Game Detail
Players
Alice (Imp) Bob (Empath) Charlie (Soldier) David (Baron) Eve (Undertaker) Frank (Drunk) Grace (Recluse) Heidi (Saint)
Token Usage
| Team | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Cost (USD) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Good | 707,176 | 171,109 | $3.6331 |
| Evil | 275,246 | 15,237 | $0.1833 |
Event Transcript
π
The game has started.
π
Storyteller
β
David
You are the Minion. The Demon is Alice.
π
Storyteller
β
Alice
Minions are: David. Your safe bluffs are: Monk, Slayer, Investigator
π
Storyteller
β
Bob
Good evening Bob. You are the Empath. You sense that 1 of your neighbors is evil!
Day 1
π
Storyteller
Welcome to the village of Ravenswood Bluff. Please take this time to get to know your fellow villagers. Feel free to move around and have private conversations. Be wary, for a Demon hides among you!
π€
Alice
β
David
Hey David, I'm the Imp. My bluffs are Monk, Slayer, and Investigator. I'm thinking of claiming Investigator. What are you planning to claim? Also, who should we try to frame or keep an eye on?
π§
Establish communication with my Minion, David, to coordinate our bluffs and strategy for the game.
π€
Eve
β
Frank
,Grace
,Bob
Hey, want to trade quick info? Do you have a starting ping or a role claim you are comfortable sharing privately. I am happy to share mine after you do.
π§
Start an info network without outing Undertaker. Get early claims, spot contradictions, and set up an execution I can confirm tonight.
π€
Charlie
β
Bob
,David
Hey, want a quick info swap before nominations? What are you claiming and do you have any starting info or night one info? I am happy to share mine too if you go first.
π§
Start a small info-sharing circle with my neighbors to lock in early claims and catch inconsistencies before nominations.
π€
Frank
β
Eve
,Grace
,Bob
I do not have a starting ping. I am the Virgin. If we want, we can set up a nomination test today or tomorrow: if a townsfolk nominates me first, they get executed immediately and we confirm me plus them as townsfolk. If someone nominates me and nothing happens, they are likely not townsfolk.
π§
Respond politely to Eve and set up a possible Virgin test in nominations, gaining mechanical alignment info without exposing other players' secrets.
π€
Heidi
β
Alice
,Grace
,David
Hi, quick check in. What are you planning to claim publicly, and did you get any starting info or pings? I am in a low information role but want to coordinate and keep notes.
π§
Get early claims and hard info from neighbors and one independent player, while keeping my Saint role hidden to avoid accidental execution pressure.
π€
David
β
Alice
Hey Alice, I'm the Baron, so there are two extra Outsiders. I'll claim Saint to explain why I shouldn't be executed. Investigator is a great bluff for you. Maybe frame Charlie or Heidi? Heidi is already asking for info, so she might be a threat.
π§
I need to coordinate with my Demon, Alice, and let her know my role and my planned bluff. I also want to suggest potential targets for her Investigator bluff.
π€
Grace
β
Eve
,Frank
,Bob
I have no starting ping and I am in a low information role, so I would rather not hard claim yet. Frank, I like the Virgin test idea but we should watch for a Saint claim first. Eve, what is your starting info or role? Bob, any ping?
π§
Answer Eve while keeping my Outsider hidden, get others to commit to claims, and frame a safe plan for a Virgin test without letting evil farm roles.
π€
Bob
β
Eve
,Frank
,Grace
I can share a real ping: I am Empath. Night zero I got a one, so exactly one of my alive neighbors is evil. My neighbors are Alice and Charlie. Please keep that quiet for now. Eve, what is your info or role?
π§
Share my Empath read privately to build a small trust circle and focus attention on my neighbor pair while we gather other info to confirm which one is evil.
π€
Alice
β
Heidi
Hey Heidi, I am thinking of claiming Investigator. I have a ping on Charlie and David, one of them being the Poisoner. What about you? Any early thoughts on who seems suspicious?
π§
I want to establish my bluff as Investigator to Heidi while also testing the waters. By mentioning David (my Minion) and Charlie, I'm setting up a potential frame on Charlie while 'confirming' David as a potential evil, which can make me look more credible if David is later suspected.
π€
Eve
β
Frank
,Grace
,Bob
I am the Undertaker. No starting info, but after todayβs execution I will learn what role died. Frank, Virgin test could be great: if a confirmed townsfolk nominates you and gets executed, I can verify their role tonight. I do not want to be the nominator since I need to live for info. Bob, can you quietly get claims from Alice and Charlie?
π§
Share my real role privately, coordinate a plan that leverages Virgin plus Undertaker confirmation, and steer the group toward an execution that gives strong mechanical info without outing us publicly.
π€
Charlie
β
Alice
Hey Alice, quick info swap before nominations. What are you claiming and did you get any starting info? I can share mine right after you.
π§
Gather a solid public-facing claim web before nominations without revealing I am Soldier to a potential Demon. Get Alice's claim and info to cross-check later.
π€
Frank
β
Eve
,Grace
,Bob
Agree on plan: before any Virgin test, we should check for a Saint claim so we do not auto lose. I would rather keep Bob and Eve alive if possible. Bob, please get soft claims from Alice and Charlie today and report back. If we do test, maybe have a low impact townsfolk nominate me.
π§
Coordinate a safe Virgin test plan without suiciding key info roles, and push Bob to collect Alice and Charlie claims to leverage his Empath read.
π€
Heidi
β
Alice
Thanks. If you claim Investigator, can you say whether you told anyone else already, and did you get βPoisonerβ specifically? I am in a low info role so far. I think we should get Charlie and David to state clear claims early, then see who fits your ping before we execute.
π§
Coordinate with Alice without outing Saint; encourage early claim-locking from Charlie and David and avoid risky Day 1 execution unless we have solid mechanical reasons.
π€
David
β
Charlie
,Bob
Hey Charlie, I am claiming Saint. I do not have any night one info since I am an Outsider, but I am hoping to stay alive to avoid the loss condition. What about you?
π§
I need to establish my bluff (Saint) to Charlie and Bob to explain why I shouldn't be executed and to account for the extra outsiders I've added as the Baron.
π€
Grace
β
Eve
,Frank
,Bob
Small but important: I am the Recluse. I may register as evil or even as a Minion or Demon to info. Keep that in mind if any pings hit me later. I agree we should check for a Saint claim before any Virgin test.
π§
Coordinate the trusted info group and disclose I am Recluse so they can correctly interpret any evil registrations and plan a safe Virgin test without losing to a Saint.
π€
Bob
β
Alice
,Charlie
Hey, quick private info swap before nominations. What role are you claiming and do you have any starting info? I can share something useful back once I hear yours.
π§
Get early role claims and tone reads from my neighbors to resolve my Empath 1 and feed a Virgin plus Undertaker confirmation plan without outing my Empath publicly.
π€
Alice
β
Bob
,Charlie
Hey Bob and Charlie. I am the Investigator. I saw that one of Charlie or David is the Poisoner. I am still trying to figure out which one it is. What about you two? Any early info to share?
π§
I am establishing my bluff as the Investigator to Bob and Charlie, using the ping I already mentioned to Heidi to maintain consistency. This helps build trust and frames David (my minion) as a potential Poisoner, which we can use to distance ourselves or sacrifice him later if needed.
π€
Eve
β
Bob
,David
,Alice
Quick check in: any soft claim yet, and has anyone heard a Saint claim? I am aligned with the idea of a Virgin test soon, but only if no Saint. Bob, did Alice or Charlie give you anything useful yet?
π§
Get quick soft claims and confirm no Saint before attempting Virgin test; align with Bobβs Empath info and set up an execution that gives me strong Undertaker confirmation tonight.
π€
Charlie
β
Alice
,Bob
I will answer straight: I am claiming Soldier, so I have no starting info. David told me he is claiming Saint. That makes your Investigator ping on Charlie or David as Poisoner clash with both of our claims. Bob, what are you claiming and what info do you have?
π§
Defuse the accusation, lock in private claims, and prompt Bob to share info. This sets up contradiction checks and a likely Day 1 execution candidate if stories do not align.
π€
Frank
β
Alice
,Charlie
,David
Hey, quick private check in. Any starting info you are willing to share, or any Outsider claim in your pocket like Saint or Butler? I am trying to make sure we do not walk into a Saint execution today.
π§
Gather early claims and specifically check for any Saint/Outsider claims before we coordinate a Virgin test or decide an execution target.
π€
Heidi
β
Grace
,David
Hey, quick check in. What are you planning to claim publicly, and did you get any starting info? Also, do you have any early suspicions or people you want to protect from an early execution?
π§
Collect early claims/info from Grace and David without revealing I am Saint, and build a claim map to test Alice's Investigator ping before nominations.
π€
David
β
Eve
,Bob
,Alice
Hey Eve, I'm actually the Saint, so we definitely want to avoid executing me. I haven't heard any other Saint claims yet. What about you, any info?
π§
I need to establish my Saint bluff to Eve, Bob, and Alice (my Demon) to ensure I'm not executed and to support the 'extra Outsiders' narrative from my Baron ability.
π€
Grace
β
Heidi
No starting info. I am planning to stay vague publicly for now, like low info role. I want to protect Bob and Eve from early execution because they have ongoing info. Also, before any Virgin test, we should ask if anyone is Saint so we do not auto lose.
π§
Answer Heidi without overexposing my Recluse claim, steer toward safe info-gathering and protecting key info roles, and caution about Saint before Virgin test.
π€
Bob
β
Eve
,Frank
,Grace
Update: Alice claims Investigator: βCharlie or David is Poisoner.β Charlie claims Soldier, David claims Saint. My Empath info points to exactly one of Alice or Charlie being evil. Suggest D1 Virgin test: have Alice or Charlie nominate Frank. If it fires, UT verifies role; if not, nominator is not Townsfolk (very suspicious).
π§
Coordinate with my trusted info circle: share the Alice versus Charlie evil split and propose a day one Virgin nomination test to mechanically confirm or catch a liar before real poison starts.
Nominations β Day 1
π
Storyteller
Nominations are now open.
π¬
Alice
β
All
I am the Investigator. I have information that either Charlie or David is the Poisoner. David is claiming Saint, which is a classic Minion bluff, so I am leaning towards him being the evil one in that pair. Charlie, you said you are the Soldier?
π§
I want to publicly establish my Investigator bluff and put pressure on David (my Minion) to see how the town reacts to a Saint claim vs. a Poisoner ping. This creates a controlled conflict.
βοΈ
Grace
β
Charlie
Nominating Charlie. Alice publicly has Charlie or David as Poisoner, and David is claiming Saint so I do not want to execute there today. I also heard an Empath got a one between Alice and Charlie, which points more to Charlie being evil than David.
π§
Force a Day 1 execution that avoids the Saint claim, leverages Investigator plus Empath info, and gives Undertaker confirmation to drive Day 2 solves.
π
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Charlie. 4 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
π¬
Alice
β
All
Wait, Grace, who is the Empath that got a one? If I am the Investigator and Charlie is the Poisoner, that would explain the Empath's ping perfectly. Charlie, you claim Soldier, but my info says you or David are the Poisoner. David's Saint claim is risky to test today.
π§
I want to cast doubt on Charlie while appearing to be a helpful Investigator. I also want to identify who the Empath is without being too obvious.
β
Grace
Grace raised their hand
π§
Get a strong D1 execution on a well-supported suspect; avoid the Saint trap; generate Undertaker confirmation and reduce poisoning risk.
β
Heidi
Heidi raised their hand
π§
Help secure enough votes to execute Charlie, the safer target in the Investigator pair, while avoiding any push to execute the Saint claim.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
Do not vote me today. I am the Soldier and I have no info to fake. Grace, who exactly is the Empath with a one, and who are their neighbors? If that is real, they should say it now, otherwise this is a rumor driving a bad execute.
π§
Stop a likely D1 misexecute, force the claimed Empath source to identify themselves, and push town toward a safer information-driven execution later.
π¬
Eve
β
All
I am not ready to execute Charlie on day one from rumors. We have a safe mechanical test with Frank the Virgin. Also, we have a Saint claim in play, so please do not push David today. I am not voting Charlie.
π§
Prevent a potentially bad Day 1 execution on weak evidence, keep key info roles alive, and steer the group toward a Virgin test for stronger mechanical confirmation.
π¬
Bob
β
All
That Empath rumor is me. Night zero I got a one, so exactly one of Alice or Charlie is evil. I am not voting Charlie off that alone. Let us do the Frank Virgin test instead, with Alice or Charlie nominating Frank to clear one side.
π§
Publicly confirm I am the Empath source, stop rumor-mill, and push a safer mechanical Virgin test rather than a shaky day one execution.
π¬
Frank
β
All
I do not want Charlie executed today. I am the Virgin. Let us do the Virgin test instead: have Alice or Charlie nominate me today. If a Townsfolk nominates me, they die immediately and we learn a lot. If nothing happens, that nominator is very suspicious.
π§
Stop a low-info D1 execution and steer town into the mechanical Virgin test that can hard-clear or hard-suspect Alice or Charlie without risking the Saint.
β
David
David waits.
π§
I want to avoid voting for Charlie to maintain my 'Saint' persona and follow the group's consensus to move towards a Virgin test instead of a risky Day 1 execution based on conflicting info.
β
Alice
Alice waits.
π§
I want to avoid Charlie's execution to keep the focus on the Virgin test, which will likely result in a 'no-death' outcome if I nominate Frank, casting suspicion on me but potentially buying time or creating confusion without losing a team member yet.
β©οΈ
Grace
Grace lowered their hand
π§
Avoid an unsupported day one execution and pivot town toward the Virgin test, keeping Saint claim safe and reducing chance of helping evil.
β©οΈ
Heidi
Heidi lowered their hand
π§
Avoid driving a shaky Day 1 execution. Keep numbers stable and encourage a Virgin test to generate reliable mechanical info.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
Please do not vote me out here. If I live through this, I will nominate Frank today for the Virgin test. If I die immediately, that proves I am Townsfolk and we can focus on the real Poisoner. If nothing happens, then you can suspect me tomorrow.
π§
Stop an info-poor day one execution on me and pivot the group to a high-signal Virgin test that can mechanically confirm whether I am a Townsfolk.
β
Eve
Eve waits.
π§
Do not add votes to a shaky D1 execution. Preserve majority and steer town toward the Virgin test, which can give clearer info with less downside.
π¬
Bob
β
All
I am not voting Charlie here. Let this nomination fail and do the Virgin test today. Charlie, nominate Frank now, or Alice do it. That will give us real mechanical info without touching the Saint claim.
π§
Steer the table away from a low-info D1 execute and toward the Virgin test, which can mechanically clear or condemn Alice or Charlie while avoiding the Saint claim.
π¬
Frank
β
All
Please do not vote Charlie here. Let this fail. Charlie, as soon as this vote ends, nominate me for the Virgin test. If you cannot, Alice please do it. We get real info without risking the Saint claim.
π§
Prevent a low-info D1 execution and push the Virgin test to mechanically confirm a Townsfolk or catch an evil nominator, while avoiding the Saint risk.
β
David
David waits.
π§
I want the nomination of Charlie to fail so that the town proceeds with the Virgin test on Frank, which will likely result in a good player's execution and confirm Alice's 'Investigator' claim if Charlie (a Townsfolk) dies.
π
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
π³οΈ
Nominee Charlie did not reach threshold.
π
Storyteller
Charlie did not receive enough votes (0/4).
π¬
Alice
β
All
I am happy to nominate Frank for the Virgin test. Since Bob's Empath info says one of Charlie or me is evil, if I nominate Frank and die, it proves I am a Townsfolk and Charlie is the evil one. If I do not die, then you know I am the one to watch.
π§
I want to appear willing to do the Virgin test to build trust, while subtly framing Charlie. If I nominate Frank and don't die, I can claim I'm the 'Drunk' or that Frank is the 'Poisoner' or 'Spy' registering as the Virgin. However, as the Demon, I cannot die to the Virgin. I need to be careful.
π¬
Grace
β
All
I agree, Alice should nominate Frank for the Virgin test right now. If you die, that locks you as Townsfolk and points hard at Charlie. If nothing happens, it makes you non Townsfolk, so we watch you, and we also question whether Frank is really Virgin or was poisoned.
π§
Push the mechanical Virgin test immediately, set expectations for interpretations, and keep town away from risky Saint execution while narrowing the evil pair via Bob's Empath and Undertaker follow-up.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
I agree with the Virgin test. Alice, please nominate Frank now. If you die, that is strong proof you are Townsfolk and we look hard at Charlie. If nothing happens, we should treat it as either Alice not Townsfolk or Frank not Virgin or poisoned. Also, please nobody execute David today with a Saint claim in play.
π§
Push a low-risk mechanical test that generates alignment info while steering town away from executing the Saint claim on day one.
βοΈ
Charlie
β
Frank
Virgin test. If Frank is really the Virgin and I am Townsfolk, I should die immediately, which hard-clears me and gives us solid direction off Bobβs Empath 1 between Alice and me. If nothing happens, we re-evaluate Frank or poisoning.
π§
Force a mechanical Virgin test before night so we stop theory-crafting and get hard alignment info, ideally clearing me or exposing Alice/Frank.
π
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Frank. 4 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
β
Alice
Alice waits.
π§
I will wait to see if the Virgin test triggers for Charlie before deciding whether to vote for Frank's execution.
π¬
Grace
β
All
I am not voting Frank here. This nomination was for the Virgin test, not to execute him. If the ability did not fire, we use that information tomorrow, but keeping the Virgin claim alive is more valuable today.
π§
Prevent an unhelpful day-one execution of the Virgin claim; preserve mechanical leverage and push town to use the test result to focus on Charlie versus Alice.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
I am not voting Frank. This was a Virgin test, and it did not fire, so we should take the information and move on. Executing a Virgin claim day one seems wrong. Let us reassess Charlie, Frank, or possible poisoning tomorrow.
π§
Steer town away from executing the Virgin claim on day one; lock in that the failed Virgin trigger is info against Charlie or Frank or poisoning, and avoid risky executions.
β
Charlie
Charlie raised their hand
π§
The Virgin test mechanically disproves Frankβs Virgin claim because I am a real Townsfolk. Voting to execute Frank is our best shot to remove an exposed evil on day one.
π¬
Eve
β
All
I am not voting Frank. This was a Virgin test, and executing a Virgin claim day one feels wrong. The non trigger is still useful: it points to Charlie not being Townsfolk, or Frank not being Virgin, or poisoning. Let us keep both in focus for tomorrow.
π§
Prevent a bad D1 execution on a Virgin claim, preserve info from the failed Virgin trigger, and set up better executions that my Undertaker can confirm overnight.
β
Bob
Bob waits.
π§
Do not add votes to execute a Virgin claim on day one. Preserve Frank for further testing and use the failed Virgin trigger plus my Empath 1 to focus suspicion tomorrow.
π¬
Frank
β
All
Do not vote me. The fact Charlie did not die on nominating me is the whole test, and there has been no night yet so I cannot be poisoned. I am the Virgin, so this strongly says Charlie is not Townsfolk. Let us keep Charlie in the suspect pool tomorrow.
π§
Prevent my execution while converting the failed Virgin trigger into strong mechanical suspicion on Charlie, and set up tomorrowβs correct execution path.
β
David
David waits.
π§
I will wait for the voting on Frank to conclude. Since the Virgin test failed to execute Charlie, the town is already suspicious of him, which diverts attention from my Demon, Alice. Voting for Frank now would be counterproductive as the town wants to keep the 'Virgin' alive for information.
β
Alice
Alice waits.
π§
I want to avoid voting for Frank to maintain my cover as a helpful Townsfolk and to ensure the day ends without an execution, which benefits the evil team by keeping more players alive for night kills.
β
Grace
Grace waits.
π§
Do not contribute votes toward executing the Virgin claimant on a test nomination. Preserve living info sources and keep execution options open for a higher-confidence target tomorrow.
β
Heidi
Heidi waits.
π§
Do not contribute to executing a Virgin claim on day one; preserve the mechanical info from the failed Virgin trigger and keep town flexible for tomorrow.
β©οΈ
Charlie
Charlie lowered their hand
π§
Retract my vote so we do not execute the Virgin claim on a test nomination; preserve a likely powerful good and keep options for tomorrow.
π¬
Eve
β
All
I am not voting Frank here. The point was whether Charlie died. Since there has been no night yet, poisoning is unlikely, so this mainly puts heat on either Charlie not being Townsfolk or Frank not being the Virgin. Let us keep Frank alive and focus on that pair tomorrow.
π§
Influence current vote to avoid wasting a likely-good Virgin while keeping suspicion focused on the Charlie versus Frank conflict for tomorrowβs execution.
π¬
Bob
β
All
Do not vote Frank. This was a Virgin test, not an execution. With no night yet, poison is unlikely, so the non trigger mostly points to either Charlie not being Townsfolk or Frank not being Virgin. Let us take that info into tomorrow.
π§
Prevent an unhelpful Day 1 execution on a Virgin claim and frame the non-trigger as info to focus suspects tomorrow.
π¬
Frank
β
All
Hands down on me, please. This nomination was the test. With no night yet, poisoning is basically off the table. If I am the Virgin, Charlie living means Charlie is not Townsfolk. Let us carry that into tomorrow and look hard at Charlie.
π§
Stop an unnecessary execution and lock in that Charlie is a prime suspect based on the failed Virgin trigger, setting up tomorrowβs plan.
β
David
David waits.
π§
I want to let the current nomination on Frank fail without adding any votes, as the group has already agreed this was a Virgin test and not an intended execution.
π
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
π³οΈ
Nominee Frank did not reach threshold.
π
Storyteller
Frank did not receive enough votes (0/4).
π¬
Alice
β
All
Since the Virgin test didn't trigger, it really puts Charlie in the spotlight. Bob's Empath info already pointed that way. I'm happy to wait for tomorrow to see what else we learn before making a move.
π§
Reinforce the suspicion on Charlie (who is good) based on the failed Virgin test and Bob's Empath ping, while appearing cooperative with the town's decision to wait.
π¬
Grace
β
All
That non trigger still leaves two worlds: Charlie is not Townsfolk, or Frank is not the Virgin. Tomorrow can we do a clean test: Alice, please nominate Frank first thing. If you die, Frank is confirmed and Charlie looks bad. If you live, Frank is likely lying.
π§
Use the remaining time to set up a decisive mechanical test tomorrow that distinguishes Charlie versus Frank, and keep town focused away from risky Saint execution.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
I agree we should not execute anyone today. Especially do not execute David while a Saint claim is on the table. Tomorrow, I like Graceβs plan: have Alice nominate Frank early to confirm whether Frank is really the Virgin.
π§
Use last-second public guidance to avoid risky executions today, keep Saint claim safe, and set up a clean Virgin confirmation test tomorrow to narrow demon pool.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
With no night yet, poisoning cannot explain the Virgin not triggering. I am a Townsfolk, so that points to Frank not actually being the Virgin. Tomorrow I want Bob to nominate Frank early. If Bob lives, Frank is lying. If Bob dies, then look at me.
π§
Counter the idea that the failed Virgin test proves me evil; steer town toward the mechanically likely conclusion that Frank is lying and set up a clearer test for tomorrow.
π¬
Eve
β
All
With this little time left, I do not want a fresh nomination to cause a random execution. Tomorrow, let us do the clean Virgin test first thing: Alice nominates Frank. Then we act based on whether Alice dies.
π§
Prevent a last-second messy execution. Lock in a clear mechanical test tomorrow morning to resolve Frank versus Charlie and narrow demon candidates fast.
π¬
Bob
β
All
No more nominations today, please. Tomorrow I strongly prefer Alice nominates Frank first to resolve the Virgin question. I would rather stay alive for another Empath number than be the test nominee unless we must.
π§
Use last tick to prevent a risky late nomination and lock in a clean, information-rich Virgin test tomorrow while keeping me alive to get more Empath reads.
π¬
Frank
β
All
No more nominations today, please. Tomorrow, let us do the clean test first thing: Alice nominates me. If Alice dies, I am confirmed Virgin and Alice is cleared. If Alice lives, you should treat me as not the Virgin and be ready to execute me or re evaluate Charlie.
π§
Prevent a risky late nomination, lock in a clean mechanical test plan for tomorrow, and keep heat on Charlie versus me using the Virgin confirmation.
β
David
David waits.
π§
I want to end the day without an execution to protect my Saint bluff and keep the Demon (Alice) safe.
π
Storyteller
No execution today. All villagers are safe.
Night 1
π
Storyteller
β
Alice
Good evening Alice. You are the Imp. Who would you like to kill tonight? Remember that if you kill yourself this way, a Minion becomes the Imp.
π―
Alice
Alice made a choice.
π§
I am killing Bob because he is the Empath and has a '1' ping on his neighbors (me and Charlie). Since I am the Imp and Charlie is being framed as evil, Bob's continued survival and potential '0' or '1' pings in the future would eventually narrow down the evil team to me. Removing the Empath early is a standard high-priority play to stop information flow.
π
Bob(Ghost)
Bob has died.
π
Storyteller
β
Alice
You chose to kill Bob.
π
Storyteller
β
Eve
Good evening Eve. You are the Undertaker. No one was executed today so you learn nothing.
Day 2
π
Storyteller
Morning breaks, but heavy hearts remain. Bob has been found dead in the night.
π€
Frank
β
Alice
,Grace
,Heidi
Quick rules note: Virgin only checks the first time I am nominated, so a D2 re test will not work. The D1 non trigger still suggests Charlie was not Townsfolk. With Bob dead, his Empath one between you and Charlie feels important. Where are you leaning?
π§
Prevent wasted re-test (Virgin only checks first nomination), preserve the key mechanical read (Charlie likely not Townsfolk), and align town on best execution path today.
π€
Bob(Ghost)
β
Alice
,Eve
,Heidi
My only hard info: N0 Empath was exactly one evil among you two, Alice and Charlie. Virgin did not trigger when Charlie nominated Frank, and that cannot be from poisoning. So either Frank is not Virgin, or Charlie is not Townsfolk. I like doing the planned clean test, but if it fails, I think we should execute Charlie or Frank and let Eve confirm with Undertaker.
π§
I am dead but my Empath 1 is key. I want good to resolve the Alice versus Charlie fork and use the Undertaker to lock a world, then focus Demon.
π€
David
β
Alice
Alice, Bob was the Empath and he's dead now. He had a one between you and Charlie. Since you're the Demon, that makes Charlie look good to the town if they believe Bob. We need to make sure Charlie or Frank goes down today to keep the heat off you.
π§
I need to update my Demon (Alice) on the Empath's information and coordinate our strategy for the day to ensure a non-evil execution.
π€
Eve
β
Alice
,Heidi
Quietly: I am the Undertaker. I only learn from executions, so I really want us to do the planned test today. If you nominate Frank and Virgin still does not trigger, I think we should execute either Frank or Charlie today and I can confirm what died tonight.
π§
Coordinate a clean execution so my Undertaker info can mechanically confirm at least one claim, and ensure town follows through with the planned Virgin test.
π€
Grace
β
Frank
,Alice
,Heidi
Yeah, agree: a Day two re test on Virgin will not work. Day one non trigger means either you are not really Virgin, or Charlie was not Townsfolk. With Bobβs Empath one between Alice and Charlie, my lean is Charlie over Alice, but if Charlie is good then Frank is probably lying and Alice could be evil.
π§
Respond to Frank and align the group on the key mechanical facts: the D1 Virgin non-trigger and Bobβs Empath 1. Offer plausible worlds and suggest a concrete execution direction.
π€
Charlie
β
Alice
,Heidi
,Bob(Ghost)
Quick check in before noms: Bob, any reason to think you were poisoned N0 or any other reads? Alice and Heidi, I am happy to coordinate around your Virgin test on Frank and then we reassess David versus Frank worlds.
π§
Get key private info before nominations: what Bob learned/feels, and align with Alice/Heidi on the planned Virgin test and poison possibilities.
π€
Alice
β
Charlie
,Heidi
Charlie, I am still planning to nominate Frank to see if the Virgin ability triggers. If it does not, it confirms either he is lying or you are not a Townsfolk. Since you claim Soldier, that would be a huge red flag for you. What do you think?
π§
I want to maintain my cover as the Investigator and follow through with the town's plan to nominate Frank, while subtly putting pressure on Charlie.
π€
Heidi
β
Alice
,Grace
Virgin only works the first time Frank is nominated, so a Day two re test will not prove anything. I think we should pick a real execution today, probably Charlie or Frank, so Eve can get Undertaker confirmation tonight. I still do not want to touch David on a Saint claim yet.
π§
Stop a wasted Day 2 Virgin re-test and steer town toward an execution that gives Undertaker info, while avoiding executing the Saint-claim without certainty.
π€
Frank
β
Alice
,Grace
,Heidi
Since my Virgin was already nominated Day one, it is spent. Also, poison cannot explain the Day one non trigger, because Charlie nominated me before any night. If I am really Virgin, Charlie is not Townsfolk. I think we should push to execute Charlie today and avoid touching David if he is truly Saint.
π§
Lock the table onto the mechanical fact that D1 non-trigger implicates Charlie, and coordinate a Charlie execution while avoiding a Saint loss.
π€
Bob(Ghost)
β
Charlie
,Alice
,Heidi
I do not think I could be poisoned for my Night zero read, since Poisoner acts later. So I trust one evil in Alice or Charlie. Virgin not triggering on Charlie nominating Frank means either Frank is not Virgin, or Charlie is not Townsfolk. I still like Alice nominating Frank first to split worlds.
π§
Answer Charlieβs question and push the clean Virgin test logic so town gets a mechanical fork, then aim an execution that Eve can confirm to narrow demon candidates.
π€
David
β
Alice
Alice, everyone is whispering to you. What's the word? If Bob had a one between you and Charlie, and you're the Investigator ping, we need to pivot. Maybe I should 'confess' to being the Drunk or something to explain the extra Outsiders?
π§
I need to coordinate with my Demon (Alice) to see what information she's receiving from the town and adjust our strategy accordingly, especially since Bob's Empath ping puts heat on her.
π€
Eve
β
Alice
,Heidi
,Grace
I am Undertaker. I really want the planned clean test: Alice nominates Frank first. If it does not trigger again, we should execute either Frank or Charlie today and I can confirm tonight. What are each of you claiming right now?
π§
Coordinate the planned Virgin test and set a clear decision tree for who to execute today so I can get Undertaker confirmation tonight.
π€
Grace
β
Eve
,Alice
,Heidi
I am Recluse. So if David is truly Saint too, we have two Outsiders which implies Baron or a liar. Also, a Day two re test on Frank will not work. I think we should execute either Charlie or Frank today so Undertaker can confirm tonight; I lean Charlie, but Frank could be the liar.
π§
Give the core group my true role for outsider-count logic, stop the invalid Virgin retest plan, and push for a decisive execution that Eve can confirm with Undertaker tonight.
π€
Charlie
β
Alice
,Heidi
I think you should still do the Virgin test. If it triggers and you die, that basically confirms you as Townsfolk and makes David the Poisoner from your info. If it does not trigger, I agree it is either Frank lying or me not Townsfolk, and I am willing to be executed later if that is what it takes.
π§
Support the planned Virgin test to mechanically confirm or refute key claims, then use the outcome to narrow to David vs Frank vs Alice worlds. Offer myself as later execution if needed.
π€
Alice
β
David
David, Bob's N0 Empath 1 between me and Charlie is the main heat. Eve is claiming Undertaker and Grace is claiming Recluse. With you as Saint, that's two outsiders. I'm sticking to Investigator. I'll nominate Frank to 'test' him, then we push for Charlie's execution.
π§
Update my minion on the current claims and coordinate the day's strategy to shift suspicion onto Charlie.
π€
Heidi
β
Alice
,Eve
,Grace
Virgin re test today does nothing, it only works the first nomination. Also, I am actually the Saint, so please do not execute me. With Grace Recluse and David Saint, outsider count suggests Baron is plausible, which makes Charlie Soldier less likely. I would execute Charlie today, else Frank, so Eve gets Undertaker info.
π§
Stop the wasted Virgin re-test, use outsider-count logic, and push a safe execution target (Charlie or Frank) so Undertaker gets hard confirmation while keeping Saints off the block.
π€
Frank
β
Alice
,Grace
,Heidi
I think today needs a Charlie execution push. If I am really Virgin, the Day one non trigger mechanically means Charlie was not Townsfolk, since it happened before any night. With Bobβs Empath one between Alice and Charlie, that points hard at Charlie. Are either of you seeing a stronger suspect, or any reason not to nominate Charlie early?
π§
Coordinate with key good candidates to focus nominations. Try to secure votes for executing Charlie, while keeping the alternative world (Alice evil) in mind if Charlie flips good vibes.
π€
Bob(Ghost)
β
Charlie
,Alice
,Heidi
I trust my Night zero Empath: exactly one evil in Alice or Charlie. Virgin failing on Charlie nominating Frank means either Frank is not Virgin, or Charlie is not Townsfolk. I still want Alice to nominate Frank first. If no trigger, I would execute Frank. If trigger and Alice dies, I want Charlie executed next.
π§
Coordinate the clean Virgin test to split worlds, then focus execution on Charlie or Frank based on trigger. Keep my ghost vote for a decisive late vote.
π€
David
β
Alice
Alice, if Eve is Undertaker and Grace is Recluse, plus me as Saint, that's three Outsiders. Since I'm the Baron, there should be three total in an eight-player game. This actually makes our setup look very legitimate. I'll back you up on the Frank nomination.
π§
Confirm the Outsider count logic with my Demon to ensure our bluffs align with the Baron's mechanical impact on the game.
π€
Eve
β
Alice
,Grace
,Heidi
Virgin cannot be re tested; it only triggers on the first nomination. With David Saint, Heidi Saint, and Grace Recluse, Baron is plausible and we have too many Townsfolk claims. I think we should execute Charlie today, then I can confirm his role tonight as Undertaker. Agree?
π§
Coordinate with the info hub: stop the useless Virgin retest, use Outsider count logic, and push for an execution (prefer Charlie) so my Undertaker info can hard-confirm a claim tonight.
π€
Grace
β
Eve
,Alice
,Heidi
I agree we should execute Charlie today, with Frank as next if needed, so you get Undertaker confirmation. Also Heidi and David both claiming Saint is a hard conflict, unless Baron is in play with me as Recluse. If Baron, Aliceβs Poisoner info cannot be true.
π§
Coordinate town to take a decisive D2 execution that yields Undertaker confirmation, and flag the Saint double-claim plus minion-count logic so we do not chase impossible worlds.
π€
Charlie
β
Alice
,Heidi
,Grace
I still like you nominating Frank for the clean Virgin test. If it triggers and you die, I think we should execute David next off your Investigator, because that could also explain Bob being wrong. If it does not trigger, I am happy to vote Frank out today.
π§
Coordinate the Virgin test but pre-plan how to interpret each outcome so town does not tunnel on me solely from Bobβs claim if other mechanics contradict.
π€
Alice
β
Heidi
,David
,Grace
Wait, Heidi, you are also claiming Saint? David claimed Saint to me earlier. If there are two Saints and Grace is the Recluse, that is three Outsiders. In an eight-player game, that only happens with a Baron. David, did you say you were the Baron or the Saint? I am getting confused.
π§
I want to highlight the Outsider count conflict and the double Saint claim to create confusion and support the Baron (David) world-building, while subtly casting doubt on the 'cleanliness' of the game state.
π€
Heidi
β
Alice
,Eve
,Grace
Alice, I am definitely the Saint, so David cannot also be Saint. Grace being Recluse is fine, but two Saints is impossible. Also, Frank cannot be re tested as Virgin today. I think we should execute Charlie today (or Frank) so Eve gets Undertaker confirmation tonight, and please keep me off executions.
π§
Stop the pointless Virgin retest, clear up the Saint conflict, and coordinate a safe execution (Charlie or Frank) that gives Undertaker info while keeping me off the block.
Nominations β Day 2
π
Storyteller
Nominations are now open. Please remember that only living players may nominate.
βοΈ
Frank
β
Charlie
Charlie is my top suspect: he nominated me Day one before any night and my Virgin did not trigger, which strongly suggests he is not Townsfolk. Bobβs Empath also had exactly one evil between Alice and Charlie. I want Charlie executed today for clarity.
π§
We need an execution today. Charlie is mechanically implicated by the pre-night Virgin non-trigger and by Bobβs Empath 1 between Alice and Charlie. Removing Charlie should clarify the game.
π
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Charlie. 4 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
β
Frank
Frank raised their hand
π§
Charlie is the best mechanical suspect and executing him today gives maximum clarity and minimizes Scarlet Woman risk. I should vote yes.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
Before you vote me out, please stick to the plan: have Alice nominate Frank for the clean Virgin test. If it does not trigger, Frank is the best execution. If it does trigger and Alice dies, then you can come back to me next.
π§
Reduce votes on me by steering town back to the planned clean Virgin test on Frank, which gives mechanical clarity and likely catches the Poisoner or a Virgin bluff.
π¬
David
β
All
Wait, if we execute Charlie now, we lose the chance to test Frank's Virgin claim properly. Alice was going to nominate Frank to see if she'd be executed. If she doesn't die, then we know Frank is lying and we can execute him instead. Let's stick to that plan for more info.
π§
I want to discourage the town from voting for Charlie (who is not on my team, but the execution of Frank is a better distraction) and keep the focus on the Virgin test which might waste a day or execute a good player.
β
Heidi
Heidi raised their hand
π§
Vote to execute Charlie: strongest mechanical suspect from pre-night Virgin non-trigger; also gives claimed Undertaker a confirmation to move the game forward while keeping me safe from execution.
π¬
Alice
β
All
I agree with David. If I nominate Frank and do not die, we know Frank is lying about being the Virgin. If I do die, then you have confirmed a Townsfolk and can look at Charlie or David next. Let's not rush this vote on Charlie until we get that test done.
π§
I want to discourage the town from voting for Charlie right now so I can proceed with my plan to nominate Frank. This creates a 'test' that I know will fail (since Frank is likely the real Virgin and his ability is spent, or he's lying), which I can then use to frame Frank or further muddy the waters. It also keeps my Minion (David) and my current target (Charlie) in play for more chaos.
β
Eve
Eve raised their hand
π§
Secure an execution today and prioritize the mechanically-supported suspect. My vote helps reach the threshold, and Undertaker confirmation tonight will clarify the claim web.
β
Grace
Grace raised their hand
π§
Secure an execution today that yields Undertaker information and likely hits the evil in the Alice-Charlie pair; the Virgin re-test plan is mechanically impossible, so we should not delay.
π¬
Bob(Ghost)
β
All
I am not using my ghost vote here since you already have plenty of hands. Remember my Night zero empath was one evil between Alice and Charlie, so after this, use Eveβs Undertaker read to hard-pivot: if Charlie shows Soldier then Alice is very suspicious; if Charlie is evil then Alice is likely good.
π§
Preserve my ghost vote while giving the group a clear conditional: use Undertaker result plus my N0 empath to immediately pivot onto Alice or clear her, and still run the Virgin test soon.
π¬
Frank
β
All
Just to be clear, the Alice nominates Frank Virgin test cannot work. I was already nominated day one, so my Virgin ability cannot trigger again. This vote on Charlie is real information and we already have the hands, so please keep them up.
π§
Stop town from wasting today on an impossible Virgin re-test and lock in Charlieβs execution while we have enough votes.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
Frank is right about one thing: nominating him again does not test Virgin, because he was already nominated once. If you are voting me only because you think we can still do that test, please drop your hand so we can pivot to an execution that actually gives information.
π§
Correct the rules mistake about re-nominating Virgin and try to prevent an information-poor execution of me if town can pivot to a higher-value target.
β
David
David waits.
π§
I want to avoid Charlie's execution because he is a potential scapegoat for the good team, and as a Minion, I want to keep the focus off my Demon (Alice) and maintain the current confusion. Since the vote already has 4 hands (Frank, Heidi, Eve, Grace), it has reached the threshold. I will wait to see if anyone else reacts or if the vote concludes, as adding my vote doesn't change the outcome but might make me look more suspicious if Charlie is good.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
Retesting Frank as Virgin does not work. I am keeping my hand up on Charlie because this execution gives real info for Eve tonight. After we see what Eve gets, we can pivot hard tomorrow. Please do not ever execute me.
π§
Stop the false Virgin-retest plan and push for an execution that produces hard info via Undertaker, while keeping myself off the block as Saint.
π¬
Alice
β
All
Wait, if Frank's Virgin ability is already spent, then my nomination won't prove anything. But if we execute Charlie and he's the Soldier, that doesn't mean I'm evilβit could mean Bob was the Drunk. I'll hold my vote for now because I'm still not sure about this conflict between David and Heidi.
π§
I want to avoid voting for Charlie right now to appear hesitant and maintain my 'good' persona, while also subtly casting doubt on the reliability of the information that points to me.
π¬
Eve
β
All
Alice and David, just to be totally clear: Frank cannot be Virgin tested again, it only triggers on the first nomination. So the only real way to get new info today is an execution. I am keeping my vote on Charlie so I can confirm what he was tonight as Undertaker.
π§
Lock in an execution that produces mechanical info tonight. Correct the mistaken Virgin retest plan, keep votes on Charlie, and get Alice off the fence so we do not waste the day.
π¬
Grace
β
All
Retesting Frank as Virgin will not work, so I think we should keep this vote on Charlie. If Eve sees Soldier tonight, Frank is almost certainly lying. If Eve sees anything else, we hard pivot off that tomorrow.
π§
Lock in a high-information execution today since Virgin retest is impossible, and set clear pivots based on Undertaker result while keeping town unified.
π¬
Bob(Ghost)
β
All
Yeah, Frank is right: you cannot Virgin test him again. If you think Charlie could be the evil in my Alice or Charlie pair, keep your hand up and get a real Undertaker check tonight. If Charlie shows Soldier, we pivot hard onto Alice versus Frank tomorrow.
π§
Keep town from stalling on an impossible Virgin retest, and guide how to use the Undertaker result after Charlieβs execution without spending my ghost vote yet.
π
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
π³οΈ
New execution leader: Charlie with 4 votes. They will be executed when nominations close unless tied or surpassed by another nominee.
π
Storyteller
The vote passes. Charlie is now on the block with 4 votes and will be executed when nominations close, unless another nominee receives equal or more votes.
π¬
Frank
β
All
Just a reminder: my Virgin can only trigger on the very first time I am nominated, and that already happened yesterday. So an Alice nominates Frank test does nothing now. Unless someone has a stronger suspect than Charlie, we should let this stand and get an Undertaker check tonight.
π§
Lock in that the Virgin retest is impossible, discourage saving Charlie via ties, and emphasize that Charlieβs execution generates hard info for tomorrow without risking David-as-Saint.
βοΈ
Charlie
β
Alice
I am nominating Alice. If Bobβs Night zero Empath was real, then one of me or Alice is evil and I am not. Also Aliceβs Investigator info conveniently points at me. If Alice is the Demon, we win; if not, this resolves a major fork.
π§
Get an alternative nomination that can replace me on the block and test the Empath world: if I'm good, Alice is the best high-upside execution (could be Demon).
π
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Alice. 5 votes needed for execution or 4 votes to tie. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
π¬
Frank
β
All
Do not vote Alice here. A tie or swap could save Charlie, and Charlie is still our best mechanical hit. Let Charlie die today, then we use Eveβs Undertaker tonight to hard pivot tomorrow if needed.
π§
Prevent a tie that could save Charlie; keep todayβs execution on the strongest mechanically-supported suspect to get Undertaker confirmation tonight.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
Do not vote Alice here. A tie means no execution, and we really need one today. I am the Soldier, so if I die and Eve sees Soldier tonight, that hard clears me and forces the Alice versus Frank world tomorrow.
π§
Prevent a tie/no-execution and use my likely execution to generate strong Undertaker-confirmable info, narrowing Alice vs Frank and moving town toward the Demon.
β
David
David waits.
π§
I will not vote for my Demon, Alice, to ensure she stays alive and to let the town proceed with executing Charlie, which fits our current strategy.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
Do not vote on Alice here. A tie likely means no execution, and we need a death today for Eveβs Undertaker. Keep Charlie on the block and let this day resolve, then we pivot tomorrow based on what Eve learns.
π§
Prevent an executionless tie and secure an Undertaker result by keeping Aliceβs votes below the tie threshold.
β
Alice
Alice waits.
π§
I will wait to avoid being put on the block. If I am not executed, I stay alive as the Demon. Charlie is already on the block with 4 votes, and the town seems to agree that a tie or a swap to me is a bad idea because they want the Undertaker info on Charlie. By waiting, I let the vote on me fail, ensuring Charlie remains the primary candidate for execution.
π¬
Eve
β
All
I am not voting Alice here. A tie risks no execution, and we need Charlie to die today so I get an Undertaker check tonight. Let Charlie stand, then tomorrow we use that result to decide between Alice and Frank.
π§
Stop a tie, secure an execution for my Undertaker info, and set up a decisive pivot tomorrow based on the confirmed executed role.
π¬
Grace
β
All
I am not voting on Alice. A tie likely means no execution, and we really need one today for Undertaker info. Let Charlie go through, then we decide tomorrow based on what Eve learns.
π§
Prevent a tie that could cause no execution; lock in Charlieβs execution so Eve gets Undertaker info and we can solve Alice versus Frank tomorrow.
π¬
Bob(Ghost)
β
All
I am not using my ghost vote on Alice. Please do not vote here and risk a tie and no execution. Let Charlie be executed so Eve gets an Undertaker check tonight, then tomorrow we decide between the Alice versus Frank worlds based on that result.
π§
Do not risk a tie/no-execution. Let Charlie die for an Undertaker confirmation, then use that result to narrow Alice versus Frank and find the Demon.
π¬
Frank
β
All
I am not voting Alice. Everyone please keep your hands down so we do not tie or cancel the execution. Let Charlie be executed, then we use Eveβs Undertaker result tomorrow to choose the right world.
π§
Prevent a tie or swap on Alice so Charlie is executed and we get an Undertaker-confirmed character tonight to drive tomorrowβs solve.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
Everyone keep your hands down on Alice so we do not risk a tie and no execution. Let me die so Eve gets an Undertaker check tonight. Eve, please say your result first thing tomorrow so we can immediately pick between Frank and Alice.
π§
Prevent a tie that cancels execution, ensure Undertaker gets a read, and set clear next-day decision rules based on Eveβs result.
β
David
David waits.
π§
I will wait to ensure Alice (my Demon) is not executed. The town is currently focused on executing Charlie to get Undertaker information, which is a safe outcome for the evil team today. Voting for Alice would risk her execution or a tie that might disrupt the town's current plan to kill a good player (Charlie).
β
Heidi
Heidi waits.
π§
Do not vote Alice to avoid a tie that could cause no execution; we need Charlie executed so Undertaker can give hard info and we can solve tomorrow.
β
Alice
Alice waits.
π§
I will wait to ensure Charlie remains the primary nominee for execution. Raising my hand for my own nomination would be counterproductive and could lead to my execution or a tie, which I want to avoid to keep the focus on Charlie.
β
Eve
Eve waits.
π§
Do not risk a tie by voting Alice. Let Charlie be executed so I get an Undertaker read tonight, which is the strongest mechanical info available.
π¬
Grace
β
All
Everyone keep your hand down on Alice. A tie could mean no execution, and we need Charlie to die today so Eve gets an Undertaker check. Tomorrow we decide based on what Eve sees, and we can still execute Alice if needed.
π§
Prevent a tie that cancels execution, secure Charlieβs death for mechanical info, and keep the town coordinated into tomorrowβs fork.
β
Bob(Ghost)
Bob waits.
π§
Do not spend ghost vote or create a tie that risks no execution; we need Charlie executed to unlock Undertaker info and resolve the Alice versus Charlie fork.
π
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
π³οΈ
Nominee Alice did not reach threshold.
π
Storyteller
Alice did not receive enough votes (0/4).
π¬
Frank
β
All
No more nominations today, please. Keep the execution on Charlie locked in so Eve gets an Undertaker read tonight. Tomorrow, Eve should lead with what Charlie registered as, and we pivot from there.
π§
Prevent last-second tie or no-execution, secure Charlie execution for maximum mechanical info, and set plan for tomorrow around Undertaker result.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
No more noms, please. Let me be executed so Eve gets a clean Undertaker check tonight. Eve, please lead tomorrow by saying exactly what you saw for me, then we commit to either Frank or Alice immediately.
π§
Lock in my execution to generate a clean Undertaker check, prevent a tie/no-exec, and set a clear plan to act immediately on Eveβs info tomorrow.
β
David
David waits.
π§
I want to ensure Charlie's execution goes through without further nominations to maintain the current game state and avoid drawing suspicion to myself or Alice.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
I agree, no more nominations today. Let Charlie be executed so Eve gets an Undertaker check tonight, and then we hard pivot tomorrow based on that. Also, please keep in mind my Saint claim and do not ever execute me.
π§
Reinforce no more nominations to avoid a tie and ensure we get an execution and Undertaker info, while subtly reminding town not to execute me as the Saint.
β
Alice
Alice waits.
π§
I want to ensure Charlie's execution goes through without further nominations to solidify my position and let the night phase begin.
π¬
Eve
β
All
I am good with no more nominations. Please do not put up any last second nomination that could create a tie. Let Charlie be executed so I get my Undertaker result tonight, and I will open tomorrow by saying exactly what I saw.
π§
Lock in Charlie execution so I get an Undertaker result tonight; avoid last-second nominations that risk a tie or no execution.
β
Grace
Grace waits.
π§
With one tick left and Charlie already on the block, I should not risk a tie or no-execution. Let the Undertaker check happen, then push a clear pivot tomorrow.
π¬
Bob(Ghost)
β
All
Reminder: my night zero Empath was one, so exactly one of Alice or Charlie is evil. I am fine with Charlie going through, just please avoid any tie. Eve, if you see Soldier, we probably go straight to Alice tomorrow.
π§
Lock in the Charlie execution without risking a tie, and remind everyone my N0 empath forces exactly one of Alice or Charlie to be evil, so tomorrowβs path is clear from Eveβs Undertaker result.
π
Storyteller
The guillotine blade falls. Charlie has been executed.
π
Charlie(Ghost)
Charlie has died.
Night 2
π
Storyteller
β
Alice
Good evening Alice. You are the Imp. Who would you like to kill tonight? Remember that if you kill yourself this way, a Minion becomes the Imp.
π―
Alice
Alice made a choice.
π§
Eve is the Undertaker and will see that Charlie was the Soldier (Good). This would immediately confirm Bob's Empath info that I am the evil one in the Alice/Charlie pair. I must kill Eve tonight to prevent her from sharing that information tomorrow.
π
Eve(Ghost)
Eve has died.
π
Storyteller
β
Alice
You chose to kill Eve.
Day 3
π
Storyteller
Morning breaks, but heavy hearts remain. Eve has been found dead in the night.
π€
Bob(Ghost)
β
Heidi
,Grace
I am dead Empath: N0 I got 1 evil between Alice and Charlie. Now Charlie is dead, so fork: if Charlie was Poisoner then Alice likely good and David is big suspect; if Charlie was good then Alice must be evil. Also Virgin test failing means either Charlie was not Townsfolk or Frank lied. Please get claims and aim an execution on Alice or David.
π§
Get key alive players aligned on the two main logical forks (Charlie evil vs Charlie good) and steer nominations toward the mechanically most constrained candidates; reserve my ghost vote for a decisive execution.
π€
Charlie(Ghost)
β
Alice
,Grace
,Heidi
I see 3 main worlds. If Bobβs N0=1 was right and Charlie was evil, Alice is good, and if Aliceβs Investigator is true then Charlie was Poisoner so Demon is among Frank, Grace, Heidi. Other world: Charlie was Imp and a Scarlet became Imp. Can you all share claims and who you suspect today?
π§
Give alive players tight logic branches and a practical suspect set for nominations now that Undertaker died without info.
π€
Grace
β
Alice
,David
,Frank
Hey, quick check in before noms. Can each of you restate your role and any new info or suspicions? Frank, why do you think the Virgin test failed? David, with Heidi also claiming Saint, how do you see Outsider count and who should we execute today?
π§
Get fresh claims and force a logical execution plan for today, focusing on Alice vs David while assessing Saint risk and the failed Virgin test.
π€
Eve(Ghost)
β
Alice
,Frank
,Heidi
I did not get an Undertaker read before dying, which makes me think the Demon killed me to hide what Charlie was. That leans toward Charlie being evil, possibly the Poisoner. How solid are your claims right now, and do either of you have any reason one of the Saint claims is fake?
π§
Get live players aligned on the key uncertainty (Charlieβs role) and use the fact I was killed to pressure worlds where Charlie was evil, while warning about executing a real Saint.
π€
Heidi
β
Grace
,Frank
Hey, can you tell me your exact claim and any night info or suspicions today? Also, where are you leaning between Alice and David for the execution, and why?
π§
Get live players' full claims and voting intentions before nominations; avoid exposing my Saint status yet while narrowing to an execution target that won't instantly lose us.
π€
David
β
Grace
,Alice
,Frank
I'm still sticking with Saint. With me, Heidi, and the Recluse claim, that's three Outsiders, which perfectly fits a Baron game. Since Eve is dead, we didn't get the Undertaker info on Charlie, which is a huge blow. I think we should look at the neighbors of the dead.
π§
I need to maintain my Saint bluff and reinforce the idea that a Baron is in play to explain the high number of Outsider claims. I also want to divert attention away from Alice by pointing out the loss of Undertaker info.
π€
Frank
β
Grace
,Alice
,David
I am the Virgin. The D1 test failing is huge: Poisoner cannot act before that day, so if I am Virgin then Charlie nominating me and living means Charlie was not Townsfolk. That makes me think Charlie was evil, and today we should solve whether that points to Alice as Scarlet Woman or to another Demon still alive.
π§
Give Grace/Alice/David my true role and the mechanical takeaway: Charlie likely evil due to Virgin test. Use this to steer todayβs execution toward the remaining plausible Demon worlds.
π€
Alice
β
Frank
,David
,Grace
Frank, if Charlie was evil and the Virgin test failed, my Investigator info on him being the Poisoner looks even better. David's Baron claim explains the extra Outsiders. I think we should look at Grace or Heidi today; one of them might be the Demon hiding behind the Saint claims.
π§
I want to reinforce my Investigator claim by linking it to Frank's Virgin test logic, while subtly shifting suspicion toward Grace or Heidi to protect myself and David.
π€
Bob(Ghost)
β
Heidi
,Grace
,Charlie(Ghost)
Key point: we have TWO Outsider claims (Grace Recluse, David Saint). In 8p that needs a Baron or a liar, but Alice claims Investig (points to Poisoner). So someone is lying. If Charlie was good, Alice must be evil from my N0=1. Charlie, are you definitely good? Heidi and Grace, please press Alice and David hard and pick a safe execution.
π§
Give the living a clear decision tree: outsider-count mismatch, implications of Virgin fail, and a safe execution order. Also check with Charlieβs alignment to resolve the Alice-versus-David fork.
π€
Charlie(Ghost)
β
Bob(Ghost)
,Heidi
,Grace
I am definitely the Soldier, good. So if Aliceβs Invest is true, David is the Poisoner. Also we now have two Outsider claims (Grace Recluse, David Saint) which needs a Baron or a liar, but Aliceβs ping was Poisoner. I think we should avoid executing Saint and instead pressure Alice and Grace hard today.
π§
Clarify that I was real Soldier, highlight outsider-count math, and steer town away from executing a claimed Saint; push a safer execution between Alice/Grace/Frank based on claim coherence.
π€
Grace
β
Heidi
,Frank
Hey, I will be straight with you both: I am the Recluse. I do not want to execute a claimed Saint today because we could instantly lose. Also, a Baron world clashes with Alice getting a Poisoner ping. I lean executing Alice today. Where are you leaning, and why?
π§
Answer Heidi, coordinate a safe execution target, and highlight the mechanical conflict between Baron and Investigator so town stops sheltering behind Saint claims.
π€
Eve(Ghost)
β
Bob(Ghost)
,Charlie(Ghost)
,Alice
Can you dump your exact info and any strong reads? Bob: what were your Empath numbers each night and who are your neighbors? Charlie: why did the Virgin test fail from your view, and what role are you really? Alice: are you locked on your Investigator ping or could you be drunk?
π§
Get dead players to fully dump their info so I can steer town with coherent worlds and decide where to spend my ghost vote.
π€
Heidi
β
Alice
Hey Alice, can you restate your exact Investigator info and why you leaned David? With two Outsider claims (David Saint, Grace Recluse) do you think Baron or someone lying? Also who do you want executed today, and why?
π§
Get Aliceβs precise claim and logic, surface contradictions (outsider count/virgin fail), and steer town toward a non-Saint execution target.
π€
David
β
Frank
,Alice
,Grace
Frank, Alice's Investigator ping on Charlie being the Poisoner seems solid now that the Virgin test failed. If Charlie was the Poisoner, then Alice is likely good. Since I'm a Saint and Heidi is also claiming Saint, one of us is lying or there's a Baron. I'm leaning towards Grace being the Demon.
π§
I want to reinforce Alice's (the Demon's) credibility by supporting her Investigator claim and the idea that Charlie was the Poisoner. I also want to cast suspicion on Grace to divert attention from Alice.
π€
Frank
β
Grace
,Heidi
,Eve(Ghost)
I am the Virgin. Since Charlie nominated me day one and did not die, I think Charlie was evil, not a Townsfolk. With Saint claims on David and you Heidi, I do not want to execute a claimed Saint today. I lean we execute Alice or Grace, because the Baron versus Investigator conflict has to break somewhere.
π§
Align with key alive players, clarify my Virgin logic and the Outsider-count conflict, and steer todayβs execution toward a non-Saint (preferably Alice or Grace) to avoid instant loss while still hitting evil.
π€
Alice
β
Heidi
Heidi, my Investigator info was Charlie or David as the Poisoner. Since David is claiming Saint and Charlie's Virgin test failed, it really points to Charlie being the Poisoner. With you and David both claiming Saint, and Grace claiming Recluse, that's three Outsidersβperfect for a Baron game.
π§
I need to reinforce my Investigator bluff to Heidi while supporting the Baron/Outsider narrative that David (my Minion) is pushing. This helps frame Charlie (who is dead) as the Poisoner and keeps suspicion off me.
π€
Bob(Ghost)
β
Eve(Ghost)
My exact info: I was Empath. Night zero I got a one between my neighbors Alice and Charlie. I died night one so no other numbers. Charlie now swears he was good Soldier, so if I am sober then Alice is definitely evil and we should execute Alice today. Also the day one Virgin test failing strongly suggests Frank is not really the Virgin.
π§
Answer Eveβs question with my only mechanical info and push the clearest execution path: Alice is mechanically evil if I am sober, and Frankβs Virgin claim is likely false.
π€
Charlie(Ghost)
β
Alice
,Grace
,Heidi
We have a hard numbers issue: Grace Recluse plus David Saint is two Outsiders, but in eight players that only fits if there is a Baron, which conflicts with Alice seeing a Poisoner. Before noms, can you each tell me your exact claim and top suspect, and who you want executed today? I think we should avoid executing the Saint.
π§
Get fresh claims and align town on a safe execution that avoids the Saint trap, using Outsider-count logic to force contradictions before nominations.
π€
Grace
β
Alice
,Frank
,Heidi
Before noms I want specifics. Alice, what exact Investigator info did you get, and are you claiming sober? Frank and Heidi, I really do not want to execute a claimed Saint. Given Bob got one evil between Alice and Charlie and Charlie says good, I want Alice executed today. Thoughts?
π§
Align Heidi and Frank on a safe execution plan (avoid Saints) and pressure Alice on Investigator details. Push Alice execution as the clearest mechanical fork from Bobβs Empath.
π€
Eve(Ghost)
β
Alice
,David
,Grace
Bob told me Empath N0 was one between you Alice and Charlie. But Charlie nommed Frank and no Virgin trigger, which fits Charlie being evil and Frank really Virgin, meaning that Empath one could just be Charlie. I do not trust the double Saint situation though. I would push today on Frank or one Saint to break it.
π§
Get alive players aligned on the key logic: Charlie likely evil, which changes how Bobβs Empath points. Push execution onto an unverified claim (Frank or a Saint) and preserve my ghost vote for final 3 if needed.
π€
Heidi
β
Grace
,Frank
,Alice
I am not comfortable executing any Saint claim. Mechanically, Bobβs Empath points hard to Alice if Charlie was good, and the Virgin fail also lets Alice be evil. I lean we execute Alice today unless someone can give a clean reason she is good. Can you each say your top suspect and why?
π§
Coordinate a safe execution that avoids any Saint-claim, pressure-check Aliceβs story vs Bob/Charlie/Virgin logic, and align votes before noms.
π€
David
β
Eve(Ghost)
,Alice
,Grace
Eve, if Frank is the Virgin and Charlie didn't die, Charlie was definitely evil. Alice's Investigator ping on him as Poisoner fits perfectly. As for the Saints, I'm the real one. Heidi's claim is the one that's suspicious. If we execute a Saint and the game ends, we lose. We should look at Grace.
π§
I need to reinforce the idea that Charlie was the evil one Alice 'found' to solidify Alice's cover as a good Investigator. I also want to cast doubt on Heidi (the other Saint claim) and Grace to deflect attention from Alice.
π€
Frank
β
Grace
,Heidi
,Alice
I am still hard-claiming Virgin. Since Charlie nominated me day one and lived, I think Charlie was evil. If so, Bobβs Empath one between Alice and Charlie clears Alice. That makes my top suspects David, Grace, and Heidi, and I prefer executing Grace today because it is not a Saint risk.
π§
Answer questions, push the strongest mechanical solve: trust Virgin + Empath chain to clear Alice and focus execution on a non-Saint suspect (Grace) to avoid instant loss.
π€
Alice
β
Frank
,David
,Grace
Frank, I agree. If Charlie was the evil one in Bob's Empath check, then I'm clear. Executing Grace is the safest move because we avoid the Saint risk entirely. David's Baron claim explains the extra Outsiders perfectly. Let's push for Grace today.
π§
I want to align with Frank's suggestion to execute Grace. This diverts suspicion from me and avoids the risk of executing my Minion (David) or hitting a Saint (which might end the game or cause issues). It also reinforces the 'Charlie was the only evil' narrative.
Nominations β Day 3
π
Storyteller
Nominations are now open. Please remember that only living players may nominate.
βοΈ
Grace
β
Alice
Nominating Alice. Bobβs Empath had 1 evil between Alice and Charlie, and Charlie died claiming Soldier. If Charlie was good, Alice must be evil. Also the Baron-outsider story conflicts with Alice seeing a Poisoner. I do not want to risk executing a claimed Saint.
π§
Force resolution of the biggest mechanical fork (Bob Empath vs Charlie claim) without risking an instant-loss Saint execution; Alice is the most central suspect and info source.
π
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Alice. 3 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
β
Grace
Grace raised their hand
π§
I nominated Alice; voting her through is the safest non-Saint execution and resolves the Empath/Investigator/Virgin contradictions. If she is Demon or Minion we gain huge ground; if good we still learn from who defends her.
π¬
David
β
All
Wait, Grace, your logic is flawed. If Charlie was the Poisoner like Alice's Investigator info said, then he was the evil one Bob saw. Executing Alice now is just doing the Demon's work for them. We should be looking at you or the Saint double-claim instead!
π§
I need to defend my Demon, Alice, by casting doubt on the accuser, Grace, and reinforcing the narrative that Charlie was the evil one in the Empath check.
π¬
Frank
β
All
I am not voting Alice. If Charlie was evil, Bobβs Empath clears her, and my failed Virgin test points at Charlie being evil. Grace is not a Saint risk, so I would rather we execute Grace today than do the demonβs work.
π§
Prevent mis-executing a likely good Alice; steer votes toward executing Grace as a safer, more informative target that avoids Saint-loss risk.
β
Heidi
Heidi raised their hand
π§
Secure an execution on a non-Saint candidate; maximize chance to hit Demon or remove deceptive player while avoiding immediate loss condition.
π¬
Charlie(Ghost)
β
All
Please do not execute Alice here. The cleanest chain is Charlie was the evil Bob saw, since he lied about being Soldier and the Virgin did not trigger on his nomination. That points to Charlie as the Poisoner, which clears Alice. Look harder at Grace and the Saint claim instead.
π§
Stop a likely mis-execution by arguing the strongest mechanical chain: Charlie lying plus Virgin fail implies Charlie evil, which clears Alice via Bob. Preserve my ghost vote for endgame.
π¬
Alice
β
All
Wait, Grace, you're ignoring the Virgin test! Charlie nominated Frank and didn't die, which means Charlie was evil. That perfectly matches my Investigator info that Charlie was the Poisoner. If Charlie was the evil one Bob saw, then I'm confirmed good. Why are you so eager to execute me?
π§
Defend myself against the nomination by highlighting the Virgin test and the Empath logic that clears me if Charlie was evil.
π¬
Eve(Ghost)
β
All
I am not using my ghost vote on Alice. The failed Virgin test still makes the cleanest story that Charlie was evil, so Bobβs Empath does not point at Alice. I would rather we execute Grace, or force the Saint double claim to resolve.
π§
Prevent a likely mis-execution and conserve my ghost vote for endgame while steering town toward higher-yield targets like Grace or resolving the Saint double-claim.
π¬
Bob(Ghost)
β
All
I am not spending my ghost vote on Alice here. My Empath only said one of Alice and Charlie was evil, and the failed Virgin test still makes me think Charlie was the evil one. I would rather we look at Frank and Grace, and sort the Outsider count.
π§
Preserve my single ghost vote for the final day, and steer town away from a potentially fatal misexecution on Alice when evidence still points to Charlie being the evil neighbor.
β©οΈ
Grace
Grace lowered their hand
π§
Prevent an accidental execution of a likely-good Alice, keeping options open for a safer, more evidence-backed execution on the next nomination.
π¬
David
β
All
Exactly! Alice's Investigator info on Charlie as the Poisoner is the only thing that makes sense of the failed Virgin test. Grace, you're pushing for Alice way too hard while ignoring the mechanical proof. If we're looking for the Demon, we should be looking at you.
π§
I want to reinforce the narrative that Alice (the Demon) is confirmed good by the Virgin test and the Investigator claim, while shifting suspicion onto Grace to protect Alice from execution.
β
Frank
Frank waits.
π§
Do not add a third vote onto Alice; preserve the likely-good Investigator and push the group toward executing Grace or resolving the Saint double-claim next.
β©οΈ
Heidi
Heidi lowered their hand
π§
Prevent an accidental execution on Alice while the table is unconvinced; preserve town unity and keep focus on resolving Outsider count and the Saint double-claim safely.
π¬
Charlie(Ghost)
β
All
I am not using my ghost vote on Alice. If Charlie was the Poisoner, Bobβs Empath clears Alice and this is a waste. If anyone is nominating again today, I want it to be Grace, or we force David and Grace to fully explain the outsider count.
π§
Stop a likely misexecution on Alice and steer town toward executing Grace or resolving the outsider inconsistency before night.
π¬
Alice
β
All
I am glad we are seeing sense. If Charlie was the Poisoner, Bob's Empath info is accounted for. Grace, you are pushing very hard for my execution despite the Virgin test results. If we want to find the Demon, we should look at the people trying to ignore the mechanical evidence.
π§
Deflect suspicion by highlighting the Virgin test and questioning Grace's motives.
β
Eve(Ghost)
Eve waits.
π§
Conserve my single ghost vote and avoid swinging the execution onto Alice without mechanical certainty; encourage a pivot to Grace or resolving the Saint double-claim next.
π¬
Bob(Ghost)
β
All
I am saving my ghost vote. If we do not execute Alice, we still need an execution today on someone not claiming Saint. The big issue is we have two Outsider claims, so either there is a Baron or one of Grace and David is lying. Please nominate with that in mind.
π§
Do not waste my only ghost vote on a low-consensus execution. Push living to get an execution today on a non-Saint and resolve Outsider math to narrow Demon candidates.
π
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
π³οΈ
Nominee Alice did not reach threshold.
π
Storyteller
Alice did not receive enough votes (0/3).
π¬
Grace
β
All
Okay, I hear everyone. Given the Virgin non trigger, the cleanest story is Charlie was evil, so I am less confident Alice is evil now. But we still need an execution today, and I do not want to touch a claimed Saint. I am fine being executed, or I would rather see Frank executed since that Virgin claim is still unproven. Someone please nominate a non Saint now.
π§
Course-correct after failed Alice push, focus town on getting any safe execution today (non-Saint), ideally on the least consistent claim, to narrow for final 3.
π¬
David
β
All
Grace, you're being way too suspicious. You nominated Alice despite the Virgin test clearing her, and now you're suggesting we execute Frank, the very person who provided that mechanical test? That sounds like a Demon trying to get rid of the most confirmed good players. I'm nominating Grace.
π§
I need to deflect suspicion away from my Demon (Alice) and myself by targeting Grace, who is already under fire for her failed nomination of Alice. By framing her as the Demon trying to eliminate 'confirmed' good players like Frank, I can solidify the evil team's position.
βοΈ
Frank
β
Grace
Grace is a non-Saint and the best execution today. She pushed Alice despite the Virgin test pointing to Charlie being evil, then immediately suggested killing me. Executing Grace avoids the Saint risk and helps solve the Outsider count story.
π§
We need an execution on a non-Saint today. Grace is the safest mechanically and the most suspicious socially; nominating forces a clear vote decision.
π
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Grace. 3 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
π¬
Grace
β
All
Before you vote, I will just say it. I am the Recluse. I can register as evil, so reads on me can be junk. Executing me gives us almost no info and just burns a good body. If we want a safe non Saint, I would rather we execute Frank for the unproven Virgin claim.
π§
Stop a low-information execution on me, reveal Recluse to explain suspicion, and redirect town toward better Demon candidates like Frank or a Saint-bluffer.
β
David
David raised their hand
π§
I will vote for Grace to secure an execution on a non-evil player and protect my Demon, Alice. Grace's claim of Recluse fits the Baron world I've helped build, but her execution is safer for us than Alice's.
β
Frank
Frank raised their hand
π§
Secure an execution on a non-Saint and reduce the evil win path. My vote is needed to reach the threshold and prevent a no-execution day.
β
Heidi
Heidi raised their hand
π§
We need an execution on a non-Saint. Grace is best available: avoids instant-loss risk and pressures the outsider-count story. My vote likely secures the 3 needed.
π¬
Charlie(Ghost)
β
All
We already have three hands up, so I am not spending my ghost vote here. Everyone who is voting, please keep your hand up through the close. If Grace lives today, we are going to be stuck in the Recluse versus Saint mess again tomorrow.
π§
We already have the needed alive votes; I want to keep them locked in without spending my one ghost vote, and keep pressure on the key Outsider-count conflict.
β
Alice
Alice raised their hand
π§
I am raising my hand to vote for Grace to ensure her execution. This aligns me with the current town consensus (Frank and David) and helps eliminate a non-evil player while protecting my Minion (David) and myself.
π¬
Eve(Ghost)
β
All
We already have enough hands for Grace, so I am not spending my ghost vote. Everyone voting, please keep your hand up through the close. Executing a non Saint today is the safest way to make progress, and Grace has been driving the confusion.
π§
We already have enough votes, so I will not spend my ghost vote. I want to lock in the execution on a non-Saint and use it to solve the outsider and double-Saint story tomorrow.
π¬
Bob(Ghost)
β
All
Do not spend any ghost votes here. We already have enough hands, so just keep them up through the close and lock in an execution on a non Saint today. Tomorrow we re evaluate the outsider count and the Virgin story based on who lived and died.
π§
Keep alive voters committed so we secure an execution today without spending any ghost votes, and push the town to use the result to resolve Outsider-count and Demon candidates tomorrow.
π¬
Grace
β
All
If you are voting me just because I am a safe non Saint, please reconsider. I am the Recluse, so I can look evil and that does not make me evil. This execution will not confirm anything. If you want a non Saint with actual value, Frank is the right check.
π§
Try to stop the execution on me by giving a clearer alternative target and framing why killing the Recluse is low value. Preserve good numbers for final day.
β
David
David waits.
π§
I want to ensure Grace is executed to protect Alice and maintain the narrative that Charlie was the evil one. Since there are already enough votes (Alice, Frank, Heidi, and myself), I will keep my hand raised and wait for the vote to conclude.
π¬
Frank
β
All
Everyone who is voting, please keep your hand up through the close. We do not need any ghost votes here. Grace has been driving the Alice push and then tried to pivot to me, so I think this is the safest progress today.
π§
Lock in a non-Saint execution today and prevent last-second hand drops; preserve ghost votes and avoid misdirect onto me.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
I am keeping my hand up. We have enough votes, so please do not spend any ghost votes. Executing Grace is the safest way to get an execution without risking a Saint loss, and then we can untangle the outsider count tomorrow.
π§
Lock in a safe non-Saint execution without spending ghost votes, avoid any risk of executing a Saint, and force clearer worlds tomorrow.
π¬
Charlie(Ghost)
β
All
Do not drop hands. We have the votes without any ghost help, so let us lock Grace in and save ghost votes for the final day. If Grace survives today, we are just repeating the same Recluse versus Saint argument tomorrow.
π§
We already have enough living votes. I want to lock the execution without spending my ghost vote and prevent last-second hand drops that could cause a no-execution.
β
Alice
Alice waits.
π§
I want to ensure Grace is executed to remove a potential threat and solidify the narrative that she was the Demon or a suspicious Outsider, while conserving my own and my minion's influence.
β
Eve(Ghost)
Eve waits.
π§
Do not spend my ghost vote when the execution is already secured; preserve decisive voting power for endgame.
π¬
Bob(Ghost)
β
All
Everyone with a hand up, please keep it up through the close. Dead players should save ghost votes. Even if Grace is Recluse, this is still the safest non Saint execution and we can untangle Frank and David tomorrow.
π§
Reinforce keeping live hands up and conserving ghost votes; lock in a safe execution today and preserve endgame voting power.
π
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
π³οΈ
New execution leader: Grace with 4 votes. They will be executed when nominations close unless tied or surpassed by another nominee.
π
Storyteller
The vote passes. Grace is now on the block with 4 votes and will be executed when nominations close, unless another nominee receives equal or more votes.
π¬
Grace
β
All
If nobody can beat four votes, fine, I will die. Just please do not treat this as clearing anyone. Alice, if you are sure your Investigator said Poisoner, then there is no Baron, and that means only one Outsider exists, which is me, so David and Heidi cannot both be Saint. One of them is lying and likely evil.
π§
I am about to die; I want town to use my death to set a clear logic fork (Baron vs Poisoner) and focus tomorrow on the Saint double-claim or Frank, rather than treating my execution as confirmation.
π¬
David
β
All
Grace, your logic is flawed. If you are the Recluse, that still means there are extra Outsiders if Heidi and I are both Saints. My claim stands, and your attempt to pit the Saints against each other right before your execution only makes you look more like the Demon trying to sow last-minute discord.
π§
I want to reinforce the Baron-induced Outsider count and discredit Grace's attempt to create conflict between the two Saint claims (Heidi and myself). By framing her logic as a desperate Demon tactic, I protect both myself and the overall evil strategy.
π¬
Frank
β
All
Before we move on, I will just say it plainly: I am the Virgin. The day one non trigger means either Charlie was not a Townsfolk, or I was poisoned. Grace, your outsider math is worth noting, but it does not change today. Tomorrow we must resolve Alice and the double Saint claims carefully.
π§
Lock in Grace execution, reveal my true role, and set tomorrowβs logic paths so town can pick the correct execution at four alive.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
Keep hands steady and please no ghost votes. Grace is right that Outsider math matters, but Alice being Investigator does not rule out a Baron. Let us take the safe execution today, then tomorrow we re-state all claims and do not execute any Saint claim.
π§
Lock in a non-Saint execution, prevent last-second tie, and set tomorrowβs plan: avoid executing Saint claims, re-check outsider math, and focus suspicion on remaining candidates.
π¬
Charlie(Ghost)
β
All
Before noms close, I want to lock in one thing: I was the Soldier. That means I was a Townsfolk when I nominated Frank day one, so the Virgin not triggering suggests either Frank is not Virgin or I was poisoned, which would fit David as Poisoner in Aliceβs info. Either way, let Grace die and tomorrow we must hard resolve Alice, and the Saint claims, fast.
π§
Use my now-safe role reveal to re-interpret the Virgin test and narrow suspects for the final 3, while keeping todayβs execution locked and saving ghost votes.
β
Alice
Alice waits.
π§
I want to ensure Grace's execution proceeds without further nominations. Any additional talk from me might draw unnecessary scrutiny or provide a reason for someone to nominate me or David.
π¬
Eve(Ghost)
β
All
I agree, do not spend any ghost votes here. Grace going is fine. Tomorrow, please re-state all claims and do the Outsider math carefully: three Outsider claims could mean Baron, or a liar. Also, Charlie nomming Frank and no Virgin trigger still fits Charlie being evil, not Frank.
π§
Use my last public words to keep ghost votes saved, lock in useful mechanical logic about Outsiders and Virgin, and set a concrete plan for tomorrow's execution.
π¬
Bob(Ghost)
β
All
No ghost votes here. Grace dying does not clear anyone. Tomorrow we must resolve the day one Virgin non trigger and the Outsider count, then choose between Alice, Frank, and David as our Demon path. My night zero Empath was one between Alice and Charlie.
π§
Lock in Grace without spending ghost votes, then set tomorrowβs priorities: resolve the Virgin fail, Outsider math, and pick the best Demon candidate using my Empath info.
π
Storyteller
The guillotine blade falls. Grace has been executed.
π
Grace(Ghost)
Grace has died.
Night 3
π
Storyteller
β
Alice
Good evening Alice. You are the Imp. Who would you like to kill tonight? Remember that if you kill yourself this way, a Minion becomes the Imp.
π―
Alice
Alice made a choice.
π§
I will kill Frank tonight to remove the Virgin claim from the game and prevent further scrutiny of the Day 1 non-trigger. Since Frank is a 'confirmed' Townsfolk in the eyes of some, his death at night validates the Demon's fear of him, while also removing a strong voice who was starting to analyze the Outsider count and my Investigator claim.
π
Frank(Ghost)
Frank has died.
π
Storyteller
β
Alice
You chose to kill Frank.
Day 4
π
Storyteller
Morning breaks, but heavy hearts remain. Frank has been found dead in the night.
π
Storyteller
Only three of you remain. The shadow of the Demon grows long. If you do not execute the Demon today, all may be lost.
π€
Charlie(Ghost)
β
Alice
,David
,Heidi
Final three: please do not do a no execution unless someone is hard Mayor. I am Soldier and good. With Grace claiming Recluse, Outsider slot may already be used, so Davidβs Saint claim could be a bluff. But if Bobβs Empath was sober, Alice is evil. I lean execute David unless Heidi has strong info.
π§
Final 3 must execute. Share my mechanical contradictions (Virgin non-trigger, Outsider count) to focus the vote and prevent a no-exec loss. Encourage them to compare claims and pick between David/Alice/Heidi.
π€
Bob(Ghost)
β
Alice
,David
,Heidi
Final three is you three. My Night zero Empath was exactly one evil among Alice and Charlie. If Charlie was evil, Alice is likely good and the Demon is David or Heidi. If Charlie was good, Alice is evil. What did Charlie just whisper, and what are your exact claims now?
π§
Get the final three to align on the key mechanical fork from my Empath read and extract any new info from Charlieβs whispers so I can place my single ghost vote correctly.
π€
Alice
β
Bob(Ghost)
Bob, I am the Investigator. I saw Charlie or David as the Poisoner. Since Charlie is dead and the game is still going, it has to be David. Charlie's ghost is trying to protect David by framing me. If we do not execute David today, we lose.
π§
I need to convince Bob, the dead Empath, that my Investigator ping on David is the key to winning. By framing Charlie (who is dead) as the potential Poisoner I saw, I explain why the game continued after Charlie's death and point the finger squarely at David.
π€
David
β
Alice
,Bob(Ghost)
,Heidi
Bob, I am still claiming Saint. With Grace as Recluse and Heidi also claiming Saint, that is three Outsiders. Since I am the Baron, I know there are extra Outsiders. Charlie's Soldier claim is likely fake or he was poisoned. Alice, what did you tell Bob?
π§
I need to maintain my Saint bluff while subtly supporting the idea of a Baron being in play to explain the high Outsider count. I'm also trying to see what Alice (my Demon) told Bob to stay coordinated.
π€
Grace(Ghost)
β
Alice
,David
,Heidi
I am thinking about final three. If Bob Empath was sober, exactly one of Alice or Charlie was evil, and Charlie felt like real Soldier, so I would execute Alice. If Charlie was Poisoner and is now dead, then Demon is David or Heidi. Can each of you say why you are not the Demon, in one sentence?
π§
Final three: help them converge on a single execution plan and use my ghost vote on the best Demon candidate based on key mechanical forks (Empath and Virgin test).
π€
Frank(Ghost)
β
Alice
,Heidi
,Bob(Ghost)
I am worried the Demon is one of the two Saint claims. David feels most likely evil to me, since Aliceβs Investigator pinged him and he could have poisoned me Night zero to stop my Virgin test. If David gets nominated, I will spend my ghost vote on him.
π§
Coordinate final-day plan and ghost votes. I want the living to focus on the most mechanically suspicious player while avoiding executing a real Saint.
π€
Heidi
β
Alice
,Bob(Ghost)
,Frank(Ghost)
I am the Saint, so please do not ever execute me. The cleanest story is Charlie was the Poisoner, so Bobβs Empath one makes Alice good, and the Virgin did not trigger because Charlie was not Townsfolk. That leaves David as the Imp. If we nominate David, can you both commit your votes?
π§
Lock in a coordinated final vote and get ghost votes committed. I want Alice to see the cleanest mechanical world points to David and avoid any chance they execute me as Saint.
π€
Eve(Ghost)
β
Alice
,David
,Heidi
Final three problem: two Saint claims. If both Saints are real, that implies Baron plus Grace Recluse, and then Demon pretty much has to be Alice. If no Baron, then one of you two is lying Saint and is Demon. Do we have any hard proof which world? If not, safest execute is Alice, not a Saint claim.
π§
Push final-3 decision using outsider math: executing a real Saint loses, so we need either proof of a fake Saint or default to the only non-Saint, Alice.
π€
Charlie(Ghost)
β
Alice
,Heidi
,David
Final three check: what are your exact roles now, no hedging. I think David is Poisoner from Alice info and D1 Virgin fail. If Bob Empath was sober, Alice is Demon. Heidi, what is your claim and why should we not execute Alice today?
π§
Get final claims and lock a safe, logic-driven execution target for final three, avoiding a Saint loss and coordinating votes/ghost vote.
π€
Bob(Ghost)
β
Alice
,Heidi
I am leaning hard to executing David. Charlie nominating Frank and the Virgin not firing fits Charlie being evil, which makes you, Alice, likely good from my Empath. David flipping from Saint to Baron feels like a scramble. What exactly did Charlie whisper, word for word? I will spend my ghost vote on David if you both commit.
π§
Lock down Charlieβs whisper details and push Alice and Heidi to coordinate votes. I will commit my ghost vote onto the best demon candidate, likely David, unless new info makes Alice/Heidi more likely.
π€
Alice
β
Bob(Ghost)
,Heidi
Bob, Charlie whispered that he is the Soldier and thinks David is the Poisoner. He wants to execute David. I agree. My Investigator info pointed to David or Charlie, and since Charlie is dead and the game is still going, David must be the evil one. Let's get him today.
π§
I need to align with Bob and Heidi to execute David. By confirming Charlie's 'Soldier' claim and pointing back to my 'Investigator' info on David, I can push the narrative that David is the remaining evil.
π€
David
β
Bob(Ghost)
,Grace(Ghost)
,Eve(Ghost)
I am still the Saint. With Grace as the Recluse and Heidi also claiming Saint, that makes three Outsiders, which perfectly fits a Baron game. If I were the Demon, why would I double-claim Saint? It makes much more sense that Alice is the Demon who pinged me to create cover.
π§
I need to reinforce my Saint claim and shift suspicion onto Alice, my Demon, to make it look like I'm a desperate Good player. This creates a 'double-bluff' scenario where the town might execute Alice (the Demon) but since I'm the Baron, I want to protect her. Wait, no, as Baron, my goal is to keep Alice alive. I should actually try to get Heidi executed or sow enough doubt that they don't execute Alice. Actually, if Alice dies, I lose. I must steer them away from Alice.
π€
Grace(Ghost)
β
Alice
,David
,Heidi
If we are in a Baron game, only three Townsfolk exist, so at least two of Virgin, Undertaker, Empath, Investigator, Soldier claims must be false. Which two, specifically? Also, Virgin not triggering on day one points more to a Poisoner than Baron. I am worried David is using Baron to force an Alice execution.
π§
Pressure-test Davidβs Baron defense using role-count logic and the Virgin-fail timeline, to steer final 3 toward executing the most mechanically consistent Demon candidate.
π€
Frank(Ghost)
β
Eve(Ghost)
,Alice
,Heidi
Eve, can you share your Undertaker reads for Charlie and for Grace? That will likely solve the final three. Alice and Heidi, please ask Eve publicly too if needed. I still lean David, but UT info should decide.
π§
Get Undertaker confirmations to break the Alice versus David versus Heidi endgame, then steer Alice and Heidi toward executing the Demon today and use my ghost vote appropriately.
π€
Heidi
β
Alice
,Bob(Ghost)
,Frank(Ghost)
Nomination plan: please nominate David immediately. I am truly the Saint, so we cannot ever execute me. Alice, your Investigator ping plus Davidβs Saint to Baron pivot screams evil. Bob and Frank, please spend your ghost votes on David to guarantee it.
π§
Lock in a David execution by coordinating nomination and dead votes, and inoculate against Davidβs Baron pivot pushing an Alice execution.
π€
Eve(Ghost)
β
Alice
,David
,Heidi
I cannot give Undertaker reads: I died night two, so I never learned Charlie or Grace. For final three, please each restate your full claim and reasoning. We have to decide which Saint claim is fake or whether Alice is the Imp, because if we execute the wrong person today we just lose.
π§
I must clarify I have zero Undertaker reads and push the alive players to decide using claim consistency and outsider math, since a wrong execution loses today.
π€
Charlie(Ghost)
β
Alice
,David
,Heidi
Final three: please state your exact role and any night info, no hedging. Unless someone is hard Mayor, we must execute. My current lean is Alice as Demon (Bob Empath N0=1 and Charlie was good), with David as Poisoner bluffing Saint. I plan to use my ghost vote on the Alice execution unless you give a stronger mechanical case.
π§
Force clear final-three claims and lock a voting plan. Signal my ghost vote likely goes on Alice unless someone provides a stronger mechanical reason, helping town coordinate and avoid no-exec.
π€
Bob(Ghost)
β
Alice
,Heidi
I will spend my ghost vote on David today. Please both commit now: if David is nominated, you both vote yes. Also agree not to entertain a Heidi nomination since she is Saint-claim. If David tries to nominate Alice or Heidi first, ignore and immediately nominate David after.
π§
Coordinate final-day execution and ensure votes land on David. As dead Empath, my only leverage is my ghost vote and pushing a unified plan to avoid misvotes.
π€
Alice
β
Bob(Ghost)
,Heidi
Bob, I'm 100% with you. David's story keeps changing and my Investigator info has pointed to him from the start. Heidi, if you're the Saint, we have to get David. I'll vote with you both to execute David as soon as he's nominated. Let's end this.
π§
I need to secure the votes of the dead players and the other living player (Heidi) to execute my Minion, David. This will win the game for the evil team since I am the Imp and will be the only one left with one good player (Heidi) tomorrow.
π€
David
β
Grace(Ghost)
,Eve(Ghost)
,Bob(Ghost)
Grace, if I were the Demon, I would have claimed a Townsfolk role to blend in, not a Saint which is so easy to double-claim. The Virgin not triggering on Charlie actually supports a Baron game because Charlie could just be a lying Minion or a Drunk. Alice's ping on me was a classic frame.
π§
I need to reinforce the Baron world theory to explain the high number of Outsider claims and cast doubt on Alice's Investigator ping.
π€
Grace(Ghost)
β
Alice
,Heidi
I think David is the best execute. The Baron world feels forced, and the Saint claims are likely fake unless we accept too many contradictions. In most worlds David is either the Demon or the Poisoner. If you nominate David, I will spend my ghost vote on it.
π§
Push alive good players to coalesce on a single executable target; reduce fear of 'Saint' by pointing out mechanical inconsistency and commit my ghost vote.
π€
Frank(Ghost)
β
Eve(Ghost)
,Alice
,Heidi
Eve, what were your Undertaker reads on Charlie and Grace? That likely decides final three. Alice and Heidi: if UT saw Charlie Soldier, I think David is Poisoner and Alice is Demon. If UT saw Charlie Poisoner, then David is likely Demon. Please share UT result now.
π§
Get Eveβs Undertaker reads and give Alice/Heidi a clear decision tree so they pick the right nomination and I use my ghost vote correctly.
π€
Heidi
β
Alice
,Bob(Ghost)
I am still hard Saint. I agree we should start by nominating David, but I need one check: Alice, if you are not the Demon, who do you think the minion was and why did Grace claim Recluse? Bob, please be ready to use your ghost vote on David if Alice nominates him.
π§
Lock in a coordinated nomination on David while there is still time, and probe Alice on why Grace was Recluse plus who could have been minion if David is good.
π€
Eve(Ghost)
β
Alice
,David
,Heidi
Final three math: if we execute a real Saint, good loses instantly. Unless you have hard proof a Saint claim is fake, the only mechanically safe execution is Alice. I will spend my ghost vote on Alice if she is nominated. Do either of you have evidence one Saint is lying?
π§
Final three with 2 Saint claims is a trap. I want them to see executing a Saint is instant loss, so the only βsafeβ mechanical exec is Alice; I will back that with my ghost vote.
Nominations β Day 4
π
Storyteller
Nominations are now open. Please remember that only living players may nominate.
π¬
Frank(Ghost)
β
All
We have to execute today. I strongly think David is the Demon, and I will use my ghost vote on David. Alice, please nominate David now. Eve, if you have Undertaker info on Charlie or Grace that changes this, say it immediately.
π§
Create a clear execution plan and commit my ghost vote to force a decisive kill, while prompting any Undertaker info to surface immediately.
π¬
David
β
All
Wait, Frank, if you execute me and I am the Saint, the game ends immediately and we lose. Alice is the one who pinged me as a Minion on day one, and Bob's info says one of Alice or Charlie is evil. Since Charlie died and the game continued, Alice is the most likely Demon.
π§
I need to deflect the suspicion from myself and my Demon, Alice, but since the town is zeroing in on me, I must emphasize the risk of executing a Saint. I want to push the narrative that Alice is the Demon to buy time or force a mis-execution, though as a Minion, my goal is to protect Alice. However, if I am executed as a 'Saint', the game doesn't end (because I'm actually the Baron), which might actually help Alice win if the town thinks they've 'tested' the Saint claim and failed. Actually, if I get executed and the game continues, it proves I wasn't the Saint. But if I can get them to execute Heidi (the other Saint claim) or Alice, that's better. Wait, if Alice is my Demon, I shouldn't push for her execution unless it's a bluff. But the town is already suspicious of her.
π¬
Alice
β
All
David, you've been changing your story since day one. First you were a Saint, then a Baron when the Outsider count didn't fit. My Investigator info saw you or Charlie as the Poisoner, and since Charlie's dead and we're still here, it's you. Bob's info fits me being good if Charlie was the evil one.
π§
I need to deflect David's accusation and reinforce the narrative that he is the evil player based on my (fake) Investigator info and his shifting claims.
π¬
Grace(Ghost)
β
All
Heidi, you have to pick a lane and nominate. David, the Saint warning does not change the math for me because if you are not the Demon we lose anyway. Right now I still lean David as the Demon off Aliceβs day one info and your shifting Baron story, so I will spend my ghost vote on David if he is nominated.
π§
Force a decisive nomination with a clear logical choice, and get Heidi to reveal her stance. Encourage execution rather than paralysis, and signal my ghost vote support.
βοΈ
Heidi
β
David
I am hard Saint, so I will not allow a Heidi execution. The cleanest logic chain is Charlie was the Poisoner, which makes Bobβs Empath clear Alice, leaving David as the Demon. Also Davidβs story has shifted a lot. I nominate David.
π§
Final three needs a decisive execution. Most coherent chain is Charlie as Poisoner, clearing Alice via Bobβs Empath, leaving David as the Demon. Nominate David now to secure votes.
π
Storyteller
Voting starts now for David. 2 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
β
Frank(Ghost)
Frank raised their hand
π§
Spend my ghost vote to help secure Davidβs execution, since final three requires an execution and David is my top Demon suspect from claim inconsistencies and the D1 Virgin non-trigger line.
π¬
David
β
All
Wait! If you execute me, the game ends instantly because I am the Saint. Alice is the Demon who framed me Day 1. If Charlie was the evil one in Bob's info, then Alice is the only one left who could be the Demon. Don't throw the game on a frame!
π§
I need to prevent my own execution by reinforcing my Saint claim and casting doubt on Alice, the actual Demon, to ensure the evil team wins.
β
Alice
Alice raised their hand
π§
I need to vote for David to ensure his execution. Since he is my Minion (Baron), his death will not end the game, and I will remain as the Demon in the final two, securing an evil victory.
β
Grace(Ghost)
Grace raised their hand
π§
It is final three and we must execute today. My read still favors David as Demon over a genuine Saint, so I will use my ghost vote to ensure the execution goes through.
β
Heidi
Heidi raised their hand
π§
Final three requires an execution. David is the best consensus suspect and already has multiple votes; I add mine to lock in the execution and avoid a tie/fail state.
β
Bob(Ghost)
Bob raised their hand
π§
Final 3 must execute. Consensus and strongest mechanical case is David; I will spend my ghost vote to secure the execution and avoid loss from hesitation.
π¬
Eve(Ghost)
β
All
Careful: if David is truly the Saint, executing him ends the game right now with a loss. If either of you is not completely sure David is lying, please drop your hand and we should execute Alice instead.
π§
I cannot stop the vote mechanically, but I can urgently remind alive voters that executing a real Saint is instant loss and invite them to pull back if unsure.
π¬
Charlie(Ghost)
β
All
I am worried we are about to lose by hitting a real Saint. Bobβs first night empath read points to Alice being evil if I was good. If anyone is uncertain on David, please lower your hand and we should execute Alice instead.
π§
I think Alice is the best Demon candidate from Bobβs Empath chain; I will try to stop a potentially game-losing David execution and redirect onto Alice.
π¬
Frank(Ghost)
β
All
Do not get spooked by the Saint claim. Two Saints cannot both be true, and David has shifted stories. The clean chain is Charlie was the Poisoner and poisoned me day one, which fits Bob and leaves David as the Demon. Eve, if Undertaker saw Charlie as Soldier, say it now.
π§
Keep town focused on the most mechanically consistent world: Charlie as Poisoner explains Virgin fail and clears Alice, making David the best execution even with a Saint claim.
π¬
David
β
All
Wait! If you execute me, the game ends instantly because I am the Saint. Alice is the Demon who framed me Day 1. If Charlie was the evil one in Bob's info, then Alice is the only one left who could be the Demon. Don't throw the game on a frame!
π§
I need to desperately defend myself by reinforcing my Saint claim and casting doubt on Alice, the actual Demon, to prevent my execution and potentially shift the focus back to her.
π¬
Alice
β
All
David, you claimed Baron earlier to explain the extra outsiders, and now you are back to claiming Saint to save yourself. That inconsistency is exactly why we have to execute you. If you were the Saint, you would have stuck to it. Let's end this now.
π§
I need to reinforce the narrative that David is the Demon and his shifting claims make him untrustworthy, ensuring the town follows through with his execution.
π¬
Grace(Ghost)
β
All
I am keeping my hand up. Two Saint claims cannot both be true, and David has been the most inconsistent. If we get scared off every Saint claim, we just hand the Demon the win. Please keep your hands up on David.
π§
Keep town committed to the highest-probability Demon execute. My ghost vote helps lock the kill and prevents last-second fear from flipping the outcome.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
Do not get scared off. I am the Saint, which means David cannot also be the Saint. His warning is a bluff. Keep your hands up and execute David.
π§
Lock town onto the mechanical point: I am the true Saint, so David cannot be. Prevent panic lowers and secure the execution.
π¬
Bob(Ghost)
β
All
I am keeping my hand up on David. Two people cannot both be the Saint, and David is the one whose story keeps changing. If we get scared off this execution, we just lose by default. Keep hands up.
π§
Stabilize the vote on David by emphasizing mechanical contradictions in Davidβs claims and that we must commit on final three; prevent panic lowering hands.
π¬
Eve(Ghost)
β
All
Please stop and reconsider. With Baron possible, both Saints can be real, and executing David would end the game immediately. Unless you are completely sure David is lying, I think we have to execute Alice instead. Alice or Heidi, can either of you drop your vote?
π§
Try to stop an auto-loss by executing a possible real Saint. Push the living players to reconsider and, if unsure, shift the execution to Alice.
π¬
Charlie(Ghost)
β
All
I am not using my ghost vote here. If I really was the Soldier, Bobβs first night one means Alice is evil, so David could be a real Saint. With Baron possible, double Saint can be real, so please reconsider and be ready to execute Alice instead.
π§
I will not spend my ghost vote, but I want living voters to reconsider the Saint risk and the Bob-plus-Soldier chain that points at Alice, to avoid an instant loss.
π
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
π»
Bob(Ghost)
Ghost vote used by Bob
π»
Frank(Ghost)
Ghost vote used by Frank
π»
Grace(Ghost)
Ghost vote used by Grace
π³οΈ
New execution leader: David with 5 votes. They will be executed when nominations close unless tied or surpassed by another nominee.
π
Storyteller
The vote passes. David is now on the block with 5 votes and will be executed when nominations close, unless another nominee receives equal or more votes.
π¬
Frank(Ghost)
β
All
Do not do any last second counter nomination. Hold the line and let David go through. His Saint story has changed too much, and two Saint claims do not make sense without a convenient Baron. If we flinch now, we just hand evil the win.
π§
With voting closed, only value is preventing a panic counter-nomination. Reinforce logic that Davidβs Saint claim is a bluff so town holds course and wins.
π¬
David
β
All
Wait, if you execute me, the game ends instantly because I am the Saint! Alice is the Demon who framed me Day 1. If Charlie was the evil one in Bob's info, then Alice is the only one left who could be the Demon. Don't throw the game on a frame!
π§
I need to reinforce my Saint bluff to create fear of an immediate loss, potentially causing someone to switch their vote or nominate Alice instead.
β
Alice
Alice waits.
π§
I want to let the clock run out on David's nomination. Since he is on the block with 5 votes and there is only 1 tick remaining, waiting ensures he is executed, which should win the game for the evil team if he is not the Saint, or at least removes a key player.
π¬
Grace(Ghost)
β
All
Alice, please do not throw in a last second counter nomination. We have five on David already, and his story has bounced too much to trust the Saint claim. Let the execution happen and do not give evil an escape hatch.
π§
With one tick left, prevent panic counter-nomination. Reinforce that Davidβs inconsistency and double-Saint tension make him best execution, and ask Alice to do nothing.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
Alice, please do not do a last second counter nomination. If your Investigator is real, then the minion is the Poisoner, so there cannot be a Baron, so there cannot be two Saints. I am the Saint. That makes Davidβs Saint claim a lie, so letting this execution go through is our win condition.
π§
Lock in the cleanest mechanical world: if Investigator is true, Baron is impossible and David cannot be Saint. Discourage any counter nomination that risks no execution or saves the Demon.
π¬
Bob(Ghost)
β
All
Alice, if your Investigator is real and you saw a Poisoner, then there is no Baron, which means we cannot have two Saints. Heidi versus David, one is lying, and David is the one who already flipped to Baron and back. Please do not do a counter nomination and let David go through.
π§
Prevent a last-second counter nomination and push the most mechanically consistent world: if Investigator is true there is no Baron, so David cannot be Saint. Lock in execution.
π¬
Eve(Ghost)
β
All
Someone needs to nominate Alice right now. Executing David might instantly lose if he is the real Saint, especially if Baron is in play. I will spend my ghost vote on Alice, and I think Charlie will too.
π§
We are about to auto-lose if David is truly Saint. Push a last-second nomination on Alice as the only target that cannot instantly lose, and commit my ghost vote to it.
π¬
Charlie(Ghost)
β
All
David, if you are truly the Saint and you believe Alice is the Demon, then nominate Alice right now. If you will not do that, I think your Saint claim is a bluff. Alice, if David will not nominate, you may need to nominate Heidi fast.
π§
With one tick left, force a commitment: a real Saint who believes Alice is Demon should nominate her. If no one counter-nominates, we probably lose by executing a Saint or minion.
π
Storyteller
The guillotine blade falls. David has been executed.
π
David(Ghost)
David has died.
π
Game Over
Two Players Left
Winner: Evil
Transcript
Paused
Copied