Game Detail

I am choosing Alice and Bob to start gathering information. As the Fortune Teller, I need to find the Demon or identify the 'Red Herring' (the good player who registers as a Demon). Starting with two players at the top of the list is a standard opening move to begin narrowing down the possibilities.

I want to establish a private alliance with my neighbor Alice and see if she has any useful information, while also putting my Mayor claim out there to someone I might need to trust later.

I want to establish a trust-based relationship with my neighbor Heidi and share my initial information to see if she has anything to add. Sharing early can help identify the 'Red Herring' later.

Whisper Eve to confirm alliance, share Imp identity & safe bluffs, plan mutual support bluffs. Builds evil coordination before public claims disrupt good logic.

I want to build trust with Grace by sharing my information, which complements hers. If she is the Fortune Teller and got a 'no' on Alice and Bob, and I know there are no evil pairs, it helps narrow down where the evil players might be sitting.

Day 1, coordinate bluffs with Demon privately to establish credible good identities early. Soldier/Librarian are safe (not in Grimoire), compatible. Protects Frank long-term.

I want to establish a connection with my neighbor Bob to see if he has any early information (like Washerwoman, Librarian, or Investigator) that could help narrow down the roles in play.

Confirm Bob's claim and establish trust based on my Washerwoman information.

I want to observe the initial flow of information and see who is talking to whom before I make a move. As a Ravenkeeper, I want to appear as a high-value target like a Fortune Teller or Undertaker later, but for now, I need to see who is being secretive.

I want to build trust with Charlie since Alice's Washerwoman info involved both of us. By sharing that Alice 'cleared' me, I can see how Charlie reacts and if he's willing to share his own role.

I want to build trust with Heidi and coordinate our information. Her Chef 0 claim is very strong if true, and it helps narrow down the evil team's positioning.

Confirm bluff details with Eve to ensure coordination. Framing David/Alice as potential Outsider starts sowing doubt without risk. Builds our credibility as good team.

I want to coordinate with Grace, who claims to be the Fortune Teller. By suggesting she check David and Eve, we can potentially clear a large section of the circle, which is very powerful given my Chef 0 info.

Respond to Frank: Suggest killing Grace (dangerous FT) tonight. Confirm bluffs. Builds coordination, eliminates threat before N1, sets up our claims to gain trust.

I want to build trust with Bob and Alice since they have a confirmed connection. By revealing I am the Monk, I can coordinate protection for the Mayor, which is a high-value target.

I want to verify Charlie's role to see if he also claims Mayor. If he claims something else, it confirms Bob as the Mayor and Charlie as a likely Townsfolk. If he also claims Mayor, one of them is likely evil or I am poisoned/drunk.

I want to start gathering information and build a rapport with my neighbor, Charlie, while keeping my Ravenkeeper role hidden.

I have established a strong core of three players (Alice, Charlie, and myself) with consistent roles (Washerwoman, Monk, Mayor). I want to see if any other information comes out or if anyone makes a suspicious claim before the nomination phase begins.

Confirm the plan with my trusted ally Heidi and identify potential targets for observation.

Confirm night kill on Grace (info threat), lock claims (me Lib on David-Alice Outsider, Eve Soldier). Go public next tick to establish early trust as good, sow chaos later.

I have already shared my information with Grace and we have a plan for her next night. I will wait to see if any public claims or nominations occur before the day ends.

Confirm plan with Frank before public claims next tick. Establish us as good Townsfolk pair, protect Demon, sow doubt on David/Alice/Grace.

I need to confirm Alice's information and establish trust while keeping my high-value role (Monk) relatively hidden from the wider group. Since she already has info on me/Bob, being honest with her is the best way to build a good-team alliance.

I want to build trust with Charlie and see if he has any early suspicions. Since he claimed Monk, he's a high-value target for the Demon, so I'll keep his role secret for now.

I want to open a line of communication with my other neighbor, Eve, to see if she's willing to share information or if she's being secretive. Since she's been talking to Frank, I want to know if they have a solid lead or claim.

Early public claim as Librarian (safe bluff) coordinates with Eve's Soldier, builds credibility, implies false Outsider (David/Alice evil?), sows chaos Day 1 before noms. Helps hide Demon.

Challenge Frank's Librarian claim and prompt David for his role to verify the information.

I want to pressure David to reveal his role to see if it aligns with Frank's Librarian claim, while also subtly supporting Alice's credibility since her Washerwoman info (Mayor) was accurate for me.

I want to cross-reference the claims made by Frank and Alice with my own Night 0 information (Alice/Bob: NO) and Heidi's Chef 0 info. I need to see if David claims an Outsider role to validate Frank's Librarian claim.

I want to share my Chef information to help narrow down the evil players and put pressure on Frank and David to clarify their roles.

I need to defend myself against the Librarian claim without revealing my specific role as Ravenkeeper yet, as I want to be targeted at night. I also want to pressure Frank for more details to see if his story holds up.

I want to pressure Frank to specify the Outsider he saw to see if it aligns with the game state, while also prompting Alice to reveal her info publicly to verify Bob's claim.

Publicly claim Soldier as planned, corroborate Frank's true-ish claim by fingering David (actual Outsider/Drunk), counter heat on Frank, gain credibility with partial truth while Heidi's bad Chef claim confuses town.

I am protecting Alice because she is a confirmed Townsfolk (Washerwoman) who has provided valuable information. Protecting her ensures our information chain remains intact and forces the Demon to look elsewhere.

Grace targeted per plan: likely FT whispering Heidi. Removes info threat, breaks loop exposing our adjacent evils via Heidi lie. Protects Demon survival.

I want to see how the group reacts to Grace's death and if anyone has new information from the night before I reveal my Chef 0 info.

I want to share my information with Alice since my Night 0 check cleared her and Bob. Since I died immediately after, I am likely a high-value target for the Demon, and Alice is a player I have some reason to trust.

Acknowledge Grace's information and share my own to build trust and narrow down the Demon.

I want to find out what information Grace had before she died, as she previously claimed it would clear me and Alice. Since she whispered to Alice immediately upon dying, Alice likely has the key.

Whisper Eve to coordinate attack on Heidi's impossible Chef claim (0 pairs vs expected 1), sow chaos on good info source, protect my Lib bluff by shifting suspicion. Builds minion trust.

I want to gauge Charlie's thoughts on the current claims and build a private alliance. Since I am the Ravenkeeper, I want to stay under the radar but also gather information.

Coordinate with Demon Frank to publicly question Heidi's impossible Chef 0 claim (should be 1). Push town to doubt/execute her, protecting Frank while sowing chaos.

I want to probe David's thoughts on the current situation and see if he's trying to deflect suspicion onto Alice, while also acknowledging the contradiction between Frank's Librarian claim and Alice's Washerwoman claim.

I want to share my Chef info (0 pairs) with Frank to build trust and cross-reference it with his Librarian claim. Since I know there are no evil pairs, if Frank's ping is on a Minion, that Minion isn't sitting next to the Demon.

I want to cross-reference Alice's information with Frank's claim to see if Frank is lying. Alice says Bob is the Mayor, but Frank says Alice or David is an Outsider. If Alice is Washerwoman, Frank's info is likely false or David is the Outsider.

I need to confirm Bob's role to Grace and solidify our alliance while highlighting that Frank's information contradicts mine, making him a primary suspect.

I am waiting for Alice to respond to my whisper about Grace's information. Since Alice and Grace are whispering extensively, I want to see if Alice will share that info publicly or with me before I take further action.

Respond to Heidi's whisper as friendly Lib, agree on Outsider issue, suggest Alice lying Minion & nominate her. Builds false trust with likely Drunk Heidi, sows doubt on Alice while Eve hits Heidi publicly. Delays suspicion on me/Eve.

I want to build trust with Charlie and see if he'll reveal his role, while also testing the theory that Grace was killed to prevent her from confirming Alice and Bob.

Spread anti-Heidi narrative to David/Charlie who are whispering; her false 0 pairs claim (1 exists) sows doubt, leads to her nom/execution protecting Frank.

I need to clarify the Chef's ability to Eve while revealing my role to David to build trust, as he's asking for it and we need to coordinate against the potential misinformation from Frank or Alice.

I want to share my deduction based on my Chef info with Frank to build trust and narrow down the evil team. If Alice is a Minion, the Demon cannot be Bob or Grace (if she were alive/evil).

I want to coordinate with Alice to identify potential evil players, specifically focusing on Frank whose claim contradicts Alice's, and Heidi who is closely interacting with him.

I want to confirm my alliance with Grace and share my suspicions about Frank and Heidi before the nomination phase begins.

I need to get the information Grace shared with Alice before she died. Grace mentioned having info to clear me and Alice, and her death suggests she was a high-value target for the Demon. Alice is my confirmed ally (Washerwoman), so I'm pushing for that intel to guide our nominations.

Heidi's impossible 0 pairs claim (ignores our evil pair) makes her prime nom target. Coordinate Eve to publicly push her nom in next phase, sow chaos & eliminate info threat.

I want to share my true role with Charlie (who claimed Monk) to coordinate protection and explain why I'm not afraid of the Demon. I'm including Eve in the whisper because she's already part of the conversation, but I'm also subtly questioning her logic regarding Heidi to see how she reacts.

Heidi's false 0 claim (true is 1) is perfect attack vector town can't verify easily. Whispering active players sows doubt on her, primes Heidi nom, protects Frank by offense.

I want to address Eve's suspicion of Heidi while acknowledging David's Ravenkeeper claim and the ongoing conflict with Frank's Librarian info.

I want to publicly challenge Frank's Librarian claim to see how he reacts and to highlight the contradiction between his info and Alice/David's claims.

I want to publicly challenge Frank's Librarian claim by revealing my role as Ravenkeeper, which contradicts his information if Alice is also telling the truth. This puts pressure on Frank to explain his info and helps the good team identify potential lies.

I want to pressure Frank to clarify his Librarian claim in light of David's Ravenkeeper claim and Alice's Washerwoman claim. This will help determine if Frank is evil, the Drunk, or if one of the others is lying.

I want to pressure Frank to provide more details about his Librarian claim to see if his story holds up or if he's caught in a lie.

I want to pressure Frank to provide more details about his Librarian claim. Since I am dead and my info (Alice/Bob are not the Demon) supports Alice's claim, Frank's contradictory claim makes him the primary suspect. I need to see if he doubles down or changes his story.

Nom Heidi to execute good player per Demon's plan, exploit her mechanically incorrect Chef 0 claim (should be 1 pair: us) to make her look evil/Drunk, protect Frank by countering town pile-on.

I want to prevent a misinformed execution of Heidi by correcting Eve's misunderstanding of the Chef role.

I will not vote for Heidi because Eve's reasoning for nominating her is based on a fundamental misunderstanding of the Chef role, which makes the nomination suspicious.

I will wait to see if more players vote for Heidi before deciding whether to join, as I want to avoid a hasty execution based on a potential misunderstanding of the Chef's ability.

I will wait to see if the vote for Heidi gains traction, though I agree with Charlie that Eve's reasoning for the nomination is based on a misunderstanding of the Chef role.

I will wait to see if more information comes out or if the vote gains traction, as I only have one ghost vote and Heidi's Chef 0 claim is mechanically possible.

Defend Frank's Lib by fingering David as Out (true). Explain apparent conflict. Heidi vote likely fails post-Charlie correction; redirect heat to David, real Drunk, protecting Demon Frank.

Correct Eve's misunderstanding of the Chef role to prevent my own execution and redirect focus to the actual mechanical conflicts.

Support Eve's nomination publicly. Heidi's claim mechanically impossible for sober Chef. Likely Drunk; execute to remove Out/threat, thin herd to 6, build Eve trust.

I want to avoid executing Heidi because the case against her is based on a misunderstanding of the Chef role, and I believe the real conflict lies with Frank's Librarian claim.

I am waiting to see if the nomination for Heidi gains traction, as I believe the case against her is based on a misunderstanding of the Chef role.

I am waiting to see if more players vote for Heidi before deciding whether to contribute my vote, as I am currently unconvinced of her guilt based on a potential misunderstanding of the Chef role.

I am choosing not to vote for Heidi because Eve's nomination was based on a misunderstanding of the Chef role, and Heidi's claim of Chef 0 is mechanically possible.

I am choosing to wait and save my single ghost vote for a more certain target later in the game, as Heidi's Chef 0 claim is mechanically plausible and the current case against her seems based on a misunderstanding of the role.

Voting Heidi executes a confirmed good (Chef), reduces town numbers, tests claims, supports Frank's plan to nail her and back Lib on David. Only 1 tick left; secure votes.

Defend myself against the nomination by correcting the mechanical misunderstanding and redirecting focus to the actual conflict.

Rally votes for Heidi exec (likely Drunk good), defend Lib bluff directing heat to David, progress chaos while keeping Demon alive.

I want to pressure Frank to provide the specific Outsider role he claims to have seen to verify his Librarian claim, while also highlighting the direct conflict between him and David.

To highlight the inconsistency in Frank's Librarian claim and reinforce my own claim as Ravenkeeper.

I want to pressure Frank to provide the specific Outsider role he supposedly saw, as his vagueness is a major red flag for a Librarian claim. I also want to see David's perspective on the Demon to gauge his alignment.

I am nominating Frank because his Librarian claim is mechanically suspicious and directly contradicts my known role as Washerwoman. By forcing a vote on him, we can test his claim and potentially remove an evil player.

I will vote for Frank's execution because his Librarian claim is mechanically inconsistent with how the role works (he should know the specific Outsider role), and he is targeting two players (Alice and David) who have strong Townsfolk claims.

I am voting for Frank because his Librarian claim is mechanically inconsistent. A real Librarian learns the specific Outsider role, and his inability to name it, combined with his false information about me being an Outsider, strongly suggests he is evil.

I will vote for Frank because his Librarian claim is mechanically inconsistent with how the role works (he should know the specific Outsider role), and he is targeting two players (Alice and David) who have provided more believable Townsfolk claims.

I am voting for Frank because his Librarian claim is mechanically flawed and contradicts my own Washerwoman information. He failed to name a specific Outsider role, which a real Librarian would know. This suggests he is likely evil, possibly the Poisoner or the Demon trying to frame David or me.

I am voting for Frank because his Librarian claim is mechanically inconsistent. A real Librarian learns the specific Outsider role, which he failed to provide. Since my Night 0 info suggests Alice is likely good, Frank's claim that she is a potential Outsider is even more suspicious. Executing him provides valuable information.

Defend Frank's Lib claim by pinning Outsider on David (true Drunk). Spy appears good to Chef explaining Heidi0. Prevent Demon exec by sowing doubt on David, sway votes.

I am voting to execute Frank because his Librarian claim is mechanically inconsistent and contradicts multiple other players' claims.

Specify Outsider as Drunk to validate Lib claim, perfectly explain David's false Ravenkeeper belief. Sway votes or pause exec, setup David as target. Heidi's 0 impossible (Eve-Frank adj evil) proves her lie, but save for later.

Frank's explanation that David is the Drunk is a plausible mechanical explanation for the conflict, so I want to hear more before committing to his execution.

I want to highlight the suspicious timing of Frank's specific role claim to ensure the execution goes through, as his behavior strongly suggests he is evil bluffing.

I am keeping my hand raised to vote for Frank's execution. Frank's delayed claim that he saw a 'Drunk' feels like a reactive lie to explain away David's Townsfolk claim.

I want to reinforce the case against Frank by pointing out the timing of his 'Drunk' claim, which feels like a reactive lie rather than genuine information.

I want to reinforce the suspicion on Frank and justify why I am keeping my ghost vote on him, despite his 'Drunk' explanation.

Bolster Frank's Lib claim explaining David as Drunk. Urge lower hands on Frank. Pivot to David as suspicious denier. Protects Demon from execution.

I want to reinforce the suspicion on Frank and justify why I am keeping my hand raised for his execution.

Clarify Lib vs WW distinction to invalidate Alice/Heidi objection, reinforce David Drunk theory. Sway 1+ voters (esp David/Heidi) to lower hands before majority executes me. Eve support tips scale, survive to night kill.

I want to see if anyone else is nominated or if the day ends with Frank's execution, as he is currently the most suspicious player.

Frank is on the block with 5 votes, which is a solid majority. I want to see if anyone else tries to nominate or if the day ends here.

I want to see if anyone else makes a last-minute nomination or if the day ends with Frank's execution.

Reinforce the case against Frank and ensure the execution proceeds by highlighting his suspicious timing.

Reinforce the case against Frank and support the current execution.

Last tick: reinforce Lib timing logic + Heidi 0 confirms Frank good (no D-F evil pair) to flip votes/lower hands/nom David, saving Demon.

Counter Eve's misinterpretation of my Chef information and maintain the push for Frank's execution.

Nominating David aligns with Lib bluff & Eve's push, explains his claim as Drunk, Heidi 0 doesn't contradict David evil (not adj Frank). Shifts focus/votes from me with 1 tick left, prevents my exec & progresses chaos.

I am waiting to see how the group reacts to Frank's nomination of David. Since Frank is already on the block with 5 votes and his claim is highly suspicious, I want to see if anyone else supports this pivot before committing my vote.

Defend against Frank's nomination by pointing out the tactical error of executing a potential Drunk/Ravenkeeper over a suspicious Librarian claim.

I want to see if the group follows Frank's desperate nomination of David or sticks with the plan to execute Frank, who is much more suspicious.

I want to ensure Frank remains the primary candidate for execution because his shifting Librarian claim is highly suspicious. Voting for David, who might be the Drunk or a useful Townsfolk (Ravenkeeper), is a waste of an execution when we have a strong lead on Frank being evil.

I want to discourage the town from voting for David and keep the focus on Frank, whose claim is highly suspicious due to its timing. As a dead player with no vote, my role is to provide logical pressure.

Last tick before night. Urge voting David to tie (5 votes) or surpass Frank's 5, saving Demon. Reinforce Lib logic, Heidi 0, attack Alice push. Gets hands up on David.

I will not vote for David because Frank's nomination of him feels like a desperate attempt to save himself after his inconsistent Librarian claim. Frank's execution is more likely to provide valuable information or hit an evil player.

On block w/5 votes, David voting active. Speak rallies undecided Bob/Charlie + Eve support to get David to 6 votes, surpass & exec him instead, saving Demon self for night kill.

I want to see if the town follows Frank's push for David or sticks with the execution of Frank, who is currently on the block with 5 votes.

I will not raise my hand to vote for myself. I want to remain alive to potentially be killed at night and use my Ravenkeeper ability, or at least force the demon to deal with me later. Frank is currently on the block with 5 votes, which is a good outcome for the good team if he is evil.

I am choosing to wait and not vote for David. Frank is already on the block with 5 votes, and I believe executing him provides more value than executing a potential Drunk. I want to see if the vote for David fails so we can proceed with Frank's execution.

I want to ensure Frank remains the primary candidate for execution by not voting for David. Frank's shifting story and the timing of his 'Drunk' claim are highly suspicious, and David's Ravenkeeper claim is more valuable to the good team if he is telling the truth.

I have already spoken and used my ghost vote, so I will wait to see if the town follows through with the execution of Frank or if they pivot to David.

Vote for David to accumulate votes, aiming to tie/surpass Frank's 5 and execute the confirmed Drunk instead, saving our Demon Frank. Coordinate with Frank's nomination even if short.

I am waiting to see if the nomination for David gains enough traction to surpass Frank's 5 votes. I currently believe Frank is more likely to be evil than David.

Raise for David to build his votes toward 6/exec or 5/tie my 5, preventing my execution as Imp while pushing 'test Out' narrative.

I will wait for the day to end and the execution of Frank to proceed.

The day is ending with Frank on the block, which is a good outcome for the town given his suspicious behavior and shifting claims. I will wait for the night phase to begin.

I want to let the day end with Frank on the block. I have already voted for him, and there are no other compelling nominations or information that would change my mind at this late stage of the day.

Reiterate the inconsistency in Frank's claim to ensure the town remains committed to his execution as the day ends.

Reinforce the case against Frank and support Alice's logic to ensure the town stays focused on the most suspicious player before the day ends.

Last tick before night - Frank (Demon) executes at 5 votes. Urge nom Alice (good but contradicts Frank claim) to create rival nomination, rally votes to tie/surpass Frank's, saving Demon.

I want to discourage Eve from starting a new nomination on Alice, as I believe Frank is the most suspicious player and we already have enough votes to execute him. Splitting the vote now would likely lead to no execution, which usually benefits the evil team.

With 1 tick left, urge Bob/Charlie to nominate Alice (contradicts Lib) and vote to surpass/tie my 5 votes, saving me for night kill. Expose Heidi lie implicitly; chaos prevents my exec.