Game Detail

I want to build trust with one of my neighbors who I've learned is likely good, according to my Night 1 info. Sharing my info early with a 'safe' neighbor helps establish a core of trust.

Give Bob the full setup and align bluff plans early while keeping our public distance.

I want to establish a connection with my neighbor Frank and share my information early to see if he's willing to reciprocate or if his info conflicts with mine.

I am waiting to see if anyone approaches me or if any public claims are made before I commit to a whisper or strategy.

I want to share my Investigator information with Heidi since she claimed Empath and gave me a '0' reading, which implies I (her neighbor) am good. Sharing my info helps narrow down the Baron.

Respond to Grace's whisper to establish a friendly rapport and acknowledge her claim without revealing my Outsider role too early.

I want to establish a connection with my neighbor Eve and see if she has any info that might corroborate or conflict with mine, while being vague about my specific role for now.

Build private trust with a likely good info role using a safe Monk bluff, so I gain influence and reduce the chance I become an early execution target.

I want to confirm Bob's claim and share my info with him to build trust. I am also cross-referencing Alice's Investigator info with my Empath result.

Gain David's trust with a soft, plausible response and steer his starting info toward Frank as the easier execution lane later.

I want to gather information from Heidi, who has been whispering with Bob and Alice, to see if their claims or behaviors align with my Chef information of one evil pair.

I want to establish a connection with my neighbor Bob and see if he's willing to share information or claims early on.

I want to solidify the logic with Heidi. If she is the Empath and got a 0, and she is my neighbor, then Bob (her other neighbor) must be good. This directly points to Frank being the Baron based on my Investigator info.

I am initiating a conversation with Charlie to gather more information and cross-reference Grace's claim.

Share my specific Librarian info with Eve to build trust and see if she has heard any conflicting claims from the other side of the circle.

Use my Monk bluff to gain Charlie’s trust, extract his claim, and set up cover for later without overcommitting.

Share my Empath zero info with Grace (my other neighbor) to build trust and cross-reference her Chef info with Alice's Investigator info.

Build trust with David and reinforce Frank as the messy explanation, while fishing for claims from Alice and Heidi without overcommitting.

Analyze the information Heidi provided and cross-reference it with my Chef information to narrow down the evil pair.

Respond to Frank's whisper to build a connection and compare information while remaining cautious about Bob's 'protective role' claim.

I want to gather information from Charlie about Bob and Frank to help verify my Investigator lead, especially since Charlie has whispered with both of them.

I am continuing my conversation with Charlie to gather more information and see if there are any other role claims circulating. as the Recluse, I want to stay low-key but helpful.

I want to check if Charlie has any information from his whispers with Frank or Alice that contradicts or confirms my Librarian ping.

Coordinate with Eve using Heidi's info so we choose matching stories and exploit Frank as a safe sink for Alice's accusation.

I want to get the public conversation started by sharing the conflicting and supporting information I've gathered privately. This puts pressure on Bob and Frank and validates Alice's claim.

To publicly verify Charlie's statement and share my Chef information and my interaction with Heidi to the whole group.

Deflect Alice's accusation without overcommitting, seed the plausible Recluse explanation on Frank, and make a day one execution on me look premature.

I need to correct Grace's public statement about my neighbors to ensure the group has the right information and then prompt Frank for a claim to see how it fits with the Investigator/Chef info.

I want to push Frank for a claim because my Investigator info specifically pokes at him and Bob. Since Heidi's Empath info suggests Bob is good (if her neighbors are me and Bob), it points more heavily toward Frank being the Baron.

I need to reveal my role as the Recluse to explain Alice's Investigator ping and de-escalate the suspicion on both myself and Bob.

I want a good player executed while framing it as a tidy mechanical test that also pulls heat off Bob and keeps town arguing around Recluse worlds.

To show cooperation with the good team's logic while confirming my role as the Recluse.

I will vote to execute Frank because he claims to be the Recluse and agrees that his execution will clarify the information for the good team.

I am voting to execute Frank to confirm Alice's Investigator information and remove the potential confusion of a Recluse from future social and mechanical reads.

Frank is a good execution for evil. Voting helps remove a town player and reinforces the public world where Alice's info points away from me through Recluse mechanics.

I am voting to execute Frank to confirm information and remove a source of potential misinformation (the Recluse or Baron).

I am voting for Frank because my Investigator information identifies him or Bob as the Baron. Frank has claimed Recluse, which explains why he might register as a Minion to me. Regardless of whether he is the Recluse or the Baron, executing him provides valuable information and clarifies the board state. Since he is willing to die to help the team, this is a safe and productive day one execution.

Secure a good execution that already has majority, maintain consistency with my nomination, and avoid drawing suspicion by failing to support my own push.

I am voting for Frank because my Librarian information confirms he is likely the Recluse, and his execution will clarify Alice's Investigator information and clean up the board.

I am the Recluse and my execution will confirm the Investigator's information as true (since I register as a Minion), which helps the good team. I am voting for my own execution to provide clarity.

I have already raised my hand to vote for Frank, and the current vote count (8 including me) is well above the required threshold (4). I will wait for the nomination to conclude.

The nomination for Frank has already reached a majority (8 votes, 4 needed), and he has expressed a willingness to be executed as the Recluse to clear up the board state. My vote is already cast, so I will wait for the phase to conclude.

I already voted with the crowd. Waiting keeps me low profile, supports a likely good execution, and avoids unnecessary extra attention during the vote.

I have already raised my hand to vote for Frank's execution as the Recluse to clarify the board state. Since a majority (8/8) has already been reached and most players have acted or are waiting, I will wait for the nomination to conclude.

I will maintain my vote to execute Frank to confirm my Investigator information and clear up potential misinformation caused by a Recluse registration.

Frank is a valuable good execution and the vote is already overwhelming. Waiting keeps my hand up, avoids unnecessary attention, and preserves credibility for later defense of Bob.

I have already raised my hand to vote for Frank, and since 8 players (including Frank himself) have now raised their hands, the majority is reached. I will wait for the Storyteller to process the execution.

I am on the block with 8 votes, and as the Recluse, my death helps clean up the board and verify Alice's information. I will wait for the phase to end.

Frank is already on the block with a majority vote (8 votes), which is everyone. There is only 1 tick left in the nomination phase, and it is highly unlikely anyone else will be nominated or reach a higher count. I will wait for the phase to end.

Wait for the nomination phase to end and the execution of Frank to proceed.

Frank is safely on the block with a huge vote. Staying quiet avoids drawing attention and preserves the misexecution.

Allow the day to end with Frank on the block as intended.

Let the execution of Frank proceed.

Frank is a strong execution for evil. I should not disturb a successful wagon or give town fresh material to analyze before night.

Confirm Frank's claim as the Librarian to solidify the town's trust in the current execution plan and Alice's information.

Kill the most trusted ongoing info role to disrupt the good team's emerging core and keep attention diffused away from me and Eve.

I want to cross-reference my information with Grace, who I know is likely good (either she's the Recluse or Frank was, and Frank's claim aligns with my info). I also want to see if she suspects Bob based on Alice's claim.

Wait to see how the town reacts to Heidi's death and what information David and Grace are sharing before I intervene as a ghost.

Give Bob exact role info and a practical plan so we can shape today's suspicion away from him and toward a good player.

I want to compare notes with Charlie, who has been proactive and already knows my information, to see how he interprets Heidi's death and the outcome of Frank's execution.

Coordinate with my minion on a clean misexecution target and a simple public story that fractures the trusted town core.

I am dead and have no night action. I need to observe the private conversations and wait for the town to share information publicly before I use my ghost vote or influence the game.

I want to share my Chef information with David to see if we can locate the evil pair. Since I know there is exactly one pair of evil players, identifying everyone's neighbors is crucial.

Alice's Investigator info is key. If Frank was the Recluse, Bob is the Baron. I need to confirm Alice's trust and see if she has any new insights or if she's leaning towards Bob being evil.

Share my neighbor information with Grace and explore the possibility of the evil pair based on her Chef result and Alice's Investigator ping.

I am waiting to see if anyone has new information to share after the night death of Heidi, the Empath. As a dead Recluse, I have already served my purpose of clearing pings, so I should observe the town's reaction to the Night 2 kill.

Recruit Charlie into a David-suspicion line and keep the day centered on good players rather than Bob.

I want to cross-reference my Investigator information with Grace's Chef information and David's Librarian claim to see if we can pin Bob as the Baron.

Coordinate with Eve on the best day push, keep attention off me, and create a public split between David and Grace before nominations.

To share my Night 0 info with Alice (a neighbor I saw as good) and establish trust now that I am dead and no longer a threat to the Demon.

I want to share my Chef information with Alice to see if it aligns with her Investigator ping on Bob and her position in the circle.

Engage with Eve's suspicion of David to see if she has a theory on the Demon, while maintaining my role's helpful stance.

Wait for Grace to respond to my previous whisper and observe the other private conversations before nominations begin.

As the dead Recluse, I want to confirm if Alice's Investigator ping on Bob is now the primary lead, since I was the other half of that ping.

I want Charlie, an influential hub, to look away from Bob and toward the David-Grace info chain, while making my suspicion sound thoughtful rather than coordinated.

To update the dead Empath (Heidi) on my information and the current deduction that Bob is likely the Baron, while also processing Grace's Chef info.

I want Grace to question David's claim publicly and help create a misexecution path on David without tying it directly to me or Eve.

I want to cross-reference Alice's Investigator claim with Grace's Chef claim. If Bob is the Baron (as Alice's ping suggests) and Grace saw a pair of evil, then Bob and his neighbor (Charlie) would be that pair. However, my N0 Empath 0 on Alice and Bob means Bob registered as good initially. This suggests either Bob is the Red Herring or Alice/Grace's info is being manipulated by a Poisoner or Spy.

Address Bob's suspicion of David while subtly reminding him of Alice's Baron ping on him, testing his reaction.

Continue building trust with Eve and discuss potential execution targets for the day, specifically David as a suspicious info-source.

I want to share my information and Alice's theory with the group to see how people react and to narrow down the Demon. Since I'm dead, I have nothing to lose by being open now.

To process the conflicting information between Heidi's Empath '0' and my Investigator ping on Bob, while incorporating Grace's Chef info to narrow down the Demon.

I will share my Chef information publicly to help the group narrow down the location of the evil pair, while noting the possible conflict between Alice's Investigator ping and Heidi's Night 0 Empath result.

Correct Grace's logic regarding the 'pair' and my role.

David is the cleanest misexecution today. It follows public logic, pressures a good player, and keeps suspicion spread away from me and Eve.

I need to defend myself against Bob's nomination by pointing out that my information logically consistent with Alice's and Frank's, making it unlikely I am lying.

I want to see how the other players react and vote before committing my single ghost vote, especially since David's Librarian claim directly linked to the now-dead Frank and Alice's Investigator ping.

I will wait and see how the group reacts to the nomination of David before committing my vote.

I want to see if more votes come in for David before deciding whether my vote is necessary to reach the majority, as I am still weighing the validity of his Librarian claim against Bob's suspicion.

I am voting for David because his Librarian claim feels like it was designed to provide cover for a potential Minion or Demon (Frank/Grace) and his explanation for the Night 1 death (if he were Demon) or his role's validity is currently the most suspicious path forward for Town.

I nominated David and want him executed. Voting here advances the misexecution and makes my public stance look consistent and town motivated.

Secure the third vote on David to pressure or execute a good player, advancing an evil-led world while keeping Bob off the block.

I want to save my ghost vote for a more critical moment, likely the final day or a clear Demon candidate, as David's Librarian claim actually aligns with my Recluse role.

I need to defend myself against this nomination. Bob is the primary suspect for being the Baron (based on Alice's Investigator ping and my Librarian info confirming Frank as the Recluse), so his nomination of me is likely a deflection. I need to remind the group that my information validated the Frank execution and that Alice's ping points directly to Bob now that Frank is dead.

I will wait to see how the voting develops and if more information comes to light before committing my single ghost vote, as saving it for a more critical moment or a more certain evil candidate is strategically sound.

I am choosing to wait and not vote for David because the case against him is currently weak, and I suspect Bob might be the Baron trying to deflect attention.

I am voting for David because Alice's Investigator ping suggests Bob or Frank is the Baron, and my Chef info of '1' suggests a pair of evil players. If Bob is the Baron, his neighbors (Charlie or David) are the most likely Demon candidates. David's Librarian claim on Frank/Grace is a common evil bluff to 'confirm' an Outsider, and his quick push against Frank might have been a redirection.

I have already voted for David, and the majority (4 votes) has been reached. I will now wait for the nomination to conclude and see if anyone else is nominated or if David is executed.

The nomination already has enough votes. Staying quiet avoids drawing more suspicion to me while letting David remain the leading execution.

Reinforce the David execution and discourage Alice from rescuing him. A confident but measured push helps keep momentum on a good target and away from Bob.

I will wait and observe the current voting process without using my ghost vote yet. David's Librarian claim (Frank/Grace as Recluse) actually matches Alice's Investigator ping (Frank/Bob as Baron) if I am the Recluse. Executing David now seems premature when Bob is the primary suspect for being the Baron based on Alice's info. I want to save my vote for a more definitive Demon candidate.

Defend myself and shift suspicion to Bob, who is a likely Minion based on Alice's Investigator claim and my Librarian info confirming Frank as the Recluse.

I want to point out the logical inconsistency in executing David if Alice's and David's information actually align. This highlights Bob as a potential Minion (Baron) who is trying to push an execution on a good player.

I want to pivot the town's focus from David to Bob. Based on my Investigator info (Bob or Frank as Baron) and Frank claiming Recluse, Bob is the primary suspect. Bob nominating David looks like a redirection tactic.

I want to share my logic regarding the 'Chef 1' information to see how it fits with the theory that Bob is the Baron, helping the group narrow down the Demon's location.

I want to counter the sudden shift in narrative that is painting Bob as the primary suspect based on David's self-serving logic. David's claim is very convenient and could easily be a Demon bluffing to clear himself.

Keep David on the block by framing his claim as opportunistic and making town postpone the case on me until after his execution.

Keep attention on David and stop the table from flipping onto Bob at the last second. A confident but measured push helps preserve a good execution for evil.

I want to highlight the logical consequence of my Recluse role if David's Librarian claim is true. This points to Bob being the Baron and potential evil. Since I'm dead, I want to make sure the living players consider the Bob-Baron possibility for tomorrow.

Remove the strongest anti-Bob voice and leave a final four where Grace's Chef logic can be turned onto Charlie, creating a winnable mis-execution.

I want to coordinate with Grace, who has Chef info, to see if we can narrow down the Demon now that I am dead and can't be targeted further.

I want to confirm Bob's alignment and gather his thoughts. Since I am a dead Empath with a 0 read on him and Alice, and Alice is now dead (likely executed/killed by demon), Bob is mechanically 'clean' in my eyes unless I was poisoned. I want to build trust with him to find the real evil.

I need to establish trust with Grace and find out what the dead Investigator (Alice) told her, while reinforcing that Bob is the primary suspect based on the Librarian/Investigator overlap.

I want to gauge Eve's current suspicions and solidify an alliance. As a Soldier, I'm a safe person for her to trust, and Alice's death removes a key 'Good' voice who was suspicious of Bob.

Deflect Charlie from executing Bob by reframing the case around Grace and the possibility that the early info chain was wrong or manipulated.

Coordinate with Eve on a unified push away from me and onto Grace using existing public doubts and Heidi's inconsistency.

Since I'm dead, I need to gather info from the remaining alive players, especially Grace who was whispered to by both Alice and David before they were out of the game or died.

To consolidate information with Frank (the Recluse) and test the theory that Bob and Charlie are the evil pair based on my Chef 1 info and Alice's Investigator ping.

To coordinate with Grace, who has the Chef info, and narrow down the Demon based on the Bob-as-Baron theory.

I need to see what the others are saying before making a move. I've already reached out to Bob to confirm my Night 0 '0' reading on him and Alice, and I want to see if he's willing to collaborate or if his behavior changes now that Alice is dead.

Wait for Grace to respond to my whisper or for the discussion to become public.

Explore Eve's suspicion of Grace and probe for her thoughts on the Demon's identity to see if she's distancing herself from Bob or genuinely suspicious of Grace.

I want Charlie focused on Grace as the cleaner execution so Bob survives today, while sounding thoughtful rather than hard-defending Bob.

Coordinate a simple push on Grace and recruit Charlie to voice it, keeping attention off me before nomination phase.

I want to narrow down the Demon candidates with Grace based on the Chef info and Alice's death.

Communicate my current theory to Alice, a dead player who is likely good, to build a consensus.

To narrow down the Demon suspect based on Grace's Chef info and my Investigator info.

I want to gather Alice's final information from Grace to cross-reference with my Empath 0 and Grace's Chef 1.

To pressure Grace to share Alice's last information and focus the group's attention on Bob.

To align with Bob and Eve against Grace, who is currently being painted as suspicious by both of them. This builds a voting block for the upcoming nomination phase.

Coordinate the anti-Grace case with Bob and Charlie so Charlie carries it publicly and Bob survives the day.

Reinforce the coordinated push on Grace and give my allies concise talking points before nominations begin.

I am alerting Grace to the suspicious behavior of Bob, Eve, and Charlie, who are currently whispering together. This helps coordinate the good players and highlights a potential evil cluster.

Share conflicting information with Heidi to see how she reconciles her Empath 0 with Alice's Investigator ping on Bob.

I want to break up the potential evil huddle and point out the mechanical tension between Bob, Charlie, and Eve based on previous claims.

Support Frank's public observation and link it to my Chef information to narrow down the evil pair.

To pressure Charlie and Eve to reveal their roles and account for Grace's '1' Chef ping and Alice's Investigator ping on Bob.

I need the execution off me and onto Grace. She is the easiest public case, and forcing her onto the block either gets a good player killed or keeps attention away from the Demon.

I need to defend myself against Bob's nomination by highlighting that his move looks like an attempt to silence the information that implicates him.

I am withholding my vote on Grace because she is likely a good player (Chef) based on the current logic and the deceased Investigator's information. Bob's nomination of her feels like a diversion to protect himself or his potential evil teammates (Charlie/Eve).

I want to see how Charlie and Eve react to the nomination and if they are willing to put Grace on the block, as my N0 information makes me lean towards Bob being good, which would make Grace's Chef info or Alice's Investigator info suspect.

I nominated Grace and need the votes to make it stick. Executing her weakens the good information web and protects me and Eve heading into the night.

I will refrain from using my ghost vote on Grace's nomination to preserve it for a more critical moment, likely against Bob or Charlie later.

Vote to put Grace on the block and maximize the chance she is executed today instead of Bob.

I will vote for Grace's execution. Bob and Eve have already voted, and we agreed that her information is the most unverifiable and potentially manipulative. A majority is needed, and this is the best lead we have today to resolve the 'Chef 1' claim which is currently being used to frame my neighborly huddle.

I need to save my single ghost vote for a more critical execution, likely Bob or one of his associates, rather than Grace who is likely good.

Point out that the three players I suspect (Bob, Eve, and Charlie) are the ones voting for me, which reinforces the theory that they are the evil team.

I will withhold my ghost vote for now because Grace is likely good based on the current logic and the voting pattern.

I am choosing to wait and not use my ghost vote yet because Grace has already reached the required 2 votes for a majority. Saving my vote for a more critical moment in the late game is a better strategic move.

Keep votes on Grace by framing her claim as flexible and self-serving, while making the execution sound useful in either world.

I want to save my ghost vote for a more critical moment, likely the final day or a clear Demon execution, as this nomination on Grace seems like a coordinated effort by the Bob-Charlie-Eve block.

Lock in Grace's execution by framing it as the most informative vote and deflecting her attempt to paint the voting bloc itself as proof of evil.

I have already raised my hand to vote for Grace, and the current vote count (Bob, Eve, and myself) is 3, which meets the requirement of 2 for execution. I will wait for the nomination phase to conclude to ensure Grace is executed.

I need to point out the suspicious nature of the current voting block to prevent a potentially disastrous execution of a useful Townsfolk.

Defend myself and point out the suspicious voting pattern before the day ends.

Reinforce the suspicion on the Bob-Eve-Charlie trio after their coordinated vote against Grace.

I want to point out the suspicious coordinated voting of Bob, Eve, and Charlie to prepare the group for Bob's execution tomorrow if Grace is telling the truth.

Lock in Grace as the most useful execution and make the ghost pile-on look like fear, so tomorrow's suspicion stays off me.

I want to highlight the logical connection between my Investigator ping on Bob and Grace's Chef info to show why the current voting block is suspicious.

Keep Grace on the block, weaken the Bob case for tomorrow, and frame this execution as the logical resolution rather than coordinated evil behavior.

Defend the current vote on Grace and address the suspicion being leveled at the 'voting block' of Bob, Eve, and myself.

Pressure Charlie's sudden Soldier claim and point out the suspicious nature of the three-person voting block.

With only three alive, I should take the line that guarantees evil reaches two living players. Killing myself avoids Soldier or protection and hands the Imp to Eve for the immediate win state.