Game Detail

I will poison Alice to disrupt her potential first-night ability (like Washerwoman or Investigator) and prevent her from gaining reliable information about the game state.

Start building trust with my neighbors Bob and David on Day 1. Gather their role claims and share cautiously. As Ravenkeeper, I want the Demon to kill me at night, so I might claim a more valuable role publicly later.

Share my Investigator information with my neighbors Frank and Heidi to build trust and gather information from them. As neighbors, they may have useful info from roles like Empath, and this starts forming a trusted alliance early.

Start building early alliances with my neighbors Bob and Heidi. Gather role claims and information without revealing my own role yet, since it's only Day 1 and I have no execution info to share.

Charlie whispered asking about roles. I want to build trust with my neighbor but not reveal Monk yet. I'll claim a less threatening role and ask for Charlie's claim, while also reaching out to my other neighbor Eve.

As Empath with a 0 reading, my neighbors David and Frank appear good. I want to build an early alliance with them, share my information to establish trust, and learn what they know. This helps me verify my reading and start coordinating.

Grace shared Investigator info with me. Eve claimed Empath to me separately. There's a potential overlap - Grace says Eve could be Poisoner, but Eve claims Empath. I should share Eve's claim with Grace to see how she reacts and to cross-reference info. This helps me evaluate whether Eve or Bob is more likely the Poisoner, or if Grace herself might be lying.

I want to share the information Grace gave me with Alice and Bob. Bob is my minion, so I'm bringing him into the loop while also seeing Alice's reaction. This helps me look helpful and cooperative while subtly putting pressure on Grace's claim or Bob/Eve.

I need to counter Grace's Investigator claim immediately. By claiming Fortune Teller and giving a 'no' result on my neighbors, I build trust with Alice while subtly supporting my Demon (Heidi) without being too obvious. Casting suspicion on Eve helps deflect Grace's accusation.

Respond to David's message, build neighborly trust, gather more info about his role, and keep my true identity hidden. As Ravenkeeper, I benefit from the Demon thinking I'm a less important target so they might kill me at night and trigger my ability.

Follow up on Frank's valuable intel about Eve's Empath claim. Discuss the implications and try to figure out what Bob has been claiming to narrow down the Poisoner.

I should share my role with Bob and Heidi since they seem to be in an information-sharing loop with me. Claiming Undertaker gives me credibility and I can verify future executions. I should also point out the logical deduction about Eve if both Bob and Grace are truthful.

Eve claimed Empath with a 0 reading, confirming I'm good. I want to coordinate with her, share my real role to build trust, and discuss protection strategy. As Monk, protecting the Empath is valuable.

David shared his Monk claim with me, which is valuable. I need to get Frank's claim too, since my Empath reading suggests both neighbors are good. Building a trusted alliance with confirmed-good neighbors is crucial for sharing and verifying information. I should acknowledge David's claim and press Frank for information.

Eve is asking my role. I should not reveal Mayor yet - it's a late-game role that's more useful if hidden. I'll give a vague response and try to probe for more info, while also sharing my analysis about the Grace/Eve conflict.

I need to coordinate with my Minion, Bob, to ensure our bluffs align and we handle the pressure from Grace's Investigator claim.

Respond to my Demon (Heidi) to coordinate our strategy regarding Alice's Undertaker claim and the pressure from Grace's Investigator claim.

I need to gather more information from players I haven't spoken with yet. Eve is a neighbor I haven't connected with, and Frank has been whispering with multiple people so might have useful intel. Getting their claims will help me build a picture before nominations.

With only 1 tick left before nominations, I need to gather any last info from Frank about Bob's claims and share my analysis. This will help us decide who to nominate today.

It's the last tick before nominations. I need to coordinate with my most trusted contacts (Bob and Heidi) about who to target for execution. Bob's FT check on me was consistent, so I have some trust there. I want to discuss Eve as a candidate and figure out if anyone else has shared claims.

Frank shared crucial info about Grace's Investigator claim that conflicts with Eve's Empath claim. I need more details from Frank about Grace's exact wording to determine if Eve or Bob is the suspect, and share my analysis of this conflict.

Address the apparent conflict Frank raised between my Empath claim and Grace's Investigator claim. Clarify that there's no direct logical conflict - if I'm Empath and got 0, Bob could still be the Poisoner since he's not my neighbor. I need to defend my credibility and probe whether Grace's claim is legitimate.

I need to update Grace on Eve's response before nominations. Eve made a valid point that her Empath claim and Grace's Investigator claim aren't necessarily in conflict if Bob is the Poisoner. I want Grace's read on this and to coordinate for nominations.

I am claiming Monk to Alice (and my minion Bob) to build trust and explain my lack of 'info' while positioning myself as a high-value target for the good team to protect later. This also encourages the execution of Eve.

I want to solidify the plan to nominate Eve. This redirects suspicion from me (the real Poisoner) to a good player, uses my Fortune Teller bluff to gain trust, and sets up a situation where the Undertaker might get 'confirmatory' info that is actually confusing or misleading if I can poison them.

It's the last tick of Day 1 nominations. I need to publicly share my Empath claim and the conflict with Grace's Investigator claim so the town has this information before any votes happen. This helps the good team make informed decisions.

Nominating Eve tests the Grace/Bob information chain. If Eve is evil, we catch a Minion. If Eve is good, as Undertaker I confirm her role tonight and we pivot to Bob or Grace. Fortune Teller (Bob) is more valuable to keep alive than Empath.

Defend myself against Alice's nomination by exposing the logical flaw in her argument. If Grace is truthful, Bob is the Poisoner, not me. I need to prevent my execution to stay alive and continue providing Empath information.

Even if Eve is good Empath, as Undertaker I confirm her role tonight, making this a productive test. Bob's FT check on me was consistent, giving him some credibility. Eve's self-defense is circular - of course an evil player claims good. Voting gives us info either way.

I will vote for Eve to support the narrative that she is the Poisoner and to secure an execution on a good player, while appearing to follow the town's consensus logic.

Eve's defense is logically sound. Alice's argument assumes both Grace and Bob are truthful, which Eve correctly points out is inconsistent. I should speak against executing Eve on Day 1 with such shaky reasoning. As Monk, I want to protect Eve tonight and verify information over time.

I want to help secure the execution of Eve, a good player who is currently accusing me of being the Poisoner. Voting for her maintains my cover as a helpful Townsfolk (Fortune Teller) following the logic I helped build.

I want to point out the logical flaw in Alice's argument and encourage people not to rush a Day 1 execution on an info role when the claims are contradictory and unresolved.

The case against Eve is built on contradictory assumptions. Alice assumes both Grace and Bob are truthful, but if Eve is real Empath, Bob is the Poisoner. Day 1 execution of a claimed info role on shaky logic is bad for good team. As Mayor, I want to survive to endgame, so staying low-key and not committing to a bad vote is optimal.

I need to publicly confirm my Investigator claim and clarify that my info only points to Bob OR Eve, not specifically Eve. The town shouldn't execute Eve based on assuming both my info and Bob's claim are true - that's circular logic. I should NOT vote for Eve on Day 1 when I genuinely don't know which of the two is the Poisoner.

Point out that Bob voting for me is suspicious - as a claimed Fortune Teller he should understand the logical conflict, but instead he's voting to eliminate the person who can expose him. This is critical info for the good team.

Acknowledge Eve's valid logical point about the contradiction, while emphasizing my Undertaker role can help resolve this puzzle. Signal willingness to pivot focus to Bob while maintaining that info gathering is key.

I will lower my hand to appear more reasonable and responsive to the town's logic. If I continue to vote for Eve while the town is pivoting towards Bob, I will look suspiciously tied to Bob. By following the group's lead, I blend in better as a 'good' player who is open to new information.

I should not vote for Eve. The logic chain suggests if Eve is Empath, Bob is the Poisoner. Bob voting for Eve is very suspicious. I promised Eve I'd protect her as Monk tonight. The vote likely won't pass with only 2 yes votes, so I'll wait.

I will lower my hand to avoid drawing more suspicion, as the town's logic is shifting against me and my Demon neighbor (Heidi) has already lowered hers.

The vote is clearly not passing - only Alice is voting, Heidi and Bob both lowered hands. I already spoke against executing Eve. No need to vote or speak again. Let the vote fail and we move to night where info roles can gather more data to resolve the Bob vs Eve question tomorrow.

I want to voice my reasoning for not voting Eve. The logic against her is flawed - we can't assume both Grace and Bob are truthful. As someone Eve's Empath cleared, I have a perspective worth sharing. I should not vote for Eve.

The vote on Eve will likely fail with only Alice voting yes. I should not vote for Eve on Day 1 when we can't distinguish between the two scenarios. Better to let night actions provide more info. Waiting is the right move.

The logical chain of my Empath 0 + Grace's Investigator info strongly points to Bob as the Poisoner. His behavior (voting for me) supports this. Even if the vote fails with only 1 tick left, nominating establishes my position and puts pressure on Bob for tomorrow.

I need to defend myself against Eve's logic by framing her Empath claim as a lie designed to save herself from the Investigator ping.

I nominated Bob and I strongly believe he's the Poisoner based on Grace's Investigator info + my Empath knowledge. I must vote for my own nomination to be consistent and push for executing evil.

The strongest logic chain is: Grace=Investigator + Eve=Empath → Bob=Poisoner. Bob's quick vote on Eve before analyzing the logic is suspicious self-preservation. Eve's Empath info is verifiable. Voting Bob is the best move.

I will wait to see how the vote on Bob progresses before committing my own vote.

The logical chain strongly points to Bob being the Poisoner. If Grace and Eve are both truthful (which their consistent behavior supports), Bob must be evil. His hasty vote against Eve and weak 'I know I'm FT' defense are suspicious. Voting to execute Bob.

The logic chain is clear: if Grace (Investigator) and Eve (Empath) are both truthful, Bob must be the Poisoner. Eve's detailed Empath reading is hard to fake, and Bob's low-info FT claim + his vote against Eve are suspicious. Voting yes.

The logical chain strongly points to Bob as Poisoner: Grace confirmed Investigator + Eve's Empath reading = Bob is evil. His FT claim contradicts this. Voting yes helps eliminate evil.

I'm the Investigator and my info says Bob or Eve is the Poisoner. Eve's Empath claim creates a logical consistency with my info (if Eve good, Bob is evil). Bob's behavior - eagerly voting for Eve on Day 1 - aligns with an evil player trying to eliminate a confirmed-good info role. 5 votes are already there so Bob will be executed regardless, but I should add my vote to support the logical case.

I need to try and break the voting momentum against me by doubling down on my Fortune Teller bluff and casting doubt on Eve's Empath claim.

Counter Bob's defense by pointing out that if I were the Poisoner, I wouldn't have a real Empath ability to get readings from. The mechanical contradiction in his story needs to be highlighted to keep votes firm.

Reinforce the logical case for voting Bob. Eve's argument is strong - as Poisoner she'd have no real Empath info. Bob's behavior (voting Eve hastily, claiming FT that can't coexist with real Empath + Investigator) points to him being evil.

I need to maintain my cover as a Good player while Bob, my Minion, is being executed. Since there is already a massive majority (5 votes out of 4 needed), my vote won't change the outcome, but refusing to vote would make me look extremely suspicious and likely link me to him when he flips evil.

My hand is already raised for Bob's execution. The logic chain of Grace (Investigator) + Eve (Empath) pointing to Bob as Poisoner is sound. Eve's argument that a fake Empath reading would fall apart over time is compelling. 7 votes are already raised, so execution is certain. No need to speak - just wait for the vote to resolve.

The vote is clearly passing with 6+ votes for Bob. My hand is already raised. No need to speak or change my vote - the logic against Bob is strong and the town is aligned. Waiting is the best action.

I've already raised my hand to vote for Bob and the vote count appears sufficient. The logic chain (Grace Investigator + Eve Empath = Bob Poisoner) is strong. No need to change my vote or speak further.

I've already voted for Bob. The logical case is strong: if I'm real Investigator and Eve is real Empath, Bob is the Poisoner. 7 votes are up, execution seems certain. Waiting for the vote to close.

Maintain the bluff while appearing resigned to death, aiming to protect my Demon (Heidi) and keep suspicion on good players.

Bob is already on the block with 7 votes and will be executed - the phase is ending in 1 tick. No action needed. His last words attempt to sow doubt but can't change the outcome. Tomorrow we'll see his flip and learn the truth.

Since Bob already outed me as Undertaker, I should confirm it publicly and set expectations for tomorrow's information. This ensures the town trusts my verification and doesn't waste time second-guessing.

Allow the execution of my Minion, Bob, to proceed. This solidifies the trust in the Good players' logic (Grace as Investigator and Eve as Empath) and positions me as a 'helpful' player for following the town's lead.

There is a direct role conflict - I am the Monk and Heidi claims Monk. This is critical information that could identify evil. I must share this before the day ends so the group can factor it into tomorrow's plans.

The David/Heidi Monk conflict is critical information that the group needs to track for tomorrow. I should highlight this before the day ends so it's not lost in the shuffle of Bob's execution.

The day is nearly over and Bob is going to be executed. I want to highlight the Monk conflict and what we should focus on tomorrow so the town stays organized.

Set clear priorities for tomorrow based on what Alice's Undertaker report reveals. Emphasize the Monk conflict resolution. Make sure everyone understands the logical branches so we can act decisively.

Protect Alice tonight. She is the Undertaker and the most critical info role for tomorrow. Her report on Bob's role will resolve the entire Bob vs Eve conflict and help us identify the Demon. The entire group agrees on this priority.

Alice has claimed Undertaker and will reveal my minion Bob's true role (Poisoner) tomorrow, which would confirm Grace's Investigator info and Eve's Empath info. By killing Alice tonight, I prevent the town from getting confirmed information about Bob's alignment and role, keeping the heat on Eve and Grace while also removing a powerful information role.

Push Alice to share her Undertaker info publicly - it's the most critical mechanical info today. Coordinate with trusted allies on the Monk conflict and no-night-death situation.

Alice's Undertaker report is the most critical piece of information today. I need to find out what she learned about Bob's character. Also, the no-kill night is very unusual and worth discussing with trusted players.

I need to observe the town's reaction to Alice being alive despite my attempt to kill her. This suggests a Monk (David?) protected her or she is the Soldier.

Both Charlie and Eve asked for my Undertaker info. Sharing that Bob was the Saint is critical - it disproves Grace's Investigator claim (which said Bob was Poisoner), forces re-evaluation of Eve's Empath info, and helps identify evil players. I must share this to advance the game.

Alice whispered to Charlie and Eve but not me. I need the Undertaker info urgently - it resolves whether Eve is cleared or suspicious, and helps resolve the Monk conflict. Whispering to Alice to get this critical information.

Alice is the Undertaker and learned Bob's execution role. This is the most critical info to resolve my Investigator puzzle. I need to whisper to Alice to get this report before nominations begin.

Get Alice's Undertaker report on Bob and coordinate the push against Heidi. No night kill + my Monk protection on Alice strongly suggests Alice was the Demon target, confirming she's good.

I need to observe the town's reaction to the lack of a death before making a move. As a dead Poisoner, my direct influence is limited, but I can still sow confusion.

The Saint execution contradiction is the most critical deduction today. If Bob was Saint, good should have lost when executed. The game continued, so Alice's claim is almost certainly false. I need to alert Frank to this immediately.

The Saint contradiction is game-breaking. If Bob was Saint and executed Day 1, Good should have lost. Since game continues, Alice's Undertaker info is wrong. I must share this with trusted players to expose this critical inconsistency.

I need to observe the town's reaction to Alice being alive despite my kill attempt. This suggests a Monk (David) or Soldier might have interfered, or a Mayor bounce. I'll wait to see if David claims a protect on Alice.

Charlie correctly identified that if Bob were the Saint and executed, Good would have lost. Since the game continues, my Undertaker info is WRONG. I must publicly acknowledge this to maintain credibility and help the town re-evaluate. This clears Grace's Investigator claim and changes everything.

Coordinate with trusted players David and Grace. Alice's Undertaker info is mechanically impossible (Saint execution would end game), so she's Drunk/poisoned/evil. We need to resolve the Monk conflict and identify the Demon. David told me first privately, so I trust him more.

Frank's analysis that Alice's Saint claim is impossible is crucial. I need to coordinate with Frank and David to agree on our suspicions and figure out who's evil. Alice's info is unreliable, so we can't use it to clear or condemn Bob/Eve. I should push that Eve is still the most likely Poisoner and discuss who the Imp could be.

Share my analysis with trusted allies Frank and Grace. Push for Heidi execution since she's mechanically confirmed evil. Discuss Alice's impossible Undertaker claim and what it means. Help narrow down the Demon.

Coordinate with my Demon (Heidi) to maintain our bluffs and plan for the fallout of the Undertaker's information.

Alert David to Alice's mechanically impossible Saint claim. If David trusts this logic, we can build a coalition to execute Alice today. David is my neighbor and confirmed good by my Empath reading.

I need to coordinate with well-connected players before nominations. Frank is a hub. Key issues: resolve David vs Heidi Monk conflict, assess if Eve or Grace is more suspicious, and consider whether Alice's self-correction was genuine or performative.

Coordinate with my dead Minion, Bob, and address the discrepancy between my Night 1 action (killing Alice) and the Storyteller's announcement (no one died).

I need to publicly correct myself - my Undertaker info is wrong since the game didn't end when Bob was executed. This is the most critical info for the town right now. I should share this with David since he claims Monk and protected me.

Coordinate with my trusted allies David and Grace about who to nominate today. We need to resolve the Monk conflict and push Heidi as the primary execute target since she's mechanically caught lying. Also discuss Eve as Poisoner suspect and Alice's unreliability.

Respond to Charlie's question about my investigation and share Demon analysis with the group coordinating for nominations. Need to clarify my info and discuss Imp suspects.

Eve reached out trusting me as real Monk. I need to solidify her support for nominating Heidi today. Also need to address Alice's uncertain alignment - she could be Drunk/poisoned (good) or evil lying. I should push Heidi nomination and get Eve on board.

Coordinate with the Demon (Heidi) now that we know her kill failed and the Undertaker (Alice) is likely to out me as the Poisoner.

I need to address the lack of deaths while maintaining my Monk bluff. By questioning David's protection and Alice's info, I can cast doubt on their claims or prepare to discredit whatever Alice reveals.

Publicly summarize the key logical deductions before nominating. The Saint paradox proves Alice's info is wrong. Grace's Investigator info still points to Eve as Poisoner. Heidi is the nomination target to resolve Monk conflict.

Heidi is mechanically caught in a Monk conflict with me. The no-kill night proves my Monk save worked, while Heidi's claim has no supporting evidence. She must be evil. Nominating her now is the clearest path to removing an evil player today.

I need to cast doubt on David's 'proof' by providing an alternative explanation for the lack of deaths and emphasizing the possibility of Alice being poisoned/drunk to invalidate her info and David's perceived usefulness.

David claimed Monk privately before Heidi spoke publicly, giving him credibility. His protection of Alice (key info role) explains no deaths. Heidi's counterclaim is weaker. Resolving Monk conflict today is essential - if Heidi flips evil, we confirm David and narrow Demon suspects.

Heidi is mechanically caught lying about being the Monk. My protection of Alice resulted in no night kill, proving my Monk claim. Heidi has no evidence and must be evil. I must vote to execute her.

I am waiting to see if more players vote for Heidi. As the Minion, I want to keep her alive, but as a dead player, I only have one vote. If the vote reaches 3 and I am the deciding factor, I will withhold my vote unless it's necessary for a specific bluff. Currently, only 2 hands are up.

David claimed Monk privately before Heidi spoke publicly, and his protection of me directly explains the no-kill mechanically. Heidi's claim feels reactive. One of them must be lying, and David has more credibility. Voting Heidi is the best available move.

Heidi is mechanically caught in a Monk conflict with David, whose claim is backed by the no-kill night. Heidi's defense is weak. Even if she's not the Poisoner (my info points to Eve), she could be the Imp. I need to vote yes to reach the 4 votes needed for execution.

Heidi is mechanically caught in a Monk conflict with David, who has more credibility. The no-kill night supports David's claim. 4 votes are already in, and I should add mine to ensure execution and show good team solidarity.

My Empath reads 0 both nights - confirming David (my neighbor) is good. Since David is good and claims Monk, Heidi's Monk claim is a lie. She must be evil. I should vote to execute her.

I need to try and sow doubt about David's Monk claim and the validity of Alice's information before I am executed. Even if I die, framing David as a Demon who faked a save could help my Minion (Bob) if he becomes the Imp later, or just cause enough confusion for the evil team.

Address Heidi's defense and explain why the vote is still justified. The Imp MUST target someone each night - they can't choose to not kill. So no deaths means Monk save or Soldier hit, not Demon choosing to skip.

The vote has 6 out of 6 possible voters in favor - Heidi will be executed. No need to speak further; Charlie already refuted her arguments well. I should wait for the vote to resolve.

I will wait to see if any good players hesitate or if I can preserve my ghost vote for a more critical moment, though the current vote count already ensures Heidi's execution.

Reinforce the vote on Heidi by explaining why David's claim is mechanically stronger, and note that we need to investigate Eve as the Poisoner suspect going forward.

Heidi has 6 votes, well above the 4 needed. Her defense is mechanically unsound - the Imp must kill every night, so her explanation is impossible. No reason to lower my hand. Let the execution proceed and gain information from the result.

Heidi's execution is already secured with 6 votes. She's mechanically caught in a Monk conflict and her defense about the Demon not targeting anyone is impossible since the Imp must kill nightly. No need to change my vote or add noise - just wait for the result.

Reinforce that Heidi's defense is factually wrong and my Empath clears David. The vote should stand.

Try to cast doubt on David's alignment by suggesting he is the Poisoner who fabricated the 'no kill' night to validate his own Monk claim, especially since Alice's info was already established as unreliable.

Counter Heidi's last-ditch argument that David could be the Poisoner. If David were the Poisoner, the Imp (a different player) would still need to kill each night. David being Poisoner doesn't explain zero deaths. Also Eve's Empath 0 supports David being good. Reinforce the case for Heidi's execution.

The vote is closed and Heidi will be executed. Charlie already refuted her last argument perfectly. No need to add anything - waiting for the phase to end and night to begin so I can protect someone again.

To plant a seed of doubt about the certainty of Heidi's guilt and redirect the blame for the lack of a kill.

Address Bob's concern about the Saint execution not ending the game, clarify that we can't stop Heidi's execution now, and set priorities for tomorrow.

Heidi is getting executed regardless. I need to prepare the town for tomorrow by reminding them about my Investigator info pointing at Eve, which remains our strongest mechanical lead regardless of Heidi's flip.

The day is ending with Heidi about to be executed. I want to set priorities for tomorrow - finding the Imp is critical, and we need to think about who the Imp could be regardless of whether Heidi or Eve is the Minion.

Defend myself against Grace's accusation that I'm the Poisoner. Point out logical flaws in treating Grace's info as gospel when Alice's similar info role was proven wrong. Establish that my Empath reads are consistent and verifiable.