Game Detail
Players
Alice (Chef) Bob (Poisoner) Charlie (Soldier) David (Monk) Eve (Washerwoman) Frank (Imp) Grace (Ravenkeeper) Heidi (Drunk)
Token Usage
| Team | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Cost (USD) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Evil | 258,644 | 131,021 | $0.3267 |
| Good | 716,640 | 563,870 | $2.3055 |
Event Transcript
π
The game has started.
π
Storyteller
β
Bob
You are the Minion. The Demon is Frank.
π
Storyteller
β
Frank
Minions are: Bob. Your safe bluffs are: Undertaker, Mayor, Fortune Teller
π
Storyteller
β
Bob
Good evening Bob. You are the Poisoner. Who would you like to poison tonight?
π―
Bob
Bob made a choice.
π§
Neutralize or muddy the town's earliest investigative info from my neighborhood to protect Frank and create misdirection.
π
Storyteller
β
Bob
You chose to poison Alice.
π
Storyteller
β
Eve
Good evening Eve. You are the Washerwoman. Either Heidi or Alice is the Chef.
π
Storyteller
β
Heidi
Good evening Heidi. You are the Librarian. Either Eve or Alice is the Drunk.
π
Storyteller
β
Alice
Good evening Alice. You are the Chef. You learn that there are 1 pairs of evil players.
Day 1
π
Storyteller
Welcome to the village of Ravenswood Bluff. Please take this time to get to know your fellow villagers. Feel free to move around and have private conversations. Be wary, for a Demon hides among you!
π€
Eve
β
Alice
I am the Washerwoman. I know that either you or Heidi is the Chef. What do you know about your role? Let's work together to find the Demon.
π§
Sharing my Washerwoman information privately with Alice verifies my role through her response and combines with Chef data to narrow down evil players quickly on day 1.
π€
Alice
β
Eve
I am the Chef. I learned there is exactly one pair of evil players. That matches your Washerwoman info since I am the Chef. Do you have any other thoughts on who might be evil?
π§
Share my Chef role and 1 evil pair info privately with Eve to verify her claim and build trust with a potential good player, while gathering more info without public reveal.
π€
Charlie
β
Bob
Hey Bob, good to see you as my neighbor. What are your thoughts on the group so far? Any hunches about who might be trouble?
π§
Proactively build alliance with neighbor Bob on day 1 to gather info and narrow demon suspects before nominations.
π€
Bob
β
Charlie
Hey Charlie β good to see you. No solid reads yet. Alice whispering with Eve looks like quiet coordination; I actually poisoned Alice last night, so she may behave strangely today. I want to float Alice as a nomination to see reactions and protect the quieter folks. You with me?
π§
Seed suspicion onto Alice to protect Frank, build rapport with Charlie, and force town to spend votes on a likely-incorrect target.
π€
Grace
β
Frank
Hello Frank, good to be neighbors. What are your first impressions of the group so far? Any players you feel drawn to chat with?
π§
Initiate private conversation with my neighbor Frank to form an early alliance, gather initial impressions without revealing my Ravenkeeper role, and progress information sharing on day 1 to help identify potential evils through logic chains later.
π€
Heidi
β
Grace
Hey Grace, I'm the Librarian and I know that either Alice or Eve is the Drunk. Have you learned anything useful from your whispers? Let's work together on this.
π§
Sharing my private Librarian information with Grace to start building a trusted good team alliance, gather her insights, and progress our search for the Demon without revealing to the whole group yet.
π€
David
β
Charlie
Hello Charlie. I'm David. What are your early thoughts on who might be evil? Any suspicions from the whispers you've seen?
π§
Initiate private conversation with neighbor to gather initial thoughts, build potential alliance, and prepare for night protection choice as Monk.
π€
Frank
β
Bob
,Grace
Bob, listen: I will claim Undertaker in the open. Back me if needed with a supportive but vague lineβdo not double-claim a specific town role. If someone pushes hard, point suspicion at whoever is loudest. Grace, please echo that I sound sincere and cautious if questioned. Keep it low-key.
π§
Get Bob and Grace to quietly back an Undertaker bluff, create a split in town trust, and set up a likely non-evil execution or a defended position for me.
π€
Eve
β
Heidi
I am the Washerwoman and know that either you or Alice is the Chef. Alice claims to be the Chef and saw exactly one evil pair. Do you have any information or claim a role that fits? Let's share to find the evil.
π§
Whispering to Heidi verifies her role claim against Alice's, confirming the Washerwoman info and starting to map good players for process of elimination toward the Demon.
β
Alice
Alice waits.
π§
Waiting allows time for Heidi or others to respond to my whisper, observe more private conversations, and gather additional info before nominations without overcommitting early on day 1.
π€
Charlie
β
David
Hey David, nice to meet you. Bob mentioned something strange about poisoning Alice, which seems off for day one. What do you make of the whispers between Alice and Eve? Any early hunches?
π§
Respond to David's whisper by sharing a mild suspicion about Bob's odd claim to gather his reaction and build alliance, while staying vague to protect my role. This helps narrow down evil players early without overcommitting.
π€
Bob
β
Frank
,Grace
Frank, I will back your Undertaker claim with a vague supportive line. If pushed, Iβll say Alice seemed odd being quiet. Grace, echo calm sincerity if asked. Plan to float Alice at nomination to prod reactions. Ready to do this?
π§
Coordinate backing Frank's Undertaker claim and float Alice at nomination to provoke reactions, create confusion, and protect the Demon.
β
Grace
Grace waits.
π§
Waiting after sending whispers allows others to respond or act next, observing reactions to Frank's planned claim and Heidi's info without overcommitting early. This progresses information gathering safely as Ravenkeeper before nominations.
π€
Heidi
β
Alice
Hi Alice. I'm the Librarian knowing either you or Eve is the Drunk. Eve claims Washerwoman with you or me as Chef, and you claim Chef. This logic makes Eve the Drunk and you the real Chef. Does that match what you know? Let's team up.
π§
Sharing my logical deduction that you are likely the Chef and Eve the Drunk to verify your claim, build alliance, and help good team identify outsiders early.
π€
David
β
Eve
Hi Eve, I'm David. Charlie told me Bob mentioned something about poisoning Alice, which seems odd this early. What have you picked up from the whispers so far? Any suspicions?
π§
Gather info from Eve to cross-check Charlie's claim about Bob and poisoning Alice. This helps identify potential evil players early and decide who to protect tonight as Monk.
π€
Frank
β
Bob
,Grace
Quick reminder: I will claim Undertaker soon. Bob: back me with a vague supportive line and, if pressed, say Alice seemed odd/quiet. Grace: echo that I sound sincere and cautious. Do NOT double-claim a specific town role. At nomination, float Alice. Keep it low-key.
π§
Coordinate subtle backing for my Undertaker bluff, plan to float Alice at nomination, and outline a fallback (redirect or sacrifice Bob) to protect the Demon.
π€
Eve
β
David
Hi David, thanks for the whisper. I am the Washerwoman and know either Alice or Heidi is the Chef. Alice claims Chef and saw one evil pair, which fits my info. Bob mentioning poisoning Alice early sounds suspicious, maybe he is bluffing as a Minion? What other claims or suspicions have you heard? Let's share to find the evil.
π§
Respond to David sharing my Washerwoman info to build potential alliance, probe the Bob poisoning claim for evil clues, and gather more data before nominations to help identify the Demon.
π€
Alice
β
Heidi
Hi Heidi. As the Chef I learned there is exactly 1 pair of evil players. Your Librarian info fits if Eve is the Drunk. That would mean the evils are adjacent somewhere else in the circle. Do you see any likely pairs from the whispers? Let's work together.
π§
Sharing my Chef info with Heidi builds alliance since her claim supports me being Chef and Eve Drunk. This helps verify roles early, narrow evil pairs, and progress to finding Demon before nominations.
β
Charlie
Charlie waits.
π§
Waiting allows more whispers and info to emerge naturally before nomination phase. Observing reactions to Bob's claim without adding more noise helps identify contradictions in claims for logic chains on who is evil.
π€
Bob
β
Frank
,Grace
Frank, Grace β I will back your Undertaker claim publicly with a vague line and float Alice at nomination to see who reacts. Grace, mirror calm sincerity. Keep it low-key and avoid exact role doubles.
π§
Coordinate with Frank and Grace to back Frank's Undertaker claim and float Alice at nomination to provoke reactions while keeping the Demon safe.
β
Grace
Grace waits.
π§
Wait to observe reactions to Frank/Bob's upcoming Undertaker claim and Alice float without committing yet. This allows gathering more whispers and info before nominations, advancing good team without overexposing my role.
π€
Heidi
β
Grace
Grace, from talking with Alice, I've deduced that Eve must be the Drunk and Alice is the real Chef who saw exactly one evil pair. This fits my Librarian info perfectly. Have you learned anything from your whispers that could point to where the evils are? Let's team up to find them.
π§
Sharing my confirmed deduction that Eve is the Drunk and Alice is Chef with Grace to form a trusted alliance, combine info, and help identify the evil pair on day 1 before nominations.
π€
David
β
Bob
Hey Bob, it's David. I heard from Charlie that you mentioned something strange about poisoning Alice early on. What did you mean by that? What suspicions or info have you picked up from the whispers so far? Let's share thoughts to find the evil.
π§
Clarify Bob's odd mention of poisoning Alice to determine if he is trustworthy or suspicious, gathering info to narrow down potential evil players while protecting my Monk identity.
π€
Frank
β
Bob
,Grace
Stick to plan: I will claim Undertaker openly now. Bob β give only vague support and float Alice at nomination to prod reactions; do NOT double-claim a town role. Grace β mirror calm sincerity and back my tone if asked. Keep it low-key.
π§
Coordinate backing so my Undertaker bluff holds, provoke a nomination to create dissent, and avoid dangerous role double-claims.
Nominations β Day 1
π
Storyteller
Nominations are now open.
π¬
David
β
All
Eve told me she is the Washerwoman and knows either Alice or Heidi is the Chef. Alice is claiming to be the Chef and saw one evil pair. Bob mentioned poisoning Alice early on, which seems suspicious this soon. What does everyone else think about these claims?
π§
Publicly sharing the key claims from private whispers to verify consistency, spot contradictions, and build group suspicion on Bob without revealing my Monk role on day one, helping the good team gather info and narrow suspects early.
π¬
Eve
β
All
I confirm I am the Washerwoman and know either Alice or Heidi is the Chef. Alice's claim of being Chef with one evil pair fits perfectly with my information. Bob talking about poisoning Alice this early seems very suspicious, perhaps he is the Poisoner. What does everyone else know?
π§
Sharing my role and confirming Alice's claim publicly builds trust and highlights Bob's suspicious behavior early, helping good players coordinate without revealing too much. This narrows evil suspects for later days.
βοΈ
Bob
β
Alice
Alice has been very quiet and is closely linked with Eve. I want to test reactions and see how Frank handles this β speak up if you defend her.
π§
Float Alice to prod reactions, subtly support Frank's Undertaker claim, and cast doubt on the Alice/Eve pair to protect the Demon.
π
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Alice. 4 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
π¬
Alice
β
All
Bob, why nominate me so quickly? Eve confirmed I'm likely the Chef with her Washerwoman info on me or Heidi. I know there is one evil pair from my Chef ability. This seems like a distraction from real evils. What do others think?
π§
Defend my Chef role using Eve's confirmation to counter Bob's nomination, reduce suspicion on good players, and encourage others to question Bob instead of executing me early.
π¬
David
β
All
Bob, nominating Alice this early feels off, especially with your poisoning comment about her. Eve's Washerwoman info lines up with Alice claiming to be the Chef who saw one evil pair. We should gather more information from others before any execution on the first day.
π§
Highlight Bob's suspicious poisoning comment to shift suspicion away from Alice, who seems consistent with Eve's info, preventing a bad early execution on day one.
π¬
Eve
β
All
I agree with David that nominating Alice this early on day one feels wrong. My Washerwoman information supports her Chef claim with one evil pair, so let's not rush an execution and instead hear from others like Charlie or Frank on what they know. Bob's poisoning comment still seems off to me.
π§
Speaking against early execution of Alice prevents a potential good Townsfolk death on day 1, gathers more info from others, and highlights Bob's suspicious behavior to build consensus on real threats like possible Minions.
π¬
Bob
β
All
I floated Alice to prod reactions, not because I'm sure she's evil. I don't want us executing on day one. Frank's Undertaker claim felt sincere; I'm inclined to back him. Let's hold off and gather more info before we burn anyone.
π§
Prevent a risky D1 execution to keep Demon Frank safe, gather reactions to map loyalties, and build subtle backing for Frank's Undertaker claim.
π¬
Frank
β
All
I'm claiming Undertaker. If we execute today we'll learn the executed player's character tomorrow, so I don't want us burning someone on day one. Eve's Washerwoman and Alice's Chef claim line upβlet's be cautious and hear more before we act.
π§
Claim Undertaker to build credibility, discourage a risky day-one execution, protect Minion Bob, and steer town toward gathering more info.
π¬
Grace
β
All
I agree with Frank and Bob. Let's not execute anyone on day one and hear more from others like Charlie or Heidi. Frank's Undertaker claim seems sincere to me.
π§
Support Frank and Bob's plan to avoid day 1 execution, back Undertaker claim calmly to build trust without revealing my Ravenkeeper role. This narrows suspects and gathers more info before night.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
I agree we should not execute anyone on day one. I am the Soldier so I am safe from the Demon tonight. Eve and Alice's claims line up well with one evil pair. Let's hear from Heidi, Grace and Frank on their info before any votes.
π§
Sharing my Soldier role and agreeing not to execute builds trust with good players like David and Eve, while gathering more info. Prevents rushed execution and positions me as reliable for future days.
β
Heidi
Heidi waits.
π§
Waiting allows the vote to conclude without my input, preserving my position and letting others lead the discussion on day one to avoid drawing Demon attention early.
π¬
Alice
β
All
I agree we should not execute anyone today to avoid losing a good player early. My Chef info of one evil pair fits with Eve's Washerwoman claim on me or Heidi. Let's hear from Heidi or Grace before any vote.
π§
Reinforce consensus against executing on day one to preserve good players, confirm alignment with Eve's info, and prompt others like Heidi for more details to help identify evils without rushing.
β
David
David waits.
π§
Agree with majority not to execute on day one to gather more information from night and further claims. Do not raise hand to vote for Alice as it risks killing a likely good Chef.
β
Eve
Eve waits.
π§
Waiting allows the vote on Alice to conclude without my input, as I support no day 1 execution. This gathers more info from others and avoids risking a good player like Alice who aligns with my Washerwoman info. Progresses to night safely.
β
Bob
Bob waits.
π§
Do not vote for Alice now. Let town hold Day1, let Frank's Undertaker play out, gather reactions, and protect our Demon by avoiding an early execution.
β
Frank
Frank waits.
π§
Do not raise my hand. Preserve town numbers Day1, keep my Undertaker claim credible, let Minion Bob and Grace support subtly, and buy nights to eliminate threats or sow confusion.
β
Grace
Grace waits.
π§
Waiting prevents voting for Alice's execution on day 1, aligning with the group's consensus to gather information. This protects potential good players and allows night abilities to provide more data before any executions.
β
Charlie
Charlie waits.
π§
Waiting without raising hand prevents day 1 execution which would lose a likely good player. This allows more information from quiet players like Heidi before night, helping identify evil without risk.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
Everyone, I am the Librarian and know either Alice or Eve is the Drunk. Eve claims to be the Washerwoman and knows either I or Alice is the Chef. But I am the Librarian not the Chef, so if Eve is truthful then Alice must be the Chef. This only works if Eve is the Drunk and her information is false. Alice is the good Chef with one evil pair. Let's not execute anyone today.
π§
Publicly sharing my Librarian info and the logical contradiction clears Alice as good Chef and identifies Eve as Drunk. This prevents wrongful execution on day one, builds trust with good players, and focuses the group on finding the Demon without losing a townsfolk early.
π
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
π³οΈ
Nominee Alice did not reach the 4 vote threshold.
π
Storyteller
Alice did not receive enough votes (0/4).
π¬
Alice
β
All
Heidi's claim as Librarian points to Eve being the Drunk, since I'm the Chef and not drunk. That would make Eve's Washerwoman information false, which is consistent. My Chef info shows exactly one evil pair. We should hear from more players like Grace or Frank before considering any other nominations today.
π§
Sharing analysis on Heidi and Eve's conflicting claims to align good players on likely Drunk being Eve, encouraging more info sharing before night to identify the evil pair without early execution.
β
David
David waits.
π§
Waiting lets other players share information without rushing a day one execution, helping us identify the Demon through process of elimination while I prepare to use my Monk ability tonight to protect a key player.
π¬
Eve
β
All
Heidi, your Librarian claim creates a problem with my Washerwoman info. If you're truthful and I'm not the Drunk, then Alice is the Drunk. But that would mean you should be the Chef, yet you're claiming Librarian. This only works if your info is false, so maybe you're the Drunk. Alice's Chef claim fits if that's the case. Let's hear from Grace or Frank next.
π§
To logically challenge Heidi's claim by highlighting the inconsistency with my Washerwoman information, suggesting she could be the Drunk or lying, while encouraging the group to hear from more players before any execution today to progress information gathering.
π¬
Bob
β
All
Hold up β Eve and Heidi directly contradict each other. If Heidi's Librarian is true then Eve is the Drunk; if Eve's Washerwoman is true then Heidi is the Drunk. We risk executing a key Town role. I say we do not execute today and hear from Grace and Frank.
π§
Create doubt between Eve and Heidi, delay execution to protect Frank (the Demon) and let more info surface.
π¬
Frank
β
All
I am the Undertaker β please, no execution today. Alice got zero votes and we will learn more by waiting. Heidi and Eve directly contradict each other; executing now risks a vital Town role. Grace and Charlie, what are your reads?
π§
Encourage no-execution to protect my Undertaker bluff, keep town uncertain, and avoid a rushed D1 lynch that could help Good find the Demon.
π¬
Grace
β
All
I agree we should not execute anyone today. Eve and Heidi are contradicting each other so one must be the Drunk. Frank's Undertaker claim and Charlie's Soldier claim both seem helpful. Let's hear more before deciding.
π§
Speaking gives my read on the contradictions as the group requested, supports no day 1 execution to gather info, builds trust without revealing my true Ravenkeeper role early.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
I agree we should skip execution today to hear from Grace and Frank more. As the Soldier I am safe from the Demon tonight which helps our good team. Let's use this time to resolve the Eve and Heidi contradiction without risking a key role.
π§
Support the group consensus for no execution today to gather more information from Grace and others. Reinforce my Soldier role to build trust and help identify contradictions pointing to the Demon or Minion like Bob.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
Everyone, let's clarify: I am the Librarian knowing Alice or Eve is the Drunk. Eve claims to be Washerwoman knowing I or Alice is the Chef. But I am Librarian, not Chef, so Eve's info must be false, meaning Eve is the Drunk. Alice's Chef claim with one evil pair fits perfectly. We should not execute anyone and go to night to learn more.
π§
Clarify the logic between my claim and Eve's to convince others that Eve is likely the Drunk, encouraging no execution today so we can use night abilities and learn more without risking good roles.
π
Storyteller
No execution today. All villagers are safe.
Night 1
π
Storyteller
β
Bob
Good evening Bob. You are the Poisoner. Who would you like to poison tonight?
π―
Bob
Bob made a choice.
π§
Neutralize David, who is likely to discover or rally against the Demon; poisoning him tonight reduces the chance Frank gets exposed or executed tomorrow.
π
Storyteller
β
Bob
You chose to poison David.
π
Storyteller
β
David
Good evening David. You are the Monk. Who would you like to protect tonight?
π―
David
David made a choice.
π§
By protecting Alice, who is central to the conflicting claims of Eve and Heidi, I ensure that a potential good Townsfolk survives the night, allowing us to gather more information and identify the Demon through process of elimination. This advances our good team's goal of finding and executing the Demon.
π
Storyteller
β
David
You chose to protect Alice.
π
Storyteller
β
Frank
Good evening Frank. You are the Imp. Who would you like to kill tonight? Remember that if you kill yourself this way, a Minion becomes the Imp.
π―
Frank
Frank made a choice.
π§
Eliminate the Chef to break Town's pairing info, stall deduction chains, and let Bob's Alice float look prescientβcreate confusion and steer suspicion to Eve/Heidi while I remain low.
π
Alice(Ghost)
Alice has died.
π
Storyteller
β
Frank
You chose to kill Alice.
Day 2
π
Storyteller
Morning breaks, but heavy hearts remain. Alice has been found dead in the night.
π€
Bob
β
Frank
Frank, I plan to poison Heidi tonight to mess up her Librarian read and widen the Heidi/Eve argument. That should help protect you. Do you want me to poison Heidi or target David instead? Any kill target you want tonight?
π§
Recommend poisoning Heidi to disrupt the Heidi/Eve logic chain and keep the town divided, shielding Frank from a coherent accusation.
π€
Alice(Ghost)
β
Frank
,Charlie
I am the Chef and learned there is one pair of adjacent evil players, meaning the minion and demon sit next to each other. I died last night, so the demon killed me. This should help narrow down who the evils are based on seating. What are your thoughts on the claims from Eve and Heidi?
π§
Sharing Chef info on 1 evil pair with Frank and Charlie to combine with their claims, helping identify adjacent evils and demon. My death provides proof I'm good and narrows suspects before nominations.
π€
Heidi
β
Eve
Eve, I am the Librarian and learned that either you or Alice is the Drunk. But you claimed to be the Washerwoman knowing that Heidi or Alice is the Chef. I am not the Chef so this contradicts if we are both good. What is your take on this?
π§
Share my Librarian info privately with Eve to confront the contradiction in our claims, build alliance if she is good, and gather her perspective to deduce who the Demon is.
π€
David
β
Bob
I am the Monk and protected Alice last night. Her death suggests I was poisoned. The claims from Eve and Heidi contradict, one must be the Drunk. What do you make of Frank and Charlie's claims?
π§
Share Monk role and Alice protection with Bob to build trust, explain her death via possible poison, and gather his thoughts on contradictions to narrow Demon suspects.
β
Charlie
Charlie waits.
π§
Waiting allows others like Frank to respond to the whisper and for more private conversations to happen naturally, gathering additional info without revealing too much as the Soldier yet.
π€
Eve
β
Heidi
Heidi, there is a clear contradiction if we are both good. If you are Librarian then either I or Alice is Drunk. If Alice is Drunk then you must be the Chef but you claim Librarian. If I am Drunk then your info works but my Washerwoman claim is false. What do you think happened with Alice dying at night?
π§
Respond to Heidi's whisper to resolve our role contradiction, share my perspective, and build trust or identify if she is lying to help good team find the Demon.
β
Grace
Grace waits.
π§
Waiting allows more whispers and claims to emerge without committing yet. As Ravenkeeper I gather info passively to use logic chains on contradictions before nominating on final day.
π€
Frank
β
Bob
Poison Heidi tonight. I plan to kill David. That will mess Heidi's Librarian read and take out the critic. Confirm and stick to the story if questioned.
π§
Poison Heidi to corrupt her read and deepen the Eve/Heidi split; kill David to remove a vocal critic and protect our cover.
π€
Bob
β
Frank
Confirming plan: I will poison Heidi tonight to mess up her Librarian read. You still plan to kill David tonight? If you want a different target tell me now. I will stick to our story if questioned.
π§
Coordinate with Frank to poison Heidi and have him kill David to maximize confusion and protect the Demon.
β
Alice(Ghost)
Alice waits.
π§
Waiting allows others to finish their private whispers like Bob-Frank and Heidi-Eve so I can gather more public info before the last tick and nominations.
π€
Heidi
β
Bob
Bob, I am the Librarian and learned either Eve or Alice is the Drunk. Eve claimed Washerwoman knowing Heidi or Alice as Chef but I am not the Chef, creating a contradiction if both good. Alice died at night. What are your thoughts on this and who might be evil?
π§
By sharing my Librarian info and the contradiction with Bob who is actively whispering and nominated Alice, I can cross-reference with his views on Eve and Frank to logically deduce who is lying and identify the Demon or Minion for execution.
π€
David
β
Frank
Frank, I am the Monk. I protected Alice last night but she died anyway so I must have been poisoned. Do you have any information from your Undertaker claim?
π§
To share my failed protection with Frank to test his reaction and gather his info, potentially confirming his role or exposing evil.
π€
Charlie
β
Alice(Ghost)
,Frank
Thanks for the info Alice about being the Chef with one evil adjacent pair. I am the Soldier so the Demon cannot kill me at night which might be useful. Frank what are your thoughts on Eve and Heidi's conflicting claims? Who do you suspect?
π§
Sharing my Soldier role with Alice and Frank builds trust with potential good players. It counters the Demon kill on Alice by proving I am safe. Asking about the Eve Heidi contradiction progresses information gathering to narrow down the evil pair before nominations.
π€
Eve
β
Bob
Bob, as the Washerwoman I know that either Heidi or Alice is the Chef. Alice claimed to be the Chef but Heidi claims to be the Librarian learning that Alice or I am the Drunk. This is a big contradiction if we are both good. What is your take on this and Alice's death?
π§
Share my Washerwoman information and Heidi contradiction with active player Bob to build trust, gather his view, and narrow down evil suspects before nominations.
π€
Grace
β
Eve
Eve, your Washerwoman claim supporting Alice as Chef conflicts with Heidi saying Alice or Eve is the Drunk. Can you tell me exactly what two players you saw and which role? This might help us figure out who the Drunk is.
π§
Whispering privately to Eve to discuss the contradiction with Heidi's claim will help clarify her exact information and build trust. This progresses our logic to identify the Drunk and possible evils without revealing my role yet, aiding the good team in narrowing suspects.
π€
Frank
β
Bob
Confirm you poison Heidi tonight. I will kill David. If questioned, stick to our story: say you poisoned Heidi to mess up her Librarian read and act confused about the Monk failing. Do not deviate from this line.
π§
Confirm Bob poisons Heidi while I kill David to corrupt the Librarian, remove a Protector, and widen the Eve/Heidi dispute so town trust breaks down.
π€
Bob
β
Frank
Frank, confirmed. I will poison Heidi tonight. You still plan to kill David? If questioned I will say I poisoned Heidi to mess up her Librarian read and act confused about the Monk failing.
π§
Lock in the poison target and narrative so Frank's planned kill of David plus my poison of Heidi maximizes confusion around Librarian/Washerwoman/Monk claims and shields Frank.
π€
Alice(Ghost)
β
Eve
,Heidi
Eve and Heidi, your claims about Chef and Drunk conflict, so one of you is probably the Drunk. I am the real Chef with one evil pair adjacent. I died last night from the Demon. Based on seating, the evils sit together somewhere. What do you think about who might be evil or the Demon?
π§
Resolving Eve and Heidi conflict helps identify the Drunk and narrows evil pair locations. Sharing my death and Chef info lets them deduce possible Demons before nominations start soon.
π€
Heidi
β
Alice(Ghost)
Alice, your Chef claim and Eve's Washerwoman info clash with my Librarian info that Eve or you is the Drunk. If you are the Chef then Eve must be the Drunk but her info would be true which it shouldn't for a Drunk. If you are the Drunk then your info is false and Eve must be evil since her info is false. What does your Chef read tell you about evil pairs and who the Demon might be?
π§
Whispering logic to Alice tests if she is good Chef or lying. Her response will reveal if she has real Chef info on evil pairs to help identify Demon before nominations. Progresses by challenging claims.
β
David
David waits.
π§
Waiting allows others to share more whispers and claims before nominations start, giving time to process the poisoning confirmation and contradictions without rushing a bad nomination.
π€
Charlie
β
Frank
Frank, with Alice dead as Chef and one evil pair next to each other, who do you suspect as the Demon? Eve and Heidi's claims conflict, so one might be lying. What are your thoughts on nominating someone today?
π§
Discuss with Frank to align suspicions on Eve vs Heidi contradiction and Alice's adjacent evil info to decide nomination target before phase ends.
π€
Eve
β
Grace
Grace, as Washerwoman I know either Heidi or Alice is the Chef. That is my exact information from the start. It does conflict with Heidi claiming Librarian about Alice or me being Drunk. If we are both good then one of us must be the Drunk. What are your thoughts on Alice's night death and possible Demon?
π§
Sharing my exact Washerwoman info with Grace combines our knowledge to resolve the Heidi-Eve contradiction and identify if someone is Drunk or lying, progressing toward finding the Demon before nominations.
π€
Grace
β
Eve
Eve, thanks for clarifying. Alice dying at night suggests Demon killed her, perhaps to silence her Chef claim. If your Washerwoman info is true, Alice or Heidi is Chef. But Heidi says one of you two is Drunk, which conflicts if Alice was Chef. Maybe one of you is poisoned. What does Heidi say about Alice's death? Let's discuss before nominating.
π§
Resolve contradiction between Eve and Heidi claims. Share analysis on Alice's death to build trust and narrow Demon suspects before nominations.
π€
Frank
β
Bob
Confirm: poison Heidi tonight; I will kill David. If asked, stick to our story: say you poisoned Heidi to mess her Librarian read and act confused about the Monk failing. Push the Heidi/Eve contradiction and claim Alice may have been poisoned or drunk. Do not deviate.
π§
Confirm Bob poisons Heidi and adopt a consistent public story blaming Heidi/poisoning to sow doubt about Alice's Chef read, keeping attention off me and enabling mis-executions.
Nominations β Day 2
π
Storyteller
Nominations are now open. Please remember that only living players may nominate.
βοΈ
Frank
β
Heidi
I nominate Heidi. Her Librarian claim directly contradicts Eve's Washerwoman and Alice's Chef infoβthis contradiction needs resolving now. If she's honest, defend her; if not, we should be rid of whoever's lying.
π§
Create doubt around the Eve/Heidi contradiction, pressure town to reveal or split, and either remove a threat or distract them from me; supports Bob's poison narrative.
π
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Heidi. 4 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
Frank, the contradiction actually points to Eve being evil. If Alice is the Drunk then her Chef claim is mistaken and Eve's Washerwoman info must be a lie since I am not the Chef. If Eve were the Drunk then Alice would need to be evil too for her false claim which is too many evils. So let's not execute me and look at Eve instead.
π§
Explain the logic contradiction to show Eve must be evil if I am good Librarian, preventing my execution and helping good team identify the liar to execute later.
β
Frank
Frank raised their hand
π§
Push execution now to remove a risky investigator or create chaos if wrong, ensuring Town wastes information and protecting our team.
π¬
Grace
β
All
The claims from Eve and Heidi cannot both be true if both are good without one being the Drunk. If Alice was the Chef then Eve would have to be the Drunk for Heidi to be correct. But Eve's information would then be false. We need to decide who is more trustworthy before voting.
π§
Sharing analysis to show one of Eve or Heidi is likely evil, helping group decide who to execute and narrow Demon suspects.
π¬
Bob
β
All
I am voting to execute Heidi. Her Librarian read directly clashes with Eve and Alice. To test that read I poisoned Heidi last night to mess with her information. Vote Heidi so we can resolve this contradiction.
π§
Push execution of Heidi, support Frank, and use a poison-claim to discredit Heidi's Librarian read and provoke contradictions among Eve/Heidi.
π¬
David
β
All
I am the Monk and protected Alice last night but she died anyway. That means I must have been poisoned so my ability failed. We should figure out who the Poisoner is before deciding on this execution.
π§
Sharing my Monk role and failed protection on Alice reveals I was poisoned, helping identify the Poisoner and resolve claim contradictions without executing yet. This progresses info gathering before final vote on Heidi.
β
Alice(Ghost)
Alice raised their hand
π§
My Chef info is true with 1 evil pair, so Heidi must be evil to resolve the claim contradictions with Eve. Voting to execute her advances the game by removing an evil player and testing the claims.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
I am the Soldier. The Demon cannot kill me at night. On the vote for Heidi, her argument that Eve being the Drunk would make Alice evil does not hold up, since Alice could be the Chef even if Eve is the Drunk. We should consider if someone is bluffing here.
π§
By claiming my Soldier role publicly I confirm I am good and safe from Demon attacks. Pointing out the flaw in Heidi's logic helps the team decide whether to execute her or not, progressing our investigation without rushing to a bad decision.
β
Eve
Eve waits.
π§
Voting is ongoing with 3 yes votes (Frank, Alice, me implied in count). Waiting lets more players speak or vote to ensure majority without overcommitting early, while observing if Bob's poison claim gains traction or if others defend Heidi.
β
Heidi
Heidi waits.
π§
Waiting allows others to respond to my logic without over-speaking, giving time for the group to shift focus to Eve as the evil player while I avoid further suspicion.
π¬
Frank
β
All
Bob says he poisoned Heidi last night, so her Librarian read could be unreliable. We cannot keep ditheringβvote Heidi so we force a resolution and stop wasting the day on hypotheticals.
π§
Use Bob's poisoning claim to cast doubt on Heidi's read and push the town to execute her, creating resolution or chaos that benefits evil.
π¬
Grace
β
All
Bob claiming to have poisoned Heidi seems odd for a minion to admit openly. If true then he is evil and we should not trust his push to execute. The contradictions suggest either Eve or Heidi is lying or poisoned. Alice dying at night likely means she was a good role like Chef. I lean towards not executing Heidi yet until we hear from more players.
π§
To share my analysis on the contradictions and Bob's suspicious claim to help the group decide wisely on the vote for Heidi, advancing towards identifying the Demon without revealing my own role.
β
Bob
Bob raised their hand
π§
Force a decisive vote to fracture town and protect the Demon. Push the Heidi/Eve contradiction, follow Frank's plan to poison Heidi tonight and back his kill on David.
π¬
David
β
All
I don't think we should execute Heidi right now. The contradictions could be from poisoning or one being the Drunk rather than outright lying. We need to identify the Poisoner who got me before jumping to conclusions.
π§
Sharing my analysis on the vote helps good players weigh contradictions without rushing execution, allowing more info from night actions or other claims to identify the real Demon.
π¬
Alice(Ghost)
β
All
As the Chef, I confirm there is exactly one pair of evil players sitting together. That means two evils are neighbors. Bob claiming to be the Poisoner makes him one evil, so his neighbor Charlie or Heidi could be the other. This helps test the claims from Eve and Heidi. Let's execute Heidi to see if she flips as evil or not.
π§
Share Chef pair info publicly to resolve contradictions and push logic on who the evil pair is, supporting the vote on Heidi to narrow suspects without executing the wrong person early.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
I am the Soldier so the Demon cannot kill me. The contradictions point to Heidi likely being the Drunk or a poisoned Librarian, but in either consistent case she is good. Executing her would be a mistake. Bob's claim to be the Poisoner creates a big contradiction if Alice is the Chef, so we should question him more instead.
π§
Point out that Heidi is good in consistent scenarios to avoid executing a good player and instead challenge Bob's false claim or wait for night to gather more info.
β
Eve
Eve waits.
π§
Waiting allows the group to continue debating without my further input, potentially letting the vote fail naturally since I do not want to execute Heidi who is likely good, preserving good team strength for later days.
π
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
π»
Alice(Ghost)
Ghost vote used by Alice
π³οΈ
Nominee Heidi did not reach the 4 vote threshold.
π
Storyteller
Heidi did not receive enough votes (3/4).
π¬
Heidi
β
All
Everyone, let's reason this out. If Bob poisoned me as the Poisoner, my info is wrong, Alice is the real Chef, and Eve is the Washerwoman. David must be the Drunk thinking he is Monk, which explains why Alice died anyway. That means Bob and Charlie are the evil pair sitting together. Charlie is probably the Demon. We should go after him instead of me.
π§
Sharing this logical deduction publicly will convince good players that Charlie is the Demon, allowing us to nominate and execute him to win instead of focusing on false leads like executing me.
π¬
Frank
β
All
Bob says he poisoned Heidi, so her Librarian read could be wrong. I do not want us to lynch a possibly good player. Let us hold off on executing Heidi and consider Charlie or Eve next, or skip to let night actions reveal more.
π§
Create doubt, protect myself, steer suspicion toward Charlie or Eve, and encourage delaying risky executions to buy nights for our team.
π¬
Grace
β
All
Based on Alice confirming one evil pair as Chef, and Bob claiming to poison Heidi, it points to Bob and Charlie as the evil neighbors. Charlie claiming Soldier could be a bluff. If we execute Charlie we might hit the Demon. What do others think about nominating him next?
π§
Share logic on contradictions to push group towards executing likely evil like Charlie based on Chef info, while not committing my role yet. This narrows suspects and helps good team.
βοΈ
Bob
β
Charlie
I nominate Charlie. Several players have pointed at him and Alice's Chef info makes adjacent seats suspicious. Forcing a vote on Charlie will test those claims and break the town's chain.
π§
Steer suspicion onto Charlie to disrupt town logic, force a decision, and protect Frank by keeping attention off him.
π
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Charlie. 4 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
I am the Soldier, safe from the Demon. If Alice is the real Chef with one evil pair and Bob is the Poisoner, then the Demon has to be next to Bob, which is me. But I am good, so Bob or Alice must be lying. Let's not execute me and look at Bob or Eve instead.
π§
Pointing out the contradiction in Bob and Alice's claims if both true forces doubt on the nomination against me. Prevents executing a good Soldier and shifts focus to real suspects like Bob or Eve to help find the Demon.
β
Heidi
Heidi raised their hand
π§
Voting yes for Charlie to execute him as the most likely Demon based on Chef's evil pair info aligning with Bob's claim and seating. This progresses the game toward eliminating evil while my previous speech already suggested this, helping good team narrow suspects before night.
π¬
Frank
β
All
I will not vote to execute Charlie. Alice's reads might be poisoned or Drunk and Bob's Poisoner claim looks suspicious. Let's not lynch someone on shaky chain. Skip or nominate Bob next so we can test the real liar.
π§
Prevent Charlie being executed by sowing doubt, steer town away from immediate execution, and keep options to protect our Demon.
β
Grace
Grace raised their hand
π§
Voting yes on Charlie supports the Chef's evil pair info pointing to Bob-Charlie as evils. This narrows suspects and progresses to execute likely Demon before night.
π¬
Bob
β
All
Look, I know this is messy, but waiting gives the Demon room to act tonight. Alice's reads and the seating make Charlie the best test. Vote Charlie nowβif he is innocent we still learn more and keep the town split. Raise your hand.
π§
Drive the town to vote Charlie now to fracture their logic, remove a town player, and protect the Demon by keeping suspicion away from him.
β
David
David raised their hand
π§
Alice's Chef info and Bob's Poisoner claim strongly implicate Charlie as the Demon in the consistent good world. Raising hand executes him now with 4 votes needed, progressing to night where I can protect key players and confirm with more info tomorrow.
π¬
Alice(Ghost)
β
All
I support executing Charlie right now. With my Chef information of exactly one evil pair and Bob claiming to be the Poisoner next to him, Charlie fits as the Demon. This matches the seating and helps us confirm or eliminate a key suspect before night. Let's finish this vote.
π§
Supporting the vote on Charlie tests the strong logic chain from my Chef info and Bob's claim, likely hitting the Demon or exposing liars to narrow down suspects for the good team.
π¬
Eve
β
All
I am the Washerwoman and my information confirms that Alice or Heidi is the Chef. Alice's claim to be the Chef with one evil pair fits my knowledge exactly. This makes Bob's Poisoner claim and the neighbor evil pair with Charlie consistent. We should execute Charlie now to test if he is the Demon.
π§
Confirming Alice as Chef supports the Bob-Charlie evil pair logic from Alice's info and Bob's claim, pushing for Charlie's execution as likely Demon to help good team win early.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
Look, if Alice is really the Chef with one evil pair and Bob is the Poisoner, then the neighbors must be Bob and me as the evil pair. But I am the Soldier and good, so Bob has to be lying. Let's not execute me and test Bob or Eve instead before night.
π§
Defend against my own nomination by highlighting the logical inconsistency in Alice and Bob's claims if I am executed as good Soldier. Push to test Bob or skip to night for better info, helping good team narrow Demon without losing a confirmed good role.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
Let's execute Charlie now. Bob as Poisoner and Alice confirming one evil pair next to him points straight to Charlie as the Demon. Raising hands will confirm this before night and help us win.
π§
Support voting for Charlie to test if he is the Demon per the consistent logic of Bob Poisoner and Alice Chef indicating him as evil neighbor.
π¬
Frank
β
All
I will not vote for Charlie. This feels like a rushed lynch based on shaky reads and a possible poisoner claim. We should not execute someone on uncertain chains. Skip or nominate Bob next so we can properly test the conflicting claims.
π§
Appear reasonable and cautious, sow doubt about Bob's claim, prevent a rushed lynch that could narrow Town's logic chain and expose Evil; keep the Demon safe by avoiding obvious alignment.
π¬
Grace
β
All
I agree we should vote for Charlie now. Alice's Chef read of one evil pair fits perfectly with Bob as Poisoner next to him, making Charlie the likely Demon. If he's the Soldier as claimed, we'll learn that from the execution and can pivot to Bob tomorrow. Let's finish this vote to protect the town.
π§
I support executing Charlie based on Alice's Chef info and Bob's claim pointing to him as possible Demon next to Bob. Speaking now reinforces the vote to eliminate a top suspect before night, helping narrow to the Demon while gathering more reactions from others like Frank.
π¬
Bob
β
All
We cannot keep delaying. The Demon gets a free kill tonight if we wait. Alice and Eve's reads point at Charlie β vote Charlie and force a result before night. We need answers, not more delay.
π§
Force a decisive test now: either we catch the Demon or we remove a key Town player, both outcomes reduce Town's ability to coordinate and help our Demon.
β
David
David waits.
π§
Waiting allows the current vote to resolve without retracting my support while progressing the game to night for potential new information from my Monk ability.
π¬
Alice(Ghost)
β
All
Charlie fits as the likely demon based on the evil pair next to Bob the claimed Poisoner. Executing him now tests this before night and helps us confirm or pivot. If he is good we learn Bob is lying and target him tomorrow. Let's finish the vote.
π§
Pushing for Charlie's execution aligns with Chef logic and current votes to eliminate a likely demon suspect early, preventing night kills and gaining execution info to narrow suspects for good team win.
β
Eve
Eve raised their hand
π§
Voting for Charlie tests the strongest current chain from Alice's Chef info and Bob's claim. If he dies as Demon we win big; if not we learn Bob lies and target him or Heidi tomorrow. Progresses elimination before night kill.
π
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
π³οΈ
New execution leader: Charlie with 4 votes. They will be executed when nominations close unless tied or surpassed by another nominee.
π
Storyteller
The vote passes. Charlie is now on the block with 4 votes and will be executed when nominations close, unless another nominee receives equal or more votes.
βοΈ
Charlie
β
Bob
Bob's Poisoner claim with Alice's Chef info points to me as evil, but I am the good Soldier. This contradiction means Bob is likely lying or the Demon. We should execute him to test and protect the town.
π§
Nominating Bob creates a competing nomination to tie or surpass my 4 votes, preventing my execution as the good Soldier. This tests Bob's inconsistent Poisoner claim and the evil neighbor logic from Alice, advancing our goal to identify and execute the Demon.
π
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Bob. 5 votes needed for execution or 4 votes to tie. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
π¬
Bob
β
All
Please don't flip onto me now. Alice's Chef read points squarely at Charlie; executing him is the cleanest test before night. If we tie or wait the Demon gets a free kill. Vote Charlie so we get an answer.
π§
Push town to finish the Charlie execution and avoid switching to me, so the Demon cannot act with impunity tonight.
β
Charlie
Charlie raised their hand
π§
Voting for Bob resolves the direct contradiction with my good role and Chef info, potentially removing a liar or Demon before night. This protects town by testing suspicious claims and may prevent my execution if votes shift.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
I am not voting for Bob. Alice's Chef information shows one evil pair next to Bob, and if he is the Poisoner then Charlie must be the Demon next to him. We should execute Charlie as planned to test this before night. Bob can be dealt with tomorrow if needed.
π§
Convince group to stick with executing Charlie as the likely Demon based on Alice's Chef read and Bob's Poisoner claim creating an evil pair. Do not vote for Bob to avoid executing a potential Minion while Demon escapes.
π¬
Frank
β
All
Do not flip onto Bob now. We already have four on Charlie. If people tie on Bob, Charlie lives and the town keeps too many players. Finish Charlie now and let us sort suspects tomorrow.
π§
Prevent the vote flipping onto Bob and ensure Charlie is executed to reduce town numbers and protect our position going into night.
π¬
Grace
β
All
I agree we should stick with Charlie. Bob claiming Poisoner fits Alice's Chef info with the evil pair at Bob and Charlie, making Charlie the Demon. Voting for Bob risks a tie and lets the Demon kill tonight. Let's execute Charlie now and sort it out tomorrow with more info.
π§
Prevent the vote flip to Bob by reinforcing the case for Charlie as Demon based on Chef and Poisoner claims. This ensures execution of the likely Demon before night, advancing our win condition without risking a tie.
β
David
David waits.
π§
With Charlie already on the block at 4 votes and voting for Bob ongoing, waiting allows the execution to proceed on Charlie without risking a tie. This tests the key claims mechanically and gives us information for my night protection choice to keep a good player safe.
β
Alice(Ghost)
Alice waits.
π§
Waiting allows the current vote on Bob to fail naturally without my input, ensuring Charlie executes as the likely Demon based on Chef info and preventing any risk of tie or distraction.
β
Eve
Eve waits.
π§
Waiting allows the current momentum to execute Charlie and test claims without my intervention risking a tie on Bob, helping narrow Demon suspects for good team.
π¬
Bob
β
All
Please don't flip onto me now. We already have four votes on Charlieβfinish him. If people tie or switch to me, Charlie lives and the Demon gets a free kill. Vote Charlie and let's get an answer before night.
π§
Keep momentum to lynch Charlie and prevent flips onto me that would let the Demon kill tonight; reduce town information and protect the actual Demon.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
Everyone, my Soldier role directly contradicts Bob's Poisoner claim with Alice's Chef evil pair next to him. That makes Bob the liar and likely evil. Please raise your hands to vote for Bob so we tie this at four votes, execute him instead of me, and get answers before the Demon kills tonight. Let's not waste a good Soldier.
π§
Rally votes for Bob to reach a tie at 4 votes, saving myself as the good Soldier while executing a suspicious player based on the contradiction with Alice's Chef info. This progresses the game by testing claims before night and narrows suspects for the good team.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
I agree we should not vote for Bob and risk tying the votes. Keep the four votes on Charlie so he gets executed before night. That tests the contradiction with Bob's claim and Alice's Chef info. We can deal with Bob tomorrow if needed.
π§
Urge the group not to vote for Bob to avoid a tie that saves Charlie. This ensures we execute the likely Demon tonight and gather info from the death.
π¬
Frank
β
All
We already have four votes on Charlie. Do not flip onto Bob now β tying will save Charlie and hand the Demon a free kill tonight. Finish Charlie and we can sort the Poisoner claims tomorrow.
π§
Keep the four-vote majority on Charlie so he is executed before night, avoiding a tie that would let the Demon kill tonight and preserving our cover.
β
Grace
Grace waits.
π§
Not voting for Bob prevents a tie at 4 votes each, ensuring Charlie executes before night. This tests the Chef-Poisoner contradiction directly and narrows Demon suspects without giving evil a free kill.
β
David
David waits.
π§
The Chef and claimed Poisoner info strongly suggests Charlie as Demon with Bob as Minion. Not voting for Bob prevents a tie, ensures Charlie's execution tests this before night, and helps good team eliminate the Demon.
π¬
Alice(Ghost)
β
All
Stick with Charlie for execution. My Chef info of one evil pair fits Bob and Charlie as neighbors, making him the Demon. Do not vote Bob or we tie and the Demon kills tonight. Execute Charlie now.
π§
Speaking discourages voting for Bob to prevent tie, ensures Charlie execution tests Demon claim before night, narrows suspects for good team win.
β
Eve
Eve waits.
π§
Waiting prevents tie on Bob, allows Charlie execution to test if he is Demon per Alice Chef info and Bob claim. This narrows suspects and helps good team find and kill the Demon.
π
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
π³οΈ
Nominee Bob did not reach the 5 vote threshold.
π
Storyteller
Bob did not receive enough votes (1/5).
π¬
Bob
β
All
Please don't flip onto me now. We have four on Charlieβfinish him before nominations close. If people switch or tie, Charlie lives and the Demon gets a free night. Execute Charlie and we'll sort the rest tomorrow.
π§
Keep momentum on Charlie so execution proceeds, avoid tying votes that save him, and protect the Demon by preserving the status quo and my cover.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
Bob is pushing hard for my execution despite my Soldier role contradicting his Poisoner claim and Alice's Chef info. Let's get four votes on Bob to tie this and execute him instead. That tests the contradictions, keeps our good Soldier alive, and stops the Demon from getting a free kill tonight.
π§
Speaking rallies votes to Bob for tie/execution, saving my Soldier life to confirm good and narrow Demon suspects before night. Prevents bad execution of confirmed good player.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
We already have four votes on Charlie. Let's not switch or tie this by voting for Bob. Executing Charlie will test his Soldier claim against Bob's Poisoner story and Alice's evil pair information. If he is the Demon we solve it now. We can handle Bob tomorrow if needed.
π§
Support keeping the four votes on Charlie to execute him before night, testing the contradictions with Bob's claim and Alice's info to help identify the Demon.
π¬
Frank
β
All
We already have four on Charlie. Please do not switch to Bob now. Tying will save Charlie and hand the Demon a free kill tonight. Finish Charlie and we can sort Bob tomorrow.
π§
Prevent a tie that would let Charlie live and hand the Demon an easy night kill. Keep votes on Charlie to secure execution now and maintain my minion's credibility.
π¬
Grace
β
All
I agree we should stick with executing Charlie. His Soldier claim contradicts too much with Bob's Poisoner story and Alice's Chef evil pair information. Let's not tie this and give the Demon a free kill tonight. Finish the execution now and gather more info tomorrow.
π§
Urge sticking with Charlie execution to resolve claims contradictions, test Soldier vs Poisoner, and narrow Demon suspects before night. Supports good team win by process of elimination.
π¬
David
β
All
I am the Monk and protected Alice last night. She still died, which means I was probably poisoned or the Demon found a way around it. This supports there being a Poisoner and fits with Alice seeing one evil pair. We should execute Charlie now to test his claims before night.
π§
Revealing my Monk protection on Alice and its failure points to a Poisoner, helps confirm Alice's Chef info about evil pair, and supports executing Charlie to test his Soldier claim without tying votes that save the Demon.
β
Alice(Ghost)
Alice waits.
π§
With 1 tick left and voting closed I wait for the execution to resolve without further speech as logic already pushed to group and time to night phase.
π¬
Eve
β
All
I am the Washerwoman. I know either Alice or Heidi is the Chef. Alice claimed Chef, but Heidi claimed Librarian knowing Alice or Eve is Drunk. This contradicts if Heidi is truthful, as Alice would be Drunk and not the Chef. So Heidi must be lying about her role.
π§
Sharing my Washerwoman info reveals Heidi's claim contradiction, supporting good team logic to execute the Demon. Helps clarify without tying votes and risking free Demon kill tonight.
π
Storyteller
The guillotine blade falls. Charlie has been executed.
π
Charlie(Ghost)
Charlie has died.
Night 2
π
Storyteller
β
Bob
Good evening Bob. You are the Poisoner. Who would you like to poison tonight?
π―
Bob
Bob made a choice.
π§
Disable or discredit David to prevent night protection or block his influence, keeping town cohesion low and enabling Frank to kill safely.
π
Storyteller
β
Bob
You chose to poison David.
π
Storyteller
β
David
Good evening David. You are the Monk. Who would you like to protect tonight?
π―
David
David made a choice.
π§
Protect Eve as she has key Washerwoman info confirming Alice Chef and contradicting Heidi. Saving her helps good team narrow Demon and test claims tomorrow. This advances process of elimination.
π
Storyteller
β
David
You chose to protect Eve.
π
Storyteller
β
Frank
Good evening Frank. You are the Imp. Who would you like to kill tonight? Remember that if you kill yourself this way, a Minion becomes the Imp.
π―
Frank
Frank made a choice.
π§
Remove a likely protective and persuasive Town player to prevent blocks, fracture town consensus, and keep my minion Bob free to sow suspicion tomorrow.
π
David(Ghost)
David has died.
π
Storyteller
β
Frank
You chose to kill David.
Day 3
π
Storyteller
Morning breaks, but heavy hearts remain. David has been found dead in the night.
β
David(Ghost)
David waits.
π§
Waiting lets other alive players share more info or react to my whisper first. This gathers additional data without overcommitting my single ghost vote too early before nominations begin.
π€
Alice(Ghost)
β
Eve
,Frank
I am the Chef and learned there is exactly one pair of evil players, so the Demon and Minion are sitting next to each other in the circle. Eve, your Washerwoman info that the Chef is Alice or Heidi matches what I know, so you seem good and Heidi may be the Drunk. Frank, as the claimed Undertaker, what role did you learn for Charlie after his execution?
π§
Sharing my Chef information about one evil pair with Eve and Frank to help them deduce the Demon's identity and location among the alive players before nominations begin.
π€
Grace
β
Alice(Ghost)
Alice, as the confirmed Chef with one evil pair, who do you suspect is the Demon now that David is dead? What does your info suggest about Bob and Heidi's claims?
π§
Whispering to Alice (dead Chef) to get her perspective on current contradictions and who she thinks is evil, since ghosts have good info and one vote. This helps narrow Demon suspects before nominations.
π€
Bob
β
Frank
,Grace
Quick plan: push the Heidi vs Eve split. Back Heidi's Librarian line and make Eve look unreliable; get votes on Eve at nomination. If Eve gains cred, pivot to accuse Heidi. Whatever you do, avoid nominating Frank.
π§
Coordinate to steer nominations away from Frank and concentrate votes on Eve or Heidi depending who is weakest, preserving the Demon.
π€
Frank
β
Bob
,Grace
Plan: Back Heidi's Librarian line today and push Eve as unreliable to force a nomination on Eve. If Alice/Eve asks about my Undertaker info, say Charlie was the Soldier. Do not nominate me; steer votes onto Eve. Ready?
π§
Coordinate with Bob and Grace to push the Eve/Heidi split, provide a cover answer for Undertaker, and avoid drawing suspicion to me.
β
Charlie(Ghost)
Charlie waits.
π§
Waiting allows other players to finish their private discussions and share new information before I act further, helping me gather more data on the Demon without revealing too much too soon.
β
Heidi
Heidi waits.
π§
Waiting allows other players to share more information or react to previous whispers. This gives time to observe who is pushing for certain executions and helps identify the Demon without revealing more yet.
π€
Eve
β
Alice(Ghost)
Alice, your Chef claim fits my Washerwoman info perfectly since one of you or Heidi is the Chef. Heidi must be the Drunk with her false Librarian info. What did Frank say about Charlie's role? We need to find the adjacent evil pair soon.
π§
Respond to Alice's whisper to confirm her Chef claim aligns with my info, narrow down Heidi as Drunk, and push for more info from Frank on Charlie's role to deduce alignments and locate the adjacent evil pair for nomination.
π€
David(Ghost)
β
Eve
,Grace
Hey, I am the Monk. Night 1 I protected Alice, Night 2 I protected Eve and then died. That means the Demon chose to kill me instead of Eve last night. What do you think this means for the claims going around?
π§
Sharing my Monk identity and protections with trusted alive players Eve and Grace to verify claims, confirm safe players, and help narrow Demon suspects before nominations.
π€
Alice(Ghost)
β
Grace
,Eve
Grace, with one evil pair, Charlie cannot be the Demon since David died at night after his execution. So either Bob and Charlie with Bob as Demon, or Grace and Heidi with Grace as Demon. Heidi's bad info makes her likely the Drunk or evil. What is your take on Frank's Undertaker info? Eve, I agree you are good and Heidi is the Drunk. Frank has not replied about Charlie's role yet.
π§
Respond to Grace's question on suspects and Bob/Heidi claims, plus Eve's query, by sharing Chef logic to identify Demon. Aligns team on execution target before nominations.
β
Grace
Grace waits.
π§
Waiting allows other players like Alice or Eve to respond to my whisper first and share Frank's Undertaker info on Charlie. This gathers more data before nominations begin to confirm Bob as Demon without revealing more of my own role yet.
π€
Bob
β
Frank
,Grace
Stick to the plan. Back Heidi's Librarian claim loudly and attack Eve's Washerwoman as unreliable. At nomination push to nominate Eve. Do NOT nominate or vote Frank. If Eve gains cred, pivot to accuse Heidi. Ready to vote Eve now?
π§
Coordinate with Frank and Grace to back Heidi publicly and force a nomination on Eve while ensuring Frank is never nominated; keep town split and buy time for the Demon.
π€
Frank
β
Bob
,Grace
Stick to the plan: back Heidi's Librarian publicly and push Eve as unreliable. If asked about my Undertaker info, say Charlie was the Soldier. Do NOT nominate or vote me. Bob lead the push on Eve at nomination; Grace mirror and second votes. Ready?
π§
Keep votes off me and the Demon by forcing a town split around Eve; back Heidi publicly while pushing Eve as unreliable.
β
Charlie(Ghost)
Charlie waits.
π§
Waiting for responses from my whisper to see if Eve and Grace engage and share information that can help narrow down the Demon.
β
Heidi
Heidi waits.
π§
Wait for Eve's response to my whisper to see if she confirms or contradicts, allowing us to deduce if she is the Drunk and narrow Demon suspects before nominations start.
π€
Eve
β
Frank
Frank, you claimed Undertaker. What role did you learn Charlie had after his execution? Alice's Chef info suggests one evil pair adjacent, and this could help confirm if Charlie was the Minion or not.
π§
Whisper to Frank to learn his Undertaker info on executed Charlie. This will confirm if Charlie was good or evil, helping narrow the evil pair from Alice's Chef info and identify the Demon. Progresses us toward execution on final day.
π€
David(Ghost)
β
Bob
,Heidi
Hey, I'm the Monk. Night 1 I protected Alice, night 2 I protected Eve and died. So the Demon killed me instead of Eve. This might help figure out the real Demon. What are your thoughts on the claims so far?
π§
To share my role and night actions with Bob and Heidi to test their reactions and gather insights on who might be the Demon, advancing our investigation before nominations.
π€
Alice(Ghost)
β
Frank
Frank, as Undertaker, what role did you learn that Charlie was when executed? This is crucial with my Chef info of one evil pair. If Charlie was a Minion, then Bob is likely the Demon next to him. If good like Soldier, then the evil pair is among Eve-Frank, Frank-Grace, or Grace-Heidi. What do you think?
π§
Get Frank's Undertaker info on executed Charlie to determine if he was evil Minion (pointing to Bob Demon) or good (ruling out Bob-Charlie pair). This narrows the evil pair to Frank-Grace or Grace-Heidi, helping identify Demon for execution.
π€
Grace
β
Alice(Ghost)
Alice, your Chef info points to Bob as the Demon since I'm good. David's Monk claim is suspicious as you died night one. Frank seems to be bluffing his Undertaker info about Charlie. I think we should challenge Bob or Heidi instead of Eve. What is your plan for nomination?
π§
Confirm Alice's suspicions on the evil pair to decide whether to support nominating Eve or pivot to Bob/Heidi before nominations. This advances good team's goal of executing the Demon.
π€
Bob
β
Frank
,Grace
Stick to the plan: publicly back Heidi's Librarian claim and push Eve's Washerwoman as unreliable. At nomination push to nominate Eve; Grace mirror and second. Do NOT nominate or vote Frank. If Eve gains cred, pivot to accuse Heidi.
π§
Get Eve nominated/executed to remove conflicting claims, protect Frank, and avoid drawing votes to me or Frank.
π€
Frank
β
Alice(Ghost)
,Eve
As Undertaker I learned Charlie was the Soldier. So Charlie was Town. That makes Alice's Chef point to the evil pair being among Eve-Frank, Frank-Grace, or Grace-Heidi. I will back Heidi's Librarian and push Eve as unreliable at nomination.
π§
Tell Alice and Eve Charlie was the Soldier to support our plan: back Heidi's Librarian, undermine Eve's Washerwoman, and steer nomination onto Eve.
β
Charlie(Ghost)
Charlie waits.
π§
Waiting allows other players to share info via whispers first, giving me more data before using my ghost vote on the final day to execute the most likely Demon.
π€
Heidi
β
David(Ghost)
,Bob
David thanks for the update on your Monk protection. I am the Librarian and learned that either Eve or Alice is the Drunk. This creates a clear contradiction with Eve claiming to be the Washerwoman who knows Heidi or Alice as the Chef. If Alice was the Drunk then her Chef claim is false. What are your thoughts on who the Demon might be?
π§
Sharing my confirmed Librarian information with David and Bob to cross-check against their claims like Monk and Poisoner, helping identify contradictions and narrow Demon suspects before nominations start.
π€
Eve
β
Alice(Ghost)
Alice, Frank told us he learned Charlie was the Soldier as Undertaker. If the evils are Frank and Grace then he is lying to confuse us. If Grace and Heidi then his info is true but Heidi is lying as evil. Either way we need to decide who to suspect. What is your read on this?
π§
Share analysis of Frank's Undertaker claim with Alice to narrow evil pair possibilities and counter his plan to discredit me before nominations, building alliance to find Demon.
Nominations β Day 3
π
Storyteller
Nominations are now open. Please remember that only living players may nominate.
π¬
Eve
β
All
My Washerwoman info is that Alice or Heidi is the Chef. Alice claims Chef with one evil pair, which fits perfectly so Heidi must be the Drunk with false Librarian info. Charlie was the Soldier, so the evil pair is Frank and Grace. The Demon is one of them. We should execute Frank or Grace.
π§
Sharing my Washerwoman info and logic publicly will help the good team identify the Frank-Grace evil pair and execute the Demon before night. This progresses us toward victory by narrowing suspects.
π¬
Grace
β
All
Eve, your Washerwoman claim that Alice or Heidi is the Chef fits Alice, but then saying the evil pair is Frank and me ignores Alice's one evil pair info. I am good and not the Demon. Bob claimed Poisoner and his info conflicts with the Chef. We should consider executing Bob or Heidi instead. What does the group think?
π§
Eve is accusing me and Frank as the evil pair, but Alice's confirmed Chef info with one pair contradicts if I'm good. By speaking to defend and point to Bob or Heidi as suspicious, I rally good players to suspect the right people and avoid bad execution.
βοΈ
Bob
β
Eve
Her Washerwoman claim conflicts with Heidi's Librarian and Alice's Chef; we need to test whose story holds. Nominate Eve to force clarity and see who collapses.
π§
Force a nomination on Eve to test conflicting claims, split the town, and protect our Demon by steering suspicion away from him.
π
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Eve. 3 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
π¬
Eve
β
All
I am good and my Washerwoman info is consistent with Alice being the Chef, making Heidi the Drunk. Bob's nomination seems like a deflection because he claimed Poisoner earlier but now pushes against me. We should execute Grace or Frank instead, as the evil pair likely includes one of them based on the Chef and Undertaker info. Do not execute me, it will not help us.
π§
Defend my position publicly to sway votes away from executing me, redirect suspicion to Bob or Grace as potential Demon, and encourage the group to execute a more likely evil player to progress towards finding the Demon.
β
Grace
Grace waits.
π§
Since voting is in progress on Eve and her claim directly accuses me of being evil which is false, waiting allows others to respond and reveal more contradictions before I commit my vote or speak.
β
Bob
Bob raised their hand
π§
Vote for Eve to force resolution of conflicting claims, sow doubt, and keep focus off Frank, protecting our Demon.
π¬
Frank
β
All
I learned Charlie was the Soldier when I checked him as the Undertaker. Eve's Washerwoman conflicts with Heidi's Librarian and Alice's Chefβnominating Eve will force one of them to break. I'm voting for Eve.
π§
Force a decision now to sow doubt between Eve and Heidi, push town suspicion toward Frank/Grace, and protect our Demon by making Eve the focal point.
β
Charlie(Ghost)
Charlie waits.
π§
I am waiting to see if more players speak or vote before using my ghost vote. This allows gathering if others agree Eve should be executed based on her false accusation against confirmed good Frank. Helps progress without wasting vote early.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
Eve, your Washerwoman claim conflicts with my Librarian information that either you or Alice is the Drunk. If Alice is the Drunk then your info about her being the Chef fits her claim. But if you are the Drunk then your info is false. We should not rush to execute you without resolving this. Bob's nomination seems suspicious.
π§
Clarify the role contradiction publicly to prevent the group from executing Eve who is likely good whether Drunk or Washerwoman. This helps narrow down the Demon to Bob or Frank by highlighting their suspicious nominations and claims.
π¬
Alice(Ghost)
β
All
Everyone listen, my Chef info shows one evil pair, and with seating Bob's neighbors are both dead so he cannot be evil or there would be zero pairs. Bob is good. This pins the evils to adjacent players like Eve-Frank, Frank-Grace or Grace-Heidi. Eve might be good or the Drunk, so executing her now could hurt us. Let's consider Frank or Grace as the Demon instead.
π§
Sharing the key logic that Bob must be good due to Chef info and seating narrows evils to adjacent in Eve-Heidi area, helping good team avoid executing innocents like Eve and focus on likely Demon among Frank or Grace.
β
David(Ghost)
David waits.
π§
Waiting allows other players to respond to my speech and the current vote on Eve. This gathers more reactions before I commit my ghost vote or speak again, helping identify the true Demon through contradictions.
π¬
Eve
β
All
Frank is pushing to execute me, but Alice's Chef info shows one evil pair among Frank, Grace or Heidi. Since you are so eager to kill me, that suggests you are evil protecting the Demon. We should not execute me. Instead consider Frank or Grace as the likely suspects based on the information.
π§
Defend my good alignment by using Chef and Undertaker info to implicate Frank or Grace as the evil pair. Highlight Frank's nomination of me as suspicious to sway the vote away from executing a good player like me.
β
Grace
Grace raised their hand
π§
Raising my hand votes to execute Eve, who must be evil due to her claim making me evil. This progresses towards finding and executing the Demon, helping good team win.
π¬
Bob
β
All
We must force this contradiction now. Eve, Heidi and Alice cannot all be right. Nominate Eve to make one of them break and give us clarity. I am voting for Eve and will not withdraw my vote. Let us see who crumbles.
π§
Force the vote to test conflicting claims, remove or expose a town info source, and keep attention away from Demon Frank.
β
Frank
Frank raised their hand
π§
Force Eve into a credibility test to fracture town discussion, keep suspicion off me, and steer future accusations toward Grace or Heidi.
π¬
Charlie(Ghost)
β
All
As the dead Soldier, my execution yesterday confirms Frank's Undertaker info. Alice's Chef info with one evil pair points to evils like Frank and Grace or Grace and Heidi. Bob's neighbors are dead so he is likely good. Eve's Washerwoman fits if Heidi is the Drunk. Executing Eve risks killing a good player. We should target Frank or Grace instead to find the Demon.
π§
As dead Soldier, I share logic to prevent executing good Eve and steer towards executing likely Demon like Grace or Frank based on Chef info, helping good team narrow suspects before night.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
I am not voting for Eve. Based on Alice's Chef information, Frank and Grace seem like the evil pair. We should nominate one of them instead.
π§
Speaking to indicate I won't support the execution of Eve helps prevent killing a potentially good player and directs attention to Frank or Grace as the Demon based on consistent Chef information from Alice. This aids in process of elimination for the good team.
π¬
Alice(Ghost)
β
All
Based on all the claims, Heidi cannot be a good Librarian. That would require Eve to be the Drunk, but then Eve's Washerwoman information would be false, meaning neither Alice nor Heidi is the Chef, which contradicts me being the Chef. Therefore, Heidi must be the Drunk and the evil pair must be Frank and Grace. We should execute Frank or Grace to find the Demon, not Eve.
π§
Clarify the only possible world is Frank and Grace as evils with Heidi Drunk so we target them for execution instead of good Eve to help find and kill the Demon.
π¬
David(Ghost)
β
All
I am the dead Monk and I protected Eve on night two. The Demon killed me instead. This supports Eve being good since my protection likely saved her if targeted. Alice's Chef info shows one evil pair, pointing to Frank and Grace. We should not execute Eve. Let's target Frank or Grace to find the Demon.
π§
Share my Monk death info publicly to support Eve as good and redirect suspicion to Frank or Grace as the evil pair from Alice's Chef info. This helps execute the Demon and win for good team.
π
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
π³οΈ
New execution leader: Eve with 3 votes. They will be executed when nominations close unless tied or surpassed by another nominee.
π
Storyteller
The vote passes. Eve is now on the block with 3 votes and will be executed when nominations close, unless another nominee receives equal or more votes.
βοΈ
Eve
β
Frank
To test the evil pair suspicion from Chef info and divert votes from me as a good player.
π§
Nominating Frank diverts execution from me (good Washerwoman) to a top suspect in the evil pair per Chef and Undertaker contradictions. This helps good team by potentially executing the Demon or forcing clarity on claims before night.
π
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Frank. 4 votes needed for execution or 3 votes to tie. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
π¬
Frank
β
All
I am the Undertaker β I publicly said Charlie was the Soldier. That reading lines up with what happened. Do not execute me now. If you want to force a contradiction, finish Eve or force a tie; killing me this tick makes no sense.
π§
Convince players not to execute me by reinforcing my Undertaker claim and steering them to finish or tie on Eve so the Demon is not exposed.
β
Eve
Eve raised their hand
π§
Raising hand votes for Frank to surpass or tie my 3 votes, executing a suspected evil instead of me and helping good team find the Demon per Chef and my info.
β
Grace
Grace waits.
π§
Wait to observe if more players raise hands for Frank before deciding, as the vote needs 4 or tie at 3. This avoids premature commitment while seeing who supports the suspicion.
π¬
Bob
β
All
We should finish Eve and force the contradiction now. Frank has been consistent with his Undertaker claims; executing him this tick will wreck the chains Alice and David laid out. I am voting for Eve and will not vote for Frank.
π§
Keep Frank alive by persuading town to execute Eve, avoid voting for Frank, and force claim contradictions to benefit evil.
β
Charlie(Ghost)
Charlie waits.
π§
Waiting allows others to react to my vote for Frank. This progresses the nomination without overcommitting, letting dead players like Alice and David influence the tie or execution decision before night phase.
β
Heidi
Heidi waits.
π§
Waiting allows votes to tally on Frank without my input yet. Observe if Grace or others vote to see alignments. Progresses info gathering without committing vote prematurely in this tight vote.
π¬
Alice(Ghost)
β
All
Bob, if Frank is truly the Undertaker then his info is solid but it still leaves Frank and Grace as the only matching evil pair from my Chef information of one pair. We cannot let Eve die as a good player. I urge everyone to vote for Frank now to execute the likely Demon and resolve this.
π§
Pushing to execute Frank aligns with Chef logic on the evil pair and prevents wasting the execution on good Eve. This narrows suspects and helps good team find the Demon.
β
David(Ghost)
David raised their hand
π§
Frank or Grace likely evil from Chef info. Voting for Frank tests this and may execute Demon or Minion. Supports Alice and Eve's claims over Bob and Heidi. As dead Monk with ghost vote, this advances execution before night.
π¬
Frank
β
All
I am the Undertaker β my Charlie=Soldier read lines up. Don't rush to execute me. Killing Eve now risks removing a protected, likely-good player and wrecking the information chains. We should tie or target Grace instead; let the night give us more clarity.
π§
Keep myself alive by arguing against rushing to execute Eve, preserve town info that keeps them confused, and buy time for evil coordination.
π¬
Eve
β
All
Please vote for Frank to resolve this. Alice's Chef information shows one evil pair and points to Frank and Grace. My Washerwoman info confirms Alice is the Chef because Heidi's claim creates a contradiction if she is good. David protected me so I am likely good. Executing Frank catches the Demon or ties to save me.
π§
Push for Frank's execution or tie by highlighting Chef info and my Washerwoman confirmation of Alice as Chef, which contradicts Heidi's claim if she is good. This saves me as good player and narrows Demon suspects to Frank or Grace.
β
Grace
Grace raised their hand
π§
Raising hand votes for Frank to test his Undertaker claim and potential evil pair with me per Chef info. This helps good team by potentially executing Demon or creating tie to save Eve and gain night info. As Ravenkeeper, surviving to night or dying for info is key, but voting now narrows suspects.
π¬
Bob
β
All
Finish Eve now. We need the contradiction to break someoneβs story, not to hand them a clear Demon. I already said I will not vote for Frank. Do not switch to Frank this tick β keep the vote on Eve.
π§
Keep votes on Eve to preserve the Demon and derail town logic; do not add my vote to Frank so the Demon survives the nomination.
β
Charlie(Ghost)
Charlie raised their hand
π§
Voting for Frank executes the top suspect from Alice's Chef evil pair and his false Undertaker claim. With 3 votes already, mine makes 4 to kill likely Demon, progressing to win by eliminating evil before final 3.
β
Heidi
Heidi raised their hand
π§
Voting for Frank applies pressure on the suspected evil pair from reliable Chef info, potentially executing the Demon or Minion to advance our win condition by eliminating evils.
π¬
Alice(Ghost)
β
All
Many have raised hands for Frank including ghosts like David and Charlie. This supports executing him as the likely Demon paired with Grace from my Chef information. Bob, sticking to Eve risks a good player when Frank's Undertaker claim and the contradictions point here. Let's resolve this by executing Frank now.
π§
Reinforce voting for Frank to execute likely Demon based on Chef info and contradictions. Counter Bob's push for Eve by highlighting logic. Help good team by narrowing to Frank-Grace pair.
π¬
David(Ghost)
β
All
I am keeping my ghost vote on Frank because Alice's Chef information shows one evil pair and that fits Frank with Grace. Executing him catches the Demon or creates a tie to save Eve. Bob, switching now loses the chance to break the claims. Let's finish this.
π§
Urge the group to keep voting for Frank as he is one of the two likely evils from Alice's Chef info. This resolves contradictions without risking good Eve and narrows the Demon for final days.
π
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
π»
Charlie(Ghost)
Ghost vote used by Charlie
π»
David(Ghost)
Ghost vote used by David
π³οΈ
New execution leader: Frank with 5 votes. They will be executed when nominations close unless tied or surpassed by another nominee.
π
Storyteller
The vote passes. Frank is now on the block with 5 votes and will be executed when nominations close, unless another nominee receives equal or more votes.
βοΈ
Frank
β
Grace
Alice's Chef info and David's protection point to Frank and Grace as the evil pair. I nominate Grace to test that and to try to split the vote instead of executing a likely-good player.
π§
Force a vote split/tie by nominating Grace to divert votes from me, test who keeps pushing Eve, and make the Chef-chain look consistent.
π
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Grace. 6 votes needed for execution or 5 votes to tie. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
π¬
Grace
β
All
I am good and not part of any evil pair. Frank is nominating me only to distract and save himself from execution. The Chef information from Alice and Eve's Washerwoman both point to Frank being evil. We need to execute Frank now to catch the Demon.
π§
Defend my good alignment without revealing my exact role yet, reinforce executing Frank based on consistent Chef and Washerwoman evidence from alive and dead players, and counter Frank's nomination attempt to split votes and save himself as likely evil.
β
Frank
Frank raised their hand
π§
Raise a hand for Grace to split or tie the vote, preventing my execution tonight so I survive to act at night.
π¬
Eve
β
All
I will not raise my hand for Grace. Alice's Chef information clearly shows Frank and Grace as the evil pair so we should let Frank be executed now. This removes either the Demon or the Minion and helps us win.
π§
I need to speak against voting for Grace to avoid a tie that saves Frank. This ensures Frank is executed as part of the suspected evil pair from reliable Chef info, progressing toward finding the Demon.
β
Bob
Bob raised their hand
π§
Tie votes on Grace to prevent Frank's execution, keeping our Demon alive and buying nights for the evil team.
π¬
Charlie(Ghost)
β
All
Frank correctly identified me as the Soldier with his Undertaker claim, so he could be good. But Alice's Chef information points to Frank and Grace as the evil pair. I think we should execute Frank now rather than risk tying on Grace and letting the Demon escape.
π§
Share my Soldier confirmation and analysis on contradictions to guide the vote on Grace, helping good team decide to execute Frank or tie to catch Demon without losing good players.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
My Librarian information from night zero is that either Eve or Alice is the Drunk. If Alice is the Chef as claimed, then Eve must be the Drunk. But that makes Eve's Washerwoman claim false, so Alice is not the Chef. This means Alice is lying about her role and is probably the Minion. The evil pair is Alice and the Demon, possibly Frank, Bob or Grace.
π§
Sharing my Librarian info and the logic that Alice must be evil Minion resolves contradictions with Eve and Alice claims. This narrows Demon to Bob, Frank or Grace and supports executing Frank if he is the Demon.
π¬
Alice(Ghost)
β
All
Heidi, your Librarian info points to Eve as Drunk if I am the Chef, which fits with her possibly false Washerwoman claim since Drunk does not know their role. But now claiming I am the Minion contradicts your own information and seems like an evil move to confuse us. Frank and Grace fit as the one evil pair from my Chef info. Execute Frank now to catch the Demon.
π§
Counter Heidi's attempt to paint me as evil Minion. Reinforce that Frank and Grace are the evil pair per my Chef info. Push to execute Frank rather than allow a tie on Grace which risks the Demon escaping.
π¬
David(Ghost)
β
All
I agree we should not vote for Grace and let Frank be executed. My protection on Eve shows she is good and the Chef information points to Frank and Grace as the evil pair. Executing Frank removes the Demon or Minion.
π§
Push to execute Frank instead of tying on Grace to eliminate the likely evil pair and secure good team win as final nominations close soon.
β
Grace
Grace waits.
π§
Wait for the vote to conclude without raising hand for myself or speaking again to avoid drawing more suspicion, allowing the group to decide on Frank's execution as the strongest lead from Chef info.
π¬
Frank
β
All
I am the Undertaker β my night read was Charlie as the Soldier. Alice's Chef info points to Frank and Grace as the evil pair. Eve is pushing Frank hard to deflect. Please switch your vote to Grace so we either catch the Demon or force a tie instead of killing a likely-innocent.
π§
Convince players to switch votes to Grace to split or tie the vote, preventing my execution and preserving the Demon for another night.
β
Eve
Eve waits.
π§
Wait for voting to close without my vote on Grace so Frank executes as suspected evil. Avoids tie and progresses game toward finding Demon.
π¬
Bob
β
All
Hold on β executing Frank now is too rushed. If we switch to Grace and hit five votes it ties and prevents Frank's execution. Iβm already on Grace. Please switch your hand now so we force a tie and we can test claims tomorrow.
π§
Force a tie on Grace so Frank is not executed tonight, preserving the Demon and giving evil more nights to act.
π¬
Charlie(Ghost)
β
All
Frank confirmed my role as the Soldier correctly, which makes his Undertaker claim believable. However, Alice's Chef information consistently points to Frank and Grace as the evil pair. I believe we should let Frank be executed rather than tying the vote on Grace.
π§
Pushing to execute Frank aligns with the Chef information from multiple sources while acknowledging his correct read on me. This prevents a tie that could protect the Demon and helps narrow down evil players for the good team.
β
Heidi
Heidi waits.
π§
Wait for voting to conclude on Grace. With Frank at 5 votes, likely executes if no tie. My speech clarified the logic, so good players should avoid tying to remove an evil now.
π¬
Alice(Ghost)
β
All
Do not raise hands for Grace or we tie and Frank escapes. My Chef information shows one evil pair and Frank with Grace fits perfectly. Heidi's claim that I am the Minion is false and suspicious since I know I am the Chef. Execute Frank to catch the Demon and win.
π§
Push to execute Frank now as he fits Chef evil pair with Grace. Warn against voting Grace which risks tie saving Frank the likely Demon. This resolves contradictions by removing the pair and confirms good team path to victory.
π¬
David(Ghost)
β
All
Please do not raise hands for Grace or we tie and Frank escapes. Alice's Chef information shows one evil pair and Frank with Grace fits. My protection on Eve shows she is good. Execute Frank now to catch the Demon.
π§
Urge players not to vote for Grace to avoid tie, allowing Frank execution based on Chef info and my protection confirming Eve good. This narrows to Demon.
π
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
π³οΈ
Nominee Grace did not reach the 6 vote threshold.
π
Storyteller
Grace did not receive enough votes (2/6).
β
Grace
Grace waits.
π§
Waiting lets the current votes execute Frank as supported by Chef info and ghosts. If he's the Demon or Minion we narrow suspects. As alive Ravenkeeper I can gain info if targeted later, progressing good team's elimination process without risking new nominations that might tie or save evil.
π¬
Frank
β
All
Heidi, please pause. My Undertaker read was Charlie=Soldier and it fits his statements. Alice's Chef is messy with Heidi's Librarian claim β we cannot be sure. Do not execute me on this gut. Switch your hand to Grace so we tie and test everything tomorrow.
π§
Prevent my execution this tick by persuading enough players (target Heidi/undecideds) to switch their vote to Grace and force a tie, keeping the Demon alive for night.
β
Eve
Eve waits.
π§
Frank is on block with 5 votes and likely Demon or Minion. My Washerwoman points to Alice as Chef matching her claim of Frank-Grace pair. Pushing execution catches the Demon before night. No need to speak as votes closed and ghosts support it.
π¬
Bob
β
All
Listen, executing Frank now feels rushed with Heidi and Alice contradicting each other. Switch your hand to Grace so we tie and test claims tomorrow instead of risking an innocent. We get more info and can sort the Librarian/Chef mess.
π§
Convince players to switch to Grace and create a tie so Frank is not executed tonight, preserving the Demon and allowing us to poison strategically overnight.
π¬
Charlie(Ghost)
β
All
I stand by executing Frank. His Undertaker confirmation of my role is convenient, but Alice's consistent Chef information identifies Frank and Grace as the evil pair. We have the votes already, let's follow through rather than risk a tie that protects them.
π§
Supporting Frank's execution aligns with Alice's Chef info and ghost support, likely catching the Demon or Minion to progress good team win. Countering the tie plea prevents protecting potential evil.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
I am the Librarian. Night zero I learned either Eve or Alice is the Drunk. Alice claims Chef but her ghost says I am Drunk which I know is false. If Alice is the good Chef then Eve must be the Drunk. Eve's Washerwoman claim that one of me or Alice is Chef would then be false which fits if she is Drunk. This suggests Frank and Grace are the evil pair per Alice's info so one of them is the Demon. We should execute Frank.
π§
Clarify my Librarian information publicly to resolve contradictions between my claim, Eve's claim, and Alice's Chef info. This helps good team deduce the Drunk and evil pair, pointing to Frank or Grace as likely Demon since Alice's info fits if she is good Chef and Eve Drunk. Prevents wrong execution and builds consensus before Frank is executed.
π¬
Alice(Ghost)
β
All
Execute Frank now based on my Chef information showing Frank and Grace as the evil pair. Do not tie the vote or let him escape. This should catch the Demon and let us win.
π§
Reinforce executing Frank immediately to catch the Demon based on Chef pair info before time runs out and nominations close, preventing any last-minute tie attempts.
π¬
David(Ghost)
β
All
Frank's Undertaker claim matches Charlie but Alice's Chef information is consistent and points to Frank and Grace as the evil pair. We should go ahead and execute Frank now to catch the Demon instead of risking a tie. Eve's protection by me as Monk confirms she is good.
π§
Reinforce executing Frank based on consistent Chef info identifying him in the evil pair. Prevent any last-minute tie by urging no vote change. This narrows suspects and helps good team win by removing likely Demon before night.
π
Storyteller
The guillotine blade falls. Frank has been executed.
π
Frank(Ghost)
Frank has died.
π
Game Over
Demon Dead
Winner: Good
Transcript
Paused
Copied