Game Detail

I will poison Alice on Night 1 to neutralize any potential investigator or powerful role early in the game, buying our team time to maneuver.

First night, no info. Choosing spread non-adjacent Alice & Frank to efficiently cover board, identify Demon early or clear sections for process of elimination.

Share Washerwoman info with suspects to get Chef confirmation. Builds trust with good player, tests reactions for lies. Early alliances key to info sharing.

Day 1, no info yet. Whisper neighbors to exchange roles privately, build trust, gather starting info without public reveal. Saves time, forms core alliance.

Confirm my role to Eve, verifying her claim. Share Chef info privately to allies. With 0 evil pairs, we can deduce non-adjacent suspects later. Day 1 alliance building key.

Day 1 start: Privately share my strong clear on Alice/Frank to neighbors for trust/alliance. Prompt their roles/info to cross-verify and narrow Demon suspects.

Day 1, respond to David's whisper including me. Share true ability/info to form good alliance with David/Eve, gather their info, exclude Alice/Frank early.

I want to act cooperative while observing the claims. Acknowledging Frank's "Chef" info as "interesting" helps me blend in while I plan to disrupt their logic later. I need to be careful not to contradict the "no evil pairs" claim yet.

I want to establish my fake claim early and push a false narrative about David being good to build trust while keeping suspicion off my minion, Grace.

Day 1, respond to neighbors' whispers to share my safe Soldier role, build trust/alliance, probe Bob's claim for contradictions. Progress info before nominations.

Share Frank's valuable Chef info (0 evil pairs) with David/Charlie who reached out. Builds trusted good group, narrows suspects via no adjacent evils. Progress day1 info.

Continue private neighbor chat to get Bob's exact Investigator info on David. Reveal my Slayer role to build trust as good Townsfolk with execution power. Narrow evil suspects early.

Early day 1, nomination soon. Sharing verified Chef info (0 pairs) with reps from both chatting groups builds good alliances, progresses info sharing, and sets up logic chains for who can/can't be evil based on seating.

Consolidate info with trusted neighbors Charlie/Eve before nomination. Their claims align with mine, build alliance to share publicly and narrow Demon suspects using logic chains.

Respond to David/Eve, share logic narrowing suspects (Bob prime?), build trust with proven good chain to control nominations.

I want to build trust with Frank and Eve by "confirming" a role (Investigator) and pointing suspicion toward Alice, who I poisoned, making it easier for her to appear unreliable or like a Minion if she tries to claim a role.

Maintain the Investigator bluff and pivot to suspicion of others to keep heat off myself and Grace. Alice asked a leading question about 'Minion pair' for Investigator, which isn't how the role works, so I corrected her to maintain my credibility.

Question Bob's Investigator details to verify truth (wrong desc suspicious). Discuss Frank's Chef claim. Build trusted trio (me, Alice, Bob) sharing info early to narrow evils via logic, progress to noms.

Consolidate good info group (Charlie/David/Frank chain). With nomination imminent, agree to nominate Bob (clique outsider, no clears) to gain info/execute evil.

Challenge Bob's inaccurate claim privately with Heidi to expose lie or confusion without alerting evils. Build trust with neighbors, gather exact info on David/Frank to logic-chain.

With nomination soon, engage secretive Alice-B-H clique directly. Share verifiable Chef info + Grace suspicion to get their response, narrow suspects using adjacency constraint.

Last tick pre-nom. Bob top suspect per info/chains. Coordinate with trusted Charlie/Eve to nom Bob, narrow evils.

Confirm nomination of suspicious Bob with trusted allies David/Eve before nomination phase. He's unchained, clique-y, no info. Locks our good majority vote.

I am reinforcing my fake Investigator claim and casting doubt on Alice, who I poisoned, to keep her suspicious and off-balance.

I need to pivot my false claim to something plausible to regain trust. Admitting to a 'confusion' about role names is a common way to cover a mistake. I want to shift the focus onto Frank to create suspicion.

Clarify Bob's Librarian with Alice's Slayer claim to confirm David Outsider via logic chain. Discuss Frank's Chef/Eve verify to check consistency, narrow goods/evils before noms.

Publicly share verified Chef info to enable group logic on isolated evils, counter private groups, set up Day 2 chains without early execution risk.

Reveal Soldier publicly Day 1 to build trust. Confirm Bob Librarian/David Outsider fits Alice Slayer. Question Frank Chef 0 convenience, push for verification. Narrow suspects with logic before nominating.

I want to sound like a helpful townsfolk and not draw suspicion to myself while supporting the general discourse. I need to keep the heat off Bob.

Publicly reveal my Librarian info to counter Heidi's false claim that Bob is Librarian. Expose her lie, build trust with info group (David/Eve/Frank), progress to nominating the clique suspect (Bob/Heidi). Helps narrow evils.

Deflect from my flip-flopping and cast suspicion on Charlie for his aggressive 'Drunk' claim, which threatens my Minion Grace.

Alliance with Charlie/David/Frank to nominate suspicious Bob (clique, no info, Lib lie). Last tick Day1 - test him mechanically before night. Progress to narrow evils.

Defend myself against the nomination by discrediting Charlie and reaffirming my claimed role. I need to get people to not vote for me.

Bob's clique suspicious, conflicting Lib claim from trusted Charlie/Eve side. Vote executes potential evil or forces info. Day 1 test progresses game.

Publicly defend Bob to prevent execution of good player. Charlie's claim scummier than Bob's correction. Chain with Alice solid. Last tick, sway votes before night.

Bob is the Demon and is currently on the block. If I vote for him, I risk killing my own Demon. If I don't vote, I might look suspicious, but protecting the Demon is my primary objective. I will wait and see if he gets executed. If he does, I have to adapt, but for now, I should not help execute my own teammate.

Bob fake Lib claim directly contradicts me. In suspicious info-less clique. Heidi defends hard. Chef 0 pairs isolates him as possible lone evil. Vote exec to test/prove good team win path.

Our good team (me/Frank/Charlie/David/Grace) planned Bob nom as suspicious clique member with fake Lib claim vs Charlie. Frank/Charlie voted; I vote to push execution on likely evil, narrow field.

Bob top suspect in unconfirmed clique with fake Lib claim vs Charlie's. Good team voting: Frank/Charlie/Eve up, my vote makes 4 to execute and progress by testing.

Defend Bob to prevent day1 good execution. Solid neighbor chain > Charlie aggression. Progress by reinforcing logic publicly.

I am on the block and currently have 4 votes against me. I need to pivot the suspicion onto Charlie and Eve to survive the vote. My goal is to paint them as the evil pair.

4 votes already on Bob (me,Charlie,Eve,David). Grace waiting; speak to convince her. Secretive Alice/Bob/Heidi clique vs open info group. Test duplicate Lib claim to progress info.

4 votes on Bob already (Frank,Charlie,Eve,David); Grace waiting. Urge her no-vote publicly as neighbor, reinforce perfect chain vs Charlie's scummy day1 Drunk specificity. Save potential good Lib day1.

I need to sow doubt among the voters to prevent the 4th vote or sway someone to drop their hand, as my Demon (Bob) is currently on the block and has 4 votes. If I stop the execution, the Demon survives.

Grace is pivotal vote. Explain Lib contradiction and Drunk fit to Heidi Soldier claim. Secure her vote on Bob (4 already, but sway her) to execute top suspect Day 1.

Grace hesitant on Charlie day1 Drunk claim but Lib starts w/ that info. Urge her vote Bob to test clique lie vs our chain. 4 votes already, her yes executes suspicious Bob.

Push Grace to vote Bob. Our chain solid vs impossible evil chain. 4 votes already, her vote seals execution of top suspect Bob, clears path.

Expose David's impossible day1 FT claim (no night info possible) to discredit pro-exec team (David/Eve/Charlie/Frank), rally Grace against voting Bob. My Bob-Heidi chain solid, progress logic.

I need to highlight David's contradiction (Fortune Teller info before a night phase) to save myself from execution and cast doubt on my accuser.

David's impossible FT claim proves lie/evil. Bob's exec tests Lib but David more confirmed evil. Nominate him to shift execution or block for tomorrow; progress by targeting confirmed liar.

Defend by clarifying N0 FT info standard. Prevent my exec, push Bob as lying Lib in conflict w/Charlie. Bob clique evil hiding behind chains. Good team executes Bob.

I need to shift the town's attention and execution target to David. By highlighting that his claim about Fortune Teller information is impossible, I can frame him as the obvious liar and evil player, saving myself from execution.

David's false FT Night 0 claim is impossible for good player, proving lie/evil. Vote to put him on block or tie Bob, forcing test of liar in last tick before night.

David's fabricated FT N0 info is a massive lie proving evil. Frank nominated correctly. Raising to vote David, aiming to tie/surpass Bob's 4 votes to save likely good Librarian Bob and progress by testing real suspect.

I need to help secure the execution of David instead of my Demon, Bob. Voting for David is the best way to divert attention away from Bob and remove a potentially problematic good player who has just revealed themselves as a liar or incompetent.

Do not vote David (don't raise). Keeps him at 3 votes < Bob's 4. Executes lying Lib Bob day1, removes evil early. Progresses game safely with solid chains intact.

David's blatant lie proves evil. Voting executes him over Bob, whose Lib claim conflicts but unproven. Chains with my Washerwoman confirming Frank Chef 0 pairs, Charlie Lib. Ties/surpasses Bob, tests David.

David's impossible FT claim proves him evil. Vote to execute David (5th vote), surpass Bob to save good Lib & remove evil.

Clarify FT receives N0 info before D1 to debunk 'no night' claim. Prevent my execution as good FT; push Bob execution to test lying Lib claim. Save good info-giver.

I need to ensure David is executed instead of me to save myself and cast suspicion away from my Imp role. Since David is already on the block and currently has 5 votes, voting for him confirms his execution, which is my best path to survival.

Retract vote on likely-good David (N0 confirmed), publicly share Chef N0 to validate his claim and expose Bob's contradiction (votes evil target he cleared), refocus exec on duplicate Lib Bob to kill evil.

Charlie's Lib contradicted by my true Soldier role. Chef 0 isolates him as evil solo. David good neighbor. Lower to tie votes, avoid day1 good exec of Bob/David.

Defend the Demon (Bob) by discrediting David, who is currently being voted on. If I can shift the suspicion from Bob to David, Bob survives.

Bob confirmed fake Lib conflict. Ensure he executes by preventing David tie/surpass. Speak to urge lower hands on David, focus Bob liar independent of David's slip.

Lower hand to drop David votes below 4, prevent tie/pass Bob's 4. Exec Bob tests Lib claim safely with Chef 0 guaranteeing win outcome. Progress game.

Bob's Lib claim impossible as it forces lying David good (Out). Bob evil, must execute him. Lower hand to prevent David tying at 4 votes—Bob's 4 votes stand, he dies. Save Slayer shot for confirmed Demon later.

Bob lied about FT N0 (false) and Lib conflicts Charlie. Let him execute to remove liar, progress day1 by narrowing suspects via death info.

To deflect suspicion from myself by highlighting David's lie and undermining Charlie's push against me by framing it as misdirected aggression.

1 tick left, Bob executes. Use Chef 0 to prove Eve's clique accusation impossible unless Bob lying, confirming him suspicious. Progress by executing fake claimer Day 1.

Publicly confirm Soldier role to debunk Charlie's Lib claim directly (since I'm TF not Out). This proves Charlie lying (or Grace Out, unlikely). Sways votes off Bob, who chains well, prevents day1 good death.

I need to sow confusion and protect my Demon, Bob. By highlighting the contradiction between Heidi (who is defending Bob) and Charlie (who is pushing for Bob's execution), I can shift the focus away from Bob and onto the conflicting claims.

Bob fake Lib impossible good. Chains solid with Chef/Washer. Heidi Soldier contradicts Lib - she's lying. With 1 tick left, rally final votes to execute Bob, narrow evils.

Key deduction: adj Bob/Charlie + Lib conflict + Chef 0 = exactly 1 evil. Execute Bob tests which, confirms Chef, progresses Day 1 safely (1 evil dies or ID'd). Nears Demon.

Bob is evil (fake Lib, consistent with all info). With phase ending, wait for his execution to remove an evil player safely on Day 1 without wasting Slayer shot.