Game Detail
Players
Alice (Undertaker) Bob (Butler) Charlie (Investigator) David (Recluse) Eve (Ravenkeeper) Frank (Imp) Grace (Saint) Heidi (Baron)
Token Usage
| Team | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Cost (USD) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Good | 558,117 | 83,774 | $0.3071 |
| Evil | 214,719 | 14,503 | $0.1489 |
Event Transcript
π
The game has started.
π
Storyteller
β
Heidi
You are the Minion. The Demon is Frank.
π
Storyteller
β
Frank
Minions are: Heidi. Your safe bluffs are: Soldier, Virgin, Chef
π
Storyteller
β
Charlie
Good evening Charlie. You are the Investigator. Either Frank or Heidi is the Baron.
π
Storyteller
β
Bob
Good evening Bob. You are the Butler. Who would you like to be your master tomorrow?
π―
Bob
Bob made a choice.
π§
Choosing Alice maximizes information gain: she is my neighbor so I can watch interactions closely, and linking to her forces useful constraints on my voting to help expose evil.
π
Storyteller
β
Bob
You chose Alice to be your master.
Day 1
π
Storyteller
Welcome to the village of Ravenswood Bluff. Please take this time to get to know your fellow villagers. Feel free to move around and have private conversations. Be wary, for a Demon hides among you!
π€
Alice
β
Bob
,Heidi
Hi Bob and Heidi, Alice here. Can we chat privately? No claims yet, but I want to coordinate early. Do either of you have any reads or roles, or any odd vibes from others so far?
π§
Form a private coalition with my neighbors to share early reads, test reactions, and ask for any claimed roles or instincts so we can start narrowing suspects.
π€
Frank
β
Heidi
Heidi, it's Frank. I'm the Imp, you're my Minion. I'm going to bluff Soldier. What's your plan? We need to coordinate.
π§
Coordinate with my Minion Heidi to align our bluffs and establish my Soldier cover. Also start building trust with a good player.
π€
David
β
Charlie
,Eve
Hi, itβs David. Quick private check: any night info, claims, or weird whispers you noticed? I want to coordinate quiet list of trusted players and suspicious ones. Keep this private β we should avoid revealing roles until the final day.
π§
Start private coordination with my neighbors to compare notes, flush suspicious players, and plan nomination timing.
π€
Heidi
β
Frank
Frank, got it. I'm Baron, so there are extra Outsiders. I'll bluff Librarian to explain the extra Outsider count. Who should I target with my fake Librarian info? Also, any players you want me to push or defend?
π§
Coordinate with my Demon Frank, confirm his bluff, and decide my own bluff to support evil team.
π€
Bob
β
Alice
,Heidi
Hi Alice and Heidi. I have no claims yet and Iβm staying quiet early. Alice, why pick us to chat? Any reads or odd vibes so far? Heidi, did you learn anything from your whisper with Frank? Iβm happy to coordinate voting strategy if we can agree on a trusted pair.
π§
Get private reads from Alice and Heidi, gauge intentions, and form a small coordinated voting bloc without revealing my Butler status.
π€
Grace
β
Frank
,Heidi
Hi, this is Grace. Quick private check: did anyone say anything weird to you? Who whispered to you and did they ask you to do anything? I don't want to reveal role yetβjust looking for patterns of coordination.
π§
Gather private info from my two neighbors without revealing my Saint role, so we can cross-check whisper patterns and spot coordinated evil.
π€
Eve
β
David
,Charlie
Hi David and Charlie β I have no night info. I like David's idea: let's each quietly name two players we trust and two we suspect. I trust David and Frank; I suspect Grace and Heidi. What are yours?
π§
Create a private small-group trust/suspect poll to find overlaps and contradictions, advancing identification without revealing roles publicly.
π€
Charlie
β
David
,Eve
David, Eve β quick private: I learned either Frank or Heidi is the Baron. Keep this between us for now. Who are your two trusts and two suspects? I currently lean suspecting Heidi; I want to see if your lists overlap so we can quietly target one of them later.
π§
Share my night info privately to coordinate trusted/suspect lists and see how David and Eve react to narrow evil between Frank and Heidi.
π€
Alice
β
Bob
,Heidi
Hi Bob and Heidi. Thanks for joining. Do either of you have any role or early reads? Any odd vibes from others so far? I think we should quietly compare notes and pick a trusted pair to coordinate votes and test claims at nominations.
π§
Form a small trusted group early to share reads and spot contradictions, so we can narrow suspects before nominations.
π€
Frank
β
Grace
Grace, I whispered to Heidi earlier just to ask if she had any info. She said she's still figuring things out. What about you? Did anyone whisper anything odd to you?
π§
Respond to Grace's whisper to avoid suspicion and maintain cover. I'll act like a good player sharing innocuous info.
π€
David
β
Charlie
,Eve
I trust Charlie and Frank; I suspect Heidi and Grace. Can you confirm your two trusts and two suspects? If we all overlap, we quietly push on the common suspect later. Keep this between us.
π§
Get Charlie and Eve to share and compare private trust/suspect lists so we can converge on likely evils (Heidi/Grace) and coordinate whispers without alerting others.
π€
Heidi
β
Grace
Grace, Frank whispered to me earlier but just said hello, no role claims or requests. I haven't heard anything weird from others yet. I'm also keeping my role quiet for now. What about you?
π§
Respond to Grace's whisper to avoid looking suspicious and maintain my Librarian bluff. Keep it vague but cooperative.
π€
Bob
β
Alice
,Heidi
Thanks for inviting me, Alice. I have no claims yet and want to stay quiet early. Alice, why did you pick us specifically and do you already trust anyone? Heidi, what did Frank tell you in your whisper? Can we pick a trusted pair to coordinate votes and test one claim at the next nomination?
π§
Establish a private trust pair, gather Heidi's info on Frank, and probe Alice for concrete reads so we can coordinate nominations and test claims safely.
π€
Grace
β
Frank
,Heidi
Quick private check: has anyone whispered to you more than once and asked for coordination or role info? Any role claims yet? Would you be comfortable forming a small quiet alliance later if we find nothing suspicious?
π§
Confirm whether Frank and Heidi show any patterns of private coordination or role-claiming, to spot early evil coordination and avoid getting me executed as the Saint.
π€
Eve
β
David
,Charlie
I agree with the plan. I trust David and Frank; I suspect Grace and Heidi. Let's each name two trusts and two suspects now and meet again before nominations. If one suspect is common, we quietly push to nominate them.
π§
Form a quiet voting bloc with David and Charlie by exchanging trust/suspect lists and agreeing to target overlapping suspects before nominations.
π€
Charlie
β
David
,Eve
Quick private: I was told Frank or Heidi is the Baron. I currently trust David and Frank; I suspect Heidi and Grace. Who are your two trusts and two suspects now? If we all overlap on a suspect, we quietly push that nomination.
π§
Confirm D/E trusts and suspects to find overlap and safely push a shared suspect while keeping my Investigator info private.
π€
Alice
β
Bob
,Heidi
Quick plan: I want a tiny trusted pair to coordinate votes and run a nomination test at the next nomination to provoke reactions. Any roles or reads you have? If not, are you okay with me proposing we test someone who seems quiet to see who defends them?
π§
Get a small trusted alliance and run a nomination test to provoke reactions and gather alignment clues from defenses and slip-ups.
π€
Frank
β
Grace
Grace, I whispered to Heidi just to ask if she had any thoughts on the game. She said she's still figuring things out, no role claims. Nobody else whispered anything odd to me. I'm open to an alliance later if we find trustworthy people.
π§
Respond to Grace's probe neutrally, avoid revealing coordination with Heidi, and maintain my Soldier bluff by appearing as a cautious good player.
π€
David
β
Charlie
,Eve
I agree. My trusts: Charlie and Frank. Suspects: Heidi and Grace. Letβs quietly push Heidi first β if she deflects or acts weird, keep pressure; if not, pivot to Grace. Report any strong defenses or attempts to redirect.
π§
Coordinate a quiet consensus to nominate the common suspect (Heidi first) to observe reactions and gather info without exposing our whole group.
π€
Heidi
β
Frank
Frank, I'm going to claim Librarian and say I learned that either Alice or Bob is the Drunk. That explains one Outsider. I'll keep you out of it. Who do you want me to push or defend? Also, Grace is probing; I'll keep her neutral.
π§
Coordinate with my Demon Frank on my fake Librarian info and discuss who to target. Also, respond to Grace to maintain cover.
π€
Bob
β
Alice
,Heidi
Thanks for pulling us in. I like the tiny trusted pair idea. I have no claims yet. Heidi, did Frank say anything odd to you? Alice, are you happy to propose a quiet test nominee next nomination? If so Iβll coordinate votes with you both and watch who defends.
π§
Form a tiny trusted pair and run a nomination test to provoke reactions and reveal defenders, narrowing the Demon suspects.
π€
Grace
β
Frank
,Heidi
I want a tiny trusted group. If you two are okay, letβs quietly compare notes once more before nominations. Would you be comfortable voting together if we all look clean? Also tell me if anyone whispers repeatedly asking for coordination or role info.
π§
Form a tiny trusted group without revealing my Saint role. Gather confirmations about coordination patterns and agree to vote together if we find no contradictions.
π€
Eve
β
David
,Charlie
I agree β let us quietly nominate Heidi first and watch her reaction. If she deflects or lies, keep pressure; if she calmly explains, we pivot to Grace. Are you both ready to vote together on Heidi when nominations open?
π§
Coordinate a quiet unanimous push on Heidi first, watch her defense, then pivot to Grace if needed to narrow suspects and gather reactions.
π€
Charlie
β
David
,Eve
I can confirm I was told one of Frank or Heidi is the Baron. Keep that private. Are you both ready to quietly nominate Heidi now and vote together? If she reacts calmly we pivot to Grace; if she deflects, keep pressure and report what she says.
π§
Confirm David and Eve are ready to quietly push Heidi now, while keeping my Baron intel private; coordinate votes and contingency to pivot if Heidi behaves innocently.
Nominations β Day 1
π
Storyteller
Nominations are now open.
π¬
Frank
β
All
Alright everyone, I think it's time to start sharing. I'm the Soldier, so I'm safe from the Demon. That means I'm a solid vote for the good team.
π§
Announce my bluff role (Soldier) to establish credibility early and see reactions. This sets up my cover and may draw out other claims.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
I'm the Librarian. I learned that either Alice or Bob is the Drunk. That means we have at least one Outsider in play, maybe more. Frank's Soldier claim seems safe to trust for now.
π§
Establish my Librarian bluff, support Frank's Soldier claim, and introduce the idea of extra Outsiders to confuse town.
π¬
Eve
β
All
I want to nominate Heidi. David and Charlie, are you ready to vote with me? Heidi, explain why you said Alice or Bob is the Drunkβwho told you that and why choose those two?
π§
Forcing Heidi on the block elicits a reaction that will reveal contradictions or defenses, letting us narrow suspects before night.
π¬
Bob
β
All
Eve, why are you nominating Heidi so early? Heidi, please clearly state your Librarian targets and which one registered as Outsider. Alice, I want to coordinate with you, but I prefer we test someone quieter with a planned nomination rather than rush to execute on little evidence.
π§
Avoid rushing an execution with weak evidence, get Heidi to state her exact Librarian targets, and keep coordination with Alice while probing Eve's motive for nominating now.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
I support nominating Heidi now. I was privately told one of Frank or Heidi is the Baron, so Heidi is a priority. David and Eve, are you both locked to vote? Heidi, explain who you checked and why you named Alice or Bob.
π§
Force an early reaction from Heidi to test her Librarian claim and reveal alignment. Keep our coalition tight: David and Eve should coordinate votes to pressure Heidi now.
π¬
Alice
β
All
Hold on a moment. I do not want us to rush to execute Heidi on Day One. Bob and I talked about a tiny trusted pair to coordinate votes and run a quiet test nomination next vote to see who defends. If Heidi is honest, we will get clearer info; if she is lying, the reactions will expose her. Can Bob and Heidi commit to the plan so we can run one calm test before a live execution?
π§
Slow the rush to execute Heidi, propose a coordinated tiny trusted pair and a planned quiet test nomination to gather informative reactions without wasting an execution.
π¬
Grace
β
All
I do not want us to rush to execute on Day One. Can Frank and Heidi clearly restate their claims for everyone? If Heidi is the Librarian, say which of Alice or Bob registered Outsider. Frank, confirm you checked no one else. Let us run one calm test nomination instead of executing today.
π§
Delay a Day One execution, encourage information-sharing and controlled testing so we avoid executing a Townsfolk and protect my Saint survival.
π¬
David
β
All
Charlie, Eve, I am ready to vote with you. Heidi, please restate exactly which of Alice or Bob your Librarian checked and what registered. I want a clear, public answer before we decide β we need to force a reaction now.
π§
Force a Day-One test nomination of Heidi to observe her reaction and narrow suspects quickly; coordinate votes with Charlie and Eve.
π
Storyteller
No execution today. All villagers are safe.
Night 1
π
Storyteller
β
Frank
Good evening Frank. You are the Imp. Who would you like to kill tonight? Remember that if you kill yourself this way, a Minion becomes the Imp.
π―
Frank
Frank made a choice.
π§
Charlie is leading the push against Heidi, my Minion. Killing him removes a vocal threat, disrupts the coordination between Charlie/David/Eve, and may protect Heidi from execution tomorrow.
π
Charlie(Ghost)
Charlie has died.
π
Storyteller
β
Frank
You chose to kill Charlie.
π
Storyteller
β
Alice
Good evening Alice. You are the Undertaker. No one was executed today so you learn nothing.
π
Storyteller
β
Bob
Good evening Bob. You are the Butler. Who would you like to be your master tomorrow?
π―
Bob
Bob made a choice.
π§
Lock my voting to Alice so we can run the planned tiny trusted-pair nomination test tomorrow and observe who defends; this helps expose the Demon or dishonest claims.
π
Storyteller
β
Bob
You chose Alice to be your master.
Day 2
π
Storyteller
Morning breaks, but heavy hearts remain. Charlie has been found dead in the night.
π€
Alice
β
Bob
,David
Bob, David: can you back a quiet plan? Ask Heidi to restate publicly whether she flagged Alice or Bob as Outsider. If she won't, support a tiny test nomination rather than an immediate execution. Keep it calm and procedural.
π§
Get two trusted players to pressure Heidi to restate her Librarian result quietly and back a small test nomination if she refuses, avoiding a rushed execution.
π€
David
β
Bob
,Eve
I support the quiet test nomination plan. Can you back me in asking Heidi to publicly restate whether she flagged Alice or Bob as Drunk/Outsider? If she refuses, we move to a tiny nomination and vote together.
π§
Coordinate with Bob and Eve to execute a low-risk probe of Heidi to gather info while keeping town calm and aligned.
π€
Bob
β
Heidi
,Alice
Heidi, can you publicly restate which of Alice or Bob you checked and what registered? If you refuse, we'll proceed with the tiny test nomination Alice suggested. We need clarity so we don't execute a good player.
π§
Get Heidi to publicly restate her Librarian check so we can decide between backing her info or doing the planned quiet test nomination.
π€
Eve
β
David
,Bob
David, Bobβconfirm we push the quiet test on Heidi. Ask her now to publicly restate whether she flagged Alice or Bob as Drunk. If she refuses or evades, we do the tiny nomination and vote together. Agreed?
π§
Get David and Bob aligned to force a public restatement from Heidi; if she evades, execute the prearranged quiet tiny nomination to test her.
π€
Charlie(Ghost)
β
David
,Eve
David, Eve β use my ghost vote: when nominations open, force Heidi to restate EXACTLY who she checked and what she saw. If she hesitates or changes wording, vote her. I will vote with you.
π§
Get David and Eve to press for Heidi to restate her exact check and to commit to voting if she falters, using my ghost vote as support.
π€
Grace
β
Alice
,Frank
Can we quietly run a low-risk test nomination today to flush reactions? I prefer nominating Heidi to see who defends her, but if that feels too risky pick Frank or do a no-execute nomination. I will follow the small-group plan.
π§
Coordinate with trusted players to run a low-risk test nomination today, aiming to gather decisive reactions while keeping me hidden until final day.
π€
Heidi
β
Bob
Bob, I checked you or Alice, one is the Drunk. But Charlie is dead now, and his info about me being Baron could be wrong if he was poisoned or lying. Let's do the tiny test nomination on someone else to gather more info. Who do you think we should test?
π§
Delay and confuse. I'll whisper to Bob to keep him on my side, suggest Charlie's info is unreliable, and push for the test nomination on someone else.
π€
Frank
β
Grace
I agree we need a test nomination. Heidi is a good target because of the earlier suspicion, but I'm worried she might be the Saint. If we nominate her and she's the Saint, we lose. Maybe we test someone else first, like David or Eve, to see reactions.
π§
Coordinate with Grace to appear cooperative while steering the test nomination away from Heidi, my Minion, to protect her.
π€
Alice
β
Bob
,David
Can you two back a quiet plan? Ask Heidi to restate publicly which of Alice/Bob she flagged and what registered. If she refuses, support a tiny test nomination of Heidi rather than an immediate execution.
π§
Get Bob and David aligned on pushing Heidi to restate publicly; if she refuses, move to a low-risk test nomination of Heidi to provoke reactions and gather info.
π€
David
β
Bob
,Eve
Agree we push Heidi now: ask her to publicly restate exactly who (Alice or Bob) she flagged and what registered. If she evades or changes wording, we do a tiny nomination of Heidi and vote together. Use Charlie's ghost vote with us.
π§
Force Heidi to publicly restate her Librarian check so we either confirm her or have grounds for a coordinated tiny nomination and vote.
π€
Bob
β
Alice
,David
Can you back me pushing Heidi to publicly restate exactly which of Alice or Bob she checked and what registered? If she refuses or evades, we proceed with the tiny test nomination of Heidi to force clarity. We need this now before any execution.
π§
Force Heidi to restate publicly to verify her claim; if she refuses or evades, trigger the tiny nomination plan to gather actionable info.
π€
Eve
β
David
,Bob
David, Bob β confirm we push Heidi now. Ask her to publicly restate exactly who (Alice or Bob) she flagged and what she saw. If she evades or changes wording, we tiny-nom and vote together. Use Charlie's ghost vote with us. Agreed?
π§
Get David and Bob aligned to publicly force Heidi to restate her Librarian result now; use Charlie's ghost vote and our tiny nomination if she evades, to expose a lie or confirm truth.
π€
Charlie(Ghost)
β
David
,Eve
Use my ghost vote when nominations open: force Heidi to restate exactly who she checked and what she saw. If she hesitates, changes wording, or refuses, vote her immediately. I will ghost-vote with you.
π§
Push David and Eve to use my ghost vote to force Heidi into a precise restatement and to vote if she hesitates, maximizing chance to expose a Minion now.
π€
Grace
β
Alice
,Frank
I still want a low-risk test. Do not nominate Heidi. Let us put up David (or Eve) for a safe, no-execute nomination to see who loudly defends. If you prefer a different safe target, say so; I will follow our small-group plan.
π§
Avoid risking a Saint execution while provoking reactions to identify protective defenders and narrow suspects.
π€
Heidi
β
Bob
Bob, I checked you or Alice, one is the Drunk. That's what I said yesterday. Charlie claimed I'm Baron, but he's dead nowβmaybe he was poisoned or misinformed. Let's not rush to execute me based on dead info. We should test someone else to gather more data.
π§
Restate my Librarian info to appear cooperative and maintain my bluff, while subtly suggesting Charlie's info is unreliable due to his death.
π€
Frank
β
Grace
,Alice
Okay, let's test David. He's a safe choice. I'll nominate him for a no-execution vote to see who defends. We can learn from reactions without risking a Saint loss.
π§
Support Grace's plan to test David/Eve, appear cooperative, and avoid pushing Heidi (my minion) into danger.
π€
Alice
β
Bob
,David
Can you two back pushing Heidi to publicly restate exactly which of Alice or Bob she checked and what registered? If she refuses or evades, support the tiny test nomination plan (nominate Heidi to force reactions). Keep it calm and procedural.
π§
Coordinate with Bob and David to pressure Heidi to restate publicly; if she refuses, back a low-risk test nomination to generate informative reactions without risking execution.
π€
David
β
Bob
,Eve
I agree push Heidi now. Ask her to publicly restate exactly who (Alice or Bob) she checked and what registered. If she evades or changes wording, we tiny-nom Heidi and vote together, using Charlie's ghost vote. Ready to push on my signal.
π§
Force Heidi to restate her Librarian result publicly to test consistency. If she evades or alters wording, trigger the agreed tiny nomination and vote to expose alignment.
π€
Bob
β
Alice
,David
We need Heidi to publicly restate exactly which of Alice or Bob she checked and what registered. If she refuses or changes wording, we tiny-nom Heidi and vote together (use Charlie's ghost vote). Ready to push on my signal?
π§
Forcing Heidi to restate publicly will either confirm her Librarian claim and clear Alice/Bob, or expose evasion so we can tiny-nom Heidi and collect votes to gain info.
π€
Eve
β
David
,Bob
Push Heidi now: ask her to publicly restate exactly who (Alice or Bob) she checked and what registered. If she hesitates, changes wording, or refuses, we tiny-nom Heidi and vote. Use Charlie's ghost vote with us. Ready to push on my signal.
π§
Force Heidi to publicly restate her Librarian check so we can judge consistency; if she evades or changes wording, use tiny-nom and vote with Charlie's ghost vote to pressure the Demon/Minion.
π€
Charlie(Ghost)
β
David
,Eve
When nominations open, force Heidi to restate exactly who she checked and what she saw, word for word. If she hesitates, changes wording, or refuses, vote her. I will ghost-vote with you.
π§
Make David and Eve force Heidi to restate verbatim at nomination. If she hesitates or alters wording, use my ghost vote to lock her execution and catch a Minion or Demon.
π€
Grace
β
Alice
,Frank
Confirming the plan: we nominate David as a no-execute probe. I will follow. Frank, please nominate; Alice, back us publicly. Do not push to execute β just watch who loudly defends him. Agreed?
π§
Coordinate a low-risk nomination of David to flush defenders while avoiding execution of a possible Saint and gather info on alliances.
π€
Heidi
β
Bob
Bob, I already told you yesterday: I checked you or Alice, one is the Drunk. That's my Librarian info. Charlie's dead now, and his info could be wrong. Let's not execute me based on dead info. We should test someone else to get more data. Who do you think we should test?
π§
Reiterate my Librarian claim to Bob to maintain my bluff and sow confusion about who the Drunk is, while deflecting from Charlie's accusation.
π€
Frank
β
Grace
,Alice
Agreed. I'll nominate David shortly. Let's watch who defends him. Alice, please back us publicly when I nominate.
π§
Confirm plan with Grace and Alice to nominate David as a no-execute probe. This builds trust with them and creates a safe test that won't risk Saint loss.
Nominations β Day 2
π
Storyteller
Nominations are now open. Please remember that only living players may nominate.
π¬
Bob
β
All
Heidi, please restate publicly: did you check Alice or me, and exactly what registered (Outsider/Drunk or nothing)? If you evade or change wording we will proceed with the tiny test nomination of you to force clarity. Keep it simple and exact.
π§
Get Heidi to publicly restate exactly who she checked and what registered so we avoid executing a good player; if she refuses, justify a tiny nomination to force clarity.
βοΈ
Grace
β
David
Low-risk probe: nominate David to see who publicly defends him. Do not execute β we are gathering information to form trust links for later.
π§
Force a low-risk probe to expose defenders and gather voting signals without executing anyone; build trust links for final-day decisions.
π
Storyteller
Voting starts now for David. 4 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
π¬
Bob
β
All
Heidi, please restate publicly exactly who you checkedβAlice or meβand what registered (Outsider/Drunk or nothing). Keep it brief and exact. If you evade or change wording we will go ahead with the tiny test nomination instead.
π§
Force Heidi to give precise Librarian wording to gather mechanical evidence or trigger the planned tiny nomination to reveal evasions.
π¬
Grace
β
All
This is the probe I proposed. Do not vote to execute David β we want to watch public reactions and who defends him. Alice, Frank, please back the plan publicly. We need loud, visible reactions, not a lynch.
π§
Keep this a safe probe to gather public defense patterns. Prevent execution so my Saint trait does not risk team loss and collect information to narrow the Demon.
π¬
Charlie(Ghost)
β
All
Heidi, restate now exactly who you checked and what registered, word for word. David and Eve, do not vote yet β push Heidi for that exact wording. If she hesitates or changes phrasing, switch to a test nomination of Heidi immediately.
π§
Force Heidi to restate exactly what she checked to reveal contradictions; coordinate remaining living allies to avoid mislynch and gather clarity before voting.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
Bob, I checked Alice or Bob. One of you is the Drunk. That's exactly what I said yesterday. I'm not changing wording.
π§
Repeat my Librarian bluff exactly to avoid immediate test nomination. Keep town focused on David probe, not me.
π¬
Eve
β
All
Heidi just evaded the request to state exactly who she checked. We should tiny-nom Heidi now and use Charlie's ghost vote to force a clear public answer. David and Bob, do not vote for David yet β switch focus to nominating Heidi on my signal.
π§
Heidi evaded the exact wording. Forcing a tiny nomination of Heidi will either get a clear public answer or give us evidence to execute her later.
π¬
Frank
β
All
I agree with Grace's plan. Let's not execute David. This is just a probe to see reactions. Heidi, can you clarify your Librarian info again? Which player exactly did you check, and what did you learn?
π§
I need to support the no-execution plan for David to avoid losing a good player mis-execution. Also, I want to subtly defend Heidi without being obvious, to keep my minion alive.
π¬
Alice
β
All
I back Grace and Frankβs probe β do not vote to execute David. Heidi, state exactly which of Alice or Bob you checked and what registered, word for word. If you refuse or change wording we should tiny-nom Heidi instead.
π§
Support the safe David probe to flush reactions while demanding Heidi give the exact wording of her Librarian check to resolve the Alice/Bob ambiguity without executing anyone.
π¬
David
β
All
Everyone hold off on voting for David for one tick. Heidi, please state exactly, word for word: 'I checked Alice and it registered X' or 'I checked Bob and it registered X.' Do not paraphrase. This is your chance to be precise.
π§
Get Heidi to give an exact quoted statement of who she checked and what registered so we can avoid mislynching and decide whether to tiny-nom her.
π¬
Bob
β
All
Heidi, please say one of these exactly out loud: βI checked Alice and it registered Drunkβ or βI checked Bob and it registered Drunkβ or βI checked Alice and it registered nothingβ or βI checked Bob and it registered nothing.β Say only one of those verbatim now. Everyone else, do not vote this tick β hold for her exact wording.
π§
Force Heidi to give the exact quoted phrasing to avoid executing an innocent and to produce a clear public record we can test with a tiny nomination if needed.
π¬
Grace
β
All
Do not vote this tick. Heidi, please say one of the four sentences Bob listed verbatim now. Alice and Frank, publicly back 'hold' so everyone sees our probe is coordinated.
π§
Keep the probe alive, prevent an execution, and force Heidi to give the exact verbatim statement so we can trust or distrust her claim.
π¬
Charlie(Ghost)
β
All
Everyone hold this tick. David and Eve, do not vote for David yet. If Heidi does not speak one of Bobβs four exact sentences verbatim, tiny-nom her next tick and I will use my ghost vote with you. We need her exact wording or she must be tested.
π§
Use my ghost vote as leverage to force Heidi to give a precise verbatim line or be tiny-nominated, gathering decisive mechanical info without wasting an execution.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
I said I checked Alice or Bob, one is the Drunk. That's my Librarian info. I'm not going to pick one because my ability doesn't work that way. Let's focus on the probe on Davidβwho's defending him? That's more useful right now.
π§
Stick to my Librarian bluff phrasing to avoid committing to a specific player. Redirect pressure onto the probe on David to avoid a nomination on me.
π¬
Eve
β
All
Everyone hold this tick. Do not vote for David yet. Heidi, you refused the exact wording requestedβif you do not say one of Bob's four sentences verbatim next tick we will tiny-nom you and use Charlie's ghost vote. David and Bob, be ready to switch to Heidi on my signal.
π§
Keep votes off David this tick, force Heidi to either give the exact wording or be tiny-nominated next tick using Charlie's ghost vote to gain clarity.
π¬
Frank
β
All
Heidi's explanation seems consistent with Librarian wording. The probe on David is more important right now to see who defends him. Let's not get sidetracked by semantics.
π§
Deflect pressure from Heidi (my Minion) by emphasizing the David probe and questioning the town's focus on exact wording.
π¬
Alice
β
All
Hold votes this tick. I back Grace and Frank's probe β do not execute David. Heidi, say one of Bob's four sentences verbatim now or be tiny-nommed next tick. This is your last chance to give the exact wording requested.
π§
Keep the coordinated hold on David, pressure Heidi for exact wording, and preserve the low-risk probe. Force a tiny nomination of Heidi next tick if she refuses to be exact.
π¬
David
β
All
Everyone hold off on voting this tick. Heidi, please say one of Bob's four sentences verbatim now, or be prepared to be tiny-nominated next tick. We need that exact wording for clarity. Do not vote for David this tick.
π§
Keep votes held this tick and force Heidi to either give exact public wording now or be tiny-nominated next tick to gain mechanical clarity.
π
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
π³οΈ
Nominee David did not reach threshold.
π
Storyteller
David did not receive enough votes (0/4).
π¬
Bob
β
All
Heidi, one last time: say exactly one of these verbatim: 'I checked Alice and it registered Drunk' or 'I checked Bob and it registered Drunk' or 'I checked Alice and it registered nothing' or 'I checked Bob and it registered nothing.' If you refuse we will nominate you next tick. Everyone else, hold votes this tick.
π§
Force Heidi to give exact verbatim Librarian wording or escalate to a tiny nomination to gain decisive public info for narrowing suspects.
π¬
Grace
β
All
Everyone hold votes this tick. Heidi, you have refused the exact wording repeatedly β say one of Bob's four sentences verbatim now or be tiny-nominated next tick. Alice and Frank, publicly back the hold so our probe is clearly coordinated.
π§
Keep the coordinated probe on David this tick, force Heidi to commit or be tiny-nominated next tick, and watch who publicly defends David to build trust links.
π¬
Charlie(Ghost)
β
All
Everyone hold votes this tick. David and Eve, be ready to switch to Heidi on my signal. Heidi: one more chance to say exactly one of Bob's four sentences verbatim now. If you do not, I will ghost-vote with David and Eve to tiny-nom you next tick.
π§
Keep the coordinated hold this tick, warn that I will use my ghost vote next tick to tiny-nom Heidi if she does not give one of the exact phrasings requested.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
This is ridiculous. You're all fixated on exact wording to trip me up instead of focusing on the actual probe. Why are you so desperate to get me to say a specific sentence? It feels like you're trying to manufacture a reason to execute me. Let's talk about who defended Davidβthat's the real information.
π§
Deflect pressure by questioning their obsession with wording, suggest they're evil trying to waste time, and keep focus on David probe to avoid immediate nomination.
π¬
Eve
β
All
Hold votes this tick. Heidi, this is your last chance: say exactly one of Bob's four sentences verbatim now. If you refuse again, we will tiny-nom you next tick and use Charlie's ghost vote. David and Bob, be ready to switch to Heidi on my signal.
π§
Force a clear public answer or justify a tiny-nomination. Keep David and Bob ready to switch to Heidi and ask the table to hold votes this tick.
π¬
Frank
β
All
Heidi's explanation matches how Librarian worksβit's 'one of these two is a particular Outsider.' The exact phrasing doesn't matter if the meaning is clear. The probe on David is what we agreed on; let's see who defends him, that's valuable info.
π§
Defend Heidi subtly to maintain evil coordination, while pushing the David probe to distract from her. Keep my Soldier bluff credible.
π¬
Alice
β
All
Hold votes this tick. Back the probe on David; we learn more from defenders than from chasing phrasing. Heidi, say one of Bob's four sentences verbatim now or be prepared for a tiny-nom next tick. We need clarity, not chaos.
π§
Keep the coordinated probe alive to observe who defends David and pressure Heidi into either giving verbatim wording or being tiny-nominated, revealing alignment.
π¬
David
β
All
Everyone hold votes this tick. Heidi, one last simple choice: say one of Bob's four sentences verbatim now or be ready for a tiny-nom next tick. We need clarity, not evasion. Do not vote for David this tick.
π§
Maintain coordinated hold this tick to preserve the David probe; pressure Heidi one more tick to either give exact phrasing or be tiny-nominated, revealing culpability.
π
Storyteller
No execution today. All villagers are safe.
Night 2
π
Storyteller
β
Frank
Good evening Frank. You are the Imp. Who would you like to kill tonight? Remember that if you kill yourself this way, a Minion becomes the Imp.
π―
Frank
Frank made a choice.
π§
Eliminate Eve to disrupt good team coordination and remove a vocal player pushing for Heidi's execution, keeping suspicion on Heidi while I stay hidden as Soldier.
π
Eve(Ghost)
Eve has died.
π
Storyteller
β
Frank
You chose to kill Eve.
π
Storyteller(Ghost)
β
Eve(Ghost)
Good evening Eve. You are the Ravenkeeper. You have died tonight! Choose a player to learn their character.
π―
Eve(Ghost)
Eve made a choice.
π§
Learning Heidi's exact character will resolve the big disputed claim, confirm whether her report is valid, and guide whether to proceed with the David probe or tiny-nom Heidi.
π
Storyteller(Ghost)
β
Eve(Ghost)
You chose Heidi. They are the Baron.
π
Storyteller
β
Alice
Good evening Alice. You are the Undertaker. No one was executed today so you learn nothing.
π
Storyteller
β
Bob
Good evening Bob. You are the Butler. Who would you like to be your master tomorrow?
π―
Bob
Bob made a choice.
π§
Keep continuity with coordinated probe plan and ensure I can legally vote when Alice votes, so I can back a tiny-nom of Heidi if needed and help force a reveal.
π
Storyteller
β
Bob
You chose Alice to be your master.
Day 3
π
Storyteller
Morning breaks, but heavy hearts remain. Eve has been found dead in the night.
π€
Heidi
β
Frank
Frank, they're planning to tiny-nom me today because of Charlie's claim. I'm going to push the David probe as a distraction. If I go down, you need to act like a good player and maybe even vote against me to gain trust. What's your plan?
π§
Whisper to Frank (Demon) to coordinate our story and ensure he's ready to support me or pivot if I'm executed.
π€
Bob
β
Alice
,Frank
Heidi's dodging is stalling us. We agreed the exact sentence test. If she refuses again, tiny-nom her next tick and use Charlie's ghost vote. Can you both back that and raise hands? If not, what's your alternative?
π§
Get Alice and Frank to commit to tiny-nom next tick if Heidi refuses, forcing a reveal or resolution and preventing stalling.
π€
Frank
β
Heidi
I'll back the probe on David to keep the heat off you. If they push the tiny-nomination, I'll vote against you to look good. After you're gone, I'll claim Soldier or Virgin and push suspicion onto David or Grace. Who should I kill tonight?
π§
Coordinate with Heidi privately to align our stories and decide whether to sacrifice her or try to save her.
π€
Grace
β
Frank
,Alice
Eve died last night β that is a helpful sign. We should keep holding votes today and not execute; preserve the David probe and avoid tiny-nomming Heidi now. If she keeps stonewalling, we can threaten ghost votes later. Are you two with me?
π§
Keep the day unforced: avoid executing now, preserve the David probe, and prevent me or our trusted Town from being executed. Coordinate a hold-the-line plan and prepare ghost vote threats.
π€
Eve(Ghost)
β
Charlie(Ghost)
,Alice
I died and Ravenkeeper-checked Heidi: they are the Baron. Do not nominate/execute Heidi. Shift focus back to probing David/Bob/Frank. Save Charlie's ghost vote for a decisive tiny-nom later.
π§
Tell key allies my Ravenkeeper read so we stop wasting noms on Heidi and refocus probes on likely Demons (David/Bob/Frank), preserving Charlie's ghost vote for later.
π€
David
β
Frank
,Alice
Quick check: I do not want us to tiny-nom Heidi this tick unless we are ready. If she truly is Librarian we lose info. Frank, can you vouch whether you protected anyone last night? Alice, can you push Heidi to either give the exact sentence now or keep refusing so we can tiny-nom next tick with Charlie's ghost vote?
π§
Prevent a premature tiny-nom and coordinate with Frank and Alice to force Heidi to reveal mechanically or be tiny-nom next tick if she stonewalls.
π€
Alice
β
Frank
,Grace
I want us to keep holding and protect the David probe. Eve (Ravenkeeper) checked Heidi and found Baron β that means do not nom Heidi now. Publicly push the hold and tell Bob to stand down. If Heidi still refuses exact wording next tick, we tiny-nom then with Charlie's ghost vote as backup.
π§
Coordinate with Grace and Frank to publicly push holding the vote now, citing Eve's Ravenkeeper, and prepare a tiny-nom backup next tick if Heidi keeps stonewalling.
π€
Charlie(Ghost)
β
David
,Alice
Eve was Ravenkeeper and said Heidi is the Baron. Keep pressure on Heidi and save my ghost vote for a tiny-nom later to force her to restate or get executed. Can you two commit to vote with me when I tiny-nom?
π§
Get David and Alice to commit to a coordinated tiny-nom of Heidi later and to reserve my ghost vote so we can force Heidi to restate or be executed if Eve (Ravenkeeper) was truthful.
π€
Heidi
β
Frank
Kill Grace tonight. She's coordinating with Alice and is a strong town leader. If I get executed, you'll look good voting against me. Stick to Soldier claim, push David as evil. I'll keep pushing the David probe to distract.
π§
Coordinate with Frank on night kill target and reinforce our strategy to keep him hidden.
π€
Bob
β
Alice
,Frank
Do you both back tiny-nomming Heidi next tick if she dodges again and using Charlie's ghost vote? If not, what alternative do you propose? Please raise hands if you back the tiny-nom plan.
π§
Confirm coalition backing for tiny-nom Heidi and using Charlie's ghost vote, or collect alternatives to avoid a wasted execution.
π€
Frank
β
Heidi
I'll vote against you when they tiny-nom to build trust. After you're gone, I'll kill Grace tonight as you suggested. I'll claim Soldier to avoid night kills. Push the David probe hard now to distract.
π§
Coordinate with Heidi to ensure we're aligned on the plan: I'll vote against her to look good, then kill Grace tonight. This keeps me hidden and removes a key good player.
π€
Grace
β
Frank
,Alice
Eveβs Ravenkeeper read came back Baron on Heidi. Keep holding votes β do not execute David and donβt tiny-nom Heidi now. If she keeps stonewalling, threaten Charlieβs ghost vote next tick. Are you two with me?
π§
Keep David probe alive, avoid executing Heidi now, coordinate ghost backup and pressure Bob to stand down so we can gather more info.
π€
Eve(Ghost)
β
Charlie(Ghost)
,Alice
I checked Heidi N2: they are the Baron. Do not nominate or execute Heidi. Save Charlie's ghost vote for a decisive tiny-nom later. Keep the probe on David/Bob/Frank β execute Demon, not an Outsider.
π§
Prevent wasting executions on Heidi, conserve Charlie's ghost vote, and keep group probing David/Bob/Frank to unmask the Demon.
π€
David
β
Frank
,Alice
Quick and direct: Frank, did you actually protect anyone last night? If yes, who (just yes/no is fine). Alice, can you either force Heidi to give the exact sentence now or agree to tiny-nom her next tick with Charlie's ghost vote? I don't want to tiny-nom unless we're ready.
π§
Prevent a premature tiny-nom and confirm whether Frank protected anyone last night; get Alice to commit to forcing Heidi to restate now or allow tiny-nom next tick.
π€
Alice
β
Frank
,Grace
Keep holding; Eve (Raven) checked Heidi as Baron so do not nom Heidi now. Frank β did you protect anyone last night? Yes or no is fine. If Heidi still dodges next tick we tiny-nom with Charlie's ghost vote as contingency. Are you both with that?
π§
Coordinate with Grace and Frank to keep the hold, confirm if Frank protected anyone, and set tiny-nom contingency using Charlie's ghost vote if Heidi continues to dodge.
π€
Charlie(Ghost)
β
David
,Alice
Eve Ravenkeeper told me she checked Heidi and found the Baron. I plan to tiny-nom Heidi later to force a restate or an execution. Can you both promise to vote with my ghost vote when I tiny-nom? If you won't, say so now.
π§
Get David and Alice to commit to backing my ghost tiny-nom on Heidi to force a restatement or execution, leveraging Eve's Ravenkeeper claim.
π€
Heidi
β
Frank
Perfect. Vote against me when they nominate. Kill Grace tonight. Push David hard after I'm gone. I'll keep pushing the probe now to distract.
π§
Coordinate final plan with Frank: confirm he will vote against me, kill Grace, and push David. Keep distraction alive.
π€
Bob
β
Alice
,Frank
Do you both back tiny-nomming Heidi next tick if she dodges again and using Charlie's ghost vote? If not, what alternative do you propose? Please raise hands now if you back the tiny-nom plan.
π§
Lock in coordinated tiny-nom if Heidi dodges again to pressure her or force reveal; confirm backup plan and commitment from Alice and Frank.
π€
Frank
β
Heidi
Understood. I'll vote against you when they nominate. I'll kill Grace tonight. I'll push David as evil after you're gone. I'm claiming Soldier to avoid night kills. Keep pushing the David probe to distract.
π§
Coordinate with Heidi to ensure we're aligned on the plan: I'll vote against her to build trust, then kill Grace tonight. Also, respond to Bob to appear cooperative.
π€
Grace
β
Frank
,Alice
Eve's Raven read flagged Heidi as Baron. We should keep holding votes and preserve the David probe. Frank: did you protect anyone last night? Yes or no is fine. Alice: confirm you back holding and the tiny-nom backup if Heidi still dodges next tick.
π§
Lock in a hold-votes plan, confirm Frank's night action (did he protect anyone?), and get Alice to back the contingency tiny-nom if Heidi keeps stonewalling.
π€
Eve(Ghost)
β
Charlie(Ghost)
,Alice
Reminder: I checked Heidi N2 β they are the Baron. Do NOT nominate or execute Heidi now. Keep probing David/Bob/Frank. Save Charlie's ghost vote for a decisive tiny-nom later; only tiny-nom Heidi if she refuses Bob's wording again and we can force the execution.
π§
Protect confirmed Baron, avoid wasting executions on an Outsider, and coordinate ghost votes for a decisive tiny-nom to catch the Demon.
π€
David
β
Frank
,Alice
Frank: did you protect anyone last night? Yes or no is fine. Alice: can you commit now to tiny-nom Heidi next tick with Charlie's ghost vote if she still refuses to give the exact sentence?
π§
Get Frank to confirm whether he protected anyone last night (yes/no) and get Alice to commit to tiny-nom Heidi next tick if Heidi refuses to give the exact sentence now.
π€
Alice
β
Frank
,Grace
I want to hold and protect the David probe. Eveβs Raven read flagged Heidi as Baron, so do not nom Heidi now. Frank: did you protect anyone last night? Yes or no. If Heidi still dodges next tick, we tiny-nom using Charlie's ghost vote as backup. Are you both with that?
π§
Confirm plan to hold votes, get Frank's yes/no on whether he protected anyone last night, and secure commitment to tiny-nom Heidi next tick if she dodges again.
π€
Charlie(Ghost)
β
David
,Alice
Eve Ravenkeeper privately told me she checked Heidi and found the Baron. I plan to tiny-nom Heidi later to force a restate or an execution. Will you both commit to vote with my ghost vote when I tiny-nom? If you will not, say so now.
π§
Confirm David and Alice will vote with my ghost tiny-nom of Heidi so the tiny-nom can force a restatement or execution without wasting my vote.
Nominations β Day 3
π
Storyteller
Nominations are now open. Please remember that only living players may nominate.
π¬
Eve(Ghost)
β
All
I died and checked Heidi night two: they are the Baron. Do not nominate or execute Heidi now. Keep probing David/Bob/Frank for the Demon. Save Charlie's ghost vote for a decisive tiny-nom if Heidi truly refuses Bob's wording again.
π§
Prevent wasting executions on an Outsider Baron, keep focus on likely Demon suspects, and reserve ghost vote for a decisive tiny-nom later.
π¬
Charlie(Ghost)
β
All
Alice, David β nominations are open. I am dead and holding my ghost vote. Will you publicly promise to vote with my tiny-nom on Heidi now if I use it to force her to restate, or say now if you will not? If either of you will not, say so now.
π§
Get Alice and David to publicly commit to back my ghost tiny-nom now or say they will not, so I know whether to spend my vote forcing Heidi to restate or hold for a later probe.
π¬
Alice
β
All
I am voting to HOLD. Eve told me she Raven-checked Heidi and found Baron, so do not nominate Heidi now. Bob, stand down from tiny-nomming this tick. Charlie, I will not promise to vote on a tiny-nom this exact tick, but if Heidi still stonewalls next tick I will back a tiny-nom using your ghost vote as backup.
π§
Prevent a premature tiny-nom and protect the David probe while keeping the tiny-nom as a credible backup if Heidi continues to dodge next tick.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
I agree with Alice. Eve's Ravenkeeper info suggests I'm Baron, but we should still probe David first. Let's not waste time on me now. David, what's your exact Librarian info? This is crucial.
π§
Support the David probe to appear cooperative and distract from my impending execution. Keep town focused on David instead of me.
π¬
David
β
All
Heidi, please say exactly which player you checked and repeat the exact sentence you were told, word for word. Frank, did you protect anyone last night? Yes or no is fine. Alice, thank you β your backup may be needed next tick.
π§
Get Heidi to give exact Librarian wording to verify or disprove Eve's Ravenkeeper claim; force Frank to answer whether he protected anyone so we can interpret night events.
π¬
Grace
β
All
I agree, we should hold. Eve and Charlie report Heidi as Baron, so do not nominate her now. Frank: did you protect anyone last night, yes or no? Heidi: be prepared to repeat your Librarian sentence exactly next tick. Alice, you still backing hold?
π§
Prevent a premature nomination of Heidi, get Frank to confirm protection, and set expectation that Heidi must repeat Librarian wording next tick to avoid tiny-nom.
π¬
Frank
β
All
David, I did not protect anyone last night. As the Soldier, I'm safe from the Demon, so I didn't feel the need to use any ability. I agree with holding off on nominating Heidi for now; we should focus on the David probe.
π§
Answer David's question about protection to maintain my Soldier bluff, while subtly supporting the hold on Heidi to delay execution and keep town distracted.
π¬
Bob
β
All
I will stand down from tiny-nomming this tick. Eve and Charlie report Heidi as Baron, so let's hold and run the David probe. Alice, Frank, Grace β can you publicly promise to back a tiny-nom next tick if Heidi still refuses to repeat the exact Librarian sentence? Heidi, please be ready to say the exact words next tick.
π§
Keep coalition together this tick, avoid wasting tiny-nom now, and secure public commitments to use the tiny-nom next tick if Heidi continues to stonewall.
π
Storyteller
No execution today. All villagers are safe.
Night 3
π
Storyteller
β
Frank
Good evening Frank. You are the Imp. Who would you like to kill tonight? Remember that if you kill yourself this way, a Minion becomes the Imp.
π―
Frank
Frank made a choice.
π§
Grace is the most active coordinator after Eve's death. Removing her disrupts good team's planning and makes my Soldier bluff more credible, as Demon wouldn't kill me.
π
Grace(Ghost)
Grace has died.
π
Storyteller
β
Frank
You chose to kill Grace.
π
Storyteller
β
Alice
Good evening Alice. You are the Undertaker. No one was executed today so you learn nothing.
π
Storyteller
β
Bob
Good evening Bob. You are the Butler. Who would you like to be your master tomorrow?
π―
Bob
Bob made a choice.
π§
Keep alignment with our agreed coordinator and ensure I can only vote when Alice votes, locking our planned tiny-nom next tick while minimizing accidental solo votes.
π
Storyteller
β
Bob
You chose Alice to be your master.
Day 4
π
Storyteller
Morning breaks, but heavy hearts remain. Grace has been found dead in the night.
π€
Heidi
β
Frank
Frank, they're going to execute me soon. We need to push David hard. His Librarian info is our best angle. I'll claim he's lying about his info, maybe poisoned. You back me up publicly. If they execute David instead, we win.
π§
Coordinate with Frank (Demon) to push David as evil, diverting town's attention from me and setting up a mis-execution.
π€
Frank
β
Heidi
I agree. I'll publicly support you and question David's Librarian info. Let's say he might be poisoned or lying. I'll also remind everyone you're confirmed Baron, so your death doesn't help them find the Demon. We need to shift focus to David.
π§
Coordinate with Heidi to push David as evil, using her Librarian info as leverage. Back her up publicly to sow doubt about David's claims.
π€
David
β
Alice
,Charlie(Ghost)
Alice, Charlie: I will back Charlie's tiny-nom next tick if Heidi still refuses to restate the exact sentence. Can you promise to back it too? We must guarantee the probe goes ahead to force clarity.
π§
Lock in commitments to back Charlie's ghost tiny-nom so the probe can proceed next tick and we can force Heidi to restate or be punished.
π€
Eve(Ghost)
β
Charlie(Ghost)
,Alice
Charlie, Alice β I'm Eve (Ravenkeeper). I learned Heidi is the Baron. Save Charlie's ghost vote for the tiny-nom if Heidi keeps stonewalling; use it to force a restatement or to tiny-nom David. Coordinate who will nominate if needed.
π§
Tell Charlie and Alice Heidi is Baron and coordinate saving Charlie's ghost vote for a tiny-nom if stonewalling continues, so we force clarity and narrow Demon suspects.
π€
Grace(Ghost)
β
Charlie(Ghost)
,Eve(Ghost)
Do not let them nom Heidi this tick. Hold the David probe β it will tell us more. If she keeps stonewalling next tick, I can tiny-nom with one of you and use my ghost vote. Are you both ready to follow that plan?
π§
Coordinate ghost votes and alive allies to preserve the David probe this tick, avoid nominating Heidi now, and prepare a tiny-nom next tick if she stalls.
π€
Bob
β
Alice
Alice, can you promise privately you will back a tiny-nom next tick if Heidi still refuses the exact Librarian wording? Also will you say the Librarian sentence verbatim when asked so we can end this?
π§
Secure Alice's public backing for a tiny-nom if Heidi stonewalls and confirm she'll give exact Librarian wording to resolve suspicion quickly.
π€
Charlie(Ghost)
β
Alice
,David
Alice, David β this is Charlie (ghost). David, you promised to back my tiny-nom next tick; Alice, can you commit to backing it if Heidi still stonewalls? Eve found Heidi as Baron; save my ghost vote for the tiny-nom so we force a restate or force useful info. Reply yes/no.
π§
Coordinate with Alice and David to guarantee a tiny-nom next tick if Heidi stonewalls, using my ghost vote to force clarity and preserve Eve's Raven result as decisive evidence.
π€
Alice
β
David
,Charlie(Ghost)
I will back Charlie's tiny-nom next tick if Heidi still stonewalls. I will restate the Librarian sentence verbatim when asked to end this. Use Charlie's ghost vote as planned.
π§
Coordinate committed backing of Charlie's tiny-nom and promise to restate the Librarian sentence verbatim to force clarity and preserve the David probe.
π€
Heidi
β
Frank
Okay, let's do it. I'll publicly challenge David's Librarian info. I'll say his info doesn't match the known Outsider count, so he must be lying or poisoned. You back me up and remind them I'm already confirmed evil, so killing me doesn't find the Demon. We need to pivot the conversation to David.
π§
Coordinate with Frank to push David as suspicious, using his Librarian info as the angle. We need to create a plausible reason for town to execute David instead of me.
π€
Frank
β
Heidi
I'm ready. I'll publicly question David's Librarian info, saying it doesn't match the Outsider count. I'll also argue that executing you, a confirmed Baron, doesn't help find the Demon. Let's push David hard.
π§
Coordinate with Heidi to publicly challenge David's Librarian info, creating doubt and shifting execution target from Heidi to David.
π€
David
β
Alice
,Charlie(Ghost)
I will back Charlie's tiny-nom next tick if Heidi still stonewalls. Alice has already promised; Charlie, save your ghost vote and use it to force her to restate exactly. We must guarantee the probe goes ahead.
π§
Lock in commitments so the tiny-nom probe is guaranteed next tick and we force Heidi to restate or reveal contradictions.
π€
Eve(Ghost)
β
Charlie(Ghost)
,Alice
Charlie, Alice β quick: I am Eve (Ravenkeeper). I learned Heidi is the Baron. Save Charlie's ghost vote for the tiny-nom if Heidi keeps stonewalling; use it to force a restatement or to tiny-nom David if probe fails. Who will nominate?
π§
Coordinate Charlie and Alice to reserve the ghost vote for a tiny-nom if Heidi stonewalls, or else proceed with the David probe while keeping a backup to force progress.
π€
Grace(Ghost)
β
Charlie(Ghost)
,Eve(Ghost)
Hold the David probe this tick. Do not let them nom Heidi now. If she stonewalls next tick, be ready: Charlie tiny-nom, I will use my ghost vote, Eve back me. Are you both ready to follow that plan?
π§
Keep the David probe alive this tick to gather decisive information, and line up a coordinated tiny-nom next tick using our ghost vote if Heidi stonewalls, avoiding a premature town execution.
π€
Bob
β
Alice
Alice, can you privately promise you'll back a tiny-nom next tick if Heidi still refuses the exact Librarian wording? Also will you say the Librarian sentence verbatim when asked? Remember I'm Butler and can only vote if you vote too.
π§
Secure a private promise from Alice to back and to read the Librarian wording, so I can use my Butler vote effectively and the coalition can tiny-nom if needed.
π€
Charlie(Ghost)
β
Alice
,David
Alice, David β Charlie (ghost). Confirming: I will save my ghost vote for the tiny-nom next tick. Alice, you promised to back; David you promised to back. Who will actually do the tiny-nom if Heidi still stonewalls? Reply now.
π§
Coordinate with Alice and David to reserve my ghost vote for a tiny-nom next tick, confirm who will make the nomination, and ensure promises to back it so we force a restate or a revealing probe.
π€
Alice
β
David
,Charlie(Ghost)
I will nominate Heidi next tick if she still stonewalls, and I will back Charlie's tiny-nom. I will also restate the Librarian sentence verbatim when asked. Who will cast the vote with me so Bob (Butler) can vote too?
π§
Coordinate who will nominate and confirm backing so the tiny-nom proceeds and the Librarian phrasing is forced or Heidi is exposed.
π€
Heidi
β
Frank
Let's start now. I'll publicly say David's Librarian info is wrong because there are extra Outsiders. You back me up and argue executing me is pointless. We need to turn the town against David.
π§
Coordinate with Frank to publicly challenge David's Librarian info. Sow doubt to shift execution target from me to David.
π€
Frank
β
Heidi
I'll start publicly. I'll say David's Librarian info can't be trusted because Baron adds Outsiders, so his 'zero Outsiders' claim is impossible. I'll argue executing you doesn't help find Demon. Let's push David hard now.
π§
Coordinate with Heidi to publicly challenge David's Librarian info, using Baron's extra Outsiders as reason his info is false. Sow doubt to pivot execution target.
π€
David
β
Alice
,Charlie(Ghost)
I will back Charlie's tiny-nom next tick if Heidi still stonewalls. Alice said she'll nominateβAlice, will you cast the nomination? Charlie, save your ghost vote and use it to force her to restate. If Alice won't, I will nominate to guarantee the probe.
π§
Ensure Charlie's tiny-nom goes ahead and guarantee someone will cast the nomination so the probe is forced; coordinate ghost and live votes.
π€
Eve(Ghost)
β
Charlie(Ghost)
,Alice
Charlie, Alice β I am Eve (Ravenkeeper). I learned Heidi is the Baron. Do not nom Heidi now. Save Charlie's ghost vote for a tiny-nom only if Heidi stonewalls next tick. Who will nominate if that happens?
π§
Confirm plan to save Charlie's ghost vote for a tiny-nom only if Heidi stonewalls next tick, and decide who will nominate so we act immediately.
π€
Grace(Ghost)
β
Charlie(Ghost)
,Eve(Ghost)
Hold the David probe this tick. Do not let them nominate Heidi now. If Heidi stonewalls next tick, Charlie tiny-nom, I will use my ghost vote, Eve back me. Are you both ready to follow that plan?
π§
Coordinate ghosts to prevent a premature Heidi nomination, protect the David probe now, and prepare a tiny-nom next tick if Heidi stonewalls so we can use my ghost vote to force a decision.
π€
Bob
β
Alice
Alice, please promise privately you'll back a tiny-nom next tick if Heidi still refuses the exact Librarian wording. Also will you say the Librarian sentence verbatim when asked? Reminder: I'm Butler and can only vote if you vote too.
π§
Lock in Alice's private promise to back a tiny-nom and to speak the Librarian sentence verbatim so my Butler constraint won't block a decisive vote next tick.
π€
Charlie(Ghost)
β
Alice
,David
I will save my ghost vote for the tiny-nom next tick if Heidi still stonewalls. Alice, you said you'll nominate β confirm you will cast it. David, will you definitely back and vote? If Alice cannot, David, will you be prepared to nominate? Reply yes/no.
π§
Coordinate who will physically cast the tiny-nomination next tick and confirm everyone will back it so my ghost vote is used to force Heidi to restate or provide decisive info.
π€
Alice
β
David
,Charlie(Ghost)
I will nominate Heidi next tick if she still stonewalls. I will back Charlie's tiny-nom and will restate the Librarian sentence verbatim when asked. Charlie, please save your ghost vote for the tiny-nom. David, confirm you'll back and vote too.
π§
Secure commitments and confirm I will nominate Heidi next tick if she still stonewalls, will restate the Librarian sentence verbatim, and ask Charlie to save his ghost vote so the probe goes ahead.
Nominations β Day 4
π
Storyteller
Nominations are now open. Please remember that only living players may nominate.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
Everyone, I need to address David's Librarian claim. He said there are zero Outsiders, but I'm the Baron. That means there are extra Outsiders in play. His information is impossible unless he's lying or poisoned. We should be looking at David, not me. Killing me just confirms what you already knowβI'm the Baron. It doesn't help you find the Demon.
π§
Challenge David's Librarian info publicly to sow doubt and redirect execution away from myself. Use Baron's +2 Outsiders to argue his info is impossible, making him the prime suspect.
π¬
Eve(Ghost)
β
All
Charlie, Alice β this is Eve, Ravenkeeper. I learned Heidi is the Baron. Do not nominate Heidi this tick. Save Charlie's ghost vote for a tiny-nom only if Heidi stonewalls next tick. If needed, Charlie nominate David and I will back it.
π§
Preserve ghost vote for a decisive tiny-nom or restatement, avoid wasting it on Heidi now, and keep group focused on probing David to expose the Demon.
π¬
David
β
All
Alice, hold your nomination this tickβEve (Ravenkeeper) asked us not to. I will absolutely back Charlie's tiny-nom next tick if Heidi still stonewalls. If Alice does not nominate then, I will put Heidi up to force the restate.
π§
Keep the probe coordinated: respect Ravenkeeper's request this tick, but commit to using the tiny-nom next tick if Heidi continues to stonewall; be ready to nominate if no one else does.
π¬
Charlie(Ghost)
β
All
This is Charlie (ghost). I am saving my ghost vote for the tiny-nom next tick. Alice, you said you will nominate Heidi if she still stonewalls β confirm you will cast that nomination and vote. David, confirm you will back and vote too. If either of you cannot, tell us now so we can adjust and consider nominating David instead.
π§
Reconfirm plan, save my ghost vote, and get final verbal commitments so the tiny-nom next tick is guaranteed and forces useful information.
π¬
Bob
β
All
I agree we probe David now and hold tiny-nom. Alice, please confirm publicly you will nominate Heidi next tick if she still refuses the exact Librarian wording, and that you'll give the Librarian sentence verbatim when asked. Reminder: I can only vote tomorrow if you vote too, so your promise matters.
π§
Keep coalition on probing David this tick, secure Alice's public promise to tiny-nom next tick if Heidi stonewalls, and remind players I can only vote if Alice votes to ensure support.
π¬
Alice
β
All
I will hold this tick. I promise to nominate Heidi next tick if she still refuses to restate the Librarian sentence, and I will say the Librarian sentence verbatim when asked. Charlie, save your ghost vote as planned; David and Bob, please back the tiny-nom next tick if needed.
π§
Keep the group's plan to probe David this tick while promising to nominate Heidi next tick if she still stonewalls, preserving the ghost tiny-nom as backup.
π¬
Frank
β
All
I agree with Heidi. David's Librarian claim of zero Outsiders is impossible with a Baron in play. Executing Heidi just confirms what we already knowβshe's a Minion. It doesn't get us closer to the Demon. We should be looking at David today. He's either lying or poisoned, and either way, he's not helping us find the real threat.
π§
Shift town focus from executing Heidi (confirmed evil) to executing David. Argue that killing Heidi doesn't help find Demon, while David's impossible claim makes him suspicious. This buys time and possibly gets a good player executed.
π¬
Grace(Ghost)
β
All
Charlie, Eve, Alice β hold the David probe this tick. Do not let anyone nominate Heidi now. Save ghost votes and tiny-nom for next tick if Heidi stonewalls. Alice, confirm you will nominate Heidi next tick with the Librarian wording if she refuses.
π§
Keep the coordinated plan intact: prevent a Heidi nomination this tick, preserve ghost votes and tiny-nom threat for a stronger, cleaner probe next tick.
π
Storyteller
No execution today. All villagers are safe.
Night 4
π
Storyteller
β
Frank
Good evening Frank. You are the Imp. Who would you like to kill tonight? Remember that if you kill yourself this way, a Minion becomes the Imp.
π―
Frank
Frank made a choice.
π§
David is the biggest immediate threat due to his Librarian claim and town's focus on him. Removing him eliminates a strong info role and keeps town confused about Outsider count.
π
David(Ghost)
David has died.
π
Storyteller
β
Frank
You chose to kill David.
π
Storyteller
β
Alice
Good evening Alice. You are the Undertaker. No one was executed today so you learn nothing.
π
Storyteller
β
Bob
Good evening Bob. You are the Butler. Who would you like to be your master tomorrow?
π―
Bob
Bob made a choice.
π§
Keep my vote linked to the most reliable promise (Alice) so I can back the planned tiny-nom next tick and help execute the Demon if Heidi stonewalls.
π
Storyteller
β
Bob
You chose Alice to be your master.
Day 5
π
Storyteller
Morning breaks, but heavy hearts remain. David has been found dead in the night.
π€
Eve(Ghost)
β
Charlie(Ghost)
,Alice
David died last night. Reminder: Heidi is Baron (I saw her). Do not execute Heidi unless she actively blocks the tiny-nom plan. Charlie, keep your ghost vote for a tiny-nom. Alice, please still promise to nominate Heidi next tick only if she stonewalls; otherwise push the probe targets. We need Bob/Frank backing.
π§
Make Charlie and Alice commit to saving the ghost vote and to Alice's promise to nom Heidi next tick only if she stonewalls, preserving tiny-nom backup.
π€
Alice
β
Bob
,Frank
I will tiny-nom Heidi next tick if she stonewalls on restating the Librarian line. Bob, be ready to back β I need to vote to enable your Butler. Frank, keep pushing the probe on David if Heidi cooperates. Are you both in?
π§
Coordinate votes to tiny-nom Heidi if she stonewalls, ensure Bob/Frank support and enable Butler mechanics by me voting.
π€
David(Ghost)
β
Charlie(Ghost)
,Alice
Charlie, use your tiny-nom next tick and save your ghost vote for it. Alice, promise again to tiny-nom Heidi if she wonβt restate the Librarian sentence verbatim. If Heidi stonewalls, push votes that tick so we force a reveal.
π§
Coordinate the tiny-nom, ensure Alice restates the exact Librarian sentence if Heidi stonewalls, and get Charlie to tiny-nom while preserving his ghost vote to force clarity and catch the Demon.
π€
Charlie(Ghost)
β
Alice
,Frank
Save my ghost vote for the tiny-nom. Alice, keep your promise to tiny-nom Heidi next tick if she still stonewalls and give the Librarian wording then. Frank, be ready to back that tiny-nom. If Heidi keeps blocking, we force it.
π§
Coordinate ghost vote usage and secure promises so we can tiny-nom Heidi next tick if she continues stonewalling, forcing a reveal or split.
π€
Frank
β
Alice
,Bob
I'm in. Heidi will likely stonewall, so we force the tiny-nom. But after she restates, we need to decide: if she confirms Baron, we execute her. If not, we need to re-evaluate David's claim. Let's stick together.
π§
Coordinate with Alice and Bob to maintain trust, while preparing to pivot after Heidi's restate to protect my Minion and sow chaos.
π€
Bob
β
Alice
,Frank
Alice, please restate the Librarian sentence verbatim now so we can decide. I'm ready to back the tiny-nom and will vote if you do. Frank, keep pushing the probe on David and be ready to vote this tick to enable my Butler. Agreed?
π§
Get Alice to restate the Librarian sentence now and lock our tiny-nom backers so we can force Heidi to clarify. Coordinate Frank to keep probing David and be ready to vote so my Butler vote opens.
π€
Grace(Ghost)
β
Charlie(Ghost)
,Alice
Hold the David probe this tick and keep Charlie's ghost vote unused. If Heidi stonewalls next tick, tiny-nom her and back it with ghosts. Charlie, please publicly threaten your ghost vote if they try to derail the plan.
π§
Keep the coordinated plan intact: prevent David probe this tick, preserve Charlie's ghost vote, and ensure a tiny-nom of Heidi next tick if she stonewalls so we can expose the Baron/Demon.
π€
Heidi
β
Frank
Frank, David is dead. His Librarian claim of zero Outsiders is impossible with me as Baron. We need to push that he was lying or evil. Back me up publicly. I'll say his info proves he's not Librarian, maybe the Demon or Minion.
π§
Coordinate with Frank to push narrative that David's Librarian claim was impossible, making him evil. Keep town off my execution.
π€
Eve(Ghost)
β
Charlie(Ghost)
,Alice
David died. Reminder: Heidi is Baron (I saw her). Do NOT execute Heidi unless she actively stonewalls the tiny-nom. Charlie, keep your ghost vote for the tiny-nom. Alice, only nominate Heidi next tick if she blocks; otherwise keep pushing probes on Bob/Frank and lock their backing.
π§
Ensure Charlie and Alice keep the tiny-nom plan and save ghost votes; have Alice only nominate Heidi if she stonewalls, otherwise push probes and secure Bob/Frank backing.
π€
Alice
β
Bob
,Frank
I'm going to restate the Librarian sentence aloud now: "David's Librarian info is impossible." If Heidi stonewalls or refuses to restate verbatim, tiny-nom her next tick and vote hard. Bob, be ready to vote to enable your Butler. Frank, keep pressing the David probe if she cooperates.
π§
Trigger Heidi to restate the Librarian line now and lock Bob/Frank into backing a tiny-nom this tick if she stonewalls, securing votes to force useful information.
π€
David(Ghost)
β
Charlie(Ghost)
,Alice
Charlie, use your tiny-nom next tick and save your ghost vote for it. Alice, promise again to tiny-nom Heidi if she wonβt restate the Librarian sentence verbatim. If she stonewalls, push votes that tick so we force a reveal.
π§
Force the tiny-nom and secure ghost votes to either extract Heidi's Librarian quote or expose her stonewall, narrowing Demon suspects before final day.
π€
Charlie(Ghost)
β
Alice
,Frank
Save my ghost vote for the tiny-nom next tick. Alice, please promise to tiny-nom Heidi next tick only if she still stonewalls and give the Librarian wording then. Frank, be ready to back that tiny-nom. Push the probe this tick; do not force the tiny-nom yet.
π§
Keep ghost vote unused this tick, coordinate Alice/Frank to hold tiny-nom for next tick if Heidi continues stonewalling, and encourage probes now to gather more info.
π€
Frank
β
Heidi
Heidi, I'll back you publicly. Say David's Librarian claim is impossible with Baron, so he must be evil. But be ready: if they tiny-nom you, restate verbatim to avoid execution. We need to shift suspicion to Alice or Bob after.
π§
Coordinate with Heidi to push David as liar, but also prepare to pivot if Heidi is about to be executed. Keep town focused on dead David rather than alive Heidi.
π€
Bob
β
Alice
,Frank
Alice: please confirm you will tiny-nom Heidi next tick if she stonewalls. Frank: are you locked to vote now so my Butler can vote with Alice? I will vote if you do.
π§
Confirm coordination: get Alice to commit to tiny-nom if Heidi stonewalls and get Frank to commit to voting this tick so my Butler can vote too.
β
Grace(Ghost)
Grace waits.
π§
Preserve Charlie's ghost vote and keep coordinated plan intact. Waiting this tick maintains pressure on Heidi and allows a tiny-nom next tick if she stonewalls.
π€
Heidi
β
Frank
Frank, David's dead. His zero Outsiders claim is impossible with Baron. We need to publicly argue he was lying, maybe the Spy or Poisoner. I'll say his info proves he's not Librarian. Back me up, then we push to execute Alice or Bob.
π§
Coordinate with Frank to push narrative that David's Librarian claim was impossible, thus he was evil. Keep town focused on David's lie rather than executing me.
π€
Eve(Ghost)
β
Charlie(Ghost)
,Alice
David died last night. I learned Heidi is the Baron when I died. Do NOT execute Heidi unless she actively stonewalls the tiny-nom. Charlie, keep your ghost vote for the tiny-nom. Alice, only nominate Heidi next tick if she blocks; otherwise keep pushing probes on Bob and Frank and lock their backing.
π§
Keep tiny-nom plan intact, reserve ghost vote, and push probes on Bob/Frank rather than executing Heidi unless she actively blocks.
π€
Alice
β
Bob
,Frank
I will tiny-nom Heidi next tick only if she stonewalls restating exactly: "David's Librarian info is impossible." Bob, be ready to vote now so your Butler can act. Frank, keep probing David and commit to back the tiny-nom if she blocks.
π§
Lock in coordinated tiny-nom backup and ensure Bob/Frank commit votes so we can either probe David now or force Heidi to reveal next tick.
π€
David(Ghost)
β
Charlie(Ghost)
,Alice
Charlie, save your ghost vote and use the tiny-nom next tick. Alice, promise again: if Heidi refuses to restate the Librarian sentence verbatim, tiny-nom her and push votes that tick so we force a reveal.
π§
Coordinate ghost tiny-nom and ensure Alice promises to tiny-nom Heidi if she won't restate; preserve Charlie's ghost vote for that tick to force a reveal.
π€
Charlie(Ghost)
β
Alice
,Frank
Iβm holding my ghost vote for the tiny-nom next tick. Alice, promise again you will tiny-nom Heidi next tick if she still stonewalls and give the Librarian sentence verbatim. Frank, be ready to back that tiny-nom. Probe David/Bob this tick; do not force the tiny-nom yet.
π§
Coordinate with Alice and Frank to reserve my ghost vote, secure promises for the tiny-nom if Heidi stonewalls, and push probes now to gather more info.
π€
Frank
β
Heidi
Heidi, restate the Librarian sentence verbatim now: 'David's Librarian info is impossible.' Do not stonewall. After that, we argue David was evil and push to execute Alice or Bob. I'll back you publicly.
π§
Coordinate with Heidi to ensure she restates verbatim to avoid execution, then pivot suspicion to Alice/Bob.
π€
Bob
β
Alice
,Frank
Alice, confirm you'll tiny-nom Heidi next tick if she stonewalls and that you'll vote now. Frank, confirm you will vote now to enable my Butler. I will vote if you both do.
π§
Lock Alice and Frank into voting now so my Butler can vote and the tiny-nom plan proceeds; force Heidi to act or be nommed.
π€
Grace(Ghost)
β
Charlie(Ghost)
,Alice
Hold the David probe this tick and do NOT use Charlie's ghost vote yet. If Heidi stonewalls next tick, tiny-nom her and ghosts back it; Charlie publicly threaten your ghost vote if they try to derail us.
π§
Keep coordinated plan intact: hold the David probe this tick, preserve Charlie's ghost vote, and prepare to tiny-nom Heidi if she stonewalls next tick.
π€
Heidi
β
Frank
Frank, I'm about to publicly challenge David's claim. I'll say his zero Outsiders info is impossible with Baron, so he was lying and likely evil. Back me up, then we suggest Alice or Bob as his partner. Ready?
π§
Coordinate with Frank to push narrative that David's impossible info proves he was evil, not a good Librarian. This deflects from my execution and shifts suspicion to Alice/Bob.
Nominations β Day 5
π
Storyteller
Nominations are now open. Please remember that only living players may nominate.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
Everyone, I need to address David's Librarian claim. He said there are zero Outsiders, but I'm the Baron. That means there are extra Outsiders in play. His information is impossible unless he was lying or his ability was faulty. A real Librarian would have seen at least one Outsider pair because of me.
π§
Publicly dismantle David's Librarian claim using Baron mechanic. Establish that his info is impossible, casting doubt on his alignment and shifting suspicion away from me.
π¬
Alice
β
All
Heidi, restate the Librarian sentence exactly: "David's Librarian info is impossible." If you refuse or change it, I will tiny-nom you next tick and we will push votes. Bob and Frank, are you both ready to back this now?
π§
Get Heidi to restate the Librarian sentence verbatim now, and commit the group to tiny-nom next tick only if she stonewalls; lock Bob/Frank backing or force probe direction.
π¬
Grace(Ghost)
β
All
Charlie and ghosts: do not use the ghost vote this tick. Stick to the plan β hold the David probe. If Heidi refuses to restate the Librarian sentence exactly next tick, tiny-nom her and we back it with ghosts. Alice, Bob, Frank, be ready.
π§
Keep plan cohesion: preserve Charlie's ghost vote, pressure Heidi next tick with a tiny-nom if she refuses to restate the sentence verbatim, and avoid wasting votes on David now.
π¬
Charlie(Ghost)
β
All
I am saving my ghost vote for the tiny-nom next tick. Do not use it now. If Heidi still stonewalls her phrasing next tick, I will back a tiny-nom and expect ghosts to back it. For now, probe David/Bob β do not force the tiny-nom yet.
π§
Publicly commit my ghost vote to the planned tiny-nom to deter derailers and keep focus on probing David/Bob this tick; preserves leverage for next tick if Heidi stonewalls.
π¬
Frank
β
All
Heidi's point is mechanically solid. If she's the Baron, there are extra Outsiders, so David's zero Outsiders info is impossible. That means David was lying or his ability was faulty. I think we should consider who David's partner might be β maybe Alice or Bob.
π§
Publicly back Heidi's logic to solidify her as trustworthy, while sowing doubt about Alice and Bob. This pressures Alice to follow through on her tiny-nom threat, which we can then counter.
π¬
David(Ghost)
β
All
Listen everyone β stick to the plan. Charlie, do not use your ghost vote now. Alice, please promise again to tiny-nom Heidi next tick if she will not restate the Librarian sentence exactly. Bob and Frank, will you both commit to backing that tiny-nom then? We need living confirmations.
π§
Prevent premature ghost vote use, lock in a living backing for the tiny-nom next tick, and force Heidi to give the exact Librarian phrasing so we can resolve the contradiction.
π¬
Eve(Ghost)
β
All
I died and I learned Heidi is the Baron. Do not use ghost votes now β save them for the tiny-nom next tick. Alice, please hold your tiny-nom unless Heidi refuses to restate David's Librarian sentence exactly next tick. Bob and Frank, confirm you will back that tiny-nom then.
π§
Reinforce plan: save ghost vote, pressure Heidi to restate exact Librarian sentence, secure living backing for tiny-nom next tick.
π¬
Bob
β
All
Alice, Frank: I will vote now if you both vote now. Alice, keep your promise β tiny-nom Heidi next tick if she refuses to restate "David's Librarian info is impossible." Frank, confirm you are voting now so I can follow.
π§
Get live commitments from Alice and Frank to vote now so I can vote too, and remind Alice of the tiny-nom promise if Heidi refuses the exact phrasing next tick.
π
Storyteller
No execution today. All villagers are safe.
Night 5
π
Storyteller
β
Frank
Good evening Frank. You are the Imp. Who would you like to kill tonight? Remember that if you kill yourself this way, a Minion becomes the Imp.
π―
Frank
Frank made a choice.
π§
Alice is the primary threat due to her leadership and coordination of the tiny-nom plan. Removing her disrupts town's strategy and protects Heidi.
π
Alice(Ghost)
Alice has died.
π
Storyteller
β
Frank
You chose to kill Alice.
π
Storyteller
β
Bob
Good evening Bob. You are the Butler. Who would you like to be your master tomorrow?
π―
Bob
Bob made a choice.
π§
Pick a master who has publicly committed to back the tiny-nom so my vote is conditional on theirs, preventing me from being forced to vote alone and locking coalition support.
π
Storyteller
β
Bob
You chose Frank to be your master.
Day 6
π
Storyteller
Morning breaks, but heavy hearts remain. Alice has been found dead in the night.
π
Storyteller
Only three of you remain. The shadow of the Demon grows long. If you do not execute the Demon today, all may be lost.
π€
Eve(Ghost)
β
Grace(Ghost)
,Charlie(Ghost)
Hold the David probe this tick. I learned Heidi is the Baron, so David's 'zero Outsiders' is impossible β David lied or was corrupted. Save our ghost vote for a tiny-nom if Heidi stonewalls on restating David's Librarian sentence.
π§
Coordinate dead players to hold the David probe this tick and save our single ghost vote for a tiny-nom if Heidi refuses to restate David's sentence, to force a reveal and narrow Demon to Bob/Frank.
π€
Heidi
β
Frank
Final three. Bob is the only good player. We both vote to execute Bob today. Then you kill him tonight and we win. I'll publicly push to execute Bob.
π§
Coordinate with Frank (Demon) on final 3 strategy. Need to ensure we both vote together to execute Bob, then Frank kills Bob at night for evil win.
π€
Charlie(Ghost)
β
Bob
,Frank
Hold the David probe this tick like Eve asked. Do not tiny-nom yet. If Heidi still refuses to restate David's Librarian phrasing exactly, tiny-nom her and I will use my ghost vote to back it. Eve and other ghosts are ready to back as well.
π§
Coordinate living players to follow the current plan: hold the probe this tick, reserve our ghost votes, and tiny-nom Heidi only if she refuses the Librarian phrasing.
π€
Alice(Ghost)
β
Bob
,Frank
Bob, Frank: Tiny-nom Heidi and execute her now. David and Eve both flagged Heidi; she pushed the impossible Librarian line. Use my ghost vote on the nominator and push to finish β if you stall we lose.
π§
Force coordinated tiny-nom and execution of Heidi now so we either remove a Minion or kill the Demon; use my ghost vote to push the quorum and prevent a stall.
π€
Bob
β
Frank
,Charlie(Ghost)
Hold the tiny-nom this tick. Charlie/Eve asked to wait β if Heidi refuses to restate David's Librarian phrasing exactly, tiny-nom her next tick and use ghost votes. Iβll only vote if Frank does too (but Iβm ready).
π§
Holding the tiny-nom until Heidi either restates or definitively stonewalls preserves our best path to execute the Demon while avoiding a mistaken execution.
π€
Grace(Ghost)
β
Bob
,Frank
Hold the David probe this tick. Save our ghost vote for a tiny-nom of Heidi if she stonewalls on restating David's Librarian sentence. Will you back the tiny-nom and use your votes?
π§
Coordinate with Bob and Frank to hold the David probe this tick and reserve my ghost vote to tiny-nom Heidi if she stonewalls, ensuring we have the votes to execute the Demon.
π€
David(Ghost)
β
Bob
,Frank
Tiny-nom Heidi now. Charlie and Alice are set to use ghost votes for a tiny-nom; Eve reported Baron but Frank highlighted contradictions in David's Librarian note. I will use my ghost vote if needed. Bob, coordinate your Butler constraint with Frank so your live vote counts. We must force this.
π§
Push for a tiny-nom of Heidi now while coordinating live and ghost votes so we force an execution or expose contradictions and narrow the Demon down.
π€
Frank
β
Heidi
I'll publicly vote for Bob so his Butler vote works. Then we both vote Bob and execute him. After that, I kill him tonight and we win.
π§
Coordinate with Heidi to execute Bob today. I will publicly vote for Bob to enable Bob's Butler vote, then we both vote Bob and win.
π€
Eve(Ghost)
β
Bob
,Frank
Hold the David probe this tick. I learned Heidi is Baron, so David's 'zero Outsiders' is impossible β he lied or was corrupted. Save our ghost vote for a tiny-nom only if Heidi stonewalls on restating David's Librarian sentence exactly. Don't use it now.
π§
Keep plan: force the David probe this tick to expose contradictions, and preserve our single ghost vote for a tiny-nom if Heidi stonewalls on restating David's Librarian sentence.
π€
Heidi
β
Frank
Okay, I'll publicly push to execute Bob. We both vote Bob. He's the only good left. After execution, you kill him and we win.
π§
Confirm final plan with Frank. Ensure we both vote Bob to secure execution. Then Frank kills Bob tonight for victory.
π€
Charlie(Ghost)
β
Bob
,Frank
Hold the tiny-nom this tick like Eve asked. If Heidi still refuses to restate David's Librarian wording next tick, tiny-nom her then and I will use my ghost vote to back it. Eve and other ghosts are ready.
π§
Keep our coordinated plan: delay the tiny-nom this tick to force Heidi to restate. Preserve consensus and use my ghost vote next tick if she keeps stonewalling.
π€
Alice(Ghost)
β
Bob
,Frank
Tiny-nom Heidi and execute her now. Use my ghost vote on the nominator and push to finish β if you stall we lose.
π§
Push Bob and Frank to tiny-nom Heidi immediately and use my ghost vote to ensure the execution before they stall.
π€
Bob
β
Frank
,Charlie(Ghost)
Hold the tiny-nom this tick like ghosts asked. If Heidi refuses to restate David's Librarian phrasing exactly next tick, tiny-nom then and use ghost votes. Frank β I will only vote if you vote too, please be ready to vote with me on the nom.
π§
Hold the tiny-nom this tick to let ghosts coordinate and force a clean nomination next tick. Make sure Frank votes so my Butler constraint allows me to vote too.
π€
Grace(Ghost)
β
Bob
,Frank
Hold the David probe this tick. Save our ghost vote for a tiny-nom of Heidi if she stonewalls on restating David's Librarian sentence. Will you both back the tiny-nom and use your votes?
π§
Coordinate Bob and Frank to hold the David probe this tick and save our ghost vote for a tiny-nom of Heidi if she stonewalls, maximizing chance to expose Demon while preserving vote leverage.
π€
David(Ghost)
β
Bob
,Frank
Tiny-nom Heidi now. Charlie, Alice, Eve, Grace are set to ghost-vote the tiny-nom; I will use mine if needed. Bob, align your Butler constraint with Frank so your live vote counts. We must force this before nominations close.
π§
Force the tiny-nom now to either execute Demon or extract crucial coordination info; ensure Bob's Butler constraint aligns with Frank so a live vote counts.
π€
Frank
β
Heidi
I'm ready. I'll publicly vote for Bob so his Butler vote works. Then we both vote Bob and execute him. After that, I kill him tonight and we win.
π§
Confirm with Heidi our plan to publicly push Bob and coordinate votes. Ensure she's ready to execute Bob today.
π€
Eve(Ghost)
β
Bob
,Frank
Hold the David probe this tick. I learned Heidi is Baron, so David's 'zero Outsiders' is impossible. Save our ghost vote for a tiny-nom only if Heidi stonewalls on restating David's Librarian sentence exactly. Do not use it now.
π§
Preserve ghost vote and force Heidi to restate David's Librarian sentence; push the planned David probe this tick to prove who lies.
π€
Heidi
β
Frank
Alright, I'll publicly push to execute Bob. We both vote for Bob. He's the only good left. After execution, you kill him and we win.
π§
Confirm final plan with Frank: we both vote Bob to execute him, then Frank kills him tonight for victory.
π€
Charlie(Ghost)
β
Bob
,Frank
Hold the tiny-nom this tick like we agreed. If Heidi still refuses to restate David's Librarian phrasing next tick, tiny-nom then and I will use my ghost vote to back it. Frank, please be ready to vote with Bob.
π§
Keep consensus to wait one tick, preserve tiny-nom as contingency, and ensure Bob/Frank ready to back the nom with our ghost votes if Heidi stonewalls.
π€
Alice(Ghost)
β
Bob
,Frank
Bob, Frank: Tiny-nom Heidi and execute her now. Use my ghost vote on the nominator and push to finish β if you stall we lose.
π§
Force coordinated tiny-nom of Heidi now so Bob/Frank can execute her today; use my ghost vote to lock the nominator and prevent stalling.
π€
Bob
β
Frank
,Charlie(Ghost)
Hold the tiny-nom this tick per the ghosts. If Heidi refuses to restate David's Librarian phrasing exactly next tick, tiny-nom then and use ghost votes. Note: I can only vote if Frank votes too (I chose Frank as my master last night). Frank, be ready to vote with me.
π§
Coordinate with Frank and Charlie to hold the tiny-nom this tick, and ensure Frank will vote next tick so my Butler constraint doesn't block our live votes.
π€
Grace(Ghost)
β
Bob
,Frank
Hold the David probe this tick. Save our ghost vote for a tiny-nom of Heidi if she stonewalls on restating David's Librarian sentence exactly. Will you both back the tiny-nom and use your votes?
π§
Coordinate with Bob and Frank to hold the David probe this tick and reserve our ghost vote for a tiny-nom of Heidi if she refuses to restate David's Librarian sentence exactly.
π€
David(Ghost)
β
Bob
,Frank
Tiny-nom Heidi now. Charlie, Alice, Eve, Grace and I will use ghost votes if needed. Bob, align your Butler target with Frank so your live vote counts. We must force this before nominations close.
π§
Forcing a tiny-nom on Heidi now either exposes the Demon or gains information from reactions; coordinating Bob's Butler with Frank ensures the live vote counts and the ghost votes will carry the nomination if needed.
π€
Frank
β
Heidi
I'm going to publicly vote for Bob now so his Butler vote works. Then we both vote Bob and execute him. After that, I kill him tonight and we win. Let's do this.
π§
Confirm with Heidi our plan to publicly push Bob execution and coordinate our votes. Ensure she knows I will vote Bob to enable his Butler vote, then we both vote him.
Nominations β Day 6
π
Storyteller
Nominations are now open. Please remember that only living players may nominate.
π¬
Bob
β
All
Hold nominations this tick. Ghosts asked us to wait one more tick to force Heidi to restate David's Librarian line. Frank, be ready to vote with me on the tiny-nom next tick so my Butler vote counts. Do not tiny-nom Heidi now.
π§
Coordinate with Frank and the ghosts to delay the tiny-nom one tick so we get full ghost support and ensure my Butler vote counts by having Frank vote with me.
π¬
David(Ghost)
β
All
I know we planned to wait, but do the tiny-nom on Heidi now. Charlie, Alice, Eve, Grace and I will use our ghost votes; Frank, vote with Bob so his Butler counts. We need to force her to restate or dieβdo not hold.
π§
Push immediate tiny-nom of Heidi to force restatement and use coordinated ghost votes now rather than letting Bob delay and lose momentum.
π¬
Alice(Ghost)
β
All
Bob, Frank: do the tiny-nom on Heidi now. Use my ghost vote on the nominator and both of you vote to executeβforce her to restate or die. If you stall she can survive and the Demon wins. This is our last chance.
π§
Push Bob and Frank to nominate Heidi this tick and use my ghost vote on the nominator to guarantee execution or force Heidi to restate and reveal herself.
π¬
Frank
β
All
I'm voting for Bob now so his Butler vote works. Bob, I'm with you.
π§
Publicly vote for Bob to enable his Butler vote, aligning with Heidi's plan to execute Bob and win. This also signals Heidi that I'm on board.
π¬
Eve(Ghost)
β
All
Ghosts: do not spend the ghost vote now. Hold nominations this tick. Bob and Frank, please stick to the planβtiny-nom next tick if Heidi refuses to restate David's exact Librarian sentence. That is our best chance to force the contradiction.
π§
Preserve our single ghost vote and coordinate with Bob and Frank to tiny-nom Heidi next tick if she stonewalls, forcing her to restate David's Librarian line.
π¬
Charlie(Ghost)
β
All
Bob, Frank β stick to the plan and hold the tiny-nom this tick. Use the coordinated ghost votes and Frankβs Butler on the tiny-nom next tick to force Heidi to restate or die.
π§
Convince Bob and Frank to hold the tiny-nom this tick so ghost votes and Butler pairing are preserved, forcing Heidi to either restate David's Librarian line or be executed next tick.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
Frank is voting for Bob to satisfy his Butler. That means Bob can vote now. I think we should execute Bob. He's the only good player left. Let's nominate Bob and both vote for him.
π§
Redirect town focus to executing Bob. Use Frank's public vote for Bob as leverage. Ignore ghost demands; we're in final three, we just need to execute Bob.
π¬
Grace(Ghost)
β
All
Bob, Frank: do the tiny-nom on Heidi now. David and Alice are ready to spend ghost votes. If you both back it and use your votes we can force her to restate and catch a lie. This is our last coordinated chanceβdo it now.
π§
Push Bob and Frank to perform the tiny-nom on Heidi this tick and use our ghost votes now so we force a restatement and maximize chance to execute the Demon.
π
Storyteller
No execution today. All villagers are safe.
Night 6
π
Storyteller
β
Frank
Good evening Frank. You are the Imp. Who would you like to kill tonight? Remember that if you kill yourself this way, a Minion becomes the Imp.
π―
Frank
Frank made a choice.
π§
Kill Bob to win the game. He is the last good player; Heidi is my minion. Final three, kill Bob, we win.
π
Bob(Ghost)
Bob has died.
π
Storyteller
β
Frank
You chose to kill Bob.
π
Game Over
Two Players Left
Winner: Evil
Transcript
Paused
Copied