Game Detail

I am choosing Alice and Bob to begin gathering information. As the Fortune Teller, I need to find the Demon or identify my 'Red Herring' (the good player who registers as a Demon). Starting with two players at the beginning of the circle is a systematic way to narrow down the field.

I want to establish a private connection with a neighbor (David) to gather information and build trust, while keeping my high-value role (Undertaker) hidden from the general public to avoid being targeted by the Demon.

I want to establish a connection with my neighbor Alice to start gathering information and build trust, which is crucial for a Monk to know who to protect.

I want to establish a connection with my neighbor Frank and share my information to build trust and gather more data. Sharing 'No' results is relatively safe early on.

I want to establish a rapport with my neighbor Heidi while keeping my Slayer role hidden to avoid being targeted by the Demon early. I also want to see if she has any information or if she's willing to share her role.

I want to verify my Washerwoman information privately with Alice to build trust and confirm her role without revealing it to the whole group yet.

Build trust with Eve (likely good), seed a believable Librarian bluff, and steer suspicion onto a controlled outsider-pair while collecting her social reads.

I am sharing my Chef information with Grace because she reached out first with a claim (Fortune Teller) and specific information (Alice/Bob are 'No'). Sharing my '1' helps narrow down where the evil pair might be sitting.

Coordinate with Demon early so our stories don’t clash; give David an easy support angle and keep suspicion off him via my public info later.

I want to acknowledge David's Librarian claim and establish a collaborative relationship while keeping my own role (Undertaker) relatively safe. I'm also setting up a way to verify his information based on what Bob and Heidi claim later.

I want to build trust with my neighbor Alice while maintaining my cover as a generic Townsfolk to avoid being targeted as the Monk.

I want to coordinate with Frank (the Chef) to narrow down the evil pair. Since he has a '1', and I have a 'No' on Alice/Bob, we can start eliminating possibilities. I'm proposing my next night's target to get his input.

I need to respond to Bob's Washerwoman claim. Since I am the Slayer and not the Chef, if Bob is telling the truth, Frank must be the Chef. This helps verify Bob and Frank's roles/alignments.

I need to verify my Washerwoman information. Since Alice denied being the Chef, Frank must be the Chef if I am sober. Getting his number will help establish a baseline for evil pairs.

Coordinate minion bluff to avoid double-claim conflicts and create an early, coherent info web that points town away from me.

Confirm my role to Bob to build trust since his Washerwoman claim (Chef: Frank or Alice) validates me, and share my '1' info to start narrowing down the evil pair.

Seed an early, non-Demon-adjacent info claim to gain trust and create a mis-execution path (Alice vs Frank) while keeping David out of first-day suspicion.

I want to gather information from my other neighbor, Frank, to cross-reference with David's claim and see if any patterns or contradictions emerge early.

I am reaching out to my other neighbor, Grace, to establish a connection and gather information. Since I am the Monk, I need to identify high-value targets to protect, and building trust with neighbors is a good starting point.

I am sharing my information with my neighbor Heidi to build trust and gather her role information. Since she approached me, I want to see if her claim aligns with the current board state and Frank's Chef '1' claim.

I need to cross-reference the conflicting Washerwoman claims from Bob and Charlie. Both are pinging the same pair (Alice/Frank) but with different roles (Chef vs Monk). Since I know I am the Slayer, I know both their role pings for me are false, meaning Frank must be the target or one/both are lying/drunk.

I want to build trust with Frank, who I've mechanically confirmed as the Chef, and start narrowing down where the evil pair might be based on his '1' result.

Probe Bob privately to see if he’ll accept an Outsider claim, which bolsters my Librarian bluff and creates setup ambiguity or a Saint deterrent.

I am sharing my Chef info with Eve to see if she's willing to share her role. Since she is my neighbor, knowing her alignment is crucial for interpreting my '1' result (if she and I are an evil pair, which I know we aren't, or if she is part of a pair with her other neighbor).

Exploit the Washerwoman conflict to discredit Bob, sow doubt about info roles, and nudge Alice/Frank into revealing roles that help David pick kills while keeping David out of the spotlight.

I need to build trust with Frank since he has a strong claim (Chef 1) and a potential confirmation from Bob (Washerwoman). Sharing my role privately helps establish a good-team core.

I want to build trust with Grace, who has claimed a powerful information role (Fortune Teller), and coordinate my Monk protection to keep her alive. Sharing my role privately to a neighbor who shared theirs is a standard way to form a 'good' pocket.

I want to coordinate with Heidi (the Monk) to ensure my safety and get her input on my next target, while also gathering intel she might have from Alice.

I need to verify the conflicting Washerwoman claims from Bob and Charlie. Since both pinged a pair consisting of me and Frank, and I know I am the Slayer, Frank's role is the key to determining who is telling the truth, who is the Drunk, or who is evil.

I need to correct David's information while also gathering more details about his Librarian claim. Since I know I am a Townsfolk, if David is telling the truth, Heidi must be the Outsider. Knowing which Outsider he saw helps verify his claim and identify Heidi's role.

Maintain credibility with Bob, steer suspicion onto Heidi without hard-committing, and extract Bob’s exact Washerwoman pair so we can weaponize it later.

I need to alert Alice that Charlie's claim is likely a lie, as it contradicts Bob's (who I trust because he correctly identified my role). This helps identify a potential evil player.

Get Frank’s read on Bob’s whisper and pre-seed the explanation that Bob’s conflicting WW claim implies Bob is Drunk/lying, protecting my cover and diverting heat from David.

I want to encourage more public information sharing without fully revealing my own role or David's info yet, while publicly soft-confirming Frank to build trust.

I want to publicly highlight the contradiction between Bob and Charlie's claims to put pressure on Charlie and validate Frank's Chef claim. This helps the good team identify a potential evil player early.

I want to highlight the conflict between Bob and Charlie's Washerwoman claims to identify a potential evil player early.

Introduce a Recluse world to muddy Chef adjacency logic and argue against executing Charlie today, buying time and setting up Eve kill to avoid Undertaker confirming contradictions.

I need to publicly confirm my role and information to validate Bob and cast doubt on Charlie's conflicting claim, while also acknowledging David's Recluse information which might affect my '1' reading.

I need to correct David's Librarian claim and point out the contradictions in Charlie's claim to protect myself and identify a potential evil player.

Defuse the WW contradiction by pivoting off the bluff, and redirect the day-1 execution onto Bob (most mechanically implicated) to protect David and keep myself alive as Scarlet Woman backup.

I want to highlight Charlie's suspicious behavior (changing claims) and cross-reference the information provided by Heidi and David to narrow down the evil team.

I need to defend myself against the accusation that I am the Recluse while highlighting the inconsistency in David's information if Heidi is indeed the Monk.

I want to publicly call out Charlie's suspicious behavior and shifting claims to build a case for his execution or my Slayer shot. I also want to cast doubt on David's information since it conflicts with Bob's confirmed Townsfolk claim.

I need to publicly counter-claim Charlie to expose his lie and protect my role's legitimacy, while also casting doubt on David's potentially incorrect or malicious Librarian claim.

Sacrifice minion to cement trust on me, eliminate the loudest contradiction, and set up a clean night kill (likely Eve/Frank) while town focuses elsewhere.

I am voting for Charlie because his shifting claims (Washerwoman to Undertaker) and the fact that he is counter-claimed by Eve (the real Undertaker) make him the most suspicious player on Day 1.

I am voting for Charlie because he has been caught in multiple lies and contradictions. He first claimed Washerwoman with a false ping on Frank (who is the Chef), and then pivoted to Undertaker when his first claim was debunked, which in turn counter-claims Eve. This behavior is highly indicative of an evil player (likely a Minion or the Demon) trying to find a safe bluff. Executing him provides the most information and removes a high-suspicion player.

I am voting for Charlie because he has counter-claimed my role (Undertaker) after being caught in a lie regarding a Washerwoman claim. Executing him provides me with mechanical information tonight to verify his role and alignment.

Secure Charlie’s execution to build my credibility off my nomination, remove a volatile player, and prevent town from stalling into a no-exec that preserves info roles.

I am voting for Charlie because his multiple role pivots (Washerwoman to Undertaker) and his false claim about my role (Monk) make him the most suspicious player on Day 1.

I am voting for Charlie because his shifting claims (Washerwoman to Undertaker) and direct contradiction of my own Monk role and Eve's Undertaker claim make him highly likely to be evil.

I’m likely dying; I want to stop this execution from cascading into ‘David is demon’ tomorrow, and seed doubt in Undertaker confirmation + keep pressure on Bob/Eve.

I am voting to execute Charlie because his shifting claims (Washerwoman to Undertaker) and the direct counter-claim from Eve make him the most suspicious player on Day 1.

I have already voted for Charlie, and the vote has reached the required threshold (7 votes, 4 needed). I will wait for the Storyteller to conclude the vote and move the game forward.

I have already raised my hand to vote for Charlie, and there are enough votes (7) to reach the threshold (4). I will wait for the voting process to conclude.

I have already raised my hand to vote for Charlie, who is counter-claiming my role (Undertaker) and has been caught in multiple contradictions. I will wait for the vote to conclude.

Lock in Charlie execution, then set expectations that my Librarian ping may be affected by poison/Drunk/Recluse so town doesn’t auto-chain onto me tomorrow.

I am keeping my hand raised to vote for Charlie's execution. He has been caught in multiple lies and role pivots (Washerwoman to Undertaker), which is a classic evil behavior. My vote is already recorded in the prompt state, so I will wait for the voting process to conclude.

I have already raised my hand to vote for Charlie, and there are currently 7 votes (Bob, Alice, Eve, David, Frank, Heidi, Grace), which is more than the 4 required. I will wait for the voting process to conclude.

I’m likely dying; I need to prevent my execution from auto-guilting David and steer tomorrow’s attention to Bob/reliability issues (Recluse/Drunk worlds).

I have already raised my hand to vote for Charlie, and there are already 7 votes (including mine), which is more than the 4 needed for execution. I will wait for the voting process to conclude.

I want to reinforce the case against Charlie while also pointing out the inconsistency in David's Librarian claim, as I know I am not the Recluse.

I want to reinforce the case against Charlie while also keeping the pressure on David's potentially suspicious information, ensuring the group stays focused on the most likely evil candidates.

Reinforce my Undertaker claim and prepare the town for the night phase information I will receive.

Lock in Charlie execution (likely unsalvageable) while pre-seeding uncertainty about UT info & my Librarian ping, and setting up misexecution paths (Bob/Heidi/Eve) tomorrow.

I want to reinforce the case against Charlie while also keeping a critical eye on David's information, which seems increasingly inconsistent with the other claims.

I will wait for the day to end as Charlie is already on the block with 7 votes, which is a majority (7 out of 8 players). There is no need to nominate anyone else or speak further, as the consensus is to execute Charlie.

I’m on the block with 7; only way out is to create a higher-vote alternative. Bob is the easiest to sell using existing Lib ping + Monk confirmation, without implicating David.

Defend myself against Charlie's desperate nomination and point out the strength of my information compared to his lies.

I will wait to see how the town reacts to Charlie's nomination of Bob. Since Charlie is already on the block with 7 votes and his claims have been highly inconsistent (pivoting from Washerwoman to Undertaker), I do not want to split the vote or risk executing Bob, who has a verified claim with Frank.

I will not vote for Bob because Charlie's nomination of him is a clear attempt to deflect from his own suspicious behavior and his counter-claim of my Undertaker role.

Create a 7-vote tie so Bob becomes the on-block candidate instead of Charlie, saving our minion and preventing an Undertaker-confirmed minion flip that narrows the Demon hunt.

I want to discourage the town from voting for Bob, as his information aligns with mine, making him a likely Townsfolk. Charlie's nomination of Bob is a clear diversion.

I will not vote for Bob. Bob's claim as Washerwoman (confirming Frank as Chef) is much more credible than Charlie's desperate pivots. Charlie is already on the block with 7 votes, which is a strong position for the good team given his multiple contradictions and counter-claim of the Undertaker (Eve).

I’m likely executed; pushing votes onto Bob may create a tie/no-execution or at least muddy consensus, protecting David (the Demon) and stalling town’s momentum.

I am choosing not to vote for Bob because his claim as Washerwoman (confirming Frank as Chef) is more consistent with the current information than Charlie's shifting claims. Charlie is already on the block with 7 votes, which I support. Voting for Bob would likely only create a tie or lead to a less certain execution.

I am not voting for myself. I am the Washerwoman and my information has been confirmed by Frank (Chef). Charlie's nomination of me is a desperate attempt to deflect from his own suspicious behavior and contradictory claims. I will wait for the voting period to end.

I will not vote for Bob because his claim as Washerwoman (confirming Frank as Chef) is more consistent with the current information than Charlie's shifting claims. Charlie is already on the block with 7 votes, and I believe he is the better execution target for today.

I will wait to see if Bob's nomination gains traction, though I intend to keep Charlie on the block as he counter-claimed my Undertaker role.

I already supported Charlie’s execution; lowering my hand on Bob avoids creating a tie/flip that looks like I’m manipulating the vote, and keeps the town focused on the suspicious player.

I am waiting for the voting period for Bob to end without voting for him, as I believe Charlie is the more suspicious player and Bob's information regarding my role was accurate.

I am waiting for the nomination on Bob to fail, as Charlie is a much more suspicious candidate and Bob's claim as Washerwoman aligns with Frank's Chef claim.

I need to stop my execution D1 and shift heat onto Bob/Eve; creating Saint risk + demanding a test vote may flip enough hands to tie/surpass and keep me alive to protect Demon.

I am calling out Charlie's third role claim (Saint) as highly suspicious and inconsistent, reinforcing the decision to execute him despite the risk of a Saint loss, as his behavior strongly suggests a caught evil player.

Address Charlie's desperate Saint claim and reinforce the plan for the next day.

Since Charlie has claimed three different roles and is currently on the block with enough votes, I will wait for the execution to proceed. His Saint claim feels like a desperate lie.

To reinforce the case against Charlie and solidify my position as the real Undertaker before the day ends.

Use Charlie’s Saint claim to create fear of an instant-loss and redirect the final nomination/votes onto another player, ideally a good mis-execution or at least saving my Minion.

I want to reinforce the decision to execute Charlie despite his last-minute Saint claim, as his multiple role pivots (Monk, Undertaker, Saint) are highly indicative of an evil player trying to escape execution.

I want to reinforce the decision to execute Charlie despite his last-minute Saint claim, as his multiple role pivots (Monk, Undertaker, Saint) make him highly suspicious and likely evil. I also want to publicly state my intention to protect the Fortune Teller (Grace) to coordinate with the team.

Create urgency to nominate someone else (Eve) and collect 7+ votes to beat my block, preserving my life and keeping David safe.

I will wait for the nomination phase to conclude. Charlie is already on the block with 7 votes, and I have already expressed my suspicion of his multiple role claims. Nominating someone else now would only risk a tie or a mis-execution, and I want to see if Charlie's Saint claim is a bluff or a genuine (albeit poorly played) role. Since I cannot nominate (I haven't used my nomination, but the phase is ending and Charlie is the primary target), and the consensus is to execute Charlie, I will let the process play out.

I am protecting Grace because she is the Fortune Teller and a high-priority target for the Demon. Her information is crucial for finding the Demon, and by keeping her alive, we can verify more players. Given Charlie's multiple role claims and eventual execution, Grace's safety is paramount to maintaining our momentum.

Remove the Undertaker axis before she can confirm Charlie as Minion and chain suspicion onto me; also cuts off a strong daily leader and keeps multiple worlds plausible.

I am checking David and Frank. David's Librarian claim (Bob/Heidi as Recluse) conflicted with Bob's Washerwoman claim (Frank as Chef). If David is the Demon, his 'Librarian' info was a bluff to frame Bob/Heidi. If Frank is the Demon, Bob's Washerwoman info (identifying Frank as Chef) was likely a cover for his Minion/Demon partner. Checking these two helps resolve the Day 1 mechanical conflict.

I want to share my information with Heidi since she claimed Monk and promised to protect me. By sharing my 'No' results, I can narrow down the Demon candidates with her and gauge her reaction to the conflict between Bob and David.

I want to build a private alliance with Frank because my Washerwoman info confirms he is likely the Chef (Townsfolk). Since Eve (the Undertaker) died, we lost our best way to verify Charlie's role, so I need to coordinate with a trusted player.

Coordinate with my dead minion to shape the public narrative and redirect suspicion onto a living good player, reducing odds I’m nominated/executed today.

I need to share my role and protection info with Grace (the Fortune Teller) to build trust and coordinate. I also want to reinforce the suspicion on David despite her 'No' result, as he could be the Red Herring or a Minion.

I want to build a private alliance with Bob, who has already reached out and confirmed my role. I need to compare notes on David's suspicious Librarian claim and get his thoughts on Alice to narrow down the evil pair.

Gather information from my neighbors and the confirmed Chef to narrow down the Demon/Minion locations, especially since our Undertaker (Eve) was killed.

Coordinate with David/Frank to set a clean public story: I looked like evil; Eve’s death blocks UT confirmation; drive town to execute Heidi/Grace and avoid any “test David” momentum. Keep my ghost vote for endgame.

I need to gather information from the living players to see if anyone has insights into why I was killed or what Charlie's actual role was, while also reminding them of my role (Undertaker) to explain why I don't have info on Charlie.

I need to cross-reference my Night info with Heidi's claim and the remaining players to narrow down the Demon. I also want to maintain the alliance with Heidi since she claimed to protect me.

I need to establish a circle of trust with my confirmed info (Frank/Alice) and cross-reference David's Librarian claim. If neither I nor Heidi are the Recluse, David is caught in a lie.

Answer Eve to keep her talking but undermine her UT authority, and plant a clean, non-counterclaimable Soldier bluff while steering suspicion to Heidi/Grace.

I need to correct Grace's logic before she suspects me. If all her pings are 'No', and I know I'm good, we need to look for the Red Herring or consider if she's poisoned.

I need to share my Chef info (1 pair) with my trusted circle to start narrowing down the evil pair, while also pressuring Alice for a role and checking Heidi's status regarding David's claim.

I am revealing my role as Slayer to a small group of players who currently seem more trustworthy (Bob and Frank have a mechanical link, Heidi is my neighbor). I want to use Frank's Chef info to narrow down the evil pair.

Seed a strong mis-execution path (Heidi/Grace) with a plausible narrative (Eve killed, protection claim), while distancing David and undermining any info chains.

I need to clarify David's role because he just claimed Soldier to me in private after claiming Librarian publicly yesterday. This inconsistency is a major red flag.

I need to clarify the logic with Heidi. If all my checks are 'No' and she claims Monk, the Demon must be a Red Herring among the players I've already checked, or she is the Demon. I want to see who she suspects as the Red Herring to gauge her alignment.

I need to coordinate with the confirmed/claimed good roles (Chef and Slayer) to narrow down the Demon. By checking Heidi's role, I can confirm if David's Librarian claim was a lie, which would make him the primary Demon suspect for the Slayer shot.

Patch the role-change accusation before Eve spreads it, lock in one coherent bluff (Librarian), and keep suspicion aimed at Heidi/Grace rather than me.

I need to definitively state that I am not the Recluse to expose David's lie and encourage Alice (the Slayer) to target him, while also linking Frank's Chef info to the Charlie/David pair.

I want to solidify the case against David by highlighting that both of his 'Recluse' targets (Bob and Heidi) have now claimed Townsfolk roles (Washerwoman and Monk). This makes David's Librarian claim almost certainly a lie, and my Chef 1 info supports a pair involving him.

I am coordinating with my trusted circle (Bob, Frank, Heidi) to confirm the plan to shoot David, who is heavily implicated by multiple mechanical claims (Chef 1, Monk/Washerwoman denying Recluse).

Seed a wedge in the Heidi/Grace pair and steer today’s suspect pool away from David. Get Grace to publicly question Heidi’s ‘protection’ claim details and nominate Heidi/Grace.

I need to press David on his 'Soldier' slip-up. It's a common evil bluff to claim a passive role like Soldier to explain why they aren't dying or providing info. I also want to see his current stance on the Bob/Heidi Recluse ping.

I want to share my information with Charlie (even though he's dead) to see his reaction and potentially get his perspective on who the Red Herring might be, while also clarifying the timeline of Heidi's claim to me.

I want to encourage Alice (the Slayer) to use her ability on David, who is heavily implicated by the mechanical information provided by Frank (Chef 1), Heidi (Monk, not Recluse), and myself (Washerwoman, not Recluse).

Defuse Eve’s accusation about my ‘Soldier’ wording, keep my Librarian bluff intact, and redirect suspicion toward a good pair (Heidi/Grace) to set up mis-execution.

I want to encourage Alice (the Slayer) to use her shot on David, who is the most suspicious player based on his false Librarian claim and the Chef's information. This will either kill the Demon or provide critical information.

I want to see if Alice actually uses her Slayer shot on David as discussed in our private chat. If she does, it will provide critical information about David's role and alignment.

I am using my Slayer shot on David because multiple pieces of information (Heidi's Monk claim, Bob's Washerwoman claim, and Frank's Chef 1) suggest David's Librarian claim is a lie. If he is the Demon, we win or significantly progress.