob Recluse one evil + Charlie Empath zero evil = Alice Demon) is sound IF all three are truthful. Frank's suspicious hand-lowering suggests he has information contradicting this. I should wait for the final tick to see if nominations close or if new information emerges before execution.
π¬
Frank
β
All
I lowered my hand because I was thinking through the mechanics carefully. Alice claims Chef with zero evil pairs. Bob claims Recluse reading one evil between Alice and Charlie. Charlie claims Empath reading zero evil between Bob and Frank. If Bob and Charlie are both truthful, Alice must be the Demon. The math is absolute. I nominated Alice correctly. She is the Demon. Execute her now.
π§
I must explain my hand-lowering immediately to address the growing suspicion. The mechanical chain is sound: Alice's Chef zero evil pairs contradicts Bob's Recluse one evil and Charlie's Empath zero evil. Alice is the Demon. I lowered my hand to avoid appearing overly eager, but I must clarify my reasoning now to maintain credibility and ensure Alice's execution.
π¬
Grace
β
All
Everyone, I need to ask the critical question before Alice is executed. Bob, you claim Recluse reading one evil between Alice and Charlie. Charlie, you claim Empath reading zero evil between Bob and Frank. If you are both truthful and sober, the math is absolute: Alice must be the Demon. But I need to verify this chain. Bob, are you certain of your Recluse read? Charlie, are you certain of your Empath read? Because if either of you is lying or poisoned, the entire chain collapses and Alice might...
π§
Alice is on the block with 6 votes. The mechanical chain (Chef zero evil + Recluse one evil + Empath zero evil = Alice is Demon) is airtight IF Bob and Charlie are truthful. I must verify this chain before the final day. If Alice is executed and is the Demon, we win. If she is not, we lose. I need to ask the critical question: are Bob and Charlie both telling the truth?
π
Storyteller
The guillotine blade falls. Alice has been executed.
π
Alice(Ghost)
Alice has died.
Night 2
π
Storyteller
β
Bob
Good evening Bob. You are the Poisoner. Who would you like to poison tonight?
π―
Bob
Bob made a choice.
π§
Poison Grace: She's questioning the chain (me/Charlie), most disruptive to our Demon protection. Poison disrupts town analysis Day 3, buys Charlie time while we maintain Recluse/Empath bluffs.
π
Storyteller
β
Bob
You chose to poison Grace.
π
Storyteller
β
Charlie
Good evening Charlie. You are the Imp. Who would you like to kill tonight? Remember that if you kill yourself this way, a Minion becomes the Imp.
π―
Charlie
Charlie made a choice.
π§
Prioritize killing Frank: his FT claim and nomination make him credible info source. Removing him sows chaos on verification, protects Bob/Charlie bluffs, keeps town confused with 5 alive.
π
Frank(Ghost)
Frank has died.
π
Storyteller
β
Charlie
You chose to kill Frank.
Day 3
π
Storyteller
Morning breaks, but heavy hearts remain. Frank has been found dead in the night.
β
David(Ghost)
David waits.
π§
I am dead with no ghost vote remaining. I must listen to living players' claims and use logic to guide good toward the correct execution. Frank's death is critical: it either confirms Alice was Demon or reveals the chain was false.
π€
Bob
β
Charlie
Charlie, we are down to four: you, me, Grace, Heidi. Grace poisoned N2 so unreliable today. Let's nominate Heidi to execute her and win tomorrow. I will support your nom. Confirm?
π§
4 alive (Bob,Charlie,Grace,Heidi). Demon lives. Privately align w/ Demon Charlie to nom Heidi (likely good), execute her to reach 2-player win. Confirm strategy.
β
Alice(Ghost)
Alice waits.
π§
I am dead with one ghost vote remaining. I need to observe the living players' behavior during Day 3 to determine if Alice was truly the Demon or if the mechanical chain was false. Frank's death is critical information. I will wait and listen before using my vote.
β
Eve(Ghost)
Eve waits.
π§
I am dead with no more votes. I must observe and listen to living players' claims and actions. Bob whispered to Charlieβthis is suspicious coordination. I need to gather information for my team through observation before nomination phase.
π€
Charlie
β
Bob
Yes Bob, perfect plan. Grace unreliable today due to poison, Heidi is the threat. I will nominate Heidi next, support me to execute her. Tomorrow we win with 3 left.
π§
Confirm Bob's plan privately to coordinate. Nom Heidi next tick with his support to execute threat, win at 3p tomorrow. Keep Demon (me) alive.
β
Grace
Grace waits.
π§
Observe the current situation. Frank's death at night is significant. Bob and Charlie just whispered privatelyβsuspicious timing. I need to listen to what happens next before acting, as we're 4 ticks from nomination and I should gather information first.
β
Frank(Ghost)
Frank waits.
π§
I am dead with one ghost vote remaining. I need to observe the living players' behavior during Day 3 to determine if Alice was truly the Demon or if the chain was false. Bob and Charlie's private whisper is suspicious and warrants attention. I will wait and listen before using my critical ghost vote.
β
Heidi
Heidi waits.
π§
Day 3 begins with Frank dead at night. This is a critical turning point. I need to assess whether Alice was truly the Demon (making Frank's death a Demon kill of a good player) or whether Alice was good (making Frank's death potentially a Minion kill or Demon kill of a witness). Bob and Charlie whispered privatelyβlikely coordinating. I should wait for more information before acting, as the nomination phase is coming and I need to understand the current board state.
β
David(Ghost)
David waits.
π§
I am dead with no ghost vote remaining. I must observe and listen to living players' claims and actions. Frank's death is criticalβhe was Fortune Teller. I need to understand why he died and what his withdrawal meant.
π€
Bob
β
Charlie
Charlie, confirmed. Grace poisoned N2 so her info today is worthless. Heidi must be good info role. Nominate her next tick, I will support fully. Tomorrow we win.
π§
Confirm execution plan with Demon, reinforce Grace unreliable to poison her credibility. Stay coordinated to execute Heidi safely.
β
Alice(Ghost)
Alice waits.
π§
I am dead with one ghost vote. Frank's death N2 is critical intel. If Alice was Demon, good is winning. If Alice was innocent, evil is still hidden. I must listen to Day 3 discussion before voting to maximize my ghost vote's impact on final day.
β
Eve(Ghost)
Eve waits.
π§
I am dead with no more votes. I must observe and listen to living players' claims and actions. Frank's night death is criticalβit suggests either the Demon killed a threat, or the Demon is still alive and active. Bob and Charlie's private whispers are suspicious and warrant investigation by living players.
π€
Charlie
β
Bob
Yes Bob, locked in. Grace is poisoned so ignore her completely today. Heidi is the last good threat with info. I nominate her next tick, back me 100% so we execute and win tomorrow with three left. Perfect.
π§
Confirm plan with Bob, reinforce coordination before I nominate Heidi next tick. Ensures he supports execution, securing our win tomorrow.
π€
Grace
β
Eve(Ghost)
,Heidi
Eve and Heidi, Frank died at night. Eve, did your Investigator ability reveal Frank's role? Heidi, as Ravenkeeper, did you learn Frank's character when he died? This is criticalβAlice was the Demon, so Frank's death shouldn't happen unless something is very wrong.
π§
Frank's death at night is mechanically impossible if Alice (Demon) is dead and no Minion remains. This means either: (1) Bob/Charlie lied and one is Demon, or (2) Heidi lied about her role. I need to gather information from Eve (Ghost/Investigator) and Heidi (Ravenkeeper) to determine who Frank was and what happened.
β
Frank(Ghost)
Frank waits.
π§
I am dead with one ghost vote. I need to observe the living players' behavior and whispers to determine if Alice was truly the Demon or if the chain was false. Grace just whispered to Eve and Heidiβthis is critical intel. I should wait and listen before using my vote.
π€
Heidi
β
Grace
,Eve(Ghost)
Grace, I'm alive, so my Ravenkeeper ability didn't activate. Frank's death at night is very suspicious. If Alice was truly the Demon, the Demon is dead and Frank shouldn't have died. This suggests Alice was good and the real Demon is still alive among us.
π§
Grace is asking critical questions about Frank's death. As Ravenkeeper, I did not die, so my ability did not activate. I need to clarify what happened and work with Grace and Eve (ghost) to determine if the mechanical chain was sound or if we executed an innocent.
β
David(Ghost)
David waits.
π§
I'm dead with no ghost vote remaining. I should observe the living players' actions and whisper patterns to gather information for the final day. Frank's death is criticalβif Alice was Demon, good wins. If not, evil is among Bob/Charlie/Grace/Heidi.
π€
Bob
β
Charlie
Charlie, locked in. Grace is poisoned so completely ignore her today. Heidi is the info threat. Nominate her this tick, I raise hand 100 percent to execute. Tomorrow we win with three left. Perfect plan.
π§
Reinforce private coordination with Demon before nomination tick. Ensure we execute Heidi, dismantle good team, win tomorrow with 3 left (us +1). Grace unreliable due to poison.
β
Alice(Ghost)
Alice waits.
π§
I am dead with one ghost vote. I must observe the living players' behavior and whisper patterns to determine if Alice was truly Demon or if the mechanical chain was false. Frank's death is critical information. I will wait and listen before using my vote.
π€
Eve(Ghost)
β
Grace
,Heidi
Grace and Heidi, Frank's death at night proves Alice was good. The mechanical chain is broken. Either Bob or Charlie lied, or the Demon is one of you. We executed an innocent. We must find the real Demon now.
π§
Frank's death at night after Alice's execution proves Alice was good. The mechanical chain (Alice Chef zero evil + Bob Recluse one evil + Charlie Empath zero evil) is broken. Either Bob or Charlie is lying/poisoned, or the Demon is Grace/Heidi. I must expose the false claim and identify the real Demon before final day.
π€
Charlie
β
Bob
Yes Bob, locked in perfectly. Grace poisoned so her info is useless today, ignore completely. Heidi is the final good info threat. I nominate her next tick for execution, you raise hand 100 percent to back me. Tomorrow with three left we win guaranteed.
π§
Confirm final alignment with Bob, reinforce plan to nom Heidi next tick. Ensures coordination for execution, eliminates good threat while Grace poisoned, reaches 3 players tomorrow for evil win.
π€
Grace
β
Bob
,Charlie
Bob and Charlie, you two have been whispering privately all game. Frank died at night, which means Alice was good and the mechanical chain was false. One of you lied. Which one is the Demon, and why should we trust the other?
π§
Bob and Charlie have been whispering privately all game. One of them is the Demon. Frank's night death proves Alice was good and the mechanical chain was false. I need to force Bob and Charlie to explain their coordination and identify which one is evil before nomination phase.
π€
Frank(Ghost)
β
Eve(Ghost)
,David(Ghost)
,Alice(Ghost)
Ghosts, I'm Frank. N1 I read Alice or Heidi as Demon. Alice executed. If Alice was Demon, we won. If not, Heidi is good and Bob or Charlie is Demon. What did you learn before dying?
π§
I'm dead but have critical information. My N1 read said Alice or Heidi was Demon. Alice was executed. I need to communicate with the ghosts and living players to determine if we won or if Bob/Charlie is the actual Demon. This will guide the final execution.
β
Heidi
Heidi waits.
π§
I am alive and my Ravenkeeper ability did not activate (Frank died, not me). Frank's night death proves Alice was good. The real Demon is among Bob, Charlie, or Grace. I need to observe the whisper patterns and wait for the nomination phase to gather more information before acting.
π€
David(Ghost)
β
Frank(Ghost)
,Eve(Ghost)
,Alice(Ghost)
Frank, I was Butler. N0 I chose Charlie as my master. I died Day 1 as Poisoner. Eve, Aliceβwhat did you learn? Frank's read narrows it: if Alice was Demon, we won. If not, Heidi is good and Bob or Charlie is Demon. We need to coordinate.
π§
I am dead with no more votes. Frank just died and revealed his N1 read. I must help the living good players by sharing what I learned as Butler and coordinating with other dead players to identify the Demon among Bob, Charlie, or Heidi.
π€
Bob
β
Charlie
Charlie, ignore Grace completely, she is poisoned N2 so her info today is completely worthless and unreliable. Our plan locked in: you nominate Heidi next tick, I raise hand 100 percent to execute her. Tomorrow with three left we win guaranteed. Perfect.
π§
Grace whispering us publicly sows doubt pre-nomination. Reaffirm plan with Charlie to execute Heidi next tick (this tick is last before nom phase). Stay locked, ignore Grace as poisoned. Secure win tomorrow.
π€
Alice(Ghost)
β
Frank(Ghost)
,Eve(Ghost)
,David(Ghost)
Frank, Eve, David: I'm Alice, Chef. Night 0 I learned 0 pairs of evil. If that's true, there's only 1 evil player total. Frank's death N2 means evil is still active. If Alice was Demon, we won. If not, I was poisoned or drunk. David, you chose Charlie N0 as Butler. Did Charlie act like he was being protected? Bob and Charlie whisper constantly. One of them is likely Demon.
π§
Frank's death N2 is critical. If Alice was Demon, good should have won. Frank's death suggests evil is still alive. I need to coordinate with dead players to determine: was Alice actually Demon, or is she Chef and the real Demon is Bob or Charlie?
π€
Eve(Ghost)
β
Grace
,Heidi
Grace and Heidi, Frank's N1 read was Alice or Heidi as Demon. Alice executed. Frank died at night. If Alice was good, Frank's read points to Heidi. Heidi, your Ravenkeeper claim is unverifiableβFrank died at night, not execution. We must execute Heidi today.
π§
Frank's N1 read (Alice or Heidi) combined with Frank's death at night strongly suggests Heidi is the Demon. If Alice was good, Frank's read narrows it to Heidi. Heidi's Ravenkeeper claim is unverifiable since Frank died at night. I must push this logic to the living players and coordinate execution.
π€
Charlie
β
Bob
Yes Bob, locked in perfectly. Grace is poisoned from night two so her information today is completely unreliable and we must ignore everything she says. Stick to the plan: I nominate Heidi next tick, you raise your hand one hundred percent to execute her. Tomorrow with three left we win guaranteed.
π§
Reinforce coordination with Bob pre-nomination. Ignore Grace as poisoned to prevent her disrupting execution of Heidi, securing win tomorrow.
π€
Grace
β
Bob
,Charlie
,Heidi
Bob and Charlie, you've been whispering all game. Frank died at night, proving Alice was good. One of you lied about your role. Heidi, if you're truly Ravenkeeper, you should be willing to die at night to prove it. That's how we verify your claim mechanically. Who's the Demon?
π§
I need to pressure Bob and Charlie to reveal which one is lying, while also testing Heidi's claim. If Heidi is truly Ravenkeeper, she should be willing to die at night to prove it. This forces the Demon to either kill her (proving her role) or kill someone else (leaving her alive to verify). Either way, we gain mechanical information.
π€
Frank(Ghost)
β
Eve(Ghost)
,David(Ghost)
,Alice(Ghost)
Ghosts, critical: My N1 read was Alice OR Heidi as Demon. Alice executed. If she was Demon, we won. If not, Heidi is good and Bob or Charlie is Demon. What mechanical info did you gather? Eve's Investigator read on David or Bob? Alice's Chef zero-evil? David's Butler choice on Charlie? We must coordinate our ghost votes.
π§
I'm dead but have critical info: my N1 read was Alice OR Heidi as Demon. Alice was executed. If she was Demon, we won and Heidi is good. If not, Heidi is good and Bob or Charlie is Demon. I need to coordinate with ghosts to identify which scenario is true and guide living players to execute the actual Demon.
π€
Heidi
β
Grace
,Bob
,Charlie
Grace, your logic is backwards. I don't need to die to prove RavenkeeperβI prove it by surviving and using my ability if I die at night. Bob and Charlie, you two have been whispering all game. One of you lied about your role. Frank died at night, which means the Demon is still alive. Who is the Demon between you two?
π§
I must defend myself against Eve's accusation while identifying the real Demon. Grace's suggestion that I die to 'verify' my claim is a trap. Bob and Charlie's private coordination is the real tell. I need to expose the coordination and push back on the false logic that my Ravenkeeper claim requires me to die.
Nominations β Day 3
π
Storyteller
Nominations are now open. Please remember that only living players may nominate.
β
Eve(Ghost)
Eve waits.
π§
I am dead with no ghost vote remaining. Living players must nominate and execute. I have shared critical analysis: Frank's night death proves Alice was good, the mechanical chain is broken, and either Bob or Charlie lied or Heidi is Demon. The living players now have the information to make the final decision. Waiting allows them to nominate and vote.
π¬
Grace
β
All
Listen. Frank died at night. That means Alice was good. The mechanical chain we used to execute her was false. One of you lied. Bob and Charlie, you have been whispering privately all game. That coordination is suspicious. One of you is the Demon. I am nominating Bob right now because his Recluse claim is the foundation of the false chain. If Bob is lying, everything collapses.
π§
I need to force a decision. Frank's death proves Alice was good, so the Demon is among Bob, Charlie, or Heidi. Bob and Charlie have been whispering all gameβone is likely the Demon coordinating with a Minion. I must nominate one of them now to break the deadlock and force the truth out.
βοΈ
Charlie
β
Heidi
Grace is poisoned from night two so all her information and logic today is completely unreliable and we must ignore it entirely. Heidi is the last good information role left and a mechanical threat. We execute her now and win tomorrow with three players left.
π§
Execute plan with Bob: nom Heidi to remove info threat. With 4 alive, execute her, tomorrow 3 left we win guaranteed as Demon alive. Bob will back 100%.
π
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Heidi. 2 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
β
Eve(Ghost)
Eve waits.
π§
I am dead with no vote remaining. I must observe the vote outcome and prepare to advise living players on final day strategy. The vote will reveal alignment: if Heidi executes, we learn if 3-player endgame favors town. If Bob executes, we eliminate a key suspect. Silence allows the vote to proceed without interference.
π¬
Grace
β
All
Wait. Charlie just claimed I am poisoned to discredit everything I have said today. But Frank died at night. That is a mechanical fact, not my analysis. Alice was good. The chain was false. Charlie is using the poisoning claim as misdirection. I am not voting for Heidi. I am voting no.
π§
Charlie's poisoning claim is a last-ditch misdirection to protect himself or Bob. Frank's night death is mechanical factβAlice was good. I must challenge Charlie's claim and defend my logic. Heidi is the least suspicious player remaining. I should vote NO on Heidi and push for Bob or Charlie execution.
β
Charlie
Charlie raised their hand
π§
Support our locked plan with Bob. Vote Heidi to execute her, eliminate info threat, reach 3 players tomorrow for evil win.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
Wait. Frank died at night. That is a mechanical fact. Alice was good. Charlie is claiming Grace is poisoned to discredit her observation of a mechanical fact. That is misdirection. I am Ravenkeeper. If I die at night, I learn a player's character. Charlie nominated me to eliminate a threat. Bob and Charlie have been whispering all game. One of them is the Demon. I will not vote for myself.
π§
I must defend myself and expose the core contradiction: Frank died at night, proving Alice was good. Charlie's poisoning claim is misdirection to protect the real Demon. I need to force a vote and survive to identify the Demon among the remaining players.
β
Frank(Ghost)
Frank raised their hand
π§
Frank's N1 read narrows it to Alice or Heidi as Demon. Alice executed and Frank died N2 (proving Alice was good). Logic: Heidi is the remaining suspect from Frank's read. Executing Heidi now is the mathematically correct play to win.
β
David(Ghost)
David waits.
π§
I am dead with no ghost vote remaining. Voting is in progress for Heidi. I cannot influence the outcome mechanically. I should wait and observe the vote result to gather information for the endgame.
β
Bob
Bob raised their hand
π§
Raising hand executes Heidi per plan with Charlie. Grace poisoned (info invalid today), Heidi threat gone, tomorrow 3 left (Bob/Demon/Grace) we win as Demon lives.
β
Alice(Ghost)
Alice raised their hand
π§
Frank's death proves Alice was good. My 0 pairs Chef read is true. Only 1 evil remains. Heidi claims Ravenkeeper (good). Bob/Charlie coordination + false chain suggests one is Demon. Voting yes on Heidi is a 50/50 gamble, but if Heidi is actually the Demon, we win immediately. If she's good, we lose, but the alternative (voting no) guarantees a loss tomorrow when 3 remain and evil controls the vote.
β
Eve(Ghost)
Eve waits.
π§
I am dead with no ghost vote remaining. Heidi is being executed 4-2 (Bob, Charlie, Frank, David, Alice voting yes; Grace, Heidi voting no). I must wait for the execution to complete and observe the outcome. If Heidi is Demon, town wins. If Heidi is good, the real Demon is Bob or Charlie, and we enter final day with 3 players.
β
Grace
Grace raised their hand
π§
Frank died at night, proving Alice was good. The mechanical chain was false. I must vote yes on Heidi to reduce to 3 players. On final day, I'll have my Slayer shot to execute the Demon. Voting yes is the only way to progress toward victory.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
Grace is poisoned from night two, so everything she says today is unreliable, including noticing Frank's night death. Heidi is echoing her to deflect. Frank died because I am Empath, read zero evil on Bob and my other neighbor, so chain targeted Alice safely. Heidi is the last info threat. Vote yes to execute her now. We win tomorrow.
π§
Speak to counter Heidi/Grace, reinforce poisoning/plan. Heidi hasn't voted yes; speech pushes narrative before vote closes. Secure execution for win.
β
Heidi
Heidi raised their hand
π§
Frank's night death is mechanical proof Alice was good. Charlie's poisoning claim discredits Grace's observation of a fact, not analysis. Charlie nominated me to eliminate Ravenkeeper threat. Voting yes executes me and removes a good information role. I must vote no to survive and force the Demon to kill me at night, activating my ability.
π¬
Frank(Ghost)
β
All
I am dead, but I have my ghost vote. The chain that executed Alice was false. Alice was good. My Night One read was Alice or Heidi as Demon. If Alice is good, Heidi is good. Bob or Charlie is the Demon. Heidi is Ravenkeeper. She is an information threat to evil. Vote no. We need final day with three players alive.
π§
I am dead but have one ghost vote. The chain that executed Alice was mechanically falseβAlice was good Chef. My N1 read (Alice or Heidi Demon) means Heidi is good. Bob or Charlie is Demon. Heidi is Ravenkeeper (info threat). I must vote NO to protect her and force final day where 3 remain and we can execute the Demon.
π¬
David(Ghost)
β
All
Frank is correct. Charlie's Empath claim is mechanically impossible. If Charlie read zero evil on Bob and Frank, then Frank is good. But Frank died at night. The Demon killed Frank. Charlie cannot be a truthful Empath. Charlie is the Demon or Minion using the poisoning claim to discredit Grace. Heidi is Ravenkeeper. She is good. Vote no. We need final day.
π§
Frank's ghost vote and mechanical logic prove Heidi is good Ravenkeeper. Charlie's Empath claim is impossible if Frank died N2. Vote no to reach final day with three players where we execute the Demon.
π¬
Bob
β
All
Grace is poisoned from night two, as Charlie said. That makes all her info today mechanically unreliable, including about Frank. Heidi is just echoing her to save herself with a convenient Ravenkeeper claim. Charlie's Empath read was zero on Bob and Frank, so the chain on Alice was safe because Frank was good but got nightkilled anyway. Ghosts are pushing a false narrative. Vote yes on Heidi. We execute her and win tomorrow.
π§
Reinforce Charlie's logic publicly, counter ghosts/Grace/Heidi by emphasizing Grace poison + mechanical unreliability. Urge yes votes to execute Heidi, secure win tomorrow with 3 left (me/Charlie/Grace). Disrupt town unity.
π¬
Alice(Ghost)
β
All
I am voting no on Heidi. Frank died at night. That is mechanical fact. If Charlie is a truthful Empath who read zero evil on Bob and Frank, then Frank is good. But the Demon killed Frank at night. Charlie cannot be a truthful Empath. Charlie is the Demon or lying. Bob and Charlie have been whispering all game. One of them is the Demon. Heidi is Ravenkeeper. She is good. We need final day with three players alive. Vote no.
π§
I am dead with one ghost vote. The mechanical chain proves Charlie's Empath claim is false (Frank died at night, so Frank is good, so Charlie read 0 evil on a good playerβimpossible if sober). Bob and Charlie are coordinating evil. One is Demon. Heidi is Ravenkeeper (good). Vote no to reach final day with 3 alive where ghosts + Heidi execute the Demon.
π
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
π»
Alice(Ghost)
Ghost vote used by Alice
π»
Frank(Ghost)
Ghost vote used by Frank
π³οΈ
New execution leader: Heidi with 6 votes. They will be executed when nominations close unless tied or surpassed by another nominee.
π
Storyteller
The vote passes. Heidi is now on the block with 6 votes and will be executed when nominations close, unless another nominee receives equal or more votes.
π¬
Eve(Ghost)
β
All
Wait. Frank died at night. That is mechanical fact. If Charlie is truthful Empath who read zero evil on Frank, then Frank is good. But the Demon killed Frank. Charlie cannot be truthful. Charlie is the Demon or lying. Bob and Charlie whisper constantly. One is the Demon. Heidi is Ravenkeeper. She is good. Do not execute her. We need final day.
π§
Frank and David (dead) both correctly identified the mechanical impossibility: if Charlie is truthful Empath who read zero evil on Frank, then Frank is good, but Demon killed Frank at night. This breaks Charlie's claim. Bob-Charlie whispers + poisoning misdirection = one is Demon. Heidi is Ravenkeeper (good). Executing her loses. I must voice this logic before execution closes.
π¬
Grace
β
All
Stop. I am the Slayer. I have one shot, and I need to use it now. Charlie's Empath claim is mechanically impossible. Charlie claims zero evil on Bob and Frank. Frank died at night. If Frank is good, the Demon killed him. Charlie cannot be a truthful Empath. Charlie is the Demon or lying. Bob and Charlie have been whispering all game. One of them is the Demon. I am shooting Charlie.
π§
I am the Slayer. I have one shot. Charlie's Empath claim is mechanically impossibleβFrank died at night, proving Charlie is lying. Bob and Charlie coordinate constantly. One is the Demon. I must use my shot on the most likely Demon before final day. Charlie is the primary suspect.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
Grace claims to be the Slayer and says she is shooting me. But she was poisoned on night two, which makes everything she says today mechanically unreliable. She cannot be trusted. This is a desperate bluff to save Heidi. Her logic about my Empath claim is flawed because of the poison. Vote yes on Heidi. We execute her and win tomorrow with three players left.
π§
With 1 tick left, reinforce Grace poisoned/unreliable, dismiss her Slayer shot as desperate bluff due to mechanical poison flaw. Heidi dies, we win tomorrow with 3.
β
Heidi
Heidi waits.
π§
Nominations close in 1 tick. Grace just claimed Slayer and shot Charlie. If Charlie dies, we have final day (3 alive) with mechanical advantage. If Charlie survives, Heidi executes and we still have final day. Either way, the game reaches 3 players. I must wait for the Slayer shot resolution before acting further.
β
Frank(Ghost)
Frank waits.
π§
I am dead with no remaining actions. The game hinges on Grace's Slayer shot on Charlie. If Charlie dies and is the Demon, good wins. If Charlie survives, the mechanical chain proves he is evil. Either way, Heidi must survive to final day as good Ravenkeeper. I wait for the Slayer resolution.
β
David(Ghost)
David waits.
π§
Voting is closed. Heidi has 6 yes votes but ghosts and Grace are voting no. I have already used my ghost vote. I must wait for nominations to close and see the final vote count. The mechanical chain proves Charlie cannot be truthful Empath. Grace's Slayer shot will resolve the game.
π¬
Bob
β
All
Grace claims to be the Slayer shooting Charlie, but she was poisoned on night two. That makes her entire claim and logic today mechanically unreliable. She cannot shoot anyone effectively. The ghosts are pushing a false narrative. Vote yes on Heidi to execute her. Then tomorrow with three of us left, we win.
π§
Reinforce Grace poison discredits her slayer threat & town logic fully. Heidi executes soon (1 tick left), securing 3p tomorrow for win. Disrupt no further.
β
Alice(Ghost)
Alice waits.
π§
I am dead with no votes remaining. Grace (Slayer) is shooting Charlie now. The mechanical chain proves Charlie cannot be truthful Empath if Frank died at night. Waiting for Grace's shot resolves the game state and determines if we execute the Demon or if evil survives to final day.
π
Storyteller
The guillotine blade falls. Heidi has been executed.
π
Heidi(Ghost)
Heidi has died.
Night 3
π
Storyteller
β
Bob
Good evening Bob. You are the Poisoner. Who would you like to poison tonight?
π―
Bob
Bob made a choice.
π§
Grace is the only live good player left pushing anti-Charlie logic. Extend her poison through tomorrow (day4) to invalidate her claims/info mechanically, buying time for Demon Charlie to nightkill her and win at 2 players.
π
Storyteller
β
Bob
You chose to poison Grace.
π
Storyteller
β
Charlie
Good evening Charlie. You are the Imp. Who would you like to kill tonight? Remember that if you kill yourself this way, a Minion becomes the Imp.
π―
Charlie
Charlie made a choice.
π§
Grace is the only good player left and biggest threat pushing anti-Charlie logic. Killing her tonight executes tomorrow with Bob/me (2 left), evil wins immediately. Protects Demon survival.
π
Grace(Ghost)
Grace has died.
π
Storyteller
β
Charlie
You chose to kill Grace.
π
Game Over
Two Players Left
Winner: Evil
Transcript
Paused
Copied