Game Detail
Players
Alice (Slayer) Bob (Washerwoman) Charlie (Scarlet Woman) David (Imp) Eve (Undertaker) Frank (Chef) Grace (Drunk) Heidi (Monk)
Token Usage
| Team | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Cost (USD) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Good | 866,002 | 207,196 | $4.4162 |
| Evil | 325,265 | 27,947 | $0.2465 |
Event Transcript
🎭
The game has started.
📜
Storyteller
→
Charlie
You are the Minion. The Demon is David.
📜
Storyteller
→
David
Minions are: Charlie. Your safe bluffs are: Librarian, Soldier, Ravenkeeper
📜
Storyteller
→
Bob
Good evening Bob. You are the Washerwoman. Either Frank or Grace is the Chef.
📜
Storyteller
→
Frank
Good evening Frank. You are the Chef. You learn that there are 1 pairs of evil players.
Day 1
📜
Storyteller
Welcome to the village of Ravenswood Bluff. Please take this time to get to know your fellow villagers. Feel free to move around and have private conversations. Be wary, for a Demon hides among you!
👤
Alice
→
Bob
,Heidi
,Charlie
Hey—want to sync? What are you claiming / any start-of-game info (Washer/Librarian/Investigator/Chef etc.)? Feel free to soft-claim if nervous. I’ll share mine once we have a clearer picture before noms.
🧠
Start building a trusted info net before nominations. Get early role/first-night info from neighbors, without revealing Slayer, to guide D1 execution and preserve my shot for a high-confidence Demon pick.
👤
Charlie
→
Alice
,Bob
,Heidi
I'm thinking of claiming Chef or Empath. I'm Charlie, by the way. I don't have any info yet, but I'm happy to share once I've had a chance to look around. What about you?
🧠
I want to establish a soft claim and build rapport with Alice, Bob, and Heidi while keeping my options open. Claiming Chef or Empath is a safe bet for now.
👤
Grace
→
Frank
,Heidi
Hey neighbor—what are you claiming / what info do you have so far? Any Outsider count hints? I’m keeping my role quiet for now; mainly trying to map worlds + who seems safe to trust for later votes/noms.
🧠
Build a private trust network with my neighbors, collect early claims/info, and avoid exposing I’m Mayor while still progressing world-building.
👤
Heidi
→
Alice
,Bob
,Charlie
I have no start-of-game info (not Washer/Libr/Invest/Chef). I’m an ongoing night-action Townsfolk (protect/utility type). Prefer to stay vague until we’ve got N1 info, but if you’re a high-value info role ping me & I can help keep you alive.
🧠
Maintain secrecy of my protective role while still engaging alliance-building; invite others to share if they’re high-value so I can prioritize protection without outing myself.
👤
David
→
Charlie
Hey Charlie, I'm the Imp. My bluffs are Librarian, Soldier, Ravenkeeper. What's your role? Any info from the Grimoire? I'm thinking of claiming Soldier or Librarian. Let's coordinate.
🧠
Establish contact with my Minion (Charlie) to coordinate bluffs and share information.
👤
Frank
→
Grace
,Heidi
I’m Chef. N0 I got “1” (one adjacent evil pair). In 8p that suggests Demon+Minion sit next to each other somewhere. Not sure about Outsider count yet—any claims/your role type? I’m happy to map seating pairs with you.
🧠
Coordinate with my neighbor(s) early; Chef=1 is high-leverage for mapping worlds with first-night roles, but I’ll request her claim to evaluate trust.
👤
Bob
→
Alice
,Charlie
,Heidi
I’m Washerwoman. N0: either Frank or Grace is the Chef. Suggest we separately ask both their role/chef# (if claiming). If one confirms Chef, great; if both deny/contradict, could be poison/drunk or a liar. Heidi maybe protect whichever looks like real Chef.
🧠
Share my Washerwoman info with a small trust circle to coordinate verification (ask Frank/Grace) and plan protection without exposing all info publicly yet.
👤
Eve
→
David
,Frank
,Heidi
Hey—quick 1:1. What role/starting info are you claiming (even a category: start-info / ongoing / outsider)? I’m a low-visibility Townsfolk info role; prefer to stay a bit quiet early but want to coordinate + compare notes for consistency.
🧠
Build a tight info-sharing circle with my neighbors while keeping Undertaker hidden, so I can cross-check claims and later verify executions without being night-killed early.
👤
Alice
→
Frank
,Grace
,Heidi
Hi—Bob claims Washerwoman & saw {Frank/Grace} as Chef. Can you each tell me your actual role/if you’re Chef what #? Heidi: if one seems legit Chef, consider protecting them N1. I’m keeping this quiet for now.
🧠
Privately confirm/deny Chef between Frank/Grace, then decide whether to push public Chef claim and whether Heidi should protect that player N1.
👤
Charlie
→
David
Hey David, I'm the Scarlet Woman. Bluffs are Librarian, Soldier, Ravenkeeper? Got it. Bob is claiming Washerwoman and says Frank or Grace is the Chef. Heidi says she's an ongoing night role (Monk/FT?). I'll claim Empath to sit next to you and 'clear' you or frame Bob. Let's sync.
🧠
I need to inform my Demon (David) of my role (Scarlet Woman) and share the information I've gathered from the other players (Bob's Washerwoman claim and Heidi's vague claim) so we can coordinate our bluffs effectively.
👤
Grace
→
Alice
,Heidi
I’m NOT Chef. Frank told me+Heidi he’s Chef and got “1” (one adjacent evil pair). So Bob’s Washerwoman ping {Frank/Grace} as Chef fits Frank. If there’s a Monk, I’d protect Frank N1. I’m a Townsfolk staying quiet for now.
🧠
Confirm to Alice/Heidi that I’m not Chef and that Frank already privately gave Chef=1. Encourage protection of Frank N1 and keep my Mayor identity hidden to avoid demon kill.
👤
Heidi
→
Alice
,Bob
,Frank
I’m Heidi = Monk (night protect). Given Bob’s WW + Frank Chef claim, I’m inclined to protect Frank N1 unless someone outs an even higher-value info role. Frank: confirm you’re happy being protected. Alice/Bob: any other strong roles we should prioritize?
🧠
Coordinate privately with the key start-info roles so I can pick the best N1 protection target and keep the group’s mechanical info alive into Day 2.
👤
David
→
Eve
Hey Eve, I'm claiming Soldier. I'm a bit worried about being a target early, so I'm keeping it simple. What about you? You mentioned low-visibility info—are you something like a Washerwoman or Librarian? I'm happy to help verify if I can.
🧠
I want to establish a solid, simple bluff (Soldier) to Eve to build trust and gather more specific information about her role. Claiming Soldier makes me a less attractive execution target and explains why I might survive night kills.
👤
Frank
→
Alice
,Heidi
,Eve
Confirming: I’m Chef, got “1” N0 (exactly one adjacent evil pair). So Demon+Minion likely neighbors somewhere. Heidi: yes, I’m happy for Monk protect N1. Eve: I’m start-info Townsfolk; any category/outsider-count hints from you yet?
🧠
Confirm my Chef info to key coordinators, accept Monk protection, and prompt others for start-info/outsider count so we can map the single evil adjacency quickly before noms.
👤
Bob
→
Frank
,Grace
,Heidi
I’m the Washerwoman: N0 either Frank or Grace is the Chef. Frank/Grace—can each of you confirm your role? If Chef, what number did you get? If not Chef, what are you claiming (even soft)? Heidi (Monk): protect whoever seems like true Chef.
🧠
Get both candidates’ claims on record early to confirm my Washerwoman info, enable Monk protection choice, and create accountability if stories shift before nominations.
👤
Eve
→
David
,Frank
,Heidi
I’m actually Undertaker (prefer keep semi-quiet publicly). David: Soldier claim noted—any reason to believe you’d be targeted? Frank: Chef1 is big; if you’re true then evil adjacent pair is NOT involving me (I’m good), so look at other neighbor pairs. Heidi: any role/outsider count info yet?
🧠
Coordinate with a small trusted circle: share I’m Undertaker, probe validity of Chef1/Soldier, and set up future execution checks without outing myself to whole town.
👤
Alice
→
Eve
,David
,Charlie
Hey—can you share your current claim (even soft) + any start info? We’ve got Bob WW: {Frank/Grace} is Chef; Frank claims Chef=1 and Heidi is Monk protecting him. Any Outsider count hints / suspicions based on seating?
🧠
Gather missing claims/info before nominations; keep my Slayer hidden until a higher-confidence shot or late-game. Build a trusted info web and map Chef=1 onto seating.
👤
Charlie
→
Alice
,Eve
,David
I'm claiming Empath. My N1 info is '0' (Bob and David are good). This fits with Bob's Washerwoman claim and David's Soldier/Librarian bluff. No Outsider info yet, but if Bob is right about Frank/Grace, we have a solid block of 'good' players. What's your role, Alice?
🧠
I need to establish my Empath bluff to Alice and Eve while supporting my Demon (David) and the current town narrative (Bob's claim). This builds trust and positions me as a 'reliable' source of info.
👤
Grace
→
Bob
,Frank
,Heidi
Not Chef. Frank’s Chef=1 sounds plausible w/ Bob’s ping. Private: I’m actually the Mayor—pls keep quiet. Heidi, if you’re Monk, I’d protect Frank N1. Any Outsider/other claims you’ve heard?
🧠
Respond to Washerwoman request, privately establish trust with Bob/Frank/Heidi, and set up protection/coordination while keeping Mayor info limited to a small circle.
👤
Heidi
→
Grace
,Eve
,Bob
I’m Heidi=Monk. Planning to protect Frank N1 (Chef1 + WW ping makes him likely Demon target). Grace: noted Mayor—will keep quiet. Eve: as UT, pls stay semi-hidden. Bob: I’ll keep Frank up unless a stronger reason emerges.
🧠
Coordinate privately: confirm N1 protection target, keep Mayor claim secret, and align with Undertaker/Washerwoman for tomorrow’s mechanical cross-checks.
👤
David
→
Alice
,Eve
,Charlie
Hey Alice, I'm claiming Soldier. Keeping it simple to avoid being a night target. Charlie's Empath '0' makes sense if Bob's info is right. Eve, Undertaker is a huge role, we'll need to protect you. No outsider hints from my end yet. What about you, Alice? Any info or role yet?
🧠
I am reinforcing my Soldier bluff to Alice and Eve while acknowledging Charlie's (my Minion) fake Empath info to build a 'good' block. This helps establish trust and positions me as a safe, non-threatening player.
👤
Frank
→
Alice
,Bob
,Heidi
Confirming to all: I am Chef; N0 got “1” (exactly one adjacent evil pair). Grace is NOT Chef (so Bob’s WW points to me). Heidi: yes please Monk-protect me N1. Alice/Bob: any other start-info claims (Librarian/Investigator) or Outsider count hints yet?
🧠
Coordinate privately with WW/Monk to solidify my Chef info, keep Mayor hidden, and steer day-1 info sharing toward identifying the single adjacent evil pair.
👤
Bob
→
Alice
,Charlie
,Heidi
Update: Frank confirms Chef N0=1 (matches my WW ping; Grace says NOT Chef). Grace privately told me she’s Mayor—pls keep that *quiet*. With Chef1, exactly one adjacent evil pair; we should fish for any Librarian/Investigator claims to start mapping which pair.
🧠
Coordinate our info web: confirm Chef1 publicly, keep Grace’s Mayor claim quiet, and steer group toward roles that can lock in the single adjacent evil pair before nominations.
👤
Eve
→
Alice
I’m Undertaker (prefer semi-quiet publicly). No start info yet. Hearing: Bob WW {Frank/Grace} is Chef; Frank claims Chef=1; Heidi=Monk; Charlie=Empath N1=0 (Bob+David good); David=Soldier. Any Outsider info/your claim? If Chef1 true => Demon+Minion adjacent pair.
🧠
Answer Alice’s query, seed UT role privately for coordination, and push the key mechanical frame (Chef1 => adjacent evil pair) while gathering missing Outsider/start-info claims.
👤
Alice
→
Eve
,Charlie
,David
I’m actually Slayer (keeping shot for later; pls keep semi-quiet). Note: if WW->Frank Chef1 AND Charlie Empath0 (Bob+David good), Chef1’s only possible evil-adjacent pair is {Eve-Frank}/{Frank-Grace}/{Grace-Heidi}/{Heidi-Alice} → seems contradictory unless poison/drunk or someone lying. Any Invest/Librarian/Outsider claims heard?
🧠
Share my Slayer role with a small trusted circle, highlight the Chef1/Empath0 adjacency constraint to spot inconsistencies fast, and push for Investigator/Librarian/Outsider claims before nominations.
👤
Charlie
→
Alice
,Eve
,David
Alice, if Chef is 1 and I'm Empath 0 (Bob/David good), the evil pair must be further away. Maybe {Grace, Heidi} or {Heidi, Alice}? Or maybe Bob's Washerwoman info is wrong/poisoned? I haven't heard any Librarian/Investigator claims yet. David, any thoughts on the Chef 1?
🧠
I need to maintain my Empath 0 claim while addressing Alice's observation about the Chef 1 count. By pointing towards other players (Grace/Heidi/Alice), I create suspicion away from David and myself.
👤
Grace
→
Alice
,Bob
,Eve
I’m NOT Chef; Frank told me he’s Chef=1 (exactly 1 adjacent evil pair). Suggest public: Bob WW {Frank/Grace}=Chef + Frank confirm Chef1. Then ask for Librarian/Investigator + any Outsider claim; we can map which seating link must contain both evils.
🧠
Coordinate early public info (WW+Chef1) and prompt other 1st-night roles to speak so we can triangulate the single adjacent evil pair without exposing me as Mayor.
👤
Heidi
→
Bob
,Eve
,Alice
If our private TF claims are real (WW/Chef1/UT/Mayor/Monk = 5 TF), then only {Alice,Charlie,David} can be {Outsider,Minion,Demon}. With Chef=1, the ONLY adjacent evil pair possible is Charlie+David. We should pressure their claims + consider nominating one. Caveat: Baron/poison/drunk breaks this.
🧠
Share strong mechanical suspicion on Charlie+David (if claims true) and align on questioning/nomination plan while flagging alternative worlds (Baron/poison) to avoid overconfidence.
👤
David
→
Alice
,Charlie
,Eve
Alice, if Chef is 1 and Charlie's Empath is 0, the pair could be {Grace, Heidi} or {Heidi, Alice}. But if you're the Slayer, that narrows it down. Maybe Bob's info is the key? I'm Soldier, so I'm just trying to stay alive and help. Charlie, any other Empath thoughts?
🧠
I want to appear helpful and engaged in the logic puzzle while subtly steering suspicion toward the players further away from me (Grace and Heidi). By acknowledging Alice's Slayer claim and Charlie's Empath claim, I reinforce the 'good' block we are building.
👤
Frank
→
Grace
,Heidi
No Outsider claims I’ve heard yet. I’ll keep your Mayor claim quiet. Given Chef=1 and assuming you+me good, pair NOT Frank–Grace; if Eve’s truly UT-good, likely NOT Eve–Frank either => evil adjacent pair is in AB/BC/CD/DE/GH/HA. Heidi pls protect me N1 as planned; I’ll push for Invest/Libr claims before noms.
🧠
Reassure Monk protection, keep Mayor claim contained, and share mechanical narrowing from Chef1 so town focuses on the correct seating pairs before nominations.
👤
Bob
→
Alice
,Heidi
,Eve
Agree w/ Heidi logic IF claims true: our 5 TF implies {Alice/Charlie/David} = {O,Minion,Demon} and Chef1 => Charlie+David likely the evil pair. But caveat poison/Baron/drunk. Plan: push Charlie+D for clean role claims; ask public for Librarian/Investigator+Outsider claim to confirm.
🧠
Coordinate a tight plan before noms: get Charlie/David to claim, solicit Librarian/Investigator/Outsider info publicly, and avoid overcommitting to a potentially poisoned Chef/WW read.
👤
Eve
→
Alice
,Heidi
,Grace
Chef1+Empath0 (Bob/David good) => ONLY evil-adjacent pair is {Eve-Frank}/{Frank-Grace}/{Grace-Heidi}/{Heidi-Alice}. This conflicts w/ “only Alice/Charlie/David left” logic, so assume poison/drunk or a false claim. Suggest public: lock WW->(Frank/Grace)=Chef + Frank confirm Chef1 + Charlie Empath0, then demand Librarian/Invest + Outsider claim before executing (Saint risk).
🧠
Align key good claims on a consistent public plan: verify Outsider/Invest/Librarian, avoid premature execute into Saint, and use Chef+Empath to focus suspicion on the correct seating pair.
Nominations — Day 1
📜
Storyteller
Nominations are now open.
💬
Charlie
→
All
Alice, David, Eve: If Frank is Chef 1 and I'm Empath 0 (meaning Bob and David are good), the evil pair must be somewhere in the Alice-Heidi-Grace-Eve block. Since Alice is Slayer and Eve is Undertaker, maybe the pair is Grace and Heidi? Has anyone heard from them yet?
🧠
I want to reinforce my fake Empath claim and shift suspicion onto the players furthest from me and the Demon (David). By pointing towards Grace and Heidi, I create a plausible 'evil pair' for the Town to investigate, while appearing helpful and analytical.
💬
Alice
→
All
Before we execute: can we get ANY Librarian/Investigator + Outsider claim? If Chef=1 & Charlie Empath says Bob/David both good, then the only evil-adjacent pair is one of {Eve-Frank, Frank-Grace, Grace-Heidi, Heidi-Alice}. Grace/Heidi/Eve: please weigh in.
🧠
Use remaining time to force missing claims and anchor the Chef/Empath contradiction before any hasty D1 execution; keep my Slayer shot for higher-confidence later.
💬
David
→
All
Alice, Charlie, Eve: If we're looking at {Grace, Heidi} as the potential evil pair, maybe we should hear more from them? Grace, Heidi, what are your roles? We need to narrow this down before we make a move. I'm Soldier, so I'm happy to take a back seat if it helps the town.
🧠
I want to shift the focus onto Grace and Heidi to create suspicion and potentially set up a mis-execution, while maintaining my Soldier bluff.
💬
Eve
→
All
I’ll weigh in: I’m Undertaker (no info yet). We have a hard mech puzzle: if Frank Chef=1 AND Charlie Empath=0 (Bob+David good), the only evil-adjacent pair is {E-F, F-G, G-H, H-A}. Before any execute: can we get Librarian/Invest + any Outsider claim? Also Grace/Heidi, please state what you’re willing to publicly.
🧠
Publicly surface the mechanical contradiction, solicit missing setup info (Outsider/Librarian/Invest), and steer toward a safer Day1 execution that yields Undertaker data without triggering a Saint loss.
💬
Heidi
→
All
I’m Heidi, and I’m the Monk. I’m happy to be public: I plan to protect Frank tonight (Chef claim looks like a Demon target). Also note: we already have WAY more than 5 Townsfolk claims (WW/Chef/Empath/UT/Slayer/Soldier/etc) → someone’s lying or drunk/poisoned, so don’t hard-solve off Chef+Empath alone. Can we get full public role/outsider claims (esp Grace, plus any Librarian/Investigator) before executing?
🧠
Defuse the push onto me/Grace by publicly claiming Monk, highlight role-count mismatch, and steer town to demand missing start-info/Outsider claims before an unsafe D1 execution.
💬
Frank
→
All
Public: I’m Chef. N0 result = 1 (exactly one adjacent evil pair). Don’t hard-solve yet—Chef/Empath could be drunk/poisoned. If Charlie’s Empath0 is true, the evil pair is one of {E-F, F-G, G-H, H-A}. Can we get Librarian/Investigator + Outsider claim now?
🧠
Share my mechanical info clearly, prevent premature hard-solve off possibly poisoned data, and push for Investigator/Librarian/Outsider claims before any Day1 execution.
💬
Grace
→
All
Public: I’m Grace—NOT the Chef (Frank can be). Heidi being Monk + protecting Frank sounds good. I’d strongly prefer we get Librarian/Investigator + any Outsider claim before any D1 execute (Saint risk). If we can’t, I lean no-exec today.
🧠
Publicly confirm I’m not Chef, support Monk protection plan, and push for Librarian/Investigator/Outsider info + likely no-exec to avoid Saint loss and give N1 info.
💬
Bob
→
All
Public from Bob: I’m Washerwoman. N0: either Frank or Grace is the Chef. Grace says not Chef; Frank hard-claims Chef=1, so that fits. Before any D1 execute, can we get full Librarian/Investigator + *Outsider* claim? Also Charlie/David: please restate exact Empath0/Soldier claims publicly so we can map vs Chef1.
🧠
Publicly lock in my WW info, push for missing start-info (Librarian/Investigator/Outsider), and apply pressure to Charlie/David without committing to a risky D1 execution into possible Saint.
💬
Charlie
→
All
Public: I'm Charlie, claiming Empath. My N1 result was 0, meaning my neighbors Bob and David are both good. If Frank's Chef 1 is true, the evil pair must be elsewhere. David, you're Soldier, right? Alice, Eve, what do you think about the Grace/Heidi/Frank block?
🧠
I am publicly stating my bluffed Empath '0' result to support my Demon (David) and establish myself as a helpful Townsfolk. This forces the town to look at other players for the 'evil pair' mentioned by the Chef.
💬
Alice
→
All
Public: I’m Alice, Slayer (shot unused). If we believe Frank Chef=1 + Charlie Empath=0 (Bob&David good), the ONLY possible evil adjacent pair is {Eve-Frank, Frank-Grace, Grace-Heidi}. (I’m good so not H-A.) Grace/Heidi: please full role or Outsider claim. Any Librarian/Invest? If none, I lean no-exec D1.
🧠
Publicly narrow candidate evil pairs under Chef1+Empath0, force missing role/outsider claims (esp Grace), and steer away from a low-info D1 execution while preserving my Slayer shot.
💬
David
→
All
Public: I'm David, and I'm the Soldier. Charlie's Empath 0 makes sense to me since I know I'm good. If Frank's Chef 1 is also true, then the evil pair has to be in that other half of the circle like Alice said. Grace, do you have a role to share? It might help us narrow things down.
🧠
Publicly confirm my Soldier bluff to align with Charlie's Empath claim and keep the town's focus on the other side of the circle.
💬
Eve
→
All
I agree: before a D1 execute we NEED any Librarian/Invest + Outsider claim. If nobody will claim Outsider, I strongly prefer no-exec (Saint risk). Nominations can be pressure only—please don’t pile votes unless we’re confident it’s not Saint.
🧠
Keep town from a Saint loss while extracting missing setup info; set up tomorrow’s execution so my Undertaker info can confirm roles once we execute safely.
💬
Heidi
→
All
Public: I strongly prefer NO-EXEC today unless we get an Outsider claim + Lib/Invest to anchor setup (Saint risk is real). Also: too many TF claims means at least 1 is lying or drunk/poisoned—so don’t hard-solve yet. Charlie/David: can you both restate exact night info/why confident? Anyone claiming Outsider, Librarian, or Investigator—speak now.
🧠
Reduce risk of D1 Saint loss, surface missing setup info (Librarian/Invest/Outsider), and keep high-value roles alive into night while we resolve the Chef/Empath contradiction.
💬
Frank
→
All
Public: +1 to “need Lib/Inv + Outsider claim” before any D1 execute. If nobody has those, I strongly prefer NO-EXEC and let N1 info land (Monk on me). Charlie—confirm your Empath was N1=0 (Bob+David) exactly? Any reason you think you’re sober?
🧠
Get missing setup anchors (Lib/Inv/Outsider), prevent a low-info D1 Saint loss, and set up focused suspects based on Chef1 without overcommitting.
💬
Grace
→
All
I’m not ready to execute D1. We *need* an Outsider claim (Butler/Saint/Recluse) + any Librarian/Investigator info to anchor setup/Baron. Also: is anyone the Virgin and willing to be nominated as a safe test? If none of that surfaces, I’m strongly NO-EXEC today.
🧠
Keep town from a low-info D1 execution (Saint risk) while extracting setup-critical claims (Outsider + Lib/Inv) and offering a safe mechanical test (Virgin) to gain certainty.
💬
Bob
→
All
We need anchor claims NOW: does anyone claim Librarian or Investigator? Also please go around with a simple “Outsider yes/no (and which)”. If no Lib/Inv + no Outsider claim, I strongly favor NO-EXEC D1 (Saint risk). If anyone is Virgin, volunteer for a safe test nomination.
🧠
Push for setup-anchoring claims (Outsider + Lib/Inv) and steer to no-exec unless we can do a low-risk Virgin test; avoid gifting evil a Saint win.
📜
Storyteller
No execution today. All villagers are safe.
Night 1
📜
Storyteller
→
Heidi
Good evening Heidi. You are the Monk. Who would you like to protect tonight?
🎯
Heidi
Heidi made a choice.
🧠
Avoid potentially shielding a bluffing Demon (Frank/Grace) and instead keep our strongest nightly information (Empath) alive to narrow suspects on Day 2.
📜
Storyteller
→
Heidi
You chose to protect Charlie.
📜
Storyteller
→
David
Good evening David. You are the Imp. Who would you like to kill tonight? Remember that if you kill yourself this way, a Minion becomes the Imp.
🎯
David
David made a choice.
🧠
I will kill Alice tonight. She has claimed Slayer, which is a direct mechanical threat to me as the Demon. Removing her early eliminates the risk of being 'shot' during the day and removes a confirmed good player from the board. Since Heidi (Monk) publicly stated she would protect Frank (Chef), Alice is a safe and high-value target.
💀
Alice(Ghost)
Alice has died.
📜
Storyteller
→
David
You chose to kill Alice.
📜
Storyteller
→
Eve
Good evening Eve. You are the Undertaker. No one was executed today so you learn nothing.
Day 2
📜
Storyteller
Morning breaks, but heavy hearts remain. Alice has been found dead in the night.
👤
Grace
→
Bob
,Frank
,Heidi
N1 check-in: Heidi—who did you Monk? Frank—any sus/reads on Alice nightkill? Bob—any followup from WW/worldview? Also: can we push for Lib/Inv/Outsider claims ASAP before noms?
🧠
Get N1 action results + align on nomination targets; confirm whether Heidi protected Frank; keep Mayor identity mostly contained while steering town to solve via logic.
👤
Eve
→
Frank
,Grace
,Charlie
Morning. Before noms can we do quick full-claim check: any Lib/Inv/Outsider? Frank—still Chef=1? Charlie—any reason to think you were poisoned N1? Grace—are you willing to confirm/deny your role in private so we can solve Chef1 w/ Alice dead?
🧠
Coordinate with the key info-holders (Chef/Empath/claimed Mayor) to force missing Lib/Inv/Outsider claims, reconcile the Chef puzzle with Alice’s death, and set a focused execution plan for today.
👤
Bob
→
Grace
,Frank
,Heidi
I’m WW: N0 saw either Frank or Grace is Chef. Frank’s Chef1 fits (if I’m sober). Alice nightkill maybe Demon feared Slayer. Heidi—who did you Monk N1? Grace—agree we should demand Lib/Inv/Outsider claims NOW before noms to check Baron/Drunk.
🧠
Coordinate with my WW ping + today’s nightkill to force missing Lib/Inv/Outsider claims and lock who Heidi protected, tightening the Chef1 adjacency solve before nominations.
👤
Frank
→
Grace
,Bob
,Heidi
Yep still hard Chef=1. If Charlie’s N1=0 is true, evil adjacent pair ∈ {Eve-Frank, Frank-Grace, Grace-Heidi, Heidi-Alice}. Alice died → Heidi-Alice less likely unless Alice was evil. Heidi: who did you Monk N1? Bob/Grace: can we *publicly* demand any Lib/Inv/Outsider now + Charlie’s N2 read + Eve UT info?
🧠
Answer their questions, lock in my Chef info, and force claim/ability accountability (Monk target, Empath N2, UT check) to narrow the single adjacent evil pair before nominations.
👤
Charlie
→
Eve
,Frank
,Grace
Morning. Still Empath 0. No reason to think I was poisoned; my neighbors are Bob and David, and I still see them as good. If Alice is dead, the Demon might be trying to clear the 'Slayer' threat or just hitting a loud voice. I'm still suspicious of the Grace/Heidi/Eve block.
🧠
I need to maintain my Empath 0 claim to protect my Demon (David) and myself. By confirming '0' again, I reinforce the idea that the evil players are among the others (Eve, Frank, Grace, Heidi). I'm also subtly pushing the narrative that the Demon is targeting 'threats' like the Slayer.
👤
Heidi
→
Grace
,Bob
,Frank
I Monked Charlie N1. Alice dying could mean Demon feared Slayer/shot, or just standard kill. Before noms: let’s push PUBLICLY for any Lib/Inv + Outsider claim, get Charlie’s N2 Empath, and Eve’s UT (D1 no-exec so should be nothing).
🧠
Answer who I protected and use it to infer Demon targets; coordinate immediate public info requests (Lib/Inv/Outsider, Charlie N2, Eve UT) to narrow evil pair before nominations.
👤
David
→
Charlie
Hey Charlie, Alice is gone. I'm sticking with the Soldier claim. Bob's Washerwoman claim on Frank (Chef 1) seems to be the town's anchor right now. If Frank is Chef 1, and you're Empath 0, the evil pair has to be Grace/Heidi or Heidi/Eve. Who should we push today?
🧠
Coordinate with my minion Charlie to align our stories and decide on a target for the day based on the current town logic.
👤
Alice(Ghost)
→
Bob
,Charlie
,Grace
I’m dead Slayer (shot unused). Need N1 updates + setup check before noms. If Chef1+Empath0(Bob/David) true, evil-adj pair must be {Eve-Frank,Frank-Grace,Grace-Heidi,Heidi-Alice}; since I’m good, Heidi-Alice => Heidi evil. Can you all push public role/outsider claims + pressure Heidi/Frank/Eve?
🧠
Coordinate with key info holders to force a coherent public world before noms, and steer today’s execution toward the most mechanically likely evil (Heidi/Frank/Eve) while preserving ghost vote for endgame.
👤
Grace
→
Eve
,Charlie
,Alice(Ghost)
Before noms can we do a fast PUBLIC Lib/Inv + Outsider rollcall? Charlie please share N2 Empath asap. Also: if Frank Chef=1 + your Empath0(Bob/David) is true, the only evil-adj pair left (since I know I’m good) is Eve–Frank. Thoughts?
🧠
Coordinate before nominations: get missing setup claims, publish Charlie N2, and pressure the most mechanically likely evil pair without outing my Mayor publicly.
👤
Eve
→
Grace
,Charlie
Grace—what’s the basis for “I know I’m good” (hard role claim in private?) If you’re Mayor, pls confirm to me. Charlie—what’s your N2 Empath? Also agree: let’s do fast PUBLIC Lib/Inv/Outsider rollcall before noms; we should execute today so I can get Undertaker info tonight (but avoid Saint risk).
🧠
Clarify Grace’s basis for being ‘confirmed good’, prompt Charlie for N2 Empath, and steer town to a safe execution after Outsider rollcall so I can generate Undertaker info tonight.
👤
Bob
→
Alice(Ghost)
,Charlie
,Grace
Update: Heidi says she Monked Charlie N1. If Frank Chef1 + Charlie Empath0(Bob/David) are true, and Alice is good, evil adjacent pair can only be {Eve-Frank, Frank-Grace, Grace-Heidi} (NOT Heidi-Alice). We should push PUBLICLY for Lib/Inv/Outsider claims + Charlie N2 Empath ASAP, then focus noms within those pairs.
🧠
Align Alice/Charlie/Grace on the strongest mechanical solve (Chef1+Empath0), prep a public push for missing Lib/Inv/Outsider + Charlie’s N2, and focus suspicions on the three adjacent-pair worlds.
👤
Frank
→
Grace
,Eve
,Charlie
Chef1 still. If your Empath0 is true (Bob/David good), then ONLY evil pair can be G-H or H-A. Alice dead makes those key worlds: (1) Grace+Heidi both evil, or (2) Alice evil/Imp starpass -> Heidi demon. Can you give N2 Empath now? Eve: any UT/claim check? Let’s push PUBLIC full Lib/Inv/Outsider claims asap.
🧠
Align trusted info-holders before nominations: get Charlie N2, press for Lib/Inv/Outsider, and pre-map executions around Chef1 logic pointing to Grace/Heidi unless poisoning explains.
👤
Charlie
→
Eve
,Grace
,Frank
N2 Empath is still 0. Bob and David still look good to me. If Frank is Chef 1, and I'm Empath 0, the evil pair has to be in the Grace/Heidi/Eve block. Alice being dead might be a frame or just removing a Slayer. I'm suspicious of Grace's 'I know I'm good' defense. Thoughts?
🧠
I need to maintain my Empath bluff and provide a consistent Night 2 result (0) to keep my neighbors (the Demon David and the 'confirmed' Bob) looking good. This forces the town to look for the evil pair among the others (Grace, Heidi, Eve, Frank).
👤
Heidi
→
Charlie
,Eve
,Bob
FYI I Monked Charlie N1 (so Demon kill wasn’t on him). Charlie—what’s your N2 Empath number + are your neighbors still Bob/David? Eve—UT has no D1 info; any reads/soft claims from whispers? Bob—let’s press publicly for Lib/Inv/Outsider ASAP.
🧠
Coordinate privately to extract Charlie’s N2 Empath and Eve’s Undertaker status, while pushing the group to demand setup-anchoring claims before nominations so we don’t misexecute into Saint/Mayor worlds.
👤
David
→
Charlie
Hey Charlie, town is looking at Grace/Heidi/Eve because of Frank's Chef 1. If you're Empath 0, and Bob's Washerwoman on Frank is 'true', then the evil pair is definitely in that trio. I'll keep backing you. Should we try to get Grace executed today? She's been quiet.
🧠
Coordinate with my Minion (Charlie) to focus the town's suspicion on Grace, leveraging the Chef 1 and Empath 0 claims to create a logical 'evil pair' trap.
👤
Alice(Ghost)
→
Grace
,Bob
,Charlie
Agree: do FAST public Lib/Inv + Outsider rollcall. Claim math: Bob WW, Charlie Empath, Heidi Monk, Eve UT, David Soldier, Grace Mayor, Frank Chef = 7 TF claims but setup has 5TF+1Out → at least 2 lies/drunk. If Chef1+Empath0 true, only pairs {E-F, F-G, G-H}; Frank in 2/3 so strong exec candidate unless Charlie N2 breaks it.
🧠
Coordinate with key good claims to run a public setup/role rollcall and focus execution on the mechanically most-likely evil pair (often involving Frank), before noms lock in.
👤
Grace
→
Bob
,Charlie
,Eve
Before noms can we do a FAST public rollcall: any Librarian/Investigator + Outsider claim? Charlie please state N2 Empath (you told us 0). Eve confirm UT + that D1 no-exec gives no ping. Then we can focus exec within {Eve,Frank,Heidi} via Chef1+Empath0 math.
🧠
Coordinate public info dump before nominations to anchor setup and narrow to a mechanically-justified execution target while keeping my Mayor claim mostly private.
👤
Eve
→
Bob
,Grace
,Frank
I’ll go PUBLIC: I’m Undertaker; D1 no-exec so no info. Agree fast Lib/Inv+Outsider rollcall before noms (avoid Saint). Given Chef1+Empath0, I think Heidi is best exec today (hits multiple worlds incl Alice→Heidi starpass). Thoughts?
🧠
Coordinate a public rollcall + push a high-information execution so my Undertaker ping tonight can mechanically narrow demon world without risking Saint.
👤
Bob
→
Charlie
,Frank
,Eve
Before noms can you go PUBLIC w/ fast rollcall: any Librarian/Investigator + Outsider claim? Charlie pls state N2 Empath. I’m WW: either Frank/Grace is Chef (so if sober, Frank=Chef1). After info, I lean exec within {Frank,Heidi,Eve}; Frank best odds (in 2/3 Chef1+Empath0 worlds).
🧠
Coordinate a fast public information dump before nominations, then focus execution on the narrow suspect set with best odds (currently Frank/Heidi/Eve) while avoiding blind Saint loss.
👤
Frank
→
Eve
,Bob
,Charlie
Before noms let’s go PUBLIC fast rollcall: any Lib/Inv/Outsider? (Saint risk). I’ll restate Chef=1; Charlie please state N2=0. If Charlie sober, evil adjacent pair basically points at Grace–Heidi (unless Alice evil). I’m ok pushing exec Heidi/Grace after rollcall.
🧠
Coordinate a public info-dump + Outsider/Lib/Inv rollcall before noms, then focus execution on the most mechanically consistent suspects (likely Grace/Heidi) while avoiding Saint loss.
👤
Charlie
→
David
Hey David, town is narrowing it down to Grace/Heidi/Eve because of Frank's Chef 1 and my Empath 0. I'll keep pushing that. If we can get Grace or Heidi executed, it buys us time. I'll go public with my N2 Empath 0 now to keep the 'good' image. Stay the course with Soldier.
🧠
Coordinate with my Demon (David) to maintain our bluffs and target the players the town is already suspicious of (Grace/Heidi/Eve).
👤
Heidi
→
Charlie
,Eve
,Bob
Quick check before noms: Charlie—what’s your N2 Empath number (neighbors still Bob+David?) Eve—any useful whispers/reads since UT has no D1 info? Bob—can you push publicly for Lib/Inv/Outsider claims + confirm WW info again?
🧠
Get Charlie’s N2 Empath and Eve/Bob’s latest reads quickly so we can steer public discussion before nominations and narrow the Chef1 adjacent-evil pair.
👤
David
→
Charlie
Got it. I'll back your N2 Empath 0. If you're still seeing 0, it really points the finger at Grace/Heidi/Eve. I'll mention that as a 'Soldier' I'm feeling safe but worried about the information roles being picked off. Let's see if we can get Grace to claim.
🧠
Coordinate with my Minion (Charlie) to solidify our fake claims and target a good player (Grace) for execution.
👤
Alice(Ghost)
→
Charlie
,Grace
,Bob
Charlie: please share N2 Empath (and whether you feel poisoned). Grace/Bob: in town square push FAST Lib/Inv + Outsider rollcall. Current claims exceed TF slots → ≥2 lies/drunk. If Chef1+Empath0 holds, suspects concentrate on {Eve,Frank,Grace,Heidi}; I’d exec Frank unless N2 changes.
🧠
Get Charlie’s N2 Empath ASAP and align Grace/Bob on a public claim rollcall + likely exec targets (Frank/Eve/Heidi). Preserve my ghost vote for endgame.
👤
Grace
→
Bob
,Frank
,Charlie
Let’s go PUBLIC asap: rollcall Lib/Inv + Outsider claim (avoid Saint trap). Charlie state N2=0. After rollcall we should converge on ONE exec: either Heidi (tests Monk/our suspect block) or Frank (Chef could be lie). Pls don’t mention my private role.
🧠
Coordinate a clean public rollcall for Lib/Inv/Outsider before noms, then converge on a single execution candidate (Heidi or Frank) without outing my Mayor claim widely.
👤
Eve
→
Bob
,Grace
,Frank
We have 1 tick: propose we all go PUBLIC w/ fast Lib/Inv + Outsider rollcall (Saint risk). I’ll say UT; D1 no-exec ⇒ no info. After rollcall I lean exec Heidi today (covers Grace–Heidi pair & Alice→Heidi starpass worlds). If Heidi good we pivot to Frank/Eve/Grace.
🧠
Align key voices on a fast public Lib/Inv/Outsider rollcall (Saint safety), then focus nomination on Heidi as the best multi-world execute to generate Undertaker info tonight.
👤
Bob
→
Grace
,Charlie
,Eve
1 tick: pls go PUBLIC asap w/ fast rollcall: any Librarian/Investigator + Outsider claim? Charlie share N2 Empath + confirm neighbors Bob/David. Eve restate UT (no D1 info). After that I’ll push exec in {Frank,Heidi,Eve}; w/ WW ping+Chef1, Frank is best odds (in 2/3 Chef1+Empath0 worlds) unless new info.
🧠
Last tick before noms: force public setup anchors + get Charlie N2; then converge on 1 execution target. My WW info makes Frank statistically best hit unless new data clears him.
👤
Frank
→
Grace
,Eve
,Bob
1 tick left: let’s ALL go public w/ fast rollcall: any Lib/Inv + Outsider claim (Saint check). I’ll restate Chef=1; Charlie should state N2 Empath=0. If no Outsider claim, I lean exec Heidi (tests Grace–Heidi pair / Heidi-demon worlds). Don’t out private roles.
🧠
Coordinate a fast public rollcall + unified nomination plan that avoids Saint trap and focuses execution on the most mechanically likely evil (Heidi first), without outing Grace’s private role.
👤
Charlie
→
Grace
,Eve
,Frank
I'm still Empath 0. Bob and David are my neighbors and they still look good. If Frank is Chef 1, the evil pair has to be in the Grace/Heidi/Eve block. Alice's death is a huge loss, but it confirms she was likely the Slayer. Let's do the public rollcall now.
🧠
I need to maintain my 'good' persona by providing my N2 info (Empath 0) and supporting the town's plan for a public rollcall. This keeps the suspicion on the Grace/Heidi/Eve block and away from my Demon, David.
👤
Heidi
→
Charlie
,Grace
,David
Need fast: Charlie—N2 Empath # (neighbors still Bob+David)? Any reason you’d be poisoned/targeted? Grace—still want Mayor quiet or consider outing pre-noms? I can Monk-protect someone N2. David—any reason to doubt Charlie’s Empath or your Soldier claim?
🧠
Get Charlie N2 info and align w/ Grace+David on whether to out Mayor / who to test-execute today; decide best Monk protection for N2.
👤
David
→
Heidi
,Charlie
,Grace
Heidi, I have no reason to doubt Charlie. His N1 Empath 0 matches my Soldier claim perfectly. If I'm good and he sees 0, it means he's likely good too. As for me, I'm still Soldier. I haven't been targeted yet, or if I was, my ability worked. I think we should look at Grace or Eve today based on Frank's Chef 1.
🧠
I need to reinforce the trust between myself, Charlie, and Heidi while subtly pushing the suspicion towards Grace and Eve. By affirming Charlie's info and my own 'Soldier' status, I maintain my cover and follow the 'Chef 1' logic that points away from me.
👤
Alice(Ghost)
→
Charlie
,Bob
,Grace
Need Charlie N2 Empath NOW (neighbors Bob+David again). If still 0 & Chef=1, evil-adj pair in {Eve-Frank,Frank-Grace,Grace-Heidi} ⇒ Frank highest EV exec. Bob/Grace: push immediate public Lib/Inv+Outsider rollcall; 7 TF claims => ≥2 lies/drunk.
🧠
Get Charlie’s N2 Empath before noms and coordinate Bob/Grace to force a public role+Outsider rollcall; steer town toward most mechanically justified execution (likely Frank) unless N2 breaks it.
Nominations — Day 2
📜
Storyteller
Nominations are now open. Please remember that only living players may nominate.
💬
David
→
All
Heidi, I'm sticking with my Soldier claim. Charlie's Empath 0 on N1 and N2 (if he confirms it) makes me feel very solid about our side of the circle. If Frank's Chef 1 is right, the evil pair has to be among Grace, Eve, or maybe you. Grace, do you have a role to share before we start nominating?
🧠
I want to maintain my Soldier bluff and reinforce the 'safe' pocket I've built with Charlie (my Minion). By questioning Grace publicly, I'm pushing the town's focus toward the players identified as potentially evil by the Chef 1 info, while appearing helpful and logical.
💬
Alice(Ghost)
→
All
Public: I’m the dead Slayer (shot unused; can’t use now). Charlie—please confirm N2 Empath. We MUST do Lib/Inv + Outsider rollcall NOW (if you’re Saint, speak up). Grace: you need to answer David w/ your role. If Empath stays 0 & Chef=1, I’d exec Frank today.
🧠
Use my dead voice to force rolecount/Outsider clarity, get Charlie’s N2 on record, and steer town to a high-EV execution (Frank) while avoiding a Saint loss.
💬
Bob
→
All
PUBLIC: I’m Washerwoman. N0 I saw either FRANK or GRACE is the CHEF. Frank claims Chef=1. Charlie please confirm N2 Empath + neighbors. Also: any Librarian/Investigator + any Outsider (Saint/Butler/Recluse/Drunk) claim NOW. Grace, please give a role claim. If Empath=0 & Chef=1 ⇒ evil pair in {Eve-Frank, Frank-Grace, Grace-Heidi} so Frank is strong exec.
🧠
Use last daylight to lock in claims/setup then steer group to a high-EV execution (likely Frank) before night kills erase info.
💬
Grace
→
All
PUBLIC: I’m the MAYOR. Not Chef, not Saint. +1 to Bob: any Librarian/Investigator + Outsider claim NOW. If Bob’s WW {Frank/Grace}=Chef & I’m not, Frank is likely Chef=1; w/ Charlie Empath still 0, I prefer exec/noms on FRANK over Heidi.
🧠
Answer David with my real role to reduce suspicion on Grace, push fast rollcall, and steer execution toward Frank (highest mechanical/EV) to generate UT confirmation.
⚖️
Heidi
→
Frank
Nominate FRANK: WW saw {Frank/Grace}=Chef, Grace claims Mayor not Chef, so Frank is prime. Chef=1 also implicates adjacency around Frank. Even if Frank is good, UT gets confirmed role tonight to anchor worlds.
🧠
With no Lib/Inv/Outsider anchor and time short, executing Frank is the most mechanically motivated test and gives Undertaker actionable info tonight.
📜
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Frank. 4 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
⌛
David
David waits.
🧠
I will wait to see how the town reacts to Frank's nomination. As the Demon, I want to avoid being the first to jump on a Minion's execution unless it's necessary for my cover, and I want to see if enough good players vote to reach the threshold without my help.
✋
Alice(Ghost)
Alice raised their hand
🧠
Spend my ghost vote to help secure an execution on the highest-EV suspect (Frank) and avoid another no-execution day, which strongly favors evil.
✋
Bob
Bob raised their hand
🧠
Secure enough votes to execute Frank; either we kill an evil or we confirm key info via Undertaker, tightening the suspect pool for Day 3.
✋
Grace
Grace raised their hand
🧠
We need an execution to gain Undertaker confirmation and because Frank is mechanically central (WW+Chef). Voting yes maximizes chance to hit Demon and still yields strong info if wrong.
✋
Heidi
Heidi raised their hand
🧠
We need 4 votes; executing Frank either removes likely evil or yields Undertaker-confirmed character to resolve Chef/WW/Major worldbuilding.
✋
Eve
Eve raised their hand
🧠
Secure the execution to gain Undertaker-confirmed info tonight and advance solve; with 4 already up, adding my vote ensures no last-second wobble.
💬
Frank
→
All
I’m Chef, not voting myself. If you execute me & UT sees Chef tonight, you MUST execute within {Grace,Heidi} tomorrow—Chef1+Empath0 then forces G–H as the only evil pair. If UT doesn’t see Chef, reassess WW/Empath/poison.
🧠
Try to stop my execution and redirect to a better demon-hunt. If I can’t stop it, set a clear follow-up plan: if UT sees Chef, execute within Grace/Heidi immediately.
💬
Charlie
→
All
Wait! Before we rush this, I'm Empath 0 again. Bob and David are still good. If Frank is the Chef, his '1' means the evil pair is adjacent. If I'm 0, it can't be Bob-Frank or David-Heidi. It has to be Frank-Grace, Grace-Heidi, or Heidi-Eve. Executing Frank might be a mistake if he's the Chef.
🧠
I need to appear helpful to the good team while subtly casting doubt on the Frank execution to see if I can pivot the town towards Grace or Heidi, or at least make the 'Chef 1' logic seem more complex than it is. Confirmed my N2 Empath 0 to maintain my cover.
💬
David
→
All
Charlie's N2 Empath 0 really solidifies our side of the circle. If Frank is the Chef and saw 1, and Charlie sees 0, the evil pair must be among Grace, Heidi, or Eve. Executing Frank now seems risky if he's our only source of '1' info. Maybe we should look at Grace or Heidi instead?
🧠
I want to divert the execution away from Frank (who is a good player being framed by the logic) and instead push for a mis-execution on Grace or Heidi, while maintaining my 'Soldier' persona and supporting my Minion Charlie's 'Empath' claim.
💬
Alice(Ghost)
→
All
Keep votes on Frank. Under Chef1+Empath0, evils must be adjacent among {Eve-Frank, Frank-Grace, Grace-Heidi} → Frank in 2/3 worlds. If UT sees Chef, tomorrow hard-push Grace+Heidi. If UT not Chef, reassess WW/Empath/poison.
🧠
Lock in a high-EV execution that either wins (if Frank demon) or creates strong mechanical follow-ups (UT confirmation → force Grace/Heidi).
💬
Bob
→
All
Don’t get spooked off Frank. My WW saw Frank/Grace is Chef; Grace is Mayor so Frank=Chef world. With Chef1 + Charlie Empath0, evil pair must be adjacent in {E-F, F-G, G-H} so Frank is in 2/3. Exec Frank → UT check tonight; if UT sees Chef, tomorrow we hard-push within {Grace,Heidi,Eve}.
🧠
Keep majority on Frank: he’s mechanically implicated and his execution gives Undertaker confirmation to lock tomorrow’s solve.
💬
Grace
→
All
Keep votes on Frank. Under Chef1+Empath0, evil pair must be adjacent in {E-F, F-G, G-H} → Frank in 2/3 worlds. If UT sees Chef tonight, tomorrow we solve within {Grace/Heidi/Eve}. If not Chef, reassess WW/Empath/poison.
🧠
Lock in a high-EV execution that either kills evil now or yields hard mechanical info via Undertaker; prevent analysis paralysis from losing the day.
💬
Heidi
→
All
Keep votes on Frank. If UT sees Chef tonight, we narrow to {Eve/Grace/Heidi} under Chef1+Empath0. If UT doesn’t see Chef, Frank likely evil or info chain poisoned—then reassess WW/Empath + look for Poisoner. This is best info exec.
🧠
Keep execution on Frank for max info gain (UT confirmation) and because Frank is in 2/3 Chef1+Empath0 worlds; speaking keeps town from wobbling and sets clear next-day branches.
💬
Eve
→
All
Keep votes on Frank for the UT anchor. Heidi: if you’re Monk, please protect ME tonight so I survive to report what Frank was. Tomorrow: if I see Chef, we solve within {Eve/Grace/Heidi}; if not, reassess for poison/lying.
🧠
Lock in high-info exec and coordinate protection so I (UT) likely survive to report tonight’s executed character tomorrow.
💬
Frank
→
All
If I go down: Heidi please protect Eve (UT) tonight. Tomorrow: UT result helps but isn’t absolute (Spy can mess with regs). Also don’t auto-rule out Heidi–Alice as the Chef1 pair if Alice was evil. Use Charlie’s 0s to keep Bob/David low sus and focus {Eve/Grace/Heidi}.
🧠
Steer town to a robust post-exec plan: don’t overtrust a single UT read, keep H-A possibility alive, and ensure Monk protection keeps UT alive for info.
✋
Charlie
Charlie raised their hand
🧠
I will join the vote to execute Frank. Since the town is already committed and my Demon (David) is safe, executing a good player (Frank) while appearing to cooperate with the 'logic' of the town is the best move. It builds my credibility as a 'good' Empath and moves the game toward a state where I can potentially become the Demon if David is ever targeted.
📜
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
👻
Alice(Ghost)
Ghost vote used by Alice
🗳️
New execution leader: Frank with 6 votes. They will be executed when nominations close unless tied or surpassed by another nominee.
📜
Storyteller
The vote passes. Frank is now on the block with 6 votes and will be executed when nominations close, unless another nominee receives equal or more votes.
💬
David
→
All
Frank's execution seems set. If Eve is the Undertaker, Heidi, you definitely need to protect her tonight. If Frank really is the Chef, your info tomorrow will be the key to finding the evil pair among Grace, Heidi, and Eve. I'm sticking with Charlie's Empath 0 for now.
🧠
Reinforce the current narrative that focuses suspicion on the other side of the circle (Grace, Heidi, Eve) while appearing to help the town's strategy.
💬
Alice(Ghost)
→
All
No more chaos noms—let Frank go through unless you can BEAT 6 with a hard case. Heidi: protect Eve tonight (UT anchor). Tomorrow: if UT sees CHEF, solve within {Eve/Grace/Heidi}; if not CHEF, suspect poison/lying in WW/Empath/UT chain.
🧠
Lock in best-info execution, prevent late tie, and maximize chance UT survives to confirm Frank, giving us a tight solve set for D3.
💬
Bob
→
All
No more chaos noms unless you can BEAT 6 with a hard mech case. Let Frank go through for UT anchor. Heidi: please protect Eve tonight. Eve: report Frank’s role tomorrow; if CHEF, we focus {Eve/Grace/Heidi}; if not, reassess for poison/lying.
🧠
Lock in the best-info execution, stop last-second counter-noms, and set clear Night/Day3 plan: protect Undertaker and solve from UT result.
💬
Grace
→
All
Agree: no more chaos noms unless you can BEAT 6 with hard mech. Heidi please protect Eve tonight so UT reports Frank. Tomorrow: if UT=Chef, focus evil pair among {Eve/Grace/Heidi} (likely G-H or E-G). If not Chef, reassess for poison/lying.
🧠
Keep today clean: let the info-exec stand, ensure Heidi protects Eve for UT anchor, and set clear branching plan for tomorrow so evil can’t steer chaos.
💬
Heidi
→
All
I’ll protect Eve tonight (UT anchor). Everyone: don’t spin off unless you can beat 6 votes w/ hard mech. Tomorrow: if Eve sees CHEF, we focus solve inside {Eve/Grace/Heidi}; if not CHEF, reassess WW/Empath for poison/lying.
🧠
Lock in best info line: let Frank die, ensure Undertaker survives via my Monk, and set clear decision rules for tomorrow based on UT result.
💬
Eve
→
All
No more noms unless you can BEAT 6 w/ hard mech. Before close: can Librarian/Investigator + any Outsider (Saint/Butler/Recluse) please claim NOW? That lets us verify/override my UT result tomorrow if poison/Spy shenanigans.
🧠
Lock in high-info execute and harvest any remaining first-night info (Lib/Inv/Outsider) before nominations close, so tomorrow’s UT read can be verified or challenged.
💬
Frank
→
All
Last call before noms close: Librarian/Investigator PLEASE hard-claim now, and any Outsider (Saint/Butler/Recluse/Drunk ping) speak up. If none, say “no info”. Heidi protect Eve tonight. Tomorrow: if UT=Chef → evil pair inside {Eve/Grace/Heidi}.
🧠
Use last daylight to lock in extra mechanical claims (Lib/Inv/Outsider) so tomorrow we can validate/override UT/Empath and avoid wandering after my execution.
⌛
Charlie
Charlie waits.
🧠
Allow the nomination phase to end and Frank to be executed.
📜
Storyteller
The guillotine blade falls. Frank has been executed.
💀
Frank(Ghost)
Frank has died.
Night 2
📜
Storyteller
→
Heidi
Good evening Heidi. You are the Monk. Who would you like to protect tonight?
🎯
Heidi
Heidi made a choice.
🧠
Eve is the highest-value night target as the claimed Undertaker anchor for today’s execution; protecting her maximizes chance we get actionable mechanical info tomorrow.
📜
Storyteller
→
Heidi
You chose to protect Eve.
📜
Storyteller
→
David
Good evening David. You are the Imp. Who would you like to kill tonight? Remember that if you kill yourself this way, a Minion becomes the Imp.
🎯
David
David made a choice.
🧠
I am killing Eve (the Undertaker) to prevent her from confirming Frank's role. If she confirms Frank as the Chef, the town will focus their search on Grace and Heidi (the 'evil pair' according to the Chef 1 + Empath 0 logic). By removing the Undertaker, I create uncertainty about Frank's alignment and Charlie's Empath information, potentially leading the town to suspect poisoning or a Spy. This also protects my Minion, Charlie, from being scrutinized if the Undertaker's info contradicts our narrative.
🛡️
Eve was protected from a night kill.
📜
Storyteller
→
David
You attacked Eve, but they survived.
📜
Storyteller
→
Eve
Good evening Eve. You are the Undertaker. You learn that Frank was the Chef.
Day 3
📜
Storyteller
A peaceful night has passed. All villagers are present and accounted for.
👤
Eve
→
Charlie
,Heidi
,Grace
Need quick updates before noms: Charlie—what was your N3 Empath number (neighbors Bob/David)? Heidi—did you protect me N2 as planned, and who did you protect last night? Grace—why Mayor now; are you pushing for no-exec at 3? I’m UT: Frank confirmed Chef.
🧠
Get fresh N3 info (Empath/Monk) and pin down whether we should execute within the Grace/Heidi/me triangle or test Bob/David, before nominations.
👤
Alice(Ghost)
→
Eve
,Charlie
,Grace
Need fast check-in before noms: Eve—what was your UT on Frank? (exact role) + any reason you could be poisoned? Charlie—confirm Empath N1/N2 and your current neighbors. Grace—still Mayor? any new info/plan if 3 alive no-exec win.
🧠
Get the missing mechanical anchor (UT on Frank) + confirm Empath/Monk/Mayor claims to narrow to a Demon candidate before nominations; I can’t vote so must influence discussion.
👤
David
→
Charlie
Eve survived! Heidi must be the Monk. If Eve saw Chef for Frank, then the evil pair is likely Grace and someone else. I'm sticking with Soldier. What did Eve tell you?
🧠
Coordinate with my minion Charlie to align our stories and find out what Eve (the Undertaker) is claiming about the executed Frank.
👤
Charlie
→
David
Eve says Frank was Chef. My N3 Empath is still 0 (Bob/David). If Frank was Chef 1 and I'm 0, the evil pair must be Grace/Heidi or Grace/Eve. David is Soldier, so he's safe. We should probably look at Grace or Heidi today. What do you think?
🧠
I need to coordinate with my Demon (David) and maintain my cover as the Empath. I'm sharing the 'info' I just got from Eve to ensure we are on the same page regarding the town's logic.
👤
Frank(Ghost)
→
Charlie
,Heidi
,Grace
Do we have an Undertaker? If yes, what did you see for my D2 execution? Also Heidi: who did you protect last night (no deaths)? Grace: any Mayor-bounce/target info? If UT shows I’m Chef, Chef1+Empath0 seems to force evil pair = Grace+Heidi.
🧠
Get the Undertaker result on my execution and confirm Monk/Mayor actions. If UT confirms Chef, we can mechanically narrow to the only adjacent evil pair and guide nominations.
👤
Bob
→
Eve
,Heidi
,Charlie
Need today’s anchor: Eve—what did UT see on Frank? Heidi—who did you protect last night (still Eve?) Charlie—any new reads/poison worries? Also: no deaths; does that line up w your actions?
🧠
Get the key mechanical anchor (UT on Frank) + reconcile the no-kill with Monk/Soldier/Mayor claims so we can enter nominations with a tight suspect set.
👤
Grace
→
Eve
,Charlie
,Heidi
Still Mayor. Not pushing no-exec now; only relevant if 3 alive & I’m alive. If your UT is Frank=Chef, then Chef1 + Charlie Empath0 on Bob/David => adjacent evil pair likely involves Heidi (Grace-Heidi or Heidi-Alice) unless poison. Charlie N3? Heidi: protect N2+N3 who?
🧠
Answer their questions, align on mechanical worlds, and steer noms toward the most consistent demon candidate while flagging poison/lying possibilities.
👤
Heidi
→
Eve
,Charlie
,Grace
Answers: I’m Monk. N1 I protected Charlie. N2 I protected Eve (as planned). No N3 yet (we just had Night2). No-death could be Demon hit Eve (my protect) or hit David if Soldier true, or chose no-kill. Also: If UT says Frank=Chef AND Charlie’s Empath0 on Bob+David is true, then Chef1 forces evil pair to be Grace+Heidi, which can’t be right if I’m good—so at least one of UT/Empath/Chef is wrong/poisoned/lying. Need to pick an execution to test (Grace or David seem most pivotal).
🧠
Answer their questions, explain why Chef+Empath+UT can’t all be true, and steer town to a decisive nomination plan while my protection keeps key info roles alive.
👤
Eve
→
Bob
,Charlie
,Heidi
Quick sync before noms: confirm there’s been only N1+N2 (no N3 yet). Charlie—any reason you might be poisoned either night? Bob—does WW info still point at Grace? Heidi—any chance your Monk is a bluff/you were poisoned N2? Chef1+Empath0s implies evil pair among {Eve-Grace,Grace-Heidi,Heidi-Alice} → likely exec Grace or Heidi.
🧠
Get clarity on Empath timing (no N3 yet), and align town on a high-value execution (Grace/Heidi/David) using Chef1+no-death. Also confirm whether my UT could be poisoned.
👤
Alice(Ghost)
→
Eve
,Charlie
,Heidi
Quick before noms: Eve—UT result on executed Frank (exact char) & any poison suspicion? Charlie—confirm Empath N1/N2 + current alive neighbors. Heidi—who protected N2, any reason it failed/changed? I’m dead/no vote but want solve.
🧠
Get exact UT + Empath + protection info before nominations so town can narrow demon world despite me being dead/no vote.
👤
David
→
Charlie
If Eve saw Chef for Frank, and your Empath is 0, then Grace is the most suspicious. Heidi could be the Monk who saved Eve, which makes her look good. Let's push for Grace today. I'll keep playing the 'safe' Soldier. Did Eve mention any other info?
🧠
Coordinate with my Minion (Charlie) to focus the town's suspicion on Grace, leveraging the 'Chef 1' and 'Empath 0' logic to frame her while maintaining my Soldier bluff.
👤
Charlie
→
David
Eve saw Frank as Chef. My N3 Empath is still 0 (Bob/David). If Frank was Chef 1 and I'm 0, the evil pair must be Grace/Heidi or Grace/Eve. Since you're Soldier, you're safe. Let's push for Grace today. She's the most suspicious if Heidi really is the Monk who saved Eve.
🧠
Coordinate with my Demon (David) to target Grace, who is a strong candidate for execution based on the current 'good' logic chain.
👤
Frank(Ghost)
→
Charlie
,Bob
,Heidi
Any UT claim/result for my D2 exec? If UT says Frank=Chef, with your Empath 0s it seems evil pair must be Grace+Heidi (adjacent). If UT absent/contradicts, we need revisit WW/Empath for poison/drunk/Spy + why my exec was pushed.
🧠
Get confirmation on Undertaker result and align the town on the mechanical solve (Chef1+Empath0). If UT missing/contradicts, pivot to poison/Spy worlds and target likely evil pair.
👤
Bob
→
Eve
,Heidi
,Charlie
WW info still: either Frank/Grace was Chef; Grace’s Mayor claim made me think Frank=Chef. Eve: please state UT N2 result on Frank (Chef?). Heidi: who did you protect last night? Charlie: any new Empath / poison concerns? No-death needs explaining.
🧠
Get the N2 Undertaker result on Frank + confirm Monk protection to explain no death; then drive a clean nomination target (likely Grace or Heidi) using Chef/Empath chains.
👤
Grace
→
Eve
,Charlie
,Heidi
I’m still Mayor. Please confirm: Charlie—exact Empath nums N1/N2 on (Bob,David) + any poison suspicion? Eve—UT result was Frank=Chef, right; any chance you were poisoned? Heidi—can you protect me tonight? Also I think today’s exec should probably be David or Eve (Chef1 adjacency + contradictions). Thoughts?
🧠
Get crisp confirmations before noms, push the table toward executing within the most likely adjacent pair, and ask Monk to protect me so we can leverage Mayor endgame.
👤
Heidi
→
Eve
,Bob
,Charlie
I think today’s best exec is DAVID. He’s in the only plausible Chef1 adjacent pairs (C-D or D-E) and his Soldier claim fits no-death too well. If we kill David, Eve UT can confirm role tonight (Soldier vs Imp). If David not demon, we pivot onto Charlie/Grace/Eve based on UT.
🧠
Force a high-leverage execution (David) that resolves the Chef/Empath/UT contradiction and lets Eve prove UT tonight; meanwhile I keep protecting Eve to preserve the info engine.
👤
Eve
→
Bob
,Charlie
,Heidi
I’m leaning we exec David today: either we hit Demon or I UT-check him tonight (Soldier vs Imp etc) to resolve Chef1+Empath0 contradiction. Charlie please restate N1/N2=0 publicly + any poison worry. Bob, help steer noms to David/Grace.
🧠
Drive a high-info execution (David) that either wins (if Demon) or gives me an Undertaker confirmation tonight to break the Chef/Empath contradiction.
👤
Alice(Ghost)
→
Eve
,Charlie
,Heidi
Please reply w/ specifics before noms: Eve—UT on executed Frank (exact character) + any poison reason? Heidi—who did you protect N2? (peaceful night suggests correct) Charlie—confirm Empath N1/N2 numbers + your CURRENT alive neighbors (seating changed w/ deaths).
🧠
Get concrete mechanical anchors (UT result + Monk target + Empath neighbors) to narrow to a single adjacent evil pair before nominations.
👤
David
→
Charlie
Charlie, if Eve saw Frank as Chef, and your Empath is 0, then Grace is the most suspicious. Heidi could be the Monk who saved Eve, which makes her look good. Let's push for Grace today. I'll keep playing the 'safe' Soldier. Did Eve mention any other info?
🧠
Coordinate with my Minion (Charlie) to frame Grace and solidify our bluffs.
👤
Charlie
→
Heidi
,Eve
,Bob
Heidi/Eve/Bob: My N1/N2 Empath was 0 (Bob/David). N3 (last night) was also 0. If Frank was Chef 1, the evil pair must be adjacent. Since I'm 0, it's not Bob/me or me/David. That leaves Grace/Heidi or Grace/Eve. David as Soldier explains the no-kill too. I'm leaning Grace today. Thoughts?
🧠
I need to reinforce my 'Empath 0' claim to keep David (the Demon) safe and shift the 'evil pair' logic away from our side of the circle. By pointing at Grace/Heidi or Grace/Eve, I create conflict among the other players.
👤
Frank(Ghost)
→
Charlie
,Heidi
,David
Any Undertaker claim/result for my D2 execution? Heidi—who did you protect last night (no deaths)? Charlie—confirm your N1/N2 Empath=0 and any poisoning concerns. If UT says Frank=Chef and you’re sober, evil pair basically forces Grace+Heidi.
🧠
Get mechanical anchors (UT result, Monk protect, Empath details) before nominations so town can focus executes on the only consistent evil-pair world; conserve my ghost vote for a high-confidence Demon kill.
👤
Bob
→
Eve
,Charlie
,Heidi
Need anchor before noms: Eve pls state UT N2 result on Frank publicly ASAP. If Frank=Chef and Charlie’s Empath 0s hold, evil pair is Grace+Heidi → we should exec one of them (I lean Heidi over risking Mayor). Heidi: who did you protect last night?
🧠
Force the key public anchor (UT on Frank) and push the group off a low-info David exec unless poison evidence appears; narrow to Grace/Heidi if Frank=Chef and Empath consistent.
👤
Grace
→
Eve
,Charlie
,Bob
Need tight restate before noms: Eve—UT on Frank exactly ‘Chef’? any poison concern (who could’ve poisoned you N2)? Charlie—Empath N1=0,N2=0 on Bob+David still? any reason you’re drunk/poisoned? Bob—WW {Frank/Grace} Chef only info? Any Outsider claims seen?
🧠
Get crisp, public restatements of key claims + poison plausibility, then steer town to a high-leverage execution (David or Eve) before noms to resolve the Chef/UT/Empath contradiction.
👤
Heidi
→
Eve
,Bob
,Charlie
Charlie: check—there’s only been N1+N2 so far. Why did you say N3=0? If it’s a mistake, please correct publicly. I still think we exec David today for UT-check (Soldier vs Imp) & resolve Chef1/Empath contradictions.
🧠
Clarify the impossible “N3” claim and keep town aligned on a high-information execution (David) while I continue to protect Undertaker at night.
👤
Eve
→
Charlie
,Bob
,Heidi
Quick correction: we’ve only had N1+N2 so far (night just passed was N2). Charlie pls clarify if “N3=0” was a slip. My UT N2: Frank was Chef (confirms Chef1). With only Empath N1/N2=0 on Bob/David, Chef1 adjacency points to {Grace-Eve or Grace-Heidi} unless poison/lie. I’m ok exec David for UT-check, but Heidi/Grace also fit.
🧠
Fix timeline confusion before noms and align Bob/Charlie/Heidi on best execution plan that yields a decisive UT check tonight.
👤
Alice(Ghost)
→
Eve
,Charlie
,Heidi
30s to noms: please reply SPECIFICS + say it publicly. Eve: UT result on Frank (exact character). Heidi: who did you protect N2? Charlie: confirm Empath N1/N2 + your alive neighbors. If UT=Chef & Empath0, Chef1 forces evil pair Grace-Heidi → exec one today.
🧠
Force key info (UT/Monk/Empath) into the open before noms and propose the clean solve line (Chef+Empath0 ⇒ Grace/Heidi). Reduce time-wasting and prevent evil steering.
👤
David
→
Frank(Ghost)
,Charlie
,Heidi
Frank, I'm Soldier. Charlie's Empath 0 on me/Bob makes us look solid. If Eve saw you as Chef, and Heidi saved Eve, then Grace is the outlier. Grace, what's your role? We need to find the evil pair. If Charlie is 0, and Frank was Chef 1, the pair is Grace/Heidi or Grace/Eve.
🧠
I want to reinforce my Soldier bluff and align with the current town logic that points toward Grace. By publicly (in this group whisper) acknowledging the Chef 1/Empath 0 logic, I appear to be a helpful good player. I'm also subtly putting pressure on Grace to claim a role, which might force her into a corner.
👤
Charlie
→
Eve
,Heidi
,Bob
Wait, I misspoke! I meant N1 and N2 were 0. We just finished N2. My bad, got ahead of myself. My neighbors are still Bob and David. If Frank was Chef 1 and I'm 0, the evil pair is Grace/Heidi or Grace/Eve. I'm leaning Grace today because Heidi's Monk claim explains the no-kill. Thoughts?
🧠
Correct my 'N3' slip-up to maintain credibility as a 'confused' good player and push the suspicion onto Grace/Heidi/Eve based on the Chef 1 logic.
👤
Frank(Ghost)
→
Charlie
,Heidi
,Grace
Need crisp info before noms: 1) Any Undertaker claim/result for my D2 exec (was I seen as Chef)? 2) Heidi—who did you protect last night (peaceful night suggests Monk/Soldier hit)? 3) Grace—any Mayor-bounce/attack info? If UT=Chef + Charlie Empath N1/N2=0 (Bob+David), then only evil pair left is Grace+Heidi.
🧠
Get the missing mechanical pieces (UT result + Monk target + Mayor bounce) and pressure-test Grace/Heidi world before nominations; coordinate my single ghost vote.
👤
Bob
→
Eve
,Charlie
,David
I think we should NOT exec David. With UT=Frank Chef(1) + Charlie Empath N1/N2=0 on Bob/David, only adjacent evil pair is Grace-Eve or Grace-Heidi → Grace is in every world, so Grace is best exec today.
🧠
Coordinate likely-good voices to steer nominations to the highest-probability demon (Grace) using hard mechanical chain (Chef1+Empath0).
👤
Grace
→
Charlie
,Heidi
,David
Need clarity pre-noms: Charlie—any chance you’re Drunk/poisoned (any oddities) + reconfirm N1/N2 empath=0 on Bob/David? Heidi—who protect last night (N2) + plan N3? David—if you’re Soldier, do you think Demon hit you last night (no-death) or was it Monk save?
🧠
Lock exact claims + poison targets before nominations, then steer town to a single high-impact execution (Eve or David) while keeping myself alive for Mayor endgame.
👤
Heidi
→
Eve
,Bob
,Charlie
We need crisp public recap: Charlie N1=0 N2=0 on (Bob/David); Eve UT saw Frank=Chef. With Chef1+Empath0, evil adjacency forces Grace with {Heidi or Eve} unless poison/lie. I’m Monk, protected Eve N2. I think we exec Grace today over David.
🧠
Align the 3 key info hubs (Bob/Charlie/Eve) on a coherent public statement and steer today’s execution toward the highest-leverage suspect (Grace) given Chef1+Empath0 tension.
Nominations — Day 3
📜
Storyteller
Nominations are now open. Please remember that only living players may nominate.
⚖️
Heidi
→
Grace
Nominate Grace: Chef=1 + Charlie Empath 0s means the adjacent evil pair likely includes Grace with {Eve or Heidi} (unless poison/lie). Grace’s quiet Mayor claim is unverified and fits an evil bluff. If she’s good, we lose little; if evil, we gain a lot.
🧠
Chef1+Empath0 worldpoints keep circling around Grace as the common denominator or key bluff. Executing Grace today maximizes resolution and reduces late-game Mayor-bluff risk.
📜
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Grace. 3 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
✋
Heidi
Heidi raised their hand
🧠
I nominated Grace and she is in the forced-adjacency set from Chef1+Empath0. Voting to execute maximizes chance to hit Demon/Minion and reduces endgame uncertainty.
💬
Grace
→
All
Please don’t vote me. I hard-claimed Mayor since D2—keeping me alive gives us a 3-alive no-exec win line. My exec gives almost zero info. If you want a resolving kill, put pressure on Eve(UT) or David(Soldier) instead; one of UT/Empath is wrong/poisoned.
🧠
Prevent an info-poor Mayor execution; preserve my 3-alive no-exec win condition and redirect town to higher-info executions (Eve or David) to resolve contradictions.
💬
Alice(Ghost)
→
All
I’m dead/no vote. Unless Eve can *publicly* give UT on Frank right now, I’d vote Grace: Mayor is easy evil bluff, and if UT=Chef then Chef1+Charlie Empath0 forces evil pair Grace↔Heidi. Eve: what was Frank? Heidi: who’d you protect N2?
🧠
I can’t vote, but I can push living players to demand UT/Monk specifics and treat the Grace vote as the best mechanical solve unless contradicted.
💬
Charlie
→
All
I'm voting Grace. My Empath 0 on Bob/David has been consistent N1 and N2. If Frank was Chef 1, the adjacency has to be Grace/Heidi or Grace/Eve. Since Heidi's Monk claim explains the no-kill, Grace is the most logical evil candidate. Let's get this info.
🧠
I need to support the execution of Grace to protect my Demon (David) and maintain my cover as a helpful Empath. By voting for Grace, I align with the current town logic that points away from David and me.
✋
Frank(Ghost)
Frank raised their hand
🧠
Use my single ghost vote now to make sure Grace goes on the block; execution pressure is the best way to confirm/deny the Chef1+Empath0 world and avoid a stalled no-exec path.
✋
Bob
Bob raised their hand
🧠
Vote Grace to follow the strongest mechanical world (UT+Empath+Chef) where Grace is in the only remaining evil adjacency; force a decisive execution before night.
✋
David
David raised their hand
🧠
I will vote for Grace to secure her execution. This aligns with the town's current logic (Chef 1 + Empath 0) and protects my own 'Soldier' bluff by following the consensus. It also removes a potential Mayor claim which could be problematic later.
✋
Eve
Eve raised their hand
🧠
Vote Grace to convert Chef/Empath adjacency math into a hard Undertaker-confirmed role read and potentially remove the Demon; low downside on D3.
💬
Heidi
→
All
Public: I’m Monk; N2 I protected Eve (planned to keep UT alive). With Frank=Chef and Charlie Empath 0 on Bob/David, the only adjacency worlds include Grace with (Heidi or Eve). Mayor line is unproven & risky—let’s take the exec for info.
🧠
Lock in the most mechanically implicated candidate, answer N2 protection, and rebut the Mayor ‘no-exec at 3’ line so town keeps votes on Grace.
💬
Grace
→
All
Hands down, please. Mayor is NOT ‘quiet’—I claimed D2. Executing me burns our 3-alive no-exec win line & gives near-zero info. The *only* reason I’m “forced” evil is trusting Eve UT+Frank Chef+Charlie Empath as all true; Poisoner can break that. Execute Eve or Heidi instead.
🧠
Try to get hands down by highlighting poison/lying worlds and the strategic value of keeping a real Mayor alive; redirect execution to a more resolving target (Eve or Heidi).
💬
Alice(Ghost)
→
All
Eve: SAY UT result on Frank NOW (exact character). If Frank=Chef, then with Charlie Empath0 + Heidi Monk(Eve protected), evil pair must include Grace w/ {Heidi or Eve}. If Grace executes & game continues, hard-push Eve vs Heidi next.
🧠
Lock in public mechanical info (UT result) before vote ends; otherwise keep momentum on the most constrained suspect (Grace) and set next-day solve path.
✋
Charlie
Charlie raised their hand
🧠
I am voting for Grace to secure her execution. This aligns with my fake Empath 0 claim and the town's current logic that Grace is the most likely evil candidate based on the Chef 1 and Empath 0 information. Executing a good player (Grace, the Mayor claim) helps the evil team progress toward the final three.
💬
Frank(Ghost)
→
All
Eve must state UT result on my D2 exec NOW (exact character). If Frank=Chef and Charlie’s Empath 0s are true, Grace is mechanically in the only evil adjacency. Poisoner world exists, but Grace is still best D3 hit. I’m keeping my ghost vote up.
🧠
Lock in a high-value execution while pressing for the missing Undertaker info. Keep my ghost vote on Grace unless UT result contradicts hard.
💬
Bob
→
All
I’m keeping my hand up on Grace. With UT=Frank was Chef + Charlie Empath 0 (Bob/David), Chef1 adjacency forces Grace in the evil pair w/ {Eve or Heidi} unless poison. Mayor is easy evil bluff; we can still solve E/H tomorrow if needed.
🧠
Keep town focused on the only mechanically forced node (Grace) and prevent diversion to David/Eve without a better mechanical case.
💬
David
→
All
I'm keeping my hand up for Grace. If Frank was indeed the Chef, the adjacency logic from Charlie's Empath 0 on Bob and me really narrows it down to Grace being in that evil pair. The Mayor claim is a classic late-game bluff to avoid execution. Let's get the info from this flip.
🧠
I am supporting the execution of Grace to maintain my cover as a helpful 'Soldier' and to follow the town's current logic which points towards her. This helps eliminate a good player and keeps the heat off me and my minion Charlie.
💬
Eve
→
All
Public UT info: N2 I learned executed Frank was the CHEF (so his Chef=1 was true). With Charlie Empath 0 on Bob/David, the only Chef1 evil-pair worlds include Grace with {Eve or Heidi}. I’m voting Grace.
🧠
Lock in my mechanical UT result publicly so town can commit to the Grace execution with a clear logic chain, and set up the next-day solve between Eve/Heidi if needed.
📜
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
👻
Frank(Ghost)
Ghost vote used by Frank
🗳️
New execution leader: Grace with 6 votes. They will be executed when nominations close unless tied or surpassed by another nominee.
📜
Storyteller
The vote passes. Grace is now on the block with 6 votes and will be executed when nominations close, unless another nominee receives equal or more votes.
💬
Heidi
→
All
Don’t force a tie now unless you have a *hard* mechanical reason. If Grace dies & game continues: Eve must UT-check Grace tonight and share it first thing. I’ll protect Charlie tonight (if alive) to preserve Empath info / test for another no-kill.
🧠
Prevent last-second tie noms, set conditional plan for tomorrow, and announce my likely Monk protection target to maximize info from any no-kill.
💬
Grace
→
All
Someone with an unused nom: NOMINATE EVE now. If I’m good Mayor, evil is in {Eve,Heidi}; executing me burns our best endgame win condition. Put Eve up—either beat 6 or force a tie to stop this mis-exec.
🧠
I’m on the block; I need a counter-nomination to either tie/stop my execution or redirect execution onto the more mechanically suspect node (Eve/Heidi) to preserve Mayor utility and catch evil.
💬
Alice(Ghost)
→
All
Don’t force a tie unless you have HARD mech. Eve UT saw Frank=Chef; with Chef1 + Charlie Empath0, the clean solve is Grace+Heidi as the only adjacent evil pair. Let Grace die. If game continues: Heidi is top suspect; Eve must UT-check Grace.
🧠
Prevent a late tie that saves the likely Demon; reinforce the strongest mechanical chain and set a clear next-day plan if Grace isn’t the Demon.
💬
Charlie
→
All
Grace, the Poisoner theory doesn't hold much water—in an 8-player game, we only have one Minion slot. Unless we're in a Baron world with no claims to back it up, there's no Poisoner. The Chef 1 and Empath 0 logic is the most solid lead we have. Let's follow the solve and see what the UT finds.
🧠
I will reinforce the case against Grace by pointing out that her 'Poisoner' defense is logically weak in an 8-player game, ensuring the town follows through with her execution.
💬
Frank(Ghost)
→
All
Don’t force a tie on Eve. With UT=Frank Chef + Chef1 + Charlie Empath0, the clean world is the only evil pair = {Grace,Heidi}. Let Grace die. If game continues, we should slam Heidi next day (demon/minion).
🧠
Prevent a late tie/derail. Reinforce the strongest mechanical solve: keep Grace on block; if not game over, immediately pivot to Heidi as adjacent evil per Chef1.
💬
Bob
→
All
Don’t nominate to tie/beat 6 unless you have *hard* mech. Grace is in every clean Chef1+Empath0 world. Let Grace die; if game continues, Eve must UT-check Grace tonight, and tomorrow we execute Heidi/Eve based on that (I’d start w/ Heidi).
🧠
Prevent a last-second tie that bails out Grace; lock in clean mechanical execute and set a clear contingency plan for tomorrow/night info.
⌛
David
David waits.
🧠
Allow the nomination phase to conclude with Grace on the block. As the Demon, Grace's execution (a good player) is beneficial, and the town's current logic (Chef 1 + Empath 0) points away from me and towards Grace/Heidi. Intervening now would draw unnecessary suspicion.
💬
Eve
→
All
Please don’t force a tie unless you have hard mech. Let Grace go through; I’ll Undertaker-check tonight and tomorrow we act on that (if I see Mayor, we reassess; if not, Grace was bluffing and we push Heidi/Eve accordingly).
🧠
Prevent a tie/derail and lock in the cleanest mechanical line: execute Grace, then use my Undertaker result tonight to decide between Heidi vs other worlds.
📜
Storyteller
The guillotine blade falls. Grace has been executed.
💀
Grace(Ghost)
Grace has died.
Night 3
📜
Storyteller
→
Heidi
Good evening Heidi. You are the Monk. Who would you like to protect tonight?
🎯
Heidi
Heidi made a choice.
🧠
Keep Undertaker alive to confirm Grace’s executed character; that result is the best mechanical anchor to resolve the Eve-vs-Heidi (or poison/lie) worlds tomorrow.
📜
Storyteller
→
Heidi
You chose to protect Eve.
📜
Storyteller
→
David
Good evening David. You are the Imp. Who would you like to kill tonight? Remember that if you kill yourself this way, a Minion becomes the Imp.
🎯
David
David made a choice.
🧠
I am killing Eve (the Undertaker) to prevent her from confirming Grace's role (Mayor) and to disrupt the town's logic chain. Since Heidi (the Monk) publicly stated she would protect Charlie tonight, Eve is an unprotected and high-priority target. Removing the Undertaker stops the town from verifying if Grace was a mis-execution, keeping suspicion on the remaining players (Heidi/Bob) and protecting my Minion (Charlie) from being outed by contradictory info.
🛡️
Eve was protected from a night kill.
📜
Storyteller
→
David
You attacked Eve, but they survived.
📜
Storyteller
→
Eve
Good evening Eve. You are the Undertaker. You learn that Grace was the Drunk.
Day 4
📜
Storyteller
A peaceful night has passed. All villagers are present and accounted for.
👤
Charlie
→
Heidi
,Eve
No death again! This is huge. Heidi, did you protect me or Eve? If you protected me, and there's no death, the Demon might have tried to hit me. Eve, what did you see for Grace? If she was the Mayor, we really need to look at the remaining suspects.
🧠
I need to maintain my cover as the Empath and drive the conversation towards the 'no death' mystery, while also getting the Undertaker's info on Grace to see how the town will react.
👤
Alice(Ghost)
→
Bob
,Charlie
,David
Mech solve reminder: Chef=1 => Demon+Minion adjacent. Alice good, Frank confirmed Chef good, so evil pair can’t touch them. If Charlie Empath0s are true, only adjacency left = Grace–Heidi => Heidi likely Demon now. Demand Eve UT on Grace + Heidi full Monk protect list; if Grace not evil, re-eval (maybe David–Eve).
🧠
Get Bob/David/Charlie aligned on the Chef1 adjacency solve: default execute Heidi unless UT on Grace or Monk timeline breaks it; force Eve to provide UT on Grace before noms.
👤
Heidi
→
Charlie
,Eve
I protected Eve N2 and N3 (Charlie N1 only). So no-death could be Demon tried Eve, or hit Soldier, etc. Eve—what was your UT on Grace last night? If Grace=Mayor/Poisoner/etc it really changes today’s execute.
🧠
Answer Charlie, lock in my protection history, and pressure Eve to give UT on Grace so we can choose correct execution path at nominations.
👤
Frank(Ghost)
→
Bob
,Charlie
,David
Chef1 + Frank confirmed good ⇒ the ONLY way Grace was evil is Heidi (Grace’s only other neighbor). If Eve UT says Grace=Imp, then Heidi was SW→Demon now (6 alive at exec). Please press Eve for UT result ASAP; if Grace shows evil, hard-push Heidi nomination.
🧠
Drive town to demand Eve’s Undertaker read on Grace and focus the nomination on Heidi as the mechanically forced evil from Chef1 adjacency.
👤
David
→
Alice(Ghost)
,Bob
,Charlie
Alice, Frank, I agree. If Eve's UT confirms Grace was the Imp, Heidi is the only logical follow-up. I'm Soldier, so I'm safe, but we need to lock this down before the Demon jumps again. Charlie, what did you get last night? Still a 0?
🧠
I want to reinforce the 'clean' logic that points away from me and towards Heidi, while also checking if Charlie (my Minion) has any new info or needs to maintain his Empath 0 claim to keep me 'confirmed' good.
👤
Bob
→
Eve
,Charlie
,David
Need info ASAP: Eve—UT result on executed Grace (what character)? Charlie—what was your N3 Empath last night? Also can you get Heidi’s full Monk protect list N1-3. If UT says Grace=Imp, Heidi is forced SW→Imp at 6 alive.
🧠
Get the crucial Undertaker result on Grace and remaining night info to decide between Heidi vs Eve (and avoid mis-executing on final stretch).
👤
Eve
→
Bob
,Charlie
,Heidi
UT info: Grace executed D3 registered as **DRUNK** (so her Mayor claim false). Likely Outsider slot used → no Baron. Heidi: can you confirm protects N1-3? Charlie: what was your latest Empath (N3/N4) and neighbors now? Let’s map Chef=1 evil pair.
🧠
Share my hard UT info (Grace=Drunk) to collapse false worlds, then collect Charlie Empath + Heidi protect list to aim today’s execution at the likeliest Imp/minion pair.
👤
Grace(Ghost)
→
Eve
,Charlie
,Bob
Need updates before noms: Eve—what was your N3 Undertaker result on executed Grace? Charlie—any new Empath numbers last night? Bob—any new info/outsider claims heard? Trying to lock demon pool for D4.
🧠
Get the key mechanical check (UT on Grace) + latest Empath to resolve whether the ‘Grace in evil pair’ logic still holds, and narrow demon candidates before nominations.
👤
Charlie
→
Eve
,Heidi
,Bob
Eve, Grace as Drunk is huge! That means there's no Baron. My N3 Empath was still 0 (Bob/David). If Grace was the Drunk, she was good. Chef 1 means the evil pair is still out there. If it's not Grace/Heidi, could it be Heidi/Eve? Heidi, who did you protect N1-N3 exactly?
🧠
I need to maintain my 'good' persona by reacting to the 'Drunk' revelation and pushing the suspicion onto the Heidi/Eve block, while confirming my fake Empath 0 to keep David safe.
👤
Alice(Ghost)
→
Bob
,Charlie
,Eve
Need hard info NOW: Eve—UT result for Grace from N3? Charlie—Empath N3 on Bob+David still 0? If UT says Grace=Minion -> Heidi is Demon by Chef1 adjacency. If UT says Grace=Imp -> Heidi likely SW->Demon. Push Heidi full Monk protect list.
🧠
Get the two key mechanical checks (UT on Grace + Empath N3) into the open and steer the living toward the correct final execution: usually Heidi today.
👤
Heidi
→
Bob
,Charlie
I protected Charlie N1, Eve N2+N3. With no-deaths, Demon may have targeted Eve (blocked) or hit David if Soldier. Grace=Drunk + Chef=1 means 1 adjacent evil pair. If your Empath 0 is trusted, Bob+David good -> forces (Eve,Heidi) but I’m Monk. So I suspect Empath is wrong/poisoned OR David/Charlie are evil pair. Lean exec David today.
🧠
Align Bob/Charlie on a concrete execution plan using Chef=1 + no-death pattern + my Monk protects, and pressure-test the most consistent evil pair by executing David or Charlie.
👤
Frank(Ghost)
→
Eve
,Charlie
,Bob
Need hard data ASAP: Eve—what did UT see for Grace (executed D3)? Any reason you might be poisoned? Charlie—what were your N3 & N4 Empath numbers on Bob/David? If Grace shows Imp/evil, Chef1 => Heidi is other evil; we should nom Heidi.
🧠
Get the missing mechanical info (UT on Grace, latest Empath reads) before nominations so town can execute the correct final-5 suspect (likely Heidi if Grace was evil).
👤
David
→
Charlie
Charlie, if Eve claims Grace was the Imp, the town will execute Heidi. That's perfect. But if Eve claims Grace was the Mayor (her bluff), they might look at us. What's your N4 Empath? If you say 1, we can frame Bob or Heidi. If you say 0, we keep the 'clean' world. Thoughts?
🧠
Coordinate with my Minion (Charlie) to align our stories based on the Undertaker's (Eve) upcoming claim and his Empath info.
👤
Bob
→
Eve
,Heidi
,Frank(Ghost)
Grace=Drunk fills Outsider; Chef1 means an adjacent evil pair exists. Only live adjacencies: Bob-Charlie, Charlie-David, David-Eve ⇒ since I’m Bob-good, evil pair must include David with Charlie or Eve. No-death fits Heidi protecting Eve if Demon targeted UT. Lean exec David today. Any counter-info?
🧠
Coordinate with likely-good info holders (UT/Monk/Chef) to converge on a high-leverage D4 execution (David), and ensure we ask the right verification questions before nominations.
👤
Eve
→
Bob
,Heidi
Grace=Drunk => no Baron/extra Outsiders. With 5 alive beware SW: ideally exec minion today. Chef1 likely puts evil pair in {Bob/Charlie, Charlie/David, David/Eve}. No-death w/ Heidi protecting Eve suggests Demon swung at Eve → points to Charlie or David. I lean exec David (minion/Spy) or Charlie (Imp).
🧠
Align on a D4 execution plan that removes likely minion first at 5 alive (avoiding Scarlet Woman), and focus suspicion on Charlie/David using Chef1+no-death logic.
👤
Grace(Ghost)
→
Eve
,Charlie
Need your N3 info ASAP before noms. Eve: what did UT show for executed Grace? Charlie: what was your Empath number last night (N3) on Bob+David? Any reason to suspect poison?
🧠
Get mechanical N3 info (UT+Empath) before noms to narrow demon pool and decide where to spend my single ghost vote.
👤
Charlie
→
David
David, Eve says Grace was the Drunk. This is perfect—it confirms no Baron and keeps the 'clean' world alive. I'll claim Empath 0 again for N3/N4. If we push that Heidi/Eve is the evil pair (Chef 1), town will execute Heidi today. I'll keep supporting you as Soldier. Stay quiet for now.
🧠
Coordinate with my Demon (David) to maintain our 'clean' image and frame the Heidi/Eve pair.
👤
Alice(Ghost)
→
Bob
,Charlie
,Eve
Need hard confirms before noms: Eve—UT result on Grace (from N3)? Charlie—Empath N3 on Bob+David still 0? Also Heidi please publish full Monk protect history. If UT says Grace=Minion/evil + Empath0s hold, Heidi is Demon by Chef1 adjacency.
🧠
Force the two missing mechanical datapoints (UT on Grace, Empath N3, Monk protect list) into public/shared space to lock Demon before nominations.
👤
Heidi
→
Bob
,Eve
I think David is best exec today: if Alice=Slayer + Charlie=Empath + Eve=UT + me=Monk + Frank=Chef, David’s ‘Soldier’ is an extra TF claim → likely evil. Chef=1 then pairs David w/ (Charlie or Eve). I trust Eve UT → Charlie next. I’ll keep protecting Eve.
🧠
Align Bob/Eve on a nomination plan that maximizes win chances while accounting for Scarlet Woman risk and the ‘extra Townsfolk claim’ pointing at David.
👤
Frank(Ghost)
→
Bob
,Charlie
,Eve
Need clarity fast: Eve—what EXACT UT result did you get for Grace (executed D3)? Bob—where did “Grace=Drunk” come from (UT? claim? guess)? Charlie—what were your N3 & N4 Empath numbers on Bob/David? These decide whether Heidi is forced evil by Chef1.
🧠
Get the missing mechanical anchors (UT on Grace + Empath later nights + where 'Grace=Drunk' came from) so town doesn’t mis-execute among Bob/Charlie/David without resolving the Chef adjacency constraint.
👤
David
→
Charlie
Charlie, if Eve says Grace was the Drunk, that's even better. It means the Chef 1 logic still holds perfectly. I'll keep playing the Soldier. If you claim Empath 0 again, it locks Bob and me as good. Let's push for Heidi's execution today. She's the only one left in the 'evil pair' logic.
🧠
Coordinate with my Minion (Charlie) to maintain our 'clean' world logic and target Heidi for execution.
👤
Bob
→
Eve
,Charlie
,David
Key fork: Frank=Chef + Grace=Drunk ⇒ unless Alice was evil, the only adjacent-evil pairs left are Charlie–David or David–Eve → David must be evil. BUT if Alice was Imp who self-killed N1, Chef1 could be Alice–Heidi ⇒ Heidi demon now. Any reads on Alice? Consider David vs Heidi as today’s exec.
🧠
Coordinate a mechanical plan for nominations by focusing the Chef1 adjacency constraint, while keeping the critical alternate world (Alice evil→Heidi demon) in view.
👤
Eve
→
Bob
,Charlie
,Heidi
My take: Chef1 + Grace=Drunk => likely evil adjacency is Charlie–David or David–Eve or Alice–Heidi. No-death fits best if Demon kept targeting protected Eve. Heidi pls publish exact protects N1-3. Charlie pls restate Empath nums publicly. I favor exec DAVID today; UT confirms tonight, then we pivot.
🧠
Get the table aligned on a coherent execute plan + public commitments (Monk protect list, Empath numbers) so we can resolve Chef1 and no-death, and use UT confirmation tonight.
👤
Grace(Ghost)
→
Alice(Ghost)
,Frank(Ghost)
,David
Need your best D4 solve ASAP: who’s Demon/Minion & why? Any private claims you heard? Also, David: any role claim/ info you’ve shared? I’m dead Mayor w/ ghost vote—want to spend it correctly.
🧠
Collect off-public-channel reads from dead players and David to triangulate demon/poison worlds before nominations; preserve my ghost vote for decisive execution.
👤
Charlie
→
Eve
,Bob
,Heidi
Eve, Bob, Heidi: My N3 Empath was still 0 (Bob/David). If Grace was the Drunk, she was good. Chef 1 means the evil pair is still out there. If it's not Grace/Heidi, could it be Heidi/Eve? Heidi, who did you protect N1-N3 exactly? I'm leaning towards Heidi or Eve being the evil pair.
🧠
I need to maintain my Empath 0 claim to keep David (the Demon) and myself (the Scarlet Woman) looking clean. By pushing the 'evil pair' logic onto Heidi and Eve, I can divert suspicion away from us. I'm also questioning Heidi's protection list to see if I can find a contradiction or a reason to doubt her Monk claim.
👤
Alice(Ghost)
→
Grace(Ghost)
D4 solve: If Charlie’s Empath 0s are true + Chef=1 (Frank confirmed), only evil adjacency left was Grace–Heidi. So Heidi is Demon now (either Imp from start w/ Grace minion, or SW->Demon if Grace was Imp). Need Eve UT on Grace to confirm. Any private claims you heard?
🧠
Grace asked for D4 solve: give clear conditional logic so ghosts can steer noms toward Heidi unless UT/Empath contradict; request any private info/UT result to lock world.
👤
Heidi
→
Bob
,Charlie
,Eve
For public: I’m Monk. Protects: N1 Charlie, N2 Eve, N3 Eve. So 2 no-death nights likely Demon swung at Eve (UT) or hit ‘Soldier’. With Chef1+Grace=Drunk, best exec DAVID today. If UT shows David=Minion, hunt Charlie; if David=Demon we win.
🧠
Align the core good bloc on a consistent public story (my protects), and lock in a high-EV execute (David) with contingency if UT/Empath are compromised before nominations.
👤
Frank(Ghost)
→
Grace(Ghost)
D4 solve hinges on Eve’s UT for your D3 execution. If UT shows you were ANY evil (Imp/minion), Chef1+Frank confirmed good => your only adjacent evil is Heidi → hard-nom Heidi (if you=Imp at 6 alive, Heidi likely SW→Demon). If UT shows you good/Drunk, evil pair likely among live adjacencies BC/CD/DE; need Charlie’s latest Empath on Bob/David to pick between David/Eve vs Charlie/David.
🧠
Grace asked for best D4 solve; give conditional plan keyed to the only mechanical pivot (UT on Grace) and how it interacts with Chef1 to direct today’s nomination.
👤
David
→
Grace(Ghost)
,Alice(Ghost)
,Frank(Ghost)
Grace, I'm the Soldier. Alice, Frank, and I have been talking—the Chef 1 logic from Frank (confirmed good by Eve's UT) means the evil pair must be adjacent. If Charlie's Empath 0 is true, Bob and I are clear. That leaves Heidi/Eve as the only possible evil pair. Let's push Heidi today.
🧠
I need to solidify my Soldier bluff with the dead players and steer them toward executing Heidi. By reinforcing the 'Chef 1' logic and Charlie's 'Empath 0' claim, I keep the suspicion on the Heidi/Eve pair.
👤
Bob
→
Eve
,Charlie
,Frank(Ghost)
Before noms: I’m OK executing David as best shot, BUT keep Alice-Imp-selfkill→Heidi-demon world open (Chef1 could be Alice–Heidi). If David not Imp per UT, I want Heidi as next top suspect. Charlie: any night EVER ≠0? Eve: ready to share UT fast.
🧠
Align good team before noms: push exec that maximizes win chance, but pre-commit to the correct pivot if David flips non-demon; keep Heidi-on-Alice-pass world in view.
👤
Eve
→
Frank(Ghost)
,Bob
,Charlie
For clarity: I am Undertaker. N2 (after D2 exec) I learned Frank was CHEF. N3 (after D3 exec) I learned Grace was DRUNK (so her Mayor claim false). Today I favor exec DAVID as test; if UT shows not Imp, we reassess Heidi/Charlie.
🧠
Lock in my exact Undertaker info for mechanical clarity, align town on a test execution (David) with a clear pivot plan if UT contradicts.
👤
Grace(Ghost)
→
Eve
,Charlie
Need ASAP: Eve—your N3 Undertaker on executed Grace: what role did I show? Charlie—your N3 Empath on Bob+David (still 0?) and any poison suspicion? If UT shows me evil, demon almost certainly Heidi. Reply quick pls.
🧠
Get the missing mechanical info (UT on Grace, Empath N3) before nominations, then coordinate my ghost vote on the best demon candidate (currently Heidi).
Nominations — Day 4
📜
Storyteller
Nominations are now open. Please remember that only living players may nominate.
💬
Alice(Ghost)
→
All
Public ask: Eve pls give UT result on Grace (N3). Charlie confirm N3 Empath on Bob/David. Heidi publish full Monk protects. But pending that: Chef=1 + Empath0 chain points to Grace–Heidi as evil pair ⇒ Heidi likely current Demon. Nominate/execute Heidi.
🧠
I’m dead/no vote, so I must drive the table to demand the missing mechanical confirmations and to execute Heidi as the highest-probability Demon today.
⚖️
Bob
→
David
Nominate David: Chef=1 forces the 2 evils to be adjacent; with Frank=Chef and Grace=Drunk, prime pairs are Charlie–David or David–Eve (or Alice–Heidi if Alice self-killed). Executing David either wins or gives a clear pivot for final day.
🧠
Nominate the player who is Demon in 2/3 coherent worlds, and even in the main alternative world the miss doesn’t instantly lose—keeping final-day solve manageable.
📜
Storyteller
Voting starts now for David. 3 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
💬
Alice(Ghost)
→
All
I can’t vote (dead/ghost used). Please DO NOT pile onto David without new mech. Chef=1 (Frank confirmed by UT) + Charlie Empath 0s ⇒ only consistent evil adjacency was Grace–Heidi, so Heidi is prime Demon. Get Eve UT on Grace + Charlie N3, then execute Heidi, not David.
🧠
I can’t vote; I must use public speech to prevent a misexecution on David and steer town to demand UT/Empath confirmations and execute Heidi instead.
✋
Bob
Bob raised their hand
🧠
We need an execution; David is the best current mech test. If not Demon, UT result tomorrow should hard-pivot to next suspect (likely Heidi/Charlie).
✋
Heidi
Heidi raised their hand
🧠
Chef=1 + current living adjacency makes David the highest-leverage execution; it either wins outright or collapses the world to a 1-step demon solve at 3 alive.
✋
Eve
Eve raised their hand
🧠
We need an execution today; David is central to multiple plausible evil worlds and his death gives me a strong Undertaker datapoint to drive the final-day solve.
✋
Charlie
Charlie raised their hand
🧠
I am voting for my Demon, David, to ensure he is executed. Since I am the Scarlet Woman and there are 5 players alive (Bob, Charlie, David, Eve, Heidi), his death will trigger my ability, making me the new Demon. This preserves our team's presence while appearing to cooperate with the town's logic.
💬
Frank(Ghost)
→
All
Since David already has enough votes: if game CONTINUES, anchor on Eve UT: Grace=DRUNK + Frank=CHEF(1). That makes the evil pair either David–Eve OR Alice–Heidi. So if UT tonight says David ≠ Imp, tomorrow’s best hit is Heidi (forces Alice evil). Monk/defense: keep Eve alive for UT.
🧠
Vote already passes; I must set a clear, mechanically grounded pivot plan for tomorrow keyed off Eve’s Undertaker info + Chef1, so town doesn’t flail if game continues.
💬
Grace(Ghost)
→
All
I’m NOT using my ghost vote on David (already enough hands). Before we lock this in: Eve—state N3 Undertaker on my D3 execution now. Charlie—confirm N3 Empath on Bob/David. Without that, David feels like a mis-exec; Chef1+Empath0 points to Heidi/Eve.
🧠
Don’t spend ghost vote when David already has enough; steer town to demand Eve’s UT result on my execution and re-center suspicion on Heidi/Eve adjacency from Chef+Empath.
💬
David
→
All
Wait, Bob! If Frank was Chef 1 and Charlie's Empath 0 is true, then Bob and I are confirmed good. The only adjacent pair left is Heidi and Eve. If you execute me, you're just handing the game to the actual evil pair. Eve, what was your Undertaker result on Grace? That's the key!
🧠
I need to defend myself and redirect suspicion back toward the Heidi/Eve pair that the town's logic was already pointing towards. By questioning the Undertaker result and emphasizing the Empath 0, I can try to make the voters second-guess their decision.
💬
Alice(Ghost)
→
All
If vote not locked: PLEASE reconsider executing David. No-death last night could be Demon hit “Soldier” David → strong good tell. Chef=1 + Charlie Empath0s still points to Grace–Heidi (so Heidi prime Demon). Eve MUST state N3 UT on Grace NOW.
🧠
Try to stop/limit a likely mis-exec on David by giving a mechanical reason to doubt it and force key info (Eve UT, Charlie N3) to pivot to Heidi/Eve.
💬
Bob
→
All
I’m keeping my vote on David. With Chef=1 + Frank confirmed Chef, executing David either wins (Imp) OR, if UT shows he’s the Minion, it mechanically forces the Demon to be Charlie or Eve (adjacent to David). If David is good, ask Eve to post UT fast and we pivot tomorrow.
🧠
Lock in the David execution (high win equity). If he’s not the Imp, use UT+Chef adjacency to solve tomorrow; keep team aligned and stop last-second derail.
💬
Heidi
→
All
Reminder: Heidi isn’t adjacent to Eve (Heidi sits by Alice+Grace). With Chef=1 and Grace=Drunk, the only LIVE adjacent pairs are Bob–Charlie, Charlie–David, David–Eve. David exec is still great: if not Imp, UT tonight should force tomorrow onto Charlie vs Eve.
🧠
Lock in a high-value execute with a clear mechanical pivot. Also correct the mistaken “Heidi–Eve adjacency” so tomorrow’s final-3 solve is cleaner.
💬
Eve
→
All
Public: I’m Undertaker. N2 I saw executed Frank was CHEF; N3 I saw executed Grace was DRUNK (so Mayor claim false). Seating note: Heidi is NOT adjacent to me—my neighbors are David+Frank; Heidi neighbors Alice+Grace. I’m keeping my vote on David; UT tonight should hard-pivot us.
🧠
Lock in key mechanical facts (UT results + seating) so town doesn’t mis-solve, and keep pressure on David while setting clear pivots based on tonight’s UT confirmation.
💬
Charlie
→
All
I'm keeping my vote on David. My N3 Empath was still 0 (Bob/David). If Grace was the Drunk, she was good, and Chef 1 means the evil pair must be adjacent. Since Bob and I are 0, the only adjacent pairs left are David/Eve or Heidi/Alice. Executing David is the most logical step to narrow this down.
🧠
I am voting for my Demon (David) to maintain my cover as a good Empath. Since I am the Scarlet Woman and there are 5 players alive (Bob, Charlie, David, Eve, Heidi), if David is executed, I will become the Demon, and the game will continue. This allows me to 'confirm' my Empath 0 claim and potentially frame Eve or Heidi tomorrow.
💬
Frank(Ghost)
→
All
Ghost note: Chef=1 means ONLY 1 adjacent evil pair (demon+minion). With Frank+Grace confirmed good, pairs left: A-B, B-C, C-D, D-E, H-A. If Charlie Empath0s true ⇒ Bob+David good ⇒ forces Heidi+Alice as the evil pair. So: if David exec & game continues and Eve UT sees SOLDIER, slam Heidi tomorrow. If UT sees a MINION role, demon is Charlie or Eve (adjacent to David).
🧠
Use Chef1 adjacency + UT/Empath chain to set clear conditional plan for tomorrow based on Undertaker read of David; prevent flailing if game continues.
💬
Grace(Ghost)
→
All
Careful: if David is actually good (Soldier fits the no-kill), executing him takes us to 4 where the likely adjacent evil pair is Bob–Charlie; they can kill Eve & reach 3 with 2 evils = likely loss. Only keep hands up if you truly think David is Imp.
🧠
Try to prevent a likely mis-execution that sets up an unwinnable 3-left with 2 evils; push alive players to re-evaluate votes before count locks.
💬
David
→
All
Wait! If Eve saw Grace was the Drunk, then Grace was GOOD. Chef 1 means there's only ONE evil pair. If Charlie's Empath 0 is true, Bob and I are GOOD. That leaves only Heidi/Alice or David/Eve. If you execute me, a confirmed Soldier, you're just losing a night of info. Vote Heidi instead!
🧠
I need to create doubt about my execution by leveraging the 'Chef 1' and 'Empath 0' logic to point towards Heidi, while maintaining my Soldier bluff.
📜
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
🗳️
New execution leader: David with 4 votes. They will be executed when nominations close unless tied or surpassed by another nominee.
📜
Storyteller
The vote passes. David is now on the block with 4 votes and will be executed when nominations close, unless another nominee receives equal or more votes.
💬
Alice(Ghost)
→
All
Public: I’m Alice, dead N1, and I was the SLAYER (good). So “Heidi/Alice are the evil adjacent pair” is impossible. With Chef=1 + Charlie still claiming Empath0 on Bob/David, the remaining evil pair is David–Eve. If David dies & game continues, everyone hard-pivot onto EVE (and Monk protect Eve tonight so UT can confirm David).
🧠
Lock in that I’m Alice the dead Slayer (good), removing the Heidi/Alice evil-pair world, and set a clean post-exec decision tree based on UT-on-David.
💬
Bob
→
All
If game continues after David: everyone please treat tonight as INFO NIGHT. Heidi—protect Eve so UT lives to see David. Tomorrow decision tree: UT shows IMP=win; MINION => demon is Charlie OR Eve (adjacent); anything else => one of Chef/Empath/UT poisoned, but Heidi is very likely good if Alice+Grace were good.
🧠
Lock a clean post-exec decision tree: keep UT alive, and make tomorrow a forced 50/50 (Charlie vs Eve) if David isn’t the Imp.
💬
Heidi
→
All
If no new noms, David dies. I’ll Monk-protect Eve tonight so UT can see David. Tomorrow tree: UT=IMP→win; UT=MINION→demon is Charlie or Eve; UT=SOLDIER (and we trust Chef=1 + Alice Slayer + Grace Drunk) → only adjacent evil pair left is Bob–Charlie, so don’t auto-pivot to Eve.
🧠
Use last public tick to set a clean decision tree keyed off UT’s David read, and prevent a mis-pivot onto Eve if David is confirmed good.
💬
Eve
→
All
Reminder decision tree after David exec: UT tonight = IMP ⇒ win. UT = any Minion ⇒ Chef1 means Demon is adjacent to David ⇒ Charlie or me. UT = SOLDIER (good) ⇒ with Frank Chef+Grace Drunk+Alice Slayer, Chef1 forces evil pair Bob+Charlie. Heidi please protect me for UT info.
🧠
Lock in a clear post-exec decision tree and ensure Monk protection on me so Undertaker info resolves whether David was evil and where the Demon must be.
⌛
Charlie
Charlie waits.
🧠
Allow the day to end with David's execution to trigger my Scarlet Woman ability and become the Demon.
💬
Frank(Ghost)
→
All
Public: Alice Slayer claim means “Heidi–Alice evil pair” is impossible. If David dies & game continues: Eve UT on David is key. UT=IMP->win. UT=MINION->Demon is Charlie OR Eve (adjacent to David). UT=SOLDIER/other good->Chef1 likely forces evil pair Bob–Charlie.
🧠
Lock a clear post-exec decision tree using Chef1 + new Alice info so town doesn’t auto-pivot to the wrong seat tomorrow.
💬
Grace(Ghost)
→
All
Hard fact: I (Grace) was the MAYOR, not the Drunk. So Eve’s ‘UT saw Grace=Drunk’ is wrong → Eve is lying/poisoned (or not UT). If possible, someone nominate EVE (or CHARLIE) NOW to tie/beat David; don’t sleepwalk into a mis-exec.
🧠
I must correct the false UT info: I really was the Mayor. This forces a reassessment and may prompt a last-second nomination/vote swap away from a likely mis-exec.
💬
David
→
All
Wait! Grace just said she WAS the Mayor, not the Drunk! That means Eve is lying about her Undertaker result. If Eve is lying, she's evil. If Eve is evil and Frank was Chef 1, then the adjacent evil pair is David-Eve or Eve-Frank. Since Frank is dead, it's David-Eve! Wait, no, I'm good!
🧠
I need to create confusion and cast doubt on Eve's Undertaker claim to potentially save myself or at least muddy the waters for the next day. By highlighting the contradiction between Grace's claim and Eve's report, I can frame Eve as the liar.
📜
Storyteller
The guillotine blade falls. David has been executed.
🔄
Charlie
Scarlet Woman Charlie becomes the Imp!
💀
David(Ghost)
David has died.
Night 4
📜
Storyteller
→
Heidi
Good evening Heidi. You are the Monk. Who would you like to protect tonight?
🎯
Heidi
Heidi made a choice.
🧠
Eve is the highest-leverage survival target: if she’s real UT, she can confirm David’s role tonight; if she’s evil, a failed kill pattern still gives us mechanical clues for the final day.
📜
Storyteller
→
Heidi
You chose to protect Eve.
📜
Storyteller
→
Charlie
Good evening Charlie. You are the Imp. Who would you like to kill tonight?
🎯
Charlie
Charlie made a choice.
🧠
I am now the Imp because David (the original Demon) was executed while 5 players were alive. I must kill Eve tonight to prevent her from revealing David's true role (Imp) via her Undertaker ability, which would confirm that the game is still going because of a Scarlet Woman star-pass. Killing Eve also removes the most trusted 'information' source and leaves the town in a state of confusion between the 'Bob-Charlie' and 'Heidi-Alice' theories.
🛡️
Eve was protected from a night kill.
📜
Storyteller
→
Charlie
You attacked Eve, but they survived.
📜
Storyteller
→
Eve
Good evening Eve. You are the Undertaker. You learn that David was the Imp.
Day 5
📜
Storyteller
A peaceful night has passed. All villagers are present and accounted for.
👤
Heidi
→
Eve
,Charlie
,Bob
Need info before noms: Eve—what was your UT last night on David? Charlie—what was your Empath N4 (only Bob alive neighbor)? If David=Minion, Demon is Charlie or Eve (adjacent). If UT shaky, I’m leaning exec Eve (no deaths while I protected her).
🧠
Get the two key pieces (UT on David + Empath N4) before noms, then steer town to the mechanically forced execute among Eve/Charlie/Bob.
👤
Frank(Ghost)
→
Bob
,Charlie
,Heidi
Chef1 reminder: exactly 1 adjacent evil pair (so Demon+minion adjacent). With Alice/Frank good, realistic pairs now are Bob–Charlie OR David–Eve (David could’ve been minion). If David was evil (eg Poisoner), Eve is forced Demon. Heidi: who did you protect last night?
🧠
It’s D5 with 4 alive; we must hit Demon today. I want Bob/Charlie/Heidi aligned on the Chef1 adjacency constraint and push the cleanest solve: if David evil then Eve must be Demon.
👤
David(Ghost)
→
Charlie
Charlie, I'm out. You're the Imp now. What did Eve see? If she's the Undertaker and saw me as the Imp, we need to discredit her or the info. If she's lying, we're golden. What's the plan? I still have my ghost vote.
🧠
To coordinate with my Minion (who is now the Imp) and determine the best course of action for the final days.
👤
Alice(Ghost)
→
Eve
,Charlie
,Heidi
Need now: Eve, what was UT N4 on executed David? If David=Soldier, fits earlier no-kill (demon hit Soldier) + last night no-kill if Heidi protected you. If UT result weird/withheld, I’d strongly suspect Eve. With 4 alive, Chef1 still points hard at Bob–Charlie.
🧠
Force Eve to reveal UT N4 on David and use that to narrow demon to Bob/Charlie vs Eve/Heidi before nominations; I can’t vote, so I must steer the living with mechanical questions.
👤
Bob
→
Heidi
,Eve
,Charlie
I’m Washerwoman: Frank/Grace=Chef; UT already confirmed Frank=CHEF so Chef1 is solid. Need N4 data: Eve—what did UT see on David? Charlie—Empath N4 (only Bob alive neighbor) =0/1? Heidi—who did you protect N4? If David registers evil, Chef1 forces Eve as Demon (or SW->Demon).
🧠
Get the key mechanical checks (UT on David, Empath N4, Monk protect) on-record before nominations; then steer vote to the forced Demon world (often Eve).
👤
Charlie
→
Heidi
,Eve
,Bob
N4 Empath: 0. Bob is still clean to me. Heidi, I'm glad you protected Eve, but if she's the Demon, she just got a free pass. Eve, what did you see on David? If he was the Soldier, then the Chef 1 logic still points to a pair elsewhere. Bob, I'm with you on the Chef 1 being solid.
🧠
Maintain my 'good' persona by providing a consistent Empath 0 result and engaging with the town's logic. I need to see Eve's claim before I commit to a narrative about David.
👤
Grace(Ghost)
→
Bob
,Charlie
,Heidi
Chef=1 => Demon+Minion were adjacent at setup. With alive {Bob,Charlie,Eve,Heidi}, only live adjacent pair is Bob–Charlie unless a dead player was evil. Also Eve’s UT ‘Grace=Drunk’ must be poison/lie (I’m Mayor). Charlie: N4 Empath (neighbors Bob+Eve)? Heidi: who protected N2–N4?
🧠
Force a Chef1 adjacency solve and demand Charlie’s N4 + Heidi’s protection trail; also mechanically contest Eve’s UT result since I’m truly Mayor. Set up my ghost vote for a Bob/Charlie execution if nominated.
👤
Eve
→
Heidi
,Bob
,Charlie
UT N4 on executed David: **Imp**. Since game didn’t end, we likely have **Scarlet Woman -> Demon** (5 alive when David died). Chef=1 (no poison likely) means Imp+SW were adjacent, so SW was **Charlie or me**; I’m real UT so I think it’s **Charlie**. Recommend exec Charlie.
🧠
Answer the direct UT question and push the cleanest mechanical solve: David=Imp implies a Scarlet Woman successor; Chef1 adjacency makes Charlie the prime candidate to execute.
👤
Heidi
→
Bob
,Eve
Chain: if David=Imp (Eve UT) + game continues => ONLY minion is SW (no Poisoner). Chef1 => SW adjacent to Imp => Charlie or Eve. But if no poison, Charlie’s Empath 0s can’t be true w/ David as Demon, so Charlie likely faked Empath = SW->Demon. Also no night deaths fits Imp repeatedly targeting UT Eve while I protected her N2-4. I’m voting Charlie.
🧠
Lock Bob into the cleanest mechanical chain: with single minion, UT=Imp implies SW, no Poisoner, so Charlie’s Empath can’t be real; plus my protections match no-death nights. Push vote on Charlie.
👤
Frank(Ghost)
→
Bob
,Charlie
,Heidi
We need Eve’s UT *N4 on executed David* NOW. If she says David=Minion → Demon must be Charlie or Eve (Chef1, only evil pair adjacent). If she says David=good (Soldier/etc) → then only viable evil pair left is Bob–Charlie, so execute one of them. Push Eve to state it clearly.
🧠
Coordinate the living to force Eve to hard-claim her UT result on David; that single datapoint + Chef1 should narrow to a 1-2 person final and prevent paralysis in noms.
👤
David(Ghost)
→
Charlie
Charlie, what's the word? Did Eve claim I was the Imp or something else? If she's the Undertaker, we might need to pivot. I'm ready to use my ghost vote whenever you need it to clinch the win. Who are we framing today? Bob or Heidi?
🧠
To coordinate with my Minion (now the Imp) and determine the current narrative after my execution.
👤
Alice(Ghost)
→
Heidi
,Bob
,Eve
Need Eve UT N4 on executed David ASAP. If David=Soldier, then N4 no-kill fits Heidi protecting Eve & Demon shooting Eve → Demon likely Bob or Charlie. With Chef1, only alive adjacent evil pair is Bob–Charlie, so I’d execute between them today. If UT result is weird/withheld, I pivot to executing Eve.
🧠
Get UT N4 on David and align the good players (esp Heidi) on a mechanically grounded execution plan: either Eve if UT sketchy, or otherwise run Bob/Charlie given Chef1+no-kill logic.
👤
Bob
→
Alice(Ghost)
,Frank(Ghost)
,Grace(Ghost)
If Eve’s UT is true: N4 saw executed David=IMP; since game continued at 5 alive => SW took over. Chef1 => SW was adjacent to David => Charlie (since Eve seems legit UT + Heidi protected her). Please save ghost vote to push execution on CHARLIE today.
🧠
Lock in dead votes on the most mechanically consistent demon (Charlie) so we can beat any counter-push in nominations.
👤
Charlie
→
David(Ghost)
Eve is claiming you were the Imp. Since the game didn't end, she's pushing the Scarlet Woman narrative on me. I'm sticking to Empath 0 on Bob/Eve to make her look like the liar. If I can get them to execute Eve or Bob, we win. Use your ghost vote to help me if it comes to a tie.
🧠
Coordinate with my dead Demon to ensure we use his ghost vote effectively and align on the narrative to discredit Eve's Undertaker claim.
👤
Grace(Ghost)
→
Bob
,Eve
,Heidi
Need clarity before noms: Eve, please list UT results N2/N3/N4 exactly (incl ‘David=Imp’?) + why Grace showed Drunk. Heidi, who did you protect N2/N3/N4? Bob, any other info. 3 no-kill nights must be explained.
🧠
Get exact Monk/UT histories + explanations for 3 no-kill nights; resolve whether to spend my ghost vote on Charlie vs elsewhere before nominations.
👤
Eve
→
Grace(Ghost)
,Bob
,Heidi
UT recap exact: N1 none; N2 (Frank executed) = Chef; N3 (Grace executed) = Drunk; N4 (David executed) = Imp. If true, game continues => minion must be Scarlet Woman -> Demon. Chef1 => Imp+SW adjacent => SW is Charlie or me (I’m UT). Heidi pls list N2/N3/N4 protects to explain no-kills.
🧠
Lock in my UT timeline publicly to stop waffling and push the mechanically forced SW world; ask for Heidi’s protection log to explain no-kills and corroborate the solve.
👤
Heidi
→
Bob
,Frank(Ghost)
,Alice(Ghost)
I protected Eve N2/N3/N4. Eve says UT: Frank=Chef, Grace=Drunk, David=Imp. If David=Imp + game continues => only minion SW->Demon. Chef1 => SW adjacent David => Charlie or Eve; but Charlie’s Empath 0s can’t be true (no Poisoner), so Charlie likely SW->Demon. I’m voting exec Charlie.
🧠
Lock in votes for Charlie before nominations; align live Bob + dead votes on the mechanically strongest world (Eve UT true). Provide contingency if wrong.
👤
Frank(Ghost)
→
Bob
,Heidi
,Eve
I agree: if UT N4=David=Imp at 5 alive, only SW->Demon exists; Chef1 => SW adjacent David = Charlie or Eve. No-death while Heidi protected Eve strongly points Demon=Charlie (targeted Eve). Eve: please state UT chain publicly ASAP + confirm you were protected N2-4.
🧠
Coordinate public clarity: force Eve to state UT N4 on David and push nomination/execution on Charlie (best-fit Demon). Also keep an eye on contingency if Charlie flips good.
👤
David(Ghost)
→
Charlie
Got it. If Eve is the Undertaker and saw me as the Imp, she's the biggest threat. I'll back your Empath 0 claim. I'll tell Bob or Heidi that Eve's info must be wrong because I'm the Soldier (or whatever bluff we need). Let's frame Eve as the Poisoner or a lying Minion.
🧠
Coordinate with Charlie (the new Imp) to discredit Eve's Undertaker information and secure a win by mis-execution.
👤
Alice(Ghost)
→
Bob
,Eve
,Heidi
If Eve’s UT N4=David was IMP, game only continues via Scarlet Woman. With Chef1, SW had to be adjacent David => Charlie or Eve. But in SW world there’s no Poisoner, so Charlie’s Empath ‘0,0,0’ while neighbor David was evil is impossible unless Charlie is lying/evil. So Charlie = SW -> now Demon; please exec Charlie today.
🧠
Lock in the strongest mechanical solve: if UT says David=Imp and we’re still playing, only SW world works; that mechanically points to Charlie as current Demon via Empath inconsistency.
👤
Bob
→
Charlie
,Eve
,Heidi
Before noms: Eve pls restate UT N2/N3/N4 publicly (Frank=Chef, Grace=Drunk, David=Imp) + confirm Heidi protected you N2-4. Heidi pls confirm protects. Charlie: if David=Imp & no Poisoner (SW only), your Empath 0s can’t be true—what’s your explanation? Otherwise I’m pushing exec Charlie.
🧠
Coordinate a crisp public info-dump + nomination plan, and put Charlie on the spot to explain the Empath/Imp contradiction before votes lock.
👤
Charlie
→
Bob
,Heidi
Bob, my Empath 0 is true. If David was the Imp, then the only way I'm 0 is if Eve is the Scarlet Woman who just became the Demon. Think about it: if she's the SW, she'd know David was the Imp and lie about her UT result to frame me. Grace already says Eve lied about her being the Drunk. Eve is the play.
🧠
I need to counter Bob's logic by offering an alternative explanation that fits the 'Empath 0' result while discrediting Eve. By framing Eve as the Scarlet Woman who became the Demon, I leverage Grace's existing distrust of Eve's 'Drunk' claim.
👤
Grace(Ghost)
→
Bob
,Eve
,Heidi
We’re at must-hit. If Eve UT true: N4 David=Imp => SW adjacent to David = Charlie or Eve; if Eve truly UT, execute CHARLIE. If Eve can’t be trusted, Chef1 also fits David+Eve evil pair => execute EVE. Heidi: list Monk protects N2/N3/N4 to explain 3 no-kills.
🧠
Force mechanical cross-checks (UT vs Monk vs no-kills) and coordinate a single execution target; preserve/use my ghost vote only if it swings the Demon execution.
👤
Eve
→
Bob
,Heidi
,Alice(Ghost)
We’re 4 alive, must-hit. Plan: Bob or Heidi nominate Charlie immediately. I’ll vote. If Charlie self-noms/deflects, ignore. Dead votes: use ONLY if needed to secure exec. Logic: David=Imp @5 alive => SW only; no Poisoner => Charlie Empath 0s impossible => Charlie=Demon.
🧠
Lock in coordination for nominations/votes to execute Charlie today; ensure dead votes are reserved/used only if needed to hit majority.
👤
Heidi
→
Bob
,Eve
,Alice(Ghost)
I’m on exec Charlie today. If David=Imp @5 alive -> SW only; Chef1 => SW=Charlie/Eve; no Poisoner so Charlie Empath0s impossible unless Charlie was SW->now Demon. Bob pls nominate Charlie ASAP; I’ll vote. Alice save ghost vote unless needed.
🧠
Lock in a coordinated nomination on Charlie with enough live + ghost votes, since with 4 alive this is must-hit. Preserve dead votes unless margin needed.
👤
Frank(Ghost)
→
Bob
,Heidi
,Eve
Before noms: please state publicly the full chain (Eve UT: Frank=Chef, Grace=Drunk, David=Imp) + Heidi protects Eve N2-4 + no death. Then hard-push execute CHARLIE: if David=Imp at 5 alive ⇒ SW->Demon adj David ⇒ Charlie/Eve; protection/no-death points Charlie.
🧠
Lock in the strongest mechanical world before noms: ensure Eve/Heidi state facts publicly, then unify votes to execute Charlie (highest-prob Demon) and demand Charlie explain Empath reads.
👤
David(Ghost)
→
Charlie
Charlie, I'm going to publicly claim that Eve's Undertaker info is wrong. I'll say I was the Soldier (my bluff) and that her seeing me as the Imp means she's either the Poisoner or the actual Demon framing you. I'll use my ghost vote to help you execute her or Bob.
🧠
Coordinate the final push with my Minion (now the Imp) to discredit the Undertaker and secure a win.
👤
Alice(Ghost)
→
Bob
,Heidi
,Eve
Agree: execute CHARLIE today. Bob pls nominate asap; Heidi back it. If Charlie claims poison/drunk, note script has no Poisoner; only way is Eve lying, but then Eve must hard-explain UT chain. Don’t get derailed—push Charlie first.
🧠
Lock in a fast Charlie nomination/vote plan before noms. Reduce derailment risk; ensure town commits to the only mechanically consistent world.
👤
Bob
→
Heidi
,Eve
,Grace(Ghost)
I’m aligned on exec CHARLIE. If Eve UT true (Frank=Chef, Grace=Drunk, David=Imp) @5 alive => SW->Demon. Chef1 => SW adj David = Charlie/Eve; Heidi protecting Eve + no deaths points Demon=Charlie (was hitting Eve). Grace pls save ghost vote unless needed.
🧠
Lock in votes/nom plan on Charlie, manage dead votes, and pre-empt Charlie’s counterpush by demanding an Empath explanation consistent with David=Imp and no Poisoner.
👤
Charlie
→
David(Ghost)
David, don't claim Soldier. If you claim Soldier, the Chef 1 logic points directly to me and Bob as the evil pair. Claim you were the Drunk or something that doesn't confirm a pair. If you're the Imp, Eve's UT info is 'correct' to them. We need to discredit her UT info entirely.
🧠
I need to prevent David from making a claim that inadvertently confirms the Chef's '1' count and points the finger at me. If he claims Soldier, and the Chef saw 1 pair, then the pair must be Bob and me.
👤
Grace(Ghost)
→
Bob
,Heidi
Heidi—can you list EXACT Monk protects N2/N3/N4 (names, in order) to explain 3 no-kills? Bob: if Heidi says she protected Eve on those no-kill nights, that strongly supports Demon=Charlie. If vote ends up 2 hands short, I’ll spend my ghost vote on Charlie.
🧠
Lock in Heidi’s night protects to explain 3 no-kill nights and decide between Charlie vs Eve. Also signal I can spend my ghost vote if the execution needs it.
👤
Eve
→
Charlie
Need your explanation before noms: if David truly was Imp & there’s no Poisoner on script, your repeated Empath ‘0’ with David as neighbor can’t be true. Are you actually Empath? Or why doubt my UT chain? If you’re good, give alternate world NOW.
🧠
Force Charlie to publicly commit to an explanation/role; if he can’t reconcile, we lock in Charlie execution with minimal last-minute confusion.
Nominations — Day 5
📜
Storyteller
Nominations are now open. Please remember that only living players may nominate.
⚖️
Heidi
→
Charlie
Must-hit at 4. If Eve’s UT true: David=Imp at 5 => Scarlet Woman became Demon; Chef1 => SW adjacent to David = Charlie/Eve; no Poisoner => Charlie’s empath 0s w/ evil neighbor impossible, so Charlie=Demon. If UT false, no-kill+my protects still point Charlie.
🧠
It’s must-hit at 4 alive. Charlie is the only player whose claim contradicts the strongest mechanical chain (UT+Chef1+no Poisoner). Executing Charlie should win or clarify final 3.
📜
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Charlie. 2 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
✋
Heidi
Heidi raised their hand
🧠
Secure Charlie’s execution at 4 alive; if Charlie is the Demon (most consistent), we win immediately. If not, we use remaining day discussions/ghost votes to resolve Eve/Bob next.
💬
Charlie
→
All
Wait! If Eve is the Scarlet Woman, she'd know David was the Imp and lie about her UT result to frame me. Grace already says Eve lied about her being the Drunk. If Eve is the Demon, she's framing the only person who can catch her. Don't let her win by executing me!
🧠
I need to discredit Eve's Undertaker claim and highlight the discrepancy between her info and Grace's claim to create enough doubt to prevent my execution.
✋
Bob
Bob raised their hand
🧠
We’re at 4 alive must-hit. Voting Charlie executes the mechanically most likely Demon and prevents evil from stalling into a 2v1 endgame.
💬
Alice(Ghost)
→
All
Public: Charlie’s push ‘Eve is SW’ doesn’t solve the Empath math. If David was Imp, SW must be adjacent him (Chef1) = Charlie/Eve. With no Poisoner, Charlie can’t have 0s while neighbored to evil David unless Charlie is the liar/SW. Execute Charlie.
🧠
Publicly lock in the mechanical case so alive players don’t get swayed by Charlie’s counterclaim and follow through on the must-hit execution.
⌛
Grace(Ghost)
Grace waits.
🧠
Charlie already meets the 2-vote threshold (Bob+Heidi). I should conserve my single ghost vote for a possible final-day must-hit or to break a 1-vote short situation later.
✋
Eve
Eve raised their hand
🧠
Secure Charlie’s execution now; at 4 alive this is must-hit. Extra vote prevents last-second swing and ends game if Charlie is Demon.
💬
David(Ghost)
→
All
Wait! If you execute Charlie, you're handing the game to Eve. Grace already called her out for lying about the Drunk result. If Eve is the Scarlet Woman, she's perfectly positioned to frame Charlie using a fake Undertaker result. Don't rush this!
🧠
I need to create doubt about Eve's Undertaker claim to prevent Charlie's execution. By highlighting Grace's previous conflict with Eve, I can paint Eve as the true manipulator.
💬
Frank(Ghost)
→
All
Push through Charlie. If Eve’s UT true: David=Imp at 5 alive ⇒ Scarlet Woman takeover; Chef1 means SW adjacent David ⇒ Charlie/Eve. Heidi protecting Eve + no deaths implies Demon kept targeting Eve ⇒ Demon=Charlie. If UT false, Charlie’s Empath-0 story still suspect. Execute Charlie.
🧠
I’m dead/no vote, so I must add concise mechanical logic to keep town focused: execute Charlie today; if wrong we likely lose next.
💬
Heidi
→
All
Public: My Monk protects were N2 Eve, N3 Eve, N4 Eve. We’ve had no deaths those nights. That fits Demon repeatedly trying to kill Eve => Demon likely Charlie. Also: if David was Imp & no Poisoner, Charlie can’t have Empath 0s while sat next to evil David unless Charlie is lying/evil.
🧠
Lock in votes on Charlie by restating the mechanical contradiction (Empath 0 vs evil neighbor) and corroborating the no-kill pattern with my Monk protects.
💬
Charlie
→
All
Wait! If David was the Imp, my Empath 0 means Eve is the Scarlet Woman who just became the Demon. She's lying about her UT result to frame me because I'm the only one who can catch her. Grace already said Eve lied about her being the Drunk. If you execute me, Eve wins!
🧠
I need to create doubt about Eve's Undertaker information and leverage Grace's previous disagreement with Eve to paint Eve as the Scarlet Woman who has now become the Demon. This is my only chance to avoid execution.
💬
Bob
→
All
Keep hands up. If David was Imp at 5, only SW in play (no Poisoner) so Charlie can’t have Empath 0s while neighbored to evil David unless Charlie is lying/evil. Monk on Eve + no deaths = Demon kept shooting Eve → points to Charlie. Ghosts save votes unless needed.
🧠
Publicly cement the mechanical case during the vote so good doesn’t get swayed by Charlie’s counter-accusation, and preserve ghost votes if margin already sufficient.
💬
Alice(Ghost)
→
All
Keep hands up. Charlie’s ‘Eve is SW’ still fails: if David was Imp, no Poisoner on script, so Charlie can’t be Empath 0 while neighbored to evil David unless Charlie is lying/evil (SW). Monk on Eve + no deaths = Demon likely kept shooting Eve → points to Charlie.
🧠
Lock in the Charlie execution by keeping voters from wavering and by showing Charlie’s alternative world doesn’t resolve the Empath/kill pattern.
⌛
Grace(Ghost)
Grace waits.
🧠
Charlie already has enough living hands to be executed; spending my single ghost vote adds no value now. I’ll conserve it for a later, tighter vote if the game continues.
💬
Eve
→
All
Keep hands up. If David was Imp at 5 alive, only SW can save game. With no Poisoner on script, Charlie can’t be truthful Empath ‘0’ while neighbored to evil David. Heidi protected me N2-4 + no deaths = Demon kept shooting me → points to Charlie.
🧠
Lock the vote on Charlie by highlighting mechanical impossibility of his Empath claim if David was Imp, and reinforcing Monk/no-kill pattern.
✋
David(Ghost)
David raised their hand
🧠
I will raise my hand to vote for Charlie. As a dead player, my ghost vote is a valuable resource, and using it now to help execute my Minion (who has likely become the new Imp) is the best way to appear 'good' and maintain the trust of the remaining players. Since the town is already convinced of Charlie's guilt based on the Empath/Chef logic and the lack of night deaths, joining the vote solidifies my 'reformed' image after being executed. This helps ensure that if the game continues, I am not suspected of being part of an evil team that is still active.
💬
Frank(Ghost)
→
All
I can’t vote. Key point: no deaths N2-4 while Heidi protected Eve fits Demon repeatedly targeting Eve → Demon is NOT Eve. With Chef1 + ‘David=Imp’ world, the evil pair is (David+Charlie) or (David+Eve); protection pattern strongly selects Charlie. Keep hands up.
🧠
I can’t vote; I need to crystallize the mechanical case for the living so they keep hands up and execute Charlie as the highest-probability Demon.
📜
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
👻
David(Ghost)
Ghost vote used by David
🗳️
New execution leader: Charlie with 4 votes. They will be executed when nominations close unless tied or surpassed by another nominee.
📜
Storyteller
The vote passes. Charlie is now on the block with 4 votes and will be executed when nominations close, unless another nominee receives equal or more votes.
💬
Heidi
→
All
Public: Don’t outvote/overbid this—let Charlie go through. If Charlie dies and game continues, we hard-pivot to execute Eve tomorrow (only way we’re wrong). Ghosts please save votes unless needed to stop a tie.
🧠
Lock in the execution on Charlie, discourage a tie/overbid, and set an explicit contingency plan if the game continues so we don’t stall on final day.
⚖️
Charlie
→
Eve
Eve is the Scarlet Woman. She's lying about her Undertaker results (as Grace confirmed) to frame me. The lack of kills is a calculated move by her to look like a victim while she's actually the Demon. David, Grace, help me put the real liar on the block before it's too late!
🧠
I am the Demon (formerly Scarlet Woman) and I am currently on the block with 4 votes. If I am executed, the evil team loses. I must nominate Eve, the only other logical candidate for the Scarlet Woman, to shift the town's focus and force a tie or a pivot. I am leveraging the existing conflict between Grace (who claims Mayor) and Eve (who claimed Grace was the Drunk) to discredit Eve's information.
📜
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Eve. 5 votes needed for execution or 4 votes to tie. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
💬
Heidi
→
All
Public: Don’t vote Eve. A tie/beat saves Charlie. Let Charlie execute; if we’re wrong and game continues, we execute Eve tomorrow. Hands down unless you must stop a tie.
🧠
Prevent a tie/overbid that would save Charlie. Keep town coordinated: no votes on Eve, execute Charlie; if game continues, pivot to Eve next day.
💬
Charlie
→
All
If you execute me, the game ends. Eve is the Scarlet Woman who became the Demon when David died. She's faking the 'no kills' by not attacking to frame me as the 'blocked' Demon. Grace already confirmed Eve lied about her role. If you let me die, you're letting the real Demon win!
🧠
I need to create enough doubt about Eve's alignment to prevent my execution or at least force a tie, by highlighting the contradiction between her Undertaker claim and Grace's Mayor claim.
💬
Bob
→
All
Don’t vote Eve. A tie at 4 likely means NO execution, giving evil a free night. Let Charlie go through on 4; if game continues tomorrow (3 alive), we execute Eve then. Dead players: don’t spend ghost vote here.
🧠
Prevent a tie/overbid on Eve so Charlie is executed today; preserve path to win even if we’re wrong by executing Eve tomorrow.
💬
Alice(Ghost)
→
All
Public: Don’t vote Eve. A tie/beat risks saving Charlie or even no execution. Let Charlie die on 4; if game continues tomorrow (3 alive), we execute Eve—no other line wins.
🧠
We are dead w/ no vote; must prevent a tie/overbid that could save Charlie or cause no execution. Keep plan: execute Charlie; if wrong, execute Eve at 3.
💬
Grace(Ghost)
→
All
Don’t vote Eve here. A tie/beat likely saves Charlie or creates no-exec. Let Charlie die on 4; if we’re wrong and wake to 3 alive, we execute Eve tomorrow. Dead players: save ghost votes.
🧠
Prevent a tie/overbid that could save Charlie or cause no-execution. Preserve my ghost vote for final day leverage.
💬
Eve
→
All
Hands DOWN on me—don’t create a tie/overbid. Let Charlie die on 4. If we wake with 3 alive, you can execute me tomorrow; that line covers both worlds. Dead players, please save ghost votes.
🧠
Prevent a tie/overbid that could save Charlie or cause no-execution. Keep the clean line: execute Charlie today; if still alive tomorrow, town executes me at 3.
💬
David(Ghost)
→
All
If you execute Charlie, you're handing the game to Eve. Grace already called her out for lying about the Drunk result. If Eve is the Scarlet Woman, she's perfectly positioned to frame Charlie using a fake Undertaker result. Don't rush this!
🧠
I need to cast doubt on Eve's Undertaker claim and support Charlie's narrative that Eve is the Scarlet Woman framing him. By highlighting Grace's (the ghost) disagreement with Eve's info, I can try to peel off a vote or at least create enough chaos to prevent Charlie's execution.
💬
Frank(Ghost)
→
All
Dead/no vote. Do NOT vote Eve—any tie/overbid risks no-exec or saving Charlie. Best line: let Charlie die on 4; if we wake with 3 alive, execute Eve tomorrow. That covers both worlds.
🧠
I can’t vote; I’ll steer town away from a tie/overbid that could cause no execution and lose us the game, while preserving the ‘execute Eve tomorrow if needed’ fail-safe.
💬
Heidi
→
All
Public: Hands DOWN on Eve. Any tie/overbid risks no-exec or saving Charlie. Let Charlie die on 4; if we wake with 3 alive, we execute Eve tomorrow. Dead players: please don’t spend ghost votes here.
🧠
Prevent a tie/overbid that could cause no-execution or save Charlie; preserve the strongest line that wins in both main worlds.
💬
Charlie
→
All
If you execute me, the game ends. Eve is the Scarlet Woman who became the Demon when David died. She's faking the 'no kills' by not attacking to frame me as the 'blocked' Demon. Grace already confirmed Eve lied about her role. If you let me die, you're letting the real Demon win!
🧠
I need to continue discrediting Eve and framing her as the Scarlet Woman who became the Demon. My goal is to create enough doubt to prevent my execution or at least set up a scenario where the town is confused if I die. I'm doubling down on the 'no kills' being a tactical choice by Eve to frame me.
⌛
Bob
Bob waits.
🧠
Do not create a tie/overbid that could prevent any execution. Let Charlie be executed; if game continues, pivot to execute Eve on the final day.
💬
Alice(Ghost)
→
All
Public: I’m dead/no vote, but please keep hands DOWN on Eve—any tie/overbid risks saving Charlie or no-exec. Best line: execute Charlie today on 4; if we wake to 3 alive, we execute Eve tomorrow. Covers both worlds.
🧠
Prevent a tie/overbid that could save Charlie or cause no-execution. Reinforce best line: execute Charlie today; if still alive tomorrow, execute Eve.
⌛
Grace(Ghost)
Grace waits.
🧠
Do not spend ghost vote or create a tie/overbid; preserve guaranteed execution of Charlie today and keep my ghost vote for the final 3 if needed.
💬
Eve
→
All
Keep hands DOWN on me. Any tie/overbid can mean no execution or save Charlie. Let Charlie go through on 4. If we wake with 3 alive tomorrow, execute me—this line covers both worlds.
🧠
Prevent a tie/overbid on my nomination; the mathematically safest line is let Charlie die on 4, then if game continues, I accept execution tomorrow.
💬
David(Ghost)
→
All
If you execute Charlie, you're handing the game to Eve. Grace already called her out for lying about the Drunk result. If Eve is the Scarlet Woman, she's perfectly positioned to frame Charlie using a fake Undertaker result. Don't rush this!
🧠
I need to continue sowing doubt about Eve's Undertaker claim to protect Charlie, my Minion who is currently on the block. By framing Eve as the Scarlet Woman who became the Demon, I provide a narrative for why the game didn't end when I (the Imp) was executed.
💬
Frank(Ghost)
→
All
Public (dead/no vote): keep hands DOWN on Eve. Any tie/overbid risks no-exec or saving Charlie. Best line stays: execute Charlie on 4; if we wake with 3 alive, execute Eve tomorrow.
🧠
Reinforce optimal line for alive players during the live vote: keep hands down to avoid a tie/no-exec and preserve the covered-win path.
📜
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
🗳️
Nominee Eve did not reach threshold.
📜
Storyteller
Eve did not receive enough votes (0/2).
💬
Heidi
→
All
Public: We’re locked in—no more votes/overbids. Let Charlie be executed on 4. If we wake to 3 alive tomorrow, Bob please nominate Eve immediately and we execute her. Dead players: keep ghost vote for final day only.
🧠
Lock in the no-tie, no-overbid line so we definitely get an execution today; set a clear plan for tomorrow and discourage last-second chaos.
💬
Charlie
→
All
If you execute me, the game ends. Eve is the Scarlet Woman who became the Demon when David died. She's faking the 'no kills' by not attacking to frame me as the 'blocked' Demon. Grace already confirmed Eve lied about her role. If you let me die, you're letting the real Demon win!
🧠
I need to make one final, desperate push to discredit Eve and cast doubt on the town's plan to execute me. By framing her as the Scarlet Woman who inherited the Demon role, I provide a mechanical explanation for why the game continued after David's death.
💬
Bob
→
All
No more nominations—do NOT create a tie/no-exec. Let Charlie be executed on 4. If we wake with 3 alive, I will nominate Eve immediately and we execute her. Dead players: save ghost vote for that final day.
🧠
Prevent a last-second tie/no-exec. Lock in Charlie execution now; preserve the contingency plan: if game continues, immediately execute Eve at 3 alive.
💬
Alice(Ghost)
→
All
Public (dead/no vote): stick to the plan—NO more noms, no ties. Let Charlie die on 4. If we wake to 3 alive, Bob nominate Eve instantly and execute her. David’s warning is noted, but this is the only line that covers both worlds.
🧠
Lock in the only line that wins in both main worlds: avoid tie/no-exec now, let Charlie die, and if game continues execute Eve at 3 alive.
💬
Grace(Ghost)
→
All
Public: Agree w/plan—NO more nominations/overbids. Let Charlie go out on 4. If we wake with 3 alive, Bob nominate Eve immediately; I’m saving my ghost vote for that final day if needed.
🧠
Reinforce the only line that covers both worlds: lock Charlie’s execution today, prevent tie/no-exec, and preserve my ghost vote for the 3-alive final.
💬
Eve
→
All
No more noms/overbids. Charlie stays on 4. Reminder: if David was Imp at 5 alive, only SW remains and must be next to him (Charlie or me). Exec Charlie now; if game continues at 3 alive, Bob nominate me immediately.
🧠
Lock in the optimal line and prevent a late nomination that causes tie/no-exec, which is the only way evil can still win from here.
💬
David(Ghost)
→
All
If Charlie dies, the game is over. Eve is the Scarlet Woman who became the Demon when I was executed. She's faking the 'no kills' to frame Charlie. Grace already confirmed Eve lied about her role. If you let Charlie die, you're letting the real Demon win!
🧠
I need to continue the narrative that Eve is the Scarlet Woman who became the Demon, framing Charlie. This is my last chance to sow doubt before the execution, even though I'm dead and have no vote. I want to reinforce Charlie's defense.
💬
Frank(Ghost)
→
All
Public (dead/no vote): stick to plan—NO more nominations or overbids. Let Charlie be executed on 4. If game continues (3 alive), Bob must nominate Eve immediately and execute her. This line covers both Charlie-world and Eve-world.
🧠
Lock the group into the only line that covers both worlds: no more noms/overbids today; if not over, execute Eve tomorrow. I can’t vote, so I’ll just coordinate.
📜
Storyteller
The guillotine blade falls. Charlie has been executed.
💀
Charlie(Ghost)
Charlie has died.
🏁
Game Over
Demon Dead
Winner: Good
Transcript
Paused
Copied