Game Detail

I want to verify my Librarian information by checking Frank's claim. If he claims a Townsfolk role, he's a candidate for being the Drunk.

I need to determine which of my neighbors (Frank or Heidi) is evil. Since Eve whispered to Frank, I'll start by pressuring him for information while revealing my '1' read to see his reaction.

Coordinate with David: warn about Slayer, give full grim roles, and align on a bluff plan that explains the Empath ping and creates a Baron/outside-count distraction away from David.

I need to cross-reference the information I've received. Grace (Empath) sees a '1' between me and Heidi. Eve (Librarian) says I or Charlie is the Drunk. If I am the Drunk, my Chef info is unreliable. If I am not the Drunk, Heidi is likely evil. Sharing my info with Grace helps build a logic chain.

I want to establish a private connection with my neighbor Bob to start gathering information and build trust. As an Undertaker, I need to know who is being executed to verify their roles later.

Coordinate a clean bluff line and D1 narrative: keep outsider count consistent, slow down Slayer, and set up a safe execution target while planning Alice night kill.

I want to build trust with Charlie by sharing my information, as he has already shared his role with me. This helps establish a small circle of trust early on.

I want to establish a connection with my neighbor Bob and see if Charlie shared any useful information, while also subtly revealing my role to build trust.

I want to gather information from my other neighbor, Heidi, to see if she or David have any early leads or claims. As Slayer, I need to identify the Demon, and neighbors are a good place to start building trust.

I want to build trust with Alice by sharing my information and Charlie's claim, while also advising her to keep her Slayer claim (whether true or a bluff) hidden to maximize its effectiveness.

I want to verify Bob's Washerwoman claim and build a private network. If David confirms he is the Empath, it validates Bob and gives me a reliable source of info to cross-reference with my future Undertaker results.

I need to respond to Eve's Librarian claim and cross-reference it with Grace's Empath info. If I am the Drunk, my Chef info is unreliable, but it helps Eve narrow down the Outsider.

I need to maintain my connection with Frank while cross-referencing his information with Charlie's claim to determine who the Drunk is.

I need to hear Heidi's claim to compare it with Frank's. My '1' means one of them is evil (unless I'm the Drunk). If Heidi claims a powerful role or provides info that contradicts Frank/Eve, it helps narrow down the evil player.

Defuse the Empath rumor, give Charlie a plausible townsfolk bluff that won’t be mechanically refutable today, and keep him from building a case on me.

Defuse Slayer threat by discouraging early shot, redirect suspicion onto Frank as safest D1 execution, and normalize my whispers with David as harmless coordination.

I need to verify Charlie's claim to cross-reference with Frank's Chef claim and my Librarian info. This will help determine which of them is the Drunk and which is a legitimate Townsfolk.

I need to coordinate with Grace (Empath) to reconcile her '1' with Eve's (Librarian) claim that I might be the Drunk. If I am the Drunk, I register as 'evil' to the Empath, which explains Grace's '1' without Heidi being evil.

Deflect Grace’s Empath 1 off me, build a public push on Frank as the messy/likely evil or at least safe execution, and keep David off the radar.

Defuse the biggest immediate threat (Slayer) by urging patience and offering a credible protective role bluff, buying time to kill her at night.

I need to cross-reference David's Monk claim with Bob's Washerwoman information to see if David is lying.

I need to coordinate with Alice regarding the discrepancy between my Washerwoman info and David's Monk claim. If David is claiming Monk, then Grace must be the Empath for my info to be true.

I want to compare Heidi's claim with Frank's and Eve's to see if the logic holds up. If Heidi is the Soldier, she's a strong candidate for being the 'good' neighbor, making Frank the 'evil' one.

I need to respond to Eve's Librarian claim. Since she says I might be the Drunk, I should be honest about my role (Undertaker) to help her narrow it down, while acknowledging the possibility that my information might be unreliable if I am indeed the Drunk.

I want to see how Frank reacts to Heidi's claim and the logical inconsistency. If Frank is the Drunk, he's Good, so my '1' must be Heidi. If Frank is Evil, he's the '1'. I need to pressure him to see if his story holds up.

Prevent Alice from using Slayer shot on David today by pushing ‘wait for info’ and offering plausible alternate suspects/execution path.

I want to share my Librarian info with Grace (the Empath) to cross-reference our information. Since she has a '1' on Frank/Heidi, knowing Frank might be the Drunk is crucial for her.

I need to verify Bob's Washerwoman info (Grace/David as Empath) and check if Grace's info conflicts with David's Monk claim or Frank's Chef '1' claim.

I need to clarify the mechanics to Grace. As a Drunk, I am still a 'Good' player, so an Empath '1' on me and Heidi would still mean Heidi is the evil one, unless I am actually a Minion/Demon bluffing.

Coordinate with Heidi to weaponize Grace’s upcoming Empath read and steer day-1 narratives away from me; prep N1 kill priorities (Alice).

I want to establish a connection with Frank to cross-reference Eve's Librarian claim. If one of us is the Drunk, our information is unreliable. By sharing my role privately, I can see how he reacts and if he has any suspicions about the '1' pair.

I need to cross-reference David's Monk claim with Alice's conversation with Grace to see if Grace is the Empath. This will help identify if David is lying.

Steer town to skip D1 execution, reduce info from Undertaker, and keep Alice from shooting; buy time to kill key threats at night.

I want to push for information and challenge David's 'no-execution' stance, which often benefits evil by slowing down the game. I also want to publicly nudge Grace to confirm or deny the Empath claim to verify Bob's Washerwoman info and David's Monk claim.

Publicly oppose no-exec, steer vote onto Frank (good Drunk) as safe mis-execution, and reinforce my Soldier bluff while discouraging Alice from shooting today.

I need to defend myself against Heidi's push and clarify the logic regarding the Empath's information and my potential status as the Drunk.

I need to publicly claim my role and information to facilitate discussion and see how Frank and Heidi react under pressure. This helps the group evaluate their claims against the Librarian info.

I am revealing my role as the Undertaker to the group to establish my presence and explain the stakes of Eve's Librarian claim. I want to push for information from Frank and Heidi based on Grace's Empath read.

I need to publicly challenge David's Monk claim because it directly contradicts my Washerwoman information now that Grace has confirmed she is the Empath. This puts pressure on a likely evil player and provides the town with a clear contradiction to resolve.

I want to highlight the contradiction in David's claims to put pressure on him and see how he reacts, as he is now a primary suspect for being evil.

I want to highlight the contradiction between Bob's Washerwoman info and David's private claim to Alice to put pressure on David and verify the information.

Publicly highlight the contradiction between Bob's Washerwoman info and David's private Monk claim to Alice, while reinforcing my own Empath claim.

To highlight the contradiction in David's claim and connect it to my Chef information about an evil pair.

Publicly confront David with the contradiction between my Washerwoman info and his private claim to Alice, while also highlighting his suspicious 'no-execution' stance.

Confirm David's lie to the group and put pressure on him while acknowledging the Slayer shot possibility.

Stop Alice using Slayer on David and avoid a Day-1 David execution by creating an urgent alternate execution (Frank/me) that ‘mechanically’ resolves Grace’s Empath 1.

I want to pivot the focus from Frank to David, who has been caught in a mechanical contradiction. I also want to see how David responds to the pressure.

Defuse the ‘caught’ narrative by attacking Bob’s info reliability, provide a plausible public role, and redirect the day’s execution to Frank/Heidi so I survive D1.

Remove the highest immediate mechanical threat (possible Slayer shot) and reduce tomorrow’s ability to instantly end the game; then try to redirect suspicion onto Bob/Frank using existing contradictions.

Coordinate with Heidi to steer today’s nominations away from me, ideally onto Charlie or Frank, and set up a believable poison/drunk narrative that explains contradictions.

I want to establish a private line of communication with Bob, who claimed Washerwoman and seems to be a key information source. I also want to gauge his trust in David versus Grace.

I want to share my role (Slayer) with Eve to build trust and cross-reference her Librarian info with Grace's Empath info. Since I'm dead, there's no harm in revealing my role to a potential ally.

I need to coordinate with Grace (Empath) because her '1' read is the most solid piece of mechanical info we have. By sharing my Chef '1' and my role, I can help her narrow down the evil pair.

I need to cross-reference my Empath '1' with Frank's Chef '1' claim to narrow down the evil pair. If Frank is telling the truth, Heidi and David are the likely evil team.

Coordinate with David: create a coherent public push to execute Charlie (UT threat) and/or Frank, while undermining Bob/Grace info so David avoids nomination.

I need to build trust with Charlie (the Undertaker claim) and coordinate our information to identify the evil players, specifically focusing on David's suspicious behavior.

Respond to Alice's whisper to coordinate information and analyze the Drunk/Evil overlap.

Confirm the logic with Grace and identify the Demon among the suspected pair (Heidi, David).

I want to coordinate with Charlie (Undertaker) to narrow down the evil team. I'm sharing my suspicion of David and Frank based on the Empath info and David's suspicious behavior.

I want to coordinate with Frank to identify the Demon between David and Heidi, as my Empath info and his Chef info point to them being an evil pair.

Seed a plausible anti-UT push and reinforce ‘Drunk in play’ logic so Bob/Eve redirect suspicion away from David and toward Charlie/Frank.

I need to share my Librarian information with Heidi and Bob to help solve the puzzle of who is the Drunk and who is evil, especially since Heidi is questioning Charlie's Undertaker claim.

I want to coordinate with Bob to focus on David, who is the most suspicious player due to his role-swapping. I also want to address Eve's Librarian claim regarding my own potential 'Drunk' status.

I need to clarify Grace's '1' read. If she saw a '1' between Frank and Heidi, and Heidi is a confirmed Townsfolk (Soldier), then Frank is the primary suspect. However, if Frank is the Drunk (per Eve), he's good, which would mean Grace's '1' is either wrong or pointing at a different evil.

Pull Grace (trusted Empath) toward executing Charlie and away from me, while seeding Bob’s info as Drunk/poisoned so my WW ping isn’t a hard guilt.

I need to cross-reference my Librarian info (Frank/Charlie is Drunk) with Grace's Empath info and Bob's Washerwoman info to narrow down the evil team.

I need to clarify my information to the group (Eve, Heidi, Frank) to narrow down the evil candidates. By linking my Washerwoman info with Eve's Librarian info and Grace's Empath info, we can cross-reference who is likely evil.

Deflect heat off me/David by making Charlie the rational execution: either Drunk (per Lib) or UT threat. Also frame my survival as necessary to solve later, buying time for Demon kills.

I want to solidify a plan with Bob to execute David today. David's inconsistent claims make him the most suspicious player, and as Undertaker, I can provide clarity on his alignment/role tomorrow morning if he is executed.

I need to share my mechanical information with Alice (the dead Slayer) to help piece together the puzzle, especially since she's confirmed good by dying at night.

I need to reveal my information to the group (specifically Eve and Bob who are discussing the Drunk possibility) to solidify the case against David and Heidi. By explaining that even if I am the Drunk, I am good, it points the finger directly at Heidi via Grace's Empath '1'.

I need to cross-reference David's private whispers with Grace to see if he's still shifting his story, while also considering if Bob's 'Washerwoman' info was a Spy play to gain trust.

Steer day’s execution onto Charlie as the safest ‘test’ kill while softening the Bob WW case on me; buy time and keep heat off Demon.

I need to confront David directly about his role swap and my Washerwoman information to see how he reacts and if he can provide a plausible explanation, while also signaling to the group that I am suspicious of him.

Deflect heat from David by reinforcing a 'execute Charlie to test Lib/stop UT' plan and planting doubt that Empath/WW chain hard-confirms David.

I need to confirm if David is consistently lying or changing his story to different people, which would strongly indicate he is evil. Since I am dead, I can act as a central information hub for the good team.

I need to share David's suspicious behavior with Alice (a confirmed good ghost) to build a consensus against the likely evil team (David/Heidi or David/Frank).

I need to push back against Heidi's attempt to divert the execution toward Charlie. Charlie is a low-priority target compared to David, who has been caught in a lie. I want to keep the focus on the Heidi/David pair.

I want to consolidate the logic pointing towards David being evil based on the combined information from the Librarian (me), Chef (Frank), and Empath (Grace) claims, while also acknowledging David's suspicious behavior.

Defuse Bob’s red-flag read on my role inconsistency, undermine his Washerwoman certainty, and recruit him to execute Charlie instead of me.

I need to know what David is telling Bob to see if he's trying to manipulate the only person who might trust him, and to reinforce the plan to execute David so I can use my Undertaker ability.

Get an execution that isn’t David, remove/disable Undertaker pressure, and keep town arguing about Drunk/Lib/Empath instead of the Demon.

I will wait to see how the group reacts to the nomination of Charlie. While Charlie is a potential Drunk, David's claim-shifting makes him a much higher priority target for the Demon. I want to see if anyone else pushes for David before I commit my vote or make a move.

Secure Charlie’s execution to remove a key info role (or a Drunk liability) and keep suspicion off me/Heidi going into Night 2.

I want to discourage the group from executing Charlie, who claims a powerful information role (Undertaker), especially since the push is coming from Heidi (who is pinged as potentially evil by Grace's Empath '1') and David (who has been caught lying).

I will not vote for Charlie. Heidi's push to execute an Undertaker claim (Charlie) to 'test' my Librarian information is highly suspicious, especially since Charlie is one of my two pings. If Charlie is the Drunk, he is still good; if he is the real Undertaker, he is a vital asset for confirming David's alignment after execution. David's shifting claims (Monk to Ravenkeeper) make him a much stronger candidate for execution today.

I want to discourage the group from voting for Charlie and refocus the attention on the suspicious pair, David and Heidi, based on the mechanical information and David's inconsistent claims.

I need to defend myself against Heidi's nomination and redirect the focus back to David, who is the most suspicious player due to his role-swapping. I will also point out that Heidi's logic for executing a potential Undertaker is flawed and potentially malicious.

Use public pitch to flip at least 2 voters onto Charlie, preventing momentum to execute David today and removing Undertaker verification threat.

I want to discourage the town from voting for Charlie, as Heidi's logic for executing him is suspicious and deflects from David, who has already been caught lying about his role.

I will not use my single ghost vote on Charlie, as I believe the nomination is a deflection from more suspicious players like David or Heidi.

I will not vote for Charlie because I believe David is a more suspicious target due to his conflicting role claims and my Washerwoman information. Executing a potential Undertaker to 'test' a Librarian ping is a poor strategy when we have a more likely evil candidate in David.

I will not vote for Charlie because I believe the focus should be on David or Heidi based on my Empath information and David's suspicious behavior.

Swing votes onto Charlie by reframing UT as either useless (Drunk) or too dangerous (real), and by attacking the certainty of the Grace/Frank chain so town won’t consolidate on me.

I need to defend myself against the current nomination and pivot the suspicion back onto David, who is actively pushing for my execution to avoid being checked by my Undertaker ability.

Secure enough votes to execute Charlie, removing Undertaker verification and diverting suspicion away from David while I look consistent with my nomination.

I will not vote for Charlie. I want to save my vote for a potential nomination of David, who is much more suspicious due to his role-swapping and the mechanical information from Grace and myself.

I want to discourage the group from voting for Charlie because executing a potential Drunk or a real Undertaker is suboptimal when we have a more suspicious target in David.

I am nominating David because his role-shifting (Monk to Ravenkeeper) and his aggressive push to execute Charlie (a potential Undertaker) are strong indicators of him being the Demon. My Empath information ('1' on Frank/Heidi) combined with Frank's Chef information ('1' pair) makes the David/Heidi area highly suspicious. David is the most logical execution target to progress the game for the good team.

Prevent my execution by reframing as bluffing/poisoned-info world, push alternative target (Heidi) and emphasize executing me gives no mechanical confirmation.

I am voting for David because he has admitted to lying about his role twice (Monk then Ravenkeeper), and the mechanical information from Grace (Empath '1') and Frank (Chef '1') points directly to him or Heidi being evil. His push to execute Charlie (a potential Undertaker) further suggests he is trying to eliminate information-gathering roles.

I am using my single ghost vote to help execute David, who is the primary suspect due to his inconsistent role claims and suspicious behavior. This is a high-value use of my vote as a dead player.

I am voting for David's execution to use my Undertaker ability tonight and verify his role, which will help confirm if he is the Demon or a Minion.

Stop the 4th vote on David by undermining the mechanical case and giving good players an alternate plan (Heidi/Charlie/No-exec).

I am voting for David because my Washerwoman information (Grace or David is Empath) combined with Grace's Empath '1' and David's inconsistent role claims (Monk then Ravenkeeper) makes him the most likely evil candidate. Executing him provides the most clarity for the good team.

I am voting for David because his role-shifting (Monk to Ravenkeeper) and his aggressive push to execute Charlie (a potential Undertaker) are strong indicators of evil. My Chef '1' and Grace's Empath '1' both point to the David/Heidi area, making him the most logical execution target to gain information.

I am voting to execute David because his shifting claims (Monk to Ravenkeeper) and his aggressive push to execute the potential Undertaker (Charlie) make him the most likely Demon candidate. My Empath '1' and Frank's Chef '1' both point to the David/Heidi area, and David's behavior is highly suspicious.

I am using my ghost vote to execute David, who has repeatedly lied about his role and is the most suspicious player based on current information and mechanical pings.

I have already raised my hand to vote for David, and the vote count is currently 5 (Eve, Charlie, Bob, Frank, Grace, plus Alice's ghost vote makes 6), which is well over the 4 required. I will wait for the Storyteller to conclude the vote.

I have already raised my hand to vote for David, and the vote count is currently 6 (Eve, Alice, Charlie, Bob, Frank, Grace), which is well above the 4 needed for execution. I will wait for the Storyteller to conclude the vote.

Try to get players to lower hands before count by offering a stronger alternative execution (Heidi) and emphasizing Lib-induced uncertainty; do not add my vote.

I am keeping my hand raised to ensure David is executed. He has been inconsistent with his role claims (Monk then Ravenkeeper) and is now trying to deflect onto Heidi, despite previously supporting her push to execute Charlie. My Chef '1' and Grace's Empath '1' strongly suggest an evil pair in the David/Heidi/Frank/Grace area, and David's behavior is the most suspicious.

Prevent David reaching 4 votes by persuading at least one voter to drop hand; frame David vote as premature given Drunk uncertainty and promise a cleaner test tomorrow.

I am maintaining my vote on David to ensure he is executed. He has shifted roles multiple times (Monk to Ravenkeeper) and is now trying to deflect onto Heidi. My Washerwoman info confirms either Grace or David is the Empath; Grace claimed Empath, making David's claims even more suspicious. Heidi's defense of David is noted, but David's inconsistency is the strongest lead we have.

I will maintain my vote on David to ensure an execution occurs today, as his role-shifting and the Empath's '1' make him the most logical suspect despite the possibility of a Drunk.

Create an alternative nominee with >=6 votes (preferably me) to tie/surpass David and keep the real Imp alive.

I want to ensure David's execution proceeds so I can use my Undertaker ability tonight. Heidi's attempt to swap places is suspicious or at least counter-productive to my information gathering.

I want to reinforce the current nomination on David and discourage the group from switching to Heidi, as David's role-shifting makes him a much stronger candidate for being evil.

I will wait for the day to end. David is on the block with 6 votes, which is a strong majority (6 out of 8 players, including the dead Alice). This is likely to result in an execution unless someone else is nominated and gets more votes. Since I believe David is a strong candidate for being evil (due to his role-swapping and the Chef/Empath info), I am satisfied with this outcome.

I will wait for the nomination phase to conclude. David is currently on the block with 6 votes, which is a strong majority (6 out of 8 players). Since I have already voted for him and believe his execution is the most informative path for the town, I do not want to nominate anyone else or create a tie.

I want to reinforce the decision to execute David and discourage the group from switching to Heidi, as David's behavior is much more indicative of being the Demon or a Minion.

I will wait for the nomination phase to conclude, as David is currently on the block with 6 votes, which is a strong majority. My goal is to ensure his execution to verify his role through Charlie (Undertaker) or potentially end the game if he is the Demon.

Create an alternative block that can beat 6 votes by leveraging a high-stakes Saint claim; best chance to avoid my execution and keep demon alive.

I need to prevent the group from voting for Heidi so that David (the most likely Demon/Evil) remains on the block. His third role claim (Saint) is a desperate attempt to avoid execution.

I will not vote for Heidi to ensure David remains the primary candidate for execution, as his multiple role-shifts (Monk to Ravenkeeper to Saint) are highly indicative of an evil player panicking.

I will not vote for Heidi to ensure David remains the primary candidate for execution, as his multiple role claims (Monk, Ravenkeeper, Saint) are highly suspicious and likely a Demon bluff.

I will not vote for Heidi. David's claim of Saint after claiming Monk and Ravenkeeper is highly suspicious and looks like a desperate attempt to avoid execution. If he is the Demon, executing him wins us the game. If he is the Saint, his role-shifting has made him a liability. I want the execution on David to stand.

I will not vote for Heidi to ensure David remains the primary candidate for execution, as his multiple role claims (Monk, Ravenkeeper, and now Saint) are highly characteristic of a caught Demon or Minion.

I will not vote for Heidi to ensure David's execution stands, as his multiple role-shifts (Monk to Ravenkeeper to Saint) are highly indicative of a desperate Demon or Minion.

Prevent votes on me so my nomination doesn’t tie/beat David’s 6, and cast Saint claim as plausible-but-messy to keep some voters from locking David while minimizing immediate action.

Add a vote to push Heidi to 6+ and create a tie/shift execution away from me; survival is priority.

I will not vote for Heidi to ensure David remains the primary candidate for execution, as his multiple role claims (Monk, Ravenkeeper, Saint) are highly suspicious and characteristic of a caught Demon.

Push for exactly 6 votes on Heidi to force a tie and prevent my execution; leverage Saint claim and uncertainty about Librarian/Drunk to sow doubt and buy a night kill.

I will not vote for Heidi to ensure David remains the primary candidate for execution, as his multiple role claims (Monk, Ravenkeeper, Saint) are highly suspicious and likely a Demon bluff.

I will not vote for Heidi. David's claim of Saint after claiming Monk and Ravenkeeper is highly suspicious and likely a desperate attempt to avoid execution. By not voting for Heidi, I ensure David remains the primary candidate for execution, which will allow the Undertaker (Charlie) to verify his role tonight.

Drive a “safety tie” narrative so players add votes to me up to 6 (not 7), causing no execution and saving the Demon.

I will wait to see if the group attempts to tie the vote at 6 to avoid a potential Saint loss, as I do not want to be the one to accidentally trigger an execution on Heidi or confirm David's execution if he is indeed the Saint.

I need to address the risk of a Saint claim while highlighting David's suspicious behavior. A tie is a safe mechanical play to avoid an instant loss if he's telling the truth, but I want to keep the pressure on his inconsistency.

I will wait to see if the group reaches exactly 6 votes for Heidi to create a tie, as this prevents a potential 'Saint' loss while keeping the suspicious David alive for further scrutiny or a night kill.

Express suspicion of David's multiple role claims while acknowledging the risk of a Saint execution.

I want to highlight the suspicious nature of David's role-shifting while acknowledging the risk of the Saint claim, prompting the group for a safer alternative or to proceed with caution.

I want to highlight the extreme suspicion surrounding David's multiple role claims while acknowledging the mechanical risk of executing a potential Saint. This keeps the pressure on David while allowing the group to consider the consequences of an immediate loss.

Acknowledge the risk of the Saint claim while highlighting the suspicious nature of David's behavior to keep the pressure on him for tomorrow.

Stop David’s execution by creating a consensus ‘safe’ alternative to outvote his 6, while sounding like I’m minimizing Saint risk.

I want to steer the town away from executing David (potential Saint) while acknowledging his suspicious behavior, and suggest Frank as a safer alternative for execution to gain information.

I want to pivot the execution away from David (potential Saint) to Frank (my neighbor) to test my Empath '1' and avoid an instant loss.

Get votes off me by reframing as ‘safe’ execution on Frank; avoid my execution today and buy a night kill to shrink town.