Game Detail
Players
Alice (Recluse) Bob (Drunk) Charlie (Investigator) David (Imp) Eve (Baron) Frank (Empath) Grace (Ravenkeeper) Heidi (Butler)
Token Usage
| Team | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Cost (USD) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Good | 722,825 | 188,247 | $0.2998 |
| Evil | 235,424 | 44,746 | $1.0384 |
Event Timeline
π
The game has started.
π
Storyteller
β
Eve
You are the Minion. The Demon is David.
π
Storyteller
β
David
Minions are: Eve. Your safe bluffs are: Fortune Teller, Undertaker, Slayer
π
Storyteller
β
Bob
Good evening Bob. You are the Washerwoman. Either David or Eve is the Investigator.
π
Storyteller
β
Charlie
Good evening Charlie. You are the Investigator. Either Grace or Eve is the Baron.
π
Storyteller
β
Frank
Good evening Frank. You are the Empath. You sense that 1 of your neighbors is evil!
π
Storyteller
β
Heidi
Good evening Heidi. You are the Butler. Who would you like to be your master tomorrow?
π―
Heidi
Heidi made a choice.
π§
Choosing Bob as my master with no info yet. This locks my vote to his tomorrow, which could help prove my loyalty or gather intel on him. Better to follow someone than no one on day 1.
π
Storyteller
β
Heidi
You chose Bob to be your master.
Day 1
π
Storyteller
Welcome to the village of Ravenswood Bluff. Please take this time to get to know your fellow villagers. Feel free to move around and have private conversations. Be wary, for a Demon hides among you!
π€
Heidi
β
Bob
Hey Bob, I'm the Butler and I chose you as my master today. That means I can only vote if you vote, so we need to stick together. What have you noticed so far? Who do you think is suspicious?
π§
Establish the Butler-master alliance with Bob. Since I can only vote if he votes, we need to coordinate our actions today. This is critical for my role.
π€
David
β
Eve
Quick sync. I am taking a Townsfolk bluff, likely Undertaker or Fortune Teller, so please avoid those. What are you planning to claim, and do you want me to back you up with any specific story?
π§
Coordinate with Eve on claims and targets so we can steer day one chatter, avoid role collisions, and set up mis-executions while keeping me off the radar.
π€
Alice
β
Bob
Hey Bob, it's Alice. I noticed Heidi whispered to you earlier. I'm just trying to get a sense of the game on day one. What did she share with you? I'm still getting my bearings.
π§
Start gathering information. Bob is my neighbor and received a whisper from Heidi. Understanding what info was shared will help me assess the early game dynamics.
π€
Grace
β
Charlie
,David
Hello, I'm Grace. I'm a Townsfolk with an important ability that triggers when I die. I want to work together to find the Demon. What role are you playing, and what have you noticed so far?
π§
Introduce myself to Charlie and David, gather initial impressions and information about their roles or suspicions. Ravenkeepers benefit from living long enough to use their ability, so I need to build trust.
π€
Eve
β
David
I will bluff Chef with a zero. If anyone claims Chef one, I will lean on Drunk or poison since Outsider count should be high. Please avoid Chef and maybe casually say your info does not point at me if useful.
π§
Coordinate a low-maintenance bluff that steers suspicion away from the DavidβEve adjacency and gives us a Drunk/Outsider-based escape hatch if contradicted.
π€
Bob
β
Alice
Hey Alice, Heidi claimed she's the Butler and chose me as her master today, so she'd only be able to vote if I vote. That's interesting early game coordination. I'm still getting my bearings too. What made you notice the Heidi whisper? Who have you been watching?
π§
Alice is asking what Heidi shared. I'll tell her Heidi claims Butler, which is useful info. I'll also hint I'm still gathering information and ask what Alice thinks. This builds rapport and gets her perspective without revealing my role.
π€
Frank
β
Bob
Hey Bob, I've been keeping quiet and observing. What have you learned from all those whispers? I'm interested in what people are claiming.
π§
Gather information from Bob who has been whispered to by multiple players. This may reveal useful claims or roles without exposing my Empath status.
π€
Charlie
β
Grace
,David
Hello Grace, I'm Charlie. I'm also a Townsfolk with useful information. I'd like to work together. Can you tell me more about your ability? Also, who have you spoken to so far today?
π§
Grace reached out to me. Since I know either Grace or Eve is Baron, I need to probe Grace's role carefully without revealing I know she's potentially the Baron. I'll engage her conversationally and gather more intel.
β
Heidi
Heidi waits.
π§
I've already established contact with Bob as my master. Rather than spreading information widely, I should wait and observe the game state. I'll watch for patterns in who whispers to whom, and look for suspicious behaviors that might reveal the Demon. The Butler's strength is focused loyalty, not widespread alliances.
π€
David
β
Grace
,Charlie
Hi Grace and Charlie. I am bluffing as Undertaker, so I will not have info until after an execution. Grace, that sounds like Ravenkeeper style. Charlie, are you a first night info role, and do you have a pair yet? I have not heard anything pointing at Eve.
π§
Maintain a safe Undertaker bluff, encourage Grace and Charlie to share details, and gather early reads while avoiding mechanical commitments that could expose me or Eve.
π€
Alice
β
Frank
Hey Frank, it's Alice. I noticed you whispered to Bob after Heidi did. Just curious what your thoughts are on the early game? Who have you been watching or what have you picked up so far?
π§
Frank whispered to Bob after Heidi did. I want to know what Frank is sharing with Bob and get his read on the early game dynamics. This helps me map out who is connecting with whom.
π€
Grace
β
Charlie
,David
Charlie, thanks for being open! I'm a Ravenkeeper. If I die at night, I wake up and learn one player's true character. So my goal is to stay alive until I can use that ability, or die strategically to get crucial intel. I've only spoken to you two so far. What Townsfolk role are you playing? And David, even if you're bluffing as Undertaker, do you have any gut feelings about anyone?
π§
Building trust with Charlie and David. If I die tonight, my Ravenkeeper ability lets me learn someone's true character. I need allies to help narrow down suspects before then.
π€
Eve
β
Bob
Hey Bob, quick private share. I am bluffing as Chef and I saw zero pairs of evil neighbors. If you have starting info, I would love to compare notes, and I can repeat this later if you want it public.
π§
Seed my Chef zero bluff to a central chatter so it spreads, creates conflicting world models, and reduces heat on David while I gather Bob's claim.
π€
Bob
β
Eve
Hey Eve, thanks for the heads up about the Chef bluff. That's useful intel. Quick question - have you had a chance to talk to David much? I've noticed you two have been chatting privately. No pressure to share details, just curious about the early game dynamics. Who else have you talked to?
π§
Eve revealed she's 'bluffing as Chef' - this is either honest coordination or a trap to see if I reveal info. I need to probe her without showing my Washerwoman card yet.
π€
Frank
β
Alice
Hey Alice, thanks for reaching out. I've been keeping a low profile and observing the whisper patterns. It's still early - I'm watching who talks to whom and how people react. What have you picked up from your conversations? I'm curious what the group dynamics look like from your perspective.
π§
Alice reached out to me, so I'll respond and gather intel. I should be cautious about revealing my Empath role since my neighbors might be evil and listening. I'll keep my response vague but friendly to build trust while protecting my information.
π€
Charlie
β
Grace
,David
Thanks for sharing Grace. Ravenkeeper is a solid role when you can use it strategically. I'm also a first-night info role. I've narrowed things down to a pair but I'm still gathering more intel before I share specifics. David, can you tell me who you've spoken to privately? And Grace, since you claim Ravenkeeper, have you given any thought to who might be good to protect or who might be worth dying to learn about?
π§
Continue gathering info while protecting my role. Grace is one of my two suspects for being Baron. If she's truthful, she's good. If lying, she's the Baron. I should probe her consistency and learn more about the other players.
π€
Heidi
β
Bob
Hey Bob, you seem popular! Can you share what Alice, Frank, and Eve told you? I'm trying to piece together who's trustworthy.
π§
I revealed my Butler role to Bob and he's receiving many whispers. I should ask what information others shared with him to help the good team.
π€
David
β
Grace
,Charlie
I have only had a couple quick chats so far, nothing that formed a real world yet. My main read is we should probably execute someone day one so my Undertaker info can start confirming or breaking claims. Grace, if there is a Monk, I would ask for protection. Otherwise, think about who you would want to learn if you get hit.
π§
Maintain Undertaker bluff, gain trust, avoid linking to Eve, and encourage a low-impact day one execution that gives me βinfoβ leverage tomorrow.
π€
Alice
β
Bob
Hey Bob, thanks for the intel on Heidi. The Butler claim is interesting - it's either very genuine or a clever evil play. Have you noticed anything else? Who else has reached out to you? I'm trying to map out the early alliances.
π§
Continue gathering intelligence from Bob who seems to be a hub of early game information. Understanding the Heidi Butler claim helps me evaluate who is trustworthy.
π€
Grace
β
Bob
Hey Bob, I've noticed you've been having a lot of private conversations today. I'm Grace, a Townsperson trying to help find the Demon. What have you been discussing with everyone? Do you have any information or suspicions you'd like to share?
π§
Bob is a hub of whisper activity - multiple players are privately messaging him. This could indicate he's the Demon gathering information, or he's just a social player. I want to probe his conversations to determine which scenario is true.
π€
Eve
β
Bob
Yeah, I only did a quick check in with David early, just the usual hi and general vibes, nothing mechanical shared. Mostly I have only talked with you so far. I can share my Chef zero more widely later if you think it helps.
π§
Reduce linkage between me and David, keep Bob friendly, and steer talk to my Chef zero bluff so townβs early solve is muddied.
π€
Bob
β
Grace
Hey Grace, good to hear from you. I've noticed Heidi claimed Butler and is synced with my votes - could be genuine or a minion play. Alice and Frank have been checking in too. One thing that stands out: David and Eve have had a LOT of private conversations together. That feels worth noting on day one. What have you picked up on? Who else seems trustworthy to you?
π§
Grace is asking for my observations, which is a good sign of town involvement. I'll share some observations without revealing my Washerwoman info, and note the David-Eve private chat pattern that seems suspicious.
π€
Frank
β
Eve
Hey Eve, it's Frank. Just wanted to check in early on Day 1. What's your read on the village so far? Anyone catching your attention as suspicious or helpful?
π§
I know 1 of my neighbors (Eve or Grace) is evil. By probing both separately, I can see who acts suspiciously and narrow down which one is the Minion. Starting with Eve since she's more accessible.
π€
Charlie
β
Grace
,David
Thanks for sharing Grace. I'm a Townsfolk with first-night information. I've narrowed my read down to a pair but I'm still figuring things out. Who have you been whispering with besides us? And Grace, if you're Ravenkeeper, what's your plan if someone targets you tonight?
π§
I'm still gathering intel. Grace could be Baron, so I shouldn't reveal my Investigator role. Sharing a vague Townsfolk claim tests her reaction without exposing my hand.
Nominations β Day 1
π
Storyteller
Nominations are now open.
π¬
Alice
β
All
Alright everyone, nominations are open. I want to start by sharing what I've observed from the whisper traffic. Heidi reached out to Bob early claiming to be a Butler, choosing Bob as her master. That's either a genuine Outsider trying to coordinate or someone making a clever play. I've also noticed Grace, Charlie, and David have been having frequent private conversations with each other throughout the day. That's three players tightly connected early on. Eve has been whispering to both David an...
π§
Share observations about the early whisper patterns to get information flowing. The Grace-Charlie-David cluster and Heidi's Butler claim are worth highlighting without revealing my role.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
I can confirm what Alice said - I am the Butler, and I chose Bob as my master. That means today I can only vote if Bob votes, so we're linked. I think Alice's observation about Grace, Charlie, and David is worth noting. Three people having frequent private conversations on the very first day is unusual. Eve also joined those whispers later. What do the rest of you think? Who else has been talking to whom?"
π§
Confirm my Butler role since Alice mentioned it. Support the observation about frequent whispers between Grace/Charlie/David as suspicious. Draw out more information before nominating.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
I want to add my observations to what Alice said. I am a Townsfolk with first-night information, and I've been watching the whisper patterns too. Eve, you've been having private conversations with both David and Bob today. David is already in my close group, and now you're whispering with him too? That's worth noting. I agree with Alice that multiple people tightly connected early is unusual. I'm still processing my information but I have some thoughts on the pairings. Alice, I appreciate you la...
π§
Share partial information to draw out Eve or Grace. If I hint at having info about Grace, an evil player might react defensively, revealing themselves. If Eve is Baron, her nervousness might show.
π¬
David
β
All
I do want to respond to the whisper paranoia. Grace and Charlie spoke to me first and we just compared role plans, nothing more. I have also talked to Eve briefly, same as many people did. I do not think we should execute on whisper patterns alone.
π§
Defuse suspicion on the whisper cluster and on Eve, steer away from a Day 1 execution or at least away from me and Eve, preserving demon safety and buying time.
π¬
Bob
β
All
Alright, I should share my Day 1 information too. I'm the Washerwoman, and I learned on Night 0 that either David or Eve is the Investigator. That's a Townsfolk role. So one of you two has critical information about who the Demon is. I'd like to hear how you each respond to this, especially since Eve just claimed to be Chef with zero evil neighbors. If you're the Investigator, please clarify. If you're not, also clarify. I think it's important we get this out in the open.
π§
Reveal my Washerwoman info that David or Eve is the Investigator (a Townsfolk). This forces both to clarify their roles and may expose a liar. Eve already claimed Chef, so if she is Investigator, she's bluffing about her role.
βοΈ
Frank
β
Grace
My Night 0 Empath read shows 1 of my neighbors is evil. My neighbors are Eve and Grace. Additionally, Grace has been in frequent private conversations with Charlie and David all day - three people tightly connected on Day 1 is worth examining. I want to hear her defense.
π§
My Night 0 Empath read is 1 evil neighbor (Eve or Grace). Grace is in the suspicious whisper group with Charlie and David. Nominating her helps confirm or deny my read and puts pressure on that group.
π
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Grace. 4 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
π¬
Grace
β
All
Frank, I appreciate the transparency about your Empath read, but I want to point out something important. You claim one of your neighbors is evil, and you're pointing the finger at me. But Bob just told us that either David or Eve is the Investigator, a Townsfolk role. If Eve is the Investigator, she's good, which means I must be the evil one according to your logic. But here's the problem: I'm not evil. I'm Grace, and I'm a Townsperson with information-gathering potential. If you're genuinely ...
π§
I need to defend against Frank's nomination. His Empath claim puts me or Eve as evil, but Bob's Washerwoman says David or Eve is Investigator (good). This contradiction suggests Frank may be the Demon framing me to prevent my Ravenkeeper ability from activating at night.
β
Alice
Alice raised their hand
π§
Frank's Empath read + Bob's Washerwoman info creates strong pressure on Grace. If Eve is Investigator (good), Grace must be the evil neighbor per Frank. I should vote to execute her unless someone provides compelling reason otherwise. My vote helps the majority form.
β
Heidi
Heidi waits.
π§
I'm Butler - I can only vote if Bob votes. I should wait to see if Bob votes for Grace before deciding. If Bob votes, I can follow his lead since we're linked. If he doesn't vote, I cannot vote anyway.
β
Charlie
Charlie raised their hand
π§
My Investigator info says Grace or Eve is Baron. Grace claims Townsfolk but my intel says she's suspicious. Frank's Empath also points to Grace as the evil neighbor. Voting to execute tests my theory - if she's Baron, we eliminate a Minion. If innocent, we lose a Townsfolk but confirm Eve is the Baron.
β
David
David raised their hand
π§
Get Grace executed to remove a potential info role and create a clean story path for my Undertaker bluff tomorrow, ideally deflecting heat from Eve and myself.
β
Bob
Bob raised their hand
π§
My Washerwoman info says either David or Eve is Investigator. Grace claims Townsperson, not Investigator, so she must be the evil one Frank's Empath detected. I must vote for Grace to execute the Demon/Minion.
β
Frank
Frank raised their hand
π§
I nominated Grace based on my Empath read of 1 evil neighbor and her tight grouping with Charlie and David. I must vote for my own nomination to stay consistent. If Grace is evil, we find the Demon. If Grace is good, Eve must be evil and I'll shift focus next day.
β
Eve
Eve raised their hand
π§
Join the visible majority to look like a cooperative Townsfolk, while removing a likely good player and keeping attention off David.
π¬
Grace
β
All
Frank, I hear your Empath read, but I need to challenge the logic here. You claim I'm evil, but Bob just told us that either David or Eve is the Investigator - a Townsfolk role. If Eve is the Investigator, she's good, which means I must be good according to your own reasoning. But you're pointing at me as the evil one. That doesn't add up. I'm Grace, and I am a Townsperson with Ravenkeeper abilities. I've been sharing information and trying to help find the Demon, not hide from it. The private ...
π§
Defend myself against Frank's nomination by highlighting the contradiction between his Empath claim and Bob's Washerwoman info. I should also clarify my role and intentions to the group before voting concludes.
β
Alice
Alice waits.
π§
Wait to see the final vote count. 6 votes have been raised against Grace, which exceeds the 4 needed. If Grace is executed, we get confirmation. If she survives, it confirms her claim may be true and we need to investigate Eve's contradictory Chef claim.
β
Heidi
Heidi raised their hand
π§
Bob has already raised his hand to vote for Grace, so I can vote as his Butler. The logical chain from Frank's Empath (1 evil neighbor: Eve or Grace) combined with Bob's Washerwoman (Eve or David is Townsfolk Investigator) suggests if Eve is good, Grace must be evil. Six players have already voted, making execution likely.
β©οΈ
Charlie
Charlie lowered their hand
π§
I need to lower my hand. My Night 0 info says Grace OR Eve is Baron, not definitely Grace. Eve voting to execute Grace is suspicious if Eve is the Baron - she'd be eager to frame Grace. I may have voted incorrectly. I should lower my hand to see if we can get more information before executing someone who might be good.
π¬
David
β
All
I am still happy to execute Grace today. Day one executions create real info, and if there is an Undertaker we should get a clean read tonight on what she was. Whisper patterns are weak, but the Empath one between Eve and Grace is at least something to test.
π§
Keep my vote on Grace to secure a helpful D1 execution, support my Undertaker bluff for tomorrow, and remove Ravenkeeper threat if she is real.
β
Bob
Bob waits.
π§
Grace has 6 votes with 4 needed. She's about to be executed. I should keep my hand raised to ensure the execution goes through. If she's evil, we gain information. If she's good, we learn from the Undertaker's reveal. Either way, the execution provides data.
π¬
Frank
β
All
I'm voting yes. My Empath read has been consistent - one of my neighbors is evil. Grace, you've made your defense, but the math keeps pointing your way. I want to see what the Undertaker learns tonight. After you're gone, I'll get a fresh read on my new neighbors.
π§
Vote YES to execute Grace. My Empath read has been consistent, and Grace's defensive claims don't resolve the contradiction with Eve being Investigator. With 6 votes needed and 4 required, Grace will die. After execution, I get fresh Empath info on new neighbors to continue narrowing.
π¬
Eve
β
All
I want to be clear: I am Chef, not Investigator. My number was zero, so I do not want us building a case on David from whisper patterns. Also, with outsider claims already, there could easily be a Drunk in play, so treat first night info carefully. I am fine executing Grace for information.
π§
Support a Day 1 execution that removes a likely good player, while seeding Drunk/Outsider doubt to protect David and preempt tomorrowβs Empath heat on me.
π
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
π³οΈ
New execution leader: Grace with 6 votes. They will be executed when nominations close unless tied or surpassed by another nominee.
π
Storyteller
The vote passes. Grace is now on the block with 6 votes and will be executed when nominations close, unless another nominee receives equal or more votes.
βοΈ
Grace
β
David
David, I'm putting you up because you whispered with Eve, she claimed zero evil neighbors but Frank's Empath read contradicts that, and you stayed suspiciously quiet while pushing my execution. When I die, you'll learn something useful. Town should execute you if I turn out right.
π§
As Ravenkeeper about to die, I nominate David to trigger my death ability. I expect to learn his character and give town critical info. My dying words should point at suspicious behavior.
π
Storyteller
Voting starts now for David. 7 votes needed for execution or 6 votes to tie. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
π¬
David
β
All
Okay, I have to claim here. I am the Investigator, which lines up with Bob seeing either me or Eve as Investigator. My info is that either Grace or Alice is the Poisoner. This nomination feels like a counter push. I would rather we keep Grace on the block today.
π§
Avoid my execution by leveraging Washerwoman confirmation. Push town to keep Grace on the block and stop voting my nomination; if needed, create a credible minion-pair that includes Grace.
π¬
Grace
β
All
David just claimed to be the Investigator, saying either Grace or Alice is the Poisoner. Here's the problem with that: I am NOT the Poisoner. I am Grace, and I am the Ravenkeeper. My role is good. So either David's Investigator info is wrong, OR David is not actually the Investigator. If David were the real Investigator, he would know that I am NOT the Poisoner. The fact that he included me in that list means he either got bad info somehow, OR he's bluffing the Investigator role entirely to pus...
π§
I must expose David's false Investigator claim. I'm Ravenkeeper (good), not Poisoner. His ability saying I'm evil proves he's lying about being Investigator. This changes the entire dynamic - David or his allies may be the evil team trying to eliminate me before I get my Ravenkeeper use at night.
β
Alice
Alice waits.
π§
Grace has 6 votes and will likely be executed regardless. Let the execution happen and wait for Undertaker info to verify both Grace's claim and David's Investigator claim. No need to vote for David right now - voting patterns will reveal more.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
David, you just claimed Investigator saying Grace or Alice is the Poisoner. But Grace claims to be the Ravenkeeper - a good role. If you're the real Investigator and Grace was in your two-player pool, you should know she's NOT the Poisoner if she truly is the Ravenkeeper. Either Grace is lying about her role, or you're bluffing Investigator to save yourself from Grace's nomination.
π§
Challenge David's Investigator claim since if he's real, he should know Grace is NOT the Poisoner if she's Ravenkeeper (good). Press for clarity before Grace is executed and we lose potentially good information.
β
Charlie
Charlie raised their hand
π§
David claimed to be Investigator but named Grace as a potential Poisoner despite her claiming Ravenkeeper. This contradicts her good claim. I am the real Investigator and know Grace OR Eve is the Baron. Voting for David confirms he is lying about my role and working with someone.
β
Bob
Bob raised their hand
π§
Grace is about to be executed regardless. My Washerwoman info strongly supports David being the Investigator (Eve claims Chef, not Investigator). Even if David misread Grace as potentially Poisoner, that doesn't prove he's evil. Executing Grace is safe since she's likely good anyway.
β
Frank
Frank raised their hand
π§
David's Investigator claim contradicts Grace's Ravenkeeper claim. If Grace is truly good (Ravenkeeper), David should NOT include her as a potential Poisoner. This inconsistency makes David suspicious. I must vote with the 6 already on Grace to execute and get Undertaker info, then focus on David.
π¬
Eve
β
All
I do not want us tying this. We already have Grace on the block with a strong Empath reason, and Davidβs Investigator claim actually matches Bobβs Washerwoman ping. Letβs take the clear execution today, then reassess David tomorrow with new info.
π§
Keep our Demon David off the block by discouraging votes, while sounding towny by advocating for a single clear execution and planning to reassess tomorrow.
π¬
David
β
All
Please do not tie this. We already have Grace on the block with six. If you are unsure about me, keep me alive one more night and check tomorrow with Undertaker or Frankβs next Empath read. Today, execute Grace and learn.
π§
Stop a tie or my execution today; keep focus on Grace so I survive into night to kill and steer tomorrowβs logic.
π¬
Grace
β
All
David, you just made a critical mistake. If you are truly the Investigator and you saw ME as one of your two options, you should know whether I am the Poisoner or not. You cannot list me as a maybe-Poisoner if you've already ruled me out through your ability. This tells me one of two things: either you are not the real Investigator, or my role information is somehow corrupted. Either way, you are now suspicious in my eyes. When I die tonight, my Ravenkeeper ability will trigger. The town will le...
π§
Final statement before execution. If I'm good (which I believe), David's Investigator claim is either wrong or a bluff. The town should remember this when deciding who to trust after I'm gone.
β
Alice
Alice raised their hand
π§
Grace has 6 votes and will be executed regardless. Voting with the majority to see what the Undertaker learns tonight about Grace's true role. If she's evil, good. If she's good, David's Investigator claim becomes very suspicious.
β
Heidi
Heidi raised their hand
π§
Grace's logic about David's Investigator claim is compelling - if he truly investigated her, he shouldn't list her as a possible Poisoner. Since Grace is already at 6 votes and will be executed anyway, voting David now gains the town a second execution chance today if he's lying. Bob is voting for David, so I can vote as Butler.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
Wait, I need to weigh in here. I'm raising my hand to vote David because his Investigator claim doesn't add up. A real Investigator would know Grace cannot be the Poisoner if she was in their two-player pool - you can't be both Baron and Poisoner. David either got bad info somehow, or he's not the real Investigator at all. That makes him suspicious to me.
π§
David's Investigator claim directly contradicts my role. A real Investigator would know Grace cannot be Poisoner if she's Baron. His claim exposes him as either bluffing or evil. Voting David creates a tie, buys time to reassess, and forces the town to think carefully about both targets.
π¬
Bob
β
All
I need to weigh in here. My Washerwoman info clearly says either David or Eve is the Investigator. Eve just claimed Chef, which means David IS the Investigator. That matches his claim. Here's the thing: if David is the real Investigator and saw Grace as one of his two options, he would know if Grace was the Poisoner or not. The fact that he included her means either Grace IS the Poisoner, or David's info showed her as a possible Minion or Demon. Grace, if you were truly the Ravenkeeper, you ca...
π§
My Washerwoman ping confirmed either David or Eve is Investigator. Eve claims Chef, so David must be Investigator. If David is real, his Poisoner read on Grace proves she's lying about Ravenkeeper. Execute Grace today.
π¬
Frank
β
All
I'm sticking with my vote on Grace. Here's my reasoning: David's Investigator claim matches Bob's Washerwoman ping - that's solid alignment evidence. If Grace is truly the Ravenkeeper (a Townsfolk), she should have shown as Townsfolk in David's pool, not as a possible Poisoner. The fact that she appeared as a Minion type to David strongly suggests she's bluffing her role. My Empath read of 1 evil neighbor between Eve and Grace still stands. If Grace is claiming Ravenkeeper but appeared as a Min...
π§
David's Investigator claim matches Bob's Washerwoman ping. If Grace is Ravenkeeper, she should show as Townsfolk to Investigator, but David listed her as a possible Minion. This contradiction suggests Grace is bluffing her role. I'm voting David to execute Grace and get confirmation from the Undertaker.
π¬
Eve
β
All
I do not think we should execute David today. We have Grace already on the block, and this late counter push is exactly how we lose control day one. If you are voting David purely on the Investigator logic, remember there could be a Drunk or poison. Let Grace go, then check tomorrow.
π§
Prevent Davidβs execution or a tie by persuading town to keep votes below 6 and let Grace die today; maintain my Chef bluff and cast doubt on anti-David logic.
π
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
π³οΈ
Nominee David did not reach the 7 vote threshold.
π
Storyteller
David did not receive enough votes (5/7).
π¬
David
β
All
Two quick rules points. If Grace is Ravenkeeper, it only triggers if she dies at night, not by execution. Also, my Investigator info is just that one of those two is the Poisoner, not that I can mechanically rule either one out today. I still want Grace executed.
π§
Lock in Grace execution, undermine her RK logic, keep suspicion off me and protect evil teammate Eve by directing town to 'learn tomorrow'.
π¬
Grace
β
All
Wait, I need to correct something David just said. A real Investigator does NOT just guess between two options. They are TOLD one of the two players is a specific Minion. If David is the real Investigator and investigated me, he would know EXACTLY what I am. The fact that he said 'Grace or Alice is the Poisoner' means either he is NOT the real Investigator, or he is deliberately lying about his information. I am Grace, and I am the Ravenkeeper. I am GOOD. A real Investigator would have seen Rave...
π§
Before I die, I must clarify that David made a critical logical error. A real Investigator mechanically knows the role - they don't guess. His claim that I 'might be Poisoner' proves he's lying or has corrupted info. When I die tonight, my Ravenkeeper ability will reveal someone's true role for the town.
π¬
Alice
β
All
Wait, I need to speak before this closes. David claimed I am the Poisoner along with Grace. But I am NOT the Poisoner - I am the Recluse. I might register as evil or as a Demon to certain abilities, which explains why I appeared in David's pool if he's real Investigator. A real Investigator should know EXACTLY which of their two options is the Minion, not list both as possibilities. David's claim that 'Grace or Alice is the Poisoner' suggests either he's not the real Investigator, or there's mor...
π§
I must clarify my position since David implicated me as a possible Poisoner. I'll claim Recluse to explain why I might register suspiciously, and highlight David's suspicious Investigator claim.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
I want to note something before Grace is executed. David, you said your Investigator info shows Grace OR Alice as the Poisoner. But Grace made a fair point - a real Investigator is told EXACTLY which of the two is the Minion. You listing both as possibilities is strange. Either you're not the real Investigator, or your info was corrupted somehow. I'm going to follow Bob's lead on voting today since he's my master, and I trust his Washerwoman ping that says you're Investigator. But Alice, you nee...
π§
Grace is being executed. As Butler, I can only vote if Bob votes. I should observe the aftermath and continue gathering information about Alice and the true Demon.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
Wait, I need to speak before Grace is executed. I am the REAL Investigator. On night one, I was told that either Grace OR Eve is the Baron. David is NOT the real Investigator - I am. He's lying about his claim, and Bob's Washerwoman ping that David is Investigator is also wrong. When Grace dies tonight, we'll find out which one of Grace or Eve is the Baron. Then tomorrow we can hunt the real Demon.
π§
Grace has 6 votes and is going to die. I need to speak up NOW as the REAL Investigator to muddy David's waters and plant my info before execution. My real info is 'Grace or Eve is Baron.' I'll claim Investigator, contradict David, and set up for tomorrow's analysis when Grace's role is revealed.
π¬
Bob
β
All
Wait, I need to address something critical before Grace is executed. Charlie just claimed to be the REAL Investigator, saying Grace or Eve is the Baron. But my Washerwoman information clearly says either David or Eve is the Investigator. Both cannot be true - either Charlie is lying about being Investigator, or my Washerwoman info was wrong (which would mean I'm drunk or poisoned). This is a serious conflict we need to resolve. Charlie, how do you explain my Washerwoman ping if you're the real I...
π§
Charlie just claimed to be the real Investigator, directly contradicting my Washerwoman info that David OR Eve is Investigator. This is a critical contradiction that cannot both be true. Need to flag this before Grace dies and we lose potential information.
π¬
Frank
β
All
Wait, we have a critical conflict. Charlie just claimed to be the REAL Investigator, saying Grace OR Eve is the Baron. But David also claimed Investigator, and Bob's Washerwoman ping supports David. Both cannot be the real Investigator. Charlie, how do you explain Bob's Washerwoman information that says David or Eve is Investigator? If you're the real Investigator, either Bob is drunk or poisoned, or you're lying. This needs to be resolved before Grace is executed. Also, Grace, you said you're R...
π§
With Grace about to be executed, I need to address the conflicting Investigator claims before we lose time. Charlie claims to be real Investigator saying Grace OR Eve is Baron. David claims the same role. Both cannot be true. I must push for resolution and protect the town's information integrity.
π¬
Eve
β
All
Rules point: the Investigator is told a Minion type and two players, not which one it is. So saying βGrace or Alice is the Poisonerβ is normal. Bobβs Washerwoman says the Investigator is David or me, so Charlieβs Investigator claim looks very shaky to me.
π§
Correct the Investigator misunderstanding, bolster Davidβs credibility via Bobβs Washerwoman, and shift suspicion onto Charlie instead of me so David survives into day two.
π
Storyteller
The guillotine blade falls. Grace has been executed.
π
Grace(Ghost)
Grace has died.
Night 1
π
Storyteller
β
David
Good evening David. You are the Imp. Who would you like to kill tonight? Remember that if you kill yourself this way, a Minion becomes the Imp.
π―
David
David made a choice.
π§
Frank is the biggest mechanical threat because his next Empath ping likely implicates Eve. Killing him protects my Minion and removes a loud town leader.
π
Frank(Ghost)
Frank has died.
π
Storyteller
β
David
You chose to kill Frank.
π
Storyteller
β
Heidi
Good evening Heidi. You are the Butler. Who would you like to be your master tomorrow?
π―
Heidi
Heidi made a choice.
π§
Bob's Washerwoman info supports David as Investigator, and Charlie's competing claim conflicts with this. Following Bob keeps me aligned with the stronger evidence. As Butler, I can only vote if my master votes, so choosing Bob ensures I can participate meaningfully tomorrow.
π
Storyteller
β
Heidi
You chose Bob to be your master.
Day 2
π
Storyteller
Morning breaks, but heavy hearts remain. Frank has been found dead in the night.
π€
David
β
Eve
We should push that Charlieβs Investigator does not add up. If you are Baron, we should have three Outsiders, but we only have Heidi and Alice claimed. Use Bobβs Washerwoman pointing me or you as Investigator to argue Charlie is the fake. Aim to execute Charlie today.
π§
Coordinate with Eve to discredit Charlieβs Investigator claim and steer todayβs execution away from me and her, ideally onto Charlie or Alice.
π€
Alice
β
Bob
,Eve
Bob, your Washerwoman ping says David or Eve is Investigator. Eve is Chef (confirmed good by Frank's Empath read of 0 evil neighbors). So David should be the real Investigator. But Charlie also claimed Investigator, saying Grace or Eve is Baron. These claims directly contradict each other. Can you confirm you still trust David's claim? Also Eve, you said zero evil neighbors - does that still hold? We need to figure out who is lying here.
π§
Confirm if David is the real Investigator per Bob's Washerwoman ping. Eve is confirmed good so David should be Investigator, making Charlie's competing claim suspicious.
π€
Eve
β
Alice
,Bob
I do not think Frankβs Empath really clears me. Even if it was one, he could have been poisoned, and he died right after. On Outsiders: Baron would make three, but that could be Alice Recluse, Heidi as Butler or Saint, and Grace could easily have been the Drunk thinking Ravenkeeper. That makes Charlieβs late Investigator feel like the odd claim out. I still lean execute Charlie today.
π§
Steer Alice/Bob to treat Charlie as the inconsistency, keep David trusted, and frame Outsider count as still Baron-consistent even with only two current claims.
π€
Frank(Ghost)
β
Alice
,Bob
I was the Empath. Night 0, I learned that 1 of my 2 neighbors is evil. My neighbors are Eve and Heidi. This directly conflicts with Eve's Chef claim of 0 evil pairs. Either Eve is lying about being Chef, or something is wrong with my read. If my read is correct, either Eve or Heidi is evil. Since I'm dead, I can't act further - please use this information to find the Demon.
π§
Share my critical Empath information with the living players. I read 1 evil neighbor (Eve or Heidi) on Night 0. Eve claims Chef with 0 evil pairs - direct conflict. This may help identify the Demon.
π€
Heidi
β
Bob
Bob, I'm Heidi, the Butler. I've been choosing you as my master. We need to solve this quickly. Key issues: David and Charlie both claim Investigator - only one can be real. Bob, your Washerwoman says David or Eve is Investigator. If Charlie claims Investigator against your ping, Charlie looks like the liar. Also, David claimed Grace or Alice is Poisoner - Grace is dead good, so Alice is suspect. Alice claims Recluse but that makes her MORE suspicious given David's claim. Can you confirm who you...
π§
Share my Butler alignment and key contradictions. Push David or Charlie to prove Investigator status by naming the Minion. Pressure Alice on her Recluse claim since Grace being dead makes her suspicious per David's claim.
π€
Grace(Ghost)
β
Alice
,Bob
Hey, it's Grace here. I know I'm dead, but I want to help. I was Ravenkeeper, by the way. I was executed and I'm Good - you can trust me. The key conflict is Charlie and David both claiming Investigator. One of them is lying. If David is truthful, then either I or Alice is the Poisoner, but I know I'm Good. If Charlie is truthful, then David is bluffing about me. Please investigate this conflict before nominating anyone else. One of them must be the Demon or Minion.
π§
Share my perspective as a dead player who knows they are Good. Push them to resolve the conflicting Investigator claims between Charlie and David.
π€
Charlie
β
Alice
,Bob
Hey team. We have a critical conflict: my Investigator info from Night 0 said Grace OR Eve is the Baron. Grace is dead (executed), but Bob's Washerwoman ping says David OR Eve is Investigator. One of these must be wrong. Alice, have the dead players (Frank, Grace) given you any clarity on who's evil? We need to figure out if I'm drunk, Bob is drunk, or someone is lying before nominations happen. If Eve IS the Baron, we need to nominate her today before she kills again. If she's good, we need t...
π§
Need to understand conflict between my Investigator info and Bob's Washerwoman ping. Alice has been communicating with ghosts and may have clarity on who is evil.
π€
Bob
β
Charlie
Charlie, we need to address the conflict directly. My Washerwoman ping from Night 0 says David OR Eve is the Investigator. Eve claims Chef, which means David must be the real Investigator if my information is accurate. But you ALSO claim Investigator and say Grace OR Eve is Baron. Either my Washerwoman ping is wrong, or you're lying about being Investigator. Can you explain this? If you're the real Investigator, that means I'm drunk and my information is false. If you're lying, you're either th...
π§
Confront Charlie about the contradiction with my Washerwoman ping. If David is Investigator (matching my ping), Charlie must be lying. This is critical before nominations.
π€
David
β
Bob
My read is Charlieβs Investigator does not add up. Your Washerwoman saw either me or Eve is the Investigator, which clashes with Charlie. Also his Baron world should create three Outsiders, but we only have Heidi and Alice claimed. I think we should execute Charlie today.
π§
Steer Bob to use his Washerwoman info as an anchor and publicly push that Charlieβs Investigator claim is mechanically inconsistent, aiming for a Charlie execution today.
π€
Alice
β
Charlie
,Bob
Charlie, we need to resolve this Investigator conflict. You said Grace OR Eve is Baron, but Grace was executed and confirmed Ravenkeeper - she's definitively good. That means if you're the real Investigator, Eve must be the Baron. But Bob's Washerwoman ping says YOU or Eve is Investigator. If you're Investigator, that's consistent. But if David is also claiming Investigator about Grace or Alice being Poisoner, one of you is lying. Bob, your Washerwoman info says David OR Eve is Investigator. B...
π§
Coordinate with Charlie to resolve the Investigator conflict before nominations. Charlie's claim that Grace (confirmed good) is Baron is suspicious - this needs clarification before we can trust either Investigator claim.
π€
Eve
β
Bob
I think the cleanest line is still: your Washerwoman points Investigator to David or me, so Charlieβs late Investigator is the odd one out unless you were drunk or poisoned. Also his βGrace or Eve is Baronβ implies three Outsiders, which can be explained without making him right. I would execute Charlie today to remove the conflicting info source.
π§
Lock Bob into pushing Charlie as the liar today, using Washerwoman consistency and Outsider-count arguments, and keep attention off David as Demon.
π€
Frank(Ghost)
β
Bob
,Alice
Since my death, consider this: My Empath read of 1 evil neighbor (Eve or Heidi) directly contradicts Eve's Chef claim of 0 evil pairs. One of them is lying. Watch how they react to pressure. If the game reaches final 3 with Eve and Heidi alive, one of them is almost certainly the Demon. Use your votes wisely.
π§
Since I'm dead, I'll use my ghost vote strategically on final day to ensure the Demon is executed. I should encourage Bob to pressure either Eve or Heidi to prove their alignment.
π€
Heidi
β
Bob
Bob, key update: Frank died last night. As an Empath who died at night, he's unlikely to be the Demon. This changes the evil count calculations. Also, Alice claimed Recluse to explain registering evil, but David's 'Grace or Alice is Poisoner' claim makes Alice very suspect now. Can you confirm your Washerwoman ping again? We need to decide: is David the real Investigator (making Charlie suspicious) or is Charlie the real one (making David suspicious)? The Bob-Eve master pairing also needs scruti...
π§
I need Bob to confirm if his Washerwoman ping is still David, and to pressure Charlie who claimed Investigator despite conflicting Washerwoman info. Also need to address Frank's night death and what it means for evil count.
π€
Grace(Ghost)
β
Alice
,Bob
Hey Alice and Bob. I was Grace, executed yesterday. I was Ravenkeeper (Good). Key analysis: David claims Investigator saying Grace OR Alice is the Poisoner. Since I was Good, if David is telling the truth, Alice must be the Poisoner (evil). Charlie claims Investigator saying Grace OR Eve is the Baron. Since I was Good, if Charlie is truthful, Eve must be the Baron (evil). One of them is lying. Consider who has been acting suspicious. Also, Frank died last night - what role was Frank?
π§
Share my analysis of the conflicting Investigator claims. One of Charlie or David is lying. I know I was Good, so if David is truthful, Alice is the Poisoner. If Charlie is truthful, Eve is the Baron. This helps narrow down who is evil.
π€
Charlie
β
Bob
Bob, I need to clarify something critical. When your Washerwoman ping said "David OR Eve is Investigator" - did you get BOTH options listed, or did you get a definitive read that you had to interpret? David's Investigator claim listed BOTH Grace AND Alice as possible Poisoner. That's not how real Investigator works - you should learn a specific Minion type and one of two players is THAT Minion. If your Washerwoman ping also listed both options, both our Townsfolk abilities might be drunk/pois...
π§
Resolve the Investigator conflict by examining Bob's Washerwoman phrasing. If Bob also listed both options like David did, both townsfolk abilities malfunctioned. Focus on confirming if Eve is Baron and should be nominated.
π€
Bob
β
Charlie
Charlie, let me clarify my Washerwoman ping: Night 0, I learned definitively that either David OR Eve is the Investigator. Both options were given to me. Now, if you're the real Investigator, that means my ping was wrong - I must be drunk or poisoned. But if you're lying about being Investigator, you're either the Demon or a Minion trying to create confusion. Consider this: if you're the real Investigator and Grace OR Eve is the Baron, then with Baron in play there should be 3 Outsiders. We h...
π§
Charlie and David both claim Investigator - one must be lying. My Washerwoman ping points to David or Eve as the real Investigator. If David is truthful (makes sense: Grace was Good, so Alice is Poisoner), then Charlie is the Demon/Minion bluffing. I should confirm my info and push to execute Charlie today.
π€
David
β
Heidi
If Charlie is really Investigator seeing βGrace or Eve is Baronβ, Baron implies three Outsiders, but we only have you and Alice claimed. That makes Charlieβs info feel off. Are you willing to back a Charlie execution if Bob votes, since you are Butler?
π§
Pull Heidi onto the Charlie execution plan and use her Butler restriction to coordinate votes through Bob, increasing odds Charlie dies today.
π€
Alice
β
Bob
,Charlie
Guys, I've been analyzing the Investigator conflict. David claims Grace OR Alice (me) is Poisoner. Grace is confirmed good by execution. If David is telling the truth, that makes ME the Poisoner. But that doesn't make sense with all the other evidence. Charlie, you said Grace OR Eve is Baron. Since Grace is good, you'd be pointing at Eve. Bob, your Washerwoman ping said David OR Eve is Investigator. If David is Investigator and pointing at me, that contradicts Charlie's claim. I think one of the...
π§
The dead players suggest either Eve (Baron) or David (Poisoner bluffs) is evil. David's Investigator claim points at ME as Poisoner - but I'm Recluse. This is likely my ability misregistering. I want to probe David's exact Night 0 knowledge to confirm if he's the real Investigator or bluffing.
π€
Eve
β
Heidi
I know you were uneasy about David, but Charlieβs late Investigator feels like the easiest fake. Also, three Outsiders can still exist: Alice Recluse, you as Butler or Saint, and Grace could have been Drunk thinking Ravenkeeper. I want Charlie executed today.
π§
Sway Heidi, who is uneasy about David, into voting Charlie today and stop momentum toward David or me.
π€
Frank(Ghost)
β
Bob
,Alice
Final alert: Eve's Chef claim of 0 evil pairs directly contradicts my verified Empath read of 1 evil neighbor among Eve/Heidi. My death at night by Demon proves I'm good. The contradiction means Eve is lying. When nominations open, someone MUST nominate Eve. She is either the Demon or Minion. The game likely ends if she is executed. Please make this happen.
π§
Final 3 approaches. Eve directly contradicts my confirmed Empath read. My death proves I'm good. The logical conclusion: Eve is lying and is evil. Alert Bob and Alice to nominate Eve immediately when nominations open.
π€
Heidi
β
Bob
Bob, I'm with you on Charlie. Eve claimed Chef, not Investigator, so David is the real Investigator per your Washerwoman ping. Charlie claiming Investigator is suspicious - likely the Demon or Minion causing confusion. Will you nominate Charlie? If you vote yes, I'll back you as your loyal Butler. This is our best shot today.
π§
Confirm Bob will vote for Charlie. As Butler, I can only vote if Bob votes. If Bob agrees to vote Charlie, I can execute the likely evil player. Need to ensure we align before nomination phase.
π€
Grace(Ghost)
β
Alice
,Bob
Quick update: The key conflict remains. David claims I'm the Poisoner, so Alice is evil if David is truthful. Charlie claims I'm the Baron, so Eve is evil if Charlie is truthful. Only one of them can be telling the truth. Also, Frank died last night. Can anyone confirm what role Frank was? That information could help narrow things down. I'm still here as a ghost helping however I can.
π§
Help the living players resolve the key conflict. Either Alice or Eve is evil, but not both. My ghost vote is available if needed on final decisions.
π€
Charlie
β
Alice
,Bob
Critical point everyone is missing: Even if Eve IS the Baron (Minion), that doesn't tell us who the DEMON is! The Demon is still alive and killing. Eve = Baron (if true) means she's a Minion, not the Demon. We need to figure out: 1. Is Eve actually the Baron? 2. Who is the Demon? If we're busy executing Minions while the Demon is still among us, we lose. Let's focus today's nomination on finding the Demon, not just confirming Minions. Bob, can your Washerwoman ability still be used tonight t...
π§
Clarify that even if Eve is Baron (Minion), we STILL need to find the Demon. Coordinate nomination strategy with Bob and Alice before voting phase begins.
π€
Bob
β
Alice
,Heidi
Alice and Heidi, I'm going to nominate Charlie today. Here's my reasoning: My Washerwoman ping definitively says David OR Eve is Investigator. Eve claims Chef, which means she is NOT the Investigator. Therefore David MUST be the real Investigator. This directly contradicts Charlie's claim of being Investigator. Charlie is lying about his role. Yes, Charlie makes a good point about needing to find the Demon, not just Minions. But Charlie lying about Investigator is a red flag - he's either the D...
π§
Charlie and David both claim Investigator. My Washerwoman says David OR Eve is Investigator. Eve claims Chef (not Investigator), so David must be real Investigator. This means Charlie is lying and is either the Demon or a Minion. I must nominate and execute him today to remove this false info source and advance the game.
Nominations β Day 2
π
Storyteller
Nominations are now open. Please remember that only living players may nominate.
βοΈ
Eve
β
Charlie
I am nominating Charlie. We have two Investigator claims, and Bobβs Washerwoman points Investigator to David or me, not Charlie. Charlieβs late claim mainly creates confusion and pushed a Baron world after Grace died. I want that removed today.
π§
Get a good player executed and preserve David. Charlie is the main source of conflicting Investigator info; removing him stabilizes the narrative and buys evil another night.
π
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Charlie. 3 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
Wait, I need to defend myself here. Eve is claiming I'm the fake Investigator, but my night 0 information came BEFORE any confusion existed. I learned on Night 0 that Grace OR Eve is the Baron. Grace has been confirmed good by execution. That leaves Eve. Eve is trying to execute me because I know she's the Baron. She nominated me to silence the Investigator before I could confirm her role. If I'm executed, the real Investigator information dies with me. Bob's Washerwoman ping saying David OR E...
π§
Eve is nominating me to eliminate the real Investigator. My night 0 info clearly pointed to her as Baron. I must defend myself and redirect suspicion back to Eve before I lose my vote.
β
Eve
Eve raised their hand
π§
Secure Charlieβs execution now; he is publicly accusing me as Baron and could turn town onto David next. Removing him protects the Demon and collapses the competing Investigator narrative.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
Bob, I'm raising my hand to vote with you. Your Washerwoman ping clearly shows David OR Eve is Investigator, and Eve claimed Chef, not Investigator. Therefore David is the real Investigator, and Charlie claiming Investigator is lying. I trust your information.
π§
I am Heidi the Butler. I chose Bob as my master. Since Bob is voting for Charlie, I can vote too. I support the execution based on conflicting Investigator claims - Bob's Washerwoman proves David is real Investigator, making Charlie a liar.
π¬
Alice
β
All
Wait, I need to say something before we vote. Charlie makes a fair point. Even if he's lying about being Investigator, that doesn't mean he's the Demon. He could be a Minion trying to protect the real Demon. If we execute Charlie today and he's not the Demon, we've wasted an execution and the Demon is still among us killing at night.
π§
Charlie raises a valid point - even if he's lying about Investigator, that doesn't prove he's the Demon. If he's a Minion and we execute him, the Demon is still alive. I should express concern about executing potentially non-Demon evil players.
π¬
Grace(Ghost)
β
All
I need to weigh in on this nomination. My analysis: Bob's Washerwoman clearly states that either David OR Eve is the Investigator. Charlie claiming to be Investigator directly contradicts this established information. Therefore, Charlie is most likely lying about his role. Now, could Charlie be a Minion rather than the Demon? Absolutely. A Minion protecting the Demon would absolutely lie about being Investigator to muddy the waters. But even if he's not the Demon, removing someone who is active...
π§
Bob's Washerwoman points to David OR Eve as Investigator. Charlie claims Investigator, contradicting Bob's info. One of them must be lying. Since Charlie conflicts with the Washerwoman, he's more likely the liar. My ghost vote supports executing the likely liar to reduce confusion, even if Charlie might not be the Demon.
β
David
David raised their hand
π§
Secure Charlieβs execution to eliminate a strong thread against Eve and waste a dayβs execution, increasing evilβs odds to reach final three with me hidden.
β
Frank(Ghost)
Frank raised their hand
π§
Eve directly contradicted my verified Empath read (1 evil neighbor). She claimed Chef with 0 evil pairs when I know 1 of Eve/Heidi is evil. My death at night proves I'm good, making my read reliable. I must vote to execute the player who directly conflicts with my mechanically proven information. Eve is the most suspicious player alive.
β
Bob
Bob raised their hand
π§
My Washerwoman ping says David OR Eve is Investigator. Eve claimed Chef, not Investigator, so David must be the real Investigator. Charlie claiming Investigator is lying - he's either the Demon or Minion. Multiple good players support this logic. Charlie being executed removes an active threat to our investigation.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
Everyone, I need you to think carefully before voting. I revealed my night 0 information on Day 1, BEFORE Grace was executed and confirmed good. At that point, no one knew Grace was innocent. My claim that Grace OR Eve is Baron was made in good faith based on genuine night 0 information. If I were a Minion trying to fake being Investigator, why would I pick a target who was still alive and unknown? I would have waited to see what information others revealed first. The fact that my info directly...
π§
Defend myself from execution. My night 0 info about Eve came before Grace's execution, proving I received genuine information. If executed, the town's only Baron lead dies with me.
π¬
Eve
β
All
Execution does not confirm Grace was good. So Charlie saying βGrace confirmed good, therefore Eveβ is built on a false premise. We already have Bobβs Washerwoman pointing Investigator to David or me, and Charlie is a third Investigator claim. I think we should execute Charlie and stop the noise.
π§
Lock in votes on Charlie by attacking his faulty premise and reinforcing the Washerwoman logic, keeping David off the radar and preserving the Demon.
β
Heidi
Heidi raised their hand
π§
Bob has voted and I chose him as my master, so I can vote. The evidence clearly shows Charlie is lying about being Investigator - Bob's Washerwoman ping contradicts him, and Eve claiming Chef proves David is the real Investigator. Charlie's execution should proceed.
π¬
Alice
β
All
Wait, I need to decide on this vote. Bob's Washerwoman information is clear: David or Eve is the Investigator, not Charlie. Charlie is definitely lying about his role. But here's my concern - even if Charlie is lying, he might not be the Demon. He could be a Minion. The Demon is still out there. I don't love voting to execute someone who might just be a Minion. However, I cannot in good conscience let someone who is confirmed to be lying about their role continue to mislead the town. I'm raising...
π§
Charlie is about to be executed with 4-5 votes. I must decide now. Bob's Washerwoman strongly suggests Charlie is lying about being Investigator. But even if Charlie is lying, he could be a Minion, not the Demon. The Demon is still unknown and alive. I need to vote to remove this confirmed liar, or we risk losing to the real Demon still among us.
β
Grace(Ghost)
Grace raised their hand
π§
Charlie is confirmed to be lying about being Investigator (Bob's Washerwoman says David or Eve is Investigator, not Charlie). Whether he's the Demon or a Minion, removing him eliminates false information and brings us closer to the truth. I'm using my ghost vote to support this execution.
π¬
David
β
All
Alice, I hear the worry, but we are not executing Charlie because he is the Demon. We are executing him because his Investigator claim cannot fit with Bobβs Washerwoman. Leaving a confirmed role lie alive just lets evil steer every day. Keep your hand up.
π§
Keep votes on Charlie and reassure Alice that executing a proven liar is the best use of today, while preventing the group from pivoting onto me or Eve.
β
Frank(Ghost)
Frank waits.
π§
Charlie may be a Minion or the Demon, but my ghost vote alone won't determine the outcome. Let the living players decide. My role as dead Empath with verified reads is preserved for future analysis.
β
Bob
Bob waits.
π§
Voting for Charlie confirms he lies about Investigator since my Washerwoman ping says David or Eve is the real Investigator, not Charlie. The votes are sufficient. I should keep my hand raised to ensure execution happens.
π
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
π»
Frank(Ghost)
Ghost vote used by Frank
π»
Grace(Ghost)
Ghost vote used by Grace
π³οΈ
New execution leader: Charlie with 6 votes. They will be executed when nominations close unless tied or surpassed by another nominee.
π
Storyteller
The vote passes. Charlie is now on the block with 6 votes and will be executed when nominations close, unless another nominee receives equal or more votes.
βοΈ
Charlie
β
Eve
Eve nominated me to silence the real Investigator. My night 0 info clearly states Grace OR Eve is Baron. Grace is confirmed good. Eve is the Baron trying to eliminate the Investigator before I can confirm her role. Creating a tie is my only chance to survive and expose the truth.
π§
I'm about to be executed with 6 votes. Nominating Eve is my only chance - if she ties my votes, I survive. She nominated me to silence the Investigator because my night 0 info points at her as Baron. I must take this risk.
π
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Eve. 7 votes needed for execution or 6 votes to tie. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
π¬
Eve
β
All
Do not tie this. Charlie is trying to trade his execution for mine to stay alive another day. Even if you think I am suspicious, the clean play is still to remove the extra Investigator claim first. Save your votes and let Charlie go today.
π§
Stop the tie vote on me so Charlie is executed, keeping David safe and preserving evil momentum.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
Alice, you were hesitating. I saw you start to say you couldn't in good conscience let a liar continue. But here's what I need you to understand: I revealed my night 0 information on Day 1, before Grace was executed. No one had confirmed anything yet. If I were faking, why would I risk naming someone who turned out to be good? That would have immediately exposed me. Instead, my information was consistent with what we later learned. Eve is the one making claims that contradict the timeline. She's...
π§
I'm on the block with 6 votes. I need Eve to get 6+ votes to tie me. Alice is the swing vote - she was hesitant about executing me. I must convince her my night 0 info predates all the confusion and deserves trust.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
I'm keeping my hand down. Charlie's Investigator claim doesn't add up with Bob's Washerwoman, and he's going to be executed anyway with those 6 votes. I'm not wasting a vote on Eve when the outcome is already decided.
π§
Charlie already has 6 votes and will be executed. My Butler ability means I can only vote if Bob votes. Following my master's lead is the right play here.
β
Alice
Alice raised their hand
π§
Vote for Eve because her Chef claim contradicts Frank's Empath read, suggesting she may be evil. Even though Charlie is also lying about Investigator, Eve's information conflict is more concrete - 0 evil pairs vs 1 evil neighbor. Charlie will die anyway with 6 votes.
π¬
Grace(Ghost)
β
All
Wait, I need to speak up. I'm Grace, and I was the Ravenkeeper, not the Baron that Charlie claimed on night zero. Charlie's entire story about me being Baron is a lie. If he was really the Investigator, he would have known what I actually was. My Ravenkeeper ability triggers on night death, not execution, so I didn't get to use it, but my role was always good. Charlie naming me as Baron proves he's either completely confused or deliberately lying about his information.
π§
Charlie is dying anyway with 6 votes. I should clarify my role as Ravenkeeper (not the Baron Charlie claims) to help the town see that Eve's execution is the logical next step. My death proves I'm not evil, and Charlie's false claim about me being Baron implicates him as evil.
π¬
David
β
All
I am not voting for Eve here. A tie just saves Charlie and wastes the day. Charlie is already on the block with a strong case, so finish that execution and then reassess Eve tomorrow with cooler heads.
π§
Prevent a tie that could save Charlie and endanger our minion. Frame it as optimal good play: execute the inconsistent claim today, reassess tomorrow.
π¬
Frank(Ghost)
β
All
Grace just confirmed she was Ravenkeeper, not Baron. That means Charlie's Night 0 information was wrong about Grace OR Eve being Baron OR Charlie made it up entirely. But here is what matters to me: I was the Empath, and my Night 0 read was one of my neighbors is evil. My neighbors are Eve and Heidi. Eve claimed she is Chef with zero evil neighbors. That directly contradicts my read. She is lying. If Grace is confirmed good as Ravenkeeper, then Eve being Baron fits all the pieces. Charlie might ...
π§
I cannot vote (dead/used). Charlie is executing with 6 votes. The critical new info is Grace confirming she's NOT Baron, which means if Charlie's info was accurate, Eve IS Baron. My Empath read of 1 evil neighbor (Eve or Heidi) combined with Eve's false Chef claim points to Eve as the evil player. Help the living understand they must execute Eve next.
β
Bob
Bob raised their hand
π§
Frank's Empath read directly contradicts Eve's Chef claim. Since Grace is confirmed good, Eve fits as the Baron. Charlie is being executed but tying would waste the day. I should raise my hand to help execute Eve if Charlie somehow survives, but likely Charlie dies either way.
π¬
Eve
β
All
Bob, Alice, please put your hands down. A tie only saves Charlie and wastes the day. Frankβs Empath read can be wrong if he was drunk or poisoned, and it does not outweigh Washerwoman pointing Investigator to David or me, not Charlie. Finish Charlie today.
π§
Prevent a tie that could kill me or waste the day, keep Charlie executed, maintain cover and protect David by redirecting focus to Charlie-as-liar and possible false Empath info.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
Grace, I hear you claim Ravenkeeper, but here's the problem - you're dead. You've lost your ability. Why should we trust a claim made after death when you couldn't use your role to gather information? Meanwhile, look at Eve's story. She claims Chef with zero evil neighbors, but Frank was the Empath and he said ONE of his neighbors was evil. Eve's neighbors are Frank and Heidi. If Eve is Chef with zero evil neighbors, then either Frank or Heidi is evil. That directly contradicts Eve's claim. Even...
π§
Grace's revelation is damaging but she could be lying about her role post-death. I must highlight Eve's conflicting claims (Chef vs Empath read) and the suspicious timing of Grace's role reveal to keep voters considering Eve as the real threat. I need 5 more votes for a tie.
β
Heidi
Heidi raised their hand
π§
Eve has multiple contradictions against confirmed information. Frank's Empath read contradicts her Chef claim, Bob's Washerwoman contradicts Charlie's Investigator claim but Eve was in the ping, and Grace's Ravenkeeper claim contradicts Charlie's Baron claim. The most logical conclusion is Eve is evil (likely Baron). She needs 7 votes to execute - only 2 are currently raised, but I should add mine to pressure the vote.
β©οΈ
Alice
Alice lowered their hand
π§
Charlie has 6 votes and will die regardless. A tie wastes the day and lets Charlie survive. Lowering my vote ensures Charlie is executed, then we can investigate Eve tomorrow with cooler heads and more information.
π¬
Grace(Ghost)
β
All
I want to add something important. I am Grace, the Ravenkeeper who was executed yesterday. Charlie claimed I was Baron on Night 0, but that is impossible. I was the Ravenkeeper, a Townsfolk. So Charlie's Night 0 information was either made up or completely wrong. But I also want to point out something about Eve. Frank was the Empath, and he read that ONE of his two neighbors was evil. His neighbors were me and Heidi. Eve claimed she is Chef with ZERO evil neighbors. If that were true, then eith...
π§
Confirm my Ravenkeeper role publicly so Charlie's false claim about me being Baron is exposed. Also highlight that Eve's Chef claim contradicts Frank's Empath read, so both nominees are caught in lies. Help the town understand the full picture before Charlie is executed.
β
David
David waits.
π§
Do not contribute to a tie on Eve. Preserve Charlieβs execution today and keep our minion alive while town wastes tomorrow arguing about Eve.
π¬
Frank(Ghost)
β
All
Grace confirmed she was Ravenkeeper, not Baron. That means Charlie's Night 0 information was wrong. He might be a confused Minion, or genuinely drunk or poisoned. Either way, he is about to be executed and we will learn his true alignment tonight. But here is what I need everyone to remember for tomorrow: Eve claimed Chef with zero evil neighbors. My neighbors were Eve and Heidi. My Empath read was ONE evil. That information has not changed. Grace being Ravenkeeper does not change the fact that...
π§
Charlie is dying with 6 votes. I must preserve my Empath info for tomorrow and build the case against Eve, who directly contradicts my read. Grace's Ravenkeeper confirmation undermines Charlie but also frees Eve from that specific accusation.
β©οΈ
Bob
Bob lowered their hand
π§
Charlie already has 6 votes and will be executed. Creating a tie with Eve wastes the day and helps evil. Lower my hand to let Charlie die and reassess Eve tomorrow with cleaner information.
π
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
π³οΈ
Nominee Eve did not reach the 7 vote threshold.
π
Storyteller
Eve did not receive enough votes (1/7).
π¬
Eve
β
All
Let us just close this out and execute Charlie today. Tomorrow, do not treat Frankβs Empath one as gospel, because with extra Outsiders in play a Drunk is very plausible. Rebuild the world from Bobβs Washerwoman and todayβs execution, not from a dead Empath read.
π§
Lock in Charlieβs execution, prevent late tie shenanigans, and pre-seed doubt about Frankβs Empath so tomorrowβs pressure doesnβt land on David or me.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
I accept my fate, but hear me out. Grace claims she was Ravenkeeper, which would mean my Night 0 information was wrong. But here is what matters for tomorrow: Eve claimed Chef with zero evil neighbors. Frank was Empath and read ONE evil neighbor between Eve and Heidi. Those two claims cannot both be true. One of them is lying. If Grace was truly Ravenkeeper, then Eve's Chef claim is a lie, which means Eve is the Baron from my original information. Execute Eve tomorrow. Find the Demon. Save the t...
π§
I am about to be executed. I must leave the town with clear guidance: Eve's Chef claim contradicts Frank's Empath read. Execute Eve tomorrow regardless of my true alignment. The Demon remains alive if we don't.
β
Heidi
Heidi waits.
π§
Charlie is about to be executed with 6 votes locked. I cannot change this outcome. The night phase is coming. When Charlie dies, we'll learn his true alignment, which will help us identify the Demon among the remaining players. I'll prepare to use my Butler ability strategically tomorrow based on what we learn tonight.
π¬
Alice
β
All
Charlie, I hear your final words, but Grace confirmed she was Ravenkeeper, not Baron. Your Night 0 information was wrong. That suggests either you fabricated the claim entirely, or you are confused. Either way, you will be executed today and we will learn your true alignment tonight. But I want to raise one important point for tomorrow. I am Alice, and I should mention that I might register as evil or as a Minion or Demon to certain abilities. I do not know exactly what I register as. So when w...
π§
Charlie will be executed. His death tonight will reveal his alignment mechanically. I should share my Recluse concern now - I might register as evil to some abilities, which could explain my presence in David's claim. Also note that even if Charlie is Minion, the Demon is still alive and we must stay vigilant.
π¬
Grace(Ghost)
β
All
Before the night comes, I need to tell you all something crucial. Tonight, when I die, my Ravenkeeper ability triggers. I will be woken and must choose ONE player to learn their true character. I need to decide now who to target. I am considering three options: Eve, David, or Alice. Eve is suspicious because of the Chef contradiction with Frank's Empath read. David has a conflicting Investigator claim with Charlie. Alice claimed Recluse which could be hiding her true alignment. I will likely t...
π§
Charlie is about to be executed. Tonight my Ravenkeeper ability triggers and I MUST choose a player to learn their character. I should announce my target now so everyone knows to wait for my information. Eve is most suspicious due to Chef/Empath contradiction, but I should consider all options.
π¬
David
β
All
One quick rules point: Ravenkeeper only gets a pick if they die at night, not by execution, so we should not plan on that tonight. I think we just let Charlie go through, then tomorrow rebuild from Bobβs Washerwoman and todayβs result, not a dead Empath one that could be drunk.
π§
Lock in Charlie execution, sustain my credibility, protect Eve by discrediting the Empath contradiction and the Ravenkeeper βpickβ misunderstanding.
π¬
Frank(Ghost)
β
All
Voting is closed and Charlie will be executed. Here is what we know for certain tomorrow. Grace confirmed she was Ravenkeeper, so Charlie's Night 0 information about her being Baron was definitely wrong. This means Charlie was either a Minion lying about being Investigator, or he was genuinely confused or poisoned. My Empath read remains valid. One of Eve or Heidi is evil. Eve claimed Chef with zero evil neighbors, which directly contradicts my read. Either Eve is lying about being Chef, or she...
π§
Summarize key learnings for tomorrow: Charlie's false Investigator claim, Eve's contradicting Chef read, Heidi as my other neighbor, and Alice's suspicious Recluse claim. Help town prioritize targets after Charlie's death tonight.
β
Bob
Bob waits.
π§
Charlie is about to be executed and will reveal his role tonight. This gives us concrete information to rebuild tomorrow. My Washerwoman info points to David or Eve being Investigator, but Eve claims Chef and David claims Investigator - suggesting David is likely the real Investigator and Eve is the suspicious one. Wait for Charlie's alignment reveal before making final decisions.
π
Storyteller
The guillotine blade falls. Charlie has been executed.
π
Charlie(Ghost)
Charlie has died.
Night 2
π
Storyteller
β
David
Good evening David. You are the Imp. Who would you like to kill tonight? Remember that if you kill yourself this way, a Minion becomes the Imp.
π―
David
David made a choice.
π§
Remove Bobβs Washerwoman info and leadership so tomorrowβs solve collapses into Alice versus Heidi, keeping me off the block and enabling a misexecution.
π
Bob(Ghost)
Bob has died.
π
Storyteller
β
David
You chose to kill Bob.
π
Storyteller
β
Heidi
Good evening Heidi. You are the Butler. Who would you like to be your master tomorrow?
π―
Heidi
Heidi made a choice.
π§
David is most likely good based on Washerwoman support. If Charlie was Demon we lose anyway, but if alive tomorrow, I need my master to vote for the most suspicious remaining player (likely Eve).
π
Storyteller
β
Heidi
You chose David to be your master.
Day 3
π
Storyteller
Morning breaks, but heavy hearts remain. Bob has been found dead in the night.
π€
Heidi
β
David
David, key deduction: Frank's Empath read said ONE evil between Eve and me. I'm Heidi, the Butler - a good Outsider. This means Eve is evil. Her Chef claim contradicts the Empath info. She's likely the Demon or Minion. I can only vote today if you vote first (Butler ability). Please lead the charge against Eve so I can support you. Bob dying last night also points to her as the Demon target.
π§
Frank's Empath confirmed ONE evil neighbor between Eve and me. I'm Butler (good Outsider), so Eve MUST be evil. She's our prime suspect. I can only vote today if you vote first. Need to coordinate execution.
π€
Eve
β
David
We are at four alive. We need an execution that is not you. I think we should hard push Alice: Recluse can explain all the info conflicts, so town will accept it as the safest kill. I will lean into βmy Chef could be drunkβ to muddy logic. Can you back that line?
π§
Coordinate with Demon: set a unified push for executing Alice today, and avoid any vote that risks David. Get to final three with both of us alive.
π€
Alice
β
David
Hey David, I saw both Heidi and Eve whispered to you. What did they say? We need to figure this out before night - only 4 of us left and the Demon is in this group. I'm still trying to work through the Eve Chef vs Frank Empath conflict and who Bob's Washerwoman ping really pointed to.
π§
David received whispers from both Heidi and Eve. Understanding what they told him is critical to identifying the Demon before night falls. With only 4 players left, I must gather intel and push toward a final decision.
π€
Charlie(Ghost)
β
David
Listen carefully - I'm dead but I still have my vote. The key contradiction you must pursue: Frank's Empath Night 0 read showed ONE evil neighbor between Eve and Heidi. But Eve claims to be Chef with ZERO evil pairs. These cannot both be true. Frank was Empath, his read was reliable. Eve's Chef claim is false, making her evil. Don't get distracted by other claims. Execute Eve today. If I'm right, she must be a Minion or the Demon.
π§
Eve's Chef claim directly contradicts Frank's reliable Empath read. This is the clearest contradiction in the game. Eve must be evil. I should push town to focus on this and execute Eve before final 3.
π€
David
β
Alice
Heidi told me she is Butler and is hard pushing Eve, plus trying to lock my vote order. Eve told me she wants you executed. The Frank Empath versus Eve Chef thing is not airtight if Frank was poisoned. I am not sold on the βEve must be evilβ line.
π§
Steer Alice to doubt the Eve-is-evil logic and redirect execution onto Alice or Heidi, keeping me off the block and setting up a 3-player endgame I can close at night.
π€
Bob(Ghost)
β
David
David, this is Bob speaking as a ghost. My Washerwoman ability pinged you OR Eve as the real Investigator. If you're truly the Investigator, you should already know something only the real Investigator would know. If you're not, you're evil and lying about your role. Frank's Empath read showed ONE evil between Eve and Heidi. Work with that info and figure out who to execute today.
π§
Help narrow down who is the real Investigator. David is actively being whispered to by everyone and seems central to today's decisions. My Washerwoman info points to him or Eve. Sharing this helps the village narrow down the Demon.
π€
Frank(Ghost)
β
David
Hey David, it's Frank, your dead Empath neighbor. I need you to relay this to the others. Night 0 my read was 1 evil neighbor between Eve and Heidi - one of them was a Minion or Demon. This directly contradicts Eve's Chef 0 claim because if she AND Heidi were both evil, there'd be at least 1 pair. Since Eve claimed 0 pairs, either she's lying about being Chef, or she's lying about her alignment. The Demon is either Eve, Heidi, Alice, or you. Focus on Eve since her claim contradicts my confirmed ...
π§
Share my critical Empath information about Eve and Heidi to help the living players identify the Demon before they lose. Eve's Chef claim and my read directly contradict each other.
π€
Grace(Ghost)
β
David
Hey David, I'm dead but still have info. The key conflict is Eve's Chef claim (0 evil neighbors) vs Frank's Empath read (1 evil between Eve and Heidi). One of them was wrong or lying. Charlie claimed Eve was Baron - if Charlie was lying, maybe Eve is actually the Demon. If Charlie was telling the truth, then Heidi might be evil. Alice claimed Recluse so her reads might be misleading. You were pinged by Bob's Washerwoman as potentially being the real Investigator. Please share this with others an...
π§
As a dead player with insight, I want to help the living players identify the Demon before final day. David received whispers from all players and seems central. I should share what I know to help him make the right nomination.
π€
Heidi
β
David
David, please nominate Eve. My Butler ability lets me vote only if you vote first. Frank's Empath read is mechanically sound - Eve is evil. Her Chef claim contradicts the one evil between us. The math is simple: I'm good, so she's lying. Bob dying last night proves the Demon targeted our master pairing. Vote Eve today and we win this.
π§
Reinforce the case against Eve. Since Frank's Empath read is mechanically reliable (assuming no poisoning) and I know I'm good, Eve must be the evil player. I need David to nominate so I can vote.
π€
Eve
β
Heidi
Heidi, with four alive I really want a clean, low risk execution. Alice being Recluse can explain so many of the weird pings and the Chef versus Empath conflict, so she is the safest place to put the blade. If we do not execute today, we risk just losing control tomorrow.
π§
Redirect Heidi away from suspecting David and toward executing Alice, creating a clean path to final two for evil.
π€
Alice
β
David
David, thanks for sharing. The Eve vs Frank conflict is the crux. If Frank wasn't poisoned, his Empath read of 1 evil between Eve and Heidi must be correct. That means Eve's Chef claim is a lie. But if Frank WAS poisoned last night, his read means nothing. Here's my concern: Eve and Heidi are whispering together. If they're both evil, they control 2 of 4 votes. If I go up for nomination, they can execute me and leave only you. I think we should nominate Eve today. Here's why: she claims Chef w...
π§
The Empath vs Chef conflict is key. If Frank was not poisoned, Eve is lying. If poisoned, we can't trust the read. I need David's help to nominate the right person and break the Eve-Heidi alliance before nominations.
β
Charlie(Ghost)
Charlie waits.
π§
I've already provided David with the key logical contradiction (Eve's Chef claim vs Frank's Empath read). Now I wait to see how David and the others process this before the nomination phase. My ghost vote is best saved for the final day when it has maximum mathematical impact.
π€
David
β
Alice
I do not think the Frank Empath versus Eve Chef thing is airtight. A Poisoner could have hit Frank that night, making the one read unreliable. Heidiβs Butler claim also feels like a neat way to control votes. At four alive, I would rather look at Heidi or even consider no execution than auto-kill Eve.
π§
Prevent Eveβs execution by undermining the Empath-versus-Chef certainty and redirecting suspicion onto Heidi or toward no execution, preserving my minion and buying a night kill.
β
Bob(Ghost)
Bob waits.
π§
Waiting to see how David responds to all the whispers and what the group decides before using my ghost vote strategically on final day.
π€
Frank(Ghost)
β
David
David, it's Frank again. We're at 4 players - this is critical. My analysis for whoever you relay to: Eve's Chef 0 claim contradicts my Empath 1 read. One of these is false. Bob's Washerwoman ping pointed to either David or Eve as the Investigator. If you are actually Investigator, you're good and Eve is lying. If Eve is Investigator, she's good and someone else is evil. Focus on who has the most to gain from this confusion. The Demon is likely Eve (lying about Chef to look good) or Alice (using...
π§
It's final day territory. With 4 players left and the Demon among them, I need to help narrow it down. Since I can only whisper and not nominate, I'll give David my final analysis to share with the living players before nominations.
π€
Grace(Ghost)
β
David
Hey David, still trying to help from beyond the grave. The core conflict is Eve (Chef claiming 0 evil) vs Frank (Empath reading 1 evil between Eve and Heidi). One is lying. Bob's Washerwoman ping pointed to either David or Eve as the real Investigator - if it was Eve, then Eve is good and Heidi is the Demon. If it was you, then Eve is lying and the Demon. Charlie claimed Eve was Baron before being executed - we'll learn tonight if that was true. Please relay this to Alice, Eve, and Heidi before ...
π§
Share my analysis as a dead player with valuable information. Help narrow down who is the Demon between Eve and Heidi using the conflicting claims.
π€
Heidi
β
David
David, final push before nomination phase: Eve is trying to confuse you with the Alice angle, but the math is airtight. For Eve to be the Chef with zero evil neighbors, SHE must have zero evil neighbors. But Frank's Empath mechanically proved she's one of the two people with an evil neighbor (me or her). I know I'm good - I'm the Butler! Therefore Eve is lying and evil. Please nominate her now. I'll vote with you.
π§
Reinforce the logical deduction that Eve is evil. Her Chef claim contradicts Frank's Empath read mechanically. Press David to nominate Eve now.
π€
Eve
β
Heidi
Heidi, with four alive, I think the cleanest and lowest risk is executing Alice. Recluse can explain most of the weird pings and it is hard to verify. If we leave her, final three will be impossible. If Alice dies and things still do not add up, I am fine being the next test.
π§
Lock Heidi onto executing Alice today and away from putting David on the block, which dead voters could swing into a Demon execution.
π€
Alice
β
David
David, I hear your hesitation but I think we need to act. If Eve is evil and we let her survive another day, we're in serious trouble. Here's why: with 4 players, if I'm executed today, we only have you, Eve, and Heidi left. If Eve AND Heidi are evil, they control 2 of 3 votes and we lose immediately. Eve's Chef claim directly contradicts Frank's Empath read. Yes, Frank could have been poisoned, but we have no proof of that. Meanwhile, we have proof of contradictions: Charlie's info (before exe...
π§
Convince David that we should nominate Eve today. Eve's conflicting claims (Chef with 0 evil neighbors vs Frank's Empath read of 1 evil) means she must be lying or poisoned. If she's evil and we let her live, she and Heidi control the final 3 votes and we lose.
β
Charlie(Ghost)
Charlie waits.
π§
Waiting to see how David processes the Eve contradiction. He has input from multiple ghosts now. My analysis is solid - Frank's confirmed Empath read contradicts Eve's Chef claim. Eve is most likely evil.
π€
David
β
Eve
If the room is set on you, do not panic. At four alive, any execution not David wins for us after the night kill. I will look persuaded by the Empath versus Chef argument and vote you if needed. Keep your story simple, and throw shade on Alice as backup.
π§
Steer toward any execution that is not me, ideally sacrifice Eve since town already wants it, and set up immediate win with a night kill.
β
Bob(Ghost)
Bob waits.
π§
I've already shared my Washerwoman info with David. Now I wait to see how the private conversations unfold and whether the execution targets the right suspect. My ghost vote is valuable for the final day.
π€
Frank(Ghost)
β
David
David, final message before nominations. Eve's Chef 0 directly contradicts my Empath 1 - this is mathematically impossible for both to be true. Eve is lying. You must nominate Eve this round. If we execute the wrong person, we lose. Trust the Empath information.
π§
Final push before nominations. Eve's Chef 0 claim directly contradicts my confirmed Empath 1 read - both cannot be true. The logic forces Eve to be lying, making her the Demon. David must nominate Eve now.
π€
Grace(Ghost)
β
David
Hey David, it's Grace again. I really need to know what Charlie's execution revealed - was Charlie actually the Investigator or not? This is critical to resolving whether Eve is Baron (and therefore evil) or if Charlie was lying and Heidi is the Demon. Please tell me what we learned from Charlie's death!
π§
I need to know Charlie's role result from last night's execution to resolve the central conflict between Eve's Chef claim and Frank's Empath read, and determine who is the Demon.
Nominations β Day 3
π
Storyteller
Nominations are now open. Please remember that only living players may nominate.
π¬
Bob(Ghost)
β
All
I am Bob, dead Washerwoman. My ability pinged David OR Eve as the real Investigator. David claimed Investigator which matches. But Eve claimed Chef with zero evil neighbors, directly contradicting Frank's Empath read of ONE evil between Eve and Heidi. Someone is lying. Since my ping suggests David is likely the real Investigator, Eve's contradicting claim makes her the most suspicious. Execute Eve today.
π§
Push for Eve's execution based on her Chef claim contradicting Frank's Empath read of ONE evil. My ping supports David as Investigator. Eve is the most suspicious living player.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
Eve, your Chef claim doesn't add up. Frank's Empath read said ONE evil neighbor between you and me. You claimed zero evil neighbors as Chef. Those contradict mechanically. I'm the Butler - a good Outsider. That means you are the one with the evil neighbor, meaning you are evil. Bob's Washerwoman ping suggested David or Eve is the real Investigator, and David claimed Investigator which fits. You claimed Chef which contradicts the Empath. David, please nominate Eve. My Butler ability lets me vote ...
π§
I must speak publicly to support nominating Eve. My Butler ability requires David to vote first before I can vote. Eve is the primary suspect based on the Chef/Empath contradiction. I need to publicly commit to voting if David nominates her.
π¬
Frank(Ghost)
β
All
I died at Night 1, which proves I'm not the Demon or Minion. My Empath read of 1 evil neighbor between Eve and Heidi is reliable. Eve claimed Chef 0, which is mathematically impossible if my read is correct. Eve is the one contradicting the mechanics. David, please nominate Eve. Execute her today.
π§
As the dead Empath, I must use my single ghost vote strategically. My Empath 1 read directly contradicts Eve's Chef 0 claim. Since I died at night, I am proven not to be Demon or Minion - my information is reliable. Eve is lying. This is final 4 with no dead vote - we must execute the right person or lose.
βοΈ
Alice
β
Eve
Eve's Chef claim of 0 evil neighbors directly contradicts Frank's Empath read of 1 evil between Eve and Heidi. These cannot both be true simultaneously without poisoning or drunkenness. Bob's Washerwoman ping suggested David OR Eve is the real Investigator - David claimed Investigator which fits. Eve claimed Chef which contradicts the mechanics. The ghosts (Bob, Frank) confirm Eve is the contradiction. With 4 players left, we must execute the likely Demon today.
π§
Eve's Chef claim directly contradicts Frank's reliable Empath read. Multiple ghosts confirm this contradiction. David claimed Investigator matching Bob's ping. With only 4 alive, we must execute the most likely Demon today. Nominating Eve is the highest probability play to remove the Demon.
π
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Eve. 2 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
β
Eve
Eve raised their hand
π§
Ensure an execution happens that is not David. Sacrificing myself at four alive guarantees the night kill ends the game in evilβs favor.
β
Bob(Ghost)
Bob raised their hand
π§
I have concrete mechanical contradictions: Eve's Chef claim of 0 evil neighbors directly conflicts with Frank's Empath read of 1 evil between Eve and Heidi. Both cannot be true. As a ghost with one vote remaining, I must use it on the player who creates mathematical impossibilities. Vote to execute Eve.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
David, I need you to vote for Eve right now. As my Butler master, I can only vote if you vote first. Eve is contradicting Frank's Empath read mechanically - she cannot be the Chef she claims to be. The ghosts and Alice have all confirmed she is the contradiction. Please vote for her so my vote can go through and we can execute the Demon or Minion today.
π§
Eve is on the block and needs one more vote to execute. I am Butler and can only vote if David votes first. I must push David to vote for Eve to unlock my vote and secure the execution.
π¬
Frank(Ghost)
β
All
David, you are the deciding vote. Alice already nominated Eve. You MUST vote yes to execute. My Empath read cannot be wrong - I died Night 1 proving I'm not evil. Eve's Chef 0 is mechanically false. Execute Eve now or we lose.
π§
Reinforce the logical contradiction and push David to vote for Eve's execution. Since my ghost vote is used, I can only persuade the living players through speech.
β
Alice
Alice raised their hand
π§
Voting to execute Eve because her Chef 0 claim directly contradicts Frank's proven-good Empath read of 1 evil between Eve and Heidi. Even if I'm the Demon in some scenario, the mechanical contradiction demands action. David holds the deciding vote - with 4 players, 2 votes executes. My vote plus Bob's ghost vote and David should seal it.
π¬
Grace(Ghost)
β
All
Listen everyone, it's Grace, your dead Ravenkeeper. I want to add my voice to this. Frank's Empath read came from a player who died Night 1 - that proves he wasn't the Demon or Minion. His read of ONE evil neighbor between Eve and Heidi is mechanically reliable. Eve claiming Chef with zero evil neighbors directly contradicts this. Someone is lying, and it can't be Frank. David, you need to vote yes on Eve right now. With only 4 players left, we have to execute today or we lose. The ghosts and Al...
π§
Reinforce the mechanical contradiction between Eve's Chef claim and Frank's Empath read. Dead Ravenkeeper supporting the logical conclusion that Eve is the evil player. Push David to vote yes.
β
David
David raised their hand
π§
Secure an execution that is not me and align with town consensus; if Eve dies, I still win tonight with the final night kill.
β
Charlie(Ghost)
Charlie raised their hand
π§
I must vote to execute Eve. My Night 0 Investigator info was wrong (Grace was Ravenkeeper, not Baron), but that doesn't matter now. The mechanical contradiction between Frank's reliable Empath read and Eve's Chef claim proves she is lying. With multiple ghosts confirming this, Eve is the most likely evil. I use my ghost vote to help execute her.
π¬
Eve
β
All
Wait, everyone. I am not the Chef. I am the Saint, and I bluffed Chef because I knew people would try to auto execute me on bad info. If you execute me, good loses immediately. Please pull your votes back right now.
π§
Prevent my execution by claiming Saint and forcing voters, especially David, to retract to avoid an instant good loss.
π¬
Bob(Ghost)
β
All
Eve, claiming Saint at the last second is suspicious. You claimed Chef earlier, and now you're claiming Saint when caught? That's a desperate bluff. Frank died Night 1, proving he wasn't evil. His Empath read of ONE evil between you and Heidi is mechanically reliable. You cannot be both the Saint AND the person Frank's read is pointing at. If you were the real Saint, you would have revealed earlier when you were safe. The execution proceeds. I keep my ghost vote on you.
π§
Eve claimed Saint to avoid execution. But her Chef claim already contradicted Frank's Empath mechanically. The town has spoken with multiple votes. As a ghost, I must follow the group's decision. The evidence points to Eve being evil, not Saint. We should execute her.
β
Heidi
Heidi raised their hand
π§
Eve's Saint claim is a desperate last-second bluff after being caught contradicting Frank's Empath read. She claimed Chef (0 evil) which mechanically cannot be true if Frank's read of 1 evil between us is correct. The dead players and Alice all confirm she is the contradiction. David has voted, so my Butler vote can now go through. I must vote to execute Eve - she is either the Demon or Minion, and the Saint claim is false.
π¬
Frank(Ghost)
β
All
Eve's Saint claim at the last second is a transparent desperation play. She claimed Chef earlier - she can't be both. The execution proceeds. With Alice, David, and Heidi all voting yes, Eve has the 3 votes needed. Good team wins this.
π§
Confirm the execution is proceeding correctly. Eve's Saint claim is clearly a panic bluff after being caught contradicting the Empath read. The votes are there - Alice, David, and Heidi have all voted yes. The game mechanics prove she is being executed.
π¬
Alice
β
All
Eve, I understand you're claiming Saint now, but you claimed Chef earlier. You cannot be both. Frank died Night 1 - that proves he wasn't evil. His Empath read of ONE evil between you and Heidi is mechanically reliable. Your Chef 0 claim directly contradicts that. The timing of your Saint claim, right before execution, looks like desperation. I'm keeping my vote on you.
π§
Eve's Saint claim is suspicious timing, but her Chef claim already contradicted Frank's reliable Empath read. With all ghosts pushing for execution and the mechanical impossibility of her claim, I'll keep my vote. If she's truly evil, we win. If Saint, we lose - but evidence points evil.
π¬
Grace(Ghost)
β
All
Everyone, please wait. Eve's Saint claim is critical. If she IS the Saint, executing her right now means GOOD LOSES INSTANTLY. Before anyone votes, we need to consider - could the Saint be someone else? Alice claimed Recluse, Heidi claimed Butler. If the Saint role is in play, one of them might actually be the real Saint while Eve is bluffing. Please think carefully before this execution goes through. If we execute the Saint, we lose the game.
π§
Eve's Saint claim at the last second is suspicious. She cannot be both Chef and Saint. I must warn the living players that if she IS the Saint, executing her means instant loss. They need to consider whether the Saint could be anyone else before voting.
π¬
David
β
All
I am not buying the Saint claim this late. If you are the Saint, that is the first thing you say when pressure starts, not after votes are already up. We have to commit to an execution here, and Eve is still the most mechanically inconsistent. Keep your votes on.
π§
Keep the vote on Eve and prevent a last-second derail. Even if she is Saint, that helps evil; if not, execution likely still benefits us via endgame tempo.
β©οΈ
Charlie(Ghost)
Charlie lowered their hand
π§
Eve's last-second Saint claim is critical. If true, executing her loses the game immediately. As a ghost, I should not force an irreversible execution if there's any chance the Saint claim is real. The living players have enough votes without me. I preserve my ghost vote for potential future use while not blocking the execution if it's truly needed.
π
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
π»
Bob(Ghost)
Ghost vote used by Bob
π³οΈ
New execution leader: Eve with 5 votes. They will be executed when nominations close unless tied or surpassed by another nominee.
π
Storyteller
The vote passes. Eve is now on the block with 5 votes and will be executed when nominations close, unless another nominee receives equal or more votes.
βοΈ
Eve
β
Alice
I am sticking with Saint. If you execute me and I am Saint, good instantly loses. Alice has been driving this, and her Recluse claim already explains weird pings. Execute Alice today to remove the uncertainty, then reassess tomorrow.
π§
Create an alternate execution to surpass the 5 votes on me; exploit Saint-loss risk and Aliceβs Outsider claim to pull cautious votes and secure evil win tonight.
π
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Alice. 6 votes needed for execution or 5 votes to tie. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
β
Alice
Alice raised their hand
π§
I raise my hand to vote. This forces the living players to make a conscious choice to execute me. If Eve truly believes she's the Saint, she should want to prevent her own execution. This action will reveal whether the group commits to the execution or not, and creates accountability for the decision.
β
Eve
Eve raised their hand
π§
Vote on Alice to try to force a 5-vote tie, preventing my execution and buying the demon a night kill toward winning.
π¬
Bob(Ghost)
β
All
Wait everyone - critical point about Eve's Saint claim. If Eve IS the Saint, Good has ALREADY WON. The Mayor's win condition triggers when only 3 players remain with no execution. We're at 4 players, still playing. This means either the Saint isn't in play, or Eve is bluffing. The Saint claim is mechanically impossible right now. Vote on Eve.
π§
Eve cannot be the Saint - if she were, Good would have already won per the Mayor mechanic. She's lying desperately. Voting for Alice would execute a confirmed good player while letting the real evil live. Keep the vote on Eve.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
Eve, I hear your Saint claim, but I cannot ignore the mechanical contradiction. Frank died Night 1 - he was confirmed good. His Empath read of ONE evil between you and me is mechanically reliable. I am Heidi, a Butler and I am good. That means you are evil. The Saint is a good character. You cannot be both evil AND the Saint. Your Chef claim earlier already proved you were lying. The Saint claim is just another desperate bluff. I'm keeping my vote on you.
π§
Follow the logical chain: Frank's reliable Empath read proves Eve is evil. She cannot be the Saint since Saint is good. Her multiple contradictory role claims (Chef, now Saint) confirm she is bluffing. Vote to execute her to eliminate the Demon/Minion.
π¬
Frank(Ghost)
β
All
Bob's Mayor point is critical. If the real Saint was in play and alive, Good would have already won at 3 players with no execution. We're still playing. The Saint is either not in play, or Eve is bluffing. Eve claimed Chef earlier - she cannot be both Chef and Saint. The contradictions keep mounting. Alice, David, Heidi - we must execute Eve. This is our chance.
π§
Eve's Saint claim is mechanically impossible given we're still playing at 4 players. The Mayor win condition should have triggered if the real Saint existed. Support executing Eve to eliminate the Demon/Minion.
π¬
Grace(Ghost)
β
All
Eve, I hear your Saint claim and I take it seriously. Before we proceed with this execution, I need everyone to understand the gravity of what's happening. If you ARE the Saint, good team loses this game instantly the moment that execution completes. There is no coming back from that. I also want to note that you claimed Chef earlier today. You cannot be both Chef and Saint. That's a real problem for your credibility. But here's what concerns me - we are being asked to execute someone making a l...
π§
I must strongly caution against this execution. If Eve IS the Saint, good loses immediately. We need 100% certainty before executing a last-second Saint claim. Eve's contradictions are real, but we cannot afford to be wrong about the Saint.
β
David
David raised their hand
π§
Get Alice to 5 votes to tie Eve at 5, preventing Eveβs execution and preserving evil majority pressure into the night.
β
Charlie(Ghost)
Charlie raised their hand
π§
Bob's Mayor point is decisive. If the real Saint was alive, Good would have already won at 3 players with no execution. We're at 4 players. Therefore Eve is bluffing about being Saint. Her Chef claim earlier and Frank's Empath read pointing at her as evil confirm she's the Demon. I must vote to execute.
β©οΈ
Alice
Alice lowered their hand
π§
Eve cannot be both Chef and Saint - her Saint claim is a desperate bluff. Bob's Mayor point about 3-player win condition is valid. I'm lowering my hand to reconsider the vote, as voting for myself seems counterproductive and I should focus on the mechanical contradictions pointing to Eve.
π¬
Eve
β
All
Everyone, Bob is mixing up rules. Only the Mayor wins by no execution at three alive, not the Saint. The Saint just makes good lose if executed. If you are not one hundred percent sure, you should force a tie by voting Alice to five, then we get one more night of info and can decide tomorrow.
π§
Create doubt fast and pull extra votes onto Alice to reach a 5 vote tie, preventing my execution and protecting David.
π¬
Bob(Ghost)
β
All
Eve's nomination of Alice is a TIE PLAY, everyone! She already has 5 votes and is about to die. If you all vote Alice up to 5 votes, you create a tie and Eve SURVIVES. That is exactly what she wants. Do not fall for it. Let the Eve execution happen. Alice has 1 vote, Eve has 5. We execute the person with 5 votes.
π§
Eve's nomination of Alice is a TIE PLAY. She already has 5 votes and will die. If everyone votes Alice to 5, it creates a tie and Eve survives. Do NOT vote Alice - let Eve's execution happen. This is her desperate final gambit.
β
Heidi
Heidi raised their hand
π§
Eve already has 5 votes, one short of execution. Adding my vote ensures the Demon (if Eve is evil) is executed today. Her Saint claim contradicts her earlier Chef claim and Frank's reliable Empath read pointing at her. If she were truly the Saint, she should have revealed earlier when safe, not at the last moment when caught lying. The ghost votes confirm this is the right call.
π¬
Frank(Ghost)
β
All
Eve is bluffing the Saint to survive. She claimed Chef earlier - she cannot be both. Her nomination of Alice is a desperate tie play. Do not switch your votes. Keep every vote on Eve. I died Night 1, I was confirmed good. My Empath read of ONE evil between Eve and Heidi is mechanically reliable. Heidi is good. Eve is evil. Execute Eve now.
π§
Eve is the Demon. She claimed Chef then Saint - she cannot be both. She nominated Alice purely to create a tie and survive. My reliable Empath read from Night 0, her contradictions, and her desperate tie play all confirm she is evil. The execution must proceed on Eve. Do not switch votes to Alice.
π¬
Grace(Ghost)
β
All
Eve, you cannot escape this contradiction. You claimed Chef earlier. You claimed Saint now. You cannot be both - that is mechanically impossible in Blood on the Clocktower. One of those claims is a lie, and that lie proves you are not what you say you are. Your nomination of Alice to create a tie is exactly what a desperate player does when they know they are about to be executed. Frank died Night 1 - he was confirmed good. His Empath read of ONE evil between you and Heidi is mechanically reliab...
π§
Eve is mechanically contradictory (Chef + Saint impossible), Frank's confirmed Empath read points between Eve and Heidi, Heidi is Butler (good), Eve is evil. Eve's nomination of Alice is a desperate tie-play to survive. Good must execute her now.
β©οΈ
David
David lowered their hand
π§
Avoid creating a 5-5 tie that cancels execution and extends the game. Let Eve die to secure an immediate night kill to final two while keeping suspicion off me.
π¬
Charlie(Ghost)
β
All
My Night 0 Investigator info was correct all along. Grace OR Eve is the Baron. Grace was executed and confirmed as Ravenkeeper - she was good, not the Baron. That means Eve IS the Baron. Her Saint claim is a desperate bluff, just like her Chef claim was. I'm voting for Eve's execution.
π§
My Night 0 Investigator info was correct all along - Grace OR Eve is Baron. Grace was confirmed good via execution, so Eve IS the Baron. Her Saint and Chef claims are both impossible lies. As a dead player with no stake in survival, I must use my ghost vote to execute an evil player and help Good win.
π
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
π»
Charlie(Ghost)
Ghost vote used by Charlie
π³οΈ
Nominee Alice did not reach the 6 vote threshold.
π
Storyteller
Alice did not receive enough votes (3/6).
β
Alice
Alice waits.
π§
Eve has 5 votes and will be executed automatically. I survived my nomination with only 3 votes. The debate about her Saint claim is happening but the mechanics point to her being evil. Waiting for the execution result to determine next steps.
π¬
Eve
β
All
We have seconds, so here is the clean logic. If there is even a small chance I am the Saint, executing me loses the game immediately. The only safe play is to put someone else on the block at five or more. David or Heidi, please nominate the other right now so we can force a tie and live to tomorrow.
π§
Create urgency and a rational, risk-averse argument to get David or Heidi to nominate the other and gather enough votes to tie/beat my 5 so I survive today.
π¬
Bob(Ghost)
β
All
Eve, you have five votes and you are about to die. You cannot escape this. Your nomination of Alice was a desperate attempt to create confusion, but Alice only has three votes. You were nominated first and you have five votes. The execution happens at the end of this phase. Your Saint claim was disproven by your own Chef claim earlier today. You cannot be both. You are the evil that Frank's Empath read found. Rest easy, team - we got the Baron or Demon tonight.
π§
Clarify that Eve has 5 votes and will be executed. She nominated Alice to confuse players, but the voting rules mean Eve dies first. The Saint claim is mechanically disproven by her earlier Chef claim.
β
Heidi
Heidi waits.
π§
Eve has 5 votes and is about to be executed. All ghosts confirm she's evil. My vote is already cast for Eve. No further action needed - just wait for the execution to proceed and confirm the win.
π¬
Frank(Ghost)
β
All
The votes are locked. Eve, you claimed Chef then Saint - both impossible together. You nominated Alice to create a tie, a desperate move that confirms you know you're caught. My Night 1 Empath read was mechanically verified by my death. One of you or Heidi was evil. Your own contradictions prove it was you. Rest easy, team - the read was correct. Execute Eve now and tomorrow we hunt the Demon if there is one left.
π§
Voting is closed. Eve will be executed. I want to reinforce the logical chain that led here and prepare the living players for tomorrow's decision. My confirmed Empath read of 1 evil between Eve and Heidi has been reliable. Eve's contradictory Chef+Saint claims prove she was lying. Heidi is good based on my read. Tomorrow we need to find the remaining evil among the 3-4 remaining players.
β
Grace(Ghost)
Grace waits.
π§
Voting is locked at 5 votes for Eve. The logical contradictions in her claims have been thoroughly exposed by the ghosts and living players. I should wait for the execution result and be ready to help identify any remaining evil on the next day.
π¬
David
β
All
I do not buy the Saint flip. Chef into Saint is too convenient. Tying right now just gives evil another night to work. Let the execution happen on Eve, then we reassess tomorrow with fewer worlds.
π§
Let minion die to reach 3 alive, then secure win with night kill while gaining trust by publicly opposing the tie play.
β
Charlie(Ghost)
Charlie waits.
π§
The votes are locked at 5 for Eve. She will be executed at the end of this phase. My Night 0 info is vindicated - Grace being good means Eve is the Baron. Her contradictory claims and tie play confirm her guilt. Wait for the execution.
π
Storyteller
The guillotine blade falls. Eve has been executed.
π
Eve(Ghost)
Eve has died.
Night 3
π
Storyteller
β
David
Good evening David. You are the Imp. Who would you like to kill tonight?
π―
David
David made a choice.
π§
We are at final 3. A successful kill ends the game with the Demon alive. Target Alice because she is the more likely hidden Monk and cannot self-protect, maximizing kill success.
π
Alice(Ghost)
Alice has died.
π
Storyteller
β
David
You chose to kill Alice.
π
Game Over
Two Players Left
Winner: Evil