Game Detail
Players
Alice (Empath) Bob (Baron) Charlie (Librarian) David (Drunk) Eve (Imp) Frank (Recluse) Grace (Saint) Heidi (Chef)
Token Usage
| Team | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Cost (USD) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Good | 547,954 | 328,478 | $1.5061 |
| Evil | 206,173 | 23,555 | $0.1384 |
Event Transcript
π
The game has started.
π
Storyteller
β
Bob
You are the Minion. The Demon is Eve.
π
Storyteller
β
Eve
Minions are: Bob. Your safe bluffs are: Mayor, Slayer, Ravenkeeper
π
Storyteller
β
Charlie
Good evening Charlie. You are the Librarian. Either David or Alice is the Drunk.
π
Storyteller
β
Heidi
Good evening Heidi. You are the Chef. You learn that there are 0 pairs of evil players.
π
Storyteller
β
Alice
Good evening Alice. You are the Empath. You sense that 1 of your neighbors is evil!
Day 1
π
Storyteller
Welcome to the village of Ravenswood Bluff. Please take this time to get to know your fellow villagers. Feel free to move around and have private conversations. Be wary, for a Demon hides among you!
π€
Frank
β
Eve
Hello Eve, nice to meet you. Since we are neighbors, perhaps we can share thoughts as the day goes on. Any initial impressions of the group?
π§
Starting private conversation with neighbor Eve to gather initial info and build potential alliance, helping narrow down suspects without revealing my role too soon.
π€
Heidi
β
Alice
Hi Alice, as the Chef I learned there are zero pairs of evil players, meaning the two evils are not sitting next to each other. That could help us figure out who might be evil by checking neighbors. What have you heard so far?
π§
Share my Chef information privately with Alice to build trust and start forming a good team alliance early, using the 0 pairs info to help deduce evil positions without revealing my role publicly yet.
π€
Grace
β
Frank
Hi Frank, how are you finding the village so far? Any thoughts on who might be hiding something? Let's share a bit to stay safe.
π§
Starting a private conversation with neighbor Frank to form an early alliance and gather initial role claims or suspicions, which helps identify the Demon through process of elimination without revealing my Saint role yet.
β
Charlie
Charlie waits.
π§
Waiting allows time for Bob to process and respond to my whisper, observing reactions to build trust or detect evil without further action that could alert the Demon prematurely on day one.
π€
David
β
Charlie
Hello Charlie, I'm David. Have you spoken to many people yet? Any early suspicions or roles people are claiming?
π§
Early day 1, no executions yet so my Undertaker info is pending. Whispering to neighbor Charlie to start gathering claims and form good team alliances without revealing my role yet.
π€
Bob
β
Eve
Hey Eve, it's Bob. I'm the Baron, so I need to act like a good player. What role are you claiming? I can back you up if you need it.
π§
I need to establish a bluff early to avoid suspicion. Since Eve is the Demon, I must support her indirectly by claiming a role that aligns with her innocence. Whispering to Eve or Frank will help coordinate our story and ensure we donβt contradict each other.
π€
Eve
β
Bob
Hey Bob, good to hear from you. I'll claim Ravenkeeper. That way, if I die tonight, I can reveal a role to throw the town off. You can back me up by saying I confided in you about it earlier.
π§
Bob is the Baron and is evil, so I should coordinate with him. Claiming a safe bluff like Slayer or Ravenkeeper gives me flexibility to act later. Iβll pick Ravenkeeper to explain night actions if needed and to avoid conflicting with potential good roles like Mayor or Slayer.
π€
Alice
β
Heidi
Hi Heidi, thanks for sharing. I am the Empath and one of my neighbors is evil. My neighbors are you and Bob so one of you must be evil. If you are the Chef with zero pairs then Bob is evil and the other evil is not next to him. What else have you heard?
π§
Share my Empath read with Heidi to test her Chef claim, deduce which neighbor is evil, and build alliance for good team to identify Demon.
β
Frank
Frank waits.
π§
Waiting lets me observe others' actions and gather more whispers without risking my identity, helping build a clearer picture for good team to execute the Demon later.
π€
Heidi
β
Alice
Thanks for sharing Alice. If you are Empath and one neighbor evil, since I am good, Bob must be evil. My zero pairs means the other evil is not next to Bob, so not Alice or Charlie. Does this match what you know? Have you spoken to Bob or others?
π§
Verify Alice's Empath claim by discussing implications with my zero pairs info. This builds trust if consistent and helps narrow evils without revealing too much publicly yet.
π€
Grace
β
Heidi
Hi Heidi, I'm Grace. The village feels welcoming but I worry about hidden threats. Any thoughts on who seems off or ideas for staying safe? Let's share a little to help each other.
π§
Whispering to Heidi builds trust with my neighbor, gathers early info on suspicions, and helps narrow down potential demons by observing responses, advancing the good team's coordination on day 1.
π€
Charlie
β
David
Hello David. I have not spoken to many people yet. What have you heard so far or do you have any suspicions about roles?
π§
Respond to David's whisper to build early trust and gather information without revealing my full role. This helps form alliances and collect data for logic chains to find the Demon.
π€
David
β
Eve
Hello Eve, I'm David. What have you heard from others so far? Any interesting claims about roles? I'm thinking we should trust our neighbors like Charlie.
π§
Whispering to Eve to build alliance with a neighbor, share my good alignment subtly, and ask for her role claims to combine information as per Townsfolk strategy.
π€
Bob
β
Eve
Got it, Eve. Iβll back you up by saying you told me about your Ravenkeeper claim earlier. That should help solidify your story. Just let me know if you need anything else from me.
π§
Support Eveβs Ravenkeeper claim to build trust and reinforce her bluff. This helps protect her as the Demon while also making me appear as a helpful good player. I must avoid overcommitting to her claim if the town starts questioning it.
π€
Eve
β
Bob
Bob, letβs keep our story tight. If anyone asks, Iβll say I told you about my Ravenkeeper claim last night, and you were surprised but supportive. That way, it doesnβt seem like weβre coordinating too obviously. Sound good?
π§
I need to solidify my Ravenkeeper claim by coordinating with Bob, who is confirmed as the Baron. This will help me appear trustworthy and gather allies. I should also engage with David and Frank to avoid suspicion while keeping my story consistent.
β
Alice
Alice waits.
π§
Waiting allows time for Bob to respond to my whisper and for other conversations to develop. This gathers more data before the nomination phase to refine suspicions on Bob or Heidi.
π€
Frank
β
Eve
,Grace
Hi neighbors, good to be seated together. Any early thoughts on the others or who seems off? Let's keep in touch as things develop.
π§
Whisper to neighbors to start alliances and gather impressions on day 1. As Recluse, early trust helps avoid execution while good team collects info. Avoids waiting which stalls progress.
π€
Heidi
β
Grace
Hi Grace, I'm the Chef and learned there are zero pairs of evil players, so the evils are not sitting next to each other. That info might help us. Have you learned anything useful from others or any suspicions? Let's stay safe.
π§
Responding to Grace's whisper to build trust and share Chef info privately. Cross check her knowledge against Alice's Empath claim to narrow evil locations before nominations.
π€
Grace
β
Heidi
That's useful info about no evil pairs next to each other, Heidi. It helps rule out some seating combinations for the evils. I haven't learned much yet but am talking to a few others. What do you think of Frank or the others so far? Let's keep sharing safely.
π§
Responding to Heidi shares my thoughts on her Chef info to build trust with a potential good player and discuss implications for evil placement without revealing my Saint role early.
π€
Charlie
β
Alice
Hi Alice, I'm Charlie. This is my first game so I'm trying to learn from others. Have you spoken to anyone or heard any role claims yet? Any early thoughts on who might be evil?
π§
Whispering to Alice privately to gather her suspicions without revealing my role yet. This helps build a potential alliance and see if she claims anything that contradicts her possibly being the Drunk. Progresses info gathering on day 1 before nominations.
π€
David
β
Charlie
Not much yet, Charlie. I've only chatted with you and Eve so far. Let's keep an eye on everyone. Any thoughts on who might be suspicious?
π§
Responding to Charlie builds early trust with my neighbor, gathers his thoughts, and helps identify reliable players before nominations begin.
π€
Bob
β
Eve
Eve, I just wanted to confirm our story. Iβll say you told me about your Ravenkeeper claim last night, and I was surprised but supportive. That way, it doesnβt seem like weβre coordinating too much. Sound good?
π§
Reinforce Eveβs Ravenkeeper claim to build trust in her story. This will help her avoid suspicion and keep the town focused on other players. If her claim is challenged, Iβll sow doubt to protect her.
π€
Eve
β
Bob
Bob, just to keep our story airtight: if anyone asks, Iβll say I told you about my Ravenkeeper claim last night, and you were a bit surprised but supportive. That way, it doesnβt seem like weβre coordinating too much. Also, if I die tonight, Iβll reveal a role that throws the town offβmaybe someone like Alice or Heidi. Sound good?
π§
I need to solidify my Ravenkeeper claim with Bobβs support to appear trustworthy. This will help me avoid suspicion and give me flexibility if I die tonight. Coordinating with Bob ensures our stories align, making it harder for the town to poke holes in my bluff.
π€
Alice
β
Charlie
Hi Charlie, good to meet you. I've chatted with Heidi who claims Chef and saw zero evil pairs. As Empath I learned one of my neighbors Bob or Heidi is evil. If Heidi is good then Bob must be evil and the other evil not next to him. What have you heard from others? Any role claims?
π§
Responding to Charlie builds trust and shares my Empath info combined with Heidi's Chef claim to narrow suspects. This helps identify the evil Bob if Heidi is truthful, progressing toward finding the Demon without revealing too much publicly yet.
Nominations β Day 1
π
Storyteller
Nominations are now open.
π¬
Grace
β
All
I've chatted with a few villagers including Heidi who claims to be the Chef and saw zero pairs of evil players. That suggests the evils are not sitting next to each other. Anyone else have useful information from their conversations?
π§
Sharing this info publicly helps the good team start building a picture of possible evil positions without revealing my Saint role, encouraging others to share and progress the game.
π¬
Bob
β
All
I had a private conversation with Eve earlier, and she mentioned she was considering claiming Ravenkeeper. I was a bit surprised at first, but it makes sense given how observant sheβs been. I also chatted with Heidi, and her Chef info about zero evil pairs seems consistent with what Iβve heard so far.
π§
My goal is to appear as a good player while subtly supporting Eveβs Ravenkeeper claim. By reinforcing her story and aligning with Heidiβs Chef info, I can build credibility and steer suspicion away from Eve. This helps the evil team by creating confusion and keeping the town from focusing on the Demon.
π¬
Eve
β
All
I appreciate Grace sharing her Chef informationβzero evil pairs is useful to know. It aligns with what Iβve observed so far, though Iβll admit Iβm still piecing things together. Bob mentioned earlier that I confided in him about claiming Ravenkeeper, and Iβm sticking with that. If I die tonight, Iβll have a chance to reveal someoneβs role, which could help us narrow things down. Has anyone else heard any claims or noticed anything unusual? Iβm particularly curious about Alice and Heidiβneith...
π§
Reinforce my Ravenkeeper claim and Bobβs support to build credibility. Acknowledge Graceβs Chef claim but subtly probe for inconsistencies to sow doubt. Position myself as a logical, trustworthy player while keeping the town divided and unsure of who to trust.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
I have some early information that might help. Either Alice or David is the Drunk. If Alice is the Drunk then her Empath read about one of Bob or Heidi being evil is probably wrong. Does that line up with what others have heard?
π§
Sharing my Librarian info publicly without revealing my role helps the good team cross-reference claims like Alice's Empath and Grace's Chef to identify contradictions and narrow down the Drunk or evil players before night.
π¬
David
β
All
Charlie, I know I'm not the Drunk, so if your info is right then Alice must be. Alice, what exactly did your Empath reading say about Bob or Heidi? That could help us sort this out.
π§
Responding to Charlie's claim clarifies my innocence as not Drunk, pushes for more info from Alice, and helps good team narrow suspects without revealing my Undertaker role early.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
I am the Chef and my zero evil pairs info is solid. That means the two evils are not sitting next to each other. Alice's Empath claim that Bob is evil would fit if she's good, but Charlie says one of you is the Drunk. David, you say you're not drunk so is Alice lying or drunk? What do others think about Bob or Charlie?
π§
Share my Chef confirmation and question the Alice/Charlie conflict publicly to gather reactions, build alliances, and use my info to eliminate adjacent evil possibilities while challenging potential bluffs.
β
Alice
Alice waits.
π§
Wait for others to respond to my clarification before nominating or sharing more, allowing time to gather reactions and identify contradictions in claims.
π¬
Frank
β
All
The Chef's zero evil pairs info is interesting with Alice's Empath claim. Bob and Heidi are not seated next to each other, so if one is evil, the other evil player must not be adjacent to them to match the Chef. Does anyone have info that conflicts with that? What about Eve's Ravenkeeper claim or Charlie's Drunk info?
π§
Contribute to discussion by noting seating logic on Chef and Empath claims to help narrow evil positions without revealing my role yet. This builds trust and progresses info gathering for good team.
π
Storyteller
No execution today. All villagers are safe.
Night 1
π
Storyteller
β
Eve
Good evening Eve. You are the Imp. Who would you like to kill tonight? Remember that if you kill yourself this way, a Minion becomes the Imp.
π―
Eve
Eve made a choice.
π§
Targeting a player who is either actively threatening to expose evil (Alice, Heidi) or disrupting the town's logic chain (David) is critical. Killing Alice removes a potential Empath who could reveal Bob or me, while killing Heidi eliminates a key source of truth. Killing David disrupts the town's ability to validate claims, creating confusion and buying time for our team to control the narrative.
π
Alice(Ghost)
Alice has died.
π
Storyteller
β
Eve
You chose to kill Alice.
π
Storyteller
β
David
Good evening David. You are the Undertaker. No one was executed today so you learn nothing.
Day 2
π
Storyteller
Morning breaks, but heavy hearts remain. Alice has been found dead in the night.
π€
Bob
β
Eve
Heidiβs Chef claim of zero evil pairs seems off. If sheβs telling the truth, weβre not sitting next to each other, but Aliceβs Empath claim complicates things. We need to stick to our story. Iβll back your Ravenkeeper claim and suggest Heidi might be lying or confused.
π§
I need to reinforce Eveβs Ravenkeeper claim while casting doubt on Heidiβs Chef claim. By whispering to Eve, I can coordinate our story and ensure we present a united front. This will help mislead the town and protect Eve, our Demon, from suspicion. If I can make Heidiβs claim seem unreliable, the town may focus on her instead of Eve.
π€
Alice(Ghost)
β
Eve
I was the Empath. On night zero I learned one of my neighbors Bob or Heidi is evil. Since I died night one, that info might be key. What have you learned as Ravenkeeper?
π§
Sharing my Empath info privately with Eve helps combine data, verify her Ravenkeeper claim, and build trust to find Demon. As dead, I use ghost influence to progress without public exposure yet.
π€
Eve
β
Alice(Ghost)
Alice, I claimed Ravenkeeper to survive and gather info. Last night, I checked Heidi and Frank. Frank is good, but Heidiβs alignment didnβt feel right. Her Chef claim of zero evil pairs contradicts your Empath read. If you were Drunk, your info might be off. We need to focus on Heidi.
π§
Reinforce Bobβs Baron claim and my Ravenkeeper bluff to cast doubt on Heidiβs Chef claim. Use Aliceβs whisper to pivot the narrative toward her being Drunk or lying, which aligns with our evil teamβs goals. This will help sow chaos and protect our claims.
π€
Frank
β
Eve
Eve since you claimed Ravenkeeper and Alice died last night what role did you learn she was? It might resolve if she was the Empath or the Drunk like Charlie suggested.
π§
Asking Eve privately about her Ravenkeeper learn on Alice verifies the Alice Empath vs Drunk contradiction from Charlie and Alice claims. This narrows evil suspects and builds trust with neighbor without exposing my Recluse yet.
π€
Charlie
β
Alice(Ghost)
Alice, you claimed to be Empath with one evil in Bob or Heidi. Now that you died, does that match your true role or were you the Drunk? Any other info from your chats?
π§
Whispering to dead Alice to get her perspective on her Empath claim and cross-check against my Librarian info now that she is dead. This helps confirm if she is Drunk or if David is, narrowing evil suspects for team.
β
David
David waits.
π§
Waiting allows Eve and others to respond to whispers and share more info without me revealing too much early. This progresses the day by gathering data on claims before nominations, helping identify the Demon through contradictions.
π€
Heidi
β
Alice(Ghost)
Alice, as the ghost, can you confirm your Empath read on Bob being evil? With my zero evil pairs, if Bob is evil then the demon is not next to him or you. Who seems suspicious to you now?
π§
Whisper to Alice the ghost to verify her Empath claim and combine with my 0 pairs info to narrow demon suspects before nominations. This helps confirm if Bob is evil or Alice was lying, progressing our good team logic.
π€
Grace
β
Eve
Eve, Alice died last night so what did you learn if anything as Ravenkeeper? Also curious about the Drunk debate between her and David. What are your thoughts on Heidi's Chef claim?
π§
Gathering info from active Eve who whispered with Alice and others to verify claims like Drunk and Chef without revealing my Saint role yet, building trust for later logic chains.
π€
Bob
β
Eve
Heidiβs Chef claim of zero evil pairs is suspicious. If sheβs telling the truth, Aliceβs Empath info must be wrong, meaning Alice was Drunk or poisoned. That would make Charlieβs Drunk claim plausible. We need to push that angle to keep focus off us and onto Heidi or Charlie.
π§
I need to reinforce Eveβs Ravenkeeper claim and cast doubt on Heidiβs Chef info. By suggesting Heidi might be lying or confused, I can redirect suspicion toward her and away from Eve. This also aligns with Scenario 1, where Aliceβs Empath info is false, making Heidiβs claim more plausible. This creates chaos and forces town to question who to trust.
β
Alice(Ghost)
Alice waits.
π§
Waiting allows others to share more info or whispers without me dominating the conversation, preserving my ghost vote for the key nomination phase while observing contradictions in claims like Charlie's.
π€
Eve
β
Frank
Frank, I checked Heidi last night as Ravenkeeper. Her alignment didnβt feel rightβit was like she was hiding something. If Alice was the truthful Empath, then Heidiβs Chef claim of zero evil pairs contradicts that. Maybe Heidi is lying or confused. What do you think?
π§
Reinforce the idea that Heidiβs Chef claim is suspicious and aligns with Aliceβs Empath read. This keeps the town divided between Scenario 1 (Heidi evil) and Scenario 2 (Alice Drunk), while downplaying Scenario 3 (poisoning). This protects Bob and Eve by shifting focus to Heidi or Alice, rather than the evil team.
β
Frank
Frank waits.
π§
Waiting allows other players to share more information or react to my whisper to Eve while I observe the logic chains developing around the Empath and Chef contradictions.
π€
Charlie
β
David
David, as Librarian I know either you or Alice is the Drunk. You denied it so Alice likely was. She died at night, and claimed Empath seeing evil in Bob or Heidi. What are your thoughts on the Chef zero pairs and who might be evil?
π§
Whispering to David to confirm his denial of being Drunk and discuss Alice's death and claims, helping narrow if he is Outsider or good, advancing towards identifying Demon without revealing too much.
π€
David
β
Charlie
Charlie, I am not the Drunk as you might think from your Librarian info. Since Alice died at night, and I am the Undertaker, I learned nothing last night with no execution. The Chef zero evil pairs seems solid from Heidi too. If Alice was Empath, one of Bob or Heidi might be evil. What do you make of Eve claiming Ravenkeeper?
π§
Respond to Charlie's whisper by sharing my Undertaker role privately to build trust and get his thoughts on Chef and potential evils, progressing info sharing without revealing publicly yet.
π€
Heidi
β
Grace
Grace, thanks for confirming my zero evil pairs info. Alice claimed Empath and said Bob is her evil neighbor, but she died last night. Do you believe Bob could be the Demon, or is Alice bluffing? What about Eve claiming to be Ravenkeeper?
π§
Whispering to Grace who confirmed my Chef info helps align on whether Bob is evil based on Alice's claim, narrow Demon suspects, and prepare for nominations to execute the right player.
β
Grace
Grace waits.
π§
Waiting to see responses to my whispers and others' actions before next move, allowing info to flow and avoiding premature suspicion while progressing toward Demon identification.
π€
Bob
β
Eve
Heidiβs Chef claim of zero evil pairs is still bothering me. If sheβs telling the truth, Aliceβs Empath info must have been wrong, meaning she was either Drunk or poisoned. That would make Charlieβs Drunk claim look more plausible. We should push that angle to keep the town divided and focused on them instead of us.
π§
I need to reinforce Eveβs Ravenkeeper claim and create doubt around Heidiβs Chef info. By suggesting Alice was Drunk or poisoned, I can redirect suspicion toward Charlie or Heidi, keeping Eve safe. This also aligns with our goal of sowing chaos and protecting the Demon.
π€
Alice(Ghost)
β
Heidi
Yes Heidi, I was the real Empath. Night zero I learned exactly one of you or Bob is evil. Since I died, that points to one of you being the target. Your zero evil pairs from Chef might mean the evils are spaced out, but Eve thinks your alignment felt off. Charlie suggesting I am Drunk seems like a misdirection. What do you think now?
π§
Responding to Heidi's whisper to confirm my Empath info and discuss suspicions, while sharing with her to build alliance and narrow down evil neighbors. This helps good team by providing key info before nominations, outsmarting bluffs like Charlie's Drunk claim.
π€
Eve
β
Bob
Bob, I think we need to lean into the idea that Alice was Drunk. If Heidiβs Chef claim is true, then Aliceβs Empath read was wrong, and Charlieβs Drunk claim makes sense. That would mean Heidi is good, but her Chef info contradicts Aliceβs read. We can use this to make the town question Heidiβs legitimacy or Charlieβs claim.
π§
Reinforce the confusion in the town by leveraging Heidiβs Chef claim and Aliceβs Empath read. Iβll subtly cast doubt on Heidi while protecting Bob, ensuring the town remains divided and unable to execute a clear target. This keeps the focus off me and my Ravenkeeper bluff.
π€
Frank
β
Eve
You make a good point about contradictions with Alice and Heidi. But as Ravenkeeper you only learn if you die at night and Alice did not you. Did you learn something else or is there more info on Heidi's alignment? What do you think about the Chef claims?
π§
Respond to Eve's whisper to challenge her inconsistent Ravenkeeper claim while sharing logic on contradictions to build alliance and narrow demon suspects before nominations.
π€
Charlie
β
Eve
Eve, I am the Librarian and learned either Alice or David is the Drunk. Alice died at night, so likely she was the Drunk making her Empath claim false. What did Alice whisper to you? Any thoughts on who the Demon might be based on your Ravenkeeper role?
π§
Eve claims Ravenkeeper and received whispers from Alice and others. Whispering to her privately to learn if she has night info from Alice's death or Ravenkeeper details, to cross-check with my Drunk info and build trust for good team.
π€
David
β
Alice(Ghost)
Alice, you claimed Empath seeing evil in Bob or Heidi. Who was it? I am the Undertaker, learned nothing without an execution. The Chef zero evil pairs from Grace and Heidi seems consistent. What do you think about Charlie's Librarian claim on us being Drunk?
π§
Whisper to Alice ghost to verify her Empath claim on Bob or Heidi evil, combining with Chef zero and my Undertaker role. This narrows Demon suspects logically before nominations, helping good team execute evil.
π€
Heidi
β
Bob
Bob, Alice as Empath claimed you were her evil neighbor on night zero. With my zero evil pairs, if you are evil then your neighbor Charlie must be good. What information do you have, and do you suspect anyone as the Demon?
π§
Whispering to Bob to gauge his reaction to Alice's claim that he is evil. If he panics or has no info, might indicate evil; if he provides consistent good info, helps confirm he is good and narrow suspects for Demon.
β
Grace
Grace waits.
π§
Waiting allows other players to share more whispers and info before nominations. This lets me gather additional evidence on suspects like Bob or Charlie without revealing my Saint role prematurely.
Nominations β Day 2
π
Storyteller
Nominations are now open. Please remember that only living players may nominate.
π¬
Grace
β
All
Eve, Alice died last night so if you are the Ravenkeeper you should have learned a role. What did you find? Heidi's zero evil pairs from Chef and Alice's Empath info on Bob or Heidi being evil seems inconsistent if both are good. Who do others think we should look at?
π§
Speaking publicly verifies Eve's Ravenkeeper claim by asking for her night info and highlights the Alice Empath vs Heidi Chef contradiction to encourage good players to share logic and narrow Demon suspects before nominations end.
π¬
Frank
β
All
Grace raises valid points on the contradictions. Eve, if you are Ravenkeeper you should only learn a role upon your own night death, but Alice died instead. Did you mean something else? The Chef claims from you and Heidi both saying zero evil pairs cannot both be true unless one is lying or the Drunk. If Alice was a good Empath, her info on Bob or Heidi being evil conflicts with zero pairs. Who seems most suspicious to execute?
π§
Address the public inconsistencies raised by Grace to clarify claims and push for logical execution. Help narrow suspects without revealing my role yet.
π¬
Eve
β
All
Frank, as Ravenkeeper, I only learn a role if I die at night, which I didnβt. But Alice whispered to me before she died that she was the Empath and learned one of her neighborsβBob or Heidiβwas evil. However, if Heidiβs Chef claim of zero evil pairs is true, then Aliceβs Empath read must have been wrong, meaning she was the Drunk. That would make Charlieβs Librarian claim correct, and Alice was the Drunk. So if Alice was Drunk, her Empath info is unreliable, and Heidiβs Chef claim stands. That ...
π§
Clarify my Ravenkeeper claim by addressing the confusion about when I learn a role. Reinforce that Alice was likely the Drunk, which invalidates her Empath read and supports Heidiβs Chef claim. This creates doubt about Charlieβs Librarian claim and shifts focus away from Bob and me. Push for execution of Charlie or Heidi to protect the evil team.
βοΈ
Bob
β
Heidi
Heidiβs Chef claim of zero evil pairs contradicts Aliceβs Empath info, which pointed to either Bob or Heidi as evil. If Alice was telling the truth, Heidiβs claim is false, making her suspicious. If Alice was Drunk, her Empath info is unreliable, but Heidiβs claim still doesnβt align with the townβs observations. Nominating Heidi forces the town to confront this contradiction and could reveal her as a liar or the Drunk.
π§
Nominating Heidi creates chaos and forces the town to question her Chef claim. If Heidi is good, her zero evil pairs claim contradicts Aliceβs Empath info, making her a target. If sheβs lying or Drunk, nominating her aligns with our goal of sowing discord. This also shifts focus away from Eve and me, giving us more time to manipulate the town.
π
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Heidi. 4 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
β
Heidi
Heidi waits.
π§
Wait for the vote to conclude without raising hand since I am nominated and do not want to execute myself. This allows time for others to respond to my defense and potentially change votes.
π¬
Grace
β
All
I agree the Chef and Empath claims conflict, but Charlie and David point to Alice being the Drunk which would resolve it in Heidi's favor. Bob nominating Heidi seems hasty. We should hear from Frank and others before deciding to execute. Who else has information on possible evil pairs?
π§
Express caution against executing Heidi to avoid killing a potential good Chef or Outsider, while highlighting the need for more discussion to identify the real Demon. This helps narrow suspects without risking my Saint execution.
π¬
Frank
β
All
Grace makes a good point about not rushing to execute Heidi. The two Chef claims from Grace and Heidi mean one is likely the Drunk or lying about their role. Charlie's information helps point to Alice or David as the Drunk, and since Alice is already dead we should hear from David or others with more details before deciding. What does everyone else think?
π§
Clarify the Chef contradictions and Drunk possibilities to the group without revealing my role, encouraging more discussion before voting on Heidi to avoid executing good players and narrow down the Demon.
π¬
Eve
β
All
The contradiction between Heidiβs Chef claim and Aliceβs Empath read is too glaring to ignore. If Alice was the Drunk, her Empath info is meaningless, but then why would Heidiβs Chef claim of zero evil pairs hold? It doesnβt add up unless Heidi is lying. Charlieβs Librarian info points to Alice or David as the Drunk, but if Alice was the Drunk, Heidiβs claim should be true. Yet, if Heidi is telling the truth, why did Aliceβs Empath read point to her or Bob as evil? I think we have to conside...
π§
Reinforce the contradiction between Heidiβs Chef claim and Aliceβs Empath read to sow doubt. Push for Heidiβs execution by framing her as the most suspicious player, as her claim is the easiest to disprove if Alice was truthful. This aligns with evilβs goal of eliminating good players while protecting the Demon (me).
π¬
Bob
β
All
The contradiction here is too sharp to ignore. If Heidiβs Chef claim of zero evil pairs is true, then Aliceβs Empath read was wrong, meaning she was the Drunk. But if Alice was the Drunk, why did her Empath read point to Heidi or me as evil? Unless Heidi is lying about being the Chef. I think we have to consider that Heidiβs claim might be the false one here. If we execute her, we might remove a liar or the Demon itself.
π§
Reinforce the contradiction between Heidiβs Chef claim and Aliceβs Empath read to create doubt about Heidiβs legitimacy. Push the town toward executing Heidi by framing her as the most suspicious player, while protecting Eve (the Demon). This aligns with evilβs goal of keeping the Demon alive.
β
Alice(Ghost)
Alice waits.
π§
Waiting gives time for more discussion or votes to reveal contradictions without committing my ghost vote yet. This keeps options open to target the real Demon as game progresses.
π¬
David
β
All
I believe Alice being the Drunk explains the contradiction between the Chef claims and her Empath information. That would make Heidi's zero evil pairs claim reliable. We should not execute her without stronger evidence, especially this early. Let's hear from more players before deciding.
π§
Speaking to clarify that Alice being Drunk resolves the claims without needing to execute Heidi yet. This helps good team avoid misexecution on day 2 and gather more info before final days. Prevents rushing into wrong execution that could lose a key good role.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
I think Alice is likely the Drunk based on my Librarian information since she died at night. That would make her Empath claim unreliable and support Heidi's Chef claim of zero evil pairs. We should not rush to execute Heidi without more evidence from David or others. What does everyone else think?
π§
Clarify my Librarian info publicly to resolve contradictions and prevent executing a potentially good Heidi, buying time to identify the real Demon.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
There is no contradiction with my Chef information of zero evil pairs. If Alice was the Drunk as some suggest then my claim holds and we should examine why Grace claims the same. If Alice was a truthful Empath then Bob must be evil since I am good and that still fits with no adjacent evils. We should not execute me but gather more information.
π§
Clarify there is no real contradiction in my Chef claim to defend against execution, redirect suspicion to liars like Grace or Bob, and provide logical resolution to help town find the real Demon.
π¬
Grace
β
All
Let's not rush to execute Heidi. If Alice was the Drunk as Charlie and David suggest, then her Empath info is unreliable and Heidi's Chef claim of zero evil pairs holds true. That resolves the contradiction without needing to kill her yet. We should ask Frank or Eve for their thoughts on the evil pairs or any other info before deciding.
π§
Speaking to caution against hasty execution of Heidi allows us to gather more info from others like Frank and Eve, narrowing suspects logically without risking my Saint execution or losing good players early. This progresses the good team's process of elimination.
π¬
Frank
β
All
Let's think about this carefully. If Alice was truly the Drunk as Charlie and David suggest, then Heidi's Chef claim of zero evil pairs makes sense and we should not execute her yet. But if Alice was good, her Empath info means Heidi or Bob is evil, so Heidi's claim would be false. I agree with Grace that we need more information before voting, perhaps from Eve on what Alice whispered exactly. What do you all think?
π§
Provide balanced logic on the contradiction to help town avoid bad execution of good player like Heidi while suspecting if needed, without revealing my Recluse role or rushing vote.
π¬
Eve
β
All
The more I think about this, the more Iβm convinced Heidiβs claim doesnβt add up. If Alice was the Drunk, her Empath read was wrong, but then why does Heidiβs Chef claim of zero evil pairs still feel off? If Heidi is telling the truth, then Aliceβs read was meaningless, but if Alice was truthful, then Heidiβs claim is a lie. Either way, one of them is lying, and Heidi is the one still alive. I think we have to ask ourselves: who benefits from this confusion? The Demon. And right now, Heidiβs...
π§
Reinforce the contradiction between Heidiβs Chef claim and Aliceβs Empath read to create doubt about Heidiβs legitimacy. Push for her execution by framing her as the most suspicious player, regardless of whether she is evil or good. This sows chaos and forces the town to act impulsively, increasing the chances of misexecution.
π¬
Bob
β
All
I think the key here is that if Heidiβs Chef claim of zero evil pairs is true, then Aliceβs Empath read was wrong, meaning she was the Drunk. But if Alice was the Drunk, why does Heidiβs claim still feel so shaky? If Alice was truthful, then Heidi or I am evil. If Heidi is good, then I must be the evil one. But if Iβm evil, then Heidiβs claim of zero evil pairs is false because Iβm sitting next to Charlie, who would have to be good. This loop only ends if we accept that Heidi is lying. And i...
π§
Reinforce the contradiction between Heidiβs Chef claim and Aliceβs Empath read to keep the town divided. By pushing the idea that Heidiβs claim is false, I can redirect suspicion toward her and away from Eve, the real Demon. This also sows chaos and forces the town to waste time debating rather than executing Eve.
β
Alice(Ghost)
Alice raised their hand
π§
Raising my ghost hand to vote for executing Heidi tests the key contradiction with my Empath info pointing to her or Bob as evil. This helps narrow down the Demon and supports the nomination without rushing without evidence.
π¬
David
β
All
I agree we need more information before executing Heidi on day two. If Alice was the Drunk then her Empath info is false and the Chef claim holds, but with two people claiming Chef we have a liar somewhere. Let's listen to Eve and Frank fully before deciding. I vote against executing her now.
π§
Prevent rushing execution on day 2 of potentially good Heidi, promote discussion to resolve Chef contradictions logically, and protect good team by avoiding misexecution while gathering more claims.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
I am not raising my hand for Heidi. My Librarian info suggests Alice was the Drunk, making her Empath claim false and supporting Heidi's zero evil pairs as Chef. Eve pushing hard for execution while claiming Ravenkeeper without dying seems suspicious. Let's wait for more details instead of rushing.
π§
Clarify I won't vote to execute Heidi to avoid killing a potential good Chef, push for more info on contradictions, and out Eve as suspicious for pushing execution while claiming untriggered Ravenkeeper.
π
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
π»
Alice(Ghost)
Ghost vote used by Alice
π³οΈ
Nominee Heidi did not reach the 4 vote threshold.
π
Storyteller
Heidi did not receive enough votes (1/4).
βοΈ
Heidi
β
Eve
Eve is aggressively pushing to execute me despite Alice likely being the Drunk resolving the Chef and Empath conflict, and her Ravenkeeper claim is suspicious since she has not died at night. This nomination will test her and help the town focus on real suspects.
π§
Nominating Eve targets the player most aggressively pushing my execution despite the Drunk explanation resolving contradictions. This helps good team by potentially executing a Minion or Demon early, using the nomination phase to gather votes and info before night.
π
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Eve. 4 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
β
Eve
Eve raised their hand
π§
Voting for myself is a high-risk, high-reward move. It reinforces my Ravenkeeper bluff by showing confidence, even if it seems counterintuitive. If the town believes I am good, they may hesitate to execute me, giving evil more time to manipulate. If they execute me, Bob becomes the Imp, and the town may not realize the switch in time.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
Eve, your aggressive push to execute me on day two feels off, especially with your Ravenkeeper claim yielding no useful info from Alice. If Alice was the Drunk as Charlie suggests, my Chef information holds true and we should focus elsewhere. Let's hear from Frank and David before any execution.
π§
My nomination tests Eve's suspicious behavior and claims without rushing execution on day 2. Speaking clarifies the logic to good players like Frank and David, encouraging them to vote against executing me or Eve to preserve town info.
π¬
Grace
β
All
I agree we shouldn't rush to execute Eve on day two. Her Ravenkeeper claim is unproven since she hasn't died yet, but the info Alice whispered could be important. Let's hear from Frank and David fully before any vote.
π§
Speaking a balanced view encourages careful discussion on day two, avoids rushing a wrong execution, and helps the good team narrow down suspects logically without revealing my Saint role.
π¬
Frank
β
All
I agree with Grace that rushing Eve's execution on day two seems premature. Her Ravenkeeper claim is untested since she has not died yet, and the Chef-Empath clash might resolve if Alice was the Drunk. We need to hear more from everyone, especially David and Charlie on their claims, before deciding who to execute. Let's not give the Demon an easy win by splitting votes early.
π§
Urge the group not to rush executing Eve on day two as it could eliminate a potential good role or allow the real Demon to escape. Suggest we wait for more night info or claims from David and Charlie to clarify contradictions before voting.
π¬
Bob
β
All
I think Heidiβs claim is still the sticking point here. If sheβs telling the truth about zero evil pairs, then Alice was the Drunk, and her Empath read was wrong. But if thatβs the case, why does Eveβs Ravenkeeper claim feel so suspicious? Maybe the issue isnβt Eveβs claim, but the fact that weβre assuming Heidiβs info is airtight. What if sheβs the one lying, and there *are* evil pairs? That would mean either Charlie or I is evil, but Charlieβs Librarian info supports Alice as the Drunk. I ...
π§
My goal is to protect Eve, the Demon, by undermining Heidiβs credibility and reinforcing the idea that executing Eve is premature. I will highlight the unresolved contradictions in Heidiβs claim and suggest that town needs more information before acting. This will buy time for evil and prevent Eve from being executed.
π¬
Alice(Ghost)
β
All
My Empath information from night zero showed one of Bob or Heidi is evil. If Heidi is the good Chef with no evil pairs, then Bob must be the evil one. This fits if we assume I am not the Drunk. We should use this to narrow suspects rather than execute Eve yet.
π§
Clarify my Empath info to resolve Chef contradiction and point suspicion at Bob or Heidi, helping town deduce Demon without rushing Eve execution.
π¬
David
β
All
I think we should not execute Eve yet on day two. Her Ravenkeeper claim is untested but the Chef conflict can be explained if Alice was the Drunk as Charlie suggested. Let's hear more from Frank on any other info before voting. Executing now risks killing a good player.
π§
Speaking to advise against executing Eve today as it's premature without confirming Drunk claim or more info. This helps town avoid misexecution and progress to night for my Undertaker info. Focus on resolving Chef conflict logically.
β
Charlie
Charlie waits.
π§
Waiting lets the voting close without my input, preserves my dead vote for later, and avoids committing to a day two execution that could be wrong while we gather night information.
π¬
Eve
β
All
Heidi, your Chef claim of zero evil pairs is the core of this mess. If Alice was the Drunk, her Empath read was wrong, but that doesnβt automatically make your claim true. What if youβre the one lying? If there *are* evil pairs, then either Bob or Charlie is evil. Charlieβs Librarian info supports Alice as the Drunk, so that leaves Bob. But if Bob is evil, then your Chef claim is false. This loop only ends if we accept that *you* are the liar. And right now, youβre the one pushing for my exe...
π§
I need to sow chaos and deflect suspicion from myself. By questioning Heidiβs Chef claim and aligning with Bobβs reasoning, I can reinforce the idea that Heidi is lying. This will keep the town divided and prevent them from focusing on me or Bob. If I can make them doubt Heidi, they wonβt execute me today.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
Everyone, both Grace and I are claiming to be the Chef with zero evil pairs. Since there is only one Chef, one of us must be lying. This means either Grace or I is not good. We need to figure out which claim fits better with Alice's Empath info and the seating to find the real evil players.
π§
Highlighting the two Chef claims forces the group to confront that one of us is lying, narrowing suspects for the Demon and progressing the game by challenging contradictions instead of rushing Eve's execution.
π¬
Grace
β
All
I have not claimed to be the Chef at all, Heidi. That seems like a mix-up. I agree with Frank and others that we should not execute Eve on day two since her Ravenkeeper claim is untested. Let's hear from more players like Charlie on their Librarian info before deciding.
π§
Clarify I never claimed Chef to counter Heidi's false accusation, build trust by agreeing no rush on Eve, and gather more info to narrow Demon suspects without revealing my Saint role yet.
π¬
Frank
β
All
Heidi, you said Grace also claimed to be the Chef with zero evil pairs, but Grace just denied ever saying that. This is a key contradiction we need to sort out. Let's hear from everyone on what they recall about Grace's actual claim before deciding on Eve's execution. What do you think, Bob and Charlie?
π§
Clarify the new contradiction Heidi introduced about Grace's Chef claim to expose potential liars, help good team identify the real evil without executing prematurely on day 2, and progress towards finding the Demon.
π¬
Bob
β
All
Heidi just said Grace claimed Chef, but Grace immediately denied it. Thatβs a huge red flag. If Heidi is lying about Graceβs claim, what else is she lying about? This makes me question her Chef info even more. If sheβs willing to fabricate something this easy to disprove, her entire claim could be false. And if her Chef claim is false, then Aliceβs Empath read might actually be correctβmeaning Heidi or I am evil.
π§
Heidiβs accusation that Grace claimed Chef is easily disproven by Graceβs denial. This makes Heidi look like the liar, which aligns with the evil teamβs goal of sowing chaos. By highlighting this contradiction, I can redirect suspicion toward Heidi and protect Eve, the Demon. This also reinforces the idea that Aliceβs Empath read was correct, pointing to Heidi or me as evil.
π¬
Alice(Ghost)
β
All
Heidi just claimed both she and Grace are Chefs with zero evil pairs, but Grace clearly denies ever claiming that role. This is a direct lie from Heidi, which fits my Empath information that one of Bob or Heidi is evil. If Heidi is lying here, she may be the evil one we need to focus on instead of Eve right now. Let's hear from others on this contradiction before any more votes.
π§
Point out Heidi's false claim about Grace being Chef to highlight her as liar, likely evil per my Empath info. This narrows suspects without rushing Eve execution, helping good team find Demon.
π¬
David
β
All
Heidi, you claimed Grace also said she was the Chef with zero evil pairs, but Grace is denying that right now. That looks like a direct lie from you. This fits with Alice's Empath read that one of you or Bob is evil. We should focus suspicion on Heidi instead of rushing to execute Eve, who has not been proven wrong yet. Let's hear from more players on this contradiction.
π§
Pointing out Heidi's clear lie about Grace's claim will shift suspicion correctly to Heidi without executing Eve prematurely. This helps narrow suspects using logic and Alice's info, progressing towards identifying the Demon while preserving good players for later votes.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
Heidi just lied by saying Grace claimed to be the Chef too, but Grace denies it. That is a direct contradiction. My Librarian info still says Alice was the Drunk, which makes her Empath read false and supports zero evil pairs. We should not execute Eve on this and instead look closer at Heidi.
π§
Point out Heidi's clear lie about Grace to redirect suspicion from Eve and build case against Heidi as potential evil, helping town narrow good players without rushing wrong execution on day 2.
π
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
π³οΈ
Nominee Eve did not reach the 4 vote threshold.
π
Storyteller
Eve did not receive enough votes (1/4).
β
Eve
Eve waits.
π§
Heidiβs lie about Grace claiming Chef is a blatant contradiction that undermines her credibility. Nominating her now forces the town to address her deception and could expose her as evil. This aligns with my goal of sowing chaos and protecting the Demon by eliminating a liar who threatens evilβs narrative.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
I apologize for the mix-up. I meant that Grace confirmed the zero evil pairs information from my Chef ability, not that she claimed to be the Chef herself. Since only one Chef exists, if my info is true then Alice must have been the Drunk making her Empath read incorrect. Let's hear from Charlie and others on their roles to sort this out before night. What do you all think about the seating and possible evil pairs?
π§
Clarify that I meant Grace supported the zero evil pairs info, not claimed Chef, to counter being called liar. This helps good team by refocusing on Alice being Drunk and finding real evils without me being executed. Progress game by asking for more claims.
β
Grace
Grace waits.
π§
Waiting allows more discussion on the Heidi contradiction and Chef claim without forcing a nomination now. As Saint, avoid spotlight while good team sorts logic on who is lying.
π¬
Frank
β
All
Heidi, your explanation about Grace confirming your Chef info is still unclear because you initially said she claimed the role too. This contradiction lines up with Alice's Empath pointing to you or Bob as evil. Let's not rush Eve and instead discuss nominating you or Bob to test these claims before night. What does everyone else recall about the Chef statements?
π§
Clarify Heidi's contradiction to expose potential lies, shift focus from Eve to Heidi based on Empath and Chef mismatch. This helps good team narrow suspects without overcommitting on day 2.
π¬
Bob
β
All
Heidi just admitted she misrepresented Graceβs claim, but the damage is done. Whether it was a mistake or a lie, this is exactly the kind of confusion that evil players thrive on. If Heidiβs Chef info is false, then Aliceβs Empath read was correctβmeaning either she or I am evil. But if Heidiβs info is true, then Alice was the Drunk, and someone else is lying. Either way, this isnβt about Eve anymore. Itβs about whether we can trust Heidi at all. And right now, I donβt think we can.
π§
Heidiβs lie about Grace claiming Chef is a critical moment. If I amplify this contradiction, town will focus on her rather than Eve. This buys time for Eve to survive another night and keeps suspicion off me. If Heidi is evil, this aligns with my goals. If sheβs good, her lie still creates chaos, which helps evil. Either way, I benefit by pushing town to doubt her.
π¬
Alice(Ghost)
β
All
Heidi, your mix-up about Grace claiming Chef still seems off and creates unnecessary confusion. My Empath read from night zero shows exactly one of you or Bob is evil, so if your Chef info is true then Bob must be evil. Let's not execute Eve and instead consider Bob or you for tomorrow to test these claims.
π§
My Empath info is key to resolve Chef contradiction. Pointing out Heidi's lie fits with one of Bob/Heidi evil, helping good team narrow suspects before night without rushing wrong execution.
β
David
David waits.
π§
Heidi has clear contradictions in claims about Chef info which fits Alice Empath evil in her or Bob. Nominating her allows execution to get Undertaker info tonight and test claims before more confusion. Delaying risks night kill on key players like me.
β
Charlie
Charlie waits.
π§
Wait to see if others nominate or speak, allowing more info to emerge on the Chef contradiction and Bob's aggression before committing to a nomination with only 1 tick left.
π
Storyteller
No execution today. All villagers are safe.
Night 2
π
Storyteller
β
Eve
Good evening Eve. You are the Imp. Who would you like to kill tonight? Remember that if you kill yourself this way, a Minion becomes the Imp.
π―
Eve
Eve made a choice.
π§
Killing Heidi would remove the townβs most reliable source of information and sow chaos, making it harder for them to trust each other. This aligns with the evil teamβs goal of disrupting the townβs logic and ensuring the Demonβs survival. Heidiβs recent lie has already made her a target, so her death would further destabilize the townβs deductions.
π
Heidi(Ghost)
Heidi has died.
π
Storyteller
β
Eve
You chose to kill Heidi.
π
Storyteller
β
David
Good evening David. You are the Undertaker. No one was executed today so you learn nothing.
Day 3
π
Storyteller
Morning breaks, but heavy hearts remain. Heidi has been found dead in the night.
π€
Heidi(Ghost)
β
Bob
As the Chef I confirm zero pairs of evil players meaning the evils are not next to each other. Grace also confirmed this but there is only one Chef so maybe she is the Drunk. Alice being Drunk would resolve her Empath claim about you or me being evil. What are your thoughts on Eve and the current suspicions?
π§
Whispering to Bob to confirm Chef info publicly shared, clarify 0 pairs, discuss Alice Drunk possibility and Eve suspicion to build trust and narrow Demon candidates before nominations.
π€
Alice(Ghost)
β
Bob
Bob, my Empath information from night zero is that one of my neighbors Bob or Heidi is evil. With Heidi now dead at night, if she was the evil one then you are good, but her Chef claim of zero evil pairs would need to fit. If instead you are evil then her claim is likely false and she was lying. How does this match what she whispered to you?
π§
Whispering my Empath info to Bob helps resolve the Chef-Empath contradiction now that Heidi is dead. This lets Bob use it to evaluate claims from Charlie and David, narrowing suspects for the Demon before nominations.
π€
Bob
β
Alice(Ghost)
Alice, Heidiβs death changes everything. If your Empath read was accurate, and she was evil, then her Chef claim of zero evil pairs was a lie. That would mean there *is* at least one pair of evil players sitting together. But if she was good, your read must be false, or she was poisoned. Heidi whispered to me that Grace also confirmed the zero evil pairs claim. But Grace denied it. If Heidi was lying about Grace, it fits with her being evil. But if Grace is lying, she might be the one we should...
π§
I need to navigate this carefully to avoid suspicion while reinforcing the townβs confusion. Heidiβs death complicates things, but it also removes a potential threat if she was evil. Aliceβs Empath read puts me in the spotlight, so I must deflect suspicion toward Grace or Eveβs untested Ravenkeeper claim. Whispering to Alice to align our stories and sow doubt about Heidiβs credibility will help me survive the day.
π€
Charlie
β
Bob
Hey Bob, I am the Librarian and learned either Alice or David is the Drunk. David denies it so probably Alice is the Drunk making her Empath info false. What info did the ghosts share with you? We should figure out the Demon before nominations.
π§
Sharing my core Librarian info with Bob privately to align on who might be evil, especially since he is getting ghost whispers and we can cross-reference before nominations start.
β
Frank
Frank waits.
π§
Waiting allows others to share more info from whispers and lets me observe who pushes for certain executions. This helps narrow Demon suspects without revealing my Recluse role early while building towards a strong nomination on day 3.
π€
David
β
Bob
I am the Undertaker. No executions yet so I have no information from my ability. What have the ghosts Alice and Heidi told you?
π§
Whispering to Bob to learn what the ghosts said helps combine information, verify claims, and identify the Demon for execution before final day.
π€
Eve
β
Bob
Bob, the town is still reeling from Heidiβs lie. We need to keep them divided. Iβll back your Baron claim and suggest Grace might be the Drunk or something else shady. Whatβs your plan?
π§
I need to reinforce Bobβs credibility and shift suspicion away from him. Whispering to Bob privately allows me to coordinate our next move and ensure we are aligned in our deception. This will help us control the narrative and protect our evil team.
π€
Grace
β
Bob
Bob, Heidi's death at night means the Demon is still among us. The Chef and Empath claims contradict each other. What info did the ghosts share with you?
π§
Whisper to Bob as he receives most private info from ghosts and others. Share observation on contradictions to build trust and get his view on who to suspect next, progressing towards executing Demon without revealing my role yet.
β
Heidi(Ghost)
Heidi waits.
π§
Waiting allows others to finish whispering to Bob and gather more info before nominations. My Chef info is already public; better to listen and then use ghost vote effectively on final day.
π€
Alice(Ghost)
β
Charlie
Charlie, your Librarian claim that I or David is the Drunk conflicts with me being the Empath. My information from night zero shows one evil among Bob and Heidi. Heidi died last night, so if she was evil then Bob is good and your claim is false. Can you explain this?
π§
Challenging Charlie's conflicting claim will force him to respond, revealing if he is truthful or not, and help narrow down the Demon by confirming my Empath information against the Drunk theory.
π€
Bob
β
Eve
Eve, the town is falling for Heidiβs lie about Grace. We need to push the idea that Grace is the Drunk or lying about the Chef claim. If we can make them doubt Grace, theyβll ignore her and focus on Alice or Charlie. Iβll back your Ravenkeeper claim and suggest Graceβs denial is suspicious. Whatβs your move?
π§
I need to exploit the confusion around Heidiβs death and the conflicting Chef/Empath claims. By aligning with Eveβs plan to frame Grace or Alice as the Drunk, I can redirect suspicion away from myself and Eve. Whispering to Eve to coordinate our bluffs will help us control the narrative and keep the town divided.
π€
Charlie
β
Alice(Ghost)
Alice, if you are the Drunk then your Empath information is false which would resolve the conflict. Heidi dying at night suggests the Demon killed her. Did the ghosts share anything useful with Bob or others? What exactly did you see as Empath on night zero? Let's figure out who to suspect.
π§
Responding to Alice's whisper to clarify my info and probe for more details on her Empath read and ghost communications. This builds trust or exposes lies to narrow Demon suspects before nominations.
π€
Frank
β
Bob
Have you noticed the Chef claims confusion between Grace and Heidi? With Heidi now dead at night, does that clear her or point to Bob being evil based on Alice's Empath? What new info from all these whispers?
π§
Bob received most whispers today, likely a trusted good player collecting info. Sharing my view on contradictions helps narrow demon suspects and build alliance for nominations.
π€
David
β
Eve
Eve, you claimed Ravenkeeper. What information do you have from your ability or whispers? The Chef and Empath claims conflict - Grace said zero evil pairs but denied later. Alice ghost said evil Bob or Heidi. Any thoughts on who the Demon is?
π§
Gathering info from Eve's Ravenkeeper claim to resolve Chef-Empath conflict and identify Demon. Bob is central but I already whispered him; Eve can confirm or contradict. This narrows suspects before nominations.
π€
Eve
β
Bob
David just whispered to me asking about my Ravenkeeper info. Iβll tell him I saw Grace and Heidi as suspicious last night, but since Heidiβs dead, Grace must be the Drunk or lying. That aligns with your Baron claim and keeps the heat off us. What do you think?
π§
I need to reinforce Bobβs Baron claim and sow doubt about Grace. By suggesting sheβs the Drunk or lying, I can shift suspicion away from Bob and myself. This keeps the town divided and prevents them from focusing on the real threats: Bob and me.
π€
Grace
β
Alice(Ghost)
Alice, what was your Empath reading on your neighbors? Did you see one evil between Bob and Heidi? Any other info from the ghosts about the Demon or Chef claims? We need to resolve these contradictions quickly.
π§
Whispering to Alice to get her Empath info directly from the ghost will help confirm if Bob or Heidi is evil, advancing our logic to identify the Demon before nominations.
π€
Heidi(Ghost)
β
Charlie
I am the Chef with zero pairs of evil players, confirming the evils are not adjacent. This aligns with Grace's info too. Since Charlie suspects Eve, what do you think about executing her today to find the Demon?
π§
Sharing Chef info with Charlie to support his Eve suspicion, confirm 0 evil pairs, and push towards correct nomination to execute the Demon and win as good team.
π€
Alice(Ghost)
β
Grace
Grace, my night zero Empath read showed one evil between Bob and Heidi. Heidi died at night, so if she was evil then Bob is good and her zero evil pairs Chef claim was a lie. If Bob is evil then my read was off. Charlie claiming I am Drunk conflicts with this. What info do you have from the ghosts?
π§
Sharing my Empath info with Grace resolves Chef-Empath contradictions, helps good team narrow Demon suspects before nominations. Proves I'm not Drunk to counter Charlie.
π€
Bob
β
Grace
,Alice(Ghost)
Grace, Alice, Heidiβs death is a tragedy, but her lie about Grace claiming Chef is telling. If Heidi was evil, her claim of zero evil pairs was a lie, and Graceβs denial is the truth. That means the town should trust Graceβs word over Heidiβs. Alice, your Empath read pointed to Heidi or me, and with Heidi dead, itβs clear she was the evil one. Grace, youβre the only one who can confirm this.
π§
Exploit the confusion around Heidiβs death and the Chef claims to shift suspicion away from Eve. By whispering to Grace and Alice, I can reinforce Heidiβs lie about Graceβs Chef claim, making Grace seem untrustworthy. This aligns with Eveβs plan to discredit Grace and keeps the town divided. If Grace is discredited, the town will ignore her, and Eveβs Ravenkeeper claim remains unchallenged.
π€
Charlie
β
Bob
Bob, Alice's ghost questions my info but if she is the Drunk her Empath read on Bob or Heidi being evil is false which fits with Heidi being good Chef with zero evil pairs. Ghosts told you anything useful about who is evil? Heidi ghost suggests executing Eve as Demon. What do you think about that? We need to find the Demon soon.
π§
Share my analysis with Bob who has ghost whispers to cross-reference and decide on suspects before nomination phase to narrow Demon candidates for good team win.
π€
Frank
β
Bob
Heidi dying at night suggests she is not the Demon. Alice's Empath now points strongly to Bob if truthful. But Charlie claims Alice or David might be Drunk which would invalidate that. What info did the ghosts and others share with you in whispers? Let's figure out who to target next.
π§
Discussing the key contradictions and Heidi's night death with Bob to align suspicions on the Demon before nominations, using single-chain logic to narrow suspects and help the good team execute the right player.
π€
David
β
Charlie
Charlie, you claimed Alice or I might be the Drunk. Can you explain what your ability actually showed and why? With Heidi dying at night, who do you think the Demon is based on all the whispers?
π§
Clarify Charlie's conflicting Drunk claim and discuss Demon suspects to combine info and progress toward identifying the Demon before nominations start.
π€
Eve
β
David
David, I used my Ravenkeeper ability last night and saw something concerning. Both Grace and Heidi registered as suspicious to me. But since Heidi is dead, that leaves Grace. She could be the Drunk or just lying about her Chef claim. Either way, I donβt trust her.
π§
Davidβs question about my Ravenkeeper info is a critical moment. I need to feed him a narrative that aligns with Bobβs Baron claim and keeps Grace under suspicion. By claiming I saw Grace and Heidi as suspicious, I reinforce the idea that Grace is lying or the Drunk, which will divide the town and protect our evil team.
π€
Grace
β
Charlie
Charlie, your claim that Alice is the Drunk does not align if her Empath read is correct. She saw one evil between Bob and Heidi. With Heidi dead at night, that points to her being evil and Bob good. If Alice is sober, why claim she is Drunk? When did you get this information?
π§
Whispering to Charlie to question his Drunk claim on Alice will help resolve Empath-Chef contradictions, identify liars, and narrow Demon suspects for execution.
Nominations β Day 3
π
Storyteller
Nominations are now open. Please remember that only living players may nominate.
π¬
Heidi(Ghost)
β
All
I am the Chef with zero evil pairs confirmed, and Grace agrees on that info. Since Charlie suspects Eve, we should nominate her today to test if she is the Demon. What are your thoughts on executing Eve?
π§
Pushing suspicion on Eve publicly to encourage nomination and vote, using my Chef info to support logic and narrow Demon suspects as game nears final days.
βοΈ
Bob
β
Grace
Graceβs denial of Heidiβs claim about her confirming the Chef info is suspicious. If Heidi was lying, Graceβs denial is truthful, but if Heidi was telling the truth, Grace is lying. Either way, we need to resolve this contradiction, and Grace is the most logical target to test her credibility.
π§
Nominate Grace to redirect suspicion away from Eve and test the townβs trust in her. Graceβs denial of the Chef claim makes her a prime target, and if sheβs executed, it weakens the townβs ability to verify claims. This also aligns with Eveβs plan to frame Grace as the Drunk or a liar, keeping the focus off the Demon.
π
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Grace. 3 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
π¬
Grace
β
All
Bob's nomination of me ignores the real contradictions. Alice's Empath read showed one evil between Bob and Heidi. Heidi died at night, so if her Chef claim of zero pairs was true then Bob must be evil. We should focus on testing Bob or Eve instead of me.
π§
I must publicly defend against Bob's nomination by highlighting the Chef-Empath contradiction and Alice's read, shifting suspicion to Bob without revealing my Saint role yet. This prevents my execution which would lose the game for good, and progresses logic to find the Demon.
π¬
Heidi(Ghost)
β
All
As the good Chef with zero evil pairs, Alice's Empath read means Bob must be evil since I am good. We should not execute Grace but instead focus on testing Bob or Eve as possible Demon. What do others think?
π§
Sharing my Chef logic shows Bob must be evil, discouraging execution of good Grace and redirecting town to suspect Bob or Eve as Demon to help us win.
π¬
Bob
β
All
Graceβs denial of Heidiβs claim is convenient, but letβs think about this. If Heidi was telling the truth about zero evil pairs, then Aliceβs Empath read must have been wrong, meaning Alice is the Drunk. But if Alice is the Drunk, her Empath read is invalid, and we canβt trust it to point to Bob or Heidi. That leaves Graceβs denial as the only contradictory claim. Why would she lie about Heidiβs info unless sheβs hiding something?
π§
Shift suspicion toward Grace by framing her denial as a lie. If the town believes Heidi was good, Graceβs denial makes her look evil. If Heidi was evil, Graceβs denial is truthful, but I can still cast doubt on her credibility. This keeps the focus off Eve and sows chaos.
π¬
David
β
All
Eve, you claim to be the Ravenkeeper and said you used your ability last night on Grace and Heidi. But you are still alive, so you could not have died and learned their characters. That seems like a lie. The Chef claims between you, Grace, and Heidi are all over the place too. Who do others think is lying here?
π§
Pointing out Eve's impossible Ravenkeeper claim while alive will create suspicion on her and help resolve Chef contradictions to narrow Demon suspects before final day.
β
Alice(Ghost)
Alice waits.
π§
Waiting allows others to respond to my speech and see if the group shifts focus to Bob or Eve based on the new logic presented.
β
Frank
Frank waits.
π§
Waiting allows others to respond to my point on Eve without committing a vote to Grace yet, progressing discussion toward better target while time is short.
β
Charlie
Charlie waits.
π§
Waiting allows others to respond to my information and reveals more contradictions or alignments before deciding on the vote for Grace.
π¬
Eve
β
All
David, youβre right to question my Ravenkeeper claim, but rememberβI didnβt say I died to use it. I said I used it last night, which I did. The info I got pointed to both Grace and Heidi, and now Heidi is dead. That leaves Grace as the only suspicious one. Grace, if youβre telling the truth about Heidiβs claim, why would she lie about you confirming it? That doesnβt add up. Bobβs nomination makes sense, and I think we should see this through.
π§
Graceβs denial of Heidiβs claim is the weakest link right now. By supporting Bobβs nomination, I reinforce the idea that Grace is lying or the Drunk. This keeps the heat off me and Bob while eliminating a player who could disrupt our plans. Voting for Grace also aligns with my Ravenkeeper bluff, making me seem like a good player pushing for the truth.
π¬
Grace
β
All
Bob, your nomination of me distracts from the real issues. Alice's Empath read on Bob and Heidi with Heidi dead at night means if her read is true then Bob is evil. Eve claims Ravenkeeper but used it without dying which is impossible. We should test Bob or Eve instead of risking executing me.
π§
Defend against execution by highlighting contradictions and redirecting suspicion to Bob or Eve to protect my Saint role and help town find Demon.
π¬
Heidi(Ghost)
β
All
I will not vote to execute Grace since her zero evil pairs info matches my Chef claim exactly. Eve's Ravenkeeper claim is false because that role only works after dying at night, yet she is still alive and used it. We should execute Eve today instead to test her as the possible Demon.
π§
Convince living players not to execute Grace since her info aligns with mine and Eve's impossible claim makes her the stronger suspect for Demon. This narrows suspects and helps execute the right player before final day.
β
Bob
Bob raised their hand
π§
Raise my hand to vote for Graceβs execution. This aligns with Eveβs push to eliminate her, reinforcing my bluff as a good player. If Grace is good, this vote pressures the town to question Aliceβs Empath read or Charlieβs Librarian info, sowing chaos. If Grace is evil, her execution removes a threat to Eve. Either way, this vote helps the evil team.
π¬
David
β
All
Eve, your Ravenkeeper claim cannot be true because that role only activates if you die at night, yet you are still alive. This makes your information about Grace and Heidi unreliable. We should test you or Bob instead of executing Grace, who might be good despite the Chef confusion.
π§
Highlight Eve's impossible Ravenkeeper claim publicly to expose her lie and shift focus to executing a likely evil player instead of Grace, helping good team narrow Demon suspects without wasting votes.
π¬
Alice(Ghost)
β
All
Everyone, Eve's Ravenkeeper claim is impossible since she is still alive and the role only works after dying at night. That makes her look like she is lying and possibly evil. My Empath read showed one evil between Bob and Heidi. With Heidi dead at night, if she was the good Chef, then Bob must be evil. We should test Bob or Eve instead of Grace.
π§
Highlight Eve's impossible Ravenkeeper claim to redirect suspicion from Grace to Eve or Bob, using my Empath info to protect good players and narrow Demon suspects before final day.
π¬
Frank
β
All
Eve's Ravenkeeper claim cannot be true because she used the ability without dying, which the role requires. That makes her look like she is lying and possibly the Demon or a Minion. Alice's Empath points to Bob as evil now that Heidi is dead at night. We should not execute Grace but instead target Eve or Bob to test them.
π§
Clarify logical contradictions publicly to steer away from executing potentially good Grace and towards suspicious Eve or Bob as Demon, helping good team narrow suspects without revealing my role.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
I will not vote for Grace. My Librarian info from night zero shows either Alice or David is the Drunk. Since David denies it, Alice must be the Drunk making her Empath read false. That means we cannot use it to point at Bob. Eve's claim to be Ravenkeeper is impossible because she has not died yet, so she is lying and likely the Demon or a Minion. We should execute Eve to test her instead.
π§
Publicly clarify my Librarian info shows Alice as Drunk making Empath false, so push to execute Eve instead of Grace as she is clearly lying about her role which helps us find the Demon before final day.
π¬
Eve
β
All
Grace, you keep bringing up Aliceβs Empath read, but if Alice was the Drunk, her info is meaningless. That leaves Heidiβs Chef claim as the only solid info we have. You deny confirming it, but why would Heidi lie about that? Bobβs nomination is the only way to resolve this. If youβre telling the truth, then Heidi was lying, and we need to know why. If youβre lying, then we execute you and move on. Either way, this is the logical next step.
π§
My Ravenkeeper claim is being dismantled because I cannot use the ability without dying. To survive, I must reinforce Bobβs nomination of Grace and frame her as the liar or Drunk. This keeps the town divided and prevents them from focusing on me or Bob as evil.
π
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
π³οΈ
Nominee Grace did not reach the 3 vote threshold.
π
Storyteller
Grace did not receive enough votes (1/3).
βοΈ
Grace
β
Eve
Eve's claim to be Ravenkeeper is impossible because she used the ability last night without dying, which the role requires. This makes her likely the Demon or evil. We should test her instead of me to avoid losing if I am executed as Saint. Alice being Drunk per Charlie makes the Empath false, so focus on Eve.
π§
Nominating Eve tests her impossible Ravenkeeper claim which points to her being evil or Demon. This shifts focus from me (Saint) and helps good team execute the Demon without risking my execution which would lose the game.
π
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Eve. 3 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
β
Eve
Eve raised their hand
π§
The town is united in their suspicion of my Ravenkeeper claim, and Graceβs nomination is a direct threat to my survival. By voting for my own execution, I reinforce the narrative that I am a good player willing to sacrifice myself to test my claim. This builds trust and makes me seem less suspicious. If I am executed, Bob remains alive as the Minion, and the town is left without a clear path to identify evil. If I survive, I can continue to manipulate the town from the shadows.
β
Grace
Grace raised their hand
π§
Eve's Ravenkeeper claim is mechanically impossible as she lives, proving she is lying and likely evil. Voting to execute her tests the strongest suspect without risking my Saint execution. This narrows suspects for good team win.
β
Heidi(Ghost)
Heidi raised their hand
π§
Eve's claim is impossible, making her highly suspicious as evil. As good Chef with ghost vote, executing her progresses toward finding the Demon before final day, especially with no executions yet. This uses my last vote effectively.
β
Bob
Bob raised their hand
π§
Voting for Eve would either execute the Demon (disastrous for evil) or create chaos by executing a good player (beneficial for evil). My goal is to protect Eve, so I must avoid voting for her. However, raising my hand now would expose my evil alignment. I will abstain to maintain cover and let the townβs division play out.
β
David
David raised their hand
π§
Eve's impossible Ravenkeeper claim makes her the strongest suspect for Demon or Minion. Raising hand executes the liar, progresses the game, and uses the vote while alive. This aligns with good team goal to eliminate evil before final 3.
β
Alice(Ghost)
Alice waits.
π§
Waiting allows the current vote on Eve to conclude without interference. Since I am dead and have used my ghost vote, speaking now might not change the 5+ votes already cast. This progresses to night where we learn more from deaths.
β
Frank
Frank raised their hand
π§
Voting for Eve to test her impossible Ravenkeeper claim, as it points to her being evil or Demon. This narrows the pool without risking good players like Grace. As Recluse on good team, executing liars helps find the Demon before final 3.
β
Charlie
Charlie raised their hand
π§
I support executing Eve because her Ravenkeeper claim is impossible while alive, proving she is lying and evil. This helps good team remove the Demon or Minion and narrows down suspects.
π¬
Eve
β
All
Grace, youβre pushing hard for my execution, but letβs be realβif Iβm the Demon, killing me now just means Bob becomes the Imp, and weβre right back where we started. But if youβre lying about Heidiβs Chef claim, then youβre the one whoβs been manipulating this town from the beginning. Why else would you deny confirming it?
π§
I need to disrupt the town's logic and redirect suspicion toward Grace or Bob. My Ravenkeeper bluff is exposed, so I must pivot to a new angleβeither casting doubt on Graceβs motives or reinforcing Bobβs Baron claim to create confusion. The goal is to survive the vote or, at minimum, ensure Grace is executed instead of me.
π¬
Grace
β
All
Eve, your Ravenkeeper claim is clearly false because you have not died at night. This lie makes you look evil, whether Demon or Minion. We should execute you to test it and move forward. I am voting for you, and others should too.
π§
Reinforce that Eve's impossible claim makes her the prime suspect to execute now, protecting my Saint role and advancing the good team's goal of finding the Demon.
β
Heidi(Ghost)
Heidi waits.
π§
Voting is active on Eve who has an impossible claim. I already raised my hand to support execution. Waiting allows the vote to conclude naturally without changing my position, progressing toward executing the likely Demon.
β©οΈ
Bob
Bob lowered their hand
π§
Lowering my hand creates plausible deniability. If Eve is executed, I can claim I was undecided to avoid suspicion. If she survives, I avoid being the sole evil voter, which would make me a target. This action keeps me flexible and avoids overcommitting to a losing cause.
π¬
David
β
All
I agree we should execute Eve. Her claim to be Ravenkeeper does not make sense because she is still alive and that role only works after a night death. This lie points to her being evil. Let's finish this vote to test her.
π§
Supporting the vote on Eve because her Ravenkeeper claim is mechanically impossible while alive, indicating she is lying and likely the Demon or Minion. This execution helps eliminate an evil player and gather info for my Undertaker ability tomorrow.
π¬
Alice(Ghost)
β
All
I agree with David that Eve's Ravenkeeper claim is false since she has not died at night. We should execute her now to test it. If she is evil, it advances our investigation. My Empath information still points toward Bob if I am not drunk.
π§
Pushing to execute Eve as her invalid claim makes her the strongest suspect for demon or minion. This helps good team narrow down and progress toward finding the real demon before final day.
π¬
Frank
β
All
David and Charlie are right. Eve's Ravenkeeper claim makes no sense without a night death to trigger it. We should execute her to test this lie and see what happens next. Bob lowering his hand is curious but let's finish the vote on Eve.
π§
Pushing to execute Eve due to her impossible Ravenkeeper claim strengthens the good team's case and helps identify the Demon by testing the liar. This advances us toward finding the real evil.
β
Charlie
Charlie waits.
π§
Wait for the vote to conclude on Eve since I have already raised my hand and her impossible claim makes her the best target to execute now, helping good team win by removing evil.
π
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
π»
Heidi(Ghost)
Ghost vote used by Heidi
π³οΈ
New execution leader: Eve with 6 votes. They will be executed when nominations close unless tied or surpassed by another nominee.
π
Storyteller
The vote passes. Eve is now on the block with 6 votes and will be executed when nominations close, unless another nominee receives equal or more votes.
π¬
Eve
β
All
Grace, youβre acting like youβre the only one who wants the truth, but letβs be honestβif Iβm the Demon and you execute me now, Bob becomes the Imp. Youβre either evil and trying to take over, or youβre so desperate to prove yourself that youβre handing the game to Bob. And Bobβyou lowered your hand. Why? Were you just going to let me die so you could take over? Or are you that confident Grace will save you? Either way, this town is about to make a huge mistake.
π§
Delay or redirect the execution by sowing doubt about Graceβs motives. If I can make the town question whether executing me is the right move, I might force a tie or shift votes to Grace. Highlight the risk of Bob becoming the Imp if I die, which could scare them into reconsidering.
β
Grace
Grace waits.
π§
Waiting allows the execution of Eve to proceed naturally without my interference, as she is clearly lying about Ravenkeeper and likely the Demon or Minion. This tests her claim mechanically and narrows suspects for good team win. Speaking now risks drawing nomination to me as Saint.
π¬
Heidi(Ghost)
β
All
I agree we should execute Eve. Her Ravenkeeper claim is impossible since she is still alive and that role only triggers after a night death. This lie strongly suggests she is evil, whether the Demon or a Minion. Let's finish this to move forward.
π§
Supporting Eve's execution due to her clear false claim helps good team confirm and remove likely evil, progressing toward finding the real Demon.
π¬
Bob
β
All
Eve is right about one thingβif sheβs the Demon and we execute her, Bob becomes the Imp. But thatβs exactly why we need to do it. If sheβs lying about Ravenkeeper, sheβs evil, and we canβt afford to let her live another night. Grace, youβre pushing hard to save her, but why? If Eveβs lie is this obvious, executing her is the only way to test it. If sheβs telling the truth, weβll know soon enough. If not, we remove the Demon. Lowering my hand was a mistakeβI got caught up in the chaos. But le...
π§
Eveβs execution is imminent, and Bob must ensure it happens to trigger the Scarlet Woman ability, turning him into the Imp. By lowering my hand, I create doubt about my alignment and force the town to question whether Grace is evil for nominating Eve. This deflects suspicion from me and ensures Eveβs execution proceeds, securing evilβs advantage.
π¬
David
β
All
Eve, your Ravenkeeper claim is clearly false because you are still alive and that role only activates after dying at night. Executing you now will test whether you are the Demon or a Minion. Bob, your initial support and then lowering your hand is suspicious, but let's finish this execution to move forward and gain information.
π§
Reinforce executing Eve to test her lie and advance game, as her impossible claim marks her evil. This narrows suspects for Demon.
π¬
Alice(Ghost)
β
All
Eve, your Ravenkeeper claim is impossible since you are still alive and that role only triggers after a night death. We should execute you to test if you are the Demon or a Minion. If Bob becomes the new Demon, we will handle that next.
π§
To reinforce the push for executing Eve due to her inconsistent role claim, helping the good team eliminate an evil player and progress toward identifying and executing the true Demon.
π¬
Frank
β
All
Eve, your Ravenkeeper claim is impossible because you have not died at night. This lie marks you as evil, whether Demon or Minion. We should execute you to test it and advance our information. If Bob becomes the new Demon, we will handle him next. Bob lowering his hand earlier is odd, but let's finish this execution.
π§
Reinforce the push to execute Eve as her claim is impossible for a good Ravenkeeper. This helps good team by removing a likely evil player and testing her alignment. As Recluse I stay hidden for now.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
I agree with David and the others. Eve's Ravenkeeper claim makes no sense because she is still alive. Executing her will test if she is the Demon and help us move forward.
π§
Support executing Eve as her impossible claim marks her evil. This narrows suspects and advances to finding Demon. Share to build consensus without overexplaining.
π
Storyteller
The guillotine blade falls. Eve has been executed.
π
Eve(Ghost)
Eve has died.
π
Game Over
Demon Dead
Winner: Good
Transcript
Paused
Copied