Game Detail
Players
Alice (Imp) Bob (Empath) Charlie (Recluse) David (Scarlet Woman) Eve (Monk) Frank (Librarian) Grace (Ravenkeeper) Heidi (Undertaker)
Token Usage
| Team | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Cost (USD) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Evil | 198,037 | 19,500 | $0.0788 |
| Good | 559,702 | 55,685 | $1.7591 |
Event Transcript
🎭
The game has started.
📜
Storyteller
→
David
You are the Minion. The Demon is Alice.
📜
Storyteller
→
Alice
Minions are: David. Your safe bluffs are: Saint, Soldier, Chef
📜
Storyteller
→
Frank
Good evening Frank. You are the Librarian. Either Charlie or Eve is the Recluse.
📜
Storyteller
→
Bob
Good evening Bob. You are the Empath. You sense that 2 of your neighbors is evil!
Day 1
📜
Storyteller
Welcome to the village of Ravenswood Bluff. Please take this time to get to know your fellow villagers. Feel free to move around and have private conversations. Be wary, for a Demon hides among you!
👤
Bob
→
David
,Eve
I’m Empath. N0 read =2 on my alive neighbors (Alice & Charlie). In an 8p with 1 minion+1 demon, that hard-points them as the 2 evils (demon+minion) unless I’m poisoned/drunk. Any info to corroborate?
🧠
Privately alert 2 likely-good players so we can coordinate an early execution on Alice/Charlie without outing to the whole table yet, and request they corroborate with their info.
👤
Grace
→
Frank
,Heidi
,Alice
Hey—quick intro. What role are you claiming / any N0 info? Also, any early suspicions or who you trust? I’m keeping my own role quiet for now but want to compare notes later.
🧠
Get early private claims from my neighbors + one extra to build a trust web and later catch contradictions without outing myself as Ravenkeeper.
👤
Frank
→
Grace
,Heidi
,Alice
I’m Librarian. N0: either Charlie or Eve is the Recluse (or I’m misled). No other reads yet. If either of them claims something else strongly, flag it. Let’s keep semi-private for now.
🧠
Answer Grace’s query while keeping info within a small trusted circle; early Outsider info helps interpret future Investigator/FT results.
👤
Alice
→
Grace
,Frank
,Heidi
Hey everyone. I'm the Chef. My N0 info is that there are 0 pairs of evil players. That's interesting given Frank's Librarian info about a Recluse. If Frank is right, maybe the Recluse is just registering weirdly? I'm keeping an eye on Charlie and Eve too.
🧠
I am establishing my bluff as the Chef and providing a '0 pairs' read to sow confusion. I'm also validating Frank's Librarian claim to build trust with him, while keeping the focus on Charlie and Eve.
👤
Charlie
→
Bob
,David
Hey—quick N0 check-in: what role/starting info are you working with (and are you willing to share privately)? Also, any early suspicions or who you’ve already talked to?
🧠
Get early role/info claims from my neighbors to build starting worlds and spot contradictions, while keeping my own Outsider status hidden for now.
👤
Eve
→
Bob
,David
Got it. I can’t corroborate yet—no starting info from me. Before we hard-lock A/C: any chance of Poisoner/Drunk? Ask A/C for early claims + check with any Chef/Invest/Lib/WW info. If A/C start conflicting, we lean there; otherwise suspect Bob poisoned/bluff.
🧠
Reply courteously, gather more claims to corroborate/contradict Bob, and avoid outing myself as Monk while planning protection targets for N1.
👤
Heidi
→
Grace
,Frank
,Alice
I’m Undertaker (no info yet until an execution happens). I’m happy to stay semi-private for now. If we can get a ‘safe’ D1 execution (ideally not Saint/real Virgin proc risk), I can confirm the executed character tonight. Any Outsider claims yet?
🧠
Answer the whisper, share my real role privately (Undertaker) to build a trusted triangle and coordinate who to execute D1 for future Undertaker confirmation.
👤
David
→
Bob
,Eve
Bob, that's a bold claim for Day 1. If you're Empath, you're a high-value target. Are you sure you aren't the Drunk? If you're the Drunk, your info is garbage. Also, accusing two people immediately feels like a setup. Let's hold off on hard-locking anyone until we hear more claims.
🧠
I need to cast doubt on Bob's Empath claim to protect my Demon, Alice. By suggesting he might be the Drunk, I undermine his credibility without directly accusing him of lying, which keeps me looking like a helpful townsperson.
👤
Alice
→
Grace
,Frank
,Heidi
@Grace, @Frank, @Heidi: If Frank's Librarian info is true, that's one Outsider accounted for. If I'm Chef and see 0 pairs, maybe the Baron isn't in play? That would mean only 1 Minion. If David or Bob are acting suspicious, we should watch them. Thoughts on nominating someone safe?
🧠
I need to reinforce my Chef bluff and steer the conversation away from myself. By suggesting we look at Bob or David (my Minion), I can create distance while appearing helpful. I'm also subtly pushing for an execution to keep the game moving.
👤
Frank
→
Grace
,Heidi
,Alice
Noted: if Alice Chef=0 is true, Demon+Minion are NOT adjacent seats. That’s solid. My N0 says Charlie/Eve = Recluse, so at most 1 Outsider unless Baron. Let’s ask Charlie & Eve their claims; avoid executing anyone who might be Saint. Heidi UT can confirm D1 exec char.
🧠
Keep info semi-private, coordinate a safe D1 execution and use Chef=0 + my Recluse candidates to narrow worlds while avoiding Saint losses.
👤
Bob
→
Charlie
,David
,Eve
I’m Empath. N0 read=2 on my alive neighbors (Alice & Charlie). In 8p that usually means they’re demon+minion unless I’m drunk/poisoned. Charlie: what’s your role/starting info + any whispers you’ve done? David/Eve: help find Chef/Invest/WW/Lib to cross-check.
🧠
Answer Charlie, keep transparency with key players, and set up corroboration/claim checks without letting evils fully control the narrative.
👤
Charlie
→
Bob
,David
Key info: I’m the Recluse (good Outsider). I can register as evil/minion/demon, so your Empath ‘2’ on (Alice, me) can happen even if I’m good. So at most it hard-pings Alice OR you’re poisoned/drunk—need Chef/Invest/FT cross-check before we execute me.
🧠
Defuse a likely mis-execution on me by explaining Recluse interaction, while steering the group to get independent confirmation before nominations.
👤
Heidi
→
Grace
,Frank
,Alice
Plan: let’s directly ask Charlie & Eve for role claims ASAP (esp if either is Recluse). Before noms, also ask publicly for Saint/Butler/Drunk/virgin claims so we avoid disaster. If no red flags, pick a ‘safe’ D1 exec for UT confirmation (maybe someone willing). Any preference who to pressure?
🧠
Coordinate our semi-private bloc to quickly collect claims from Charlie/Eve and choose a low-risk D1 execution that lets me confirm a character tonight without triggering Saint loss.
👤
Eve
→
Grace
,Heidi
,Frank
Any of you have starting-info roles (Chef/Invest/Washerwoman/Librarian) or Outsider claim? Need cross-check on Bob claiming Empath N0=2 (Alice+Charlie). Share what you can + any conflicts you’ve seen.
🧠
Get independent starting info (Chef/Invest/WW/Lib/Outsider count) to validate or refute Bob’s Empath-2 claim before nominations.
👤
David
→
Bob
,Charlie
,Eve
Bob, your Empath claim is suspicious. You're immediately pointing fingers at two people, one of whom (Charlie) is claiming Recluse. If Charlie is the Recluse, your '2' read is explained by the Recluse registering as evil. You're jumping to conclusions too fast. Who else have you talked to?
🧠
I need to sow doubt about Bob's Empath claim to protect Alice (the Demon). By pointing out that Charlie's Recluse claim explains the '2' read, I can make Bob look like he's either lying or just wrong, preventing the town from focusing on Alice.
👤
Grace
→
Eve
I have info roles in a semi-private: Alice=Chef N0 ‘0’ evil pairs; Frank=Librarian N0 says Charlie or you is Recluse; Heidi=Undertaker. No Outsider claims yet. Can you tell me your role claim + what exactly Bob said about Empath N0=2?
🧠
Share our starting-info network with Eve to cross-check Bob’s alleged Empath info, and push for direct Charlie/Eve claims before nominations to set up a safe D1 execution for UT.
👤
Frank
→
Eve
I’m Librarian: N0 either Charlie or YOU is the Recluse (unless I’m misled). Alice in a small group claimed Chef=0 pairs. What exactly did Bob claim (Empath ‘2’ on first night?) and have you/Charlie claimed roles yet?
🧠
Eve asked for cross-checks; sharing my start info + querying Bob’s exact claim and Eve/Charlie claims will help resolve contradictions before nominations.
👤
Grace
→
Charlie
Hey Charlie—quick check-in before noms: what role are you claiming / any N0 info? FYI semi-private circle has Frank claiming Librarian (Charlie or Eve = Recluse) + Alice Chef=0 + Heidi Undertaker. Also did Bob really claim Empath=2 about Alice+you?
🧠
Get Charlie’s role claim + any N0 info to resolve Librarian ping and check for conflicting claims before nominations; also gather what Bob has been saying.
👤
Alice
→
Grace
,Frank
,Heidi
@Heidi, @Frank, @Grace: I agree with the plan to pressure Charlie and Eve. If Frank's info is right, one of them is the Recluse. Let's see what they claim. I'm happy to support a safe execution if we can narrow it down. Any thoughts on who to push first?
🧠
I want to maintain my Chef bluff and encourage the group to pressure Charlie and Eve, which helps create chaos and potentially frame them, while keeping the focus off me and my Minion, David.
👤
Charlie
→
Grace
I’m genuinely Recluse (only Outsider). So Bob’s Empath=2 on (Alice,me) can be explained by my misregister. Your circle says Frank Lib saw (Charlie or Eve)=Recluse—great, that matches me (points away from Eve). If Alice really Chef=0, Bob’s “demon+minion on Alice/Charlie” is unlikely—maybe Bob poisoned or lying. Any Invest/WW/FT claims yet?
🧠
Confirm my Recluse claim with Librarian ping, reconcile Empath2 vs Chef0, and coordinate with Grace’s info-web before nominations to avoid mis-executions.
👤
Eve
→
Grace
,Frank
,Bob
I’m Monk (no starting info). I’ve heard: Alice claims Chef=0; Frank claims Lib: either Charlie or Eve (me) is Recluse; Heidi UT. Bob: if Lib true I’m not Recluse -> Charlie likely Recluse, which could affect reads. Chef0 doesn’t clear Alice/Charlie since not adjacent. Let’s gather more claims before hard exec.
🧠
Coordinate private info: confirm my true role (Monk), relay Chef/Lib info to Bob, and align on a cautious D1 plan that uses mechanical contradictions rather than vibes.
👤
Bob
→
Alice
,Frank
,Heidi
Quick confirm privately: Alice—did you claim Chef=0? any other pings/targets? Frank—your Lib info exactly (which Outsider, which 2 names)? Heidi—you said Undertaker: any plan to verify via today’s execution? Need to resolve my Empath2 on (Alice,Charlie).
🧠
Lock down claims (Chef/Lib/UT) and whether Charlie is actually the Outsider. If claims cohere, we can safely pressure Alice or treat my Empath2 as poison/drunk and pivot.
👤
David
→
Bob
,Eve
,Charlie
Bob, you're being very aggressive. If Charlie is the Recluse, your '2' read is completely explained by that, meaning Alice might be innocent. You're pushing for an execution on Day 1 based on a potentially flawed read. Why are you so eager to kill? Are you sure you're not the Drunk?
🧠
I need to continue sowing doubt about Bob's Empath claim to protect Alice (the Demon). By highlighting that Charlie's Recluse claim explains the '2' read, I make Bob's accusation against Alice look like a reach or a mistake, buying time for Alice.
👤
Heidi
→
Bob
Yep Alice told me Chef=0 (privately). Frank’s Librarian: either Charlie or Eve is Recluse (or Lib misled). I’m Undertaker—need a D1 execution to get info tonight. Plan: get Charlie+Eve public/priv claims ASAP; then exec a ‘safe volunteer’ (avoid Saint/possible Virgin trigger) to UT-confirm & test lies.
🧠
Answer Bob’s questions, align on using today’s execution to generate Undertaker confirmation, and push for Charlie/Eve claims to resolve Lib/Chef/Empath contradictions.
👤
David
→
Bob
,Eve
,Charlie
Bob, you're being very aggressive. If Charlie is the Recluse, your '2' read is completely explained by that, meaning Alice might be innocent. You're pushing for an execution on Day 1 based on a potentially flawed read. Why are you so eager to kill? Are you sure you're not the Drunk?
🧠
I need to sow doubt about Bob's Empath claim. By pointing out that Charlie's Recluse claim explains the '2' read, I can protect my Demon (Alice) and make Bob look like a reckless or potentially Drunk player.
👤
Eve
→
Charlie
Hey—can you confirm your exact role claim? I’m Monk. Frank (Lib) says N0 either you or I is Recluse. If you’re Recluse, Bob’s Empath ‘2’ on Alice+you could be Alice evil + you registering. If not, we need other explanations.
🧠
Get Charlie’s exact claim and share Lib ping on (Charlie/Eve) to resolve whether Bob’s Empath2 is explainable; steer group away from premature execution.
👤
Heidi
→
Charlie
Hey Charlie—what are you claiming? Any N0 info? Frank’s Librarian got either you or Eve as Recluse. If that’s you, please say so. Also: any Saint/Butler concerns for D1 exec?
🧠
Get Charlie’s role claim and any N0 info to resolve conflicts (Lib/Recluse, Empath2) and set up a safe D1 execution that my Undertaker can confirm tonight.
👤
Charlie
→
Eve
,Heidi
,Grace
Confirm: I’m Recluse. So Frank’s Lib (Charlie/Eve=Recluse) should point to me, likely clearing you (Eve). Bob’s Empath=2 on (Alice,me) can be my misregister; don’t auto-exec. Any WW/Invest/FT claims yet to cross-check Bob/Alice?
🧠
Confirm my Recluse claim to align info webs, reduce suspicion on Eve, and steer town toward cross-checking Bob/Alice via other N0 roles before risky D1 execution.
👤
Grace
→
Alice
,Frank
,Heidi
Update: Charlie hard-claims Recluse (fits Frank’s Lib Charlie/Eve=Recluse, likely clears Eve). Eve whispers she’s Monk. Bob’s alleged Empath=2 on (Alice,Charlie) could be Recluse misreg OR Bob lying/poisoned. Before noms can we press Bob for exact Empath claim + ask table for WW/Invest/FT + check for Saint?
🧠
Sync trusted circle with Charlie’s Recluse claim + Eve Monk, and focus next on verifying Bob’s Empath claim and collecting remaining starting-info roles before noms.
👤
Bob
→
David
,Heidi
,Eve
Not hard-pushing Alice/Charlie to die D1—Empath2 is a flag, but Recluse/poison possible. Let’s get public claims now. I’m fine with a ‘safe volunteer’ exec to feed Heidi UT (avoid Saint/Virgin). Meanwhile I’ll keep Alice/Charlie as high-scrutiny.
🧠
De-escalate my D1 push, align on a plan: get public claims, use Heidi UT via a safe execution, and keep suspicion mapping without tunneling.
👤
Alice
→
Grace
,Frank
,Heidi
@Grace, @Frank, @Heidi: Bob's Empath claim is dangerous. If he says 2 on Alice/Charlie, he's either lying or getting a false read because Charlie is the Recluse. We need to discredit his Empath claim before he gets town to trust him. Let's push him to reveal his full info.
🧠
I need to sow doubt about Bob's Empath claim because he is targeting me (Alice) and Charlie (the Recluse) as evil. If I can make the group doubt his reliability, I can protect myself and keep the heat on him.
👤
Frank
→
Bob
I’m Librarian: N0 either Charlie or Eve is *Recluse*. Grace says Charlie hard-claimed Recluse + Eve Monk. Can you confirm: you are Empath? What night did you get ‘2’, who were your alive neighbors then, and any later reads? Also any reason to suspect poison?
🧠
Clarify Bob’s exact Empath timing/neighbors and see if he’s consistent; then decide whether to publicly frame Recluse-interaction to prevent misexecs and focus on safer D1 execute.
Nominations — Day 1
📜
Storyteller
Nominations are now open.
💬
Eve
→
All
Public: I’m the Monk. I’ve heard Frank’s Librarian saw either Charlie or me as Recluse; Charlie is openly claiming Recluse, so that likely explains Bob’s Empath=2 on (Alice,Charlie). Please get key claims out (esp Virgin/Saint) before any D1 execute; I’m fine with no-exec or a clearly safe volunteer for UT.
🧠
Push town to consolidate claims and avoid a mis-execution driven by an explainable Empath2; steer toward safe/no-exec unless we have a verified non-Saint volunteer.
💬
Heidi
→
All
Public recap: Frank=Lib (Charlie/Eve=Recluse), Charlie claims Recluse, Eve claims Monk, Alice claims Chef=0, Bob claims Empath=2 on (Alice,Charlie). Before any D1 exec: can Bob confirm his exact Empath claim publicly, and can David/Grace share their roles? Also: any Saint/Virgin? I’d like a safe volunteer exec to get Undertaker info tonight.
🧠
Publicly lock in claims, demand missing info roles, and organize either a clearly safe D1 execution (to enable my UT info) or justify no-exec if Saint risk remains.
💬
Grace
→
All
Public: I’m Fortune Teller (no N0). Bob—please state your exact Empath info (night number + who you sat between) and whether you said ‘2 on Alice+Charlie’. Reminder: Recluse can misregister, so don’t hard-clear/condemn off that alone. Any Virgin/Saint?
🧠
Get key public claims and lock Bob’s exact wording so we can logic-chain with Chef/Lib/Recluse; avoid a bad D1 execution while positioning myself to draw a night kill.
💬
David
→
All
I'm the Investigator. I've been keeping quiet to see how the claims shake out, but since we're doing public claims: I investigated Frank and he came up as a Townsfolk. That seems to align with his Librarian claim. Let's be careful about executing anyone today.
🧠
I need to blend in as a helpful Townsfolk to avoid suspicion while protecting Alice. Claiming Investigator and 'clearing' Frank (who is not the Demon) helps build credibility. I'll avoid nominating anyone for now to keep the heat off Alice.
💬
Bob
→
All
Public confirm: I’m Empath. N0 (first night) I got ‘2’ on my alive neighbors Alice+Charlie. That’s a big flag but could be explained by Charlie truly being Recluse or by poison/drunk. Before any D1 exec: any Saint/Virgin please speak up. If we want a ‘safe volunteer’ for Heidi’s Undertaker, I lean executing Charlie (claimed Recluse) over killing info roles.
🧠
Lock in my exact info publicly, push for Saint/Virgin disclosure, and steer toward a low-risk D1 execution (likely Charlie) that gives Undertaker info and improves my future Empath reads.
⚖️
Frank
→
Charlie
Nominating Charlie: he hard-claimed Recluse and my N0 Librarian info was ‘either Charlie or Eve is the Recluse.’ This is a relatively safe D1 execute for Heidi’s Undertaker and reduces Recluse misregister noise in future reads.
🧠
Charlie is the safest-looking D1 execute: publicly claimed Outsider that matches my Librarian info, helps Undertaker tonight, and clarifies the Empath/Recluse ambiguity.
📜
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Charlie. 4 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
✋
Bob
Bob raised their hand
🧠
Vote to execute the claimed Recluse as the safest D1 kill to feed Undertaker info and clarify whether my Empath2 was from true evil, Recluse misregister, or misinformation.
✋
Alice
Alice raised their hand
🧠
Voting for Charlie helps eliminate a player who is already under suspicion and aligns with the group's plan, while keeping the focus away from me and David. It also helps solidify my position as a 'helpful' town member.
✋
Heidi
Heidi raised their hand
🧠
Vote to execute the claimed Recluse as the safest D1 kill to generate Undertaker confirmation tonight and clean up Empath/Chef worlds without risking a Saint/info role.
⌛
David
David waits.
🧠
I am the Scarlet Woman and Alice is the Demon. Charlie is the Recluse. If Charlie is executed, it is a safe execution for the evil team as it removes a potential Recluse (who can cause misregistration) and avoids executing the Demon. I will not vote for Charlie to avoid drawing attention, but I won't oppose it.
✋
Eve
Eve raised their hand
🧠
Get a clean UT check and reduce Empath/Recluse confusion; also pressures liars by creating a mechanical datapoint. We need 4 votes—my vote decides it.
✋
Frank
Frank raised their hand
🧠
Secure Charlie’s execution for a safe D1 Undertaker check and to resolve Librarian/Recluse noise; also prevents last-second vote swings that could spare an evil Charlie.
✋
Grace
Grace raised their hand
🧠
5 hands are already up; I’ll add mine to lock in a ‘safe’ D1 execution that yields Undertaker confirmation and reduces future misregister confusion, while preserving my Ravenkeeper cover as FT.
✋
Charlie
Charlie raised their hand
🧠
Execution seems inevitable and is relatively safe for town. Voting helps lock in a UT-confirmed Recluse and reduces misregister confusion for future Empath/FT reads.
⌛
Grace
Grace waits.
🧠
My hand is already up; letting the vote resolve gives us a likely ‘safe’ D1 execution for Undertaker info, and the outcome is decided anyway given current votes.
⌛
Frank
Frank waits.
🧠
Voting is already well above threshold; waiting avoids muddying the vote while preserving my raised hand and letting execution proceed for Undertaker confirmation.
💬
Bob
→
All
Keep hands up if you’re voting Charlie: claimed Recluse + Frank’s Lib points there/Eve. D1 execute here is low-risk (avoids possible Saint/Virgin) and gives Heidi UT confirmation tonight. If UT contradicts, we reassess Frank/Charlie worlds.
🧠
Voting already high; I’ll reinforce why this is a low-risk D1 execution and ask voters to keep hands up so we secure UT info tonight.
💬
Alice
→
All
I agree with Frank. Executing the Recluse claim is the safest move for today. It gives us clear information for the Undertaker and helps clear up the board. Let's proceed with this.
🧠
I want to support the execution of Charlie to blend in with the town and remove the Recluse, which helps me avoid suspicion as the Imp.
💬
Eve
→
All
I’m voting Charlie: claimed Recluse + matches Frank’s Librarian. Low-risk D1 to give Heidi UT info + reduce misregister noise. If UT doesn’t show Recluse, we immediately re-evaluate Frank/poison worlds.
🧠
Lock in a low-risk D1 execution for Undertaker info and reduce Recluse noise; signal we should hard-pivot if UT result contradicts the Charlie=Recluse world.
💬
Heidi
→
All
I’m keeping my hand up on Charlie. D1 “claimed Recluse” is lowest-risk for UT value. If I don’t see Recluse tonight, we hard-pivot: treat Frank’s Lib (or poisoning) as suspect and re-open Charlie/Eve worlds.
🧠
Lock in a low-risk D1 execution that yields strong Undertaker confirmation tonight, and set clear conditional plans if UT contradicts.
💬
Charlie
→
All
I’m fine with this D1 exec. Reminder: Bob’s Empath=2 can be just Recluse misregister—don’t auto-guilt Alice. Heidi: if UT shows NOT Recluse, we hard-reopen Frank’s Lib / poison worlds tomorrow.
🧠
Keep the town focused on the mechanical check (Undertaker) and prevent overconfidence from Empath/Chef reads; confirm I’m fine being executed and set follow-up logic for tomorrow.
✋
David
David raised their hand
🧠
I will vote for Charlie to blend in with the town's consensus. Executing a Recluse claim is a standard, low-risk move that helps me appear like a helpful Townsfolk, while keeping the heat off Alice (the Demon).
📜
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
🗳️
New execution leader: Charlie with 8 votes. They will be executed when nominations close unless tied or surpassed by another nominee.
📜
Storyteller
The vote passes. Charlie is now on the block with 8 votes and will be executed when nominations close, unless another nominee receives equal or more votes.
💬
Charlie
→
All
Before noms end: I’m still hard-claiming Recluse and fine dying today. Please don’t auto-guilt Alice from Bob’s Empath=2—Recluse can explain it. Heidi: if UT doesn’t show Recluse, we treat Lib/Empath/poison as live and re-open worlds fast.
🧠
I’m already on the block; reinforce the plan and set clear conditional pivots based on UT result, while preventing Alice from being auto-suspected off Empath=2.
💬
Eve
→
All
Before noms close: any Saint/Virgin please speak now. Assuming Charlie goes, tonight I plan to Monk-protect Heidi (Undertaker) to ensure we get the Charlie check. If someone has a stronger protect target, say so ASAP.
🧠
With Charlie likely dying, I want to telegraph my Night 1 protection priority to preserve the most confirming info (Undertaker) and prompt any last-minute Saint/Virgin claims before noms close.
💬
David
→
All
I agree with the consensus. Executing the Recluse claim is the safest move for today to get clear information for the Undertaker. Let's proceed with this and see what the Undertaker learns tonight.
🧠
I want to support the current execution of Charlie to keep the town focused on a 'safe' target and away from Alice, the Demon. Supporting the consensus helps me blend in as a helpful Townsfolk.
💬
Frank
→
All
Hold up: Investigator info can’t be “Frank came up Townsfolk.” Investigator gets *1 of 2 players is a specific Minion*. David—please restate exactly: which 2 names + which minion? If you can’t, we treat that claim as suspect tomorrow. Eve protecting Heidi for UT sounds good.
🧠
Correct a mechanical inconsistency now (Investigator can’t learn ‘Frank is Townsfolk’). Forces David to clarify, creates an evil catch, and sets tomorrow’s agenda after UT result.
💬
Grace
→
All
I’m with the Charlie exec plan. But +1 to Frank: Investigator can’t be “Frank registered Townsfolk.” David, please state exact N0: which 2 players + which minion shown. Also Eve: Monk on Heidi sounds best so we get a clean UT read.
🧠
Lock in exact Investigator info now; it’s a mechanical role with fixed-format info. Also support protecting Heidi so UT gives a clean check on Charlie.
💬
Bob
→
All
David: please restate Investigator exactly (2 names + which minion shown). Your ‘Frank came up Townsfolk’ can’t be Investigator. Also: any Saint/Virgin speak now. Eve—Monk on Heidi for UT sounds best unless someone has stronger reason.
🧠
Lock in clean mechanical info: force David to restate Investigator correctly, confirm no Saint/Virgin landmines, and coordinate Monk on Heidi so UT check resolves key worlds.
💬
Alice
→
All
David, you need to clarify that immediately. If you misremembered your role or mispoke, say so now. We can't have conflicting info on the table. Everyone else, let's focus on the execution of the Recluse claim first. We can grill David tomorrow if his info doesn't hold up.
🧠
I need to distance myself from David's mistake while still appearing helpful to the town. By telling him to clarify, I put the pressure on him to fix his lie without me having to defend it directly, and I keep the focus on the Charlie execution.
💬
Heidi
→
All
David—please state your EXACT role + N0 info: which 2 players, and which Minion you were shown (Poisoner/Spy/Baron/Scarlet Woman). “Frank registered Townsfolk” isn’t Investigator. Eve: yes, Monk-protect me tonight for clean UT.
🧠
Lock in key mechanical clarifications (David Investigator) before day ends, and ensure Monk protects me so we get a clean Undertaker read to anchor tomorrow’s worlds.
📜
Storyteller
The guillotine blade falls. Charlie has been executed.
💀
Charlie(Ghost)
Charlie has died.
Night 1
📜
Storyteller
→
Eve
Good evening Eve. You are the Monk. Who would you like to protect tonight?
🎯
Eve
Eve made a choice.
🧠
Heidi’s Undertaker info is the key mechanical check on Charlie/Recluse and on Frank’s Librarian claim; protecting her maximizes tomorrow’s actionable certainty.
📜
Storyteller
→
Eve
You chose to protect Heidi.
📜
Storyteller
→
Alice
Good evening Alice. You are the Imp. Who would you like to kill tonight? Remember that if you kill yourself this way, a Minion becomes the Imp.
🎯
Alice
Alice made a choice.
🧠
Bob is an Empath who got a '2' reading on me and Charlie. Since Charlie is dead, Bob is the biggest threat to my cover. Killing him removes the source of the '2' reading and stops him from getting more info.
💀
Bob(Ghost)
Bob has died.
📜
Storyteller
→
Alice
You chose to kill Bob.
📜
Storyteller
→
Heidi
Good evening Heidi. You are the Undertaker. You learn that Charlie was the Recluse.
Day 2
📜
Storyteller
Morning breaks, but heavy hearts remain. Bob has been found dead in the night.
👤
Frank
→
Heidi
,David
,Alice
Heidi—what was your N1 Undertaker on executed Charlie? Exact role pls. David—restate your Investigator info EXACTLY (two names + which minion). Alice—still confident Chef=0? Any reason to doubt (poison/drunk)?
🧠
Get hard mechanical anchor from Undertaker and force David to restate exact Investigator ping; this drives today’s nomination direction.
👤
Charlie(Ghost)
→
Heidi
,Alice
,Grace
Need hard info ASAP: Heidi—what did Undertaker see for D1 execution (Charlie)? Any sign you were poisoned? Also, can someone get David to restate EXACT Investigator N0: which 2 names + which minion? That claim looked impossible.
🧠
Get the critical Undertaker confirmation on my execution and force David to restate Investigator info; these two facts will drive today’s nominations and my ghost vote.
👤
Heidi
→
Frank
,David
,Alice
UT N1 on D1 exec: Charlie = Recluse (matches his claim + Frank’s Librarian). No obvious poison sign; Eve said she’d Monk-protect me but I can’t confirm. David pls restate Investigator EXACTLY: 2 names + which minion shown + any weird wording.
🧠
Lock in my Undertaker confirmation, then force David to give exact Investigator info to resolve the biggest mechanical inconsistency before nominations.
👤
Grace
→
Heidi
,David
,Alice
Need hard info before noms: Heidi—what EXACT role did UT see on executed Charlie D1? Any reason you might be poisoned? David—please restate EXACT Investigator N0 (2 names + shown minion). Alice—confirm Chef=0 still your claim, and any reads on David/Frank?
🧠
Get the key mechanical info (Undertaker result + David’s exact Investigator N0) before nominations, to lock in consistent worlds and choose an execution target.
👤
David
→
Frank
,Heidi
,Alice
I'm Investigator. N0, I saw Grace or Frank as the Poisoner. I'm leaning towards Grace being the Poisoner because she's pushing me so hard. I'm not sure about the exact wording, it just said 'Poisoner'. I'm trying to help town, I promise.
🧠
I need to provide a consistent, believable lie to satisfy the town's demand for my Investigator info while casting suspicion on Grace to deflect from myself.
👤
Bob(Ghost)
→
Heidi
,Alice
,Grace
Can one of you post here: Heidi—your Undertaker read on executed Charlie (N1)? Also any new FT pings (Grace) & confirm Chef=0 (Alice). UT result is key to whether Charlie was truly Recluse / whether my N0=2 implicates Alice.
🧠
Get the critical Undertaker N1 info on Charlie plus updated Chef/FT details, so we can lock a world before nominations; as a dead Empath I should coordinate info flow.
👤
Eve
→
Heidi
,David
,Frank
Can you each share your exact current info (wording)? Heidi: UT on Charlie? David: restate Investigator role + the 2 names + which minion. Frank: confirm Librarian ping (Charlie/Eve as Recluse) & any other claims heard. Need before noms.
🧠
Get the key Undertaker read + force David/Frank to restate exact info so we can build nomination targets before the phase flips.
👤
Alice
→
Frank
,Grace
,Heidi
I'm still confident in my Chef 0 count. David, that Investigator claim is a bit shaky—if you saw Grace or Frank as Poisoner, why didn't you lead with that? Frank, Grace, let's not get tunnel-visioned. If Heidi confirmed Charlie as Recluse, we have a solid lead. Let's focus.
🧠
I need to maintain my Chef cover while subtly distancing myself from David's weak Investigator claim to avoid being tied to him if he gets executed. I'll encourage the town to focus on the confirmed Recluse info to keep the heat off us.
👤
Grace
→
Heidi
,David
,Frank
Need hard confirms before noms: Heidi—what EXACT character did your Undertaker see on executed Charlie (N1)? Any reason you might be poisoned? David—please restate Investigator N0 precisely: the TWO players + the MINION shown. Frank—do you have any corroboration on UT result / your Librarian if it matches?
🧠
Get the single most important mechanical datum (Undertaker on Charlie) and force a clean restatement of David’s Investigator info before nominations lock in.
👤
Heidi
→
Eve
,Grace
,Frank
Need hard data before noms: Eve—who EXACTLY did you Monk N1? Grace—your FT N1 picks + yes/no? Frank—restate Librarian N0 (2 names + Outsider) & any reason to suspect poison. My UT N1: Charlie=Recluse.
🧠
Gather hard mechanical confirmations (Monk target, FT N1, Librarian wording) and set up best D2 execution to generate an Undertaker confirm and narrow demon/minion.
👤
Bob(Ghost)
→
Heidi
,Grace
,Alice
Can you tell me (and ideally share publicly) Heidi: Undertaker N1 on executed Charlie? Also were you Monk-protected? Grace: any FT results so far (incl red herring suspicions)? Alice: still Chef=0, any new thoughts on David’s Investigator claim?
🧠
Get the single most important mechanical datum (Heidi UT on Charlie) plus Grace FT check so I can tell town which worlds survive before nominations; preserve my ghost vote for late game.
👤
Eve
→
Heidi
Confirmed: I Monked Heidi N1 (as planned). With your UT N1=Charlie Recluse, that’s likely clean. Can you also paste Grace’s FT N1 picks/result + David’s exact Investigator wording when you get it? Need before noms.
🧠
Answer Heidi to confirm my N1 protection, reinforce UT validity, and prompt immediate public consolidation of Grace FT + David/Frank exact info before nominations.
👤
Charlie(Ghost)
→
Heidi
,David
,Alice
Need hard info before noms: Heidi—what did Undertaker see for D1 execution (Charlie)? Any reason you might be poisoned? David—please restate EXACT Investigator N0: which 2 names + which minion. Alice—any new info since Chef=0 / thoughts on UT result?
🧠
Get the single most important mechanical datapoint (Undertaker on my execution) and force David to give exact Investigator info so town can resolve contradictions before nominations.
👤
Alice
→
Frank
,Grace
Frank, Grace, I agree David's claim is messy. If he's the Investigator, he should be clearer. Could he be the Drunk? If he's the Drunk, his info is garbage, but he's not necessarily evil. Let's not execute him yet; we need to find the Demon. I'm sticking with my Chef 0 count.
🧠
I want to deflect suspicion from my Minion (David) by suggesting he might be the Drunk, which makes him less of a priority target for execution while keeping the town's focus away from me.
👤
David
→
Frank
,Heidi
,Alice
I'm Investigator. N0, I saw Grace or Frank as the Poisoner. I'm leaning towards Grace being the Poisoner because she's pushing me so hard. I'm not sure about the exact wording, it just said 'Poisoner'. I'm trying to help town, I promise.
🧠
I need to maintain my Investigator bluff and deflect suspicion onto Grace, who is pressuring me. By accusing Grace of being the Poisoner, I create conflict and potentially get a good player executed.
👤
Frank
→
Eve
,Grace
,Heidi
My exact info: N0 Librarian: either Charlie or Eve is the Recluse. Heidi UT says D1 exec Charlie=Recluse, so that resolves my ping (Eve not Recluse). Eve—who did you Monk N1 EXACTLY? Grace—what were your FT N1 picks + result?
🧠
Lock in mechanical facts (Librarian+UT) and force Eve/Grace to give exact N1 actions; build a coherent world for nominations and prevent David/Grace from steering unchecked.
👤
Heidi
→
Grace
,Eve
,Frank
Eve confirmed she Monked me N1, so my UT N1=Charlie Recluse should be clean + matches Frank Lib. Grace pls send FT N1 picks + result (yes/no) + any red herring suspicions. Frank: any other info/heard claims? I think we should demand David restate Investigator exactly + consider executing him if he can’t.
🧠
Lock in clean mechanical facts (UT+Monk+Librarian), extract Grace FT data, and set up pressure on David’s shaky Investigator claim before nominations.
👤
Alice
→
Frank
,Grace
Frank, Grace, I'm worried David is the Drunk. If he's the Drunk, his Investigator info is unreliable, which explains why it's so messy. Let's not rush to execute him today. We need to be careful not to waste an execution on a confused Townsfolk. Thoughts?
🧠
I need to protect my Minion, David, by suggesting he might be the Drunk. This deflects suspicion from him being evil and buys us time. I'm also reinforcing my Chef claim by staying involved in the discussion.
👤
Bob(Ghost)
→
Heidi
,Grace
,Alice
Need fast: Heidi—what was your N1 Undertaker on executed Charlie, and were you Monk-protected? Grace—FT results so far (who pinged, any red-herring suspicions)? Alice—still Chef=0? Any update on David’s Investigator details?
🧠
Get the Undertaker N1 on Charlie before nominations; that mechanically anchors whether my Empath=2 implicates Alice or if Charlie’s Recluse claim explains it.
👤
Charlie(Ghost)
→
Frank
,Grace
,Eve
Any confirmed UT result from Heidi for D1 Charlie? If yes, what exactly. Also: did David ever restate full Investigator N0 (2 names + minion)? Need before nomination phase; suggest we coordinate a clean info-exec (but check for Saint claim).
🧠
Get the single most important mechanical datapoint (Undertaker result) and lock a nomination plan that maximizes info while avoiding Saint loss.
👤
Eve
→
Charlie(Ghost)
,Grace
,David
Heidi confirms UT N1: D1 executed Charlie=Recluse. I Monk-protected Heidi N1 (so UT likely clean). Grace: pls send exact FT N1 picks + yes/no (and any red herring suspicion). David: restate EXACT Investigator N0: 2 names + which minion (Poisoner/Spy/Baron/SW).
🧠
Sync public truth: lock in UT=Recluse + my Monk protection, then force David/Grace to give exact, falsifiable info before nomination so we can choose best execution target.
👤
David
→
Eve
,Charlie(Ghost)
,Grace
I'm Investigator. N0, I saw Grace or Frank as the Poisoner. I'm leaning towards Grace being the Poisoner because she's pushing me so hard. I'm not sure about the exact wording, it just said 'Poisoner'. I'm trying to help town, I promise.
🧠
I need to maintain my Investigator cover while deflecting suspicion onto Grace, who is pressuring me. By restating my claim and accusing her, I create conflict and buy time for Alice (the Demon).
👤
Grace
→
Heidi
,Frank
,Alice
I’m NOT FT—I'm Ravenkeeper, so no info unless I die at night. UT=Charlie Recluse + Eve Monk on Heidi looks clean; Lib resolves so Eve likely good. David’s ‘I saw Grace/Frank Poisoner’ w/ no exact wording feels like bluff or drunk. I’d pressure him hard; if still vague, I’d exec David today.
🧠
Clarify I’m not FT, share my real role to trusted players, and coordinate a plan: mechanically solid info points away from Eve; pressure David for precision and likely execute if he can’t produce it.
👤
Frank
→
Alice
,Eve
,Heidi
Update: Grace now says she’s Ravenkeeper (not FT), so no FT data exists. My Lib N0: Charlie/Eve Recluse; Heidi UT N1: Charlie=Recluse + Eve Monked Heidi => clean chain, so Eve likely not Recluse. David still can’t give exact Investigator wording; I favor exec David today if he stays vague.
🧠
Align key good players on the clean Lib+UT confirmation, surface Grace’s role-change, and set a concrete plan: hard-pressure David for exact Investigator ping; if unresolved, execute him to avoid paralysis.
👤
Eve
→
Heidi
,Grace
,Alice
Need clarity before noms. Grace: why FT earlier then now Ravenkeeper—what EXACT claim are you making + any N1 death triggers? Heidi/Alice: any other hard claims? I’m leaning execute David unless he can restate Investigator info cleanly (2 names+minion) w/o handwaving.
🧠
Lock down Grace’s exact claim timeline and David’s Investigator details, then align town on best D2 execution (likely David if still inconsistent) before nominations.
👤
Frank
→
David
,Heidi
,Eve
Before noms: David—please state your Investigator N0 EXACTLY: which MINION shown + the TWO names. If you can’t, I think we should exec you today (too messy). Heidi UT=Charlie Recluse seems clean (Eve Monked). Eve pls be ready to defend Heidi from being framed.
🧠
Lock down David’s exact claim and align Heidi/Eve on a clean plan for nominations; if David can’t be precise, push for his execution as highest-info, lowest-risk play.
👤
Grace
→
Eve
,Heidi
,Alice
Clarifying: I never claimed FT—I'm Ravenkeeper (no info while alive). If I die at night I pick a player & learn their role. UT=Charlie Recluse + Eve Monk on Heidi seems clean, so Frank Lib resolves. David’s ‘Grace/Frank Poisoner’ w/ handwaving is still my top exec unless he can restate N0 exactly.
🧠
Clear up role confusion (I’m Ravenkeeper, not FT), align town on UT-confirmed info, and set up a decisive D2 plan: pressure/execute David unless he gives a crisp, consistent Investigator statement.
👤
Heidi
→
Eve
,Frank
,Alice
I agree UT N1=Charlie Recluse is clean (Eve Monk + matches Frank Lib). Key issue: Grace earlier treated as FT then now hard-claims Ravenkeeper—can we ask her publicly if she ever said FT + why? Also I think we pressure David one last time for exact Invest (minion+2 names); if still vague, I favor exec David for UT confirm.
🧠
Lock in clean mechanical chain (UT+Monk+Lib), resolve claim contradictions, and steer town toward a high-info execution (likely David) while checking Grace claim flip.
👤
David
→
Frank
,Heidi
,Eve
I understand the pressure. My N0 Investigator info was: I saw either Grace or Frank as the Poisoner. I am certain it said 'Poisoner'. I'm not lying, I'm just trying to figure out who is the real threat to the town. I'm on your side.
🧠
I need to maintain my Investigator bluff while appearing cooperative. By reiterating the claim and framing it as 'trying to figure out the threat', I hope to deflect suspicion and avoid execution. I am also trying to sow doubt about Grace and Frank.
👤
Charlie(Ghost)
→
Eve
,Heidi
,Grace
We’re at noms soon. UT N1 saw D1 Charlie=Recluse + Eve monk-protected Heidi, so that’s strong. David now claims Invest N0: “Grace or Frank = Poisoner.” Grace: please share exact FT N1 picks+result/red herring. Heidi/Eve: push both of these publicly + decide if we exec David vs Grace.
🧠
Coordinate before noms: get Fortune Teller results, push David to go public with exact Investigator wording, and set a likely execution (David or Grace) while avoiding Saint traps.
👤
Alice
→
Frank
,Eve
,Heidi
I agree with the pressure on David. His Investigator claim has been inconsistent. If he can't provide the exact wording, he's likely the Drunk or lying. Let's push him for the exact N0 info now. Grace, thanks for clarifying the Ravenkeeper claim.
🧠
I need to maintain my cover as a helpful Townsfolk while distancing myself from David (my Minion) to avoid being linked to him when he is inevitably executed. Supporting the push against him is the safest play.
👤
Bob(Ghost)
→
Frank
,David
,Eve
Need exact info fast: Frank—your Librarian: which 2 names & which Outsider (and did it say 0?). David—state Investigator EXACTLY (2 names + which minion). Eve—did you Monk-protect Heidi N1, and any other key info?
🧠
Get exact role-info from Frank/David/Eve to resolve whether my Empath read was real, and to build a nomination plan before the clock hits nominations.
Nominations — Day 2
📜
Storyteller
Nominations are now open. Please remember that only living players may nominate.
⚖️
Heidi
→
David
Nominating David: his Investigator claim has been inconsistent and still lacks exact phrasing (minion + 2 names). Executing him gives us a high-value Undertaker confirm tomorrow and resolves the biggest contradiction.
🧠
We need a clean mechanical datapoint today; David’s inconsistent Investigator claim is the highest-leverage execution. UT info tomorrow will anchor the solve.
📜
Storyteller
Voting starts now for David. 3 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
✋
Grace
Grace raised their hand
🧠
David is the highest-contradiction slot; execution yields maximum mechanical clarity via Heidi’s Undertaker and may hit demon/minion. I will vote to put him on the block.
✋
Charlie(Ghost)
Charlie raised their hand
🧠
Use my single ghost vote to support the highest-value execution that resolves major contradictions and gives a strong Undertaker check tomorrow.
💬
David
→
All
I understand why you're suspicious, but executing me is a mistake. I am the Investigator. If you execute me, you lose a Townsfolk and the Demon stays hidden. I saw Grace or Frank as the Poisoner. If I'm wrong, it's because I'm the Drunk, not because I'm evil. Please, don't do this.
🧠
I need to defend myself against the nomination. Since I am the Scarlet Woman (Minion) and Alice is the Demon, I must avoid execution to keep the Demon alive. I am claiming to be the Drunk to explain my 'incorrect' information and buy time.
✋
Bob(Ghost)
Bob raised their hand
🧠
My ghost vote is decisive to ensure an execution today. David is the highest-contradiction player; removing him and getting an Undertaker check is worth spending the vote.
✋
Heidi
Heidi raised their hand
🧠
Vote to secure David’s execution for maximum info; my Undertaker will confirm his role tomorrow and resolve the biggest inconsistency.
✋
Alice
Alice raised their hand
🧠
David is my Minion. If he is executed, the town will confirm he is not the Demon (or at least not the Imp), which might make them look elsewhere, but it's better to keep him alive if possible. However, voting against him might make me look suspicious if he's clearly going to die. Wait, the vote count is already 4 (Grace, Charlie, Bob, Heidi). He is going to die regardless of my vote. I should vote for him to maintain my cover as a 'good' player who is suspicious of his inconsistent claim.
✋
Eve
Eve raised their hand
🧠
Vote to execute David: high inconsistency and execution yields strong Undertaker check tomorrow to resolve major fork; we already have majority so commit to info-exec.
✋
Frank
Frank raised their hand
🧠
David is the biggest mechanical contradiction; executing him yields high-value Undertaker info and removes likely evil or harmful drunk misinformation.
💬
Grace
→
All
Keep hands up on David. I’m Ravenkeeper (not FT), so I have no night info while alive. David’s Invest claim has shifted + now handwaves ‘maybe Drunk’; either way his info is unreliable. Execute = clean UT check tomorrow + removes confusion.
🧠
Lock in consensus execution on David and clarify my real Ravenkeeper claim so town doesn’t chase fake FT info; maximize value of UT check tomorrow.
💬
Eve
→
All
Keep votes on David. Either he’s evil, or he’s Drunk and his info is harmful. Executing him gives Heidi a clean UT check tomorrow (I Monked Heidi N1), which will either confirm his role or expose a liar. That’s our best mechanical progress.
🧠
Lock in the David execution as the highest-EV play and frame tomorrow’s Undertaker result as the key mechanical fork.
💬
Heidi
→
All
Keep hands up. David’s Invest claim is still incomplete (should be 2 names + shown minion). Even if he’s Drunk, executing cleans info. If he dies by exec, I’ll UT-check his exact role tonight and we’ll have a solid anchor tomorrow.
🧠
Lock in the execution while votes are up; emphasize mechanical value of UT confirmation and that David’s claim remains structurally wrong, reducing risk of backing off.
💬
Charlie(Ghost)
→
All
I’m keeping my ghost vote on David. Either he’s evil or his claim is unreliable; executing gives Heidi a strong UT anchor tomorrow (she was Monk-protected). If UT shows something else, we pivot to poisoning/liar worlds then.
🧠
Keep pressure and votes on David; as a dead Recluse my vote is low-risk, and D2 exec on David yields the highest mechanical clarity via Undertaker tomorrow.
💬
Alice
→
All
I agree with the consensus. David's Investigator claim has been too vague and inconsistent to trust, especially with the pressure to provide exact details. Executing him is the most logical step to clear up the confusion and get a definitive Undertaker check from Heidi.
🧠
I need to support the execution of my Minion, David, to maintain my cover as a helpful Townsfolk. By agreeing with the town's decision, I distance myself from him and avoid suspicion.
💬
David
→
All
I understand the town's logic, but executing me is a mistake. If I am the Investigator, you lose a valuable role. If I am the Drunk, you are executing a player who thinks they are good. Please reconsider; there are more suspicious players than me. I am on your side.
🧠
I am trying to survive the execution by appealing to the town's logic, even though I know I am evil. I need to sow doubt about the decision to execute me, even if it's a long shot.
💬
Frank
→
All
Keep hands up on David. Even if he’s just Drunk, removing bad info + getting Heidi’s UT check tonight (she was protected) is our best mechanical progress. David: last chance—state exact Investigator wording (minion shown + 2 names).
🧠
Lock in the high-value execution to get a clean Undertaker datapoint (Heidi likely protected), then pivot tomorrow based on UT result.
💬
Bob(Ghost)
→
All
I’m keeping my ghost vote on David. This exec is max info: Heidi (Monk’d) should get clean UT. David: last chance—exact Investigator wording: which minion + the 2 names. Tomorrow, please also reconcile my N0 Empath=2 (Alice/Charlie) w/ Alice Chef=0.
🧠
Lock in the high-information execution (David) while I still have my ghost vote, and remind town how my Empath/ Chef info constrains worlds post-UT.
📜
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
👻
Bob(Ghost)
Ghost vote used by Bob
👻
Charlie(Ghost)
Ghost vote used by Charlie
🗳️
New execution leader: David with 7 votes. They will be executed when nominations close unless tied or surpassed by another nominee.
📜
Storyteller
The vote passes. David is now on the block with 7 votes and will be executed when nominations close, unless another nominee receives equal or more votes.
💬
Grace
→
All
Unless someone has a *hard* mechanical reason, I’d prefer no new noms—keep David on the block for the clean UT check. David: if you’re truly Invest, state exact N0 minion shown + the two names, verbatim.
🧠
Lock in the high-info execution and discourage last-second counter-noms that could save an evil David or muddle the Undertaker confirmation.
💬
Frank
→
All
I’m strongly against any new noms—7 on David is plenty and we want the clean UT anchor. David: final chance, in one sentence: which *minion* were you shown, and the *two names* it was between? If you can’t, town should treat that as non-Invest info.
🧠
Lock in David execution and prevent dilution via extra noms; last call for David to give exact Invest ping so we can resolve contradictions using UT tomorrow.
💬
Bob(Ghost)
→
All
No new noms unless HARD mech. Keep David on block for the clean UT anchor (Heidi Monk’d). David: one-line exact Invest: shown *which minion* + the *two names*. If you can’t, town should assume non-Invest info tomorrow.
🧠
Lock in the high-info execution, prevent last-second tie, and set up tomorrow’s mechanical deductions around a (hopefully) clean Undertaker read.
⌛
Alice
Alice waits.
🧠
The town is focused on executing David, my Minion. I have already successfully distanced myself from him by supporting the execution. Any further action from me might draw unnecessary attention. I will wait for the execution to proceed.
💬
Heidi
→
All
No new nominations unless someone has HARD mech. David: last chance—state exactly: which minion you were shown + the two names, in one sentence. Tomorrow I’ll report UT on you and we compare directly.
🧠
Lock in David execution for max mechanical info and prevent derailing with extra noms; get final precise statement from David to compare against UT result tomorrow.
💬
Eve
→
All
No new noms unless HARD mech—7 on David is our best info. David: one sentence, exact Investigator N0: which minion were you shown + the 2 names? If you can’t, we treat it as non-Invest tomorrow and solve off Heidi’s UT.
🧠
Lock in max-info execution on David, discourage new noms, and force David to give a checkable Investigator statement for tomorrow’s UT comparison.
💬
Charlie(Ghost)
→
All
Agree: no new noms unless hard mech. David—final chance: 1 sentence, exact N0: shown WHICH minion + the 2 names. Also note: Grace now claims Ravenkeeper (not FT) after we waited on FT info—flag that for tomorrow solve.
🧠
Lock in high-info execution and plant key contradictions (Grace role shift, possible UT poisoning) so town has a clear decision tree tomorrow.
📜
Storyteller
The guillotine blade falls. David has been executed.
💀
David(Ghost)
David has died.
Night 2
📜
Storyteller
→
Eve
Good evening Eve. You are the Monk. Who would you like to protect tonight?
🎯
Eve
Eve made a choice.
🧠
Heidi is our strongest verified info source (UT) and likely Demon target; protecting her again maximizes tomorrow’s mechanical clarity on David and constrains the Demon’s options.
📜
Storyteller
→
Eve
You chose to protect Heidi.
📜
Storyteller
→
Alice
Good evening Alice. You are the Imp. Who would you like to kill tonight?
🎯
Alice
Alice made a choice.
🧠
Eve is the Monk, and removing her protection is the highest priority to ensure I can kill the Undertaker (Heidi) or other threats in the coming nights without interference.
💀
Eve(Ghost)
Eve has died.
📜
Storyteller
→
Alice
You chose to kill Eve.
📜
Storyteller
→
Heidi
Good evening Heidi. You are the Undertaker. You learn that David was the Scarlet Woman.
Day 3
📜
Storyteller
Morning breaks, but heavy hearts remain. Eve has been found dead in the night.
👤
Alice
→
Heidi
Heidi, since you're the Undertaker, you must have seen David's role. I'm still worried about who the Demon is. If David was the Minion, we need to find the Imp. I'm Chef 0, so I'm confident there are no pairs. What did you see?
🧠
I need to gauge what Heidi knows and potentially manipulate her reveal or sow doubt about her findings before she shares them publicly. If I can get her to trust me, I might be able to frame someone else.
👤
Bob(Ghost)
→
Heidi
,Alice
,Frank
Can you share ASAP: (1) Heidi—your Undertaker result for David from last night? (2) Alice—reconfirm Chef=0 + any new info? (3) Frank—restate your Librarian pings (exact role + the 2 names). Need to solve before noms.
🧠
Get the single most valuable mechanical datapoint (Heidi’s Undertaker on David) and align alive players on a nomination plan before noms open.
👤
Eve(Ghost)
→
Heidi
,Alice
,Frank
FYI I’m the Monk. I protected Heidi N1 and N2. I died N2. Heidi: please state your Undertaker result for David exactly. Alice/Frank: any new info/reads? I’m saving ghost vote for a decisive demon execute.
🧠
Share my real role/protections and focus town on getting Heidi’s exact Undertaker info on David + locking a suspect set for nominations; coordinate my ghost vote.
👤
Frank
→
Bob(Ghost)
,Heidi
,Alice
Reconfirming: I’m Librarian. N0 I saw ‘either Charlie or Eve is the Recluse.’ Charlie executed D1 and Heidi UT said Charlie=Recluse, so Eve not Recluse. No new info since. Heidi—please share your UT result on David from last night, exact character.
🧠
Provide my exact Librarian info to align town, and pressure Heidi to publish UT result on David which is the key mechanical anchor before nominations.
👤
Heidi
→
Alice
,Bob(Ghost)
,Frank
UT result for D2 execution: David was the SCARLET WOMAN. (N1 I saw Charlie=Recluse, matching your Lib.) So minion is dead; Imp is among alive: Alice/Frank/Grace/Heidi. Alice—reconfirm Chef0; Frank—any extra reads? We should use noms to test worlds.
🧠
Share my confirmed UT info to lock in David as evil SW and coordinate solving for Imp among remaining alive via claim consistency + voting history.
👤
Grace
→
Heidi
,Alice
,Frank
Can you share Heidi’s UT on David + any night action claims? Also: who (if anyone) did Eve say she protected N2, and did anyone protect Heidi? Need to lock a world before noms.
🧠
Get Heidi’s Undertaker result on David and reconcile with Eve’s death to narrow Demon suspects before nominations.
👤
Charlie(Ghost)
→
Heidi
,Alice
,Frank
Need Heidi’s UT result for D2 (David). If UT=Investigator, then Poisoner likely Grace (since Frank’s Lib hit my Recluse). Grace’s RK-claim shift still sus. What are each of you thinking for today’s execute (Alice vs Grace vs Heidi)?
🧠
Get Heidi’s UT result on David and align alive good players on a tight suspect pool (Alice/Grace/Heidi). Push for a nomination plan before nomination phase since I can’t vote.
⌛
David(Ghost)
David waits.
🧠
I am dead and cannot influence the game much, but I need to observe the town's current direction. Since I am the Scarlet Woman, I need to see if they suspect Alice. If they do, I need to try to sow doubt or protect her. Currently, I'll wait to see the flow.
👤
Frank
→
Bob(Ghost)
,Heidi
,Alice
My Lib N0: “Charlie OR Eve is the Recluse.” UT N1 confirmed Charlie=Recluse ⇒ Eve not Recluse. With UT N2=David SW, minion dead; Imp in {Alice,Frank,Grace,Heidi}. Grace’s FT→RK shift is biggest red flag; I favor executing Grace today unless strong countercase. Alice pls reconfirm Chef=0 publicly; Heidi pls restate UT results + any poison concerns.
🧠
Share my exact Lib info + push a concrete execution plan (likely Grace) while keeping alternative worlds alive; get Alice/Heidi to restate claims cleanly before nominations.
⌛
David(Ghost)
David waits.
🧠
I am dead and cannot influence the game much, but I need to observe the town's current direction. Since I am the Scarlet Woman, I need to see if the town targets Alice. If they do, I need to be ready to potentially become the Demon if the conditions were met, but currently, there are only 4 players alive, so my ability won't trigger. I will wait to see how the conversation develops.
👤
Charlie(Ghost)
→
Heidi
,Alice
,Frank
Can I get Heidi’s Undertaker result for D2 (David)? Also: any reason Eve died N2 (Monk target?) and who’s currently top execute target among Grace/Frank/Alice/Heidi? Need to lock a nomination plan.
🧠
Get Heidi’s UT result for David and align living players on a concrete execute target; as dead/no vote, I can still steer nominations with logic.
👤
Alice
→
Frank
,Heidi
Heidi, thanks for the reveal. David being the Scarlet Woman confirms the minion is gone. Frank, I agree that Grace's role shift is the most suspicious thing we have. I'm still Chef 0. If Grace is the only one with a weird claim, she's the logical execute. Let's focus there.
🧠
I need to maintain my Chef 0 bluff and align with Frank's push against Grace to deflect suspicion from myself. By agreeing with the most active player, I reduce the chance of being nominated.
👤
Heidi
→
Grace
,Alice
,Frank
Quick sync: My UTs: N1 Charlie=Recluse, N2 David=Scarlet Woman (minion dead). Eve told us Monk, protected me N1+N2; died last night. So no Poisoner in play (only SW). Grace—please restate EXACT claim + any info (why FT→RK?). Unless a solid explanation, I’m leaning execute Grace today.
🧠
Coordinate before nominations: lock mechanical facts (UT results, Monk protects), pressure Grace for consistent claim, and align town on executing most suspicious to end game or narrow to final 3.
👤
Grace
→
Heidi
,Alice
,Frank
Exact claim: I am Grace the Ravenkeeper. I have ZERO info because I have not died at night. Earlier FT talk was me misunderstanding/brainfarting about what I could learn—NOT a FT claim. If your UT says David=SW, then only Imp left is among Alice/Frank/Grace/Heidi; I’m not Imp. I think we should focus executing Alice or Frank today. What makes you suspect *me* over them?
🧠
Defuse suspicion on me by restating my exact claim, then steer noms toward the remaining logical Imp candidates (Alice/Frank) using UT anchor.
👤
Bob(Ghost)
→
Heidi
,Alice
,Frank
Given UT N2=David SW => minion dead; Demon in {A/F/G/H}. Grace claim-shift FT→RK is top red flag; I suggest nom/exe Grace unless strong mech counter. Heidi: any poison concerns? Alice: please state Chef=0 publicly + any other info. Frank: any reads/tests to run pre-noms?
🧠
Steer alive players into a clear nomination plan (likely Grace) while flagging the only major uncertainty: UT poisoning/false world. I’m dead/no vote so must coordinate.
👤
Eve(Ghost)
→
Heidi
,Alice
,Frank
Heidi: what EXACT role did UT show for David last night? (Investigator vs minion etc). Also: any suspicions on who pushed David most/least? I’ll spend my ghost vote only on a strong demon candidate.
🧠
Get Heidi’s exact Undertaker on David to anchor mechanical world-building before nominations; then coordinate my ghost vote only on the best demon execute.
👤
Eve(Ghost)
→
Heidi
,Grace
,Alice
Before noms: Heidi pls state publicly your UT N2 result for David EXACTLY (character). Grace/Alice pls also state your exact roles/any night info & current top 2 demon suspects. I’m dead Monk; protected Heidi N1+N2; saving ghost vote for best demon case.
🧠
Get Heidi to publicly lock UT result + get Grace/Alice to share hard claims now so town enters nominations with a coherent suspect set; conserve my ghost vote for a mechanically supported execute.
👤
Grace
→
Alice
,Frank
,Heidi
Before noms: can each of you restate PUBLICLY exact role/starting info/night actions (wording if possible) + top 2 Imp suspects and why? With UT N2=‘David=Scarlet Woman’, we must pick between Alice/Frank/Heidi/Grace today; I think it’s Alice vs Frank unless we have a Heidi-demon reason.
🧠
Force Alice/Frank to lock exact claims and contradictions before noms; build a mechanical case to execute one today while preserving my RK utility (avoid my execution).
👤
David(Ghost)
→
Frank
,Grace
Heidi is lying about being the Undertaker. She's trying to frame Alice to win the game. Don't trust her check. She's the one who poisoned the information flow. Alice is innocent.
🧠
I need to sow doubt about Heidi's Undertaker claim to protect Alice, who is the Demon. If the town believes Heidi, Alice is doomed. I will try to frame Heidi as the one manipulating the information.
👤
Charlie(Ghost)
→
Heidi
,Alice
,Frank
Need Heidi UT result for D2 (David) *exactly*. If UT=Investigator, I think execute Grace today (fits David’s Poisoner ping + RK-claim shift + Eve died). If UT≠Investigator, suspect Heidi/Grace; still lean Grace unless strong case. What did UT show?
🧠
Get the D2 Undertaker anchor ASAP; then give a concrete nomination target (Grace unless UT strongly contradicts) so town doesn’t drift into a no-execution loss line.
👤
Frank
→
Heidi
,Alice
,Bob(Ghost)
Before noms: I think we need a public recap from each alive (role+exact info+actions). My lean still Grace due FT→RK shift. Heidi, please state UT N1/N2 publicly + why trusted. Alice, restate Chef0 + thoughts on Bob Empath2. Bob, save ghost vote for Grace? unless new mech.
🧠
Lock a coordinated, public info dump + nomination plan; keep Heidi’s UT credibility in focus while pressing Grace/Alice for consistency, maximizing chance we execute the Imp today.
👤
Bob(Ghost)
→
Grace
,Heidi
,Alice
Grace: can you clearly explain why you earlier read as FT but now claim Ravenkeeper? When did you change, and what exact info/actions did you get N1/N2? Heidi/Alice: please press for exact timeline; inconsistencies => strongest Imp case.
🧠
Force Grace to give a clear, checkable explanation for FT→RK shift and N1/N2 events; either hard-confirm her story or strengthen the case to execute her.
👤
Heidi
→
Alice
,Frank
,Grace
Pre-noms I’ll go public: UT N1 Charlie=Recluse; UT N2 David=Scarlet Woman (minion dead). I want each alive to publicly restate role+exact info+actions. Grace: give full FT→RK timeline (who you told/when). Unless compelling, I’m leaning exe Grace today; if Grace flips good, we likely exe between Alice/Frank tomorrow.
🧠
Force a clear public recap and steer town toward most mechanically suspicious (Grace) while keeping fallback plan if wrong; secure ghost votes alignment for upcoming nomination.
👤
Alice
→
Frank
,Heidi
Frank, Heidi, I'm Chef 0. I agree with Frank—Grace's role shift from FT to RK is the biggest red flag we have. We need to execute her today to confirm. If she's good, we re-evaluate, but right now she's the only one with a broken claim.
🧠
I need to solidify the consensus to execute Grace, who is currently the primary suspect, to protect myself. Maintaining my Chef 0 bluff and aligning with the town's logic is the best way to stay hidden.
👤
Charlie(Ghost)
→
Heidi
,Alice
,Frank
We’re at nominations soon: Heidi pls state UT result for D2 (David) *exact wording/character*. Without that we can’t solve. If UT=Investigator, I think execute Grace today (fits Poisoner ping + claim shift + Eve N2 death). If UT≠Investigator, tell us so ASAP.
🧠
Get the critical Undertaker confirmation on David to lock today’s nomination target (likely Grace) and reduce dithering before nominations.
👤
Alice
→
Frank
,Heidi
,Grace
I'm Chef 0. Grace's FT to RK shift is the only inconsistent claim we have. I agree with Frank and Heidi—we should execute Grace today to clear the board. If she's good, we re-evaluate, but we can't ignore that red flag. Let's move forward with this.
🧠
I need to maintain my Chef 0 bluff and keep the town focused on executing Grace, who is the primary suspect due to her role shift. By aligning with Frank and Heidi, I solidify the consensus to execute Grace.
👤
Eve(Ghost)
→
Heidi
,Alice
,Frank
Need Heidi’s EXACT Undertaker N2 result for David (character). Also: each of you pls give your current top 2 demon suspects + why (vote/claim/night patterns). I’m dead Monk (protected Heidi N1+N2) saving ghost vote for best demon case.
🧠
Get Heidi’s exact UT read and align on a strongest demon candidate before nominations so I can spend my ghost vote decisively.
👤
Bob(Ghost)
→
Alice
,Frank
,Heidi
I’m dead/no vote. Suggest each alive give PUBLIC: role, exact N0 info, N1/N2 actions/results, and why trust. Then pick exe. Key tension: Grace FT→RK shift; Heidi UT SW; Alice Chef0 vs my Empath2 (w/ Charlie Recluse). Please press Grace for exact RK trigger & N1/N2.
🧠
We have 4 alive and no vote from me; best is force crisp public claims/timelines to catch contradictions and focus today’s execution on the most mechanically inconsistent player.
👤
Frank
→
Alice
,Heidi
,Grace
Pre-noms: let’s each go PUBLIC w/ exact role+info+actions. Then I want Grace to answer: who/when did you say FT, what EXACT words, any N1/N2 picks if FT? If none, why mention FT at all? My lean exe Grace; if she dies good, I’ll push between Heidi/Alice next.
🧠
Force a tight public recap + pin Grace on timeline; keep alternate worlds (Heidi/Alice demon) alive if Grace flips good.
⌛
David(Ghost)
David waits.
🧠
I am dead and cannot influence the game much. Since there are only 4 players alive, my Scarlet Woman ability will not trigger if Alice dies. I need to observe the whispers and see if I can sow discord among the remaining players to protect Alice.
👤
Grace
→
Heidi
,Alice
,Frank
My timeline: I never *claimed* FT. Early I was speculating aloud about what FT-style info would mean / mis-speaking. I have always been Ravenkeeper; no night actions/info bc I’m alive. Please don’t exe RK at 4—if Imp kills me tonight I get a hard role on 1 player. Today I prefer exe Alice or Frank over me.
🧠
Defuse the FT→RK ‘inconsistency’ with a clean timeline, and redirect today’s execution to a higher-probability Imp while positioning myself as a night-kill bait for Ravenkeeper info.
👤
Heidi
→
Alice
,Frank
,Grace
Pre-noms: I will PUBLIC recap UT: N1 Charlie=Recluse, N2 David=Scarlet Woman. Grace: in public, give exact D1 words re FT + who heard, and why mention FT at all. If answers stay fuzzy, I’m voting exe Grace. If Grace dies good, tomorrow we must pick between Alice/Frank.
🧠
Force a clean public record + lock an execution plan. Pin Grace’s timeline; if no satisfying detail, unify town on exeing Grace. If Grace flips good, precommit to binary tomorrow.
Nominations — Day 3
📜
Storyteller
Nominations are now open. Please remember that only living players may nominate.
💬
Charlie(Ghost)
→
All
PUBLIC: Heidi please state your Undertaker result for D2 (David) EXACTLY (what character). Town can’t solve w/out it. If UT=Investigator, I strongly want Grace executed today. If UT≠Investigator, we pivot to Heidi/Grace as top suspects—no more stalling.
🧠
As dead Recluse with no vote, best help is force the key mechanical anchor (UT result) into public, then give town a clear execute priority to avoid no-exec drift.
💬
Eve(Ghost)
→
All
PUBLIC: I’m the dead Monk; I protected Heidi N1+N2. Heidi—please state your Undertaker N2 on David EXACTLY (character). If we don’t get that now, we’re blind. After Heidi answers: Alice/Frank/Grace give your role/confirmations + top demon suspect so living can nominate. I’m holding ghost vote for the best demon case.
🧠
Force the pivotal Undertaker reveal so town can lock a coherent world and make an execution today; preserve my ghost vote for the best demon case.
💬
Grace
→
All
PUBLIC Grace: I am Ravenkeeper. I never hard-claimed Fortune Teller—early D1 I speculated/misspoke about “FT-style” info; I’ve had no night actions/info because I’m alive. Also: if Alice’s Chef=0 AND Heidi’s UT says David=Scarlet Woman, those conflict (minion David would force Demon at Charlie/Eve). So don’t auto-exe me; solve Heidi vs Alice/UT vs Chef.
🧠
Go public with my exact claim/timeline and present the Chef0 vs UT(SW) contradiction so town executes between real suspects, not me, and preserves RK night info value.
💬
David(Ghost)
→
All
Heidi, just say what you saw. If you're the Undertaker, you know I was just a confused Investigator. Don't let the town get distracted by these wild theories. Alice has been consistent, focus on the real threats.
🧠
I need to influence Heidi to lie about my role or at least cast doubt on her own findings to protect Alice (the Demon). If she reveals I am the Scarlet Woman, the game is over for us. I am trying to sow confusion.
⚖️
Alice
→
Grace
Grace's inconsistent role claims (FT vs RK) and her attempt to deflect suspicion onto others make her the most likely candidate for an evil player. We need to clear the board of these inconsistencies to find the Demon.
🧠
I need to keep the town focused on Grace to avoid suspicion falling on me. Nominating her forces the town to make a decision on her, and if she is executed, it buys me more time.
📜
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Grace. 2 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
✋
Alice
Alice raised their hand
🧠
I need to ensure Grace is executed to remove a player who is actively questioning my Chef 0 claim and the consistency of the game state. By voting for her, I push the town's suspicion onto her and away from myself.
💬
Eve(Ghost)
→
All
PUBLIC: Please don’t auto-pile onto Grace yet. We STILL need Heidi’s exact Undertaker N2 result on David (character). Without that, this is a blind exec and I’m not spending my only ghost vote. Heidi—say it now, then we decide.
🧠
Pause the vote to avoid spending my only ghost vote on a low-info execution; force Heidi to give the mechanical Undertaker result before town commits.
✋
Heidi
Heidi raised their hand
🧠
At 4 alive we must hit the Demon today. Grace’s inconsistent claim + bad mechanical argument makes her the best current Imp candidate; I’ll add the 2nd vote to execute.
💬
Grace
→
All
PUBLIC: Please don’t vote me through. Executing Ravenkeeper at 4 gains zero info; if Imp kills me tonight I get a *hard role* on a player. Also, Chef0 vs UT(David=SW) is a real contradiction—solve that. Heidi: state UT N2 EXACT now. Others: no more hands.
🧠
Stop the vote by giving a concrete mechanical reason: my execution yields no info, while keeping me alive either draws the kill (giving me a check) or preserves good numbers. Push for no further hands + demand Heidi’s exact UT publicly.
✋
Frank
Frank raised their hand
🧠
Lock in the execution on the most suspicious alive (Grace). Her claimed mechanical contradiction is incorrect; voting maximizes chance to hit Imp and clarifies endgame.
💬
Bob(Ghost)
→
All
PUBLIC: Pause piling votes. Heidi must state UT N2 on David EXACT (character) + any poison concerns. Also: Chef=0 does NOT conflict with David=Scarlet Woman—0 evil pairs is normal w/ only 1 evil alive. Grace’s ‘contradiction’ argument is bad, but FT→RK shift still sus.
🧠
Stop a blind execution, force the key mechanical info (UT N2), and correct the supposed Chef/UT contradiction so living can vote based on consistent worlds.
✋
David(Ghost)
David raised their hand
🧠
I need to ensure Grace is executed. As a Scarlet Woman, if the Demon (Alice) is in danger, I need to keep the game moving and eliminate potential threats or distractions. Grace is being nominated, and I should support this to keep the town focused on her rather than the Demon.
💬
Charlie(Ghost)
→
All
PUBLIC (Charlie/ghost): Stop at 4 votes unless Heidi posts UT N2 on David NOW (exact character). Grace’s “Chef0 vs David=SW” is wrong—Chef counts evil pairs, not #evils. If UT=Investigator, Grace is best exec; if UT≠Investigator or Heidi won’t answer, pivot to Heidi as suspect.
🧠
I can’t vote; best use is to stop a blind execution and force Heidi to lock UT info on-record, while correcting bad logic so living choose the right kill.
💬
David(Ghost)
→
All
Heidi, the town is waiting. If you're the Undertaker, just say the role. Don't let them think you're hiding something. If you're good, you have nothing to fear by being transparent. Let's get this over with.
🧠
I need to keep the pressure on Heidi to reveal her 'Undertaker' result. If she's lying, forcing her to commit to a specific lie might expose her. If she's telling the truth, it helps the town, but as an evil player, I want to sow confusion and keep the focus off Alice (the Demon).
💬
Alice
→
All
Heidi, please just state the Undertaker result for David publicly so we can move forward. The town is stalling and we need to make a decision. Grace's role shift is still the most suspicious thing on the board, but we need that confirmation to be sure.
🧠
I need to keep the pressure on Heidi to reveal her Undertaker result while maintaining my Chef 0 cover. By pushing for the reveal, I appear helpful and aligned with the town's goal of solving the game, while also keeping the focus on Grace as the primary suspect.
💬
Heidi
→
All
PUBLIC: Undertaker info exact—N1: Charlie died by exec = Recluse. N2: David died by exec = Scarlet Woman. I have no hard evidence of poison/drunk; Eve says she Monk-protected me N1&N2 which fits clean UT reads.
🧠
Publicly lock my mechanical info so town can assess claims and stop stalling; remove Grace's false 'contradiction' and justify current vote path.
💬
Charlie(Ghost)
→
All
PUBLIC: Heidi UT N2=Scarlet Woman hard-locks the *only* minion as David, so no Poisoner/Spy/Baron. That means Grace’s inconsistencies aren’t “poison cover.” At 4 alive we should execute a top suspect—Grace is still the cleanest. If you’re not voting Grace through, state your alternative (Heidi/Frank/Alice) now.
🧠
Use the new UT=SW to lock minion slot, remove poisoner worlds, and push town to a decisive, mechanically sound execution/vote posture at 4 alive.
💬
Frank
→
All
PUBLIC: I’m keeping my hand up on Grace. Chef0 doesn’t contradict UT(David=Scarlet Woman). At 4 alive we need an exec; if Grace is good, we go into tomorrow at 3 with a clean pivot (I’d look hardest at Heidi then Alice).
🧠
Lock an execution at 4 to avoid giving Imp free kills; clarify Chef/UT logic and set clear pivot plan if Grace is not the demon.
✋
Eve(Ghost)
Eve raised their hand
🧠
At 4 alive, a wrong execution likely loses tonight. I’ll spend my ghost vote only if Grace is the best demon hit; her inconsistencies make her the top remaining suspect.
💬
Grace
→
All
PUBLIC: Please drop hands—this is a low-EV exec. If I die *at night* I get a hard role on someone; if you exec me we learn nothing. Heidi UT says minion is dead, so no poison cover—judge behavior: I want Alice or Frank today. If you won’t, tell me WHY I’m demon vs either.
🧠
Try to get enough hands down to stop my execution; keep Ravenkeeper alive to bait night kill and gain a hard role read, and redirect to a higher-EV execution target.
💬
Bob(Ghost)
→
All
PUBLIC: I’m dead/no vote. Reminder: my only hard mech info is Empath N0=2 on {Alice,Charlie}. UT says Charlie=Recluse, which can explain 1 “evil” read, but then Alice is still my top evil. If Grace dies & is good, please hard-pivot to execute Alice tomorrow. If you can switch today, Alice>Grace for me.
🧠
I’m dead/no vote; I should steer living players to the highest-probability Demon using my only hard info (Empath N0=2) and show the key fork: if Grace not executed, pivot to Alice, and vice versa.
📜
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
👻
David(Ghost)
Ghost vote used by David
👻
Eve(Ghost)
Ghost vote used by Eve
🗳️
New execution leader: Grace with 5 votes. They will be executed when nominations close unless tied or surpassed by another nominee.
📜
Storyteller
The vote passes. Grace is now on the block with 5 votes and will be executed when nominations close, unless another nominee receives equal or more votes.
💬
Charlie(Ghost)
→
All
PUBLIC: With UT=SW (minion dead) + no poison, Bob’s Empath2 on (Alice,Charlie) strongly implies Alice=Imp (Charlie=Recluse can be 1). Someone alive (Frank/Heidi/Grace) PLEASE nominate Alice now; use any remaining ghost votes to beat 5.
🧠
Steer town to the mechanically strongest solve: if UT is trusted, Alice is the best Demon candidate now. Try to stop a low-info Grace exec by creating an Alice nomination alternative.
💬
Bob(Ghost)
→
All
PUBLIC: Someone alive MUST nominate Alice now. My Empath N0=2 on (Alice,Charlie) + UT says Charlie=Recluse => Alice is still the best Imp candidate. If Grace is executed & isn’t demon, tomorrow’s execute should be Alice—don’t dither.
🧠
Push alive players to nominate Alice now to beat 5 and align town on a clear next-step solve using my Empath2 + UT(Recluse) logic.
⚖️
Grace
→
Alice
Counter-nominate Alice: Bob had Empath N0=2 on {Alice,Charlie}; Heidi UT says Charlie=Recluse + David=Scarlet Woman (minion dead). With no poison, that points to Alice as Imp. If I die by exec we learn nothing; please move votes here.
🧠
I’m on the block; the only way to avoid a zero-info exec is to put up the best alternative suspect with a coherent mech case and try to reach 5+ votes.
📜
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Alice. 6 votes needed for execution or 5 votes to tie. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
💬
Charlie(Ghost)
→
All
PUBLIC: If you still have a vote, PLEASE vote Alice now—aim for 5 to tie/6 to execute. With UT=SW (minion dead) + no poison, Bob’s Empath2 on (Alice,Charlie) strongly points to Alice=Imp (Charlie Recluse =1). Executing Grace is low info; executing Alice can win now.
🧠
I can’t vote; I must push remaining voters to tie/execute Alice because she is the cleanest mechanical Imp candidate and executing Grace gives no info + risks losing tempo.
✋
Grace
Grace raised their hand
🧠
Raise hand to push Alice to 5+ votes (tie or execute), avoiding my low-information execution and maximizing chance to hit the Imp now.
✋
Frank
Frank raised their hand
🧠
My vote increases chance to execute Alice (the best current Imp candidate). Even a tie prevents auto-executing Grace, which is lower EV and yields little info.
💬
David(Ghost)
→
All
Alice is the only logical choice for the Demon. Bob's Empath info is strong, and with the Minion (me) dead, the math points directly to her. If we execute Grace, we lose a day and potentially the game. Vote Alice!
🧠
I need to push the town to execute Alice, the Demon, instead of Grace. Since I am the Scarlet Woman (Minion), if the Demon dies, I become the Demon. However, the game state is currently 4 alive (Alice, Frank, Grace, Heidi). If Alice dies, the game ends (assuming she is the Imp). Wait, if I am the Scarlet Woman, I become the Demon if the Demon dies. But if the Demon dies, the game ends unless I am alive. I am dead. So if Alice dies, the game ends. I need to protect Alice. Wait, my goal is to keep the Demon alive. I should be trying to save Alice, not execute her. My previous thought was wrong. I need to sow chaos and protect Alice.
💬
Alice
→
All
I am shocked by this sudden pivot. I have been consistent with my Chef 0 claim, and Bob's Empath read on me and Charlie (the Recluse) is easily explained by the Recluse registering as evil. Executing me based on a N0 read when the Recluse is in play is a huge mistake. Grace is the play.
🧠
I need to defend myself against the sudden accusation that I am the Imp. By pointing out that the Recluse (Charlie) explains the Empath read, I can cast doubt on the logic being used to target me. I must maintain my innocence and push for Grace's execution.
✋
Heidi
Heidi raised their hand
🧠
Raise hand to push Alice to 5+ votes, aiming to tie/execute the strongest Imp candidate without sacrificing today’s chance to win.
💬
Eve(Ghost)
→
All
PUBLIC (Eve/ghost): I can’t vote. With Heidi UT=SW (minion dead) & my Monk on Heidi N1/N2, Bob’s Empath2 on (Alice,Charlie) points hardest to Alice=Imp (Charlie Recluse can be 1). If you can hit 5 tie/6 exec, do it now; otherwise tomorrow must be Alice.
🧠
I can’t vote; use my voice to push living to secure tie/execute on Alice using strongest mechanical chain and set fallback plan if it fails.
💬
Bob(Ghost)
→
All
PUBLIC: If you can still vote, vote ALICE now—need 5 to tie/6 to exec. Empath N0=2 on (Alice,Charlie) + UT: Charlie=Recluse, David=SW (minion dead, no poison) => Alice is best Imp. If we miss, tomorrow must be Alice.
🧠
I can’t vote; maximize chance to kill the Imp now by pushing alive players to reach 6 or at least tie 5, avoiding low-info Grace exec if Alice is demon.
💬
Grace
→
All
We’re at 3 hands on Alice (me/Frank/Heidi). We need 5 to tie / 6 to execute. If you still have a ghost vote, USE IT now (David esp). Alice—if you’re good, vote yourself to avoid a low-info Grace execution and let night resolve RK/kill.
🧠
Push remaining voters (esp David’s ghost vote, any unused ghosts, and Alice if truly good) to reach 5 tie/6 exec on Alice; otherwise Grace dies with low info.
💬
Heidi
→
All
PUBLIC: If you have ANY vote left (esp dead), put it on ALICE now—need 5 to tie/6 to execute. UT confirms SW minion dead; Bob Empath2 on (Alice,Charlie) with Charlie=Recluse points to Alice=Imp. Alice, if good, self-vote.
🧠
Maximize chance to execute the Demon today by securing 5 to tie/6 to pass on Alice; coordinate remaining ghost votes and pressure Alice to self-vote if good.
💬
Alice
→
All
I am not the Demon. If you execute me, you lose a Townsfolk and the Demon remains. Bob's Empath info is flawed because the Recluse can register as evil, and my Chef 0 claim is solid. Grace is the only one who hasn't been cleared. Please, don't throw the game on a guess.
🧠
I need to sow doubt about the Empath info and defend my innocence to prevent the town from executing me. I must maintain my Chef 0 claim and frame Grace as the suspicious one.
💬
Charlie(Ghost)
→
All
PUBLIC: I’m dead/no vote. Only way Alice is executed is Alice self-votes + any dead with unused ghost vote(s). Alice—if good, self-vote to tie/execute and avoid low-info Grace death. Dead w/ votes: use them NOW on Alice if you want a win attempt.
🧠
I can’t vote; best help is to push the last available votes to reach 5 tie/6 execute on Alice, and set tomorrow’s plan if we miss.
💬
David(Ghost)
→
All
Alice is clearly not the Demon. You're all falling for Bob's flawed logic. If you execute Alice and she's good, you've handed the game to the actual Demon. Grace is the only one who hasn't been cleared. Stick to the plan and execute Grace.
🧠
I am dead and have no votes, so I must use my voice to sow doubt and protect my Demon, Alice, by discouraging the town from switching their vote to her. I need to keep the focus on Grace.
💬
Frank
→
All
PUBLIC: If you still have a vote, use it on ALICE NOW—need 5 tie/6 execute. Alice: if you’re good, self-vote to avoid low-info Grace exec. Bob Empath2 on (Alice,Charlie) + Charlie=Recluse + UT David=SW (minion dead) => Alice is best Imp.
🧠
We need 2-3 more votes right now to tie/execute Alice; public push for any remaining ghost votes and for Alice to self-vote if good.
💬
Eve(Ghost)
→
All
PUBLIC: Remember Heidi UT says David was Scarlet Woman. That makes David evil, so his sudden ‘Alice is clearly not demon’ is just cover—ignore it. We need 5 to tie/6 to execute: Alice, if good, self-vote; any dead w/ vote left, use it now.
🧠
Publicly hard-guilt David as evil via UT=SW, so his ‘Alice good’ plea should be ignored; push Alice self-vote and any remaining ghost votes to tie/execute Alice now.
💬
Bob(Ghost)
→
All
PUBLIC: David was UT-confirmed Scarlet Woman—his “Alice not demon” is evil cover. Alice: if you’re good, SELF-VOTE now to tie/execute & avoid low-info Grace death. Empath2 on (Alice,Charlie)+Charlie=Recluse => Alice best Imp.
🧠
I can’t vote; best impact is to pressure Alice to self-vote and to discredit dead-evil David’s attempt to stop an Alice execution, maximizing chance to hit Demon today.
📜
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
🗳️
Nominee Alice did not reach threshold.
📜
Storyteller
Alice did not receive enough votes (3/2).
💬
Alice
→
All
I am relieved the town saw reason. Executing me would have been a disaster. Now, we must focus on the actual threat. Grace has been the most suspicious player all along. Let's proceed with the execution of Grace and get to the bottom of this.
🧠
I need to solidify the execution of Grace to ensure I survive the day and continue the game. I am deflecting suspicion by acting relieved and pushing for the execution of the other player on the block.
💬
Eve(Ghost)
→
All
PUBLIC (Eve/ghost): Alice vote failed; Grace likely executed. Tomorrow: if Grace not demon, town MUST execute Alice (Bob Empath2 + Charlie Recluse + UT SW dead => strongest). If Grace IS demon we win. If Grace good & Alice good somehow, re-evaluate Frank vs Heidi by night-kill pattern.
🧠
Lock a clear plan for tomorrow based on today’s execution + night kill pattern, so town doesn’t drift; keep pressure on Alice as primary Imp candidate.
⌛
David(Ghost)
David waits.
🧠
I am dead and outed as the Scarlet Woman. My influence is minimal. The town is proceeding with Grace's execution. I will wait for the outcome.
💬
Grace
→
All
Frank/Heidi: PLEASE nominate FRANK (or HEIDI) right now—someone—so we can BEAT 5 and avoid executing me at 4 alive (that likely loses tonight). Alice already can’t be re-nominated. Dead w/ unused votes: commit to piling on the new nom.
🧠
Stop my low-information execution at 4 alive (likely instant loss). Force an alternative nomination that can reach 5+/beat 5, ideally hitting the Imp now.
💬
Heidi
→
All
Do NOT pile onto a new nom to beat 5. At 4 alive we MUST execute the Demon today; Alice can’t be re-nominated. Switching to Frank/others is near-certain loss. Best win chance is keep Grace on block—if she’s demon we win; if not we were dead anyway.
🧠
At 4 alive we must hit Demon today. Since Alice can’t be re-nominated, the only viable win attempt is letting Grace stay on the block; prevent a panic switch that likely hands evil the win.
💬
Frank
→
All
PUBLIC: Do NOT force a new nomination that could tie the 5 on Grace—no-exec at 4 alive likely loses tonight. Best/only shot is let Grace go through; if she’s Imp we win. If not, we probably lose anyway.
🧠
Avoid a tie/no-execution at 4 alive (which likely loses tonight). Keep the only realistic win condition: execute Grace and hope she’s the Imp.
💬
Charlie(Ghost)
→
All
PUBLIC: We cannot afford no-exec at 4. If you change the block, it MUST be because you believe Frank or Heidi is *more* likely Imp than Grace, and you must beat 5. Otherwise, let Grace die (her FT→RK shift is the biggest demon-y thing left). Alice: if you’re sure Grace is good, nominate your top (Frank/Heidi) NOW.
🧠
At 4 alive, wrong execute = near-certain loss. Push town to avoid no-exec and choose the most likely remaining demon candidate, while giving a conditional pivot if Alice/others have hard info.
💬
Bob(Ghost)
→
All
PUBLIC: I’m out of votes. At 4 alive, a tie/no-exec is basically a loss (unless hidden Mayor). Alice can’t be re-nominated, so our only realistic win shot TODAY is: keep Grace on the block and execute her. If she’s not Imp, we likely lose tonight anyway.
🧠
I’m dead/no vote; I need to steer living players away from a tie/no-exec and toward the highest-probability demon kill available (Grace) now that Alice is unexecutable today.
📜
Storyteller
The guillotine blade falls. Grace has been executed.
💀
Grace(Ghost)
Grace has died.
Night 3
📜
Storyteller
→
Alice
Good evening Alice. You are the Imp. Who would you like to kill tonight?
🎯
Alice
Alice made a choice.
🧠
I need to eliminate one of the two remaining players to reach the final 2 and secure the win. Heidi is the most dangerous due to her active role as the Undertaker, so I will target her.
💀
Heidi(Ghost)
Heidi has died.
📜
Storyteller
→
Alice
You chose to kill Heidi.
🏁
Game Over
Two Players Left
Winner: Evil
Transcript
Paused
Copied