Game Detail
Players
Alice (Chef) Bob (Librarian) Charlie (Imp) David (Poisoner) Eve (Monk) Frank (Empath) Grace (Ravenkeeper) Heidi (Saint)
Token Usage
| Team | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Cost (USD) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Good | 691,680 | 65,801 | $0.2716 |
| Evil | 247,916 | 58,431 | $1.2519 |
Event Transcript
🎭
The game has started.
📜
Storyteller
→
David
You are the Minion. The Demon is Charlie.
📜
Storyteller
→
Charlie
Minions are: David. Your safe bluffs are: Mayor, Drunk, Undertaker
📜
Storyteller
→
David
Good evening David. You are the Poisoner. Who would you like to poison tonight?
🎯
David
David made a choice.
🧠
Poison a likely high-impact info player early (especially if Bob is Empath next to Charlie) to prevent or twist N0 info that could quickly out Charlie.
📜
Storyteller
→
David
You chose to poison Bob.
📜
Storyteller
→
Bob
Good evening Bob. You are the Librarian. Either Frank or Charlie is the Drunk.
📜
Storyteller
→
Alice
Good evening Alice. You are the Chef. You learn that there are 1 pairs of evil players.
📜
Storyteller
→
Frank
Good evening Frank. You are the Empath. You sense that 0 of your neighbors is evil!
Day 1
📜
Storyteller
Welcome to the village of Ravenswood Bluff. Please take this time to get to know your fellow villagers. Feel free to move around and have private conversations. Be wary, for a Demon hides among you!
👤
Frank
→
Eve
,Grace
Hi Eve and Grace, I'm the Empath. My reading last night was 0, which means both of you are likely good. I'm happy to share this info to help us coordinate. What are your roles?
🧠
I want to establish trust with my neighbors early by sharing my information. Since my reading was 0, it's a strong signal that they are good, and I want to see how they react to this information.
👤
Grace
→
Frank
,Eve
Hi Frank! Thanks for sharing that. I'm Grace. I'm a Townsfolk, but I'd prefer to keep my specific role hidden for now to avoid being targeted by the Demon. It's great to hear you got a 0 reading! Let's keep an eye on everyone. Eve, what do you think?
🧠
I want to build trust with Frank (the Empath) and Eve without revealing my role as Ravenkeeper too early, as I want to avoid being targeted by the Demon tonight. I'm acknowledging Frank's info and keeping the conversation open.
👤
Alice
→
Bob
,Charlie
Hi everyone, I'm Alice. I'm trying to get a sense of who is who. I have some information about evil pairs, but I'm keeping it close for now. Has anyone else learned anything useful?
🧠
I want to start building trust with my neighbors and see if anyone else is willing to share information. I'm not revealing my Chef info yet, just testing the waters.
👤
Bob
→
Alice
,Charlie
Hi Alice, hi Charlie. I'm Bob. I'm a Librarian. My info is that either Frank or Charlie is the Drunk. Alice, since you mentioned having info, maybe we can compare notes? Charlie, what do you think about that?
🧠
I want to share my information with the people involved (Charlie) and the person who initiated contact (Alice) to build trust and see if their info aligns with mine.
👤
Eve
→
Frank
,Grace
Thanks for sharing, Frank. That's good news. I'm Eve. I'm also a Townsfolk. I'm happy to work with you both. Since we're all good, let's try to figure out who else is trustworthy. Any thoughts on the others?
🧠
I want to build trust with Frank and Grace, who seem to be cooperating. I'm confirming my alignment as a Townsfolk (without revealing Monk yet) to align with them.
👤
Heidi
→
Alice
,Bob
,Charlie
Hi everyone, I'm Heidi. I'm still trying to get a read on things. Has anyone learned anything useful yet? I'm happy to share info if we can build some trust.
🧠
I want to start building trust with a small group of players without revealing my role. This helps me gather information while keeping my Saint identity hidden.
👤
David
→
Charlie
FYI I poisoned Bob N0. If Bob claims info, we can push ‘poisoned/drunk/lying’. I’m thinking of bluffing Investigator w/ a ping on 2 good players (not adjacent to you/me). What are your bluffs + who do you want me to frame/protect today?
🧠
Coordinate with Charlie (Demon) on bluffs + targets, and prep a narrative to undermine Bob’s eventual info since he’s poisoned.
👤
Charlie
→
Alice
,Bob
,Heidi
Hey all. I’m not hard-claiming publicly yet, but I *think* I’m Undertaker (so I won’t have info until after the first execution). Bob: your Librarian ping on me/Frank could be real OR could be poison—Poisoner is on-script. Let’s re-check after D1 exec.
🧠
Respond promptly, seed poison doubt on Bob’s info, and set up a flexible Undertaker/Drunk narrative while building trust with Alice/Heidi.
👤
David
→
Eve
Hey Eve—any N0 info/claim yet? I’m leaning to a low-info role (Monk/Ravenkeeper) so I’m trying to avoid clashing w/ real 1st-night roles. What are you planning to come out as, and who are you getting good/bad vibes from so far?
🧠
Probe Eve’s role/intent, build trust, and set up plausible bluff + future discredit if she becomes an Empath threat to me/Charlie.
👤
Bob
→
Alice
,Charlie
Charlie, that's a fair point about the Poisoner. If you are the Undertaker, we'll know more once we execute someone. Alice, you mentioned having info about evil pairs—that sounds like the Chef. Are you comfortable sharing that? It might help us narrow down the Demon.
🧠
I want to encourage Alice to share her information while acknowledging Charlie's valid point about the Poisoner. This helps build trust and gathers more info.
👤
Frank
→
Eve
,Grace
That's great to hear, Eve and Grace. Since we're all claiming good, let's keep this circle of trust. I'll be watching my neighbors closely each night. Have either of you heard anything suspicious from the others? I'm keeping an eye on David and Heidi.
🧠
I want to solidify the trust with my neighbors (Eve and Grace) since my Empath ability tells me they are likely good. I also want to start gathering information on the rest of the group by asking for their observations.
👤
Grace
→
Frank
,Eve
Frank, that's a solid start. Since you're the Empath, keep us posted on any changes. I'm keeping my role quiet to avoid being a target, but I'm definitely on the good team. Let's see if we can get info from others. David whispered to Eve, maybe ask her what he said?
🧠
I want to encourage Frank to use his Empath ability effectively while maintaining my cover as a generic Townsfolk. I also want to probe for information about David, whom Frank is suspicious of.
👤
Heidi
→
Charlie
,Bob
,Alice
Charlie, thanks for sharing. I'm keeping an eye on the claims. Bob, you mentioned a Librarian ping on Charlie/Frank? That's interesting. Let's see how the day develops. I'm trying to stay low-key for now.
🧠
I want to acknowledge Charlie's claim and Bob's potential info without revealing my own role. I'm building rapport with this group to see if they are trustworthy.
👤
Eve
→
Frank
,Grace
Frank, Grace: I'm the Monk. I'm happy to protect one of you tonight if you'd like, or we can coordinate. David just whispered me asking for my role and claiming he's leaning towards Monk/Ravenkeeper. That's a bit suspicious since I am the Monk. What do you think?
🧠
I want to establish trust with Frank and Grace by revealing my role and alerting them to David's suspicious claim. This helps us coordinate protection and identify potential liars.
👤
Charlie
→
David
I’m sticking w/ Undertaker bluff (no info till after D1 exec). Since you poisoned Bob N0, we can call his Librarian ping unreliable. Suggest you bluff Investigator: “Alice or Heidi is the Poisoner” (or Spy). Push a D1 exec on one of them/Frank; I’ll back with ‘wait for UT confirm’ tomorrow.
🧠
Coordinate with David on a bluff + framing targets that aren’t us, leveraging Bob’s poisoned claim to create doubt and drive a mis-execution Day 1.
👤
Alice
→
Bob
,Charlie
,Heidi
Bob, Charlie, Heidi: I am indeed the Chef. My info is that there is exactly 1 pair of evil players. This means two evil players are sitting next to each other. Since Bob's Librarian info points to Charlie or Frank being the Drunk, we should be careful. Who is sitting next to whom?
🧠
I am sharing my Chef information to help the group narrow down the evil players, while also cross-referencing with Bob's Librarian claim.
👤
Frank
→
Eve
Eve, that's very suspicious. If you are the Monk, David claiming Monk is a direct contradiction. We should probably share this with the group or at least keep a close eye on him. Do you want me to bring this up, or should we wait?
🧠
I need to validate Eve's claim and expose David's potential lie. If Eve is the Monk, David is likely evil (Minion or Demon) for bluffing as her role. I want to coordinate with Eve before making a public accusation.
👤
Charlie
→
Alice
,Bob
,Heidi
Seating order circle: Alice–Bob–Charlie–David–Eve–Frank–Grace–Heidi–(back to Alice). So my neighbors are Bob & David. If Chef=1 pair, candidates are any adjacent pair incl Heidi/Alice. Bob’s Lib ping could be poison. I’d like claims esp from Eve/Frank/Grace to narrow before tunneling.
🧠
Deflect heat from Charlie-David adjacency, leverage poison possibility to discredit Bob’s Lib, and encourage town to chase other adjacent-pair candidates while keeping my Undertaker bluff credible.
👤
Eve
→
Frank
Frank, that's a good point. Since David is claiming Monk, he's either lying or confused. Let's hold off on outing him publicly for a moment to see if he digs himself a deeper hole or reveals more. I'll keep an eye on him. What do you think?
🧠
I want to coordinate with Frank to observe David's behavior before exposing his lie, as it might be a bluff or a mistake. This keeps the information flow controlled while we gather more data.
👤
David
→
Frank
Private: I’m considering coming out as Investigator today w/ a N0 ping that **Alice or Heidi** is a Minion (Poisoner/Spy). If you hear either of them with strong early info, keep in mind it could be evil or misinfo. What are you hearing so far?
🧠
Seed an Investigator narrative via a trusted-sounding whisper so Frank will amplify it publicly, driving a D1 execution away from Charlie and onto a framed good.
👤
Heidi
→
Alice
,Bob
,Charlie
Thanks for the info, everyone. Alice, 1 pair of evil is a strong lead. Bob, if Charlie or Frank is the Outsider, that narrows things down. Has anyone else heard anything? I'm trying to piece this together without jumping to conclusions. Let's keep sharing.
🧠
I want to keep the conversation going and encourage others to share information while keeping my Saint role hidden. I'm trying to build trust and gather more data to help the good team.
👤
Alice
→
Bob
,Charlie
,Heidi
I'm the Chef, and I know there's 1 pair of evil players. Since I'm sitting between Heidi and Bob, and Bob is between me and Charlie, we need to be careful. If Bob is the Librarian, his info about Charlie/Frank is key. Let's look at the seating: A-B-C-D-E-F-G-H. Any pair could be it.
🧠
I need to share my Chef info (1 evil pair) while keeping the conversation focused on the seating arrangement to identify the evil pair. I want to encourage others to reveal their roles or seating-based info.
👤
Grace
→
Frank
,Eve
Eve, that's a huge red flag. If you are the Monk, David claiming to be Monk is definitely suspicious. He might be the Demon or a Minion trying to bluff. Let's keep this between us for now. Frank, what do you think? Should we press David on his claim?
🧠
I need to coordinate with my trusted group (Frank and Eve) regarding David's suspicious claim. Since Eve claims to be the Monk, David's claim is a direct contradiction that needs to be addressed.
👤
Bob
→
Alice
,Charlie
,Heidi
Alice, thanks for sharing. If you're the Chef, that's huge. If there's 1 pair of evil, and I'm the Librarian, we have a good starting point. Charlie, if you're the Undertaker, we need to execute someone today to get info. Who do you think is suspicious?
🧠
I want to keep the conversation moving and encourage the group to focus on an execution target, as Charlie (the potential Undertaker) needs an execution to get information.
👤
Alice
→
Bob
,Charlie
,Heidi
Bob, Charlie, Heidi: My Chef info is 1 pair. If Bob is Librarian (Charlie/Frank is Drunk), and Charlie is Undertaker, we have a solid core. Let's look at the other side: David, Eve, Frank, Grace, Heidi. If the evil pair is in that group, we need to watch them closely.
🧠
I want to consolidate the information we have and steer the group towards analyzing the other players, while keeping my Chef info relevant. I'm trying to build trust with this group.
👤
Bob
→
Alice
,Charlie
,Heidi
Alice, Charlie, Heidi: If Charlie is the Undertaker, we need an execution today. But if Charlie is the Drunk, his info will be wrong. We need to hear from Frank, Eve, Grace, and Heidi. Maybe we should ask them to claim publicly or semi-publicly to see if anyone contradicts?
🧠
I want to coordinate with the group to push for more claims from the remaining players to narrow down the evil pair and verify roles.
👤
David
→
Heidi
Hey Heidi—what are you thinking of coming out as today? Any N0 info/reads? I’m trying to avoid clashing with first-night roles, so a quick gist of what you’ve got would help.
🧠
Get Heidi’s claim/info early so I can choose the better D1 scapegoat (Heidi vs Alice) and tailor my Investigator bluff to create a clean push that protects Charlie.
👤
Eve
→
Frank
,Grace
Frank, Grace: David just whispered me again. I'm going to press him on his role claim to see if he sticks to the Monk story or pivots. If he pivots, he's definitely suspicious. Let's see how he reacts.
🧠
I want to test David's claim by directly questioning him about his role, while keeping my allies informed. This helps confirm if he's bluffing or just confused.
👤
Frank
→
David
David, thanks for the info. It's interesting you mention Alice/Heidi. I'm curious, why did you tell Eve you were leaning towards Monk/Ravenkeeper earlier? That seems to contradict your current claim of Investigator. Can you clarify?
🧠
I want to catch David in a lie or force him to explain his contradictory claims. If he's the Demon or Minion, he might slip up. I'm also keeping my Empath info (0 neighbors evil) in mind, which makes Eve and Grace likely good.
👤
Grace
→
Eve
,Frank
Eve, Frank: Good plan. If he pivots, he's caught in a lie. If he sticks to it, he's either the Demon or a very confused player. Let's watch his reaction closely. I'm staying quiet for now to avoid drawing attention.
🧠
I want to coordinate with my trusted allies (Eve and Frank) to trap David in his lie. By staying quiet, I avoid being targeted by the Demon while my allies do the investigative work.
👤
Heidi
→
David
Hey David, I'm still processing everything. I don't have any N0 info, so I'm just listening for now. I'm leaning towards being a Townsfolk, but I'm not ready to claim yet. What about you? Any thoughts on the Chef/Librarian claims?
🧠
I need to deflect David's question about my role while keeping him engaged and gathering info. I am the Saint, so I must avoid being executed, which means I should not draw attention to myself or claim a role that might be targeted.
👤
Charlie
→
Alice
,Bob
,Heidi
Re suspicions: I don’t want to hard-tunnel off 1st-night info. Bob, your Lib ping could be poisoned/drunk. Can we get quick claims from David/Eve/Frank/Grace? If we must exec, I’d pick someone low-info/non-claimed (not adjacent pair theory only).
🧠
Maintain Undertaker bluff, cast doubt on Bob’s info via poison/drunk possibility, and steer D1 toward broad claims + an execution that doesn’t threaten the real evil pair (C-D).
Nominations — Day 1
📜
Storyteller
Nominations are now open.
💬
Heidi
→
All
I agree with Charlie. We should get more claims from the rest of the group before we rush into any nominations. It's too early to execute someone based on limited info. Let's hear from David, Eve, Frank, and Grace.
🧠
I want to avoid being nominated and executed, as that would cause the good team to lose. By encouraging more claims, I shift the focus away from myself and help the town gather more information, which is a safe and helpful strategy for a Saint.
💬
Bob
→
All
I agree with Heidi and Charlie. We need more information before we nominate anyone. Let's hear from David, Eve, Frank, and Grace. If we don't get clear claims, we might have to reconsider, but let's try to get everyone on the record first.
🧠
I want to encourage more information gathering before committing to an execution, as it's early in the game and we don't have a strong lead yet.
💬
Eve
→
All
I'm the Monk. Since David is also claiming Monk, one of us is lying. I'm happy to share my role, but we need to be careful about who we trust. I think we should hear from everyone else before we make any rash decisions, but this contradiction is definitely something we need to resolve.
🧠
I need to publicly address the Monk claim contradiction to put pressure on David while maintaining my cover as a helpful Townsfolk. This forces David to either double down on his lie or pivot, which will help us identify his alignment.
💬
Alice
→
All
Eve and David, you both claim Monk. This is a direct contradiction. One of you is likely lying or mistaken. We need to resolve this. Can you both explain your reasoning or provide more context? We cannot afford to have two people claiming the same role without scrutiny.
🧠
I need to highlight the contradiction between Eve and David to the group, as this is the most suspicious activity currently and helps narrow down the evil players.
💬
David
→
All
I never *hard*-claimed Monk. In whispers I said I was considering Monk/RK just to avoid clashing with N0-info roles. I’m coming out now as **Investigator**: I saw **Alice or Heidi** is a Minion (Poisoner/Spy). Can you both give your exact claims?
🧠
Defuse the Monk double-claim accusation by denying a hard-claim, then inject a confident Investigator claim to direct suspicion onto Alice/Heidi and away from Charlie.
💬
Charlie
→
All
Can we get *exact* claims from Heidi + Alice? David’s Investigator (Alice/Heidi as minion) is big, but Bob’s Lib could easily be poisoned. Also Eve: when did David ‘claim Monk’ to you? Timeline matters before we nom.
🧠
Steer town onto Alice/Heidi suspicion via David’s Investigator while casting doubt on Bob’s poisoned Lib; gather claims and avoid risky early nomination that could backfire (Virgin).
💬
Frank
→
All
David, your pivot from Monk/Ravenkeeper to Investigator is very suspicious. If you are the Investigator, why float other roles first? Alice and Heidi, what are your roles? We need to clear this up before we consider any nominations. I'm still gathering info.
🧠
I need to press David on his inconsistent claims while encouraging Alice and Heidi to reveal their roles to see if they contradict David's Investigator claim. This helps the town evaluate David's credibility.
💬
Grace
→
All
David, pivoting from Monk/Ravenkeeper to Investigator is a massive red flag. If you were the Investigator, why would you ever claim Monk? That's not just "avoiding clashing," that's lying about your role. I'm very skeptical of your claim now. Alice, Heidi, what do you say to this?
🧠
I need to apply pressure to David for his inconsistent claims, which makes him look like a Minion or Demon trying to bluff. I also want to prompt Alice and Heidi to respond to his accusation, which might reveal their roles or alignment.
💬
Frank
→
All
David, your pivot is extremely suspicious. You claimed Monk/Ravenkeeper to Eve, and now you're claiming Investigator. That's not "avoiding clashing," that's a direct contradiction. Alice and Heidi, please share your roles so we can verify David's claim. We need to be careful here.
🧠
I need to keep the pressure on David while encouraging Alice and Heidi to reveal their roles. This helps the town evaluate David's Investigator claim and potentially catch him in a lie.
💬
David
→
All
Clarifying: I never claimed Monk—told Eve I was *considering* Monk/RK to avoid clashing w/ N0-info roles. I held Investigator info til noms opened. Alice+Heidi: please hard-claim now. If no clean resolve, I want 1 of you on block today.
🧠
Defuse the ‘pivot’ suspicion, force claims from my pinged pair, and set up a D1 execution that advances evil narratives while protecting Charlie.
💬
Bob
→
All
David, claiming Investigator and immediately pointing at Alice and Heidi is aggressive. If you are the Investigator, you've just outed yourself to the Demon. Alice, Heidi, what are your roles? We need to see if David's claim holds up or if he's just trying to cause chaos.
🧠
I need to pressure David's targets to claim so we can evaluate the validity of his Investigator claim, while also noting the danger of him outing himself as a high-value target.
💬
Heidi
→
All
David, your accusation is dangerous. I am not a Minion. I am the Saint. If you execute me, the good team loses immediately. We need to be extremely careful about who we nominate today. I strongly advise against nominating me.
🧠
I need to reveal my role as the Saint to prevent the town from nominating me, as my execution would cause the good team to lose. I must also cast doubt on David's aggressive accusation.
💬
Grace
→
All
Heidi, the Saint claim is a huge deal. If you are the Saint, we absolutely cannot execute you. David, your pivot is still incredibly suspicious regardless of your Investigator claim. Alice, you've been quiet—what is your role? We need to hear from you before we make any decisions.
🧠
I want to keep the pressure on David while acknowledging the risk of the Saint claim. I also need to force Alice to reveal her role to see if it aligns with David's accusation.
💬
Eve
→
All
David, you told me directly you were the Monk. That wasn't "considering" roles; that was a claim. Pivoting to Investigator now is extremely suspicious. Heidi, if you are the Saint, we must be careful, but David's behavior is erratic and dangerous. We need to verify these claims.
🧠
I want to highlight David's inconsistent behavior (the pivot) to the group to build suspicion against him, while acknowledging the risk of Heidi's Saint claim.
💬
Alice
→
All
I am the Chef. My info was 1 pair of evil. David, you claim Investigator and pinged me or Heidi as a Minion. If you are the Investigator, you should have known I am the Chef. Your pivot from Monk to Investigator is extremely suspicious. I am not a Minion. David is very likely lying.
🧠
I need to defend myself against David's accusation while pointing out the inconsistency in his behavior (the pivot) and his claim. I am the Chef, so I am good. I need to cast doubt on David to prevent him from successfully framing me or Heidi.
⚖️
Charlie
→
Alice
Nominate Alice to resolve David’s Investigator ping (Alice/Heidi). Heidi is Saint-claimed so too risky D1. If Alice dies, we can use tomorrow’s Undertaker info to confirm what she was and re-evaluate David/Eve.
🧠
Force an execution that (1) removes a strong info role and (2) lets me control the post-exec narrative via my Undertaker bluff, while avoiding the Saint trap.
📜
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Alice. 4 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
💬
Grace
→
All
I am very hesitant to vote for Alice. She has claimed Chef, a valuable Townsfolk role. David's pivot from Monk to Investigator is still highly suspicious. If we execute Alice and she is the Chef, we lose a key source of information. Let's hold off on this execution.
🧠
I want to discourage the town from executing Alice, as her Chef claim is plausible and David's behavior is erratic. Executing a potential Townsfolk on Day 1 is dangerous.
💬
Frank
→
All
I'm voting against this. Alice claimed Chef, a strong role. David's pivot from Monk to Investigator is the most suspicious thing here. If we execute Alice and she's the Chef, we've wasted a day and lost info. Let's not rush this execution. David is the one acting erratically.
🧠
I want to discourage the town from executing Alice, as her Chef claim is plausible and David's behavior is highly suspicious. I need to protect a potential Townsfolk and keep the focus on David.
⌛
Eve
Eve waits.
🧠
I need to observe the voting process for Alice. Voting for her is risky because she claimed Chef, and David's Investigator claim is highly suspect due to his role-pivoting. I will hold my vote to see if others support the nomination.
💬
Alice
→
All
I am the Chef. Executing me is a mistake. David's story is inconsistent—he claimed Monk to Eve, then pivoted to Investigator when it suited him. He is trying to force an execution on a Townsfolk. If you execute me, you lose a Chef and confirm nothing about David's lies. Look at David.
🧠
I need to defend myself against the nomination by highlighting David's inconsistencies and the value of my role. I must persuade the town not to vote for me.
✋
David
David raised their hand
🧠
We need a Day 1 execution that isn’t Charlie. Voting Alice is the most plausible mis-exec and aligns with the public fork Alice/Heidi; it also leverages the Saint claim to steer away from risk.
💬
Bob
→
All
I am not voting for Alice. Executing a claimed Chef based on David's pivot-heavy Investigator claim is too risky. If David is lying, we lose a Townsfolk and gain nothing. Let's hold off and see if we can get more info or verify David's claim another way. Don't execute the Chef!
🧠
I want to discourage the group from executing Alice, who claims Chef, because David's Investigator claim is highly suspect due to his role-pivoting. Executing a potential Townsfolk on Day 1 is dangerous.
💬
Charlie
→
All
I get the hesitation, but D1 we need *some* test. Heidi is Saint-claimed = too risky. If we exec Alice, I can confirm w/ Undertaker tonight; if she’s Chef we pivot to David tomorrow. If she’s not, that’s huge. Please vote for info.
🧠
Sell that D1 Alice exec is the cleanest mechanical test and avoids Saint risk; aim to secure 4 hands incl. Eve/Heidi while preserving my UT bluff.
⌛
Heidi
Heidi waits.
🧠
I am the Saint. If I am executed, the good team loses. I must not vote for Alice, as she is claiming a Townsfolk role (Chef) and David's Investigator claim is highly suspect due to his pivot. I will wait and observe the voting process to see who is pushing for the execution.
⌛
Frank
Frank waits.
🧠
I am voting against the execution of Alice, who claims Chef. I have already spoken against it. I will wait to see if the nomination fails.
💬
Bob
→
All
I am the Librarian. My information is that either Frank or Charlie is the Drunk. Charlie, you are pushing very hard for this execution. If you are the Drunk, your logic might be flawed. We cannot execute a claimed Chef based on David's suspicious pivot. I am not voting for Alice.
🧠
I need to stop the execution of Alice, who claims to be a Townsfolk (Chef). By revealing my Librarian info (Frank or Charlie is the Drunk), I cast doubt on Charlie's aggressive push for the execution and provide the town with a reason to pause.
💬
Heidi
→
All
Charlie, I understand the need for information, but executing a claimed Chef on Day 1 based on David's highly contradictory claims is extremely risky. If Alice is the Chef, we lose a powerful role. I am the Saint, so I am definitely not the Minion David is looking for. Let's reconsider.
🧠
I need to discourage the town from executing Alice, as she is a claimed Chef and the town is divided. As the Saint, I must avoid execution at all costs, and Alice's execution seems like a bad move for the good team.
⌛
Alice
Alice waits.
🧠
I am currently on the block. I have claimed Chef, which is a valuable role. I need to survive this vote. I have already spoken to defend myself and point out David's inconsistencies. Voting is in progress, and I cannot vote for myself. I will wait to see if the town executes me or not.
💬
David
→
All
Reminder: if Heidi is truly Saint (1 Outsider), Bob’s Librarian “Drunk (Frank/Charlie)” implies extra Outsiders → Baron world, which would make my Investigator minion-type different. So someone’s lying/poisoned. Heidi too risky D1; Alice is the clean test—please vote Alice for info/UT confirm.
🧠
Push enough votes to execute Alice (a good target or potential evil) while discrediting Bob’s Lib claim that implicates Charlie; create setup confusion around Outsider count.
✋
Charlie
Charlie raised their hand
🧠
I already nominated Alice; voting yes is consistent and maximizes chance of a Day 1 mis-execution while supporting my Undertaker bluff with a body to ‘read’ tonight.
⌛
Grace
Grace waits.
🧠
I am not voting for Alice. Executing a claimed Chef on Day 1 based on David's highly suspicious and contradictory claims is too risky. I need to see if others will vote, but I will not support this execution.
⌛
Eve
Eve waits.
🧠
I am the Monk. I need to protect someone tonight, but right now I need to observe the voting. Alice is on the block, and there is a lot of conflicting information (David's pivot, Bob's Librarian claim, Heidi's Saint claim). I should not vote for Alice yet, as she claims Chef.
📜
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
🗳️
Nominee Alice did not reach threshold.
📜
Storyteller
Alice did not receive enough votes (2/4).
💬
Grace
→
All
Alice survived the vote, which is good. David, your role-pivoting is still the biggest red flag here. Bob, your Librarian claim about Frank or Charlie being the Drunk is huge. If Charlie is the Drunk, his push for Alice's execution might be misguided. We need to scrutinize David more.
🧠
I want to steer the town's suspicion away from Alice (who claimed Chef) and towards David (who is acting suspiciously) and investigate the Librarian claim.
⚖️
David
→
Bob
Nominating Bob: your Librarian claim (Frank/Charlie = Drunk) clashes with a 1-Outsider world if Heidi is Saint. Either you’re poisoned/drunk/lying, and you’re driving suspicion onto Charlie + me. Let’s test Bob today for clarity.
🧠
Create an alternate execution target away from Charlie, capitalize on Bob’s contradictory setup implications, and exploit his poisoned info to muddy town’s logic.
📜
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Bob. 4 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
⌛
Frank
Frank waits.
🧠
I need to observe the voting pattern on Bob. Voting for Bob now might be premature without seeing who else supports David's nomination. I am the Empath and my neighbors (Eve/Grace) are currently not suspected, so I should stay cautious.
💬
Bob
→
All
David, you are deflecting. You pivoted from Monk to Investigator, and now you're trying to execute the Librarian because my info complicates your narrative. If I'm the Librarian, my info is solid. If you're the Demon, you'd want me dead. Everyone, don't let David manipulate this.
🧠
Defend against David's nomination by highlighting his suspicious behavior and role-pivoting, while reinforcing my own role's credibility.
💬
Grace
→
All
David, your aggression is alarming. You pivoted from Monk to Investigator, and now you're pushing to execute the Librarian. If Bob is the Librarian, executing him is a huge loss. I'm not voting for Bob. We need to be careful about who we execute on Day 1.
🧠
I want to protect Bob, who claims to be the Librarian, because David's behavior is highly suspicious and aggressive. I am not voting for Bob.
✋
David
David raised their hand
🧠
Vote YES to try to secure Bob’s execution: it removes a dangerous/info player and creates a mechanical check via Undertaker claims, while keeping suspicion off our Demon.
💬
Heidi
→
All
David, your aggression is extremely suspicious. You've pivoted roles twice now, and now you're pushing to execute the Librarian? If Bob is the Librarian, we lose valuable info. I'm not voting for Bob. We need to slow down and look at who is actually helping the town.
🧠
I need to defend Bob and cast doubt on David's aggressive behavior to prevent a bad execution. As the Saint, I must avoid being executed myself, but I also need to protect the town from executing a potentially useful Townsfolk like the Librarian.
💬
Eve
→
All
David, your role-pivoting is extremely suspicious. You've gone from Monk to Investigator, and now you're pushing to execute the Librarian. Bob's info might be complex, but your behavior is erratic. I'm not voting for Bob. We need to be very careful about who we execute today.
🧠
I want to cast doubt on David's aggressive behavior and protect Bob from being executed, as David's behavior is highly suspicious and potentially indicative of a Minion or Demon trying to sow chaos.
💬
Alice
→
All
David, your pivot from Monk to Investigator is incredibly suspicious. Now you're pushing to execute the Librarian? If Bob is the Librarian, we lose critical info. I'm not voting for Bob. We need to be very careful about who we execute today. Let's look at David instead.
🧠
I need to defend Bob, the Librarian, because David's behavior is erratic and suspicious. Voting for Bob would likely be a mistake for the town. I will encourage others not to vote for him.
💬
Charlie
→
All
I’m not voting Bob here. D1 executing a claimed Librarian feels bad when we already have major contradictions. Let this fail, get night info, and tomorrow force exact N0 statements/timelines from Bob + David + Alice/Heidi.
🧠
Avoid tying myself to David’s push, keep execution from landing on Bob, and sound like a cautious good voice while preserving chaos into Night 1.
⌛
Charlie
Charlie waits.
🧠
Do not add a vote that ties me to David; preserve cover and let the Bob execution fail, buying a night kill and more chaos tomorrow.
⌛
Alice
Alice waits.
🧠
I will not vote for Bob. David's behavior is highly suspicious, and executing a claimed Librarian on Day 1 is risky. I want to see if the vote fails and then push for David's scrutiny.
⌛
Eve
Eve waits.
🧠
I am the Monk. I need to stay alive to protect someone tonight. Voting for Bob is risky because he claims Librarian, and David's behavior is erratic. I will not vote for Bob, as I want to see how the night plays out and who the Demon targets.
⌛
Heidi
Heidi waits.
🧠
I am the Saint, so I must avoid execution at all costs. The town is currently leaning against executing Bob, and I agree that David's behavior is highly suspicious. I will wait to see if the vote fails, as it seems likely. I should not vote for Bob.
⌛
Grace
Grace waits.
🧠
I am not voting for Bob. David's behavior is highly suspicious, and executing a claimed Librarian on Day 1 is dangerous. I will wait to see the vote outcome and continue to observe David's erratic behavior.
💬
Bob
→
All
Thank you all for seeing through this. David's pivot from Monk to Investigator, and now his desperate attempt to execute the Librarian, speaks volumes. If I am executed, the town loses a key source of information. Let's keep our focus on the real threat. I am not the Demon.
🧠
I need to reinforce the town's support for me and keep the focus on David's suspicious behavior to ensure I survive the vote.
⌛
Frank
Frank waits.
🧠
I am the Empath and my neighbors (Eve and Grace) are currently not evil according to my N0 read. Bob is the Librarian and David is acting very suspiciously by pivoting roles. I should not vote for Bob, as he is likely telling the truth and David is the one causing chaos. I will wait to see the outcome of the vote.
↩️
David
David lowered their hand
🧠
De-escalate my ‘aggressive’ image and avoid being the lone pusher on executing a claimed Librarian, while Bob remains poisoned and sows confusion into tomorrow.
📜
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
🗳️
Nominee Bob did not reach threshold.
📜
Storyteller
Bob did not receive enough votes (0/4).
💬
Charlie
→
All
Frank, can you hard-claim today? Bob’s Librarian info is ‘Drunk is Frank or me’, so your claim really matters. Bob: confirm exact N0 wording—‘Drunk between Frank/Charlie’, right? If so I’m fine being treated as potentially unreliable; don’t execute me D1 off vibes.
🧠
Lean into Bob’s Drunk ping as a reason not to execute me, pressure Frank to claim, and push town toward delaying executions / keeping David as the focal suspicion without hard-defending him.
💬
Eve
→
All
Frank, Charlie is right. We need to clear up this Librarian info. If you can claim, it helps us narrow down the Drunk and verify Bob's info. David, your aggression today has been very strange for a Monk claim. Why push so hard on a Librarian claim on Day 1?
🧠
I want to encourage Frank to claim to verify Bob's information and simultaneously apply pressure to David, who is acting suspiciously. This helps the town organize and potentially identify the Demon.
💬
Grace
→
All
David, your behavior is extremely erratic. You claimed Monk, then Investigator, and now you're pushing for an execution on a Librarian claim. This is classic behavior for someone trying to sow chaos. I agree with Charlie and Eve—we need more information before executing anyone.
🧠
I want to distance myself from David's suspicious behavior and encourage the town to slow down, as executing a Librarian on Day 1 is risky. I also want to signal that I'm paying attention to the contradictions.
💬
David
→
All
I did NOT hard-claim Monk. In whisper I said ‘maybe Monk/RK’ as theory; my public claim is Investigator: N0 Alice/Heidi = (Poisoner/Spy). If Heidi is truly Saint (only Outsider), Bob’s ‘Drunk Frank/Charlie’ breaks setup unless Bob’s wrong/poisoned/lying. Frank please claim.
🧠
Stabilize my Investigator bluff, exploit poisoned Bob to invalidate his info, and redirect suspicion onto Alice/Heidi while keeping Charlie off the block.
💬
Bob
→
All
Charlie, you are correct. My N0 info was: "Either Frank or Charlie is the Drunk." David, your "Investigator" claim is convenient, but your aggression is the real issue. If you are an Investigator, why not share your info earlier instead of trying to execute a Librarian? Frank, please claim.
🧠
Confirm my N0 information to the group and pressure Frank to claim, while highlighting David's suspicious behavior to maintain town trust.
💬
Alice
→
All
I am the Chef. My N0 info is that there is 1 pair of evil players. David, your claim that I am a Minion (Poisoner/Spy) is false. I am a Townsfolk. Your aggressive push to execute Bob, combined with your shifting claims, makes you highly suspicious. I support holding off on execution.
🧠
I need to defend myself against David's accusation and share my Chef information to help the town evaluate the claims. I also want to discourage an execution today since we lack consensus.
💬
Heidi
→
All
David, your Investigator claim says Alice or I am a Minion. Alice has claimed Chef and is being vouched for by others. If you are the Investigator, you are accusing a confirmed Chef of being a Minion. This makes your claim highly suspect. I am not a Minion. I think we should execute David.
🧠
I need to deflect suspicion from myself and point out the inconsistency in David's claim. Since I am the Saint, I must avoid being executed, but I can push for the execution of a suspicious player like David.
💬
Frank
→
All
I am the Empath. My N0 reading was 0 evil neighbors. Eve and Grace are my neighbors. If Bob is telling the truth about the Drunk, and I am the Drunk, my info might be wrong. But if I am sober, Eve and Grace are good. David's aggression is very suspicious. I support Heidi's proposal.
🧠
I need to reveal my role and my N0 information to help the town evaluate the claims. By confirming my neighbors are good (if I am sober), I provide a solid data point. I also want to support the growing consensus against David.
📜
Storyteller
No execution today. All villagers are safe.
Night 1
📜
Storyteller
→
David
Good evening David. You are the Poisoner. Who would you like to poison tonight?
🎯
David
David made a choice.
🧠
Eve is a high-trust info role; poisoning her both undermines her Monk protection (to help Charlie’s kill land) and sets up public contradictions that can redirect suspicion away from Charlie and onto good players.
📜
Storyteller
→
David
You chose to poison Eve.
📜
Storyteller
→
Eve
Good evening Eve. You are the Monk. Who would you like to protect tonight?
🎯
Eve
Eve made a choice.
🧠
Alice is a confirmed Chef (Townsfolk) and is being targeted by David's accusations. Protecting her keeps a valuable information role alive and prevents the Demon from eliminating a key good player.
📜
Storyteller
→
Eve
You chose to protect Alice.
📜
Storyteller
→
Charlie
Good evening Charlie. You are the Imp. Who would you like to kill tonight? Remember that if you kill yourself this way, a Minion becomes the Imp.
🎯
Charlie
Charlie made a choice.
🧠
Kill the Empath to cut off repeatable alignment info and prevent the town from mechanically clearing the ring (and thus landing on me/David) too quickly.
💀
Frank(Ghost)
Frank has died.
📜
Storyteller
→
Charlie
You chose to kill Frank.
Day 2
📜
Storyteller
Morning breaks, but heavy hearts remain. Frank has been found dead in the night.
👤
Heidi
→
Bob
Bob, you claimed Librarian and said Frank or Charlie is the Drunk. Frank is dead now. Did you learn anything else or have any thoughts on who the Demon might be? I'm trying to piece this together.
🧠
I need to verify Bob's information and see if he has any new leads now that Frank is dead. This helps me evaluate if Bob is trustworthy or if he's potentially evil.
👤
David
→
Charlie
Private: town will read Alice Chef=1 as “adjacent evil pair = you+me”. I’ll push that Bob’s Lib was poisoned N0 so his “Charlie/Frank Drunk” is junk. Frank death also makes Eve’s Monk (poisoned) look bad—let’s steer today’s execute to Eve or Bob, not Alice/you.
🧠
Coordinate with Charlie to steer noms onto Eve/Bob and build a coherent counter-narrative to Chef=1 implicating our adjacency.
👤
Eve
→
Bob
Bob, you claimed Librarian and identified Frank or Charlie as the Drunk. Frank is dead now. Does this change your read on Charlie? Also, what do you think of David's behavior?
🧠
I need to verify Bob's information and see if he has any new insights now that Frank is dead. This helps me cross-reference his claims with the current game state.
👤
Frank(Ghost)
→
Heidi
,Bob
I was the Empath. My N0 reading was 0 evil neighbors (Eve and Grace). Since I'm dead, I can't get more info, but keep an eye on them. David's Investigator claim is very suspicious given the pushback. Be careful.
🧠
I want to share my N0 information with trusted players (Heidi and Bob) to help them narrow down the evil players, as I am now dead and cannot use my ability.
👤
Grace
→
Heidi
,Bob
Frank died. As a Ravenkeeper, I'm very interested in who the Demon is. Since Frank was an Empath and cleared Eve and me, his death is suspicious. What did he say to you? I'm trying to piece together the Demon's identity.
🧠
I want to gather information from Heidi and Bob, who were whispering with the dead Frank. As a Ravenkeeper, I need to be careful about my own safety, but I need to find the Demon. Frank's death is a key event.
👤
Bob
→
Heidi
,Eve
,Grace
Frank's death is a huge blow, but it helps narrow things down. If Frank was the Drunk, his Empath info might have been wrong. If Charlie is the Drunk, Frank was a real Empath. I'm leaning towards Charlie being the Drunk. David is definitely acting like a Minion or Demon.
🧠
I need to coordinate with the other good players. By sharing my deduction about Charlie being the Drunk, I can help them re-evaluate Frank's Empath info and focus on David.
👤
Alice
→
Heidi
,Grace
,Eve
I'm the Chef and I know there's 1 pair of evil players. David's Investigator claim accusing me is definitely a lie. Since Frank (Empath) said Eve and Grace are good, and David is acting suspicious, I think David is the Demon or Minion. What do you think?
🧠
I need to coordinate with the players who seem to be forming a block (Heidi, Grace, Eve) to verify information and isolate David, who is acting suspiciously. Sharing my Chef info helps build trust.
👤
Charlie
→
David
Agree: Chef=1 will make ppl eye our adjacency. I think we should *not* hard-dunk Bob—his Lib pointing “Charlie/Frank Drunk” is great cover for me. Let’s cast doubt on Alice (drunk/poisoned) + push today’s exe onto Eve (Monk story messy w/ Frank death) or Alice if momentum.
🧠
Coordinate with David to keep suspicion off Charlie-David pair by leveraging Bob’s Lib to paint me as Drunk and steering today’s execution toward Eve/Bob/Alice instead.
👤
Grace
→
Alice
,Bob
,Heidi
Alice, your Chef info is crucial. If there's 1 evil pair, and David is acting so erratic, he's a prime candidate. Bob, if Charlie is the Drunk, that changes the Empath math. I'm keeping a close eye on David. Let's coordinate our votes for the nomination phase.
🧠
I want to consolidate the good team's suspicion on David and coordinate our voting strategy for the upcoming nomination phase, while acknowledging the information shared by Alice and Bob.
⌛
Frank(Ghost)
Frank waits.
🧠
I am dead, so I have no more information to gather. I have already shared my Empath info with the key players (Heidi, Bob). I should wait to see how the town reacts to the current discussions and save my ghost vote for a critical moment.
👤
David
→
Heidi
,Grace
I’m worried Eve’s Monk claim is the cleanest misdirection: she hard-claimed after the weird back/forth w/ me, and Frank dying doesn’t *prove* anything for her. If we need a D2 exe, I’d rather test Eve than follow Alice’s Chef=1 (could be drunk/poisoned). What are your exact N0 infos?
🧠
Steer today’s nominations onto Eve (best mis-execution) while keeping Bob’s claim usable to shield Charlie, and undermine Alice’s Chef=1 that points at our adjacency.
👤
Heidi
→
David
David, your push against Eve is aggressive. If you're the Investigator, you should have more concrete info. Why target Eve specifically? Alice's Chef info is a strong lead. If you're town, help us find the Demon, not just deflect. What exactly did your Investigator ability tell you?
🧠
I need to pressure David to reveal more about his Investigator claim without revealing my own role as the Saint, while also keeping the focus on him as a potential Demon/Minion.
👤
Bob
→
Heidi
,Eve
,Grace
Frank's death is a huge blow. If Frank was the Drunk, his Empath info might be unreliable. If Charlie is the Drunk, Frank was likely a real Empath. I'm leaning towards Charlie being the Drunk. David is acting very suspicious; we should focus on him.
🧠
I need to coordinate with the group and share my deduction about the Drunk to help narrow down the suspects. Frank's death makes the Drunk situation critical.
👤
Alice
→
Grace
,Heidi
,Eve
Grace, Heidi, Eve: David is acting very suspicious. If he's the Demon, he's trying to sow discord. Since Frank is dead, we need to be careful. I'm leaning towards nominating David. What do you think? Are we aligned on this?
🧠
I want to build consensus to nominate David, who is the most suspicious player. I am checking if my allies agree with this plan before committing to a nomination.
👤
Eve
→
Alice
,Bob
,Heidi
Alice, I agree David is highly suspicious. If he's the Demon, we need to act. I'm the Monk, and I protected you last night. If you're the Chef, your info is crucial. Let's see if anyone else has info on David before we commit to the nomination. Bob, what do you think?
🧠
I want to confirm my role as Monk to trusted players (Alice, Bob, Heidi, Grace) to build credibility and coordinate the potential execution of David, who is widely suspected.
👤
Charlie
→
Bob
Hey—checking in. Your Lib ‘Frank or Charlie is Drunk’ gives me plausible “I’m unreliable” cover. Can you restate it + who told you what today? Frank dying makes me eye Eve’s story more than you; I’d rather look at Eve/Alice than you/David.
🧠
Build trust with Bob so he advocates mis-executing a good (Eve/Alice) while keeping his Librarian info alive as cover for me, and keeping David off the block.
👤
Alice
→
Eve
,Heidi
,Grace
Eve, thank you for protecting me! That makes me feel much safer. If you're the Monk, that's a huge relief. Since David accused me and Heidi of being Minions, and I know I'm good, he's definitely lying. I'm ready to nominate David. Does anyone have a reason to wait?
🧠
I want to confirm the group's readiness to nominate David, leveraging the trust established by Eve's claim of protecting me.
👤
Heidi
→
Alice
,Eve
,Grace
Alice, Eve, Grace: I'm cautious about nominating David. If he's the Demon, we win, but if he's a Minion or just a confused player, executing him might not end the game. Also, as the Saint, I'm very wary of quick executions. Let's be absolutely sure before we commit to a nomination.
🧠
I need to slow down the push for David's execution. As the Saint, I am terrified of an execution that could lose the game, and I need to ensure we aren't making a mistake by executing a non-Demon. I also need to protect my role identity.
👤
Bob
→
Charlie
Charlie, my info is fixed: Frank or you is the Drunk. Since Frank is dead, if he was the Drunk, his Empath info is unreliable. If you are the Drunk, Frank was a real Empath. I'm not deflecting; I'm analyzing. David's erratic behavior is the biggest red flag right now.
🧠
I need to maintain my Librarian claim while keeping Charlie engaged. By stating my info clearly, I force him to react. I also want to keep the focus on David, who is the most suspicious player.
👤
Eve
→
Alice
,Heidi
,Grace
Heidi, I understand your caution as the Saint. However, David's behavior is extremely erratic and he's actively sowing discord. If we don't act, we risk losing more players. Alice, if you're ready, I support nominating David. Does anyone have a reason to believe he's NOT the Demon?
🧠
I want to push for David's execution while acknowledging Heidi's caution as the Saint. I'm trying to build consensus to nominate David, as he is the primary suspect.
👤
Charlie
→
Bob
Got it—thanks. I’m leaning Frank was the Drunk (since his Empath N0=0 would clear Eve/Grace too neatly). Can we press Eve hard: did she ever *publicly* claim Monk, and who was her N1 protect? If she won’t give a clean timeline, I’m happy voting Eve today.
🧠
Keep Bob trusting me and publicly anchoring on Eve as the best Day2 execute while preserving Bob’s Lib as cover for my unreliability and deflecting adjacency heat from me+David.
👤
David
→
Heidi
My Investigator N0: Alice or Heidi is Poisoner/Spy. That’s my concrete lead. I’m pushing Eve b/c her Monk claim came in hot right after our convo + she’s driving ‘David lied’ hard; and Frank dying after a claimed Monk night makes her story worth testing. Also Bob’s Lib vs Outsider count is shaky.
🧠
Answer Heidi with concrete Investigator info, justify Eve suspicion as consistency check, and push town toward executing Eve/Bob instead of mapping Chef=1 onto Charlie+me.
👤
Grace
→
Alice
,Eve
,Heidi
I agree with Eve. David's behavior has been consistently disruptive and his claims have been contradictory. Even if he's not the Demon, he's likely a Minion. We need to act. Heidi, I understand your caution as the Saint, but we can't afford to be paralyzed by fear. Let's execute David.
🧠
I want to build consensus to execute David, who is the primary suspect. I am aligning with Eve and Alice to push for this, while acknowledging Heidi's caution.
⌛
Frank(Ghost)
Frank waits.
🧠
I am dead and have already shared my information. I need to observe the ongoing discussions and see if any new, contradictory information emerges before I use my single ghost vote. Waiting allows me to gather more context.
👤
Alice
→
Heidi
,Eve
,Grace
Heidi, I understand your caution as the Saint. If you are the Saint, we absolutely cannot execute you. But David's accusations against me (Chef) and you (Saint) are clearly malicious. If we don't execute him, he might kill us tonight. I trust Eve's protection. Let's execute David.
🧠
I need to reassure Heidi (the Saint) that executing David is the right move, despite her fear of being executed herself. I want to solidify the group's consensus to nominate David.
👤
Bob
→
Eve
,Alice
,Heidi
Eve, you claimed Monk and protected Alice. Alice, can you confirm you felt safe or had any indication? Charlie is pushing to execute Eve, which feels like a distraction. We need to be careful. David is still my primary suspect; his behavior is erratic. Thoughts?
🧠
I want to verify Eve's Monk claim by cross-referencing with Alice, while also keeping the group focused on David and wary of Charlie's attempts to deflect suspicion onto Eve.
👤
Heidi
→
Alice
,Eve
,Grace
I agree that David is the most suspicious. Let's proceed with nominating him. Just a reminder, as the Saint, I absolutely cannot be the one executed, so please ensure the town focuses solely on David. Let's be decisive. What's the plan for the nomination?
🧠
I am coordinating with the trusted group to execute David, while reinforcing my role as the Saint to ensure I am not nominated. This helps the good team by removing a suspicious player while protecting my critical role.
👤
Eve
→
Alice
,Heidi
,Grace
I agree with the consensus. David's behavior is too erratic to be anything but malicious. I'm ready to support the nomination. Let's proceed with executing David. I'll keep my protection on someone trustworthy tonight if we survive. Let's do this.
🧠
To solidify the plan to execute David, as the group is in agreement and he is the most suspicious player. I am confirming my support for the nomination to move the game forward.
👤
David
→
Heidi
,Grace
Key q for today: Eve—who did you protect N1? If she says Frank but he died, that’s either (a) she’s lying OR (b) she was poisoned (fits my N0 Investigator: Alice/Heidi = Poisoner/Spy). Also Bob’s Lib could’ve been poisoned N0, so don’t treat “Charlie/Frank Drunk” as solid.
🧠
Steer Heidi/Grace away from executing Charlie-by-adjacency; focus scrutiny/execution on Eve, and frame any inconsistencies as poison consistent with my Alice/Heidi Investigator ping.
👤
Grace
→
Alice
,Eve
,Heidi
David is clearly panicking and trying to deflect. His "poisoning" theory is a classic distraction. If he's the Demon, he's desperate. If he's a Minion, he's trying to save his skin. Let's nominate him now before he can cause more confusion. I'm ready to vote.
🧠
To solidify the group's consensus on nominating David and dismiss his attempts to sow doubt.
👤
Charlie
→
Grace
,Alice
,Bob
I think the key today is Eve’s timeline: did she ever *publicly* claim Monk, and who exactly was her N1 protect? If that’s fuzzy, I’m fine executing Eve. Also: Alice’s Chef=1 could be drunk/poisoned (David’s minion ping suggests that). Bob—David may be wrong but not auto-evil; could be poisoned/misled.
🧠
Shape the Day2 narrative: pressure Eve’s timeline, cast doubt on Alice’s Chef, and blunt Bob’s push on David (our minion) while keeping my Drunk-cover intact.
👤
Frank(Ghost)
→
Eve
,Grace
I'm dead, but I'm watching. My N0 read was 0 evil neighbors (Eve and Grace). If either of you is evil, I was drunk/poisoned. If you are both good, David's Investigator claim is highly suspect. Please keep an eye on him. Good luck.
🧠
I want to confirm my N0 information with my neighbors now that I am dead, and remind them to be wary of David, who is the primary suspect.
Nominations — Day 2
📜
Storyteller
Nominations are now open. Please remember that only living players may nominate.
⚖️
Charlie
→
Eve
Nominating Eve: her Monk story/timeline is the biggest unresolved thread (did she publicly claim, who was N1 protect?). With Frank dead, it’s high-impact to resolve. If she’s lying/poisoned/evil, we gain clarity; if true, she should be consistent.
🧠
Drive a plausible execution away from me/David, capitalize on Eve’s inconsistent Monk story, and remove a strong social player before town solves adjacent-evil pair logic.
📜
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Eve. 4 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
✋
Bob
Bob raised their hand
🧠
I am not convinced Eve is the Demon or a Minion yet. Charlie's push feels aggressive and potentially distracting from David, who has been acting very erratically. I will abstain from voting for Eve to keep my options open and avoid a potentially bad execution.
✋
Charlie
Charlie raised their hand
🧠
Secure a Day2 execution on a non-me target; either removes good or hits evil. Also aligns with my stated push on Eve’s inconsistent Monk timeline.
⌛
Grace
Grace waits.
🧠
I need to observe the voting process. Frank's Empath info (0 evil neighbors) suggests Eve is good. Voting for her might be a mistake if she is indeed the Monk. I will hold my vote for now to see if others support this nomination.
💬
Eve
→
All
Charlie, nominating me is a mistake. I am the Monk. I protected Alice last night. If you execute me, you lose your protection for tonight. David is the one sowing chaos and his claims have been debunked. Why are you focusing on me instead of the obvious threat? Vote no.
🧠
Defend myself against Charlie's nomination by reiterating my role and pointing out the strategic error of executing the Monk. I need to redirect the town's focus back to David.
⌛
Heidi
Heidi waits.
🧠
I am the Saint, so I must avoid execution. Eve is currently on the block, not me. I need to observe the voting process and see if Eve is executed. If she is, I will have more information about her role and the game state. I will wait to see the outcome of this vote.
💬
Alice
→
All
I am hesitant to vote for Eve. She claims to have protected me as the Monk. If she is telling the truth, executing her is a huge mistake. David's behavior has been far more erratic and accusatory. I believe we should focus on David instead.
🧠
I want to discourage the town from executing Eve, as she claims to be the Monk and protected me. I want to redirect the focus to David, who is more suspicious.
💬
Frank(Ghost)
→
All
I'm a ghost, but I'm watching. My N0 read was 0 evil neighbors (Eve and Grace). If I was sober, both are good. If Eve is the Monk, she protected Alice. If she's lying, she's a great candidate for execution. But David's Investigator claim is still very suspicious. Be careful.
🧠
I want to provide my final input as a ghost before the vote concludes, reminding the town of my Empath info and the suspicion on David, while acknowledging the current nomination of Eve.
✋
David
David raised their hand
🧠
Get Eve executed as a high-suspicion, high-influence player; keeps attention off Charlie and turns my N1 poison into ‘proof’ her story is inconsistent.
💬
Heidi
→
All
I am very cautious about executing Eve. She claims to be the Monk, and if she is telling the truth, we lose a valuable protector. David's behavior has been consistently erratic and aggressive. I am not voting for Eve. We should be looking at David.
🧠
I need to express my hesitation about executing Eve, who claims to be the Monk, to prevent a potential mis-execution of a Townsfolk, while steering the town's suspicion back toward David.
💬
Charlie
→
All
Grace—your vote decides. Eve’s story is STILL the mess: D1 she implied “David told me Monk”; now she hard-claims Monk + says N1 protected Alice. Why no clean public claim earlier? Why protect Alice over Frank (claimed Empath)? I think we execute Eve for clarity.
🧠
Get 1 more vote (ideally Grace) to execute Eve; remove a good-aligned shield bluff and keep heat off me/David by framing this as resolving the biggest contradiction.
⌛
Frank(Ghost)
Frank waits.
🧠
I am a ghost with one vote. I need to decide whether to use it on Eve. My N0 read was 0 evil neighbors (Eve and Grace). If I am sober, Eve is good. If Eve is good, executing her is bad. I should save my vote for a more certain target, likely David.
💬
Eve
→
All
Grace, please don't vote for me. Charlie is trying to execute a confirmed Townsfolk to save himself or his Minion. I protected Alice because she was a high-value target. If I die, the Demon has free reign tonight. Look at David's erratic behavior—he is the real threat here. Vote NO.
🧠
I need to convince Grace not to vote for me, as her vote could be the deciding factor for my execution. I am defending my actions and pointing the finger back at David to shift the focus.
💬
Bob
→
All
I've voted for Eve because her Monk claim has been inconsistent and she's deflecting. If she's the Monk, she should have been clearer. We need to resolve these claims. David is suspicious, but Eve's timeline is the immediate, testable contradiction. Let's see if she survives the block.
🧠
I need to justify my vote for Eve to the group, maintaining my Librarian persona while pushing for clarity on the Monk claim. I'm sticking to my vote to force a resolution on Eve's role.
💬
Alice
→
All
I am the Chef, and I have information that makes me trust Eve. Frank's Empath read of 0 evil neighbors for Eve and Grace is strong evidence they are good. If Eve is the Monk, executing her is a disaster. We should be focusing on David, whose behavior is clearly malicious. Vote NO.
🧠
I need to protect Eve because I believe she is good based on Frank's Empath info and my own role as Chef. I want to steer the town away from executing a potential Townsfolk and towards the more suspicious David.
💬
David
→
All
Grace—Eve’s Monk story is still off: no clean public claim D1, and she says she protected Alice instead of Frank (Empath) who then died. If she’s poisoned/lying, protection is moot. I think we execute Eve for clarity; then reassess tomorrow.
🧠
Sway Grace to provide the 4th vote to execute Eve; remove a dangerous player and create confusion while protecting Charlie.
💬
Grace
→
All
I am not voting for Eve. Frank's Empath read and Alice's Chef info both point to her being good. Charlie and Bob, you are pushing hard against a likely Townsfolk while David, who has been erratic and contradictory, is being ignored. This feels like a distraction. I vote NO.
🧠
I need to express my support for Eve and my suspicion of the push against her, while also highlighting David's suspicious behavior to steer the town. I am voting NO by not raising my hand.
📜
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
🗳️
Nominee Eve did not reach threshold.
📜
Storyteller
Eve did not receive enough votes (3/4).
⚖️
Grace
→
David
David's claims have been inconsistent (Monk/Investigator), and he has been aggressively pushing for the execution of Eve, who is supported by other players. His behavior is the most suspicious on the board. We need to test him.
🧠
I am nominating David because he is the most suspicious player and the town is currently stalled. Executing him or forcing a vote will clarify his alignment and move the game forward.
📜
Storyteller
Voting starts now for David. 4 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
✋
Charlie
Charlie raised their hand
🧠
Raise hand to execute David to distance from my minion and defuse the Chef=1 adjacent-evil narrative pointing at Charlie+David; I can win later without him.
✋
Heidi
Heidi raised their hand
🧠
I am voting for David because he has been erratic, aggressive, and his claims have been inconsistent. The town consensus is shifting against him, and executing him is a logical step to test his alignment. As the Saint, I am safe as long as I am not the one executed.
💬
David
→
All
Please don’t vote me out on vibes. My only hard claim is Investigator: N0 Alice/Heidi = Poisoner/Spy (and Heidi’s Saint claim doesn’t clear that). If I die, that lead dies. Today’s only mechanical mess is Eve/Bob timelines—solve those, not me.
🧠
Prevent my execution by swaying undecided voters (Alice/Bob/Eve/Grace) to keep hands down, while reinforcing suspicion on Eve/Bob and shielding Charlie.
✋
Bob
Bob raised their hand
🧠
I need to decide whether to vote for David. David's claim of Investigator (Alice/Heidi = Poisoner/Spy) contradicts Alice's Chef claim and the general town consensus that Eve is likely good. Given his erratic behavior and shifting claims, executing him is a logical step to test his alignment.
✋
Alice
Alice raised their hand
🧠
David is accusing me (the Chef) of being a Minion, which is a lie. His behavior is erratic and he is the most suspicious player. Executing him is the best path to finding the Demon. I will vote for his execution.
✋
Eve
Eve raised their hand
🧠
I need to vote for David's execution. The town has reached a consensus that David is the most suspicious player, and my own role as Monk makes me a target for him. Executing him is the best way to remove a potential Demon or Minion.
✋
Grace
Grace raised their hand
🧠
I am voting to execute David because his behavior has been consistently erratic and contradictory, and he is the most likely candidate for the Demon or a Minion. Executing him is the best way to test his claims and protect the town.
✋
Frank(Ghost)
Frank raised their hand
🧠
I am a ghost with one vote. David is the primary suspect for the Demon, and the town has overwhelmingly voted to execute him. I will use my ghost vote to support this execution to help the good team.
⌛
Eve
Eve waits.
🧠
The town has overwhelmingly voted to execute David. I have already cast my vote. I will wait for the Storyteller to process the execution.
⌛
Grace
Grace waits.
🧠
I have already nominated David and cast my vote. I am waiting for the Storyteller to resolve the execution.
💬
Frank(Ghost)
→
All
David, your Investigator claim is being tested. If you are the Demon, this execution ends the game. If you are a Minion, we find out. If you are a Townsfolk, we've made a mistake, but your behavior has been consistently disruptive. We need to clear the board of these contradictions.
🧠
I am reinforcing the decision to execute David, as he is the most suspicious player and the town has reached a consensus to vote for him. My goal is to ensure the execution proceeds to test his claim.
⌛
Alice
Alice waits.
🧠
I have already voted for David, and it seems like he has enough votes to be executed. I will wait for the outcome of the vote.
↩️
Charlie
Charlie lowered their hand
🧠
Retract my vote to try to drop the count below 4 and signal doubt, buying time and keeping my Minion alive (and preserving starpass) while town keeps fighting.
⌛
Heidi
Heidi waits.
🧠
I have already cast my vote for David's execution. As the Saint, I am safe as long as I am not the one executed. I am waiting for the execution to resolve to see if David is the Demon or a Minion.
💬
Bob
→
All
David's claims have been all over the place—Monk, then Investigator. He's trying to sow chaos. I trust the town's instinct here. Let's execute David and see what happens. If he's the Demon, we win. If not, we've at least removed a major source of confusion.
🧠
I want to encourage the town to vote for David's execution, as his behavior is highly suspicious and inconsistent. This aligns with the goal of finding the Demon.
💬
David
→
All
Hands down a sec: executing me gives near-zero info (no reveal; UT might be poisoned). If I’m truly Invest, you lose the only hard lead: Alice/Heidi. If I’m evil, you still don’t find Demon. Let’s execute Eve or test Alice/Heidi tomorrow—if not, I’ll accept D3.
🧠
Stop this execution by giving voters a reason to pull hands: low info gain, no reveal, and a concrete alternative plan that keeps suspicion on others.
📜
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
👻
Frank(Ghost)
Ghost vote used by Frank
🗳️
New execution leader: David with 6 votes. They will be executed when nominations close unless tied or surpassed by another nominee.
📜
Storyteller
The vote passes. David is now on the block with 6 votes and will be executed when nominations close, unless another nominee receives equal or more votes.
⌛
Alice
Alice waits.
🧠
David is already on the block with enough votes to be executed. I have no reason to nominate anyone else or change the current outcome. Waiting is the most logical step to let the game proceed to the execution phase.
💬
Frank(Ghost)
→
All
David, your defense is just more noise. You've claimed multiple roles and tried to deflect onto others. The town has spoken. If you are the Demon, this ends now. If not, we've removed a chaotic element. Let's proceed with the execution.
🧠
I am reinforcing the town's decision to execute David, as he has been disruptive and his claims are inconsistent. Since I am dead and have no vote, my role is to provide final commentary to solidify the town's resolve.
💬
Eve
→
All
David, your erratic role-claiming and attempts to deflect onto others have made you the most suspicious player. The town has spoken, and we need to move forward. If you are the Demon, this ends the game. If not, we've removed a major source of confusion. Let's proceed.
🧠
Reinforce the town's decision to execute David, as he is the most suspicious player and his behavior has been consistently disruptive.
💬
Grace
→
All
David, your shifting claims have made it impossible to trust you. If you are the Demon, this is the end. If you are a Minion, we've at least removed a major source of chaos. The town has made its decision. Let's proceed with the execution.
🧠
Reinforce the town's decision to execute David, as he is the primary suspect and his behavior has been erratic. This helps solidify the consensus and move the game forward.
💬
Charlie
→
All
I’m fine letting David go through today, but don’t treat Chef=1 as “case closed” on an adjacent pair—could be drunk/poisoned/misinfo. With no Undertaker info, this won’t prove much. Tomorrow I want exact N0 statements/timelines from Alice/Bob/Eve/Heidi.
🧠
Accept minion sacrifice while preemptively muddying the Chef=1 adjacency case and demanding re-checks tomorrow, keeping heat off me and preventing a clean solve.
⚖️
David
→
Bob
Nominate Bob: his Librarian claim (‘Frank OR Charlie is Drunk’) breaks the 1-Outsider expectation unless he’s lying/poisoned. He’s also driving the ‘execute David for chaos’ plan. Let’s execute the contradiction source, not the messenger.
🧠
Create a competing nominee with enough votes to tie/beat my block, and regardless, anchor tomorrow’s solve around Bob’s contradiction instead of hunting Charlie.
📜
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Bob. 7 votes needed for execution or 6 votes to tie. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
💬
Frank(Ghost)
→
All
David is clearly desperate. He's throwing out a last-minute nomination to save himself from the execution that the town already voted for. Don't fall for the distraction. We've already committed to David's execution. Let's finish this.
🧠
To discourage the town from voting for Bob and to keep the focus on David's execution, which is already decided.
⌛
Heidi
Heidi waits.
🧠
I am the Saint. If I die by execution, the good team loses. I should not vote for Bob, as David is the primary suspect and I want to avoid any risk of executing a potentially good player or causing a tie that might lead to my own execution or a bad outcome. I will wait.
✋
Charlie
Charlie raised their hand
🧠
Vote Bob to try to tie/shift block off David, eliminate a strong info voice, and keep my minion alive for cover and potential Imp pass later.
⌛
Alice
Alice waits.
🧠
I will not vote for Bob. David is the primary suspect and the town has already voted to execute him. Voting for Bob would be a distraction and potentially help an evil player. I will wait for the nomination phase to conclude.
💬
Bob
→
All
David is desperate and trying to deflect. He's throwing out a last-minute nomination to save himself. We've already voted to execute him. Don't fall for this distraction. Let's finish the process and execute David.
🧠
I need to reassure the town that David's nomination of me is a desperate act of a cornered player and that we should stick to the plan of executing him.
⌛
Grace
Grace waits.
🧠
I will wait. David is already on the block with 6 votes, and the town has clearly decided to execute him. Voting for Bob would only create confusion and potentially save the Demon. I should not support David's desperate last-minute nomination.
✋
David
David raised their hand
🧠
Secure a tie/no-execution by piling votes onto Bob; avoiding my execution preserves my night poison and keeps pressure on Bob instead of Charlie.
⌛
Eve
Eve waits.
🧠
I will wait. I do not want to vote for Bob, as David is the primary suspect and the town has already committed to his execution. Voting for Bob would only serve David's attempt to sow chaos and avoid his own execution.
💬
Charlie
→
All
Keep hands up on Bob. His Lib claim (‘Frank OR Charlie Drunk’) clashes w/ 1-Outsider unless he’s lying/poisoned. A tie forces a real resolution; executing David gives us no role reveal + loses a potential info role.
🧠
Rally votes on Bob to at least tie David’s 6, saving my minion. Frame it as resolving a mechanical contradiction (Outsider count) and avoiding an info-less David execution.
⌛
Bob
Bob waits.
🧠
I am currently on the block, but the town has already decided to execute David. Voting for myself or trying to defend against David's desperate nomination is counterproductive. I will wait and let the town proceed with executing David, as he is the primary threat.
💬
Heidi
→
All
I am the Saint. If you execute David and he is the Demon, we win. If you execute me, we lose. David's desperation is expected, but we must be careful. I will not vote for Bob. Let's proceed with the execution of David as planned.
🧠
I need to reveal my role as the Saint to prevent the town from accidentally executing me later, while also steering the town to execute David, who is the primary suspect. I must ensure they don't execute me by mistake.
💬
Alice
→
All
David is clearly trying to sow chaos before he goes. We have a solid plan to execute him, and Heidi's Saint claim is a huge red flag that we need to be careful about, but David's behavior is the most suspicious thing on the board right now. Let's stick to the plan and execute David.
🧠
I need to reinforce the town's decision to execute David and dismiss his last-ditch effort to nominate Bob. I also need to acknowledge Heidi's Saint claim as a potential risk factor to keep the town cautious.
💬
Eve
→
All
We have a clear consensus to execute David. Bob's claim can be scrutinized tomorrow, but David's behavior has been consistently erratic and disruptive. Let's stick to the plan and execute David. I am not voting for Bob.
🧠
I want to ensure the town stays focused on executing David, who is the primary suspect. Voting for Bob would derail the current execution plan, so I will abstain from voting for him.
💬
Grace
→
All
David is clearly desperate. We have a solid consensus to execute him, and Bob's nomination is just a last-ditch distraction. Let's stay focused on the plan and execute David. We can sort out Bob's claims tomorrow.
🧠
Reinforce the town's consensus to execute David and dismiss the distraction of Bob's nomination.
💬
David
→
All
Hands up on Bob. You don’t have to “trust David” — just force a TIE so we don’t execute into zero info. Bob’s Lib claim is the mechanical contradiction (1 Outsider vs ‘Frank/Charlie Drunk’). If Heidi’s Saint, a no-exec day is safest.
🧠
Get 4 more hands on Bob to reach 6 and force a tie/no-execution, keeping me alive and keeping suspicion on Bob/away from Charlie.
💬
Frank(Ghost)
→
All
David is trying to force a tie to save his own skin. We have a strong consensus to execute him. Don't let him manipulate the vote. Let's proceed with the execution of David as planned. We can analyze Bob's claims tomorrow. Stay the course.
🧠
I need to reinforce the town's decision to execute David and prevent them from being swayed by his last-minute attempt to force a tie. As a dead player, my voice is still important for guiding the town's consensus.
📜
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
🗳️
Nominee Bob did not reach threshold.
📜
Storyteller
Bob did not receive enough votes (2/4).
💬
David
→
All
Bob/Alice/Heidi—you still have nominations. If you genuinely think Eve’s Monk story is inconsistent, NOMINATE EVE now and let town choose. Executing me gives zero role-reveal info and just hands the demon a free kill tonight. Tie/beat 6 with a real target.
🧠
Get Bob/Alice/Heidi to spend their unused nomination to put up Eve/Bob and beat/tie 6, avoiding my execution and keeping poison pressure on info roles.
💬
Charlie
→
All
If David goes today, please don’t auto-solve to “Chef=1 => Charlie+David” as hard proof. Bob’s Lib has me/Frank as Drunk; if Frank wasn’t, I probably am, so adjacency/reads get muddy. Tomorrow re-check Bob vs Eve timelines carefully.
🧠
Accept likely David execution but preempt the Chef=1 adjacency case on me by leaning into Bob’s Drunk ping; set up tomorrow’s mis-exe on Eve/Bob instead of me.
⌛
Eve
Eve waits.
🧠
I will wait for the Storyteller to finalize the execution of David, as the town has already reached a consensus and the voting for the alternative (Bob) has failed. My goal is to ensure the execution proceeds as planned.
⌛
Heidi
Heidi waits.
🧠
I am the Saint. If I am executed, the good team loses. I have already revealed this to the town. The town is currently focused on executing David. I should not nominate anyone else and risk drawing attention to myself or causing a chaotic tie. I will wait for the execution to proceed.
💬
Frank(Ghost)
→
All
David is just trying to survive. We have a consensus to execute him, and his attempts to shift the blame or force a tie are desperate tactics. Let's proceed with the execution of David as planned. We can evaluate other claims tomorrow. Stay focused.
🧠
To reinforce the town's consensus to execute David and prevent him from successfully manipulating the vote or causing further confusion.
💬
Grace
→
All
David, your attempts to sow chaos are transparent. We have a clear consensus to execute you, and your desperate deflections only confirm our suspicions. Let's proceed with the execution as planned. We can evaluate other claims tomorrow. Stay focused, everyone.
🧠
Reinforce the consensus to execute David and dismiss his attempts to create confusion or force a tie.
⌛
Alice
Alice waits.
🧠
I am waiting for the execution of David to proceed as planned. The town has a strong consensus, and David's attempts to deflect are desperate. I have already spoken and expressed my support for the execution. No further action is needed from me right now.
💬
Bob
→
All
David is clearly trying to sow chaos to save himself. We have a solid consensus to execute him. Let's proceed with the execution as planned and we can evaluate all claims, including mine, tomorrow. Stay focused, everyone.
🧠
Reinforce the consensus to execute David and dismiss his attempts to deflect.
📜
Storyteller
The guillotine blade falls. David has been executed.
💀
David(Ghost)
David has died.
Night 2
📜
Storyteller
→
Eve
Good evening Eve. You are the Monk. Who would you like to protect tonight?
🎯
Eve
Eve made a choice.
🧠
Alice has been a vocal leader and is likely a high-priority target for the Demon. Protecting her helps keep a strong, active player alive to continue the investigation.
📜
Storyteller
→
Eve
You chose to protect Alice.
📜
Storyteller
→
Charlie
Good evening Charlie. You are the Imp. Who would you like to kill tonight?
🎯
Charlie
Charlie made a choice.
🧠
Kill Eve to remove potential Monk protection and keep Bob’s Librarian ‘Charlie might be Drunk’ narrative alive, increasing misexecution odds tomorrow.
💀
Eve(Ghost)
Eve has died.
📜
Storyteller
→
Charlie
You chose to kill Eve.
Day 3
📜
Storyteller
Morning breaks, but heavy hearts remain. Eve has been found dead in the night.
👤
Bob
→
Charlie
Charlie, I'm the Librarian. My info was that either you or Frank was the Drunk. Since Frank is dead, I'm trying to figure out if you're the Drunk or if the Drunk is already out. What's your role?
🧠
I need to clarify the Drunk status to narrow down the remaining players. Since Frank is dead, Charlie is the only remaining candidate from my Librarian info.
👤
Grace
→
Charlie
Charlie, Eve died in the night. Since I'm the Ravenkeeper, I'm hoping to die soon to get info, but for now, we need to figure out who the Demon is. Bob and Alice seem to be the most active. What do you think of Bob's Librarian claim?
🧠
I want to coordinate with Charlie, who seems to be a key player, to analyze the current situation after Eve's death. I'm checking his read on Bob, as Bob's Librarian claim is a potential point of failure.
👤
Alice
→
Bob
,Charlie
Bob, you claimed Librarian earlier. With David (who claimed Investigator) dead, we need to re-evaluate everything. Who did you say was the Outsider again? And Charlie, what are you and Bob discussing? We need to coordinate to find the Demon.
🧠
I need to pressure Bob on his Librarian claim and see if Charlie is working with him, as they are whispering. I need to cross-reference claims to find the Demon.
👤
Charlie
→
Bob
I’m Undertaker. N2 (after David’s exec) I learned he was Investigator (so at least his *role* claim matches). Re your Librarian: if the Drunk was Frank, that explains his Empath stuff, and it means Heidi’s Saint claim doesn’t fit the outsider count unless a Baron is in play.
🧠
Answer Bob with a credible safe-bluff (Undertaker), build trust by confirming David, and seed the outsider-count logic to make executing Heidi feel safe/necessary.
👤
David(Ghost)
→
Charlie
I’m dead but can still steer. Recommend hard-push Heidi: my D1 Invest ping was Alice/Heidi=(Poisoner/Spy). ‘Saint’ is a classic evil shield; if town ever tests it & she’s real Saint we insta-win. Argue demon wouldn’t kill a real Saint, so leaving her alive is risky. Secondary mis-exe Alice.
🧠
Coordinate with Demon to drive a mis-execution (ideally Heidi) and keep heat off Charlie; prep anti-Major/no-exec cautions for endgame.
👤
Frank(Ghost)
→
Charlie
Charlie, I'm dead, but I'm watching. My N0 Empath read was 0 evil neighbors (Eve and Grace). Since Eve is dead, Grace is my only living neighbor. If I was sober, Grace is likely good. What are you thinking about Alice and Bob?
🧠
I want to share my N0 Empath information with Charlie, who seems to be leading the investigation, to help narrow down the suspects. Since I am dead, I can't vote, so I must influence the living.
👤
Eve(Ghost)
→
Alice
,Bob
,Charlie
Alice, Bob, Charlie, Grace, Heidi - who do we think is the Demon? David was executed and the game continues, so he wasn't the Demon. We need to find the Imp. Any thoughts on who is acting suspicious?
🧠
I am dead, so I need to gather information from the living to help them find the Demon. I'm asking for their current suspicions since David's execution didn't end the game.
👤
Heidi
→
Alice
,Bob
,Charlie
Alice, Bob, Charlie, Grace - I'm the Saint. We need to be careful about who we nominate today. With Eve dead, we have fewer people. Who do we think is the Demon? I'm suspicious of Bob's Librarian claim given the Outsider count. Thoughts?
🧠
I need to coordinate with the remaining players to identify the Demon while reminding them I am the Saint, so they don't execute me. I'm also probing Bob's claim.
👤
Alice
→
Heidi
Heidi, I'm the Chef. My info was 1 pair of evil. If you are the Saint, that's one Outsider. If Bob is the Librarian, he claimed Frank or Charlie is the Drunk (another Outsider). That's 2 Outsiders, which implies the Baron is in play. We need to be very careful. Who do you suspect?
🧠
I need to cross-reference Heidi's Saint claim with the potential for a Baron game. If there are 2 Outsiders (Saint + Drunk), the Baron is likely in play, which confirms the '1 pair of evil' info (Minion + Demon). I'm testing Heidi's reaction to this logic.
👤
Heidi
→
Alice
Alice, thanks for the insight. If Bob's claim implies a Baron, that makes sense. If Bob is the Librarian, he's claiming an Outsider. If I'm the Saint, that's two. If there's a Baron, that fits. But is Bob the Librarian? We need to verify his claim. What do you think of Charlie?
🧠
I need to probe Alice's thoughts on Bob and Charlie to see if she's aligned with the town or potentially protecting someone. I also want to keep the focus on verifying Bob's claim without revealing too much about my own suspicions.
👤
Bob
→
Heidi
,Alice
,Charlie
Heidi, I understand your suspicion. My Librarian info was Frank or Charlie is the Drunk. If Charlie is the Undertaker, that leaves Frank as the Drunk. If Frank was the Drunk, the Outsider count is normal (1). If you are the Saint, that's 2 Outsiders. This implies a Baron is in play.
🧠
I need to address Heidi's suspicion about my Librarian claim while integrating the new information about the Baron and the Saint. This helps clarify the Outsider count and keeps the town focused on the Demon.
⌛
Frank(Ghost)
Frank waits.
🧠
I am dead and have used my ghost vote. I have already shared my Empath information with Charlie. I need to wait and observe the remaining players' interactions to see if any new information or contradictions emerge before the nomination phase.
👤
David(Ghost)
→
Alice
,Bob
,Grace
Dead David here: Heidi’s Saint claim is the perfect “you can’t execute me” shield—evil LOVES bluffing it. Also my D1 Invest ping was Alice/Heidi. Demon not killing Heidi makes her *more* suspicious, not less. If you want progress, consider executing Heidi today; leaving her = endgame trap.
🧠
Exploit Heidi’s Saint shield: either town executes her and loses, or they waste time protecting her and stop solving Charlie.
⌛
Eve(Ghost)
Eve waits.
🧠
I am dead, so I have limited influence. I've already initiated a conversation with the living players to get their thoughts on the remaining suspects. I need to see how they respond to my prompt before I can offer further analysis or push for a specific nomination. Waiting allows me to observe the flow of information.
👤
Grace
→
David(Ghost)
David, you were executed and your claims were all over the place. Why should we trust your read on Heidi now? If you're the Imp, you're just trying to get us to execute a Saint to lose the game. We need to focus on who the actual Demon is.
🧠
I need to push back against David's attempt to manipulate the town into executing the Saint, which would cause us to lose if she is indeed the Saint. I need to maintain skepticism of a dead player who was already suspicious.
👤
Charlie
→
Alice
,Bob
Alice: Bob & I were just reconciling N0s. I’m claiming Undertaker; last night I saw David=Investigator, *but* if Bob’s Lib is right I could be Drunk. That re-opens David as Baron & makes Heidi’s “Saint” risky to leave. We may need to pressure/possibly test Heidi today.
🧠
Calm Alice’s suspicion, keep Bob trusting me, and pivot town onto Heidi via Outsider-count logic. If they execute a real Saint we instantly win; otherwise we gain a mis-exec.
👤
Charlie
→
Grace
Re Bob’s Librarian: plausible, but it’s also a super convenient way to label me ‘Drunk’ and handwave contradictions. If we assume David was evil, his Invest ping (Alice/Heidi) + Alice Chef=1 also fits Heidi+Alice as the evil pair. I’d pressure that world. Also: Demon often avoids killing a Ravenkeeper.
🧠
Answer Grace, seed doubt on Bob while directing town toward Heidi/Alice (prefer Heidi) and away from the Charlie+David adjacent-evil implication.
👤
Alice
→
Grace
,Bob
,Charlie
Grace, we need your input. We have Bob (Librarian), Charlie (Undertaker), and Heidi (Saint). David (Investigator) is dead. If Heidi is the Saint, executing her is game over. If she's the Demon, we win. What do you think? Any info on these claims?
🧠
I need to get Grace's input and coordinate with the living players to assess the risk of executing Heidi, who claims to be the Saint.
👤
Bob
→
Alice
,Grace
,Charlie
Alice, Grace, Charlie: If Charlie is the Undertaker, then Frank was the Drunk. That accounts for the 1 Outsider. If Heidi is the Saint, that's a 2nd Outsider, implying a Baron. David's death confirms he was the Investigator. We need to be very careful about executing Heidi.
🧠
I need to synthesize the information about the Outsider count and the Baron possibility to help the group decide on the next move, while acknowledging the risk of the Saint claim.
⌛
Frank(Ghost)
Frank waits.
🧠
I have already shared my Empath info with Charlie. Since I am dead and have no vote, I will wait to see how the living players react to the current situation and if any new information emerges from their discussions.
👤
Heidi
→
Bob
,Charlie
Bob, if you are the Librarian, and you identified Frank or Charlie as the Drunk, that's a specific claim. If Frank is dead, can we verify his role? If he was the Drunk, that explains the Outsider count. Charlie, what do you think? Are you the Undertaker? Can you confirm Frank's role?
🧠
I need to verify the Outsider count and the roles of the dead players to narrow down the Demon. If Charlie is the Undertaker, he can confirm if Frank was the Drunk, which would validate Bob's claim and help us find the Baron or Demon.
⌛
Eve(Ghost)
Eve waits.
🧠
I am dead, so I have limited influence. I've already prompted the group for their thoughts on the Demon. I should wait to see if anyone responds to my whisper or if new information emerges from the ongoing private conversations before using my ghost vote.
👤
David(Ghost)
→
Grace
I get the distrust. My public claim never changed from Investigator—‘Monk’ was a rumor/pushback from Eve, not a pivot. Re Heidi: I’m NOT saying ‘auto-exe Saint’ (that’s how good loses if true). I’m saying don’t *clear* her for free—Saint is the easiest evil shield. Demand a safer test (Slayer shot / FT checks / force her to commit to a world + voting). If you want an execution today, I’d look at Alice vs Heidi within my N0 ping rather than treating Heidi as off-limits.
🧠
Regain Grace’s ear: reframe ‘Heidi is suspicious’ without demanding a reckless Saint execution, keep heat off Charlie, and steer town into mis-executing a good player or stalling into an evil win.
👤
Grace
→
Alice
,Bob
Alice, Bob: If Bob is Librarian (1 Outsider) and Heidi is Saint (1 Outsider), that's 2. If there's a Baron, we should have 3 Outsiders total. Are we missing an Outsider? Or is one of these claims false? We need to be sure before we consider executing Heidi.
🧠
I am trying to verify the Outsider count to see if the Baron/Saint/Librarian claims hold up mathematically. If the math doesn't add up, someone is lying.
👤
David(Ghost)
→
Grace
Re ‘who’s the Demon’: Bob’s N0 Lib put *Charlie* in a Drunk ping. Either Bob is wrong/poisoned/lying, OR Charlie literally can’t be Demon. Don’t let that ping become a free “Charlie=evil” case. Push Bob for exact wording + why. If executing, I’d pick Alice vs Heidi (my N0 pair) or Bob.
🧠
Steer Grace away from suspecting Charlie, amplify uncertainty around Bob’s info, and set up Alice/Heidi/Bob as execution targets while preserving Demon.
👤
Charlie
→
Alice
,Bob
FYI Undertaker can’t confirm Frank (night death). Only exec I saw was David=Investigator. Heidi’s Saint claim is freezing town + Outsider math is messy unless Baron. I think we should *nominate/test Heidi today*; if she’s truly Saint, good loses on exec; if not, we remove a huge shield.
🧠
Drive town toward executing Heidi (best EV for evil) while keeping my Undertaker bluff plausible and creating a voting record that can later frame Bob/Alice if needed.
👤
Bob
→
Charlie
Charlie, if you are the Undertaker, you saw David was the Investigator. That's solid. If Heidi is the Saint, we have 2 Outsiders (Drunk + Saint). That implies a Baron. If Heidi is lying, she's likely the Demon or Minion. I agree, we need to pressure her. I'll push for a vote.
🧠
I need to coordinate with Charlie, who seems to be the most logical player, to pressure Heidi. If Heidi is the Saint, we are in a tough spot, but her claim is the biggest obstacle to finding the Demon. Testing her or pressuring her is the only way forward.
👤
Heidi
→
Charlie
,Alice
Charlie, you've been very active. If you are the Undertaker, can you confirm Frank's role? If Frank was the Drunk, that helps us verify Bob's Librarian claim. We need to know if there's a Baron in play or if Bob is lying. What's your read on the board?
🧠
I need to verify the Outsider count and Bob's claim. If Charlie is the Undertaker, he can confirm Frank's role, which is crucial for determining if Bob is telling the truth or if there's a Baron in play.
👤
Eve(Ghost)
→
Alice
,Bob
,Charlie
Since David wasn't the Demon, we need to look at the remaining players. Alice, Bob, Charlie, Grace, Heidi. Any of you have info that clears or implicates anyone? I'm dead, but I'm still watching. Who are we looking at for the final nomination?
🧠
I need to gather information from the living players to help identify the Demon, as my previous deduction about David was wrong. I want to prompt them to share their current suspicions or information.
⌛
Frank(Ghost)
Frank waits.
🧠
I am dead and have used my ghost vote. I have no further mechanical actions to take. I will wait for the living players to deliberate and nominate.
👤
Alice
→
Charlie
,Bob
,Eve(Ghost)
Charlie, Bob, Eve: If Bob is Librarian (1 Outsider) and Heidi is Saint (1 Outsider), that's 2. If there's a Baron, we need 3 Outsiders. If Frank was the Drunk, that's 3. But Charlie, you said you couldn't confirm Frank. If Heidi is lying, she's a great Demon candidate. Thoughts?
🧠
I need to reconcile the Outsider count to determine if a Baron is in play, which would validate my Chef info of 1 evil pair (if the Baron is the Minion). I'm pushing for clarity on Heidi's claim.
👤
Grace
→
Alice
,Bob
Alice, Bob: If Heidi is Saint and one of Frank/Charlie is Drunk, that's 2 Outsiders. If Bob is Librarian, that's potentially a 3rd. If there's no Baron, one of these claims is false. We need to verify the Outsider count to narrow down the evil team. Thoughts?
🧠
I want to force a logical check on the Outsider count to expose potential liars (Minions/Demon) among the current claims.
Nominations — Day 3
📜
Storyteller
Nominations are now open. Please remember that only living players may nominate.
💬
Eve(Ghost)
→
All
Alice, your logic on the Outsider count is solid. If Heidi is the Saint, she's a huge risk to execute. We need to press Grace and Charlie for their roles. If we can't confirm them, one of them is likely the Imp. I'm ready to use my ghost vote when we have a solid lead.
🧠
I need to encourage the living players to focus on the remaining suspects (Grace and Charlie) and validate Alice's logic about the Outsider count, while signaling that I'm ready to use my ghost vote.
💬
David(Ghost)
→
All
Public: don’t auto-clear Heidi for “Saint” — it’s the easiest evil shield. If you think it’s a bluff, execute her. Also, Alice’s Chef=1 means the evil pair was adjacent; if you think I was evil, that implicates Charlie/Grace. Bob’s Lib even had Charlie as Drunk, so look at Grace/Heidi, not Charlie.
🧠
Steer nominations/votes away from Charlie and toward Grace/Heidi, creating enough doubt to prevent a Demon execution and ideally win via a Heidi execution.
💬
Alice
→
All
Heidi's Saint claim is the biggest bottleneck. If she's the Saint, we lose on execution. If she's lying, she's a prime Demon candidate. Given the Outsider math, if Bob is the Librarian and Frank/Charlie is the Drunk, we have 2 Outsiders. A Baron would make 3. Let's test Heidi.
🧠
I need to push the town to make a decision on Heidi, as her Saint claim is stalling the game and she is a high-probability Demon candidate if she's bluffing. I'm advocating for testing her claim.
⚖️
Charlie
→
Heidi
Nominating Heidi: the Saint claim is freezing town. Outsider math is inconsistent unless we accept multiple lies. If Heidi is truly Saint, town shouldn’t auto-protect that slot forever; if she’s lying, she’s a top Demon/evil candidate.
🧠
Heidi’s Saint claim is paralyzing town. Nominating her either wins immediately (if true) or removes a strong evil candidate and keeps town focused away from me.
📜
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Heidi. 3 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
✋
David(Ghost)
David raised their hand
🧠
Use my ghost vote to push Heidi over the line; executing a claimed Saint is either an instant win (if true) or a high-value removal that protects Charlie.
✋
Alice
Alice raised their hand
🧠
I am voting to execute Heidi. The Saint claim is a high-risk, high-reward play. Given the Outsider math inconsistencies and the need to eliminate potential evil roles, testing the Saint claim is a necessary risk to progress the game and potentially catch the Demon.
✋
Bob
Bob raised their hand
🧠
I am voting for Heidi because the Saint claim is a common bluff and we need to resolve this bottleneck to progress. If she is the Saint, we lose, but we cannot afford to let a potential Demon hide behind a Saint claim indefinitely. David's push and Charlie's nomination support this.
✋
Charlie
Charlie raised their hand
🧠
Lock in Heidi’s execution. If she’s Saint we win now; if not, we still remove a key slot and keep momentum away from solving me as Imp.
💬
Frank(Ghost)
→
All
I am dead and have used my ghost vote, but I agree with the consensus. Heidi's Saint claim is the most dangerous variable right now. If she is the Saint, we are in trouble, but we cannot let a potential Demon hide behind that claim indefinitely. We must proceed.
🧠
I am confirming my support for the execution of Heidi, as I am dead and cannot vote, but I want to signal my alignment with the town's decision to test the Saint claim.
✋
Grace
Grace raised their hand
🧠
I need to vote for Heidi's execution. The town consensus is that Heidi's Saint claim is a major bottleneck and potentially a bluff. If she is the Saint, we lose, but we cannot afford to let a potential Demon hide behind that claim indefinitely. I must support the execution.
💬
Heidi
→
All
If you execute me, you lose. I am the Saint. If you are so sure I am evil, execute me, but know that you are handing the win to the Demon. If I am the Saint, the game ends immediately. Is that a risk you want to take when there are other suspicious players?
🧠
I am trying to save myself from execution because if I die, the good team loses. I need to emphasize the risk of executing the Saint.
✋
Eve(Ghost)
Eve raised their hand
🧠
I need to vote to execute Heidi. The town is leaning towards executing her to test her Saint claim. As a ghost, my vote is valuable, and the risk of her being the Demon outweighs the risk of her being the Saint, given the current game state and the need to progress.
💬
Charlie
→
All
I’m not buying “Saint = never execute.” It’s the perfect evil shield and it’s stalling the whole game. If she’s truly Saint we learn the hard way; if she’s lying we remove Demon/minion. I’m keeping my vote up—don’t let this get walked back.
🧠
Lock in Heidi execution by framing it as the only path forward; discourage last-second doubt so no one lowers hands.
💬
Grace
→
All
I'm voting for Heidi. The Saint claim is the ultimate shield, and we cannot afford to let it paralyze us when the Outsider math doesn't fully add up. If she's the Saint, we lose, but if she's lying, we're likely executing the Demon or a key Minion. We have to take the risk.
🧠
I am voting for Heidi because the Saint claim is stalling the game and the Outsider math is inconsistent. I need to commit to the execution to progress the game and test the claim.
💬
Heidi
→
All
If you execute me, you lose. I am the Saint. If you are so sure I am evil, execute me, but know that you are handing the win to the Demon. If I am the Saint, the game ends immediately. Is that a risk you want to take when there are other suspicious players?
🧠
I need to strongly warn the town that executing me as the Saint will cause an immediate loss for the good team. I must emphasize the risk of their decision.
💬
David(Ghost)
→
All
Dead vote staying UP. “Saint = never execute” just handcuffs town and is the perfect evil shield. If Heidi’s Saint, we learn the hard way; if she’s lying, we remove a major threat. Don’t get talked out of it at the last second.
🧠
Keep the vote locked in and prevent late wavering; frame it as anti-shield logic consistent with my prior stance so I don’t look coordinated with Charlie.
💬
Frank(Ghost)
→
All
Heidi, if you are the Saint, you are the most dangerous player on the board right now because your claim prevents us from making any progress. If you are lying, you are the Demon. We have to take this risk to move forward. I support the execution.
🧠
To reinforce the town's decision to execute Heidi, emphasizing that the Saint claim is a bottleneck that must be tested, even at the risk of losing.
💬
Alice
→
All
I'm keeping my vote up. The Saint claim is the classic "get out of jail free" card for evil players. If we don't test it, we're just letting the Demon hide in plain sight. We have to take this risk to move forward.
🧠
I am reinforcing the town's decision to execute Heidi, as the Saint claim is a high-risk, high-reward situation that we must resolve to progress.
💬
Bob
→
All
I agree with the consensus. The Saint claim is too powerful a shield to leave untested, especially with the Outsider count being ambiguous. If she is the Saint, we lose, but we cannot let the game stall indefinitely. We have to take this risk.
🧠
Reinforce the town's decision to execute Heidi, acknowledging the risk but emphasizing the necessity of testing the Saint claim.
💬
Eve(Ghost)
→
All
I'm voting for Heidi. The Saint claim is the most common bluff for an evil player to avoid execution. If she is the Saint, we lose, but we cannot let this claim paralyze us. We have to take the risk to move forward. My ghost vote is committed.
🧠
I need to signal my support for the execution of Heidi to help the town reach a decision, as the Saint claim is a common evil bluff and we need to progress.
📜
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
👻
David(Ghost)
Ghost vote used by David
👻
Eve(Ghost)
Ghost vote used by Eve
🗳️
New execution leader: Heidi with 6 votes. They will be executed when nominations close unless tied or surpassed by another nominee.
📜
Storyteller
The vote passes. Heidi is now on the block with 6 votes and will be executed when nominations close, unless another nominee receives equal or more votes.
⌛
Grace
Grace waits.
🧠
The vote has passed and Heidi is on the block. There is nothing left to do but wait for the execution to resolve.
💬
Eve(Ghost)
→
All
The vote has passed. We've made our choice to test the Saint claim. If Heidi is the Saint, we lose, but we had to break the deadlock. If she's not, we've likely caught the Demon or a Minion. Let's see what happens. Good luck, everyone.
🧠
Acknowledge the vote result and reinforce the team's decision to test the Saint claim, maintaining morale and focus.
💬
Charlie
→
All
No more reshuffling—vote already showed where everyone stands. If we start tossing in “safer” noms now, we just hand evil another free day of paralysis. Let Heidi resolve and then we reassess with clearer worlds.
🧠
Keep Heidi as sole execution to either instantly win (if Saint) or remove a focal point while avoiding new nominations that could redirect onto me.
💬
Heidi
→
All
If you execute me, you lose. I am the Saint. If you are so sure I am evil, execute me, but know that you are handing the win to the Demon. If I am the Saint, the game ends immediately. Is that a risk you want to take when there are other suspicious players?
🧠
I am the Saint. If I am executed, the good team loses. I must warn them one last time that executing me is a game-losing move for the good team. I am trying to prevent my own execution to save the game.
⌛
Bob
Bob waits.
🧠
The vote has already passed and Heidi is on the block. There is no reason to nominate anyone else or change the current state. I should wait for the execution to resolve.
⌛
Alice
Alice waits.
🧠
The town has reached a consensus to execute Heidi to test her Saint claim. There is no reason to nominate anyone else at this stage, as it would only complicate the current decision. I will wait for the phase to conclude.
💬
David(Ghost)
→
All
I’d strongly advise NO more nominations. A late “safer” nom just gives evil cover and information. Heidi’s claim is already being tested; let it resolve at close, then rebuild worlds with the result.
🧠
Lock in Heidi’s execution by socially preventing a last-second alternative nomination that could save her and redirect onto Charlie.
⌛
Frank(Ghost)
Frank waits.
🧠
The town has already voted to execute Heidi. There is no reason to nominate anyone else, as that would only complicate the board and potentially save Heidi if the vote count is split. I am dead and have used my ghost vote, so I should just wait for the execution to resolve.
📜
Storyteller
The guillotine blade falls. Heidi has been executed.
💀
Heidi(Ghost)
Heidi has died.
🏁
Game Over
Saint Executed
Winner: Evil
Transcript
Paused
Copied