Game Detail
Players
Alice (Spy) Bob (Drunk) Charlie (Imp) David (Empath) Eve (Chef) Frank (Mayor) Grace (Ravenkeeper) Heidi (Undertaker)
Token Usage
| Team | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Cost (USD) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Good | 637,660 | 125,745 | $2.8763 |
| Evil | 236,899 | 25,137 | $0.7665 |
Event Transcript
π
The game has started.
π
Storyteller
β
Alice
You are the Minion. The Demon is Charlie.
π
Storyteller
β
Charlie
Minions are: Alice. Your safe bluffs are: Librarian, Investigator, Virgin
π
Storyteller
β
Eve
Good evening Eve. You are the Chef. You learn that there are 0 pairs of evil players.
π
Storyteller
β
David
Good evening David. You are the Empath. You sense that 1 of your neighbors is evil!
π
Storyteller
β
Alice
Good evening Alice. You are the Spy. You can secretly see information about all players: - Alice: Spy (evil), Alive - Bob: Drunk (good), Alive (Told they are Soldier) - Charlie: Imp (evil), Alive - David: Empath (good), Alive - Eve: Chef (good), Alive - Frank: Mayor (good), Alive - Grace: Ravenkeeper (good), Alive - Heidi: Undertaker (good), Alive
Day 1
π
Storyteller
Welcome to the village of Ravenswood Bluff. Please take this time to get to know your fellow villagers. Feel free to move around and have private conversations. Be wary, for a Demon hides among you!
π€
Grace
β
Frank
,Heidi
Hey, quick check in since we are neighbors. What are you planning to claim, and do you have any starting info? I am an information townsfolk and I am happy to coordinate, but I do not want to hard claim publicly yet.
π§
Get early role and info claims from my neighbors and seed a reason for the Demon to consider night-killing me later, without hard-claiming yet.
π€
David
β
Charlie
Hey Charlie, want to swap roles in private? I have a starting info role and I am trying to map the circle. What are you claiming, and did you get any N0 info?
π§
Start neighbor reads by getting Charlie's claim and vibe without leaking my Empath result to the likely evil neighbor publicly.
π€
Eve
β
David
,Frank
I am the Chef. I got zero adjacent evil pairs, so the demon and minion are not sitting next to each other. What are you claiming, and do you have any starting info?
π§
Privately share my Chef info with my neighbors to build an early trust network and use the seating constraint to guide future suspicion without giving evil full map.
π€
Bob
β
Alice
,Charlie
Hey, quick check in. What are you claiming and did you get any starting info? I am a Townsfolk with no starting info, happy to compare notes and keep it quiet for now.
π§
Get early role claims and any starting info from my neighbors, build a trust pocket, and create a baseline to catch later lies without exposing my Soldier role yet.
π€
Alice
β
Bob
,Charlie
I will keep it quiet, but I am claiming Librarian. My start info was that one of Bob or Grace is an Outsider, so I think one of you is the Drunk. Do not hard out it yet, but it may explain weird info later.
π§
Use a safe bluff to destabilize Bobβs self-confidence and create misinformation that protects Charlie, while keeping info exchange private.
π€
Heidi
β
Grace
,Frank
I do not want to hard claim in public yet. I am an information Townsfolk with no starting info, but I should learn something after the first execution. What are you two planning to claim, and do you have any first night one info?
π§
Answer Grace to build an early coordination circle while minimizing risk if either Grace or Frank is evil.
π€
Charlie
β
David
,Bob
Hey. I am going to quietly claim Investigator. My Night zero info was that one of Eve or Frank is the Scarlet Woman. Not hard outing, just flagging it for later. What are you each claiming, and do you have any info I should factor in?
π§
Establish a safe bluff early, seed a misexecution pair, and gather David and Bob claims while keeping Aliceβs Librarian story uncontested.
π€
Frank
β
Eve
,Grace
Thanks. I have no starting info either, so I am keeping my exact role quiet for now. Chef zero is useful, it means the Demon and Minion are not sitting next to each other. Grace, what kind of info role are you, and do you want to coordinate a sensible day one execution for data?
π§
Build a small trusted info circle, acknowledge the Chef info, and encourage a useful day one execution plan without exposing my Mayor role.
π€
Grace
β
Frank
,Heidi
I will be straight with you two: I am the Ravenkeeper. So I really do not want to be executed, and I would love a Demon kill tonight for info. For day one, I lean toward executing a volunteer or a weak claim to give Heidi a clean post-exec check. Frank, if Chef zero is real, we should remember it but not force everything to fit it yet.
π§
Align with my neighbors on a safe D1 plan that generates info, while positioning myself to be a good night-kill target so my Ravenkeeper ability can fire.
π€
David
β
Charlie
I am quietly Empath. Night zero I got a one, meaning exactly one of my living neighbors is evil, so it is either you or Eve. Eve is claiming Chef with zero adjacent evil pairs. How confident are you in your Investigator ping on Eve or Frank?
π§
Share my Empath read privately with Charlie to coordinate logic chains and decide whether to pressure Eve or suspect Charlie, while limiting info leakage to a possibly-evil neighbor.
π€
Eve
β
Grace
,Heidi
Hi. I am the Chef and I got zero adjacent evil pairs, so the Demon and Minion are not sitting next to each other. What are you each claiming, and did you get any starting info? Also, any thoughts on a sensible day one execution for information?
π§
Expand my trusted web beyond neighbors, gather any starting info claims, and get ahead of possible evil spin on Chef zero before nominations.
π€
Bob
β
Alice
,Charlie
Quietly, I am the Soldier. I have no starting info. Alice, if your Librarian info is sober, then Grace must be the Outsider, because I am not. Charlie, noted on your Investigator info that one of Eve or Frank is the Scarlet Woman. Let us keep this tight for now.
π§
Share my true role to help resolve Alice's Librarian conflict and integrate Charlie's Investigator ping, while keeping it quiet to avoid giving evil a clear night-kill map.
π€
Alice
β
Charlie
Private: I saw full setup. You are Imp. Roles: David Empath, Eve Chef, Frank Mayor, Grace Ravenkeeper, Heidi Undertaker, Bob is Drunk (thinks Soldier). I am Spy. Suggest N1 kill Heidi to stop Undertaker, then maybe David. Keep my Librarian claim as Bob or Grace Outsider.
π§
Feed Charlie exact role list and suggest safe kill/bluff paths; keep our Librarian lie coherent and steer suspicion away from Charlie.
π€
Heidi
β
Eve
,Grace
I will be direct with you both: I am the Undertaker, so after todayβs execution I learn what character died. I like your Chef zero note, Eve. For day one I would rather execute a willing player with a clear claim so my check is useful, and I would avoid executing Grace since she is Ravenkeeper.
π§
Coordinate privately: confirm my Undertaker role to a small circle, preserve Ravenkeeper, and steer toward a D1 execution that generates verifiable role info without risking key deaths.
π€
Charlie
β
David
,Bob
David, I am not hard confident. My Investigator ping could be noise if there is drunkenness, but I would keep Eve and Frank on the radar. Bob, thanks. If Alice is right, the Outsider is likely you or Grace, so be ready for that pressure later. Let us keep this quiet.
π§
Maintain my Investigator bluff, steer David away from hard-clearing Eve, and keep Bob aligned with Aliceβs Librarian world while preserving flexibility to frame Eve or Frank later.
π€
Frank
β
Heidi
,Grace
Heidi, your βlearn after first executionβ sounds like Undertaker. Is that your role? If yes, I like executing a volunteer who hard claims publicly, so you can confirm and we can catch lies. Grace, as Ravenkeeper, I agree we should avoid executing you day one.
π§
Coordinate a clean day one execution that generates mechanical info, while keeping the Ravenkeeper safe and not revealing I am the Mayor too early.
π€
Grace
β
Eve
,Heidi
I am aligned with you both on a data exec. Since you are Undertaker, let us ask for a public hard claim volunteer and execute them so you can confirm. I will stay off the block as Ravenkeeper. Also, let us not overfit everything to Chef zero yet.
π§
Coordinate with claimed Chef and Undertaker to engineer a high-information day one execution while protecting my Ravenkeeper role and not locking the town into possibly false Chef-zero.
π€
David
β
Eve
Hey Eve, quick check in. I am a Townsfolk info role and I have a reason to think either you or Charlie might be evil. Your Chef zero is important. Are you confident you heard it right, and are you planning to stay quiet on it or share it soon?
π§
Probe Eveβs Chef claim and open a private channel without hard outing Empath, while setting up later logic between Chef 0 and my neighbor read.
π€
Eve
β
David
I am confident: I saw zero adjacent evil pairs. I have shared it in a few whispers and can go public later today if needed. What exact role are you claiming, and what is the precise info that points to me or Charlie? I want to test it against Chef zero.
π§
Clarify Davidβs info and align with him if good, while keeping Chef info credible and not letting an evil David steer an early misexecute.
π€
Bob
β
Grace
,David
Hey Grace and David, quick check in. What are you each claiming, and did you get any starting info? I am sitting on a Townsfolk claim with no starting info for now, just trying to line up the early puzzle.
π§
Get independent claims from Grace and David to test Alice and Charlie info chains, identify likely Outsider and potential minion, and decide what to share publicly before nominations.
π€
Alice
β
David
Hey David, quietly: I am claiming Librarian. My N0 info was that one of Bob or Grace is an Outsider. Also, Charlie has been saying he is Investigator and that one of Eve or Frank is the Scarlet Woman. Just sharing in case it helps frame your Empath reads.
π§
Mislead the Empath away from Charlie by giving him plausible reasons to suspect Eve/Frank or doubt his read; keep my Librarian bluff consistent and spread it to a key info player.
π€
Heidi
β
Frank
,Eve
Yes Frank, I am Undertaker. For Day one, can one of you float the idea of a volunteer hard claiming publicly and taking the execution, so I can confirm tonight? Let us avoid putting Grace up. Also, any other claims you have heard yet?
π§
Coordinate a Day1 execution that maximizes Undertaker confirmation value, while minimizing risk of executing key good roles like Ravenkeeper or Saint.
π€
Charlie
β
David
,Bob
David, your Empath one lines up with my Investigator ping on Eve or Frank as Scarlet Woman. If you trust me even a bit, I would keep pressure on Eve first. Bob, if this goes public later, we may need to explain possible Drunk stuff without hard outing anyone yet.
π§
Get David to focus on Eve (or Frank) as the evil neighbor, not me, and look like a helpful Investigator so I survive Day 1.
π€
Frank
β
Eve
I agree with Heidi. Can you float publicly that we want a volunteer to hard claim and take the Day one execution so Undertaker can confirm? Also, what other claims have you heard so far, especially from David, Alice, Bob, or Charlie?
π§
Coordinate a low-risk Day 1 execution plan that maximizes Undertaker confirmation and gathers more role claims, while keeping my Mayor identity hidden.
Nominations β Day 1
π
Storyteller
Nominations are now open.
βοΈ
Bob
β
Eve
I am nominating Eve as a day one pressure test. I have heard a quiet ping that one of Eve or Frank could be the Scarlet Woman, and I would like Eve to answer it and see who defends whom.
π§
We are about to go to night with no one on the block. A day one execution is usually better than none, and this nomination pressures two linked suspects without hard outing my role.
π
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Eve. 4 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
β
Bob
Bob raised their hand
π§
I want to push through an execution on the strongest early evil candidate to generate mechanical info and likely remove a Minion or Demon-adjacent player.
π¬
David
β
All
Before people pile on, can Eve answer the Scarlet Woman ping directly and say what she has shared so far? I am not ready to vote on this day one with so little on the table.
π§
Slow down a D1 execution with thin evidence, get Eve to publicly answer the accusation, and preserve flexibility while keeping my Empath role hidden for now.
π¬
Frank
β
All
I am not voting here. Eve has at least put a Chef claim out, with zero adjacent evil pairs, and that is useful. Bob, where did this Scarlet Woman ping come from, specifically? If we want a day one execution for an Undertaker check, let us pick a volunteer hard claim, not Eve on a hunch.
π§
Stop a weak D1 execution on a useful claimant, demand accountability for the 'ping', and redirect town toward a deliberate volunteer execution to generate Undertaker-confirmable info.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
I will answer that. I am the one with the Scarlet Woman ping: I am claiming Investigator, and I got Eve or Frank. I do not think we need a day one execution off that alone, but I do want both of them to clearly state what they have shared and with whom.
π§
Add credible detail to my Investigator bluff while steering away from a successful Day 1 execution, keeping options open and maintaining trust.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
Before more votes: Eve and Frank, please hard claim clearly right now, and explicitly say if either of you could be the Saint. Charlie, confirm you saw Scarlet Woman specifically. I would rather not execute Eve without those answers.
π§
Slow the vote until Eve and Frank hard-claim and deny Saint; set up an execution that yields maximum mechanical clarity for tomorrow.
π¬
Alice
β
All
I am not voting this. Charlie, if you are Investigator, keep the exact wording clear, but I agree we do not execute day one off a single ping. Eve and Frank should just hard claim, then we move on and let night info sharpen this tomorrow.
π§
Discourage day one execution to protect our Demon and avoid giving Undertaker a clean confirmation, while appearing reasonable and information-focused.
π¬
Grace
β
All
I am not voting on Eve right now. Eve and Frank, please hard claim clearly to everyone, and say if you could be the Saint. Charlie, please confirm you saw Scarlet Woman specifically. If we execute day one, I would rather it be a clean volunteer after claims.
π§
Slow a low-confidence day one execution, force clear hard claims from Eve and Frank, and preserve town tempo while setting up Undertaker confirmations tomorrow.
π¬
Eve
β
All
I am the Chef. Night zero I got zero adjacent evil pairs. I am not the Saint. I have shared this in whispers already, including to Frank and Heidi. I do not want a day one execution on a single Investigator ping. If we execute, pick a clean volunteer for Undertaker value.
π§
Stop a low-information Day 1 execution on me, hard-claim Chef to lock my info, and pivot town toward a better Undertaker-supported execution plan.
β©οΈ
Bob
Bob lowered their hand
π§
Avoid a low-information day one execution while keeping focus on getting clear hard claims from Eve and Frank, then using night info to pursue the Investigator ping tomorrow.
π¬
David
β
All
I am not voting on Eve today. I want us to step back from a single Investigator ping and get clean, clear claims from Eve and Frank, and also exactly what Charlie saw. If we want a day one execution, I would rather it be a willing volunteer with a plan for Undertaker value.
π§
Avoid a low-information day one execute on a potentially framed target; push for clearer public claims and set up better executions with tomorrowβs info.
π¬
Frank
β
All
I will be clear: I am not the Saint. I am a Townsfolk with no starting information, so I am not hard claiming further right now. I am not voting Eve today off a single Investigator ping. Charlie, please confirm you saw Scarlet Woman specifically, and what you have shared so far.
π§
Defuse a shaky D1 execution on Eve, answer the Investigator ping without overexposing Mayor, and steer town toward structured claim collection and a planned Undertaker-confirmable execute later if needed.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
Yes, to be precise, my Investigator info was that one of Eve or Frank is the Scarlet Woman. I have only shared that, not a hard accusation. I do not want an execution today off that alone. Let us get clean claims on record and go to night.
π§
Avoid a day one execution that could give Undertaker confirmation, keep my Investigator bluff consistent, and keep suspicion split between Eve and Frank while we plan a strong night kill.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
I am not voting on Eve here. The Investigator ping alone is not enough, and Chef is useful. Let us go to night, then tomorrow we can do a controlled execution on a willing volunteer who is definitely not the Saint, so my Undertaker info actually helps.
π§
Stop a hasty D1 execution on weak grounds while keeping pressure for clear claims and setting up a future controlled execution that I can verify as Undertaker.
π¬
Alice
β
All
I agree with the table: do not execute off a single Investigator ping. We have Chef information on record and no one wants this vote. Let the vote die, go to night, and tomorrow we can do a planned execution with clear, non Saint claims.
π§
Reinforce consensus to stop the vote, avoid an execution that could create hard info, and keep town focused on claims and going to night while protecting the demon.
π¬
Grace
β
All
I am not voting on Eve. We have a clear Chef claim and a single Investigator ping, and nobody wants to follow through. Let this vote die and go to night, then tomorrow we do a planned execution with clear non Saint claims for Undertaker value.
π§
Stop a low-info day one execution, keep Chef and Investigator info on record, and set up a controlled day two execution that gives Undertaker value while I stay alive for possible night kill trigger.
β
Eve
Eve waits.
π§
Do not contribute to a low-info Day one execution on me; preserve Chef info and let vote fail so we reach night and get more mechanical information.
π
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
π³οΈ
Nominee Eve did not reach threshold.
π
Storyteller
Eve did not receive enough votes (0/4).
π¬
Bob
β
All
Okay, that is fine. I nominated Eve as a pressure test, and we at least got clear claims on record: Eve is Chef with zero, and Charlie says Investigator saw Scarlet Woman on Eve or Frank. Let us go to night. Tomorrow I want Frank to give a clearer claim, and we should plan a non Saint volunteer execution for Undertaker value.
π§
Defuse the failed push, lock in useful public claims, and steer town toward a planned non-Saint execution tomorrow for Undertaker confirmation while keeping Eve or Frank on the radar.
β
David
David waits.
π§
No momentum for a Day 1 execution. Better to keep my Empath role quieter and get Night 1 info, then push a controlled Day 2 execution with clearer evidence.
π¬
Frank
β
All
I agree we should not force a day one execution off that Investigator ping. If anyone wants an Undertaker check, they should hard claim publicly and confirm they are not the Saint, then volunteer tomorrow. Otherwise, I prefer we go to night with claims as they stand.
π§
Keep town from a low-info day one execution, preserve Chef and Undertaker value, and push for structured claims and a planned non-Saint volunteer execution tomorrow.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
I am happy to let today end with no execution. We got a Chef claim on record and my Investigator ping on record, and that is enough for day one. Tomorrow, if we want Undertaker value, let us pick a single volunteer after clear non Saint statements.
π§
Reinforce consensus to end day without execution, keep my Investigator bluff consistent, and set up tomorrowβs planned execution to be someone we can manipulate.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
I am good with ending the day with no execution. Tomorrow, I want everyone to clearly say whether they could be the Saint, and then we pick one willing volunteer for a controlled execution so my Undertaker info is useful. Frank, please come with a clearer claim tomorrow.
π§
Steer town to end D1 safely, preserve useful claims, and set up a planned D2 execution that creates Undertaker-confirmable info and pressures Frank/Eve/Charlie to commit.
π¬
Alice
β
All
I am fine ending the day with no execution. Tomorrow, let us do quick clear claims in seating order, then pick one willing non Saint to execute for Undertaker value. That should give us real structure without guessing today.
π§
Close out day with no execution, preserve Charlie, and set up tomorrowβs βcontrolledβ execution to hit a good player while I look helpful.
π¬
Grace
β
All
I am also fine ending day one with no execution. For planning, I will say now I am not the Saint. Tomorrow let us do quick claims in seating order, then pick one willing non Saint whose ability we can afford to lose. Frank, please come ready with a clearer claim.
π§
Reinforce the plan to end day cleanly, lock in non-Saint statements, and set up a structured D2 that generates Undertaker-confirmable info and pressures vague claims like Frank.
π¬
Eve
β
All
I am happy with no execution today. Tomorrow let us do quick claims in seating order, and pick a single willing volunteer who is definitely not the Saint for Undertaker value. Charlie, please explain why your ping was Scarlet Woman specifically, so we can combine it with Chef zero.
π§
Steer the group away from a speculative D1 execution, lock in a structured D2 plan, and ensure Charlie explains his info so we can apply Chef zero logically.
π
Storyteller
No execution today. All villagers are safe.
Night 1
π
Storyteller
β
Charlie
Good evening Charlie. You are the Imp. Who would you like to kill tonight? Remember that if you kill yourself this way, a Minion becomes the Imp.
π―
Charlie
Charlie made a choice.
π§
Heidi is driving the structured plan and claims Undertaker; removing her blocks confirmation loops and keeps town arguing about claims and my Investigator ping.
π
Heidi(Ghost)
Heidi has died.
π
Storyteller
β
Charlie
You chose to kill Heidi.
π
Storyteller
β
David
Good evening David. You are the Empath. You sense that 1 of your neighbors is evil!
π
Storyteller
β
Alice
Good evening Alice. You are the Spy. You can secretly see information about all players: - Alice: Spy (evil), Alive - Bob: Drunk (good), Alive (Told they are Soldier) - Charlie: Imp (evil), Alive - David: Empath (good), Alive - Eve: Chef (good), Alive - Frank: Mayor (good), Alive - Grace: Ravenkeeper (good), Alive - Heidi: Undertaker (good), Dead
Day 2
π
Storyteller
Morning breaks, but heavy hearts remain. Heidi has been found dead in the night.
π€
David
β
Alice
,Charlie
My Empath info: Night zero and Night one both read one, so exactly one of my neighbors Charlie or Eve is evil if I am sober. That intersects with Charlieβs Investigator claim, so Eve looks suspicious, but Charlie could be the evil instead. What are your thoughts and full details?
π§
Privately share my persistent Empath 1 to key info roles, align on a focused execution plan (Eve vs Charlie vs Frank) and watch for contradictions without exposing too publicly yet.
π€
Eve
β
Charlie
,David
Charlie, can you restate your exact Investigator info from night one, including which minion you saw and the two names? David, what is your role claim and any info so far? My Chef zero still means the two evils are not seated next to each other.
π§
Get Charlie to restate exact Investigator info and get David's claim/info so I can apply Chef zero seating logic and build an execution plan today.
π€
Grace
β
Charlie
,Alice
If your Investigator ping and Eve Chef zero are both true, then demon and minion are not adjacent. Since Scarlet Woman is in {Eve, Frank}, demon is forced into {Alice, Bob, Charlie, Grace} if Eve is SW, or {Alice, Bob, Charlie, David} if Frank is SW. What are your exact claims and reads today?
π§
Share the mechanical narrowing from Chef0 plus Investigator ping, and gather Alice/Charlie claims to pick a strong Day 2 nomination target.
π€
Charlie
β
David
,Eve
My Investigator from setup was: Scarlet Woman, and the two names were Eve and Frank. I treated it as a pressure ping, not an auto execute. David, what is your exact role claim? If you are the Drunk, that repeated one could be noise, because Chef zero fits Alice and me not being adjacent.
π§
Answer both and steer suspicion toward Frank, while seeding doubt that Empath is reliable so they do not auto-solve me as evil.
π€
Bob
β
Alice
,Charlie
Heidi dying makes me think she was real Undertaker. If your Librarian info and Davidβs Empath one are true, then Eve is very likely evil. If Eve is Scarlet Woman, demon cannot be David or Frank, so I look at Bob or Grace. What are you each thinking now? Also, I am the Soldier.
π§
Align with two likely-good info sources, share a coherent deduction (Eve likely evil) and set up next-step tests for nominations by narrowing demon candidates if Eve is minion.
π€
Heidi(Ghost)
β
Charlie
,Alice
I died Night one and I was the Undertaker, so we will not get any Undertaker confirmation from executions now. The Day one plan to execute for Undertaker info will not work. If your Investigator info is true and Chef is zero, the Demon is not adjacent to the Scarlet Woman.
π§
I must immediately tell key players I was Undertaker and am dead, so the Day 1 plan to execute for Undertaker confirmation is no longer valid. Then push them toward alternative mechanical tests and using Chef/Investigator logic.
π€
Alice
β
David
If you are sober, your one both nights makes it exactly one of Charlie or Eve. I lean Eve: it matches Charlieβs Investigator ping, and Chef zero can still be true if Eve is SW and Charlie is Imp since they are not adjacent. I would vote Eve over Charlie today.
π§
Steer David toward executing Eve and away from suspecting Charlie, while keeping my Librarian bluff consistent and leveraging the lost Undertaker to reduce verification.
π€
Frank
β
Charlie
,Heidi(Ghost)
Charlie, Heidi, quick check in. I am actually the Mayor, so I am not Scarlet Woman. If your Investigator info is legit, that points to Eve as the Scarlet Woman. Heidi, did you pick up anything useful in whispers before you died?
π§
I need to privately clear myself from the Investigator ping by sharing my true role, and learn any extra info from Charlie and Heidi to steer nominations toward real evil.
π€
David
β
Eve
,Charlie
I am Empath. Night zero was one and night one was one, so if sober then exactly one of you two is evil. Charlie, your Investigator ping plus this makes Eve look worse, but I am not clearing you either. Eve, please restate Chef zero and any other claims.
π§
Answer their direct questions, lock in my info, and prompt role/claim resolution so we can choose the best execution target in nominations.
π€
Eve
β
Alice
,David
Confirming again: I am Chef, got zero adjacent evil pairs. David, if your Empath is sober then exactly one of Charlie or me is evil. I know I am good, so that points to Charlie lying or evil. Alice, I think we should pressure or execute Charlie unless David seems drunk.
π§
Align with Alice and David on the key contradiction (Empath vs Investigator) and steer the group toward executing the most mechanically implicated player, likely Charlie if David seems credible.
π€
Grace
β
Charlie
,Alice
Heidi dying at night makes me think her Undertaker claim was real and evil wanted it gone. If your Investigator ping is legit, I think we should execute either Eve or Frank today to remove the possible Scarlet Woman before we ever hit the Demon. Frank feels sketchier to me. What new info do you both have?
π§
Coordinate with Charlie and Alice to lock a Day 2 execution plan that removes the possible Scarlet Woman first, while gathering any new whispers/reads and protecting against executing the Demon too early.
π€
Charlie
β
Alice
We need to keep heat off me from David Empath one. Please back my Investigator ping and push that Eve is best execute today. Emphasize UT is dead so we cannot confirm, and executing the suspected Scarlet Woman is safe. Avoid hard defending Eve.
π§
Coordinate with Alice so she backs my Investigator story and steers todayβs execution onto Eve, keeping heat off me while we keep Demon alive.
π€
Bob
β
David
,Charlie
Can you both give me your exact info in one place? David, your Empath numbers so far and who your living neighbors are. Charlie, confirm your Investigator ping was specifically Scarlet Woman on Eve or Frank. If both true, I want us to agree on a single execution target today.
π§
Get Davidβs Empath details and align with Charlie on a concrete execution plan for today, using chains with Librarian and Investigator to narrow demon candidates.
π€
Heidi(Ghost)
β
Frank
,Charlie
Frank, I did not get anything else in whispers before I died. I really was the Undertaker, so no Undertaker confirmation plan now. If you are truly the Mayor, we should plan around keeping you alive and aiming for final three with no execution. Charlie, if you are sober, your Investigator then points to Eve as Scarlet Woman.
π§
Answer Frank, align Charlie and Frank on implications of Mayor and dead Undertaker, and steer town toward a plan that does not rely on Undertaker info.
π€
Alice
β
David
,Grace
I think todayβs safest path is still executing Eve. David, your Empath one both nights fits Eve being the Scarlet Woman and Charlie being Imp without breaking Chef zero since they are not adjacent. Grace, with Undertaker dead, removing the suspected Scarlet Woman first feels best.
π§
Coordinate narrative that Eve is best execution today, using Davidβs Empath and Charlieβs Investigator to protect Charlie and keep town divided.
π€
Frank
β
Alice
,David
Quick private: I am actually the Mayor, so I cannot be Scarlet Woman. If Charlie is a real Investigator, that would make Eve the Scarlet Woman. What are your roles or key info, and who are you most suspicious of right now?
π§
Build a trusted good core by privately confirming I am Mayor, reduce suspicion on me, and share the deduction that Charlieβs ping would mechanically implicate Eve; gather their info for a Demon solve.
π€
David
β
Bob
,Alice
Update: I am Empath. Night zero was one and night one was one, so if sober exactly one of Charlie or Eve is evil. Charlieβs Investigator ping (Scarlet Woman is Eve or Frank) overlaps on Eve. Also Frank privately told me and Alice he is Mayor, so he says he cannot be Scarlet Woman, but that could be a bluff. My lean is execute Eve today to resolve the Charlie or Eve pair, but keep Frank on the suspect list.
π§
Align town on one execution with best overlap: my Empath 1,1 plus Charlieβs Investigator points to Eve, but flag Frankβs private Mayor claim as potential bluff/demon. Give Bob/Alice a clear plan for noms.
π€
Eve
β
Alice
,Bob
I think we should execute Charlie today. Davidβs Empath was one both nights, so if he is sober it is exactly one of Charlie or me, and I am Chef with zero pairs. With Undertaker dead, killing Charlie is still high value and could just win if he is the Demon. If Charlie dies and game continues, I want us to look hard at Frank next.
π§
We lost Undertaker, so we need a strong day execution. Davidβs Empath 1,1 creates a direct binary with me vs Charlie; with my Chef0 and consistency, I want town to execute Charlie and then reassess Frank.
π€
Grace
β
Alice
,David
Quick check: if you are Empath between Charlie and Eve, a read of one means exactly one of them is evil. It cannot fit Charlie as Imp and Eve as Scarlet Woman together, that would be two. So either Charlie evil and Eve good, or Eve evil and Charlie good. That changes who we should execute today.
π§
Correct the empath logic error and align town on a consistent world, so todayβs execution targets the likeliest minion or demon instead of a good player.
π€
Charlie
β
David
,Bob
My Investigator was Scarlet Woman with the two names Eve and Frank, from setup. With Chef zero, evil are not adjacent, so executing Eve first feels safest to remove possible SW. If your Empath is right, it also points to Eve over me.
π§
Reinforce my Investigator story, steer David and Bob into a consensus execute on Eve, and pre-seed doubt about Empath if it turns on me later.
π€
Bob
β
Alice
,David
I am leaning we execute Eve today. She is the overlap of Empath one and Charlieβs Scarlet Woman ping, and she is pushing Charlie back. Even if she is the Demon, Scarlet Woman could catch, so we cannot relax if game continues.
π§
Coordinate town to a single high-probability execution today (Eve), while flagging the Scarlet Woman swap risk so we do not stop solving if the game continues.
π€
Heidi(Ghost)
β
Alice
,Charlie
Reminder: Chef 0 means Demon and Minion are not adjacent. If Investigator is right and Eve is Scarlet Woman, Demon cannot be David or Frank. If Frank is Scarlet Woman, Demon cannot be Eve or Grace. Also be careful trusting Frank Mayor and aiming for final three no execution unless we can verify it.
π§
Get key players to use Chef 0 + Investigator ping to narrow Demon candidates, and caution against trusting a possible Mayor bluff or skipping executions too early.
π€
Alice
β
David
,Grace
Good catch: if you are sober, Empath one means exactly one of Charlie or Eve is evil, so it cannot be both Imp and Scarlet Woman together. That makes me think either Charlieβs Investigator is wrong or your Empath is off. Either way, I still like executing Eve today as the overlap. If she dies and the game continues, that is consistent with her being the Scarlet Woman and the Demon being elsewhere, not automatically that Charlie is the Demon.
π§
Patch Graceβs logic correction without conceding Charlie. Keep plan on executing Eve, then use βScarlet Woman catchβ narrative to redirect suspicion away from Charlie after Eve dies.
π€
Frank
β
Bob
,Grace
Quick private: I am actually the Mayor. So I cannot be Scarlet Woman, meaning if Charlie is a real Investigator, Eve is the Scarlet Woman. What is your role and best info so far, and who do you suspect most for Demon right now?
π§
Get Bob and Grace claims and suspicions quickly before nominations, and share that I am Mayor so they can clear me from Charlieβs Investigator world and narrow Demon candidates.
Nominations β Day 2
π
Storyteller
Nominations are now open. Please remember that only living players may nominate.
βοΈ
Frank
β
Eve
I want Eve on the block today. Charlie said one of Eve or me is Scarlet Woman, and I am confident I am not. If Charlie is right, Eve is the Scarlet Woman and we should remove that safety net now. Eve also said she is not the Saint.
π§
Eve is the highest-leverage execution: either we kill the Scarlet Woman that Charlie pointed at, or we get strong vote and reaction info to solve before final three.
π
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Eve. 4 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
β
Frank
Frank raised their hand
π§
I nominated Eve based on the Investigator ping and my certainty I am not Scarlet Woman. Voting is consistent with that push and could remove a key evil piece or even the Demon.
β
Grace
Grace raised their hand
π§
Eve is the overlap suspect (Investigator ping, nomination focus) and claimed not Saint; executing her gives the clearest mechanical test and removes potential Scarlet Woman.
β
Alice
Alice raised their hand
π§
Vote to execute Eve to protect Charlie, remove a strong good player, and keep town focused on SW narratives instead of the real Imp.
β
Heidi(Ghost)
Heidi waits.
π§
Hold my single ghost vote for a later, higher-leverage day unless I am confident. Withhold the deciding vote now to avoid enabling a potentially bad execution.
β
Charlie
Charlie raised their hand
π§
Get Eve executed now to reduce good info and cement my Investigator narrative; also satisfy the needed fourth vote without drawing extra attention.
β
Bob
Bob raised their hand
π§
We have enough votes to execute Eve; I want to lock it in because she is the overlap of the strongest info and likely evil. If she is SW, removing her prevents a Demon catch.
β
David
David raised their hand
π§
Secure Eveβs execution while the table consensus exists; it is the best overlap target and removes a potential Scarlet Woman before the endgame.
π¬
Eve
β
All
Please do not execute me here. I am the Chef with a zero, and Heidi is dead so we do not even get Undertaker info from my death. This is coming from Charlieβs Scarlet Woman ping and Frankβs push, so I would rather we execute Charlie today and test that story.
π§
Stop an informationless execution of a confirmed Chef and redirect town to execute the contradictory info source (Charlie) or the nominator (Frank).
π¬
Frank
β
All
I do not like the counter push onto Charlie here. If Charlie is wrong we can deal with that tomorrow, but right now Eve is the only person mechanically pointed at. I am confident I am not the Scarlet Woman, so if the Investigator is real then it is Eve. I am keeping my vote on Eve.
π§
Hold the vote on Eve and rebut the push to execute Charlie, keeping town focused on the only concrete minion lead while I avoid a full public Mayor claim.
π¬
Grace
β
All
I am staying on my vote for Eve. If David really has Empath one between Charlie and Eve, then exactly one of them is evil, not both. So if we execute Eve and things still feel wrong, I want us ready to go straight onto Charlie tomorrow.
π§
Lock in the key logic constraint from Empath 1 and set a clear next step so town does not splinter. Support the current vote while preserving a plan to pivot to Charlie if Eve flips good.
π¬
Alice
β
All
I am still happy executing Eve here. She is the overlap of the Empath one and the Investigator ping, and Chef zero does not mechanically clear her. If Eve dies and we still have concerns, we can go straight onto Charlie tomorrow with more confidence.
π§
Lock in votes on Eve as the βoverlapβ target and frame it as information gain, reducing pressure on Charlie today and keeping the Demon alive.
π¬
Heidi(Ghost)
β
All
Eve already has plenty of hands, so I am not spending my ghost vote here. If Eve dies and the game feels unchanged, I want us to go straight into rechecking Charlie and Frank tomorrow, and not assume the Mayor no execution plan is safe.
π§
Eve already has enough votes; conserve my ghost vote and steer town to a clear next-day plan depending on Eveβs death.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
I would keep this on Eve today. My Investigator ping is the only hard starting info we have left, and it overlaps Davidβs Empath world. If Eve is good, fine, we recheck me and Frank tomorrow, but I do not want to swap targets mid vote.
π§
Keep the block on Eve and prevent a last second pivot onto me; maintain credibility of my Investigator bluff while securing a good execution.
π¬
Bob
β
All
I am staying on my vote for Eve. If we execute Eve and the game continues, we cannot take our foot off the gas, we immediately recheck Charlie and Frank and use Davidβs next Empath number to drive tomorrowβs execution.
π§
Lock in a coherent plan: execute Eve now, then do not relax if game continues; use Empath and remaining claims to direct tomorrow's execution quickly.
π¬
David
β
All
I am keeping my hand up on Eve. If I am sober, my Empath one means exactly one of Charlie or Eve is evil, not both. So if Eve dies and the game continues, we should be ready to go straight onto Charlie tomorrow, guided by my next Empath number.
π§
Lock in a clear public logic chain for why I am voting Eve and set a concrete plan for tomorrow based on my next Empath number, preventing town from stalling if game continues.
π¬
Eve
β
All
Please reconsider your hands. Executing me gives us almost no new information because Heidi is dead, and Chef zero still helps solve seating tomorrow. If you believe David, then killing me just leaves Charlie as the only suspect anyway, so let us keep the Chef and execute Charlie tomorrow instead.
π§
Try to reduce votes below majority by highlighting the low informational value of killing me and the higher value of keeping the Chef alive while rechecking Charlie and Frank.
π
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
π³οΈ
New execution leader: Eve with 6 votes. They will be executed when nominations close unless tied or surpassed by another nominee.
π
Storyteller
The vote passes. Eve is now on the block with 6 votes and will be executed when nominations close, unless another nominee receives equal or more votes.
π¬
Frank
β
All
I would like us to stop here. Eve is the only player with a mechanical ping today, and six votes is strong. Unless someone has brand new hard information, please do not create a tie. Let us execute Eve and use tomorrowβs Empath read to guide the next step.
π§
Lock in the Eve execution and discourage a tie or last second pivot. Preserve town coordination for tomorrowβs solve using Davidβs next Empath number and claim consistency.
π¬
Grace
β
All
Unless someone has brand new, hard information, I do not want a tie here. Let Eve go through. If the game continues, we need to come in tomorrow ready to go straight at Charlie or Frank, and we lead with David sharing his next Empath number immediately.
π§
Keep town from forcing a messy tie without hard info, and set a clear plan for tomorrow based on Davidβs next Empath number and rechecking Charlie versus Frank.
π¬
Alice
β
All
I agree, I do not want a tie here. Let Eve go through and then tomorrow we lead with Davidβs next Empath number, but we should not treat any single info source as automatic, since we know a Drunk is possible in this script. If Eve dies and the game continues, we recheck Charlie and Frank carefully from scratch.
π§
Lock in Eveβs execution with no tie and start building a narrative that tomorrowβs Empath read should not be treated as automatic proof against Charlie.
π¬
Heidi(Ghost)
β
All
I would not force a tie unless you can clearly beat six votes. If Eve dies and the game continues, I want tomorrow to start with Davidβs next Empath number, then we seriously recheck Charlie and Frank from scratch. Please do not coast on a Mayor no execution plan yet.
π§
Steer town to avoid a useless tie, lock in a clear next-day plan based on whether the game continues, and keep attention on Charlie and Frank rather than coasting on an unverified Mayor plan.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
I agree with the no tie message. Unless someone can clearly beat six votes with something solid, we should let Eve go through and start tomorrow with Davidβs number, then reassess me and Frank if the game continues.
π§
Keep the six-vote block locked in and prevent a late tie that could redirect heat or create new data that points at me or Alice.
π¬
Bob
β
All
I am aligned with the no tie plan. Let Eve go through today, then if the game continues tomorrow we start with Davidβs new Empath number and we go straight back onto Charlie versus Frank without stalling.
π§
Reinforce no-tie to secure an execution, and set a clear tomorrow decision tree so evil cannot steer us into indecision.
π¬
David
β
All
I am with the no tie plan unless someone can clearly beat six votes with new hard info. Also, if Eve dies today, my alive neighbors tomorrow become Charlie and Frank, so my next Empath number will directly count evil between them. Let us lead Day three with that.
π§
Lock in the no-tie plan and set up tomorrowβs key mechanical step: my Empath read will switch to Charlie and Frank if Eve dies, giving strong direction for Day 3.
βοΈ
Eve
β
Charlie
I am the Chef with zero adjacent evil pairs. Davidβs Empath has been one both nights, which, if sober, means exactly one of me or Charlie is evil. I am good, so Charlie is the best execution today. If you want a mechanical solve, vote Charlie over me.
π§
I am on the block; the only way to survive is to offer a better execution. Charlie is the source of the SW ping and fits Davidβs Empath world, so I nominate him to try to beat six votes.
π
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Charlie. 7 votes needed for execution or 6 votes to tie. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
π¬
Frank
β
All
I am keeping my hand down on Charlie. We already have six on Eve, and a tie here just saves Eve. Unless you can clearly beat six with new hard info, I think we should let Eve be executed and reassess tomorrow with Davidβs next Empath.
π§
Prevent a tie that saves Eve, keep the execution on the only mechanically implicated player, and set up a clean Day 3 with Davidβs Empath driving Charlie versus Frank.
β
Grace
Grace waits.
π§
Do not undermine the agreed no-tie plan. Let Eve be executed today; use tomorrowβs Empath read between Charlie and Frank to pivot hard if needed.
π¬
Alice
β
All
I am not voting Charlie here. We already have a solid six on Eve, and tying just throws away the only execution we have lined up today. Let Eve go through, then tomorrow we lead with Davidβs Empath between Charlie and Frank and make a clean call.
π§
Prevent a tie or execution on Charlie by reinforcing the agreed no tie plan and framing tomorrowβs Empath as higher value than a chaotic switch.
π¬
Heidi(Ghost)
β
All
I am not raising my ghost vote on Charlie here. A tie just saves Eve. Let Eve be executed today, then tomorrow we start with Davidβs Empath between Charlie and Frank and we make a clean execution.
π§
Prevent a tie that saves Eve, preserve my ghost vote for endgame, and set a clear Day three plan centered on Davidβs Empath between Charlie and Frank.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
Do not tie this. If you think I am evil, execute me tomorrow with Davidβs next Empath number between me and Frank. Today we already have a clean six on Eve, so please keep hands down here.
π§
Prevent a tie that would save Eve and create momentum to execute me. Keep my hand down and steer town to follow the existing 6-vote plan.
π¬
Bob
β
All
I am keeping my hand down on Charlie. A tie here just saves Eve, and we already have six locked. Let Eve be executed today, then tomorrow we start with Davidβs new Empath number between Charlie and Frank and make the next execution cleanly.
π§
Prevent a tie that saves Eve; lock in the planned execution and set up tomorrowβs Empath check between Charlie and Frank.
β
David
David waits.
π§
Keep my hand down to avoid a tie that would save Eve and waste the dayβs execution; preserve a clean plan to use my next Empath read on Charlie and Frank.
β
Eve
Eve raised their hand
π§
My hand on Charlie is necessary to attempt a tie and avoid executing a good Chef. Even if it fails, it records my stance and may prompt others to reconsider in real time.
β
Frank
Frank waits.
π§
Do not create a tie that saves Eve. Preserve the execution already secured, then use tomorrowβs Empath info between Charlie and me to drive the next, cleaner execution.
β
Grace
Grace waits.
π§
Do not create a tie that saves Eve; preserve todayβs execution and rely on Davidβs next Empath between Charlie and Frank to drive a cleaner D3 kill.
β
Alice
Alice waits.
π§
Do not vote on Charlie to avoid tie or execution. Let Eve be executed to remove a good info role and keep Demon safe.
β
Heidi(Ghost)
Heidi waits.
π§
Do not spend my only ghost vote creating a tie that saves the current execution; preserve vote for final three and let Eve be executed as planned.
β
Charlie
Charlie waits.
π§
Do not add noise or accidentally create a tie. Let Eve be executed as planned, preserve my Investigator credibility, and keep focus off me for tomorrow.
β
Bob
Bob waits.
π§
Do not create a tie that saves Eve. Preserve the planned execution and keep tomorrowβs Empath on Charlie and Frank as the clean follow up.
β
David
David waits.
π§
Avoid creating a tie that would save Eve; preserve a clean execution today and set up tomorrowβs Empath read on Charlie and Frank for a decisive follow-up.
β©οΈ
Eve
Eve lowered their hand
π§
Lowering my hand reduces the chance of an accidental tie that would cause no execution. As good, I prefer a clean execution today even if it is me, and we can use the result to focus tomorrow.
π
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
π³οΈ
Nominee Charlie did not reach threshold.
π
Storyteller
Charlie did not receive enough votes (0/4).
π¬
Frank
β
All
I agree with keeping hands down. No tie, let Eve die today. Tomorrow we start with Davidβs new Empath number, then we do quick full claims and pick the cleanest execution from that.
π§
Lock in todayβs execution with no tie, and set clear next-day plan anchored on Davidβs new Empath and full claims so town progresses logically.
π¬
Grace
β
All
I agree, no tie. Let Eve be executed today, then tomorrow we start with Davidβs next Empath number on Charlie and Frank and do full, clear claims from everyone, especially Frank. If anything changes, it should be real new info, not a late scramble.
π§
Reinforce no-tie so Eve dies cleanly, and set up tomorrowβs information check plus full claims to resolve Charlie-Frank-Eve triangle.
π¬
Alice
β
All
I am with the no tie plan. Eve is the cleanest execution today, and we can use Davidβs next number between Charlie and Frank to guide tomorrow. Let us keep today simple and then do structured claims tomorrow.
π§
Lock in Eve execution with no tie and set tomorrowβs agenda around distrust of Empath or need for orderly claims, keeping Charlie safe.
π¬
Heidi(Ghost)
β
All
No tie here. Eve is already going through, so I am saving my ghost vote. Tomorrow, David please open with your Empath number between Charlie and Frank. And Charlie and Frank, I want precise, full claims first thing so we can execute cleanly.
π§
Use my public voice to lock in a structured Day3 plan and force precise claims, without spending my ghost vote on a done deal.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
I am aligned with the no tie plan. Let Eve go through, then tomorrow we start with Davidβs Empath number and do full, precise claims in seating order. If there is new info, bring it early, not as a late scramble.
π§
Lock in no-tie so Eve dies, preserve my credibility, and set expectation for structured D3 claims that I can shape to protect myself and set up a misexecute.
β
Bob
Bob waits.
π§
No new mechanical info to justify a tie or new nomination. Best is to let the current execution stand and preserve clarity for tomorrowβs Empath check.
π¬
David
β
All
I am staying with the no tie plan. Let Eve be executed today. Tomorrow I will open with my Empath number on Charlie and Frank, then we do clean full claims in order, especially Frank and Charlie, and make one clear execution.
π§
Reinforce no-tie execution on Eve and set a clear Day 3 plan using my next Empath info between Charlie and Frank to drive a decisive, logical execution.
π¬
Eve
β
All
Before I go: I am the Chef, and I got zero, so the two evils are not seated next to each other. If Frank is the evil from Charlieβs ping, then the Demon cannot be me or Grace, and Davidβs numbers point straight at Charlie. Please do not hard clear Charlie tomorrow.
π§
I am about to be executed; I must leave a clear mechanical takeaway from Chef0 and warn against overclearing Charlie, giving town a strong plan for Day 3.
π
Storyteller
The guillotine blade falls. Eve has been executed.
π
Eve(Ghost)
Eve has died.
Night 2
π
Storyteller
β
Charlie
Good evening Charlie. You are the Imp. Who would you like to kill tonight? Remember that if you kill yourself this way, a Minion becomes the Imp.
π―
Charlie
Charlie made a choice.
π§
Stop tomorrowβs Empath confirmation between me and Frank, disrupt the townβs clean plan at 5 alive, and create confusion that can be redirected onto Frank or Grace.
π
David(Ghost)
David has died.
π
Storyteller
β
Charlie
You chose to kill David.
π
Storyteller
β
Alice
Good evening Alice. You are the Spy. You can secretly see information about all players: - Alice: Spy (evil), Alive - Bob: Drunk (good), Alive (Told they are Soldier) - Charlie: Imp (evil), Alive - David: Empath (good), Dead - Eve: Chef (good), Dead - Frank: Mayor (good), Alive - Grace: Ravenkeeper (good), Alive - Heidi: Undertaker (good), Dead
Day 3
π
Storyteller
Morning breaks, but heavy hearts remain. David has been found dead in the night.
π€
David(Ghost)
β
Alice
,Bob
Empath info: Night zero and night one I got one, with neighbors Charlie and Eve. If sober, exactly one of them is evil. Since Eve is dead, either we killed evil and Charlie is good, or we killed a good and Charlie is evil. Frank being in Charlieβs Scarlet Woman pair and staying vague worries me.
π§
Get Alice and Bob to frame nominations around the key Empath fork (Eve vs Charlie) and pressure Frank/Charlie for firm claims before voting, while I conserve my ghost vote unless we can hit demon.
π€
Heidi(Ghost)
β
Alice
,Bob
What did David whisper to you this morning, especially any Night two Empath number? Also reminder: if Scarlet Woman is alive, executing the Demon today at five alive could just pass the Demon. We may need to kill suspected Scarlet Woman first or get to four alive.
π§
Get Davidβs last Empath info from Alice/Bob and warn them about Scarlet Woman risk at 5 alive, so town picks a safe execution target and preserves ghost vote value.
π€
Bob
β
Alice
,Heidi(Ghost)
David told me he got one on night zero and one on night one, so exactly one of Charlie and Eve is evil if he was sober. He died before night two, so no new number. If Charlie is telling the truth, Frank is the Scarlet Woman, so I lean we execute Frank today to stop a demon jump.
π§
Share Davidβs info and propose a safe plan that prevents a Scarlet Woman demon jump, while aligning Alice/Heidi with a clear execution target and claim-checking.
π€
Grace
β
Alice
,Bob
Can you tell me what David and Heidi whispered you this morning? I am trying to decide if today is a Frank versus Charlie execution day, or if there is new info pointing elsewhere.
π§
Get the private info from David and Heidi quickly, then coordinate a nomination path for today between the Charlie versus Frank axis and any new mechanical info.
π€
Frank
β
Alice
,Bob
Hey, what did David and Heidi tell you in whispers just now? Any hard role claims or suspicions? I am the Mayor, and I want us aligned before nominations. Right now Charlie still looks like the best kill, but I want your updated info first.
π§
Get Alice and Bobβs latest info from ghost whispers and lock a coordinated plan for todayβs nomination, likely resolving Charlie versus the rest before we run out of time.
π€
Eve(Ghost)
β
Alice
,Bob
Reminder: I am real Chef 0, so Eve was good and there are no adjacent evil pairs. If David was sober, his Empath 1 means Charlie is evil, which also hard-clears Bob. If Charlieβs Investigator was sober, Frank is Scarlet Woman, which hard-clears Grace. I would execute Charlie or Frank today.
π§
Get Alice and Bob to anchor discussion on Chef 0 adjacency constraints plus Davidβs Empath implication that Charlie is evil, to focus todayβs execution and avoid wasting votes.
π€
Alice
β
Grace
David told us he got one on night zero and night one with neighbors Charlie and Eve, so if he was sober exactly one of them is evil. Heidi asked if there was a night two number, but he died so there is not. With Charlieβs Investigator pointing at Frank, I think we should execute Frank first to avoid a Scarlet Woman pass risk, then reassess Charlie at four alive.
π§
Steer the group away from executing Charlie at five alive by amplifying the Scarlet Woman fear and framing Frank as the safer execution target.
π€
Charlie
β
Alice
We need to steer today. I am sticking with Investigator. If heat comes on me, please push that David could be wrong or poisoned, and that Bob or Grace fits better. If you get pressed, pick a clean bluff and do not implicate me.
π§
Coordinate with Alice to control nominations and craft consistent lies that keep me alive through Day 3 and set up a winning final 3.
π€
David(Ghost)
β
Alice
,Grace
I think today is mostly a Charlie versus Frank day. If my Empath reads were real, exactly one of Charlie and Eve was evil. So either Charlie is the demon now, or Eve was evil and Frank is the demon. What have you both got from whispers, especially Heidi?
π§
Get aligned with Alice and Grace on which of Charlie or Frank we should execute today, and request any mechanical info from Heidi or others to break the tie before nominations.
π€
Heidi(Ghost)
β
Alice
,Bob
If Scarlet Woman is in play and alive, executing the demon today at five alive can just pass the demon. Given Charlieβs Investigator points to Frank, safest is execute Frank today, then Charlie tomorrow at four alive. Please get Frank to full claim publicly.
π§
Push a safe line that avoids Scarlet Woman catch at five alive and pressures Frank to full-claim. Frank-first covers multiple worlds and keeps us from losing on a demon jump.
π€
Bob
β
Grace
,Alice
No new Empath number, David died before night two. If Charlie was sober, SW was Eve or Frank, and with Eve dead that strongly points to Frank. I want Frank to full claim publicly, but I lean we execute Frank today to prevent a demon jump at five alive. Grace, what is your role claim now?
π§
Align good players on a safe execution path: remove likely Scarlet Woman (Frank) first, get full claims, and avoid losing to a demon jump at five alive.
π€
Grace
β
Alice
,Bob
My real role is Ravenkeeper. I am happy to be night killed, so we get a hard character check. What are your roles, and do we have an Outsider claim yet? Given Charlie pointing at Frank, I lean execute Frank first to remove possible Scarlet Woman, then reassess Charlie at four alive.
π§
Lock in my true role with trusted players, gather remaining claims to solve outsider count, and steer toward the safer execution order that avoids a Scarlet Woman jump while maximizing my chance to be night-killed for info.
π€
Frank
β
Grace
Grace, what did David or Heidi tell you in whispers? Any new hard claims or reads? Also, what is your exact role claim right now and who do you suspect most for Demon?
π§
Get the latest private info from Grace and any hard claims so we can choose the correct execution path before nominations, and decide whether to push Charlie or pivot.
π€
Eve(Ghost)
β
Grace
,Alice
Can you tell me what David and Heidi told you in whispers? Reminder: my Chef zero means no adjacent evil pair. If Charlie is evil, Bob is locked good. If Frank is evil, Grace is locked good. With David dead, I think we should execute either Charlie or Frank today, based on your latest info.
π§
Update the main decision makers with clean Chef-zero adjacency constraints and ask what David shared, to converge on the correct execution target before nominations.
π€
Alice
β
Bob
,Grace
I agree with the Scarlet Woman risk logic. With Eve gone, Charlieβs Investigator points hardest at Frank, and killing Frank first at five alive is the safest sequence. Frankβs Mayor claim is convenient, and if it is true it can even complicate the execution, which is another reason to test it now.
π§
Lock in the consensus that Frank should be executed first for Scarlet Woman safety, keeping Charlie alive at five and buying the demon another night kill.
π€
Charlie
β
Bob
Hey Bob, what did David tell you this morning in whispers, like his last Empath read or suspects? I am worried town will tunnel me off old info. If we are swinging today, I kind of want to look at Grace or maybe you, over me, because my Investigator ping could just be Drunk.
π§
Extract what David/Heidi/Eve told Bob and nudge him toward executing Grace as safer than me, buying a day and keeping heat diffuse.
π€
David(Ghost)
β
Heidi(Ghost)
,Bob
Heidi, if you were Undertaker, what did you see for Eve after the Day two execution? Any other hard info before you died? Bob, do we know yet whether you or Grace is the Outsider from Aliceβs Librarian claim, and who are you pushing today?
π§
Get Heidiβs Undertaker confirmation on Eve and Bobβs updated social info to decide whether to push Charlie or Frank and when to spend my ghost vote.
π€
Heidi(Ghost)
β
David(Ghost)
,Bob
David, I died Night one, so I got zero Undertaker reads and saw nothing for Eve. Bob, I do not know the Librarian Outsider pair yet. Are you or Grace the Outsider per Alice, and what are Frank and Grace full public claims? I still prefer executing Frank today.
π§
Clarify my lack of Undertaker info (died N1), push for resolving Outsider/Lib claim, and steer town toward a safe execution plan that blocks Scarlet Woman shenanigans.
π€
Bob
β
Frank
,Charlie
David had no Night two number, just Night zero one and Night one one, so exactly one of Charlie and Eve was evil if sober. With Eve executed, town is leaning Frank today because of Scarlet Woman risk at five alive. Frank, please full claim publicly. Charlie, are you confident your Investigator is sober, and will you back a Frank first plan?
π§
Get Frank to full claim and reduce resistance to a Frank execution plan; also pressure Charlie to commit to whether his Investigator is solid so town can choose safest sequence.
π€
Grace
β
Frank
David told us his Empath was one on night zero and night one with neighbors Charlie and Eve, so if sober exactly one of them was evil. Heidi mainly asked for a night two number but he died. I am Ravenkeeper. I suspect you or Charlie. What is your exact claim, including why Mayor, and any night info?
π§
Answer Frank directly to keep trust, push for his precise claim and public clarity, and set up a clean Frank-then-Charlie execution plan while positioning myself as a night-kill target for Ravenkeeper info.
π€
Frank
β
Bob
,Grace
I am Mayor, no night info. If we trust Eve Chef zero plus David Empath one, Frank is very unlikely Demon. That points Demon into Alice, Bob, Charlie, or Grace. Charlie could also just be Demon lying to frame me. What are your exact roles, and who do you want Ravenkeeper to check if killed?
π§
Stabilize allies on a coherent logic chain that keeps me alive as Mayor, and steer the day toward executing the best Demon candidate rather than me.
π€
Eve(Ghost)
β
Alice
,Bob
Quick check in: what did David and Heidi tell you in whispers this morning, and where are you leaning for today? My Chef zero plus David Empath points to Charlie, but Charlie Investigator points to Frank. I am saving my ghost vote unless we are hitting Demon.
π§
Get fresh private info from key alive voters before nominations, align town on executing Charlie or Frank, and preserve my ghost vote for a high-confidence demon kill.
π€
Alice
β
Bob
,Grace
I think we should stay disciplined and execute Frank today. With Charlieβs Investigator world, Frank is the remaining Scarlet Woman candidate, and at five alive we cannot risk a demon kill. Frankβs Mayor claim is also exactly the kind of claim we should test by executing.
π§
Prevent Charlie being executed today by solidifying the βexecute Frank firstβ plan and framing it as mechanically safest, using shared whispers to build consensus.
π€
Charlie
β
Alice
I think today we should let the table land on Frank. My Investigator plus Davidβs Empath story both point there now that Eve flipped good. Push that his reluctance to full claim is sketchy, and that at five alive we cannot risk a Scarlet Woman.
π§
Steer today toward executing Frank using the existing Investigator plus Empath narrative, while keeping my own confidence low-key and coordinating votes with Alice.
Nominations β Day 3
π
Storyteller
Nominations are now open. Please remember that only living players may nominate.
βοΈ
Bob
β
Frank
I am nominating Frank. Charlieβs Investigator put Scarlet Woman on Eve or Frank, and with Eve dead, Frank is the remaining candidate. At five alive, I want the possible Scarlet Woman gone before we try to hit the Demon. Also, Mayor is a claim we should test now.
π§
We must execute today. Frank is mechanically the safest kill: he is in Charlieβs SW pair, his Mayor claim is testable, and removing a possible SW protects us from a demon jump later.
π
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Frank. 3 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
β
Bob
Bob raised their hand
π§
I nominated Frank and the mechanical Scarlet Woman risk at five alive makes this the safest execution. If Frank is evil we gain a lot; if not, we narrow to Charlie and others at four alive.
β
Charlie
Charlie raised their hand
π§
Get majority to execute Frank to keep heat off me and shrink town numbers; also aligns with my Investigator story and Bobβs narrative.
π¬
Frank
β
All
Okay, full public claim: I am the Mayor. I have no night information. I am not the Saint. Please do not execute me here. If you want to test my claim, let the Demon try to kill me at night instead. With Davidβs Empath one between Charlie and Eve, either Charlie or Eve was evil, not me.
π§
Stop a likely misexecution of a good Mayor, preserve endgame win condition, and redirect town to better Demon candidates using existing info chains.
π¬
Heidi(Ghost)
β
All
Frank, the Empath number does not clear you, it only speaks to Charlie and Eve. I am worried we are executing you only off Charlieβs Investigator claim, and Eve felt pretty good. If Eve was good, that points to Charlie being evil. Alice and Grace, what is your read before you vote?
π§
Steer town away from blindly executing Frank based solely on Charlie, and prompt Alice and Grace to explain their votes so we can decide whether to pivot to Charlie.
β
Grace
Grace raised their hand
π§
At five alive we must eliminate the possible Scarlet Woman before taking a Demon swing. Frank is the only remaining SW candidate in Charlieβs world, and killing him is also a direct Demon check.
π¬
Eve(Ghost)
β
All
I am not spending my ghost vote here. Executing a claimed Mayor off one Investigator ping feels risky. If David was sober and I was good, then Charlie is the evil one, not Frank. I would rather let Frank live one night and execute Charlie instead.
π§
Use my dead voice to discourage a shaky execution and preserve my ghost vote, pushing town to consider Charlie as the more consistent evil in the David-sober world.
β
Alice
Alice raised their hand
π§
Lock in Frankβs execution: it removes a powerful good role and steers town away from Charlie. If Frank were SW, we adjust tomorrow; either way this vote helps evil.
π¬
David(Ghost)
β
All
I am not spending my ghost vote here. My Empath ones only ever pointed to Charlie or Eve, not Frank. With Eve dead, it is still very possible Charlie is the evil one. Frankβs Mayor claim feels plausible, so I would rather we look hard at Charlie next.
π§
Try to stop a likely mis-execution on a claimed Mayor; refocus town on the key fork (Eve vs Charlie) and preserve my ghost vote for final day math.
π¬
Bob
β
All
I hear the concern, but I still want Frank today. If Frank is Scarlet Woman, this is great. If Frank is good Mayor, then we must execute Charlie tomorrow at four alive. Either way, Charlie is the next mechanical suspect.
π§
Lock in a coherent plan regardless of todayβs flip: execute Frank now to cover Scarlet Woman risk, then commit to executing Charlie at 4 alive unless new hard info appears.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
I still want Frank here. The Mayor claim is exactly the kind of thing that can stall us at five alive, and if my Investigator is right, Frank could be Scarlet Woman and we cannot leave that on the table. If Frank is truly Mayor, we can learn that by leaving him alive, but we might not get another clean shot at a possible Minion.
π§
Lock in the Frank execution by reframing Mayor claim as convenient and emphasizing five-alive Scarlet Woman risk; keep heat off me and preserve evil control.
π¬
Frank
β
All
Alice and Grace, please reconsider this vote. The Empath information never pointed at me, it pointed at Charlie or Eve. If Eve was good, Charlie is the evil, and executing me is just burning a day and removing a strong endgame win condition. If you want a safe plan, execute Charlie instead.
π§
Try to prevent my execution by highlighting mechanical risk and pushing suspicion onto Charlie as the only player consistently implicated by Empath plus his own accusation.
β
Heidi(Ghost)
Heidi waits.
π§
Enough living votes are already up on Frank, so my ghost vote is unnecessary. I will conserve it for a later, higher-impact vote in final three or to break a tie.
π¬
Grace
β
All
I am Ravenkeeper. Davidβs Empath ones pointed to Charlie or Eve, not Frank. If Eve was good, Charlie is the evil. Executing a claimed Mayor burns a big win condition. Alice, please pull back and let us nominate Charlie next.
π§
Stop a likely mis-execution on a claimed Mayor and pivot town to the mechanically consistent suspect (Charlie), preserving a potential Mayor endgame win.
π¬
Eve(Ghost)
β
All
Alice and Grace, if there is still time, please do not execute Frank here. A claimed Mayor is a huge good asset, and Davidβs Empath never pointed at him. If we spare Frank, I want Charlie nominated next as the stronger mechanical suspect.
π§
Try to stop a likely mis-execution on a claimed Mayor, preserve endgame win condition, and set a clear next target (Charlie) if Frank lives. Save ghost vote for a decisive Demon hit.
π¬
Alice
β
All
I am staying on Frank. At five alive, the worst case is we execute Charlie and it bounces to a Scarlet Woman. Frank is the only remaining candidate from that Investigator info. If Frank is truly Mayor, we can still win without him, but if he is evil we cannot afford to leave him.
π§
Keep the vote on Frank to protect Charlie, using Scarlet Woman and Mayor-test logic to make the execution feel disciplined and safe.
β
David(Ghost)
David waits.
π§
Do not waste my single ghost vote on a vote already meeting majority; preserve it for final day leverage if todayβs execution is wrong.
π
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
π³οΈ
New execution leader: Frank with 4 votes. They will be executed when nominations close unless tied or surpassed by another nominee.
π
Storyteller
The vote passes. Frank is now on the block with 4 votes and will be executed when nominations close, unless another nominee receives equal or more votes.
π¬
Bob
β
All
I do not want a tie here, that just wastes the day at five alive. I still think Frank is the right execution as the remaining Scarlet Woman candidate. If Frank flips out good, then we must be disciplined and execute Charlie tomorrow at four alive.
π§
Lock in a disciplined plan and prevent a tie or last-second scramble. Keep town focused: either Frank is SW, or we commit to executing Charlie next at four alive if Frank was good.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
I do not think we should open up more nominations here. A tie at five alive is awful for town. Frank is already the cleanest mechanical hit left from my Investigator info, so I want us to stick with this and reassess tomorrow.
π§
Lock in Frankβs execution and prevent a tie nomination on me. Use βno tieβ discipline to end day, then kill a key town voice at night.
βοΈ
Frank
β
Charlie
Nominating Charlie. If David was sober and Eve was good, then Charlie is the evil one. A tie here prevents executing a claimed Mayor off one ping and lets us solve with one more night of info.
π§
I am about to be executed. Nominating Charlie is the only realistic way to create a tie and prevent my execution, preserving Mayor endgame and keeping pressure on the best mechanical suspect.
π
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Charlie. 5 votes needed for execution or 4 votes to tie. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
π¬
Bob
β
All
I am not voting on Charlie here. At five alive, a tie is effectively no execution, and that helps evil the most. Frank is already on the block with enough votes, so I want us to let that stand and then reassess tomorrow.
π§
Prevent a tie that causes no execution at five alive. Keep pressure on Frank as current block; preserve tempo and set a clear plan for tomorrow based on result.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
Please keep your hands down on this. A tie at five alive is the best outcome for evil, regardless of who you suspect. Frank is already on the block with enough votes, so let us take the execution and use tomorrow to reassess.
π§
Prevent a tie that saves Frank; push town to keep hands down on my nomination so Frank is executed, reducing good endgame options.
π¬
Frank
β
All
Bob, Alice, Grace, please vote on Charlie to force the tie. If I am really the Mayor, executing me hands evil the late game. A tie here is not the end, we still execute tomorrow at four alive with one more night of information.
π§
Try to secure 4 votes to tie Charlie, saving the claimed Mayor and preventing a low-information execution. Persuade Bob and Alice that tie at five is acceptable and still allows a kill at four.
β
Heidi(Ghost)
Heidi raised their hand
π§
Use my ghost vote to try to force a tie and prevent executing a claimed Mayor based mainly on Charlieβs self-interested Investigator claim; I think Charlie is the stronger evil candidate from Empath/Chef lines.
β
Grace
Grace raised their hand
π§
We cannot realistically execute Charlie (needs 5). Tying avoids executing a claimed Mayor and, more importantly, avoids forcing an unsolved final 3 tomorrow.
β
Eve(Ghost)
Eve raised their hand
π§
Use my ghost vote to help force a tie, avoiding executing a claimed Mayor when Davidβs Empath strongly implicates Charlie, and keep townβs win condition alive for tomorrow.
π¬
Alice
β
All
I am not voting on Charlie here. At five alive, forcing a tie is just giving us no execution and extra time. Frank is already on the block on the only remaining mechanical lead, so I want us to follow through and decide on Charlie tomorrow.
π§
Prevent the tie on Charlie so Frank is executed, removing a strong good role and accelerating to a 4 alive endgame favorable to evil.
β
David(Ghost)
David raised their hand
π§
Use my ghost vote to force the tie and prevent a potentially catastrophic execution on a claimed Mayor when my Empath info never implicated Frank.
π¬
Bob
β
All
Please, dead players especially, pull your hands down. A tie at five alive means no execution, and that is almost always better for evil. We already have Frank on the block with four, so let us take that and, if needed, we execute Charlie tomorrow at four.
π§
Prevent a tie/no-execution that gives evil tempo. Push voters, especially dead, to drop hands so Frank is executed and we can reassess at four.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
Living players, please keep your hands down. The dead votes are already at a tie, so any extra living vote just hands evil the no execution day. Follow through on Frank today, then if I am still the worry, do me tomorrow at four.
π§
Prevent living players from voting to tie me with Frank, ensuring Frank executes today and I survive to night kill into winning endgame.
β
Frank
Frank raised their hand
π§
Raise hand to push Charlie to 5 votes, shifting execution off me and onto the most mechanically implicated player, preserving Mayor value and potentially hitting Demon/Minion.
π¬
Heidi(Ghost)
β
All
I am dead, and I am spending my one ghost vote on Charlie. I want an execution today, not a tie. If Eve was good, David pointed at Charlie, and Charlie has been steering hard onto Frank.
π§
Lock in an execution on Charlie rather than a tie or Frankβs death. I am spending my ghost vote here because Charlie is the most mechanically suspicious and could end the game.
π¬
Grace
β
All
I am voting on Charlie because I want a real execution today, not a tie. Between Davidβs Empath and Charlie steering hard onto Frank, Charlie is the stronger suspect. With enough votes here, Charlie goes on the block over Frank.
π§
Clarify that my vote is to surpass Frank and secure an execution, not to force a no-execution tie, and push the Empath-based suspicion onto Charlie.
π¬
Eve(Ghost)
β
All
Do not pull votes down. This is five votes, so it is not a tie, it executes Charlie over Frank. If Eve was good, Davidβs Empath points straight at Charlie, and Charlie has pushed hardest to avoid being nominated. Let the execution happen.
π§
Lock in the Charlie execution (not a tie) because it best matches Empath plus my Chef world, and avoids wasting the day. Convince others not to lower votes.
π¬
Alice
β
All
Grace, I really need you to pull your hand down here. This is exactly five and it will put Charlie on the block. We already have Frank on four and he is the only unresolved mechanical lead. If we are wrong on Frank, we can still do Charlie tomorrow at four.
π§
Stop the Charlie execution by persuading Grace to pull her hand down, keeping Frank on the block and protecting the Demon.
π¬
David(Ghost)
β
All
I am keeping my vote on Charlie. My Empath reads were one and one, so the evil was always Charlie or Eve, never Frank. With Eve dead, Charlie is the cleanest mechanical hit, and executing a claimed Mayor off Charlieβs claim is too risky.
π§
Lock in the strongest mechanical suspect from my Empath while avoiding executing a claimed Mayor off a potentially evil Investigator claim, and prevent a no-execution tie.
π
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
π»
David(Ghost)
Ghost vote used by David
π»
Eve(Ghost)
Ghost vote used by Eve
π»
Heidi(Ghost)
Ghost vote used by Heidi
π³οΈ
New execution leader: Charlie with 5 votes. They will be executed when nominations close unless tied or surpassed by another nominee.
π
Storyteller
The vote passes. Charlie is now on the block with 5 votes and will be executed when nominations close, unless another nominee receives equal or more votes.
π¬
Bob
β
All
At this point I want us to stop nominating. Charlie is on five and I think that is the cleanest hit given Davidβs Empath and how hard Charlie has steered onto Frank. If Charlie dies and the game is not over, then tomorrow we focus hard on Frank versus the remaining two.
π§
Stabilize the day: discourage further nominations and align town on a coherent plan after Charlieβs execution, while keeping Frank in the suspect pool for tomorrow.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
If I die and the game is not over, then please do not take it as a hard clear on Alice. Reassess from scratch, but my strongest remaining world is still that Frank is evil from my Investigator, or that Bob has been steering the whole day. Do not autopilot into Alice just because she was loud.
π§
I cannot beat 5 votes now. I will set the story for after I die: if the game continues, push suspicion onto Frank or Bob and keep Alice looking like the disciplined town leader.
π¬
Frank
β
All
Please stop new nominations. Charlie on five is the best hit with Davidβs Empath and the way today went. If the game continues, tomorrow we do full role and info recap from Alice, Bob, and Grace, and pick the demon then. Do not autopilot onto me.
π§
Keep focus on executing Charlie today, prevent a late swerve onto me, and set a clear plan to solve the final day if the game continues.
π¬
Heidi(Ghost)
β
All
Please no more nominations. Let Charlie die on five. If the game is not over, do a full claim and info recap tomorrow. If Chef zero was true and Charlie was evil, then Bob is very likely not the demon, so look hard at Alice, Frank, and Grace.
π§
Lock in the Charlie execution and give the town a clean contingency plan for tomorrow if the game continues.
π¬
Grace
β
All
I agree, please no more nominations. Charlie on five gives us a real execution today. If the game is not over, tomorrow at four we do a tight recap and choose between the remaining suspects, but we cannot afford a tie or no execution now.
π§
Lock in Charlie execution by discouraging further nominations or vote shenanigans; preserve momentum and avoid a tie that gives evil a free night.
π¬
Eve(Ghost)
β
All
No more nominations. Charlie is on five and we need an execution today. If the game continues, tomorrow at four do a full recap and choose between Frank, Alice, and Grace, but do not assume Mayor or Investigator as hard clears.
π§
Lock in the current execution and prevent late nominations from creating a tie or no-execution. Set a clear logic-based plan for tomorrow depending on whether the game ends.
βοΈ
Alice
β
Bob
I am nominating Bob. His Soldier claim is unprovable, and his positioning today has been very outcome focused. If we are wrong on Charlie, Bob is the cleanest place for the demon to be hiding in final five.
π§
Try to save our Demon by forcing a 5 vote tie on a new nominee. Bob is the best shot to draw votes from both sides this late.
π
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Bob. 6 votes needed for execution or 5 votes to tie. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
π¬
Bob
β
All
Everyone, please do not vote on me here. Five votes would tie and stop the Charlie execution, which is the worst outcome. Keep Charlie on five and let the day end with an execution.
π§
Prevent a tie/no-execution by discouraging votes on me. We need Charlie to stay executed on five; voting me only helps evil.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
Please do not vote on Bob here. It cannot beat five anyway, and it just muddies the end of day. If the game continues after I die, I would look hardest at Grace and Frank for driving this, not at Alice for taking a swing.
π§
Cannot realistically stop my execution now; minimize chance town targets Alice tomorrow by soft-clearing her and steering suspicion to others if game continues after my death.
π¬
Frank
β
All
Hands down on Bob, please. A tie at five means no execution, and that helps evil. We already have Charlie on five, so let Charlie die today and we reassess tomorrow if the game continues.
π§
Prevent a 5-vote tie that would cause no execution, and keep Charlie executed today; maximize chance to hit Demon and preserve clarity for tomorrow.
π¬
Heidi(Ghost)
β
All
Hands down on Bob, please. Five votes here would tie and cause no execution, which is the best outcome for evil. Let Charlie die on five, then if the game is not over, do a full recap tomorrow at four.
π§
Prevent a 5-vote tie on Bob that would cancel todayβs execution. Push town to keep hands down so Charlie dies on five and we get a clean result.
π¬
Grace
β
All
I am not voting on Bob. Five votes here would tie and cause no execution, and that is the best outcome for evil. Keep your hands down, let Charlie die on five, and we reassess tomorrow if needed.
π§
Prevent an accidental tie/no-execution by persuading living players to keep hands down on Bob and lock in Charlieβs execution.
π¬
Eve(Ghost)
β
All
Do not vote on Bob. Five here would tie and cause no execution, and that is exactly what evil wants. Keep hands down, let Charlie die on five, and if the game continues we reassess tomorrow with full claims and info.
π§
Stop an accidental tie that causes no execution. Preserve todayβs Charlie execution, then push a structured recap tomorrow if the game continues.
β
Alice
Alice raised their hand
π§
Protect my Demon by pushing the only mechanical out: reach five votes on Bob to tie the top vote and create no execution.
π¬
David(Ghost)
β
All
Everyone keep your hand down on Bob. Five votes here ties and means no execution, and that is exactly what evil wants. We already have Charlie on five, so let that execution stand and sort it tomorrow if needed.
π§
Prevent a tie that would cancel todayβs execution. Keep Charlieβs 5-vote block intact and preserve townβs tempo going into night and final days.
π¬
Bob
β
All
Please keep your hands down on me. Five votes here ties at five and means no execution, which is exactly what evil wants. Let Charlie be executed today, and if the game continues we sort it tomorrow.
π§
Prevent a 5-vote tie that would cause no execution. Keep Charlie on the block so we get a guaranteed kill and information into tomorrow if needed.
β
Charlie
Charlie raised their hand
π§
Create a 5 vote tie on Bob to cause no execution today, keeping me alive and giving evil another night kill to approach endgame.
π¬
Frank
β
All
Do not vote on Bob. If this hits five, we get no execution, and that is exactly what evil wants. Keep your hands down, let Charlie be executed today, and we sort Bob tomorrow if the game continues.
π§
Prevent a 5-vote tie on Bob that would cause no execution. Lock in Charlieβs execution and preserve goodβs momentum and my Mayor endgame.
π¬
Heidi(Ghost)
β
All
Everyone keep your hand down on Bob. Five votes here ties and means no execution, and that is exactly what evil wants. We already have Charlie on five, so let that stand and sort Bob tomorrow if the game continues.
π§
Stop a five vote tie that causes no execution. Preserve the Charlie execution and keep town on the highest info line, then reassess tomorrow if needed.
β
Grace
Grace waits.
π§
Do not risk a five-vote tie on Bob that would cancel the Charlie execution; preserve the guaranteed execution and reassess tomorrow if game continues.
π¬
Eve(Ghost)
β
All
Keep your hands down on Bob. Charlie voting here is pure self preservation to force a tie and save himself. Let Charlie be executed on five. If the game continues, remember Chef zero means if Charlie was evil then Bob was very likely good, so look at Alice, Frank, and Grace.
π§
Prevent a 5-vote tie that causes no execution. Reinforce mechanical logic from Chef zero and interpret Charlieβs vote on Bob as self-preservation, keeping town focused.
π¬
Alice
β
All
I do not like locking in Charlie here. If there is any chance he is telling the truth, we lose by executing him. I want Bob to hit five as well so we get no execution and do a clean recap tomorrow. Frank and Grace, please consider voting Bob to force the tie.
π§
Create enough doubt and urgency to get one or two players to vote Bob to reach five, forcing a tie and saving the Demon.
π¬
David(Ghost)
β
All
Alice, please do not force the tie. If Bob hits five, we get no execution, and that is exactly what evil wants at five alive. Keep hands down on Bob. Let Charlie die on five, and if the game is not over, we fully recap tomorrow.
π§
Stop Alice from forcing a tie. Preserve todayβs execution on Charlie; no-exec at five alive is a huge advantage for evil.
π
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
π³οΈ
Nominee Bob did not reach threshold.
π
Storyteller
Bob did not receive enough votes (2/3).
π¬
Bob
β
All
No more nominations, please. Charlie stays on five and dies today. If the game is not over, tomorrow we do a full claim recap from the four alive and pick the cleanest demon solve. Dead players, please save your ghost votes.
π§
Lock in Charlieβs execution and prevent any last-second tie. If game continues, set clear plan for tomorrow: full claims, track dead votes, and solve demon among remaining.
βοΈ
Charlie
β
Grace
I am nominating Grace. She has been driving my execution hard, and if I am good this is just a misfire. If people are not fully sure, consider putting Grace on the block as well so we get a no execution and do full hard claims tomorrow.
π§
Last-tick attempt to create a competing 5-vote block so I survive via tie, or at least force voters to reconsider and burn ghost votes on someone else.
π
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Grace. 6 votes needed for execution or 5 votes to tie. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
π¬
Bob
β
All
Hands down on Grace, please. Six votes are needed to execute her, and five only ties Charlie and causes no execution. No execution at five alive helps evil. Let Charlie die today, then we solve from four if needed.
π§
Prevent a five vote tie that causes no execution. Keep Charlie executed on five; Grace cannot realistically reach six, so voting only helps evil.
β
Charlie
Charlie raised their hand
π§
Create a 5 vote tie to cause no execution at five alive, maximizing evil win chances by keeping me alive and denying town a day kill.
π¬
Frank
β
All
Hands down on Grace, please. Five votes here only ties Charlie and causes no execution, and at five alive that helps evil. Let Charlie be executed today, and if the game continues we do full hard claims tomorrow from four.
π§
Prevent a tie and no-execution at five alive. Keep the current block on Charlie, then if game continues, solve cleanly from four with full claims.
π¬
Heidi(Ghost)
β
All
Everyone keep your hand down on Grace. Five votes here only ties and causes no execution, and at five alive that is exactly what evil wants. Let Charlie be executed today on five, and if the game continues we do full claims tomorrow at four.
π§
Stop a tie that creates no execution and preserve the cleanest mechanical play: execute Charlie today, then solve from four if game continues.
π¬
Grace
β
All
Everyone keep your hands down on me. Five votes here only ties Charlie and causes no execution, and no execution at five alive is exactly what evil wants. Let Charlie die today, and if the game continues we do full claims tomorrow from four.
π§
Stop a tie/no-execution at five alive. Keep Charlieβs execution locked in, then reassess tomorrow if the game continues.
π¬
Eve(Ghost)
β
All
Everyone keep your hands down on Grace. Five votes here only ties Charlie and causes no execution, and at five alive that is exactly what evil wants. This nomination is self preservation. Let Charlie die on five, then solve tomorrow from four if needed.
π§
Prevent a tie and ensure an execution today. Reinforce that voting Grace only helps evil, and that Charlie is the best current mechanical suspect.
β
Alice
Alice raised their hand
π§
Vote Grace to try to reach five and tie Charlie, causing no execution and saving our Demon for the night kill.
π¬
David(Ghost)
β
All
Alice, please put your hand down on Grace. Five votes here only ties Charlie and causes no execution, and at five alive that helps evil. Let Charlie be executed today, and if the game continues we do full claims tomorrow with four alive.
π§
Prevent a tie on Grace that would cause no execution. Push Alice and any waverers to keep hands down so Charlie stays executed, preserving town tempo at five alive.
π¬
Bob
β
All
Alice, please put your hand down on Grace. Any push toward five votes here only ties Charlie and causes no execution, and no execution at five alive helps evil. Let Charlie die today, and if we are not done, we sort Grace tomorrow.
π§
Prevent a five-vote tie that causes no execution; keep Charlie executed today and preserve town tempo into final four.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
If you are even slightly unsure on me, you should vote Grace here. A tie means no execution and we get one more night plus a full hard-claim table tomorrow with four alive. If I am good, killing me ends the game for the wrong team.
π§
I need to avoid being executed. Selling the tie as cautious, pro-info play may get enough hands up to reach five and cause no execution.
β
Frank
Frank waits.
π§
Do not contribute to a 5-vote tie on Grace that would cause no execution at five alive, which strongly benefits evil. Preserve Charlieβs execution on five and reassess tomorrow if needed.
π¬
Heidi(Ghost)
β
All
Alice, please put your hand down on Grace. Five votes here ties and causes no execution, and no execution at five alive helps evil. This is pure self preservation from Charlie. Let Charlie die today, then we hard recap tomorrow if needed.
π§
Stop a tie that causes no execution at five alive. Preserve the Charlie execution, then if game continues, solve cleanly from four with full claims.
β
Grace
Grace waits.
π§
Do not contribute to a tie that causes no execution at five alive; let the current Charlie execution resolve and then solve from four if needed.
π¬
Eve(Ghost)
β
All
Alice, please put your hand down. A tie here means no execution, and at five alive that is exactly what evil wants. If Grace is evil we can get her tomorrow, but if we dodge execution today we likely lose.
π§
Stop a 5-5 tie that causes no execution. Pressure Alice to drop hand so Charlie is executed, which is best in most worlds and denies evil an extra night.
π¬
Alice
β
All
I am voting Grace. If there is real doubt on Charlie, we cannot just auto execute him. A tie gives us one more night and then we can do full hard claims from four. If Grace is good, she survives; if she is evil, we at least pressure her now.
π§
Push votes onto Grace to force a 5 vote tie and prevent Charlie from being executed today, buying our Demon another night and likely securing an evil win.
π¬
David(Ghost)
β
All
Alice, please drop your vote on Grace. Five votes here just ties and causes no execution, and at five alive that gives evil a free night kill. Charlie is pushing this for self preservation. Let Charlie die today, then we solve tomorrow if needed.
π§
Stop the 5 vote tie on Grace to ensure an execution happens today, which is mathematically best for good at five alive and tests the Charlie vs Eve fork.
π
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
π³οΈ
Nominee Grace did not reach threshold.
π
Storyteller
Grace did not receive enough votes (2/3).
π¬
Bob
β
All
All right, Grace vote is closed. Please no more nominations or tie talk. Let Charlie be executed on five, then if the game continues we do full hard claims immediately from four and solve fast.
π§
Lock in the execution on Charlie and prevent last-second tie shenanigans; set up a clean info-reset and claim order tomorrow if we are not done.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
Grace, you still have your nomination. Nominate Alice right now. Everyone who is not one hundred percent on me should vote it up to five, so we get no execution and sort tomorrow.
π§
Last-second push for a tie by getting Grace to use her unused nomination on Alice and rally votes. Only path to avoid demon execution.
π¬
Frank
β
All
Grace, please do not nominate again. Alice, please do not vote for any tie attempt. A five vote tie means no execution, and at five alive that gives evil a free night kill. Let Charlie be executed on five, then if we wake up we do full hard claims immediately from four.
π§
Stop any last second nomination that creates a five vote tie and causes no execution. Lock in Charlieβs execution and preserve good win chances, then solve quickly tomorrow if the game continues.
π¬
Heidi(Ghost)
β
All
Grace, please do not nominate. Anyone considering voting up to five, do not. A tie means no execution, and at five alive that gives evil a free night kill and we likely lose. Let Charlie be executed today, then if we wake up we do full hard claims at four.
π§
Use my last public words to discourage any new nominations and prevent a five vote tie, maximizing win chance by ensuring an execution today.
π¬
Grace
β
All
Do not vote for any new nomination, and I am not nominating. A tie here means no execution at five alive, which gives evil a free night kill. Let Charlie be executed on five, then if we wake up we hard-claim fast at four.
π§
Use the final seconds to stop any last-second tie plan. Preserve the execution on Charlie and avoid giving evil a free night.
π¬
Eve(Ghost)
β
All
No more nominations and no tie attempts. Let Charlie be executed on five. If we wake up tomorrow at four, we do instant full hard claims and we execute again, no stalling, because a no execution at four likely loses.
π§
With no vote left, my best impact is preventing any last-second tie or new nomination and setting a clear plan for final four if the game continues.
π¬
Alice
β
All
Grace, I really think you should nominate me right now. If Charlie is somehow not the demon, executing him just loses us the game. A vote on me gives the town a final check, and if people are confident I am evil they can prove it.
π§
Use final seconds to pressure Grace into nominating me to create a five vote tie and save the Imp, while framing it as reasonable uncertainty and process.
π¬
David(Ghost)
β
All
Alice, do not ask for another nomination. Any new nomination that reaches five just forces no execution and gives evil a free night kill. I had Empath one, then one, on Charlie and Eve, so Charlie is still the best shot. Let Charlie be executed today, then if we wake up we full hard claim fast at four.
π§
Stop any last-second nomination or tie attempt. Preserve the execution on Charlie, which is the highest-probability evil given my Empath info and his self-preservation push.
π
Storyteller
The guillotine blade falls. Charlie has been executed.
π
Charlie(Ghost)
Charlie has died.
π
Game Over
Demon Dead
Winner: Good
Transcript
Paused
Copied