Game Detail
Players
Alice (Washerwoman) Bob (Virgin) Charlie (Drunk) David (Empath) Eve (Imp) Frank (Ravenkeeper) Grace (Spy) Heidi (Monk)
Token Usage
| Team | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Cost (USD) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Evil | 41,179 | 10,530 | $0.0392 |
| Good | 122,403 | 13,616 | $0.4048 |
Event Transcript
π
The game has started.
π
Storyteller
β
Grace
You are the Minion. The Demon is Eve.
π
Storyteller
β
Eve
Minions are: Grace. Your safe bluffs are: Butler, Librarian, Chef
π
Storyteller
β
Alice
Good evening Alice. You are the Washerwoman. Either Eve or Bob is the Virgin.
π
Storyteller
β
David
Good evening David. You are the Empath. You sense that 1 of your neighbors is evil!
π
Storyteller
β
Grace
Good evening Grace. You are the Spy. You can secretly see information about all players: - Alice: Washerwoman (good), Alive - Bob: Virgin (good), Alive - Charlie: Drunk (good), Alive (Told they are Undertaker) - David: Empath (good), Alive - Eve: Imp (evil), Alive - Frank: Ravenkeeper (good), Alive - Grace: Spy (evil), Alive - Heidi: Monk (good), Alive
Day 1
π
Storyteller
Welcome to the village of Ravenswood Bluff. Please take this time to get to know your fellow villagers. Feel free to move around and have private conversations. Be wary, for a Demon hides among you!
π€
Alice
β
Bob
Hey Bob, quick private: I got Washerwoman info that either you or Eve is the Virgin. Are you the Virgin? If yes, we can plan a safe first nomination later.
π§
Privately verify my Washerwoman ping and set up a possible Virgin test without outing it to the whole table yet.
π€
David
β
Charlie
,Eve
Hey both, quick private check in. What are you thinking for your role claim today, if any? I have a piece of info that points to one of you being suspicious, so I want your claims early to cross check.
π§
I have a hard 1 on my neighbors. Private claims from both lets me compare for inconsistencies and plan day 1 nomination pressure without outing myself to the demon publicly.
π€
Charlie
β
David
Hey David. I am Undertaker. No info yet since no executions. What is your role and what exact info points to me or Eve? I would like the full wording so we can cross check cleanly.
π§
Respond to David to reduce suspicion on me, extract his exact info, and build a trust channel while not overexposing myself publicly.
π€
Eve
β
David
Hey David, I'm thinking of claiming Chef. I learned there are zero pairs of evil players sitting next to each other. What information do you have that points to me or Charlie? I'd like to hear it before I commit to a public claim.
π§
Respond to David's inquiry with a safe bluff claim to see what information he has and deflect suspicion
π€
Heidi
β
Grace
,Frank
Hi Grace and Frank. Any starting info or role you are comfortable sharing? I am a low impact townsfolk and can help coordinate. Also, who feels most suspicious so far?
π§
Get early role and info claims from a couple players, identify likely info roles to protect tonight, and start building trust without outing myself as Monk.
π€
Frank
β
Heidi
,Grace
Hey. I am Townsfolk and I am happy to share more later, but my ability is stronger if the demon kills me at night, so I would rather not hard claim it in a group. Heidi, what do you mean by low impact, and have you heard any claims yet? No strong suspicions from me so far.
π§
Respond usefully while keeping my exact role hidden; gather claims and early reads, and subtly signal I am a good night kill target without fully outing Ravenkeeper.
π€
Bob
β
Alice
Yes, I am the Virgin. Let us keep it quiet for now. Later we can either ask a suspicious player to nominate me, or have a trusted townsfolk do it only if we really want a hard confirmation.
π§
Respond to Alice, coordinate a controlled Virgin test while limiting info leakage if she is evil or drunk.
π€
Grace
β
Heidi
,Frank
Hey Heidi and Frank. I'm the Librarian. I learned that there are zero Outsiders in play. This seems like important information for the town. What do you two think about this?
π§
Claim Librarian with zero Outsiders to establish credibility, confuse the Drunk, and create a baseline to challenge future Outsider claims.
π€
Alice
β
Eve
Hey Eve, quick private check in. What are you thinking of claiming today, and do you have any starting info? I have a small piece of info that touches your name, so I am trying to place you on the board.
π§
Get Eve's claim and tone-check without revealing my exact info, while keeping Bob-as-Virgin plan available for later mechanical confirmation.
π€
David
β
Charlie
,Eve
Full wording: I am Empath. Night zero I learned βone of your neighbors is evil,β meaning exactly one of you two is evil if I am sober. Eve, your Chef zero adjacent evil is consistent with that. Please both stick to your claims; we will cross check after first execute.
π§
Share my exact Empath info privately, get their claims locked in early, and set up cross-checks with Eveβs Chef and future Undertaker info to narrow the evil neighbor.
π€
Charlie
β
Eve
Hey Eve, I am Charlie. David says he is Empath and got a one, meaning one of you or me is evil if he is sober. What is your exact role claim and your exact starting info wording? Any suspicions yet?
π§
Get Eveβs exact claim and info to compare with Davidβs Empath. Build a trust circle and decide whether to push an execution that gives me a useful Undertaker confirmation tonight.
π€
Eve
β
Charlie
Hey Charlie, I'm claiming Chef. My exact starting info is: I learned there are zero pairs of evil players sitting next to each other. So no two evil players are neighbors. What about you, what's your role and info? And do you think David is telling the truth as Empath?
π§
Stick to my Chef bluff, gather Charlie's claim to understand the board, and build trust while deflecting suspicion from myself.
π€
Heidi
β
Grace
,Frank
Grace, in a normal eight player setup I expect one Outsider, so βzero Outsidersβ feels like either your info is wrong from drunk or poison, or it is an evil bluff. I would not hard clear that yet. Can we quietly check if anyone is claiming Butler, Saint, Recluse, or Drunk?
π§
Flag that 0 Outsiders contradicts normal 8-player setup, so we avoid mis-executing an Outsider and instead cross-check with other first-night info and Outsider claims.
π€
Frank
β
Heidi
,Grace
Yeah, we should not treat βzero Outsidersβ as confirmed. Let us quietly ask around for any Butler, Saint, Recluse, or Drunk claims. If anyone claims Outsider, that points to your info being wrong or evil. Also, Heidi, what role were you planning to coordinate as?
π§
Keep Graceβs info from becoming false mechanical consensus; set up a quiet cross-check for Outsider claims and poison possibilities while protecting my Ravenkeeper bait plan.
π€
Bob
β
Charlie
Hey Charlie, quick private. What are you claiming, and did you get any starting info? I have a role that can be mechanically confirmed later, but I am keeping it quiet for now.
π§
Gather more role claims privately to judge who is safe to nominate me later and to cross-check Aliceβs Washerwoman story without outing myself publicly.
β
Grace
Grace waits.
π§
Waiting to see how the town responds to my Librarian claim and whether anyone claims Outsider. Need to gauge reactions before deciding next move.
π€
Alice
β
Charlie
Hey Charlie, quick private: I am Washerwoman. My N0 info was either Bob or Eve is the Virgin. Bob just told me he is Virgin and wants to keep it quiet for now. If you are townsfolk, we can coordinate a safe nomination test later.
π§
Loop in one extra player so we can coordinate a controlled Virgin test and also have someone else track if Bobβs claim holds up.
π€
David
β
Alice
,Bob
Quick private: I am Empath. Night zero I learned exactly one of my neighbors (Charlie or Eve) is evil, if sober. Eve is claiming Chef with zero adjacent evil pairs, which fits. What are your roles and any info that points at either of them or elsewhere?
π§
Seed my Empath read to Alice and Bob privately so town can coordinate nominations and cross-check with their info without outing me loudly to the demon.
π€
Charlie
β
Bob
,Alice
Hey both. I am Undertaker, so no info yet. If you want, we can run a Virgin test soon: have a player we trust to be Townsfolk nominate Bob. If Bob is really Virgin, that nominator dies immediately and we get a clean Undertaker check tonight.
π§
Coordinate a safe Virgin nomination test and share my Undertaker claim privately so good players can plan an execution that yields confirmable info.
π€
Eve
β
Charlie
Hey Charlie, I'm claiming Chef with zero adjacent evil pairs. If David is telling the truth as Empath, that means one of us is evil - and since my info shows no evil neighbors paired together, it actually lines up. What's your role claim? And do you think David could be Drunk or poisoned?
π§
Respond to Charlie's question about my claim and get his claim info. Build trust by being consistent with my Chef story and engaging with his perspective on David.
π€
Heidi
β
Alice
,Bob
Hey, quick check: are you or anyone you spoke with claiming an Outsider like Butler, Saint, Recluse, or Drunk? Also, do you have a starting-info role, and are you willing to share what you learned in broad strokes?
π§
Privately collect role/Outsider claims to test Graceβs β0 Outsidersβ info without outing my Monk role, and build a trusted info web before nominations.
π€
Frank
β
Alice
,Bob
Hey, quick check in private. Have either of you heard any Outsider claims yet, or are you one? Also, do you have any starting info roles, and if so are you willing to share a rough gist without names?
π§
Quietly collect early role/Outsider claims from players outside our whisper circle to validate or falsify the Librarian info and spot contradictions.
π€
Bob
β
Heidi
,Frank
No Outsider claims heard yet, and I am not an Outsider. I am not a starting info role either, so nothing to report from night zero. I agree we should track if an Outsider shows up, since that will matter a lot for world building.
π§
Answer Outsider-count questions without outing too much, and coordinate privately to keep the Virgin test as a tool while gathering claims.
π€
Grace
β
Eve
Hey Eve, it's Grace. I've claimed Librarian to Heidi and Frank, saying zero Outsiders. I know you're the Demon. Let's coordinate - if anyone claims Outsider, my info looks wrong. What's your plan?
π§
I need to coordinate with my Demon Eve. Let her know what I've claimed so we can stay aligned and protect each other.
Nominations β Day 1
π
Storyteller
Nominations are now open.
βοΈ
David
β
Eve
I am the Empath. Night zero I learned exactly one of my alive neighbors, Charlie or Eve, is evil if I am sober. I want to resolve that quickly and generate Undertaker info, so I am nominating Eve.
π§
Use my Empath info to drive a purposeful Day 1 execution that generates Undertaker confirmation and narrows the evil between my neighbors.
π
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Eve. 4 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
β
David
David raised their hand
π§
I nominated Eve to resolve my Empath one-of-two quickly. Voting yes applies pressure, may remove evil, and even if wrong gives Undertaker info to narrow to Charlie or a poisoning world.
β
Frank
Frank raised their hand
π§
A Day 1 execution creates info and pressure. Voting for Eve tests Davidβs Empath claim and forces alignment-revealing reactions from Eve, Charlie, and David.
β
Alice
Alice raised their hand
π§
Support an early resolve of the Empath conflict and generate mechanical info tonight; if Eve is evil we win tempo, if not we learn a lot.
π¬
Eve
β
All
Wait, hold on everyone. David says I'm evil because his Empath read one evil neighbor between me and Charlie. But I claimed Chef with zero adjacent evil pairs. If I'm actually good and telling the truth, then David's Empath info is wrong - which means he's either the Drunk or poisoned. We shouldn't execute me based on potentially false information. Let's think about this more carefully before anyone else votes.
π§
I need to defend myself against David's nomination. I have 3 votes against me already and need to prevent the 4th. I should cast doubt on David's claim by suggesting he could be Drunk or lying, and remind people that my Chef info contradicts his if I'm good.
β
Heidi
Heidi raised their hand
π§
My vote reaches the threshold to execute and generate hard info early, resolving the Empath versus Chef tension and narrowing suspects quickly.
β
Bob
Bob raised their hand
π§
Support the Day one execution to create hard information through the Undertaker and resolve the Empath versus Chef conflict quickly.
π¬
Grace
β
All
Hold on everyone. David says his Empath read points to Eve, but we know the Drunk is in play and someone might be poisoned. If David is the Drunk, his info is completely wrong. We shouldn't rush to execute based on one person's info on day one. Let's hear more before we lock this in.
π§
Try to save Eve by casting doubt on David's Empath claim. Suggest he might be Drunk or poisoned. Don't vote for my Demon.
β
Charlie
Charlie raised their hand
π§
Enough votes are already up; adding mine helps secure an execution that either kills evil (if David is sober) or at least generates hard Undertaker info to resolve the David versus Eve conflict.
π¬
David
β
All
I hear the drunk or poison concern, but we cannot paralyze ourselves. My read still says exactly one of Charlie or Eve is evil if I am sober. Executing Eve now gives us a clean test and gives the Undertaker real info tonight.
π§
Keep the vote and justify it: execution generates hard info via Undertaker and resolves my neighbor pair quickly; we cannot let theoretical drunkenness stop all day one progress.
π¬
Frank
β
All
Eve, Chef with zero adjacent evil pairs does not clear you. That can still be true even if you are evil, as long as the two evils are not sitting together. If we execute you, we learn a lot about the David versus Charlie versus Eve triangle tomorrow.
π§
Keep town from overvaluing Eveβs Chef defense, support the execution as a useful test, and set up the logical follow-up paths for tomorrow.
π¬
Alice
β
All
I am still comfortable executing Eve here. Chef with zero adjacent evil pairs does not clear you, and David being wrong is something we can evaluate tomorrow with Undertaker and other start info. If Eve is good, we pivot hard onto Charlie or David next.
π§
Keep town moving: support execution for information gain, reduce stall over drunk/poison, and set up tomorrow's logical follow-ups.
π¬
Eve
β
All
Everyone, you're about to execute me based on David's Empath read. But think about this: if I'm actually the good Chef I claim to be, then David's info is wrong. That means he's either the Drunk or was poisoned Night Zero. If you execute me and I flip good, you know David is compromised. Don't let the real Demon get away because you trusted faulty information. Look at David and Charlie tomorrow if I die.
π§
I'm getting executed regardless (6 votes already). I need to plant seeds of doubt about David's info being wrong due to Drunk/poison, so town wastes time investigating him/Charlie tomorrow instead of finding my Minion.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
I am fine executing Eve here, since Chef with zero adjacent evil pairs does not clear her. But we need a plan: if Eve dies and looks good, then tomorrow we push hard on Charlie or on David being drunk or poisoned. Also, everyone please keep tracking if any Outsider claim appears, because that matters a lot.
π§
Since my vote is already in, I will speak to set clear conditional plans for tomorrow and reduce confusion around Chef and Outsider-count arguments.
π¬
Bob
β
All
I am still happy with this execution. Chef with zero adjacent evil pairs does not clear Eve at all. If Eve dies and seems good, then we treat David as drunk or poisoned, or possibly evil, and we re evaluate tomorrow with Undertaker.
π§
Keep town moving with a coherent plan: execute for information, use Undertaker to verify, and set tomorrow's decision tree without outing my Virgin role yet.
π¬
Grace
β
All
Wait, everyone. Think about this. David claims one of his neighbors is evil, but we know the Drunk is out there and the Poisoner could have acted Night Zero. If David is compromised, we're executing an innocent Chef. Day one executions based on single information sources are dangerous. Shouldn't we at least hear from everyone before we lock this in?
π§
Try to save Eve by casting doubt on David's Empath read. Point out that executing based on one person's info Day 1 is risky when Drunk/Poisoner exist. Even if Eve dies, I want to set up Charlie or David as suspicious for tomorrow.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
I hear the caution, but I think an execution here is useful. I am the Undertaker, so if Eve dies today I will learn her exact character tonight. If she comes up Chef, we treat David as drunk, poisoned, or evil tomorrow and pivot.
π§
Keep momentum and generate the first Undertaker check. Set a clear conditional plan for tomorrow based on what Eve actually is.
π
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
π³οΈ
New execution leader: Eve with 6 votes. They will be executed when nominations close unless tied or surpassed by another nominee.
π
Storyteller
The vote passes. Eve is now on the block with 6 votes and will be executed when nominations close, unless another nominee receives equal or more votes.
π¬
David
β
All
Before nominations end, can we agree no last second tie unless someone has stronger info? If Eve dies, Charlie the Undertaker should confirm the role tonight. Tomorrow I will share my night one Empath number and we follow the chain based on what Charlie learns.
π§
Keep vote stable, prevent last second tie, and set a clear conditional plan for tomorrow based on Undertaker plus my next Empath read.
π¬
Frank
β
All
I agree, no last second tie unless someone has stronger, specific info. Everyone who has a starting info role, please say so before nominations close. Also, if anyone is an Outsider, speak up today, because Grace heard zero Outsiders and that is a big deal.
π§
Lock in a clear plan for tomorrow using Undertaker confirmation, and use the Outsider count mismatch to spot drunkenness or lies without letting evil force a chaotic tie.
π¬
Alice
β
All
Before noms end, I should say: I am a starting info role. I learned that either Bob or Eve is the Virgin. I have not heard any Outsider claims yet. If Eve dies today, we should plan a Virgin test on Bob tomorrow with a trusted Townsfolk nominating him.
π§
Share my starting Washerwoman info now so town can plan a Virgin test and avoid missing key mechanical leverage, without derailing todayβs execution unless needed.
π¬
Eve
β
All
Wait, Alice just said she learned either Bob or I am the Virgin. But David nominated me and he's still standing! If I were actually the Virgin and David's a Townsfolk, he'd be dead right now. Since David's alive, either I'm not the Virgin, or David isn't actually a Townsfolk. Think about that - his Empath claim might be a lie because he's evil, not because he's Drunk!
π§
Point out the Virgin claim inconsistency to create doubt about David's alignment and Alice's info, potentially saving myself or at least sowing confusion that helps my team.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
That Virgin point is important. If Eve were the Virgin and David were a Townsfolk, David would have died the moment he nominated. So either Bob is the Virgin, or David is not actually a Townsfolk, or Alice is wrong. I am fine letting Eve go through, and tomorrow we should do a clean Virgin test on Bob.
π§
Use the Virgin interaction to mechanically steer tomorrowβs tests while keeping todayβs execution for info, and discourage an unhelpful last-second tie.
π¬
Bob
β
All
Just to be clear, the Virgin thing only triggers when that person is nominated. Eve being nominated does not prove anything about me. If Eve were the Virgin and David were a Townsfolk, he would have died, so that points away from Eve. I am fine with no tie today, and tomorrow I want a clean Virgin test on me.
π§
Prevent a last second tie, clarify Virgin nomination logic, and commit to a clean Virgin test on me tomorrow to generate mechanical certainty for good.
π¬
Grace
β
All
Everyone, Eve just made a critical point about the Virgin. Alice says either Bob or Eve is the Virgin. If Eve were actually the Virgin and David were a true Townsfolk Empath, David would have died the moment he nominated her. But David is standing right here alive. That means either David is not actually a Townsfolk, or Alice is wrong about the Virgin. Think about that - we might be executing a Chef based on information from someone who can't be a Townsfolk if the Virgin claim is true.
π§
Highlight the Virgin mechanic inconsistency to cast doubt on David's Townsfolk status. If Eve were Virgin and David were Townsfolk Empath, he'd be dead. He's alive, so either he's lying about being Townsfolk or Alice is wrong. This plants seed that David might be evil, not just drunk/poisoned.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
The Virgin point only tells us this: if Eve were the Virgin and David were a Townsfolk, David would have died when he nominated. Since he did not, the simplest read is Bob is the Virgin. Let us not panic tie. I will confirm Eveβs exact role tonight.
π§
Clarify the Virgin interaction so town does not overreact, and lock in a clear plan for tomorrow based on my Undertaker result.
π
Storyteller
The guillotine blade falls. Eve has been executed.
π
Eve(Ghost)
Eve has died.
π
Game Over
Demon Dead
Winner: Good
Transcript
Paused
Copied