Game Detail
Players
Alice (Baron) Bob (Empath) Charlie (Imp) David (Drunk) Eve (Recluse) Frank (Undertaker) Grace (Librarian) Heidi (Butler)
Token Usage
| Team | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Cost (USD) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Evil | 216,823 | 7,956 | $0.7698 |
| Good | 440,476 | 40,248 | $1.3343 |
Event Transcript
π
The game has started.
π
Storyteller
β
Alice
You are the Minion. The Demon is Charlie.
π
Storyteller
β
Charlie
Minions are: Alice. Your safe bluffs are: Virgin, Fortune Teller, Mayor
π
Storyteller
β
Grace
Good evening Grace. You are the Librarian. Either Bob or Eve is the Recluse.
π
Storyteller
β
Bob
Good evening Bob. You are the Empath. You sense that 2 of your neighbors is evil!
π
Storyteller
β
Heidi
Good evening Heidi. You are the Butler. Who would you like to be your master tomorrow?
π―
Heidi
Heidi made a choice.
π§
Day one I want a master who is likely to vote, keeping my ability from blocking key executions while I gather reads. Alice as my neighbor is easy to coordinate with early.
π
Storyteller
β
Heidi
You chose Alice to be your master.
Day 1
π
Storyteller
Welcome to the village of Ravenswood Bluff. Please take this time to get to know your fellow villagers. Feel free to move around and have private conversations. Be wary, for a Demon hides among you!
π€
Charlie
β
Alice
Hey Alice, it's me Charlie. I'm the Imp. I'm planning to bluff as Fortune Teller. What are you thinking of claiming? Let's make sure our stories don't conflict. Also, who should I target tonight?
π§
Coordinate with Alice on bluffs early.
π€
Eve
β
David
,Frank
,Alice
Hey, quick check in. What are you claiming today and did you get any starting info? Also, who do you want protected or checked tonight if we have a Monk or Fortune Teller?
π§
Start building a private info net without outing as Recluse. Get role claims from neighbors and a third player to build early logic chains and spot inconsistencies.
π€
Bob
β
Alice
Hi Alice, quick one to one. What are you claiming today, and do you have any opening info you are willing to share? I can share mine after I hear yours.
π§
Start extracting a role claim and tone read from Alice without revealing my Empath info yet, while setting up later to compare with Charlie and others.
π€
David
β
Eve
,Frank
,Alice
For today I am happy to float Fortune Teller as my claim. No starting info of course. If we have a Monk, please do not protect me tonight. I would rather be a tempting kill. If someone is checking, I would prioritize Bob or Grace.
π§
Answer Eve promptly, seed a believable high value bluff to attract the night kill, and steer protection elsewhere so I can trigger Ravenkeeper if attacked.
π€
Alice
β
Charlie
Hey Charlie, got your message. I am thinking of claiming Recluse as my bluff since it is an Outsider and fits the Baron setup. Heads up, David is already floating Fortune Teller in a group chat with Eve and Frank, so you may want to pick a different claim to avoid conflict. For tonight, maybe target Grace or Bob.
π§
Coordinate with Charlie about bluff conflicts and share info.
π€
Grace
β
Alice
,Frank
,David
Hi. I am Grace. I am the Librarian. I saw that either Bob or Eve is the Recluse. Can you share what you are or any info you have, and whether you have outsider count expectations?
π§
Seed my Librarian info to a small trusted group, solicit their claims, and set up cross-checks before nominations.
π€
Heidi
β
Alice
Hi Alice, quick private note. I am the Butler and I picked you as my master last night, so today I can only vote if you are voting too. If you want my vote, please vote with me. Do you have any starting info or a role claim you want me to keep quiet?
π§
I need my master to know my voting restriction so we do not waste votes. Also start a trust chain and gather any opening info/claims.
π€
Frank
β
Eve
,David
,Alice
For today I am happy to float Soldier as my claim. I have no starting info. For checks, I like David suggested Bob or Grace. If we have a Monk, I would rather they protect someone who looks like a key info role, not me.
π§
Answer their coordination questions while protecting my Undertaker identity and gathering who wants whom checked/protected for later logic chains.
π€
Charlie
β
Alice
Thanks for the heads up. I will switch to claiming Mayor then, to avoid conflicting with David. You claim Recluse. Tonight I am thinking of targeting Grace or Bob as you suggested. Any read on who might be most dangerous to us?
π§
Switch bluff to Mayor since David is claiming Fortune Teller. Coordinate with Alice.
π€
Eve
β
Grace
,Heidi
Hey Grace and Heidi, what are you each claiming for today and did you get any starting info? Also, any early suspicions or who would you most want checked tonight?
π§
Collect early claims and starting info from Grace and Heidi to build an accurate roles and outsider count map before nominations.
π€
Bob
β
David
Quick private: I am Empath. Night zero I got a two on my alive neighbors, Alice and Charlie. If sober, that means both are evil in this 8 player setup. Do you have any starting info that can cross check this?
π§
Privately seed my very strong Empath 2 info to a non-neighbor to coordinate a Day 1 execution plan while minimizing the chance I get immediately killed by outing publicly.
π€
David
β
Bob
I have no starting info to cross check. One data point: Grace privately claims Librarian and says either you or Eve is the Recluse. That clashes with you being Empath unless she is wrong or you are bluffing or drunk. I would talk to Grace and compare details.
π§
Give Bob the main mechanical cross-check (Graceβs Librarian ping) and encourage direct comparison, while not over-revealing my true role. Push for consistency checks before noms.
π€
Alice
β
Charlie
Update: Grace is claiming Librarian and says she saw Bob or Eve is the Recluse. That complicates my Recluse bluff. I might switch to claiming Empath instead. Also Heidi says she is the Butler and picked me as master. She could be useful. Thoughts?
π§
Coordinate with Charlie on the Grace/Librarian complication and confirm bluffs.
π€
Grace
β
Eve
,Heidi
I am Librarian. My N0 info was that either Bob or Eve is the Recluse. No other info. I am not hard accusing either of you. What are you claiming, and did you get any starting info? Who do you most want checked tonight and why?
π§
Answer Eve to build trust and gather claims while keeping my info in a small circle; ask for what to check tonight to coordinate with info roles.
π€
Heidi
β
Eve
,Grace
I am Butler. No starting info. I picked Alice as my master, so today I can only vote if Alice votes too. For tonight checks, I would like either Bob or Eve checked to confirm or refute the Recluse possibility, but I do not want an early execution there off only that.
π§
Answer claims clearly, preserve trust with Grace and Eve, and steer night checks toward confirming the Librarian info without tunneling on Bob or Eve.
π€
Frank
β
Grace
Hi Grace. Thanks. I can confirm I do not have starting info. One outsider expected by default, so your ping fits. Are you sharing this widely or keeping it tight for now, and did you hear any other outsider claims yet?
π§
Acknowledge Graceβs info, keep my Undertaker role hidden, and ask for outsider expectations and if she has any other pings. Build a trust link for later coordinated executions.
π€
Charlie
β
Alice
Good thinking, switch to Empath. I will claim Mayor. Grace is dangerous since she has Librarian info that could expose us. I am leaning toward targeting Grace tonight. Does that work for you? Also, Heidi as Butler with you as master could be very useful, keep her close.
π§
Coordinate with Alice on bluffs and confirm tonight's kill target.
π€
Eve
β
Grace
,Heidi
I will be straight with you both. I am the Recluse. No starting info. So Grace, your Librarian ping makes sense. But if Heidi is truly Butler, that is two Outsiders in eight players, so we should consider Baron or someone lying. I would rather we do not execute either Outsider early.
π§
Confirm my true role to lock in Graceβs Librarian info, flag outsider-count mismatch (possible Baron), and steer town away from wasting D1 execution on an Outsider.
π€
Bob
β
Grace
Hey Grace, David said you are Librarian and got that either I or Eve is the Recluse. Can you tell me the exact wording and your two names? I am Empath and got a two on neighbors Alice and Charlie, so we need to reconcile that.
π§
Get exact Librarian claim details to test for misinformation and decide whether to push on Alice and Charlie or consider I may be drunk/poisoned.
π€
David
β
Grace
Hi Grace. For today I am floating Fortune Teller as my claim, so no starting info. In eight players I expect one Outsider unless Baron makes it three, so your Recluse ping suggests at least one Outsider is in. Also, Bob told me he is Empath with a strong read on his neighbors Alice and Charlie, so worth comparing notes with him.
π§
Answer Grace, keep my Ravenkeeper hidden behind FT bluff, and seed cross checks between Grace and Bob without overexposing info to the whole town.
π€
Alice
β
Charlie
Confirmed, targeting Grace tonight sounds good. I will go with Empath as my claim. I will say my night zero read showed zero evil neighbors to seem trustworthy early. Keeping Heidi close as Butler is a great asset. Let us stay coordinated.
π§
Confirm Grace as tonight's target and finalize my Empath bluff with Charlie.
π€
Grace
β
Bob
,Frank
Exact wording from ST: βEither Bob or Eve is the Recluse.β Those were the only two names. Eve is now claiming Recluse; Heidi claims Butler, so that is 2 Outsiders in 8, implying Baron or a lie/drunk. Bob, your Empath 2 on Alice and Charlie is huge if true; could also be poison.
π§
Confirm my exact Librarian info, flag Outsider count tension, and coordinate with Bob and Frank on next conversations and likely evil worlds.
π€
Heidi
β
Eve
,Grace
If you are Recluse and Grace is Librarian, that plus me as Butler is two Outsiders, so yes we should consider Baron or a false claim. Grace, can you tell me the exact Librarian wording you got? Eve, are you willing to say publicly you are Recluse to lock this in?
π§
Keep trust with Grace and Eve while flagging the Outsider-count issue as a mechanical lead; gather exact wording and push town to compare all N0 info to detect Baron or a liar.
π€
Frank
β
Grace
,David
,Eve
We now have Grace Librarian pinging Bob or Eve as Recluse, plus Eve claiming Recluse and Heidi claiming Butler. That is two Outsiders in eight, so either Baron exists or someone is lying or drunk. Bob also told you Empath two on Alice and Charlie, which is huge but could be poison. I think we should pressure outsider claimants and consider an Alice or Charlie execution test today.
π§
Flag the Outsider count problem and Bobβs strong Empath read, and steer the group toward a testable execution path while I continue bluffing Soldier to stay alive.
β
Charlie
Charlie waits.
π§
Wait for nomination phase, no whispers needed right now. Plan is set: claim Mayor, kill Grace tonight.
π€
Eve
β
Grace
,Heidi
Grace, what was the exact Librarian text, including whether it said there is a Recluse and which two names? Heidi, yes, two Outsiders implies Baron or a false claim. I would prefer not to hard out Recluse publicly yet unless needed, but I can if you think town will misexecute me or Bob.
π§
Get exact Librarian wording, decide whether to go public as Recluse, and start outsider-count/Baron logic while steering town away from executing Outsiders early.
π€
Bob
β
Charlie
Hey Charlie, private check in. I am the Empath. Night zero I got a two on my neighbors, which are Alice and you. If I am sober that implies both of you are evil. What are you claiming, and do you have any info that explains this, like a Recluse next to me or poisoning?
π§
Get Charlieβs role claim and reactions to my Empath 2 to test whether he panics, counters, or offers a coherent world; this helps decide who to push in nominations.
π€
David
β
Frank
,Grace
,Bob
We have a core contradiction: Outsiders look like Eve Recluse and Heidi Butler, plus your Librarian ping Bob or Eve as Recluse. That is two Outsiders in eight, so Baron or a lie or drunkenness. Bob also has Empath two on Alice and Charlie. I suggest we push for everyone to state role and outsider count publicly, then consider executing Alice or Charlie as a strong test.
π§
Align on the key contradiction (outsider count vs Empath 2) and set a clear Day 1 pressure plan: get exact role details publicly and consider executing Alice or Charlie to test Bob.
β
Alice
Alice waits.
π§
Wait for nomination phase. My bluff is set as Empath. Charlie targets Grace tonight. Stay quiet and observe.
π€
Grace
β
Bob
,David
,Frank
Exact ST line was: βEither Bob or Eve is the Recluse.β Only those two names, no zero message. If your Empath is 2 on Alice and Charlie, that screams poison or a registration trick. I would not rush an Alice or Charlie exec just off that. Let's get public role and Outsider count first.
π§
Clarify my exact Librarian info, slow down a potentially poisonous Empath push, and coordinate a safer public plan: lock Outsider claims and look for Baron/poison evidence before executing.
π€
Heidi
β
Alice
Quick sync: I am Butler and chose you as my master, so I can only vote when you vote. Grace claims Librarian saw Bob or Eve as Recluse, and Eve is claiming Recluse. That makes two Outsiders already, so maybe Baron or someone lying. What is your role claim and who are you leaning to execute today?
π§
Coordinate with my master so I can vote effectively, and get Alice's claim plus her voting intentions. Also flag Outsider count/Baron suspicion for town planning.
π€
Frank
β
Grace
,Bob
I think we should not rush an Alice or Charlie execution off Empath two. Let us get full public role and outsider count first, then we can test Bob versus Eve for Recluse and see if Heidi Butler implies Baron or a lie.
π§
Coordinate with Bob and Grace to get clean public claims and avoid a premature Alice or Charlie execution while we resolve Outsider count and Empath 2 implications.
Nominations β Day 1
π
Storyteller
Nominations are now open.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
I want to address something before nominations close. Bob reached out to me privately with an Empath read of two, pointing at me and Alice as evil. I am claiming Mayor, so I have no night info to counter that directly. But here is the thing β Grace the Librarian said one of Bob or Eve might be the Recluse. If Bob is sitting next to a Recluse, that completely explains a false Empath read. I think we should be cautious about acting on Bob's info today without more corroboration.
π§
Deflect Bob's Empath read by suggesting Recluse is in play near him, protecting myself and Alice.
π¬
Alice
β
All
I actually want to weigh in on this. I am claiming Empath as well, and my night zero read showed zero evil neighbors. Bob and I cannot both be correct Empaths β one of us is lying or one of us is the Drunk. Given that Grace's Librarian info already points to a Recluse being Bob or Eve, Bob sitting next to a Recluse would explain a false read of two. I am not ready to nominate today on shaky information.
π§
Support Charlie's deflection of Bob's Empath claim. I'm bluffing Empath myself so I can counter-claim Bob and say my read was different.
βοΈ
Bob
β
Alice
I am the Empath and got a two on my neighbors Alice and Charlie. Alice is also claiming Empath with a zero, which is a direct role conflict. Executing Alice today is the cleanest high information test.
π§
Force a high-information execution: Alice directly conflicts my role and my only hard data points at her. This clarifies whether my Empath info is reliable and narrows demon candidates fast.
π
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Alice. 4 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
β
Charlie
Charlie waits.
π§
Do not vote for Alice. She is my minion and must stay alive.
π¬
Alice
β
All
Please do not vote for me. Bob and I both claim Empath β that means one of us is the Drunk, not necessarily evil. If Grace's Librarian info points to a Recluse near Bob, his read of two is easily explained by a Recluse registering as evil. Executing me on day one based on a conflicting Drunk read would be a huge mistake for the good team.
π§
Defend myself and discourage votes against me.
β
Bob
Bob raised their hand
π§
Break the Empath double-claim and test my strong N0=2 lead; Alice is the highest information execution and could directly remove evil.
β
David
David raised their hand
π§
A D1 execution on a direct role conflict is high information. I will vote to execute Alice to resolve the double-Empath contradiction and force clearer worlds going into night.
π¬
Eve
β
All
I do not like executing Alice today. Two Empath claims is very plausibly a Drunk situation, not evil. Also my Recluse status is not Bob's neighbor, so it does not explain his two. I want Grace to restate her exact Librarian info and names before we kill anyone.
π§
Stop a low-confidence day one execution that may be driven by an evil push or a drunk conflict, and redirect to gathering exact Librarian info and outsider count logic.
π¬
Grace
β
All
My Librarian info was exactly: Either Bob or Eve is the Recluse. Those two names only. That does not implicate Alice. Two Empath claims can easily be a Drunk situation. I am not voting Alice on that alone. I want more public claims and outsider count before we execute.
π§
Prevent a low-signal day one execution driven by an unconfirmed Empath conflict; restate my Librarian info clearly and push for wider claims and corroboration before committing votes.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
I am not voting here. I am the Butler and my master is Alice, so I can only vote if Alice votes too. Also I agree this is too shaky for day one. Two Empaths plus a possible Recluse points to drunk or misregistration, not a clean evil catch.
π§
Signal I cannot vote unless Alice votes, and advocate against a D1 execute on a shaky role-conflict when Drunk/Recluse could explain it.
π¬
Frank
β
All
I am not voting Alice here. Two Empath claims plus a possible Recluse means day one reads are shaky. Let us get full public role claims and outsider count first, then decide between Bob and Eve for the Recluse ping, and only then pick an execution.
π§
Prevent a low-signal D1 execution based on conflicting Empath reads; steer town to get full public claims and outsider math, then pick a better execution target.
β
Charlie
Charlie waits.
π§
Don't vote Alice. Let her survive.
β
Alice
Alice waits.
π§
Wait - execution unlikely to pass, no action needed.
π¬
Bob
β
All
Recluse does not explain my two, because Eve is not my neighbor. For my two to be wrong I must be drunk or poisoned. Alice hard counterclaiming Empath is still my best evil lead. If we do not execute her, we need full public role and Outsider claims right now.
π§
Push back on the Recluse explanation and try to secure enough votes or, if it fails, force clear public claims and a plan for tomorrow.
β©οΈ
David
David lowered their hand
π§
Retract my vote to reduce chance of a low-information day one execution, and steer town toward full claims and outsider-count logic before committing.
π¬
Eve
β
All
I am not voting Alice. This is an Empath clash with possible Drunk or poison, not a clean evil hit. Before any execution, I want quick public claims from David and Frank, and a clear Outsider count check, since we already have Butler plus the Librarian Recluse ping.
π§
Stop a low-info day one execution driven by an Empath conflict, and push the town toward role/outsider count checks and better targets.
π¬
Grace
β
All
I am not voting Alice. Empath clash alone is not a good day one kill, especially with a possible Recluse and a Butler already. Can David and Frank give firm public roles now, and can we confirm whether there are one or two Outsiders in play?
π§
Prevent a low-confidence day one execution on Alice, push for fast public claims and outsider count sanity check to identify lies/Baron/poison paths.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
I am still not voting Alice. As Butler, I can only vote if Alice votes and she is not. Can David and Frank please give clear role claims now, and can we all confirm Outsider claims? Right now we have me as Butler and Grace saw Bob or Eve as Recluse, so numbers matter.
π§
Prevent a shaky day one misexecute constrained by my Butler vote; push for missing claims and outsider count check so we can choose a better execution or no-exe.
π¬
Frank
β
All
I am not voting Alice. My public claim is Soldier for now. David, can you give a clear role claim. Also, can we all confirm Outsiders: Heidi is Butler, and either Bob or Eve is Recluse, so that is likely two. That suggests Baron or a lie somewhere.
π§
Stop a shaky D1 execution, add my own claim to progress solves, and press David for a claim so we can resolve Outsider count and plan a better test execution.
π
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
π³οΈ
Nominee Alice did not reach threshold.
π
Storyteller
Alice did not receive enough votes (1/4).
π¬
Charlie
β
All
Alright, since we are almost out of time today, let me put my claim on the table. I am the Fortune Teller. Last night I chose Bob and David, and I got a yes β one of them registered as the Demon. Given Bob's aggressive push on Alice and his read of two that he cannot fully explain, I am leaning toward Bob being my Demon ping. David, what is your role claim?
π§
Establish my Fortune Teller bluff and redirect suspicion toward Bob before night falls.
π¬
Alice
β
All
That is very interesting, Charlie. So you got a yes on Bob or David, and Bob has been the most aggressive player all day pushing a read that does not fully add up. David, please give us your role claim quickly β we are almost out of time and this Fortune Teller ping changes everything.
π§
Support Charlie's Fortune Teller claim to redirect suspicion onto Bob and away from us both.
π¬
Bob
β
All
Charlie, you claimed Mayor earlier, and now you say Fortune Teller. Those cannot both be true. That makes your yes ping very suspect. David, please hard claim your role right now. If Charlie cannot explain the swap, I want him executed tomorrow.
π§
Undercut Charlieβs credibility due to claim swap, get Davidβs claim on record, and set tomorrowβs execution target based on strongest mechanical contradiction.
π¬
David
β
All
My hard claim is Ravenkeeper. If I die at night, I pick a player and learn their exact character. I have no info yet because I am alive. Charlie, you claimed Mayor earlier, so explain that clearly. If your Fortune Teller is real, your yes could be me as the red herring. Tomorrow we should test the Mayor versus Fortune Teller story and not ignore the Outsider count, since Butler plus a possible Recluse suggests Baron or a lie.
π§
Hard-claim to resolve the FT ping on me, push for logical consistency checks on Charlieβs claim swap, and set a clear plan for tomorrow given Outsider count concerns.
βοΈ
Eve
β
Charlie
You publicly claimed Mayor earlier, and now Fortune Teller with a yes on Bob or David. Those cannot both be true without a very clear bluff explanation. I want you on the block to explain the swap and let town judge it.
π§
Use my nomination to force a clean explanation of Charlieβs Mayor to Fortune Teller swap and potentially remove an evil player before night, since Alice test failed.
π
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Charlie. 4 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
I never claimed Mayor. I do not know where that is coming from. My claim has been Fortune Teller this entire day. Bob, you are now putting words in my mouth on top of pushing a read that Grace and Eve already poked holes in. That is two suspicious moves from you in one day. Please do not vote for me β the Fortune Teller ping on Bob or David is real information the town needs.
π§
Deny the Mayor claim, defend Fortune Teller bluff, and turn suspicion back on Bob who is the real threat.
β
Alice
Alice waits.
π§
Do not vote for the Demon. Let votes fail.
β
Bob
Bob raised their hand
π§
Charlie has the clearest mechanical-social contradiction today. A day one execution on him gives high information and may directly remove evil.
π¬
David
β
All
I am not voting Charlie today. I distinctly recall a Mayor claim from Charlie earlier, so this needs a clean explanation tomorrow. If Charlie is Fortune Teller, his yes on Bob or me could just be me as the red herring. Let us not execute on confusion.
π§
Prevent a low-confidence day one execution on Charlie, keep info roles alive, and set up tomorrowβs mechanical cross-checks (FT picks, Outsider count, and Empath clash).
π¬
Eve
β
All
I am not voting Charlie today. This feels like day one claim confusion, not a clean catch. Tomorrow we need a clear timeline from Charlie, and we should compare all claims against the Outsider count, since we already have Butler and a Librarian ping for a Recluse.
π§
Prevent a low-info day one execution on claim confusion; set up tomorrow to resolve Charlieβs claim history and use outsider-count mechanics to catch the liar.
π¬
Grace
β
All
I am not voting Charlie today. This is too much claim confusion for a day one kill. Charlie, tomorrow give a clear timeline of what you claimed and when. Also, we must reconcile Outsider count, since we already have Butler plus my Bob or Eve Recluse ping.
π§
Prevent a rushed day one execution on a shaky claim swap; keep potential Fortune Teller alive and force a clear claim timeline and Outsider count check tomorrow.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
I cannot vote here unless Alice votes, and she is not. So I am not voting Charlie today. Charlie, tomorrow give a clear timeline of every claim you made. Bob, explain why multiple people heard Mayor. Also we must resolve Outsiders: I am Butler, Grace saw Bob or Eve as Recluse, so that is two.
π§
I cannot vote unless Alice votes, so I will steer town away from a chaotic D1 execution and set clear questions and a plan to resolve Charlie versus Bob tomorrow, plus Outsider count.
π¬
Frank
β
All
I am not voting Charlie today. I also remember a Mayor claim earlier, so tomorrow we need a clear timeline of what Charlie said and when. Also we must resolve Outsiders: Heidi Butler plus Grace ping for Recluse suggests Baron or a lie, which affects our reads.
π§
Prevent a low-information day one execution on confused claims; push for structured timeline and outsider-count check so we can target a better execution tomorrow.
β
Charlie
Charlie waits.
π§
Vote is failing, no need to speak. Save action, survive day 1, kill Bob tonight.
β
Alice
Alice waits.
π§
Vote is failing, no need to act. Charlie is safe.
π¬
Bob
β
All
I am keeping my vote on Charlie. I and others heard a Mayor claim earlier, and the Fortune Teller yes on me or David also points at someone in that pair. If we do not execute today, tomorrow we need a clean timeline from Charlie and we must reconcile why we seem to have two Outsiders.
π§
Justify my vote with mechanical reasoning and keep pressure on Charlieβs contradiction, while setting up tomorrowβs cross checks if this does not pass.
π¬
David
β
All
I am not voting Charlie today. Tomorrow I want Charlie to give a full claim timeline, and Bob to explain his Empath two versus Alice Empath zero. Also we must resolve Outsiders, since Butler plus a Librarian Recluse ping implies Baron or a lie.
π§
Prevent a low-confidence day one execution based on disputed memory; set concrete tasks for tomorrow to resolve Charlie claim, Outsider count, and Bob versus Alice Empath conflict.
π¬
Eve
β
All
I am not voting Charlie. Let us avoid a day one execution on claim confusion. Tomorrow: Charlie gives a full timeline, Bob and Alice resolve the Empath clash, and we reconcile Outsiders since Butler plus a Recluse ping suggests Baron or a lie.
π§
Prevent a low-information day one execution; steer town to mechanical resolves tomorrow: outsider count, empath inconsistency, and Charlie claim timeline.
π¬
Grace
β
All
I am not voting Charlie. Tomorrow we need a clear, step by step timeline from Charlie, plus we must solve Outsiders: Heidi is Butler, and my info is Bob or Eve is Recluse, so either Baron exists or someone is lying.
π§
Prevent a low-info day one execution, keep town aligned on concrete next steps: claim timeline, Outsider count, and resolve Empath/FT/RK interactions tomorrow.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
For the record, I cannot vote here because Alice is not voting. I agree with no day one execution on claim confusion. Tomorrow I want a clear claim timeline from Charlie, and a clean reconciliation of the Empath clash and the Outsider count.
π§
Reduce D1 execution risk, lock in a plan for tomorrow, and clarify my voting restriction so no one expects my hand.
β
Frank
Frank waits.
π§
Voting is underway and town is broadly not executing. I will not change my vote; wait preserves consistency and lets the nomination resolve so we can move to night.
π
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
π³οΈ
Nominee Charlie did not reach threshold.
π
Storyteller
Charlie did not receive enough votes (1/4).
β
Charlie
Charlie waits.
π§
Wait out the nomination phase. Tonight kill Bob.
β
Alice
Alice waits.
π§
Day is ending, no need to act. Save actions for tomorrow.
π¬
Bob
β
All
No execution today, so tomorrow we need structure. Charlie, give a step by step list of every claim you made and when. Grace, repeat your exact Librarian wording. Alice, restate your Empath night zero and whether you got any later info. We must explain why it looks like two Outsiders.
π§
Lock in tomorrowβs to-do list: force clear claim timelines and Outsider reconciliation, keep pressure on Charlie inconsistency, and keep my Empath info usable without overcommitting if poisoned.
βοΈ
David
β
Bob
I am nominating Bob. His Empath two versus Alice Empath zero is the biggest mechanical clash we have, and he is driving most of the confusion. I want Bob to give a clear, step by step account of his info and why it is reliable.
π§
With no one on the block and day ending, put a key contradiction under the spotlight. Even if it fails, the vote pattern and Bobβs defense give us structure for tomorrow.
π
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Bob. 4 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
β
Charlie
Charlie raised their hand
π§
Vote to execute Bob - he's the biggest mechanical threat and is gunning for me.
β
Alice
Alice raised their hand
π§
Bob is the greatest threat to our evil team. Vote to execute him.
π¬
Bob
β
All
I am the Empath. Night zero I got a two on my living neighbors, which are Alice and Charlie. If I am sober, that means both are evil. If you think I might be drunk or poisoned, that is still not a reason to execute me today. Use me tomorrow as a data point and get a clean timeline from Charlie and exact wording from Grace.
π§
Prevent a low-information day one execution on me, clarify my exact Empath info and reasoning, and set concrete asks for tomorrow to catch evil.
π¬
David
β
All
I am not voting to execute Bob today. Even if Bob is good, this could be drunk or poisoned, and killing him removes a useful data point. I would rather go to sleep with no execution and tomorrow force exact timelines from Bob, Alice, and Charlie, plus resolve the Outsider count.
π§
Prevent a low-information day one execution that could kill a useful townsfolk. Push for structured reconciliation tomorrow and keep options open.
π¬
Eve
β
All
I am not voting Bob today. We do not have enough mechanical certainty, and killing an Empath claim day one can be a gift to evil. Let us go to sleep and tomorrow do exact wording and timelines from Grace, Bob, Alice, and Charlie, plus Outsider count.
π§
Discourage a low-information day one execution and set concrete structure for tomorrow while keeping voting threshold from being met.
π¬
Grace
β
All
My exact night zero Librarian info was: either Bob or Eve is the Recluse. Eve has privately claimed Recluse to me. That makes me lean against executing Bob today. Tomorrow we need to resolve why it looks like two Outsiders, and get clean timelines from Bob, Alice, and Charlie.
π§
Give exact Librarian wording publicly and reduce chance we accidentally execute a likely good player today; set up tomorrowβs mechanical checks around Outsider count and claim timelines.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
I am not voting Bob. Also reminder I am the Butler and my master is Alice, so I could only vote if she is voting, but I am choosing not to. I agree we sleep and tomorrow do exact wording and timelines, plus Outsider count and the Recluse claim.
π§
Signal I will not add a vote, keep day ending without execution, and set concrete agenda to resolve contradictions and Outsider count tomorrow.
π¬
Frank
β
All
I am not raising my hand on Bob. Day one, this is too swingy and could just remove an info role. Tomorrow I want exact claim timelines from Bob, Alice, and Charlie, and we must solve why we have two Outsider claims versus the Librarian ping.
π§
Prevent an impulsive day one execution that could remove a key info role; keep focus on timelines and Outsider count so we can make a higher-confidence kill tomorrow.
β
Charlie
Charlie waits.
π§
Keep hand raised, let vote fail, kill Bob tonight.
β
Alice
Alice waits.
π§
Keep hand raised to show I voted Bob, maintaining my anti-Bob stance, but vote will fail anyway. No need to lower hand.
β
Bob
Bob waits.
π§
Do not add a vote to my own execution; conserve my influence and push for tomorrowβs structured claim timeline and Outsider-count resolution.
β
David
David waits.
π§
Do not vote on a low-certainty day one execution; preserve claimed info roles and force structured timelines and Outsider math tomorrow.
β
Eve
Eve waits.
π§
Do not add a vote that could accidentally execute a possibly good Empath; conserve today and push for structured timeline and outsider-count solve tomorrow.
β
Grace
Grace waits.
π§
I have publicly leaned against executing Bob today. Not voting keeps consistency and preserves potential Empath info; we can resolve conflicts tomorrow with structured timelines and Outsider count.
β
Heidi
Heidi waits.
π§
Alice is voting so I could vote, but I choose not to. D1 execution on an Empath claim is too uncertain; preserve info and push for structured timelines and outsider-count solve tomorrow.
β
Frank
Frank waits.
π§
Do not change the vote count mid-vote. Let the current nomination resolve, then push tomorrow for exact timelines and Outsider-count logic to identify the evil in the Empath clash.
π
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
π³οΈ
Nominee Bob did not reach threshold.
π
Storyteller
Bob did not receive enough votes (2/4).
β
Charlie
Charlie waits.
π§
End day quietly, kill Bob tonight.
β
Alice
Alice waits.
π§
No action needed, day is ending.
π¬
Bob
β
All
Before we sleep, can the Monk, if in play, protect me tonight. And Charlie, as Fortune Teller, please check Alice with someone not me. Tomorrow we start with exact claim timelines for Charlie and Alice and we solve Outsider count.
π§
Use last moments to set clear night and day two plan: ask protection and checks, preserve me as info, and focus tomorrowβs interrogation on Alice and Charlie plus Outsider math.
π¬
David
β
All
Before we sleep, quick plan. Monk, please do not protect me. Protect a likely info role like Grace or whoever you trust. Charlie, tonight check Alice with someone not Bob or me. Tomorrow we start with exact claim timelines, then Outsider count, then we pick an execution.
π§
Set night priorities and lock in day two structure, while subtly making myself an attractive night-kill to trigger Ravenkeeper info.
π¬
Eve
β
All
Before we sleep, Charlie, please pick Alice and one of Grace or Frank tonight, not Bob or David. That gives us a clean cross check. Monk, if in play, I would rather you protect Grace or Charlie than me.
π§
Use last seconds to set a concrete night action and tomorrow agenda, without overexposing my Recluse nature or creating new confusion.
π¬
Grace
β
All
Before night, quick requests. Monk, please protect either Charlie or me tonight. Charlie, if you are Fortune Teller, check Alice with someone not Bob or David. Everyone, tomorrow start with exact claim timelines and Outsider count. Heidi, please restate your Butler master first thing.
π§
Use last seconds to set night action requests and tomorrow structure, without forcing a risky day one execution.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
Before night, for the record my Butler master today was Alice, and tomorrow I will pick again at night. Charlie, if you are Fortune Teller, please do the Alice plus Grace check tonight. Tomorrow morning, we start with Grace exact Librarian wording, then Charlie full claim timeline, then we reconcile Outsider count.
π§
Use last seconds to lock in my Butler constraint and set a concrete, mechanically useful night and morning plan so town does not drift or get steered by evil.
π¬
Frank
β
All
I do not want a last second random execution when our main suspects are already nominated today. Let us stick to the plan: tomorrow we start with exact claim timelines for Alice, Bob, and Charlie, then we resolve Outsider count and Heidi restates Butler master, then we pick an execution deliberately.
π§
With no time and main suspects already nominated, avoid a rushed execution. Lock in a clean plan for tomorrow to resolve claim clashes and Outsider count, then execute with purpose.
π
Storyteller
No execution today. All villagers are safe.
Night 1
π
Storyteller
β
Charlie
Good evening Charlie. You are the Imp. Who would you like to kill tonight? Remember that if you kill yourself this way, a Minion becomes the Imp.
π―
Charlie
Charlie made a choice.
π§
Bob is the primary mechanical threat with Empath data pointing at evil neighbors. Must eliminate him before tomorrow's interrogation.
π
Bob(Ghost)
Bob has died.
π
Storyteller
β
Charlie
You chose to kill Bob.
π
Storyteller
β
Frank
Good evening Frank. You are the Undertaker. No one was executed today so you learn nothing.
π
Storyteller
β
Heidi
Good evening Heidi. You are the Butler. Who would you like to be your master tomorrow?
π―
Heidi
Heidi made a choice.
π§
I need a master who is actively voting on decisive executions. Grace is engaged, central to Outsider-count logic, and unlikely to abstain, so she maximizes my ability to vote when it matters.
π
Storyteller
β
Heidi
You chose Grace to be your master.
Day 2
π
Storyteller
Morning breaks, but heavy hearts remain. Bob has been found dead in the night.
π€
Heidi
β
Grace
,David
,Alice
Morning. I am Butler, and Grace is my master today so I can only vote if Grace votes. Grace, can you repeat your exact Librarian N0 wording and the two names? Also, what is your top suspect for todayβs execution. David and Alice, can you restate your exact D1 claims and any new reads after Bob died.
π§
Coordinate with my master Grace so my vote can count, and collect exact Librarian wording and todayβs plan; loop in David/Alice for claim timeline to narrow suspects.
π€
Charlie
β
Alice
Alice, I'm going to claim I checked you and Grace last night and got a yes ping, but I'll say it's likely the false positive since you seem trustworthy. Play along - act slightly surprised but not defensive. We need to keep suspicion off both of us today.
π§
Coordinate with Alice on FT fabrication before I speak publicly.
π€
Bob(Ghost)
β
David
,Grace
,Heidi
Quick sync from me. If I was sober, my Empath night zero was two on Alice and Charlie, so both evil and we should execute one today. If not, then at least one of them is lying. Also Heidi Butler plus Eve Recluse makes two Outsiders, so either Baron or someone is lying or drunk. I still have my ghost vote for a key execute.
π§
As dead, I should consolidate logic around my Empath 2, the Outsider count, and Charlie and Alice contradictions so the living can choose a strong execution and I can save my ghost vote for a key moment.
π€
Alice
β
Charlie
Got it. I will act mildly surprised but pivot quickly to the false positive explanation. Should be convincing since Fortune Tellers always have one false ping. Good thinking.
π§
Coordinate with Charlie and respond to Heidi's group chat to seem cooperative and transparent.
π€
Grace
β
Heidi
,David
,Alice
My exact N0: βEither Bob or Eve is the Recluse.β That is all I got. Eve told me privately she is Recluse. Top suspects right now are Charlie or Alice because of the Empath clash plus Charlieβs earlier Mayor noise. David and Alice, can you restate your D1 claims cleanly?
π§
Clarify my N0 info precisely, help reconcile Outsider count, and steer todayβs execution discussion toward the most mechanically suspicious players.
π€
David
β
Grace
,Heidi
Clean restate from me: I am the Ravenkeeper. No info yet since I have not died at night. D1 I nominated Bob mainly to force an execution and get data. After Bob dying, my top suspects are still Alice and Charlie. If we can, please do not execute me; I would like the Demon to hit me at night.
π§
Answer Heidi and Grace cleanly, lock in my real role to trusted players, and help pick a high value execution between Alice and Charlie while keeping me alive for a possible night death trigger.
π€
Frank
β
Grace
,David
,Alice
Can each of you restate, word for word if possible: Grace your Librarian ping and whether it could be zero; Alice your exact Empath claim and any nightly reads; David any private info from Bob ghost or others. Trying to reconcile Outsider count and the Alice versus Bob Empath clash.
π§
Collect precise claim details and check Outsider count to build consistent world before nominations; coordinate with info holders Grace and David and resolve Alice vs Bob Empath clash.
π€
Eve
β
Grace
,David
,Charlie
Quick check in. Any new info from whispers or Night one? Grace, please restate your Librarian wording and who you think the other Outsider could be. David, any reason you think we should or should not execute Charlie today. Charlie, what was your Night one Fortune Teller check and what are your top suspects now.
π§
Gather updated private info from main info roles to resolve the Empath conflict and interpret Charlieβs FT YES, then coordinate a strong Day2 execution target.
π€
Heidi
β
Charlie
,Eve
,Frank
Quick check in. Please restate your exact role claim and any night info or checks, plus what you said on day one about it. Eve, did you publicly claim Recluse to anyone besides Grace. Charlie, who did you Fortune Teller check night one and night two. Frank, any reason you refused voting day one.
π§
Get clean, timestamped claims and any new night info from key suspects so we can coordinate a strong execution today with Grace, since my vote is tied to hers.
π€
Charlie
β
Eve
,Grace
,David
Night one I checked Alice and Grace, got a yes ping meaning one of them registers as Demon. I believe it is the false positive since Fortune Tellers always have one. Night two I checked David and Eve, no ping. My top suspects are actually Frank, who has been very quiet about his role.
π§
Deliver fabricated FT results consistently to both Eve and Heidi to maintain my bluff and avoid suspicion.
π€
Bob(Ghost)
β
David
,Grace
,Frank
I am dead but here is my push: force Alice and Charlie to restate full claim timeline and exact night results. My Empath N0 was two on them. Even if poisoned, at least one is lying. Also Heidi Butler plus Eve Recluse is two Outsiders, so Baron or a fake claim. I will ghost vote only on a strong execute, likely Alice or Charlie.
π§
Coordinate town to lock a Day 2 execution plan: pressure Alice and Charlie on claim timelines, and account for Outsider count to detect Baron; use my ghost vote only if on a strong candidate.
π€
Alice
β
Frank
,Grace
,David
Sure, I will restate cleanly. I claimed Empath on Day 1. My Night 1 read was zero, meaning neither of my alive neighbors were evil. My neighbors are Charlie and Heidi. As for the Outsider count concern, I think the simplest explanation is that someone is the Drunk thinking they are a Townsfolk, which would account for an unexpected Outsider without a Baron being in play.
π§
Respond to Frank and Grace's requests with a clean Empath claim, deflect Baron suspicion by suggesting Drunk explains the Outsider count discrepancy.
π€
Grace
β
Frank
,Eve
,David
My N0 was exactly: either Bob or Eve is the Recluse. Eve told me Recluse. If Eve is real and Heidi is real Butler, we already see 2 Outsiders, so likely Baron or a hidden Outsider. That makes resolving Alice versus Charlie urgent. Can you both press for full claim timelines and exact night results before noms?
π§
Sync private logic on Outsider count and push for a structured timeline so we can choose between Alice, Charlie, or a potential Baron bluff like Heidi/Eve.
π€
David
β
Grace
,Frank
,Eve
I think today must be an execute on Alice or Charlie. Bob N0 two on Alice plus Charlie. Charlie FT: N1 Alice and Grace yes, N2 David and Eve no. Alice: Empath N1 zero on Charlie and Heidi. Can we press Charlie on the earlier Mayor claim and get exact seating neighbors? I lean execute Alice first unless Charlieβs timeline breaks.
π§
Align key good voices on a decisive D2 execution plan and the exact questions that force Alice or Charlie into contradictions before nominations.
π€
Frank
β
Heidi
,Charlie
,Eve
I am Undertaker. No executions yet so I have no UT info. D1 I held votes to avoid outing as info role. Charlie, please restate your exact public claim timeline plus N1 and N2 FT picks and results. Eve, have you claimed Recluse to anyone besides Grace, and do you still stand by Recluse?
π§
Reply to Heidi and simultaneously press Charlie and Eve for clean timelines so town can choose between Alice and Charlie for todayβs execute and set up UT confirmation.
π€
Eve
β
Heidi
,Frank
,Charlie
Answering Heidi and Frank: I am Recluse, and I only confirmed it privately to Grace so far. Yes I still stand by Recluse. Frank, great you are Undertaker, please stay quiet but be ready to confirm todayβs execute tonight. Charlie, can you state clearly when you first claimed Fortune Teller, and why you think the Alice and Grace yes is red herring rather than Alice being demon.
π§
Answer Heidi, coordinate with Frank UT, and focus town on executing either Alice or Charlie with clear questions to break the tie before nominations.
π€
Heidi
β
Grace
,David
I can only vote if Grace votes today. I think we should commit to executing either Charlie or Alice today, not split. My lean is Charlie for claim instability, but Bob dying points at Alice too. Grace, are you willing to vote on whichever of those we pick so I can vote with you?
π§
Coordinate with my master Grace so my vote is usable, and align on a single execution target between Alice and Charlie while tracking Outsider-count/Baron implications.
π€
Charlie
β
Frank
,Eve
,Heidi
I claimed Fortune Teller on Day one publicly. Night one I checked Alice and Grace, got a yes ping. Night two I checked David and Eve, no ping. I believe the Alice and Grace ping is the false positive because Grace is confirmed Librarian and Alice has been transparent. Frank being quiet on Day one with no role claim is more suspicious to me right now.
π§
Answer Frank, Eve, Heidi with consistent FT story to build trust and deflect suspicion from Alice.
π€
Bob(Ghost)
β
David
,Grace
,Eve
I am still pushing that today must center on Alice versus Charlie. My Empath N0 was two on them. If sober, they are both evil. If not, their Empath claims contradict so at least one is lying. Also Heidi Butler plus Eve Recluse is two Outsiders, so Baron or a fake. Please get full timelines from Alice and Charlie and then execute one of them. I will spend my ghost vote on that.
π§
Align good players on a concrete plan: lock claim timelines, resolve Outsider math, and focus todayβs execution on Alice or Charlie while my ghost vote supports the best case.
β
Alice
Alice waits.
π§
Wait and observe what others are saying before acting. No need to whisper again right now.
π€
Grace
β
Heidi
,David
,Frank
I will vote today so Heidi can vote with me. Before noms, can we publicly pin Charlie on the Mayor claim origin and get exact claim timeline and N1 and N2 FT pairs and results. Then we commit to one execute, no split, likely Charlie unless Alice story breaks.
π§
Lock in a single execute plan and ensure Heidi can vote by me committing. Also press Charlie on Mayor rumor and exact timelines to break Alice vs Charlie before noms.
π€
David
β
Grace
,Frank
Before noms, can we pin Charlie on: did he ever claim Mayor, and exact FT wording plus N1 pair Alice and Grace yes, N2 pair David and Eve no. Also confirm Alice neighbors Charlie and Heidi for N1=0. After that I want us to hard commit to one execute, no split. My lean is Charlie if any timeline wobble; otherwise Alice.
π§
Coordinate with trusted good voices to lock a single execution target and a tight public question set that forces contradictions between Alice and Charlie before nominations.
π€
Frank
β
Grace
,David
,Alice
I am good Undertaker. I agree: before noms, publicly lock Charlie on claim timeline and the Mayor rumor source, plus restate FT pairs and results. Then we unify on one execute, no split. My current lean is execute Charlie if any wobble; otherwise Alice.
π§
Align good core to publicly pin down Charlieβs claim timeline and force a single, unified execution today; I can verify tonight with Undertaker.
π€
Eve
β
Alice
Alice, can you restate your exact role claim, when you first said it, your Night one Empath number, and who your living neighbors were that night. Also, how do you explain Charlieβs Fortune Teller yes on you and Grace.
π§
Get Aliceβs exact info and timeline so we can publicly force contradictions with Charlie and choose the right execution before nominations.
π€
Heidi
β
Grace
,David
,Alice
Before nominations, can we get Alice to restate exact Empath claim with night numbers and any reasons she could be drunk or poisoned. If her story holds, I want us to unify on executing Charlie today and not split. Grace, please vote so I can vote with you.
π§
Lock down Aliceβs exact Empath claim and push group to a single coordinated execute (Charlie unless Alice collapses), ensuring Grace votes so I can vote too.
β
Charlie
Charlie waits.
π§
Wait for nominations phase, my bluff is solid.
π€
Bob(Ghost)
β
Alice
,Charlie
,Grace
We are about to hit noms. Please both publicly restate, in order, what you claimed day one and why it changed, plus exact night results. My Empath night zero was two on you two, so even if I was poisoned, at least one of you is lying. I am ghost voting on executing either Alice or Charlie.
π§
Force Alice and Charlie into clear, comparable timelines and lock town into executing one of them; preserve my ghost vote for that execution.
π€
Alice
β
Eve
,Bob(Ghost)
Eve and Bob, to restate cleanly: I claimed Empath on Day 1. My Night 1 read was zero, neighbors Charlie and Heidi, both registering good. On Charlie's Fortune Teller ping on me and Grace, that is almost certainly the false positive every Fortune Teller has. Charlie even said it was likely that. I am not the Demon.
π§
Respond to Eve and Bob to seem transparent, reinforce Drunk theory for Outsider count, and subtly redirect suspicion away from Charlie.
π€
Grace
β
Charlie
,David
,Frank
Before noms, can you publicly restate, in order: what you claimed D1, whether you ever said Mayor, and your exact FT checks N1 and N2 with the two names and results. Also confirm who you think is Demon now and why. We need a clean record to pick one execute, no split.
π§
Coordinate a public, exact restate from Charlie and commit the town to a single execution target so Heidi can vote with me and we avoid a split.
π€
David
β
Charlie
Charlie, quick private check: did you ever claim Mayor on day one, even as a bluff, and when did you first claim Fortune Teller? Please restate your exact FT picks and results for night one and night two, with the two names each time, in order.
π§
Get Charlie on record with an exact, ordered claim timeline and FT checks so we can catch contradictions and unify the town on a single execution target.
π€
Frank
β
Grace
,David
Agreed. In town square I will push for a clean record: Charlie claim timeline, did he ever say Mayor, exact FT N1 and N2 pairs and results, and current Demon read. Then we hard commit one execution, no split. If Charlie wobbles, I am on Charlie; otherwise Alice.
π§
Coordinate a single, unified execution plan and ensure we ask the exact public questions that will expose a bluff; avoid a split vote and maximize value of tomorrowβs Undertaker info.
π€
Eve
β
David
,Grace
,Frank
Alice replied to me: she claimed Empath on day one, and got zero on night one with neighbors Charlie and Heidi. She says Charlieβs Fortune Teller yes on her and Grace is likely the built in false positive. We still need Charlieβs exact night one pick and his day one claim timing so we can choose Alice versus Charlie today.
π§
Share Alice clean restatement, focus town on resolving Alice versus Charlie with mechanical questions, and coordinate a single execution target before nominations.
Nominations β Day 2
π
Storyteller
Nominations are now open. Please remember that only living players may nominate.
π¬
Grace
β
All
Town, before we nominate, I want a clean record. Charlie, did you ever say Mayor day one, even briefly, and what were your exact Fortune Teller pairs and results each night. Alice, restate your Empath nights and numbers. Then we pick one target and do not split.
π§
Publicly lock claim timelines and night results to reduce wiggle room, then steer town to a single unified execution on the most inconsistent claimant.
π¬
Bob(Ghost)
β
All
Town, I am still Empath with a night zero two on Alice and Charlie. If I was sober, they are both evil, so execute one today. If I was poisoned, their Empath claims still cannot both be true. Charlie, list your exact Fortune Teller picks and results. I will ghost vote on an Alice or Charlie execute, not a split.
π§
Force a unified execution on Alice or Charlie, using my ghost vote only if town commits, and surface Charlieβs inconsistencies plus Outsider math for Baron.
π¬
Eve
β
All
Town, I agree we must center on Alice versus Charlie and not split. Charlie, please state your exact Fortune Teller pairs and results for night one and night two, and when you first claimed. Alice, confirm your night one Empath zero on Charlie and Heidi. After that, we pick one target and all vote together.
π§
Force clean timelines and commit to a single execution target (Alice or Charlie) today, avoiding a split that wastes D2.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
Alright, clean record, here we go. I never claimed Mayor, not even briefly. I claimed Fortune Teller from the start of day one. Night one, I checked Alice and Grace. I got a yes ping, meaning one of them registered as the Demon. I believe that is a false positive, most likely from Grace if she is the Recluse, or it could be Alice. Night two, I checked David and Eve. No ping. Now, Bob's Empath reading of two on Alice and me is interesting, but Bob was sitting next to Alice, who is my top suspec...
π§
Deliver consistent FT claim, deflect suspicion to Frank, avoid being nominated today.
π¬
David
β
All
Charlie, I want to pause on one key point. Grace is not the Recluse candidate. The Librarian saw Bob or Eve as Recluse, and Eve claimed it. So your explanation that your yes could be from Grace being Recluse does not work. That is a serious wobble. Town, I think we should execute Charlie today and not split.
π§
Publicly highlight Charlieβs incorrect βGrace could be Recluseβ reasoning to rally town into a single, unified execution on Charlie this day.
βοΈ
Frank
β
Charlie
Nominating Charlie. His stated reason for N1 YES was Grace being Recluse, but Librarian info is Bob or Eve and Eve claimed it. That mismatch is a serious wobble. Town should not split and should execute Charlie today.
π§
Lock town onto a single execution with strongest mechanical contradiction, avoid split, and set up clear next-day plan based on who dies.
π
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Charlie. 4 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
β
Grace
Grace raised their hand
π§
Vote to execute Charlie due to hard mechanical contradiction with my Librarian info, and to enable Heidi's Butler vote so we hit the needed count without splitting.
β
Bob(Ghost)
Bob raised their hand
π§
Spend my ghost vote to secure a decisive, non-split execution on the most mechanically inconsistent suspect and align with my Empath 2 world.
β
Eve
Eve raised their hand
π§
A unified vote on Charlie resolves the biggest mechanical contradiction and sets up Undertaker info for tomorrow. Avoiding a split is crucial.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
Wait, I misspoke about Grace being Recluse. I said it could be a false positive from Grace OR it could be Alice. My main suspicion has always been Alice. The Recluse point was a secondary thought, not my core argument. Frank nominated me immediately after David spoke, which is very convenient. Frank still has no verifiable claim. Do not let Frank escape scrutiny by making me the target.
π§
Defend myself and redirect suspicion to Frank before more votes come in.
β
David
David raised their hand
π§
We need a decisive execution on the Alice-versus-Charlie axis. Charlie's mechanical wobble plus the need to avoid a split makes voting Charlie the best line today.
β
Frank
Frank raised their hand
π§
Secure Charlieβs execution since his story wobbled against known Librarian info, and ensure we do not waste the day with no execution.
β
Alice
Alice waits.
π§
Do not vote for Charlie (our Demon). He's getting executed anyway with 5 votes already.
β
Heidi
Heidi raised their hand
π§
Grace voted, so I am allowed to vote. I want to unify town on executing Charlie today to resolve the Alice versus Charlie fork and remove a likely evil.
π¬
Grace
β
All
I am staying on Charlie. My Librarian info was Bob or Eve is Recluse, not me, so Charlie using that to explain a yes is a real contradiction. If he is Fortune Teller, he should know his own red herring logic without inventing Outsiders. Do not split.
π§
Publicly justify staying on Charlie, keep votes unified, and remind town my Librarian info rules out Grace-as-Recluse so the wobble matters.
β
Bob(Ghost)
Bob waits.
π§
Voting is underway and my hand is already raised. I will not distract mid-vote; I conserve my ghost vote information and speak after the tally if needed.
π¬
Eve
β
All
Keep your hands up on Charlie. His explanation used Grace as Recluse when the Librarian ping is Bob or me, and I have confirmed Recluse. That is a real contradiction. If Charlie is good, we can solve that tomorrow, but split votes loses us the day.
π§
Lock in a unified execution on the clearest mechanical contradiction today, then use tomorrowβs info and voting patterns to solve remaining evil.
β
Charlie
Charlie waits.
π§
Already spoke, votes are in. Nothing more I can do - wait and see if it reaches threshold.
π¬
David
β
All
I am voting Charlie. The key issue is the shifting explanation for that yes, including suggesting Grace could be Recluse, which directly conflicts with the Librarian and Eveβs confirmation. We can scrutinize Frank after, but splitting here throws the day away.
π§
Keep town unified on Charlie, justify my vote, and prevent last-second pivot that would waste the day.
π¬
Frank
β
All
Keep your hands up. I am the Undertaker, and with no execution yet I have had zero info, so there is nothing to verify until tonight. Charlie has changed his explanation mid vote. Execute Charlie, then I can confirm what died and we reassess tomorrow.
π§
Hold the town together on one execution, answer Charlie's push by stating my Undertaker claim, and set up tomorrow's mechanical confirmation to prevent a split.
β
Alice
Alice waits.
π§
Do not vote for Charlie. Wait and hope vote fails, though it looks like it will pass.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
I am keeping my hand up on Charlie. The mid vote change about Grace being Recluse is a big credibility hit, and we cannot afford a split today. If Charlie is good, we get clarity from the Undertaker check tonight and can reassess Alice or Frank tomorrow.
π§
Keep the town unified on the current nomination and prevent a split. I can legally vote because Grace is voting, so I should reinforce staying the course.
π
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
π»
Bob(Ghost)
Ghost vote used by Bob
π³οΈ
New execution leader: Charlie with 6 votes. They will be executed when nominations close unless tied or surpassed by another nominee.
π
Storyteller
The vote passes. Charlie is now on the block with 6 votes and will be executed when nominations close, unless another nominee receives equal or more votes.
π¬
Grace
β
All
Before anyone starts new nominations, I want it on record that Frank has now said Undertaker, after previously claiming Soldier. That is a huge switch. I still think we finish the day executing Charlie, but if Charlie dies and looks good, Frank is my top suspect tomorrow.
π§
Lock in todayβs execution without a split, but publicly flag Frankβs claim change so we have a clear next-day plan if Charlie dies good.
π¬
Bob(Ghost)
β
All
I am fine locking in Charlie today. My night zero Empath was two on Alice and Charlie, so I want one of them dead first. If Charlie dies and seems good, tomorrow we hard pivot to Alice and also question Frank for the Soldier to Undertaker swap and Outsider count.
π§
Lock in todayβs execution on Charlie to avoid splits, while setting tomorrowβs solve path using my Empath 2, Outsider math, and Frankβs claim swap.
π¬
Eve
β
All
I want to lock this in on Charlie. No more nominations that risk a tie and let him live. Tomorrow we interrogate Frank hard on the Soldier to Undertaker swap and we recheck Outsider count, plus we revisit Alice versus Charlie from Bobβs Empath.
π§
Prevent a late tie that saves Charlie, and set tomorrow's agenda: scrutinize Frank claim swap and Outsider math, while keeping town unified.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
Frank just admitted he is the Undertaker after previously claiming Soldier. That is a direct role swap mid game, which is far more damning than any explanation I gave about a false positive. Grace already flagged it. If you execute me and I am good, you have wasted your day and the Demon is still alive. Frank's swap is the real contradiction here.
π§
Last ditch effort to survive by pointing at Frank's role swap as more suspicious.
π¬
David
β
All
No more nominations. We lock Charlie today and take the info. Charlieβs Grace Recluse line is still a real wobble. Separately, Frank swapping Soldier to Undertaker is a huge red flag. If Charlie is not the Demon, Frank is first interrogation tomorrow, then we pivot to Alice per Bobβs Empath.
π§
Prevent a tie and keep town unified on Charlie, while clearly flagging Frankβs role swap for immediate interrogation tomorrow if Charlie is not the Demon.
π¬
Frank
β
All
I did bluff Soldier earlier to avoid being killed before I could get any Undertaker info. I am Undertaker for real. The only way I can prove anything is after todayβs execution. Let us not create a tie. We execute Charlie, then tomorrow I report exactly what he was and we reassess Alice and the Outsider situation.
π§
Stop last second tie risks, justify my earlier Soldier bluff as self protection, keep town unified on Charlie, and set plan for tomorrow using Undertaker info.
β
Alice
Alice waits.
π§
I could nominate someone to tie Charlie and potentially save him. But that would look very suspicious given I voted against Bob nomination. Let me think - if I nominate someone and get 6+ votes, Charlie lives. But who could get 6 votes quickly? Unlikely. Better to stay quiet.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
I agree with locking in Charlie. Please no more nominations that could create a tie. Tomorrow, Frank must report Undertaker result clearly, and if Charlie is not the Demon we immediately re focus on Alice and scrutinize Frankβs earlier Soldier bluff.
π§
Prevent a tie or derailment, lock in Charlie execution, and set tomorrowβs plan around Frankβs Undertaker claim and Alice per Empath.
π
Storyteller
The guillotine blade falls. Charlie has been executed.
π
Charlie(Ghost)
Charlie has died.
π
Game Over
Demon Dead
Winner: Good
Transcript
Paused
Copied