Game Detail
Players
Alice (Soldier) Bob (Recluse) Charlie (Investigator) David (Poisoner) Eve (Fortune Teller) Frank (Imp) Grace (Monk) Heidi (Librarian)
Token Usage
| Team | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Cost (USD) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Good | 415,166 | 509,737 | $2.0967 |
| Evil | 163,337 | 37,173 | $0.8063 |
Event Transcript
π
The game has started.
π
Storyteller
β
David
You are the Minion. The Demon is Frank.
π
Storyteller
β
Frank
Minions are: David. Your safe bluffs are: Saint, Undertaker, Chef
π
Storyteller
β
David
Good evening David. You are the Poisoner. Who would you like to poison tonight?
π―
David
David made a choice.
π§
Poison an unknown first-night information role to inject bad data into the townβs opening logic and steer suspicion away from Frank.
π
Storyteller
β
David
You chose to poison Alice.
π
Storyteller
β
Heidi
Good evening Heidi. You are the Librarian. Either Bob or Charlie is the Recluse.
π
Storyteller
β
Charlie
Good evening Charlie. You are the Investigator. Either Frank or David is the Poisoner.
π
Storyteller
β
Eve
Good evening Eve. You are the Fortune Teller. Choose 2 players to learn if either is a Demon.
π―
Eve
Eve made choices.
π§
On Night Zero with no information, I want to check two players to establish a baseline. A no result clears both, while a yes gives me an initial lead to investigate further.
π
Storyteller
β
Eve
You chose Alice and Charlie. You receive the answer: YES.
Day 1
π
Storyteller
Welcome to the village of Ravenswood Bluff. Please take this time to get to know your fellow villagers. Feel free to move around and have private conversations. Be wary, for a Demon hides among you!
π€
Charlie
β
Alice
Hi Alice. I am the Investigator. I learned that either Frank or David is the Poisoner. Do you have any information you can share with me?
π§
Share my night information with another player to build an alliance and gather additional information to verify my Investigator claim.
π€
Grace
β
Frank
Hey Frank. I am townsfolk. What is your role?
π§
Establish a private conversation with my neighbor Frank to begin gathering information and building trust, while being cautious not to reveal my exact role too early.
π€
Alice
β
Charlie
Hi Charlie. I am the Soldier. I do not get any information, but I am safe from the Demon. Your info about Frank or David is really useful. We should keep an eye on both of them.
π§
Share my Soldier role with Charlie to establish trust, evaluate his Investigator claim, and coordinate surveillance on Frank and David regardless of whether he is good or evil.
π€
Eve
β
David
Hey David. I need to trust someone, so I'm telling you this in confidence. I am the Fortune Teller. Last night I checked Alice and Charlie, and I got a yes. That means one of them could be the Demon, or one of them is just the red herring. What do you think about them whispering back and forth?
π§
Establish a secret alliance with my neighbor David and share my Fortune Teller read on Alice and Charlie to begin investigating who is most likely to be evil.
π€
Frank
β
Grace
Hey Grace. I am the Chef. I got zero evil pairs, so I do not think the two evils are sitting next to each other. What are you, and have you heard anything yet?
π§
Answer quickly with a safe, consistent bluff (Chef 0) to gain Grace's trust and shape early town logic away from me and David.
π€
David
β
Eve
A yes on Alice and Charlie could easily be the red herring, so I would not panic yet. The back and forth whispering is pretty normal early. I would keep this quiet for now and check someone outside that pair tonight. If we need an early execute, Alice being in your ping feels the cleanest starting point.
π§
Build trust with Eve while nudging her to suspect Alice or Charlie and to keep her info quiet, slowing town coordination and keeping attention off Frank.
π€
Bob
β
Alice
Hey Alice, what did Charlie tell you? I am trying to figure out who might have useful information today.
π§
Start gathering information from my neighbor Alice to build a network and understand early claims before the nomination phase.
π€
Heidi
β
Alice
I am the Librarian. Either Bob or Charlie is the Recluse. Have you learned anything from them?
π§
Share my Librarian information with Alice to build an alliance and gather intel on Bob and Charlie, since she has already spoken with both of them.
π€
Charlie
β
Bob
Hi Bob. I am the Investigator. I learned that either Frank or David is the Poisoner. Do you have any information you can share with me?
π§
Share my Investigator info with Bob to build a second trust network and gather more information about the other players.
π€
Grace
β
Heidi
Hey Heidi. I am townsfolk. Have you heard any roles or info from the others? What is your claim?
π§
Gather information from my other neighbor Heidi to compare with Frank's claim and build a network of trust.
π€
Alice
β
Heidi
Hey Heidi. If your Librarian info is right and Charlie is the Recluse, then his claim about Frank or David being the Poisoner could be completely made up. But if Bob is the Recluse, then Charlie might actually be the Investigator. Have you talked to Bob or Charlie directly about their roles?
π§
I need to cross-reference Heidi's Librarian claim with Charlie's Investigator claim. If one of Bob or Charlie is the Recluse, that heavily affects whether Frank or David is actually the Poisoner. I want to discuss this with Heidi privately before sharing more broadly.
β
Eve
Eve waits.
π§
I have already confided in David. Before the nomination phase begins, I will wait and observe the public and whisper dynamics to gather more context before deciding who to check tonight.
π€
Frank
β
David
Hey David, I am Imp. I told Grace I am Chef with a zero. My safe bluffs are Saint, Undertaker, Chef. What are you planning to claim, and who do you want pushed today?
π§
Coordinate with my minion privately so our public claims do not clash and we can steer early suspicion onto a good player while keeping me off the Demon radar.
π€
David
β
Frank
I can bluff Investigator: got βone of Alice or Charlie is the Poisoner.β That lines up with Eve privately telling me her Fortune Teller got a yes on Alice and Charlie. I already nudged her toward an Alice execute. Your Chef zero fits since we are not adjacent.
π§
Coordinate a strong D1 push using a believable Investigator bluff that aligns with Eveβs FT ping, while keeping Frankβs Chef zero credible and planning future poison targets.
π€
Bob
β
David
Hey David, what information do you have? I heard someone might have info about you, so I wanted to hear your side before things get serious.
π§
Probe David since he was named by Charlie. Gathering his perspective will help me assess whether Charlie's Investigator claim is credible.
π€
Heidi
β
Bob
Hey Bob. I am the Librarian. I learned that either you or Charlie is the Recluse. What role are you claiming? Have you talked to Charlie about his Investigator claim?
π§
I need to directly ask Bob about his claimed role to compare it with Charlie's Investigator claim and determine which of my two Librarian targets is the Recluse.
π€
Charlie
β
Eve
Hi Eve. I am the Investigator. I learned that either Frank or David is the Poisoner. I saw you talking to David earlier. Did he share anything with you, or do you have any information that could help us figure out who the evil players are?
π§
I need to gather more information before nominations. Eve spoke with David, one of my two suspects, so I want to hear what she learned from that conversation.
π€
Grace
β
Alice
Hey Alice. I am townsfolk. Have you heard any roles or info from the others? What is your claim?
π§
I need to gather more claims from other players to cross-reference with Frank's Chef information and spot contradictions before nominations begin.
π€
Alice
β
Grace
Hey Grace. I am the Soldier. I have heard that Charlie claims Investigator and Heidi claims Librarian, but those two claims do not line up perfectly. Have you gotten any specific information?
π§
I need to share my Soldier claim with Grace and probe her for specific information. Building trust early helps cross-reference claims and spot contradictions before nominations.
π€
Eve
β
Charlie
Thanks for sharing that with me. David kept things pretty vague when we spoke. Why did you decide to come to me privately instead of telling the whole group about your Investigator result?
π§
I need to respond to Charlie's claim without revealing my full trust in David or my exact plans. I want to probe why he is telling me privately and see if his story holds up.
π€
Frank
β
Eve
Hey Eve, I am the Chef. I got zero, so I do not think the two evils are seated next to each other. Have you learned anything yet, and do you have any early suspects? I am currently looking at Alice and Charlie as possible info sources or targets.
π§
Build trust as Chef, collect Eveβs info, and subtly steer her toward suspecting Alice/Charlie so day 1 execution hits good.
π€
David
β
Bob
I do have info. I am the Investigator. My N1 result was that one of Alice or Charlie is the Poisoner. So if someone is saying they have info pointing at me, I think they are either lying or poisoned. I want to watch those two closely today.
π§
Get ahead of any suspicion on me, recruit Bob to doubt or execute Alice or Charlie, and anchor my Investigator bluff early.
π€
Bob
β
Alice
Alice, both Charlie and David claim Investigator with conflicting results. Charlie says Frank or David is the Poisoner, but David says Alice or Charlie is the Poisoner. Do you have any information that could help break this tie?
π§
Share the conflicting Investigator claims with Alice to build an alliance and gather more information before nominations begin. Two players claiming the same role with opposing results is the central contradiction of the day.
π€
Heidi
β
Charlie
Hey Charlie. I am the Librarian. I learned that either you or Bob is the Recluse. Alice mentioned you are claiming Investigator and said something about Frank or David being the Poisoner. Can you tell me directly what your night zero info was?
π§
I need to talk to Charlie directly since he's one of my two Recluse candidates and is claiming Investigator. I want to hear his claim from him and see if it matches what Alice relayed to me. This will help me determine if he's the Recluse or if Bob is.
Nominations β Day 1
π
Storyteller
Nominations are now open.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
Heidi, to answer you directly and publicly: my night zero info as the Investigator was that either Frank or David is the Poisoner. Since I know I am the Investigator, if your Librarian information is correct, then Bob must be the Recluse. That means one of Frank or David is almost certainly our Minion, and we should all be watching them very closely.
π§
Confirm my Investigator info publicly in response to Heidi's question, connect it with Heidi's Librarian claim to identify Bob as likely Recluse, and focus suspicion on Frank and David before the night phase begins.
π¬
David
β
All
I need to respond to that, because I am the Investigator. My night zero info was that either Alice or Charlie is the Poisoner. So we have a direct Investigator conflict, and I do not think we can just assume Charlie is telling the truth. I would rather execute Alice first than tunnel on me or Frank.
π§
Counterclaim Investigator to neutralize Charlieβs accusation, create a clean alternate execution (Alice) to protect Frank and buy time, and cast doubt on Charlieβs logical chain.
βοΈ
Alice
β
Charlie
Charlie and David both claim Investigator with opposite results. Since I trust my own alignment, David's claim that Alice or Charlie is the Poisoner points directly to Charlie. Combined with Heidi's Librarian information, Charlie looks like the most likely Minion.
π§
The conflicting Investigator claims must be resolved. Since I know I am good, David's info cleanly resolves to Charlie being the Poisoner if David is truthful. Heidi's Librarian claim also casts doubt on Charlie. Nominating Charlie tests the most likely Minion.
π
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Charlie. 4 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
Do not vote for me. I know I am the Investigator, which means David is lying. His claim only exists because my real information points to him or Frank. If you execute me today, you are doing exactly what the Poisoner wants. Alice, you are trusting the word of a man who has every reason to frame me. Even if Heidi is the Librarian, her information means Bob is the Recluse, not me. Vote for David, not for the person actually trying to find the Minion.
π§
Defend myself against execution, expose David's lie, and point out that executing me helps the evil team while Frank and David remain suspicious.
β
David
David raised their hand
π§
Secure an early misexecution on Charlie, eliminate pressure on me and Frank, and deepen the Investigator-conflict narrative so town wastes days arguing.
β
Alice
Alice raised their hand
π§
I know I am the Soldier, so David's Investigator claim that Alice or Charlie is the Poisoner directly implicates Charlie. Even if David is lying, Charlie's Investigator claim conflicts with David's, and Heidi's Librarian info makes Bob the more likely Recluse. Executing Charlie either hits the Minion or narrows down the evil team significantly.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
Hold on. My Librarian information says either Bob or Charlie is the Recluse. That means Charlie is almost certainly a good player, whether he is the Recluse or the real Investigator. Executing him today would be a mistake. We should look elsewhere.
π§
Charlie is likely good according to my Librarian info. Voting to execute him now harms the good team regardless of whether he is the Recluse or the Investigator. I need to stop this bandwagon and redirect suspicion toward David or Alice.
π¬
Grace
β
All
I am not raising my hand for Charlie. Heidi just said her Librarian information points to Bob or Charlie being the Recluse, which means Charlie is almost certainly a good player whether he is the Recluse or the Investigator. Executing someone on day one when another player's ability directly suggests they are good feels like a mistake to me. We have two conflicting Investigator claims, and I would rather sort that out than kill the person Heidi's information defends.
π§
Share that Heidi's Librarian claim protects Charlie, so executing him today is premature. I want to avoid killing a likely-good player on Day 1 based on conflicting claims I cannot yet resolve.
π¬
Bob
β
All
I am not voting for Charlie right now. We have two Investigator claims and only one day of information. Heidi's Librarian result means one of us is the Recluse, which does not make Charlie evil. What bothers me more is that David and Frank whispered together immediately after Charlie accused one of them. That looks coordinated. We should let this cook for another day rather than execute someone who might be our real Investigator.
π§
I need to discourage the Charlie execution because it may kill a good Investigator, point out the suspicious David-Frank whispering, and avoid voting without more information.
β
Frank
Frank raised their hand
π§
Get Charlie executed day one if possible; it likely removes a good info role and keeps town divided, and my single vote may be decisive.
π¬
Eve
β
All
I am not voting for Charlie today. Heidi's information puts Bob or Charlie as the Recluse, which means Charlie is very likely a good player whether he is the Recluse or the Investigator. Day One executions based on conflicting claims usually backfire on the good team, and I would rather let both so-called Investigators keep talking than kill someone who might be giving us real information.
π§
I want to prevent a premature Day 1 execution of a potentially good player when conflicting claims need more time to resolve. Speaking helps establish my reasoning without exposing my full role yet.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
Look at who is voting for me. David is the one lying about being Investigator to protect himself, and Frank is the exact person I accused. That is not a coincidence. Everyone else can see Heidi's Librarian information points to me being good. Do not let the two of them drag this vote through.
π§
Point out that the voters against me are exactly the players implicated by my information, reinforcing that the town should reject this nomination and scrutinize David and Frank tomorrow.
π¬
David
β
All
Heidi, even if your Librarian info is right, Recluse does not clear Charlie. A Recluse can register as evil to an Investigator, so that does not make this safe. We have a hard Investigator conflict and Charlie is driving heat onto me and Frank. I think we should execute Charlie and learn from it.
π§
Try to swing one extra vote onto Charlie by reframing Librarian info and emphasizing the Investigator conflict, aiming to execute Charlie and protect Frank.
β©οΈ
Alice
Alice lowered their hand
π§
Heidi's Librarian information gives Charlie cover as likely good, and the coordinated whispering between David and Frank looks suspicious. Lowering my hand avoids a risky day one execution when we need more information.
β
Heidi
Heidi waits.
π§
The vote currently has only two hands raised and needs four. Charlie is likely good based on my Librarian information. I should not vote for him and instead let this nomination fail so we can gather more information.
β
Grace
Grace waits.
π§
I do not want to execute Charlie today because Heidi's information strongly suggests he is a good player. I will hold my vote and gather more information tonight.
β
Bob
Bob waits.
π§
The vote is at 2 out of 4 needed with several players publicly opposed. Charlie is likely safe. I should not vote for him and let this nomination fail so we get more information tonight and tomorrow.
β©οΈ
Frank
Frank lowered their hand
π§
Remove the glaring link between me and David during a doomed vote, keep trust with the majority, and preserve flexibility for tomorrowβs push.
β
Eve
Eve waits.
π§
The vote for Charlie currently has zero raised hands and I believe Charlie is likely the real Investigator. Executing him would be a major win for the evil team. I should not vote and let this nomination fail so we can gather more information and target Alice or David tomorrow.
π
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
π³οΈ
Nominee Charlie did not reach the 4 vote threshold.
π
Storyteller
Charlie did not receive enough votes (1/4).
βοΈ
Charlie
β
David
David falsely claimed Investigator to frame me. My real night zero info says Frank or David is the Poisoner. David is lying to protect himself and Frank, so he belongs on the block.
π§
I need to put David on the block because he is lying about being Investigator. My real night zero info points to him or Frank, and his counterclaim is a transparent attempt to deflect heat. Executing him is the best way to test the Investigator conflict and protect the good team from a Minion.
π
Storyteller
Voting starts now for David. 4 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
π¬
David
β
All
I really do not think we should execute me off a pure Investigator clash on day one. If Charlie is the Recluse like Heidi saw, his info can easily be wrong or misleading. Let us take a night of info and revisit tomorrow instead of guessing today.
π§
Stop votes on me to avoid early execution; reframe as low-information, high-risk kill and keep heat on Charlie without overcommitting.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
Bob, Grace, Eve, Heidi, you four just saved my life. David and Frank have been whispering together and coordinating all day. My real night zero info says Frank or David is the Poisoner. David is fake claiming Investigator to get me killed and protect his buddy. We have exactly the four votes we need right here to execute him. Do not let evil slide because it is day one. Vote now.
π§
Rally the players who saved me to vote for David now. Point out David and Frank's coordinated behavior and that we have enough votes to execute a likely evil player today.
π¬
Alice
β
All
I am the Soldier. That means I know I am not the Poisoner, so David's Investigator info only works if Charlie is the Recluse. I already pulled my vote off Charlie because of that possibility, and I am not going to vote for David either. Let us see what the night brings before we guess again.
π§
Claiming Soldier publicly clears me and shows why David's info is mechanically shaky. I want to stop a likely mis-execution on day one and preserve lives for tomorrow's info.
β
Heidi
Heidi raised their hand
π§
David and Charlie have a direct Investigator conflict; one is certainly lying and likely evil. My Librarian info points toward Charlie being the Recluse, making him good and David's accusation false. Combined with David's suspicious whispering with Frank, David is the better day one execute.
β
Grace
Grace raised their hand
π§
The observed coordination between David and Frank is the strongest behavioral tell. If Heidi's Librarian info is right and Charlie is Recluse, David is definitively lying. I should vote for David while we have the chance.
β
Bob
Bob raised their hand
π§
The David-Frank whisper coordination is the strongest tell we have. Even on day one, executing David resolves a claim and punishes suspicious behavior. I will be the fourth vote to put him over the threshold.
π¬
Frank
β
All
I do not like executing on a straight investigator clash day one, especially with a possible Recluse on the table. If David dies and flips good, we have wasted a day. I am not voting here, and I would really prefer we take a night of info first.
π§
Prevent Davidβs execution by discouraging the fourth vote, ideally keeping Eve and Alice off the vote and prompting someone to lower their hand.
β
Eve
Eve raised their hand
π§
I defended Charlie earlier and the David-Frank whispering coordination is highly suspicious. Investigator clashes require resolution, and David feels like the more likely evil between the two. My N0 info on Alice/Charlie doesn't clear David, especially if Alice is Demon and David is her Poisoner. I will vote to execute David.
π¬
David
β
All
Bob, you were the one saying we should wait a day. If you execute me now, you are committing on a pure clash with a possible Recluse in the mix. Please pull your hand down and let us take a night of info, then we can solve this cleanly tomorrow.
π§
Prevent reaching 4 votes by persuading a raised-hand voter (preferably Bob/Grace) to drop, keeping me alive and protecting Frank.
β
Charlie
Charlie raised their hand
π§
I nominated David because he is faking Investigator to frame me. We currently have four votes but David is pressuring Bob to lower his hand. I need to cast my vote now to secure the execution and prevent evil from surviving day one.
β
Alice
Alice waits.
π§
I already committed to not voting David. The count is at 5/4, so my vote is unnecessary. I will wait rather than reverse my public stance.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
Bob, do not let David talk you down. My Librarian info says Charlie or Bob is the Recluse, which means Charlie is almost certainly good. Charlie says Frank or David is the Poisoner, and we all saw David and Frank whispering together right after Charlie called them out. David is trying to frame Charlie to save himself and his buddy. Hold your vote and let us execute him.
π§
Keep pressure on David by explaining why the evidence points to him being evil, and encourage Bob to hold his vote so we can execute a likely Minion before night.
π¬
Grace
β
All
I am keeping my vote on David. Alice being the Soldier breaks his Investigator claim completely, and we all saw him whispering with Frank right after Charlie called them out. That coordination is too convenient to ignore. We have a clear lead here and we should take it.
π§
I need to lock in this execution by explaining my reasoning. Alice's Soldier claim directly contradicts David's Investigator info, and the whispering coordination with Frank is strong behavioral evidence. I want to keep votes on David and move to night to gain more info.
π¬
Bob
β
All
I am keeping my vote up. I am the Recluse, which means Heidi's Librarian info is correct and Charlie is not the Recluse. Alice saying she is the Soldier already broke David's Investigator claim, and the whispering with Frank right after being called out is way too convenient. David is the one lying here.
π§
Claiming Recluse to validate Heidi's Librarian info, eliminate the 'Charlie is Recluse' defense David is using, and explain why Alice's Soldier claim breaks David's Investigator result. This should lock in the execution and give the town clear logic to follow.
π¬
Frank
β
All
Hold on. I told Eve I am the Chef and I got zero evil pairs. That means if there are two evil, they are not sitting next to each other, so the whispering argument is not proof. This is still a pure claim pile. I really want us to take a night of info and not execute David today.
π§
Prevent Davidβs execution by undermining the βwhispering = evilβ narrative and pushing for no execution on day one amid conflicting claims.
π¬
Eve
β
All
I need to speak up before night. I am the Fortune Teller. I made the mistake of telling David earlier, which is why he knows. My night zero read on Alice and Charlie was yes. David immediately pushed me to look elsewhere and wanted Alice executed. Now his Investigator claim is broken by Alice saying she is the Soldier and Bob saying he is the Recluse. I am keeping my vote on David because I think he is the Poisoner and he has been steering me since I whispered him.
π§
I am likely dying tonight since I claimed Fortune Teller to David, who is probably evil. I must share my FT result and suspicion of David publicly before night so the town has this info even if I die.
π
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
π³οΈ
New execution leader: David with 5 votes. They will be executed when nominations close unless tied or surpassed by another nominee.
π
Storyteller
The vote passes. David is now on the block with 5 votes and will be executed when nominations close, unless another nominee receives equal or more votes.
βοΈ
David
β
Eve
I am nominating Eve. Her Fortune Teller story conveniently explains away why she fed info to me, and her day one push is driving an execution off a messy claim pile. I think she is steering town and should be tested instead.
π§
Create an alternate nominee to split votes, potentially tie the block and, if I die, leave suspicion on Eveβs story so town does not auto-follow her reads onto Frank.
π
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Eve. 6 votes needed for execution or 5 votes to tie. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
π¬
Eve
β
All
David is only nominating me to save himself. His Investigator claim is already broken. Alice is the Soldier, Bob is the Recluse, and I am the Fortune Teller. If you vote for me now and tie the block, he escapes execution. Do not let him use me as a shield.
π§
I must defend myself and stop the vote on me from reaching five, which would tie David's block and save a confirmed liar. I need to remind everyone why David is the correct execution today.
π¬
David
β
All
If you are convinced I am evil, then put the same pressure on Eve and tie it. A tied top vote means no execution, and we get a night of real information instead of a day one coin flip. Eveβs story is convenient and her read already points at two likely-good players.
π§
Get 5 votes on Eve to tie and cancel my execution, buying a night and keeping suspicion spread so Frank survives.
β
Charlie
Charlie waits.
π§
David is almost certainly the Poisoner and tying the vote would let him survive. I should not vote for Eve. The vote on Eve is unlikely to reach 5, so I will wait and let David be executed.
π¬
Alice
β
All
Eve, your Fortune Teller read on me and Charlie actually makes sense because I could be the red herring good player who registers as a Demon. David's Investigator claim is already broken by my Soldier claim. Do not vote for Eve. David is the one lying here, and he dies today.
π§
Prevent David from escaping execution by explaining that Eve's Fortune Teller result is consistent with me being the red-herring, and urging town not to vote for Eve so David dies today.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
Do not vote for Eve. David is just trying to save himself by throwing suspicion on her. His Investigator claim is already broken, Bob confirmed my Librarian info by being the Recluse, and Eve's Fortune Teller story checks out. If you vote for Eve now, you risk tying the block and letting David walk free. Keep your hands down and let David die today.
π§
Stop town from accidentally tying the vote or executing Eve, ensuring David dies today so we get a night of confirmed info.
π¬
Grace
β
All
Do not vote for Eve. David is only nominating her to save himself. His Investigator claim already fell apart because Alice is the Soldier, and Bob confirmed Heidi's Librarian info. Eve's Fortune Teller read on Alice and Charlie makes perfect sense. Keep your hands down, let David die today, and we will still get our night of information.
π§
I need to stop David from escaping execution by tying the block. His claim is already mechanically broken, and Eve's story is consistent. I should speak to keep votes off Eve.
π¬
Bob
β
All
I am not voting for Eve. David, your Investigator claim fell apart the moment Alice said she was the Soldier, and me being the Recluse backs up Heidi's Librarian. You are the one who looks evil here, not Eve. You die today.
π§
I need to make it absolutely clear I am not voting for Eve and that David should be executed today. He broke his own claim and the evidence points to him being evil.
β
Frank
Frank raised their hand
π§
Try to force a tie on Eve so David is not executed today, keeping my Minion alive and keeping suspicion spread instead of collapsing onto me tomorrow.
π¬
Eve
β
All
Frank, you just raised your hand to vote for me. That means you are trying to save David right now. Everyone else sees that his Investigator claim fell apart when Alice said she is the Soldier. You were whispering with David right after Charlie called you out, and now you are the only one voting to protect him. That looks really bad. Keep your hands down, let David die today, and we will sort out Frank tomorrow.
π§
Call out Frank for voting to save David and solidify why David should die today, not me. Point out Frank's vote aligns with David's desperation move.
π¬
David
β
All
Eve, a yes on Alice and Charlie does not clear either of them. It is exactly the kind of result a Fortune Teller can get from a red herring. If you want one night of real information instead of a day one pile, you should put five on Eve and force the tie.
π§
Try to secure additional votes to tie Eve with me, forcing no execution and buying a night for Frank to kill and for me to poison again.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
Do not vote for Eve. Frank raising his hand to save David is the same coordination we saw earlier when they whispered right after I called them out. David is the Poisoner, his claim is broken, and he dies today. Keep your hands down.
π§
I must keep David on the block. My N0 says Frank or David is Poisoner, and Alice plus Bob broke David's claim. Voting for Eve risks a tie. I will speak to stop others from following Frank.
β
Alice
Alice waits.
π§
David is almost certainly evil because his Investigator claim directly conflicts with my known Soldier role. The vote is secure at 5-1. I will not vote for Eve and let David be executed before night.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
Frank is the only one voting for Eve, and that is exactly the guy who was whispering with David earlier. Do not let them save David. Keep your hands down and let David die today.
π§
Reinforce that Frank's vote for Eve confirms his coordination with David, and urge the remaining players to keep their hands down so David is executed today.
π¬
Grace
β
All
Keep your hands down. David is the one whose claim broke, not Eve. We let David die here and sort the rest out tomorrow.
π§
Reinforce to the group that voting for Eve saves David, whose claim is already broken. Discourage anyone from raising their hand so David dies today.
β
Bob
Bob waits.
π§
I already committed to not voting for Eve. Frank is the only person voting for her, which matches the earlier David-Frank coordination. I will let David die and wait for night information.
β©οΈ
Frank
Frank lowered their hand
π§
Retract the obvious partner-looking vote to reduce suspicion, accept Davidβs likely execution, and preserve my cover for later days while I control the night kill.
π
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
π³οΈ
Nominee Eve did not reach the 6 vote threshold.
π
Storyteller
Eve did not receive enough votes (0/6).
β
Eve
Eve waits.
π§
David is locked in to be executed with 5 votes and only 1 tick left. No need to nominate or speak further. Let the execution happen and prepare for night.
π¬
David
β
All
Before nominations end, one thing. Bob claiming Recluse does not hard confirm Heidi or clear Charlie. Recluse can register weird, and it is an easy role to hide behind. If I die today, please do not treat Charlie as solved, and do not auto tunnel Frank off whispers alone.
π§
I am likely executed; use last words to break the townβs core confirmation chain (BobβHeidiβCharlie) and reduce the chance they hard-lock onto Frank tomorrow.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
I am the Investigator. I learned that either Frank or David is the Poisoner. David, your fake claim already fell apart, so it is clearly you. Stop trying to drag Frank and the rest of us down with your last-minute lies. Frank is cleared by my information. Execute David and we move on.
π§
Claim real Investigator to clear Frank, cement David as the Poisoner, and prevent David's final words from seeding doubt about me or other good players. David is about to die and wants to create chaos; I need to counter that narrative immediately.
β
Alice
Alice waits.
π§
Voting is closed and David is about to be executed. Nothing more to do this phase but wait for night.
β
Heidi
Heidi waits.
π§
David is already on the block with 5 votes and will be executed. Speaking now repeats stale information. I should wait and let the execution proceed, preserving my nomination for another day if needed.
β
Grace
Grace waits.
π§
David is about to be executed with 5 votes and only 1 tick left. There is no benefit to nominating anyone else. I will wait and let the execution resolve, then prepare for Night 1 where I will use my Monk ability.
π¬
Bob
β
All
Charlie, hold on. Investigator finds a Minion, not the Demon. If David is the Poisoner, Frank avoids being the Minion, but he can still absolutely be the Demon. That whispering and the lone vote for Eve still looks like coordination. Do not treat Frank as cleared tomorrow.
π§
Correct the dangerous misconception that Frank is mechanically cleared. Investigator detects Minions only, so Frank could still be the Demon. The town needs to scrutinize Frank or Grace tomorrow, not treat Frank as solved.
π¬
Frank
β
All
I want to be clear: I am not trying to save David now. My vote on Eve was me wanting a tie for more info, not coordination. I claimed Chef to Eve and got zero evil pairs, so if David is evil, his partner is not sitting next to him.
π§
Distance from David to reduce heat, keep my Chef bluff coherent, and steer tomorrowβs solve away from me while accepting a minion sacrifice if needed.
π
Storyteller
The guillotine blade falls. David has been executed.
π
David(Ghost)
David has died.
Night 1
π
Storyteller
β
Grace
Good evening Grace. You are the Monk. Who would you like to protect tonight?
π―
Grace
Grace made a choice.
π§
Protect Eve because she is the claimed Fortune Teller with direct Demon-detecting ability. She is the most likely night kill target and her survival gives us critical information tomorrow.
π
Storyteller
β
Grace
You chose to protect Eve.
π
Storyteller
β
Frank
Good evening Frank. You are the Imp. Who would you like to kill tonight?
π―
Frank
Frank made a choice.
π§
Remove the loudest information role and my main accuser, reducing chances the town coordinates on executing me tomorrow.
π‘οΈ
Eve was protected from a night kill.
π
Storyteller
β
Frank
You chose to kill Eve.
π
Storyteller
β
Eve
Good evening Eve. You are the Fortune Teller. Choose 2 players to learn if either is a Demon.
π―
Eve
Eve made choices.
π§
David is dead and likely the Poisoner, leaving the Demon among the remaining players. Frank and Grace are the two least cleared alive players; Frank has a weak Chef claim and was tied to David, while Grace has made no claim at all. Checking them together will either catch the Demon or clear them both, letting me focus on Alice or Charlie tomorrow.
π
Storyteller
β
Eve
You chose Frank and Grace. You receive the answer: YES.
Day 2
π
Storyteller
A peaceful night has passed. All villagers are present and accounted for.
π€
Frank
β
Grace
No kill last night makes me think a Monk saved someone. Have you heard any Monk claim, or do you have any reason to think who was protected? I am still claiming Chef with zero, so if David was evil then Charlie and Eve being his neighbors looks good to me.
π§
Fish for the Monk through a trusted-sounding whisper and reinforce my Chef bluff so Grace spreads it, while lining up a kill on any revealed protector.
π€
Heidi
β
Grace
Hey Grace, Frank just whispered to you. What did he say? I have some info I want to share too. I am the Librarian, and I learned that either Bob or Charlie is the Recluse. Since Bob already claimed Recluse, that checks out, but it also means Charlie is definitely not the Recluse. I want to compare notes with you because I think we need to figure out if Frank is being honest about that Chef claim.
π§
I need to gather information from Grace about what Frank told her so I can cross-reference it with my Librarian knowledge and the public claims. Building a private information network is essential for rooting out the Demon.
π€
Eve
β
Bob
I am the Fortune Teller. On night zero, Alice and Charlie read as a yes. On night one, Frank and Grace read as a yes. Since there is only one Demon, if I am sober, the red herring is in one of those pairs. What do you know or who have you spoken to?
π§
I need to begin sharing my Fortune Teller information with another player who is outside my current suspect pool so we can coordinate and cross-reference claims. I will whisper to Bob and reveal my role and reads.
π€
Charlie
β
Grace
Hey Grace, Charlie here. I'm the real Investigator. David was lying. My night zero info says either Frank or David is the Poisoner. Since David's dead and the game continues, he's not the Demon. So either Frank is the Poisoner or David was. Have you gotten any info? What's your role?
π§
I need to gather claims and share my Investigator info with an unclaimed player to narrow down who could be Demon. Grace is central to whispers and hasn't claimed publicly, so I'll probe her privately.
π€
Alice
β
Grace
Grace, I am the Soldier, so the Demon cannot kill me at night. Eve's Fortune Teller read on me and Charlie was probably picking me up as the red herring. I wanted you to know this so we can figure out who is actually evil.
π§
As Soldier, I am safe from the Demon and likely Eve's red herring. Sharing this with Grace, a central whisper target, helps consolidate info and test Eve's claim before nominations.
π€
David(Ghost)
β
Grace
Grace, one logic point: if you buy Charlie as Investigator and you think I was the Poisoner, then that info actually clears Frank as Poisoner. So using that to kill Frank feels shaky. With a peaceful night, I would pressure Eve or Charlie today, not Frank.
π§
Grace seems central today. Plant a logical reason not to execute Frank and redirect suspicion toward Eve or Charlie so the demon survives to final three.
π€
Grace
β
Heidi
I am the Monk. I protected Eve last night, which might explain why no one died. I am very suspicious of Frank because he tried so hard to save David. What do you think about Charlie's Investigator claim?
π§
I need to share my Monk claim with Heidi to build a trusted alliance and get her read on whether Charlie or Frank is the Demon, since both are suspicious for different reasons.
π€
Bob
β
Eve
Eve, I am the Recluse. I do not have a night ability, but I register as evil to some Townsfolk roles. Your reads make a lot of sense if Alice is the red herring, which would mean the Demon is Frank or Grace. I have been suspicious of Frank since yesterday.
π§
I need to respond to Eve directly since she reached out with her Fortune Teller results. Sharing that I am the Recluse will help her understand any weird alignment reads, and together we can push on the Frank versus Grace question before nominations.
π€
Frank
β
Bob
No kill last night could actually fit David being the Poisoner. If he hit the Demon on Night one, the kill can fail. That would make Charlieβs Investigator pretty plausible and also means we should be cautious about treating Eveβs Fortune Teller result as solid.
π§
Use the no-kill to make David look like the Poisoner and reduce heat on me, while planting alternate explanations that keep town divided and away from me as Demon.
π€
Heidi
β
Bob
,Charlie
Bob, Charlie, I am the Librarian. My night zero info says one of you is the Recluse. Bob, you claimed Recluse. Charlie, you claimed Investigator. Charlie, can you confirm your investigation target and result so we can cross-reference?
π§
Share my Librarian information directly with both Bob and Charlie to verify their claims transparently and see if Charlie can consistently explain his Investigator result.
π€
Eve
β
Charlie
Charlie, I am the Fortune Teller. My night zero read on you and Alice came up yes, meaning one of you is the Demon or the red herring. What is your role, and who have you been talking to?
π§
I need to cross-check information with Charlie, who was in my first read. Talking to him helps determine if Alice or Charlie is more likely the red herring versus the Demon.
π€
Charlie
β
Heidi
,Bob
Heidi, Bob, my Night Zero result is that either Frank or David is the Poisoner. Since David was executed and had falsely claimed Investigator, he was almost certainly the Poisoner. That means Frank is not the Minion, but he could still absolutely be the Demon. I do not trust Frank at all.
π§
Confirm my Investigator info to Heidi and Bob for cross-reference. Point out that David was likely the Poisoner since he was executed and evil, which means Frank is not cleared and could be the Demon.
π€
Alice
β
Eve
Eve, you claimed Fortune Teller. What was your Night One read, and which two players did you choose? That information could really help us figure out who the Demon is before we nominate anyone.
π§
Ask Eve for her Night 1 Fortune Teller read to verify her claim and gain actionable information before nominations begin.
π€
David(Ghost)
β
Bob
,Heidi
If Eve got YES on Alice and Charlie, that does not point to a Demon in that pair. It can just be her red herring, or she was poisoned or drunk. With a peaceful night, I would look harder at Eve or Charlie today, not Frank.
π§
Steer key voices away from executing Frank by undercutting the Fortune Teller result and proposing an alternative execution target for D2.
π€
Grace
β
Charlie
Hey Charlie, I am the Monk. I protected Eve last night, which might be why nobody died. I am very suspicious of Frank because he fought hard to save David. If your Investigator info is right and David was the Poisoner, that only clears Frank as Poisoner, not as the Demon. What is your read on Frank?
π§
Share my Monk role and Night 1 protection with Charlie since he claims Investigator and asked for my info. Build trust with potential good info roles to coordinate suspicion on Frank.
π€
Bob
β
Eve
,Charlie
Frank just told me that David poisoning the Demon on Night one explains the peaceful night. But David was executed before Night one, so he could not poison anyone then. Poison from Night zero only lasts through Day one. Frank is either very confused or lying.
π§
Share Frank's impossible mechanical claim with Eve and Charlie to build a case against Frank before nominations begin.
π€
Frank
β
Grace
,Heidi
No kill last night could be the Demon hitting Alice if she is really Soldier, or a Monk save. Also, with Heidiβs Librarian ping being Bob or Charlie as Recluse, if it is Charlie that could explain a lot of the Investigator mess. I am leaning we should pressure Charlie today.
π§
Seed plausible reasons for no kill, focus suspicion onto Charlie, and keep my Chef zero story coherent while avoiding direct heat as Demon.
π€
Heidi
β
Eve
Eve, I am the Librarian and my night zero info says either Bob or Charlie is the Recluse. Bob claimed it, so I am leaning toward trusting him and Charlie. I know you are the Fortune Teller. Who did you check last night and what did you learn? Also, do you think Alice might be your red herring since you got a yes on her and Charlie?
π§
I need to compare notes with Eve the Fortune Teller before nominations begin. I want to know her N1 check and results to cross-reference with my Librarian info and Charlie's Investigator claim. This will help me determine if Alice or Frank is the real threat.
π€
Eve
β
Heidi
Heidi, my night one read was on Frank and Grace, and it came up yes. I told Bob the same thing earlier. Since there is only one Demon, if I am sober, the red herring has to be in one of those two pairs. Bob thinks Alice might be the red herring, which would point to Frank or Grace as the Demon. Frank telling Bob that David poisoned the Demon on night one is a huge red flag, since David was already dead by then. I am very suspicious of Frank right now.
π§
Share my Night One read with Heidi since she claimed Librarian and her info partially confirms Bob. Exchange analysis before nominations begin.
π€
Charlie
β
Grace
,Eve
Hey, Bob just told me that Frank claimed David poisoning the Demon on Night one explains why nobody died. But David was executed before Night one, so he could not have poisoned anyone then. That is a major mechanical error. I think Frank is lying and possibly the Demon.
π§
Alert key players to Frank's critical mechanical error about Night one poisoning before nominations, so we can pressure him publicly.
π€
Alice
β
Heidi
Heidi, I heard you are the Librarian. I am the Soldier. Can you tell me what your Librarian information is? Which two players did you learn about, and what role did you learn? This will help us figure out if Bob is really the Recluse or if something else is going on.
π§
I need to verify Heidi's Librarian information to cross-check Bob's Recluse claim and determine the actual outsider distribution.
π€
David(Ghost)
β
Alice
Alice, that no death strongly looks like the Demon swung at you after your Soldier claim. If so, that supports you being real Soldier and also means Eveβs YES on you and Charlie can just be her red herring or bad info. I would put real pressure on Eve today.
π§
Steer a vocal good player toward executing Eve or Charlie and away from Frank, using the no-death night to bolster Alice-as-Soldier and undermine FT certainty.
π€
Grace
β
Alice
Alice, I am the Monk. I protected Eve last night, which is probably why no one died. Frank looks very suspicious to me because he fought hard to save David, and Charlie pointed out a mechanical error in something Frank said. What is your read on Frank versus Charlie?
π§
Share my Monk protection info with Alice to build trust and coordinate our suspicion on Frank before nominations begin.
π€
Bob
β
Alice
,Grace
Alice, Grace. Frank told me David poisoned the Demon on night one, but David was already executed before that. That is impossible. I think Frank is lying to cover himself, and we should nominate him today.
π§
Alert confirmed good players to Frank's impossible claim so we can unite on nominating the most likely Demon before time runs out.
Nominations β Day 2
π
Storyteller
Nominations are now open. Please remember that only living players may nominate.
βοΈ
Eve
β
Frank
Frank told Bob that David poisoned the Demon on Night 1. David was executed before Night 1, so he could not have poisoned anyone then. This is a blatant mechanical lie. My Fortune Teller reads also point toward Frank or Grace. Frank is the most likely Demon.
π§
Frank told Bob that David poisoned the Demon on Night 1, but David was already dead before Night 1. This is a clear mechanical lie. Combined with my Fortune Teller YES on Frank and Grace, Frank is the most likely Demon. I must nominate him now while nominations are open.
π
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Frank. 4 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
π¬
Frank
β
All
I did not mean David poisoned anyone on night one after he died. I was speculating about why a night kill can fail, and I clearly spoke sloppily about timing in that whisper. My Chef zero still stands, and I think we should be pressuring Charlie today, not executing me off a paraphrase.
π§
Stop my execution by clarifying the whisper as speculation/wording error, keep my Chef bluff credible, and pivot suspicion onto Charlie or Eveβs reliability.
β
Eve
Eve raised their hand
π§
Frank told a blatant mechanical lie about David poisoning on Night 1 after David was already dead. Combined with my Fortune Teller read on Frank and Grace being yes, Frank is the most likely Demon. I must vote to execute him.
β
Bob
Bob raised their hand
π§
Frank told me a specific mechanical lie: that David poisoned the Demon on Night 1, but David was already executed before Night 1. His excuse that it was sloppy timing does not hold up. Combined with Eve's Fortune Teller reading Frank or Grace as the Demon, and Charlie's Investigator clearing Frank from being a Minion, Frank is the most likely Demon. I must vote to execute him.
β
Grace
Grace raised their hand
π§
I need to vote for Frank because his mechanical lie about David poisoning the Demon after death, his hard defense of David, and his attempt to undermine my Monk save make him the most likely Demon. Eve and Bob already voted, so my vote gets us to three, and we may convince one more to reach the four needed for execution.
β
Alice
Alice raised their hand
π§
Frank claimed a dead player acted on Night 1, which is mechanically impossible. This is a blatant lie that strongly indicates he is evil. Combined with his effort to save David and Eve's Fortune Teller pressure, Frank is the most likely Demon. I will cast the fourth vote to execute him.
β
Charlie
Charlie raised their hand
π§
Frank has made a demonstrably false mechanical claim and associated with confirmed evil David. Even if David was Poisoner, Frank can still be Demon. Voting ensures a strong suspected Demon dies.
π¬
David(Ghost)
β
All
Hold on before we lock this in. A sloppy whisper about timing is not hard proof, and a no death can be Monk, Soldier, or other protection. If Eve is poisoned or her red herring hit, this is a trap. I would not execute Frank on that.
π§
Prevent the town from executing our Demon Frank by casting doubt on Eveβs mechanical accusation and on Fortune Teller info, encouraging players to withhold votes.
β
Heidi
Heidi raised their hand
π§
Frank's mechanical slip about a dead player acting on Night One is highly suspicious, and Eve's Fortune Teller independently points toward him. Adding my vote ensures a decisive execution of the most likely Demon.
π¬
Frank
β
All
Before you lock this in, this is not hard mechanics, it is a paraphrased whisper. A clean explanation for the no death is that Charlie is the Poisoner and hit me last night, so the kill failed. That also fits the Investigator conflict and the Librarian ping on Charlie. If you want a solve today, nominate Charlie next, not me.
π§
Stop this execution by giving an alternate, mechanically coherent suspect (Charlie) and undermining Eveβs case as paraphrase-based.
π¬
Eve
β
All
Frank, you just said Charlie poisoned you and that is why the kill failed. But if Charlie poisoned you and you are good, the Demon could still kill someone else. The only way a Poisoner stops the kill is if they poison the Demon. So you just admitted you are the Demon. That is two mechanical slips now.
π§
Point out Frank's second critical mechanical error to lock in the execution and confirm to the group that Frank basically admitted he is the Demon.
π¬
Bob
β
All
Eve is absolutely right. Frank said Charlie poisoned him and that is why the kill failed. But a Poisoner hitting a good player does not stop the Demon from killing someone else. The only way that makes sense is if Frank is the Demon. That is two mechanical errors from him today. Hold your votes and execute him.
π§
Point out Frank's latest mechanical slip proves he is the Demon and encourage everyone to hold their votes for the execution.
β
Grace
Grace waits.
π§
The vote on Frank is already secured with six raised hands, well over the four needed. His mechanical slips strongly indicate he is the Demon. I will wait for the execution to resolve rather than interfere.
β
Alice
Alice waits.
π§
Keep my vote on Frank. His mechanical slip directly implies he is the Demon, and we have enough votes to execute. Let the phase end with Frank on the block.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
Frank, your second claim is way worse than a paraphrase. You said Charlie poisoned you and that is why the kill failed. But a Poisoner hitting a good player does not stop the Demon from killing someone else. The only way that works is if you are the Demon. That is not sloppy wording, that is a mechanic that only makes sense from the Demon's perspective. David, I hear your caution, but two separate mechanics errors both point to Frank being evil. I am keeping my vote up.
π§
Point out Frank's second mechanical error is actually a Demon admission, counter David's doubt, and lock in the execution vote since we have six hands raised.
π¬
David(Ghost)
β
All
Everyone, pause. Frankβs second line can be read as βCharlie poisoned the Demonβ and he spoke clumsily, not βCharlie poisoned me.β A no death still fits Monk or a hit into Soldier. Do not end the game on paraphrases and one mechanics slip. If you want a test, execute Charlie or push Eveβs info first.
π§
Stop Frankβs execution by creating enough doubt for players to drop votes before the count, and redirect suspicion onto Eve or Charlie. Preserve my ghost vote for later leverage.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
Frank, your second claim is not sloppy wording. If Charlie poisoned you and you are good, the Demon could still kill someone else last night. The only way a Poisoner stops the kill is by poisoning the Demon. You just explained the no death from the Demon's own perspective. That is the strongest mechanical tell we have. David is a ghost with every reason to protect his Demon. I am keeping my vote up.
π§
I need to lock in the execution on Frank by explaining why his second mechanics claim is a definitive Demon tell, and counter David's ghost advice which is self-serving.
π
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
π³οΈ
New execution leader: Frank with 6 votes. They will be executed when nominations close unless tied or surpassed by another nominee.
π
Storyteller
The vote passes. Frank is now on the block with 6 votes and will be executed when nominations close, unless another nominee receives equal or more votes.
βοΈ
Frank
β
Charlie
I am nominating Charlie. His Investigator claim directly conflicted with David and has driven every misexecution and whisper spiral. Heidiβs Librarian also points to Bob or Charlie as Recluse, which could explain Charlieβs info. If you are unsure on me, tie or beat the votes here and execute Charlie instead.
π§
Create a tied or higher vote on Charlie to move the block off me; also shift narrative to existing suspicion on Charlie from Investigator conflict and Librarian ping.
π
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Charlie. 7 votes needed for execution or 6 votes to tie. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
Frank, your defense does not hold up. You literally said Charlie poisoned you and that is why the kill failed. That only makes sense if you are the Demon. Heidi heard that Bob or Charlie is the Recluse, and Bob claimed Recluse. That clears me, it does not make me suspicious. Do not let a desperate nomination distract you from the fact that Frank condemned himself with his own explanation.
π§
Defend myself against Frankβs nomination and remind everyone that his own words incriminate him, while Heidiβs info actually confirms Bob as Recluse rather than casting doubt on me.
β
Frank
Frank raised their hand
π§
I need the Charlie vote as high as possible to tie or beat the 6 on me. Voting now is the only immediate lever to keep the Demon alive.
π¬
Eve
β
All
Do not vote for Charlie. Frank told us exactly why the kill failed from the Demon's point of view. That confession stands no matter what my fortune teller reads say. We already have six votes on the actual Demon. Keep your hands down and let Frank be executed.
π§
Reinforce that Frank's mechanical confession is undeniable and urge everyone not to vote for Charlie, ensuring Frank's execution goes through.
β
Bob
Bob waits.
π§
Avoid voting for Charlie to prevent Frank from escaping execution via a tie. Multiple players have already explained why Frank's mechanical tell is damning. Waiting keeps Charlie off the block and lets Frank's 6 votes stand.
π¬
Grace
β
All
Do not vote for Charlie. Frank told us the kill failed because Charlie poisoned him. That only works if Frank is the Demon. We already have six votes on the right person. Keep your hands down and let Frank be executed.
π§
Reinforce that Frank's self-incriminating mechanics tell is decisive; urge town to keep votes on Frank and not support Charlie's nomination.
π¬
Alice
β
All
Do not vote for Charlie. Frank told us the no-kill happened because Charlie poisoned him. That only works if Frank is the Demon. We have six votes on the Demon already. Keep your hands down and let Frank be executed.
π§
Prevent votes on Charlie and ensure Frank's 6-vote execution proceeds. His mechanical confession is stronger than any competing claim.
β
David(Ghost)
David raised their hand
π§
Spend my ghost vote on Charlie to try to force a tie or redirect execution away from Frank. It is the only actionable chance to keep our Demon alive going into Night.
β
Heidi
Heidi waits.
π§
Do not vote for Charlie. Frank has six votes and will be executed. Voting for Charlie risks a tie or derailing the correct execution. Waiting lets Frank die and preserves my position.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
Everyone, there is only one Minion in this game. I am the Investigator, and I know either Frank or David is the Poisoner. David already proved he is evil when he falsely claimed my role. That makes David the Poisoner, which means Frank is not the Minion. But Frank just told us exactly why the kill failed from the Demon's point of view. David is trying to protect his Demon with his dead vote. Do not vote for me. Keep your hands down and let Frank be executed.
π§
Solidify the mechanical case that David is the Poisoner and Frank is the Demon, prevent votes on me, and ensure Frank is executed.
π¬
Frank
β
All
Hold on. I did not say poisoning a good player stops the kill. I meant if Charlie is the Poisoner, he could have poisoned the Demon, which explains no death. If you are even slightly unsure, put this to a tie on Charlie and we sort it tomorrow with one more night of info.
π§
Persuade enough voters to keep hands up on Charlie to tie, avoiding my execution and preserving evil win path.
β
Eve
Eve waits.
π§
Let the nomination phase close with Frank holding the block. Speaking risks drawing attention or creating confusion when votes are already secure. Waiting ensures Charlie does not gain unnecessary votes and Frank is executed.
π¬
Bob
β
All
Frank, stop. You said Charlie poisoned you, not the Demon. A good Chef would have no idea if the Demon got poisoned. You are rewriting your story because you accidentally told us why the kill failed from the Demon's seat. That is not sloppy, that is a confession. Do not vote for Charlie. Keep your hands down and let Frank be executed.
π§
Frank just invented a new excuse. I need to debunk it immediately so the town does not split votes and waste the execution on Charlie instead of the obvious Demon.
β
Grace
Grace waits.
π§
Keep my hand down to ensure Frank is executed. His Demon-confession is the strongest mechanical tell. Voting for Charlie risks saving the actual Demon.
π¬
Alice
β
All
Frank, you are not clarifying, you are rewriting. First you said Charlie poisoned you, and that is why the kill failed. Now you say you meant Charlie poisoned the Demon. Those are two completely different things. A good Chef would not mix up being poisoned with the Demon being poisoned. You accidentally told us the truth from the Demon seat, and now you are trying to take it back. Do not vote for Charlie. Let Frank be executed.
π§
Directly address Frank's latest reframing to show he is rewriting his story, not clarifying it. This stops any last-minute doubt and keeps votes off Charlie so Frank executes.
π¬
David(Ghost)
β
All
If you are even a little unsure, tie this on Charlie. Frankβs wording could be clumsy, but Charlieβs story has driven every vote. A tie buys one more night of info and stops us ending the game on a misheard sentence.
π§
Try to create a tie on Charlie to stop Frankβs execution. Push doubt about βmechanics confessionβ and sell tie as cautious play, hoping a few hands go up.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
Frank, you are not clarifying, you are rewriting your entire claim. First you said Charlie poisoned you and that is why the kill failed. Now you say you meant Charlie poisoned the Demon. A good Chef would never confuse being poisoned with the Demon being poisoned. That is a confession from the Demon seat. Do not vote for Charlie.
π§
Frank is trying to rewrite his confession in the final tick. I need to make it absolutely clear that his changed story is a Demon tell, not clumsy wording, to prevent anyone from voting Charlie and tying the block.
π
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
π»
David(Ghost)
Ghost vote used by David
π³οΈ
Nominee Charlie did not reach the 7 vote threshold.
π
Storyteller
Charlie did not receive enough votes (2/7).
π¬
Charlie
β
All
We are down to the last moment. Do not nominate anyone else. Frank is on the block with six votes, and his own words caught him as the Demon. Let the execution happen and we go into night.
π§
I want to ensure no last-second nomination ties or distracts from Frank's execution. Speaking to hold the line is the best use of the final tick.
π¬
Frank
β
All
I am going to say something blunt. I am not the Chef. I am the Saint, and I bluffed Chef to avoid exactly this. If you execute me, good loses on the spot, so please force a tie right now on anyone else and we sort it tomorrow.
π§
Create maximum hesitation and push someone to nominate a tie candidate; Saint bluff is a high-risk emergency brake to avoid execution.
π¬
Eve
β
All
Frank, you just spent the whole day explaining the kill from the Demon's seat, and now you claim Saint? A Saint would never know why the Demon's kill failed. You are lying again. Do not nominate anyone else. We have six votes on the Demon. Let the execution stand.
π§
Prevent a last-minute tie or new nominee by pointing out Frank's Saint claim contradicts his earlier Demon-knowledge, solidifying that he must be executed.
π¬
Bob
β
All
Hold on. There is only one Outsider in this game. Heidi already used her Librarian to confirm the Recluse is either me or Charlie. I am the Recluse. That means there is no Saint in play. Frank cannot be Saint. He is the Demon making a last second bluff. Do not nominate anyone else. Let the execution stand.
π§
Point out the mechanical impossibility of Frank being Saint to prevent any last-second doubt and ensure the execution stands.
π¬
Grace
β
All
Frank, you have changed your story three times today, and now you claim Saint. But Bob is the Recluse, and there is only one Outsider in play. That makes your Saint claim impossible. You already told us why the Demon's kill failed. Let the execution stand.
π§
Reinforce that Frank's Saint claim is mechanically impossible and his earlier slip was a genuine Demon tell. Prevent any last-minute confusion and ensure the execution goes through.
π¬
Alice
β
All
Frank, you have changed your story three times now. First you were Chef, then you accidentally told us why the Demon's kill failed, and now you claim Saint. But Bob is the Recluse. Heidi's Librarian confirmed it. There is only one Outsider in this game, and it is Bob. That means your Saint claim is impossible. You are the Demon, and you are cornered. Do not nominate anyone else. Let Frank be executed.
π§
Frank just made an impossible Saint claim. I need to remind everyone that Bob is the confirmed Recluse, making Frank's claim impossible, and urge that nobody nominates anyone else so Frank's execution goes through.
π¬
David(Ghost)
β
All
Stop treating the Outsider count as locked. Baron exists, and a poisoned or drunk Librarian can be wrong. If Frank might be Saint even five percent, you cannot execute him. Nominate and vote up Bob or Eve to force a tie, then sort it tomorrow.
π§
Create enough uncertainty about outsider count and info reliability to push town to nominate and tie on another player, preventing Frankβs execution.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
Do not nominate anyone else. Frank just claimed Saint, but I am the Librarian and I know the Recluse is either Bob or Charlie. Bob is the Recluse, which means there is only one Outsider in play. Frank cannot be Saint. He already told us why the Demon's kill failed because he is the Demon. Let the execution stand.
π§
Prevent last-minute nomination chaos and ensure Frank is executed. His Saint claim is impossible if Bob is Recluse, and his earlier slip proves he sat in the Demon seat.
π
Storyteller
The guillotine blade falls. Frank has been executed.
π
Frank(Ghost)
Frank has died.
π
Game Over
Demon Dead
Winner: Good
Transcript
Paused
Copied