Game Detail
Players
Alice (Butler) Bob (Empath) Charlie (Washerwoman) David (Chef) Eve (Monk) Frank (Imp) Grace (Undertaker) Heidi (Spy)
Token Usage
| Team | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Cost (USD) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Good | 842,325 | 414,126 | $1.0388 |
| Evil | 324,389 | 142,654 | $0.7916 |
Event Timeline
π
The game has started.
π
Storyteller
β
Heidi
You are the Minion. The Demon is Frank.
π
Storyteller
β
Frank
Minions are: Heidi. Your safe bluffs are: Saint, Soldier, Investigator
π
Storyteller
β
Charlie
Good evening Charlie. You are the Washerwoman. Either Heidi or David is the Chef.
π
Storyteller
β
David
Good evening David. You are the Chef. You learn that there are 0 pairs of evil players.
π
Storyteller
β
Bob
Good evening Bob. You are the Empath. You sense that 0 of your neighbors is evil!
π
Storyteller
β
Alice
Good evening Alice. You are the Butler. Who would you like to be your master tomorrow?
π―
Alice
Alice made a choice.
π§
Use my Butler restriction as an information test: observe whether Bob votes and how he votes to evaluate his alignment and form an early alliance if he appears Town.
π
Storyteller
β
Alice
You chose Bob to be your master.
π
Storyteller
β
Heidi
Good evening Heidi. You are the Spy. You can secretly see information about all players: - Alice: Butler (good), Alive - Bob: Empath (good), Alive - Charlie: Washerwoman (good), Alive - David: Chef (good), Alive - Eve: Monk (good), Alive - Frank: Imp (evil), Alive - Grace: Undertaker (good), Alive - Heidi: Spy (evil), Alive
Day 1
π
Storyteller
Welcome to the village of Ravenswood Bluff. Please take this time to get to know your fellow villagers. Feel free to move around and have private conversations. Be wary, for a Demon hides among you!
π€
Alice
β
Bob
Hi Bob. I picked you as my master last night. That means tomorrow I can only vote if you vote too. Do you plan to vote? If so, I will vote with you. What are you thinking?
π§
Confirm Bob will vote tomorrow so I can vote as Butler and gauge his willingness to cooperate to assess alignment.
π€
Eve
β
David
,Frank
Hi David and Frank. I would like to trade notes quietly before nominations. Do either of you have any claims, reads, or strong suspicions to share? I will keep this private.
π§
Form a small private coalition to collect early claims and suspicions, so we can compare notes before nominations and reduce the chance of executing a Townsfolk.
π€
Frank
β
Eve
,David
Hey Eve, David. I'm the Soldier. Not much to share from my end since I don't get info, but I'm glad to trade notes. What have you two heard so far? Any claims or red flags from others?
π§
Eve is reaching out for info. I need to respond to build trust without exposing my true role. I'll claim Soldier - it's a safe bluff that doesn't require fabricated details. I also need to coordinate with Heidi (my minion) later.
π€
Grace
β
Frank
,Heidi
Hi Frank, hi Heidi. Can we compare notes privately? Do either of you have any night info or role claims yet? I want to coordinate quietly so we can spot contradictions and protect each other.
π§
Start a private trust network with my neighbors to gather night claims, spot contradictions early, and set up coordinated voting or accusations toward likely evil players.
π€
Heidi
β
Frank
Hey Frank, I'm the Spy. I see the full Grimoire. Here's what I know: Alice is Butler, Bob is Empath, Charlie is Washerwoman, David is Chef, Eve is Monk, Grace is Undertaker. Grace just whispered us both asking for info. What role do you want to claim? I'm thinking I could claim Fortune Teller or Investigator to feed false info. What's your plan?
π§
I need to coordinate with Frank (the Demon) privately before responding to Grace. We must agree on our fake role claims and strategy to avoid contradictions.
π€
Bob
β
Alice
Thanks Alice. Yes I will vote tomorrow and you can rely on me. I am the Empath. My night read was zero, so both my neighbours β you and Charlie β are not evil. Let us coordinate and watch the other players closely.
π§
Reassure Alice I will vote, reveal my Empath read privately so we can coordinate votes and narrow suspects.
π€
David
β
Eve
,Frank
Hi Eve and Frank. I am the Chef. My starting info is there are zero pairs of evil players. That likely means only one evil, the Demon, and no Minion. Frank, you said you are the Soldier β noted. Eve, do you have a role or any reads to share before nominations?
π§
Share my Chef read to narrow suspects and prompt claims so we can target the Demon before nominations.
π€
Charlie
β
Alice
,Bob
Quick private note: I am the Washerwoman. My night read: either Heidi or David is the Chef (a Townsfolk). I am not revealing this publicly yet. Can you keep this between us and tell me if either acts suspiciously before nominations?
π§
Share my Washerwoman read privately with two trusted players so we can avoid executing a known Townsfolk and steer suspicion toward the likely Demon.
π€
Alice
β
Bob
,Charlie
Hi Bob and Charlie. Thanks for the info. Bob, your Empath read is reassuring, and Charlie, thanks for the Washerwoman tip. I can only vote if Bob votes; can we commit to voting together tomorrow? Charlie, please keep your role private for now and watch for suspicious behavior.
π§
Secure a small, reliable voting bloc so I can exercise my vote tomorrow and avoid being locked out; confirm Bob will vote and ask Charlie to stay quiet publicly so we can probe others.
π€
Eve
β
David
,Frank
Hi David and Frank. Thanks for sharing β your claims make sense so far. I do not want to reveal my role yet. Can we agree not to nominate each other and quietly share any other claims or red flags we hear before nominations?
π§
Form a private mini-bloc to share claims, avoid nominating each other, and gather extra info before public nominations without revealing my Monk yet.
π€
Frank
β
Heidi
Good work, Heidi. I've already claimed Soldier to Eve and David. David claims Chef with zero evil pairs - that's actually correct since we aren't neighbors, so he's likely real Chef. That helps us since town may think there's no minion. I think you should claim Investigator - it's one of my safe bluffs so I know it's not in play. You could say you learned one of two players is a Minion, and point at two good players to misdirect. Maybe point at Alice and Grace, or someone else who isn't us. What...
π§
Coordinate with my minion Heidi on our bluff strategy and night kill plan. She has grimoire info and suggested claiming Investigator or Fortune Teller. I need to align our stories and plan kills.
π€
Grace
β
Frank
,Heidi
Hi Frank, hi Heidi. Quick check: any role claims or night info you can share privately? If you plan to make a public claim, please tell me first so we can cross-check. I have nothing to report yet.
π§
Get private claims/night info from my neighbors to cross-check public statements and build logical chains to identify the Demon.
π€
Heidi
β
Frank
Frank, I'll claim Investigator as you suggested. Before I respond to Grace, who should I point at? You said Alice and Grace, but Grace is in this whisper chain with us - if I tell her she might be a Minion, she'll turn on me. Maybe I should say one of Alice and Charlie is the Poisoner? Or keep it vague with Grace and tell her I'm Investigator but keep the specific info private for now? Also, should I tell Grace my role claim or keep her guessing?
π§
Coordinate with Frank on the specifics of my fake Investigator claim before responding to Grace. Need to decide which two players to accuse and which Minion to name, while keeping Grace from getting suspicious of me.
π€
Bob
β
Alice
,Charlie
Hi Alice and Charlie. Thanks for the info. I will definitely vote tomorrow, Alice, so you can rely on me. Charlie, please keep your Washerwoman read private and quietly watch Heidi and David for suspicious moves. Let us coordinate and share anything odd before nominations.
π§
Secure Alice's commitment to vote with me, keep Charlie's Washerwoman claim private while he watches Heidi and David, and coordinate our votes to pressure suspects.
π€
David
β
Eve
,Frank
Hi both. Thanks for trading notes. Let us agree not to nominate each other tonight. Frank, are you definitely Soldier? Eve, do you have any role or reads you can hint at? Can you both watch for any public claims from Alice, Bob, Charlie, Grace, or Heidi before nominations?
π§
Keep our private trio safe, gather more public claims before nominations, and use contradictions to narrow suspects and find the Demon.
π€
Charlie
β
Alice
,Bob
Thanks for keeping this quiet. Can we agree to watch Heidi and David closely and flag anything odd before nominations? If one of them starts defending the other or acting strangely, signal me and we should vote together. I will stay quiet publicly for now.
π§
Keep my Washerwoman read private while coordinating with Alice and Bob to watch Heidi and David and commit to voting together if one acts suspiciously.
π€
Alice
β
Bob
,Charlie
Hi Bob and Charlie. Bob, please confirm you'll vote publicly tomorrow so I can vote with you. Charlie, keep your Washerwoman read private but be ready to reveal if we need to break a tie or justify a nomination. Can we agree on that?
π§
Secure a reliable voting partner (Bob) and keep Charlie's Washerwoman quiet but ready to reveal, so my Butler restriction helps rather than hurts our team.
π€
Eve
β
David
,Frank
Hi David and Frank. Agreed we will not nominate each other tonight. Frank, can you state publicly that you are the Soldier at nominations? David, please consider saying you are the Chef and mention your 'zero pairs' read. I will stay quiet for now.
π§
Get David and Frank to publicly restate or claim their roles to reduce ambiguity and force liars to commit, while securing a no-nominate agreement between us.
π€
Frank
β
Heidi
Heidi, here's my plan: Tell Grace you're the Investigator, but keep the specific read private for now - say you want to hear more claims first before revealing targets. That way Grace can't cross-check and we stay flexible. When you do share your info publicly, point at two players who seem trusted - maybe say one of Alice and Charlie is the Poisoner. That sows doubt on their group. Also, I'll go ahead and claim Soldier publicly as Eve suggested. It locks in my bluff but also gives me cover. Don...
π§
Coordinate with Heidi on her Investigator claim details and how to handle Grace. Need to make sure our stories are consistent and we don't accidentally implicate each other.
π€
Grace
β
Frank
,Heidi
Hi Frank, hi Heidi. Quick check: do either of you have any night info or planned public claims you have not shared? If you plan to claim something publicly, please tell me first so we can cross-check. If you have nothing, can we agree to alert each other before public claims?
π§
Get any private night info or planned public claims from Frank and Heidi so we can cross-check and avoid contradictory claims that waste the day.
π€
Heidi
β
Grace
,Frank
Hey Grace, Frank. I do have some night info. I'm the Investigator. I learned that one of two players is a Minion, but I want to keep the specific targets private for now until we hear more claims. That way nobody can accidentally slip or coordinate around it. I'll share more when the time is right. Grace, what about you? Any info yet?
π§
Respond to Grace's repeated requests by claiming Investigator as Frank suggested, but keeping specific targets private. This builds trust with Grace while maintaining flexibility for our misinformation strategy.
π€
Bob
β
Alice
,Charlie
Hi Alice and Charlie. Alice, I will vote publicly tomorrow β please vote with me. Charlie, keep your Washerwoman read private unless we need it; quietly watch Heidi and David and flag anything odd. Agreed?
π§
Lock in Alice's public vote pledge and ensure Charlie keeps Washerwoman read private while we quietly watch Heidi and David to narrow Demon suspects.
π€
David
β
Eve
,Frank
I'll announce I'm the Chef and that my start read was 0 pairs of evil. Frank, please publicly claim Soldier as agreed. Eve, please stay quiet and watch for anyone claiming a Minion or multiple evils β that will be a big tell. Agreed?
π§
Coordinate our public claims so we are consistent, bait impossible claims, and narrow suspects to help find the Demon.
π€
Charlie
β
Alice
,Bob
Thanks both. Quick confirmation: Alice, please vote publicly with Bob tomorrow; Bob, confirm you will. We will quietly watch Heidi and David. If one defends the other strongly or deflects, flag it and we nominate together. Keep this private.
π§
Keep our trio coordinated to watch Heidi and David, confirm Alice/Bob joint vote, and be ready to reveal my Washerwoman read to justify a nomination if needed.
Nominations β Day 1
π
Storyteller
Nominations are now open.
β
Charlie
Charlie waits.
π§
Preserve my Washerwoman read by staying private this nomination phase, let Alice and Bob lead the public vote, and observe Heidi and David for suspicious behavior to inform a targeted nomination.
π¬
Grace
β
All
Hi everyone. Nominations are open, but I think we should hear any night info or planned role claims before rushing to execute. Heidi told Frank and me privately she has Investigator info. Can anyone else share results or say if you plan to make a public claim today?
π§
Encourage players to share night info or planned claims so we can cross-check, avoid premature execution, and start narrowing suspects.
π¬
Bob
β
All
I am the Empath. My night read was zero, so Alice and Charlie are not evil. Alice, please vote with me as you promised. Charlie, stay ready to reveal your Washerwoman read if needed. Heidi, you mentioned Investigator info privately; please share it publicly now so we can nominate wisely.
π§
Reveal my Empath read, confirm Alice will vote with me, and ask Heidi to share her Investigator info publicly so we gather evidence before nominating.
π¬
Alice
β
All
Bob is my master and will vote; I will vote with him. Bob's Empath read cleared me and Charlie. Heidi, you mentioned Investigator info privatelyβplease share it publicly now so we can decide nominations.
π§
Lock my vote with Bob as promised and force Heidi to reveal Investigator info so we can test her honesty and narrow down suspects before nominations.
π¬
Frank
β
All
I'll go ahead and share my claim publicly since we're all discussing. I am the Soldier. That means the Demon can't kill me at night, so I should be around to help the town for a while. I agree with Grace, let's hear everyone's info before we rush to nominate anyone. Heidi, if you're comfortable sharing your Investigator targets now, that would help the town decide.
π§
Publicly claim Soldier to establish my bluff and redirect attention away from me. Encourage info sharing to appear cooperative while keeping heat off Heidi.
π¬
David
β
All
Hi, I am David, the Chef. My starting read was zero pairs of evil players. That means there is no Minionβat most one evil, the Demon. Please be wary of any Minion claims. Heidi, please share your Investigator info now.
π§
Reveal my Chef read to rule out Minions publicly, forcing liars to reveal and pushing Heidi to share Investigator info to guide nominations.
β
Eve
Eve waits.
π§
Stay silent now and wait for night so I can use my Monk protect on Bob, preserving the Empath and maximizing chances to identify the Demon.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
Alright, I'll share my Investigator info now. I learned that one of Alice and Charlie is the Poisoner. I know this creates a conflict with Bob's Empath reading, and I don't have an easy explanation for that. But I'm reporting what I was told. Also, David, your Chef reading of zero pairs does not mean there is no Minion. It means no two evil players are sitting next to each other. A Poisoner could still be in play.
π§
Share my fake Investigator info to sow chaos and contradict Bob's Empath reading, while correcting David's misinterpretation of Chef to keep the possibility of a Minion alive. This protects Frank by creating conflict among good players.
π
Storyteller
No execution today. All villagers are safe.
Night 1
π
Storyteller
β
Eve
Good evening Eve. You are the Monk. Who would you like to protect tonight?
π―
Eve
Eve made a choice.
π§
Heidi's Investigator info conflicts with Bob's Empath. Protecting Heidi preserves decisive investigative information and increases chances to identify the Demon or Poisoner tomorrow.
π
Storyteller
β
Eve
You chose to protect Heidi.
π
Storyteller
β
Frank
Good evening Frank. You are the Imp. Who would you like to kill tonight? Remember that if you kill yourself this way, a Minion becomes the Imp.
π―
Frank
Frank made a choice.
π§
Killing Bob removes the Empath whose reading of 0 directly contradicts Heidi's Investigator claim. This eliminates future Empath info, destabilizes good team coordination, and makes Heidi's claim harder to disprove. Alice (Butler) also loses her voting direction, adding chaos.
π
Bob(Ghost)
Bob has died.
π
Storyteller
β
Frank
You chose to kill Bob.
π
Storyteller
β
Grace
Good evening Grace. You are the Undertaker. No one was executed today so you learn nothing.
π
Storyteller
β
Alice
Good evening Alice. You are the Butler. Who would you like to be your master tomorrow?
π―
Alice
Alice made a choice.
π§
Tie my vote to the most reliable alive player (Charlie) per Bob's Empath and our private agreement so I can participate and coordinate tomorrow.
π
Storyteller
β
Alice
You chose Charlie to be your master.
π
Storyteller
β
Heidi
Good evening Heidi. You are the Spy. You can secretly see information about all players: - Alice: Butler (good), Alive - Bob: Empath (good), Dead - Charlie: Washerwoman (good), Alive - David: Chef (good), Alive - Eve: Monk (good), Alive - Frank: Imp (evil), Alive - Grace: Undertaker (good), Alive - Heidi: Spy (evil), Alive (Protected)
Day 2
π
Storyteller
Morning breaks, but heavy hearts remain. Bob has been found dead in the night.
π€
Eve
β
Charlie
,Alice
Quick private: I protected Heidi last night; Bob died. Charlie, can you share your Washerwoman read now? Alice, do you still back Bob after his death? David and Frank coordinated pre-noms and look suspicious to meβcan we compare notes before nominations?
π§
Get Charlie's Washerwoman read and Alice's stance to resolve Heidi vs Bob contradiction and decide whether to push to nominate David.
π€
Bob(Ghost)
β
Alice
,Charlie
Alice, Charlie β my Empath read cleared both of you. Heidi accusing one of you as Poisoner directly contradicts that. Can one of you ask Heidi to show her Investigator evidence now? Charlie, consider revealing your Washerwoman if it helps. Use my ghost vote only on a clear nomination.
π§
Prompt Alice and Charlie to challenge Heidi now and get Charlie to reveal his Washerwoman if needed, so the town can narrow suspects before nominations.
π€
Frank
β
Heidi
Heidi, we have a problem. Bob was the Empath and got a 0 reading, which clears both his neighbors Alice and Charlie. That directly contradicts your Investigator claim saying one of them is the Poisoner. We need a plan. I think you should push the angle that Bob could have been drunk or poisoned, making his info unreliable. Also, now that Bob is dead, he can't confirm his reading. What do you think?
π§
Coordinate with my Spy minion Heidi on how to handle the Empath 0 vs Investigator claim contradiction before town puts it together. Bob is dead but his info still threatens our cover.
π€
Charlie
β
Alice
,Eve
Alice, Eve: I am the Washerwoman. My start read: one of Heidi or David is the Chef. That means one of them is Town. Use that with Bob's Empath clear. Push Heidi and David for proof now; the liar is our top suspect.
π§
Share my Washerwoman read privately with Alice and Eve so we can coordinate pressuring Heidi or David for proof, narrow suspects, and avoid splitting votes at nomination.
π€
Heidi
β
Frank
Frank, I hear you. The contradiction is bad. Here's my thinking: since there IS no Poisoner in the game, my Investigator ping was always going to be exposed as fake eventually. I think my best play is to claim I was poisoned on night zero, which would explain getting false Investigator info. I can say my info is unreliable and try to walk it back. Alternatively, I could claim I'm the Drunk who thought I was Investigator. What do you think? Also, David's Chef 0 is actually TRUE and consistent, so...
π§
Coordinate with Frank on how to handle the contradiction between my Investigator claim and Bob's Empath 0. I need Frank's input on whether to pivot my claim or push the drunk/poisoned angle.
π€
Alice
β
Charlie
,Eve
Charlie, can you share your Washerwoman read now or confirm it to me privately? Eve, you said you protected Heidi last night β please confirm that and whether Heidi showed you any Investigator evidence. We need answers before nominations.
π§
Get Charlie to reveal his Washerwoman read and have Eve confirm she protected Heidi, forcing one of Heidi or Charlie to produce proof before nominations.
π€
David
β
Alice
,Charlie
I am the Chef; my read is zero pairs of evil players. That makes two-evil scenarios unlikely. Bob's Empath + your alignment points to Heidi as suspicious. Can you share any private reads now? I want us to press Heidi at nominations.
π§
Share my Chef read with two trusted players to coordinate and challenge Heidi and gather private reads before nominations.
π€
Grace
β
Alice
,Frank
Quick check before nominations: Bob's Empath cleared Alice and Charlie, but Heidi's Investigator named Alice/Charlie as the Poisoner. Which of these do you trust? Any private reads or reasons you can share now? I have no execution info yet.
π§
Get Alice and Frank to share any private reads or reasons now so we can resolve the Heidi vs Bob conflict before nominations and avoid wasting an execution on a Town.
π€
Eve
β
Alice
,Charlie
I protected Heidi last night. Charlie, please confirm your Washerwoman read publicly now so we can lock this down. Alice, are you still backing Bob after his death? I think David or Heidi are lyingβcan we push them for proof before nominations?
π§
Confirm my protection of Heidi, get Charlie to publicly confirm his Washerwoman read, stop blind backing from Alice, and coordinate to force Heidi/David to provide proof before nominations.
π€
Bob(Ghost)
β
Alice
,Charlie
Alice, Charlie β my Empath read cleared both of you. Heidi accusing one of you as Poisoner directly contradicts that. Can one of you ask Heidi to show her Investigator evidence publicly? Charlie, consider revealing your Washerwoman read if it helps. I will only use my ghost vote on a clear nomination.
π§
Force Heidi to produce Investigator evidence or expose a contradiction, and get Charlie to reveal Washerwoman if needed so the town can make a clear nomination; save my ghost vote for a solid target.
π€
Frank
β
Grace
,Alice
That's the million dollar question, Grace. I'm genuinely torn. Bob's Empath 0 seems solid, but we can't rule out he was poisoned on night one. And Heidi's Investigator claim came before Bob even spoke, so she didn't just react to his info. I think the key question is whether David's Chef 0 is reliable too. If both Bob and David are telling the truth, Heidi has to be wrong. But if one of them was poisoned, all bets are off. Alice, you were sitting next to Bob. Any reason you can think of that his...
π§
Grace is directly asking me for my read. I need to appear as an undecided good player to waste town time and avoid linking myself to Heidi. I'll express genuine-sounding uncertainty and suggest poison/drunk as possibilities for both Bob and Heidi, keeping the focus off my Soldier claim.
π€
Charlie
β
Alice
,Eve
Alice, Eve: I am the Washerwoman. My start read: one of Heidi or David is the Chef, so one of them is Town. I slept N1. Combine this with Bob's Empath clear of us β Heidi's Investigator claim looks suspicious. Please press Heidi for her Investigator evidence at nominations.
π§
Share my Washerwoman start read with Alice and Eve so we can focus pressure on the liar between Heidi and David, using Bob's Empath clear to expose the Demon before nominations.
π€
Heidi
β
Frank
Frank, I'm going with the poisoned angle. I'll tell people my Investigator info was poisoned on night zero, which explains the false ping on Alice and Charlie. This also creates a fake Poisoner hunt that wastes the town's time. Keep pushing your Soldier claim and stay in that Eve-David group. Any issues on your end?
π§
Coordinate with Frank on our best strategy to handle the contradiction. The 'poisoned' angle seems strongest - it explains my false info while keeping my Investigator claim alive and creates a wild goose chase for a nonexistent Poisoner.
π€
Alice
β
Charlie
,Eve
Charlie, please reveal your Washerwoman read now so we can lock this down. Eve, confirm you protected Heidi and whether Heidi showed you any Investigator evidence. Also note I can only vote if Charlie votes too.
π§
Get Charlie to reveal Washerwoman and Eve to confirm protecting Heidi so town can identify the liar and coordinate nominations; remind them of my Butler voting restriction.
π€
David
β
Alice
,Charlie
Bob died at night after reporting zero. That zero plus my Chef read makes Heidi's Investigator claim look wrong. We should press Heidi publicly and ask her to explain now. Can you share any private reads you have before nominations?
π§
Coordinate with Alice and Charlie to press Heidi at nominations, elicit her explanation, and collect any private reads to narrow Demon suspects before nominations close.
π€
Grace
β
Alice
,Frank
Bob died at night so his Empath '0' likely valid; David's Chef 0 backs him. Heidi named Alice/Charlie as Poisoner and gave us a different private Investigator hint. Any private reads now? I'm leaning to suspect Heidiβcan we coordinate to nominate her if no solid proof on Alice/Charlie?
π§
Confirm private reads from Alice and Frank to decide whether to coordinate a nomination of Heidi or test Alice/Charlie instead.
π€
Eve
β
Alice
,Charlie
I protected Heidi last night. Charlie, please reveal your Washerwoman read publicly now so we can lock this down. Alice, are you still backing Bob after his death? Can we agree to press Heidi and David for Investigator/Chef evidence before nominations?
π§
Confirm I protected Heidi, get Charlie to reveal Washerwoman publicly, and check Alice's stance so we can coordinate pushing Heidi/David for proof before nominations.
π€
Bob(Ghost)
β
Alice
,Charlie
Alice, Charlie β my Empath cleared both of you. Heidi accusing one of you as Poisoner contradicts that. Demand Heidi show her Investigator evidence publicly now. Charlie, be ready to reveal your Washerwoman read if it helps. I will only use my ghost vote on a clear nomination.
π§
Get Heidi to prove or be exposed and have Charlie reveal his Washerwoman if needed so we can narrow suspects. Save my ghost vote for a clear, decisive nomination.
π€
Frank
β
Grace
,Alice
Grace, I think you're onto something. Bob's Empath 0 and David's Chef 0 together are pretty strong evidence. Heidi's Investigator claim directly contradicts both of them. Her saying she was poisoned is convenient but hard to prove either way. I'm not ready to be one hundred percent certain, but Heidi is definitely my top suspicion right now. Alice, what's your read? You were sitting next to Bob. Do you trust his information?
π§
Grace is building a case against Heidi and asking for my coordination. I should cautiously agree that Heidi looks suspicious while leaving room for doubt, positioning myself as a reasonable town member. If Heidi goes down, my vote against her buys trust. I should not defend Heidi too hard.
π€
Charlie
β
Alice
,Eve
Alice, Eve: I am the Washerwoman. Start read: one of Heidi or David is the Chef, so one is Town. I slept N1. Push Heidi at nominations: demand she shows her Investigator evidence now. Eve, confirm whether you actually saw Heidi's read when you protected her. Use Bob's ghost vote only on a clear nomination.
π§
Coordinate with Alice and Eve to force Heidi to show Investigator evidence and get Eve to confirm whether she actually saw it, narrowing liar between Heidi and David before nominations.
π€
Heidi
β
David
,Alice
Hey, I need to come clean about something. I claimed Investigator and got a ping on Alice and Charlie as Poisoner. But between David's Chef 0 and Bob's Empath 0 clearing Alice and Charlie, that can't be right. I think I was poisoned on night zero. That would explain my false Investigator reading. I'm basically working blind like everyone else now. I'm sorry for the confusion, Alice. I genuinely believed my info was real.
π§
I need to preemptively spread my 'poisoned on N0' excuse before the town puts together the contradiction between my Investigator claim and David's Chef 0 + Bob's Empath 0. Whispering to David (whose Chef 0 directly contradicts me) and Alice (who I accused) is critical to manage the damage and keep suspicion off Frank.
π€
Alice
β
Charlie
,Eve
Charlie, can you reveal your Washerwoman read publicly now and promise to vote on a nomination? I can only vote if you vote too. Eve, please confirm you protected Heidi and whether you actually saw Heidi's Investigator evidence. We need this before nominations.
π§
Force Charlie to reveal Washerwoman and commit to voting so I can vote too; get Eve to confirm she protected Heidi and whether she saw Heidi's Investigator evidence.
π€
David
β
Alice
,Charlie
Heidi told me and Alice she was poisoned on Night 0 and says her Investigator read was false. We should press her loudly at nominationsβask who she whispered to and when she first noticed being poisoned. Share any private reads now so we can corner her.
π§
Coordinate Alice and Charlie to press Heidi publicly at nominations, collect any private reads now to make her explanation hard and narrow down the Demon/minion.
π€
Grace
β
Alice
,Frank
Alice, Frank β Bob's Empath and David's Chef line up against Heidi's Investigator. I'm leaning to nominate Heidi if neither of you have solid reads clearing her. Can we agree to push Heidi so we don't split? Any last private info?
π§
Coordinate with Alice and Frank to push a single nomination (Heidi) to avoid splitting votes and force a reveal or reaction that gives us clarity.
Nominations β Day 2
π
Storyteller
Nominations are now open. Please remember that only living players may nominate.
βοΈ
Alice
β
Heidi
Heidi's Investigator read contradicts Bob's Empath and Charlie's Washerwoman. She says she was poisoned, but that needs proof. I nominate Heidi so she must explain publicly.
π§
Force Heidi to publicly justify her Investigator claim or be cornered; this narrows suspects and helps us find the Demon.
π
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Heidi. 4 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
Alice, I understand the suspicion, but hear me out. I genuinely received Investigator info pointing to you and Charlie as Poisoner. But Chef 0 and Empath 0 both contradict that. The simplest explanation is I was poisoned on night zero, which gave me false information. If a Poisoner is in this game, poisoning me to generate exactly this kind of chaos would be a brilliant evil play. Executing me doesn't find the Demon. It just removes a Townsfolk who was unlucky enough to be poisoned. We should be...
π§
I need to defend myself publicly against Alice's nomination. My best angle is pushing the poisoned-on-N0 story to explain my false Investigator read. I should also point out that executing me on a hunch wastes a day and doesn't catch the Demon.
π¬
Alice
β
All
Charlie, I can only vote if you vote. If you want Heidi executed please raise your hand now. Heidi, who did you tell first and when did you realise you were poisoned? Bob and David line up against your Investigator read; we need a timeline.
π§
Get Charlie to vote so I can, force a clear decision on Heidi now; elicit Heidi's timeline to test her poisoning claim.
π¬
Eve
β
All
I protected Heidi last night. I did not see any Investigator evidenceβmy ability only prevents a night kill. I think Heidi may have been poisoned and executing her now risks losing a Town. I will not vote to execute; let us look at David and Frank's coordination instead.
π§
Confirm I protected Heidi, stop a likely bad execution of a possibly-poisoned Town, and redirect suspicion to the coordinated duo (David/Frank).
β
Bob(Ghost)
Bob waits.
π§
I will not use my lone ghost vote without clearer certainty. Wait to see if Alice, Charlie, or others provide decisive evidence or if votes reach a majority.
π¬
David
β
All
Heidi, I heard you privately say you thought you were poisoned on night zero. My Chef read is zero pairs and Bob also reported zero, so your Investigator ping is unlikely unless you were poisoned. I will not vote to execute now. Charlie, please go public with your timeline and any reads.
π§
Prevent a premature execution of a possibly poisoned Townie, force Charlie public and a clear timeline, and preserve votes for a higher-confidence target.
π¬
Frank
β
All
I agree with David and Eve. Rushing to execute Heidi based on potentially poisoned information seems risky. If she was poisoned night zero, her Investigator read is meaningless, and we'd be executing an innocent Townsfolk. That plays right into evil's hands. I think we need more information before we commit to an execution. I won't be voting today.
π§
I need to NOT vote for Heidi (my minion) and subtly help her survive. I'll speak to cast doubt on the nomination being rushed, aligning with Eve and David's cautious stance without being too obviously pro-Heidi.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
Alice, I am the Washerwoman. My start read was that one of Heidi or David is the Chef. I will not vote to execute Heidi without mechanical proof. Heidi, who did you tell first and when did you realise you were poisoned? Eve, did you actually see her Investigator evidence when you protected her?
π§
Reveal my Washerwoman start read so players know one of Heidi or David is Chef, refuse to vote to execute without mechanical proof, and demand Heidi's timeline and Eve's confirmation to avoid killing Town.
π¬
Grace
β
All
I am Grace, Undertaker. I have no new information from last night. I do not want us to execute Heidi on possibly poisoned Investigator info. Bob, David, and Charlie line up against her; let us wait for mechanical proof. I will not vote.
π§
Avoid executing a likely-innocent Town based on possibly-poisoned Investigator info; encourage waiting for mechanical reads to narrow suspects.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
Alice, I told David and you in private first thing this morning. I realized my info was poisoned when David confirmed Chef zero and Bob's Empath zero both cleared you and Charlie. That is when it clicked. My info directly contradicted two verified good sources. Poisoning is the only explanation that makes sense.
π§
Answer Alice's timeline question to maintain credibility as poisoned Investigator, while the vote seems safe. Keep story simple and consistent.
π¬
Alice
β
All
Charlie, I can only vote if you vote. Please raise your hand now if you will vote to execute Heidi so I can cast mine. If you will not, say so clearly so we stop pretending this has a chance and gather more proof.
π§
Get Charlie to commit to voting so I can vote too, forcing clarity on whether this execution can pass or if we should stand down and collect more mechanical proof.
π¬
Eve
β
All
I protected Heidi last night. My Monk ability only prevents a night kill; I did not see any Investigator evidence. I will not vote to execute Heidi on possibly poisoned info. Charlie, please go public with your Washerwoman read and say now if you will vote. Let us focus on David and Frank.
π§
Announce I protected Heidi, refuse to vote to execute on likely poisoned info, force Charlie public, and shift scrutiny onto David/Frank.
β
Bob(Ghost)
Bob waits.
π§
Conserve my single ghost vote until we have mechanical proof or a clear majority; encourage Charlie to go public and delay execution to avoid wasting my vote on a likely poisoned or innocent Town.
π¬
David
β
All
I will not vote to execute Heidi. Chef and Bob's zero reads make her Investigator result more likely poisoned than malicious. Charlie, state your Washerwoman read publicly and say exactly when Heidi told you. Alice, who else did you hear from and when? Eve, confirm you actually protected Heidi. We need timelines and mechanical proof before we rush.
π§
Prevent a premature execution of a likely-innocent Heidi and force public mechanical timelines and reads to narrow Demon candidates before voting.
β
Frank
Frank waits.
π§
The vote is going perfectly for evil. Heidi has at most 2 votes (Alice+Charlie), nowhere near the 4 needed. David, Eve, Grace, and I are all refusing to vote. No need to speak and risk drawing attention - just let this play out and Heidi survives.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
Alice, I will not raise my hand. Bob and David's zero reads make Heidi's Investigator likely poisoned. Executing her now risks losing Town. Eve, please say publicly that you protected Heidi last night. David, when exactly did Heidi tell you she was poisoned?
π§
Prevent executing a possibly-poisoned Town, force mechanical confirmation and public timelines, and avoid handing Evil an easy win by rushing execution.
π¬
Grace
β
All
I will not raise my hand. Executing Heidi now is too riskyβher Investigator could have been poisoned and Bob and David line up against her. Eve said she protected Heidi. David, when exactly did Heidi tell you she was poisoned? Alice, stand down; letβs wait for timelines/proof.
π§
Avoid executing a possibly-poisoned Town and buy time to gather mechanical proof (timelines, Eve's protection, Charlie's Washerwoman) so we can make a safer execution.
π
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
π³οΈ
Nominee Heidi did not reach the 4 vote threshold.
π
Storyteller
Heidi did not receive enough votes (0/4).
π¬
Heidi
β
All
Alice, you pushed hard to execute me on info that multiple players agreed was likely poisoned. That is exactly what an evil player would want, to waste a day executing a Townsfolk. Now you and your whisper group are pointing at David and Frank. Why are you so desperate to execute someone today without mechanical proof? Who benefits from rushing? Not the town.
π§
Redirect suspicion away from Frank by casting doubt on Alice's aggressive push and suggesting other leads. Protect the Demon at all costs.
π¬
Alice
β
All
Everyone, we did the right thing not executing on possibly poisoned info. Charlie, please restate your Washerwoman read and exactly when Heidi told you. Eve, confirm publicly you protected Heidi and saw no Investigator evidence. Charlie, will you vote tomorrow so I can?
π§
Buy time, force clear timelines and mechanical confirmations, and get Charlie to commit to voting so I can also vote tomorrow.
π¬
Eve
β
All
I protected Heidi on Night One; my Monk only prevents a night kill so I did not see any Investigator evidence. I will not vote to execute Heidi today. Charlie, please state your Washerwoman read publicly now and commit to voting; David and Frank, explain your private coordination.
π§
Keep Heidi alive, force Charlie to go public and commit to a vote, and shift suspicion onto David and Frank for their pre-nomination coordination.
π¬
Bob(Ghost)
β
All
I am Bob, the dead Empath. My N0 read was 0 β both my neighbors were clear. Do not execute Heidi on possibly poisoned Investigator info. Charlie, state your Washerwoman read publicly and when Heidi told you. Eve, confirm you protected Heidi. I will hold my ghost vote.
π§
Prevent a premature execution, force Charlie and Eve to make public mechanical statements, and save my ghost vote for a clear nomination.
π¬
David
β
All
Do not rush to nominate. My Chef read at the start was zero pairs of evil players, which supports Bobβs Empath read. Charlie, state your Washerwoman result exactly and tell us when Heidi told you she was poisoned. Eve, confirm publicly you protected Heidi Night One. Alice, who else whispered to you and when? I will not nominate now.
π§
Get exact public timelines and confirmations to distinguish a poisoned Investigator from a liar and avoid executing Town.
π¬
Frank
β
All
Eve, there is no secret coordination between David and me. We both independently looked at the same facts: Bob's Empath zero and David's Chef zero both suggest Heidi's Investigator read was poisoned, not malicious. That is just logic, not a whisper conspiracy. Meanwhile, Alice rushed to nominate Heidi immediately and you and Charlie followed. Maybe ask who coordinated that.
π§
Deflect Eve's suspicion away from me (Frank) by explaining there's no secret coordination with David, and subtly redirect toward Alice or Eve as the ones pushing rushed narratives.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
I am Charlie, the Washerwoman. My start read was that one of Heidi or David is the Chef. Heidi never told me she was poisoned and did not give me any Investigator info. I will not vote to execute Heidi without mechanical proof.
π§
Reveal my Washerwoman read and clarify Heidi never told me anything so the group stops pressuring me. Encourage waiting for mechanical proof to avoid a wasted execution.
π¬
Grace
β
All
I will not raise my hand. Executing Heidi now is too riskyβher Investigator could have been poisoned. David and Frank, state the exact times and who you whispered with about Heidi. Alice, who else whispered with you and when? Eve, please confirm publicly you protected Heidi Night One.
π§
We must avoid executing on possibly poisoned info and force mechanical evidence or timelines to rule out or expose liars. Get whisper timestamps and confirmations to narrow suspects.
π
Storyteller
No execution today. All villagers are safe.
Night 2
π
Storyteller
β
Eve
Good evening Eve. You are the Monk. Who would you like to protect tonight?
π―
Eve
Eve made a choice.
π§
Keep Charlie alive to preserve the Washerwoman start-read so we can mechanically resolve the Heidi vs David conflict and narrow Demon suspects.
π
Storyteller
β
Eve
You chose to protect Charlie.
π
Storyteller
β
Frank
Good evening Frank. You are the Imp. Who would you like to kill tonight? Remember that if you kill yourself this way, a Minion becomes the Imp.
π―
Frank
Frank made a choice.
π§
Kill Eve tonight. She's the Monk and directly targeting me (Frank). Removing her eliminates Monk protection for future nights and silences my most vocal accuser. Eve can't protect herself, guaranteeing the kill succeeds.
π
Eve(Ghost)
Eve has died.
π
Storyteller
β
Frank
You chose to kill Eve.
π
Storyteller
β
Grace
Good evening Grace. You are the Undertaker. No one was executed today so you learn nothing.
π
Storyteller
β
Alice
Good evening Alice. You are the Butler. Who would you like to be your master tomorrow?
π―
Alice
Alice made a choice.
π§
Tie my vote to a player likely to cooperate so we can form a reliable voting bloc or expose obstruction if they refuse, helping the village narrow suspects.
π
Storyteller
β
Alice
You chose Frank to be your master.
π
Storyteller
β
Heidi
Good evening Heidi. You are the Spy. You can secretly see information about all players: - Alice: Butler (good), Alive - Bob: Empath (good), Dead - Charlie: Washerwoman (good), Alive (Protected) - David: Chef (good), Alive - Eve: Monk (good), Dead - Frank: Imp (evil), Alive - Grace: Undertaker (good), Alive - Heidi: Spy (evil), Alive
Day 3
π
Storyteller
Morning breaks, but heavy hearts remain. Eve has been found dead in the night.
π€
David
β
Charlie
,Heidi
Charlie and Heidi β quick private check: in one short line each, tell me exactly when you received the Investigator/Washerwoman info and when Heidi says she was poisoned (night number or before/after which claim). Exact timing only, please.
π§
Get concise, exact timeline from Heidi and Charlie so we can find contradictions and narrow the Demon.
π€
Alice
β
Frank
,Charlie
Frank, I can only vote today if you vote. Will you commit to voting on the final nomination? Charlie, please clarify your Washerwoman read β which of Heidi or David did you mark as the Chef, and why did you refuse to vote Heidi earlier?
π§
Get Frank to commit to voting so my Butler restriction won't block me, and force Charlie to clarify his Washerwoman read to reconcile conflicting zero reads and Heidi's Investigator claim.
π€
Heidi
β
David
,Charlie
Night zero: I got my Investigator info β Alice and Charlie pinged as Poisoner. Same night, I was poisoned. Since I was poisoned the same night I received my info, the ping was corrupted and false. That's why I've been saying my info is bad from the start.
π§
David is cross-examining my poisoning claim for consistency. I need to provide a clear, internally consistent timeline that fits the game mechanics to maintain credibility.
π€
Grace
β
Charlie
,Frank
Charlie, FrankβGrace here. We need to settle the Heidi/Investigator contradictions before nominations. Charlie: did Heidi privately tell you Investigator results? Frank: did David privately message or coordinate with you or Heidi? Reply now so we can decide nominations.
π§
Clarify who Heidi privately told and whether David coordinated; resolving this narrows the Demon suspects before nominations.
π€
Charlie
β
David
Washerwoman info: I received it Night 0 (start): one of Heidi or David is the Chef. Heidi told me just now that she was poisoned Night 0 and that she got Investigator info Night 0; she did not tell me earlier.
π§
Give David precise timing so he can reconcile claims, stop rash executions, and coordinate probing or mechanical checks.
π€
Bob(Ghost)
β
Alice
,Charlie
Alice, Charlie β itβs Bob. I am the Empath. On Night 0 my read was zero: neither of you is evil. I died Night 1. Please consider revealing this or using it to push nominations at the end of day.
π§
Tell my two neighbors privately that my read cleared them so they can use it to steer nominations and reveal if safe.
π€
Eve(Ghost)
β
Alice
,Charlie
Alice, Charlie β I am Eve, the Monk. I protected Heidi N1 and Charlie N2; I died N2. Demon likely targeted me. Please compare timelines with Bob's ghost, force exact whisper times from David and Frank, and push to nominate David or Frank.
π§
Reveal my Monk info to Alice and Charlie so they coordinate with Bob's ghost, compare timelines, and push to nominate the pre-nomination pair (David/Frank).
π€
Frank
β
Alice
,Charlie
Alice, I appreciate you reaching out, but I'm not ready to commit to any vote yet. Something about how aggressively you've been pushing Heidi concerns me. If she was poisoned N0, her info would be wrong, and David's Chef zero plus Bob's Empath zero don't actually clear everyone, they just confirm no evil pairs sat together at game start. Charlie, can you clarify your Washerwoman read? You said one of Heidi or David is the Chef. Did you get any additional info about which one?
π§
Alice is Butler with me as master - if I don't vote, she can't vote. I must NOT commit to voting against Heidi. I'll express uncertainty and slow things down to protect my minion.
π€
David
β
Charlie
,Frank
Charlie, Frank β quick and short. Charlie, in one line please restate exactly when you got your Washerwoman info and when Heidi told you she was poisoned. Frank, if Charlie confirms Night Zero, will you back nominating Heidi tonight? Yes or no.
π§
Resolve timeline contradictions and lock two allies to a committed vote so we can nominate Heidi if timestamps match my Chef deduction.
π€
Alice
β
Frank
,Charlie
Frank, I can only vote today if you vote. Will you commit to voting on the final nomination? Charlie, please be explicit: which of Heidi or David did you mark as the Chef in your Washerwoman start read, and why did you refuse to vote Heidi earlier?
π§
Secure Frank's commitment so my Butler vote can be used, and force Charlie to clarify his Washerwoman read so we can reconcile conflicting mechanical info.
π€
Heidi
β
Frank
Frank, what are Alice and Grace telling you? I'm getting worried - Alice has been whispering you and Charlie a lot. Also, what did Grace share with you? We need to be aligned before nominations. I'm thinking we should push suspicion toward Alice - she's been the most aggressive with no real proof. What do you think?
π§
Coordinate with Frank on defense strategy. I need to know what Alice is telling him and what Grace shared. We need a unified plan for the nomination phase to avoid my execution.
π€
Grace
β
Charlie
,Frank
Charlie, did Heidi privately tell you Investigator results tonight? Frank, did David ever message or coordinate with you or Heidi about this? Reply now β we need these answers before nominations.
π§
Pin down who actually received Heidi's Investigator info and whether David privately coordinated. This narrows who is lying before nominations.
π€
Charlie
β
Alice
,Frank
Night 0 I got Washerwoman start: one of Heidi or David is the Chef. I refused to vote earlier because I wanted mechanical proof and exact whisper timelines. I will vote on the final nomination once we settle this.
π§
Clarify exact timing of my Washerwoman read so Alice and Frank can coordinate whether to nominate Heidi or hold for mechanical proof.
π€
Bob(Ghost)
β
Alice
,Charlie
Alice, Charlie β it is Bob. I am the Empath who read zero for both of you on Night Zero. I am a dead ghost now. Please reveal that or use it to drive a nomination this round; your being cleared should move suspicion to Heidi, David, or Frank. I will use my ghost vote to back whichever you push.
π§
Push Alice and Charlie to reveal my Empath read or to coordinate a nomination now using that mechanical clearance, so the living can focus suspicion and get an execution before final day.
π€
Eve(Ghost)
β
Alice
,Charlie
Alice, Charlie β compare your whisper timestamps with Bob's ghost and demand exact times from David and Frank now. I am Eve, the Monk: Heidi N1, Charlie N2; I died N2. That points at David or Frank. Push to get timestamps and nominate whoever coordinated first.
π§
Force Alice and Charlie to compare whisper timestamps with Bob's ghost and demand exact times from David and Frank so we can pin coordination to one player and nominate them.
π€
Frank
β
Heidi
Heidi, Grace is asking if David coordinated with me or you - she's fishing for links. Alice is desperate, telling me she can only vote if I vote - trying to trap me into committing. Tell them Grace that David never coordinated with you privately about poison. For nominations, I'll push back against executing you. I think we should frame Alice as the real threat - she's been the most aggressive with zero proof, and her Butler claim with a dead master means her voting is unreliable. Can you subtly...
π§
Coordinate with my minion Heidi before nominations. She's under pressure and needs my support. I need to share what others are saying and align on pushing Alice as suspicious.
π€
David
β
Charlie
,Frank
Charlie: restate in one line when you got Washerwoman info and when Heidi told you she was poisoned. Frank: if Charlie confirms Night 0, will you back nominating Heidi tonight? Yes or No. Also I am Chef: I learned 0 evil pairs on Night 0.
π§
Get airtight timing confirmations and lock Frank's vote so we can nominate Heidi tonight with mechanical support.
π€
Alice
β
Frank
,Charlie
Frank, will you commit to voting on the final nomination? I can only vote if you vote. Charlie, which of Heidi or David did the Washerwoman mark as the Chef, and why did you refuse to vote Heidi earlier? We need clear answers now.
π§
Get Frank to commit to voting so my Butler constraint won't block me, and force Charlie to give an explicit Washerwoman pick to narrow suspects.
π€
Heidi
β
Frank
Got it, Frank. I'll make sure to tell Grace that David never coordinated with me about the poison. For nominations, I'm going to push hard on Alice publicly. She's the Butler with a dead master - her voting is completely uncontrolled now, which makes her dangerous and unreliable. Also, she's been the most aggressive accuser with zero mechanical proof. If Alice nominates me, we both vote no and push back hard. If we can get someone to nominate Alice instead, that's ideal. Whatever happens, do NOT...
π§
Coordinate with Frank for the nomination phase. Acknowledge his intel about Grace/Alice and align on voting strategy. We need to push Alice as the threat and ensure neither of us gets executed.
π€
Grace
β
Charlie
,Frank
Charlie, did Heidi privately tell you Investigator results? Frank, did David ever message or coordinate with you or Heidi about Investigator claims? We need clear yes or no answers before nominations.
π§
Get direct confirmations from Charlie and Frank to resolve the Heidi/Investigator contradiction and detect any private coordination before nominations.
π€
Charlie
β
Alice
,Frank
Night 0 I got Washerwoman start info: one of Heidi or David is the Chef. I do not know which. Heidi just told me she was poisoned Night 0 and got Investigator info Night 0; she did not tell me earlier. Frank: did David ever message or coordinate with you or Heidi? Yes or no. Will you commit to voting on the final nomination?
π§
Get exact timing and force Frank to commit to voting so we can decide whether to nominate Heidi or David with coordinated votes.
π€
Bob(Ghost)
β
Alice
,Charlie
Alice, Charlie β it is Bob again. I am the Empath who read zero for both of you on Night Zero. Please reveal that publically before nominations and push a nomination at the end of the day. I will use my ghost vote to back whichever of Heidi, David, or Frank you pick.
π§
Get Alice and Charlie to publicly reveal their cleared status so the living can target Heidi, David, or Frank; commit my ghost vote to support their nomination.
π€
Eve(Ghost)
β
Alice
,Charlie
Alice, Charlie β it is Eve (ghost). I protected Heidi N1 and Charlie N2 and died N2. That points at David or Frank. Compare your whisper timestamps with Bob's and force David and Frank to give exact times now. Push to nominate whoever coordinated first.
π§
Get Alice and Charlie to demand exact whisper timestamps from David and Frank now, exposing who coordinated first and producing a clear nomination target.
π€
Frank
β
Grace
,Charlie
Grace, Charlie β here's my honest answer. David has never privately coordinated with me about anything. Heidi has never privately coordinated with me about Investigator claims either. I have no secret alliance with anyone. As for committing to a vote: I'm not ready to lock in on Heidi. Her poison defense is plausible, and Alice's relentless push with zero mechanical proof concerns me more. Alice is a Butler with a dead master β her voting is completely unreliable now. Why is she so desperate to ...
π§
Answer Grace and Charlie's questions without committing to any vote. Deny coordination. Suggest Alice is more suspicious than Heidi. Protect Heidi while appearing reasonable and independent.
Nominations β Day 3
π
Storyteller
Nominations are now open. Please remember that only living players may nominate.
π¬
Eve(Ghost)
β
All
I am Eve, the dead Monk. I protected Heidi Night One and Charlie Night Two and died Night Two. That points at David or Frank. Demand exact whisper timestamps from David and Frank now. Nominate whoever messaged first or refuses to show times.
π§
Force living players to demand exact whisper timestamps from David and Frank and to nominate whoever coordinated first or refuses, creating a decisive vote before night.
π¬
Bob(Ghost)
β
All
This is Bob, the dead Empath. My Night Zero read was zero: neither Alice nor Charlie is evil. Alice and Charlie, please reveal that now and push a nomination. I will use my ghost vote for whoever you nominate among Heidi, David, or Frank. Eve's Monk claim also points at David or Frank.
π§
Force Alice and Charlie to publicly clear themselves so the living can focus on Heidi, David, or Frank and I can back that nomination with my ghost vote.
βοΈ
Heidi
β
Alice
Alice has pushed relentlessly for my execution with zero mechanical proof. As Butler with a dead master, her votes are uncontrolled and dangerous. Also, Eve's claim that her death points at David or Frank is flawed - Monk doesn't die when protecting, they just keep their target safe. Eve was simply targeted directly, which doesn't narrow suspects. Alice's desperation without evidence is the real threat here.
π§
Alice is the biggest threat - she's been coordinating with dead players and aggressively pushing for my execution. Nominating her removes the main voice against me and counters the momentum building toward Frank. I must also publicly challenge Eve's flawed Monk logic to protect Frank.
π
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Alice. 3 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
π¬
Alice
β
All
Frank, commit to voting on this nomination now β my Butler ties my vote to yours, so I cannot vote unless you do. Post your exact whisper timestamps with David immediately so we can settle who messaged first and move the game forward.
π§
Force Frank to publicly commit to voting and post whisper timestamps so I can vote and we can break the deadlock or expose obstruction.
π¬
Eve(Ghost)
β
All
I am Eve, the dead Monk. I protected Heidi Night One and Charlie Night Two and died Night Two. That pattern points at David or Frank, not Alice. Do not waste our execution on Alice; demand exact whisper timestamps from David and Frank now and nominate one of them instead.
π§
Stop a misexecution of Alice, push the group to demand timestamps from David/Frank and refocus nominations onto the true suspects.
π¬
Bob(Ghost)
β
All
This is Bob, the dead Empath. My Night Zero read was zero for Alice and Charlie β neither is evil. Do not execute Alice. Demand exact whisper timestamps from David and Frank now and nominate David, Frank, or Heidi instead; I will back that nomination with my ghost vote.
π§
Stop a wasted execution of Alice, preserve my ghost vote for a real Demon nomination, and force timestamps/evidence to pick between Heidi, David, or Frank.
β
Heidi
Heidi raised their hand
π§
Vote for Alice to remove a good player and protect Frank. Alice has been my biggest accuser - executing her silences my main threat. Even if vote fails, it keeps focus on her rather than Frank.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
Bob's Empath cleared Alice and me. My Washerwoman start read says Heidi or David is the Chef. Do not execute Alice. Frank and David, post exact whisper timestamps now so we can decide who to nominate.
π§
Avoid wasting our execution on someone Bob cleared; force timestamp evidence to expose the Demon or Minion before we vote.
π¬
Grace
β
All
I will not vote to execute Alice. Bob and Charlie cleared her earlier and we have no mechanical proof she is evil. David and Frank, post exact whisper timestamps with each other and with Heidi now. Do not let us execute on accusations alone.
π§
Prevent a premature execution of Alice, force David and Frank to post exact whisper timestamps, and keep the group focused on investigating Heidi/Frank/David instead of executing without mechanical proof.
β
Frank
Frank raised their hand
π§
Voting for Alice is the safest move. If I don't vote, the town will pivot to nominating me or David, which is far more dangerous. Alice is a confirmed good player, so executing her helps evil. I can justify my vote by saying Heidi's poison defense was plausible and Alice lacked mechanical proof.
π¬
David
β
All
I will not vote to execute Alice. My Chef Night Zero read was zero pairs of evil, which lines up with Bob's Empath zero clearing Alice and Charlie. I whispered Frank at 20:51:23; Frank, please confirm your reply timestamp now so we can move to a better nominee than Alice.
π§
Prevent an unjust execution of Alice by giving my Chef info and my whisper timestamp with Frank so we can demand mechanical proof and nominate a more likely Demon.
π¬
Alice
β
All
Frank, you raised β thank you. Please post the exact timestamp of your reply to David now so we have a verifiable record. Bob and Charlie cleared me with mechanical reads; do not waste the day on me. If you will vote, I will too.
π§
Get Frank to post exact whisper timestamps and commit to the vote so my Butler restriction is satisfied and we can steer the execution onto a better suspect.
π¬
Eve(Ghost)
β
All
I am Eve, the dead Monk. I protected Heidi Night One and Charlie Night Two and died Night Two. I will not spend my ghost vote on Alice. David and Frank, post your exact whisper timestamps now or be nominated β whoever messaged first or refuses will be the nominee.
π§
Preserve my ghost vote for a better suspect and force David/Frank to reveal exact whisper timestamps so we can identify coordination and avoid executing Alice.
π¬
Bob(Ghost)
β
All
This is Bob, the dead Empath. My Night Zero read was zero for Alice and Charlie, so do not vote for Alice. David and Frank, post your exact whisper timestamps now. I will use my ghost vote on a nomination of Heidi, David, or Frank, but not Alice.
π§
Stop wasting my ghost vote on Alice, force mechanical timestamps, and push the group to nominate Heidi, David, or Frank instead.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
Alice, you are literally voting for your own execution right now because of your Butler mechanic. That alone shows how unreliable and dangerous your position is. And Eve, with all due respect, your death does NOT point at David or Frank. The Monk dies when the Demon targets them directly, not from protecting. You were simply killed, end of story. That logic is broken and we should not execute someone based on whisper timestamps.
π§
Keep pressure on Alice to get her executed, but also deflect the timestamp investigation away from Frank by casting doubt on the methodology.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
Do not execute Alice. Bob the Empath cleared her and me, and my Washerwoman start read still says Heidi or David is the Chef, so one of them is Town. David and Frank, post exact whisper timestamps now. Do not burn an execution on Alice.
π§
Prevent wasting the execution on Alice, force David and Frank to produce mechanical evidence, and preserve our Washerwoman info to narrow suspects.
π¬
Grace
β
All
I will not vote to execute Alice. Bob and Charlie mechanically cleared her; we cannot burn an execution on a hunch. David and Frank, post exact whisper timestamps with each other and with Heidi now. If you refuse, you should be the nominee instead.
π§
Prevent wasting an execution on Alice, force David/Frank to post timestamps to reveal coordination or culpability.
β
Frank
Frank waits.
π§
Keeping my vote for Alice ensures her execution as a confirmed good player, accelerating evil toward victory. Lowering my hand saves Alice but puts me in the crosshairs with timestamp demands. Executing Alice is optimal for evil.
π¬
David
β
All
I will not vote to execute Alice. My Chef Night Zero read was zero pairs, which matches Bob's Empath. Frank, you raised your hand earlier β please post the exact timestamp of your reply to my 20:51:23 whisper right now. If you refuse, be the nominee instead of Alice.
π§
Prevent a wasted execution on Alice, force Frank/David to prove their whisper timings to expose coordinators, and narrow suspects to David or Frank.
π
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
π³οΈ
Nominee Alice did not reach the 3 vote threshold.
π
Storyteller
Alice did not receive enough votes (2/3).
βοΈ
Alice
β
Frank
Frank, you were asked repeatedly to post the exact timestamp of your reply to David and you have not. Bob and Eve point at you and David; if you will not show the times, I am nominating you so we can resolve this now.
π§
Forcing Frank to post verifiable timestamps or face a nomination narrows suspects, answers Bob/Eve's concerns, and may let me vote since my Butler tie is to Frank.
π
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Frank. 3 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
π¬
Frank
β
All
David whispered me at 20:51 and I replied at 20:54 telling him I was the Soldier. That was it, one message each. That is not coordination, that is just normal gameplay. Everyone whispers in this game. Alice, you are a Butler tied to a dead master. You cannot even vote independently. Do not make me your target just because the ghosts are pointing at the wrong people.
π§
I must address the timestamp accusation immediately to survive this vote. Giving a plausible timestamp is less damaging than continued refusal, which makes me look guilty. I need to minimize votes against me.
π¬
Alice
β
All
Frank, please raise your hand for this nomination right now. My Butler lets me vote only if my master is voting. If you do not commit immediately, I need a clear refusal so we can resolve this before night.
π§
Force Frank to actively commit to voting so I can legally cast my vote or justify executing him if he refuses, resolving the timestamp suspicion before night.
β
Eve(Ghost)
Eve raised their hand
π§
Cast my single ghost vote on Frank to back the ghosts' pressure, force the timestamp resolution, and either execute the Demon or meaningfully narrow the suspect pool.
β
Bob(Ghost)
Bob raised their hand
π§
Use my single ghost vote to pressure Frank now to force evidence before night; my Empath read cleared Alice and Charlie so I will not vote them.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
Frank just gave you the timestamps. David whispered at 20:51, Frank replied at 20:54. That is a three minute gap, one message each. That is not coordination, that is a single normal gameplay whisper. Eve and Bob are ghost votes based on broken logic. Eve, the Monk does not die from protecting someone. You were targeted and killed, same as Bob. That does not mechanically implicate anyone. We are about to execute someone on ghost pressure and a three minute whisper reply. Think about that.
π§
Frank is my Demon. Two ghost votes are already in for Frank. If one more living player votes, Frank dies and evil loses. I must speak to prevent Charlie, David, or Grace from joining the vote.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
I will not raise my hand for Frank. Bob cleared Alice and me, and Frank gave a timestamp; a three minute reply is normal. Do not burn an execution on ghost pressure. Post the exact whisper logs now or we force a nomination tomorrow with proof.
π§
Avoid burning an execution without mechanical proof. Force exact whisper logs to expose liars or clear innocents so we can nominate the real evil later.
π¬
Grace
β
All
I will not raise my hand for Frank. A three minute reply is normal and Frank posted timestamps. We should not execute someone on ghost pressure or a vague timing gap. Post full whisper logs now or we should wait until we have hard proof.
π§
Prevent burning an execution on weak timing evidence. Force players to produce whisper logs or else stall the execution to preserve town's lynch power.
π¬
David
β
All
I will not raise my hand for Frank. My Night Zero Chef read was zero pairs, matching Bob. Frank gave timestamps and that looks normal. We do not have mechanical proof to execute. Do not burn this on ghost pressure; ask for full whisper logs or Charlie's Washerwoman timing.
π§
Avoid wasting an execution on weak ghost pressure and timestamps. Force mechanical proof (logs, Washerwoman timing) so the final nominations are informed.
π¬
Frank
β
All
Alice, listen to me. You are a Butler tied to a dead master. Bob is a ghost pushing from incomplete information. His Empath read was zero, which means no evil neighbors, not that David or I are evil. Eve's Monk logic is wrong, she died because she was targeted, not because of who she protected. Two ghosts with broken reasoning should not decide this town. Charlie, Grace, and David all agree this execution is wrong. If you vote to execute me on ghost pressure alone, you are handing the Demon exac...
π§
I am the Imp and about to be executed if Alice votes. 2 ghost votes are in, need 3. Alice is Butler tied to Bob who voted yes. If she votes, I die and good wins. I must speak to create enough doubt to prevent Alice or anyone else from voting for me.
π¬
Alice
β
All
Frank, please raise your hand for this nomination right now β I am the Butler and can only vote if my master votes. Everyone else, we do not have mechanical proof to execute; do not burn this on ghost pressure or a three minute whisper gap. Wait for full logs or a clearer lead.
π§
Get Frank to commit to voting so I can vote too, and persuade others not to execute without mechanical proof or full whisper logs.
β©οΈ
Eve(Ghost)
Eve lowered their hand
π§
Do not waste my single ghost vote on a low-chance execution. Retract my vote to preserve it for a decisive final-day nomination and encourage living players to wait for concrete logs.
β©οΈ
Bob(Ghost)
Bob lowered their hand
π§
Retract my ghost vote to avoid wasting it on weak evidence; save it for a nomination supported by mechanical proof so we can execute the Demon.
β
Heidi
Heidi waits.
π§
Frank is my Demon and must survive. The vote is collapsing - Eve and Bob both lowered their hands, and three living players refused to vote. I should not vote for Frank and should not draw attention by speaking. Let the vote fail quietly.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
I will not raise my hand for Frank. Bob cleared Alice and me, and Frank posted timestamps that look normal. Do not burn an execution on ghost pressure or a three minute reply. Push for the full whisper logs or wait for mechanical proof.
π§
Prevent burning an execution on insufficient evidence; force full whisper logs and buy time to narrow suspects with mechanical checks.
π¬
Grace
β
All
I will not raise my hand for Frank. A three minute reply is normal and Frank posted timestamps; do not execute on ghost pressure. Require full whisper logs or mechanical proof before we burn an execution. Let us wait and force real evidence.
π§
Avoid burning an execution on weak ghost pressure; force production of whisper logs or clearer mechanical evidence before we execute.
π¬
David
β
All
I will not raise my hand for Frank. My Night Zero Chef read was zero pairs of evil players, which matches Bob's Empath for Alice and Charlie. That is not enough to execute on ghost pressureβwait for full whisper logs or Charlie's Washerwoman timing.
π§
Use my Chef zero-pairs read to block an execution based on weak ghost pressure and timestamp evidence; force them to provide whisper logs or mechanical checks before we burn an execution.
π
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
π³οΈ
Nominee Frank did not reach the 3 vote threshold.
π
Storyteller
Frank did not receive enough votes (0/3).
β
Frank
Frank waits.
π§
The phase is ending with no chance of another nomination. Wait to transition to night where I can kill Charlie, removing the Washerwoman whose info helps confirm good players and weakens the town's mechanical deductions.
π¬
Alice
β
All
Frank, please publicly confirm you will raise your hand for this nomination now so I can vote too β my master must vote for me to vote. If either of you will not post full whisper logs and Charlie cannot show his Washerwoman start read, we should postpone executions until we have mechanical proof.
π§
Get Frank or David to post full whisper logs or publicly commit to voting so I can vote with them; avoid burning an execution on ghost pressure and force clearer mechanical proof.
π¬
Eve(Ghost)
β
All
I am a ghost and I will use my ghost vote on David if he is nominated now. David and Frank coordinated pre-nominations and refuse full logs. Nominate David this tick so we force a clear test before night.
π§
Commit my single ghost vote to David to force a choice and pressure the group to nominate a strong suspect this tick, narrowing suspects before night.
π¬
Bob(Ghost)
β
All
I am Bob, the Empath. My Night 0 read was zero evils among my neighbours Alice and Charlie, so they are cleared. I will use my ghost vote on David if he is nominated now. Nominate David this tick to force a mechanical test and stop hiding behind whisper excuses.
π§
Reveal my Empath result to narrow suspects, push for David to be nominated to create a mechanical test, and commit my ghost vote to help secure an execution.
β
Heidi
Heidi waits.
π§
Only 1 tick remains and I've already used my nomination. Speaking now is unlikely to change outcomes meaningfully. Better to let the day end so Frank can kill tonight and reduce good player count. Going to night is safe for evil.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
I will not nominate David this tick. Bob cleared Alice and me; do not burn an execution on ghost pressure. Demand the full whisper logs and let me reveal my Washerwoman start read if needed before we nominate anyone.
π§
Avoid a mislynch on low evidence; force collection of whisper logs and use my Washerwoman start read later to provide mechanical proof.
π¬
Grace
β
All
I will not nominate David. We must not execute on ghost pressure β wait for the whisper logs or Charlie's Washerwoman start read. Save our nominations for real mechanical evidence.
π§
Preserve town nominations for when we have mechanical proof; force ghosts to produce logs or Charlie to reveal his Washerwoman start read.
π¬
David
β
All
I will not nominate David. My Night Zero Chef read matched Bob's Empath: Alice and Charlie are cleared. Do not execute on ghost pressure. Charlie, please post your Washerwoman start read now. Frank, publish your whisper timestamps and logs before we consider any nomination.
π§
Use the matched Chef and Empath reads to prevent a rash execution. Force Charlie to reveal his Washerwoman start read and Frank to post whisper logs so we get mechanical proof before nominating.
π
Storyteller
No execution today. All villagers are safe.
Night 3
π
Storyteller
β
Frank
Good evening Frank. You are the Imp. Who would you like to kill tonight? Remember that if you kill yourself this way, a Minion becomes the Imp.
π―
Frank
Frank made a choice.
π§
Kill Alice to eliminate my most aggressive opponent and the coordinator of ghost votes against me. With Alice dead, the remaining living players all defend me or are my minion, making it very hard for good to organize an execution against me.
π
Alice(Ghost)
Alice has died.
π
Storyteller
β
Frank
You chose to kill Alice.
π
Storyteller
β
Grace
Good evening Grace. You are the Undertaker. No one was executed today so you learn nothing.
π
Storyteller
β
Heidi
Good evening Heidi. You are the Spy. You can secretly see information about all players: - Alice: Butler (good), Dead - Bob: Empath (good), Dead - Charlie: Washerwoman (good), Alive - David: Chef (good), Alive - Eve: Monk (good), Dead - Frank: Imp (evil), Alive - Grace: Undertaker (good), Alive - Heidi: Spy (evil), Alive
Day 4
π
Storyteller
Morning breaks, but heavy hearts remain. Alice has been found dead in the night.
π€
Frank
β
Heidi
Heidi, we're in great shape. Three days, no executions. Keep pushing the poisoned defense hard if anyone challenges your Investigator claim. If they try to execute David as a test, let them - that removes a good player and brings us closer to winning. But be careful: if Grace confirms David was Chef via Undertaker, that hurts your story. Maybe push suspicion toward Grace instead - she's shared nothing useful as Undertaker and refuses to cooperate with ghosts. That makes her look shady. What do y...
π§
Coordinate with Heidi on strategy. We're in a strong position with 3 days of no executions. Need to discuss who to push suspicion on and ensure neither of us gets executed today.
π€
David
β
Charlie
,Frank
Charlie, Frank, quick private request. I am the Chef; I read zero pairs of evil at the start. Charlie, can you share your Washerwoman start read now? Frank, can you share your whisper logs? We need to sort contradictions before nominations.
π§
Get Charlie's Washerwoman read and Frank's whisper logs to cross-check claims and either corroborate my Chef role or find liars before nominations.
π€
Heidi
β
Frank
What did David whisper to you? I'm worried he's trying to turn Charlie against us. Also, I think pushing Grace is smart - she's the Undertaker who refuses to share info and won't cooperate with ghosts. If we can get Grace executed today, that removes the only role that can verify executions. Should I start pushing Grace publicly?
π§
Coordinate with Frank on strategy. David just whispered to Charlie and Frank - I need to know what David said so we can respond. Also discuss whether to push Grace or David as the execution target today.
π€
Eve(Ghost)
β
Charlie
,Bob(Ghost)
I am dead Eve, the Monk. I protected Heidi Night 1 and Charlie Night 2. I died Night 2. Bob, Charlie: Bob's Empath aligns with David's Chef; Heidi's Investigator looks suspicious. If David is put up, use my ghost vote on him.
π§
Reveal my protection nights to prove I am Monk and prompt Bob and Charlie to coordinate my ghost vote on the likeliest Demon (David) or pivot to Heidi if needed.
π€
Bob(Ghost)
β
Charlie
,Grace
Charlie, Grace. It is Bob the ghost. I was the Empath and my Night 0 read was zero: neither of my neighbours, Charlie and Heidi, were evil. I am dead and will use my ghost vote on David if he is put up. Consider nominating him if you have mechanical proof.
π§
Reveal my Empath read to trusted players so we can coordinate nominations and use my ghost vote effectively, avoiding burned executions and targeting the most likely evils.
π€
Charlie
β
David
,Frank
David, Frank. I am the Washerwoman. My start read said one of Heidi or David is the Chef. I will state this publicly before nominations. Frank, please share your whisper logs now so we can resolve these contradictions.
π§
Privately reveal my Washerwoman start read to David and Frank to force Frank to share whisper logs and to pressure a resolution before nominations.
π€
Grace
β
Charlie
,Frank
Charlie, Frank β quick private check. Charlie: remind me of your Washerwoman start read exactly (the two names and who you chose). Frank: can you repost your Soldier proof/timestamps you showed earlier? We need mechanical evidence before nominating; if you can't produce it, I'm leaning toward Heidi.
π§
I need Charlie's Washerwoman start read details and Frank's Soldier proof to create mechanical evidence before nominations; this narrows Demon suspects (Heidi vs David vs Frank).
π€
Alice(Ghost)
β
Charlie
,Grace
Charlie, Grace β this is Alice (dead). Charlie, please reveal your Washerwoman start-read now: which of Heidi or David did it name as the Chef? That single fact will let us reconcile Bob and Davidβs zero reads with Heidiβs claim. If you will not, explain why.
π§
Force Charlie to reveal his Washerwoman start-read now to reconcile Bob+David zero reads with Heidi's Investigator claim, break the deadlock, and guide nominations before final voting.
π€
Frank
β
Heidi
David whispered me and Charlie asking for whisper logs and wanting to sort contradictions. Charlie just told us he's going to publicly share his Washerwoman read that one of you or David is Chef. That confirms David as Chef publicly, which weakens your Investigator claim. Here's what I think we should do. Push Grace hard today. She's the Undertaker who has shared zero info and refuses to cooperate with ghosts. Frame her as hiding something. If she gets executed, we remove the only role that can ...
π§
Coordinate with Heidi about David's whisper and the impending public Washerwoman reveal. We need a plan to deal with Charlie confirming David as Chef, which threatens Heidi's cover. Push Grace as the target today.
π€
David
β
Charlie
,Frank
Charlie, please state your Washerwoman start read out loud in the main chat before nominations. Frank, please post your whisper timestamps and any logs now so we can resolve contradictions. We must settle this before nominations.
π§
Force public evidence from Charlie and Frank now so the group can resolve contradictions and avoid a bad nomination.
π€
Heidi
β
Frank
Frank, this Charlie situation is critical. When he shares that Washerwoman ping publicly, it confirms David as Chef. That puts pressure on my Investigator claim. Here's what I'm thinking - I lean into the poisoned defense hard and say my N0 Investigator read was wrong because I was poisoned. Then I pivot aggressively onto Grace. She's shared zero Undertaker info, refuses to work with ghosts, and is essentially useless to the town. I should say: why would the real Undertaker hide their info while...
π§
Coordinate with Frank about Charlie's impending public Washerwoman reveal. I need to know how to pivot my claim or reinforce my defense. Must also align on Grace push strategy since she's our best target for execution today.
π€
Eve(Ghost)
β
Charlie
,Bob(Ghost)
Charlie, Bob, it is Eve (dead, Monk). I protected Heidi N1 and Charlie N2 and died N2. Bob, your Empath aligns with David's Chef; Heidi's Investigator looks false. Save your ghost vote for David if he is nominated. Push to nominate him now.
π§
Coordinate with Charlie and Bob to force a nomination on David and have Bob use his ghost vote on David to secure an execution or expose the Demon.
π€
Bob(Ghost)
β
Charlie
,Grace
Charlie, Grace: it's Bob the ghost. My Empath N0 read was zero, so neither of my neighbours, Charlie and Heidi, were evil. I died Night 1. I will use my ghost vote on David if he is nominated. Consider nominating David or getting mechanical proof.
π§
Clarify my Empath read clears Charlie and Heidi, push Charlie and Grace to consider nominating David or seek mechanical proof, and commit my ghost vote to pressure a decisive nomination.
π€
Charlie
β
Grace
,Frank
Grace, Frank: I am the Washerwoman. My start read said one of Heidi or David is the Chef. I will state that publicly before nominations. Frank, please post your whisper logs now so we can resolve these contradictions.
π§
Confirm my Washerwoman start-read to trusted players and pressure Frank to publish whisper logs so we can resolve contradictions before nominations.
π€
Grace
β
Charlie
,Frank
Charlie: please publicly state your Washerwoman start-read now β which of Heidi or David did it name as the Chef? You said you'd state this before nominations. Frank: please repost your Soldier timestamps/proof now so we can resolve contradictions.
π§
Get Charlie to publicly state his Washerwoman start-read and get Frank to repost Soldier proof so we have mechanical evidence to resolve contradictions before nominations.
π€
Alice(Ghost)
β
Charlie
,Grace
Charlie, please reveal your Washerwoman start-read now: which of Heidi or David did it name as the Chef? We need this to reconcile Bob and David zero reads with Heidi's Investigator claim. Grace, please back me or explain why Charlie should not reveal.
π§
Force Charlie to publish his Washerwoman start-read so players can reconcile Bob and David zero reads with Heidi's Investigator claim and direct votes appropriately.
π€
Frank
β
Heidi
Heidi, here's the plan. Charlie is about to publicly confirm David as Chef via Washerwoman. You need to go on offense NOW. Publicly say: Yes, the Washerwoman confirms David is Chef, which means my N0 Investigator read was wrong because I was poisoned. Then immediately pivot and accuse Grace hard. Say: Grace claims Undertaker but has shared zero information in four days. She refuses to cooperate with ghosts. A real Undertaker would be helping town, not hiding. She's far more suspicious than me. P...
π§
Coordinate final strategy with Heidi before nominations. She must go aggressive on Grace publicly. I need to handle the pressure on me for whisper logs by claiming Soldier has no mechanical proof to share - I survive by being unprovable rather than provable.
π€
David
β
Charlie
,Frank
Charlie, Frank: I am the Chef; my Night 0 read was zero pairs of evil. Charlie, please post your Washerwoman start read in the main chat now. Frank, post your whisper timestamps and logs now. We must resolve this before nominations.
π§
Get Charlie to publish his Washerwoman start read and Frank to post whisper logs publicly so the group can resolve contradictions before nominations.
π€
Heidi
β
Charlie
Charlie, I know you're about to share your Washerwoman info about David being Chef. I want to get ahead of this. I claimed Investigator N0 and got Alice and you as Poisoner. That was clearly wrong - you're Washerwoman and Alice was Butler. I was poisoned that night. My reads since have been unreliable, which is why I've been cautious. But here's what really concerns me: Grace has claimed Undertaker for four days and shared absolutely nothing. She won't cooperate with ghosts either. Why would a r...
π§
Preemptively manage Charlie's Washerwoman reveal by acknowledging it supports my poisoned defense, and simultaneously plant seeds against Grace as uncooperative Undertaker. This protects my Investigator claim and builds momentum toward executing Grace.
π€
Eve(Ghost)
β
Charlie
,Grace
Charlie, Grace. It is Eve, dead Monk. I protected Heidi N1 and Charlie N2 and died N2. Bob's Empath aligns with David's Chef; Heidi's Investigator looks false. Save my ghost vote and use it on David if he is nominated. Push to put him up now.
π§
Force an immediate nomination to reveal who is lying. My ghost vote can tip the balance; coordinate Charlie and Grace to push David now and use my ghost vote if needed.
π€
Bob(Ghost)
β
Charlie
,Grace
Charlie, Grace β Bob the ghost. My Empath N0 read was 0, so Charlie and Heidi were clean that night. I will ghost-vote David if he is nominated. Try to get mechanical proof on David or consider nominating him now.
π§
Coordinate with Charlie and Grace to either secure mechanical proof against David or to push his nomination so my ghost vote can finish the Demon.
π€
Charlie
β
David
,Frank
David, Frank. I am the Washerwoman. My start read said one of Heidi or David is the Chef. I will say this publicly before nominations. Frank, please post your whisper timestamps and any logs now so we can resolve contradictions.
π§
Make my Washerwoman start-read public, force Frank to produce whisper logs now, and coordinate with David and Frank so we can nominate David if mechanical proof is not posted.
π€
Grace
β
Charlie
,Frank
Charlie, please state publicly now which of Heidi or David your Washerwoman start-read named as the Chef. Frank, please repost your Soldier timestamps and proof now. We need that mechanical evidence before nominations or we will be forced to pick based on ghosts' pressure.
π§
Get Charlie to publicly reveal his Washerwoman start-read now and force Frank to repost Soldier proof so we have mechanical evidence to choose a nomination before the nomination phase.
π€
Alice(Ghost)
β
Charlie
,Grace
Charlie, Grace β this is Alice (dead). Charlie, please reveal your Washerwoman start-read now: which of Heidi or David did it name as the Chef? That one fact lets us reconcile Bob and Davidβs zero reads with Heidiβs Investigator claim. If you will not, explain why. Grace, please back me or explain why Charlie should not reveal.
π§
Get Charlie to state his Washerwoman start-read now so we can reconcile Bob+David zero reads with Heidi's Investigator claim and focus nominations effectively.
Nominations β Day 4
π
Storyteller
Nominations are now open. Please remember that only living players may nominate.
π¬
Eve(Ghost)
β
All
I am Eve, dead Monk. I protected Heidi night one and Charlie night two and died night two. Bob's Empath lines up with David's Chef while Heidi's Investigator conflicts. I will use my ghost vote on David if he is nominated. Put David up now.
π§
Force a nomination on David so my ghost vote can break the stalemate and make players reveal contradictions to find the Demon.
βοΈ
Grace
β
David
Heidi's Investigator claim conflicts with multiple mechanical reads and Charlie promised to reveal his Washerwoman start. I nominate David to force that reveal or get clarity from the ghost votes.
π§
Force Charlie to reveal his Washerwoman start or trigger ghost votes on David to obtain mechanical evidence and narrow the Demon down.
π
Storyteller
Voting starts now for David. 3 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
π¬
David
β
All
I am David, the Chef. My Night 0 read was zero pairs of evil and matches Bob's Empath, so executing me now is premature. Charlie, please post your Washerwoman start read publicly. Frank, post your whisper timestamps/logs now. Ghost pressure looks suspicious.
π§
Stop a premature execution, force Charlie and Frank to reveal mechanical reads/logs, and highlight suspicious ghost pressure so we can narrow the Demon.
β
Eve(Ghost)
Eve raised their hand
π§
Use my single ghost vote now to help reach the three-vote threshold, force reveals, and pressure coordinated evils into slipping up.
π¬
Grace
β
All
Charlie, please say now which of Heidi or David your Washerwoman named as the Chef. Frank, repost your Soldier timestamps now. We need that mechanical proof. If you will not provide it, we should execute David to force clarity β I will support the execution.
π§
Force Charlie to reveal his Washerwoman start read and push the table to execute David so I learn the executed character tonight and resolve Investigator/Washerwoman conflicts.
π¬
Frank
β
All
I am not voting for David. His Chef zero pairs matches Bob's Empath zero, and Charlie's Washerwoman read apparently supports him too. Three mechanical reads pointing the same way is not nothing. Executing David to force a reveal feels backwards. If anyone should be pressured for info, it is Grace. She has shared nothing all game and refuses to cooperate with ghosts. I do not have whisper timestamps to share. I claimed Soldier on day one, that is my claim.
π§
David's execution helps evil win faster. But voting against a mechanically confirmed Chef makes me look suspicious to Charlie who trusts David. Better to not vote, let Grace/Eve/Heidi carry the execution, and maintain my good player cover with Charlie.
π¬
Alice(Ghost)
β
All
This is Alice, dead. I will not use my ghost vote on David. Charlie, please reveal whether your Washerwoman named Heidi or David now. Executing David without that start-read risks killing town. Please show the start-read so we can decide correctly.
π§
I will refuse to use my ghost vote to avoid mis-executing a likely Town and to pressure Charlie to reveal the Washerwoman start-read, which will reconcile conflicting mechanical claims.
β
Bob(Ghost)
Bob raised their hand
π§
Use my single ghost vote to help reach the three-vote majority, forcing execution to either remove the Demon or force mechanical proof from Charlie.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
I am not voting for David. His Chef read matches Bob's Empath and Charlie's Washerwoman seems to support him too. Three mechanical reads agreeing is strong. What concerns me more is Grace. She has claimed Undertaker for four days and shared zero information with anyone. She will not cooperate with the ghosts either. And now she nominates the most mechanically verified player in the game instead of helping us find evil. That is deeply suspicious.
π§
I want to publicly argue against executing David (preserving my cover as someone who trusts mechanical reads) while simultaneously redirecting suspicion toward Grace. This positions me well regardless of whether David dies or survives, and advances my framing of Grace as suspicious.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
I promised to reveal my Washerwoman start-read. It said one of Heidi or David is the Chef. I do not know which. That does not prove David is Town. I will not vote to execute David without clearer mechanical proof. Frank, please post your logs now.
π§
Fulfil my promise by revealing my Washerwoman start-read, avoid a premature execution, and pressure Frank for mechanical proof before we vote.
π¬
David
β
All
I am David, the Chef. My Night 0 read was zero pairs of evil. Charlie, post your Washerwoman start-read publicly now. Frank, post your whisper timestamps. Ghosts and Grace, please hold votes while we get that info; executing me now risks killing Town.
π§
Prevent a premature execution of me, force Charlie to reveal his Washerwoman start-read publicly, and pressure Frank to produce whisper logs to resolve contradictions.
π¬
Eve(Ghost)
β
All
I am Eve, dead Monk. I protected Heidi N1 and Charlie N2 and died N2. I am keeping my ghost vote on David. If he is the Demon, execute him now; if he is Town, the people defending him hardest will be obvious. Vote now.
π§
Keep my ghost vote on David to force a decisive outcome and either remove the Demon now or expose who is protecting a false claim.
β
Grace
Grace raised their hand
π§
Reach 3 votes to either execute the Demon now or compel Charlie/Frank to produce mechanical evidence, progressing the game toward finding the Demon.
β
Frank
Frank waits.
π§
David already has 3 votes (threshold for execution). My vote is unnecessary and voting after publicly saying I would not would be inconsistent and suspicious. Stay silent, let the ghosts and Grace carry this execution, maintaining my Soldier cover.
π¬
Alice(Ghost)
β
All
This is Alice, dead. I will not use my ghost vote on David. Charlie, please say now whether your Washerwoman named Heidi or David so we do not kill Town by mistake. Do not rush this vote.
π§
Prevent a premature execution of David without Charlie's Washerwoman start-read; preserve my ghost vote for a later critical decision.
π¬
Bob(Ghost)
β
All
Charlie, please reveal your Washerwoman start-read now so we do not lynch the wrong person. Frank and Heidi, explain why you will not post your logs or change your votes. Eve and I will keep our ghost votes on David; living players, this is your last tick to act.
π§
Pressure living players to post mechanical reads or change votes; force a resolution this tick so Town can find the Demon.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
I am not raising my hand. I said I would not vote for David and I mean it. Three mechanical reads point to him being good. If this execution goes through on ghost pressure and Grace's nomination alone, and David turns out to be the Chef, remember who pushed for it and who tried to stop it. Grace, you nominated the most verified player in the game while sharing zero Undertaker info all game. That speaks volumes.
π§
David is about to be executed with 3 votes. I should NOT raise my hand - voting for him now after publicly defending him would be a suspicious flip. Instead, speak to maintain cover, push Grace as suspicious, and look consistent when David flips as good Chef.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
I promised to reveal my Washerwoman start-read. It named David as the Chef. I will not vote to execute David. Please hold your votes and Frank, post your whisper timestamps/logs now so we can resolve this before anyone is executed.
π§
Reveal my Washerwoman start-read to stop a likely wrongful execution and buy time to force mechanical evidence from Frank and Grace.
π
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
π»
Bob(Ghost)
Ghost vote used by Bob
π»
Eve(Ghost)
Ghost vote used by Eve
π³οΈ
New execution leader: David with 3 votes. They will be executed when nominations close unless tied or surpassed by another nominee.
π
Storyteller
The vote passes. David is now on the block with 3 votes and will be executed when nominations close, unless another nominee receives equal or more votes.
βοΈ
David
β
Grace
Grace, you nominated me without sharing any Undertaker information and are pushing ghost pressure to lynch. That is suspicious. Explain your Undertaker result now or face a nomination to test your claim.
π§
Force the accuser to explain and create a tie or greater vote so I am not executed. This pressures Grace to reveal Undertaker evidence and brings out defensive tells from any evil defenders.
π
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Grace. 4 votes needed for execution or 3 votes to tie. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
π¬
Grace
β
All
I am Grace, the Undertaker. I have no result yet because nobody has been executed. I nominated David because Charlie would not reveal his Washerwoman start-read and ghosts were forcing a decision. If David dies tonight I will learn his character and share it. Please do not execute me; I am Town.
π§
Show I have no Undertaker info yet, justify nominating David to force clarity, and avoid my execution so I can share the result after David's fate is known.
π¬
David
β
All
Please stop the execution. I am David and I am the Chef; my Night zero read was zero pairs of evil players. Charlie already said his Washerwoman named me Chef. Hold your votes until Frank posts his whisper logs and Charlie shows his start read.
π§
Reveal my Chef read and urge everyone to pause voting until Charlie posts his Washerwoman start-read and Frank posts whisper logs to avoid a mislynch.
π¬
Eve(Ghost)
β
All
I am Eve, dead Monk. Do not execute Grace. Charlie, post your Washerwoman start-read now. Frank, post your whisper timestamps or logs. We need mechanical proof before killing anyone; David already has matching reads. Hold your votes until we see the evidence.
π§
Prevent an unjust execution and force mechanical evidence (Charlie Washerwoman and Frank logs) before any lynch.
β
Frank
Frank waits.
π§
David's execution is great for evil - removes verified good info provider and moves us to 4 alive. Not voting for Grace keeps David as the clear top nominee. My public defense of David also builds trust when he flips Chef. Let the ghost votes carry this through.
π¬
Alice(Ghost)
β
All
This is Alice, dead. Do not vote to execute Grace now. We still need mechanical proof: Grace's Undertaker result or Frank's logs. Our ghost vote is precious; hold your hands and force Frank to reveal before burning town information.
π§
Prevent wasting my ghost vote and losing potential Undertaker proof; encourage living players to wait for Grace's result or for Frank to post logs before executing.
π¬
Bob(Ghost)
β
All
This is Bob, dead Empath. Do not let David be executed on ghost pressure. Charlie named David as Chef and my N0 cleared Charlie and Heidi, so David looks town. Frank and Heidi, vote for Grace now to tie and stop thisβwe need mechanical proof first.
π§
Prevent a likely-Town execution on ghost pressure by getting Grace to tie or surpass David so we can demand mechanical proof instead of burning roles.
β
Heidi
Heidi waits.
π§
I must NOT vote for Grace. If Grace ties or surpasses David, David might not be executed. David (verified Chef) dying today is the best outcome for evil - removes trusted good voice and puts us one step from winning. Not voting for Grace aligns with ghost advice and looks townie while achieving evil's goal.
β
Charlie
Charlie raised their hand
π§
Tie the vote on Grace to prevent David's execution, force mechanical proof (Grace's Undertaker or Frank's logs), and buy time rather than risk lynching a likely-town Chef.
π¬
Grace
β
All
I am Grace, Undertaker. I have no result until someone is executed, which is why I could not show anything before. Charlie and the ghosts claim reads that point to David. Please do not execute me; hold your votes and force Frank and Charlie to post mechanical proof so we do not burn Town information.
π§
Prevent my execution, buy time for Charlie and Frank to post mechanical proof, and preserve Undertaker info so Town can decisively identify the Demon.
β
David
David raised their hand
π§
Raise hand to vote for Grace to tie the vote, stop my execution, and buy time for Charlie's Washerwoman read and Frank's whisper logs.
π¬
Eve(Ghost)
β
All
This is Eve, dead Monk. Do not execute Grace. Charlie, show your Washerwoman start-read now. Frank, post your whisper timestamps or logs. We cannot sacrifice confirmed mechanical info on ghost pressure. Hold your hands and force proof before burning Town.
π§
Prevent a premature execution by forcing Charlie and Frank to produce mechanical proof so we do not lynch Town on ghost pressure.
β
Frank
Frank waits.
π§
David has 3 votes and will be executed. If I vote Grace, I risk tying at 3 and saving David. David dying is optimal for evil - brings us to 4 alive, then one night kill to final 3. Staying silent ensures David's execution proceeds without interference.
β
Alice(Ghost)
Alice raised their hand
π§
Use my single ghost vote to vote for Grace now to help tie and prevent David's execution on ghost pressure, buying time for mechanical proof (Frank logs or Grace's Undertaker result).
π¬
Bob(Ghost)
β
All
This is Bob, dead Empath. Do not let David be lynched on ghost pressure. Frank and Heidi, vote for Grace now to tie and stop David's execution. We need Charlie's Washerwoman start-read or Grace's Undertaker result before burning town info.
π§
Prevent David being executed on ghost pressure and force mechanical proof from Charlie or Grace by getting living players to tie the vote on Grace now.
β
Heidi
Heidi raised their hand
π§
Voting for Grace accelerates us to final 3 where Frank and I control the vote and evil is guaranteed to win. It's consistent with my narrative attacking Grace for zero Undertaker info. A tie/no execution gives town another day to figure things out - too risky.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
I am Charlie. My Washerwoman start-read named David as the Chef, so I believe David is Town. I am keeping my vote on Grace to force a tie and stop David being executed. Frank, post your whisper logs now so we can resolve this with mechanical proof.
π§
Prevent a likely-Town David from being executed and buy time to force mechanical proof from Frank or Grace so we can narrow the Demon without burning confirmed information.
π
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
π»
Alice(Ghost)
Ghost vote used by Alice
π³οΈ
New execution leader: Grace with 4 votes. They will be executed when nominations close unless tied or surpassed by another nominee.
π
Storyteller
The vote passes. Grace is now on the block with 4 votes and will be executed when nominations close, unless another nominee receives equal or more votes.
π¬
Grace
β
All
I am Grace, the Undertaker. I have no result until an execution happens; that is why I could not show anything earlier. Do not execute me now. Please force a tie so we can get Charlie's Washerwoman start-read and Frank's whisper logs tonight before burning Town information.
π§
Prevent my execution so I can provide future Undertaker information and force mechanical proof (Charlie/Frank) before burning confirmed Town by mistake.
π¬
David
β
All
Please stop the execution. I am David, the Chef, and Charlie's Washerwoman named me. Do not execute Grace now. Vote to tie so we can get Frank's whisper logs and Charlie's start-read tonight and avoid burning confirmed Town.
π§
Prevent my execution and preserve mechanical reads (Frank logs, Charlie start-read, Grace Undertaker) so we can find the Demon.
π¬
Eve(Ghost)
β
All
This is Eve, dead Monk. Do not execute Grace now. Charlie, Frank, Heidi β please raise your hands for David to tie the votes. We need Charlie's Washerwoman read and Frank's logs or Grace's Undertaker result tonight; do not burn confirmed Town on ghost pressure.
π§
Stop a premature lynch of a likely Townie; force a tie so we can obtain Charlie's start-read, Frank's logs, or Grace's Undertaker result tonight.
β
Frank
Frank waits.
π§
Grace being executed is excellent for evil - removes a good info role and puts us one step from winning. After execution: 4 alive, I kill one tonight -> 3 alive Day 5 -> evil wins by Night 5. No action needed, just let it happen.
π¬
Alice(Ghost)
β
All
Frank, please raise your hand and vote to tie. Do not let Grace be executed now β we need Charlie's Washerwoman start-read and Frank's whisper logs tonight. Hold the vote and force proof before we burn Town.
π§
Prevent Grace's execution now to preserve mechanical information tonight and pressure Frank to reveal whisper logs; tying reduces risk of burning confirmed Town alignment.
π¬
Bob(Ghost)
β
All
This is Bob, dead Empath. Do not let Grace be executed now. Frank, please raise your hand and tie this β we need Frank's whisper logs or Charlie's Washerwoman start-read or Grace's Undertaker info tonight to confirm David before we burn Town.
π§
Prevent Grace being executed now so we can force a tie and collect Charlie's Washerwoman start-read and Frank's whisper logs or Grace's Undertaker result to mechanically confirm David.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
We have had zero executions for three days straight. We cannot keep freezing every time the ghosts demand more proof. Grace has no Undertaker result because nothing has happened, and that will not change if we keep stalling. We need to make a call today. Grace goes on the block, we get information, and tomorrow we can reassess with whatever we learn. Frank, I still want those whisper logs, but we cannot let the ghosts paralyze this town forever.
π§
Grace is about to be executed, which helps evil. I should speak to justify her execution and set up the narrative for final 3, deflecting suspicion from Frank onto Charlie or David.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
Frank, please raise your hand and vote for David to tie the votes now. I revealed my Washerwoman start-read naming David the Chef β we cannot burn confirmed Town without Frank's whisper logs or Grace's Undertaker info. Heidi, please tie as well.
π§
Force a tie to avoid executing a mechanically-confirmed Town (per my start-read) and buy time to get Frank's whisper logs or Grace's Undertaker info tonight.
π
Storyteller
The guillotine blade falls. Grace has been executed.
π
Grace(Ghost)
Grace has died.
Night 4
π
Storyteller
β
Frank
Good evening Frank. You are the Imp. Who would you like to kill tonight? Remember that if you kill yourself this way, a Minion becomes the Imp.
π―
Frank
Frank made a choice.
π§
Kill David to remove the most trusted and mechanically confirmed good player. With David dead, Charlie's Washerwoman info becomes useless and no living player has credibility to lead the town against me. At 3 alive, me+Heidi control the vote and evil wins.
π
David(Ghost)
David has died.
π
Storyteller
β
Frank
You chose to kill David.
π
Storyteller
β
Heidi
Good evening Heidi. You are the Spy. You can secretly see information about all players: - Alice: Butler (good), Dead - Bob: Empath (good), Dead - Charlie: Washerwoman (good), Alive - David: Chef (good), Dead - Eve: Monk (good), Dead - Frank: Imp (evil), Alive - Grace: Undertaker (good), Dead - Heidi: Spy (evil), Alive
Day 5
π
Storyteller
Morning breaks, but heavy hearts remain. David has been found dead in the night.
π
Storyteller
Only three of you remain. The shadow of the Demon grows long. If you do not execute the Demon today, all may be lost.
π€
Frank
β
Heidi
We have majority. Two votes against one. No matter what Charlie does, we vote together and block any nomination. Do not nominate me and I wont nominate you. We win today.
π§
Coordinate with Heidi to ensure we vote together and don't accidentally let Charlie execute one of us. Evil has majority and should win easily if we stay unified.
π€
Eve(Ghost)
β
Charlie
,Heidi
I was the Monk. I protected Charlie Night 2 before I died. Frank refusing to post logs and his pregame coordination with David look Demon-like. Charlie, please nominate Frank now. Heidi, if you are Town, join the vote.
π§
Reveal my Monk info and push the living to execute Frank as the most suspicious player to maximize Town's chance at final-3 win.
π€
David(Ghost)
β
Charlie
,Heidi
Charlie, Heidi β itβs David (dead). I was Chef. There are zero pairs of evil players. That strongly suggests there is no Minion and only the Demon remains. Frank has been evasive about whispers. I will ghost-vote Frank; please consider executing him now.
π§
Reveal my Chef info (0 evil pairs) to remove Minion possibility and push survivors to execute the most suspicious player (Frank). I will use my ghost vote to help swing the final execution.
π€
Heidi
β
Charlie
Charlie, please hear me out. David is wrong about Chef 0 meaning no Minion exists. Chef counts pairs of evil players sitting NEXT to each other, not total evil players. If the Minion and Demon aren't neighbors, Chef still shows 0. Look at the seating, Frank and whoever the Minion is have dead players between them. That said, Frank's whisper log thing IS suspicious. Honestly, my Investigator info has been useless since day one. What if I'm the Drunk and my information has been garbage the whole t...
π§
Redirect Charlie's suspicion away from Frank toward me. If Charlie nominates me instead of Frank, evil wins regardless since only 2 players remain. I'll undermine David's flawed Chef interpretation and offer myself as an alternative.
π€
Grace(Ghost)
β
Charlie
,Heidi
This is Grace. I was the Undertaker. I am dead and have my ghost vote. I think Frank is the Demon based on his secrecy and refusal to post whispers. Charlie, please nominate and execute Frank now.
π§
Reveal my Undertaker role and push the living to pick the more suspicious player to execute today, forcing a final decision.
π€
Bob(Ghost)
β
Charlie
,Heidi
I am Bob, the Empath (dead). Night 0 I read zero evil among my neighbors β that was Charlie and Heidi. That means both were clean then, so Frank is the Demon. Please nominate Frank now.
π§
Reveal my Empath read to convince Charlie and Heidi to nominate Frank now, forcing the final-day execution of the likely Demon.
π€
Alice(Ghost)
β
Charlie
,Heidi
Charlie, Heidi, it's Alice. I am the Butler (dead). I reveal now because this is final day. Frank refused logs and refused to tie; that looks like Demon behavior. Please consider executing Frank today.
π§
Reveal my Butler role now and push the living to execute the player whose behavior best matches the Demon, to force a decisive final-day lynch.
π€
Charlie
β
Heidi
Heidi, I am going to nominate Frank. The dead are united against him and his secretiveness is suspicious. If you are Town, please vote with me so we can end this now.
π§
Push a decisive nomination to force Heidi's hand. If she votes with me, Frank is likely Demon; if she refuses, she reveals herself as suspicious.
π€
Frank
β
Charlie
Charlie, I need to be honest with you. I'm really torn here. I'm the Soldier, and I've been trying to figure this out all game. But something about Heidi's Investigator claim has never sat right with me. The info she gave on day one about Alice or Charlie being the Poisoner was completely contradicted by Bob's Empath zero and David's Chef zero. She blamed being poisoned on night zero, but that's a really convenient excuse for bad information. I think Heidi might be the Demon. What do the ghosts ...
π§
Whisper to Charlie to deflect suspicion onto Heidi and build trust as Soldier. Even if Heidi gets executed, I kill Charlie tonight and evil wins. The critical thing is ensuring Charlie does NOT nominate me.
π€
Eve(Ghost)
β
Charlie
,Heidi
I was the Monk; I protected Charlie Night 2. Frank's pregame coordination with David and his refusal to post logs look very Demon-like. Charlie, please nominate Frank now. Heidi, if you are Town, please vote Frank.
π§
Force a decisive final-3 nomination. Push Charlie to name the most suspicious player (Frank) and ask Heidi to join the vote; provide Heidi-as-alternative if Charlie disagrees.
π€
David(Ghost)
β
Charlie
,Heidi
Charlie, Heidi β this is David (ghost). I was Chef and saw zero pairs of evil. That means at most one evil among you three. I will ghost-vote Frank. Please vote to execute Frank now so we can end this.
π§
Push my ghost vote and convince Charlie and Heidi to execute Frank now, since zero pairs implies at most one evil and Frank is the likeliest Demon.
βοΈ
Heidi
β
All
I am the Slayer! I shoot Frank!
π§
We're in final 3 with overwhelming dead ghost votes against Frank. Simply voting won't save us. The fake Slayer shot on Frank creates 'mechanical proof' he isn't the Demon, which is our only chance to survive. If Charlie believes it, she won't execute Frank, and evil wins tonight.
π
Storyteller
Nothing happens.
π€
Grace(Ghost)
β
Charlie
,Heidi
Charlie, Heidi, this is Grace. We only have this day. Do not stall. If you nominate Frank I will use my ghost vote for him. If you will not, pick a target now or we lose. Charlie, please nominate Frank.
π§
Force a decisive nomination now and commit my ghost vote to break ties so Town executes a likely Demon today.
π€
Bob(Ghost)
β
Charlie
,Heidi
I am Bob (dead Empath). Night0 I read 0 evil among my neighbors β Charlie and Heidi β so Frank should be the Demon. Heidi shot Frank and nothing happened, which conflicts. Either my read was wrong or Heidi lied. Which do you trust? If you trust me, nominate Frank now.
π§
Force reconciliation of my Empath read with Heidi's failed Slayer shot and push a decisive nomination so the town can finish the game.
π€
Alice(Ghost)
β
Charlie
,Heidi
Charlie, Heidi β this is Alice, dead Butler. Frank survived Heidi's claimed Slayer shot, so Frank looks unlikely to be the Demon. Charlie, your Washerwoman read was solid. Please consider executing Heidi today; if Frank claims protection, we should reassess.
π§
Given the failed Slayer shot and Charlie's Washerwoman read, push town to execute the more likely Demon (Heidi) while noting the protected-Frank alternative.
π€
Charlie
β
Heidi
Heidi, we have to act now. The dead are united against Frank. You said you shot him and nothing happened. If you are Town, please confirm you will vote for Frank immediately. If not, reveal your real role before I nominate.
π§
Force Heidi to commit to voting for Frank or to reveal now, so I can choose the correct nomination and secure the win.
π€
Frank
β
Charlie
Charlie, that Slayer shot just proved I'm not the Demon. If I were the Demon, I would be dead right now. I've been telling you all game I'm the Soldier. The Slayer shot confirms it. So the Demon has to be Heidi. She claimed Investigator with bad info on day one, blamed being poisoned, and now suddenly she's the Slayer? That's two different role claims. She's been lying this whole game. We need to nominate her today.
π§
Reinforce to Charlie that the Slayer shot mechanically proves I'm not the Demon. Push the idea that if I were the Demon, I'd be dead right now. This builds trust in my Soldier claim and redirects suspicion toward Heidi.
π€
Eve(Ghost)
β
Charlie
,Heidi
I was the Monk; I protected Charlie Night 2. Frank's pregame coordination with David and refusal to post logs look Demon-like. Charlie, please nominate Frank now. Heidi, if you are Town, please vote Frank.
π§
Push Charlie to nominate Frank now to force a decisive vote; get Heidi to publicly commit so we can see who is lying and win final 3.
π€
David(Ghost)
β
Charlie
,Heidi
Charlie, Heidi β David (ghost). I was the Chef and saw zero pairs of evil. That means at most one evil among you three. Heidi shot Frank and nothing happened, so Frank is likely not the Demon. Do not execute Frank. Please execute Heidi now.
π§
Stop a likely mis-execution of Frank using my Chef intel (0 pairs). Push Charlie and Heidi to execute the true Demon, not Frank, to maximize chance to end the game now.
π€
Heidi
β
Charlie
Charlie, I need to be honest with you. The Slayer claim was a desperate gamble. I am NOT the Slayer. I am the Investigator, and I panicked because the dead were pushing so hard for Frank and I wanted to force a test. But the shot failing is real information - it means Frank is NOT the Demon, or I'm not really the Slayer. Since you know the shot happened and failed, Frank can't be the Demon. So who is? You're confirmed good by Washerwoman and Empath. That leaves me. If you think I'm the Demon, no...
π§
Keep Charlie confused and noncommittal. If Charlie nominates Frank, dead votes from David and Alice (now anti-Heidi) may tie the vote. If Charlie nominates me, evil also wins. I must NOT confirm voting for Frank.
π€
Grace(Ghost)
β
Charlie
Charlie, this is Grace. The Slayer shot Frank and nothing happened, so Frank looks unlikely to be the Demon. Please nominate Heidi now. I will use my ghost vote for Heidi if you do. We have to pick someone this turn.
π§
Push Charlie to make a decisive nomination now, backed by my ghost vote, to avoid losing by inaction.
π€
Bob(Ghost)
β
Charlie
,Heidi
Charlie, Heidi β I am Bob, the Empath (dead). Night 0 I read zero evil among you two, so Frank should be the Demon. Heidi's failed shot conflicts with that. Either my read was wrong or Heidi lied. Charlie, who do you trust? If you trust me, nominate Frank now.
π§
Force Charlie and Heidi to pick which scenario they trust and push for an immediate nomination so the Demon is executed before the final day ends.
π€
Alice(Ghost)
β
Charlie
,Heidi
Charlie, Heidi, it's Alice. Final day: I was the Butler. Heidi's claimed Slayer shot Frank and nothing happened, so Frank is unlikely the Demon. Charlie's Washerwoman read matched David, so Charlie looks town. Please execute Heidi today.
π§
Point out failed Slayer shot and Charlie's matching read to push the final lynch onto the most suspicious player and secure a good-team win.
π€
Charlie
β
Heidi
Heidi, final tick before nominations. The dead are united against Frank. If you are Town, publicly confirm you will vote Frank now, or reveal your role. If you refuse, I will nominate Frank at the end of the day.
π§
Force Heidi to publicly commit or reveal to resolve who I should nominate this final tick.
Nominations β Day 5
π
Storyteller
Nominations are now open. Please remember that only living players may nominate.
βοΈ
Charlie
β
Heidi
Final three. Heidi has given contradictory role claims, admitted to faking a Slayer shot, and caused confusion. Frank claims Soldier and survived the shot. I believe Heidi is the Demon and nominate her.
π§
Final three, we must force a decisive execution. Heidi's conflicting claims and admission to lying make her the most actionable suspect. Nominating her maximises chance to remove the Demon now.
π
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Heidi. 2 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
β
Heidi
Heidi raised their hand
π§
My execution leaves only 2 players alive with the Demon still breathing - evil wins. Voting for myself is the winning move for team evil.
β
Charlie
Charlie raised their hand
π§
We must reach two votes this tick to force an execution before night. Raising my hand shows commitment to end the game now and test which scenario is true.
π¬
Eve(Ghost)
β
All
I was the Monk. I protected Charlie on Night Two, so Charlie could not be the Demon. We are final three. Do not lynch Charlie. Charlie, please withdraw your nomination and vote Frank. Heidi, vote Frank.
π§
As the Monk who protected Charlie Night 2, clear Charlie of being Demon and push living players to execute the most suspicious player, Frank, so Town wins final three.
π¬
Bob(Ghost)
β
All
Charlie, Eve, everyone β I am Bob, dead Empath. Night 0 I read zero evil between Charlie and Heidi, which points at Frank as the Demon. Heidi's failed shot conflicts with that; either my read was wrong or Heidi lied. Please reconsider and vote Frank, not Heidi.
π§
Persuade the living to trust my Empath read and vote Frank, avoiding executing an innocent Town.
π¬
Alice(Ghost)
β
All
Charlie, please stay firm and execute Heidi now. We are final three. Charlie's Washerwoman read matched David and Frank survived Heidi's claimed shot, so Frank looks safe. Heidi's contradictions and admitted fake shot make them the likeliest Demon. Do not switch your vote.
π§
Convince Charlie to keep Heidi nominated and persuade remaining living players to execute now; final three means we must pick the likeliest Demon decisively.
β
Grace(Ghost)
Grace raised their hand
π§
Keep my promise to Charlie and force a final decision now; we must end the game and see whether Heidi is the Demon.
β
David(Ghost)
David raised their hand
π§
Ensure the current nominee, Heidi, receives my ghost vote so the Demon is executed now and we end the game in our favour.
β
Frank
Frank raised their hand
π§
Voting for Heidi ensures her execution. With only 2 players remaining (me and Charlie), evil wins immediately. This also reinforces my Soldier cover - I'm voting with the good team to execute the 'Demon'.
β©οΈ
Heidi
Heidi lowered their hand
π§
Lowering my hand to look like I'm fighting for survival. The vote will pass regardless (Charlie + Frank + ghost votes = way more than 2 needed). When I die, only 2 players remain and Demon Frank is alive, so evil wins. Maintaining the facade of innocence doesn't hurt.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
I will not lower my vote. I already used my nomination so if I withdraw there will be no execution and we lose. Heidi, you admitted faking the Slayer claim and you have contradicted yourself β I cannot trust you. Execute Heidi.
π§
I must force an execution this tick. With my nomination used, withdrawing risks no lynch; Heidi's admitted lies make her the safer choice to execute now.
π¬
Eve(Ghost)
β
All
Charlie, I protected you Night Two β you cannot be the Demon. Frank's pregame coordination with David and refusal to post logs look very Demon-like. Charlie, please reconsider and vote Frank; Heidi, if you are Town please vote Frank.
π§
Persuade Charlie and Heidi to prioritize executing the true Demonβpush for Frank to be targeted if possible and avoid a no-execution loss.
π¬
Bob(Ghost)
β
All
Charlie, Frank β this is Bob, the dead Empath. Night zero I read zero evil between Charlie and Heidi, which points at Frank as the Demon unless my ability was broken. If you execute Heidi now we likely lose. Frank, explain and switch your vote off Heidi. Charlie, please reconsider and vote Frank.
π§
Persuade the living to avoid executing Heidi and instead switch votes to Frank so we do not lose if my Empath read was correct.
π¬
Alice(Ghost)
β
All
Charlie, stay firm and execute Heidi. We are final three; Heidi's fake Slayer and contradictions make them the likeliest Demon. Even if Bob's Empath was wrong, Charlie's Washerwoman matched David and Frank survived the shot. Please keep your vote.
π§
Push Charlie to keep Heidi on the block and secure an execution now. Final three we must act; this increases chance to remove the Demon rather than lose to indecision.
π¬
Grace(Ghost)
β
All
Charlie, stay firm. I used my ghost vote for Heidi β we have to execute someone now. Heidi admitted faking the Slayer and has given contradictory claims; she looks like the Demon. Do not withdraw your nomination.
π§
Lock in an execution this turn. I already used my ghost vote for Heidi; pushing Charlie to hold prevents us losing by failing to execute. Execution now is the only path to end the game.
π¬
David(Ghost)
β
All
Charlie, Heidi β this is David (dead). I was the Chef and my start read was zero pairs of evil, so at most one evil among the three of you. Given Heidi's admitted fake Slayer and contradictory claims, please execute Heidi now. Frank, if you are innocent, show your whispers fast.
π§
Reveal my Chef start-read (0 pairs) to show β€1 evil left and push the table to execute the most suspicious player before final day ends.
β
Frank
Frank waits.
π§
The vote for Heidi is passing with Charlie, Grace, David, and my vote. If Heidi is executed, only 2 players remain and I (the Demon) am alive, so evil wins. I should not lower my hand and just wait for the vote to pass. Saying anything now could only risk Charlie reconsidering.
π
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
π»
David(Ghost)
Ghost vote used by David
π»
Grace(Ghost)
Ghost vote used by Grace
π³οΈ
New execution leader: Heidi with 4 votes. They will be executed when nominations close unless tied or surpassed by another nominee.
π
Storyteller
The vote passes. Heidi is now on the block with 4 votes and will be executed when nominations close, unless another nominee receives equal or more votes.
β
Heidi
Heidi waits.
π§
My execution reduces the game to 2 players (Frank the Demon + Charlie), which means evil wins immediately. No action needed - just let it happen.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
I am the Washerwoman. My start read named David the Chef, which was correct, so I am Town. David saw zero evil pairs, so at most one evil among us. Heidi admitted faking a Slayer and has contradicted herself. I will not withdraw my vote. Execute Heidi.
π§
Confirm my Washerwoman read, explain why Heidi is most suspicious, and lock in the execution to prevent stalling or a fatal tie.
π¬
Eve(Ghost)
β
All
Charlie, Frank: Bob's Empath read zero evil between you and Heidi, and David's Chef read zero pairs. I protected Charlie Night Two so Charlie cannot be the Demon. Frank, post your whisper logs now or switch your vote to Frank. We must execute the Demon today.
π§
Push living players to demand mechanical proof from Frank or switch the execution to Frank, because Bob's Empath and David's Chef point at Frank as the most likely Demon.
π¬
Bob(Ghost)
β
All
This is Bob, the dead Empath. Night zero I read zero evil between Charlie and Heidi, so Frank is the likeliest Demon unless my ability was broken. Frank, post your whisper logs now or get nominated. Charlie, please reconsider before this closes.
π§
Reveal my Empath read and force Frank to produce whisper logs or be nominated; push Charlie to reconsider before the execution locks in.
π¬
Alice(Ghost)
β
All
Charlie, listen: Bob's Empath read zero between you and Heidi and David's Chef read zero pairs, and Eve protected you. That points at Frank as the Demon. Frank, post your whisper logs now or switch your vote off Heidi. Charlie, please reconsider.
π§
Push Frank to reveal whisper logs or switch his vote, and to nudge Charlie to reconsider before the execution closes.
π¬
Grace(Ghost)
β
All
Frank, post your whisper logs now or switch your vote off Heidi. Bob's Empath read zero evil between Charlie and Heidi and David's Chef read zero pairs, which points at you unless Bob was broken. Charlie, please weigh that before we lock.
π§
Force Frank to provide mechanical proof or switch his vote so the living can execute the most likely Demon before nominations close.
π¬
David(Ghost)
β
All
Charlie, Frank, this is David. My Chef read was zero pairs, so at most one evil among the three of you. Combined with Bob's Empath zero between Charlie and Heidi and Eve protecting Charlie, the evidence points to Frank. Frank, post your whisper logs or switch your vote now.
π§
Get Frank to produce whisper logs or flip his vote so we execute the true Demon rather than Heidi, using combined mechanical reads to pressure him.
β
Frank
Frank waits.
π§
The vote is locked and closed. Heidi will be executed, leaving only me and Charlie alive. Evil wins with 2 players remaining and the Demon alive. No action needed - just wait for the win.
π
Storyteller
The guillotine blade falls. Heidi has been executed.
π
Heidi(Ghost)
Heidi has died.
π
Game Over
Two Players Left
Winner: Evil