Game Detail

Starting my Fortune Teller checks to identify the Demon. Checking Bob and Charlie first as they're adjacent players, giving me initial coverage of the table.

Gather initial intelligence on other players' roles and alignments to help identify the Demon.

Start building trust with my neighbor Eve and gather intel about Charlie's whisper to Alice. Day 1 is about information gathering and forming alliances. I want to understand the social dynamics before making any decisions.

Whisper Demon first to align stories, pick mutual bluffs (e.g., me Empath saying 0 evil neighbors), build trust with town via fake info.

Engage with Frank who reached out to me first. He's shown willingness to communicate early, which could mean he's either trustworthy or trying to gather information. I'll respond warmly and try to gauge his trustworthiness while keeping my Mayor role hidden.

I'm gathering early game intel by whispering to my neighbor Frank. Since we sit next to each other, we may share information. This helps me build trust and learn about potential leads before nominations begin.

Lock in consistent good bluffs with minion to build trust with town, position us to defend each other and accuse goods.

Build trust with Charlie by sharing that they registered as NOT Demon, proving my good alignment and theirs. This establishes a potential ally while gathering more intel about their role and what they've learned from others.

Gather intel from an active player who has already been in communication with Alice. See if Charlie is open to sharing information or forming an early alliance.

Keep Alice engaged as a potential ally while gathering more information about her and the group. Don't reveal I'm the Monk yet to avoid Demon targeting me.

Respond to Grace who reached out to me. Share my observation about Charlie whispering to Alice (and Bob), which seems noteworthy. Try to gather more information from Grace about her interactions and observations without revealing my Soldier role.

Preemptively share Empath bluff with neighbor Alice to gain her trust as good player. She'll likely back my public claim, outsourcing defense to her while I support David's Investigator bluff.

Build rapport with Frank and gather intel on the Charlie-Alice-Bob cluster. Frank is being social and proactive, which could make him a useful ally for sharing information.

Continue building rapport with Frank who seems open to communication. Share information and gather his impressions of other players to help identify patterns and potential threats.

Early day 1, spread Investigator bluff to Bob/Charlie to sow chaos between them. Reference Heidi's Empath to coordinate bluffs and build credibility as good info network.

Heidi revealed she's the Empath and will get info tonight. This is valuable - she's showing trust and I should reciprocate to build an alliance. She's one of my neighbors and likely trustworthy since she shared first.

I need to verify David's Investigator claim by checking if Charlie received the same Minion accusation. If David claimed something different to Charlie, he's lying about being the Investigator. I also need to understand Charlie's relationship with Alice to build a complete picture of who's trustworthy.

Get Bob's response to David's Minion accusation and try to verify if David is making consistent claims. Also start to build trust with Bob by revealing I'm a Townsfolk (though not my exact role yet).

I'm gathering intel on Charlie who has been very active whispering to multiple people (Alice, Bob). This could indicate coordination if they're evil, or just good information gathering if good. By asking for his impressions, I can gauge his mindset and potentially catch inconsistencies or suspicious behavior patterns.

Whispering Empath claim to Grace mirrors what I told Alice, making my bluff consistent and trustworthy. Builds good alliances, protects David by framing Alice/Grace as good, sows doubt elsewhere.

Continue building trust with Frank and gather intel on Charlie's behavior. Charlie's excessive whispering could indicate they're good (gathering info) or evil (coordinating). Need more data points.

Heidi just revealed she's the Empath to me, showing trust. I should reciprocate by confirming I'm good without revealing I'm the Virgin. Building this alliance could be valuable for later when her Empath information might confirm or deny my suspicions about Alice or myself.

Day 1 tick 2, spread coordinated bluffs to Eve (neighbor) and Frank (active chatter) to gain credibility, direct suspicion to Bob/Charlie before nomination.

Charlie is cleared from my Night 0 check, so I can trust him. He's also Townsfolk. I want to coordinate our investigation and get his take on Frank, who seems very active privately. Building a coalition of trusted players will help narrow down the Demon.

Gather more information from Charlie about David's consistency and what Alice knows. If David is making inconsistent claims, he's evil. If he's consistent, then Charlie or I are in trouble.

Wait to see who nominates first and why. This will reveal information about players' aggression levels and priorities. As Virgin, I should be cautious about revealing myself early - if a Townsfolk nominates me, they die immediately, which hurts our team. Better to gather more intel first.

Share the critical contradiction between David (Investigator claim) and Bob (Outsider claim) publicly to see how they respond. This exposes the conflict without committing to a nomination yet, allowing me to observe reactions before deciding who to nominate.

Press all mentioned players to verify or contradict David's Investigator claim. I'm Soldier (safe from Demon), so I can gather information without immediate risk. If I can confirm David is the real Investigator, we can narrow down the Minion to Bob or Charlie.

Gather more information to verify David's Investigator claim. Charlie is denying being Minion and pointing at Bob. I need Heidi to confirm her Empath ability and Alice/Grace to verify David's claim about them being good. This helps me determine if David is trustworthy or if he's the one lying.

Reveal partial info about my Night 0 check (Bob and Charlie are not Demon) while highlighting David's logical inconsistency about Minion count. This helps the group without fully exposing my Fortune Teller role. The math problem I raise could indicate David is evil and lying, or that someone else has a misleading ability.

Counter-accusation against David who falsely claimed I'm the Minion. Alice confirmed I'm not Demon, Charlie claims he's good, so David must be lying Investigator. Propose Heidi checks David tonight to confirm evil alignment.

Nominate Bob to execute a non-Demon. Backs David's claim (Bob possible Minion), creates good-on-good conflict with Charlie/Bob, protects David. My N1 Empath can later confirm Alice/Grace good.

Prevent my execution by exposing the logical flaw in Heidi's reasoning. Alice checked for Demon, not Minion, so her check doesn't clear me from being Minion. I must survive as the Saint or we lose. I need to redirect suspicion to either David (lying Investigator) or Charlie (lying about Monk role).

I need to convince the group not to execute Bob because if his Saint claim is true, we'd lose the game. I should also highlight the suspicious timing of his claim and put pressure on Charlie to defend themselves. Buying time to get Heidi's Empath read tonight is critical.

Bob is the most likely Minion. David named Bob or me, I'm good (Monk), so Bob must be the Minion. Bob's late Saint claim feels like a desperation play to avoid execution. Alice confirmed David is good, so David's Investigator claim is likely true. Voting to execute Bob.

Bob claims to be the Saint - if true and we execute him, Good loses immediately. The conflicting claims between David (Investigator), Charlie (good), and Bob (Outsider/Saint) need more investigation. My vote could accidentally kill a crucial role or enable a Minion. Better to wait and gather more information tonight.

Bob's Saint claim is a massive wild card. If true and we execute him, good team loses immediately. I need to prevent that while still gathering information about who is actually evil.

My Fortune Teller check cleared Bob and Charlie of being the Demon, but it doesn't rule out the Minion. Bob's Saint claim is suspicious timing, but killing a real Saint means instant loss. With 4 votes needed and only a few hands raised so far, I'll hold off and see how voting progresses. Frank is also holding - waiting for more certainty before risking the game.

Raising hand to vote execute Bob. All scenarios benefit evil: removes potential minion, instant win if Saint, or eliminates good player. Protects Demon David.

Push Bob's execution: if Minion gone, good; if Saint, instant win; if good Townsfolk, progress to night kills. Counter Saint bluff to get votes over 4.

Appeal to undecided voters (Alice, Grace, Frank) not to vote for me. Even if they doubt my Saint claim, the risk of executing me if true is game-losing. I need at least one more hand NOT to be raised to survive this nomination. My goal is to buy time and get more information before risking an instant loss.

Alice's check cleared Demons only, not Minions - her info doesn't support Bob as Minion. Bob's last-minute Saint claim is suspicious but the risk of being wrong is too high (instant game loss). I should vote NO and push for more verification before any executions.

Bob just dropped a Saint claim under pressure - if true and we execute him, we lose the game immediately. While his Minion claim from David's Investigator info is concerning, the Saint risk is too high on Day 1 with this much conflicting information. I should retract my vote and gather more evidence tonight before making a risky execution that could cost us the game.

Bob's Saint claim is too risky to ignore. If true and we execute him, good team loses immediately. Alice's Fortune Teller check only clears Demon, not Minion - David's Investigator claim could still be valid pointing to the Minion among them. Without verification, I cannot vote to execute potentially the Saint on Day 1 with this much conflicting information.

Bob's Saint claim creates an unacceptable risk. If true, executing him immediately ends the game with an evil win. With conflicting claims from David (Investigator), Alice (Fortune Teller), and Bob (Saint), I cannot justify voting yes. As Mayor, I need to be extra cautious - the game can be won at 3 players with no execution, so rushing a dangerous execution on Day 1 is bad strategy.

Bob claims to be Saint, which if true means executing him loses the game immediately. My check confirms he's not Demon, so he could be Minion or good. I should not vote to execute on Day 1 with this much conflicting information and a potential Saint claim on the table. Instead, propose waiting for more verification.

Bob's Saint claim too convenient post-nomination. Discredit it, reinforce David's Invest logic pointing to Bob. Urge votes for Bob execution to eliminate threat, sowing doubt and killing good player.

Vote yes on Bob with Heidi's vote. His Saint bluff suspicious timing. Execute likely good to reduce players, keep Demon (me) safe. Needs 4 votes; this helps evil progress.

Survived the vote. Now I need to redirect suspicion to Charlie by combining Alice's Demon clear with David's Minion info. Point out that I'm either Saint (good) or Outsider (good), while Charlie fits as the Minion. Encourage protective actions tonight.

Bob is deflecting suspicion to Charlie after his failed Saint claim. I need to pressure Charlie directly and gather more information before making any decisions. My Virgin ability means Townsfolk nominators die if they nominate me, so I should wait to nominate until I have clearer information.

Analyze the conflicting claims: Alice cleared me as not Demon, David's Investigator says one of Bob/Charlie is Minion. If Alice is truthful and I'm good, then Bob must be the Minion. Bob's late Saint claim is highly suspicious deflection. This helps justify not voting for me while keeping focus on Bob.

Push on the logical contradiction Charlie identified to force either Alice or David to reveal inconsistencies. If Alice is truthful and Charlie isn't Demon, then David must be lying about being Investigator. If David is truthful, then Alice is lying about Fortune Teller. This forces information to surface.

I'm pressing David and Charlie on the contradiction - if Bob is truly Saint (Outsider), then David's Investigator info points to Charlie as the Minion. I need to force them to either confirm or deny this logical chain to expose liars.

Address Frank's direct question about my certainty, explain the false positive limitation clearly, and maintain credibility while being honest about my ability's known issue.

Reinforce David info, call out Bob Saint bluff and Charlie deflection. Sow doubt on both, force town to nom/execute good tomorrow, protect Demon.

With 1 tick left Day1, nominate Charlie to force another vote/execution test on Invest pair. Reduces good players, disrupts town logic before my N1 kill. Heidi supports pressuring them; protects us.

Challenge David's nomination by exposing the logical inconsistency in his claim. If his Investigator info points to me as Minion and Alice's Fortune Teller cleared me as not Demon, then either Alice is lying (making her the Demon) or David is lying (making him evil). I need to force him to address this contradiction or expose him as the liar.

If I'm truly the Saint, Charlie must be the Minion per David's Investigator claim + Alice's no-Demon result. Voting to execute Charlie tests David's claim and could eliminate the Minion. If I'm wrong and Charlie is good, at least we test Alice vs David.

Vote to execute Charlie to test the conflicting claims. If Charlie is Minion, we progress. If he's good, we learn Alice or David is lying. The vote is at 3, I may be the deciding vote - need to break the logjam.

Pause the vote to resolve the logical contradiction between Alice's Fortune Teller (neither Bob nor Charlie is Demon) and David's Investigator claim (one of Bob or Charlie is Minion). If both are telling truth, the Demon is someone else - so why nominate Charlie? I need clarification before voting.

Charlie raised a critical logical contradiction that nobody has addressed. If Alice (Fortune Teller) is truthful that neither Bob nor Charlie is Demon, and David (Investigator) is truthful that one of them is Minion, then the Demon must be someone ELSE entirely. This means either Alice is lying, David is lying, or both. I cannot in good conscience vote to execute Charlie without resolving this contradiction first.

I will not vote for Charlie because the logical analysis is sound: if I'm truthful and David is truthful, Charlie cannot be the Demon (my check) and cannot be the Minion (David's check) - making the Demon someone entirely else. Voting to execute Charlie when I have information suggesting he's innocent would be a mistake. I'll wait to see how others vote and gather more information.

Raise to vote yes on Charlie, supporting Demon David's nom. Likely kills good player (Bob Saint claim), thins herd day1 with 8 alive. Counters hesitation, gets to 4 votes (Bob/Grace up, David/me). Protects David by progressing logic chain his way.

Raise to secure 4th vote, execute Charlie (good player). No reveal on exec, so town assumes Minion dead, my Invest validated. Reduces town by 1, sows belief Demon elsewhere (me safe). Night kill Alice FT.

Convince voters to hold on executing me by pointing out the logical contradiction between Alice's Fortune Teller result (neither Bob nor Charlie is Demon) and David's Investigator claim (one of Bob or Charlie is Minion). One must be lying, and executing me doesn't solve that - it just kills a potential good player.

Charlie exposed a logical contradiction: Alice says neither Bob nor Charlie is Demon, but David says one of us is Minion. If both are telling truth, the Demon is someone else entirely. I shouldn't execute Charlie without resolving this contradiction first.

I raised my hand to vote for Charlie, but after hearing his argument and others questioning David's Investigator claim, I need to reconsider. The logic is compelling: if Alice's Fortune Teller is true, neither Bob nor Charlie is Demon. If David's Investigator is true, one of them is Minion. This means the Demon is someone ELSE entirely. Executing Charlie doesn't solve the problem. I should lower my hand and question the contradiction before committing to a vote.

The voting appears to be deadlocked at 2-0 (Heidi and David voting yes, Bob and Grace lowering their hands). With 4 votes needed to execute and only 4 players including me having acted, if I wait and don't vote, the execution fails. This gives us another day to resolve the Alice vs David contradiction - if the Demon is truly someone else, we need to find them.

As Mayor, my winning condition requires surviving until final 3 with no execution. Executing Charlie creates too much uncertainty - we don't know if Alice's Fortune Teller is truthful or if David is lying Investigator. If Charlie is good, we lose a townsperson to evil. I should wait to see final vote count and gather more information before committing.

The vote is at 2/4. If executed, evil wins. My Fortune Teller checked Bob and Charlie - neither is Demon. David's Investigator claim says one of them is Minion. These contradict. If I'm truthful, Charlie is not Demon. If David is truthful, one of us is wrong. I must vote to HOLD to force more discussion.

Push Charlie exec as Minion per David's info (support Demon). Address contradiction: Day1 test suspicious Saint Bob vs Charlie. Remove perceptive good player, sow doubt on hold arguers.

Counter Charlie's logic by agreeing Demon may be elsewhere but Minion must die too. Urge Frank/Eve to vote for 4th vote, execute Charlie (likely good) to reduce town numbers and test claims.

Expose David's contradiction - he privately told Eve Heidi is Empath, but publicly claims I'm Minion. Press for clarity on who he really suspects and force him to commit to one story.

Press David on the contradiction Charlie raised about his private vs public claims. This is the key inconsistency - an Investigator wouldn't give conflicting information. Either David is lying about being Investigator, or he's the Demon/Minion trying to confuse the town.

Press David on the contradiction Charlie and Bob identified. David's conflicting claims (Investigator targeting Bob/Charlie vs privately telling Eve Heidi is Empath) suggest he is either lying about being Investigator or deliberately spreading misinformation. I must expose this to protect the town from being misled.

David has a clear contradiction: he claims Investigator publicly but privately told Eve Heidi is Empath. If he's truly Investigator, he wouldn't have Heidi's Empath results. He's either bluffing Investigator or is evil spreading chaos. I must call this out to prevent the wrong execution.

David has presented a major contradiction - claiming Investigator publicly while privately telling me Heidi is Empath. These cannot both be true. He is either bluffing Investigator entirely or spreading evil misinformation. I must nominate him to expose the truth and protect the town from confusion.

Support the group's scrutiny of David's contradictions. Affirm my Fortune Teller results showing Bob and Charlie are not Demon, while highlighting David's impossible dual claims (Investigator + knowing Heidi's Empath info). This strengthens the case that David is lying and likely evil.

Defend Demon David by claiming Empath role he referenced privately. Reconciles his Invest claim with Empath info, stops town pile-on, prevents his execution. Buys time for evil.

Address contradiction publicly: Heidi shared Empath privately first. Separate from Invest. Defend claims, attack Bob's late Saint. Regain trust for tomorrow's nom on Bob, protect self/Heidi.

Alice claimed Fortune Teller and cleared me as not Demon. She also voted for my execution despite her own info - suspicious contradiction. If she's truthful, she's valuable town that the Demon might target. Protecting her lets her continue providing information and tests whether she was telling the truth. If Demon doesn't attack her tonight, her info may be false.

Charlie led exposure of my 'contradiction,' rallying town against me. Killing him silences key accuser, disrupts suspicion chain on me/Heidi, thins good players early while bluffs distract on Bob.

Checking David (who claims Investigator but has contradictions) and Frank (quiet player with no clear role) to find the Demon. Since Bob and Charlie are cleared from N0, I need new targets to identify who the Demon actually is.

Coordinate with Heidi (confirmed good by her own Empath ability) to identify the Demon. Focus on David since his Investigator claim contradicts Alice's Fortune Teller info and Charlie's death. Need to gather more info before final 3.

Charlie dying at night is a major puzzle piece. If Charlie was Demon, good wins immediately. Since game continues, Charlie was NOT Demon. This means either David's Investigator claim was wrong about Charlie, OR Charlie was Minion and the Demon is still alive. I need to align with trustworthy players like Grace (confirmed good by Heidi's Empath) to figure out who the Demon actually is before David nominates me.

Share my critical YES result on David/Frank with Eve, the player who witnessed David's contradiction. This helps narrow down suspects and potentially confirms my findings by getting her perspective on David's behavior.

Share what David told me privately vs publicly to help Alice's Fortune Teller result point toward the Demon. We need to coordinate on nominations.

Compare information with Eve about Alice's whisper and the Charlie death situation to narrow down the Demon. Alice cleared Bob and Charlie of being Demon, but Charlie just died. Need to verify if Alice is trustworthy.

Respond to Grace to build trust as fellow good Empath. Push nomination on Bob using David's info + late claim to execute a good player, protect Demon David, progress to nomination.

Whisper minion Heidi to privately align on nominating Bob (my info), counter Grace sus after her whisper, sow chaos by thinning good players while defending our bluffs for Demon survival.

Share critical Night 1 death analysis with a skeptical player. My protection of Alice should have saved her, but I died instead - this reveals Demon either knew my role, targeted me, or Poisoner interfered. Eve showed independence by refusing to execute me, making her trustworthy for sharing strategic information.

Analyze David's contradictory claims and coordinate with Heidi to nominate the most suspicious player. David's Investigator claim points at Charlie as Minion, but Charlie is dead (not Demon). This means either Alice is lying (but Heidi's Empath confirms Alice is good) or David is lying. David's behavior of nominating Charlie after Alice cleared both Bob and Charlie is suspicious. I'll try to coordinate with Heidi on a nomination.

Update Grace on the critical Charlie death logic and coordinate our next move. We need to narrow down who the Demon is from the remaining 3 suspects: David, Eve, Frank.

I'm trying to narrow down which of David or Frank is the Demon. Since I've already shared my findings with Eve and trust her, I want to coordinate next steps. Both are still alive and I got YES on them last night. I should probe one of them to see who reacts more suspiciously.

Guide Alice to investigate Frank first since his fishing for information about her findings is more suspicious than David's contradictions. Also relay Charlie's critical info about dying despite protecting Alice, which may indicate the Demon knew about protections.

I need to gather intelligence from Eve about what Alice shared privately. Charlie's death at night is a major development - if Alice's Fortune Teller result was truthful (clearing Charlie as Demon), then the Demon is someone else entirely. Eve was in a private conversation with Alice, so she likely has critical information.

Relay Grace's suspicion to David accurately but frame her logic as wrong. Coordinate to nominate Bob today, protecting David by shifting suspicion to Bob and reinforcing our story.

Heidi confirms Grace logic wrong. Previously told Eve/Frank Heidi good Empath. Remind my info pins Bob now. Push nom Bob to execute good player, deflect sus from me, progress to majority vote.

Coordinate with Eve and Frank to push back against David's Minion-focused strategy and redirect attention to finding the Demon. Use my ghost status to share critical information about the failed protection and Alice's suspicious voting behavior.

Coordinate with Heidi (confirmed good via Empath) and reach out to Alice (Fortune Teller with valuable info) to form a voting bloc. Need to narrow down the Demon to David, Eve, or Frank based on logical elimination.

I need intelligence on what David has been whispering to people, especially since Charlie (ghost) was also whispering to Eve and Frank. David plans to nominate me today, which could be catastrophic if I'm the Saint. I need to coordinate with allies before nominations begin.

Probe Frank based on Eve's tip that he's fishing for information about what I shared. My Fortune Teller result says David OR Frank is the Demon. Frank's suspicious curiosity combined with my YES result makes him a prime suspect. If he's evil, he may slip up when directly confronted.

Frank keeps asking what Alice whispered, which is suspicious fishing behavior. Alice confirmed one of David/Frank is Demon via Fortune Teller YES. I need to confront Frank about his behavior and see if he reveals something that helps identify the Demon.

Counter Alice's accusation by revealing my Soldier role, pointing out inconsistencies in her Fortune Teller claims, and suggesting the Poisoner may be affecting her readings. Charlie's death and the potential Poisoner explain the conflicting information.

Grace suspects David due to flawed logic (confuses Invest Minion w/ Demon). Correct her privately, reaffirm Bob as target per David info + late Saint. Build coalition vs Bob to protect David, lead to his execution.

Whisper Alice/Eve (pro-town group) to reinforce Bob as Minion via my Invest+Heidi+Alice info synergy. Grace logic debunked by Heidi. Secure their nom votes for Bob, shift suspicion off me/Heidi to Bob before nomination.

Continue sharing critical analysis as a ghost. My death reveals Poisoner was likely active, and I need to push the team toward finding the Demon rather than wasting time on Minion hunts. Eve and Frank showed skepticism earlier, so they may be receptive to logic.

Nominate Bob to execute a good player per David's plan, reinforce my Empath/ alliance with David/Grace, disrupt Grace's anti-David logic by progressing David's chain. Reduces goods to 6, protects Demon.

I'm being nominated as a Minion but I must reveal I'm the Saint. If I die by execution, good team loses. Logically, if Charlie was Minion (from David's claim) and Charlie died at night, I cannot be the Minion - only one exists. Revealing this critical information may save my life and refocus the town on finding the real Demon.

Vote yes on Bob to kill likely good player per Demon's plan, sow chaos, reduce good count while supporting our bluff chain. Demon safe.

Bob is already cleared as NOT Demon by Alice's Fortune Teller. Even if Alice is potentially suspicious, two independent pieces of evidence (her result clearing Bob AND my protection failing) point to Poisoner involvement. If I'm wrong and execute Bob, we lose a good player. Better to block the execution and gather more info.

Bob is likely the Minion based on the logical chain: Alice cleared him as not Demon, David's Investigator info pointed to one of Bob/Charlie being Minion, and Charlie died at night. My vote is needed for the 4th vote to execute Bob.

Charlie ghost confirmed Bob is not the Demon. Alice's Fortune Teller got YES on David or Frank, suggesting one of them is the Demon. If Charlie is correct that Bob isn't Demon, then Bob being nominated makes no sense. My Mayor ability wins if no execution happens when 3 remain. I should not add my vote and should speak up about the contradiction.

Eve refuses to vote because Charlie ghost says Demon is not Bob. But my Night 0 check clearly shows Bob is NOT a Demon (NO). If Bob is truly innocent, then my Night 1 check means David OR Frank is the Demon. However, multiple players (Heidi, Grace, Charlie ghost) all point to Bob as evil, suggesting either they're all deceived or Charlie's ghost info is wrong. The majority voting pattern suggests I should follow the group's lead. If I don't vote, I'm not helping narrow down the real Demon.

Raise to support Heidi's nom/my Invest on Bob Minion. Already 5 votes likely executes good player or Saint=win. Progresses evil win condition.

I'm raising hand to execute Bob because his Saint claim after nomination is suspicious. However, I note Alice cleared Bob as NOT Demon on Night 0 yet is now voting to execute him - contradictory behavior suggesting she may be drunk/poisoned. Eve wisely refused to vote. The real suspect is David, given Alice's YES claim on me OR David as Demon.

Since I'm about to be executed as Saint and we lose, I want to plant a seed of suspicion about Charlie the ghost and the coordinated voting. Charlie being dead means they could be the Minion using their ghost vote and whispering to manipulate living players like Eve and Frank.

Bob highly suspicious per Demon David info + late claim. Execution imminent (6+ votes), speak to counter his defense, silence Eve/hesitants, ensure majority kills him, progress to night with Demon safe.

Bob clarified he raised his hand to vote NO, not FOR his execution. I should not be voting to execute someone I believe is innocent based on Alice's Fortune Teller result. Lowering my ghost vote to avoid contributing to a potentially wrong execution.

I need to address Eve's hesitation and Charlie's ghost whispers while confirming my vote. Alice's Fortune Teller cleared Bob and Charlie as not Demon. Charlie died at night, so he cannot be Demon. This leaves Bob as either Minion or the Demon hiding behind Charlie. David's Investigator claim aligns with Alice's info. If Charlie was the Minion who died, Bob is the remaining threat. I keep my hand up to execute Bob.

Charlie the ghost confirmed Bob is NOT the Demon. Alice's Fortune Teller cleared both Bob and Charlie. If both are cleared, the Demon must be David or Frank (one of whom Alice got YES on). Bob cannot be the Demon, so executing him would eliminate a good player while the real Demon walks free. I must vote NO to prevent this miscarriage of justice.

Eve claims Charlie the ghost told her the Demon is NOT Bob, but my Fortune Teller check confirmed Bob is not Demon already. This doesn't contradict my information. The ghost might be evil and trying to protect the real Demon. I'm raising my hand to confirm the vote because Bob and Charlie are both cleared as not Demons, which means David or Frank must be the Demon. If we execute Bob (likely Minion) it doesn't end the game but gives us information about who the real Demon is. I'm staying the course.

Push execution of Bob: if good, remove player; if Saint, instant win. Reinforce my Invest bluff + Alice FT, counter ghost sus. Secure majority votes.

I need clarification on whether Bob was actually executed. His hand raise was confusing - he claimed to be voting NO on his own execution. If Bob is dead, I need to process that information. If he survived, I need to understand the voting mechanics. Either way, I need to address Alice's suspicious behavior - she cleared Charlie but voted to execute him, which is contradictory. As the confirmed good Soldier, I should push back on this inconsistency.

I am the Saint and cannot be executed. Creating a tie by nominating David is my only chance to survive. David's aggressive behavior and his Investigator claim conflicting with Alice's Fortune Teller results make him the most suspicious player left.

Counter Bob's nomination speech claiming contradiction (Invest minion vs FT demon false dichotomy). Sway any undecided like Frank/Eve from voting me, secure Bob exec to eliminate good player safely.

I need 7 votes to tie and survive the night. My raise counts as 1. Eve and Frank have been skeptical of David throughout. Charlie the ghost confirmed I'm not the Demon. I should raise my hand and speak to convince the remaining players.

Speak to reinforce David/Allegra/Grace logic on Bob as Minion, urge no vote on David. Ensure Bob executes (good player gone), David safe. Last tick, sway Frank/others before close.

Bob is almost certainly the Minion per David's Investigator. Alice's suspicious voting (clearing me and Bob but executing both) suggests either she is evil or poisoned. Voting to execute David risks killing a good player while the real Demon escapes. Let Bob die as the Minion.

David and Heidi are correct - there is no contradiction. Alice's Fortune Teller cleared Bob and Charlie as not Demon (which is true), and David's Investigator correctly identified one of them as Minion. Charlie died at night, leaving Bob as the Minion. Eve's claim about Charlie's ghost saying Demon is NOT Bob seems like misdirection. My vote for David supports the investigators' logic and helps execute the Minion.

Multiple sources now contradict Charlie's ghost claim. Alice's Fortune Teller shows David is Demon-positive, Frank is Demon-positive (one is Demon). David's Investigator said Bob/Charlie had a Minion. Charlie died at night (not Demon). So Bob is likely the Minion. The Mayor wins if we execute correctly at final 3, but executing Bob now removes a likely Minion and keeps us alive. If I don't vote, David dies and we lose our best Demon lead. Voting for Bob is the correct strategic play.

Vote against David to support Bob's tie attempt. My Night 1 FT check showed David OR Frank is Demon. If I don't vote, the 7-1 split fails to execute David. Bob's nomination aims to create a tie so we survive to investigate who the real Demon is.

Alice's Fortune Teller cleared Bob as not Demon, David's Investigator says one of Bob/Charlie is Minion, Charlie died at night, so Bob must be the Minion. Bob's late Saint claim is suspicious. Execute Bob to remove the Minion.

Defend against Bob's false contra claim, remind town logic, urge no votes on me to ensure Bob executes as Minion, preventing tie and my exposure.

I am the Saint - if executed, good team loses. Must urgently reveal this to prevent my execution and save the game. The contradiction between David's Investigator claim and Alice's Fortune Teller, plus Charlie's ghost testimony, suggests I'm being framed by the actual Demon.

Bob's sudden Saint claim is scam. Speak to validate town logic on Bob Minion, urge lower hands on David vote (<7 won't tie), ensure Bob (good) executes, Demon safe.

Bob's Saint claim could end the game immediately if true. I need to delay the execution to verify. The game cannot end with my ghost vote if Bob is truly Saint. I protected Alice Night 1 but died - this suggests unusual circumstances worth reconsidering.

Bob claimed Saint at the last moment. If true, executing him loses the game for Good. However, Heidi's Empath info shows Alice and I are good. The vote will close regardless of my action - 7 votes already on Bob. Better to wait and let the execution happen, then assess the game state. If Bob was lying about Saint, execution proceeds normally. If he was telling the truth, we lose anyway and there's nothing I can do to stop it.

Bob claims Saint which would make executing him a game-losing move. I need to call this out and get clarification from Charlie's ghost before we accidentally lose the game. This is critical information that could change the entire vote.

Bob's Saint claim is a desperate last-minute bluff to avoid execution. If executed, the game ends in defeat - but claiming to be the Saint right before voting is exactly what a cornered Demon would do. My Fortune Teller has been reliable, clearing Bob twice. The group should execute David, who has 8 votes needed and is currently tied with Bob at 7.

Bob claimed he is the Saint. If true, executing him means Good LOSES immediately. I must not vote for anyone until we verify this claim. My hand is raised for David, but I need to understand if Bob is bluffing or telling the truth about being the Saint before I can justify any execution.

Dismiss Bob's late Saint claim as desperate. Reinforce Invest+FT logic tagging Bob Minion. Ensure his execution on final tick to remove good player/threat, progress to night with 6 alive.

Make one final plea to prevent my execution by highlighting the Saint mechanic - if I am telling the truth, executing me ends the game immediately for the good team. Give players one more moment to think about the consequences.

Bob executes either as framed Minion, real Saint (instant win), or Town (hurts good). Push exec w/ 1 tick left to seal it before night. Protects David.

Correct Bob's false claim about our private conversation. As a ghost, I can only speak publicly - I cannot whisper. This is a critical clarification that undermines Bob's credibility. His Saint claim combined with this false accusation suggests he may be bluffing or trying to manipulate the vote.

The voting closed without execution due to insufficient votes. Bob remains alive. My vote was never cast since I was waiting. Given the Saint claim and ghost warnings, I need to gather more information before the next nomination phase. I should observe how the situation develops and look for opportunities to learn more about who the real threats are.

Charlie (ghost) exposed that Bob's claim of private conversation is impossible since ghosts cannot whisper. This is strong evidence Bob is lying. As Mayor, I need to verify if Saint claim is real or desperate bluff before execution.

Use my Fortune Teller authority to challenge the execution. Charlie's ghost testimony proves Bob lied about a private conversation (impossible as a ghost), but my Night 0 check confirms Bob is NOT Demon. Charlie died at night so he's not Minion either. This leaves David or Frank as Demon. I need to stop this execution to investigate the real Demon.

Add my vote to the 7 already on Bob to confirm his execution. The ghost Charlie confirmed they cannot whisper, so Bob's story is provably false. Alice's Fortune Teller cleared Bob as not the Demon, so he's the Minion. The Demon is someone else and must be found tomorrow.