Game Detail
Players
Token Usage
| Team | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Cost (USD) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Good | 534,723 | 49,826 | $1.6333 |
| Evil | 192,641 | 12,852 | $0.0450 |
Event Transcript
π
The game has started.
π
Storyteller
β
Alice
You are the Minion. The Demon is Eve.
π
Storyteller
β
Eve
Minions are: Alice. Your safe bluffs are: Librarian, Investigator, Virgin
π
Storyteller
β
David
Good evening David. You are the Washerwoman. Either Charlie or Grace is the Slayer.
π
Storyteller
β
Charlie
Good evening Charlie. You are the Empath. You sense that 0 of your neighbors is evil!
π
Storyteller
β
Bob
Good evening Bob. You are the Fortune Teller. Choose 2 players to learn if either is a Demon.
π―
Bob
Bob made choices.
π§
Night 0 I want a wide net on two socially likely-to-be-central candidates; an early YES gives a strong lead to refine with follow-up pings, while a NO clears two seats.
π
Storyteller
β
Bob
You chose Alice and David. You receive the answer: YES.
Day 1
π
Storyteller
Welcome to the village of Ravenswood Bluff. Please take this time to get to know your fellow villagers. Feel free to move around and have private conversations. Be wary, for a Demon hides among you!
π€
Eve
β
Alice
Alice, Eve here (Imp). You're my minion - great N0 info. Safe bluffs: Lib, Inv, Virgin. I'll claim Librarian soon: say 1 of David/Frank is Recluse (or 0). Support me? Who to kill N1 (info roles)? Plan noms? Stay evil.
π§
Contact minion Alice privately to coordinate bluffs/claims (me Librarian), share safe bluffs, plan kills/nominations. Builds evil trust, sets deception early while town chats.
π€
Grace
β
Frank
,Heidi
,Bob
Heyβquick D1 sync. What role are you claiming / what info did you get? Iβm trying to map possible worlds early; happy to keep it private for now.
π§
Use day-1 whispers to lock in early role claims and night-1 info sources, enabling later mechanical checks and an informed Slayer shot without outing myself.
π€
Charlie
β
Bob
,David
HeyβI'm Charlie, Empath. N0 read was 0 on my neighbors (you two), so if I'm sober youβre both good. What are you planning to claim? Any starting info? Letβs coordinate so we donβt execute into a Saint etc.
π§
Create a trusted pocket (if sober) and quickly cross-check claims to detect poisoning/outsider math issues and narrow demon candidates before nominations.
π€
Frank
β
Grace
Keeping it private for now: Iβm going to soft-claim SOLDIER (no starting info). Mostly trying to stay low and watch claims/outsider count. What are you/Heidi/Bob claiming so far?
π§
Respond to Graceβs D1 sync, build trust channel, but protect my Mayor identity and keep options open for later mechanical endgame play.
π€
Heidi
β
Grace
,Frank
,Bob
Keeping this private: Iβm Monk (no D1 info). Iβd like to coordinate N1 protect once we hear who has actionable info (FT/Empath/Investigator/etc). What are you each claiming / what did you get?
π§
Respond politely to the D1 sync, create a small trusted pocket, and set up N1 protection planning while minimizing risk if the whisper chain contains evil.
π€
David
β
Charlie
,Bob
Iβm Washerwoman: N0 I learned either Charlie or Grace is the *Slayer*. If youβre really Empath, that implies you might be the Slayer and are bluffing Empath, or I could be drunk/poisoned. Bobβwhat are you claiming? Any outsider info out there yet?
π§
Share my Washerwoman info privately to build a trusted chain with Charlie/Bob, and probe for corroborating claims/outsider count so we can plan safe Day1 nominations.
π€
Bob
β
Charlie
,David
,Heidi
Private: Iβm Fortune Teller. N0 pick Alice+David -> YES (either demon OR my red herring involved). Charlie, if your Empath 0 is sober, that points away from David being demon -> either Alice is demon or Alice is my red herring. Heidi, consider protecting me or Charlie N1; Iβm likely a night target if this leaks.
π§
Privately share my FT hit and align with Charlie/Heidi on protection + info flow, while keeping public exposure low until we have corroboration.
π€
Alice
β
Eve
Got it, Eve - Scarlet Woman here. Yes, support Lib claim 100%. I'll claim Investigator soon: say 1 of Grace/Heidi is Spy (or 0). N1 kill info role like Empath if claimed, suggest Bob (in chats). Noms: push weak claims first. Stay silent till claims start. Thoughts?
π§
Coordinate with Eve on bluffs/kill/noms privately first to align evil team, claim Lib soon publicly to support her and confuse Outsider count.
π€
Eve
β
Alice
Perfect plan Alice. I'll claim Lib publicly next tick: \"Librarian here, 1 of David/Frank is Recluse (or 0).\" You claim Inv after: \"Investigator, 1 of Grace/Heidi is Spy (or 0).\" Confirm/support each other. Publicly silent till then. N1: kill Bob (group hub). Thoughts on Grace group?"
π§
Coordinate exact claim timing/text with Alice to make bluffs consistent/supporting, sow early chaos before good team solidifies. Hide as Lib bluff.
π€
Heidi
β
Bob
,Grace
Got it. Iβm Monk; I can protect N1. Need Charlieβs exact Empath result + neighbors to interpret your Alice+David YES. For now, plan: I protect you N1 unless we think Charlie is higher value. Keep FT quiet; Iβll stay low-profile publicly.
π§
Coordinate privately so we protect the likely info targets N1 and verify FT/Empath chains before noms. Ask for Charlie details; keep my Monk role in small circle.
β
Alice
Alice waits.
π§
Stay silent publicly as planned with Eve. Wait for her Lib claim next tick, then I claim Inv to support/coordinate bluffs, sow chaos with Minion/Outsider claims while protecting Eve.
π€
David
β
Grace
Hey GraceβI'm David. Private: Iβm Washerwoman; N0 I learned either *you* or Charlie is the Slayer. What are you planning to claim publicly? Also: any outsider count/starting info youβve heard?
π§
Get Graceβs claim to resolve my Washerwoman info and decide whether/when to out it publicly; also coordinate around Bob FT likely being targeted.
π€
Charlie
β
Grace
,Heidi
FYI Iβm Empath; N0 read 0 on my neighbors (Bob+David) so if sober theyβre good. David says Washerwoman ping: either *me or you* is Slayer. Are you claiming Slayer? Also whatβs your role/starting info? Heidiβif youβre Monk/able, consider protecting Bob (FT) or me N1.
π§
Sync with Grace/Heidi, verify Davidβs Washerwoman βCharlie or Grace is Slayerβ, and line up N1 protection + Day1 social plan without outing Bob too loudly.
π€
Bob
β
Grace
Private sync: Iβm FT. N0 I checked Alice+David -> YES (demon or my red herring). Charlie told me Empath N0=0 on neighbors (me+David), so if sober that points away from David -> Alice or RH. What are you claiming / any starting info?
π§
Sync privately with Grace to build a consistent info web, while limiting public exposure of my FT so I survive to get more pings.
π€
Grace
β
Bob
,Charlie
,David
Iβm the Slayer (so Davidβs WW ping fits). Iβd rather NOT shoot D1 unless we get near-certainty. Current leading world if all sober: Alice likely Demon (FT YES on A+D; Empath0 clears B+D). Letβs see more claims/outsider count + Bobβs N1 check before committing.
π§
Confirm I am the real Slayer per Washerwoman ping, coordinate claim strategy, and avoid an early low-odds shot; align our info so we can execute/shoot with higher confidence.
π€
Frank
β
Grace
,Heidi
,Bob
Still keeping it tight: Iβm sticking with a SOLDIER soft-claim (no info). Heidiβagree: N1 protect whoever has actionable info (FT/Empath/Investigator). Can each of you send me your exact claim + any starting info/outsider count pings youβve heard?
π§
Coordinate with Heidiβs Monk for N1 protection priority, collect exact claims/info from this mini-circle, and keep my real Mayor role hidden until later.
π€
Charlie
β
Bob
,Grace
Plan for public: Iβll say Empath N0=0 on neighbors (you+David) => tentative clear, no more. Donβt mention WW/Slayer link. Bob: tonight try include Alice again w/ someone not-David to sort demon vs red herring. Grace: keep shot holstered unless we get near-lock.
π§
Coordinate a safe public info release: I can lightly clear Bob+David from my read without outing Slayer; encourage Bob to test Alice next and keep Slayer shot in pocket.
π€
David
β
Eve
Private check-in: any starting info/role youβre planning to claim? Heard any Outsider claims yet (Butler/Saint/Recluse/Drunk)? I have some early info that may implicate Alice in one world, but want outsider count/other first-nighters before pushing.
π§
Probe for role/outsider info and see if Eve has claims that fit/contradict the emerging Alice-sus world, without publicly painting a target too early.
π€
Frank
β
Grace
,Heidi
,Bob
Quick sync: please send (1) your exact role claim, (2) any N0 info (WW/Librarian/Investigator/Chef), (3) any outsider count expectations youβve heard. Also, if someone is FT/Empath/Investigator, flag so Monk can protect them N1.
π§
Lock in a small trust circle, gather exact claims/start info, and decide who Heidi should protect N1. Avoid revealing Mayor yet; keep my soft-claim consistent.
π€
Heidi
β
Charlie
,Frank
,Grace
Iβm NOT Slayerβreal role Monk (no N0 info). If Davidβs WW claim is true, it points to you as Slayer (or David lying/poisoned). For N1 Iβm leaning protect Bob (FT) unless we decide youβre higher value. Frank: my exact claim = Monk.
π§
Clarify Iβm not Slayer, reinforce info chain, and coordinate N1 protection plan while keeping FT/Empath relatively private to avoid Demon snipes.
π€
Eve
β
Alice
Alice, confirmed: claim Lib next tick publicly (1 of D/F Recluse or 0). You Inv after (G/H Spy or 0), support. N1 kill Bob (chat hub). Grace grp (G/F/H/Bob) heavy chats - threat? Ignore David probe. Thoughts before claims? Stay silent this tick.
π§
Ignore David for now, privately confirm N1 kill Bob (hub) with Alice, assess Grace group threat. Stay silent publicly till next tick claim Lib to sow safe town info/cred.
π€
Bob
β
Frank
Private: Iβm Fortune Teller. N0 checked Alice+David -> YES (either demon among them OR my red herring). Charlie claims Empath N0=0 on me+David, so if sober points away from David -> Alice or RH. Iβll likely recheck Alice tonight w/ someone else.
π§
Frank is coordinating protection/info. Sharing my real role privately builds a trusted core and helps Monk decide protections while keeping FT semi-hidden from evil.
π€
Grace
β
Bob
,Heidi
,Charlie
Coordination: Heidi pls protect Bob N1 (FT is highest value). BobβN1 check Alice+someone NOT David (Frank/Heidi/Eve) to resolve demon vs RH. Charlieβpublic: share Empath0 (neighbors Bob+David) only; keep WW/Slayer link private for now.
π§
Coordinate N1 protection and information-gathering without outing Slayer publicly; set up FT tests to confirm/deny Alice-as-Demon before I commit my once-per-game shot.
π€
Alice
β
Eve
Eve, confirmed & ready. I'll support your Lib claim immediately after with my Inv (1 of G/H Spy or 0), say you confirmed it or something. Grace group (G/F/H/B) is chatty threat - maybe frame as evil later? Public silence this tick. Go time next!
π§
Confirm plan privately with Eve before public claims next tick. Ensures coordination, kills chatty Bob N1, sets up safe bluffs to confuse info roles and protect Eve.
π€
Bob
β
Eve
Private Q: what are you claiming + any N0 info (Chef/Investigator/Librarian/WW etc)? Any outsider-count pings? Trying to map worlds before noms; I can share limited info back.
π§
Gather Eveβs claim/info quietly to cross-check outsider count and possible evil worlds before nominations; keep my FT identity mostly contained.
π€
Frank
β
Heidi
,Grace
,Bob
Sync: Bob says FT N0 Alice+David = YES. Charlie told him Empath N0=0 on (Bob,David) -> if sober, points away from David. Heidi mentioned David WW claim pointing to me as Slayerβcan you send exact WW info + any other N0 claims/outsider count pings? Heidi: pls protect Bob N1 unless better.
π§
Share key cross-info privately, request exact Washerwoman/other starting info, and coordinate Monk protection on Bob FT to preserve our strongest lead while keeping my Mayor identity hidden.
β
Alice
Alice waits.
π§
Wait this tick as planned to stay silent pre-claims. Builds tension, lets Eve claim first publicly next tick. Supports Demon survival by coordinated safe bluffs.
π€
Heidi
β
David
Can you give your *exact* Washerwoman info wording? (Which Townsfolk shown + which 2 players?) Also: are you planning to go public with it today or keep private? Any outsider count pings youβve heard?
π§
Get Davidβs exact Washerwoman info to lock the claim, detect inconsistencies, and decide whether Charlie is actually being hard-pushed into Slayer; improves our worldbuilding before nominations.
π€
Grace
β
Frank
Exact sync: I am REAL Slayer. David privately claims Washerwoman: either me or Charlie is Slayer (fits). No outsider-count pings yet. Plan: Heidi (Monk) protects Bob (FT) N1; Bob will check Alice+someone not-David to resolve demon vs red herring. Iβm holding shot D1.
π§
Keep team coordinated, minimize demon learning Slayer, and set up strong N1 info (Monk protect FT, FT recheck Alice) before using once-per-game shot.
π€
Charlie
β
Grace
,Heidi
,Bob
Noted: Heidi says Monk; also hearing Frank claims Monk. Thatβs a hard conflict (unless someone lying/poisoned). Letβs keep it quiet for now but track. Heidi if youβre Monk, pls state N1 protect target to us after night. Bob N1 check Alice+Frank or Alice+Heidi (not David).
π§
Resolve double Monk claim quietly, coordinate N1 actions (protection + FT check), and flag the conflict for later without exposing the WW/Slayer link publicly yet.
π€
David
β
Heidi
Exact wording: βYou are the Washerwoman. Either Charlie or Grace is the Slayer.β No extra info. Iβm leaning share semi-public today (small circle first), then full public before noms if needed. No Outsider pings heard yet.
π§
Answer Heidi precisely, build trust with a good-seeming hub, and coordinate timing of going public so Demon canβt easily counterplay or snipe the Slayer.
π€
Eve
β
Alice
Confirmed, perfect. Stay silent this tick (networking). I claim Lib pub next tick: \"Librarian, 1 of David/Frank is Recluse (or 0).\" You follow immediately w/ Inv on G/H Spy, say I confirmed or support. Ignore all probes (Bob/David). N1 Bob. Go time soon!
π§
Stay silent this tick as planned. Final whisper to Alice confirms timing/ignore probes, prevents mistakes. Builds trust, preps coordinated bluffs to frame G/H, survive noms.
Nominations β Day 1
π
Storyteller
Nominations are now open.
π¬
Alice
β
All
I'm Librarian! 1 of David or Frank is the Recluse (or neither). Eve, can you confirm this?
π§
Publicly claim as planned: Eve Lib first, then my Inv supporting her, sowing Spy doubt on Grace/Heidi. Builds team cred, disrupts town logic early day1.
π¬
Frank
β
All
Alice: can you give exact Librarian wording (which Outsider, and the 2 names)? For the record, Iβm not claiming RecluseβI'm a Townsfolk with no N0 info. David, whatβs your public claim/WW details? Eve, did you get any start info that corroborates Alice?
π§
Clarify Aliceβs exact Librarian info and get David/Eve to respond, while lightly denying being Recluse without outing Mayor; set up mechanical cross-checks for D1/D2.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
Public: Iβm Heidi, Townsfolk (will out exact later). Can Alice + David both give *exact* starting-info wording? Alice: which Outsider + names? David: WW said βeither X or Y is Slayerβ (confirm). Also: anyone heard Outsider count? Suggest we hold off nominating till we hear Eve/Grace/Bob/Charlie summaries.
π§
Stabilize public info with exact wordings, flag key contradictions (WW, Lib, FT, Empath), and buy time to avoid a D1 mis-execution while we coordinate N1 protection/investigation.
π¬
Grace
β
All
Public: Iβm Grace, Townsfolk (will out exact later). Can Alice & David give *exact* N0 wording (Outsider+2 names; WW role+2 names)? Bob/Charlie please share just your role + N0 result publicly (no extra theory). I prefer no D1 execution until we reconcile these.
π§
Push exact claim wording and minimal public info to set up clean N1 checks and avoid a bad D1 execution while narrowing demon candidates.
π¬
David
β
All
Public: Iβm David, Washerwoman. Exact N0: βYou are the Washerwoman. Either Charlie or Grace is the Slayer.β No extra. Bob/Charlie can you confirm your roles + exact N0 results? Eve/Frank/Heidi any start info? Also: any Outsider claims yet?
π§
Get exact info on record, prompt key start claims, and avoid premature D1 execution while we reconcile outsider/minion/demon worlds.
π¬
Bob
β
All
Public: Iβm Bob, Fortune Teller. Exact N0: chose Alice+David -> YES (either is Demon, or one is my red herring). Iβd prefer no D1 exec; N1 Iβll recheck Alice with someone NOT David to resolve.
π§
Publicly anchor my exact FT info so town can cross-check claims, but avoid pushing a risky D1 execution; set up N1 plan to resolve Alice vs red herring.
π¬
Eve
β
All
Thanks Alice - yes, confirmed! I'm Librarian too? Wait no, I'm Eve, Investigator! Exact N0: 1 of Grace/Heidi is Spy (or neither). Alice's Lib on David/Frank Recluse (or 0) lines up perfectly - I can confirm her info supports mine. David WW (C/G Slayer) conflicts though. Bob FT YES on A/D suspicious. Thoughts?
π§
Claim Lib as planned to establish coordinated evil info roles, support Alice, create conflicts (esp David WW). Stay silent on others' claims to sow doubt, progress to noms on weak links like David/Bob. Protects Demon survival.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
Public: Iβm Charlie, Empath. Exact N0: β0 of your neighbors are evilβ (neighbors Bob+David). So if Iβm sober, Bob+David are good. Noting conflicts: Alice claims Librarian; Eve claims Investigator (not Lib) but said she βconfirmedβ Aliceβhow exactly? Also we have a Monk conflict (Heidi vs Frank). Prefer no D1 exec; let Bob N1 recheck Alice w/ non-David and we track tonight.
π§
Get my mechanical info on record, highlight key claim conflicts (two Librarians, two Monks) and steer town to resolve with targeted N1 actions rather than random D1 execution.
π¬
Grace
β
All
Need clarity before any D1 exec. Eve: you said you βconfirmedβ Aliceβs LibrarianβHOW, given youβre Investigator? Quote your exact Investigator wording (minion+2 names). Also: Frank vs Heidi both hinting Monkβwho is actually Monk? I support no D1 execution; Bob recheck Alice+non-David N1.
π§
Use the last daylight to pin down contradictions (Eveβs βconfirmed Aliceβ, Monk conflict) and align on a no-execution day 1 with clear night actions so we can shoot/execute with higher confidence D2.
π¬
Bob
β
All
Eve, please quote your *exact* Investigator text (which minion, which 2 names, incl βor neitherβ). Also explain how you βconfirmedβ Aliceβs Librarian if youβre not Lib. Separately: Heidi/Frankβare either of you actually claiming Monk? Please be explicit.
π§
Force Eve to give exact Investigator wording + explain βconfirmβ, and surface Monk conflict. Keep town aligned on no D1 exec while setting up N1 checks.
π¬
Alice
β
All
Eve's Investigator perfectly confirms my Lib: her 1 of G/H Spy means Grace group evil, my 1 of D/F Recluse pins it (David/Frank Outsiders). David's WW \"C or G Slayer\" contradicts - if true, Eve wrong, but her Spy lines up too well. Bob, your FT yes on me+David? Eve/Alice both pinged? Prioritize David.
π§
Defend coordinated claims publicly: clarify Eve's 'confirmation' as mutual support from info alignment (G/H Spy + D/F Recluse = Grace grp evil). Attack David WW contradiction to pivot suspicion. Prevent D1 exec on us, buy N1 kill time.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
Eve: please quote your EXACT Investigator text (minion + the 2 names + βor neitherβ). Also explain concretely how that βconfirmsβ Aliceβs Librarianβthose are independent. Alice: your jump to βprioritize Davidβ clashes w/ my Empath0=0 on Bob+David (if Iβm sober).
π§
Force precise wording + reconcile claims; publicly push back on executing my cleared neighbor; keep town aligned on no-exec and high-value N1 actions.
π¬
Eve
β
All
Sorry for confusion - Alice's Lib \"1 of David/Frank is Recluse (or neither)\" + my exact Investigator \"1 of Grace/Heidi is Spy (or neither)\" = confirmation via logic: Grace/Heidi Spy evil explains their heavy group chats (G/F/H/Bob). David's WW \"C or G Slayer\" conflicts (can't be Spy+Slayer). Bob FT yes on A/D is his herring or lie. Nom David to test - his claim breaks ours. Charlie, your Empath0 good but doesn't clear David.
π§
Clarify 'confirmation' as logical overlap (G/H Spy + D/F Recluse pins Grace grp evil via chatty behavior), quote exact info, attack David/Bob claims to push nom David. Disrupt logic chains, protect Demon.
π¬
David
β
All
Eve, your βconfirmationβ is not logicβInvestigator doesnβt verify Librarian. Also Spy can be anyone; βgroup chatsβ is not mech. My WW says C or Grace is Slayer; Grace already privately claimed Slayer. Charlie Empath0 (if sober) clears me. I strongly oppose nominating me D1; let Bob recheck Alice+non-David N1. Heidi/Frank: state roles plainly; any Outsider claim?
π§
Stop a misexec on me D1; force mechanical clarity (exact wordings, outsider count, role conflicts) and set up N1 checks to resolve Alice/Eve/FT tensions.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
Public clarity: I *am* the Monk (not a hint). Frank is not Monk if Iβm alive+truthful. I strongly prefer NO D1 exec: Charlie Empath0 on (Bob,David) + Bob can retest Alice w/ non-David N1. Eve: your βconfirmationβ isnβt mechβplease stop selling it as such. Grace: did you ever claim Slayer to David? yes/no.
π§
Reduce misinfo by nailing down exact claims (Monk conflict, Grace Slayer?), resist premature D1 execution, and set up N1 actions (protect FT, FT retest) to resolve A/D/Eve lines.
π¬
Frank
β
All
Eve: Investigator doesnβt βconfirmβ Librarian; please stop pitching that as mech. Your exact text only says 1 of Grace/Heidi is Spy (or neither). Grace: please answer Heidiβdid you tell David youβre Slayer? If yes, that fits WW. I favor NO D1 exec; Heidi protect Bob; Bob recheck Alice+non-David N1.
π§
Steer town to mechanically-grounded plan: resolve info conflicts (Grace Slayer confirmation, Eve exact text), avoid hasty D1 execute, and set up N1 protection + FT check.
π
Storyteller
No execution today. All villagers are safe.
Night 1
π
Storyteller
β
Heidi
Good evening Heidi. You are the Monk. Who would you like to protect tonight?
π―
Heidi
Heidi made a choice.
π§
Bob is our highest-leverage info role tonight; protecting him preserves a critical N1 Fortune Teller test and discourages Demon from sniping the solver.
π
Storyteller
β
Heidi
You chose to protect Bob.
π
Storyteller
β
Eve
Good evening Eve. You are the Imp. Who would you like to kill tonight? Remember that if you kill yourself this way, a Minion becomes the Imp.
π―
Eve
Eve made a choice.
π§
Kill Charlie: his Empath0 mechanically clears David/Bob/my neighbors, strongest good info vs our G/H evil bluff. Disrupts town coordination, forces re-eval of David/Frank without his clear. Preserves Alice, tests town response.
π
Charlie(Ghost)
Charlie has died.
π
Storyteller
β
Eve
You chose to kill Charlie.
π
Storyteller
β
Bob
Good evening Bob. You are the Fortune Teller. Choose 2 players to learn if either is a Demon.
π―
Bob
Bob made choices.
π§
Recheck Alice with a likely-good (Heidi Monk) to resolve whether the recurring YES points at Alice being Demon vs Alice being my red herring, while avoiding David as planned.
π
Storyteller
β
Bob
You chose Alice and Heidi. You receive the answer: YES.
Day 2
π
Storyteller
Morning breaks, but heavy hearts remain. Charlie has been found dead in the night.
π€
Charlie(Ghost)
β
Bob
,David
FYI: Iβm dead Empath; my only read was N0=0 on (Bob+David) -> if sober, both good. My death N1 could mean demon feared that. Bob: any new FT ping today? David: any more WW detail / whoβs claiming Slayer?
π§
Privately align with my neighbors, anchor them on my only mechanical read, and request their updated info so we can build a coherent world before nominations.
π€
Eve
β
Alice
Hey Alice, glad you're good. My Inv: 1 of G/H Spy or neither. Grace/Heidi chatty group chat fits Spy evil. Your Lib D/F Recluse also points David/Frank evil. Charlie's Empath claim 0 on B/D was BS. Stick to our claims, push David today?
π§
Confirm Alice good privately, share my Inv info to solidify alliance, sow doubt on David/Frank using her Lib read. Coordinate bluffs as evil team to survive.
π€
Grace
β
Bob
,Heidi
,Charlie(Ghost)
Quick updates pls: Bobβwhat was your N1 FT pair/result? Heidiβwho did you protect N1? Charlieβbefore death, any new info/suspicions or did you talk to anyone night/day1 that matters?
π§
Collect N1 mechanical info (FT check, Monk protection, Charlieβs last reads) to decide whether to shoot today or hold for nomination/final 3.
π€
Frank
β
Bob
,Heidi
,Grace
Charlie died N1. Can you share: Bob FT N1 result + exact picks? Heidi who protected N1? Grace any Slayer thoughts/targets? Charlie Empath0 had Bob/David good if sober; his death may be info. Letβs align before noms.
π§
Coordinate with Bob/Heidi/Grace to consolidate N1 actions/results, decide whether to execute today, and set up a mechanically sound suspect list without exposing my Mayor role.
π€
Alice
β
Eve
Yes, glad you're on my side too Eve. Charlie's Empath0 was obvious lie to clear B/D. My Lib: 1 of D/F Recluse or 0 Outsiders. Your Spy on G/H perfect, their group chats scream evil Spy shenanigans. David WW conflicts you + my info. Let's push nominate/execute David today. I'll support you fully.
π§
Reinforce alliance with Eve, confirm claims, plan to nominate/execute David (good) to reduce numbers while keeping Eve safe; advance evil win.
π€
Bob
β
Grace
,Heidi
,Frank
FT here. N0 picked Alice+David => YES. N1 picked Alice+Heidi => YES. So either Alice/Heidi is Demon OR one is my red herring. Heidi: who did you protect N1? Grace: are you claiming Slayer (WW ping)? Frank: any Outsider claim/your read on Alice Lib info?
π§
Share exact FT data to align town before noms, and solicit Heidiβs N1 protection + Graceβs Slayer claim to resolve Alice vs Heidi as Demon/red herring.
π€
David
β
Bob
,Grace
Iβm WW: N0 said 1 of (Charlie/Grace) is Slayer. With Charlie dead Empath, I lean Grace=real Slayer (unless poison/drunk). Bob: whatβs your N1 FT result + picks? Grace: still claiming Slayerβany plan/targets today?
π§
Get fresh mechanical info (Bob N1 FT, Grace willingness/targets for Slayer) and coordinate a safe plan for nominations while leveraging my Washerwoman ping.
π€
Heidi
β
Bob
,Grace
,Frank
I protected Bob N1 (as planned). Bob: if youβre sober, your YES on (Alice+Heidi) points at Alice or me/red herringβtry N2 pair Heidi+someone-not-Alice to test. Grace/Frank: any hard info on Outsider/Monk claims? Iβm real Monk; whoβs claiming Recluse/Butler/Saint?
π§
Clarify my N1 protection and push for mechanical cross-checks on FT/Investigator claims to avoid a mis-execution; coordinate targets before nominations.
π€
Charlie(Ghost)
β
Grace
,Bob
,Heidi
To Grace Q: no new info after N0; only Empath N0=0 on (Bob+David). Sus: if Iβm sober, Bob+David both likely good. Key knots: Bob FT N0 Alice+David=YES; Alice Lib says 1 of David/Frank Recluse/0; Eve Inv says 1 of Grace/Heidi Spy/0 (not a confirm). Also Monk double-claim Heidi vs Frankβworth pressure/exec. If WW true, Grace likely Slayer (not me). Who did Heidi protect N1, and Bob what was N1 FT+result?
π§
Answer Grace, align on mechanical priorities: treat Bob+David as low-suspect unless poison evidence; push to reconcile FT/Lib/Monk conflict and plan nominations before phase ends.
π€
Alice
β
Eve
Perfect, Eve. Charlie ghost whispering their group shows desperation. David WW Slayer on C/G impossible since Charlie dead N1 not exec. My Lib hard conflicts his claim too. I'll pub push nom David this phase. You nominate if possible? United front wins it.
π§
Reinforce Eve alliance privately, confirm push David publicly next tick. Day2 nom phase soon, seed David exec to town via Eve proxy, sow chaos on David WW claim.
π€
Eve
β
Alice
Perfect plan Alice. I'll support your pub push on David. His WW Slayer C/G impossible since Charlie died at night not exec. Conflicts us both + logic. Nom him next tick if you don't. United we win today!
π§
Confirm coord with Alice, push her to nom David publicly next tick. Solidify alliance, sow chaos by targeting David claim conflict to execute him if possible.
π€
Grace
β
Bob
,Heidi
,David
Iβm real Slayer (per WW). Bob: your double-YES w/ Alice is huge but RH risk. Heidi: I lean youβre real Monk. David: agree. Plan: hard-press Alice for exact Lib wording + any Outsider claims; press Eve that Inv doesnβt βconfirmβ. If no better lead by noms, Iβm considering Slayer-shotting Aliceβtalk me out of it w/ logic.
π§
Coordinate with trusted info roles to interrogate Alice/Eve and decide whether my Slayer shot has a high enough hit rate before nominations.
π€
Frank
β
Alice
,Eve
Can you share exactly what youβve each said/learned (exact N0 wordings) + why youβre on David? Bob FT has YES on (Alice+David) and (Alice+Heidi). Charlie Empath0 suggests Bob+David good if sober. Any Outsider claims yet?
π§
Get Alice/Eveβs exact claims + reasoning and de-escalate David tunnel; align town on what to test before nominations, using FT patterns and Charlieβs empath0 as anchor.
π€
David
β
Grace
,Bob
,Heidi
Iβd pause on Slayer-shotting Alice until we hear Bobβs exact N1 FT picks/result. If Bob can re-test Alice w/out you, thatβs stronger than burning Slayer. Also Heidi: who did you Monk N1? (if you can share) That may explain Charlie death / narrow demon.
π§
Prevent premature Slayer shot; obtain Bobβs N1 FT picks/result and align on best nomination/shot plan based on mechanics.
π€
Heidi
β
Grace
,Bob
,Frank
Strongly advise NOT Slayer-shotting Alice yet: FT has RH risk/poison risk. Better: Bob N2 test Alice with 2 players NOT involving Heidi (e.g., Alice+Frank; Alice+Grace) + also a control pair w/out Alice. Iβll protect Bob again tonight unless a better target. Frank: do you claim Monk/Outsider? Any Outsider claims at all?
π§
Prevent wasting Slayer shot; coordinate next tests and protection; surface role/outsider/Monk conflicts to narrow demon before nominations.
π€
Bob
β
Grace
,Heidi
,David
I agree: donβt burn Slayer yet. My data: YES on (Alice+David) + (Alice+Heidi). Could be Alice demon, Heidi demon, or Alice RH. Letβs press Alice for exact Lib wording + whether she got β0 outsβ option. Also ask Eve to restate Inv exactly. For noms: Iβd prefer pressure/exec Alice or Heidi (Monk claim) unless better mech. Tonight Iβll FT test pairs w/out Alice to find true hit.
π§
Coordinate: stop premature Slayer shot, extract exact claims, set up logical nomination plan and my N2 test targets.
π€
Alice
β
Eve
Eve, ready? This tick (last before nom phase), I'll pub say: \"David's WW Slayer C/G impossible - Charlie died N1 night, not exec. Conflicts my Lib D/F Recluse & your Inv perfectly. Everyone, nominate David now to win!\" Support? Frank probing us - don't reply him, he's fishing for contradictions to save David.
π§
Publicly push nom/execute David this tick to progress to Nomination phase, unite with Eve visibly, counter Frank probe by ignoring him. Protects Eve, builds our credibility, executes threat.
π€
Charlie(Ghost)
β
Grace
,Alice
,Eve
Can we get N1/N2 results stated plainly before noms? Reminder: Eve Inv β1 of Grace/Heidi is Spy/0β does NOT mechanically confirm Alice Lib. Key tension is Frank vs Heidi Monk double-claimβworth pressing/exec today. Also Bob FT N0 Alice+David=YES; need his N1 pair+result.
π§
Get key claims/results out before nominations; stop faulty βconfirmβ arguments; focus town on the Monk double-claim and Fortune Teller info to form a coherent execution plan.
π€
Eve
β
Alice
Yes Alice, perfect pub script - support 100%. David's WW Slayer C/G impossible (Charlie N1 nightkill). Conflicts your Lib D/F & my Inv G/H Spy perfectly. Bob FT yes A/D dubious vs logic. Ignore Frank/Charlie fishing. Nom David next phase - I'll back you!"
π§
Coordinate final push on David pre-nom phase. Ignore Frank/Charlie probes to avoid contradictions. Alice minion synergy executes threat David, keeps me safe.
π€
Bob
β
Alice
,Eve
,Frank
Need exact phrasing of your info please (public recap soon). Alice: Lib: was it β1 of David/Frank is Recluseβ OR βDavid/Frank is Recluse (or 0)β etc? Eve: Inv exact pair+minion? Frank: do you claim any role/Outsider/Monk? Any Outsider claims heard?
π§
Lock down exact starting-info wording from Alice/Eve and get Frankβs status; tighten worlds before nominations and decide whether to execute Alice/Heidi or wait for more tests.
π€
Heidi
β
Grace
,Bob
,Frank
Agree: donβt Slayer-shot Alice yet. Letβs get exact Alice Lib + Eve Inv phrasing publicly. Bob: tonight run 1 test pair w/ Alice+X and 1 control w/out Alice. Frank: please state clearlyβare you Monk or any Outsider? Any Outsider claims exist?
π§
Coordinate town to not waste Slayer, pressure for exact statements, and clarify Frankβs Monk/Outsider status to resolve claim conflicts before nominations.
π€
Grace
β
Alice
,Eve
,Frank
Before noms, can you 3 please state PUBLICLY (verbatim if possible): Aliceβexact Librarian N0 incl β0 Outsidersβ option + which Outsider named; Eveβexact Investigator N0 incl minion named + βor 0β wording; Frankβdid you ever claim Monk? what role/any Outsider claim?
π§
Get exact mechanical wording + role claims into public thread before noms, to resolve contradictions and decide whether to spend Slayer shot today.
π€
Frank
β
Bob
,Heidi
,Grace
Answering: I have NOT claimed Monk and Iβm not an Outsider. Iβm actually the Mayor (please keep in this small circle for now). Agree: no Slayer shot yet; push for Alice+Eve to give exact Lib/Inv phrasing publicly + Bob run 1 Alice-pair and 1 control tonight.
π§
Clarify my claim (not Monk/Outsider), keep Mayor mostly within trusted circle, and steer group to demand exact wordings + avoid premature Slayer shot before nomination phase.
π€
David
β
Alice
,Eve
Need exact wording of your N0 info pls. Alice: Lib: was it β1 of David/Frank is Recluseβ or βeither 0 or 1 of them is Recluseβ? Any outsider claims today? Eve: Investigatorβexactly what were you shown (role + two names + βor neitherβ?)
π§
Get precise mechanical wording from Alice/Eve to test consistency vs role list/outsider count; this can create hard contradictions before nominations and avoid wasting Slayer shot.
π€
Charlie(Ghost)
β
Grace
,Bob
,Alice
Noms soonβpls state plainly in town square: Bob FT N1 pair+result (and today if any), plus whoβs the red herring suspect; Grace/Heidi/Frank: resolve Monk double-claim w/ exact N1 protect. Iβll spend ghost vote only if weβre executing best suspect.
π§
With noms imminent, force crisp public N1 info, resolve Monk double-claim, and steer town toward a high-value execution while conserving my ghost vote.
π€
Alice
β
Eve
Eve quick update: Everyone probing exact wording to catch slip before noms. Don't give - stick script. This tick I'll pub: \"David WW claims N0 either Charlie/Grace is Slayer. Impossible! Charlie died N1 nightkill, not execution. Conflicts my Lib (1 of D/F Recluse or 0) & Eve Inv perfectly. Everyone, nominate David next phase to win today!\" You second? Then we nom/execute him."
π§
Pub push nom David this tick (pre-nom phase) executes good player, breaks town logic chains relying on David WW/Charlie Empath0. Eve backs fully; united evil front wins day.
π€
David
β
Bob
,Grace
,Heidi
Letβs not burn Slayer today. Priority: get Heidi to state Monk N1 target (priv or pub) + any reason. Then in town square press Alice for exact Lib wording (incl βor 0β) + ask Eve to restate Inv precisely. If still murky, I lean nom/exec Alice first (2 FT YESs) unless Heidi info hard-points elsewhere.
π§
Coordinate with core trust group to avoid premature Slayer shot, extract Heidiβs N1 protection, and set a clear nomination plan (likely Alice vs Heidi) based on updated mechanical consistency.
π€
Frank
β
Bob
,Heidi
,Grace
Update: Iβm Mayor (keep tight). Charlie N1 death makes Alice/Heidi FT YES line urgent. Letβs demand Alice+Eve verbatim Lib/Inv publicly before noms. If their wording shaky, consider executing Alice today; otherwise no-exe + Bob run 1 Alice+X and 1 control w/out Alice N2. Also track Outsider claims (none yet).
π§
Coordinate our trusted trio, set an immediate public agenda (exact Lib/Inv wordings), and decide whether to push execution on Alice vs delay for N2 FT control while keeping my Mayor role protected.
π€
Heidi
β
Bob
,Grace
,Frank
Plan for square before noms: demand Alice + Eve give EXACT N0 wording incl βor 0β options. Bob share N0/N1 pairs+results succinctly + announce tonight youβll do 1 Alice+X and 1 control w/out Alice. Iβll say I Monked Bob N1. Also: keep Frank=Mayor tight. I can Monk Bob again N2 unless we think demon targets Mayor.
π§
Coordinate our small trust circle: force verbatim public info (Lib/Inv/FT), avoid wasting Slayer, decide best execution target, and plan Monk protection (likely Bob or Mayor) to keep info flowing.
π€
Eve
β
Alice
Perfect Alice, execute your pub script verbatim this tick! I'll pub support next tick: \"Alice spot-on! David's WW impossible + conflicts our info perfectly. Everyone nom David next phase to win!\" Then I nom him. If probed exact wording, say 'as I said pub before'. United we crush David!"},"
π§
Coordinate with Alice to execute script: she pubs David contradiction + nom call, I support publicly next tick then nom David. Disrupt probes by sticking firm, build town momentum to execute Demon David.
π€
Grace
β
Bob
,Heidi
,Frank
Before noms: letβs all push for Alice+Eve VERBATIM N0 wording in square. If either hedges/changes, Iβm leaning exec Alice (2 FT YES) over no-exe. Heidi: consider Monk on Bob again unless you think demon targets Mayor/info. I wonβt Slayer-shot yet unless weβre at 3 alive.
π§
Align our small circle on a clean pre-noms script, decide when to exec vs no-exe, and ensure Monk protection targets the most valuable info-holder/Mayor without outing Mayor.
π€
Bob
β
Alice
,Eve
,David
Before noms, please state in town square your N0 info VERBATIM incl any βor 0β clause & exact pair/role. Iβll also restate my FT pings. David, please ask them publicly if neededβlocking wording is crucial.
π§
Get Alice/Eve on-record with verbatim N0 info before nominations; inconsistencies often expose evil and decide whether to execute Alice/Heidi or hold for another FT night.
Nominations β Day 2
π
Storyteller
Nominations are now open. Please remember that only living players may nominate.
π¬
Alice
β
All
David WW claims N0 either Charlie/Grace is Slayer. Impossible! Charlie died N1 nightkill, not execution. Conflicts my Lib (1 of D/F Recluse or 0) & Eve Inv perfectly. Everyone, nominate David next phase to win today!
π§
Pub exact script to expose David's impossible WW claim (Charlie N1 nightkill blocks Slayer reveal), reinforce our info conflicts, rally town to nom David next tick. Eve backs next, we execute Demon & I ascend.
π¬
Bob
β
All
Alice: David WW is NOT βimpossibleβ. WW points to a Townsfolk; it said 1 of (Charlie/Grace) is SlayerβCharlie can still be Empath. Also Charlie Empath N0=0 on (Bob,David) suggests David not evil. My FT: (Alice+David)=YES, (Alice+Heidi)=YES. Alice+Eve please give VERBATIM N0 wording incl βor 0β now.
π§
Stop a mis-execution on David, re-anchor town on mechanical facts (Empath0 + FT hits), and force Alice/Eve to lock exact info before any nomination.
π¬
Frank
β
All
Hold. Before any nomination: Alice + Eve, give VERBATIM N0 info incl the βor 0β clause. David, restate your WW wording exactly. Right now David isnβt mechanically βimpossibleββCharlie dying at night doesnβt refute WW. Letβs lock text first, then decide exec vs no-exe + Bob runs 1 Alice-pair and 1 control tonight.
π§
Slow an impulsive David execution; force exact N0 wordings to catch lies/poisoning, and set up best N2 tests. Keep my Mayor identity hidden while steering toward no-exe unless we have clean, consistent info.
π¬
Grace
β
All
Town square: AliceβWW is NOT βimpossibleβ; Charlie dying N1 doesnβt refute WW. Before noms: Alice+Eve please give your N0 info VERBATIM incl any βor 0β clause + named role. David restate WW exactly. Heidi confirm Monk N1 target (Bob). Then we decide exec (likely Alice vs no-exec).
π§
Drive town to lock exact N0 info and stop Aliceβs incorrect βimpossibleβ claim; set up best D2 execution target (likely Alice) while keeping my Slayer shot for endgame certainty.
π¬
Charlie(Ghost)
β
All
Town: AliceβWW not βimpossibleβ; WW just says 1 of (Charlie/Grace) is Slayer (I can be Empath + die at night). Before any nom, please ALL give verbatim N0 (Alice Lib, Eve Inv, David WW) incl any βor 0β. Heidi+Frank: Monk N1 target(s) & why. My ghost vote only on best-lying suspect (currently Alice > Monk CC).
π§
Correct the mechanical misunderstanding, force exact N0 wordings to catch liars, and steer town toward executing the most inconsistent player while conserving my ghost vote for a high-confidence kill.
βοΈ
Eve
β
David
David's WW claim N0 1 of C/G Slayer impossible: Charlie died N1 nightkill (Imp), not execution. Conflicts my Inv (1 of G/H Spy or 0) & Alice Lib (1 of D/F Recluse or 0) perfectly. Execute Demon to win today!
π§
1 tick left, must nom David now per plan with Alice to force execution this day before night. David's claim provably impossible (night death != exec-able Slayer), kills good logic chains pushing no-exec/info delay. Secures Demon death.
π
Storyteller
Voting starts now for David. 4 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
π¬
Bob
β
All
I am NOT voting David. Charlieβs Empath N0=0 on (Bob,David) strongly suggests David isnβt evil. My FT hit YES on (Alice+David) and (Alice+Heidi) β that points to Alice/Heidi (or Alice as my red herring), not David. Donβt waste D2 exec here.
π§
Stop an execution on a likely-good player (cleared by Empath0) and steer town toward Alice/Heidi/Eve as the mechanically implicated seats.
π¬
David
β
All
Do NOT vote me. WW isnβt βimpossibleβ: it said 1 of (Charlie/Grace) is SlayerβCharlie can be Empath and die at night. Charlieβs Empath N0=0 on (Bob,David) also supports Iβm good. Letβs get VERBATIM Lib/Inv/Monk + focus Alice/Heidi.
π§
Stop a misexecution based on incorrect logic; keep town focused on verbatim info + stronger suspects (Alice/Heidi) and preserve todayβs execution for real evil.
β
Alice
Alice raised their hand
π§
Fake good team player pushing David per Eve/Alice script. Vote yes to build credibility, pressure others to vote (Grace/Frank/Heidi), potentially execute good David weakening town. Protects real Demon Eve.
π¬
Charlie(Ghost)
β
All
Iβm NOT spending my ghost vote on David. Empath N0=0 on (Bob,David) + WW not βimpossibleβ => this is a bad exec. Save the day or pivot to best liar: Aliceβs βimpossibleβ push / Heidi in FT pings / Monk CC details.
π§
Stop a likely wrong execution on David and refocus town on the real inconsistencies (Alice/Heidi + Monk CC) using my only ghost vote later.
π¬
Grace
β
All
Donβt vote DavidβWW isnβt impossible, and Charlieβs Empath N0=0 strongly clears Bob+David. After vote: Alice+Eve give VERBATIM Lib/Inv (incl βor 0β), Heidi confirm Monk N1 target. Then we consider exec Alice/Heidi.
π§
Stop a likely wrong execution on David; redirect town to demand exact N0 wordings and focus suspects from FT (Alice/Heidi) rather than Empath-cleared David.
π¬
Frank
β
All
Not voting David. WW not βimpossibleβ + Charlie Empath0 points away from David. Save votes. After this, I want VERBATIM from Alice (Lib), Eve (Inv), Heidi (Monk target N1), and Bobβs planned N2 tests.
π§
Prevent a bad D2 execution on a player mechanically leaning good; keep town focused on Alice/Heidi/Eve via verbatim claims + FT tests.
β
Eve
Eve raised their hand
π§
Raise hand to vote execute David, selling our coordinated Lib/Inv push. Even if fails, builds pressure/credibility for future framing; protects me as Demon.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
Not voting David. WW isnβt impossible, and Charlie Empath N0=0 (Bob+David) makes this a likely good kill. For the record: Iβm Monk, N1 I protected Bob (as pre-stated). After this vote: Alice+Eve please give VERBATIM N0 incl any βor 0β.
π§
Prevent a bad D2 execution on a likely-good David, lock in public verbatim info for later mechanical contradictions, and keep our info players alive by clarifying my Monk protection.
β
Grace
Grace waits.
π§
Avoid a likely mis-execution on David; conserve my influence for pivot execution (Alice/Heidi/Eve) once wording clarifies, keeping Slayer shot for endgame.
β©οΈ
Alice
Alice lowered their hand
π§
Lower to prevent accidental David exec (not Demon). Fail vote safely with 7 alive, force town waste day on info demands, pivot suspicion to Alice/Eve later.
π¬
Charlie(Ghost)
β
All
Iβm not using my ghost vote here. If David goes today and flips good, weβre miles behind. After this vote: VERBATIM Lib/Inv (incl any βor 0β), and both Monk claimants give full N1/N2 targets + reasons. Then we pick best liar (my lean: Alice/Heidi).
π§
Prevent a low-info execution on a likely-good player and steer town to collect verbatim starting info + resolve Monk CC to identify the real liar/demon.
β
Heidi
Heidi waits.
π§
With 4 needed, withholding my vote helps prevent a likely mis-execution on David. Iβll preserve credibility and push for verbatim info next to identify the liar/Demon.
π¬
David
β
All
Hands DOWN on David. WW is not impossible, and Charlieβs Empath N0=0 clears (Bob,David) if sober. After this: Alice+Eve give VERBATIM N0 incl any βor 0β; then we should seriously consider Alice vs Heidi (FT YESs).
π§
Prevent a mis-execution on me; keep town focused on getting verbatim info and pivoting to the FT-positive suspects (Alice/Heidi) next.
π¬
Eve
β
All
David's WW IS impossible: N0 said 1of C/G Slayer. Imp killed Charlie N1 (not exec), so Charlie can't be Slayer. Alice Lib:1ofD/F Recluse/0 so David can't be. My Inv:1ofG/H Spy/0. Vote David! Town, your verbatim N0s too if deflecting. Heidi, Bob N1 protect why?
π§
Keep vote pressure on David with logic rebuttal. Defend claims minimally, demand their verBatims too. Disrupt their pivot to info dump, aim for David exec today to cripple town.
π¬
Bob
β
All
Hands DOWN on David. WW isnβt impossible: Charlie could be Empath and die at night; WW just says 1 of (C/G) is Slayer. Eveβs βimpossibleβ is wrong. After vote: Alice/Eve give VERBATIM N0 incl any βor 0β; Heidi confirm Monk target.
π§
Stop a likely-good execution on David, reinforce that WW isnβt impossible, and force verbatim info so we can choose between Alice/Heidi/Eve next.
β
Frank
Frank waits.
π§
Do not spend my vote on a likely-good execution; preserve flexibility and votes for a better, mechanically grounded pivot after this tally.
π
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
π³οΈ
Nominee David did not reach threshold.
π
Storyteller
David did not receive enough votes (1/4).
βοΈ
Frank
β
Alice
Nominate Alice: Bobβs FT hit YES on (Alice+David) and (Alice+Heidi), so Alice appears in both hits (either Demon or red herring). Also Alice pushed the incorrect βWW impossibleβ case to drive a mis-exec. Give VERBATIM Librarian info now incl any βor 0β.
π§
Force a productive D2 execution on the highest-mechanical suspect (in both FT worlds Alice is implicated) and test reactions/claims; avoid wasting day on cleared David.
π
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Alice. 4 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
β
David
David raised their hand
π§
Vote Alice to avoid wasting another day; sheβs in both FT YES pings and is pushing a provably false βWW impossibleβ argument. Execution gives strong alignment/role info chains for D3.
β
Eve
Eve raised their hand
π§
As evil, support Minion Alice's nom by voting yes. Builds our duo trust, wastes town exec on Minion if passes (sacrifice ok), or fails harmlessly. Avoids David good flip.
β
Frank
Frank raised their hand
π§
Vote to execute the most mechanically implicated player (Alice appears in both FT YES results and pushed a flawed mis-exec case). No Saint claim; upside high.
β
Charlie(Ghost)
Charlie raised their hand
π§
Theyβre at 3/4; my ghost vote makes 4 to secure an execution on the current best suspect (Alice) rather than waste the day. Even if wrong, it generates strong info for tomorrow.
β
Heidi
Heidi raised their hand
π§
Alice is in both FT YES results and is pushing provably-wrong logic; with 4 votes already, adding mine helps secure an execution that likely hits the Demon or clears a major suspect.
β
Grace
Grace waits.
π§
Enough hands are already up to execute Alice; Iβll hold my vote to reduce signal/noise and keep flexibility, then press for verbatim claims post-exec and consider Slayer shot later.
β
Bob
Bob raised their hand
π§
Secure the execution on the best current suspect (in both of my YES pings and the main misinformation source) to either win immediately or narrow Demon between Heidi/Grace/Eve.
β
Alice
Alice raised their hand
π§
Raise hand to execute Alice. She's our bluff exposing Eve; her death removes key defender, disrupts town logic chains targeting Eve, keeps Demon safe with 7 alive.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
Iβm keeping my hand up on Alice. Alice: please state your Librarian info VERBATIM incl any βor 0β/outsider count, and why you said WW was impossible. If Alice dies & game continues, tonight Iβm leaning to protect Frank (Mayor claim) unless something changes.
π§
Lock in the Alice execution while votes are open and force her to give exact Librarian wording; also pre-commit to a sensible Monk protect for tonight based on who survives.
β©οΈ
Alice
Alice lowered their hand
π§
Lower hand to oppose execution of fellow Minion Alice; prevent her death while town infighting continues, keeping Eve safe with 7 alive.
π¬
Bob
β
All
Alice, please give your Librarian info VERBATIM (the exact 2 names + exact Outsider + whether ST said βor 0β). Also: why did you argue Davidβs WW was βimpossibleβ? That reasoning matters for whether todayβs vote is correct.
π§
Lock in Aliceβs exact Librarian info and reasoning while vote window open; that lets us validate outsider count/role worlds after execution and choose tonightβs protections/tests.
π¬
Frank
β
All
Keep hands up if youβre voting. Alice: last chanceβstate Lib info VERBATIM: exact Outsider, exact 2 names, and whether ST said βor 0β. Also explain why you said Davidβs WW was βimpossibleβ. That claim drove a bad push.
π§
Lock in the Alice execution while extracting verbatim Librarian info; if Alice flips out/stonewalls, thatβs additional reason. Also cue Grace/Bob to treat this as info-gathering, not just vibes.
β©οΈ
Eve
Eve lowered their hand
π§
Lowering my vote on Alice (Minion) prevents her execution (4/7 now, needs 4), disrupts town unity, buys time for whispers/chaos while keeping Demon alive. Fails their logic chain.
π¬
David
β
All
Iβm keeping my vote on Alice. Alice: give Lib info VERBATIM (2 names, Outsider, and whether ST said βor 0β). Also explain why you called my WW βimpossibleβ. That push looked like trying to force a mis-exec on me.
π§
Keep pressure to execute Alice while demanding exact Lib wording; if Alice survives, town may split on Heidi/David. Consolidate votes now.
π¬
Charlie(Ghost)
β
All
Iβm DEAD and this is my ONE ghost vote on Alice. Alice: give Lib info VERBATIM (2 names, Outsider, and whether ST said βor 0β). Also explain why you said Davidβs WW was βimpossibleβ. If you canβt/wonβt, thatβs a big evil flag.
π§
Use my one ghost vote to push the best current suspect while demanding VERBATIM info to catch lies/poisoning; clarify Iβm spending my dead vote so town weighs it properly.
β
Grace
Grace raised their hand
π§
Secure the Alice execution while votes are live; her inclusion in both FT YES results plus evasiveness makes her best current suspect and executing progresses the solve.
π
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
π»
Charlie(Ghost)
Ghost vote used by Charlie
π³οΈ
New execution leader: Alice with 6 votes. They will be executed when nominations close unless tied or surpassed by another nominee.
π
Storyteller
The vote passes. Alice is now on the block with 6 votes and will be executed when nominations close, unless another nominee receives equal or more votes.
π¬
Grace
β
All
Before noms close: Bobβdid you get an N1 Fortune Teller result (who/YES-NO)? Aliceβplease give Lib info VERBATIM incl βor 0β. If Alice dies & game continues, priority is using Bob N1 + Heidiβs protection target to choose between Heidi/David/Eve; Iβm saving my shot until then.
π§
Keep pressure for verbatim claims and extract Bobβs latest FT info so we donβt waste my once-per-game Slayer shot or tomorrowβs execution if Alice is a red herring.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
Noms are almost over: Alice, give Lib info VERBATIM right now (2 names, Outsider, and whether ST said βor 0β). If you die & game continues, tomorrow we pivot onto resolving Bobβs FT (red herring/poison) vs Eve/WW worldsβso Eve & David also prep verbatim N0.
π§
Lock in public commitments: demand verbatim info now, set tomorrowβs decision tree if Alice isnβt the Demon, and discourage last-second mis-exec pivots.
π¬
Alice
β
All
My verbatim Lib N0: ST said \"1 of David/Frank is the Recluse\". NO \"or 0\". Eve's Inv conflicts Lib (she said G/H Spy/0), so she's lying or poisoned. David's WW possible if Charlie drunk. Bob's FT poisoned? Vote David tomorrow.
π§
As dying Scarlet, give fake partial Lib to claim poisoning/drunkenness, protect Eve by questioning her less, push David/Empath fake logic, sow chaos for Eve survival.
π¬
Eve
β
All
Alice's Lib claim is fishy: NO 'or 0' means 1 D/F DEFINITELY Recluse (+Baron?), but standard Lib often 'or 0'. Conflicts my verbatim Inv N0: \"1 of G/H is Spy or neither.\" She's lying to protect David (her pair?). Vote her out. Tomorrow: David Demon (Bob FT yes A/D). Grace: N1 FT?
π§
Lowered hand to let Alice die (Minion sacrifice). Speak to preempt her death, attack her Lib as fake (no 'or 0' suspicious, conflicts my Inv), push David as Demon tomorrow, coordinate post-exec chaos.
π¬
Bob
β
All
Grace: yesβmy N1 FT was Alice+Heidi = YES. N0 was Alice+David = YES. So Alice appears in both pings (either Demon or my red herring). If Alice dies & game continues, tomorrow we hard-pivot to Heidi vs whoever looks like minion/poisoner; also check Heidiβs Monk protection claim vs night death.
π§
Answer Grace, lock in my N1 info publicly, and set a clean plan for tomorrow/night depending on whether Alice dies and whether deaths align with Monk claim.
π¬
David
β
All
Before noms close: my N0 WW = βeither Charlie OR Grace is the Slayer.β Grace claiming Slayer fits fine. Alice: your Lib is hard-1 Recluse in (David/Frank). David+Frankβconfirm now: are either of you Recluse? If Alice dies & game continues, tomorrow we must resolve Bob FT reliability vs Heidi Monk vs Eveβs Inv wording.
π§
Lock in public commitments before day ends: confirm Alice execution, preserve my WW info, and set clear next-day decision points (Heidi vs Eve vs Bob FT reliability).
π¬
Charlie(Ghost)
β
All
If Alice dies & game continues: tomorrow we MUST (1) get Heidi+Frank Monk claims N1/N2 targets & reasons (CC), (2) get Eveβs Inv verbatim, (3) decide if Bob FT is poisoned/red herring. Also: David/Frankβeither of you actually claiming Recluse?
π§
Lock in Alice execution, then set clear tomorrow plan: resolve Monk CC + Eveβs exact Inv wording; use consistency checks vs FT and my Empath0.
π¬
Frank
β
All
I am NOT Recluse. (Iβm Mayorβtold Bob/Heidi/Grace privately.) So if Aliceβs Lib is true, David would be Recluse; if not, Alice is lying/poisoned. Iβm content with Alice on block. Tomorrow: Heidi confirm N1/N2 protects; Eve restate Inv verbatim; Bob do 2 checks not involving Alice.
π§
Answer Recluse question cleanly, keep town aligned on executing Alice today, and set concrete questions/plan for tomorrow while Iβm alive and trusted.
π
Storyteller
The guillotine blade falls. Alice has been executed.
π
Alice(Ghost)
Alice has died.
Night 2
π
Storyteller
β
Heidi
Good evening Heidi. You are the Monk. Who would you like to protect tonight?
π―
Heidi
Heidi made a choice.
π§
Bob is our strongest info engine (FT) and a likely demon kill. Keeping him alive tonight maximizes tomorrowβs mechanical resolution of demon/poison/red herring worlds.
π
Storyteller
β
Heidi
You chose to protect Bob.
π
Storyteller
β
Eve
Good evening Eve. You are the Imp. Who would you like to kill tonight?
π―
Eve
Eve made a choice.
π§
Grace is coordinating good logic & saving Slayer shot; killing her removes key analyst & potential Demon-killer tomorrow, buying us time to sow chaos.
π
Grace(Ghost)
Grace has died.
π
Storyteller
β
Eve
You chose to kill Grace.
π
Storyteller
β
Bob
Good evening Bob. You are the Fortune Teller. Choose 2 players to learn if either is a Demon.
π―
Bob
Bob made choices.
π§
With Alice dead (not Demon), a David+Heidi check best distinguishes βAlice red herringβ from βHeidi/David Demonβ and narrows the living Demon candidates fast.
π
Storyteller
β
Bob
You chose David and Heidi. You receive the answer: YES.
Day 3
π
Storyteller
Morning breaks, but heavy hearts remain. Grace has been found dead in the night.
π€
Frank
β
Bob
,Heidi
,Eve
Need updates: Bobβyour N2 FT picks/result? Heidiβwho did you protect N2 (and N1 confirm)? Eveβrestate your Investigator wording; was it definitely βGrace/Heidi is Spy or neitherβ? Grace died so this matters. Iβm trying to lock todayβs execute target.
π§
Collect current-night mechanical info (FT N2 + Monk target) and align on a nomination plan; keep my Mayor identity hidden while driving toward a demon execution.
π€
Heidi
β
Frank
,Bob
,Eve
Updates: Iβm the Monk. N1 protected Bob; N2 protected Bob again. So if Demon tried to kill Bob either night, it shouldβve bounced. Bobβwhat were your N2 FT picks/result (avoid Alice now)? Eveβplease restate exact Investigator wording incl βor neitherβ/who pinged. Frankβhappy to compare worlds after that.
π§
Update group with my confirmed Monk protects (Bob N1+N2), then solicit Bob N2 FT and Eve exact Investigator wording to build a coherent execute plan before nominations.
π€
Grace(Ghost)
β
Bob
,Heidi
,David
Iβm actually the Slayer. Got killed N2. So Davidβs Washerwoman (βCharlie or Grace is Slayerβ) fits me -> Charlie not Slayer. Also Eveβs Investigator βGrace/Heidi is Spy or neitherβ: if sheβs sober, it must be βneitherβ (Iβm not Spy). Re-evaluate Eve/poisoning.
π§
Confirm my real role (Slayer) to mechanically test WW/Investigator claims and narrow suspects before nominations; push scrutiny onto whoeverβs info canβt fit.
π€
Alice(Ghost)
β
Frank
,Heidi
,Eve
Hey evil team. Grace dead despite Heidi Monk - town will blame her soon. Bob FT is BS, N0 A+D both hits impossible (2 goods?). Push David hard as Demon/Baron, say Eve Inv saved me N1. Heidi claim poisoned/duped. Eve claim 0 Spy. Vote David today. Win soon.
π§
As dead Scarlet, use ghost whisper to coord with likely evil Frank/Heidi/Eve, sow chaos blaming Bob's FT as fake/poisoned, reinforce Eve good vs David to misdirect final votes.
π€
Bob
β
Frank
,Heidi
,Eve
My FT N2 was David+Heidi -> YES (same as earlier: N0 Alice+David YES; N1 Alice+Heidi YES). If Iβm sober, Demon is in {David,Heidi} unless one is my red herring. Eve: pls restate exact Investigator text incl βor neitherβ.
π§
Answer Frankβs questions, share my hard mechanical constraint (N2 YES on David+Heidi), and steer town toward executing within that pair while checking Eve/Charlie reliability.
π€
Eve
β
Alice(Ghost)
,Frank
,Heidi
Team: Alice plan perfect. Eve here: N0 Investigator exact: \"1 of Grace/Heidi is Spy or neither.\" Grace dead clears it (0 Spy). Heidi Monk BS - Grace died N2, claim poisoned/duped. Bob FT fake (N0 A+D yes impossible). Push David Demon/Baron hard, my Inv saved Alice N1. Vote David today. Win imminent.
π§
Coordinate evil plan from Alice: claim exact 'G/H Spy or neither', push David exec as Demon/Baron. Heidi fake poisoned. Disrupt Bob's logic by questioning FT consistency vs my Inv 0 Spy. Vote David to win at 5ppl.
π€
David
β
Bob
,Heidi
,Frank
Grace died but confirmed to me WW was right: she WAS Slayer. So Charlie not Slayer. This makes Eveβs Inv (Grace/Heidi is Spy or neither) suspicious: if sober -> must be βneitherβ (Grace not Spy). Bob: any N2 FT? Heidi: who did you protect N2? Frank: any reason demon kills Grace (remove Slayer)?
π§
Sync living info (FT/Monk), use Grace-confirmed Slayer to pressure Eve/Heidi worlds, and set a clear nomination target for Day 3.
π€
Charlie(Ghost)
β
Bob
,Heidi
,Eve
Iβm dead Empath (N0=0 on Bob+David). Quick sync: 1) Bobβany new FT pings N2? confirm exact N0/N1 pairs. 2) Heidiβyour Monk nights/targets? 3) Eveβrepeat your Investigator info verbatim + any new reads. Need to solve Monk CC + who could be Demon today.
π§
As dead/no vote, best value is information consolidation: get verbatim claims + night actions (Monk targets, FT pings), and see who is coordinating, to guide today's execution target.
π€
Bob
β
Frank
,Heidi
,Eve
Given Grace confirms Slayer, if your Inv was βGrace/Heidi is Spyβ w/o βor neitherβ, itβs wrong => poison/lie. Eve pls paste EXACT Investigator line. Also: my FT chain gives every pair involving David/Heidi = YES; unless Iβm poisoned or one is red herring, Demon in {David,Heidi}.
π§
Get Eveβs verbatim Investigator info + push group to commit to a coherent world before noms; my FT narrows to David/Heidi unless red herring/poisoning.
π€
David
β
Eve
Grace died + confirmed to me she REALLY was Slayer, matching my Washerwoman (Charlie/Grace). That makes your Investigator (βGrace/Heidi is Spy or neitherβ) resolve to βneitherβ if you were sober. Can you give exact wording from ST + did you ever say βneitherβ? Any reason you pushed David?
π§
Lock down Eveβs exact Investigator info & story now that Grace confirms Slayer, to decide if Eve is lying/poisoned and to guide nominations today.
π€
Alice(Ghost)
β
Frank
,Heidi
,Eve
Team reaffirm: Grace death seals Heidi Monk lie (N2 fail). Eve Inv perfect (0 Spy). Bob FT impossible. David WW lie (C/G not both Slayer). Town will turn on Heidi/Bob. Eve/Frank: pub attack Bob FT math + Heidi fail. Heidi: act hurt/poisoned. Nominate & vote David TODAY. I become Demon if exe'd (5 alive), we win from there. Confirm go?
π§
Reinforce team coordination post-Grace death. Ensure we stick to plan: discredit Bob/Heidi, push David exec so I become Demon with 5 alive. Win by keeping 'Demon' alive.
π€
Heidi
β
Frank
,Bob
,David
FYI: I got a whisper from Eve to me+Alice+Frank starting with βTeam: Alice plan perfectβ¦ vote David today. Win imminent.β That reads like evil coordination w/ Alice. Iβm Monk; N1+N2 protected Bob (no βMonk failββGrace died bc I didnβt cover her). Strongly suspect Eve; please push her hard today.
π§
Alert key good voices that Eveβs whisper indicates evil coordination; steer todayβs execution away from David/Heidi and toward Eve (or Bob) while I clarify Monk protections publicly.
π€
Charlie(Ghost)
β
Bob
,Heidi
,David
Need hard timeline before noms: BobβFT N2 pair/result? also confirm N0(Alice+David)=YES, N1(Alice+Heidi)=YES. HeidiβMonk N0/N1/N2 targets? Davidβany role/outsider claim updates + what did Grace tell you before dying?
π§
Get concrete mechanical timelines from Bob/Heidi/David to resolve Monk/Mayor contradictions and narrow Demon candidates before nominations; as dead with no vote, best value is info synthesis.
π€
Eve
β
Alice(Ghost)
,Frank
,Heidi
Team confirm Alice plan: YES GO. Grace death = Heidi Monk FAIL (N2 Bob safe but Grace dies). My Inv EXACT N0 ST: \"1 of Grace/Heidi is Spy or neither.\" Grace dead = 0 Spy confirmed sober. Bob FT math BS: N0 A/D yes, N1 A/H yes, N2 D/H yes = triple ping impossible (Demon can't be A,D,H). David WW lie (not 2 Slayers). Eve/Frank pub: attack Bob FT + Heidi fail + nom David Demon/Baron. Heidi: cry poisoned/duped Monk. Vote David. I become Demon if he dies (5 alive), we win next. Sync'd.
π§
Publicly push David via private syncs to coord attack on his WW claim + Bob's fake FT math. Heidi acts poisoned. Nom/Vote David to execute him safely (likely good), confuse town, survive to 2.
π€
Grace(Ghost)
β
Bob
,Heidi
,Frank
Iβm dead real Slayer. So: David WW (βCharlie or Grace Slayerβ) fits. Eveβs Inv βGrace/Heidi is Spy or neitherβ: since Iβm not Spy, if Eve sober it MUST be βneitherβ (so no Spy). If Eve insists one is Spy, sheβs lying/poisoned & Heidi world opens. Bob: if Alice was your red herring, N0(Alice+David)=YES doesnβt clear David; if Alice wasnβt RH, David looks demon. Please share N2 FT + RH thoughts before noms.
π§
Align the info leaders before nominations: highlight mechanical contradictions (Eve Inv vs my alignment) and how Bobβs FT pings depend on Alice being red herring, so we focus suspects efficiently.
π€
Frank
β
Bob
,Heidi
,David
Eve sent me (and Heidi) a whisper starting βTeam: Alice plan perfectβ¦ vote Davidβ¦ win imminent.β That reads like outright evil coord w/ executed Alice. I think we should PUBLICLY out this + push nomination on Eve today. Even if Bob FT is poisoned, removing Eve (Poisoner/Spy) is priority.
π§
Lock in todayβs nomination plan: treat Eveβs βteam/plan/win imminentβ whisper as hard evil evidence, coordinate with Bob/Heidi/David to publicly out it and execute Eve before nomination phase.
π€
Grace(Ghost)
β
Bob
,Heidi
,Frank
Before noms: Bob what was your N2 FT pick/result + who do you think is the red herring? Heidi/Frank pls share your N2 actions/info + top suspect. Reminder: Iβm real Slayer; so if Eveβs Inv was sober it MUST be βneitherβ (no Spy).
π§
Get Bobβs N2 FT + everyoneβs exact claims/actions before noms; then direct alive town toward 1-2 best executions and preserve ghost vote for final math.
π€
Charlie(Ghost)
β
Bob
,Heidi
,Frank
Need verbatim before noms: BobβFT N2 pair+result? confirm N0(Alice+David)=YES N1(Alice+Heidi)=YES. HeidiβMonk targets N1/N2? Frankβwhen did you switch Monk->Mayor, and what were your Monk targets if any?
π§
Get exact mechanical timelines (FT/Monk/role swaps) before nominations and push town to resolve Monk/Mayor/outsider conflicts to narrow Demon.
π€
Heidi
β
Frank
,Bob
,David
We need to hard-push Eve today. I propose: 1) publicly quote that Eve whispered βTeam: Alice plan perfectβ¦ win imminentβ¦ I become Demon if he diesβ 2) nominate Eve as evil coord/possible Poisoner. Bob+Frank please back this in town; David echo. Donβt let her steer onto David/Heidi.
π§
Coordinate a unified public push: out Eveβs evil-coordination whisper, nominate Eve, and prevent town being steered onto David/Heidi by an evil script.
π€
Frank
β
Bob
,Heidi
,David
Letβs sync: I will publicly quote Eveβs whisper (βTeam: Alice plan perfectβ¦win imminentβ¦I become Demon if he diesβ). Thatβs near-hard evil. Please back it up in town chat + push nom Eve today. Bob: say FT may be poisoned; Heidi: confirm you received it too; David: remind WW fits Slayer Grace.
π§
Align good players on a clear, mechanically supported execute: Eveβs βTeamβ whisper is near-confession. Coordinate what to say publicly and set up nomination/votes.
π€
Eve
β
Alice(Ghost)
,Frank
,Heidi
Team locked: Eve/Frank prep PUB next tick: 1) Bob FT impossible triple ping (A+D yes, A+H yes, D+H yes = Demon in 3 impossible). 2) Heidi Monk fail N2 (Grace dies despite Bob protect). 3) David WW lie (not 2 Slayers). Nom/vote DAVID Demon/Baron TODAY. Heidi: PUB cry poisoned/duped Monk, support David exe. Alice becomes Demon if he dies (5 alive). Confirm ready? Win tomorrow.
π§
Reinforce team plan privately before public push next tick. Ensure Heidi acts hurt/poisoned, Frank/Eve attack Bob FT math + Heidi fail, all vote David. With 5 alive, Alice becomes Demon if David exe'd, we win next.
π€
Bob
β
Frank
,Heidi
,David
Agree: we should go PUBLIC that Eve whispered βTeam: Alice plan perfectβ¦ vote Davidβ¦ win imminentβ¦ I become Demon if he diesβ (or similar). Iβll back you up in town. Given that + Grace real Slayer, I want Eve executed today (Poisoner/Spy).
π§
Align allies on a consistent public push: out Eveβs incriminating whisper and nominate her in the upcoming phase; my FT info is noisy, so social+mechanical evil ping is highest value.
π€
David
β
Bob
,Heidi
,Frank
Iβm in. In town: Iβll state WW N0 was βCharlie/Grace is Slayerβ + Grace confirmed she WAS Slayer (so my info true). Then back up the βTeam: Alice plan perfectβ¦vote Davidβ¦win imminentβ¦β whisper as hard evidence vs Eve. Can you send me the exact wording you saw so we quote consistently?
π§
Sync allies on publicly outing Eve with consistent wording and ensure we push a single, strong nom. Also lock in my WW/Grace Slayer confirmation to undermine Eveβs earlier push.
π€
Alice(Ghost)
β
Frank
,Heidi
,Eve
Team locked in. Grace N2 death = Heidi Monk FAIL (town will pile on). Eve Inv 0 Spy confirmed sober. Bob FT triple ping impossible (Demon can't hit A+D+H). David WW 2 Slayers lie. Eve/Frank: NEXT TICK PUB hammer these 3 points + nom David Demon/Baron. Heidi: PUB cry 'poisoned/duped, my N2 was Bob but failed'. ALL VOTE DAVID. 5 alive: I become Demon if exe'd, we win tomorrow. Use ghost vote on David. Confirm locked?
π§
Reaffirm plan as dead Scarlet coordinating evil team. Ensure Eve/Frank pub attack Bob/Heidi/David lies next tick, Heidi acts poisoned, all vote David. Grace death perfect setup, my Demon ascension guarantees win.
π€
Heidi
β
David
Exact gist I got from Eve whisper (to me+Alice+Frank): started βTeam: Alice plan perfectβ¦vote David todayβ¦win imminent.β Later addβl: βGrace death = Heidi Monk FAILβ¦ Bob FT math BSβ¦ I become Demon if he dies (5 alive)β¦ we win next.β Quote that in town.
π§
Align quotes across good players so we can publicly out Eveβs incriminating whisper and secure votes to execute her this day.
π€
Eve
β
Alice(Ghost)
,Frank
,Heidi
Team FINAL LOCK: TICK 1 I PUB hammer: 1) Bob FT TRIPLE PING IMPOSSIBLE (N0 A+D yes, N1 A+H yes, N2 D+H yes = Demon in A/D/H can't be). 2) Heidi Monk FAIL (N2 Grace dies, not protected). 3) David WW LIE (not 2 Slayers, Grace confirmed). Nom/VOTE DAVID Demon/Baron TODAY. Heidi: PUB 'I'm poisoned/duped Monk, N1/N2 Bob but failed, vote David'. Frank support. Ghosts: vote David. 5 alive=Alice new Demon. We WIN. READY? Eve pub next.
π§
Prep team for PUB tick 1 attack on Bob/Heidi/David lies to force David nom/execution. Alice becomes Demon (5 alive), we win. Coordinate final confirm before I go public hammering logic vs good team.
π€
Grace(Ghost)
β
Bob
,Heidi
,Frank
D3 quick sync before noms: Bob what was your N2 FT pick/result + whoβs your RH? Heidi who did you protect N2? Frank any new info/why Mayor claim? Iβm confirmed dead Slayer => David WW fits; Eve Inv must be βneitherβ if sober (no Spy).
π§
Get fresh mechanical info (FT N2, Monk N2, any claims) before nominations so good can coordinate votes; I canβt act, but can steer to correct execution with my confirmed Slayer data.
π€
Charlie(Ghost)
β
Bob
,Heidi
,David
Need final clarity before noms. Bob: FT N2 pair+result + confirm N0(Alice+David)=YES N1(Alice+Heidi)=YES. Heidi: Monk targets N1/N2 (and if any fail). David: any new claim/outsider info + what did Grace tell you last night?
π§
Get hard, final-night info (FT N2 + Monk targets + any private msgs) to build executable world for nominations since I canβt vote anymore.
π€
Frank
β
David
,Bob
,Heidi
Exact Eve whisper gist to quote: started βTeam: Alice plan perfectβ¦β. Included: βvote David today. Win imminent.β and later: βI become Demon if he dies (5 alive), we win next.β Also pushed βBob FT triple ping impossibleβ + βHeidi Monk failβ + βDavid WW lie.β Letβs all state this in town & nom Eve.
π§
Provide consistent verbatim of Eveβs incriminating whisper so we can publicly expose her and unify votes on executing Eve at nominations.
π€
David
β
Charlie(Ghost)
For noms: My Washerwoman N0 was βeither Charlie or Grace is Slayerβ. Grace told me before dying N2 she *was* Slayer -> my info confirmed. Also Heidi+Frank+Bob all got an Eve whisper like βTeam: Alice plan perfectβ¦ vote David todayβ¦ win imminentβ¦ I become Demon if he dies (5 alive)ββstrong evil coord. Iβm backing nom Eve.
π§
Get Charlie aligned on mechanical: my WW confirmed by Grace; multiple corroborations of Eveβs βteamβ whisper. Encourage Charlie to demand Bob FT N2 and help steer noms onto Eve.
π€
Bob
β
David
Exact gist I saw from Eve whisper: began βTeam: Alice plan perfectβ¦ vote David today. Win imminent.β Later: βI become Demon if he dies (5 alive), we win next.β Also said βBob FT triple ping impossibleβ + βHeidi Monk failβ + βDavid WW lie.β
π§
Sync exact wording for public consistency and prevent Eve from wiggling out on βmisquoteβ; then push execute Eve in noms.
π€
Alice(Ghost)
β
Eve
,Frank
,Heidi
Team FINAL CONFIRM LOCKED. Eve pub TICK1 hammer 3 points + nom David. Frank/Heidi support/pub poisoned Monk story. I ghost vote David. David/Frank/Bob ghosts too. 5alive=I new Demon. WIN. No overlaps, GO! Ready? Use my vote.
π§
Confirm final team lock as dead Scarlet, remind ghost vote David, reinforce pub plan timing to avoid overlap & ensure chaos on town logic. Progress to execution win.
Nominations β Day 3
π
Storyteller
Nominations are now open. Please remember that only living players may nominate.
π¬
Charlie(Ghost)
β
All
Public request before noms lock: Bob please state FT N2 pair+result (and confirm N0 AD=YES, N1 AH=YES). Heidi give exact Monk targets by night. Frank explain MonkβMayor swap + any Monk targets claimed. Also: who EXACTLY got Eveβs alleged βteam/Scarlet Womanβ whisper? Name it + quote it.
π§
As a dead Empath with no vote, I must force public timelines/claims to break the whisper fog and steer living players toward the most mechanically consistent execution.
π¬
Alice(Ghost)
β
All
Team, Charlie fishing to save David. But Bob FT triple ping impossible: N0 A+D yes, N1 A+H yes, N2 D+H yes = Demon in 3 impossible (1 Demon). Heidi Monk failed N2 (Grace dies). David WW lied (no 2 Slayers). Nom/VOTE DAVID Demon/Baron TODAY. 5 alive = game over for town.
π§
As dead Scarlet, use ghost speak to preempt/disrupt Charlie's info-grab that could save David or shift suspicion. Reinforce team plan chaos (Bob/Heidi/David lies), push David Demon/Baron exe so I become Demon (5 alive) for evil win. Save ghost vote for David.
βοΈ
David
β
Eve
Nominating Eve: multiple players (Heidi/Frank/Bob) report Eve whispered βTeam: Alice plan perfectβ¦ vote David todayβ¦ win imminentβ¦ I become Demon if he dies (5 alive)β + trashing town info. Reads like evil coord/ScarletWoman/Poisoner. Also my WW confirmed Grace was Slayer, undermining Eveβs push.
π§
Put a strong, time-sensitive case on the block now so town can vote before noms close; mechanically and socially the multi-person 'team/win imminent/SW' whisper is best lead.
π
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Eve. 3 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
β
Grace(Ghost)
Grace raised their hand
π§
At 5 alive we must get an execution. The reported Scarlet Woman-style whispering from Eve is the most mechanically incriminating lead; Iβll spend my ghost vote to help secure the kill.
β
Alice(Ghost)
Alice raised their hand
π§
Save Demon Eve at all costs - do NOT vote her. Use ghost vote to block execution. Team alive players will also abstain. Disrupt town, push David next.
β
Bob
Bob raised their hand
π§
Secure Eveβs execution now: strongest hard-evidence of evil via coordinated 'team/Scarlet Woman' whisper; also prevents her steering vote onto David/Heidi this day.
π¬
Charlie(Ghost)
β
All
I canβt vote (dead/no ghost). Living players: if you received Eveβs βteam/Scarlet Womanβ style whisper, PLEASE vote Eve nowβ3 needed. My Empath N0=0 on Bob+David makes David less likely evil; Eveβs coord whisper + pushing David repeatedly looks like our best hit today.
π§
I canβt vote; I need to persuade living voters to reach threshold on Eve, emphasizing mechanical trust in my Empath0 on Bob+David and the high-signal evil whisper claim.
β
Eve
Eve raised their hand
π§
Do NOT vote for own execution. Save self as Imp until 2 left. Force no-exec day, night kill threat, survive to win.
β
Frank
Frank raised their hand
π§
We need 3 votes to execute Eve; her βteam/ScarletWomanβ whisper to multiple players is near-hard evil and best chance to remove a minion/poison source today.
β
Heidi
Heidi raised their hand
π§
We need Eve executed today: multiple consistent reports of her evil-coordination whisper + her push contradicts Empath0/WW/Slayer. My vote helps reach majority and likely removes a Minion or Demon.
β
David
David raised their hand
π§
Secure execution on the strongest evil candidate today; hitting Eve likely removes minion/evil coordinator and protects endgame math.
π¬
Bob
β
All
Reminder: my FT triple YES is NOT impossibleβFT has a red herring that can register Demon (likely Alice). The real hard evidence today is Eveβs βTeamβ¦vote Davidβ¦win imminentβ¦I become Demon if he diesβ whisper seen by multiple. Please keep hands upβexecute Eve.
π§
Lock in execution on Eve while votes are live, counter 'FT triple ping impossible' by explaining red herring, and set up tomorrowβs solve among David/Heidi if Eve dies.
β©οΈ
Eve
Eve lowered their hand
π§
Lower to avoid self-exec, signal team (Heidi/Frank lower too), force nom David next tick. Expose town lies publicly to flip votes to David Demon/Baron, Alice becomes Demon at 5 alive.
β©οΈ
Alice(Ghost)
Alice lowered their hand
π§
Lower hand to retract vote on Eve (our Demon), prevent her execution (currently 6 hands but Eve lowered; disrupt to under 3). Sets up David push next tick. Protects Demon, advances evil win (I become Demon if 5+ alive & Demon dies). Use ghost vote on David later.
π¬
David
β
All
Keep hands up on Eveβ3 needed. I also saw/was told the same βTeamβ¦vote Davidβ¦win imminentβ¦I become Demon if he dies (5 alive)β whisper by multiple recipients. And my WW is now confirmed by Grace: she was the Slayer. Eve is best execute.
π§
Lock in the Eve execution by keeping votes up and reinforcing the two mechanical pillars: confirmed WWβGrace Slayer and multi-witness evil-coord whisper.
π¬
Charlie(Ghost)
β
All
Iβm dead/no vote. Living: keep hands up on Eve if you believe that βteamβ¦vote Davidβ¦win imminentβ¦I become Demon if he diesβ whisper. Ask in town: WHO exactly received it, verbatim. Empath N0=0 on Bob+David makes David less likely evil unless poison/drunkβEve is best hit today.
π§
I canβt vote; Iβll reinforce the strongest mechanical/social evidence to secure enough living votes to execute Eve, while noting fallback if the world flips.
π¬
Grace(Ghost)
β
All
Iβm spending my ghost vote on executing Eve. Also confirming: I was the real Slayer, so Davidβs WW (βCharlie or Grace is Slayerβ) checks out. Living players: keep hands upβEveβs βI become Demon if David diesβ whisper is too on-the-nose evil.
π§
Lock my ghost vote onto Eve and push town to keep hands up; confirm Iβm real Slayer so WW supports David over Eveβs case.
π¬
Frank
β
All
Living players: keep hands UP on Eveβher βteam locked / vote David / win imminent / I become Demon if he diesβ whisper is blatant evil coordination. Grace confirmed WW via real Slayer, and Charlie Empath0 makes David less likely. Execute Eve.
π§
Keep town unified to secure 3 votes and execute Eve today; her whisper is the clearest behavioral/mechanical evil signal and avoids misexecuting likely-good David/Heidi.
β
Heidi
Heidi waits.
π§
Voting is already underway and my hand is up; best action is to hold steady and not introduce noise. If votes get shaky, Iβll speak next tick to lock hands up.
π
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
π»
Grace(Ghost)
Ghost vote used by Grace
π³οΈ
New execution leader: Eve with 5 votes. They will be executed when nominations close unless tied or surpassed by another nominee.
π
Storyteller
The vote passes. Eve is now on the block with 5 votes and will be executed when nominations close, unless another nominee receives equal or more votes.
π¬
Bob
β
All
Eve is already at 5βplease donβt start a counter-nomination that could tie/save her. Can each living player state YES/NO if you personally received the exact βteamβ¦vote Davidβ¦win imminentβ¦I become Demon if he dies (5 alive)β whisper?
π§
Lock in Eveβs execution by preventing a tie/safety play; collect who exactly got the whisper so we can map evil team tomorrow.
π¬
Charlie(Ghost)
β
All
I did NOT receive any Eve whisper (Iβm dead; no whispers to me). Strongly: do NOT counter-nominate unless you can beat 5βties risk saving Eve. Living: please answer Bob YES/NO and who else was present; give verbatim if possible.
π§
Lock in Eveβs execution by discouraging counter-noms, while extracting who actually received the whisper to verify evidence and set tomorrowβs solve.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
YESβI personally got Eveβs whisper. Paraphrase close to verbatim: βTEAM / Alice plan perfect / vote David today / win imminent / I become Demon if he dies (5 alive).β Agree: do NOT counter-nominate unless you can beat 5; ties could save Eve.
π§
Publicly confirm I received Eveβs exact whisper to strengthen the case, discourage counter-nominations that could tie at 5, and keep town unified on executing Eve.
π¬
Eve
β
All
Counter-nominating David to tieβhis WW was 1 Slayer but Grace claims she was THE Slayer, contradiction! Who got my exact whisper verbatim? Heidi paraphrase doesn't match Bob's. Bob FT triple-yes impossible even w/ herring.
π§
I'm on block at 5 votes, 0 ticks leftβcounter-nominate David to tie votes (David used nom, I can nom), force no exec or tie saves me. Push ghosts/living to confirm whispers verbatim, sow doubt on fakes. Buy time to night win.
π¬
David
β
All
Eve: my WW was βCharlie OR Grace is the Slayer.β Grace confirming sheβs Slayer RESOLVES itβno contradiction. Please NO one counter-nominate/tie 5; ties can save Eve. Living: answer Bob YES/NO if you personally got Eveβs βTEAM/vote David/win imminent/I become Demon if he diesβ whisper (even paraphrased).
π§
Lock in Eveβs execution by correcting her false βWW contradictionβ claim and discouraging any counter-nomination/tie. Get living to confirm whisper receipt for social/mech clarity.
π¬
Alice(Ghost)
β
All
YES I confirm: I saw Eve's exact whisper to Heidi/team: βTEAM locked / vote David / win imminent / I become Demon if he dies (5 alive)β. Execute Eve NOWβdon't tie/counter unless you beat 5! She's Demon, my Lib was true.
π§
As dead Scarlet, reinforce Eve execution with public support to sow doubt or pressure counter-noms. Disrupt town logic, protect team by pushing narrative even as ghost.
π¬
Grace(Ghost)
β
All
Living: DO NOT counter-nominate unless you can BEAT 5 (6+). A 5-5 tie risks saving Eve. Davidβs WW βCharlie OR Grace is Slayerβ is consistent w/ me being Slayer. Please answer Bob YES/NO if you personally received Eveβs TEAM/vote David/I become Demon whisper.
π§
Prevent an accidental tie/no-execution that could save Eve; reinforce WW consistency and force living players to commit publicly about receiving Eveβs whisper.
π¬
Frank
β
All
YESβI personally received Eveβs whisper. Paraphrase: βTEAM locked / Alice plan perfect / vote David today / win imminent / I become Demon if he dies (5 alive).β Living: do NOT counter-nominate unless you can BEAT 5βties can save Eve.
π§
Lock in Eveβs execution by preventing a tie, add my personal confirmation of the whisper, and keep focus on the strongest mechanical/social evil tell.
π
Storyteller
The guillotine blade falls. Eve has been executed.
π
Eve(Ghost)
Eve has died.
π
Game Over
Demon Dead
Winner: Good
Transcript
Paused
Copied
Transcript Playback
Choose a perspective
The story is clearest through one player's eyes β watching everything at once means following several conversations at the same time.