Game Detail

Day zero gives me no reads, so I will pick a likely active player to maximize my chance of being able to vote usefully tomorrow.

Start building a private information network and collect early claims from nearby players before speaking publicly.

Use the last daytime tick to gather early claims from two nearby players and start a trust network without exposing my own role too broadly.

Build an early trust pocket and float my first-night info carefully so we can compare claims before public nominations.

I want early private claims from my neighbors and to lightly hide my Slayer role until I have a better demon read or need to confirm trust.

Before claiming a role, I want to know what Alice means by unusual. If her info threatens me or Heidi, I need to know immediately so I can craft an appropriate counter-narrative.

I want early private claims from nearby players so I can map trust, compare stories later, and stay useful without exposing my Outsider role yet.

I want to stay cooperative without exposing Undertaker early, and keep Frank's Chef claim in my pocket for later consistency checks.

Respond to Alice to build trust while maintaining flexibility. I need to keep my bluff options open until I understand what Alice learned as Investigator.

Private honesty about my no-info first night should build trust and may uncover other setup info without exposing me publicly to the whole table yet.

Gather independent claims from a player outside my first chat, so I can compare stories and build a cleaner suspect pool for nominations.

Reply to Grace, share useful but not overcommitting info, and see whether Grace or Heidi will trade claims that can be checked against my Chef zero.

I want to gather claims without exposing that I am the Slayer too early. A soft claim keeps me useful and lets me judge whether Eve is sincere.

I need to be cautious and gather more intel before committing to a bluff. I'll be vague with Alice about my claim while probing for more info, and I need to see what others like Charlie are claiming too.

Build a small trust web, acknowledge Frank's info, and get Heidi talking without exposing that I am a low value Outsider too early.

Charlie already reached out and is talking neighbor-to-neighbor. I want a private claim from him and to give a soft claim that keeps me safe while building a trust link for later.

Keep Alice guessing about her own role, deflect from revealing my role too early, sow doubt about whether Alice is Investigator or Drunk

I want to pressure Bob and Heidi into giving soft category claims so I can judge who is honestly engaging and who is hiding behind my odd result.

Share limited useful info to build trust with Charlie and learn whether his daytime role is one we should protect or coordinate around before nominations.

Use my true Chef info to build a small trust web and ask for category claims from two players who seem engaged, so we have something concrete before nominations.

Give Eve enough truth to coordinate later without fully exposing myself to the whole town on day one.

Build trust with Charlie by giving a soft claim as Ravenkeeper, which explains my caution and lack of first night info. Gather intel while appearing cooperative.

I want to widen my trust web beyond Frank and Heidi, gather first night or category claims, and compare them against Chef zero and later public claims.

Gather stronger private claims from two active players, test consistency around Frank's Chef zero, and keep my own later-game information role concealed.

I need to build trust with Grace while getting information. I'll claim to have first night info but stay vague, positioning myself as a good information role that can help confirm or deny theories.

Sow doubt about Alice's Investigator claim by pointing out that no first night information is unusual. This protects my Demon Bob by shifting suspicion onto Alice and forcing her to defend herself.

Push the most concrete contradiction in public without exposing my Slayer role or rushing a weak day one nomination.

Defuse the immediate suspicion on me, frame the issue as a solvable mechanical puzzle, and ask for more claims instead of letting evil turn this into an easy day one execution.

Build credibility by analyzing mechanics thoughtfully without being too aggressive. I want to be seen as logical and helpful while gathering more info. I need to see who defends Alice and who attacks her to understand the board better.

I want more concrete public claims before any day one execution. Pressure Alice for specifics, but widen the net so evil cannot hide behind one strange claim.

Keep pressure on Alice for specifics while discouraging a snap execution on a claim that has plausible good explanations, and invite outsider count information without fully outing myself.

Add my real first-night information publicly and slow a hasty execution while creating a seating constraint the town can test against later claims.

Push the group toward a measured day one decision, preserve lives, and record enough structure to test Alice and Frank against future information.

Killing Charlie removes an active, sharp-minded player who is asking dangerous questions and gathering claims. This slows the town's information gathering while making it harder to trace back to me.

I want a living, vocal player who is likely to vote on meaningful executions so my Butler restriction interferes as little as possible while aligning me with a probable good coordinator.

Get exact private claims and suspicions from two thoughtful players, build a coalition for the best execution today, and preserve my Undertaker cover a bit longer.

I want to test David's claim, share limited useful truth, and avoid exposing Butler too early while gathering clearer mechanical information.

Build a small trusted pool, test David's vague claim, and add Charlie's private Slayer claim without overexposing myself publicly.

Let others speak first and establish their claims. Need to gather information before choosing my bluff. David/Eve/Grace whispering suggests they have info roles. Better to wait and react than to claim blindly.

I am dead, so my best value is confirming I was a real good role and extracting concrete claims from trusted players to sharpen today's execution.

Build a small trusted information network before nominations and get reads on Charlie's death, outsider count, and first-night claims to sort Drunk versus poisoned versus bluff worlds.

Coordinate with Bob to align our strategies. I need to know his plan and we should coordinate our bluffs to maximize confusion among good players.

David and Grace both hinted at later or hidden info. I want to compare claims, share Chef zero, and ask whether Charlie gave them anything before dying.

Build a tighter private trust circle by giving my exact claim now, confirm Charlie's Slayer claim, and press Grace for the exact Outsider so we can test Alice versus alternative worlds before nominations.

Give exact role to the two players most directly sorting Alice so good can use outsider count and claim consistency before nominations.

Keep a private good coalition aligned, pressure the mechanically weakest claim, and test whether David and Grace stay consistent under a concrete plan.

Respond to Charlie's request for my claim and suspect. Building trust with the dead Slayer gives me credibility with good players and lets me shape his influence on town.

Answer Bob, give my current solve, and pull David into sharing an exact claim so dead Charlie can help narrow worlds before nominations.

Bob and Heidi have both been cautious and are talking to each other. A direct private compare may extract claims and reveal whether they are solving or steering town.

Deflect Alice's direct questioning without committing to a specific bluff yet. Keep positioning as having first night info while I decide which role to claim. Buy time to coordinate with Bob.

Bob has links to Charlie and the Alice-Heidi cluster. I want Charlie's last reads and Bob's exact take on Alice to test whether that pocket is solving or protecting evil.

Pressure Alice for exact mechanical detail while looping in Frank, so I can resolve whether Alice is a good malfunctioning info role or the best execution today.

Share my exact claim with Frank, align the likely good info core, and push for a precise mechanical challenge to Alice before nominations.

I want Alice's exact explanation privately before nomination time, so I can judge whether she is the best execute or whether someone is framing her.

Coordinate with Heidi on our bluffs. I need to know if she poisoned Alice, and we need to align our stories since Alice is pressing us both on first night info.

I want exact claims from the people I have engaged so I can build clean worlds before nominations and steer my ghost vote toward the best demon candidate.

Give my clearest defense to the players currently driving discussion, and tie it to outsider count so they reconsider executing me first.

Coordinate with Bob on our bluff strategy. I need to commit to a claim that positions me as having first night info, and we need to sync up before Alice forces our hand. Claiming Investigator gives me a direct counter to Alice and lets me frame Bob as a possible minion, which actually protects him.

I want to align with David and Grace on the mechanical picture before nominations and make sure we do not miss a better world than simply executing Alice.

Alice is the most mechanically suspicious player, and with time expiring we need an execution candidate that generates the most information for town.

I want to stop a low-value execution on me and push town toward broader claim comparison before giving evil an easy day two.

I nominated Alice because she is the best available execution. Voting through my own nomination pressures the strongest contradiction and gives town information overnight.

Alice's survival is strategically useful but not essential. By not voting, I either preserve a confusion asset or let town eliminate someone while I stay hidden. I need Bob's confirmation on our coordination before committing to a public claim.

Alice is the strongest mechanical suspect, and as Undertaker I gain high-value information if she dies. Voting here advances good even if she is a misfired good player.

Conserve my single ghost vote because the case on Alice is plausible but not decisive, and my vote may not be necessary or sufficient here.

Alice dying today accelerates our win condition and eliminates a good player. While it risks Heidi's Investigator claim, we can adapt by saying Alice was Drunk. Not voting after shading Alice looks suspicious. I should vote to maintain my cover and push toward endgame.

Alice is still the strongest mechanical execution. If she is evil, great. If she is good, an execution here may generate useful Undertaker confirmation and clarify the board.

Clarify why I am not voting, preserve my Butler credibility, and keep pressure on Alice to give a precise explanation before day ends.

I want to prevent the fourth vote on me by giving the town a clear mechanical reason that my anomaly does not make me the best execution today.

Keep pressure on Alice and encourage a fourth vote. Her claim is still the clearest mechanical problem, and executing her advances the game more than backing off now.

Appear hesitant about executing Alice to seem thoughtful and good. Plant the seed that first-night information needs to be compared before voting, setting up my Investigator counter-claim later.

Push for the fourth vote on the most suspicious mechanical contradiction. As Undertaker, any execution today is valuable, and Alice is the best available target.

Pressure the living to own this vote while conserving my single dead vote for a tighter spot, and keep attention on mechanical contradictions and hidden claims.

Keeping Alice alive allows Heidi's Investigator counter-claim to create maximum chaos and confusion. Executing her now wastes the opportunity for a dramatic confrontation between two 'Investigators' that would fracture the good team.

I want Bob or Heidi to cast the fourth vote. Alice is still the best mechanical execution today, and if we pass now we lose both tempo and a useful info point.

I cannot vote unless Heidi does, so I should pressure the undecided players to either make this four or clearly commit to a better alternative.

I need to redirect from a bad execute onto the player most aggressively forcing it and create a useful comparison for town before night.

Stop a bad execution on me and refocus the group on Alice as the stronger mechanical suspect while preserving my Undertaker value for tonight.

I nominated David as the best available alternative to my own execution. Raising my hand is consistent and may either execute a suspect or reveal where support actually lies.

Do not help execute David on a weaker case than Alice. Preserve my vote and signal that this counterwagon does not currently help good.

I need to weigh whether executing the Undertaker is worth losing potential misinformation opportunities versus keeping good focused on the wrong target. Let me see how voting develops first.

I want to stop a weak execution on David and preserve my ghost vote while steering living players toward better logic.

I should not vote for David yet. Heidi my minion is playing undecided, and I don't want to look coordinated with her. David being eliminated helps me but I need to be careful about appearances.

Keep Bob and Heidi off a low-value execution. David is not the best kill today, and preserving an Undertaker claim is better for good than a retaliatory vote.

Steer Bob and Heidi off a low-value retaliation execute and preserve the Undertaker claim for one more day, which is best for good in most worlds.

Do not support my own execution. The room already seems against this nomination, so waiting preserves credibility and keeps focus on stronger executions next tick or tomorrow.

Retract from a weak execution that is not gaining support, preserve credibility, and keep focus on sorting the mechanical contradiction with better context tomorrow.

Discourage Bob and Heidi from adding votes to a weak retaliation execution and preserve a likely useful Undertaker claim.

Wait to see vote count outcome before revealing position. Keeping vote off maintains undecided cover while letting others guide the execution decision.

Keep my ghost vote for a later, higher-confidence execution and avoid helping a weak retaliation nomination on a useful claim.

The vote is at 1 out of 4 needed. Good players are advising against this execute. Voting now would be suspicious and could backfire. Better to stay neutral and build trust with the group consensus against this execution.

Do not support a weak retaliation execution on a useful Undertaker claim. Preserve flexibility and avoid helping evil force through a bad kill.

I have already signaled I am off this vote, and as Butler I should not create confusion. Waiting helps keep David below four and preserves stronger executions for later.

Use the final moments to steer the group away from a low-value execution and preserve my Undertaker ability for a more informative day three.

Use the last moments to discourage a lazy re-push on me and demand clearer claim comparison from the cautious players tomorrow.

Steer town away from a bad late execution and force Bob and Heidi to commit to reads we can use tomorrow.

Position myself as cooperative and aligned with town's desire to carry claims to tomorrow. Promise specific first-night information to build credibility for my upcoming Investigator bluff and deflect current suspicion.

Use my dead voice to focus tomorrow's agenda on the unresolved holdouts and preserve a disciplined no-execution today rather than a rushed mistake.

Address the mounting pressure on me by providing a clear role claim and explaining my silence, while setting up a believable story that aligns with Heidi's planned reveal tomorrow.

Bob just gave a mechanically impossible Ravenkeeper story. I should flag it now so town does not miss the best new lead before night.

Bob's claim created the clearest fresh mechanical contradiction. A nomination either executes a likely evil bluff or forces the town to publicly sort him now instead of drifting.

I cannot vote for myself and need to see how the vote plays out. If executed, Heidi becomes Imp which could be strategically valuable.

Bob just made the strongest mechanical error on the board. Voting secures an execution and gives me Undertaker information, which is better than ending the day with no kill.

Bob just made the clearest impossible public claim. Voting helps test the strongest current suspect and shifts town away from treating my odd start as a complete solve.

Bob just made the clearest mechanical error on the board. With little time left, I should support this execution rather than allow another no-kill day.

Must not vote for my Demon Bob. Keeping execution below 4 votes is critical for evil's survival. Waiting maintains my uncertainty cover.

Bob's public Ravenkeeper explanation does not fit the role and conflicts with what he told me earlier. I am dead with no active power left, so spending my ghost vote to secure this execution is worth it.

Bob just gave the strongest mechanical contradiction on the board. Voting secures a useful execution and prevents another no-kill day with the same unresolved claim mess.

I should not vote because my Butler master Heidi is not voting. The nomination already has enough hands, so waiting avoids an illegal or confusing action.

I claimed Ravenkeeper wrong and am about to be executed. I need to shift to a Slayer bluff and create confusion to survive.

Use Bob's contradictory claims to keep the vote on him and push for a clean execution that I can verify tonight as Undertaker.

Lock town onto the clearest contradiction so Bob stays on the block and we do not drift into no execution after a stronger mechanical catch.

Reinforce the current majority on Bob and discourage last-second wavering. His claim swap is the strongest mechanical problem on the board right now.

Protect Bob by not adding my vote to the execution, even though he likely has enough votes. As evil Minion, never vote for your Demon unless there's a mechanic to save the game.

Confirm that Bob's Slayer claim is false because I am the real Slayer, and encourage town to keep this execution rather than back off.

Lock in the clearest execution and push any wavering players to keep their votes on Bob rather than letting a blatant panic bluff survive.

Push the town to keep the vote on Bob, and specifically nudge Heidi since my Butler vote depends on my master voting too.

I am completely cornered. My Slayer bluff is exposed by Charlie's ghost. Using fake_slayer_shot is a Hail Mary to at least look like I'm using an ability, but it won't save me. I'll target David since he's been actively pushing for my execution and might make me look slightly less suspicious if I 'shoot' the person trying to kill me, though I'm almost certainly going to die here.

Use the last moment to keep the block on Bob and discourage any rival nomination, because Bob is the clearest execution and my night info can help solve tomorrow.

Lock in Bob's execution and discourage any last-second counter nomination that could save a likely evil player.

Reinforce keeping Bob on the block and discourage any last second counter nomination that could rescue him before night.

Bob will be executed and I cannot nominate to save him. I should wait to see if anyone else creates an opening for disruption, or prepare for post-execution chaos.

I cannot vote or nominate, so the best help is to stop any last-second derail and lock in the strongest execution while setting up tomorrow's demands.

Reinforce that nobody should start a last second counter nomination and set up the next day's information priorities.

Reinforce that nobody should disturb the current block and set clear priorities for tomorrow's information.