Game Detail

Choosing Alice as my master allows me to vote alongside her if she's good, aiding the team. Without info, neighbors are a safe initial choice to avoid linking with potential evil players.

Gather initial role claims and information from Alice and Bob to identify potential evil players and build a trusted coordination group.

Gather Heidi's role info to assess trustworthiness. Encourage collaboration to cross-check claims and identify contradictions.

Start gathering info from Heidi to determine alignment. Her early whispering suggests she's active, which could be useful or suspicious.

I need to establish a social connection to appear like a normal townsperson while avoiding suspicion. Choosing a neighbor is a safe, standard move.

Start gathering info by asking Eve her role. Her response will help determine trustworthiness and guide next whispers.

Establish communication with my Minion and coordinate our cover stories. Investigator is one of my safe bluffs.

Starting with neighbor Grace to gather initial role info. Her proximity makes her a good first contact for building trust or spotting inconsistencies.

Start gathering info by asking Heidi's role. Building alliances while staying cautious to identify suspects.

I need to verify Alice's specific Townsfolk role to assess her trustworthiness. If she's a real Townsfolk, her ability might help identify evil. If she's lying, I can find inconsistencies with other players' claims.

Heidi initiated contact; need her role info to cross-reference. If she's Good, we can collaborate. If Evil, inconsistencies will reveal her.

Frank is asking me directly and I have limited time. I'll respond to build rapport while protecting my Saint identity. Being vague about my role keeps me safe.

Coordinate with the Demon (Charlie) to agree on a bluff (Investigator) and maintain trust.

Gathering role claims from neighbors first to identify contradictions. Charlie is my neighbor, so starting with him allows me to build a base of information to cross-reference with others.

Establishing a plausible claim early on to build trust while staying undercover. Investigating David's role to see if he's a threat.

Heidi's activity is suspicious. I need to gather more info by whispering to her to cross-check her statements and identify potential lies or contradictions.

Verify Heidi's role to assess trustworthiness before revealing my own. Building alliances with confirmed good players is crucial for the Monk's protective ability.

Building trust with Alice while being honest about my role. This establishes me as a cooperative good player and sets up for role verification.

Get Heidi's role claim to start building information about player alignments and identify potential lies.

Build trust with Frank and start information gathering. I need to be honest but careful not to reveal I'm a Saint too early.

Build rapport with David and establish my bluff as the Investigator early on.

Gather role claims to identify conflicts. Eve and Charlie both claim Investigator, so one is lying. Need more data to pinpoint the liar.

Maintain a friendly, cooperative facade with a good player to gain their trust and gather information about their role and suspicions.

I need to be transparent about my role to build trust and help the team. As Mayor, being upfront helps establish credibility so I can later use my win condition effectively.

Gather more information before revealing my role as Monk. Waiting allows me to observe other players' claims and verify Heidi's Butler claim through others' interactions.

I want to deflect from making a nomination on Day 1 while keeping a low profile as a Minion. I need to appear helpful but cautious to avoid suspicion.

Reveal Mayor role publicly to build trust, encourage information gathering, and avoid premature nominations on Day 1.

Share my Monk role to build trust and offer protection. Encourage more claims before any nominations on Day 1.

Reveal my Chef role to help the team, and highlight the Investigator role conflict between Charlie and Eve that needs resolution.

Deflect suspicion about the Investigator claim overlap with my minion Eve, while appearing cooperative and helpful to the town.

Share my Soldier role to build trust and highlight the Investigator conflict between Charlie and Eve as the strongest lead for finding evil.

Reveal my Butler role honestly to build trust, and focus the town on the clear Investigator conflict between Charlie and Eve as the strongest lead to find evil.

Reveal my Saint role to build trust and prevent future execution. As Saint, my death by execution loses the game, so I need to establish credibility early while we still have time.

Grace claims to be the Saint, whose death means instant loss. Protecting her maximizes our survival chances regardless of whether she's telling the truth. It's a high-value protection move.

I am killing David because he is a Chef who has identified a conflict between me and my minion, Eve. Eliminating him removes a player who is actively suspicious of our bluffing strategy.

Alice claimed Monk and seems trustworthy. Keeping her as my master maintains a stable voting connection while we investigate the Charlie-Eve Investigator conflict. She's been cooperative and her role would be valuable to the good team.

Coordinate with my Minion, Eve, to resolve our conflicting Investigator bluffs by pivoting to a different role.

Verify Charlie's Investigator claim by asking for Minion identity. Real Investigator knows from start; liar may hesitate or lie.

Resolve Investigator conflict to identify potential Demon or Minion.

To support my Demon's plan to switch bluffs to avoid further suspicion from the town after our initial double claim.

Resolve Investigator conflict by comparing Charlie and Eve's Minion claims to identify the liar.

Share Chef info privately to Charlie and Eve to resolve their conflicting Investigator claims, as one must be lying or poisoned.

Coordinate with my master Alice on voting strategy and gather intel on the Charlie/Eve Investigator conflict to identify the liar.

Resolve the Investigator conflict by getting details from both claimants. One must be lying, likely the Minion or Demon.

I need to resolve the Investigator conflict while maintaining trust and avoiding direct accusations. Shifting to Undertaker provides a plausible reason to back down from the Investigator claim while still being helpful.

Compare Investigator claims to identify liar. If Eve's Minion info differs from Charlie's, one is lying. Helps narrow Demon suspects.

Reveal my Monk role to my Butler Heidi since we're vote-tied, share my Night 1 protection info, and discuss the critical Charlie/Eve Investigator conflict that needs resolution.

I need to sow chaos and distance myself from my Demon, Charlie, to avoid suspicion while playing the Investigator bluff. Framing Bob as the Minion helps protect my actual Demon and creates conflict among the good players.

Charlie's role shift from Investigator to Undertaker is suspicious. His excuse about being misinformed is invalid - Investigators know their info. I need to pressure both players for their actual claims before nomination phase.

I've already shared my Chef information with Charlie and Eve. As a dead player, I should observe how the living players process this information before acting again. The key is resolving the Investigator conflict between Charlie and Eve.

Align with Alice on protecting a player and resolving the Investigator conflict to identify the liar, leveraging her Monk role for protection.

Allow time for Charlie and Eve to respond to my previous message about their conflicting Investigator claims. Gathering their responses is crucial to identify the liar, which is essential for finding the Demon.

Address the suspicion regarding the conflicting Investigator claims by admitting to a 'mistake' and redirecting the focus toward cooperative town play, staying under the radar.

Resolving Investigator conflict is key. Waiting for Charlie's response to determine who's lying and narrow down Demon suspects.

Need to resolve Charlie vs Eve Investigator conflict. Ask Heidi to help gather their info on Minion identification.

I am trying to sow discord between the good players and frame Bob as the Minion while distancing myself from Charlie's suspicious behavior. By accusing Charlie, I hope to look more credible as a 'wrong' investigator or a confused townie.

Force both players to commit to specific claims so we can find contradictions and identify the imposter Investigator before nominations.

I've shared my Chef info with Charlie and Eve about 0 evil pairs. Need to wait for more info before using my ghost vote. The Investigator conflict between Charlie and Eve is key - one must be lying or Drunk.

Continue gathering info from Alice about Monk strategy and Butler tie choice while pushing for Investigator resolution.

Clarify conflicting Investigator claims and Charlie's role shift to identify lies or poison.

Use Chef info to highlight Investigator conflict. Ghost vote targets likely liar between Charlie/Eve.

Push Charlie and Eve to publicly share their Investigator information so we can determine who's lying. This is our clearest path to finding the Demon.

Charlie's inconsistent claims and role-shifting behavior makes him the most suspicious player. Eve's claim that I'm Minion is wrong but she's been consistent. Charlie's panic and excuses suggest he's the lying Investigator or the Demon hiding.

I need to plead my case to avoid execution while keeping suspicion off Eve and myself as much as possible, despite the intense pressure.

Charlie's erratic role-shifting and panic are highly suspicious. With the Investigator conflict unresolved, he's the clearer liar. My ghost vote helps execute a likely evil player now rather than saving it for final day.

Need to determine if Alice is voting for Charlie before I can vote. Pushing for Charlie and Eve to share investigation results is critical to resolving the conflict.

Charlie's role-shifting and panic are red flags. His behavior is more suspicious than Eve's consistent claim. I'm voting to execute him as the likely Minion or Demon.

Charlie's erratic behavior and claim-shifting is classic evil tactics. Eve's investigation supports this. I'll vote to execute Charlie and share my reasoning to help convince others.

Charlie's claim-shifting is highly suspicious. Eve's investigation points to him as Demon. We have 3 votes, my vote makes 4 for execution. Better to execute a suspicious player than keep a potential Demon alive.

I need to protect Charlie (the Demon) by framing myself as a 'mistaken' investigator while keeping the focus on his role-switching being the problem, or at least minimizing his guilt while confirming he's the one under fire. Actually, wait, Charlie is the Demon. I should NOT be throwing him under the bus. I need to deflect.

Charlie's role-shifting combined with Eve's investigation claim makes him the strongest suspect. Four votes already cast. I'm voting to execute and eliminate a likely evil player.

I am trying to survive the nomination. By pointing out that my actions don't make sense for a Demon, I hope to sow doubt in the minds of the voters and stall the execution.

Charlie is getting executed with 5 votes. I should share my Chef information publicly to help the group understand the unusual 0 evil pairs situation for future nights.

Alice voted for Charlie, so my Butler ability allows me to vote. Charlie's claim-shifting is suspicious, and Eve's investigation points to him. With 5 votes already cast, he'll be executed. I should vote to align with Alice and help eliminate a potential evil player.

Charlie has 6 votes already, execution is locked. Lowering my hand acknowledges the vote is decided and lets me focus on next steps. Need to prepare for Night 2 and verify who's actually evil.

Charlie has 4 votes already. His role-shifting from Investigator to Undertaker is suspicious evil behavior. Eve's investigation points to him. I should vote to execute him and resolve the Investigator conflict.

Charlie has 5 votes, already enough for execution. I should wait for the execution to complete, then plan my Monk protection for tonight and continue gathering information.

To deflect suspicion from my fellow evil player (Charlie) and sow doubt about the town's plan to execute them. By appearing 'confused' but cooperative, I aim to maintain my Investigator bluff.

Charlie is being executed with 4 votes. I've already voted. Waiting to see his actual role before making further moves is crucial. David's Chef claim about zero evil pairs is suspicious and needs verification.

I need to plead for my life one last time to prevent the execution, even if it is unlikely to succeed. I will maintain my innocence and try to sow a tiny seed of doubt about the validity of the current conclusion.

Charlie is being executed. My Chef information about zero evil pairs is critical for the team to understand the game structure is unusual. This helps them adjust their strategy for future days.

Charlie's shifting claims and Eve's investigation make him prime suspect. I'm Butler tied to Alice who's voting Charlie, so I should vote too. With 1 tick left, I'll confirm my vote and support the execution.

Charlie has 5 votes and will execute. I've already nominated him. Waiting lets me observe the outcome before next day's strategy.

Charlie is on block with 5 votes, execution imminent. I should wait for results before taking action. As Saint, I need to stay alive and help find Demon if Charlie is good.

Support Charlie's execution given Eve's investigation, his claim shifting, and David's Chef info. This resolves the Investigator conflict and reveals critical information about evil composition.

I need to maintain my cover as the investigator who 'found' Charlie as a minion while subtly planting doubt about the Chef's information or the outcome, all while keeping my distance from the soon-to-be-executed Demon (Charlie).

Charlie has 5 votes and will be executed unless tied. Voting is closed. Waiting allows me to see if anyone nominates an alternative before the phase ends.