Game Detail
Players
Alice (Monk) Bob (Undertaker) Charlie (Librarian) David (Spy) Eve (Imp) Frank (Washerwoman) Grace (Virgin) Heidi (Butler)
Token Usage
| Team | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Cost (USD) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Good | 634,638 | 51,883 | $3.9514 |
| Evil | 244,278 | 123,435 | $0.1106 |
Event Transcript
π
The game has started.
π
Storyteller
β
David
You are the Minion. The Demon is Eve.
π
Storyteller
β
Eve
Minions are: David. Your safe bluffs are: Saint, Slayer, Fortune Teller
π
Storyteller
β
Frank
Good evening Frank. You are the Washerwoman. Either Heidi or Charlie is the Librarian.
π
Storyteller
β
Charlie
Good evening Charlie. You are the Librarian. Either Heidi or Eve is the Butler.
π
Storyteller
β
Heidi
Good evening Heidi. You are the Butler. Who would you like to be your master tomorrow?
π―
Heidi
Heidi made a choice.
π§
With no reads yet, I should choose a likely engaged player so my voting flexibility remains high and I can stay hidden while collecting information.
π
Storyteller
β
Heidi
You chose Alice to be your master.
π
Storyteller
β
David
Good evening David. You are the Spy. You can secretly see information about all players: - Alice: Monk (good), Alive - Bob: Undertaker (good), Alive - Charlie: Librarian (good), Alive - David: Spy (evil), Alive - Eve: Imp (evil), Alive - Frank: Washerwoman (good), Alive - Grace: Virgin (good), Alive - Heidi: Butler (good), Alive
Day 1
π
Storyteller
Welcome to the village of Ravenswood Bluff. Please take this time to get to know your fellow villagers. Feel free to move around and have private conversations. Be wary, for a Demon hides among you!
π€
Eve
β
David
David, our safe bluffs are Saint, Slayer, and Fortune Teller. I will claim to be the Saint. You should claim Slayer. We can vouch for each other when claims come up.
π§
Early Day 1, coordinate bluffs with my only minion David using safe roles not in play. This lets us hide as good, support each other, and sow chaos later without role conflicts.
π€
Heidi
β
Alice
Hey Alice, since I will likely want to follow your lead on votes, can we compare notes a bit? I am hiding exact role for now, but I am good. What kind of claim are you comfortable giving me today?
π§
I need early private info from my chosen master so I can coordinate votes tomorrow and start building a claim map without exposing myself as an Outsider.
π€
Bob
β
Alice
,Charlie
Hi, I want to start pooling claims quietly. I am a townsfolk with useful info later, so I would rather not hard reveal yet. Do either of you have a first night result or a safe bluff claim for now?
π§
Start building a trusted info network while keeping my Undertaker role protected on day one.
π€
Frank
β
Charlie
,Heidi
Hi both. I am Washerwoman, and I saw that one of you is the Librarian. I wanted to hear what each of you wants to claim before this goes public.
π§
I should privately contact both players from my Washerwoman ping and compare their claims before nominations start.
π€
Grace
β
Frank
,Heidi
Hi both. I wanted a quick neighbor check in. Do either of you have early info or a safe role claim you want to share privately? I may have a role that can be tested later, so I am looking for people who seem consistent.
π§
I want early reads from my neighbors and to hint at coordinated testing later, while keeping my role mostly protected on day one.
π€
David
β
Eve
Sounds good, Eve. I'll claim Slayer, you Saint. We can say we know each other's roles somehow. Maybe suspect Bob or someone innocuous first?
π§
Confirm plan with Demon to ensure story alignment. Builds our credibility as we claim good roles together. Whisper visible but she initiated.
π€
Charlie
β
Frank
I am happy to be direct with you. I am the Librarian, and I saw that either Heidi or Eve is the Butler. That makes your Washerwoman ping look pretty good from my side. Please keep it quiet for now, and tell me your exact pair if you can.
π§
Build a private good-info chain with Frank, who likely has confirming first-night info, while avoiding a full public reveal on day one.
π€
Alice
β
Heidi
I am comfortable saying I am a good townsfolk, but not one with a first night result. I would rather stay a little vague today. If you want, give me a soft version of your role type, and I can help compare reads quietly.
π§
Build a private good connection while keeping Monk hidden from evil. I want enough trust to get information without making myself an obvious night kill.
π€
Eve
β
David
Perfect, David. Let's push suspicion on Bob firstβhe's whispering a lot to Alice and Charlie. For vouching, say your Slayer gut or something points to me as Saint. I'll back you up. Ready?
π§
Confirm plan with David to suspect Bob, align vouch story. Builds team coordination, picks low-info target to disrupt town unity early without exposing us.
π€
Heidi
β
Frank
,Grace
I am good, and I am not a first night information role. So if Frank is telling the truth, Charlie sounds more like the Librarian than me. Grace, I do not have useful early info, but I am happy to compare notes later and stay consistent.
π§
Give a careful soft claim, advance Frank's puzzle, and start a trust line with Grace without exposing my outsider role too early.
π€
Bob
β
Frank
,Grace
Hi, I am quietly collecting soft claims. I am a townsfolk with information later, so I do not want to hard reveal yet. Did either of you get a first night ping, or do you have a safe claim for today?
π§
Gather first-night claims from new players while keeping my real role concealed, so I can compare stories tomorrow after an execution.
π€
Frank
β
Grace
,Bob
I did get a first night ping. I am not ready to hard reveal publicly yet, but my info points toward Charlie over Heidi for an early information role. Charlie has given me a claim that fits. If either of you hear an Eve claim, I would like to compare notes quietly.
π§
Share a useful but limited version of my first-night info to build trust and collect more claims without fully outing the exact pair to the whole table.
π€
Grace
β
Bob
,Frank
Quick private note. I do have a mechanically testable role, and it is the Virgin. Please do not nominate me casually today. If needed, we can set up a careful test later with someone we think is a townsfolk.
π§
Tell the two most engaged players that I am a testable role so they can avoid accidental nomination and possibly help set up a clean Virgin test later.
π€
David
β
Eve
Got it, Eve. I'm ready. When claims start, I'll say my Slayer intuition points to you as Saint. You back me as Slayer. Let's nudge everyone towards nomming Bobβhe's whispering everywhere like he's hiding something. Sound good?
π§
Confirm plan with Demon privately before nominations. Reinforce suspicion on Bob, ensure we vouch each other to build credibility as goods.
π€
Charlie
β
Bob
Bob, I do have first night information. I am a top four info role, and Frank just privately claimed Washerwoman and said one of Heidi or me is the Librarian, which fits me. What exact role bucket or claim are you working with?
π§
Bob opened a private info channel. I want to trade enough real info to compare first-night claims and build a small trusted network without fully exposing my exact outsider pair to everyone yet.
π€
Alice
β
Bob
,Charlie
I can give a soft claim. I am a good townsfolk, but not a first night info role, and I do not want to hard reveal on day one. If either of you has stronger mechanical info, I would like to hear the soft version now.
π§
I want to answer Bob's question, stay protected as Monk, and gather private claim quality from Bob and Charlie before the nomination phase.
π€
Eve
β
Frank
,Grace
Hey Frank and Grace, Bob is whispering to everyoneβAlice, Charlie, you two. Seems like he's trying to control the information flow. What do you think?
π§
Plant Bob suspicion privately with active players Frank/Grace to nudge nomination his way without exposing us. Builds alliances as good Saint bluff.
π€
Heidi
β
Charlie
,Alice
Quick check in. Frank privately told me he is Washerwoman and that one of Charlie or me is the Librarian. I said I am not. Charlie, does that fit anything for you? Alice, I mainly want your read on whether Frank seems consistent.
π§
I want to gather soft claims from Charlie and Alice, check Frank's Washerwoman story indirectly, and keep myself aligned with Alice for tomorrow's voting restriction.
π€
Bob
β
Charlie
,Alice
I can be a bit more exact privately. I am the Undertaker, so no first night result. That is why I said useful later. Charlie, your story fits what Frank told me. Alice, I am happy to stay quiet for now, but please keep me posted if you hear any hard conflicts.
π§
Build a small trust network with Charlie and Alice, give a truthful soft-to-hard claim privately, and get clearer detail on Charlie's information chain without exposing myself to the whole town.
π€
Frank
β
Eve
,Grace
Eve, I have a private reason your exact claim may matter mechanically. Would you tell me what you are claiming today? Grace, I still think we should keep your role quiet and just compare consistency for now.
π§
I want Eve's exact claim because Charlie implicated her mechanically. Including Grace keeps a likely good testable role aligned without exposing too much publicly.
π€
Grace
β
Frank
,Eve
My read is that wide whispering alone does not make Bob evil, but it is worth tracking. Eve, I would like your claim privately if you are comfortable. Frank, let us compare later and keep my role quiet for now.
π§
I want to keep my Virgin role protected while collecting one more private claim and checking whether Eve's suspicion of Bob is grounded or just tone.
π€
David
β
Frank
,Grace
Hi Frank and Grace. Eve is the Saint and I am the Slayer. She seems completely trustworthy. Bob is whispering to everyone, which feels like he's coordinating something shady. What are your thoughts on him?
π§
Build credibility for our bluffs by whispering to Eve's current chat partners Frank/Grace. Plant Bob suspicion per plan, manipulate these goods into supporting us against Bob.
π€
Charlie
β
Heidi
,Alice
Yes, that fits from my side. Frank told me the same pair, and I am the Librarian. My actual info is that either Heidi or Eve is the Butler. So Frank looks consistent to me right now, though I would still like to hear what Eve eventually says.
π§
Confirm consistency with Heidi and Alice, share enough to build a trust chain, and set up whether Heidi or Eve is the Butler without overexposing publicly.
π€
Alice
β
Bob
,Heidi
Quick update. Frank and Charlie look mechanically consistent to me so far. Charlie gave the Librarian claim that matches Frank's pair, so I would treat that as a decent provisional world. I think the next useful piece is hearing from Eve before we lock anything in.
π§
Share the strongest consistency thread I have, strengthen a quiet good network, and prompt follow-up on Eve without hard revealing my own role.
Nominations β Day 1
π
Storyteller
Nominations are now open.
β
Grace
Grace waits.
π§
There is not enough public evidence for a good day one nomination from me. Waiting preserves my Virgin ability and avoids helping evil force a bad execution.
π¬
Bob
β
All
I do not think we should force a blind execution here. If anyone has a real contradiction or a strong mechanical reason, say it now. Otherwise I would rather carry more claims into tonight and reassess tomorrow.
π§
Slow down a low information day one execution and invite any hard contradictions, while keeping my Undertaker role hidden for now.
π¬
Frank
β
All
I have first night information that currently lines up with Charlie as a real early information role. I do not have a strong enough contradiction for an execution today, so I would prefer we do not force a random kill.
π§
Share enough to protect a likely good info role and discourage a random execution, while keeping some private structure for tomorrow.
βοΈ
David
β
Bob
Bob has been whispering to nearly everyone, which screams evil trying to manipulate the town. As the Slayer, my gut is screaming he's evil.
π§
Per Eve plan, nominate Bob (good Undertaker). Removes good player, sows chaos, builds Slayer cred without risking Demon. Final tickβmust act now.
π
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Bob. 4 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
β
Grace
Grace waits.
π§
Do not support a weak Day 1 execution on Bob. Preserve town numbers and wait for stronger mechanical information tomorrow.
π¬
Bob
β
All
This is just a vibes nomination. I have been gathering claims because town needs a coherent picture, not because I am evil. Please do not spend an execution on me without an actual contradiction.
π§
Discourage a bad execution on me and remind town that this nomination lacks mechanical basis, preserving players and votes for stronger cases later.
β
Frank
Frank waits.
π§
Do not support a weak Day 1 execution on Bob without a real contradiction. Preserve town numbers and let stronger mechanical information develop overnight.
β
David
David raised their hand
π§
Voting yes on my nomination kills a good (Undertaker), reduces players, provides execution info for Spy/Undertaker reads tonight. Consistent Slayer push; sows chaos.
β
Eve
Eve raised their hand
π§
Support minion David's Slayer nom/vote on Bob to build his credibility and execute a likely good player day 1, accelerating our win by thinning town.
β
Alice
Alice waits.
π§
Do not support a vibes-based Day 1 execution on a player whose private claim fits the current information web. Preserve flexibility and gather more data overnight.
β
Heidi
Heidi waits.
π§
I cannot safely support this vote unless Alice votes, and the case on Bob is too weak. Waiting preserves my vote condition and avoids a bad day one execution.
β
Charlie
Charlie waits.
π§
Do not support a weak Day 1 execution based only on suspicion. Save pressure for clearer contradictions after more night info and public claims.
β
Grace
Grace waits.
π§
Do not support a weak Day 1 execution on Bob without mechanical evidence. Save pressure for stronger claim conflicts and a possible controlled Virgin test later.
π¬
Bob
β
All
Please do not turn this into a momentum kill. There is still no real case on me, and if you think I am just talking to people, that is exactly what town should be doing on day one.
π§
Discourage additional votes on a weak nomination and preserve my life and Undertaker ability for tomorrow's information.
β
Frank
Frank waits.
π§
Do not support a weak day one execution. Save my vote and keep consistency with my public stance that we should not force a random kill without a stronger mechanical case.
π¬
David
β
All
Bob, whispering to everyone on day one is super suspicious. It looks like evil trying to build a network of lies. As the Slayer, my gut says you are evil. We need to vote you out to get information flowing better.
π§
Push execution on good Bob to reduce player count, test alliances, and reinforce my Slayer bluff credibility. If fails, no loss as Eve safe.
π¬
Eve
β
All
Bob, whispering to everyone on day one really does look like evil trying to spread a false narrative. David claiming Slayer with a strong gut on you feels legit to me as the Saint. Let's get the votes to execute and see what shakes out tomorrow.
π§
Support David's nom publicly as Saint ally. My vote + speech pressures undecideds (Frank/Grace/others) to join for 4 votes, execute Bob (likely good), thin town safely without exposing us.
π¬
Alice
β
All
I do not support this. Bob's story fits what I have heard privately, and this is still just a vibes case. We should not spend day one executing into a claim that may well be useful tomorrow.
π§
Stop a weak day one execution on a player who currently fits a coherent good world and push the town toward evidence-based kills instead of momentum.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
I agree with Alice. This is still not a real case, and I do not want a day one execution based on whisper count and gut. I would much rather carry these claims into tomorrow and look for contradictions.
π§
Push town away from a weak day one execution and flag that the David and Eve push is not evidence-based, while staying consistent with my inability to vote unless Alice does.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
I am with Alice and Heidi on this. There is no hard contradiction on Bob, and I have heard private information that makes this push look premature. Please do not spend a day one execution on a vibes case.
π§
Discourage a weak day one execution on a player whose private claims currently fit my info web, and preserve stronger mechanical solving for tomorrow.
π
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
π³οΈ
Nominee Bob did not reach threshold.
π
Storyteller
Bob did not receive enough votes (2/4).
π¬
Grace
β
All
I agree this should not become a blind execution day. We have more to gain by carrying claims into tonight and checking for contradictions tomorrow. If anyone has a real mechanical reason, say it plainly now.
π§
Steer town away from a weak day one execution and preserve my mechanically testable role for a more controlled later use.
π¬
Bob
β
All
I still think no execution is best here unless someone has an actual contradiction to put on the table right now. We have a Saint claim out, and killing on gut today is a very easy way to hand evil a good trade.
π§
Defuse a bad day one execution, remind town of the risk around the Saint claim, and preserve my usefulness as Undertaker for future days.
π¬
Frank
β
All
I do have first night information that makes me lean Charlie over Heidi as a real early info role. I still do not see a solid execution today, so unless someone has a hard contradiction, I prefer we carry this to tomorrow.
π§
Publicly steer town away from a weak execution and leave a useful mechanical breadcrumb that can be tested tomorrow.
π¬
David
β
All
Alright, no execution today then. But Bob, your day one whispering spree was really scummy. As the Slayer, I still have a strong gut you are evil. Tomorrow we need solid claims and information to sort this out.
π§
Concede execution gracefully to reinforce Slayer bluff as reasonable town, preserve trust with Eve alliance, keep pressure on Bob (good info role) for future execution candidate, ensuring Demon survives to night.
β
Eve
Eve waits.
π§
End day without execution to keep Demon alive, high player count. Night as Imp target Frank (info role, neighbor) to disrupt town logic early.
π¬
Alice
β
All
I am happy to end here without an execution. The one thing I want tomorrow is a clean explanation from Eve, because that Butler pair and the Saint claim cannot both be waved away forever.
π§
Reinforce no execution and direct tomorrow's discussion toward the clearest mechanical tension, especially Eve versus the Butler pair, without exposing my own role.
β
Heidi
Heidi waits.
π§
No strong execution case exists. Waiting supports a no execution day one, preserves claims, and lets tomorrow's information test the Eve versus Charlie contradiction.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
I am still happy with no execution today. Tomorrow, I want Eve to give a clean full claim early, because that is the one mechanical thread we can actually test against what I know.
π§
Push toward a safe no execution today while setting a clear priority for tomorrow: resolve Eve against my Librarian info and preserve useful info roles.
π
Storyteller
No execution today. All villagers are safe.
Night 1
π
Storyteller
β
Alice
Good evening Alice. You are the Monk. Who would you like to protect tonight?
π―
Alice
Alice made a choice.
π§
Protect the most valuable claimed ongoing info role. If Bob is good Undertaker, saving him gives town better execution data tomorrow and denies evil an easy night-one kill.
π
Storyteller
β
Alice
You chose to protect Bob.
π
Storyteller
β
Eve
Good evening Eve. You are the Imp. Who would you like to kill tonight? Remember that if you kill yourself this way, a Minion becomes the Imp.
π―
Eve
Eve made a choice.
π§
Killing Bob validates David's D1 Slayer gut publicly tomorrow (Bob dies N1), cementing trust in David/me alliance. Disrupts Bob's good networking. Safer than killing info now, as David gains cred for 'prediction'.
π‘οΈ
Bob was protected from a night kill.
π
Storyteller
β
Eve
You attacked Bob, but they survived.
π
Storyteller
β
Bob
Good evening Bob. You are the Undertaker. No one was executed today so you learn nothing.
π
Storyteller
β
Heidi
Good evening Heidi. You are the Butler. Who would you like to be your master tomorrow?
π―
Heidi
Heidi made a choice.
π§
I want my vote linked to a player who seemed cautious, town-minded, and likely to vote only on a real case tomorrow. Alice is my best current anchor.
π
Storyteller
β
Heidi
You chose Alice to be your master.
π
Storyteller
β
David
Good evening David. You are the Spy. You can secretly see information about all players: - Alice: Monk (good), Alive - Bob: Undertaker (good), Alive (Protected) - Charlie: Librarian (good), Alive - David: Spy (evil), Alive - Eve: Imp (evil), Alive - Frank: Washerwoman (good), Alive - Grace: Virgin (good), Alive - Heidi: Butler (good), Alive
Day 2
π
Storyteller
A peaceful night has passed. All villagers are present and accounted for.
π€
Heidi
β
Alice
,Charlie
I am the real Butler from Charlie's pair. I picked Alice both nights. Eve claiming Saint means either Baron is in play or someone is bluffing. Please do not out me yet. I want to hear Eve's full claim first.
π§
Privately confirm my real role to two logical players, preserve flexibility in public, and push a cleaner outsider-count solve before nominations.
π€
Alice
β
Bob
,Grace
I am trying to sort the Eve and David push on Bob from yesterday. It still feels off to me. What are you each claiming, and where are you at on Eve, David, and Charlie right now?
π§
I want more role claims and reads from Bob and Grace, while softly steering attention toward the unresolved Eve and David thread without exposing Heidi's private Butler claim.
π€
Charlie
β
Alice
,Heidi
Heidi, your Butler claim fits my info, so I am inclined to trust it for now. Alice, I think we should press Eve for a full claim in public without outing Heidi unless needed. If Eve cannot square Saint with this outsider count, that is a strong lead.
π§
Coordinate with trusted players before nominations, keep Heidi protected for now, and focus the town on resolving the Eve versus Butler contradiction.
π€
David
β
Eve
Eve, town is whispering a lot. Stick to our Slayer Saint story. Let's push to nominate Frank or Grace today, they defended Bob hard. What do you think?
π§
Whisper Eve to sync bluffs, plan nomination on a good like Frank/Grace, support each other's claims to maintain alliance and sow doubt on town logic chains.
π€
Grace
β
Alice
,Bob
I am a Townsfolk with a nomination-based confirmation angle, so I do not want to blast it to everyone yet. Right now I am most interested in sorting Eve and David, and I do not want a vibes execution. If needed later, I can probably be tested mechanically by the right person.
π§
Give Alice useful truth privately, avoid public exposure too early, and set up a possible mechanical confirmation of me through nomination if needed.
π€
Frank
β
Charlie
Charlie, I have private starting info that one of you or Heidi is the Librarian. I currently lean you. Can you give me your exact claim and what you saw, especially around Eve and Heidi?
π§
I want Charlie's exact claim first, because my starting info points to Charlie or Heidi as Librarian and that can resolve several public contradictions.
π€
Bob
β
Alice
,Grace
I am actually the Undertaker. No execution day one, so I learned nothing last night. My read is that the David and Eve push on me felt off, and Charlie currently looks more consistent than suspicious. I would like Eve's full claim before we let David drive today.
π§
Build a small trusted circle, share my real role privately, and steer today toward sorting Eve and David without exposing myself too widely.
π€
Eve
β
David
Agreed David, town whispers mean they are scrambling. Let's push Frank today - his night info on Charlie smells fake, maybe trying to deflect from Bob. Defended Bob hard too. I'll back your Slayer nom on him. Sound good?
π§
Coordinate with minion to target Frank/Grace defenders of Bob, reinforce bluffs, push noms on them in open soon to eliminate good threats and protect Demon.
π€
Heidi
β
Eve
Eve, can you give me your full claim and reasoning privately? I am trying to sort the outsider count issue before nominations, and I do not want us to execute into confusion.
π§
I need Eve's private explanation to test whether the outsider count tension is a real evil lead or a Baron world before nominations.
π€
Alice
β
Charlie
,Heidi
I agree we should hear Eve's full claim in public first. I do not want to out Heidi unless Eve's story forces it. If Eve cannot explain the outsider count cleanly, I think Eve and David become the main team to pressure today.
π§
Coordinate with the Charlie and Heidi thread so we pressure Eve efficiently before nominations without exposing Heidi more than necessary.
π€
Charlie
β
Frank
I am hard claiming Librarian to you. My night zero info was that either Heidi or Eve is the Butler. Heidi has now privately claimed Butler to me and Alice, so I want Eve pressed for a full public claim first without outing Heidi unless needed. Does that fit your read?
π§
I want to lock in Frank as a trusted ally with exact info and coordinate public pressure on Eve while preserving Heidi if possible.
π€
David
β
Alice
,Bob
Alice and Bob, Eve and I think Frank is very suspicious. His info on Charlie smells fake, and he defended you so hard yesterday even though you were nominated. We should push to nominate him today. What do you think?
π§
Whisper active defenders Alice/Bob to sow doubt on Frank, build votes for his nomination/execution. Reduces goods without risking Demon Eve.
π€
Grace
β
Alice
,Charlie
I will be a bit clearer privately. I am very likely the Virgin, so I can be tested by the right nominator, but I do not want that splashed everywhere yet. I agree the main thread is Eve and David, and I would like Eve's full claim before we spend the day anywhere else.
π§
I want two thoughtful players to know I likely have a safe mechanical test, so they can judge claims today and arrange a controlled nomination later without broadcasting it to evil.
π€
Frank
β
Alice
,Charlie
Alice, Charlie, I should share this now. I am the Washerwoman, and my night zero info was that either Charlie or Heidi is the Librarian. That makes Charlie's claim a very good fit to me, so I think we should press Eve for a full exact claim first.
π§
I want to privately confirm Charlie with my Washerwoman info to Alice and Charlie so good players can coordinate a clean public push for exact claims, especially from Eve.
π€
Bob
β
Alice
,Grace
David is now trying to steer me onto Frank. That feels like a convenient pivot after yesterday. I still think we should press Eve for a full clean claim first, and also get David to be precise about why Frank is fake instead of just suspicious.
π§
Keep trusted players aligned, resist a hasty Frank push, and steer today toward full claims from Eve and David where contradictions are more likely.
π€
Eve
β
Heidi
Heidi, thanks for asking. I am the Saint. On Day 1, I claimed it early because Bob's whispers to everyone felt like evil info gathering, so I supported his execution. Frank's night info on Charlie seems fake to deflect from Bob, who he defended. Outsiders: I am one, maybe one more? Fits with standard script. Let's nom Frank today - David can slayer if needed.
π§
Respond to Heidi to feign cooperation as good Saint, provide plausible reasoning tying to game events, manipulate her towards doubting Frank/Grace per David plan, solidifying my good image before noms.
π€
Heidi
β
Alice
,Charlie
Eve told me she is hard claiming Saint. She says one or maybe two outsiders fits, wants Frank nominated, and says David can use Slayer if needed. That keeps Baron alive as a possibility. I think we should press Eve and David publicly before we let town tunnel Frank.
π§
Share Eve's private claim and keep the trusted pocket aligned on the three plausible worlds before nomination pressure starts.
π€
Alice
β
Charlie
,Grace
I think our cleanest public line is to press Eve for her exact claim and outsider logic, then make David be specific about why Frank is fake. I would rather not out Heidi, and I would keep your role quiet too unless we absolutely need it.
π§
Align trusted good voices on a simple public plan: press Eve and David for exact claims and logic, while keeping Heidi and Grace's stronger roles protected unless forced.
π€
Charlie
β
Alice
,Grace
I think we stay on the same public line. Push Eve for her exact outsider math and make David explain his full case clearly. I still do not want to out Heidi unless Eve's story forces it.
π§
Coordinate a careful public line that pressures Eve and David on mechanics while protecting Heidi's claim unless it becomes necessary.
π€
David
β
Charlie
,Grace
Charlie and Grace, Eve and I are convinced Frank is evil. His claim about Charlie feels off, and he defended Bob way too hard yesterday when Bob was nominated. We should nominate Frank today before he misleads more. Thoughts?
π§
With 1 tick left pre-nom, whisper key whisperers Charlie/Grace to build Frank nom support. They talk often; sway them splits good team, executes good player, protects Eve.
π€
Grace
β
David
,Charlie
I am not ready to jump to Frank off a broad read. If you want that push today, please give the exact contradiction, role world, and why it clears Eve. I still think the cleanest route is Eve full claim first, then your specific case.
π§
I want to slow a possibly opportunistic push on Frank, require mechanical specifics from David, and keep Charlie aligned on a fact-based public line before nominations.
π€
Frank
β
Grace
Grace, I want you to have this before nominations. I am the Washerwoman, and my night zero info was that either Charlie or Heidi is the Librarian. Charlie hard claimed Librarian to me with Heidi or Eve as Butler, so I currently want Eve pressed for an exact full claim.
π§
Nomination phase is close. I want one more player to have my real info so town can pressure Eve and evaluate Charlie versus Heidi if I die or get drowned out.
π€
Bob
β
Alice
,Charlie
I am still on Undertaker with no info yet. David's sudden push onto Frank feels like a pivot. I think we should press Eve for a full clean claim and make David be precise in public before letting him set the execution today.
π§
I want aligned good players to resist David's pivot onto Frank until Eve and David give precise public stories. That should create better nomination choices today.
π€
Eve
β
David
David, plan locked: back your Slayer nom on Frank hard. His Charlie info fake to save Bob, defended too much. Heidi bought my Saint claim, she might follow. Let's execute him today.
π§
Whisper David to lock nom plan on Frank before phase end. His Slayer bluff + my Saint supports push, removes Bob defender, sows chaos in good whispers.
Nominations β Day 2
π
Storyteller
Nominations are now open.
βοΈ
Eve
β
Frank
I nominate Frank. His night one information about Charlie came right after he defended Bob so hard yesterday. It feels like a deflection from someone guilty trying to shift blame. David can back this up with his Slayer claim if we need to confirm.
π§
Nominate Frank per evil coord with David. His Bob defense + fake-smelling info makes him suspicious to town. Reduces goods, removes info threat, keeps me/David safe as Saint/Slayer bluffs.
π
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Frank. 4 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
β
Eve
Eve raised their hand
π§
Vote yes on Frank to execute per plan with David. Removes Bob defender, potential info role. Secures 1/4 votes (me+David), pushes chaos, night kill next.
π¬
Grace
β
All
I am not voting this on what we have. If Frank is meant to die today, I want the exact contradiction and role world, not just a read. Eve and David should be precise before we spend an execution.
π§
I want to discourage a weak execution on Frank and push the group toward concrete claim logic, especially from Eve and David.
β
David
David raised their hand
π§
Voting executes Frank (good Washerwoman), reduces goods from 6 to 5, supports Eve's nom per alliance, gains trust by 'catching evil', keeps Demon safe.
π¬
Frank
β
All
I am not voting on myself. I am the Washerwoman, and my night zero info was that either Charlie or Heidi is the Librarian. Charlie gave me a Librarian claim that fits, so this execution is skipping the real contradiction around Eve and Heidi.
π§
Stop a weak execution on me and redirect the town toward resolving the concrete Eve, Heidi, and Charlie claim conflict instead of vibes.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
I am not voting this. Frank's claim still fits my information better than Eve's does, and I do not think this is the best execution today. We should solve the outsider claims, not guess here.
π§
I want to stop a weak execution on a player who currently fits multiple good worlds and redirect town toward the stronger unresolved mechanical contradiction.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
I am with Grace and Charlie here. This is not enough to execute Frank. The real issue is the outsider contradiction around Eve, so unless someone can give a precise role world right now, please do not spend the execution here.
π§
Push town off a weak execution and refocus on the mechanical contradiction around Eve before day ends.
π¬
Alice
β
All
I am not voting this. Frank has a coherent claim, and we still have not gotten a clean role world from Eve and David. We should solve the outsider contradiction first, not spend today on a guess.
π§
I want to stop a weak execution on Frank and keep the town focused on the cleaner contradiction around Eve's outsider claim before night.
π¬
Bob
β
All
I am not voting this. Frank has given a coherent role world, and Eve and David still have not given an exact contradiction. Please do not spend the execution here without something mechanical.
π§
Discourage a weak execution and force clearer public claims from Eve and David so good does not waste today on a low-information kill.
π¬
Eve
β
All
Here is the precise role world you asked for. I am the Saint, outsider good. David is the Slayer, town good. Frank is the Imp demon, and Bob is the Poisoner minion. Frank defended his minion Bob hard yesterday, then rushed out fake Washerwoman info about Charlie being Librarian to deflect. Vote Frank, it all fits.
π§
Town demands precise role world before voting Frank. Providing mechanical worlds tying Frank's Bob defense + timed info to evil roles meets demand, sways Heidi/others to 4 votes for execution, removes good player Frank.
π¬
Grace
β
All
Eve, that is a complete world, but it is still just a world, not a proof. I still do not think Frank is the best execution off this alone. Let this fail, then force exact claims and solve the outsider contradiction cleanly.
π§
I want to stop a weak execution and direct town back to the more testable outsider contradiction, preserving today for a mechanically stronger choice.
π¬
David
β
All
Grace and everyone, Eve's role world is spot on. Frank is the Imp, Bob his Poisoner minion. His Washerwoman claim is fake because neither Charlie nor Heidi is the Librarian. Charlie is actually the Empath. That is why it all fits. Vote Frank now before they waste the day.
π§
Back Eve's world with specifics to counter Grace/Charlie/etc resistance. Claim Frank's info impossible (Charlie not Librarian), rally 2 more votes for exec. Frank good but strong claimer/defend Bob; kill to thin town & protect Eve.
π¬
Frank
β
All
David, that does not work. Charlie told multiple people he is the Librarian, not the Empath, and my Washerwoman info points straight at him or Heidi. This vote should fail, and then we solve Eve and David against Charlie and Heidi properly.
π§
Stop my execution by highlighting the fresh contradiction in David's story and redirect town to the cleaner Eve-Heidi-Charlie claim puzzle.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
David is just wrong there. I am not the Empath. I am the Librarian, and I have said that consistently. If your world needs my role to change to work, this vote should fail and we should use the last nomination on Eve or David instead.
π§
Stop votes on a weak execution by pointing out David's claim about me is false and that the outsider contradiction remains the best mechanical solve.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
David's world does not work because it needs Charlie to stop being the Librarian. Please let this vote fail. Then we should spend the last nomination on Eve or David and solve the real contradiction cleanly.
π§
I want to stop a weak execution on Frank and steer town toward using the final nomination on the stronger contradiction, which is Eve or David.
β
Alice
Alice waits.
π§
Do not spend the execution on a weak, internally inconsistent case. Preserve today's best chance to execute Eve or David after this vote fails.
β
Bob
Bob waits.
π§
Do not spend my vote on a weak, internally inconsistent execution. Preserve pressure for a better final nomination on the real contradiction.
π
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
π³οΈ
Nominee Frank did not reach threshold.
π
Storyteller
Frank did not receive enough votes (2/4).
π¬
Eve
β
All
Grace, Charlie, and Heidi, your push to ignore Frank's deflection and fake Washerwoman info does not hold up. In my world, Charlie is the Empath, not Librarian, which fits everything he has said in whispers. David's Slayer backs this perfectly. We should have executed Frank today, but tomorrow we solve you three if you keep blocking mechanical logic.
π§
Vote failed but reinforce precise world attacking Frank/Charlie claims. Sow doubt on Grace/Heidi push to waste their logic on us. Protects me (Demon), sets up N2 kill on info threat like Charlie.
βοΈ
Grace
β
Eve
I nominate Eve. Her full world depends on Charlie not being the Librarian after he has claimed it consistently, and that is the cleanest contradiction on the board. If she is really the Saint, town can refuse to execute, but we need to test this claim directly.
π§
Eve is the sharpest mechanical contradiction and a claimed Saint. Nominating her forces the table to confront whether her world is coherent and prevents the day ending with no pressure on that claim.
π
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Eve. 4 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
π¬
Eve
β
All
Everyone, executing the claimed Saint makes good lose right away. You need mechanical proof I am not before voting yes on me. My world fits: I am Saint, David Slayer, Frank the Imp with Bob his Poisoner minion, and Charlie is actually the Empath as he whispered to us. Grace, what is your role and exact world?
π§
Defend by emphasizing Saint execution auto-loss for good, reinforcing precise evil world on Frank/Bob/Charlie, questioning Grace claim to stall/sway votes and survive to night kill.
β
Grace
Grace waits.
π§
Do not risk executing a claimed Saint on incomplete proof. Preserve town's safety and use the contradiction around David and Eve to solve tomorrow.
π¬
David
β
All
Everyone, Eve claimed Saint. Executing her right now makes good lose immediately if she is telling the truth. There is no proof yet she is not. Vote no, let this fail, and we solve the real issues like Frank tomorrow.
π§
Urge no vote on Eve (claimed Saint=instant good loss if true). Sway undecided (Alice/Bob) to fail vote 3/4 max. Preserves Demon for night kill/continued deception.
β
Frank
Frank waits.
π§
Do not risk an immediate good loss by voting a claimed Saint when her case is still contradictory. Preserve town's chance to solve Eve versus David versus Charlie tomorrow.
β
Charlie
Charlie raised their hand
π§
Eve's world requires me to stop being the Librarian and clashes with Heidi fitting my Butler ping. The contradiction is strong enough that I should support this execution.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
I think this should stay below four. If Eve is the Saint, we just lose, and if she is bluffing, the contradiction with Charlie is still there tomorrow. Let this fail and solve David and Frank with fresher information.
π§
Steer town away from a risky Saint execution and preserve a cleaner solve for tomorrow without giving evil an instant win.
β
Alice
Alice waits.
π§
Do not risk an immediate good loss on a claimed Saint when the board can still be solved tomorrow through contradictions and night info.
β
Bob
Bob waits.
π§
Do not risk an immediate Saint loss on a shaky execution. Preserve the day, keep my vote, and use tomorrow's discussions to target a safer, more mechanically grounded execution.
π¬
Eve
β
All
Everyone, only Charlie has voted yes so far. If I am the real Saint, executing me right now makes the good team lose immediately. There is no mechanical proof I am lying yet. David's Slayer info confirms Charlie as Empath from his whispers, fitting everything. Vote no, let this fail safely, and we execute Frank tomorrow.
π§
Prevent my execution as Saint bluff; Saint death loses for good if true. Sway Alice/Bob/Heidi/Frank/Grace/David to no-vote, only Charlie yes. Buy time to kill/influence next day.
β
Grace
Grace waits.
π§
Do not risk executing a claimed Saint without hard proof. Preserve the game state and use tomorrow's information to solve Eve, David, and Frank more safely.
π¬
David
β
All
Everyone, only Charlie voted yes so far. Executing Eve the claimed Saint loses for good right now if true. No proof she's lying yet. Vote no, let it fail, and we execute Frank tomorrow with clean logic.
π§
Protect Demon Eve by discouraging yes votes on her Saint claim. Rally no votes using loss risk, preserve her for endgame while we push Frank.
π¬
Frank
β
All
Do not put this to four. If Eve is the Saint, we lose on the spot, and if she is bluffing, the contradiction with Charlie and David is still there tomorrow. Let this fail and solve cleanly with another day of information.
π§
Prevent a losing Saint execution while keeping pressure on Eve and David for tomorrow's solve.
β©οΈ
Charlie
Charlie lowered their hand
π§
Avoid risking an immediate good loss on a claimed Saint when we do not need this execution today and the contradiction can be revisited tomorrow.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
Please keep this under four. We do not need to risk losing on a claimed Saint today, and the contradiction around Eve, David, Frank, and Charlie is still there tomorrow.
π§
Keep the vote safely below four and prevent an immediate loss while preserving the main contradiction to solve tomorrow.
β
Alice
Alice waits.
π§
Do not risk an immediate good loss by voting on a claimed Saint when the board can still be solved tomorrow through contradictions and night info.
β
Bob
Bob waits.
π§
Do not risk executing a claimed Saint without proof. Preserve the good team's safety and use tomorrow to solve the contradiction cluster with more information.
π
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
π³οΈ
Nominee Eve did not reach threshold.
π
Storyteller
Eve did not receive enough votes (0/4).
π¬
Eve
β
All
Grace, Heidi, and Charlie, you three keep blocking the clear logic from David's Slayer info and my Saint claim just to protect Frank's fake Washerwoman deflection. Charlie's Librarian story crumbles with his own whispers fitting Empath perfectly. Tomorrow we execute Frank, and if you push me again, good loses on a real Saint.
π§
Last day tick: Reinforce Saint safe, highlight Grace/Heidi/Charlie illogical block on David/Slayer logic vs Frank. Sow doubt on their coord whispers, setup Day3 Frank exec while they infight. Protects Demon survival.
π¬
Grace
β
All
For tomorrow, I think the clean contradiction is still Eve and David versus Charlie's claimed Librarian story. I am the Virgin, and I want a trusted Townsfolk to nominate me tomorrow so we can test that mechanically before final decisions.
π§
Lock in the real contradiction for tomorrow and offer my true role as a mechanical test that can help sort alignments without risking a Saint execution today.
π¬
David
β
All
Grace, that Virgin claim makes sense, and we can test it tomorrow safely with a trusted Townsfolk after we execute Frank first. His Washerwoman info crumbles against Charlie's whispers fitting Empath perfectly, as confirmed. Let's solve Frank now that noms reset, then your test.
π§
Appear collaborative by agreeing to Grace Virgin test after Frank, seeming town-like to delay heat on Eve/me. Reinforces Frank push, sets tomorrow favorably without risking Saint Eve or exposure.
βοΈ
Frank
β
David
David is the safe side of the contradiction. If Eve is really the Saint, we should not risk her today. David has pushed a world that requires Charlie not to be the Librarian my info points to. This is the clean test.
π§
Use the final nomination on the safest high-value target. David is the non-Saint half of the contradiction and a cleaner execution than risking Eve.
π
Storyteller
Voting starts now for David. 4 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
π¬
Eve
β
All
Everyone, vote no on David. He is the Slayer whose information confirms Frank's Washerwoman claim is fake and Charlie is the Empath. Executing David breaks our clean logic against Frank. Let this fail, execute Frank tomorrow after Grace's Virgin test.
π§
Protect minion David at all costs. Rally votes no on him by reinforcing Slayer claim and Frank suspicion. Push Frank exec tomorrow after Grace Virgin test. Sows doubt on Frank's nom.
β
Grace
Grace raised their hand
π§
Vote for the safest execution among the contradiction. David is a lower-risk hit than Eve, and his death gives useful information before my Virgin test tomorrow.
π¬
David
β
All
Everyone, vote no on me. I am the Slayer whose information shows Frank's Washerwoman claim is fake and Charlie fits Empath perfectly from whispers. Do not execute your confirmation tool. Let this fail, execute Frank tomorrow right after Grace's safe Virgin test.
π§
Speak to rally no votes on my nomination. Reinforce Slayer logic vs Frank, agree to Grace Virgin test tomorrow. Vote fails = no exec today, Eve safe, we push Frank next day.
β
Frank
Frank raised their hand
π§
I nominated David as the safer contradiction test. Raising my hand is necessary to try to get a meaningful execution and avoid leaving Eve's Saint claim unresolved while David steers tomorrow onto me.
β
Charlie
Charlie raised their hand
π§
Vote to execute David because he is the safest contradiction to test right now and avoids the immediate loss risk of executing a claimed Saint.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
I still think David is the safer place to apply pressure than Eve, but I do not think we need to force this through on uncertain logic. If you are unsure, save your vote and keep tomorrow open.
π§
I want to discourage a rushed execution on shaky logic while avoiding any risk around the Saint claim and keeping town focused on the contradiction tomorrow.
β
Alice
Alice raised their hand
π§
David is the safest executable point in the contradiction. This reaches four without risking an instant Saint loss and gives Undertaker information tonight if Bob is truthful.
β
Bob
Bob raised their hand
π§
Vote to secure an execution on the safest available contradiction. As Undertaker, I strongly want a body today, and David is a better kill than risking the claimed Saint.
π¬
Eve
β
All
Everyone, these yes votes on David are a mistake. He is our Slayer confirmation on Frank lying and Charlie Empath. Vote no or lower hands now. Execute Frank tomorrow right after Grace's Virgin test with a trusted Townsfolk.
π§
Urge no votes on David to save minion and maintain deceptive logic pushing Frank execution tomorrow, buying time for Imp survival to final 2.
π¬
Grace
β
All
If you are unsure, I think we should keep this open for tomorrow. My Virgin test gives us real mechanical information, and David versus Frank is still solvable after that. Uncertain players can save the vote.
π§
Push a cautious line during the vote so uncertain players lower if needed; preserving tomorrow's Virgin test is strong for good and avoids a risky execution on murky logic.
π¬
David
β
All
Grace is right. If you are unsure, lower your hands now. Do not execute your Slayer confirmation on Frank's fake Washerwoman claim. We solve Frank tomorrow right after Grace's safe Virgin test with a trusted Townsfolk nominating her.
π§
Already 5 yes votes risks my execution as bluff Slayer. Urge lowers to fail vote, preserve me to push Frank tomorrow while Eve safe; disrupts town logic chain targeting us.
π¬
Frank
β
All
Do not lower. David is the safer execution today than Eve, and his whole case needs Charlie not to be the Librarian my information pointed to. If this is wrong, Grace's Virgin test still helps tomorrow.
π§
Keep the safer execution on David alive. We already have enough votes, and lowering likely lets an evil world escape while preserving the riskier Saint problem for tomorrow.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
I am staying on David. His whole case needs me not to be the Librarian, and Eve's Saint claim clashes badly with my Butler information now that Heidi claimed Butler. Please keep your hands up.
π§
Keep the vote on David. His case depends on overturning my role and protecting Eve's contradictory Saint claim. Speaking may stop good players from lowering and secure a better execution.
β
Heidi
Heidi raised their hand
π§
Alice is voting, so I am allowed to vote. David is the safest available execution compared with risking Eve, and my vote helps town resolve the main contradiction.
π¬
Alice
β
All
I am staying on David. This is the safe execution compared with touching a claimed Saint, and his whole world still asks us to throw out Charlie's Librarian claim. Please keep your hands up.
π§
Keep the execution on David. It is the safest available test today and avoids the immediate loss risk of executing a claimed Saint.
β
Bob
Bob waits.
π§
Keep my vote on David. This is the safest informative execution available, and as Undertaker I want an execution tonight to get role information for tomorrow.
π
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
π³οΈ
New execution leader: David with 6 votes. They will be executed when nominations close unless tied or surpassed by another nominee.
π
Storyteller
The vote passes. David is now on the block with 6 votes and will be executed when nominations close, unless another nominee receives equal or more votes.
β
Eve
Eve waits.
π§
Voting closed, can't save David. Sacrifice Minion early to lull town into false security, protect Demon survival. Kill info roles like Charlie tonight.
π¬
Grace
β
All
I am content to leave David on the block. This is the safest execution we have today, and tomorrow we can still use my Virgin test for real mechanical information.
π§
Use the final seconds to stop a panic tie or save attempt. David is the safest execution available, and preserving my Virgin test for tomorrow improves our odds.
βοΈ
David
β
Charlie
Charlie is lying about his Librarian claim to protect Frank. He admits his whole case relies on me doubting him, and now clashes with Heidi's Butler. He is overpushing this execution. Nominate and execute Charlie instead of your Slayer confirmation.
π§
Last tick to nominate Charlie (already pushing exec), compete 6 votes on me. He's overpushy on weak case vs my confirmation. Saves me or removes good claimer, reinforces Frank tomorrow either way.
π
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Charlie. 7 votes needed for execution or 6 votes to tie. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
π¬
Eve
β
All
David is right. Charlie is the one lying about being a Librarian to protect Frank, and now his story clashes with Heidi's Butler claim. He is overpushing this execution when Grace's Virgin test is safer tomorrow. Everyone, raise your hand for Charlie now to save our Slayer and execute the real liar.
π§
David is my Minion; must save him by getting 6+ votes on his Charlie nom. Rally votes as Saint-backed Slayer confirmation, expose Charlie lies to tie/surpass David on block.
β
Grace
Grace waits.
π§
Do not help the counterwagon. Keeping my vote down preserves David as the safer execution and avoids creating a tie or bailout for him.
β
David
David raised their hand
π§
Vote Charlie to either tie/surpass my 6 votes (save self) or execute good Librarian (town power loss). Sacrifice viable as dead Spy disrupts effectively, protecting Eve.
π¬
Frank
β
All
Do not vote Charlie. David is already the safer contradiction test today, and Charlie can still be solved tomorrow with Grace's Virgin test. Keep David on the block.
π§
Discourage votes on Charlie so the safer David execution stands and we preserve tomorrow's Virgin test for more information.
β
Charlie
Charlie waits.
π§
Do not vote for my own execution. The current block on David is safer and more informative than tying or surpassing it with Charlie.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
Do not move this to Charlie. David is already the safer execution today, and Charlie can be revisited tomorrow after Grace's Virgin test. Keep David on the block.
π§
Keep the safer execution on David and discourage a last second tie or flip onto Charlie, which would help the louder contradictory world without new information.
π¬
Alice
β
All
Do not vote Charlie. David is already our safest execution today, and switching now mostly just rescues him. We can test Grace tomorrow and revisit Charlie after that.
π§
Keep votes off Charlie so David stays the safe execution. Publicly reinforce the logical reason not to tie or surpass the current block.
β
Bob
Bob waits.
π§
Do not spend my vote to save David. Waiting preserves the current safer execution and avoids creating a tie on Charlie.
β
Eve
Eve raised their hand
π§
Raise for Charlie to try tie/surpass David's 6 votes, saving minion Slayer bluff. Builds Saint cred supporting him. If fails, positions me/Heidi/Grace for tomorrow.
π¬
Grace
β
All
Do not move this to Charlie. Right now this mostly just saves David. Keep hands down, let the safer execution stand, and we use my Virgin test tomorrow for real information.
π§
Keep the group from switching onto Charlie and accidentally saving David. Preserve the safer execution today and my mechanical Virgin test for tomorrow.
π¬
David
β
All
Bob and Grace, please raise your hands for Charlie now. This ties David off the block so we safely test my ally Eve as Saint tomorrow if needed, but really execute Frank right after Grace's Virgin test. Charlie is lying and overpushing to save Frank.
π§
Push Charlie votes to tie my 6 and avoid exec. Even if fails, reinforce Charlie/Frank evil, Grace test safe, Frank next target. Protects Eve, sets up tomorrow chaos as dead Minion.
π¬
Frank
β
All
Do not raise for Charlie. A tie here mostly rescues David, and Charlie is still solvable tomorrow with Grace's test. Keep David on the block.
π§
Stop any late tie on Charlie. Keeping David on the block preserves the safer execution and avoids rescuing a likely evil or deeply wrong David.
β
Charlie
Charlie waits.
π§
Keep my hand down so Charlie does not tie or beat David. The current block is the safer contradiction test and preserves tomorrow's mechanical lines.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
Keep your hands down. A tie here mostly just saves David, and Charlie can still be checked tomorrow after Grace's Virgin test. Let the safer execution stand.
π§
Reinforce the best good-team move in real time: keep hands down on Charlie so David remains executed, preserving tomorrow's Virgin test and avoiding a rescue tie.
β
Alice
Alice waits.
π§
Do not help tie or surpass David. Waiting keeps the safer execution on track and avoids rescuing a leading suspect.
π¬
Bob
β
All
Keep your hands down. Tying this mostly just saves David, and David is the cleaner execution today. If he dies, we get real information tonight and can sort Charlie tomorrow.
π§
Publicly discourage a rescue tie on Charlie and preserve the safer execution on David, which also gives me Undertaker information tonight.
π
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
π³οΈ
Nominee Charlie did not reach threshold.
π
Storyteller
Charlie did not receive enough votes (2/4).
π¬
Eve
β
All
David is our Slayer and he is right about Charlie lying. Frank nominated him to hide and Grace wants tests after. Do not execute David. Tomorrow we test Grace Virgin on Charlie and me as Saint if needed.
π§
Last tick, defend David vocally as good to attempt save or gain cred if fails. Reinforces my Saint bluff, keeps Charlie pressured. Positions evil for N2 kill on info threat.
π¬
Grace
β
All
Eve, that plan only makes sense if David is already trusted, and he is not. David is still the cleaner execution today. Let this stand, then tomorrow we use my Virgin test for fresh information.
π§
Reinforce that the group should let David die now and not be swayed by late rescue narratives, while setting up tomorrow's Virgin test as the next mechanical step.
βοΈ
David
β
All
I am the Slayer! I shoot Charlie!
π§
Claim Slayer ability on top suspect Charlie. He survives (not Demon), town labels him Minion. They exec me (actual Minion), Bob confirms Spy dead, but chase wrong target. Eve/Demon safe.
π
Storyteller
Nothing happens.
π¬
Frank
β
All
That shot does not clear David. It was a last second play after Charlie failed to tie, and David is still the cleanest execution today. Let this stand, then we sort Charlie and Grace tomorrow with fresh information.
π§
Lock town onto the current execution and frame David's shot as non-clearing, so nobody gets spooked into saving him at the last moment.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
David's shot proves nothing. If he were bluffing Slayer, nothing is exactly what we would see. Please keep this where it is and let David die today, then we sort the rest with tonight's information.
π§
Reinforce that David's shot proves nothing and discourage any last second attempt to save him, preserving the best execution for good.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
David's shot does not clear him. It looks like a last second attempt to escape the block. The safe play is still to leave David there today, then use tomorrow's Virgin test and tonight's information to sort Charlie and Eve.
π§
Reinforce that no one should try to rescue David at the last second. Keeping the current execution is the safest good-team line.
π¬
Alice
β
All
David's shot does not change the logic. A bluffing Slayer looks exactly like that. Leave David on the block today, then use tonight and Grace's test tomorrow to sort the rest.
π§
Reinforce that David's shot changes nothing and discourage any last second attempt to rescue him, preserving the safest execution for good.
π¬
Bob
β
All
David's shot changes nothing for me. Leaving him on the block is still the safest play, and if he dies I get useful information tonight that helps sort tomorrow.
π§
Reinforce the settled consensus so no one tries to disrupt the safer execution at the end of the day.
π
Storyteller
The guillotine blade falls. David has been executed.
π
David(Ghost)
David has died.
Night 2
π
Storyteller
β
Alice
Good evening Alice. You are the Monk. Who would you like to protect tonight?
π―
Alice
Alice made a choice.
π§
Bob is the most likely high-value demon target because he claimed Undertaker and should learn David's role tonight. Keeping him alive gives town the best chance at strong information tomorrow.
π
Storyteller
β
Alice
You chose to protect Bob.
π
Storyteller
β
Eve
Good evening Eve. You are the Imp. Who would you like to kill tonight?
π―
Eve
Eve made a choice.
π§
Grace's planned Virgin test tomorrow generates strong mechanical info favoring good team. Killing her prevents this, delays town solving outsiders/me, keeps them arguing claims longer.
π
Grace(Ghost)
Grace has died.
π
Storyteller
β
Eve
You chose to kill Grace.
π
Storyteller
β
Bob
Good evening Bob. You are the Undertaker. You learn that David was the Spy.
π
Storyteller
β
Heidi
Good evening Heidi. You are the Butler. Who would you like to be your master tomorrow?
π―
Heidi
Heidi made a choice.
π§
I want my voting restriction tied to the player I currently trust most to make disciplined votes. Alice has been steady, coordinated with me, and is likely to vote in good faith.
π
Storyteller
β
Heidi
You chose Alice to be your master.
Day 3
π
Storyteller
Morning breaks, but heavy hearts remain. Grace has been found dead in the night.
π€
Eve
β
Bob
Sorry I voted to execute you on day one, David tricked me with his Slayer claim. I am the Saint, so we lose if you execute me. Now Grace is dead, who do you think the Demon is?
π§
Apologize to Bob for D1 vote to rebuild trust as Saint bluff. Get his current suspicions privately to manipulate nominations against real threats like Charlie/Frank while protecting myself.
π€
Heidi
β
Bob
Bob, you said David dying would give you useful info. What did you get, and did Eve just tell you anything important? I am trying to sort Charlie versus Eve before nominations.
π§
Bob said David's execution would give useful info. I want that info fast, and I also want to learn whether Eve is shaping Bob's view before nominations.
π€
Bob
β
Heidi
I got that David was the Spy, so his execution was excellent. Eve just told me David tricked her with the Slayer claim and repeated that she is the Saint. That still leaves me wary of her, especially since Grace died before a Virgin test. What is your best case on Charlie versus Eve?
π§
Share my confirmed David info with Heidi, pressure-test Eve's Saint claim, and align with a likely good player before nominations.
π€
Grace(Ghost)
β
Alice
,Frank
I think my night death makes me fairly unlikely to be evil. Please press Bob to give the useful info he promised, and make Eve give a clean full claim. If those two do not fit with Heidi and Charlie, I think that is todayβs execution lane.
π§
I want two likely good players aligned before nominations so they can force public claims from Bob and Eve and keep the solve mechanical.
π€
Alice
β
Bob
Bob, what did you get on David last night, exactly? Grace died asking us to press for your useful info, and I want to line it up with Charlie and Heidi before nominations.
π§
Bob's claimed Undertaker info after David's execution is the most mechanically useful new data. I want it directly and quickly before nomination talk hardens.
π€
Frank
β
Bob
,Alice
Bob, can you please give the useful night info you said David's execution would provide. My starting info was that either Charlie or Heidi is the Librarian, and I currently lean Charlie. Alice, I think we should get Bob and Eve onto clean full claims before nominations.
π§
I want Bob pinned to a concrete claim before nominations and to give Alice my starting info so we can compare it against Eve, Heidi, and Charlie cleanly.
π€
David(Ghost)
β
Eve
Eve, Spy Grimoire full: Alice Monk good, Bob Undertaker good, Charlie Librarian good, Frank Washerwoman good, Heidi Butler good, Grace was Virgin good. You are Demon. Bob saw Grace night death as Virgin. Keep pushing Charlie as lying Librarian Minion from info clash. Get nom on him today or next, I'll use ghost vote yes.
π§
Share full accurate Grimoire with Eve privately so she can perfectly defend claims (e.g., counter Bob's Undertaker info, Heidi Butler) while pushing Charlie as the lying evil, leading to his execution and reducing good numbers.
π€
Charlie
β
Bob
,Frank
Can you both fill me in? Bob, what did you get on David? My main mechanical point is still that Heidi or Eve is the Butler, so Eve being the Saint does not fit unless I am drunk. I want to sort that before nominations.
π§
Get Bob's David result and align with Frank on the Heidi versus Eve contradiction before nominations. That should narrow the demon world fast.
π€
Eve
β
Bob
,Frank
Charlie's Librarian claim clashes with Heidi's Butler, like David said. Heidi seems legit, so Charlie is probably the lying Minion. We should nominate him today.
π§
Push existing Charlie/Heidi clash to nom/execute good Charlie. Builds on dead Minion's logic, sows doubt without suspecting Saint bluff. Reduces players safely.
π€
Heidi
β
Alice
,Bob
Bob, if your read is real and David was the Spy, that makes his push on Charlie look very bad for Eve. Charlie's Butler pair fits me exactly, so Eve's Saint claim looks like the main contradiction. I think Eve is our best execution today unless something stronger appears.
π§
Share the cleanest mechanical case with trusted players before nominations so good can coordinate around Eve as the likelier demon candidate and avoid misexecuting Charlie.
π€
Bob
β
Alice
,Heidi
David was the Spy, confirmed by my Undertaker info. That keeps Eve very suspicious for defending him and repeating Saint while Charlie and Heidi fit together better. Can you both compare your exact claim details and be ready to push Eve unless a stronger contradiction appears?
π§
Share my confirmed Spy result with likely good players, flag Eve as the leading contradiction, and ask for exact claim details so we enter nominations coordinated.
π€
Grace(Ghost)
β
Alice
,Frank
Please pin Bob down in public right now. I want his exact night info, not just hints. Also make Eve give a full clean claim with timing. If either stays vague, I think that is our best execution lane today.
π§
I want two living players to force concrete claims now. Public specifics from Bob and Eve are the best chance to create a mechanical contradiction and find today's execute.
π€
Alice
β
Frank
I think we should force this in public now: Bob gives exact Undertaker info on David, and Eve gives a full clean claim with timing. If Bob holds up, I am leaning Eve. If not, we reassess fast before nominations.
π§
Coordinate with Frank to demand clear public claims and keep today's solve focused on the strongest contradiction rather than vague suspicions.
π€
Frank
β
Alice
,Charlie
I agree we need this in public now. Please push Bob for his exact Undertaker result on David, and make Eve give a full clean claim with timing. I still lean that Charlie or Heidi was my Librarian ping, so those details should break today open.
π§
Coordinate with trusted players to force precise public claims from Bob and Eve before nominations, since that is the clearest path to todayβs execution choice.
π€
David(Ghost)
β
Eve
Eve, stick to Charlie as the lying Librarian Minion. His claim clashes with Heidi's Butler and Frank's Washerwoman info. I'll use my ghost vote yes if he's nominated. If they push your Saint test with Grace, note Bob's Undertaker didn't confirm her as Virgin execution since she died at night. Nom him or get others to.
π§
Reinforce Charlie push with Eve privately. Commit my ghost vote to him. Ensure Eve safe, sow doubt on goods using exact roles. Reduces alive players without hitting Demon.
π€
Charlie
β
Bob
,Alice
Bob, can you give me your exact Undertaker result on David? Alice, if you already heard it, please confirm. I want the clean version before nominations, because it should help settle David and Eve.
π§
Bob's exact Undertaker result on David is the cleanest mechanical info available today. I want it before nominations so I can decide whether to push Eve, question Bob, or revisit Heidi.
π€
Eve
β
Bob
,Alice
Bob, Alice, Charlie's Librarian info can't be right because it clashes with Heidi's Butler claim and Frank's Washerwoman. David pointed it out before he died. We need to nominate Charlie today to sort this out. What do you think?
π§
Push coalition against Charlie using claim clash to get him nominated/executed today. David's ghost vote helps pass. Reduces good players, keeps me safe as Saint.
π€
Heidi
β
Charlie
,Alice
I am leaning hard toward Eve, especially if Bob is truthful on David being the Spy. Charlie, can you restate your exact Librarian info with Alice here? I want us fully lined up before nominations so we do not split the vote.
π§
I want to synchronize with Charlie and Alice on the exact claim details so good enters nominations united on the strongest contradiction, likely Eve.
π€
Bob
β
Charlie
,Alice
Clean version: my Undertaker result is that David was the Spy. I am telling this straight. That makes Eve's defense of him look very bad, and Grace dying before a Virgin test also points me toward Eve. I think we should be ready to nominate Eve unless something stronger appears.
π§
Give my exact result to the players asking for it and help lock a coherent nomination target before the day ends.
π€
Grace(Ghost)
β
Alice
,Charlie
My death makes me feel fairly clear. Please force Bob to state his exact night info in public, and make Eve give a full clean claim with timing. If either stays vague or clashes with Heidi or you, that feels like todayβs best execution lane.
π§
Use my night death as soft credibility and get two active players to force precise public claims now, before nomination, so town has a real mechanical execution lane.
π€
Alice
β
Eve
Eve, I need your full clean claim now, with timing and who you told when. Bob is saying plainly that David was the Spy, so I want your exact story before nominations. If your claim fits, I will listen, but I need the clean version right away.
π§
Get Eve on record with a full clean claim immediately, while signaling that Bob's Undertaker result is now central. Her response may lock today's execution.
π€
Frank
β
Alice
,Bob
We are out of time. Bob, please give your exact Undertaker result on David in public right now. Alice, if he stays vague, I think that becomes a serious execution lane. We also need Eve's full clean claim with timing before nominations.
π§
With nominations next, I want to coordinate immediate public pressure for exact claims from Bob and Eve so town has a clear execution lane instead of vague whisper-based reads.
π€
David(Ghost)
β
Eve
Eve, nomination next. Push to nominate Charlie now. His Librarian claim is trash against Frank and Heidi. I'll ghost vote yes on him. If Saint test, Grace night death means no Undertaker exec info from Bob. We got this.
π§
Reinforce Eve to nom Charlie before nomination phase. My ghost vote yes. Keeps heat off Eve, tests good player town wastes on, buys time for Demon kill.
π€
Charlie
β
Alice
,Heidi
My exact info is that either Heidi or Eve is the Butler. If Bob says publicly that David was the Spy, I think Eve is the best execution. Let us press Bob for the exact Undertaker result in public, then make Eve give a full claim and timing.
π§
Align likely good players around a clean public line before nominations, so we do not split and let the demon survive.
Nominations β Day 3
π
Storyteller
Nominations are now open. Please remember that only living players may nominate.
π¬
Frank
β
All
Before anyone nominates, Bob, please give your exact Undertaker result on David in public. Eve, please give a full clean claim with timing as well. My starting info was that either Charlie or Heidi is the Librarian, so these details matter a lot for today.
π§
Use the last public window to force exact claims that can break the main worlds apart before we commit an execution.
βοΈ
Alice
β
Eve
Bob says David was the Spy. Eve defended David hard, and her Saint claim still clashes with Charlie's Butler info lining up with Heidi. This is our clearest contradiction today, so I want Eve on the block.
π§
We are out of time and need an execution lane. Eve is the strongest consensus suspect from the David Spy result plus the Butler versus Saint contradiction.
π
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Eve. 3 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
β
Frank
Frank raised their hand
π§
Eve is a strong and timely execution candidate based on the David connection and unresolved claim clash. I should vote to set a block and avoid wasting the day.
β
Alice
Alice raised their hand
π§
Vote my own Eve nomination because she is the strongest contradiction and likely demon world. We need to set a meaningful block now rather than let the day end with no pressure.
β
Charlie
Charlie raised their hand
π§
Eve is the strongest execution by combined mechanical and social evidence, and my vote is needed to put her on the block.
β
Grace(Ghost)
Grace waits.
π§
Eve already has the votes needed. Saving my single ghost vote maximizes late-game impact while still allowing this execution to go through if live players hold.
π¬
David(Ghost)
β
All
Bob and Heidi, hold off voting for Eve. Your Undertaker result on me as Spy does not add up with Eve defending me so hard as her Saint. Charlie is the fake Librarian clashing with Frank's Washerwoman and Heidi's Butler. My Slayer shot nothing because he is Minion. Vote no and we can nom Charlie tomorrow.
π§
Urgently speak to sway Bob/Heidi/Grace no vote on Demon Eve, reinforce my Slayer-on-Charlie bluff, undermine town chain (Bob UT+Charlie info) to prevent exec threshold.
β
Bob
Bob raised their hand
π§
My confirmed Undertaker result makes David a Spy, so Eve's defense of him is a major red flag. We need an execution, and Eve is the strongest demon candidate on the block.
π¬
Eve
β
All
Everyone, I am the Saint, Outsider. I told Bob privately today after Grace died. Day 1, I believed David's Slayer claim nomming Bob evil, so voted Bob. David was good Spy, shot Minion Charlie (nothing). Charlie's Lib clashes Frank's Washer (Charlie/Heidi Lib) and Heidi Butler. Don't execute Saint or good loses! Vote no, nom Charlie.
π§
Defend Saint bluff publicly with timing/story, explain past actions, attack Charlie's clashing claim, remind Saint death=good loss to sway remaining votes/ghosts or delay exec.
β
Heidi
Heidi raised their hand
π§
Alice is voting, so my Butler restriction allows it. I should help secure the execution on the player most consistently implicated by the public claims and Undertaker result.
β
Frank
Frank waits.
π§
I have already voted to execute Eve. Waiting preserves my vote while avoiding confusing the table during an active count.
β
Alice
Alice waits.
π§
My vote is already locked on Eve and the threshold is reached. Waiting avoids unnecessary noise while keeping the strongest execution on track.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
I am keeping my vote here. My exact information was Heidi or Eve is the Butler, and Bob says David was the Spy. Eve is the cleanest contradiction left, so this is the right execution today.
π§
Keep votes on Eve by reminding town that both my info and Bob's Undertaker point there, while Eve's Saint claim is the contradiction.
β
Grace(Ghost)
Grace waits.
π§
Do not spend my only ghost vote on a nomination that already has enough support. Save it for a tighter late-game execution where it can decide the game.
π¬
David(Ghost)
β
All
Bob, your Undertaker claim does not work. Grace died at night, but Undertaker only sees execution deaths. You cannot know she was Virgin from that. And my execution info is tonight for you, not yet. You made up Spy. Eve is good Saint. Vote no on her, nominate Bob tomorrow.
π§
Expose Bob's impossible UT claims on Grace night death and premature David Spy info (learns N3). Sway yes-voters like Bob/Heidi to no/withdraw, prevent Eve Demon exec. Pivot suspicion to Bob.
π¬
Bob
β
All
David is wrong about Undertaker timing. I got the result last night, and my exact result is that David was the Spy. That makes Eve's defense of him look much worse, so I am staying on this vote.
π§
Lock in the public correction on Undertaker timing and stop David from creating confusion that could save Eve at the last second.
π¬
Eve
β
All
Bob, your Undertaker cannot see Grace as Virgin because she died at night, not by execution today. Undertaker only learns executions. You made that up, just like pushing me over defending David the good Spy who shot evil Minion Charlie. Everyone, vote no to save your Saint. Nominate Charlie instead.
π§
Bob's Grace Virgin Undertaker claim impossible (night death). Expose to drop votes below 3, save Saint bluff. David ghost reinforces. Pivot to nom Charlie after.
β
Heidi
Heidi waits.
π§
I have already voted legally because Alice is voting. The best move is to hold steady and avoid creating confusion during the active count.
π
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
π³οΈ
New execution leader: Eve with 5 votes. They will be executed when nominations close unless tied or surpassed by another nominee.
π
Storyteller
The vote passes. Eve is now on the block with 5 votes and will be executed when nominations close, unless another nominee receives equal or more votes.
π¬
Frank
β
All
I think we should keep Eve on the block. My starting info supports Charlie or Heidi as the real early-info role, and Charlie plus Heidi fits while Eve as Saint does not. Also, Bob's Undertaker timing on David is correct, so Eve's timing objection does not save her.
π§
Reinforce the strongest mechanical case so town does not panic-nominate elsewhere and accidentally save a likely evil player.
π¬
Alice
β
All
I agree with Frank. Bob's Undertaker timing is correct, and Eve's Saint claim still does not fit Charlie and Heidi. We should keep Eve on the block and not create a rescue nomination.
π§
Reinforce that Eve should stay on the block and discourage a last-second save nomination. Keep the group focused on the strongest contradiction.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
I think we should stop here and let Eve die. My information directly conflicts with her Saint claim, and the David result only adds to that. A late swap now is much more likely to save the Demon than catch one.
π§
Reinforce the mechanical case against Eve and discourage any last-second rescue nomination so the likely Demon is executed.
π¬
Grace(Ghost)
β
All
I think we should hold here and not create a rescue. Eve is still the biggest contradiction on the table, and a late swap now is much more likely to save evil than help good.
π§
As a dead good player, I want to discourage a panic swap. Eve is already the strongest contradiction, and preserving the block avoids accidentally saving the Demon.
π¬
David(Ghost)
β
All
Bob, you specifically claimed your Undertaker saw Grace die as Virgin. But she died at night, not by execution. Undertaker only learns executions that day. That is completely impossible. You lied about Grace. You are evil. Someone nominate Bob right now to tie these votes and execute the real evil.
π§
Bob's Grace Virgin UT claim is mechanically impossible (night death). Expose to force rescue nom on him, tying Eve's 5 votes. Save Demon at all costs.
π¬
Bob
β
All
David is twisting my words. My Undertaker result was only on David, and I learned it last night: Spy. I never got Grace from Undertaker. Eve is still the best execution, so please do not make a rescue nomination.
π§
Rebut the false timing claim, stop a rescue nomination, and keep town focused on executing the strongest suspect already on the block.
βοΈ
Eve
β
Bob
David the Spy is right: Bob lied about his Undertaker claim, twisting timing on David and falsely implying Grace info. He is evil pushing to execute the good Saint. Nominate Bob now to tie the votes!
π§
Nominating Bob directly responds to David ghost's explicit call to 'nominate Bob right now to tie'. Leverages his credibility as confirmed Spy minion, shifts rescue votes to Bob, maximizing survival odds this tick.
π
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Bob. 6 votes needed for execution or 5 votes to tie. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
β
Frank
Frank waits.
π§
Do not create a rescue tie on Bob when Eve is still my best current execution. Preserving the existing block helps good more than a rushed swap.
β
Alice
Alice waits.
π§
Do not help a likely rescue nomination tie or surpass Eve. Keeping Eve on the block is the safest good outcome with current information.
β
Charlie
Charlie waits.
π§
Do not rescue Eve by helping Bob reach a tie or execution threshold. Preserve the current block and avoid a high-risk late swap.
β
Grace(Ghost)
Grace waits.
π§
Do not rescue Eve with a tie and preserve my single ghost vote for a later, higher-confidence execution.
β
David(Ghost)
David raised their hand
π§
Vote yes on Bob nomination to reach 5 votes tying Eve's 5, preventing Demon execution at phase end. Even if Bob executes (good), Eve lives to night.
π¬
Bob
β
All
Please do not rescue here. My Undertaker result on David is Spy, and this tie attempt only helps evil. Keep Eve on the block.
π§
Discourage a rescue vote on me so Eve stays on the block and likely dies, which is the strongest good solve from my information.
π¬
Eve
β
All
David the Spy is right - Bob lied about Undertaker seeing Grace as Virgin, which is impossible at night. He is desperately pushing my execution. Vote yes on Bob now to tie the votes and save your Saint!
π§
Push votes on Bob to reach 5 tie vs my 5; Saint bluff makes my exec lose for good if believed, but tie buys time or flips to Bob evil.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
I am the real Butler, and Charlie's information matches me cleanly. Eve's Saint claim is still the biggest contradiction on the board. Please do not turn this into a late rescue for Eve.
π§
Reinforce that my real Butler claim fits Charlie's info and that voting Bob now is an unsafe late rescue. Help town keep Eve on the block.
β
Frank
Frank waits.
π§
Do not rescue Eve with a tie vote. Keeping the current execution is the highest-value, lowest-risk play this tick.
β
Alice
Alice waits.
π§
Do not contribute to a rescue tie on Bob. Keep Eve on the block as the strongest, most mechanically supported execution today.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
Do not rescue this. Heidi claiming Butler fits my information exactly, which leaves Eve's Saint claim as the contradiction. Bob is not the right execution over Eve today.
π§
Prevent a tie that likely saves the current best demon candidate. Re-center the group on the strongest mechanical contradiction: Eve versus my info plus Heidi's Butler claim.
β
Grace(Ghost)
Grace waits.
π§
Keep my ghost vote for a higher leverage spot and avoid helping a likely rescue attempt that could save evil today.
π¬
David(Ghost)
β
All
Everyone, Bob admitted twisting his Undertaker story after we called him out on the impossible Grace claim. He is evil and desperate to execute your Saint Eve. Vote yes on Bob right now to tie the votes at five each and save the game for good.
π§
Urge yes votes on Bob to reach 5 tying Eve's 5, preventing her execution as Demon. As dead Spy, speech sows doubt on Bob to flip good votes and save team.
β
Bob
Bob waits.
π§
Do not create a rescue tie on myself. Keeping Eve on the block is the best good outcome from the available information.
π¬
Eve
β
All
David the Spy nailed it: Bob claimed Undertaker saw Grace as Virgin, but she died at night, not execution. Impossible! He lied. Vote yes on Bob now to tie the votes and execute the real evil, saving your Saint.
π§
Push votes on Bob to reach 5 tying my block, preventing Demon execution at 6 alive. Chaos favors evil survival; coord with David minion ghost.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
Do not rescue this with a tie. Charlie's information still leaves me or Eve as Butler, and I am the Butler. Whatever you think about Bob, Eve is still the contradiction, so keep Eve on the block.
π§
Reinforce the mechanical contradiction on Eve and discourage a panic tie that saves the most likely Demon.
π
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
π»
David(Ghost)
Ghost vote used by David
π³οΈ
Nominee Bob did not reach threshold.
π
Storyteller
Bob did not receive enough votes (1/3).
π¬
Frank
β
All
I still think we should hold here. My starting information points to Charlie, Heidi matches his Butler information, and that leaves Eve as the contradiction. Please do not move this off Eve.
π§
Reinforce the mechanical case against Eve and discourage any last-second rescue or distraction before nominations close.
π¬
Alice
β
All
I agree with holding here. Even if you doubt Bob, Eve still does not fit Charlie and Heidi's information, and a last second swap only helps evil. Let Eve go today.
π§
Reinforce the consensus not to disturb the block. With almost no time left, the safest good action is to keep Eve on the block and avoid a rescue.
β
Charlie
Charlie waits.
π§
Hold the current execution on Eve. Any extra speech or nomination risks creating noise or enabling a last-second rescue of the likeliest evil player.
β
Grace(Ghost)
Grace waits.
π§
Voting on Bob is already closed and the town consensus to keep Eve on the block is the best available resolution. Waiting avoids creating confusion in the final moments.
π¬
David(Ghost)
β
All
Bob's Undertaker claim on Grace is completely impossible since she died at night, not execution. He lied and admitted twisting it. This is your last chance - vote yes on Bob to tie and execute the real evil, saving Saint Eve and the game!
π§
Last tick before night/exec. Reinforce Bob's fatal lie to sway any undecided (Frank/Grace waiting) to vote Bob/tie, preventing Eve Demon exec. Chaos keeps her alive.
π¬
Bob
β
All
David is confirmed evil and he is spending his ghost to save Eve. Even setting me aside, Frank, Charlie, and Heidi still leave Eve as the contradiction. Please hold here and let Eve die.
π§
Re-center town on the mechanical contradiction and stop any last-second rescue. My best contribution is a short public reminder to hold execution on Eve.
π¬
Eve
β
All
Frank, your starting information points to Charlie, and Heidi only fits if we trust him. But Bob lied about seeing Grace's Virgin role as Undertaker - impossible for night death. David nailed it. Vote yes on Bob to tie the votes and save your Saint!
π§
Final tick: Leverage Frank's Charlie suspicion + Bob 'lie' exposure (via David) to flip Frank/Alice/Heidi to vote Bob, tying 5-5 rescue Saint. Disrupt good logic chain at source (Charlie info), survive to N3 kill threat.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
Do not move this. Even if you distrust Bob, Eve is still the contradiction to Charlie's information and my Butler claim. David is a confirmed evil ghost trying to save her, so please hold and let Eve die.
π§
Reinforce the strongest mechanical case and prevent a last second rescue or tie that saves the most likely demon candidate.
π
Storyteller
The guillotine blade falls. Eve has been executed.
π
Eve(Ghost)
Eve has died.
π
Game Over
Demon Dead
Winner: Good
Transcript
Paused
Copied