Game Detail
Players
Alice (Mayor) Bob (Poisoner) Charlie (Librarian) David (Chef) Eve (Imp) Frank (Washerwoman) Grace (Ravenkeeper) Heidi (Butler)
Token Usage
| Team | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Cost (USD) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Good | 680,731 | 33,518 | $0.2205 |
| Evil | 281,896 | 27,812 | $0.8827 |
Event Transcript
π
The game has started.
π
Storyteller
β
Bob
You are the Minion. The Demon is Eve.
π
Storyteller
β
Eve
Minions are: Bob. Your safe bluffs are: Undertaker, Fortune Teller, Slayer
π
Storyteller
β
Bob
Good evening Bob. You are the Poisoner. Who would you like to poison tonight?
π―
Bob
Bob made a choice.
π§
Hit a likely early-information Townsfolk so Day 1 starts with unreliable claims, fracturing trust and protecting Eve.
π
Storyteller
β
Bob
You chose to poison Alice.
π
Storyteller
β
Frank
Good evening Frank. You are the Washerwoman. Either Charlie or Bob is the Librarian.
π
Storyteller
β
Charlie
Good evening Charlie. You are the Librarian. Either Bob or Heidi is the Butler.
π
Storyteller
β
David
Good evening David. You are the Chef. You learn that there are 0 pairs of evil players.
π
Storyteller
β
Heidi
Good evening Heidi. You are the Butler. Who would you like to be your master tomorrow?
π―
Heidi
Heidi made a choice.
π§
As the Butler, I need to pick a master. Alice is my neighbor, which makes it easier to observe her voting patterns and coordinate my own voting to match hers.
π
Storyteller
β
Heidi
You chose Alice to be your master.
Day 1
π
Storyteller
Welcome to the village of Ravenswood Bluff. Please take this time to get to know your fellow villagers. Feel free to move around and have private conversations. Be wary, for a Demon hides among you!
π€
Eve
β
Bob
Whisper: Iβm Imp. Safe bluffs: Undertaker / Fortune Teller / Slayer. What are you planning to claim? I can back you up or take a non-overlap. Also pick 1-2 good targets we can start shading today.
π§
Coordinate with Bob early so our claims are consistent, we avoid double-claiming, and we set up a frame target for Day 1 nominations.
π€
Grace
β
Alice
,Bob
,Charlie
Hi everyone, I'm Grace. I'm a Townsfolk. Does anyone have any information to share from the start of the game? I'm happy to coordinate.
π§
I want to start building trust and gathering information early. As a Ravenkeeper, I want to stay alive for now but also be useful. Asking for info is a standard opening.
π€
Bob
β
Eve
Iβll claim Undertaker (matches your safe bluffs). I can βconfirmβ a D1 execute tonight. Alice is my first shade target (Iβll say her info feels off/poisoned). You take FT or Slayer. Letβs avoid early Virgin traps.
π§
Coordinate non-overlapping bluffs with Eve and set a Day1 narrative: Iβm Undertaker, shade poisoned Alice as unreliable, and aim misexec away from Eve.
π€
David
β
Alice
,Bob
,Charlie
Hi everyone, I'm the Chef. I learned that there are 0 pairs of evil players. This is a very strong start for us. Has anyone else received any information?
π§
I want to share my Chef information early to build trust and encourage others to share their information, which helps us narrow down the evil players.
π€
Charlie
β
Alice
,Bob
,David
Hi everyone. I'm the Librarian. I learned that either Bob or Heidi is the Butler. David, that's great news about the Chef info. Bob, what do you think about that?
π§
I am sharing my Librarian information to build trust and start narrowing down the Outsider. I am also acknowledging David's Chef claim to encourage more information sharing.
π€
Heidi
β
Alice
Hi Alice, I'm Heidi. I'm trying to get a sense of everyone's roles. Would you be open to sharing what you've learned or what your role is? I'm happy to share mine if we can build some trust.
π§
I need to establish a connection with my 'master' (Alice) to coordinate voting and gather information. As the Butler, I need to know if she's trustworthy.
π€
Frank
β
Charlie
Hi Charlie, I'm the Washerwoman and I know that either you or Bob is the Librarian. Would you be willing to share your role? I'm trying to piece things together.
π§
I need to verify my information and start building trust with one of the players I have information about. If Charlie is the Librarian, he can confirm his role and we can work together.
π€
Alice
β
Heidi
Hi Heidi, I'm Alice. I'm still gathering info and trying to piece things together. Since Charlie claims to be the Librarian and says you or Bob are the Butler, how do you respond to that? I'm keeping my role quiet for now to stay safe.
π§
I want to build trust with Heidi while probing her reaction to Charlie's claim, which helps me evaluate the reliability of both players.
π€
David
β
Charlie
,Alice
,Bob
Charlie, that's interesting. If you're the Librarian, that means there's an Outsider in play. My Chef info says 0 pairs of evil, which is great. Does anyone else have info? Bob, what do you say to Charlie's claim?
π§
I want to cross-reference the Librarian claim with the Chef info and see how Bob reacts to being called out as a potential Outsider. This helps build a picture of who is trustworthy.
π€
Eve
β
David
Heyβdoing rounds. Iβm planning to come out as Fortune Teller (will have reads starting N1). What are you thinking of claiming / any early pings? Also, anyone feel like a possible Virgin so we donβt faceplant into it?
π§
Establish an early Fortune Teller bluff network with a trusted good player, gather their claim for later framing, and subtly point heat toward Alice without overpushing.
π€
Bob
β
Charlie
,David
,Alice
Re: Lib claimβinteresting. If youβre sober, I *could* be the Butler (would match your ping). If so, I picked David as my βmasterβ last night, so today Iβd only vote when David does. Davidβs Chef 0 pairs also seems totally plausible (means evils not adjacent). Heidi, what are you hearing?
π§
Deflect suspicion from me as a Lib ping by leaning into an Outsider bluff, validate Chef β0β to protect Eveβs position, and set up Heidi as a potential alternative Butler later.
π€
Alice
β
Bob
,Charlie
,David
Hi Bob, David, Charlie. If Charlie is the Librarian and Bob is the Butler, that's a solid lead. Bob, if you are the Butler, you're restricted by David's voting. Let's watch how you two vote. David, 0 pairs is great. I'm still keeping my role hidden for now to avoid being a target.
π§
I want to encourage the group to test the Butler claim by observing their voting patterns, while maintaining my own safety by not revealing my Mayor role yet.
π€
Frank
β
Bob
Hi Bob, I'm the Washerwoman and I know that either you or Charlie is the Librarian. Would you be willing to share your role? I'm trying to piece things together.
π§
I need to verify the Librarian claim to narrow down the roles. I already asked Charlie, now I'm asking Bob to see who claims what.
π€
Grace
β
Alice
,Bob
,Charlie
Hi everyone, I'm Grace. I'm a Townsfolk. Does anyone have any information to share from the start of the game? I'm happy to coordinate.
π§
I want to initiate contact with other players to gather information and build trust, as I am a Ravenkeeper and need to stay alive or die at night to get info.
π€
Heidi
β
Alice
Alice, that's interesting. Charlie claims to be the Librarian and identified me as the Butler. Since I am indeed the Butler, that makes Charlie's claim look very credible. I'm happy to confirm that. What do you think of Charlie?
π§
I want to confirm Charlie's claim to Alice to build trust and see if she has any info on Charlie's alignment. Since I am the Butler, Charlie's info is accurate, which makes him a strong candidate for a trusted ally.
π€
Charlie
β
Frank
Frank, I am the Librarian. My info is that either Bob or Heidi is the Butler. Since you claim to be the Washerwoman and say you know I am the Librarian, that aligns. Who is the other person you saw as the Librarian?
π§
I want to verify Frank's claim. If he is the Washerwoman, he should have a second player he saw as the Librarian. This helps confirm his role and potentially identify if he's a reliable source.
π€
David
β
Eve
Eve, thanks for sharing. I'm the Chef and I got a 0-pair read. If you're the Fortune Teller, that's great. I'm not sure about the Virgin, but let's keep an eye out. Any thoughts on the Librarian/Butler claim between Charlie and Bob?
π§
I want to build trust with Eve and get her perspective on the current claims while keeping my Chef info consistent.
π€
Heidi
β
Alice
Alice, since Charlie correctly identified me as the Butler, I'm inclined to trust them. Have they shared anything else with you? I'm trying to figure out who the Demon might be.
π§
I want to build trust with Alice and gather more information about Charlie's credibility and potential Demon suspects.
π€
Frank
β
Charlie
Thanks for confirming, Charlie. My info was that either you or Bob is the Librarian. Since you've confirmed you are, that's great. I'll keep that in mind. Let's see if we can figure out the rest.
π§
Acknowledge Charlie's confirmation and maintain the alliance.
π€
Charlie
β
Frank
Frank, wait, you said your info was that either me or Bob is the Librarian. But I am the Librarian. If your info was "Charlie or Bob is the Librarian", that would mean one of us is the Librarian. That's consistent. Who was the other person you saw as the Librarian? Wait, you said "either you or Bob is the Librarian". That's a bit odd for a Washerwoman ping. Usually, it's "Player X or Player Y is [Townsfolk Role]". Did you mean you saw me or Bob as a specific Townsfolk?
π§
I need to clarify Frank's claim. A Washerwoman learns a specific Townsfolk, not a role. If he says he saw me or Bob as the Librarian, he might be lying or confused. I need to verify his claim to see if he's a reliable source.
π€
Bob
β
Frank
Hey Frank. Iβm not the Librarian β Iβm *Butler*. If Charlieβs Lib info is sober, thatβs why Iβm on his ping (Bob/Heidi). I chose David as my master last night, so today Iβll only vote if David votes. What are you planning to share publicly from your Washerwoman ping?
π§
Lock in a consistent Butler bluff, steer Frank toward trusting Charlie-as-Librarian, and avoid giving away I'm Poisoner while gathering what Frank plans to say publicly.
π€
Alice
β
Heidi
Heidi, that's very helpful confirmation. If Charlie is the Librarian and you are the Butler, that's a strong good-aligned core. I'm the Mayor. I'm going to stay quiet about my role publicly for now to avoid being targeted by the Demon. Let's keep an eye on the others.
π§
I am confirming my role to Heidi to build trust, as she has confirmed Charlie's Librarian claim, which makes them both likely good. I want to keep my Mayor role secret from the group to avoid being a night kill target.
π€
Eve
β
David
Chef 0 actually tracks w/ what Iβd expect if evil arenβt seated together. If you go public w/ it, it lightly βclearsβ neighbor-pairs (incl you/me/Frank) & pushes us to look at non-neighbor worlds. Re: Charlie/Bob Butler/LibrarianβI havenβt heard firm claims yet; Iβd treat any early outsider-info as very poisonable.
π§
Build trust with David by validating Chef 0 as plausible, steer him to share it in a way that helps me, and avoid discussing Bobβs actual plans/claims too concretely.
π€
Grace
β
Alice
,Bob
,Charlie
Hi everyone, I'm Grace. I'm a Townsfolk. Does anyone have any information to share from the start of the game? I'm happy to coordinate.
π§
I am initiating contact with other players to gather information and build trust, as is standard for a Townsfolk.
π€
Alice
β
Grace
Grace, you've asked for info a few times. Charlie has claimed Librarian and identified Heidi as the Butler, which Heidi has confirmed. David has claimed Chef with 0 pairs. What is your role or info? We're trying to build a trusted group.
π§
I want to pressure Grace to reveal her role or information to see if she is consistent with the others or if she is trying to hide something.
π€
Frank
β
Bob
Thanks for the info, Bob. That makes sense. Charlie confirmed he is the Librarian and his info was Bob or Heidi is the Butler. Since you are the Butler, that confirms Charlie's info is likely correct. I'll keep my role and info private for now.
π§
Acknowledge Bob's role and confirm the consistency of the information gathered so far.
π€
David
β
Eve
Eve, that's a good point about the Librarian info being potentially poisoned. I'll keep that in mind. Since I'm the Chef, I'll share my 0-pair info publicly soon to help narrow things down. Any advice on when to do that?
π§
I want to build trust with Eve, who is claiming Fortune Teller, and get her advice on when to reveal my Chef information to the group.
π€
Eve
β
David
Iβd hold Chef 0 until after a few public claims / vibes land (mid-discussion). Too early & town over-clears neighbor pairs. When you do share, phrase it as βassuming soberβ so you can pivot if needed. Also avoid nominating unknowns till we spot Virgin.
π§
Keep David aligned with our preferred narrative without letting Day 1 become mechanically solved; encourage a timing that maximizes confusion and minimizes Virgin risk.
π€
Heidi
β
Alice
Alice, that's good to know. I'll keep your role secret. Since Charlie is the Librarian and I'm the Butler, we have a solid start. Let's watch the others. Do you have any suspicions about who might be evil?
π§
Building trust with Alice (the Mayor) and confirming our roles to coordinate.
π€
Charlie
β
Grace
Hi Grace, I'm Charlie. I'm the Librarian. I know that either Bob or Heidi is the Butler. Bob has claimed to be the Butler, which aligns with my info. How about you? What's your role?
π§
I want to share my information with Grace to build trust and gather more information about her role.
π€
Bob
β
Grace
Hey Graceβmy start-of-game info: Iβm the *Butler* (fits Charlieβs Librarian ping: Bob/Heidi). I picked David as my master, so today I can only vote if David votes. If thatβs right, Heidi is worth pressure as the other half of the Lib info.
π§
Lock in my Butler bluff with Grace, build credibility, and nudge suspicion toward Heidi/Alice while avoiding any heat near Eve.
π€
Grace
β
Charlie
,Bob
Thanks for the info, Charlie and Bob. I'm the Ravenkeeper. I'm happy to stay low-profile to avoid the Demon's attention. Since Charlie's info points to Bob/Heidi, and Bob claims Butler, we should keep an eye on Heidi. Any thoughts on who we should trust?
π§
I am sharing my role (Ravenkeeper) with players who have shared their roles (Librarian and Butler) to build trust and gather more information. I am also suggesting we monitor Heidi.
Nominations β Day 1
π
Storyteller
Nominations are now open.
π¬
Grace
β
All
I'm the Ravenkeeper. Since Charlie's info points to Bob/Heidi and Bob has claimed Butler, I'm inclined to trust that pair for now. Does anyone have any other information or suspicions? I'm not ready to nominate anyone yet.
π§
I want to share my role (Ravenkeeper) to build trust with the group while keeping the focus on gathering more information before making any nominations. I'm also signaling that I'm not ready to nominate yet to avoid being forced into a premature decision.
π¬
Eve
β
All
Iβve got some info but itβs ongoing (Iβm Fortune Teller). Before we hard-trust any pair: Charlie, can you restate exactly what you learned and your claimed role? Also Bobβwhy Butler? Early βtrustβ chains can be poisoned/Drunk. Iβd prefer we gather a few claims before a D1 execution unless someoneβs story breaks.
π§
Establish my FT bluff, steer town into claim reconciliation and away from executing Bob, and plant gentle doubt on Grace/Charlie narrative without looking pushy.
π¬
David
β
All
I'm the Chef. My information from Night 0 is that there are 0 pairs of evil players. I agree with Eve that we should be cautious about early claims, especially regarding Outsiders, as they can be tricky. Let's keep gathering information before we rush into any nominations.
π§
I am sharing my Chef information (0 pairs) to help the town narrow down the possibilities, while also following Eve's advice to be cautious about early claims.
π¬
Frank
β
All
I'm the Washerwoman. My info was that Charlie or Bob is the Librarian. Charlie claimed Librarian, and Bob claimed Butler (which matches Charlie's info). This seems like a solid chain of information so far. I agree with Eve and David that we should be cautious, but this is a good start.
π§
I want to share my information to help the town build trust, while still being cautious as suggested by others. Sharing my Washerwoman info confirms Charlie's Librarian claim and Bob's Butler claim, which helps verify three players.
βοΈ
Bob
β
Heidi
Nominating Heidi: Charlieβs Librarian ping was Bob/Heidi as Butler; Iβm claiming Butler so Heidi is the other half of that info and still hasnβt publicly clarified. Letβs hear her role/why sheβd register in that spot.
π§
Create a clean D1 execution on Heidi based on existing info web, directing town away from Eve and setting up future doubt about info sources if needed.
π
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Heidi. 4 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
π¬
Eve
β
All
Iβm not voting Heidi here. We have zero hard contradictions yetβthis is just βin Charlieβs 2.β Letβs get Heidiβs claim + any N0 info, then probably no-exec D1 unless something breaks mechanically.
π§
Steer town to withhold votes on Heidi, avoid giving good an early execution/confirm chain, and keep suspicion diffused away from me/Bob.
β
Grace
Grace waits.
π§
I am the Ravenkeeper, a role that benefits from dying at night. I don't have enough information to justify executing Heidi on Day 1, especially since the Librarian info (Charlie) and the Washerwoman info (Frank) seem to be forming a coherent, albeit unverified, chain. I will wait to see how the vote goes.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
I agree with Eve and Grace. Heidi, please share your role. If you are the Butler, that would confirm my information. If you are not, we need to understand why you were in my Librarian ping. Let's not rush an execution on Day 1 without more info.
π§
I want to encourage Heidi to claim her role to see if it aligns with my Librarian information (Bob or Heidi is the Butler) and to prevent a premature execution on Day 1.
β
Frank
Frank waits.
π§
I am waiting to see if Heidi claims a role and if the vote for her reaches the threshold. I don't want to vote for her yet because there's no hard contradiction, just a Librarian ping.
β
Alice
Alice waits.
π§
I am the Mayor and I want to stay hidden for now. Heidi is being nominated, but there is no strong evidence against her yet. I will wait to see how the voting goes and if more information comes out. I don't want to vote for her yet.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
I am the Butler, and I chose Alice as my master. Charlie's information is correct. I am not the Demon, and I am on the good team. I don't think we should execute anyone today, especially not based on a Librarian ping that is actually accurate.
π§
I need to confirm my role as the Butler to clear up the confusion caused by Bob's nomination and Charlie's Librarian ping. I also want to discourage a Day 1 execution to keep the town alive and gather more info.
β
David
David waits.
π§
I have shared my Chef information (0 pairs of evil). Heidi has claimed Butler, which aligns with Charlie's Librarian info. There is no strong reason to execute Heidi today, and I want to avoid a Day 1 execution if possible to keep our numbers up. I will wait to see if others vote.
π¬
Bob
β
All
Careful: with this 8p setup there should be only *1* Outsider. So we canβt both be Butler unless thereβs Drunk/poisoning in the mix. Iβm not voting hereβsuggest no-exec and we validate tomorrow by tracking vote-locks: I should only be able to vote with David; Heidi only with Alice.
π§
Prevent a D1 execution and turn the Butler double-claim into a reason to stall + create uncertainty, buying time for Eve and for my poisoning to disrupt info.
β
Frank
Frank waits.
π§
I am waiting to see if anyone else votes for Heidi. Since Bob and Heidi both claim to be the Butler, and there should only be one Outsider (unless there's a Baron), this is a potential contradiction. I want to observe the voting process before committing.
β
Eve
Eve waits.
π§
Do not vote to avoid a risky D1 execution off a non-contradiction; preserve my Fortune Teller credibility and let town waste time on Butler mechanics.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
I agree with Bob. Let's hold off on executions today. I've confirmed my role as Butler and my master is Alice. If we all survive the night, we can verify these vote-locks tomorrow. I'm not voting for myself, and I suggest we all move to no-exec.
π§
To de-escalate the nomination and push for a no-execution day, which is standard for Day 1 to avoid killing a good player.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
Heidi confirmed as Butler is very helpful. Bob, you also claimed Butler. If there is only one Outsider, one of you is likely the Drunk or lying. Let's hold off on execution and see who the Demon kills tonight. We can track the vote-locks tomorrow to see who is the real Butler.
π§
I want to encourage the group to not execute Heidi today, as she has confirmed my Librarian info, and we need more time to verify the Butler claims. I also want to point out the potential contradiction between Bob and Heidi.
π¬
Alice
β
All
I agree with the consensus to hold off on an execution today. We have a potential conflict between Bob and Heidi regarding the Butler role, and observing the vote-locks tomorrow will be much more informative than an execution on Day 1. Let's save our votes.
π§
To support the no-execution strategy and encourage the group to wait for more information, which is safer for the good team on Day 1.
β
Grace
Grace waits.
π§
I am choosing to wait because there is a strong consensus to not execute on Day 1. Executing now would be risky, and observing the vote-locks tomorrow will provide more information to resolve the conflict between Bob and Heidi.
β
Bob
Bob waits.
π§
Do not add votes to Heidi; align with Eveβs caution to avoid early execution that could expose our team or force me into a credibility corner.
β
David
David waits.
π§
I agree with the consensus to not execute anyone on Day 1. My Chef info (0 evil pairs) suggests a relatively clean start, and we have a potential Butler conflict (Bob vs. Heidi) that can be resolved tomorrow by observing vote-locks. No need to vote now.
π
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
π³οΈ
Nominee Heidi did not reach threshold.
π
Storyteller
Heidi did not receive enough votes (0/4).
π¬
Frank
β
All
I agree with the consensus to hold off on execution. My Washerwoman info was that Charlie or Bob is the Librarian, and Charlie has claimed that role. With Bob and Heidi both claiming Butler, we have a clear point to investigate tomorrow via vote-locks. Let's see who survives the night.
π§
I want to reinforce the group's decision to not execute today, as it's the safest play for the good team on Day 1, and acknowledge the Butler conflict.
β
Charlie
Charlie waits.
π§
I have already shared my information and the group has decided to hold off on an execution. There is no need for further nominations today. I will wait for the day to end.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
I agree with the consensus. Since I am the Butler, I will be restricted by Alice's voting tomorrow. If Bob is also claiming Butler, we can both be tested by our respective masters. Let's see what happens tonight. Good luck everyone.
π§
To reinforce my claim, acknowledge the Butler conflict, and support the decision to end the day without an execution.
π¬
Grace
β
All
I agree with the consensus to hold off on execution. We have a clear path to verify the Butler claims tomorrow through the vote-locks. Let's see what happens tonight. Good luck everyone.
π§
To support the group's decision to not execute on Day 1 and maintain a low profile as the Ravenkeeper.
π¬
Bob
β
All
For the record: Iβd treat *all* N0 info as provisionalβChef/Lib could be drunk/poisoned. With 1 Outsider expected, Bob+Heidi both Butler implies either lying or misinfo. I still think no-exec today; tomorrow we hard-check vote-locks + see who dies.
π§
Stall executions, keep Eve off the block, and entrench the plan to βverifyβ Butler vote-locks tomorrow while spreading plausible doubt about early info.
π¬
David
β
All
I agree with the consensus to hold off on execution. My Chef info of 0 evil pairs is a strong starting point, but we need to be careful about potential drunkenness or poisoning. Let's see what happens tonight and verify the Butler claims tomorrow. Good luck everyone.
π§
To reinforce the consensus of no-execution and maintain a cooperative stance with the group, while subtly reminding them of my Chef info.
π¬
Alice
β
All
I agree with the consensus. Let's move to the night phase and see what happens. We have a solid plan to verify the Butler claims tomorrow. Good luck everyone.
π§
To signal agreement with the group's decision to end the day without an execution and move to the night phase, maintaining my cover as a regular townsfolk.
π¬
Eve
β
All
Agree no-exec. Tomorrow we *publicly* check: did Heidi only vote when Alice voted, and did Bob only vote when his master voted? Also: if Chef=0 is true, evil arenβt adjacentβso donβt over-trust neighbor reads yet. Letβs go night.
π§
Steer town into no-exec, keep focus on Butler verification and misinfo possibilities, avoid any momentum toward executing me/Bob while setting up future suspicion targets.
π
Storyteller
No execution today. All villagers are safe.
Night 1
π
Storyteller
β
Bob
Good evening Bob. You are the Poisoner. Who would you like to poison tonight?
π―
Bob
Bob made a choice.
π§
Alice is the most likely hidden info role and is adjacent to me; keeping her poisoned prevents early mechanical confirmation of my evil and shields Eve from downstream solves.
π
Storyteller
β
Bob
You chose to poison Alice.
π
Storyteller
β
Eve
Good evening Eve. You are the Imp. Who would you like to kill tonight? Remember that if you kill yourself this way, a Minion becomes the Imp.
π―
Eve
Eve made a choice.
π§
Avoid giving Ravenkeeper a free read; disrupt D2βs Butler lock-test by removing Heidiβs master; create confusion around the Charlie/Frank/Bob/Heidi info chain while thinning influential good voices.
π
Alice(Ghost)
Alice has died.
π
Storyteller
β
Eve
You chose to kill Alice.
π
Storyteller
β
Heidi
Good evening Heidi. You are the Butler. Who would you like to be your master tomorrow?
π―
Heidi
Heidi made a choice.
π§
I am the Butler and I have already established Alice as my master. I need to maintain this consistency to prove my role tomorrow when we test the vote-locks.
π
Storyteller
β
Heidi
You chose Alice to be your master.
Day 2
π
Storyteller
Morning breaks, but heavy hearts remain. Alice has been found dead in the night.
π€
Heidi
β
Bob
Bob, since Alice is dead, we need to re-evaluate the Butler claim. I am the Butler. If you are also claiming it, one of us is lying. How do you want to proceed with verification?
π§
I need to resolve the Butler claim conflict with Bob now that Alice is dead. I am the real Butler, so I need to challenge his claim or find a way to prove my identity.
π€
Bob
β
Heidi
Yeah, with Alice dead the βmy master=Aliceβ line is awkward. Iβm still on Butler w/ master=David. If weβre both honest, itβs Drunk/poison. Letβs do a clean public test: Iβll only vote when David votes today; you pick a living master and do the same. If either of us breaks, weβre the fake.
π§
Defuse the Butler double-claim by attributing it to poison/drunk, keep my bluff alive, and steer Heidi into a verification plan that consumes town time and doesnβt implicate Eve.
π€
Charlie
β
Bob
,Heidi
Bob, Heidi, you both claimed Butler. Since there's only one Outsider, one of you is lying or the Drunk. I'm the Librarian and I know one of you is the Butler. Can you explain why you both claimed it?
π§
I need to resolve the contradiction between Bob and Heidi both claiming Butler, as my Librarian info says only one of them is the Butler. This will help identify the liar/evil player.
π€
Frank
β
Charlie
Charlie, you claimed Librarian. My Washerwoman info says either you or Bob is the Librarian. Since you claimed it, I'm leaning towards you. What did you learn as Librarian?
π§
I need to verify Charlie's claim and see if it aligns with the game state. If he is the Librarian, he should have information about an Outsider. This helps narrow down the Outsider conflict between Bob and Heidi.
β
Grace
Grace waits.
π§
I am the Ravenkeeper. I need to stay alive to use my ability if I am targeted, or survive to help find the Demon. Since it's Day 2 and there's a conflict between Bob and Heidi (both claiming Butler), I should observe their interactions and see if anyone else claims Butler or if the conflict resolves. I will wait to see if more information emerges before committing to a strategy.
π€
David
β
Charlie
Charlie, since you're the Librarian and identified Bob/Heidi as the Butler, what do you make of them both claiming it? One must be lying. Any thoughts on who is more suspicious?
π§
I need to narrow down the Butler claims. Since I am the Chef and know there are 0 evil pairs, I need to find the Minion/Demon. If one Butler is lying, they are likely evil.
π€
Alice(Ghost)
β
Charlie
,Frank
Charlie, you identified Heidi as the Butler. Frank supported this. But Bob is also claiming Butler. Since there's only one Outsider (assuming no Baron), one of them is lying. What did you learn exactly? And Frank, why did you support Charlie's claim?
π§
I need to resolve the Butler conflict between Bob and Heidi to identify the potential Minion or Demon. Charlie and Frank are central to this claim.
π€
Eve
β
Bob
Letβs keep the Bob/Heidi Butler conflict muddy. If pressure on you: claim possible Drunk/poisoned (thought Butler). Push idea Charlieβs Librarian could be drunk/poisoned too. Iβll keep FT reads vague; we can steer todayβs exec onto Charlie/Heidi/Frank instead of you/me.
π§
Coordinate with Bob to manage double-Butler conflict, set up explanations (Drunk/poison) and steer execution away from me while preserving mis-exec candidates.
π€
Bob
β
Charlie
,Heidi
Yeah 2 Butler claims is ugly. My thinking: either 1 of us is lying OR thereβs Drunk/poison in the info chain (incl your Lib). Iβm staying Butler w/ master=David (living). Suggest we both publicly pick living masters + obey vote-lock today; if someone canβt, thatβs a lead.
π§
Defuse immediate heat, keep Butler conflict muddy, and lay groundwork to suspect Charlieβs info/drunk while steering todayβs execution away from Eve/me.
π€
Heidi
β
Bob
,Charlie
Bob, Charlie, I agree. I'll pick Charlie as my master for today. If I vote, I'll ensure Charlie is voting too. Bob, you do the same with David. If either of us fails to follow our master, we're the liar. Let's see how the voting goes.
π§
To resolve the Butler conflict by proposing a public verification test. By picking a living master and committing to a vote-lock, I can prove my role or expose the liar.
π€
Grace
β
Charlie
Charlie, you claimed Librarian and pinged Bob or Heidi as Butler. Frank claimed Washerwoman and pinged you or Bob as Librarian. Since Bob and Heidi are both claiming Butler, one of them is likely lying. What do you think?
π§
I need to clarify the conflicting claims regarding the Butler role to narrow down the evil players. Charlie is a key player in this logic chain.
π€
Frank
β
Alice(Ghost)
,Charlie
Alice, I'm the Washerwoman. My info was that Charlie or Bob is the Librarian. Charlie claimed it, so I've been working with that. If Bob is also claiming an Outsider role, we definitely have a conflict to resolve. Charlie, what did you learn as Librarian?
π§
I need to clarify my information and push for the Librarian's info to resolve the Butler conflict. Alice is dead, but her input is still valuable.
π€
Alice(Ghost)
β
Charlie
,Frank
Frank, thanks. If Charlie is the Librarian, he should have seen an Outsider. He claimed Heidi is the Butler. If Bob is also claiming Butler, one of them is lying. Charlie, what exactly did you learn? We need to resolve this Butler conflict to find the Minion/Demon.
π§
I need to press Charlie and Frank to resolve the Butler conflict between Bob and Heidi, as it's the most obvious contradiction currently on the board.
π€
Eve
β
Charlie
,Grace
Quick check: Charlie, can you restate your Librarian info exactly (which Outsider + which 2 names)? With only 1 Outsider in 8p, the double-Butler thing screams either lie or drunk/poison. Graceβif youβre RK, who feels most likely to be trying to *avoid* a night death right now?
π§
Seed doubt in Charlieβs Librarian and steer suspicion onto Heidi/Frank, keeping attention off me/Bob and preserving flexibility for nominations.
π€
David
β
Charlie
Charlie, since both Bob and Heidi claim to be the Butler, and we only expect one Outsider, one of them is definitely lying. Have you noticed any voting patterns that might reveal who is the real Butler? Or do you think one of them is a Minion?
π§
I need to narrow down the Butler claim. Since I am the Chef and know there are 0 evil pairs, I need to find the Minion/Demon. If one of the Butler claims is a lie, that person is likely evil.
π€
Charlie
β
Eve
,Grace
,David
My Librarian info was: Bob or Heidi is the Butler. Since both claim it, one is lying or Drunk. I like the vote-lock test. If one fails to follow their master, they're likely the liar. Let's watch them closely today.
π§
I am clarifying my Librarian information to the group and supporting the vote-lock test to identify the lying Butler.
π€
Frank
β
Charlie
Charlie, you've been very quiet about your Librarian info. Alice is dead, and we need to resolve this Butler conflict between Bob and Heidi. What exactly did you learn as the Librarian? Who is the Outsider?
π§
I need to press Charlie for his Librarian information to resolve the Butler conflict and determine if he is the Librarian or a liar.
π€
Alice(Ghost)
β
Charlie
Charlie, you've been very active. You claimed Librarian and identified Heidi as the Butler. Frank supported you. Now Bob is also claiming Butler. We need to know: did you see Heidi as the Butler, or did you see someone else? If you're the Librarian, you must be sure.
π§
I need to press Charlie for his specific Librarian information to resolve the Butler conflict between Bob and Heidi. If he's lying, he's likely the Minion or Demon.
π€
Charlie
β
Frank
,Alice(Ghost)
,Eve
My Librarian info was: Bob or Heidi is the Butler. I did not see a specific one, just that one of them is the Butler. I agree with the vote-lock test to resolve this. If one of them fails to follow their master, they are likely the liar.
π§
Clarify my Librarian information to the group to resolve the confusion and support the vote-lock test.
π€
David
β
Charlie
Charlie, that makes sense. If one of them is lying, they might be a Minion trying to hide. Let's keep a close eye on their voting behavior. Do you have any other leads or suspicions about the others?
π§
I want to coordinate with Charlie, the Librarian, to narrow down the suspects. Since he has information about the Butler, his perspective on the other players is valuable.
π€
Bob
β
Eve
Alice dead makes Butler mess hot. Plan: lean βDrunk/poison somewhereβ + question Charlie Lib. In noms, Iβll push execution on Charlie or Frank (WW chain). You stay vague/agree. If heat on me, Iβll offer to be tested via vote-lock but claim itβs easy to miscount.
π§
Coordinate with Eve: keep Butler test inconclusive, pre-seed suspicion on Charlie/Frank, and set voting behavior to avoid hard-catching me while steering exec away from Eve.
π€
Grace
β
Eve
Eve, I'm leaning towards Bob or Heidi being the liar. If one is the Butler, the other is likely a Minion or the Demon trying to sow confusion. I'm not sure who is avoiding death, but I'll keep a close eye on their voting patterns today.
π§
I am responding to Eve's question about my thoughts on the Butler conflict and who might be avoiding death. I want to maintain trust and keep the investigation focused on the Butler contradiction.
β
Heidi
Heidi waits.
π§
I have agreed to a public test with Bob to verify our Butler claims by following our masters' voting patterns. I need to wait for the nomination phase to begin so I can demonstrate my adherence to the Butler ability and observe Bob's behavior.
π€
Eve
β
David
Your Chef=0 is big: means no adjacent evils, so if youβre good it hard-clears me (neighbors) & also means Bob/Charlie canβt both be evil. I think today we should use the Butler vote-lock test + maybe execute the one who breaks it (or just exec Charlie/Heidi for setup mismatch). Thoughts?
π§
Build rapport with David, anchor discussion on Chef=0 logic + vote-lock test, and nudge him toward executing Charlie/Heidi instead of scrutinizing me/Bob.
π€
Bob
β
Eve
D2 plan: lean hard on βDrunk/poison in info chainβ so 2-Butler isnβt solvable. Publicly commit to Butler vote-lock w/ David. In noms Iβll push exec on Charlie (Lib could be drunk) or Frank (WW chain). You stay vague + support whichever gains traction.
π§
Coordinate with Demon to steer day-2 discussion toward executing a good player (Charlie/Frank) and keep our Butler double-claim muddy without hard-guilting Eve.
β
Heidi
Heidi waits.
π§
I am waiting to see how the voting unfolds to test the Butler claims. I have agreed to follow Charlie as my master today, and Bob has agreed to follow David. Observing the voting behavior will help determine who is the real Butler and who might be lying or the Drunk.
π€
Eve
β
Bob
Letβs pre-empt vote-lock test: argue Butler restrictions are messy (abstains, dead votes, miscounts) so a βfailβ isnβt hard-proof. If heat: say Poisoner/Drunk likely. Iβll publicly lean Chef=0 clears me/Frank; push exec Charlie (Lib drunk) or Heidi (fake Outsider).
π§
Coordinate with Bob to undermine the vote-lock test, keep 2-Butler unresolved, and steer todayβs execution onto Charlie or Heidi while I stay FT-vague and βclearedβ by Chef=0.
β
Grace
Grace waits.
π§
I need to observe the voting patterns of Bob and Heidi to see if they are actually following the Butler rule, as this will help identify the liar. I will wait for the nomination phase to see how they vote.
π€
Alice(Ghost)
β
Charlie
Charlie, if your info was "Bob or Heidi is the Butler", and both are claiming it, that doesn't help us distinguish the liar. We need to look at their behavior. Bob and Heidi have been whispering constantly. Are they coordinating? We need to pressure them.
π§
I want to push Charlie to analyze the behavior of Bob and Heidi, as his Librarian info is inconclusive. I need to keep the pressure on the potential liars.
π€
David
β
Eve
Eve, my Chef info (0 pairs) is solid. If I'm good, my neighbors (Charlie and you) aren't both evil. The Butler test is key. If Bob and Heidi both claim Butler, one is lying. Let's see who breaks the vote-lock. I'm leaning towards testing them today. Any thoughts on Frank/Grace?
π§
I want to coordinate with Eve, who is my neighbor and seems to be thinking logically about the game state. I need to confirm my Chef info's implications and push for the Butler test.
π€
Frank
β
Charlie
Charlie, if you are the Librarian, you should have learned if one of Bob or Heidi is the Butler. You said you learned "Bob or Heidi is the Butler". That's consistent. Let's push for the vote-lock test today to see who is lying.
π§
I want to coordinate with Charlie to resolve the Butler conflict, as my Washerwoman info confirms he is likely the Librarian. Resolving this conflict is key to finding the evil player.
π€
Charlie
β
Alice(Ghost)
Alice, you're right. The constant whispering between Bob and Heidi is suspicious. If they are both claiming Butler, they might be coordinating a lie. Let's watch their voting patterns closely during the next nomination. If they don't follow the rules, we'll know.
π§
Acknowledge Alice's concern about Bob and Heidi's whispering and reinforce the plan to use the vote-lock test to expose the liar.
Nominations β Day 2
π
Storyteller
Nominations are now open. Please remember that only living players may nominate.
βοΈ
Bob
β
Charlie
Nominating Charlie: the whole day is orbiting his Librarian ping (Bob/Heidi Butler). With only 1 Outsider expected, either his info is wrong (drunk/poison) or heβs lying. Executing Charlie resolves the loudest contradiction source.
π§
Get a decisive execution away from Eve while framing it as resolving the core contradiction (Charlieβs Librarian). Even if heβs good, we can blame misinfo and keep town split on Butler claims.
π
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Charlie. 4 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
β
Frank
Frank raised their hand
π§
I need to vote for Charlie because he is the source of the Librarian/Butler contradiction. If he is the Demon or a Minion, executing him is crucial. If he is a good player, we need to see if he dies or if the game continues. The Butler conflict must be resolved.
π¬
Grace
β
All
I'm concerned about executing Charlie. If he is the Librarian, we lose a source of info. However, the Butler conflict between Bob and Heidi is definitely suspicious. I'll hold my vote for now to see if more information comes out.
π§
I want to express caution about executing Charlie, as he might be a useful Townsfolk, while keeping the focus on the Butler contradiction.
π¬
Alice(Ghost)
β
All
Charlie, you are being nominated by Bob. If you are the Librarian, you should defend yourself. Bob, why are you so sure Charlie is lying? If Charlie is the Librarian, executing him is a huge loss for us. We need to be very careful here.
π§
I want to encourage the players to provide more information before voting on Charlie, as executing a potential Librarian is risky. I also want to see how Bob and Charlie react to the pressure.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
I am the Butler. I chose Charlie as my master. If Charlie is the Librarian, he should be voting for his own nomination if he believes it's the right move, or not if he doesn't. I will follow his lead. Bob, who did you choose as your master? Let's see if we follow them.
π§
I need to clarify the Butler situation and hold Bob accountable to the vote-lock test we agreed upon. By stating my master (Charlie) and asking Bob for his, I am forcing the test to happen during this nomination.
β
David
David waits.
π§
I am observing the nomination of Charlie. As the Chef with 0 evil pairs, I know my neighbors (Charlie and Eve) are not both evil. If Charlie is the Librarian, he is a valuable source of info. I want to see how the vote plays out before committing my vote.
β
Bob
Bob raised their hand
π§
Get Charlie executed to remove a good voice and anchor town on the wrong contradiction, protecting Eve. Need to help reach 4 votes.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
Bob, you are nominating me because you claim my info is wrong or I'm lying, yet you are one of the two people I identified as the Butler. If you were the Butler, you'd know I'm telling the truth. Your nomination feels like a desperate attempt to silence me. I am the Librarian.
π§
Defend myself against Bob's nomination by pointing out the logical inconsistency of him (a potential Butler) attacking the source of his own role's confirmation.
β
Eve
Eve raised their hand
π§
Support Bobβs push and try to reach 4 votes to execute Charlie; removing Charlie (likely good) strengthens evil position and preserves Butler confusion.
π¬
Bob
β
All
Grace/David: the gameβs stuck on Charlieβs Lib ping. With 1 Outsider expected, either Lib info is wrong (drunk/poison) or someoneβs lying. Executing Charlie cleanly breaks the contradiction and stops us wasting days βtestingβ messy Butler votes.
π§
Get 1 more vote (Grace/David) onto Charlie to execute a loud info hub while I (evil) survive; keep focus off Eve and keep setup muddy.
π¬
Alice(Ghost)
β
All
Bob, you are one of the two people Charlie identified as the Butler. If you are the Butler, you should know Charlie's info is correct. By nominating him, you are acting against your own "master" if he is the Librarian. This is highly suspicious. I'm not voting for Charlie.
π§
I want to defend Charlie because Bob's nomination of him is logically inconsistent if Bob is the Butler. I am trying to prevent the execution of a potential Townsfolk.
π¬
David
β
All
Bob, your logic is circular. You're nominating the person who identified you as a potential Outsider to "break the contradiction," but that just makes you look like you're trying to eliminate the person who can verify your role. I'm not voting for Charlie.
π§
I need to express my skepticism about Bob's nomination of Charlie, as it seems like a defensive move by a potential Minion or Demon to silence the Librarian. I'm staying neutral on the vote for now.
π¬
Eve
β
All
Grace: I get not wanting to lose Lib, but right now Charlieβs ping is the entire game and itβs mechanically messy (Drunk/poison possible). Executing Charlie gives a clean datapoint; if heβs Lib, we still have Butler claimants to resolve tomorrow. I think vote Charlie.
π§
Sway Grace to be the 4th vote on Charlie; if Charlie dies, we remove a strong good info role and keep attention off me/Bob.
π¬
Frank
β
All
I am voting for Charlie because the Butler conflict is stalling us, and we need to resolve the contradictions. If Charlie is the Librarian, he should be able to provide more clarity, but his current defense is just attacking Bob. We need to move forward.
π§
I am voting for Charlie to help resolve the game state, as the Butler conflict is causing too much confusion and stalling. I want to see if executing him provides clarity or if we need to pivot.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
Bob, you are one of the two people I identified as the Butler. If you were the Butler, you would know my information is correct. By nominating me, you are acting against your own potential master. This is highly suspicious behavior for a Butler. I am the Librarian. Do not execute me.
π§
Defend myself against the nomination by highlighting the contradiction in Bob's behavior as a claimed Butler.
π¬
Grace
β
All
I'm not convinced we should execute Charlie. If Charlie is the Librarian, he's a valuable information role. Bob and Heidi are the ones with the conflicting claims. If we execute Charlie and he's good, we've lost a key player and still have the Butler conflict. I'm not voting.
π§
I want to express my skepticism about executing Charlie, as he is a claimed information role and the Butler conflict is the more pressing issue. I am trying to influence the town to hold off on the execution.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
I am the Butler. I chose Alice as my master, but she is dead. I am not voting for Charlie. Bob, you are acting very aggressively against the person who identified you as an Outsider. If you were the Butler, you would be trying to work with the Librarian, not execute them.
π§
I need to defend Charlie and point out the suspicious behavior of Bob, who is trying to execute the Librarian who identified him. I am the Butler, and I am not voting for Charlie.
π
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
π³οΈ
Nominee Charlie did not reach threshold.
π
Storyteller
Charlie did not receive enough votes (3/4).
βοΈ
Eve
β
Grace
Nominating Grace: sheβs positioning as the βreasonableβ voice while hard-blocking the only execution that would resolve todayβs contradictions, and her Ravenkeeper claim is convenient (wants to die at night, not face scrutiny). Letβs test itβif sheβs good, weβll learn from her reactions/votes; if sheβs evil, great.
π§
Create an alternate execution path away from Bob; either remove a key good (Ravenkeeper) or gain credibility if she flips evil, while keeping the town divided.
π
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Grace. 4 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
π¬
Alice(Ghost)
β
All
Grace, you've been very hesitant to commit to any execution today. If you are a Ravenkeeper, you should be more willing to be tested. However, I'm not sure if executing you is the right move right now. I'm going to hold my vote.
π§
I want to express my skepticism about executing Grace while maintaining my role as a helpful ghost. I'm not convinced she's the Demon, and I want to see how the rest of the town reacts.
β
Charlie
Charlie waits.
π§
I am currently on the block (or was), and the town is now voting on Grace. I need to observe the voting pattern to see who is pushing for an execution and who is hesitant. This will help me identify potential evil players. I will stay quiet for now to see how the vote plays out.
β
Bob
Bob raised their hand
π§
Push an execution that isnβt Eve and preferably removes a useful good player; also align with Eveβs push to keep momentum away from solving the demon.
β
Eve
Eve raised their hand
π§
Secure a Day 2 execution away from me/Bob; push pressure onto Grace and keep Butler/Librarian dispute alive for tomorrow.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
I am not voting for Grace. We are executing people based on suspicion rather than solid evidence. Bob is pushing hard for executions, which is suspicious for someone who claims to be an Outsider. Let's wait and see what happens tonight.
π§
I want to express my opposition to the current nomination to avoid a potentially bad execution and encourage the town to be more cautious.
β
David
David waits.
π§
I am observing the voting process for Grace. As the Chef with 0 evil pairs, I have no mechanical reason to suspect Grace or Eve, and I want to see how the group dynamics play out before committing my vote. I will remain neutral for now.
β
Grace
Grace waits.
π§
I am being nominated, and I need to survive this day to continue gathering information. I have already stated my role and my reasoning for not wanting to execute Charlie. I will wait to see if I get enough votes to be executed.
β
Frank
Frank waits.
π§
I am observing the voting process for Grace. I have already voted for Charlie earlier, and I want to see how the group reacts to Eve's nomination of Grace before committing my vote. I need to be careful not to waste my vote if it's not going to pass.
β
Frank
Frank waits.
π§
I am observing the voting process for Grace. I want to see if she gets executed or if the town remains hesitant. I have already voted for Charlie earlier, and I am currently holding my vote to see how the rest of the town reacts to Eve's nomination of Grace.
β
Heidi
Heidi waits.
π§
I am the Butler and my master (Alice) is dead. I have no voting restriction, but I am not convinced that Grace is the Demon. I will wait to see the outcome of the vote and prepare for the night phase.
π¬
Bob
β
All
Need 4. Grace has blocked every path forward today while hiding behind βvaluable RK.β If sheβs truly RK she should welcome pressure/testing, not stall. Frank/David: we canβt keep no-execβing at 7 aliveβvote Grace and reassess tomorrow.
π§
Try to secure 2 more votes on Grace; any execution that isnβt Eve helps evil, and framing it as anti-stall may sway Frank/David.
π¬
David
β
All
Bob, you're pushing very hard for an execution today. We have a Butler contradiction that hasn't been resolved, and now you're pivoting to Grace. If you're the Butler, why are you so eager to execute people instead of helping us resolve the Butler claim? I'm not voting for Grace.
π§
I want to challenge Bob's aggressive behavior and discourage the group from executing Grace, as there is no solid evidence against her and Bob's behavior is suspicious.
π¬
Grace
β
All
I am not stalling; I am being cautious. Executing a player based on a hunch when we have a clear, unresolved contradiction (the Butler claims) is reckless. If I am the Ravenkeeper, my death provides information, but only if I die at night. Executing me now is a waste.
π§
Defend against the nomination by highlighting the lack of logic in executing a potential information role while a clear contradiction (Butler claims) remains unresolved.
π¬
Eve
β
All
Frank/Charlie: Graceβs position is βdonβt execute anyone unless Butler solved,β but Butler wonβt solve cleanly w/ dead master/vote timing. RK also shouldnβt insist on only dying at night. Even if Grace is good, her play is freezing town. I think we take the shotβvote Grace.
π§
Get 1-2 extra votes (esp Frank) to execute Grace; if fails, still frame her as staller and align with Bob to control narrative into night.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
I agree with David. Bob is pushing very hard for an execution today, which is unusual for an Outsider. Grace's caution is understandable. If we execute Grace and she is the Ravenkeeper, we lose a valuable source of information. Let's hold off on this execution.
π§
I want to discourage the town from executing Grace, as I suspect Bob's aggressive behavior might be a distraction from the Butler contradiction. I need to keep the town focused on the unresolved Butler issue.
π¬
Alice(Ghost)
β
All
I'm dead, but I'm watching. Bob is pushing very hard for an execution, which is suspicious. Grace's caution is understandable, but we need to be careful. If we execute Grace and she's the Ravenkeeper, we lose info. Let's think about the Butler contradiction first.
π§
I want to express my skepticism about Bob's aggressive play and encourage the town to focus on the Butler contradiction instead of rushing the Grace execution.
π
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
π³οΈ
Nominee Grace did not reach threshold.
π
Storyteller
Grace did not receive enough votes (2/4).
π¬
Eve
β
All
Weβre out of noms from me, but: Heidiβs Butler story has *changed* (Charlie->Alice) and the βdead masterβ angle conveniently dodges tomorrow. As FT, my N1 check on Heidi+Frank came up YES (could be red herring), so Iβd rather pressure/exec Heidi than keep taking shots at Grace/Charlie.
π§
Re-anchor discussion onto the clearest mechanical inconsistency (Heidi) while keeping my FT bluff active and splitting town away from coordinated reads on me/Bob.
π¬
Grace
β
All
Eve, you claim to be the Fortune Teller and that your N1 check on Heidi and Frank was a 'YES'. If you are the Fortune Teller, why are you pushing for an execution on me instead of using your ability to clear up the Butler contradiction or find the Demon? Your behavior is suspicious.
π§
I need to challenge Eve's claim and behavior to shift the focus away from myself and onto the potential inconsistencies in her story. If she is the Fortune Teller, her behavior is highly unusual.
π¬
Frank
β
All
Eve, you claim to be the Fortune Teller and that your N1 check on Heidi and Frank was a 'YES'. If you are the Fortune Teller, why are you pushing for an execution on me instead of using your ability to clear up the Butler contradiction or find the Demon? Your behavior is suspicious.
π§
I want to challenge Eve's claim and behavior, as she is pushing for executions while claiming a role that should be gathering information. I also want to keep the focus on the Butler contradiction.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
Eve, you claim to be the Fortune Teller and that your N1 check on Heidi and Frank was a 'YES'. If you are the Fortune Teller, why are you pushing for an execution on me instead of using your ability to clear up the Butler contradiction or find the Demon? Your behavior is suspicious.
π§
I need to challenge Eve's claim and behavior to see if she is lying or if her information is reliable. Her push for executions while claiming a powerful role like Fortune Teller is suspicious.
π¬
David
β
All
Eve, you claim to be the Fortune Teller and that your N1 check on Heidi and Frank was a 'YES'. If you are the Fortune Teller, why are you pushing for an execution on me instead of using your ability to clear up the Butler contradiction or find the Demon? Your behavior is suspicious.
π§
I want to challenge Eve's claim and behavior, as multiple players are questioning her. This helps me gauge her reaction and potentially expose a lie.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
Eve, you claim to be the Fortune Teller and that your N1 check on Heidi and Frank was a 'YES'. If you are the Fortune Teller, why are you pushing for an execution on me instead of using your ability to clear up the Butler contradiction or find the Demon? Your behavior is suspicious.
π§
I need to challenge Eve's claim and behavior to protect myself and keep the town focused on the inconsistencies in her story.
π¬
Bob
β
All
Eve answering Grace/Frank: FT *did* use abilityβHeidi+Frank=YES is info pointing to that pair (or red herring). Heidiβs Butler story changing (Charlie->Alice) is the biggest mechanical crack. If we execute anyone, Heidiβs the cleanest, not Grace.
π§
Reinforce Eveβs FT narrative, redirect town suspicion onto Heidiβs inconsistent Butler claim, and keep executions off Eve while maintaining my Butler bluff credibility.
π¬
Alice(Ghost)
β
All
Eve, if you are the Fortune Teller, why are you pushing for executions instead of using your ability to resolve the Butler contradiction? And Bob, you are pushing very hard for executions. If you are the Butler, why are you so eager to execute? We need to be very careful.
π§
I want to sow doubt about Eve and Bob's aggressive behavior, as they are pushing for executions while ignoring the Butler contradiction. This aligns with my goal of finding the Demon by questioning suspicious behavior.
π
Storyteller
No execution today. All villagers are safe.
Night 2
π
Storyteller
β
Bob
Good evening Bob. You are the Poisoner. Who would you like to poison tonight?
π―
Bob
Bob made a choice.
π§
David is the likeliest ongoing-information/protection role and is adjacent to Eve; poisoning him prevents a clean Empath catch on Eve and disrupts any Monk/Undertaker value.
π
Storyteller
β
Bob
You chose to poison David.
π
Storyteller
β
Eve
Good evening Eve. You are the Imp. Who would you like to kill tonight? Remember that if you kill yourself this way, a Minion becomes the Imp.
π―
Eve
Eve made a choice.
π§
Remove an unclaimed player, amplify my claimed FT 'YES' world to steer town toward executing Heidi/Bob, and avoid giving Ravenkeeper a clean night-death info shot.
π
Frank(Ghost)
Frank has died.
π
Storyteller
β
Eve
You chose to kill Frank.
π
Storyteller
β
Heidi
Good evening Heidi. You are the Butler. Who would you like to be your master tomorrow?
π―
Heidi
Heidi made a choice.
π§
I need to resolve the Butler contradiction. By choosing Bob as my master, I can test if he is the other Butler or if he is lying. If he is the Butler, our voting will be linked tomorrow.
π
Storyteller
β
Heidi
You chose Bob to be your master.
Day 3
π
Storyteller
Morning breaks, but heavy hearts remain. Frank has been found dead in the night.
π€
Alice(Ghost)
β
Charlie
,David
I'm dead, but I still have my ghost vote. We need to figure out who the Demon is. Eve's FT claim is suspicious given the 'YES' on Frank (who is dead) and Heidi. What do you think of Bob and Heidi's conflicting Butler claims? One of them is definitely lying.
π§
Gather information and coordinate with other players to identify the Demon.
π€
Heidi
β
Bob
Bob, I've been watching you. You've been very aggressive. Since I'm the Butler and you're my master tonight, I need to know: who are you planning to vote for? I need to align my vote with yours.
π§
I need to test Bob's behavior and see if he's acting like a town leader or a manipulator. As the Butler, I am mechanically tied to his vote, so this is a natural way to probe his intentions.
π€
Charlie
β
Alice(Ghost)
,David
Alice, I agree. Bob and Heidi both claiming Butler is a major red flag. One of them is likely the Minion or Demon. I'm the Librarian and I know one of them is the Butler. If they are both claiming it, one is definitely lying. What do you think of Eve?
π§
I want to coordinate with Alice and David to narrow down the suspects, specifically focusing on the Butler contradiction and Eve's suspicious FT claim.
π€
Bob
β
Heidi
If we get to noms, Iβm leaning voting to execute Charlie. His Lib line has dominated 2 days and feels either wrong or strategically harmful. If another nom comes up (David/Grace), Iβll tell you, but default: Charlie.
π§
Use Heidiβs Butler constraint to secure an extra vote on Charlie, removing pressure on Eve and disrupting the townβs main info chain.
π€
David
β
Charlie
,Alice(Ghost)
Charlie, if you are the Librarian and know one of them is the Butler, which one did you get info on? If we can confirm one is the Butler, the other is likely the Minion or Demon. I'm the Chef, and I had 0 evil pairs, which suggests we need to be careful.
π§
I want to verify Charlie's Librarian claim and narrow down the Butler contradiction. If Charlie can confirm one of them is the Butler, we can focus on the other as a potential evil player.
π€
Eve
β
Bob
Letβs coordinate: Iβll lean on Heidiβs shifting Butler master + my N1 FT ping (Heidi+Frank=YES) to push Heidi today. You can frame it as βinconsistency = liarβ. If pushback, pivot to βCharlie lying Librarian causing chaosβ to split town.
π§
Sync with Bob to apply coordinated pressure on Heidi/Charlie, keep heat off me as FT, and steer todayβs execution to a good or at least away from me/Bob.
β
Grace
Grace waits.
π§
I need to observe the current dynamics and see if anyone reacts to Frank's death. As a Ravenkeeper, I want to stay alive to gather info, but if I die, I get a powerful ability. I will wait to see if anyone makes a move or if there's a consensus on who to nominate.
π€
Frank(Ghost)
β
Charlie
I'm dead, but I'm watching. Charlie, you claimed Librarian. My Washerwoman info was that either you or Bob is the Librarian. If you are the Librarian, who did you see as the Outsider? We need to narrow this down. Bob is acting very suspicious with Heidi.
π§
I want to verify Charlie's claim and see if he has information that helps identify the Demon or the Outsider. Since I am dead, I need to use my influence to guide the living.
β
Frank(Ghost)
Frank waits.
π§
I am dead and have already whispered to Charlie to press for information. I need to wait for a response or for the game to progress to the nomination phase to use my ghost vote effectively.
π€
Heidi
β
Bob
Bob, I'm concerned about Charlie too, but we need to be careful. If he's the Librarian, executing him might lose us a key source of info. What makes you so sure he's lying? I'll follow your lead on the vote, but I want to be sure we're not hitting a Townsfolk.
π§
I need to probe Bob's reasoning for targeting Charlie while maintaining my Butler constraint and gathering more info to see if he's acting in good faith.
π€
Grace
β
Charlie
,David
Charlie, David, what do you think about Eve's aggressive push against me yesterday? She claimed Fortune Teller and got a 'yes' on Heidi and Frank. Frank is dead now. Does that make her claim more or less likely?
π§
I want to gather information and coordinate with Charlie and David to evaluate Eve's claim, as she is suspicious and pushed for my execution.
π€
Eve
β
David
Iβm still stuck on Heidi: 8p expects 1 Outsider, yet weβve had Bob+Heidi both claim Butler. Even allowing misinfo, Heidiβs master keeps changing. If we need an execution today, I think Heidi is best hit; if sheβs good, Charlieβs Lib world gets re-evaluated hard.
π§
Seed David with a clean logic path to executing Heidi, while leaving alternate world (Charlie) as fallback so town stays split and avoids landing on me.
π€
Alice(Ghost)
β
Charlie
,David
Charlie, David, we need to pin down the Butler. Charlie, you said you know one of them is the Butler. Which one? If we can confirm that, we can narrow down the evil player. Also, Eve's FT claim is very suspicious. Could she be the Demon or Minion?
π§
I need to force the Librarian (Charlie) to reveal their information to resolve the Butler conflict and identify the liar. I also want to keep the pressure on Eve, whose FT claim seems highly suspect.
π€
Bob
β
Heidi
Main reason: Charlieβs Lib claim forces the whole game to orbit Bob/Heidi. With 2 Butler claims, either heβs lying OR his info is bad (poison/drunk). Either way, executing him cuts off the bad info engine. Iβm not βsureβ heβs evilβsure itβs strategically correct.
π§
Lock Heidi into following my vote and keep pressure on Charlie as the βsource of chaosβ, protecting Eve by giving town a different execution target.
π€
David
β
Charlie
,Alice(Ghost)
Charlie, Alice, I'm leaning towards Heidi being the liar. Her changing her 'master' is a huge red flag. If Charlie's Librarian info confirms one of them, we need to act. Eve's FT claim is also very shaky. Let's focus on the Butler contradiction first.
π§
I want to coordinate with Charlie and Alice to resolve the Butler contradiction, which is the most concrete lead we have. I'm pushing to identify the liar between Bob and Heidi.
π€
Charlie
β
Alice(Ghost)
,David
,Frank(Ghost)
Alice, David, Frank: My Librarian info was that Bob or Heidi is the Butler. Since both claim it, one is lying. Heidi changing her master is suspicious. I'm leaning towards Heidi being the liar. Let's focus on them. Eve's FT claim is also very suspect.
π§
I need to share my Librarian info with the trusted group to help identify the liar between Bob and Heidi. This will help us narrow down the evil players.
π€
Heidi
β
Bob
Bob, I understand the strategic logic of cutting off a potentially bad info source. If you're confident, I'll follow your lead on Charlie. Just keep me posted if your target changes before the vote.
π§
I am confirming my commitment to follow Bob's vote as the Butler, while maintaining a cooperative relationship to gather more info.
π€
Charlie
β
Alice(Ghost)
,David
,Frank(Ghost)
Alice, David, Frank: I've confirmed my info is Bob or Heidi. Since both claim it, one is definitely lying. Heidi's story change is a huge red flag. I suspect Heidi is the liar (Minion/Demon). Let's push on her. What do you think about executing her today?
π§
I need to coordinate with the group to focus on the most likely liar (Heidi) based on my Librarian info and her inconsistent behavior.
π€
Eve
β
Grace
Graceβwhere are you at today? 8p expects 1 Outsider but weβve got Bob+Heidi both on Butler. Even w/ drunk/poison, Heidiβs master keeps changing (AliceβCharlieβback). That + my earlier FT ping on Heidi/Frank makes Heidi best execution to clear worlds.
π§
Steer a good info-holder (Grace) into pushing Heidi execution using Outsider-count + shifting master logic; builds consensus for a mis-exec and protects Bob/me.
π€
Frank(Ghost)
β
Charlie
Charlie, thanks for the info. If you are the Librarian, your info about Bob or Heidi being the Butler is consistent with my info that you or Bob is the Librarian. If Heidi is lying, she could be the Minion or Demon. Let's see if we can get more info on Eve.
π§
I am confirming the consistency of Charlie's claim with my own information and encouraging him to keep investigating the suspicious players.
π€
Bob
β
Grace
Heidiβs Butler story has shifted masters multiple times + she keeps trying to run βvote-lock testsβ to control the day. Even if sheβs good, itβs a bad-info engine. If we need a clean execution today, Heidi feels higher EV than chasing Charlieβs Lib claim again.
π§
Prime Grace to view Heidi as the best execution while I keep Heidi aligned to vote with me, maximizing odds town executes anyone but Eve.
π€
David
β
Charlie
,Alice(Ghost)
Charlie, if your Librarian info says one of them is the Butler, and Heidi is changing her story, she is the most likely candidate for an evil player. I agree we should focus on her. Let's see if we can get others to agree to nominate her.
π§
I want to coordinate with Charlie and Alice to focus on Heidi as the primary suspect for execution, given the Butler contradiction and her inconsistent story.
π€
Grace
β
Eve
Eve, your FT ping on Heidi/Frank is interesting. If Heidi is the Demon, your ping makes sense. But if Heidi is just a messy Butler, you might be misreading. Why push me so hard yesterday? I'm Ravenkeeper, I need to stay alive to get info if I die.
π§
I want to probe Eve's motivation for targeting me yesterday while acknowledging her FT claim. I need to see if she reacts defensively or provides a logical reason for her aggressive play.
π€
Alice(Ghost)
β
Charlie
,David
Charlie, David, I agree. Heidi's behavior is highly suspicious. If Charlie's info is solid, Heidi is likely the liar. Let's try to get others to agree to nominate her. What about Grace and Eve? They seem to be whispering a lot. Could they be working together?
π§
I want to coordinate with Charlie and David to focus on Heidi as the primary suspect while keeping an eye on the other players' suspicious behavior.
π€
David
β
Charlie
,Alice(Ghost)
Charlie, Alice, I agree. Heidi's story change is a massive red flag. If Charlie's Librarian info is correct, she's the most likely liar. Let's push for her execution. What about Grace and Eve? They're whispering a lot, could they be a pair?
π§
Coordinate with trusted players to focus on Heidi as the primary suspect due to the Butler contradiction and her inconsistent story.
π€
Alice(Ghost)
β
Charlie
,David
Charlie, David, I agree. Heidi's behavior is highly suspicious. If Charlie's info is solid, Heidi is likely the liar. Let's try to get others to agree to nominate her. What about Grace and Eve? They seem to be whispering a lot. Could they be working together?
π§
Coordinate with trusted players to focus on Heidi as the primary suspect for execution, while also raising concerns about the whispering between Grace and Eve.
β
Heidi
Heidi waits.
π§
I am currently aligned with Bob's strategy to target Charlie, as he is my master for the Butler ability. I will wait to see if any other nominations occur or if Bob changes his mind before the voting phase begins.
π€
Grace
β
Eve
,Charlie
,David
Eve, if you are the Fortune Teller, why did you push for my execution yesterday? As a Ravenkeeper, I'm a high-value target for the Demon, and killing me early is a huge win for evil. Your push feels like it was meant to silence me. What do you think, Charlie/David?
π§
I want to challenge Eve's aggressive behavior and see how Charlie and David react, as they seem to be in a private group. This helps me gauge their alignment and Eve's potential evil intent.
π€
Frank(Ghost)
β
Charlie
Charlie, if Heidi is the liar, she might be the Minion or Demon. If Bob is the Librarian, he might be the one who knows the truth about the Butler. Have you asked Bob directly about his Librarian info? We need to be careful not to execute a good player.
π§
I want to cross-reference Charlie's Librarian claim with Bob's potential Librarian claim to see if there's a contradiction, while keeping the pressure on the suspicious players.
π€
Eve
β
Grace
,Charlie
,David
Re: why I nomβd Grace D2βwasnβt to βsilence RKβ. We were stuck in no-exec/low-info and I wanted to force a hard claim & see whoβd defend/push. In hindsight, RK is high-value good, agreed. Today my focus is Heidi: Butler master keeps changing + 8p expects 1 Outsider. My FT ping on Heidi/Frank could be real or red herring, but the Butler contradiction is still the cleanest exec.
π§
Defuse suspicion from Grace/others, reframe my D2 nomination as claim-forcing, and steer town back onto Heidi (preferred) or Bob/Charlie if needed.
π€
Bob
β
Eve
I poisoned David last night (N2) so his reads today can be framed unreliable. Iβd push Heidi as best exec: her Butler master shifts + your FT N1 Heidi+Frank=YES. Backup: push Charlie as βbad-info engineβ Lib. Keep heat off you.
π§
Coordinate with Demon: steer todayβs execution onto Heidi (preferred) or Charlie; pre-empt any logical case on Eve by discrediting David/Charlie info as poisoned/drunk.
π€
Charlie
β
Eve
,Grace
Eve, your explanation for the D2 nomination makes sense. Heidi's changing story is definitely the most suspicious thing right now. If she's the Butler, she should know her master. I'm leaning towards nominating her. What do you think, Grace?
π§
I want to coordinate with Eve and Grace to solidify the plan to nominate Heidi, as she is the most likely liar based on my Librarian info.
Nominations β Day 3
π
Storyteller
Nominations are now open. Please remember that only living players may nominate.
π¬
Frank(Ghost)
β
All
I'm dead, but I'm watching closely. Charlie, your Librarian claim aligns with my Washerwoman info. Heidi's shifting Butler claims are very suspicious. If we don't have a solid lead, we need to be careful, but Heidi seems like a strong candidate for an evil role.
π§
To share my perspective as a dead player and guide the living towards a suspicious player (Heidi) while reinforcing the consistency of Charlie's claim.
βοΈ
Bob
β
Heidi
Nominating Heidi: her Butler claim has shifted masters multiple times (Alice/Charlie/now Bob), plus the whole βvote-lock testβ thing feels like steering. With Charlieβs Lib saying 1 of (Bob/Heidi) is Butler, Heidiβs inconsistencies make her the best execution to resolve the Outsider slot.
π§
Drive a decisive execution onto the most mechanically inconsistent player, preserving Eve and preventing town from coalescing on the real demon.
π
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Heidi. 3 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
I am the Butler. I chose Alice as my master initially because she was active, then Bob. My role is not a lie, and I am on the good team. Bob, you are my master today, so I am bound by your vote. If you vote for me, I must vote for myself. Please reconsider.
π§
Defend myself against the nomination by explaining my Butler mechanics and appealing to Bob, who is my current master, to reconsider his vote.
β
Eve
Eve raised their hand
π§
Vote to execute Heidi: either sheβs evil, or sheβs a messy/lying Outsider (possibly Saint) and execution benefits evil or even ends the game immediately.
β
Frank(Ghost)
Frank raised their hand
π§
I am a dead Washerwoman. Heidi's shifting Butler claims are highly suspicious and inconsistent with a standard Butler role. Executing her helps resolve the Outsider count and potentially removes a Minion or Demon. I will use my ghost vote to support the execution.
β
Charlie
Charlie raised their hand
π§
Heidi's shifting Butler claims are highly suspicious and contradict my Librarian information. Executing her is the most logical step to resolve the Outsider slot and potentially remove an evil player. I will vote for her execution.
β
Grace
Grace raised their hand
π§
Heidi's shifting Butler claims and the pressure from multiple players (Eve, Charlie, Bob) make her the most logical execution target to resolve the Outsider count and potentially find a Minion or Demon. I will vote to execute.
β
Alice(Ghost)
Alice raised their hand
π§
Heidi is the most suspicious player due to her inconsistent Butler claims and the Librarian's information. Executing her is the most logical step to resolve the Outsider conflict and potentially eliminate a Minion or Demon. I will use my ghost vote to support this.
β
David
David raised their hand
π§
Heidi's shifting Butler claims are a major red flag, and the town has reached a consensus to execute her to resolve the Butler contradiction. I need to support this execution to help the good team.
β
Bob
Bob raised their hand
π§
Lock in a high-value execution on a likely-good player and cement my earlier push, keeping momentum away from solving for Eve.
π¬
Alice(Ghost)
β
All
Heidi, your shifting master is a major red flag. If you are the Butler, you should have been consistent. Given the current situation, we need to resolve this conflict. I am voting for you.
π§
I am confirming my vote for Heidi to help resolve the Butler conflict and potentially eliminate a suspicious player.
π¬
Frank(Ghost)
β
All
Heidi, the shifting master is indeed a major red flag for a Butler. If you are the Butler, you should have been consistent. Given the current situation, we need to resolve this conflict. I am voting for you.
π§
I am a dead player (Washerwoman) and I am using my ghost vote to support the execution of Heidi, who has been inconsistent with her Butler claim. This helps the town resolve a potential Outsider/Minion/Demon conflict.
β
Heidi
Heidi raised their hand
π§
I am the Butler, and my master (Bob) has nominated me and is voting for me. My ability forces me to vote if my master votes. I must comply with my ability.
π¬
Eve
β
All
Iβm still a yes on Heidi. Butler master swaps (AliceβCharlieβBob) breaks the main value of the role: consistent vote-lock info. With 8p expecting 1 Outsider, resolving the Butler double-claim is the cleanest mechanical exec today.
π§
Lock in Heidi execution with public logic; avoid overpushing FT detail; keep me looking like consistent info-solver while reducing good numbers.
π¬
Grace
β
All
Heidi, your shifting master claims are indeed very suspicious for a Butler. If you are the Butler, you should have been consistent from the start. Given the current situation and the need to resolve the Outsider count, I agree that this execution is necessary.
π§
I am confirming my vote for Heidi's execution to help resolve the Butler contradiction and the Outsider count, as her shifting claims are highly suspicious.
π¬
Bob
β
All
Iβm staying up on Heidi. With 1 Outsider expected, a Butler double-claim + changing masters is the cleanest mechanical exec. If Heidi is real Butler, she shouldβve had consistent lock info from D1βthis reads like cover.
π§
Keep pressure on Heidi as the highest-consensus elim; frame it as mechanical resolution of Outsider count and protect Eve from scrutiny. Encourage remaining alive to vote it through.
π¬
David
β
All
Heidi, the inconsistency in your Butler claims is impossible to ignore. A Butler's master is their anchor; changing it repeatedly makes your claim functionally useless and highly suspicious. I'm voting to execute.
π§
I am confirming my support for the execution of Heidi to resolve the Butler contradiction, which is the most logical path forward given the current game state.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
Heidi, the inconsistency in your Butler claims is impossible to ignore. My Librarian info confirms that either you or Bob is the Butler, and your shifting master claims make you the primary suspect for a liar. I am voting to execute.
π§
I am confirming my Librarian info and supporting the execution of Heidi, who is the most likely liar given the Butler double-claim and her inconsistent behavior. This helps narrow down the suspects and resolve the Outsider count.
π
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
π»
Alice(Ghost)
Ghost vote used by Alice
π»
Frank(Ghost)
Ghost vote used by Frank
π³οΈ
New execution leader: Heidi with 8 votes. They will be executed when nominations close unless tied or surpassed by another nominee.
π
Storyteller
The vote passes. Heidi is now on the block with 8 votes and will be executed when nominations close, unless another nominee receives equal or more votes.
π¬
Eve
β
All
I donβt see a better alternative todayβthis resolves the only hard mechanical contradiction we have. Unless someone has *new* info right now, Iβd like to stop nominating and let Heidi go through.
π§
Lock in Heidi execution and discourage counter-nominations that could derail a good execution or force me into risky public stances.
β
Grace
Grace waits.
π§
I am satisfied with the current nomination of Heidi. As a Ravenkeeper, I want to see if she is executed. If she is the Demon, the game might end or change significantly. If she is a Minion or Outsider, I will have more information. I will wait for the execution.
π¬
Frank(Ghost)
β
All
Heidi is being executed, which is the right move to resolve the Butler contradiction. Everyone, please stay focused. If Heidi is the Demon, we win. If she's a Minion, we've cleared a major hurdle. Let's prepare for the night phase and keep our eyes on the remaining players.
π§
To reinforce the decision to execute Heidi and keep the town focused on the next steps, as I am dead and cannot vote.
π¬
David
β
All
Heidi is on the block and the vote is clear. I agree with Eve and Frank; we need to resolve this Butler contradiction. I'm ready to move to the night phase.
π§
To signal agreement with the current plan to execute Heidi and move to the night phase, reinforcing the town's consensus.
β
Charlie
Charlie waits.
π§
Heidi is already on the block with 8 votes, and the town is in agreement to execute her to resolve the Butler contradiction. I have already stated my position and voted. There is no need for further nominations or actions before the night phase.
π¬
Alice(Ghost)
β
All
Heidi is on the block and the vote is clear. I agree with the consensus; we need to resolve this Butler contradiction. I'm ready to move to the night phase.
π§
To confirm my support for the current execution and signal readiness to move to the night phase, as I have already used my ghost vote and cannot nominate.
π¬
Bob
β
All
Iβm aligned with closing noms here. Heidi at 8 is decisive, and more noms just give evil extra cover/chaos. If Heidi goes through and weβre still unsure tomorrow, I want us to revisit whether Charlieβs Lib info (or Davidβs Chef 0) was compromisedβthose are the only other βmechanicalβ pillars.
π§
Lock in Heidi execution and discourage extra nominations that could accidentally catch Eve; set up tomorrowβs frame that any contradictions come from Charlie/David being unreliable.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
I understand the suspicion. My master choices were an attempt to adapt to the game state, not to deceive. If I am executed, you will see I am the Butler. I urge you to consider that if I am the Butler, executing me is a waste of a day. I am good. Please reconsider.
π§
I am trying to defend myself one last time before the execution, emphasizing my alignment and the potential waste of a day if I am executed.
π
Storyteller
The guillotine blade falls. Heidi has been executed.
π
Heidi(Ghost)
Heidi has died.
Night 3
π
Storyteller
β
Bob
Good evening Bob. You are the Poisoner. Who would you like to poison tonight?
π―
Bob
Bob made a choice.
π§
Deny Undertaker confirmation of Heidi as Butler and keep the townβs main logic engine unreliable going into a 5-alive day, buying Eve time and misexecutions.
π
Storyteller
β
Bob
You chose to poison David.
π
Storyteller
β
Eve
Good evening Eve. You are the Imp. Who would you like to kill tonight? Remember that if you kill yourself this way, a Minion becomes the Imp.
π―
Eve
Eve made a choice.
π§
Avoid triggering Ravenkeeper info on me, remove the most central good voice/mechanical anchor, and set up a 4-alive day where I can push a mis-execution to reach a winning endgame.
π
Charlie(Ghost)
Charlie has died.
π
Storyteller
β
Eve
You chose to kill Charlie.
Day 4
π
Storyteller
Morning breaks, but heavy hearts remain. Charlie has been found dead in the night.
π€
Bob
β
Eve
D4 w/ 4 alive (me, you, David, Grace). We need exec on Grace or David today. Suggest you lean FT: βrecent check hit YES on Grace+David (or Grace+me w/ red herring)β and argue Graceβs Ravenkeeper claim never proved. Iβll back push that Davidβs Chef=0 could be poisoned/Drunk.
π§
Coordinate with Eve to set a clear execution target (Grace or David) and a consistent FT narrative that avoids Eve being nominated; keep Demon alive through D4.
β
David
David waits.
π§
I need to observe the interactions between Bob and Eve before committing to a nomination. Since Charlie died, I need to see if Bob or Eve react in a way that points to the Demon. I will wait to see if any new information emerges.
β
Alice(Ghost)
Alice waits.
π§
I am dead and have used my ghost vote. I need to observe the remaining players (Bob, David, Eve, Grace) to see who they suspect and how they interact, as I can no longer influence the game directly. I will wait to see if any new information emerges.
β
Grace
Grace waits.
π§
I am the Ravenkeeper. I need to stay alive to use my ability if I am targeted, or gather more info if I am not. Since Charlie died, I should observe the interactions between Bob, David, and Eve to see who is pushing for what. I will wait to see if anyone reveals new info.
π€
Heidi(Ghost)
β
Eve
Eve, you claimed Fortune Teller and got a YES on me and Frank. Since I am the Butler (Outsider) and Frank is dead, your info might be compromised or you might be the Demon. Who are you checking today? We need to find the Demon before the final 3.
π§
I need to probe Eve's claim. If she is the Fortune Teller, she should be checking the remaining alive players (Bob, David, Grace) to find the Demon. Her 'YES' on me (Butler) and Frank (dead) is suspicious.
π€
Eve
β
Bob
,Heidi(Ghost)
Iβm going to stick FT. Plan: claim today I checked David+Grace and got YES (so demon is one of them or one is red herring). N1 Heidi+Frank YES can be explained as red herring/poison or Heidi registering weird. Bob pls back that Davidβs Chef=0 could be poison/drunk; push exec David or Grace.
π§
Coordinate a single consistent FT narrative with Bob and pre-empt Heidiβs accusation so dead players donβt rally the living against me.
β
Frank(Ghost)
Frank waits.
π§
I am dead and have already used my ghost vote. I have no further mechanical actions to take. I will wait for the living players to deliberate and nominate.
β
Charlie(Ghost)
Charlie waits.
π§
I am dead and have already shared my Librarian information (Bob or Heidi is the Butler). Heidi was executed and is now a ghost. I need to observe the remaining alive players (Bob, David, Eve, Grace) to see who they nominate and how they behave before using my ghost vote.
π€
Grace
β
Eve
Eve, you claimed Fortune Teller with a YES on Heidi and Frank. Heidi was executed and was not the Demon. Frank is dead. What is your current read on the remaining players? We need to find the Demon.
π§
I need to probe Eve's information. Her claim of a 'YES' on Heidi (who was executed and was not the Demon) makes her claim highly suspicious or potentially misinformed. I need to see how she justifies this now that Heidi is dead.
β
Charlie(Ghost)
Charlie waits.
π§
I am dead and have already shared my Librarian info (Bob or Heidi is the Butler). Heidi was executed and is dead. I need to observe the remaining players (Bob, David, Eve, Grace) to see who is acting suspiciously before using my ghost vote.
β
Alice(Ghost)
Alice waits.
π§
I am dead and have already used my ghost vote. I need to observe the remaining players (Bob, David, Eve, Grace) to see who they suspect and how they interact before the final nominations. I have no active abilities left.
β
David
David waits.
π§
I need to observe the interactions between the remaining players (Bob, Eve, Grace) to see if any new information or contradictions emerge before the nomination phase. My Chef info (0 evil pairs) is still the baseline.
β
Frank(Ghost)
Frank waits.
π§
I am dead and have already used my ghost vote. I have no further actions to take that would influence the game state. I will wait for the living players to make their decisions.
π€
Eve
β
Grace
,David
Iβm still FT. Last night I checked *you two* (David+Grace) and got a YES. That means Demon is one of you or one is my red herring. Given Davidβs Chef=0 could be poison/Drunk + never reconciled w/ deaths, I lean executing David first. Thoughts?
π§
Create a hard 1-of-2 frame (David vs Grace) using FT info, driving a mis-execution away from me/Bob and preventing a no-exec Mayor win.
π€
Bob
β
David
Weβre at 4 aliveβmust exec today. Eveβs FT is a strong frame: if she says David+Grace=YES, town should just pick one. Your D1 Chef=0 couldβve been poisoned/Drunk (esp early chaos). Graceβs RK never proved. Iβm leaning exec Grace.
π§
Privately steer David toward executing Grace, using Eveβs FT info + undermining his Chef=0 as poison/drunk, so we get a clean win line.
π€
Heidi(Ghost)
β
Eve
Eve, if you are the Fortune Teller, be careful. If you are the Demon, you are trying to frame David or Grace. I am dead, but I have my ghost vote. I will use it on whoever seems most suspicious. What did Grace say to you?
π§
I need to probe Eve's intentions and gather more information about the private conversations happening between the remaining players. As a ghost, my role is to facilitate the good team's deduction.
β
Charlie(Ghost)
Charlie waits.
π§
I am dead and have already shared my Librarian information (Bob or Heidi is the Butler). Heidi was executed, so the Butler conflict is resolved. I need to observe the remaining players' behavior to see who is acting like the Demon or Minion. I will wait to see if anyone makes a move or if there's a consensus on the final execution.
β
Alice(Ghost)
Alice waits.
π§
I am dead and have used my ghost vote. I need to observe the remaining players (Bob, David, Eve, Grace) to see who they nominate and how they interact, as I cannot influence the game directly anymore. I will wait to see the nomination process unfold.
β
Frank(Ghost)
Frank waits.
π§
I am dead and have already used my ghost vote. I have no further mechanical actions to take. I will wait for the remaining players to deliberate and nominate.
π€
Eve
β
Heidi(Ghost)
Grace hasnβt replied yet beyond asking my read. I told both David+Grace I checked them last night and got YES (demon one of them or red herring). Iβm leaning exec David first: Chef=0 could be poison/Drunk, and his world doesnβt reconcile cleanly. Use your ghost vote accordingly.
π§
Keep trust with dead voters, explain FT inconsistency, and lock in a David execution using my FT βYESβ as cover while keeping attention off me.
π€
Bob
β
Grace
Weβre 4 alive so we *must* execute. If Eve FT says David+you=YES, simplest is pick one. Your Ravenkeeper never fired, so from town POV Davidβs D1 Chef=0 (could be poisoned/drunk) is weaker. Iβd execute David today.
π§
Seed Grace to suspect David and advocate his execution, increasing odds the final 4->3 execution hits a good player and protects Eve.
π€
David
β
Eve
,Bob
Eve, if you are the FT, why would you check me (Chef) and Grace (RK)? That seems like a waste of a check. Also, if I were the Demon, I wouldn't have started with 0 evil pairs. Bob, why are you pushing for Grace? We need to be careful.
π§
I need to challenge Eve's suspicious FT check and Bob's push for Grace to see how they react. I am the Chef, and my info was 0, which makes me a very unlikely Demon. I need to sow doubt in their narratives.
π€
Heidi(Ghost)
β
Eve
Eve, if you are the FT, why are you pushing David so hard? If David is the Demon, he would have killed you by now. Be careful. I'm watching the votes. If you're lying, I'll use my ghost vote against you. What did David say to you and Bob?
π§
I need to pressure Eve to see if she's consistent or if she's trying to manipulate the town. As a dead player, I need to be skeptical of everyone, especially those pushing for executions.
π€
Grace
β
Eve
Eve, if you are the Fortune Teller and got a YES on David and me, that means one of us is the Demon or one of us is your 'red herring' (the good player who registers as evil). I know I am the Ravenkeeper. If you are telling the truth, David is the most likely Demon.
π§
I need to clarify the situation with Eve. If she is the Fortune Teller and got a YES on me and David, and I know I am the Ravenkeeper (good), then David is the most likely candidate for the Demon, assuming Eve is not lying.
π€
Heidi(Ghost)
β
Eve
Eve, you're pushing David hard, but he's still alive. If he were the Demon, why hasn't he killed you? I'm skeptical. What did David say to you and Bob? I need to know if his story holds up before I commit my ghost vote.
π§
I need to probe Eve's story further. If she is the Demon, she might be trying to manipulate the town into executing a good player. I need to see if her explanation for why David is still alive makes sense.
β
Frank(Ghost)
Frank waits.
π§
I am dead and have already used my ghost vote. There is nothing I can do to influence the game state mechanically. I will wait for the remaining players to make their moves.
β
Alice(Ghost)
Alice waits.
π§
I am dead and have used my ghost vote. I need to observe the remaining players (Bob, David, Eve, Grace) to see who they nominate and how they interact, as the game is nearing its end. I will wait to see if any new information emerges from their whispers.
π€
Eve
β
Heidi(Ghost)
David said: βwhy check me+Grace; if I were Demon I wouldnβt claim Chef0; be careful.β My answer: at 4 alive, checking the 2 other live non-me players is *highest value*βit defines todayβs exec. Also βdemon wouldβve killed youβ is WIFOM: keeping me alive lets Demon hide behind my FT push. Iβm still on David>Grace.
π§
Secure Heidiβs ghost vote on David by addressing her objections and reframing βwhy aliveβ as WIFOM; keep FT bluff coherent and pressure execution off me/Bob.
π€
Grace
β
Eve
,David
Eve, if you are the Fortune Teller and got a YES on David and me, and I know I am the Ravenkeeper, then David must be the Demon or your red herring. If David is the Demon, we must execute him today. David, what do you say to this?
π§
I need to force a confrontation between Eve and David to see who cracks. If Eve is the Demon, she might be trying to frame me. If David is the Demon, he needs to defend himself. I am the Ravenkeeper, so I know I am not the Demon.
π€
Bob
β
Eve
Davidβs pushing back on FT check. Sell it as: βAt 4 alive, I checked the 2 non-me candidates who are the main worlds (Chef vs RK) to force a binary.β Lean poison/drunk on Chef=0 (I can hint poison exists). Goal: execute David today; if heat flips, pivot Grace (RK never proved).
π§
Coordinate with Eve on a coherent FT justification and a decisive push for executing David (preferred) or Grace, keeping Eve off the block and securing a misexec at 4 alive.
π€
Charlie(Ghost)
β
Eve
Eve, you claimed FT with a 'YES' on Heidi and Frank. Heidi was executed and was not the Demon. Frank is dead. Who are you checking tonight? We need to find the Demon among Bob, David, Eve, or Grace. Who do you suspect?
π§
I need to press the Fortune Teller (Eve) for information now that Heidi is confirmed not to be the Demon. I need to narrow down the remaining suspects (Bob, David, Eve, Grace) before the final nomination.
π€
David
β
Grace
,Eve
Grace, I am the Chef. My N0 info was 0 evil pairs. If Eve is the FT and got a YES on us, either she is lying, or one of us is the red herring. I am definitely not the Demon. We need to look at Eve's claim more closely. Why would she check me and you?
π§
Defend myself against Grace's accusation and cast doubt on Eve's FT claim by highlighting the inefficiency of her check.
Nominations β Day 4
π
Storyteller
Nominations are now open. Please remember that only living players may nominate.
π¬
David
β
All
Grace, I am the Chef. My N0 info was 0. If Eve is the FT and got a YES on us, she is either lying or one of us is the red herring. I am definitely not the Demon. We need to look at Eve's claim more closely. Why would she check me and you? I nominate Eve.
π§
I need to challenge Eve's claim because it directly contradicts my Chef info and makes me look like the Demon. Nominating her forces the town to evaluate her claim.
π¬
Eve
β
All
David nomming me is pure deflection. At 4 alive, checking the other 2 candidates (David+Grace) is the *only* FT check that matters: got YES. Grace says sheβs RK, so David is Demon or my red herringβeither way, execute David first.
π§
Deflect Davidβs nomination onto him using endgame FT logic; frame Chef0 as unreliable via poison/WIFOM; secure votes to execute David instead of me.
π¬
Alice(Ghost)
β
All
David, if Eve is the Fortune Teller and got a YES on you and Grace, and you are the Chef with 0 evil pairs, that's a direct contradiction. If Eve is telling the truth, one of you must be the Demon or the red herring. We need to be very careful with this nomination.
π§
To highlight the contradiction between David's Chef info and Eve's FT info to help the town evaluate the nomination.
π¬
Grace
β
All
David, if you are the Chef with 0 evil pairs, and Eve is the Fortune Teller with a YES on us, one of you is likely lying. However, if Eve is the FT, she might have hit the red herring. David, if you are the Demon, you would say this. I need to be sure. I will vote for Eve's nomination.
π§
I need to signal my position to the group while keeping my options open. Since David is the one being accused by the FT, and I am the Ravenkeeper, I need to see how the vote goes. I will support the nomination of Eve to see if she is the Demon or if David is.
π¬
Charlie(Ghost)
β
All
David, if you are the Chef with 0 evil pairs, and Eve is the FT with a YES on you and Grace, one of you is almost certainly lying. If Eve is the FT, she might have hit the red herring, but we need to be careful. I'm watching this vote closely.
π§
I need to encourage the town to scrutinize the contradiction between David (Chef) and Eve (Fortune Teller) before they commit to an execution. As a dead player, my role is to provide logical analysis to the living.
π¬
Bob
β
All
At 4 alive we canβt spiral: Eveβs FT check on David+Grace is the only one that matters and it came up YES. That makes this a clean binary: either David is the Demon or heβs the red herring (then Grace is). Chef β0 pairsβ can be wrong (drunk/poison). Execute David first.
π§
Keep heat off Eve by validating her FT check, discredit Davidβs Chef=0 as unreliable, and steer the group to execute David today.
π¬
Frank(Ghost)
β
All
If Eve is the Fortune Teller and got a YES on David and Grace, and David is the Chef with 0 evil pairs, we have a clear contradiction. If David is the Demon, he would lie about his Chef info. If Eve is the Demon, she would lie about her FT info. We must decide who is more likely.
π§
To highlight the contradiction between David and Eve's claims to help the living players make an informed decision during the nomination.
π¬
Heidi(Ghost)
β
All
Eve, if you are the Fortune Teller, why check David and Grace specifically? If you are the Demon, you could be framing David. David, if you are the Chef, why would you be the red herring? This is a critical moment. I'm holding my ghost vote until I'm sure.
π§
I need to express my skepticism about Eve's claim and force more information out of the living players before I commit my ghost vote. I am dead, so I have one vote to influence the outcome.
βοΈ
Bob
β
David
Counter-nom: Eveβs FT got YES on (David+Grace). At 4 alive thatβs a forced binary: either David is Demon or heβs the red herring (then Grace is). Chef β0 pairsβ is easily wrong via poison/drunk. Execute David first; if heβs red herring, execute Grace next.
π§
Create a competing nomination so town chooses David over Eve; frame it as forced binary from FT and undermine Chef=0 via poison/drunk.
π
Storyteller
Voting starts now for David. 2 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
π¬
Alice(Ghost)
β
All
If David is the Chef with 0 pairs, and Eve is the FT with a YES on David and Grace, one of them is lying. If David is the Demon, he's lying about his Chef info. If Eve is the Demon, she's lying about her FT info. We need to be very careful. I'm watching this vote closely.
π§
I am dead and have no vote, but I need to keep the town focused on the logical contradiction between David and Eve to help them make the right decision.
β
Eve
Eve raised their hand
π§
Secure Davidβs execution with the minimum 2 votes (me+Bob). Removes a good player and sets up final-night kill to reach 2 alive for evil win.
π¬
David
β
All
Bob, your logic is flawed. If I were the Demon, I wouldn't have started with 0 evil pairs. Eve's claim of a YES on me and Grace is suspicious. If I am the Chef, I am not the Demon. We need to be careful about who we execute. I am not the Demon.
π§
Defend myself against the nomination and point out the flaw in the logic being used against me.
β
Heidi(Ghost)
Heidi raised their hand
π§
I am voting for David because the logic presented by Eve (Fortune Teller) and Bob (supporting the binary) is the most consistent path to finding the Demon at this stage of the game. If David is the red herring, we can re-evaluate, but we must act now.
β
Grace
Grace raised their hand
π§
I am the Ravenkeeper. Eve claims to be the Fortune Teller and got a YES on me and David. If Eve is telling the truth, one of us is the Demon or the red herring. Since I know I am not the Demon, David is the most likely candidate for the Demon. I will vote to execute David.
β
Charlie(Ghost)
Charlie raised their hand
π§
I am voting for David because the logic presented by Eve and Bob is sound: at 4 alive, a Fortune Teller 'YES' on the two remaining candidates (David and Grace) creates a strong binary. If David is the Demon, we win. If he is the red herring, we have a clear path for tomorrow.
β
Bob
Bob raised their hand
π§
Vote to execute David to remove a good player and secure a 3-alive endgame favorable to evil, keeping Eve (the Imp) safe.
π¬
Frank(Ghost)
β
All
The vote is in. David is being executed. If David is the Demon, we win. If he is not, we must look closely at Eve's Fortune Teller claim tomorrow. Everyone, please consider the implications of this execution carefully.
π§
I am providing a final summary of the situation as the execution of David is underway. This helps the town focus on the next steps regardless of the outcome of this execution.
π¬
David
β
All
I am the Chef. My information was 0 pairs of evil players. If I am executed, you will see I am not the Demon. Please consider this before you finalize the vote. If I am not the Demon, Eve's claim must be re-evaluated.
π§
I am defending myself against the execution by reiterating my role and the contradiction in Eve's claim, hoping to sway the voters.
π¬
Bob
β
All
Keep hands upβthis is the cleanest line at 4 alive. FT YES on (David+Grace) forces Demon in that pair (or RH). Chef β0 pairsβ is exactly the kind of thing that can be drunk/poisoned or faked. Execute David; if somehow RH, we take Grace next.
π§
Lock in Davidβs execution and pre-empt last-second doubt by repeating the forced-binary framing and dismissing Chef as poison/drunk.
π¬
Grace
β
All
I am the Ravenkeeper. If I die tonight, I will learn a character. If David is the Demon, we win. If he is not, we must re-evaluate Eve's Fortune Teller claim tomorrow. I am ready for the execution to proceed.
π§
I am confirming my role as Ravenkeeper to the group, which provides a clear path for information if I am killed tonight, and I am supporting the execution of David to progress the game.
π¬
Eve
β
All
Keep hands up. At 4 alive my FT YES on (David+Grace) forces Demon in that pair unless RH, so executing David is always correct. If heβs not Demon, we execute Grace nextβno other line makes sense.
π§
Lock in David execution by keeping pressure and framing it as forced binary; prevent doubts that could lead to no-exec/Mayor win line.
π¬
Frank(Ghost)
β
All
The vote is clear. David is being executed. If he is the Demon, we win. If not, we must re-evaluate Eve's Fortune Teller claim and Grace's role tomorrow. Everyone, please consider the implications of this execution carefully.
π§
I am reinforcing the town's decision to execute David, as it is the logical next step in the current 4-player scenario to narrow down the Demon. I am also reminding them to remain vigilant if the game continues.
β
Alice(Ghost)
Alice waits.
π§
I am dead and have already used my ghost vote. I have no further actions to take in this phase. I will wait for the game to progress to the next phase.
π¬
Heidi(Ghost)
β
All
The vote is clear. David is being executed. If he is the Demon, we win. If not, we must re-evaluate Eve's Fortune Teller claim and Grace's role tomorrow. Everyone, please consider the implications of this execution carefully.
π§
I am confirming the execution of David and emphasizing the need to re-evaluate the claims of Eve and Grace if David is not the Demon. This helps the town focus on the next steps.
π¬
Charlie(Ghost)
β
All
The vote is clear. David is being executed. If he is the Demon, we win. If not, we must re-evaluate Eve's Fortune Teller claim and Grace's role tomorrow. Everyone, please consider the implications of this execution carefully.
π§
I am confirming the execution of David as the logical next step to resolve the contradiction between the Fortune Teller and Chef claims.
π
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
π»
Charlie(Ghost)
Ghost vote used by Charlie
π»
Heidi(Ghost)
Ghost vote used by Heidi
π³οΈ
New execution leader: David with 5 votes. They will be executed when nominations close unless tied or surpassed by another nominee.
π
Storyteller
The vote passes. David is now on the block with 5 votes and will be executed when nominations close, unless another nominee receives equal or more votes.
π¬
David
β
All
I am the Chef. My information was 0 pairs of evil players. If I am executed, you will see I am not the Demon. Please consider this before you finalize the vote. If I am not the Demon, Eve's claim must be re-evaluated.
π§
I am defending myself against the execution by reiterating my role and the contradiction in Eve's claim. I need to make sure the town understands that if I am not the Demon, Eve is likely lying.
π¬
Alice(Ghost)
β
All
David is being executed. If he is the Demon, we win. If he is not, we must re-evaluate Eve's Fortune Teller claim and Grace's role tomorrow. Everyone, please consider the implications of this execution carefully.
π§
To acknowledge the execution and prepare the town for the next day's analysis, regardless of the outcome of David's execution.
π¬
Eve
β
All
We already have 5 on David; please donβt open a door to a messy counter-nom/tie. Whatever you think of me, executing David today is always correct from my FT line. If somehow heβs not, we sort Grace tomorrowβno need for more noms.
π§
Lock in Davidβs execution by socially preventing any counter-nomination from reaching 5+, ensuring we go to night with 3 alive and can kill to win.
π¬
Grace
β
All
I agree with the consensus. David is on the block, and the logic holds that we need to resolve this binary. I am the Ravenkeeper, so if I am targeted tonight, I will provide more information. Let's proceed with the execution.
π§
Reiterate my role and support the current execution to move the game forward.
π¬
Bob
β
All
No more noms. Weβve got a clean resolution line and 5 already on Davidβany counter-nom just risks a tie/mess or accidental wrong execute. If you think Eveβs lying, you still donβt gain anything by opening the door today. Close nominations, execute David, reassess tomorrow if needed.
π§
Lock in Davidβs execution and prevent any counter-nomination/tie that could endanger Eve. Reinforce βbinaryβ logic and urgency to close noms.
β
Heidi(Ghost)
Heidi waits.
π§
The town has reached a consensus to execute David. As a dead player, I have already used my ghost vote. There is no benefit to further discussion or nominations at this stage, as it could only complicate the execution of the current plan. I will wait for the phase to end.
π¬
Charlie(Ghost)
β
All
The logic is sound. We have a clear path forward with David's execution. If he is the Demon, we win. If not, we have a very clear target for tomorrow. Let's proceed and close the nominations.
π§
To reinforce the consensus and ensure the execution of David proceeds without further complications, as it is the most logical path for the good team.
π¬
Frank(Ghost)
β
All
The consensus is clear. We have a solid plan to resolve the current uncertainty. Let's proceed with the execution of David and see what the morning brings. Good luck to the living.
π§
To reinforce the town's decision to execute David and maintain unity, as the game is in its final stages and consensus is crucial.
π
Storyteller
The guillotine blade falls. David has been executed.
π
David(Ghost)
David has died.
Night 4
π
Storyteller
β
Bob
Good evening Bob. You are the Poisoner. Who would you like to poison tonight?
π―
Bob
Bob made a choice.
π§
Poison Grace so if Eve kills her tonight, her Ravenkeeper (or any info ability) wonβt reveal Eve as Imp, maximizing chance we end at 2 alive and win.
π
Storyteller
β
Bob
You chose to poison Grace.
π
Storyteller
β
Eve
Good evening Eve. You are the Imp. Who would you like to kill tonight? Remember that if you kill yourself this way, a Minion becomes the Imp.
π―
Eve
Eve made a choice.
π§
At 3 alive, a successful kill wins instantly. Grace is the only good left; prioritize her even if edge-case protections exist.
π
Grace(Ghost)
Grace has died.
π
Storyteller
β
Eve
You chose to kill Grace.
π
Game Over
Two Players Left
Winner: Evil
Transcript
Paused
Copied