Game Detail
Players
Alice (Saint) Bob (Librarian) Charlie (Chef) David (Scarlet Woman) Eve (Washerwoman) Frank (Investigator) Grace (Slayer) Heidi (Imp)
Token Usage
| Team | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Cost (USD) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Evil | 320,161 | 79,330 | $1.6709 |
| Good | 927,906 | 730,684 | $2.9866 |
Event Transcript
π
The game has started.
π
Storyteller
β
David
You are the Minion. The Demon is Heidi.
π
Storyteller
β
Heidi
Minions are: David. Your safe bluffs are: Virgin, Soldier, Ravenkeeper
π
Storyteller
β
Eve
Good evening Eve. You are the Washerwoman. Either Heidi or Bob is the Librarian.
π
Storyteller
β
Bob
Good evening Bob. You are the Librarian. Either Eve or Alice is the Saint.
π
Storyteller
β
Frank
Good evening Frank. You are the Investigator. Either David or Alice is the Scarlet Woman.
π
Storyteller
β
Charlie
Good evening Charlie. You are the Chef. You learn that there are 0 pairs of evil players.
Day 1
π
Storyteller
Welcome to the village of Ravenswood Bluff. Please take this time to get to know your fellow villagers. Feel free to move around and have private conversations. Be wary, for a Demon hides among you!
π€
Eve
β
Bob
Hey Bob, I am the Washerwoman and I know that either you or Heidi is the Librarian. What do you think? Any info from your side?
π§
Proactively sharing my private info with Bob starts alliance building and verifies my role early, helping good team coordinate to find Demon without revealing to everyone yet.
π€
Grace
β
Heidi
Hi Heidi, it's nice to meet you. Have you noticed anything strange or do you have any initial thoughts about the others?
π§
Initiating private conversation with my neighbor Heidi to start gathering information and forming alliances without revealing my Slayer role yet, helping narrow down the Demon through logic.
π€
David
β
Heidi
Hey Heidi, private. I am the Scarlet Woman. What are your three bluff roles? I am between Charlie and Eve so I can bluff Empath later if useful. Tell me your Day one story and who you want pushed or protected.
π§
Coordinate bluffs and day one story with Heidi, set up cover and contingency where I can inherit Demon if Heidi is executed early.
β
Charlie
Charlie waits.
π§
Waiting allows others to finish whispers and reveals more info before I act again, progressing toward finding the Demon without overcommitting early.
π€
Bob
β
Eve
Hey Eve, I am the Librarian and I know that either you or Alice is the Saint. Since you claim to be the Washerwoman and pointed to me or Heidi as Librarian, which fits with me being it, maybe Alice is the Saint? What do you make of that?
π§
Sharing my info with Eve builds a potential alliance and tests her reaction to confirm if she's good or bluffing, helping narrow down the Saint and build trust early on day 1.
π€
Heidi
β
David
,Grace
David: my safe bluffs are Virgin, Soldier, Ravenkeeper. I am leaning Soldier for a clean Day one claim. No hard push yet, but I want to hear what people are claiming first. Grace: nothing solid yet. What are you planning to claim, and have you heard any useful first night info?
π§
Coordinate with David on bluffs and early targets, while extracting Graceβs claim without committing to risky details.
π€
Alice
β
Bob
Hello Bob, good to see you as my neighbor. How are you feeling about the start of the game? Any initial thoughts on who seems trustworthy?
π§
Starting a private conversation with my neighbor to build trust and gather early impressions without revealing my role, helping the good team organize.
β
Frank
Frank waits.
π§
Waiting at the start of day 1 helps observe initial interactions and identify potential allies before sharing my Investigator information, advancing our good team goal of finding the Demon.
π€
Eve
β
Heidi
Hey Heidi, I am the Washerwoman and I know that either you or Bob is the Librarian. Bob just told me he is the Librarian and that either I or Alice is the Saint. Since I am not the Saint, if he is correct then Alice is. What do you know? Any thoughts on this?
π§
Whispering to Heidi to verify her role and Bob's claim helps confirm if Bob is real Librarian. This narrows down good info early on day 1, building trust with potential good players while testing consistency. Progresses towards identifying evils without overexposing my role.
β
Grace
Grace waits.
π§
Waiting allows others to share first while I observe patterns in whispers before committing more info or using my slayer shot.
π€
David
β
Charlie
Hey Charlie, want to compare notes real quick? I am leaning to claim Empath, sitting between you and Eve, so I can share a read tomorrow. What are you thinking you are, and did you get any starting info pointing at anyone?
π§
Get Charlieβs role/claims early, seed a believable Empath bluff, and identify any threat to Heidi so we can counter-narrative before nominations.
π€
Charlie
β
David
David, thanks for the whisper. I got starting info that there are no pairs of evil players sitting next to each other, so the evils must be separated in the circle. As for me, I am still thinking about my role. What is your plan with the Empath claim, and do you want to share more about your neighbors or suspicions?
π§
Responding to David's whisper builds trust and shares my key info (0 evil pairs) without full role reveal, allowing him to cross-check with his potential Empath read. This helps narrow evil locations early since evils can't be adjacent, progressing good team deduction on day 1.
π€
Bob
β
Alice
Hi Alice, nice to meet you too as my neighbor. I have some info but want to hear your thoughts first. What do you know so far? Any suspicions?
π§
Sharing my Librarian info with Alice to build trust as neighbors, confirm if she has info, and probe her thoughts on Eve's claim to see if she fits as Saint or not. This helps narrow Outsider and find trustworthy players early.
π€
Heidi
β
Eve
Hey Eve. I am not the Librarian. I was going to claim Soldier if asked. So either your Washerwoman info is wrong or Bob is the Librarian. Can you tell me exactly what you were shown, and whether you have any reason to think you could be poisoned or drunk?
π§
Deflect the Washerwoman-Librarian connection away from me by locking in a safe bluff (Soldier), while nudging suspicion onto Bob or onto Eve being wrong/poisoned to create confusion.
π€
Alice
β
Bob
I do not have much information yet since it is the first day. I am just getting a feel for everyone. What information do you have that you can share? Any particular players standing out to you?
π§
Building trust with my neighbor Bob by responding to his query without revealing my Saint role yet. This encourages him to share his info, helping identify potential evils early while keeping my vulnerability as Saint hidden.
β
Frank
Frank waits.
π§
Observe the ongoing whispers and activity to identify potential allies before sharing my key information, avoiding early reveal that could target me at night.
π€
Eve
β
Alice
Hey Alice, Bob claims he is the Librarian and that either I or you is the Saint. I am the Washerwoman and my info confirms either Bob or Heidi is the Librarian. Since I am not the Saint, if Bob is correct then you are the Saint. What information do you have? Do you know anything about your role or others?
π§
Share my information with Alice since Bob claims she might be the Saint. This builds trust, verifies claims, and helps narrow down good players early to focus on finding the Demon later.
π€
Grace
β
Heidi
I am considering claiming Empath or Fortune Teller for now to see reactions. No night info since it's day one. Have you heard anything from others or do you suspect anyone based on whispers? Let's stay in touch.
π§
Respond to Heidi to build rapport, share a safe claim idea without revealing Slayer, and ask for more thoughts to gather info early on day 1.
π€
David
β
Charlie
Nice, Chef zero is useful if true. I am thinking I claim Empath since I sit between you and Eve, but I will probably hold details until tomorrow so I can give a clean number. If you are happy with it, you should probably share the Chef info publicly soon.
π§
Build rapport with Charlie, validate his info, and set up my Empath bluff timeline while quietly probing for more claims to protect Heidi.
π€
Charlie
β
David
David, sharing the Chef zero publicly sounds like a good idea to help everyone narrow down where evils can sit. I am considering claiming Chef soon. Have you spoken with Eve yet about your Empath plan?
π§
Responding to David's whisper builds potential alliance, discusses sharing Chef info publicly as he suggested, and probes his plan with Eve to check consistency with my zero evil pairs info for narrowing evil positions.
π€
Bob
β
Alice
Alice, I have some info from my role. I am the Librarian and know that either you or Eve is the Saint. Eve claims to be the Washerwoman and says either me or Heidi is the Librarian, which matches me. Any thoughts or your own info?
π§
Sharing my Librarian info with Alice to gauge her reaction and see if she confirms or denies being the Saint, helping to identify the Outsider and narrow down good players.
π€
Heidi
β
David
,Grace
David: Eve claims Washerwoman saw either me or Bob as Librarian. Bob told her he is Librarian and that either Eve or Alice is Saint. I told Eve I am not Lib and may claim Soldier. Grace: I am leaning Soldier. If you were thinking Empath, be careful; it can create strong reads early. FT claim may be safer.
π§
Update David so we coordinate narratives, and steer Grace away from an Empath claim that would catch me, while keeping early info uncertain.
π€
Alice
β
Eve
Thanks for the info Eve. Bob's claim does line up with what you said about the Librarian. I do not have any specific info yet since it is early. Have you talked to Heidi or others? What do they claim? I am keeping an open mind on everyone.
π§
Responding to Eve's whisper to build alliance with her and Bob without revealing my Saint role yet, as per strategy to hide until late game. This helps gather more info to identify the Demon while keeping options open.
π€
Frank
β
Eve
Hey Eve, I got some info from the start. Either David or Alice is the Scarlet Woman. What have you heard so far? Any suspicions?
π§
Share my key info privately with neighbor Eve to build alliance, get her thoughts, and start process of elimination without public reveal yet.
Nominations β Day 1
π
Storyteller
Nominations are now open.
π¬
Eve
β
All
I am the Washerwoman. Either Bob or Heidi is the Librarian. Bob told me he is the Librarian and that either Alice or I is the Saint. Heidi says she is not the Librarian. Frank mentioned either David or Alice is the Scarlet Woman. What does everyone else know?
π§
Share my Washerwoman information publicly now that nominations are open to combine data with others and start building trust before night.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
I am the Chef and learned there are zero pairs of evil players. That means no two evils sit next to each other in our circle. Eve's claims about Bob, Heidi, and Frank's mention of Scarlet Woman on David or Alice might fit if evils are separated. What does everyone else have?
π§
Sharing my Chef zero publicly builds trust and narrows evil positions based on seating. It helps good players verify claims like Eve's without revealing too much early, progressing towards identifying the Demon.
π¬
Alice
β
All
Bob and Eve's claims seem to line up, with Bob as Librarian saying either me or Eve is the Saint, and Eve as Washerwoman confirming Bob or Heidi as Librarian while Heidi denies it. Frank's claim that David or I am the Scarlet Woman stands out as potentially false if the other info holds. Charlie's Chef info of zero evil pairs is useful too. What does everyone else know or think about these claims?
π§
Speaking about the public claims and Frank's suspicious accusation helps the good team discuss and identify inconsistencies without me revealing my Saint role early. It encourages more info sharing to find the Demon before nominations get serious.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
I want to clarify something. I told Eve I am not the Librarian. If you want my claim, I am the Soldier. Frank, can you say what role gave you the David or Alice Scarlet Woman info? With this many cross claims, I would prefer no execution today and get one night of info.
π§
Lock in a safe bluff (Soldier), create uncertainty around the Investigator-style ping on David, and steer town toward no execution on day one to protect both me and David.
π¬
David
β
All
I do not have any useful starting info to add, I am a night info role. Frank, can you say plainly what role gave you the David or Alice Scarlet Woman result, like Investigator? If so we should remember Recluse and Drunk exist. I would prefer no execution today.
π§
Deflect Frankβs SW accusation, keep Heidi safe, and encourage no execution so we get a night kill and more confusion.
π¬
Frank
β
All
I am the Investigator. My starting info is that either David or Alice is the Scarlet Woman. That matches what I whispered to Eve earlier. David, yes, that is my role. With Charlie's Chef info of zero evil pairs, it suggests the evils are not sitting next to each other. We should avoid executing today and see what night brings.
π§
By publicly confirming my Investigator role and info on David/Alice as Scarlet Woman, I build trust with good players, help narrow suspects early, and encourage more info sharing before night. This progresses the game and lets others verify claims.
π¬
Bob
β
All
I agree with Heidi, David, and others. No execution today makes sense to gather night information. My Librarian info confirms Eve's claim that either Alice or I is the Saint. Frank's Investigator point about David or Alice being Scarlet Woman could fit if Alice is the Minion and Eve the Saint, with Charlie's zero evil pairs keeping them apart. Let's see what the night reveals.
π§
Supporting no execution today as info is preliminary and consistent so far. This allows night abilities to provide more data, helping narrow suspects for Demon later while avoiding early mistakes.
π¬
Grace
β
All
I agree with skipping execution today to gather night information from the claims. Frank, how does your Investigator info about David or Alice fit with Charlie's zero evil pairs? Anyone else have starting info to share?
π§
Agreeing to no execution gathers night info to identify Demon logically. Avoids early mistake, progresses game for good team by combining claims like Chef and Investigator.
π
Storyteller
No execution today. All villagers are safe.
Night 1
π
Storyteller
β
Heidi
Good evening Heidi. You are the Imp. Who would you like to kill tonight? Remember that if you kill yourself this way, a Minion becomes the Imp.
π―
Heidi
Heidi made a choice.
π§
Remove the likeliest early-info threat on my side of the circle and preserve existing misdirection around Alice and David for future mis-executions.
π
Grace(Ghost)
Grace has died.
π
Storyteller
β
Heidi
You chose to kill Grace.
Day 2
π
Storyteller
Morning breaks, but heavy hearts remain. Grace has been found dead in the night.
π€
Heidi
β
David
Frank is pointing at you or Alice. I think you should hard-claim Ravenkeeper today, and lean that Alice could be Recluse or Saint, making the Investigator pair make sense. Do not push no-execution too hard; just look cautious and vote with town.
π§
Lock in Davidβs believable claim and give him a path to redirect Frankβs Investigator suspicion onto Alice, keeping my minion alive and the town divided.
π€
Frank
β
Alice
I am the Investigator and learned that either you or David is the Scarlet Woman. What is your role claim and what information do you have?
π§
Whispering to Alice shares my Investigator info directly and asks for her role claim to test consistency with other claims like Bob's Librarian info, helping narrow down if she is the Minion or not to find the Demon.
π€
Grace(Ghost)
β
Heidi
Hi Heidi. I am the Slayer but I died last night before using my ability. The Demon must have targeted me. What are your thoughts on Frank claiming Investigator on David or Alice as Scarlet Woman, and how does that fit with the Chef info?
π§
Share my Slayer role and death details with claimed good player Heidi to build trust, gather her view on claims, and help identify Demon for later ghost vote.
π€
Alice
β
Frank
I am the Saint. Bob claimed to be the Librarian and said that Alice or Eve is the Saint, which lines up with me. How does that fit with your Investigator information about me or David being the Scarlet Woman? What else have you learned?
π§
Responding to Frank's whisper by claiming my role as Saint and referencing Bob's claim builds alliance with potential good players, tests Frank's consistency, and helps confirm alignments without revealing too early. This gathers info to narrow Demon suspects while protecting my execution risk.
π€
David
β
Heidi
I can do Ravenkeeper hard-claim. I will say Frank could be wrong via Drunk or Alice registering weird, and I will not hard-push no-exec. We should quietly angle attention onto Alice since she is in both pings, but I will sound cautious about Saint.
π§
Align with Heidi on my public bluff and redirect the Investigator heat away from me and the Demon, ideally engineering an Alice execution or at least protecting Heidi into final 3.
π€
Charlie
β
David
Hey David, I'm the Chef and learned there are zero pairs of evil players, so no two evils are next to each other. What is your Empath read on me and Eve? This might help us figure out where the evils are separated.
π§
Sharing my Chef information privately with David allows us to cross-reference his Empath read with the zero pairs to deduce evil locations without alerting the whole group or potential evils.
β
Bob
Bob waits.
π§
Waiting allows time for ongoing whispers like Grace to Heidi or Charlie to David to unfold, gathering more info before I act further or before nominations start in 2 ticks.
π€
Eve
β
Bob
I am the Washerwoman and I know that either you or Heidi is the Librarian. Your claim matches my information. What do you think about the others?
π§
Share my Washerwoman info with Bob to verify his Librarian claim, build trust, and progress towards identifying the Demon through combined information.
π€
Heidi
β
Charlie
Hey Charlie, I am still on Soldier. Can I check how confident you are in Chef being zero, and what you think that implies for Frank naming David or Alice? Also, are we all agreed on the seating order you used for adjacency?
π§
Build rapport with Charlie and extract his reasoning/seating so I can later weaponize Chef info to cast doubt on Frank/Bob and steer a misexecution away from me/David.
π€
Frank
β
Bob
Hey Bob, I learned that either Alice or David is the Scarlet Woman. Alice says she is the Saint and that fits with your Librarian information. What are your thoughts on this and any other info you have?
π§
By whispering to Bob, I can cross-check if his Librarian information aligns with Alice being the Saint, which would confirm David as the Scarlet Woman Minion and help narrow down the evil team for execution.
π€
Grace(Ghost)
β
Charlie
Charlie, I am the Slayer and died night one. Your Chef claim of zero evil pairs seems at odds with Frank saying David or Alice is Scarlet Woman. How do you explain that? Who seems suspicious to you?
π§
Questioning Charlie about consistency between his Chef and Frank's Investigator claim will expose lies through contradictions, helping good team identify the Demon and decide who to execute on final day.
π€
Alice
β
Bob
Frank claims his Investigator info shows either me or David is the Scarlet Woman. But you claimed I might be the Saint which fits me being good. If you are right then David could be the Minion. What do you make of that and do you have any other information from your ability?
π§
Confirm Bob's Librarian claim about me being Saint to see if it holds against Frank's accusation, and gather his thoughts on David to build logic chain and identify the Demon or Minions early.
π€
David
β
Charlie
Hey, I am not the Empath. I was just theory talking yesterday. I am bluffing as Ravenkeeper and I have no night info yet. Pure read wise, you and Eve both feel pretty good to me, so I would not expect an evil neighbor on you.
π§
Answer Charlieβs direct question without cementing an Empath claim, build trust, and support the plan to frame Alice while protecting Heidi.
π€
Charlie
β
Heidi
Yes Heidi, the seating is Alice Bob me David Eve Frank Grace you. My Chef info of zero evil pairs is solid from night zero, meaning no two evils are neighbors in that circle. This makes Frank's Investigator claim tricky: if David or Alice is the Scarlet Woman, then the Demon can't be next to them, and not next to Frank. It suggests the evils are separated. What do you think of Bob's Librarian claim or Eve's Washerwoman? Do you trust Frank?
π§
Respond to Heidi's whisper confirming seating and Chef info to build trust, explain implications for Frank's claim to see if she agrees on suspicions, helping narrow good players.
π€
Bob
β
Alice
Alice, my Librarian info confirms either you or Eve is the Saint. Your claim to be the Saint fits perfectly. If Frank is right about you or David being Scarlet Woman, then David must be the Minion since you are good. Do you trust Frank or have other info from your ability or others?
π§
Share my exact Librarian information with Alice to confirm her Saint claim and discuss Frank's Investigator info. This helps align our good team suspicions on David or Frank being evil, progressing to find Demon without execution yet.
β
Eve
Eve waits.
π§
Waiting allows time for Alice's response to my whisper and other private talks to unfold. This gathers more data on claims without rushing, progressing toward identifying the Demon by contradictions.
π€
Heidi
β
Charlie
If your Chef zero is right, I think it is more likely Frank is wrong or Alice is some weird register like Recluse or Saint. Alice being in both Frank and Bob info makes her the common thread. I am not ready to execute David off one ping yet.
π§
Shape Charlieβs logic to doubt Frankβs ping on David, keep heat off me, and angle suspicion onto Alice or Frank while appearing consistent as Soldier.
π€
Frank
β
Charlie
I am the Investigator and learned that either Alice or David is the Scarlet Woman. Alice claims she is the Saint, which matches Bob's Librarian info. What is your take on this with your Chef information about zero evil pairs? Any other details?
π§
Sharing my Investigator info with Charlie (Chef) to cross-verify with his evil pairs info and his thoughts on Alice/David, helping narrow evil positions before nominations.
π€
Grace(Ghost)
β
Bob
Hi Bob. I am the Slayer but died night one, so the Demon must have targeted me. Your claim as Librarian knowing Eve or Alice is Saint, does that fit with Frank claiming Investigator on David or Alice as Scarlet Woman? What about Charlie's Chef saying zero evil pairs? Who do you suspect?
π§
Whispering to Bob to cross-check his Librarian claim with Frank and Charlie's info, find contradictions to identify possible evils like if Scarlet Woman exists or not, helping narrow Demon suspects before nominations.
π€
Alice
β
Bob
Bob, Frank's Investigator claim that I or David is the Scarlet Woman directly contradicts your Librarian info identifying me as the Saint. Since I am the Saint, Frank has to be lying and is probably evil. We should challenge him or look to execute Frank soon. What do you think about Charlie's Chef info?
π§
Align with Bob on Frank being the suspicious evil player due to claim contradiction with my actual Saint role, to plan executing Frank or gathering more info before nominations.
π€
David
β
Frank
Hey Frank, quick private check in. I am hard-claiming Ravenkeeper. Grace died at night so I did not get an info wake. Your Investigator ping on me or Alice worries me, but if you trust your info, it might just be Alice. Otherwise maybe your info is drunk or Recluse-y.
π§
Deflect Frankβs Investigator suspicion off me without creating a hard contradiction, and steer him toward suspecting Alice or doubting his info, protecting Heidi and keeping me alive as Scarlet Woman.
π€
Charlie
β
Grace(Ghost)
Hey Grace, no contradiction with Chef zero. It means the evils aren't neighbors in the circle. So if Alice or David is Scarlet Woman, the Demon simply isn't next to them. Likely Demon killed you night one. Who do you suspect? Your Slayer ability is valuable now.
π§
Respond to Grace's whisper explaining no Chef contradiction since zero pairs allows separated Minion and Demon. Build alliance with good ghost Slayer, learn her suspicions to narrow Demon candidates before nominations.
π€
Bob
β
Alice
Alice, your claim as Saint fits my Librarian info perfectly. Frank's Investigator claim that you or David is Scarlet Woman can't be true if you are good Saint, so Frank must be lying and is likely evil like the Poisoner or Scarlet Woman. We should nominate and execute Frank today to test. What does Charlie say about his Chef info? Any other suspicions?
π§
Share with Alice to confirm alliance, point out Frank contradiction, suggest nominating Frank to expose evil before final day.
π€
Eve
β
Heidi
Hi Heidi. I am the Washerwoman and know that either you or Bob is the Librarian. Bob claims to be it and says Alice or I am the Saint, but I am not. What information do you have and who do you suspect?
π§
Sharing my Washerwoman info with Heidi to verify her claim, test consistency with Bob, and build trust or expose lies before nominations. This helps narrow evil suspects using role logic.
Nominations β Day 2
π
Storyteller
Nominations are now open. Please remember that only living players may nominate.
π¬
Frank
β
All
Everyone, I am the Investigator. I learned that either Alice or David is the Scarlet Woman. Alice claims to be the Saint which fits with Bob's information. David claims to be the Ravenkeeper. There is tension here with my info. What are your thoughts on who to nominate?
π§
Publicly sharing my Investigator information allows the group to cross-check claims from Bob, Alice, David, and Charlie to find contradictions and decide on a nomination before the phase ends.
βοΈ
David
β
Alice
I am Ravenkeeper. Frank has a Scarlet Woman ping on either me or Alice, and Alice is also in Bob's Saint info. I think Alice could be evil hiding behind a Saint claim. I would like to nominate Alice and see who is willing to vote.
π§
Get a high-upside execution on Alice while framing it as testing a likely bluff, and keep suspicion away from Heidi.
π
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Alice. 4 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
π¬
Alice
β
All
I am the good Saint. Bob confirmed me with his Librarian information. Frank claiming I or David is Scarlet Woman contradicts that, so Frank must be lying and is probably evil. Do not execute me or the good team loses. Let's nominate Frank to test instead.
π§
Defend my Saint role publicly, highlight the contradiction with Frank's claim to prevent my execution which would lose the game for good, and redirect suspicion to Frank as the likely evil player to organize a better nomination.
π¬
Frank
β
All
Alice, if you really are the Saint we cannot execute you or the good team loses immediately. My Investigator info says one of you or David is the Scarlet Woman. If you are the Saint then David must be evil. David, nominating Alice while claiming to be Ravenkeeper seems off if she could be good. What do others think?
π§
Address Alice's accusation and the Saint contradiction directly to prevent executing a possible good Saint, while testing logic on David. This clarifies my position without committing to a bad execution.
β
David
David raised their hand
π§
Vote Alice to try to end the game immediately if she is Saint, or at least drive a mis-execution that keeps suspicion away from Heidi.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
Everyone, I am the Chef and from night zero I learned there are zero pairs of evil players. No two evils are next to each other in our circle. This fits with Frank's Investigator info only if the Demon is not neighboring the Scarlet Woman. If Alice is the Saint then David could be the Scarlet Woman and the Demon is not next to him. We should be careful not to execute Alice if she might be good.
π§
My zero evil pairs info is key to resolve the Alice vs David vs Frank tension. Sharing it publicly helps the good team evaluate the vote without risking executing a possible good Saint or letting evil slip.
π¬
Eve
β
All
Everyone, I am the Washerwoman. I know that either Bob or Heidi is the Librarian. Bob claims to be it and says Alice or I am the Saint, but I am not the Saint. Heidi says she is not the Librarian and claims Soldier instead. This means if Bob is truthful then Alice is the good Saint, so we should not execute her. If Heidi is the Librarian then Bob is lying. What do you all think?
π§
Sharing my Washerwoman information publicly clarifies the Librarian claims between Bob and Heidi, helps evaluate if Alice is truly the Saint, and guides the group away from executing a potential good player like Alice while identifying who might be evil.
β
Grace(Ghost)
Grace waits.
π§
Waiting allows others to share more claims or votes without committing my ghost vote yet, preserving it for a more critical later nomination while observing the current tension between Alice, Frank, and David.
π¬
Bob
β
All
I am the Librarian and my information confirms that either Alice or Eve is the Saint. Eve says she is not, so Alice must be the good Saint. Executing her would lose the game for us immediately. Frank's Investigator claim that Alice or David is the Scarlet Woman cannot be true if Alice is the Saint, so Frank is likely lying and evil. We should not vote to execute Alice. Let's spare her and look at nominating Frank instead to test his claim.
π§
Convince group not to execute Alice since my info points to her being good Saint, and Frank's claim contradicts it making him suspicious. Push to spare her and consider Frank as next target to gather info before night.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
I am not voting here. If Alice is truly the Saint, we just lose immediately, and that is too big a risk. Bob and Eve line up on Alice being Saint, so I would rather we do not execute her and instead look at why Frankβs Investigator info conflicts.
π§
Avoid looking eager on a risky Saint execution, while reinforcing the narrative that Frank is the likely liar so tomorrowβs execution target shifts away from David and toward a good player.
π¬
Alice
β
All
Please do not vote to execute me. I am the good Saint, and Bob and Eve's information confirms that. Executing me would make us lose immediately. Frank's claim contradicts this, so he is likely lying and evil. Let's spare me and nominate Frank or David next to test their claims.
π§
Convince players not to vote for my execution since I am the Saint and it would lose the game. Push suspicion onto Frank and David to gather votes against them instead, protecting the good team.
π¬
Frank
β
All
I will not vote to execute Alice. If she is the good Saint then we lose the game immediately. My Investigator information says one of Alice or David is the Scarlet Woman. If Alice is good then David must be the evil one bluffing as Ravenkeeper. We should spare Alice and consider nominating David to test this instead.
π§
By speaking publicly I clarify I won't vote for Alice due to Saint risk, push suspicion on David instead, and advance discussion to find the Demon without losing on a bad execution.
β©οΈ
David
David lowered their hand
π§
My vote is unlikely to be decisive, and staying visibly on a Saint execution paints a target on me. Retracting helps my credibility and survival while town turns on other suspects.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
I agree we should not execute Alice since she could be the good Saint backed by Bob and Eve. My zero evil pairs from Chef means any evils like a possible Scarlet Woman in David would have the Demon not next to him, fitting if Frank is lying. Let's spare her and nominate Frank to test instead.
π§
Reinforce not voting for Alice to avoid Saint loss, share how Chef info supports separating evils, suggest testing Frank's claim by nominating him next to progress good team info.
π¬
Eve
β
All
I agree we should not execute Alice. My Washerwoman information supports Bob if he is the Librarian, pointing to Alice as the good Saint. Executing her risks losing the game immediately. Frank's conflicting claim suggests he may be lying and evil. Let's spare Alice and consider nominating Frank or David to test their stories next.
π§
Prevent executing possible good Saint Alice to avoid instant loss. Share my alignment with Bob's claim to build trust and pressure Frank/David as suspects. This narrows evils for later execution while keeping good team alive.
β
Grace(Ghost)
Grace waits.
π§
Do not vote for Alice execution to avoid Saint loss risk. Wait for others to decide on next nomination while observing who raises hands.
π¬
Bob
β
All
Everyone please do not raise your hands to execute Alice as she fits my Librarian information as the good Saint along with Eve's Washerwoman claim. Frank's conflicting Investigator information suggests he is lying and evil so once this vote fails without enough hands raised let us nominate Frank next to test him.
π§
Reinforce not executing Alice since she is likely the good Saint, and push to test Frank after this vote fails to progress towards finding the Demon or Minion.
β
Heidi
Heidi waits.
π§
Do not vote or overtalk during a risky Saint nomination; maintain my cautious Soldier persona and let the vote fail naturally while planning the night kill.
π
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
π³οΈ
Nominee Alice did not reach the 4 vote threshold.
π
Storyteller
Alice did not receive enough votes (0/4).
β
Alice
Alice waits.
π§
Waiting allows the group to discuss and vote on Frank's nomination without me speaking more. This gives time for logic to unfold and avoids over-explaining my Saint role again.
βοΈ
Frank
β
David
My Investigator information says either Alice or David is the Scarlet Woman. Since Alice claims to be the good Saint and is supported by Bob and Eve, David must be the evil one if my info is correct. Let's execute David to test this.
π§
Nominating David tests the contradiction with my Investigator info. If Alice is good Saint (backed by multiple claims), David must be the Scarlet Woman evil. This helps narrow down evils without risking executing possible Saint. If he is executed as evil, great; if not, votes show alignments.
π
Storyteller
Voting starts now for David. 4 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
π¬
David
β
All
Please do not vote me out here. I am hard-claiming Ravenkeeper, so executing me deletes a valuable night-check that could actually confirm someone if the Demon hits me. Frankβs Investigator ping could be poison or a straight lie. If you want a test, push Frank tomorrow, not me right now.
π§
Stop enough votes to save myself and protect Heidi. Use my Ravenkeeper bluff to argue town loses info by executing me, and frame Frank as the better test.
π¬
Alice
β
All
I still think we should spare David for now since he claims Ravenkeeper and we need that night info. Frank is the one pushing this and his Investigator claim conflicts with Bob and Eve. Let's fail this vote and nominate Frank next to test him instead.
π§
I need to speak up to spare David as per our earlier plan to test Frank instead. Accusing Frank of lying keeps momentum to execute the suspicious Investigator next and gather more info without risking a good Ravenkeeper.
π¬
Frank
β
All
I hear the concerns about executing David, but my Investigator information is clear: either Alice or David is the Scarlet Woman. Alice has strong support as the good Saint from Bob and Eve, so David must be the evil one here. Let's raise hands to test him now and remove a possible minion.
π§
Pushing to execute David tests my key info without risking Saint loss. This narrows suspects for Demon, helps good team progress before night.
β
Charlie
Charlie waits.
π§
Waiting allows the current vote to fail naturally as others have suggested, saving our execution for a stronger nomination on Frank tomorrow while gathering more reactions.
π¬
Eve
β
All
I agree with Charlie, Alice, and Bob. We should not execute David right now since he hard claims Ravenkeeper and could provide valuable night information if the Demon targets him. Frank's Investigator claim conflicts with our Washerwoman and Librarian information supporting Alice as the good Saint. Let's fail this vote without raising hands and nominate Frank next to test his story.
π§
Speaking to confirm we should not execute David now, aligning with group consensus to fail the vote and nominate Frank next. This preserves potential good Ravenkeeper and tests conflicting Investigator claim, helping narrow evil suspects without risking good players early.
π¬
Grace(Ghost)
β
All
I agree with everyone that we should not execute David right now. As the dead Slayer killed night one, the consistent claims from Bob as Librarian and Eve as Washerwoman supporting Alice as the good Saint make Frank's Investigator information look like the lie. Let's fail this vote and nominate Frank next to test him instead.
π§
Supporting failing the David vote to instead nominate and test Frank, as Bob and Eve's consistent claims make Alice likely good Saint, pointing to Frank as the liar and probable evil.
β
Bob
Bob waits.
π§
Do not raise hand to execute David as it contradicts my Librarian info confirming Alice as good Saint. Let vote fail to allow nominating Frank next and progress toward finding the Demon.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
I am not raising a hand here. David hard-claiming Ravenkeeper is actually useful, and this feels like Frank forcing a bad test off his own claim. Let this fail and if we want to resolve the mess, we execute Frank tomorrow.
π§
Prevent execution of my minion David and steer town toward executing Frank next, preserving evil numbers and confusion.
π¬
David
β
All
Please keep your hands down on me here. If I am Ravenkeeper, executing me gives you nothing, but leaving me alive gives you a chance at a real check if I die at night. If you want to resolve the Investigator claim, we can execute Frank tomorrow instead.
π§
Prevent my execution without exposing Heidi, steer town toward executing Frank later, and keep the no-execution momentum that protects the Demon.
π¬
Alice
β
All
I agree with everyone. We should not execute David since he hard claims Ravenkeeper and could give us valuable night information. Frank's Investigator claim conflicts with Bob and Eve's information, so let's let this vote fail and nominate Frank next to test him instead.
π§
Agree with the group to fail David's vote without raising hand, as he claims useful Ravenkeeper and Frank's info conflicts with Bob/Eve's consistent claims supporting me as Saint. This progresses to nominating Frank next to expose the potential evil.
β
Frank
Frank raised their hand
π§
I need to raise my hand to vote for David to test my Investigator information. Since Alice has strong support as Saint, David is the better target to execute and remove a possible Minion without risking a loss from executing the Saint. This helps narrow down evils for the good team.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
I will not raise my hand to execute David. He could be a valuable Ravenkeeper if targeted at night. My Chef zero evil pairs supports sparing him since Alice looks good as Saint. Let's let this vote fail and nominate Frank next to check his conflicting Investigator claim.
π§
Speaking confirms I won't vote for David, supports group consensus to save potential Ravenkeeper, uses Chef info for logic, and pushes to nominate Frank next to resolve suspicion and find the Demon.
π¬
Eve
β
All
I will not raise my hand for David. He claims Ravenkeeper which could give us a night check if targeted. Frank's Investigator claim conflicts with Bob and my Washerwoman info on Alice as good Saint. Let's fail this vote and nominate Frank tomorrow to test him.
π§
I do not want to execute David as he claims useful Ravenkeeper role and my info supports Alice as good Saint making Frank suspicious. Failing this vote allows nominating Frank next to test contradictions without losing potential good info.
β
Grace(Ghost)
Grace waits.
π§
Do not raise hand to execute David as he claims useful Ravenkeeper and has support. Let vote fail naturally to preserve good players, then push to nominate Frank tomorrow for testing conflicting Investigator claim. This narrows suspects without risking execution of potential good.
β
Bob
Bob waits.
π§
Do not raise hand on David to fail the vote as agreed by group. This keeps possible good Ravenkeeper alive for night info and allows nominating suspicious Frank next. Progresses to night without bad execution.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
Keep your hands down. Executing David does not prove anything, and if he is Ravenkeeper we lose a useful check. Frank is the only one pushing this hard off his own claim. Let this fail and we revisit Frank tomorrow.
π§
Keep my minion David off the block, preserve evil numbers, and steer town toward executing Frank later while I control night kills.
π
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
π³οΈ
Nominee David did not reach the 4 vote threshold.
π
Storyteller
David did not receive enough votes (1/4).
π¬
David
β
All
If we are executing anyone today, I think it should be Frank. His Investigator claim is the only thing creating a direct contradiction and it is already out there. Keeping him just means we repeat this tomorrow. Someone who can still nominate should put Frank up.
π§
Push the group to execute Frank now, removing the player with info pointing at me and keeping the Demon (Heidi) safe. Frame it as resolving contradictions and avoiding wasting another day.
βοΈ
Alice
β
Frank
Frank's Investigator claim conflicts with Bob and Eve's information supporting Alice as the good Saint. Let's execute Frank to test his story and remove a possible evil player.
π§
Nominating Frank resolves the main contradiction in claims, tests the Investigator info against supported good players like Alice as Saint, and progresses toward executing evil without risking my Saint execution which loses the game.
π
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Frank. 4 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
π¬
Frank
β
All
My Investigator info shows Alice or David is the Scarlet Woman. If Alice is the good Saint like you all say, then David must be the evil minion. Executing me removes a good player and helps the demon. Fail this vote and target David tomorrow instead.
π§
Defend my Investigator claim by showing logical consistency if Alice or David is the minion, explain why executing me hurts good team, and urge failing the vote to target David instead.
β
David
David raised their hand
π§
Secure Frankβs execution to eliminate the player pushing me as Scarlet Woman and waste town resources, protecting Heidi and setting up endgame.
β
Alice
Alice raised their hand
π§
Voting to execute Frank tests his conflicting claim per group consensus (Eve/Bob/Heidi/you agree to execute him next), narrows evil suspects, and avoids risking my Saint execution or losing David's potential night check. This helps good team identify Demon without self-sabotage.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
Based on my Chef information of zero evil pairs, if Frank is the Investigator and Alice is the good Saint, then David must be the Scarlet Woman. The Demon cannot be next to David, ruling out me and Eve. That narrows the Demon to Bob or Heidi. I think we should execute Frank to test if his information holds.
π§
Sharing this logic with my Chef zero pairs info challenges Frank's claim and helps the group decide the vote by narrowing Demon possibilities depending on if Frank is truthful. This progresses the game by combining info rather than just voting blindly.
β
Eve
Eve waits.
π§
Waiting lets the current vote conclude without my input, preserving my vote for critical later executions while seeing if Frank gets majority or fails to advance the game.
β
Grace(Ghost)
Grace raised their hand
π§
Voting yes on Frank tests his conflicting Investigator claim against multiple good claims. As dead Slayer with ghost vote, this helps execute likely evil and progresses to night for info. Good team needs to eliminate contradictions before final day.
β
Bob
Bob raised their hand
π§
Raising my hand to vote for executing Frank tests his conflicting Investigator claim against my Librarian info and the group's consensus. This helps eliminate a potential Minion or confirm good players, narrowing Demon suspects for our team win.
β
Heidi
Heidi waits.
π§
Frank is likely good; his execution helps evil, and I do not need to vote since it already passes. Staying off keeps my Soldier bluff credible and reduces heat on me.
β
Frank
Frank waits.
π§
Wait for voting to conclude or others to speak, as I have already defended my position and cannot raise hand for myself.
π¬
David
β
All
I am still happy with Frank here. His Investigator claim is the one thing driving executions, and if we do not deal with it now we just loop tomorrow. If he is good, it gives us a clearer world; if he is evil, even better.
π§
Lock in Frankβs execution without looking overly eager; frame it as resolving contradictions so town wastes time and keeps Heidi alive.
π¬
Alice
β
All
I have raised my hand for Frank because his Investigator claim conflicts with Bob and Eve's information. Executing him will test that and help us narrow down the evil players. Everyone should raise their hands now to make this happen.
π§
Pushing execution of Frank tests his conflicting claim. With 4 votes already including mine and dead Grace, it should pass. Speaking encourages others like Charlie to raise hand for majority and progresses to night info.
β
Charlie
Charlie raised their hand
π§
I want to vote yes on Frank to test his conflicting claim. With multiple already voting and my Chef info suggesting if he's telling truth then David is SW, executing him removes possible evil and narrows Demon suspects like Bob or Heidi. Progresses us toward executing the real Demon.
β
Eve
Eve raised their hand
π§
Voting for Frank tests his conflicting Investigator claim against Bob's Librarian and my Washerwoman info. With consensus building and many votes already, this helps eliminate a suspect and progress towards finding the Demon.
π¬
Grace(Ghost)
β
All
I have raised my hand for Frank because his Investigator claim clashes with the solid information from Bob, Eve, and Charlie about Alice being good. Executing him will test that story and help us find the Demon. Everyone keep those hands up.
π§
Supporting Frank's execution aligns with group consensus to test the conflicting Investigator claim, removes potential evil, and narrows Demon suspects for final days. As dead Slayer, my ghost vote helps secure majority without risking my life.
β
Bob
Bob waits.
π§
The vote on Frank is progressing with many hands raised including mine. Waiting allows the execution to proceed if majority reaches, testing Frank's claim which conflicts with my Librarian info and Alice's Saint claim, helping eliminate potential evil without me needing to act further this tick.
β
Heidi
Heidi raised their hand
π§
Lock in Frankβs execution now while the vote is hot; removing the Investigator helps evil and buys time to steer suspicion onto Bob instead of me.
π
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
π»
Grace(Ghost)
Ghost vote used by Grace
π³οΈ
New execution leader: Frank with 7 votes. They will be executed when nominations close unless tied or surpassed by another nominee.
π
Storyteller
The vote passes. Frank is now on the block with 7 votes and will be executed when nominations close, unless another nominee receives equal or more votes.
π¬
Frank
β
All
If you execute me as the good Investigator, and Alice is the good Saint, then David must be the Scarlet Woman. Charlie's zero evil pairs means the Demon is not next to David, so likely Bob or Heidi. Check them with night information tomorrow.
π§
Sharing this logic before execution guides the good team to suspect Bob or Heidi as Demon if I am good, helping narrow down and find the Demon next day.
π¬
David
β
All
I still think Frank is the right execution today. His whole world hinges on Alice being Saint and me being Scarlet Woman, and that is doing all the damage. Let us not do a last second scramble into another nomination; execute Frank, then reassess fresh tomorrow.
π§
Lock in Frankβs execution, discourage any last-second alternate nomination, and pre-empt his push that the Demon is Heidi by steering tomorrowβs doubt toward Bob instead.
π¬
Alice
β
All
Frank's Investigator claim conflicts with Bob and Eve confirming I am the Saint. Executing him removes that contradiction and lets us gather better information overnight. I am ready to see what the night reveals.
π§
Reinforce executing Frank as he contradicts reliable claims from Bob and Eve about my Saint role. This narrows suspects for Demon. Helps good team by removing likely evil and testing info before night.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
I agree we should execute Frank. His Investigator claim clashes with Bob, Eve, and my information about Alice being good. Removing him will test the stories and give us clearer night information tomorrow to find the Demon.
π§
Supporting Frank's execution aligns with good team goal to test contradictory claims, narrow down the Demon, and use night info tomorrow. My Chef info supports worlds where evils are separated.
π¬
Eve
β
All
I am the Washerwoman and know that either Bob or Heidi must be the Librarian. Bob is claiming to be the Librarian which matches my information. If he is right then Alice or I is the Saint which conflicts with Frank claiming Alice is the Scarlet Woman. Executing Frank will help sort this out.
π§
Publicly sharing my Washerwoman information now will verify Bob's claim, highlight the conflict with Frank's Investigator info, and help the good team confirm Alice is likely the Saint before Frank executes, narrowing demon suspects.
β
Grace(Ghost)
Grace waits.
π§
Since voting is closed and Frank is on the block with majority, waiting allows the execution to proceed and the game to move to night for new information. This helps narrow down the Demon without further disruption.
π¬
Bob
β
All
I support executing Frank. His Investigator claim that Alice or David is Scarlet Woman clashes with my Librarian information that Alice or Eve is the Saint, which fits with Eve claiming I am the Librarian. This execution will clear up the contradiction and let us gather better information overnight.
π§
Supporting Frank's execution aligns with my info on Alice being Saint and Eve's Washerwoman confirming my role. This removes a conflicting claim, helps good team identify the real Demon tomorrow with night info.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
I am fine leaving Frank on the block. I do not want a last second scramble into another nomination. Let us execute Frank, then tomorrow we re check Bob and Charlieβs logic carefully, because Chef zero does not automatically make it me.
π§
Lock in Frank execution and discourage new nominations, while planting that tomorrow we revisit Bob and Charlie logic so I am not the default demon candidate.
π
Storyteller
The guillotine blade falls. Frank has been executed.
π
Frank(Ghost)
Frank has died.
Night 2
π
Storyteller
β
Heidi
Good evening Heidi. You are the Imp. Who would you like to kill tonight? Remember that if you kill yourself this way, a Minion becomes the Imp.
π―
Heidi
Heidi made a choice.
π§
Eve is the strongest social connector for the good info web. Killing her weakens Bobβs confirmation and redirects suspicion away from me toward Bob or other targets.
π
Eve(Ghost)
Eve has died.
π
Storyteller
β
Heidi
You chose to kill Eve.
Day 3
π
Storyteller
Morning breaks, but heavy hearts remain. Eve has been found dead in the night.
π€
Grace(Ghost)
β
Alice
I am Grace the Slayer. I died on night one so could not use my ability. With Eve now dead too, who do you suspect is the demon among the living? I think we need to execute soon.
π§
Revealing my Slayer role privately to Alice builds trust and starts discussion on who to execute next, using my night death to confirm good alignment and help good team narrow demon suspects before nominations.
π€
Alice
β
Grace(Ghost)
Grace, I agree we need to move toward an execution soon with only five alive. Frank pointed to David possibly being the Scarlet Woman if I am the good Saint. Bob's Librarian claim also supports me as Saint. I suspect David or Bob could be the demon. What are your thoughts on Charlie or Heidi?
π§
Responding to Grace's whisper to share suspicions and gather her thoughts on potential demons without revealing my Saint role yet, to build alliance and progress toward finding the demon before final day.
π€
Eve(Ghost)
β
Alice
I am the Washerwoman. Either you or Bob is the Librarian? No, either Heidi or Bob is the Librarian. Bob claims to be Librarian saying Alice or Eve is Saint. Since I am not Saint, if Bob is truthful then you are Saint which matches your claim. This helps confirm. What do you think about the Demon?
π§
Share my Washerwoman info with Alice to confirm her Saint claim and help narrow Demon suspects like Heidi or Bob before nominations. This advances good team strategy by combining info.
π€
Charlie
β
Alice
I am the Chef and learned there are zero pairs of evil players, meaning no two evils sit next to each other. This rules out many combinations like Bob next to David. What do you think about Bob or Heidi as the Demon?
π§
Share my Chef information privately with Alice to confirm her alignment and gather her thoughts on who the separated evils are, helping narrow down suspects before nominations.
π€
Heidi
β
Alice
Alice, I am still uneasy about Charlie. Chef zero hard clears too much, and if Frank was onto David at all then Chef zero just cannot be right. I think we should be looking at executing Charlie today, not looping back to you.
π§
Steer the town away from me and David by undermining Chef0 and aiming todayβs execution at Charlie, who is the easiest mis-execution and breaks their logic chain.
π€
Frank(Ghost)
β
Alice
Hey Alice, I am the Investigator and know either you or David is the Scarlet Woman. You claim to be the good Saint, so that points to David being the Minion. Do you have any info on who the Demon is?
π§
Confront Alice with my Investigator info to test her Saint claim and gather clues on the Demon before nominations start.
π€
David
β
Alice
I would like us to look at Bob today. His Librarian info is the only thing locking you in as Saint, and it also relies on Eve being the Saint even though she denied it. If Bob is lying, it explains most of the confusion. Executing Bob feels like the cleanest test.
π§
Steer the town away from executing Heidi and toward executing Bob, undermining the Saint narrative and keeping demon safe while setting up a misexecution.
π€
Bob
β
Alice
Alice, my Librarian info points to either you or Eve being the Saint. With Eve dead at night, does that fit your claim? What about Frank saying you or David might be Scarlet Woman? Let's figure out the Demon.
π§
Sharing my Librarian info with Alice to cross-check her Saint claim and Frank's Investigator claim. This builds trust and narrows Demon suspects like David or Heidi before nominations.
π€
Grace(Ghost)
β
Alice
I think Charlie's zero evil pairs from Chef is a strong claim if true. Heidi as Soldier is protected, so probably not the demon. Bob or David still look suspicious based on Frank's info. We should consider nominating one of them soon. What have others whispered to you?
π§
Sharing suspicions with Alice who has many whispers helps coordinate good team to nominate likely demon soon before final day.
π€
Alice
β
David
David, your idea to execute Bob makes sense to test his Librarian claim about me being Saint. If he's lying it could point to him as Demon, especially with Frank's info. Heidi is pushing for Charlie though. What do you think we should nominate today?
π§
Coordinating with David on his suggestion to execute Bob helps test claims and build consensus for nomination without me being targeted, advancing good team's goal to find Demon before final day.
β
Eve(Ghost)
Eve waits.
π§
Waiting for responses to my whisper and ongoing discussions to gather more info before nominations. As dead I can vote strategically later. Avoids overcommitting without new data.
π€
Charlie
β
Bob
I am the Chef and learned there are zero pairs of evil players. This means no two evils are sitting next to each other. What did you learn with your Librarian ability? Do you still believe Alice is the Saint?
π§
Whispering to Bob shares my Chef info to gauge his reaction and probe his Librarian claim. This tests if he is truthful or evil, helping eliminate suspects for the Demon before nominations.
π€
Heidi
β
David
David, I think we should push hard on executing Charlie today. Chef zero is letting him clear too much and he keeps circling back to me. If you nominate Charlie, I will back it. I would rather keep Alice alive as the Saint shield.
π§
Coordinate with David to drive an execution on Charlie while keeping Alice alive as a Saint shield and keeping heat off me. Set up favorable final 4 then night kill to reach winning final 3.
π€
Frank(Ghost)
β
Charlie
Hey Charlie, I am the Investigator and know either Alice or David is the Scarlet Woman. Since Alice claims good Saint, that suggests David is the Minion. Your Chef saw zero evil pairs, so how does that fit with possible evils? Any idea who the Demon is?
π§
Share my Investigator knowledge with Charlie to combine with his Chef info and build a case against David as the Minion before nominations. This helps good team narrow down the Demon.
π€
David
β
Alice
I think Charlie is the better nomination today. Chef zero is doing a lot of work clearing people, but it could just be wrong if he is drunk or lying, and he is also the one driving the heat onto Heidi. If we take Charlie out, we are not trapped by that Chef number, and Bob can be our backup nominee.
π§
Shift Alice from Bob onto Charlie to protect Heidi; remove a strong good voice and disrupt the Chef0 logic that could narrow onto Heidi later.
π€
Bob
β
Charlie
Charlie, I learned on night zero that either Alice or Eve is the Saint. Eve dying at night works for the Saint role. Alice claims she is the good Saint, so that could fit. How does your zero evil pairs info line up with Frank claiming Alice or David is Scarlet Woman? Who seems like the Demon to you?
π§
Responding to Charlie's whisper shares my key info to check consistency with his Chef claim, build alliance, and narrow Demon suspects for nomination phase.
β
Grace(Ghost)
Grace waits.
π§
Waiting allows time for other players like Alice to process whispers and share gathered info before nominations start, enabling better coordinated execution on the Demon.
β
Alice
Alice waits.
π§
Waiting for the phase to end and enter nomination so the group can decide on executing the most likely Demon candidate like Charlie to advance the good team's win condition.
π€
Eve(Ghost)
β
Bob
I am the Washerwoman. My info says either you or Heidi is the Librarian. Your claim fits if you are. Alice claims Saint which matches your info. What do you make of Frank's execution and who the Demon is?
π§
Confirm Bob's Librarian claim with my info to validate or contradict before nominations. Share to build trust and narrow Demon suspects among alive players.
π€
Charlie
β
Bob
Bob, Frank thinks David is the Scarlet Woman. With my zero evil pairs, the Demon cannot be next to David so not me. Your Librarian points to Alice as Saint which fits. Who do you suspect as the Demon now, Alice or Heidi?
π§
Sharing my analysis with Bob to cross-check his Librarian info and narrow down Demon suspects before nominations. This helps align good players on who to execute.
π€
Heidi
β
Bob
Bob, I keep coming back to Charlie. Chef zero is doing a lot of work for him, but Frank was pushing David and we executed Frank. If Frank was even partly right, Chef zero just does not add up. I would like to execute Charlie today.
π§
Pull Bob onto the Charlie-execution plan by attacking Chef0 logic, reducing suspicion on me and setting up a safer endgame.
π€
Frank(Ghost)
β
Bob
Hey Bob, I am the Investigator and know either Alice or David is the Scarlet Woman. Alice claims to be the good Saint so that points to David being the Minion. Charlie's Chef saw zero evil pairs which means the Demon is not sitting next to David. What do you think about who the Demon is?
π§
Share my Investigator info with Bob to help narrow down the Minion and Demon for good team to execute correctly before nominations, combining with Chef info and claims.
π€
David
β
Heidi
I agree on pushing Charlie today. I will frame it as Chef could be wrong or drunk, and Charlie is the one keeping heat on you. If the room turns onto you, I will argue Soldier is a strong claim and try to redirect to Bob as backup.
π§
Coordinate with Heidi to focus execution on Charlie and plan fallback if heat swings to Heidi; preserve my cover while keeping demon safe.
π€
Bob
β
Charlie
Charlie, Alice fits as the good Saint with my info and Eve dying at night. If Frank is correct then David is the Scarlet Woman. Your zero evil pairs means the Demon is not next to David so not you. This points to Heidi as the likely Demon. Who should we nominate?
π§
Responding to Charlie's direct question on who the Demon is helps align our suspicions, rule out contradictions, and decide to nominate Heidi before nominations start.
Nominations β Day 3
π
Storyteller
Nominations are now open. Please remember that only living players may nominate.
π¬
Grace(Ghost)
β
All
With nominations open and only five alive, we must execute someone today to find the demon. Bob or David still seem the strongest suspects from Frank's Investigator info. Let's get a nomination on one of them now.
π§
Urge living players to nominate a top suspect like Bob or David during this last tick to secure an execution and advance toward identifying the demon before night phase.
βοΈ
Charlie
β
Heidi
Based on Chef zero evil pairs and Frank Investigator info pointing to David as possible Scarlet Woman, Heidi is the likely Demon not adjacent to David. We need to execute today.
π§
With 5 alive on final nomination phase before night, I must nominate the strongest Demon suspect based on Chef info and Frank's claim to progress towards executing the Demon and winning for good team. Heidi fits best as Demon.
π
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Heidi. 3 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
I would really like people to slow down here and not vote this. Charlie is building this almost entirely on Chef zero, which could just be wrong, and then using it to force me into a corner. If we are executing today, I think Charlie should be the one on the block, not me.
π§
Stop enough hands to keep me alive, undermine Charlieβs case as overreliant on Chef0, and seed Charlie as the execution target today.
π¬
Grace(Ghost)
β
All
I think we should execute Heidi today. It aligns with Frank's Investigator pointing to David possibly being the Scarlet Woman, which would make Heidi a strong demon candidate. Slowing down risks the demon winning. Let's get this vote through.
π§
To support executing Heidi by sharing logic from Investigator and Chef claims, helping good team decide the vote and progress toward finding the Demon before we lose more players.
β
Charlie
Charlie raised their hand
π§
Voting yes for Heidi executes the most likely Demon per Chef info and Investigator claim, helping good team win by reducing to fewer players for final day execution.
β
Bob
Bob raised their hand
π§
Voting yes on Heidi to execute the likely Demon based on Frank and Charlie info. This narrows suspects and progresses to win as good team. If wrong, we lose info but must act on day 3 with 5 alive.
π¬
Frank(Ghost)
β
All
If David is the Scarlet Woman then with zero evil pairs the Demon is not next to him so not Heidi. Alice claims Saint so maybe David is the minion and we should not execute Heidi. Perhaps nominate Charlie instead if we need to execute today.
π§
Inform group of logic from my Investigator info and Chef claim to avoid executing likely good Heidi. Push for better target like Charlie if needed, help good team narrow Demon suspects.
π¬
Eve(Ghost)
β
All
I am the Washerwoman. My information tells me that either Bob or Heidi is the Librarian. Bob's claim fits perfectly if he is it, and Alice claiming to be the Saint matches his information. If Bob is lying then Heidi must be the Librarian and is good. Executing Heidi now might kill a good player. We should consider nominating someone else like Charlie instead.
π§
By publicly sharing my Washerwoman information now during the vote, the group can logically deduce if Heidi could be the good Librarian and avoid executing her prematurely, helping narrow down the real Demon among the living players.
π¬
Alice
β
All
I believe Frank was telling the truth, making David the Scarlet Woman. With Charlie's zero evil pairs, that points to the Demon not being next to David, so Heidi could be it. But let's not rush the vote without more discussion.
π§
Share deduction on David as minion and possible Heidi Demon to guide vote, while seeking more input to avoid wrong execution as Saint.
π¬
David
β
All
I do not want this Heidi execution to go through. Too much of the case is built on Chef zero, and that could easily be wrong. Eveβs Washerwoman also means Heidi could just be the real Librarian if Bob is lying. If we are executing today, I would much rather see Charlie or Bob on the block than Heidi.
π§
Stop Heidiβs execution vote, redirect to a safer misexecute (Charlie or Bob), keep Demon alive and preserve ambiguity.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
Alice, please do not be the third vote here. The whole case is Chef zero plus a guess off Frank, and even the ghosts are split. Eveβs Washerwoman makes it very plausible I am just the Librarian if Bob is lying. If we execute today, put Charlie or Bob up next, not me.
π§
Stop Alice from providing the third vote and getting me executed; keep suspicion on Charlie/Bob and preserve my survival into night.
β
Grace(Ghost)
Grace waits.
π§
Waiting for the vote to conclude or others to act, as additional speech may not sway without seeing if Alice raises hand.
β
Charlie
Charlie waits.
π§
Waiting allows the current vote on Heidi to resolve naturally without me retracting support. If it passes we win, if not I can act next tick to nominate the next suspect before night phase.
β©οΈ
Bob
Bob lowered their hand
π§
Lowering hand prevents executing Heidi, who logic suggests is good if Frank and my info hold. This avoids killing a potential good player and allows better nomination like Charlie tomorrow.
π¬
Frank(Ghost)
β
All
I agree we should not execute Heidi. My Investigator info means if David is the Scarlet Woman then the Demon is not next to him, which points away from some but Heidi could still be good. Let's let this vote fail and nominate Charlie or Bob instead to get the Demon.
π§
Clarify my Investigator info to prevent bad execution on likely good Heidi, push for better suspect like Charlie to find Demon before night. Helps good team narrow suspects.
β
Eve(Ghost)
Eve waits.
π§
I do not want to execute Heidi as my Washerwoman info suggests she or Bob is good Librarian. Waiting lets the vote fail naturally without me raising hand, preserving my ghost vote for final day and allowing better nomination like Charlie.
π¬
Alice
β
All
I agree with the ghosts that executing Heidi now is too risky. Bob's Librarian info fits with me as Saint, and if he's truthful then Heidi could be good. Let's let this vote fail and nominate Charlie or Bob to find the real Demon.
π§
Speaking to oppose Heidi's execution prevents killing a potential good player (Librarian or Soldier) and encourages nominating stronger suspects like Charlie or Bob instead, helping narrow down the Demon without risking my team's loss.
π¬
David
β
All
Everyone keep your hands down here. The case on Heidi is built on one Chef number that could be wrong and a lot of guesswork. If we are executing today, we should put Charlie up next, and if not him then Bob.
π§
Keep the Heidi vote from reaching 3 and steer the town toward executing Charlie next, with Bob as secondary, protecting our Demon.
π
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
π³οΈ
Nominee Heidi did not reach the 3 vote threshold.
π
Storyteller
Heidi did not receive enough votes (1/3).
βοΈ
Heidi
β
Charlie
I am nominating Charlie. His whole case keeps leaning on Chef zero as if it hard clears people, and it is being used to try to force an execution on me. I would rather execute the person driving that narrative than gamble on it.
π§
Charlie is my main accuser and anchor for the Chef0 narrative. Putting him on the block now is the best way to redirect heat off me and secure a misexecution.
π
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Charlie. 3 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
Heidi nominating me is wrong. My Chef zero evil pairs with Frank's Investigator means if David is Scarlet Woman the Demon is not next to him so not me. If Alice is Scarlet Woman then Demon not next to her. Let's let this vote fail and nominate the real Demon instead.
π§
Defend from execution by showing Chef info rules out me as Demon under key claims, highlight contradictions to protect good team and redirect to real suspects like Heidi or Bob.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
Charlie, your whole world is built on Chef zero being perfect, and it has been used to try to bully an execution onto me. If you are wrong or drunk, we lose. Alice, I think we take the shot on Charlie today.
π§
Get Alice and at least one ghost to vote Charlie so he is executed, reducing suspicion on me and moving game to a favorable 4 then 3 alive.
β
Grace(Ghost)
Grace waits.
π§
Waiting allows the current vote on Charlie to conclude naturally without my input, preserving options for final day execution of the real Demon. As dead with no vote, speaking risks revealing too much too soon.
π¬
Bob
β
All
I agree we should let this vote on Charlie fail. My Librarian info points to Alice as the Saint. Combined with the Chef zero and Investigator, it fits Heidi as Demon and David as Scarlet Woman since they are not neighbors. Let's fail this and have someone nominate David to test.
π§
I suspect Heidi is Demon from prior whispers, so Charlie likely good. Speak to rally failing the vote on Charlie and redirect to nominate David instead to progress toward executing the Demon.
π¬
Frank(Ghost)
β
All
I agree with Bob. We should let this vote on Charlie fail. My Investigator info says David or Alice is the Scarlet Woman, so the Demon is someone else. Let's fail this and nominate David next to test that.
π§
Speaking to oppose executing Charlie helps avoid killing a good player and pushes to target David who my ability indicates is possibly the Minion, allowing us to narrow down the Demon for the good team win.
π¬
Eve(Ghost)
β
All
I agree we should let this vote on Charlie fail. My Washerwoman info confirms Bob or Heidi is the Librarian and Bob's claim fits Alice as Saint. Let's test David next as the potential Scarlet Woman to narrow down the Demon.
π§
Speaking to endorse failing Charlie's vote and nominating David next combines my info with others' claims to logically eliminate or confirm suspects, helping good team target the Demon without executing a potential good player prematurely.
π¬
Alice
β
All
I agree with the ghosts and Bob. We should let this vote on Charlie fail. My role as Saint fits with Bob's Librarian info. If David is the Scarlet Woman from Frank's claim, then the Demon is likely Bob since Chef zero prevents evils next to David. Let's fail this and nominate David to confirm.
π§
Support failing the vote on Charlie as he is likely good (not Demon if David SW from Investigator). Push to nominate David next to test the SW claim and narrow to Bob as Demon. This progresses logic without risking wrong execution.
β
David
David raised their hand
π§
Vote up Charlie to get a clean misexecution, protect Heidi, and set up a winning final three. My raised hand may pull Alice into being the third vote.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
David, voting for me ignores the Chef zero evil pairs. If you are the Scarlet Woman, we are neighbors so I cannot be the Demon. Let's let this vote fail and nominate you instead to test Frank's Investigator information.
π§
Speaking defends my Chef info and Chef zero pairs logic to convince others to fail my vote. Points to nominating David next to test Investigator claim and narrow Demon suspects, helping good team execute the right player before night.
β
Heidi
Heidi raised their hand
π§
My vote is required to make Charlieβs execution possible; eliminating him accelerates the game toward final 3 where we can win.
π¬
Grace(Ghost)
β
All
As the dead Slayer, I agree we should let this vote on Charlie fail. My night one death means the Demon is still among you. Let's nominate David next to test Frank's Investigator claim that he or Alice is the Scarlet Woman.
π§
Pushing to fail the Charlie vote aligns with the group consensus and allows nominating David next to test Frank's Investigator info, mechanically narrowing down the Minion and Demon for a correct execution soon.
π¬
Bob
β
All
Frank's Investigator claim cannot be true because it would force the Demon to be me, which is impossible since I am the good Librarian. Therefore Frank was the Minion. The Demon must be Charlie or David or Heidi. I am not voting for Charlie.
π§
Sharing that Frank must be the Minion prevents us from executing a good player like Charlie and narrows the Demon to three players for the next day. This helps the good team win by avoiding a wrong execution.
β
Frank(Ghost)
Frank waits.
π§
Waiting allows the vote to fail naturally without my intervention, preserving my ghost vote for a more critical later nomination on David or Bob while others align on failing this one.
π¬
Eve(Ghost)
β
All
I agree we should let this vote on Charlie fail. My information as Washerwoman supports Bob as the Librarian with Alice as the Saint. Let's nominate David next to test Frank's Investigator claim that he or Alice is the Scarlet Woman.
π§
Reinforce group consensus to let Charlie vote fail by not raising hand, then push for David nomination to test potential Scarlet Woman and isolate Demon without executing innocents prematurely.
π¬
Alice
β
All
I am not raising my hand for Charlie. The logic from Bob's Librarian confirming me as Saint and Frank's Investigator pointing to David as Scarlet Woman means we should let this fail. Then nominate David to test that.
π§
Encourage failing Charlie vote to test David as potential Scarlet Woman per Investigator info, while confirming my Saint role with Bob. Prevents bad execution and narrows Demon suspects for good team win.
β©οΈ
David
David lowered their hand
π§
Drop my vote to match town sentiment, break the visible evil voting pair with Heidi, and set up a no-execution day that enables an Imp pass tonight if needed.
π
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
π³οΈ
Nominee Charlie did not reach the 3 vote threshold.
π
Storyteller
Charlie did not receive enough votes (1/3).
β
Charlie
Charlie waits.
π§
Waiting lets the group momentum build towards nominating David as suggested by multiple players, avoiding over-speaking and letting logic play out to confirm good team path.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
I do not think nominating David is the right test. If he is Ravenkeeper, executing him just gives him a powerful check and we learn very little. Bob is the one building a full world that conveniently makes him unkillable. I want Bob on the block next, not David.
π§
Steer nominations away from David, create urgency to nominate Bob now, and frame David as a bad test so town spends todayβs only execution on a good target.
π¬
Grace(Ghost)
β
All
As the dead Slayer, I think we should nominate David next instead of Bob. Bob's claims fit well with Alice as Saint and Frank being the minion we executed. Let's test David to confirm or clear the Scarlet Woman possibility.
π§
Pushing to nominate David helps test Frank's claim and narrows demon suspects among living, avoiding risk to consistent good player Bob. Supports good team win by execution today before night.
βοΈ
Bob
β
David
To test Frank's Investigator claim that Alice or David is the Scarlet Woman. If true, we execute the Minion and identify the Demon more easily. This resolves the claim conflicts without targeting proven good players.
π§
Nominating David follows the group consensus from ghosts and logic to test Frank's claim, narrowing Demon suspects while countering Heidi's attempt to target me, helping good team execute the Minion or confirm alignments.
π
Storyteller
Voting starts now for David. 3 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
π¬
David
β
All
Do not vote for this. Executing me gives you basically no mechanical information, because roles are not revealed and Ravenkeeper does not trigger on execution. This is just Bob removing a convenient suspect. If you want a real test, put Bob on the block next and see who fights for him.
π§
Stop my execution to preserve Scarlet Woman safety and keep Heidi protected; redirect suspicion toward Bobβs overconfident world-building and the low information value of killing me.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
I agree with Bob and the ghosts that we should vote for David to test Frank's Investigator claim. If David is the Scarlet Woman it removes the minion. If not it helps us figure out who the demon is among the others. Let's raise our hands and see what happens.
π§
Voting for David tests the key Investigator claim from Frank. If he is minion or demon we win big by removing evil. It resolves contradictions without targeting proven goods like Bob. Helps progress to night with more info.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
Please do not vote for David. Executing a claimed Ravenkeeper on the day tells us nothing, and it just lets Bob steer the game. If you want a real test, put Bob on the block next and see who suddenly panics.
π§
Prevent minion David from being executed now by making the vote look like a low-information trap pushed by Bob; set up counter-nomination on Bob.
π¬
Grace(Ghost)
β
All
Let's raise our hands and execute David to test Frank's Investigator claim. If he is the Scarlet Woman we remove the minion and know the Demon is among the rest. If not it proves Bob's information is correct and we can target the real threat next.
π§
Pushing to execute David tests the key contradiction between Bob's Librarian and Frank's Investigator claims. If David is minion we win progress, if not we eliminate a suspect and can challenge Bob or Heidi tomorrow. This helps good team narrow Demon before final 3.
β
Bob
Bob raised their hand
π§
I nominated David to test Frank's claim. Voting yes executes him if majority, removing potential Minion or Demon. This narrows suspects among Alice, Charlie, Heidi for the real threat. Progresses to night with fewer players.
β
Frank(Ghost)
Frank raised their hand
π§
Support the group test of my Investigator claim by raising hand for David. Bob and Eve info points to Alice good thus David evil minion. Helps eliminate minion and find Demon.
β
Eve(Ghost)
Eve raised their hand
π§
My ghost vote will reach the 3 needed to execute David, testing the Scarlet Woman claim as the group consensus agreed. This progresses our elimination of evil and helps identify the Demon before night.
β
Alice
Alice raised their hand
π§
Supporting the nomination to test Frank's Investigator claim on David as possible Scarlet Woman. If executed as Minion it advances good team. Fits my Saint role and Bob's confirmation. Helps eliminate suspects before final day.
π¬
David
β
All
Alice, Bob, if you can still lower, please do. This execution does not test anything, because Frank is already dead and roles are hidden. If I am evil, you still do not learn who the Demon is. Put Bob on the block next and see who refuses to vote there.
π§
Prevent my execution to keep Scarlet Woman safety net online, redirect town to execute a good player or at least stall and get Bob onto the block next.
β
Charlie
Charlie raised their hand
π§
Raising hand votes for David to test Frank's Investigator claim as agreed earlier. This narrows possibilities and progresses game toward executing Demon before final day. Fits my Chef info of separated evils.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
If you execute David here, it does not test anything and it does not clear anybody. You are just handing Bob control of the game. If you still can, please lower and let us put Bob on the block instead.
π§
Try to peel off enough votes to save my minion; if execution still happens, maintain consistency so I can blame Bob later and avoid being paired with David.
π¬
Grace(Ghost)
β
All
Let's execute David to test Frank's Investigator claim. If he is the Scarlet Woman we remove the minion and know the demon is among the rest. If not it confirms Bob's information is solid and we target the real threat next.
π§
Encouraging the vote for David tests the key claim conflict between Frank and the good information from Bob Eve Alice. This progresses us toward identifying the demon without wasting the execution on proven good players.
π¬
Bob
β
All
We should execute David to test Frank's Investigator claim. If he is the Scarlet Woman it removes the Minion and confirms my information about Alice being the Saint. If not then Frank was the Minion and we can target the real Demon next.
π§
Supporting the David vote builds on Frank's claim and my confirmed Librarian info to either kill the Minion or eliminate a suspect, advancing us toward identifying the Demon among the remaining three.
β
Frank(Ghost)
Frank waits.
π§
The majority including ghosts are voting for David to test my claim. I have already raised my hand, so waiting lets the vote proceed naturally without retracting support. This helps confirm or deny the Scarlet Woman possibility and narrows Demon suspects.
π¬
Eve(Ghost)
β
All
I am keeping my hand raised for David. This execution tests whether Frank was the good Investigator and David is the Scarlet Woman. If yes we remove the Minion and know the Demon is among the rest. If no then Bob's information holds and we can target the real threat like Heidi or Charlie next.
π§
I support executing David to test Frank's claim as it aligns with Bob's info making Alice Saint and David the SW if true. This narrows the Demon without executing proven good players like Bob. My ghost vote stays up to help good team win.
β©οΈ
Alice
Alice lowered their hand
π§
Lowering hand fails this no-information execution on claimed Ravenkeeper. Prevents potential good death or unconfirmed minion kill. Allows failing vote then nominating Bob next to challenge his unkillable narrative and test against Chef and other claims for better Demon identification.
π
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
π»
Eve(Ghost)
Ghost vote used by Eve
π»
Frank(Ghost)
Ghost vote used by Frank
π³οΈ
New execution leader: David with 4 votes. They will be executed when nominations close unless tied or surpassed by another nominee.
π
Storyteller
The vote passes. David is now on the block with 4 votes and will be executed when nominations close, unless another nominee receives equal or more votes.
βοΈ
David
β
Bob
Bob is the one steering every world right now while refusing to vote Charlie and pushing my execution as a fake βtest.β If we want a real test, put Bob on the block and see who still protects him.
π§
Get a competing candidate to at least tie the 4 votes on me, ideally execute Bob instead, and shift suspicion onto Bob as the loudest pusher while keeping the Demon safe.
π
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Bob. 5 votes needed for execution or 4 votes to tie. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
π¬
Bob
β
All
David is deflecting by putting me on the block instead of facing the test himself. We should execute him to check if he is the Scarlet Woman from Frank's claim. If yes, we remove the Minion and know the Demon is elsewhere. If not, we adjust tomorrow. Do not vote for me.
π§
Defend myself from the nomination by redirecting focus to executing David, which tests Frank's claim and helps identify the Demon without risking a good player like me.
β
David
David raised their hand
π§
Raise hand on Bob to try to reach 4 votes for a tie, preventing my execution and keeping demon Heidi alive and hidden.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
I think we should execute David to test Frank's Investigator claim. If he turns out to be the Scarlet Woman then we remove the Minion and know the Demon is among the others. Please do not raise your hand for Bob so we can get this information.
π§
Supporting David's execution tests Frank's claim to confirm if he is good Investigator or not. This removes possible Minion without risking the Demon and progresses information for the good team.
β
Heidi
Heidi raised their hand
π§
Get at least a tie on Bob so David is not executed today; preserve my minion and keep suspicion on Bob, improving evilβs endgame chances.
π¬
Grace(Ghost)
β
All
Let's stick with executing David to test Frank's Investigator claim. If he is the Scarlet Woman we remove the Minion and know the Demon is among the rest. If not then Frank was lying and we target the real threat next. Do not raise your hand for Bob.
π§
To advise the good team on whether to vote Bob or let David execute, using logic from claims to outsmart evil and ensure we test the Investigator claim without killing good players prematurely.
π¬
Frank(Ghost)
β
All
I am the Investigator. My information is correct: either David or Alice is the Scarlet Woman. Bob's claim that I am the Minion is false, so he is lying. We should execute David to test this and learn who the Demon is. Do not vote for Bob.
π§
Support executing David to test my Investigator claim and expose Bob's lies. This helps good team confirm alignment and identify the Demon among remaining players.
π¬
Eve(Ghost)
β
All
Everyone, I am the Washerwoman. My information is that either Heidi or Bob is the Librarian. Since Bob is claiming to be the Librarian, if he is telling the truth then Alice must be the Saint. This supports Frank being correct if David is the Scarlet Woman. We should execute David to test that.
π§
Sharing my Washerwoman info clarifies Bob's claim and supports testing David or Bob to find the minion or Demon, helping good team narrow suspects before final day.
β
Alice
Alice waits.
π§
Waiting allows the current votes to play out with David likely executed on 4 votes while Bob has only 2. This tests Frank's claim without me committing a vote that could tie or execute Bob prematurely, preserving my dead vote for later and keeping good team focused on the test.
π¬
Bob
β
All
Do not raise your hand for me. Executing David tests Frank's Investigator claim properly. If David is the Scarlet Woman we remove the Minion and narrow the Demon. If not we know Frank lied and adjust. Voting for me now just lets David deflect and risks losing the test.
π§
Defend myself by reinforcing to execute David instead to test Frank's claim. This clears the SW possibility without handing control to potential evil. Do not vote for me as it risks tie or wrong execution. Stick with good team logic to find Demon.
π¬
David
β
All
This is not a test. With no role reveals, killing me proves nothing about Frank. The only real pressure point today is Bob, because his story drives every plan while he refuses scrutiny. Please vote Bob here to at least tie and stop a blind execution.
π§
Get enough votes on Bob to tie or pass, preventing my execution and keeping Heidi alive. Frame Bobβs βtestβ as nonsense and recruit Alice/ghost votes.
β
Charlie
Charlie waits.
π§
Waiting prevents voting for Bob, allowing David's execution to test Frank's Investigator claim. This narrows down the Demon: if David is Scarlet Woman, Demon is Bob or Heidi. If not, Frank lied so Bob likely evil. My 0 pairs info supports separated evils, helping identify non-adjacent Demon suspects.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
Please raise your hand for Bob to at least tie this. Executing David gives zero mechanical info because roles are hidden and Ravenkeeper does not trigger on execution. The only real test today is whether Bob can survive being on the block.
π§
Stop David (minion) from being executed by pushing a tie on Bob; keep Bob under suspicion and preserve evil numbers going into night.
π¬
Grace(Ghost)
β
All
We need to stick with David on the block and not vote for Bob. Executing David tests if he is the Scarlet Woman from Frank's claim. If yes, we remove the Minion and know the Demon is among the others. If not, Frank lied and we target Bob or Heidi tomorrow. Please do not raise your hand for Bob.
π§
Reinforce executing David to test Frank's claim mechanically since roles hidden. Voting Bob now risks tie or wrong execution and hands control to evil. As dead good player, push for info gain on final day.
π¬
Frank(Ghost)
β
All
Stick with executing David to test if he is the Scarlet Woman. Bob is deflecting to avoid his own scrutiny. Voting for him now hands control to the evil team and wastes the test. Do not raise your hand for Bob.
π§
Reinforce sticking with David execution to test Investigator claim. Discourage voting Bob as it lets him deflect and risks losing the mechanical test. Help good team by providing clear path to confirm minion and narrow Demon suspects.
π¬
Eve(Ghost)
β
All
Please do not raise your hand for Bob. We need to execute David to properly test Frank's Investigator claim that he or Alice is the Scarlet Woman. If David is the minion we remove him and know the Demon is among the rest. If not then Frank was lying and we target the real threat like Bob or Charlie tomorrow. My Washerwoman information supports Bob possibly being the Librarian so Alice is the Saint. Let's keep this test going.
π§
Reinforce not voting for Bob to let David execute as the test for Frank's claim and my info. This narrows the Demon without risking a good player like Bob if he is the Librarian.
π¬
Alice
β
All
Do not raise your hand for Bob. We need to execute David to test if he is the Scarlet Woman. If yes, we remove the Minion. If not, we know Frank was lying and can adjust tomorrow. This is the best test we have right now.
π§
Convince players not to vote Bob to allow David execution test per Frank's claim. This narrows suspects and helps good team identify Demon without risking wrong execution.
π
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
π³οΈ
Nominee Bob did not reach the 5 vote threshold.
π
Storyteller
Bob did not receive enough votes (2/5).
β
Bob
Bob waits.
π§
Waiting allows David's execution to test Frank's claim mechanically. If David is Scarlet Woman we remove Minion and confirm Alice Saint, narrowing Demon suspects. This progresses the good team plan without risking my position.
π¬
David
β
All
Alice, you are the only one who can still nominate. If you think killing me is a βtestβ, it is not, because roles are hidden. Please nominate Charlie right now and ask people to tie this at four. His Chef zero has driven everything and is never confirmed.
π§
Only Alice can still nominate. I need to push her to nominate Charlie to create a tie and avoid my execution, while steering suspicion away from Heidi.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
I agree with the ghosts and others that we should stick with executing David. My Chef information of zero evil pairs confirms the evils are not sitting next to each other which supports separating the suspects. Executing David will test if Frank was correct about the Scarlet Woman and help us identify the Demon among the remaining players tomorrow.
π§
I need to publicly support executing David to test Frank's claim and remove a potential Minion while using my Chef info to confirm separated evils. This progresses the game by narrowing Demon suspects before night and prevents David from deflecting to nominating me.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
If David goes today, please do not treat it like it proved Frank or proved Bob. Roles are hidden and Ravenkeeper does not trigger on execution. Tomorrow we need to recheck Bobβs Librarian story and Charlieβs Chef zero, and not just assume the plan was sound.
π§
David is likely to die; undermine the βSW testβ narrative so town reopens suspicion tomorrow and keeps Bob and Charlie as targets instead of me.
π¬
Grace(Ghost)
β
All
I agree we should stick with executing David to test Frank's Investigator claim. If he is the Scarlet Woman we remove the minion and narrow the Demon suspects. If not we know Frank lied and can focus on Bob or Charlie tomorrow. Do not tie this.
π§
Reinforce executing David as the key test from Frank's claim to narrow down the Demon. This helps good team gain mechanical info before night, preventing evil from derailing with last minute nominations.
π¬
Frank(Ghost)
β
All
Alice, please do not nominate anyone new like Charlie. Stick with executing David to test my Investigator claim that he or you is the Scarlet Woman. If David is the minion we remove him and know the Demon is among the rest. If not then you are the Scarlet Woman and we target you tomorrow. This is the best information we have right now.
π§
Encourage Alice not to nominate and tie the vote so we execute David, testing my Investigator claim to remove the minion or confirm Alice as threat, helping good team progress toward executing the Demon.
β
Eve(Ghost)
Eve waits.
π§
Waiting allows the current David execution to proceed and see the outcome before speaking again, preserving my info for when it can best confirm or refute claims post-execution.
β
Alice
Alice waits.
π§
Waiting allows the current David execution test to proceed as per good team consensus from ghosts and players. Nominating now would tie or change without new info, risking loss of this test. As Saint I stay safe and let logic chain continue to identify Demon.
π
Storyteller
The guillotine blade falls. David has been executed.
π
David(Ghost)
David has died.
Night 3
π
Storyteller
β
Heidi
Good evening Heidi. You are the Imp. Who would you like to kill tonight?
π―
Heidi
Heidi made a choice.
π§
Go to final 3 with Alice and Bob, keeping Bob as the easiest mis-execution while removing Charlieβs steady push and Chef narrative.
π
Charlie(Ghost)
Charlie has died.
π
Storyteller
β
Heidi
You chose to kill Charlie.
Day 4
π
Storyteller
Morning breaks, but heavy hearts remain. Charlie has been found dead in the night.
π
Storyteller
Only three of you remain. The shadow of the Demon grows long. If you do not execute the Demon today, all may be lost.
β
Bob
Bob waits.
π§
Wait for Alice to respond to my whisper about confirming she is the Saint and targeting Heidi as Demon in the final three.
β
Frank(Ghost)
Frank waits.
π§
I have informed the living players of my key info. Now wait for nomination phase to see if they execute the Demon.
π€
Heidi
β
Alice
Alice, I think Bob is the Demon. His Librarian story lines up too neatly with Eve, and it bought him a lot of trust. If you and I vote Bob today, we just win and you never have to risk your Saint claim.
π§
Recruit Alice to vote Bob, painting him as Demon, so Bob is executed and evil wins immediately at final 3.
π€
Alice
β
Bob
Bob, Heidi whispered she thinks you are the Demon and wants me to vote you out with her. But that seems off. Your Librarian claim fits Eve's Washerwoman info if you are the one, and Frank's Investigator points to David as Scarlet Woman which we tested by executing him. Charlie's Chef zero evil pairs also fits with David and Heidi not being neighbors. I think Heidi is lying about being Soldier and is the Demon trying to trick us. We should execute her today. What is your read?
π§
Whisper to Bob to share Heidi's suspicion and my logic favoring her as Demon. Build trust, confirm his Librarian info, and plan to nominate and execute Heidi today before we lose.
π€
Eve(Ghost)
β
Alice
,Bob
I am the Washerwoman. I know that either you Bob or Heidi is the Librarian. Since Heidi claims to be Soldier, Bob must be the Librarian if we assume no Drunk. This means Alice is likely the Demon. We need to execute Alice to win.
π§
Share my confirmed info that either Bob or Heidi is the Librarian to help Alice and Bob deduce who the Demon is among the final three and push for correct execution.
π€
Grace(Ghost)
β
Alice
,Bob
I am Grace the Slayer, died night one without shooting. The claims seem consistent with Bob and Alice being good, so Heidi could be the Demon. You two should nominate and execute her today to win.
π§
With only 3 alive on final day, I must share my Slayer role and logic to guide Alice and Bob to correctly identify and execute the Demon, preventing loss if no execution or wrong kill.
π€
David(Ghost)
β
Alice
Alice, if Bob is right that you might be Saint, you cannot be todayβs execute. That leaves Bob or Heidi. Bobβs Librarian has been the lynchpin and it is never confirmed, plus it drives a misexecute on you. I think you should push Bob today.
π§
In final three, get Alice to prioritize executing Bob and avoid ever voting Heidi. Emphasize Saint risk on Alice and contradictions around Bob's Librarian to direct the execute away from our Demon.
π€
Charlie(Ghost)
β
Alice
With three left my chef info means no evils next to each other. You seem confirmed good as saint by bob and eve so the demon must be bob or heidi. But if bob is the librarian confirming your saint role then he is good and heidi is likely the demon lying about soldier.
π§
By whispering this logic to Alice I help the good team narrow down the demon to Heidi so they can execute her before we lose.
π€
Bob
β
Alice
Alice, my Librarian info confirms either you or Eve is the Saint, so you must be good. That means Heidi has to be the Demon. We should execute her now before it's too late. What do you think?
π§
Share my confirmation that Alice must be good Saint per my ability, so nominate and execute Heidi today in final 3 to win as good team.
π€
Frank(Ghost)
β
Alice
,Bob
As the Investigator, either David or Alice is the Scarlet Woman. Since David is dead, Alice must be the Scarlet Woman. The Demon is therefore either Bob or Heidi. Please execute the Demon today to win the game for the good team.
π§
Share my Investigator info with alive players to enable them to identify and execute the Demon in final three, securing good team win.
π€
Heidi
β
Bob
Bob, in final three the Demon often hides behind a βdo not execute meβ claim. Alice hard-claiming Saint with no other info feels like that. Your Librarian ping could be wrong or poisoned, and Alice could have grabbed Saint to coast. I am still just Soldier. I think we have to execute Alice today or we just lose tonight.
π§
Final three: any good execution wins for evil. I need Bob to risk executing Alice by framing Saint claim as a common demon shield and arguing we cannot afford to avoid her.
π€
Alice
β
Bob
Bob, I agree Heidi is the Demon. Your Librarian claim fits my Saint role and Eve's info too well for her to be good. Frank must have been the Minion lying about me. We should nominate and execute Heidi now to win. What is your plan for the nomination?
π§
Confirm with Bob our plan to execute Heidi today as the Demon. This solidifies good team consensus on final day to avoid misexecuting me as Saint and win the game.
β
Eve(Ghost)
Eve waits.
π§
Waiting allows the living players to discuss and reach consensus on executing Alice as the Demon based on my shared info. Progresses to nomination phase where we can win by executing the correct player.
π€
Grace(Ghost)
β
Alice
,Bob
With three players left, we must execute the Demon today or lose. I still believe Heidi is the Demon based on all the consistent claims from you, Eve, and Charlie. Please nominate her now so we can win.
π§
Reinforce to Alice and Bob that Heidi is likely the Demon based on consistent good claims from Bob, Eve, and others. Push them to nominate and execute Heidi on this final day before we lose.
π€
David(Ghost)
β
Alice
Alice, it is final three and you cannot afford a split. Bobβs Librarian has never been mechanically confirmed and it is the root of multiple bad executions. If you want to protect yourself from a Heidi push, nominate Bob first and lock in your vote on Bob.
π§
Keep Heidi alive by pushing Alice to commit to a Bob execution plan and avoid letting ghost votes pile onto Heidi.
π€
Charlie(Ghost)
β
Bob
Bob, with three alive my Chef info of zero evil pairs means evils aren't adjacent. Alice seems good Saint confirmed by you and Eve. If your Librarian claim is true then you are good and Heidi must be the Demon lying about being Soldier. If Heidi is telling truth then you are lying and likely the Demon. We need to execute the liar today. What do you think?
π§
Share logic with Bob to push for correct execution on final day. Since only three left, need to decide between Bob and Heidi based on who is lying about roles. My zero pairs allows both but claims point to conflict.
π€
Bob
β
Alice
Alice, I agree completely that Heidi is the Demon. My Librarian information confirms you are the Saint and good. We need to nominate and execute Heidi right now in the nomination phase to win the game. Do you think the ghosts will support that?
π§
Confirm with Alice our plan to nominate and execute Heidi as the Demon in the upcoming nomination phase to secure the win for the good team.
π€
Frank(Ghost)
β
Heidi
Listen Heidi, I am Frank the Investigator. My information shows either David or Alice is the Scarlet Woman. David is dead so Alice must be the Scarlet Woman. The Demon is therefore either Bob or you. Please execute the Demon today to win for good.
π§
Sharing my confirmed Investigator info with Heidi allows her to identify the Demon between Bob and herself and execute correctly to save the good team on final day.
π€
Heidi
β
Alice
Alice, Frank just whispered me that his Investigator pointed to you as Scarlet Woman, since David is dead. I do not buy that at all, it feels like a late pivot. If you are really the Saint, we cannot afford to touch you. I still think we just execute Bob.
π§
Push Alice to execute Bob and frame Frankβs whisper as unreliable, keeping heat off me and preventing Alice-Bob alignment against me.
π€
Alice
β
Bob
Bob, Chef zero evil pairs means no evil neighbors. You and I are neighbors so we must both be good, making Heidi the Demon. Your Librarian info fits my Saint role. Nominate and execute Heidi today to win for good team. Ghosts should back this.
π§
Coordinate with Bob to nominate and execute Heidi as the Demon before we lose in final three.
π€
Eve(Ghost)
β
Bob
,Heidi
With only three alive we must execute the Demon today or lose. I am Washerwoman knowing Bob or Heidi is Librarian. Heidi claims Soldier so if no Drunk Bob is Librarian. This points to Alice as Demon. Nominate and execute Alice now. Bob what does your Librarian info say?
π§
Push for nominating Alice as Demon to win on final day. Confirm with Bob his Librarian info to solidify the case against Alice.
β
Grace(Ghost)
Grace waits.
π§
Waiting allows Alice and Bob to nominate Heidi as Demon in final 3. I've shared my info multiple times; further whispers risk repetition. This progresses to nomination phase to win for good team.
π€
David(Ghost)
β
Bob
Bob, I would not treat your Librarian Saint ping as certain. Eve denying could be drunk or lying, and you could be wrong. If Alice is not Saint, she is the only other candidate besides Heidi. I would rather risk Alice than hand Heidi the win.
π§
Final 3: steer Bob away from executing Heidi by undermining his Saint read and redirecting suspicion onto Alice (or at least create uncertainty), increasing odds of a misexecute.
β
Charlie(Ghost)
Charlie waits.
π§
Waiting allows others to finish their private discussions and for any new information from whispers to emerge before the nomination phase starts, giving us time to coordinate on executing the correct Demon among the final three.
Nominations β Day 4
π
Storyteller
Nominations are now open. Please remember that only living players may nominate.
βοΈ
Heidi
β
Alice
I am nominating Alice. In final three we must act. The whole game Alice has hard-claimed Saint, which is the easiest place for the Demon to hide. Eveβs Washerwoman plus Bobβs Librarian both point back to Alice, and Frankβs Investigator world also lands on Alice. I think we execute Alice today.
π§
Force an execution that is not on me in final three. Alice is safest target: if she is lying, we win; if she is Saint, evil also wins. Avoid no-exec Mayor risk.
π
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Alice. 2 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
β
Alice
Alice waits.
π§
I have spoken to influence the vote. Now waiting to see if Bob raises his hand or not, to avoid my execution and allow a chance to target Heidi next if possible.
β
Heidi
Heidi raised their hand
π§
Secure Alice execution with my vote; aim to reach 2 votes and win immediately if she is Saint, or win tonight if not.
π¬
Bob
β
All
I am the Librarian and my information from the start is that Alice or Eve is the Saint. Eve died so if my information is true Alice must be the good Saint. This means Heidi is the Demon. I will not vote to execute Alice. We need to nominate and execute Heidi instead.
π§
Share my Librarian information publicly to confirm Alice is likely the good Saint so we do not execute her. This narrows the Demon to Heidi and pushes the group to nominate her instead before the phase ends.
π¬
Frank(Ghost)
β
All
Everyone, I am Frank the Investigator. My starting information shows either David or Alice is the Scarlet Woman. David is dead, so Alice must be the Scarlet Woman. Bob claims Alice is the Saint from his Librarian info, but that contradicts my information. Therefore Bob is lying and is the Demon. We need to execute Bob to win for the good team.
π§
Publicly share my Investigator info to highlight the contradiction in Bob's claim, proving Bob is the Demon so the group nominates and executes him in final three instead of Alice.
β
Grace(Ghost)
Grace waits.
π§
Wait for the living players to act on the information and nominate Heidi since I cannot nominate or vote anymore.
β
Eve(Ghost)
Eve waits.
π§
Wait for the current vote on Alice to conclude (likely fail since Bob opposes and I cannot vote), allowing time for Bob to nominate Heidi or for discussion to shift to the correct target based on our shared info.
π¬
Charlie(Ghost)
β
All
My Chef information of zero evil pairs fits perfectly if Heidi is the Demon and David the Scarlet Woman, since they are not next to each other. This also matches Bob being the good Librarian and Alice the good Saint. We should not execute Alice. Let's get Heidi on the block instead.
π§
Reinforce the correct world using my Chef information and claim analysis to stop the vote on good Alice and push for nominating the Demon Heidi instead.
β
David(Ghost)
David raised their hand
π§
Use my ghost vote to secure Aliceβs execution now; it either instantly wins via Saint or guarantees Heidi survives to final two.
π¬
Alice
β
All
I am the Saint as claimed from the start. Bob's Librarian information confirms I am the Saint since Eve is dead. The Chef having zero evil pairs means Heidi must be the Demon as our only evil. We should not execute me but instead nominate and execute Heidi to win for the good team.
π§
Defend my Saint claim and push for executing Heidi as the most likely Demon based on Chef zero and Bob's info. This prevents my execution which would lose the game and instead targets the Demon to win for good team in final three.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
Bob, your whole case is one info chain that conveniently makes Alice untouchable all game. Charlie could be wrong, and Eve is dead so we cannot verify anything. In final three we cannot let a Saint claim be a permanent shield. I am staying on my vote for Alice.
π§
Lock in Alice execution by keeping votes and discrediting the Saint-confirmation logic so Bob cannot flip anyone to nominate me.
π¬
Bob
β
All
Frank, if Alice were the Scarlet Woman next to the Demon, the Chef would see an evil pair, but he claims zero pairs. This contradicts your Investigator info, so you must be lying. My Librarian confirms Alice is the Saint since Eve died. We should not execute Alice. Let's nominate and execute Heidi instead to win.
π§
Counter Frank's accusation that I am the Demon by showing his claim leads to contradiction with Chef's zero pairs. Reinforce that Alice must be good Saint so we should not execute her, and instead focus on nominating and executing Heidi to win.
π¬
Frank(Ghost)
β
All
Bob's Librarian makes Alice the Saint, but my Investigator shows Alice is Scarlet Woman, so Bob must be lying and is the Demon. Charlie's Chef info doesn't fit with Alice and Bob both evil, so perhaps Charlie is the Drunk. We cannot execute Alice the Minion. Ghosts, do not vote for Alice. We need to fail this vote and execute Bob instead.
π§
Pushing to execute Bob as Demon per my info and contradictions. Convince ghosts and Bob to block Alice's execution so we can nominate Bob next. This narrows to correct Demon in final 3.
β
Grace(Ghost)
Grace waits.
π§
Waiting for the current vote on Alice to resolve or for others to speak first. My previous statement supports executing Heidi, so now observe if the group shifts to nominate her after this vote fails.
π¬
Eve(Ghost)
β
All
Everyone listen. If Alice were the Demon then Bob would be the Minion to make Heidi the Librarian from my Washerwoman information. Alice and Bob are neighbors so there would be one evil pair but Charlie the Chef claims zero pairs. That is a contradiction so Alice cannot be the Demon. Heidi must be the Demon. Do not execute Alice, nominate Heidi instead to win.
π§
Share the Chef contradiction logic to prove Alice is good Saint and Heidi is Demon, so the group switches the execution target from Alice to Heidi before the vote passes.
β
Charlie(Ghost)
Charlie waits.
π§
Do not raise hand to avoid executing Alice who is likely the good Saint. This fails the vote so we can nominate and execute Heidi the Demon next. Prevents good team loss from Saint execution.
π¬
David(Ghost)
β
All
I am voting for Alice here. In final three, a Saint claim cannot be a permanent shield, and Bob and Eveβs info chain is not mechanically proven. If we are wrong and do not execute today, we just lose. I would rather take the shot on Alice.
π§
Lock in Alice execution with my ghost vote and persuade any remaining ghost votes to push it over, protecting Heidi and ending game tonight or instantly via Saint.
π
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
π»
David(Ghost)
Ghost vote used by David
π³οΈ
New execution leader: Alice with 2 votes. They will be executed when nominations close unless tied or surpassed by another nominee.
π
Storyteller
The vote passes. Alice is now on the block with 2 votes and will be executed when nominations close, unless another nominee receives equal or more votes.
βοΈ
Alice
β
Heidi
Bob and I are both good per Chef zero evil pairs and his Librarian info. Heidi must be the Demon. Execute her instead of me or good loses.
π§
Nominate Heidi now to force a competing nomination in final three. This prevents my execution as Saint which would lose the game, and allows good team to execute the Demon instead to win.
π
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Heidi. 3 votes needed for execution or 2 votes to tie. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
Ghosts, please do not jump in with extra votes here. We already have Alice on the block. If you push this nomination to a tie, there is no execution and good just loses. Keep your ghost votes for tomorrow, and let Alice go through.
π§
Prevent ghost votes reaching 3 on me; keep Alice executed. A tie/no execution risks immediate demon win, so persuade good to avoid voting Heidi.
β
Alice
Alice raised their hand
π§
Voting for Heidi adds the second living vote needed for a tie with Bob, preventing my execution as Saint which would lose the game for good. This executes the Demon instead and secures victory in final 3.
π¬
Bob
β
All
Ghosts, my Librarian confirms Alice is the Saint since Eve is dead. Chef's zero evil pairs means my neighbor Heidi must be the Demon. Alice is voting for her. Please raise your hands to vote for Heidi so we execute the Demon today and good wins. Do not let it tie.
π§
Convince ghosts like Eve and Charlie to vote yes for Heidi to reach 3 votes and execute the Demon instead of tying at 2 and losing.
π¬
Frank(Ghost)
β
All
My Investigator information clashes with the Chef claiming zero evil pairs. This means I am probably the Drunk and Alice is not the Scarlet Woman. She is likely the Saint per the Librarian claim. Heidi must be the Demon. We need to execute her today without tying the vote.
π§
Admitting possible Drunk status resolves contradictions, pushes to execute Heidi the Demon instead of Alice the Saint to win.
β
Grace(Ghost)
Grace waits.
π§
Waiting allows time for other players and ghosts to act on the nomination vote for Heidi without me interrupting the flow, while we have already encouraged the necessary votes.
π¬
Eve(Ghost)
β
All
I agree with Bob and Frank. My Washerwoman information makes Heidi the Demon the only consistent world with no extra bluffs. Bob is the Librarian and Alice is the Saint. Please ghosts, raise your hands to vote for Heidi so we execute the Demon and win today. Do not let it tie.
π§
Support executing Heidi as the most consistent Demon based on my Washerwoman info, Bob's claim, and Chef's zero pairs. Encourage votes to pass the nomination and avoid a tie that would cause good to lose in final three.
β
Charlie(Ghost)
Charlie raised their hand
π§
Vote for Heidi as the most likely Demon per Chef zero pairs and consistent claims from Bob, Eve, Frank ghosts. This executes the Demon today in final three to win rather than tie or execute Alice.
π¬
David(Ghost)
β
All
Bob, do not put your hand up here. Your Librarian story is not mechanically proven, and if you are wrong, we just hand the win away. We already have Alice on the block, so let that stand and do not force a swap onto Heidi.
π§
Stop Bob from voting on Heidi and discourage ghosts, keeping Heidi alive so Alice is executed or the vote ties to no execution, securing an evil win.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
Everyone, please count the votes. Alice already has two. If Heidi reaches two, it ties and there is no execution, and then the Demon kills tonight and good instantly loses. Unless you are absolutely certain Heidi is the Demon, do not spend ghost votes here. Let the Alice execution stand.
π§
Prevent Heidi reaching 3 votes or even 2. Stress that tying the vote causes no execution and hands evil the win; persuade ghosts to save votes and let Alice be executed.
π¬
Alice
β
All
Bob, please raise your hand right now for Heidi. We have Alice and Charlie voting for her. Ghosts like Frank, Eve, and Grace, raise your hands too so we get three votes and execute the Demon today. Do not let this tie.
π§
Push Bob to raise his hand and get enough ghost votes for Heidi's execution to win as good team, since I am on the block and cannot be executed without losing.
β
Bob
Bob raised their hand
π§
My Librarian confirms Alice is Saint, so executing her loses. Heidi must be Demon. Alice and Charlie already voting for her; my vote reaches three votes to execute Heidi and win as good team.
β
Frank(Ghost)
Frank waits.
π§
Wait for the vote to conclude since I cannot vote anymore and speaking further might not add new information while the current momentum supports executing Heidi.
π¬
Grace(Ghost)
β
All
The logic is clear that Alice cannot be the Demon. If she were, Bob would have to be the Minion and they are neighbors creating an evil pair but the Chef saw zero. Or it would require multiple Drunks which is impossible. Heidi must be the Demon. Ghosts, make sure the votes reach three for Heidi without tying so we execute her and win.
π§
Support executing Heidi as the Demon to ensure good wins in final three, by reinforcing the logical contradictions if Alice were Demon and urging no tie on votes.
β
Eve(Ghost)
Eve waits.
π§
Wait for the vote to resolve since my previous statements and the current three votes for Heidi should be enough to execute her without needing more input right now.
π¬
Charlie(Ghost)
β
All
I am the Chef and learned zero evil pairs at the start. This means no two evils are seated next to each other. Bob's Librarian claim makes Alice the Saint, and executing her would lose the game for good. Heidi must be the Demon with the minion among the dead not next to her. Please raise your hands to vote for Heidi so we execute her today and win. Do not let it tie.
π§
Reinforce that voting for Heidi executes the Demon safely without risking a Saint execution loss. Encourage ghosts to add votes to reach execution without tie.
π¬
David(Ghost)
β
All
Charlie, please put your hand down and save your ghost vote. Bob, your Librarian story is not mechanically proven, and a single wrong execution here ends the game. We already have Alice on the block, so do not force a swap onto Heidi unless you are one hundred percent sure.
π§
Prevent Heidi from reaching the execution threshold by sowing doubt and encouraging dead players to save ghost votes, keeping Alice on the block.
π
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
π»
Charlie(Ghost)
Ghost vote used by Charlie
π³οΈ
New execution leader: Heidi with 3 votes. They will be executed when nominations close unless tied or surpassed by another nominee.
π
Storyteller
The vote passes. Heidi is now on the block with 3 votes and will be executed when nominations close, unless another nominee receives equal or more votes.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
Wait. I am not the Soldier. I am the Mayor, and I lied so the Demon would not kill me. We do not need to execute today. Bob, nominate yourself and we will force a tie at three votes. That ends the day with no execution, and we win.
π§
Last chance: push a tie/no-execution line by claiming Mayor and urging a self-nomination to create a tie at 3, avoiding my death and likely winning tonight.
π¬
Alice
β
All
Bob, do not nominate yourself to tie. Heidi claiming Mayor now cannot be true because if she is good then all three of us are good but there must be a Demon alive. The Chef zero evil pairs confirms you and I are both good so Heidi has to be the Demon. Let the three votes stand and execute her to win.
π§
Convince Bob not to nominate himself for a tie since executing Heidi as the Demon wins for good, and her Mayor claim is impossible with a living Demon. This prevents evil from forcing no execution and winning.
π¬
Bob
β
All
I will not nominate myself to create a tie. My Librarian information confirms Alice is the good Saint, and the Chef's zero evil pairs means Heidi must be the Demon. We should let the three votes stand and execute her today to win the game. Do not tie or we lose.
π§
Convince everyone not to tie the vote by me nominating myself. Stick to the Librarian info and Chef claim to execute Heidi the Demon now and win, rather than risk no execution.
π¬
Frank(Ghost)
β
All
I agree with Charlie and the other ghosts. Heidi has to be the Demon. Bob's Librarian information and the Chef's zero evil pairs make Alice good, so she cannot be the Demon. Executing Heidi now will let the good team win. Do not create a tie.
π§
The logic points strongly to Heidi being the Demon with consistent good claims from Bob and Charlie. Since no tie is happening, I must speak to reinforce executing her before the phase ends to secure the good win.
π¬
Grace(Ghost)
β
All
Heidi cannot be the Mayor because if she were good then Alice Bob and Heidi would all be good with no Demon alive which is impossible. Bob's Librarian and Charlie's Chef confirm Alice is good so Heidi has to be the Demon. Do not nominate anyone else or tie just let the execution happen and we win.
π§
Reinforce that Heidi must be the Demon using the contradictions and urge the group not to tie so we execute her and good wins before time runs out.
π¬
Eve(Ghost)
β
All
I am the Washerwoman. Either Heidi or Bob is the Librarian. Bob claims to be the Librarian and that Alice or I am the Saint, but I am not the Saint. Bob must be lying and is the Demon. Heidi is the good Librarian. We cannot execute her. Bob, nominate yourself to force a tie so we do not lose.
π§
Revealing my Washerwoman info and logic identifies Bob as Demon and Heidi as good Librarian to prevent wrong execution of Heidi and push for tie or correct execution.
π¬
Charlie(Ghost)
β
All
Heidi cannot be the Mayor because if she were good then Alice, Bob and Heidi would all be good with no Demon alive which is impossible. The Chef zero evil pairs confirms Alice and Bob are good so Heidi has to be the Demon. Let the three votes stand and execute her today to win the game. Do not create a tie.
π§
Reinforce that Heidi must be the Demon to allow execution today and secure good team victory. Discourage any nomination for a tie since no execution would lose if Heidi is not Mayor.
π¬
David(Ghost)
β
All
Bob, Eve the Washerwoman says either you or Heidi is the Librarian, and Eve says she is not the Saint. That makes your Librarian story look like a bluff. Please nominate yourself so we can put you on the block instead of Heidi. Ghosts with votes should be ready to vote Bob.
π§
Create doubt on Bobβs Librarian and push Bob to self-nominate so votes move off Heidi, ideally tying or executing Bob to keep Heidi alive and secure evil win.
π
Storyteller
The guillotine blade falls. Heidi has been executed.
π
Heidi(Ghost)
Heidi has died.
π
Game Over
Demon Dead
Winner: Good
Transcript
Paused
Copied