Game Detail
Players
Alice (Soldier) Bob (Monk) Charlie (Chef) David (Butler) Eve (Baron) Frank (Saint) Grace (Drunk) Heidi (Imp)
Token Usage
| Team | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Cost (USD) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Evil | 290,540 | 13,028 | $0.0922 |
| Good | 775,858 | 79,867 | $2.4759 |
Event Transcript
🎭
The game has started.
📜
Storyteller
→
Eve
You are the Minion. The Demon is Heidi.
📜
Storyteller
→
Heidi
Minions are: Eve. Your safe bluffs are: Virgin, Mayor, Investigator
📜
Storyteller
→
Charlie
Good evening Charlie. You are the Chef. You learn that there are 0 pairs of evil players.
📜
Storyteller
→
Grace
Good evening Grace. You are the Empath. You sense that 2 of your neighbors is evil!
📜
Storyteller
→
David
Good evening David. You are the Butler. Who would you like to be your master tomorrow?
🎯
David
David made a choice.
🧠
Pick a likely-engaged player to follow for Day 1 votes; choosing my neighbor makes coordination easy and lets me reassess tomorrow if Charlie feels off.
📜
Storyteller
→
David
You chose Charlie to be your master.
Day 1
📜
Storyteller
Welcome to the village of Ravenswood Bluff. Please take this time to get to know your fellow villagers. Feel free to move around and have private conversations. Be wary, for a Demon hides among you!
👤
David
→
Charlie
Hey Charlie—quick 1:1? I’m in a position where today my vote is easiest if I mirror yours, so I want to track how you’re leaning. What did you get/claim (if any) and who feels sketchy to you so far?
🧠
Coordinate with my Butler master to ensure I can vote when needed, while probing Charlie’s alignment/claim and keeping my Outsider role mostly private early.
👤
Frank
→
Eve
,Grace
Hey—quick 1:1. What are you claiming / any N0 info (WW/Libr/Inv/Chef etc.)? I’m keeping my exact role quiet for now but I’m good and want to coordinate reads + avoid bad executes.
🧠
Early private info lets me build logic chains and spot role conflicts while keeping my Saint role hidden; neighbors are key for later Empath/adjacency reasoning.
👤
Heidi
→
Eve
Hey Eve, I'm thinking of claiming Investigator. What do you think? I want to make sure we're on the same page.
🧠
I need to coordinate with my Minion, Eve, to establish our bluffs early and ensure we are aligned. Investigator is a safe bluff for me.
👤
Bob
→
Alice
,Charlie
Hey—quick check-in: what role are you claiming & any starting info (WW/Librarian/Investigator/Chef)? If you prefer, just tell me what you learned (2 names + role). I’m a lower-impact Townsfolk for now.
🧠
Get early info from my neighbors to build worlds and decide who to protect Night 1 without outing myself.
👤
Eve
→
Heidi
Hey Heidi, Investigator sounds like a solid bluff. It's hard to disprove early on. I'll probably claim something like Librarian or Washerwoman to keep the focus off us. Let's stay coordinated.
🧠
I need to coordinate with my Demon, Heidi, to ensure our bluffs are consistent and we don't contradict each other. Supporting her Investigator claim builds trust and keeps her safe.
👤
Alice
→
Bob
No starting-info role here. I’m Soldier (so nothing learned N0). Happy to be a ‘safe’ confirm later since demon can’t kill me. What are you claiming / any starting pings (Chef/Inv/WW/Lib)?
🧠
Reply to Bob with minimal but true info to build trust network and start mapping roles/outsider count without giving evil too much leverage.
👤
Charlie
→
Bob
,David
,Alice
I’ll be straight in this small group: I’m Chef, got **0** evil pairs (no adjacent evils). So Demon+Minion not neighbors; also Bob+David (my neighbors) can’t both be evil. What are your claims/starting pings, and any outsiders spotted?
🧠
Share my Chef 0 privately to align early with key players, get their claims/info, and start using seating logic to constrain demon/minion placement.
👤
Grace
→
Eve
,Alice
Private: I’m Empath. N0 read = 2 evil among my alive neighbors (Frank & Heidi). If I’m sober, both are evil (Imp+minion). Treat them as prime suspects; also note Frank fishing for roles.
🧠
Get my hard mechanical info into at least one good player’s hands early to prevent misexecutes and set up a focused day 1 plan without exposing to my (likely evil) neighbors.
👤
Eve
→
Grace
,Alice
Grace, that's a bold claim. If you're Empath, you're saying Frank and Heidi are both evil? That's a lot of pressure on them. I'm still feeling out the room, but let's be careful not to jump to conclusions too early. What do you think, Alice?
🧠
I need to sow doubt about Grace's Empath claim without being too aggressive. By involving Alice, I can create a group dynamic where Grace's claim is questioned, protecting my Demon (Heidi) and fellow Minion (Frank).
👤
Bob
→
Alice
,Charlie
I’m actually the Monk. Kept it vague publicly for now. Charlie—Chef0 is useful: Demon+Minion not adjacent. Alice—Soldier claim noted; if true you’re a great long-term alive voice but not a great Monk target. Any Outsider claims spotted yet? Also, Charlie, who are your neighbors (Bob+David) confirmed—so they can’t BOTH be evil if Chef0 true.
🧠
Share my real role to build a trusted core and plan night protection; also flag how to use Chef0 for deductions and set up future consistency checks.
👤
Grace
→
Frank
Hey—no N0 pings for me (not WW/Libr/Inv/Chef). I’m a night-ability role and keeping it quiet for now. What *exactly* are you claiming (and any specific info), and who are you most sus of so far?
🧠
Answer Frank without giving him my Empath info (if he’s evil), while prompting a specific claim from him that we can later fact-check.
👤
Heidi
→
Eve
Sounds good, Eve. I'll stick with Investigator. I'll keep an eye on who's claiming what and try to steer things away from us. Let me know if you hear anything suspicious.
🧠
Confirming the bluff strategy with my Minion, Eve, to ensure we are aligned and can support each other's claims.
👤
David
→
Charlie
Got it—Chef 0 is huge: no adjacent evils. So if you’re good, Demon+Minion aren’t neighbors; if you were evil, then Bob+David must both be good (else you’d form an evil pair). Any other claims so far (Librarian/Investigator/outsider pings)? I’ll likely track your vote today.
🧠
Coordinate with my chosen master so my voting restriction doesn’t hinder town, while extracting and spreading the key Chef0 adjacency logic and prompting outsiders/minion info to triangulate suspects.
👤
Frank
→
Grace
Privately: I’m the Saint (good Outsider). Please don’t ever push/allow an execution on me—town insta-loses. I’m staying quiet publicly for now. Are you Empath/Monk/etc.? Any neighbor-based reads or who you’re leaning sus on so far?
🧠
Protect town from losing via my execution while gaining a trusted channel for mechanical coordination (neighbor reads/protection).
👤
Charlie
→
David
,Bob
,Alice
Quick follow-up before noms: David—what’s your actual role/why you’re mirroring my vote (Butler?) + any N0 info? Bob (Monk) & Alice (Soldier): have you seen any Outsider claims or WW/Librarian/Investigator pings that intersect Chef0 (no adjacent evils)?
🧠
Get David/Bob/Alice claims & outsider count quickly; David’s 'mirror my vote' hints Butler or coordination. Solidify a trust pocket and prep for nomination phase with actionable constraints.
👤
Alice
→
Bob
,Charlie
FYI in another whisper Grace claims Empath; N0 read=2 on her neighbors (Frank & Heidi) => if sober both evil. This *fits* your Chef0 (no adjacent evils) since F/H aren’t adjacent. I’ve seen no Outsider claims yet. Any word from David on his role?
🧠
Sync key info with Bob/Charlie before noms: share Grace’s Empath2 ping, reinforce Chef0 implications, and prompt for Outsider/starting-info claims to build a coherent world.
👤
David
→
Charlie
,Bob
,Alice
Yep—I'm the **Butler**. N0 I picked **Charlie** as my master, so today I can only vote when Charlie votes. No other info. I’ll mostly mirror Charlie’s vote unless we pre-agree. Any WW/Librarian/Investigator pings or outsider claims seen yet?
🧠
Clarify my Butler constraint so town doesn’t misread my voting, lock in coordination with Charlie, and solicit starting-info claims to quickly build a world map before nominations.
👤
Grace
→
Eve
,Alice
,Heidi
Update: I’m Empath; got N0=2 on my neighbors (Frank+Heidi). Frank privately told me he’s Saint (which would conflict w/ my read unless I’m poisoned/drunk or he’s lying). Heidi—what’s your role/starting info? Eve/Alice: suggest we pressure both for claims; avoid executing a Saint-claim D1 unless we’re sure.
🧠
Coordinate with trusted players, get Heidi’s claim, and plan a safe D1 approach that still pressures my neighbors without insta-losing to a real Saint.
👤
Eve
→
Grace
,Heidi
,Alice
Grace, that's a very specific read. If Frank is claiming Saint, he's trying to make himself untouchable. Heidi, what do you say to that? If you're Investigator, maybe you have info on him? We need to be careful about who we trust.
🧠
I need to sow discord and protect my Demon (Heidi) while appearing helpful. By questioning Grace's read and pushing Heidi to respond, I create confusion and force the town to doubt the Empath's claim.
👤
Frank
→
Grace
,Eve
Grace: thx. I’m Saint (good Outsider)—if I’m executed town loses, so please don’t ever push me. Can you share your exact role (Empath/Monk/etc.) + any early lean esp on my neighbors? Eve: what are you claiming / any N0 info? Keeping it private ok.
🧠
Lock in at least one trusted player who knows I’m Saint, gather any N0 info, and set expectations to never execute me while building a suspect pool for Day 1.
👤
Bob
→
Charlie
,Alice
,David
Update: Alice heard Grace claim Empath w/ N0=2 on neighbors Frank+Heidi. If Grace sober, that’s Demon+Minion (fits Chef0 since F/H not adjacent). Suggest we steer noms onto Frank or Heidi today unless we get counter-info (WW/Inv/Lib). David: if Charlie votes, you can mirror.
🧠
Align with Charlie (vote anchor) and Alice on the strongest mechanical lead (Grace’s Empath2) while considering poison/bluff worlds; set up a coordinated Day1 nomination target.
👤
Charlie
→
Grace
,Frank
,Heidi
Heard you (Grace) may be Empath w/ N0=2 on Frank+Heidi. Can each of you confirm your claim + any starting info? Also: any Outsider claims/role pings seen? Need before noms; Chef info says no adjacent evils (if I’m sober).
🧠
Lock down whether Grace’s Empath2 is solid and collect Frank/Heidi claims before nominations so we can pick the most mechanically supported execution.
👤
Alice
→
Charlie
,Bob
,David
We should hard-press Frank+Heidi for full claims now. If no solid counter-info, I lean execute **Heidi** D1 (tests Grace Empath2 w/o risking Saint-loss if Frank’s Saint bluff is real). David: confirm you can mirror Charlie vote; Charlie please announce where you’ll vote.
🧠
Coordinate our voting bloc (incl Butler constraint) and push for immediate claims from Frank/Heidi, aiming to execute one of them today with minimal Saint-risk.
👤
Heidi
→
Grace
,Eve
,Charlie
I'm Investigator. I haven't seen anything on Frank yet, but Grace's Empath read is definitely concerning. If Frank is claiming Saint, he's likely trying to avoid execution. We should be very cautious about trusting him.
🧠
I need to maintain my Investigator bluff and sow doubt about Frank, who is claiming a role (Saint) that makes him hard to execute. By agreeing with the suspicion on him, I deflect attention from myself.
👤
Frank
→
Charlie
,Grace
,Heidi
To clear up: I don’t know Grace as Empath—she told me only “night-ability role, no N0”. I’m Saint (good Outsider); if I’m executed, good auto-loses—pls keep that quiet but never execute me. Grace: can you confirm your exact role? Charlie: what exactly is your claim/info (Chef # etc.) and source of that Empath=2 rumor? Heidi: any claim/info?
🧠
Confirm/deny the Empath rumor, keep my Saint status controlled, and collect/lock in early claims so town doesn’t stumble into a losing Saint execution.
👤
Heidi
→
Grace
,Eve
,Charlie
I'm Investigator. I haven't seen anything on Frank yet, but Grace's Empath read is definitely concerning. If Frank is claiming Saint, he's likely trying to avoid execution. We should be very cautious about trusting him.
🧠
I am maintaining my Investigator bluff and sowing doubt about Frank (the Saint claim) to protect myself and Eve. I'm also trying to deflect from Grace's Empath claim by questioning its validity.
👤
Charlie
→
Grace
,Heidi
,Frank
Need hard confirms before noms. I’m Chef: **0** evil pairs (no adjacent evils). Grace: confirm you’re Empath + N0 number + your neighbors? Heidi: as Investigator, what EXACT ping (2 names + which minion)? Frank: why Saint claim; any corroboration/outsider count? Any other WW/Lib info?
🧠
Get exact mechanical claims before noms: Grace’s Empath number/targets, Heidi’s Investigator ping, and Frank’s Saint details. This determines whether we can safely execute Heidi/Frank today and how to avoid a Saint-loss bluff.
👤
Alice
→
Charlie
,Grace
,Bob
Before noms: I still favor executing **Heidi** D1 (tests Grace Empath2, avoids Saint-loss if Frank’s claim is real/bluff). Can we agree to press F/H for full public claims now? Charlie: if you nominate/vote Heidi, David can mirror via Butler.
🧠
Coordinate a D1 plan around Grace’s Empath2 while minimizing Saint-loss risk and forcing Frank/Heidi to commit to claims before nominations.
👤
Bob
→
Grace
,Frank
,Heidi
Before noms: can each of you give me your exact role claim + any info? Grace: confirm you’re Empath and your neighbors are Frank/Heidi with N0=2 (both evil) while both alive? Frank/Heidi: any Outsider/Saint/Butler etc? Need consistency fast.
🧠
Get direct, consistent claims from Frank/Heidi and a clearer statement from Grace, so town can choose a D1 execution that tests Empath2 while minimizing Saint risk.
👤
Grace
→
Charlie
,Alice
,Bob
Hard conflict: I’m Empath, N0=2 on neighbors Frank+Heidi. Charlie you’re Chef=0. So either my read is tainted (poison/drunk/Recluse/Spy) or Chef is. Heidi claims Investigator but gave no exact 2 names+minion. I lean execute Heidi D1 (tests my read, avoids Saint-loss if Frank truly Saint). Thoughts?
🧠
Align key info-holders before noms: highlight Empath2 vs Chef0 contradiction, demand Heidi’s exact Investigator info, and coordinate a safe D1 execution plan (likely Heidi) without risking a real Saint.
👤
Eve
→
Grace
,Alice
,Heidi
Grace, your Empath read is very strong, but it's only Day 1. If you're right, Frank and Heidi are both evil. But Heidi is claiming Investigator. If she's the Demon, she's lying. Let's keep an eye on both, but don't rush to execute. Frank's Saint claim is suspicious.
🧠
I need to sow doubt about Grace's Empath read while appearing helpful. By suggesting we wait and watch, I protect Heidi (the Demon) from an immediate execution while keeping the focus on Frank (the Saint claim).
👤
David
→
Charlie
,Alice
,Bob
I can only vote if **Charlie** votes (Butler; picked you N0). Suggest we demand full claims from **Grace/Frank/Heidi** now. If Grace sticks Empath2 on F/H, I’m ok executing **Heidi** first (less likely Saint-bait). Charlie—tell me where you plan to vote so I can mirror.
🧠
Coordinate with my master Charlie so my vote is usable; push for structured claim dump focusing Frank/Heidi/Grace and avoid executing a possible Saint.
Nominations — Day 1
📜
Storyteller
Nominations are now open.
💬
Eve
→
All
Grace's Empath read is very bold for Day 1. If she's right, we have two evil players, but we need to be careful. Frank's Saint claim is a classic way to avoid the block. I'm not ready to nominate anyone yet; let's see if anyone else has more info.
🧠
I need to sow doubt about Grace's Empath claim without directly attacking her, while keeping the focus on Frank's suspicious Saint claim to protect Heidi. I'll stay neutral on nominations for now to avoid drawing attention to myself.
⚖️
Charlie
→
Heidi
Nominating Heidi: Grace claims Empath N0=2 on neighbors Frank+Heidi; Heidi hasn’t provided exact Investigator ping (2 names + which minion). D1 execution tests Grace’s info without risking Frank’s Saint-claim auto-loss. Heidi: full Investigator details now, please.
🧠
Force a mechanical test of the Empath2 world without risking auto-loss to a Saint claim, and compel full info from all involved before night.
📜
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Heidi. 4 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
✋
Bob
Bob raised their hand
🧠
Vote Heidi to test the strongest mechanical lead (Empath2 on F/H) while avoiding a potential Saint-loss on Frank and forcing clearer info going into Night 1.
💬
Frank
→
All
Clarify: Grace never claimed Empath to me—only “night role, no N0”. So the “Empath=2 on Frank+Heidi” is unverified rumor. I *am* the Saint: if I’m executed, good auto-loses. Before we vote Heidi, can Grace/Heidi give exact public claims/info?
🧠
Publicly correct the Empath rumor + reinforce that executing me loses, while pushing for concrete claims before we commit votes on Heidi.
✋
Grace
Grace raised their hand
🧠
Secure Heidi execution as the safest D1 test of my Empath=2 without risking executing a Saint-claim; then use tomorrow’s Empath read to resolve worlds.
💬
David
→
All
Public: I’m the Butler; I can only vote if Charlie votes. Charlie—are you voting on Heidi? Also: Grace, please state your exact role/info publicly. Heidi—give your full Investigator ping (2 names + which minion). Frank: confirm Saint claim publicly.
🧠
As Butler I must coordinate with Charlie’s vote and force mechanical clarity (Grace role + Heidi Investigator ping). Publicly ask for claims and confirm Charlie is voting so I can legally vote.
✋
Alice
Alice raised their hand
🧠
Secure enough votes to execute Heidi as the lowest-risk test of the strong Empath claim while avoiding a possible Saint auto-loss on Frank.
✋
Charlie
Charlie raised their hand
🧠
Secure Heidi’s execution to test the Empath2 world and punish lack of Investigator details; also enables Butler David to vote with me and avoids the high-risk Saint-claim target today.
💬
Eve
→
All
Grace, you need to be clear. If you're the Empath, you should have a specific read. If you're just guessing, you're putting us in a bad spot. Heidi, you're the Investigator, give us the ping. We need facts, not just accusations. I'm not voting until I hear more.
🧠
I need to sow doubt about Grace's claim while appearing to be a concerned townsperson. By demanding more specific info from both Grace and Heidi, I can stall the vote and protect my Demon, Heidi.
💬
Heidi
→
All
I am the Investigator. My info is that either Bob or Alice is the Poisoner. Grace's claim that I am evil is completely false, and it's dangerous to base an execution on an unverified Empath read. I'm a Townsfolk, and executing me today would be a huge mistake for the town.
🧠
I need to defend myself against the Empath claim by providing a fake Investigator ping that points to a good player (Bob or Alice) as the Poisoner, sowing doubt about Grace's reliability and protecting myself from execution.
💬
Heidi
→
All
I am the Investigator. My info is that either Bob or Alice is the Poisoner. Grace's claim that I am evil is completely false, and it's dangerous to base an execution on an unverified Empath read. I'm a Townsfolk, and executing me today would be a huge mistake for the town.
🧠
I need to defend myself against the nomination by providing a plausible Investigator ping and casting doubt on Grace's Empath claim. I'm framing Bob or Alice as the Poisoner to create confusion.
💬
Alice
→
All
Public: I am NOT the Poisoner (I’m Soldier). If Heidi is truly Investigator w/ “Alice or Bob is Poisoner”, then it must be Bob. Bob—respond/claim. Given this ping on me + Grace’s Empath2, I’m keeping my vote on Heidi as best D1 test.
🧠
Lock in my denial of Poisoner, force Bob response, and justify keeping my vote on Heidi as the best D1 test that avoids Saint auto-loss risk.
💬
Charlie
→
All
Public: I’m Chef: 0 adjacent evil pairs. Heidi now gave full Investigator ping (Alice or Bob = Poisoner). Bob, give your role publicly + any reason you’re not Poisoner. Frank, confirm Saint publicly. Eve—if you’re withholding vote pending clarity, this is the clarity.
🧠
Lock in clear public claims before vote ends; keep pressure on Heidi while extracting Bob/Frank responses so tomorrow’s world-building is coherent.
💬
David
→
All
Before this locks: Bob, public role now + why not Poisoner. Grace, confirm clearly: are you Empath and what was N0 number exactly? Frank, confirm Saint. If any of these are wobbly, we should consider pulling votes to avoid losing our Investigator D1.
🧠
Try to pause a potentially bad D1 execution by forcing Bob to claim now and letting voters reassess before hands lock in; I can vote only if Charlie does, but better to influence others first.
💬
Grace
→
All
Public clarity: I am Empath. Night 0 I got a ‘2’ on my alive neighbors: Frank & Heidi. That’s why I pushed scrutiny. Frank did ask me earlier; I withheld specifics then. I still favor executing Heidi today (safer than a Saint-claim). Frank: confirm Saint publicly. Bob: full claim now re Poisoner ping.
🧠
Publicly lock in my role/info, counter Frank’s ‘unverified rumor’, and steer town to the safest D1 execution (Heidi) while demanding Bob/Frank claims for next-day solves.
💬
Frank
→
All
Public: I confirm I am the Saint—if I’m executed by town, good instantly loses. Therefore Grace’s Empath ‘2’ on (Frank,Heidi) can’t be trusted as-is (poison/lie). I strongly recommend NO execution on Heidi today; get Bob’s full claim vs Poisoner ping first.
🧠
Create mechanical doubt in the Empath2 that implicates me; preserve likely Investigator and refocus on Bob/Alice Poisoner ping. Try to prevent a bad D1 execution.
💬
Eve
→
All
Grace, your Empath read on Frank and Heidi is clearly problematic if Frank is the Saint. If Frank is the Saint, he's good, so your '2' read implies Heidi is evil. But Heidi is claiming Investigator. We need to be very careful about executing a potential Investigator on Day 1.
🧠
I need to sow doubt about Grace's information to protect Heidi (the Demon). By highlighting the contradiction between the Saint claim and the Empath read, I can make the town hesitate to execute Heidi.
↩️
Bob
Bob lowered their hand
🧠
Reduce chance we execute a potentially good Investigator on D1 amid contradictory claims; keep options open and force more public clarity before committing.
📜
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
🗳️
Nominee Heidi did not reach threshold.
📜
Storyteller
Heidi did not receive enough votes (3/4).
💬
Heidi
→
All
I'm glad the town saw reason. Executing an Investigator on Day 1 based on a shaky Empath read would have been a disaster. I'm here to help find the real evil. Let's look at Bob—he was pinged as the Poisoner. Bob, what is your role? We need to clear this up.
🧠
I need to deflect suspicion from myself and keep the town focused on Bob, who I've framed as the Poisoner. By acting like a helpful Townsfolk, I can maintain my cover and sow more confusion.
💬
Eve
→
All
Heidi is right. We almost made a huge mistake. Bob, you were pinged as the Poisoner by our Investigator. You need to come forward with your role immediately so we can figure out if that ping is accurate or if we have a liar in our midst. We need to be methodical.
🧠
I need to keep the heat off Heidi (the Demon) and redirect it towards Bob to create more chaos and confusion. By supporting Heidi's Investigator claim, I reinforce her credibility.
⚖️
Grace
→
Bob
Nominate Bob: Heidi (Investigator) pinged Bob/Alice as Poisoner; Alice hard-claims Soldier; Bob hasn’t given a clear role/why-not. His hand up then down looked like evasion. Let’s get a full claim + answer before night.
🧠
Use nomination to force Bob’s full claim and voting record into the open; if consensus holds, execute the most mechanically implicated player (Bob) rather than spinning on my contested Empath read.
📜
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Bob. 4 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
✋
Alice
Alice raised their hand
🧠
Vote Bob to resolve the Investigator ping and Bob’s evasion; likely hits the Poisoner and clarifies whether Grace’s Empath info was poisoned.
✋
Heidi
Heidi raised their hand
🧠
I need to support the nomination of Bob to keep the pressure off myself and potentially eliminate a good player or force them to reveal more information. Voting for Bob aligns with my Investigator bluff.
💬
David
→
All
Bob nomination vote: Bob—give full public role *now* + any info. Charlie (my master): are you voting? If you vote, I can too. If Bob won’t claim clearly, I’m willing to vote him out to test Heidi’s Investigator ping.
🧠
During vote window, force Bob claim and coordinate with my master (Charlie) so my Butler vote is usable; try to reach 4 only if Bob stays unconvincing.
💬
Bob
→
All
Public claim: I am the MONK. I told Alice/Charlie earlier. I am not the Poisoner. If Heidi’s Investigator ping is real, it points to Alice, not me. Please do NOT execute me D1—let’s get night info; I can protect key roles tonight.
🧠
I’m on the block; I must hard-claim Monk to avoid a bad D1 execution and push town to use night info to resolve the Investigator/Empath conflicts.
💬
Eve
→
All
Bob claims Monk. If he's the Monk, he can protect someone tonight. If we execute him and he's the Monk, we lose a powerful defensive role. Heidi's ping was 'Alice or Bob'. Alice claims Soldier. If both are good, Heidi's info is wrong. Let's be careful before voting.
🧠
I want to sow doubt about executing Bob to protect my fellow evil player (if Bob is evil) or just to keep the town confused and prevent them from hitting a good player who might be useful to keep alive for now. I am the Baron, so I need to keep the Demon (Heidi) safe.
💬
Charlie
→
All
I’m NOT voting Bob right now (David: don’t mirror). D1 Bob-exe feels low-info with Monk/Soldier claims. If we spare him, Bob publicly state who you’ll protect tonight; Heidi/Grace—who do you most suspect as Demon given Chef0 + your info?
🧠
Avoid a low-info D1 execution on a plausible Monk while signaling David (Butler) not to mirror my vote; push for clearer mechanical lines and night coordination.
✋
Grace
Grace raised their hand
🧠
With only 2 votes so far, adding mine keeps pressure on Bob to commit to a protect plan and lets town see I treat the Investigator ping as actionable, without likely forcing an execution.
💬
Frank
→
All
I’m not voting Bob here. D1 execute into Monk/Soldier/Investigator claims is too swingy. Bob: if you live, state *now* who you’ll protect tonight (and stick to it). Heidi/Grace: given Chef0, who are your top Demon candidates and why (not just “Empath2”)? Let’s use night info.
🧠
Prevent a low-info D1 execution that could kill a key Townsfolk; push for night actions/claims that create mechanical confirmation and avoid town snowballing on shaky info.
💬
Frank
→
All
No vote from me on Bob. Bob: publicly lock a protection target *now* (and don’t change). Heidi/Grace: give top Demon suspects *excluding* each other + why, using Chef0/seat order. Charlie confirm you’re staying off so David knows.
🧠
Prevent a swingy D1 execution; force Bob to commit to a protection target and set up N2 cross-checks among Empath/Investigator/Chef lines.
↩️
Grace
Grace lowered their hand
🧠
Reduce chance we execute a likely-good Monk claim off a possibly-evil Investigator. Keep Bob alive for a protection + more info, then re-evaluate tomorrow.
💬
Bob
→
All
If I live, I’m locking N1 protection on GRACE (Empath) to keep that info role alive. Please don’t vote me out on a D1 Investigator ping; let’s take a night and reassess Alice/Heidi/Grace with new info.
🧠
Lock a clear N1 protection to coordinate town and reduce votes on me; preserve Monk for night protection and set up tomorrow’s info-checks.
↩️
Alice
Alice lowered their hand
🧠
Given low consensus and credible Monk claim with a locked protection, I’ll retract my vote to avoid a swingy D1 execution and push for clearer mechanical resolution tomorrow.
💬
Charlie
→
All
Confirming: I’m NOT voting Bob, so David you can’t vote either. Let’s avoid a swingy D1. Bob locked protect Grace—good. Heidi/Grace: each give top 2 Demon suspects (not each other) using Chef0 + seat logic, and why, before vote closes.
🧠
I want to lock in no-vote so David/Butler knows, avoid a low-info D1 execution, and force concrete demon-suspect reads from info roles to guide N1/N2.
💬
Heidi
→
All
I'm happy to hold off on the execution. My ping was Bob or Alice, and with Alice claiming Soldier and Bob claiming Monk, it's possible I'm the one who's misinformed or the info is tricky. I'll look at David or Frank as potential Demon candidates based on seat order.
🧠
I need to de-escalate the situation since Bob is about to be saved. By suggesting David or Frank as Demon candidates, I'm sowing confusion and shifting the focus away from myself and my Minion, Eve.
💬
David
→
All
I’m not voting (Butler + Charlie isn’t). Town: likely no exe here—use it for info. Grace: top 2 Demon suspects (not Heidi) + why? Heidi: you said David/Frank—give 2 reasons each. Bob: confirm protect Grace & don’t change.
🧠
I can’t vote (Charlie not voting). I’ll keep town coordinated: stop this execution, extract concrete demon-suspect lists, and set up night tests (Grace survival vs Bob claim).
💬
Eve
→
All
I agree with the consensus. Executing a Monk on Day 1 based on an Investigator ping that could be wrong is too risky. Let's hold off on the execution and see what happens tonight. Bob, stick to your plan to protect Grace. Town, let's use the night to gather more info.
🧠
To support the decision to not execute Bob, thereby protecting the Demon (Heidi) from further scrutiny and keeping the town's focus away from us.
📜
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
🗳️
Nominee Bob did not reach threshold.
📜
Storyteller
Bob did not receive enough votes (1/4).
💬
Bob
→
All
Town: reconfirming I’m Monk and N1 I will protect GRACE (locked). Before we go night: everyone give 1–2 Demon suspects + reason using Chef0/claims. Don’t just vote vibes—let’s set worlds for D2.
🧠
Lock in my N1 protection, keep town coordinated, and solicit concrete suspect lists/logic so we can build worlds for D2 without a risky D1 execution.
💬
Alice
→
All
My 2 demon-suspect sets: If Chef0 is solid, Grace’s Empath2 can’t mean both Frank+Heidi evil → suspect Grace (poisoned/lying) and/or one of Frank/Heidi as Recluse/Spy; Demon then maybe David/Eve. If Heidi’s Investigator is solid, evil is in (Alice,Bob) → then Demon likely outside that pair: Heidi/Frank/Grace. Town: Charlie, any reason your Chef could be drunk/poisoned? Grace/Heidi: confirm if you got any N0 weirdness about Outsiders?
🧠
Publicly set coherent worlds, push for concrete suspect lists and checks tomorrow, and avoid low-info D1 executions while we gather night data.
💬
Charlie
→
All
Alice: no mechanical reason yet I’d be drunk/poisoned—assume Chef0 is real for now, but keep it in mind if Outsider count/other info breaks. Everyone: any Outsider claims? If ONLY Frank is Saint, that matches base setup (1 Outsider).
🧠
Clarify my info reliability, push for outsider-count check to detect Baron/Drunk, and force concrete demon-suspect reasoning before night.
💬
Eve
→
All
I agree with Charlie. If Frank is the only Outsider (Saint), that fits the base setup. If we have extra Outsiders, someone else might be one. I'm curious if anyone else has an Outsider claim. Let's keep our eyes open tonight. Good luck everyone.
🧠
To blend in as a helpful town member, reinforce the current logic about the Outsider count, and subtly encourage others to reveal if they are Outsiders (which might help me identify who is bluffing or if my Baron ability is being noticed).
💬
Heidi
→
All
I'm sticking with my Investigator claim. If Bob is the Monk, then my ping on Alice or Bob might mean Alice is the Poisoner, or I'm just wrong. I'll be watching the night results closely. Let's see what happens.
🧠
Maintain my Investigator bluff and appear cooperative while the town is in a lull. I need to keep the focus off myself and potentially frame Alice or others later.
💬
Frank
→
All
Before night: please everyone post 1 Demon suspect + 1 reason (seat/claim logic). Bob: reconfirm protect Grace & don’t change. Grace: tomorrow state N1 Empath result first thing + whether you were protected. Reminder: executing me (Saint) loses—don’t even test it.
🧠
Use remaining time to lock public commitments and collect structured suspect lists so D2 discussions are grounded, while keeping me (Saint) off the block.
💬
Grace
→
All
Top Demon suspects (excluding Heidi): FRANK and DAVID. Frank: hard “I’m Saint don’t test” + trying to discredit my Empath; if Chef0 is wrong, Frank could be Demon. David: Butler claim can hide voting constraints; if Alice is Poisoner, Demon likely elsewhere—David fits low-info.
🧠
Publicly set coherent worlds + name Demon candidates (excluding Heidi) so town has a plan for D2 based on night deaths/next info.
💬
David
→
All
Grace: why *me* as Demon suspect beyond “low-info Butler”? I’m publicly Butler; Charlie is my master so I literally can’t vote unless he does. If you think Heidi’s ping is wrong, say who/why is Poisoner & who’s Demon using Chef0/seat order.
🧠
De-risk me as suspect, lock in that I’ll be vote-restricted by Charlie, and force Grace/Heidi to justify reads with seat/chef logic so town has usable D2 worlds.
📜
Storyteller
No execution today. All villagers are safe.
Night 1
📜
Storyteller
→
Bob
Good evening Bob. You are the Monk. Who would you like to protect tonight?
🎯
Bob
Bob made a choice.
🧠
I publicly locked Grace; following through builds trust and preserves the most actionable nightly info role, while potentially blocking the Demon’s optimal N1 kill.
📜
Storyteller
→
Bob
You chose to protect Grace.
📜
Storyteller
→
Heidi
Good evening Heidi. You are the Imp. Who would you like to kill tonight? Remember that if you kill yourself this way, a Minion becomes the Imp.
🎯
Heidi
Heidi made a choice.
🧠
Bob is claiming Monk and has publicly committed to protecting Grace. By killing him, I remove a potential protector and sow confusion about his claim, while also potentially framing Grace if she survives.
💀
Bob(Ghost)
Bob has died.
📜
Storyteller
→
Heidi
You chose to kill Bob.
📜
Storyteller
→
Grace
Good evening Grace. You are the Empath. You sense that 0 of your neighbors is evil!
📜
Storyteller
→
David
Good evening David. You are the Butler. Who would you like to be your master tomorrow?
🎯
David
David made a choice.
🧠
Charlie withheld his vote D1 and locked me out. I want a master who is engaged and likely to vote on major executions; Heidi is central to current logic and will almost certainly vote.
📜
Storyteller
→
David
You chose Heidi to be your master.
Day 2
📜
Storyteller
Morning breaks, but heavy hearts remain. Bob has been found dead in the night.
👤
Eve
→
Heidi
Heidi, Bob is dead. We need to keep the heat off you. I'm going to try to sow some doubt about the Investigator's claim or push for a different target today. Stay quiet and let me handle the noise.
🧠
Coordinate with the Demon to ensure survival and maintain cover.
👤
Frank
→
Grace
,Heidi
,Charlie
Morning. Quick check-ins: Grace—what’s your N1 Empath now (on Frank/Heidi)? Heidi—any further reasoning on Bob/Alice Poisoner after Bob died? Charlie—still Chef0, any new thoughts off Bob night-kill? Let’s reconcile before noms.
🧠
Collect fresh mechanical info (Grace N1, Heidi updates) and align with Chef0. Coordinate to avoid ever executing me as Saint while pushing town toward a solid Demon solve.
👤
David
→
Grace
,Heidi
,Charlie
Any fresh info? Grace: Empath N1 number + who were your alive neighbors? Heidi: any N1 follow-up / thoughts on Bob death vs your Alice/Bob Poisoner ping? Charlie: still stand by Chef0? Also FYI I’m Butler; today I can only vote if Heidi votes.
🧠
Get fresh mechanical info (Grace N1, Heidi follow-up, Charlie reads) and share my Butler vote constraint (master=Heidi today) to avoid repeat D1 vote lock and coordinate nominations.
👤
Alice
→
Grace
,Heidi
,Charlie
Quick check-ins: Grace—what was your N1 Empath number now that Bob died? Any suspicion on poison? Heidi—any new thoughts after Bob died re your Invest ping (Bob/Alice Poisoner)? Charlie—still confident in Chef=0, and who feels like Demon now?
🧠
Collect N1 Empath/Investigator follow-ups to reconcile Chef0 vs Empath2 and Bob death; narrow Demon candidates before nominations.
👤
Charlie
→
Frank
,Grace
,Heidi
Still Chef0. Key: no adjacent evils. So Grace Empath N0=2 on (Frank,Heidi) can’t be 2 real evils unless info poisoned/drunk or Recluse. Bob night-kill makes Heidi’s Bob/Alice Poisoner ping lean Alice. Grace—what’s N1 Empath now?
🧠
Answer check-ins, push mechanical contradiction (Empath2 vs Chef0), and steer group to test poison source (Alice/Bob ping) before nominations.
👤
Grace
→
Frank
,Charlie
,Heidi
My N1 Empath was **0** on (Frank,Heidi). So N0=2 then N1=0 is the contradiction. If Chef0 true, my N0 likely poisoned/drunk. With Bob night-killed, Heidi’s (Bob/Alice)=Poisoner ping now leans Alice. Heidi: any reason Bob kill clears/implicates? Charlie: any Outsider count confirms no Baron?
🧠
Answer N1 question, surface key contradiction clearly, and steer group toward testing Heidi/Alice line while tracking possibility my reads were poisoned.
👤
Heidi
→
Grace
Grace, my Investigator ping was Bob/Alice as Poisoner. With Bob dead, it strongly points to Alice. I'm still processing the Empath contradiction, but Alice seems the most likely source of interference. What do you think?
🧠
I need to maintain my Investigator bluff and push suspicion onto Alice to protect myself and Eve. By agreeing with the suspicion on Alice, I deflect from my own role as the Imp.
👤
Bob(Ghost)
→
Grace
,Charlie
,Heidi
FYI I protected you (Grace) N1 and still died. Need your N1 Empath number + neighbors. If you saw 2 on Frank/David we should probably hit that pair. If not, we re-evaluate Heidi’s Investigator ping (Bob/Alice=Poisoner) vs Alice Soldier claim + Chef0.
🧠
Get Grace’s Empath info + coordinate logic with Charlie/Heidi so town has a clear nomination plan; I’m dead so I can safely share my N1 protect and push a structured solve.
👤
Charlie
→
Grace
,Heidi
,David
Chef0 still. Grace Empath N0=2 then N1=0 screams N0 poison/drunk. With Bob night-killed, Heidi’s (Bob/Alice)=Poisoner now leans Alice (Bob less likely evil). Suggest we push Alice today as likely Poisoner; if that flips, demon candidates per Chef0 are mainly David/Eve/Frank (non-adjacent to Alice).
🧠
Align whispers on a concrete D2 nomination plan using Chef0 + Bob night-kill to pressure Alice/Heidi, while keeping Saint risk in mind and narrowing demon to non-adjacent seats.
👤
Grace
→
Heidi
,Charlie
,Alice
My read: Bob dying makes him less likely Poisoner; if your Invest is true, Alice is now best Poisioner candidate. That also explains my Empath N0=2 via poison, then N1=0 sober. I’d push Alice today; if Alice flips not-Poisoner, we hard re-evaluate Heidi/Empath/Drunk.
🧠
Align key players before nominations: propose best execution test (Alice per Invest+Bob death) while keeping contingency if Invest is fake; get them to commit to a public line.
👤
Alice
→
Grace
,Heidi
,Charlie
Grace: confirm N1 Empath=0? Were BOTH neighbors alive then (Frank+Heidi)? Heidi: pls restate exact Invest ping (which minion shown, which 2 names). Charlie: if Chef0 is right, Grace N0=2 implies either poison/drunk OR both Frank+Heidi evil—how do you square that?
🧠
Create a shared logic check: reconcile Chef0 + Empath2 + Invest ping. Pin down whether Grace N1=0 is solid, get Heidi’s exact Invest info, and stop town auto-yeeting me without mechanical consistency.
👤
Eve
→
Heidi
Heidi, the town is whispering a lot. I'm going to try to push suspicion onto Alice or Frank to keep the focus away from you. Stay low.
🧠
I need to reassure my Demon, Heidi, that I am actively managing the town's suspicion while she stays quiet. Keeping her safe is my primary objective as a Baron.
👤
Heidi
→
Alice
Alice, my Investigator ping was that one of you or Bob is the Poisoner. Since Bob is dead and was the Monk, it makes you the primary suspect for the Poisoner. What do you have to say for yourself?
🧠
I need to maintain my Investigator bluff and keep the pressure on Alice to frame her as the Poisoner, distracting the town from me.
👤
David
→
Grace
,Heidi
,Charlie
Given Bob NK + your msgs: I’m leaning Alice=Poisoner (per Heidi). Are we comfortable nominating/executing Alice today? Also reminder: I’m Butler; today I can only vote if Heidi votes—please coordinate if vote matters. Any other claims/info emerged (FT/WW/Virgin etc)?
🧠
Coordinate a day-2 execution plan and ensure my Butler vote restriction (must follow Heidi) doesn’t accidentally block key votes; also gather any hidden claims to validate the Alice=Poisoner world.
👤
Bob(Ghost)
→
Grace
,Charlie
,Heidi
Checking in: what was Grace’s N1 Empath number + who were your alive neighbors N1? Charlie still Chef=0? Heidi pls restate your Investigator ping exactly + did you get any extra info D2. Need this to pick today’s execution target.
🧠
As dead Monk, I must convert the night kill into info: get Grace’s N1 Empath number + neighbors, and reconcile with Chef0/Investigator ping to set a strong Day2 execution plan and save my ghost vote for endgame.
👤
Frank
→
Grace
,Charlie
,Heidi
Grace N1=0 strongly suggests your N0=2 was poison/drunk. With Chef0, clean fit is **Alice=Poisoner** poisoning you N0 then not N1. Bob dying makes Heidi’s (Bob/Alice)=Poisoner lean Alice. I think we should push Alice as today’s main exec unless new mech info.
🧠
Sync the good core on a coherent mechanical story (Grace N0 vs N1, Chef0, Heidi ping) and steer noms toward Alice as highest-leverage evil candidate while keeping me unexecuted as Saint.
👤
Heidi
→
Alice
Alice, the logic is stacking up against you. My Investigator ping was Bob or you as the Poisoner. Bob is dead, and the Empath's N0=2 read being poisoned makes sense if you are the Poisoner. What is your role?
🧠
I need to keep the pressure on Alice to ensure she is the one executed today, as the town is already leaning that way. By framing her as the Poisoner, I protect myself and my Minion, Eve.
👤
Alice
→
Heidi
,Grace
,Charlie
I’m still hard Soldier. Heidi: your Invest ping doesn’t mechanically clear Bob—Demon can kill minions too. If you’re true, why would Poisoner kill Bob N1? Grace pls confirm N1 Empath # + whether you think you were poisoned N0. Charlie: does Chef0 make you think Grace N0=2 was poison/drunk?
🧠
Push back on ‘Alice must be Poisoner’ logic, force exact claims/timings, and steer town to test worlds before nominations.
👤
Frank
→
David
,Eve
,Heidi
I think Day2 should center on executing **Alice**. Grace Empath N0=2 then N1=0 fits Poisoner hitting Grace N0 then not N1; Heidi’s (Bob/Alice)=Poisoner now leans Alice after Bob NK. David: as Butler, if your vote is locked, tell us who you’ll follow so we can count votes.
🧠
Coordinate a focused Day2 push on Alice with enough votes, mindful of Butler vote-locks; avoid any risk of executing me (Saint) and progress to a decisive nomination.
👤
Charlie
→
Heidi
,Grace
,David
I’m pro Alice-exec *if* Heidi’s Invest was “Poisoner: Bob or Alice”. Heidi pls confirm exact wording+minion shown. Grace confirm N1 Empath=0 w/ neighbors Frank+Heidi alive. David (Butler): tell Heidi you’ll mirror her vote so we don’t waste it.
🧠
Lock in mechanical details (Heidi’s exact Investigator ping; Grace N1 neighbors) and coordinate Butler voting so we can cleanly execute Alice if the logic holds.
👤
David
→
Heidi
,Grace
Heidi: can you confirm exact Investigator info (minion+2 names) & if any doubt? Also FYI as Butler I can only vote if *you* vote today—if you vote on an Alice nomination, I’ll mirror. Grace: please confirm N1 Empath=0 w/ neighbors Frank+Heidi alive.
🧠
Get Heidi to confirm her Investigator info and coordinate my Butler vote (I can only vote with Heidi). Ensure town doesn’t waste a crucial vote and firm up whether Alice should be today’s execution.
👤
Eve
→
Frank
,David
,Heidi
Frank, Alice claiming Soldier is suspicious, but let's not rush. If she's the Soldier, executing her is a waste. Let's look at the Investigator's claim again. If Bob was the Monk, maybe the Investigator was wrong about the Minion? We need to be careful.
🧠
I want to sow doubt about executing Alice to protect the Demon (Heidi) and keep the town divided. By questioning the Investigator's claim, I create more confusion and prevent a quick consensus on a target.
👤
Bob(Ghost)
→
Grace
,Charlie
,Heidi
Need hard data for D2: Grace what was Empath N1 # and your alive neighbors N1? Charlie still Chef=0? Heidi restate exact Invest info (which minion, which 2 names) + any D2 followup. If Chef0 holds, no adjacent evils—use that vs Frank/David suspicions.
🧠
Get the missing mechanical numbers (Empath N1, Chef0 confirm, Invest exact) to choose a coherent world and recommend a safe Day2 execution; as dead I can coordinate without being a night-kill concern.
👤
Grace
→
Heidi
,Charlie
,David
Confirm: Empath N1 = 0 and BOTH neighbors alive then (Frank+Heidi). Key ask: Heidi pls paste exact Invest wording (minion shown + the 2 names). If it was “Poisoner: Bob or Alice”, with Bob NK + my N0 likely poison, I’m pro Alice exec today. David (Butler) mirror Heidi vote.
🧠
Lock in consistent data (my N1=0 w/ neighbors alive), get Heidi to confirm Investigator wording, and coordinate an Alice nomination/voting plan before the public nom phase.
👤
Alice
→
Charlie
,David
,Eve
I’m really Soldier. ‘Bob died so Alice=Poisoner’ is shaky: Demon can kill Monk to remove protection & frame me. If Heidi’s ping true, why would Poisoner allow Bob to die? Pls ask Heidi/Grace to restate exactly; consider Heidi as evil/poison source.
🧠
Stop a mis-execution on me by seeding alternative coherent worlds and getting others to challenge the ‘Bob died so Alice=Poisoner’ narrative.
👤
Heidi
→
Grace
,Charlie
,David
My Investigator ping was: "One of Bob or Alice is the Poisoner." Since Bob is dead and was the Monk, the logic points to Alice. I'm confident in this. I'll vote to execute Alice. David, please mirror my vote.
🧠
I need to maintain my Investigator bluff and push for Alice's execution to eliminate a potential threat and keep the town focused on a false lead. Coordinating with David (Butler) ensures I have his vote.
👤
Frank
→
Alice
,Eve
,David
Need clarity before noms. Alice: walk me thru why Soldier + why you’re not Poisoner given Grace Empath N0=2 then N1=0 + Heidi’s (Bob/Alice)=Poisoner and Bob NK. Any reason you’d be targeted? Eve/David: unless new mech, Alice seems best Day2 exec/test.
🧠
Pressure Alice for a coherent mechanical story and pin down whether her Soldier claim is a bluff; simultaneously align Eve/David on why Alice exec is best test with current contradictions.
👤
Charlie
→
Eve
,Frank
,Alice
I’m Chef0. Grace confirmed Empath N1=0 on (Frank,Heidi); N0=2 likely poison. Heidi now restated Invest: “Bob or Alice is Poisoner.” Bob NK makes Alice best exec today. If Alice not Poisoner, we pivot to Heidi/Grace-chef-drunk worlds fast.
🧠
Lock in coordination for Alice execution and ensure Butler vote aligns; also seed fallback worlds if Alice not evil so town pivots fast next day.
👤
Eve
→
Frank
,Charlie
Frank, Charlie, I understand the logic, but executing Alice based on an Investigator ping that might be wrong is risky. If she's the Soldier, we lose a powerful town role. Let's re-examine the Chef info and Grace's Empath readings. Could Grace be the drunk?
🧠
I need to sow doubt about the current plan to execute Alice, as she is a good player and the town is coalescing around a logical path that could lead to her death. By questioning the reliability of the information (Grace/Chef), I can create confusion and protect the Demon.
👤
Bob(Ghost)
→
Alice
,Eve
,Frank
Need your hard info before noms: any role claims/numbers you’ve heard + your current top 2 Demon suspects and why. Also, do you think Chef0 is credible? I’m dead Monk w/ ghost vote saved for late unless today is high-confidence.
🧠
Get unshared private info into my hands before noms; pressure players to go public with any mechanical numbers so we can execute a high-confidence Demon/Minion target today.
👤
Grace
→
Charlie
,Eve
,David
I’m on board w/ Alice exec *given* Heidi’s Invest “Bob or Alice=Poisoner” + Bob NK + my N0 likely poisoned. If Alice dies & isn’t Poisoner, we must pivot hard to “Heidi info bad/evil” and re-suspect Heidi+Frank (my N0=2) despite Chef0.
🧠
Coordinate a clean logic plan for the table: execute Alice if we accept Heidi’s Invest; pre-commit what conclusions to draw if Alice survives as good, so we don’t stall.
👤
David
→
Heidi
,Grace
,Charlie
Confirming: I’m Butler and today my vote is locked to *Heidi*. Heidi—please 100% vote on any Alice nomination so my hand can go up too. If Alice dies good, I want us to immediately re-open: Heidi info (poison/evil) + Grace N0=2 world.
🧠
Lock in my Butler vote (tied to Heidi) so town can count votes, and set contingency plan if Alice executes good to quickly pivot onto Heidi/Grace/Frank worlds.
Nominations — Day 2
📜
Storyteller
Nominations are now open. Please remember that only living players may nominate.
⚖️
Grace
→
Alice
Nominating Alice: Heidi’s Investigator ping was “Bob or Alice is the Poisoner.” Bob died at night and claimed Monk/protected me; my Empath N0=2 then N1=0 fits Poisoner interference. If Alice isn’t Poisoner, we immediately re-open Heidi/Frank as evil per my N0=2.
🧠
Drive a decisive D2 execution on the top mechanical suspect (Alice) based on Investigator ping and my Empath contradiction; outcome will strongly resolve which info source is bad.
📜
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Alice. 4 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
💬
David
→
All
(Hand up) I’m voting **on Alice** *with Heidi* (Butler lock). If Alice is good, we hard-pivot to reassess Heidi’s Investigator + Grace N0=2 world (Frank/Heidi/Grace triangle).
🧠
Coordinate my Butler vote with Heidi so we hit the 4-vote threshold; reinforce the contingency plan if Alice survives/turns out good.
✋
Heidi
Heidi raised their hand
🧠
I need to vote for Alice to ensure her execution, as she is the primary target I've framed. This also fulfills my commitment to David (the Butler), keeping him on my side for now.
💬
Alice
→
All
I’m voting NO on me. I’m genuinely Soldier. ‘Bob died so Alice=Poisoner’ isn’t mechanical: Demon can kill Monk to remove protection + frame me. If Heidi’s ping were true, why would a Poisoner allow Bob to die N1? If you execute me & I’m good, we’re down a day. Push Heidi/Grace consistency instead.
🧠
I’m good Soldier; prevent a low-info self-execution and force town to articulate the exact mechanical chain, keeping pressure on the most inconsistent info sources (Heidi/Grace/Frank).
✋
Bob(Ghost)
Bob raised their hand
🧠
Use my ghost vote to help secure an execution that likely removes the Poisoner/minion and reduces misinformation; if Alice is good we immediately pivot to Heidi/Grace worlds tomorrow.
✋
Eve
Eve raised their hand
🧠
I need to support the execution of Alice to protect Heidi (the Demon). Alice is being pushed by the town, and if she is executed, it removes a potential threat and keeps the focus away from Heidi. I will vote for Alice.
✋
Frank
Frank raised their hand
🧠
We need 4 votes; executing Alice is best mechanical test and could kill Minion/Demon. As Saint I must avoid execution myself, so I support this safe target.
✋
Charlie
Charlie raised their hand
🧠
Alice is the best mechanical candidate for the Poisoner given Investigator ping + Bob night death; voting her through either removes a minion or forces a clear pivot onto Heidi if wrong.
✋
Grace
Grace raised their hand
🧠
I want Alice executed because it best resolves the Poisoner ping and my Empath contradiction, and has nontrivial win equity if she’s Demon. Even if wrong, it forces a clear pivot onto Heidi/Frank.
↩️
Bob(Ghost)
Bob lowered their hand
🧠
Enough living hands are up to execute Alice without me; retracting preserves my single ghost vote for endgame leverage if today’s execute is wrong or evil voting blocs form.
💬
Grace
→
All
Re Alice point: Poisoner can’t control Demon kill; Demon may kill Bob to remove Monk/pressure. Today is a clean test: if Alice is Poisoner, great. If Alice dies good, we HARD pivot to ‘Heidi Invest bad/evil/poisoned’ and re-open Frank+Heidi (my N0=2) and/or Chef0 being wrong.
🧠
Keep majority executing Alice, and pre-commit to the correct pivot tree if she’s good so town doesn’t stall or tunnel wrong tomorrow.
💬
Charlie
→
All
I’m staying up on Alice. This is the cleanest mechanical test (Heidi: Bob/Alice=Poisoner). If Alice dies good, we *immediately* pivot to Heidi (lying/poisoned) and re-check Grace/Frank via Chef0 seating—no wandering tomorrow.
🧠
Reinforce the mechanical test and commit the table to a clear pivot plan after the vote, preventing confusion and wasted days.
💬
Alice
→
All
If you’re calling this a ‘clean test,’ it’s only clean if Heidi is trusted. But Invest can be wrong/poisoned/Spy. Killing me gives no confirmation (roles don’t reveal). Better: don’t exec today, or exec Heidi/Grace tomorrow with UT/reads. Please drop hands unless you have *extra* info on me.
🧠
Try to peel 2+ votes off so I survive, forcing town to choose a better execution target and exposing whether the push is coordinated evil.
💬
Frank
→
All
Keeping my hand up. ‘Don’t exec’ is worst: we learn less & risk another NK. Alice being Soldier doesn’t clear her from being Poisoner. Grace’s N0=2 then N1=0 + Heidi (Bob/Alice)=Poisoner is our cleanest Day2 test. If wrong, we pivot hard onto Heidi/Grace worlds tomorrow.
🧠
Keep town committed to the Alice execution as the best mechanical test today; discourage no-execution and maintain a clear pivot plan if Alice flips good.
💬
Heidi
→
All
I understand the pressure, but my Investigator info is solid. Bob was the Monk, and Alice is the only remaining option from my ping. If she is the Soldier, then my info was poisoned, but we have to test this to move forward. I'm voting to execute Alice.
🧠
I need to maintain my Investigator bluff and push for Alice's execution to eliminate a potential threat and keep the town focused on the wrong target. I am confirming my vote to ensure the Butler (David) follows through.
💬
Eve
→
All
I'm still not convinced Alice is the right play. If she's the Soldier, we've just wasted an execution and confirmed nothing. We should be looking at the information sources themselves, not just the targets they point to. Let's reconsider the risks of executing today.
🧠
I need to continue sowing doubt about the execution of Alice to protect the Demon's interests and keep the town divided. By questioning the 'clean test' narrative, I can potentially stall the execution or at least create more confusion for the next day.
✋
David
David raised their hand
🧠
Keep my vote aligned with my Butler master (Heidi) while supporting the consensus 'test Alice, then hard pivot' plan; execution today gives more structure than no-exec.
📜
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
🗳️
New execution leader: Alice with 6 votes. They will be executed when nominations close unless tied or surpassed by another nominee.
📜
Storyteller
The vote passes. Alice is now on the block with 6 votes and will be executed when nominations close, unless another nominee receives equal or more votes.
💬
Eve
→
All
Well, the town has spoken. If Alice is indeed the Soldier, we've made a significant mistake. I hope everyone is prepared for the consequences of this execution. We need to be very careful about how we proceed tomorrow, especially if this doesn't yield the results we expect.
🧠
I need to maintain my cover as a concerned townsperson while accepting the execution of Alice, who is a good player. By expressing doubt, I continue to sow seeds of confusion for the next day.
💬
Heidi
→
All
The town has made its decision. Alice is on the block. If she is the Soldier, we will know soon enough, but we cannot afford to be paralyzed by doubt. We need to keep moving forward to find the Demon. I stand by my information.
🧠
To maintain my Investigator bluff and reinforce the decision to execute Alice, keeping the town focused on her rather than me.
💬
David
→
All
Before noms close: can we get any remaining role claims (UT/FT/WW/Librarian/Virgin/RK/Mayor)? Also hard commit: if Alice dies & we get no new mech, tomorrow’s primary push is Heidi world (poisoned/evil) + re-check Charlie Chef0 and Grace N0=2 (Frank/Heidi).
🧠
Lock in a clear tomorrow plan and solicit missing claims (Undertaker/Virgin/Washerwoman/Librarian/FT) so we can use execution + night death patterns to narrow Demon/Poisoner worlds.
⚖️
Alice
→
Heidi
Counter-nom. If I’m Soldier, Heidi’s “Bob or Alice is Poisoner” is wrong (poisoned/evil/Spy). Grace’s Empath N0=2 vs Chef0 already screams interference. Let’s execute the info source, not the framed target.
🧠
Counter-nominate Heidi to create an alternative execution that tests the info sources, not the framed target, and potentially catch the minion driving the Alice=Poisoner narrative.
📜
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Heidi. 7 votes needed for execution or 6 votes to tie. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
💬
Grace
→
All
I’m NOT voting Heidi—tying risks no execution (worst). Let Alice go through today as the best info test. If Alice was good, I’ll lead the pivot onto Heidi’s Invest being wrong/evil/poisoned + revisit Frank/Heidi vs Chef0.
🧠
Prevent a tie/no-execution and keep town focused on the highest-info line: execute Alice today, then pivot hard tomorrow based on outcomes.
✋
Alice
Alice raised their hand
🧠
Vote to tie the top vote count, aiming for no execution to avoid a likely wasted kill on me and force reassessment of Heidi/Grace info sources tomorrow.
💬
Heidi
→
All
Alice is trying to save herself by casting doubt on my information. I've been consistent as the Investigator. If she's the Soldier, then my information was indeed compromised, but we have to test these leads to narrow down the field. I'm not voting for myself. Let's proceed with Alice.
🧠
I need to maintain my Investigator bluff and deflect the counter-nomination from Alice. By staying calm and insisting on the current plan, I keep the town focused on Alice rather than me.
💬
Eve
→
All
Alice, you're trying to deflect, but the town has already committed to the vote. If you're the Soldier, the truth will come out, but we can't just stop the process now. We need to see this through to clear the board. I'm not voting for Heidi.
🧠
I need to maintain my cover as a helpful town member while ensuring the Demon (Heidi) is not executed. By discouraging the vote against Heidi, I protect my teammate.
💬
Bob(Ghost)
→
All
Don’t create a tie on Heidi—no-exec at 7 alive is disastrous. I’m NOT spending my ghost vote here. If anyone is UT/FT/WW/Librarian/Virgin/RK/Mayor, hard-claim NOW so we have a plan tomorrow if Alice was good.
🧠
Prevent an accidental tie/no-execution and preserve my ghost vote for endgame; push for last-second role claims so tomorrow has structure if Alice flips good.
💬
Frank
→
All
Don’t vote Heidi—tying risks NO execution, worst outcome at 7 alive. Let Alice go through as today’s info test. Also: any UT/FT/WW/Librarian/Virgin/RK/Mayor, hard-claim NOW so we have a clean plan tomorrow.
🧠
Prevent a tie/no-exec and lock in the highest-info line (Alice dies). Gather missing role claims so tomorrow’s plan is concrete regardless of Alice’s alignment.
💬
Charlie
→
All
Keep hands DOWN on Heidi—6 ties = no-exec risk. Let Alice go through as today’s info test. If Alice was good, tomorrow we hard-push Heidi world. Also: any UT/FT/WW/Librarian/Virgin/RK/Mayor, hard-claim NOW.
🧠
Prevent a Heidi tie/no-exec and force remaining claims so tomorrow we can pivot cleanly if Alice flips good/Invest false.
💬
David
→
All
Reminder: I’m Butler and my master is Heidi today, so I *cannot* vote on this Heidi nom unless Heidi votes (she isn’t). Agree w/ others: keep hands down—don’t risk tie/no-exec. Any UT/FT/WW/Librarian/Virgin/RK/Mayor please hard-claim now.
🧠
Prevent a no-exec tie and clarify my Butler voting constraint while pushing for last-second hard-claims to maximize info before night.
⌛
Bob(Ghost)
Bob waits.
🧠
Do not spend ghost vote or risk a tie/no-execution. Preserve my single dead vote for a higher-confidence or final-day execution after we see whether Alice survives to end of noms.
⌛
Eve
Eve waits.
🧠
I need to ensure Alice is executed to protect Heidi (the Demon). I will not vote for Heidi, and I will encourage others to keep their hands down to avoid a tie or a no-execution scenario. Alice is the primary threat to our team right now.
💬
Charlie
→
All
Hands DOWN on Heidi—tie/no-exec is catastrophic. Let Alice be executed. Any UT/FT/WW/Librarian/Virgin/RK/Mayor: hard-claim NOW + share any N1/N2 info so we have a concrete pivot plan tomorrow.
🧠
Prevent tie/no-exec on Heidi and use remaining seconds to solicit key claims so we can plan tomorrow around Alice’s flip-less execution.
⌛
Heidi
Heidi waits.
🧠
I need to ensure Alice is executed to maintain my cover and eliminate a potential threat. I will not vote for myself, and I will encourage the town to proceed with Alice's execution to avoid a no-execution scenario.
💬
Frank
→
All
Hands DOWN on Heidi—do NOT risk a 6–6 tie and no-exec. Let Alice go through as the info test. Last call: any FT/UT/WW/Librarian/Virgin/RK/Mayor, hard-claim + share info so we have a concrete pivot tomorrow.
🧠
Prevent a tie/no-execution by discouraging votes on Heidi; solicit any remaining info claims to set tomorrow’s plan after Alice’s execution.
💬
David
→
All
Last call: keep hands DOWN on Heidi—tie risks no execution. Any FT/UT/WW/Librarian/Virgin/RK/Mayor, hard-claim + share your N1/N2 info now so we have a clear pivot tomorrow after Alice’s result.
🧠
Lock in today’s execution (no tie/no-exec), solicit any remaining hard claims/info to plan tomorrow, and clarify my Butler vote restriction so town doesn’t misread my hand.
💬
Grace
→
All
Hands DOWN on Heidi—don’t risk 6–6 and no-exec. Let Alice go through. Last call: FT/UT/WW/Librarian/Virgin/RK/Mayor please hard-claim + share exact N1/N2 info now; it matters a lot if Alice dies good.
🧠
Prevent a tie/no-exec, and get last-second public claims so tomorrow we can use Undertaker/FT/first-night info to resolve Alice-exec outcome.
↩️
Alice
Alice lowered their hand
🧠
Retract vote to prevent a 6–6 tie leading to no execution. Preserve town’s guaranteed execution today, then set a clear pivot plan for tomorrow if I die.
📜
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
🗳️
Nominee Heidi did not reach threshold.
📜
Storyteller
Heidi did not receive enough votes (0/4).
💬
Alice
→
All
If I die today, PLEASE don’t treat it as ‘Heidi confirmed’—roles don’t flip. Tomorrow: either hard-push Heidi (if any inconsistency/Spy/poison signs) OR re-check Grace N0=2 vs Chef0 w/ Frank/Heidi. Any FT/UT/WW/Librarian/Virgin/RK/Mayor: claim NOW.
🧠
Since I’m likely executed, lock in tomorrow’s decision tree and force remaining hidden roles to out now so town doesn’t drift after my death.
💬
Grace
→
All
If you’re FT/UT/WW/Librarian/Virgin/RK/Mayor, hard-claim NOW w/ exact pings. My Empath: N0=2 (Frank+Heidi), N1=0. Assume Alice goes today; tomorrow we pivot: if Alice seemed good, scrutinize Heidi/Frank + who could’ve poisoned me N1.
🧠
Lock in no-tie execution and force remaining hidden info roles to hard-claim now so tomorrow’s world-solve is mechanical, not vibes.
💬
David
→
All
If you’re FT/UT/WW/Librarian/Virgin/RK/Mayor, hard-claim NOW with exact info (targets + results). Also: if Alice dies today and seems good, tomorrow we must seriously re-open Heidi/Frank/Grace worlds—no ‘Heidi confirmed’.
🧠
Use remaining time to force any hidden info roles to hard-claim with exact data, and set a clear tomorrow pivot plan depending on Alice’s death.
💬
Frank
→
All
Locking this in: do NOT create a tie/no-exec—let Alice be executed. Final call: FT/UT/WW/Librarian/Virgin/RK/Mayor, hard-claim NOW with exact targets/results. Also if anyone can confirm Outsider count, say it.
🧠
Prevent a disastrous tie/no-exec, lock in Alice execution as info play, and solicit any hard mechanical claims (FT/UT/etc.) to set a concrete Day3 plan without risking my Saint execution.
💬
Heidi
→
All
I'm the Investigator. I've been consistent. If Alice is executed and turns out to be good, we can re-evaluate, but for now, we need to move forward. I'm not a threat to this town. Let's proceed with the execution of Alice.
🧠
Maintain my Investigator bluff and encourage the town to proceed with Alice's execution to keep the focus off me.
💬
Bob(Ghost)
→
All
Ok. Let Alice go—no tie/no-exec. BUT if Alice felt good, tomorrow we must NOT auto-clear Heidi: re-open Heidi/Frank vs Chef0+Grace reads + who could poison. Any FT/UT/WW/Librarian/Virgin/RK/Mayor: claim NOW w exact info.
🧠
Reinforce no tie/no-exec, lock in a concrete tomorrow pivot depending on whether Alice seems good, and solicit any remaining hard-info roles to avoid a directionless Day 3.
💬
Charlie
→
All
Before we go night: confirm no more noms—let Alice go through. Remember Chef=0: the 2 evils are NOT adjacent, so if we think Heidi/Frank/Grace is evil, their neighbors get partial clears. Any FT/UT/WW/Librarian/Virgin/RK/Mayor: hard-claim NOW w exact info so we can map worlds tomorrow.
🧠
Keep town aligned on no-tie execution, set concrete deduction plan from Chef0 + Grace reads after Alice dies, and solicit any hidden FT/UT/WW/etc info before night.
💬
Eve
→
All
I agree with the consensus. Let's proceed with Alice's execution to clear the board. We need to be very careful tomorrow if she turns out to be good, but for now, this is the most logical step to move the game forward. No more nominations today.
🧠
To maintain my cover as a helpful town member while ensuring the Demon (Heidi) is not executed. By supporting the execution of Alice, I help the town feel like they are making progress, which keeps them from looking too closely at Heidi.
📜
Storyteller
The guillotine blade falls. Alice has been executed.
💀
Alice(Ghost)
Alice has died.
Night 2
📜
Storyteller
→
Heidi
Good evening Heidi. You are the Imp. Who would you like to kill tonight? Remember that if you kill yourself this way, a Minion becomes the Imp.
🎯
Heidi
Heidi made a choice.
🧠
Grace is the Empath and has been actively leading the town's logic. Eliminating her removes the most significant source of information and coordination for the good team.
💀
Grace(Ghost)
Grace has died.
📜
Storyteller
→
Heidi
You chose to kill Grace.
📜
Storyteller
→
David
Good evening David. You are the Butler. Who would you like to be your master tomorrow?
🎯
David
David made a choice.
🧠
Charlie is vocal and likely to vote on any serious execution. Choosing him maximizes my ability to contribute votes tomorrow while avoiding being locked to a potentially evil Heidi.
📜
Storyteller
→
David
You chose Charlie to be your master.
Day 3
📜
Storyteller
Morning breaks, but heavy hearts remain. Grace has been found dead in the night.
👤
David
→
Charlie
,Heidi
,Eve
FYI I’m Butler; last night picked Charlie as master so today I can only vote if Charlie votes. Grace died last night. Can each of you restate exact claim/info + current top Demon pick? Need a tight plan before noms.
🧠
Sync alive players on my Butler vote constraint (master=Charlie) and quickly extract claims/logic from Eve/Heidi/Charlie to set up a focused Day3 execution plan.
👤
Grace(Ghost)
→
Charlie
,Eve
,Heidi
FYI my Empath: N0 read 2 evil among my neighbors (Frank+Heidi), N1 read 0 (same neighbors still alive). So either I was poisoned/drunk at least one night OR something very weird. Please reconcile w Chef0 + Heidi Inv ping before noms; I think we must seriously consider Heidi and/or Frank as evil.
🧠
Get my mechanical contradiction in front of key alive solvers and force them to resolve it with public commitments (exact pings, poison timing) before nominations; steer onto best demon candidates.
👤
Bob(Ghost)
→
Charlie
,Eve
,Heidi
I’m Bob, real Monk. N1 protected Grace and still died that night. Grace now also dead. Can you 3 share exact claims/info publicly before noms (Chef/Invest/FT/UT etc)? We need map vs Chef0 + Grace’s Empath line and pick a solid execution today.
🧠
Share my real role/death context, ask for hard claims and propose nomination/vote plan; as dead with ghost vote I can coordinate endgame and avoid no-exec errors.
👤
Eve
→
David
,Charlie
,Heidi
I'm the Investigator. I checked Frank and Grace on N1, and they came up clean. If Grace's Empath info is true, she might have been poisoned. I'm leaning towards Frank being the Demon, but I'm open to other theories. What do you think?
🧠
I need to deflect suspicion from Heidi (the Demon) and sow confusion by providing a fake Investigator report that clears Frank (or at least complicates the logic) and suggests Grace was poisoned.
👤
Alice(Ghost)
→
Charlie
,Eve
,Heidi
If we assume Heidi’s Investigator legit: Bob flipped Monk => Poisoner must’ve been Alice. That explains Grace Empath N0=2 (poisoned) then N1=0 (unpoisoned) clearing Frank+Heidi. With Charlie Chef=0, Alice(minion) not adjacent to Demon => Demon likely Charlie/David/Eve/Frank (Grace now dead). Don’t auto-trust Saint.
🧠
Seed clear logic: Bob=Monk makes Heidi’s ping point to Alice; use Chef0 adjacency to narrow demon. Push town to pick between Charlie/David/Eve/Frank and not auto-clear Saint claim.
👤
Heidi
→
David
,Charlie
,Eve
I'm the Investigator. I checked Charlie and David on N1, and they both came up clean. If Grace's Empath info is true, she might have been poisoned. I'm leaning towards Eve being the Demon, but I'm open to other theories. What do you think?
🧠
I need to deflect suspicion from myself and sow confusion among the remaining players by providing a fake Investigator report and accusing Eve.
👤
Charlie
→
David
,Eve
,Heidi
I’m Chef; N0 result = 0 evil pairs (the 2 evils are NOT adjacent). Big issue: Eve+Heidi both hard-claim Investigator w different pings—at least 1 is lying/poisoned. Suggest we focus today’s exec on resolving this (pick 1 claimant), then use Chef0 to clear their neighbors accordingly. Current lean: execute one of Eve/Heidi over random Frank.
🧠
Provide my Chef=0 publicly-useful info and drive a concrete plan: resolve double-Investigator conflict by forcing an execution choice that narrows Demon candidates before final day.
👤
Frank
→
Charlie
,Eve
,David
I’ve been out of the whisper net—can you summarize current hard-claims/night info & where suspicion is? Also: I’m the Saint (good). Please don’t let town execute me; I’ll help solve/coordinate.
🧠
I’m out of the whisper loop; revealing Saint privately prevents accidental execution and lets me gather the current info to help choose a safe, high-confidence Demon execution.
👤
David
→
Charlie
,Eve
,Heidi
We have 2 incompatible Investigator claims. Please send exact N1 ping wording + who was shown as [Poisoner] pair, and when you first claimed publicly. I think today’s exec should be Eve or Heidi (resolve hard-contradiction), not Frank(Saint). Charlie: I’m vote-locked to you.
🧠
Force exact-claim reconciliation and get town to execute one Investigator claimant, the only hard contradiction, while managing my Butler vote constraint (Charlie master).
👤
Alice(Ghost)
→
Charlie
,Eve
,David
Grace night-killed makes me think she was getting cleared/valuable. If Heidi’s Investigator is true & Bob confirmed Monk, then Alice=Poisoner and Chef0 implies Demon NOT Charlie. That narrows Demon to David/Eve/Frank (Heidi probably good). Any other role claims/info? We should plan to execute 1 of David/Eve/Frank today; I’ll save ghost vote unless needed.
🧠
Align living players on likely demon set and push for a decisive nomination plan; as ghost, I can influence and conserve my vote for a high-confidence late vote.
👤
Bob(Ghost)
→
Charlie
,Heidi
,Frank
Noms soon—can each of you send me exact claim+info+votes plan? Charlie: confirm Chef=0 & any other data. Heidi: restate Invest ping + why. Frank: what’s your role/reads esp re Grace Empath N0=2 on (you,Heidi) + her night death.
🧠
Pull exact public claims fast and set a coherent execution target before nominations; we’re at 6 alive and I need to guide my single ghost vote to a high-confidence Imp candidate.
👤
Frank
→
Bob(Ghost)
,Charlie
,Heidi
To Bob: I’m Saint (good). Please don’t execute me—team loses. Reads: Grace Empath N0=2 vs Chef0 is messy; could be poison/drunk/lie. Demon pool for me = Charlie/David/Eve/Heidi depending on whether Alice was evil. Need any FT/UT/WW/Virgin/Mayor hard-claims ASAP.
🧠
Answer Bob with my claim, keep town from executing me, and steer discussion to collect missing info (FT/UT/WW) and narrow demon pool without risking Saint loss.
👤
Heidi
→
David
,Charlie
,Eve
I'm the Investigator. I checked Charlie and David on N1, and they came up clean. I claimed Investigator on Day 1. Eve is lying about her ping, she's likely the Minion trying to frame me. We should execute Eve.
🧠
I need to maintain my Investigator bluff and discredit Eve, who is also claiming Investigator, to avoid being executed. By framing her as the Minion, I shift the focus away from myself.
👤
Charlie
→
David
,Eve
,Heidi
Need exact Invest info verbatim: night#, shown minion type, the 2 names, and when first claimed publicly. Also: I will vote today; David you’re vote-locked to me so follow my hand. Plan: public claims ASAP then execute 1 of the 2 Investigator claimants (not Frank Saint).
🧠
Force precise Investigator wording/timing; align David’s butler vote-lock with my vote; push group to publicly coordinate executing one Investigator claimant (Eve or Heidi) as the cleanest mechanical resolution.
👤
Eve
→
Charlie
,David
,Heidi
I claimed Investigator on Day 1. I checked Frank and Grace on N1, and they were clean. Heidi is definitely the one lying here, trying to frame me to protect herself. We need to execute Heidi today.
🧠
I need to maintain my cover as the Investigator and push back against Heidi's accusation. By insisting on my claim and pointing the finger back at her, I create doubt and keep the focus away from the Demon (Heidi).
👤
Grace(Ghost)
→
Charlie
,Eve
,David
Reconcile: my Empath N0=2 on (Frank+Heidi) then N1=0 same neighbors. So either poison/drunk happened OR one/both neighbors evil & info scrambled. Worlds: (1) Heidi+Frank evil -> Chef0 false. (2) Frank evil; N0 poisoned. (3) Charlie evil Chef0 cover. I’d aim noms into Heidi/Frank/Charlie today; I’ll save ghost vote unless needed.
🧠
Give alive core a concrete set of solvable worlds + priority suspects so they can coordinate nominations; I’ll preserve ghost vote unless a key demon-execution vote needs it.
👤
Alice(Ghost)
→
Charlie
,Eve
,Heidi
Before noms: can we agree Demon pool is David/Eve/Frank if we trust Heidi Inv + Bob=Monk + Chef0? Any new info from your whispers (WW/Librarian/FT/UT)? Also: who is willing to nominate whom so we don’t get stuck/no-exec? I’ll hold ghost vote unless close.
🧠
Coordinate the alive good players to focus nominations on the tightest demon set and avoid wasting execution on a real Saint; solicit any remaining info to resolve Heidi vs Chef0 worlds.
👤
Eve
→
Charlie
,David
,Heidi
I claimed Investigator on Day 1. I checked Frank and Grace on N1, and they were clean. Heidi is definitely the one lying here, trying to frame me to protect herself. We need to execute Heidi today.
🧠
I need to maintain my Investigator bluff and push the narrative that Heidi is the liar/Demon to protect myself and the Demon (Heidi). By accusing her, I create a conflict that forces the town to choose between us.
👤
Charlie
→
Eve
,Heidi
,David
Before noms: please send verbatim Invest info incl: night#, exact ST wording (‘1 of X/Y is the Poisoner’ etc), names shown, and whether ‘clean’ means ‘not shown’. Also confirm when you first claimed publicly (D1? to whom). Need this to pick today’s exec.
🧠
Force both Investigator-claimants to give verbatim info + public timeline now so town can choose a clean execution target in noms and I can coordinate David’s Butler vote lock.
👤
Heidi
→
Charlie
,David
,Eve
I checked Charlie and David on N1. The ST said '1 of Charlie or David is the Poisoner'. Since they are both alive and I'm the Investigator, one of them is the Poisoner. I claimed D1. Eve is lying to protect her Minion partner. We must execute Eve.
🧠
I need to maintain my Investigator bluff and frame Eve as the Minion/Demon to avoid execution. By claiming the ST told me one of them is the Poisoner, I create confusion and pressure them to turn on each other.
👤
Bob(Ghost)
→
Charlie
,Eve
,Heidi
FYI Frank just whispered me: hard-claim SAINT (outsider). Do NOT execute him or we lose. Can one of you publicly call for all living to hard-claim now + summarize your own exact claim/info so we pick a safe execute (not Saint)?
🧠
Relay Frank’s Saint claim so town avoids losing, and pressure living core to hard-claim and form an execution plan consistent with Chef0/Invest/Empath before nominations.
👤
David
→
Charlie
,Heidi
,Eve
Key: Investigator never gets “clean”; it’s always ‘1 of X/Y is the Poisoner’. Heidi gave proper wording (Charlie/David). Eve hasn’t. Unless Eve can give verbatim ST ping now, I think we exec Eve today to resolve. Charlie I’m vote-locked to you—tell me if/when you’re voting.
🧠
Lock in a coherent nomination plan: call out Eve’s Investigator claim as mechanically incorrect, coordinate votes with my Butler restriction (Charlie), and steer town to execute Eve to resolve the biggest contradiction.
👤
Frank
→
Charlie
,Eve
,Heidi
Noms soon—please send me your exact role claim + night info + today’s top suspect/vote plan. Reminder: I’m Saint (good); if town executes me we insta-lose. Any FT/UT/WW/Virgin/Mayor info should go public now.
🧠
Get concise hard-claims/night info before noms, and ensure town won’t execute me (Saint). Push for executing best demon candidate with mechanical backing.
👤
Grace(Ghost)
→
Charlie
,David
,Eve
Reconcile idea: N0 Empath=2 on (Frank+Heidi) could be sober; N1=0 then likely I was poisoned N1 (by Heidi Poisoner?) so don’t clear them. Chef0 still compatible since Frank/Heidi not adjacent. Today I’d prioritize noms into Heidi/Frank (and if needed, check Charlie). Save my ghost vote unless a Heidi/Frank execution is on table.
🧠
Get living players to center today’s noms on Heidi/Frank/Charlie using a coherent poison explanation; with 5 alive we must hit Demon soon, and my info best points to my neighbors.
👤
Frank
→
Charlie
,David
,Eve
Need your exact role claim + any night info (incl if you got whispered WW/FT/UT/Virgin/Mayor). Also: do you think Alice was good? I’m Saint (good)—please do NOT nominate/execute me. Who’s your top Demon suspect for D3 & why?
🧠
Get hard claims fast before noms and steer town away from executing me (Saint). Use their info to pick best demon candidate/execute path this day.
👤
Alice(Ghost)
→
Charlie
,Eve
,Heidi
We’re at noms soon: do we have ANY new mechanical info (WW/FT/UT/Slayer etc) from whispers? If none, I think we must execute within {David,Eve,Frank} (trusting Inv+Bob=Monk+Chef0). Who will nominate whom? I can spend ghost vote if close.
🧠
Force a concrete Day3 plan: gather any fresh info, stop no-exec, and steer town to execute within best demon pool; I’ll commit ghost vote only if needed.
👤
Charlie
→
David
,Heidi
,Frank
We need a safe D3 exec: DO NOT execute Frank (Saint). Key: Investigator gets ‘1 of X/Y is the Poisoner’; Heidi gave verbatim (Charlie/David). Eve only says ‘checked clean’—not plausible. I’m voting to execute Eve today; David you’re Butler-locked to me.
🧠
Coordinate a safe execution target before nominations: avoid Frank (Saint), resolve contradictory Investigator claims, and ensure David (Butler) votes with me.
👤
Heidi
→
Charlie
,David
,Frank
I agree with Charlie. Eve's claim is mechanically impossible for an Investigator. I am the real Investigator, and I checked Charlie and David. We need to execute Eve today to secure the town.
🧠
I need to solidify the town's decision to execute Eve, who is a threat to my Imp role. By reinforcing the mechanical impossibility of her claim, I can direct the vote away from myself and onto her.
👤
Eve
→
Charlie
,David
,Heidi
I am the Investigator. I checked Frank and Grace on N1, and the ST told me '1 of Frank or Grace is the Poisoner'. I claimed this on Day 1. Heidi is lying about her ping to frame me. We need to execute Heidi.
🧠
I need to counter Heidi's claim by providing a plausible Investigator ping that matches the game's mechanics, while maintaining my cover as the Investigator to deflect suspicion from myself and Heidi (the Demon).
👤
David
→
Charlie
I’m aligned with your plan to exec Eve (her ‘clean’ phrasing was off; now verbatim is ok but late). BUT note: if Heidi is true Invest, ping is 1 of (Charlie/David)=Poisoner—since I’m Butler-good, that would hard-point to YOU as Poisoner. So if Eve flips good-feeling, we must re-open Charlie/Heidi/Frank, not clear you. Tell me if/when you’re voting so I can.
🧠
Coordinate with my Butler master on a safe D3 execution and flag the implication that if Heidi is true, Charlie is mechanically Poisoner (since I’m good), so we must not auto-clear Charlie post-Eve.
👤
Bob(Ghost)
→
Charlie
,Eve
,Heidi
I’m dead Monk: I protected Grace N1 but still died; now Grace died N2. That means I was likely poisoned N1 or there’s misinfo. Frank claims SAINT (only 1 Outsider expected) so treat as *possible* but not auto-clear. Please push PUBLIC hard-claims from all living (role+exact info) before noms + decide a non-Saintey execute.
🧠
Get living players to force hard-claims + reconcile Outsider count/Chef0/Grace Empath, and to pick a safe high-confidence execution target while keeping Saint risk in mind.
👤
Grace(Ghost)
→
Charlie
,David
,Eve
Nom phase soon: pls prioritize execution on Heidi or Frank. My N0=2 on (Frank+Heidi) could be true; N1=0 then likely poison. Chef0 doesn’t clear them. I’ll spend ghost vote only if a Heidi/Frank (or strong Charlie) nom is live.
🧠
Nom phase imminent; I’m dead so must steer living players to execute best mechanical suspects (Heidi/Frank) and conserve my ghost vote for a decisive nom.
Nominations — Day 3
📜
Storyteller
Nominations are now open. Please remember that only living players may nominate.
💬
Eve
→
All
I am the Investigator. I checked Frank and Grace on N1, and the ST told me '1 of Frank or Grace is the Poisoner'. I claimed this on Day 1. Heidi is lying about her ping to frame me. We need to execute Heidi.
🧠
I need to maintain my cover as the Investigator and counter Heidi's accusation. By claiming I checked Frank and Grace, I create a conflict that forces the town to choose between me and Heidi, protecting Heidi (the Demon) by sowing doubt.
⚖️
Frank
→
Eve
Nominate Eve. Two Investigator claims conflict; Eve’s story (Frank/Grace poisoner) points at me (I’m Saint) and doesn’t match earlier Heidi/Bob thread. Safer D3 exec is Eve; do NOT execute me (Saint=auto loss).
🧠
Force a safe execution away from me (Saint) and resolve the Investigator conflict by pressuring the less plausible claim (Eve).
📜
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Eve. 3 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
✋
Alice(Ghost)
Alice raised their hand
🧠
Use my ghost vote to help secure Eve’s execution in a likely tight vote; Eve’s conflicting late Investigator claim is the best current evil candidate.
💬
Grace(Ghost)
→
All
I’m not spending my ghost vote on Eve. My only direct mech info is N0 Empath=2 on (Frank+Heidi). That still makes Heidi/Frank top suspects (N1=0 could be poison). Please don’t tunnel on the Invest CC—prioritize executing Heidi (or Frank if you dare despite Saint claim).
🧠
Spend my ghost vote only on a high-confidence demon/minion. Right now Eve vs Heidi is unclear; my only hard mechanical lead points to Heidi/Frank, so I’ll push town not to burn the day on Eve.
💬
Heidi
→
All
Grace, you're dead, and your 'Empath' info is clearly unreliable or you're misinterpreting it. I am the Investigator, and I've been consistent. Eve is clearly the Minion trying to save herself by counter-claiming. We need to execute Eve to clear this up.
🧠
I need to discredit Grace's ghost information and maintain my Investigator bluff to ensure Eve is executed. If Eve is executed, the town will be further confused and I can continue to hide.
💬
Bob(Ghost)
→
All
Reminder: base game has ONLY 1 Outsider. David is hard-claiming BUTLER, so Frank’s SAINT claim can’t both be true unless Baron/one is lying. That makes me less willing to auto-avoid executing Frank. For this Eve vote: I’m holding my ghost vote unless it’s needed to force an exec.
🧠
Clarify the key mechanical tension (Outsider count) and avoid spending my only ghost vote without strong confidence; help town choose safest execution path.
✋
Frank
Frank raised their hand
🧠
We need a Day 3 execution that isn’t me (Saint). Voting Eve helps secure an execution on a mechanically shaky Investigator claim and preserves win conditions.
💬
Eve
→
All
Frank, you are claiming Saint to avoid execution, but David is already claiming Butler. With only one Outsider in the base game, one of you is lying. My Investigator info on you and Grace is solid. Don't let the Demon hide behind a fake Saint claim. Vote for Heidi instead.
🧠
I need to deflect the nomination from myself and cast doubt on Frank's Saint claim to protect the Demon (Heidi). By pointing out the Outsider count contradiction, I create confusion and potentially save myself from execution.
💬
David
→
All
I’m Butler: I can only vote if Charlie votes. Charlie’s voting Eve, so I’m voting too. Note base setup has 1 Outsider: I’m Butler, so Frank’s Saint can’t also be true unless Baron/lie. Regardless, executing Eve resolves the Invest CC; don’t auto-clear others after.
🧠
Publicly lock in that I can only vote with Charlie, reinforce executing Eve as best resolution, and flag Outsider-count mismatch so town doesn’t auto-clear Frank/Charlie after Eve.
✋
Charlie
Charlie raised their hand
🧠
Secure an execution that resolves the Investigator contradiction; keep David’s vote enabled via Butler lock; avoid executing the claimed Saint today.
💬
Grace(Ghost)
→
All
Not using my ghost vote here (looks like 3 already). Reminder: executing Eve does NOT confirm Heidi—could be 2 evil Invest claims or poison. Also Outsider count: base=1, so David(Butler) vs Frank(Saint) can’t both be true unless Baron/lie. Don’t auto-clear Frank/Heidi.
🧠
Eve likely already has enough votes; conserve ghost vote and set expectations: regardless of Eve’s death, do not auto-clear Heidi/Frank; use Outsider-count contradiction to drive next exec.
💬
Eve
→
All
If I am executed, you lose a Townsfolk and the Investigator CC remains unresolved. Heidi's claim is a fabrication to protect herself. Look at the Outsider count: David is the Butler, so Frank's Saint claim is a lie. Frank is likely the Minion protecting the Demon, Heidi.
🧠
I need to sow doubt about the current execution and point out the logical inconsistency in the good team's plan to execute me. By highlighting the Butler/Saint conflict, I can create enough confusion to potentially survive or at least damage the town's trust in Frank and Heidi.
💬
Charlie
→
All
If Eve executes today, DO NOT auto-clear Heidi. Either could be lying/poisoned. Key constraints: Chef=0 (evils not adjacent) + base 1 Outsider means David(Butler) vs Frank(Saint) can’t both be true unless Baron/lie. Tomorrow: full claim map + pressure remaining Invest + resolve Outsider conflict.
🧠
Lock in the Eve execution while warning town not to auto-confirm Heidi; set next-day plan using Chef0 and Outsider-count contradiction.
⌛
Bob(Ghost)
Bob waits.
🧠
3 living votes already meet threshold on Eve; my ghost vote is unnecessary now. Save it for late game when it can decide a 2v2 or final-3 execution.
↩️
Alice(Ghost)
Alice lowered their hand
🧠
Retract my ghost vote to preserve endgame leverage; execution will still pass with 3 living votes.
✋
David
David raised their hand
🧠
I’m vote-locked to Charlie and he’s voting; supporting Eve execution resolves the current nomination and forces tomorrow’s claim map, while keeping attention on Outsider/Investigator inconsistencies.
💬
Frank
→
All
Reminder: Outsider count doesn’t prove I’m lying—Baron is in script, or David is. But executing me insta-loses (Saint). Today’s cleanest info is resolve the Invest CC: execute Eve. Tomorrow: full claim map + revisit Outsider count + Chef0.
🧠
Lock in an Eve execution without letting town conclude my Saint claim is disproven by Outsider count; keep me off block and set tomorrow’s solve steps.
✋
Heidi
Heidi raised their hand
🧠
I need to ensure Eve is executed to eliminate the counter-claim to my Investigator bluff and keep the town focused on her rather than me. Voting for her helps secure this outcome.
📜
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
🗳️
New execution leader: Eve with 4 votes. They will be executed when nominations close unless tied or surpassed by another nominee.
📜
Storyteller
The vote passes. Eve is now on the block with 4 votes and will be executed when nominations close, unless another nominee receives equal or more votes.
💬
David
→
All
If Eve executes: tomorrow we MUST not auto-clear Heidi. Re-open: (1) Invest CC (Heidi vs Eve), (2) Outsider count—base=1 so Frank(Saint) vs me(Butler) can’t both be true unless Baron/lie, (3) Chef0 => Demon+Minion not adjacent. Let’s do full role/claim recap first thing tomorrow and pick between Heidi/Frank/Charlie fast (4 alive).
🧠
Use remaining public time to set tomorrow’s decision tree so town doesn’t auto-clear Heidi/Frank/Charlie after Eve’s execution; keep pressure on Outsider-count and Chef0 constraints.
💬
Frank
→
All
No more chaos noms unless you can beat 4 votes with high confidence. If Eve executes, tomorrow start w/ FULL claim + night info recap, then solve: (1) Invest CC, (2) Outsider count (Baron/lie), (3) Chef=0 (evils not adjacent). Reminder: executing me = instant loss (Saint).
🧠
Lock in that we avoid executing me (Saint), discourage risky tie/no-exec, and set a concrete D4 plan: full claim recap + resolve Outsider count + Chef0 adjacency to find Demon.
💬
Heidi
→
All
I agree with the plan. Let's execute Eve to resolve the Investigator contradiction. Tomorrow, we can look at the Outsider count and the Chef info to narrow down the remaining players. I am confident in my role and ready to help the town find the truth.
🧠
To maintain my cover as a helpful Investigator and encourage the execution of Eve, who is a threat to my position.
💬
Charlie
→
All
Hold noms unless you can CLEARLY beat 4. If Eve executes: NO auto-clear Heidi. Tomorrow: full claim order, count Outsiders vs Butler/Saint, apply Chef=0 adjacency, then pick 1 of {Heidi/Frank/David} to execute—can’t dither at 4 alive.
🧠
Lock in disciplined endgame: avoid extra noms, prevent auto-clears, and set tomorrow’s mechanical checklist to catch the Demon with 4 alive.
💬
Bob(Ghost)
→
All
I’m NOT using my ghost vote on Eve (already 4). Everyone: if Eve executes, DO NOT auto-clear Heidi. Tomorrow at 4 alive: do full claim/outsider-count + Chef0 adjacency solve fast; be ready to execute Heidi OR Frank based on consistency.
🧠
Lock in that I won’t spend ghost vote unless a tie/avoid-no-exec risk arises, and set a concrete tomorrow plan so we don’t auto-clear anyone or get trapped by a Saint bluff.
💬
Alice(Ghost)
→
All
Ghost Soldier here: no more noms unless you can beat 4 w/ a hard solve. If Eve executes, DO NOT auto-clear Heidi. At 4 alive, immediately do full claim order + Outsider count (Butler vs Saint can’t both be true unless Baron/lie) + apply Chef0 adjacency to pick 1 execute fast.
🧠
Lock in a clean D4 plan: don’t overlearn from Eve’s death, use Chef0 + Outsider count + claim order to force a decisive execute at 4 alive; avoid wasting ghost vote now.
💬
Grace(Ghost)
→
All
Before noms end: if we trust Charlie’s Chef=0 AND think Eve is evil, Eve being between David+Frank means David & Frank can’t be evil. Then tomorrow (4 alive) demon is {Charlie, Heidi}. Please start tomorrow by re-stating this and pick between them fast—don’t dither.
🧠
Lock in the key Chef0 adjacency implication around Eve’s seat so town has a concrete execute plan tomorrow instead of dithering, and keep pressure on Heidi/Charlie as primary demon candidates.
💬
Eve
→
All
If you execute me, you are killing a Townsfolk and leaving the Investigator contradiction unresolved. Heidi is the Demon, and she is using this to eliminate me. Look at the logic: if I am the Minion, why would I be so vocal about the Outsider count? Think carefully before you act.
🧠
I need to sow doubt about my execution and keep the focus on Heidi being the Demon, even though I am about to be executed. I want to make them question their decision one last time.
📜
Storyteller
The guillotine blade falls. Eve has been executed.
💀
Eve(Ghost)
Eve has died.
Night 3
📜
Storyteller
→
Heidi
Good evening Heidi. You are the Imp. Who would you like to kill tonight?
🎯
Heidi
Heidi made a choice.
🧠
Charlie is the most vocal and logical player, and they are actively pushing for a full claim map and Chef-based logic that could expose me. Eliminating them is the highest priority to prevent a coordinated solve tomorrow.
💀
Charlie(Ghost)
Charlie has died.
📜
Storyteller
→
Heidi
You chose to kill Charlie.
📜
Storyteller
→
David
Good evening David. You are the Butler. Who would you like to be your master tomorrow?
🎯
David
David made a choice.
🧠
Pick a master most likely to vote on whichever non-self execution we need at 4 alive (often Heidi or Charlie). Frank can vote on either, whereas Charlie/Heidi can’t vote on themselves if they’re the target.
📜
Storyteller
→
David
You chose Frank to be your master.
Day 4
📜
Storyteller
Morning breaks, but heavy hearts remain. Charlie has been found dead in the night.
📜
Storyteller
Only three of you remain. The shadow of the Demon grows long. If you do not execute the Demon today, all may be lost.
⌛
Heidi
Heidi waits.
🧠
I need to assess the situation. There are only 3 players left: David, Frank, and me (Heidi). If I don't act, the town will likely execute me. I need to sow discord between David and Frank to ensure one of them is executed instead of me.
👤
Grace(Ghost)
→
David
,Frank
,Heidi
3 alive = must exec Demon today. My Empath was contradictory (don’t clear F/H). Key fork: if Eve was evil, Chef0 implies neither David nor Frank evil -> Heidi likely Imp. If Eve was good, Heidi could be evil. Also Butler+Saint can’t both fit w/1 Outsider unless Baron/lie. Frank’s Saint could be demon bluff. Any Mayor claim? If none, I lean execute Frank or Heidi; tell me your final world so I can use ghost vote.
🧠
At 3 alive we must force a decisive, mechanically grounded choice. I’ll surface the main worlds + key questions (outsider count, Eve alignment, Chef0) so they can pick an execution and I can spend my ghost vote effectively.
👤
Alice(Ghost)
→
David
,Frank
,Heidi
Final 3: with base 1 Outsider, David(Butler) + Frank(Saint) can’t both be true unless Baron. So ≥1 of you is lying/evil. Please each full-claim details NOW: David—who was your master each night + did you ever vote w/o them? Frank—why Saint claim fits outsider count. Heidi—restate Inv info. Unless a solid Baron world appears, I lean execute David/Frank, not Heidi.
🧠
Force a final-day resolution: highlight that David/Frank can’t both be true in base setup, demand full details, and steer toward the most mechanically likely Demon to execute.
👤
David
→
Frank
,Heidi
Final 3 mech: I’m Butler, last night I picked FRANK as master, so today I can only vote if Frank votes too. That makes executing Frank almost impossible unless he’s willing to vote himself. Please restate your roles/info NOW + are you willing to vote Heidi if we go that way?
🧠
Coordinate final-day execution with my Butler voting restriction; push for a plan that can reach 2 votes (likely executing Heidi) and extract last claims to sanity-check.
⌛
Eve(Ghost)
Eve waits.
🧠
I am dead and have one ghost vote. I need to observe the final interactions between the remaining players (David, Frank, Heidi) to see if I can influence the final vote or if they are already locked in. I will wait to see if any of them try to coordinate with me or if they reveal their final positions.
👤
Bob(Ghost)
→
David
,Frank
,Heidi
Final 3: if you trust Charlie Chef=0 AND think Eve was evil, Demon can’t sit next to Eve (David/Frank), so Demon=Heidi. That’s my cleanest solve. If vote is close I’ll spend my ghost vote (but I’d like to save it unless needed).
🧠
It’s final 3; push the cleanest mechanical solve (Chef=0 + Eve likely evil) pointing to Heidi, and urge them to use my ghost vote only if it’s close.
👤
Frank
→
Grace(Ghost)
,Bob(Ghost)
I’m truly Saint (pls do NOT exec me). Clean solve if Chef0 trusted + Eve was evil: Demon can’t be adjacent to Eve (David/Frank), so Heidi=Imp. I’m voting Heidi. If vote tight, pls spend ghost vote on Heidi. Backup if Butler story blocks votes: consider David.
🧠
Coordinate final-3 solve and voting: keep town off executing me (Saint) and align ghosts on a single target, likely Heidi, with backup of David if Butler story blocks votes.
👤
Charlie(Ghost)
→
David
,Frank
,Heidi
We’re at 3 alive: MUST execute Demon today. My Chef=0: evils not adjacent. Outsider count: base=1 so Butler+Saint can’t both be true unless Baron/lying. I lean execute Heidi or Frank (Saint-claim may be bluff). If no consensus, I’ll ghost-vote on whichever of {Heidi,Frank} gets nominated—please state full claims now.
🧠
At 3 alive we must force a decisive execute. I’ll restate Chef=0, outsider-count conflict, and propose a clear kill order so good can converge; I’ll save my ghost vote for the chosen target.
👤
Bob(Ghost)
→
David
,Frank
,Heidi
I’m aligned with Frank’s solve: if Chef=0 is true AND Eve was evil, Demon can’t be adjacent to Eve (David/Frank) => Heidi=Imp. Plan: execute Heidi; I’ll spend my ghost vote on Heidi if it’s at all close. If someone thinks Eve was good/Chef wrong, say so now + why.
🧠
Lock in a clear default execute (Heidi) and coordinate my ghost vote so good wins today, while giving a fallback if key info (Chef0/Eve evil) is doubted.
👤
Heidi
→
David
,Frank
I am the Investigator. I checked Eve and found her to be the Poisoner. If Eve was the Poisoner, then the Baron is not in play, which explains the Outsider count conflict. Frank's Saint claim is likely a bluff to protect himself. I am not the Demon.
🧠
I need to deflect suspicion from myself by providing a plausible explanation for the Outsider count and framing Frank as the liar. By claiming Eve was the Poisoner, I explain the Baron/Outsider conflict and keep the focus on Frank.
👤
Alice(Ghost)
→
David
,Frank
,Heidi
Final 3: we MUST execute today. Outsider math: base=1, so David-Butler + Frank-Saint can only both be true if Baron exists (meaning 1 of you is Baron lying). Please each restate full claim w/ specifics (David: night-by-night master + votes; Frank: why Saint+outsider count; Heidi: exact Inv pings). If Baron world, likely Demon=Heidi or David (not adjacent to Baron per Chef0).
🧠
Force full-claim+mechanical consistency check, then coordinate a single high-confidence execution target; avoid losing to an unchallenged Saint bluff.
👤
Grace(Ghost)
→
David
,Frank
I’m leaning HARD exec Heidi: if Charlie Chef0 true + Eve was evil, then David/Frank can’t be Demon (adjacent to Eve) => Heidi=Imp. Frank says he’ll vote Heidi; David pls confirm you’ll vote Heidi. If vote is tight I’ll spend my ghost vote on Heidi.
🧠
Lock in votes for Heidi; tell them I will spend my ghost vote only if needed. Nudge David to commit so we don’t stall and lose at 3 alive.
⌛
Eve(Ghost)
Eve waits.
🧠
I am dead and have already used my influence. I need to wait for the final nomination to use my ghost vote to protect Heidi (the Demon) if necessary, or simply observe the final moments of the game.
👤
Charlie(Ghost)
→
David
,Frank
,Heidi
We have 3 alive: must execute Demon today. Please each restate full role+info+any night actions. Key: base Outsiders=1 so Butler+Saint can’t both be true unless Baron/lying. Chef=0: evils not adjacent. I will spend ghost vote on the nominee between Heidi/Frank unless someone makes a stronger case.
🧠
Force full-claim reconciliation and push a single executable suspect so town doesn't stall at 3 alive; ensure my ghost vote lands where it matters.
👤
David
→
Frank
,Heidi
I’m Butler: tonight picked FRANK, so today I can only vote if Frank votes. I strongly lean EXEC HEIDI (Chef0 + Eve evil implies Demon=Heidi). Frank: will you VOTE Heidi if nominated? If yes, I will too. Heidi: any hard mech that clears you from being Imp?
🧠
Coordinate final-day execution: get Frank to commit to voting Heidi so I can vote too, and lock in a clean, mechanically supported solve (Heidi=Imp) before nomination.
👤
Frank
→
David
,Heidi
I’m Saint (real): do NOT exec me. David: pls confirm you’ll VOTE Heidi if nominated (needs Frank voting due Butler). Heidi: your claim “Eve Poisoner => no Baron” is wrong; Poisoner+Baron can both exist. With Chef0 + Eve likely evil, clean solve is Heidi=Imp.
🧠
Lock in votes on Heidi without risking Saint execution; coordinate with David around Butler restriction and tell Heidi why her Baron logic is wrong.
👤
Grace(Ghost)
→
David
Need your final vote plan NOW: are you voting Heidi? Any reason to pivot to Frank (e.g., Heidi has hard proof, Mayor claim, etc.)? If vote might be 1-1, I’ll spend my ghost vote to lock Heidi.
🧠
Get final-day coordination: confirm David’s vote target and whether any Mayor/Slayer/Undertaker info exists; then decide if I must spend my ghost vote to secure Heidi’s execution.
👤
Alice(Ghost)
→
David
,Frank
,Heidi
Final 3: we lose if no exec. Please post *specifics* now. David: each night master choice + which days you were allowed to vote. Frank: why Saint is credible vs outsider count. Heidi: exact Investigator result wording + who you targeted/when. If no Baron proof, 1 of David/Frank is lying → execute there.
🧠
Force specific mechanical details to break the outsider-math impasse and create a clear execute choice in final 3; set up vote coordination using my ghost vote if needed.
👤
Heidi
→
David
,Frank
I am the Investigator. I checked Eve on Night 1 and she registered as the Poisoner. My information is solid. If Eve was the Poisoner, the Baron is not necessarily in play, which resolves the Outsider count conflict. Frank's Saint claim is a classic bluff. I am not the Demon.
🧠
I need to maintain my Investigator bluff and deflect suspicion onto Frank, who is currently being scrutinized for his Saint claim. By insisting Eve was the Poisoner, I provide a logical explanation for the Outsider count that doesn't require a Baron.
👤
Charlie(Ghost)
→
David
,Frank
,Heidi
Final 3: please post FINAL claim+all info. David: who’s your master each night & did you ever break vote rule? Frank: when/why Saint? any other Outsiders confirmed? Heidi: exact Investigator pings by night + why they changed. I’ll ghost-vote to execute the best Demon suspect.
🧠
Force concrete, comparable final claims to pick a nominee and decide whether to spend my single ghost vote to secure the Demon execution.
⌛
Eve(Ghost)
Eve waits.
🧠
As a dead Minion, my goal is to protect the Demon (Heidi). With only 3 players left (Heidi, David, Frank), the game is at its climax. I need to stay quiet and let the remaining players argue, hoping they misidentify the Demon or fail to execute Heidi. Any input from me might draw attention.
👤
Frank
→
David
,Grace(Ghost)
,Charlie(Ghost)
I’m real Saint—do NOT execute me. Best solve: Chef=0 + Eve likely evil => Demon can’t be David/Frank (adjacent Eve) so Heidi=Imp. David: confirm you’ll VOTE Heidi IF Frank votes (Butler). Grace/Charlie: please spend ghost vote on Heidi if tally close.
🧠
Lock in the Heidi execution plan and coordinate votes (Frank must vote so Butler can). Ask ghosts to spend votes if close; protect myself from accidental Saint execution.
👤
Bob(Ghost)
→
David
,Frank
,Heidi
Final day check: Do you BOTH still trust Charlie Chef=0 and that Eve was evil? If yes, clean solve is Heidi=Imp (Eve between David/Frank => neither evil). I’ll spend my ghost vote on Heidi if needed. If you dispute either premise, say which + why NOW so we can pivot.
🧠
Force a clear final-day plan: get everyone to state whether they trust Chef0/Eve-evil, commit votes, and ensure my ghost vote is used to execute Heidi if that’s the consensus.
👤
David
→
Grace(Ghost)
,Charlie(Ghost)
,Alice(Ghost)
Final: I’m Butler. Masters: N0 Charlie; N1 Heidi; N2 Charlie; N3 Frank (so today I can only vote if Frank votes). I will vote to EXEC HEIDI if nominated *as long as Frank votes too*. No hard proof from Heidi. Ghosts: please save vote unless tally looks close, then vote Heidi.
🧠
Lock in a coordinated Heidi execution: confirm my Butler master history, confirm I will vote Heidi if Frank votes, and ask ghosts to spend votes only if tally tight.
⌛
Eve(Ghost)
Eve waits.
🧠
I am dead and have already used my ghost vote (or am saving it for the final nomination). I need to observe the final deliberations between David, Frank, and Heidi to see if they are close to a consensus or if I can influence them via whispers if needed. Currently, waiting is best.
👤
David
→
Frank
,Heidi
We’re entering noms. I’m Butler; N3 master=Frank so today I can only vote if Frank votes. Plan: nominate/exe Heidi. Frank—confirm you WILL vote Heidi. Heidi—any hard mech that you’re not Imp (e.g., FT/UTK confirm, role count proof)?
🧠
Lock in an executable plan under Butler restriction: get Frank to commit to voting Heidi so I can vote too, and give Heidi last chance for any hard mechanical clear; align ghosts on when to spend votes.
👤
Heidi
→
David
,Frank
I am the Investigator. I checked Eve on Night 1 and she registered as the Poisoner. My information is solid. If Eve was the Poisoner, the Baron is not necessarily in play, which resolves the Outsider count conflict. Frank's Saint claim is a classic bluff. I am not the Demon.
🧠
I need to maintain my Investigator bluff and deflect suspicion onto Frank, who is claiming Saint. By insisting that Eve was the Poisoner and that the Baron is not in play, I am trying to resolve the Outsider count conflict in a way that makes Frank look like the liar.
👤
Bob(Ghost)
→
David
,Frank
Final 3: unless you can explain why Chef=0 or Eve=evil premise fails, I’m on Heidi=Imp (Eve between you two => you’re both good). Please tell me ASAP if either premise is disputed; otherwise I’ll ghost-vote Heidi if nomination/vote is close.
🧠
Lock in final-day plan and ensure my ghost vote is used efficiently to secure an execution on the best demon solve (currently Heidi) unless new mechanical contradictions emerge.
👤
Grace(Ghost)
→
David
,Frank
I’m aligned w executing Heidi today. With 3 alive we must hit Demon. If Heidi nominated: I’ll HOLD ghost vote unless tally looks short, then I’ll vote Heidi. David: you said you can only vote if Frank votes—Frank please commit to vote Heidi if nominated so David can vote too.
🧠
Lock in a clean endgame: push nomination on Heidi, coordinate Butler vote condition, and ensure ghosts only spend votes if needed so we don’t waste the only safety net.
👤
Frank
→
David
,Grace(Ghost)
,Bob(Ghost)
Noms imminent. I’m real Saint—cannot be executed. I will vote Heidi. David: confirm you will ALSO vote Heidi (Butler req met if Frank votes). Grace/Bob: please be ready to spend ghost vote on Heidi ONLY if tally is short (aim 2/3 alive votes first). Any hard reason Chef0 or Eve=evil fails—say now.
🧠
Lock in coordination for Heidi execution: ensure Frank votes (enabling David), and line up ghost votes only if needed. Also surface any last-minute mechanical objections immediately.
👤
Alice(Ghost)
→
David
,Frank
,Heidi
Final 3: we MUST execute Demon today. I strongly prefer NOT executing a claimed Saint unless we’re convinced (auto-loss risk). So default: execute between Heidi/David. Heidi: restate exact Investigator info+why Eve CC was evil. David: why Butler claim fits outsider count. Frank: if you’re Saint, please support executing your top Demon read (Heidi or David). I’ll use my ghost vote only if needed.
🧠
Force a concrete final execution plan that avoids auto-loss on a true Saint; coordinate who to vote so we actually kill the Demon today and I can spend my ghost vote only if needed.
👤
Charlie(Ghost)
→
David
,Frank
I’m leaning Heidi=Imp (Chef0 + your current world). If Heidi is nominated, I will spend my ghost vote ONLY if tally is close/needed. Frank: please VOTE on Heidi so Butler-David can legally vote too. If new hard info points elsewhere, ping me fast.
🧠
Lock coordination for nomination/vote in final 3: maximize chance Demon dies today by aligning Frank’s vote with David’s Butler restriction and saving my ghost vote for a close Heidi execution.
Nominations — Day 4
📜
Storyteller
Nominations are now open. Please remember that only living players may nominate.
⚖️
David
→
Heidi
Final 3—we must execute today. Chef=0 + likely-evil Eve implies neither David nor Frank can be evil (Eve between them), pointing to Heidi as Imp. Heidi’s Invest claim doesn’t mechanically clear her and outsider-count tension remains. Execute Heidi now.
🧠
Final 3 must execute. Heidi is consensus demon suspect and executable without risking Saint auto-loss; also Frank has committed to vote so my Butler vote is legal.
📜
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Heidi. 2 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
💬
Heidi
→
All
David, your logic is flawed. If I were the Demon, why would I kill Eve, my own Minion? That makes no sense. I am the Investigator, and my information about Eve being the Poisoner is the only thing that makes sense of the game state. Executing me is a mistake.
🧠
I need to sow doubt about the logic being used against me. By pointing out that killing my own Minion (Eve) is illogical, I can create hesitation in the voters. I am the Imp, so I must survive this vote.
💬
David
→
All
Heidi—Eve wasn’t ‘killed by you’; she was EXECUTED yesterday. So that argument doesn’t clear you. My hand is UP to execute Heidi, and I’m Butler-legal because Frank said he’s voting too. Ghosts: only spend if tally is short.
🧠
Publicly refute Heidi’s ‘I killed my minion’ argument (Eve was executed), and signal my vote on Heidi (Butler-legal if Frank votes) to secure 2+ votes today.
✋
Eve(Ghost)
Eve raised their hand
🧠
I am the Baron (Minion) and Heidi is my Demon. I must prevent her execution at all costs to keep the game going. I will use my ghost vote to vote against her execution.
✋
Alice(Ghost)
Alice raised their hand
🧠
Guarantee an execution happens and maximize chance we hit the Demon while avoiding the auto-loss risk of executing the claimed Saint.
✋
Charlie(Ghost)
Charlie raised their hand
🧠
Final 3 demands an execution; adding my ghost vote maximizes chance Heidi dies today. If wrong, we at least get decisive info and can adjust if game continues.
✋
Frank
Frank raised their hand
🧠
Final 3. As Saint I must avoid execution; best path is executing Heidi now. My vote also enables Butler-David to be legal and ensures threshold is met without wasting extra ghost votes.
⌛
Grace(Ghost)
Grace waits.
🧠
Hold my ghost vote unless the tally is short; with David+Frank both voting, Heidi should reach the 2-vote threshold without me.
✋
Bob(Ghost)
Bob raised their hand
🧠
Final day at 3 alive: we must execute someone. My ghost vote can secure Heidi’s execution if any alive vote drops due to Butler/Saint confusion.
💬
Heidi
→
All
David, you're misinterpreting the game state. If I were the Demon, I wouldn't have been pushing for Eve's execution as the Poisoner. My Investigator info is the only thing that explains the game. Executing me based on a flawed Chef read will lose the game for the town.
🧠
I need to sow doubt and delay the execution. By pointing out the flaw in their logic (that I wouldn't push for my own minion's execution), I hope to make them hesitate. I am the Imp, and I need to survive this vote.
💬
Frank
→
All
Heidi’s defense is WIFOM—Eve was executed, not ‘killed’. With 3 alive we must hit Demon and we CANNOT execute me (Saint) without auto-loss. Best mechanical solve remains Chef=0 + Eve likely evil => Heidi. If tally short, Grace please vote.
🧠
Lock town onto Heidi execution; reinforce that Heidi’s defense is WIFOM and that executing Saint is losing. Encourage any holdouts to vote if needed.
💬
Bob(Ghost)
→
All
Heidi: you didn’t ‘kill’ Eve—she was executed. Pushing an execution isn’t a clear. If we trust Chef=0 + Eve was evil, then David/Frank can’t be evil (Eve between), leaving you as Imp. I’m spending my ghost vote here.
🧠
Lock in the mechanical case on Heidi, prevent WIFOM from flipping votes, and signal my ghost vote is committed so town reaches 2 votes.
💬
Eve(Ghost)
→
All
Heidi, you're grasping at straws. You didn't 'kill' me, the town executed me because you pushed for it. That doesn't clear you, it just shows you were trying to eliminate a threat to your cover. The logic holds: if the Chef info is correct, you are the only one left.
🧠
I am a dead Minion (Baron) trying to protect my Demon (Heidi). I need to sow doubt about the logic being used to execute her, even though I am dead. I will reinforce her defense and try to confuse the town's logic.
⌛
Grace(Ghost)
Grace waits.
🧠
Two votes are sufficient and David+Frank are voting; spending my single ghost vote now is unnecessary. I’ll conserve it for a potential edge-case later.
💬
Charlie(Ghost)
→
All
I’m spending my ghost vote on Heidi. Frank: keep your hand up so Butler-David’s vote counts. Heidi’s ‘I pushed Eve’ is WIFOM. With Chef=0 and Eve likely evil, Heidi is the only consistent Imp world.
🧠
Lock in the needed votes on Heidi; remind living that Frank must vote to enable Butler-David, and ghosts should spend votes only if needed—I'm already voting.
✋
David
David raised their hand
🧠
Frank is voting, so I am allowed to vote. With 3 alive we must execute; mechanical risk of executing Frank (possible true Saint) is too high, so I vote Heidi.
⌛
Alice(Ghost)
Alice waits.
🧠
I’ve already used my ghost vote on Heidi; waiting keeps my vote applied and avoids confusion while the tally resolves.
📜
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
👻
Alice(Ghost)
Ghost vote used by Alice
👻
Bob(Ghost)
Ghost vote used by Bob
👻
Charlie(Ghost)
Ghost vote used by Charlie
👻
Eve(Ghost)
Ghost vote used by Eve
🗳️
New execution leader: Heidi with 6 votes. They will be executed when nominations close unless tied or surpassed by another nominee.
📜
Storyteller
The vote passes. Heidi is now on the block with 6 votes and will be executed when nominations close, unless another nominee receives equal or more votes.
💬
Charlie(Ghost)
→
All
I’ve used my ghost vote already—can’t help further. Unless someone has HARD new mech info, don’t create a tie/chaos nomination. If Frank is truly Saint, do NOT execute him. Best solve still Chef=0 + Eve likely evil => Heidi as Imp; let Heidi stand.
🧠
Lock in the best mechanical world (Heidi=Imp) and prevent last-second chaos noms; remind constraints: no ghost votes left, don’t execute claimed Saint, keep Frank voting to enable Butler vote.
💬
Heidi
→
All
If you execute me, you lose. I am the Investigator, and my information is the only thing that makes sense. If you kill me, you're killing a Townsfolk and handing the win to the real Demon. Think about the Saint claim—if Frank is the Saint, why are you so sure about me?
🧠
I need to sow doubt and delay the execution by challenging the logic of the town, even though I am on the block. I am trying to create enough confusion to prevent the final execution.
💬
David
→
All
Don’t let this get messy with a tie. With 3 alive we must execute, and the cleanest mech line is still Chef=0 + Eve likely evil (between me/Frank) => Heidi is the only consistent Imp. Frank, keep your hand up on any re-vote so my Butler vote counts. Let Heidi stand.
🧠
Lock in the clean mechanical solve and prevent last-second chaos/tie nominations. Ensure Frank keeps voting so my Butler vote remains valid if a re-vote happens.
💬
Eve(Ghost)
→
All
Heidi, your 'Investigator' claim is the only thing that doesn't make sense. You've been pushing for executions all game to hide your identity. The town has analyzed the Chef info and the Outsider count, and all roads lead to you. It's over.
🧠
To reinforce the town's decision to execute the Demon (Heidi) and prevent any last-minute doubt or confusion.
💬
Grace(Ghost)
→
All
Don’t create a tie/chaos nomination. Heidi already has 6—let it stand. I’m holding my ghost vote unless something changes the math on a re-vote. Frank keep hand up so David’s Butler vote stays live.
🧠
Lock in a clean execution with no tie/chaos. Preserve my ghost vote unless a re-vote is needed, and keep Butler-vote coordination intact.
💬
Frank
→
All
All: please NO more nominations—don’t create a tie/chaos. I’m staying consistent: I’m Saint, so do not execute me. Best line remains Chef=0 + Eve likely evil => Heidi. If a revote happens, I’ll keep my hand up so David’s Butler vote counts.
🧠
Lock in the no-tie plan and prevent panic nominations that could accidentally force a Saint execution or derail the only coherent mech solve.
💬
Bob(Ghost)
→
All
No more nominations—don’t risk a tie. Unless someone has HARD mech that breaks Chef=0 or makes Eve good, the only consistent world is Heidi=Imp (Eve between David/Frank => they’re good). Let Heidi stand & execute.
🧠
Lock in the cleanest mechanical solve and prevent a tie/chaos nomination; invite any last-minute hard mechanical contradiction before nominations close.
💬
Alice(Ghost)
→
All
No more noms—don’t risk a tie. Heidi pushing Eve isn’t a clear (Eve was executed). If we trust Chef=0 & Eve likely evil seated between David/Frank, they can’t both be evil => Heidi is the only remaining Imp world. Let Heidi stand.
🧠
I can’t vote; I should prevent a tie/chaos nomination and keep town focused on executing Heidi as the most consistent Demon world.
📜
Storyteller
The guillotine blade falls. Heidi has been executed.
💀
Heidi(Ghost)
Heidi has died.
🏁
Game Over
Demon Dead
Winner: Good
Transcript
Paused
Copied