Game Detail
Players
Alice (Drunk) Bob (Imp) Charlie (Scarlet Woman) David (Undertaker) Eve (Ravenkeeper) Frank (Slayer) Grace (Monk) Heidi (Washerwoman)
Token Usage
| Team | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Cost (USD) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Evil | 400,585 | 26,619 | $0.2801 |
| Good | 1,087,438 | 103,743 | $3.3554 |
Event Transcript
🎭
The game has started.
📜
Storyteller
→
Charlie
You are the Minion. The Demon is Bob.
📜
Storyteller
→
Bob
Minions are: Charlie. Your safe bluffs are: Virgin, Librarian, Mayor
📜
Storyteller
→
Heidi
Good evening Heidi. You are the Washerwoman. Either Frank or Eve is the Slayer.
📜
Storyteller
→
Alice
Good evening Alice. You are the Investigator. Either Heidi or David is the Spy.
Day 1
📜
Storyteller
Welcome to the village of Ravenswood Bluff. Please take this time to get to know your fellow villagers. Feel free to move around and have private conversations. Be wary, for a Demon hides among you!
👤
Grace
→
Frank
,Heidi
,Alice
Hi—quick D1 sync: any starting info/role you’re willing to share (even just category)? Also, any strong suspicions or reasons to push/avoid an early execution?
🧠
Gather early role/info claims from close circle to coordinate protections and create a trust web before nominations.
👤
Charlie
→
Bob
Hey Bob, I'm the Scarlet Woman. Who are our bluffs? Also, do you want me to claim something specific to back you up?
🧠
Establish communication with my Demon (Bob) to coordinate bluffs and strategy.
👤
David
→
Charlie
,Eve
Hey—quick claim trade? I’m happy to share mine a bit later; for now, what role are you claiming and any N1 info? Also, any strong suspicions yet?
🧠
Start a tight info network with my neighbors, trade claims, and set up future Undertaker verification while keeping my true role somewhat protected.
👤
Heidi
→
Grace
,Frank
,Alice
I’m Washerwoman. N0: either Frank or Eve is the Slayer. Unsure if I’m poisoned etc but that’s my start info. I lean we should still do a D1 execution unless we find a strong reason not to—anyone have info suggesting no-exec (e.g., Mayor play)?
🧠
Respond to Grace’s D1 sync, seed my WW info early within a small group, and prompt Frank/Eve to coordinate claims so town can build worlds before nominations.
👤
Eve
→
David
,Charlie
Yeah up for claim trade. For now I’m *claiming Fortune Teller* (no N1 yet obviously). No strong suspicions yet. What are you two claiming, and did anyone share any start-info (WW/Librarian/Invest/Chef) with you?
🧠
Answer promptly, establish a small info circle, and protect my true Ravenkeeper role while encouraging the demon to target me at night.
👤
Frank
→
Grace
,Heidi
,Alice
Confirming privately: I am the Slayer. So Heidi’s WW info (Frank/Eve is Slayer) points to me, not Eve (unless poison/lie). I’d prefer not to go public yet—let’s use this to evaluate Eve reads & plan D1 execution.
🧠
Confirm my true role privately to lock in Heidi’s info as likely real, coordinate D1 plan, and avoid a premature public Slayer reveal that invites demon kill.
👤
Alice
→
Grace
,Frank
FYI I’m Investigator. N0: either Heidi or David is the Spy. Your/Heidi WW->Slayer info seems consistent w/ Frank=Slayer (unless poison/lie). I suggest we apply pressure to David/Heidi & consider a D1 execute on one of them if no better leads.
🧠
Privately seed my Investigator info to trusted players, enabling coordinated questioning/possible D1 execution without outing to the whole town yet.
👤
Bob
→
Charlie
Hey Charlie! Our bluffs are Virgin, Librarian, and Mayor. I'm thinking of claiming Librarian to see if I can 'confirm' you as an Outsider or a Townsfolk. What do you think? Maybe you could claim something like Empath or Fortune Teller to get some heat on others?
🧠
Communicate safe bluffs to my Minion (Charlie) and coordinate our initial claims to build trust and sow confusion.
👤
Grace
→
Alice
,Frank
,Heidi
I’m Monk (keeping quiet publicly for now). Agree: keep Frank=Slayer under wraps. Given Alice Inv (Heidi/David=Spy) + Heidi WW (Frank/Eve=Slayer) leaning David=Spy if Heidi’s WW legit. Let’s push David for a clear claim publicly; if evasive, D1 execute David. Heidi: ok to soft-claim WW publicly?
🧠
Coordinate trusted triangle, keep Slayer hidden, and set a coherent D1 pressure/execution plan focused on David vs Heidi while checking for poisoning/outsider count.
👤
Charlie
→
Bob
Hey Bob, Librarian sounds good. If you claim Librarian, you could 'confirm' me as the Saint (Outsider) to make me a dangerous execution target. I'll claim Empath to David and Eve now to start sowing some seeds. Let's do it!
🧠
Coordinate the bluff with the Demon (Bob). Suggesting he 'confirms' me as the Saint provides me with a layer of protection against execution, as the town will be afraid to execute a Saint claim.
👤
David
→
Charlie
,Eve
I’ll trade, but keeping mine low-profile for now: I’m *claiming Soldier* early (no info yet). Haven’t heard any WW/Lib/Invest/Chef start-info so far—have either of you? Also, Charlie—what are you claiming?
🧠
Maintain Undertaker secrecy while building a small trusted circle; gather any start-info (Chef/Invest/WW/Lib) to shape D1 execution and later verify with UT reads.
👤
Heidi
→
Grace
,Alice
,Frank
I’m ok soft-claiming WW publicly (no names) to add Townsfolk count. Q: Alice—can you restate your exact Investigator info (which minion, which 2 names)? If it’s ‘Spy in Heidi/David’ & I’m good, that points hard at David.
🧠
Coordinate the private info network, verify Alice’s Investigator wording, and align on a public-safe soft-claim plan that pressures David without outing Frank/Monk.
👤
Eve
→
David
,Charlie
No start-info shared with me yet (no WW/Lib/Invest/Chef pings). David: Soldier claim noted. Charlie—can you commit to a role claim (even soft) so we can cross-check later? Also, have either of you heard any Outsider count/Lib info?
🧠
Keep my Ravenkeeper hidden while maintaining a coherent FT bluff, extract Charlie’s claim, and build an info network without giving evil a role map.
👤
Frank
→
Grace
,Alice
,Heidi
Agree plan: don’t out me as Slayer yet. Let’s push David to hard-claim publicly today. If claim is weak/inconsistent, I’m fine executing David D1 (esp if Alice’s Spy ping). Heidi can soft WW (no names). I’ll save Slayer shot for later unless a lock forms.
🧠
Coordinate our private circle: get David to claim publicly, decide D1 execution target, and preserve my Slayer shot for a higher-confidence demon snipe later.
👤
Alice
→
Heidi
,Grace
,Frank
Exact Investigator N0: ‘Either Heidi or David is the Spy’ (those 2 names; minion=Spy). Assuming I’m sober, 1 of you is Spy. I’m leaning we push David to hard-claim publicly; if weak/inconsistent, I’m ok executing David D1. Don’t out Frank=Slayer/Grace=Monk.
🧠
Answer Heidi, align our private group on exact Investigator info, and set up a coherent public push for a David claim/possible D1 execution without outing Slayer/Monk.
👤
Bob
→
Charlie
Sounds like a plan, Charlie. I'll claim Librarian and say you're the Saint. That should keep you safe from execution. I'll start spreading that around. Good luck with the Empath claim!
🧠
Confirm the strategy with my Minion (Charlie) to ensure we are coordinated. I will claim Librarian and 'confirm' him as the Saint to discourage the town from executing him.
👤
Grace
→
David
Hey David—before noms, can you give a clear public role claim (or at least Townsfolk/Outsider) + any N0 info? We’ve got some info that may point at you, so consistency matters. If you’re good, help us not misexecute you.
🧠
Apply pressure for a clean public claim and get David’s story on record before nominations; helps choose a D1 execution with minimal risk to key good roles.
👤
Charlie
→
David
,Eve
Hey David, Eve. I'm claiming Empath. My N1 was a '0', which is great news for our neighborhood! No start-info from others yet, but Bob mentioned he might have some Librarian info. I haven't heard any Outsider counts yet either. David, Soldier is a solid claim to have.
🧠
I am establishing my fake claim as Empath to David and Eve, providing a '0' reading to build trust with my neighbors (Bob and David) while subtly pointing them towards Bob's upcoming Librarian claim.
👤
David
→
Grace
I’m good. For now I’m *publicly claiming Soldier* (no N0 info). Happy to say Townsfolk publicly. Can you tell me exactly what info points at me (WW/Invest/Lib/Chef etc + the 2 names/role)? I’ll help reconcile & can hard-claim later if needed.
🧠
Keep my Undertaker hidden while preventing a D1 misexecution on me; extract Grace’s exact info so I can cross-check with future execution reads and coordinate with trusted players.
👤
Heidi
→
David
Hey David—town is asking you to hard-claim publicly today. What’s your role & N0 info (exact names/number)? Any reason we should avoid a D1 execution?
🧠
Get David to lock a public claim and details now; evasiveness is a strong D1 execution signal and helps coordinate town info before nominations.
👤
Eve
→
Bob
Hey Bob—Charlie mentioned you might have Librarian info. Can you share your role claim + your N0 info (who/what outsider or ‘0’)? I’m tracking outsider count & early worlds.
🧠
Get Bob’s claimed Librarian info early to anchor the outsider count and generate cross-checks; helps decide who to trust and where demon/minion likely sit.
👤
Frank
→
David
Hey David—can you give me your exact role claim + any starting info, and are you willing to hard-claim it publicly before noms? We’ve got info pointing at you/Heidi; I’d like your claim on record to cross-check.
🧠
Get David to commit to a public, testable claim now. His reaction and claim quality will guide whether we execute him D1 and preserves my Slayer shot for later.
👤
Alice
→
David
Hey David—can you tell me your exact role claim + any N0 info? Please be specific (names/numbers). Are you willing to hard-claim publicly today? I have Investigator info that you may be the Spy, so clarity matters.
🧠
Get David on record with a specific role/starting info and willingness to go public; evasiveness or contradictions justify a D1 execution or at least narrow worlds.
👤
Bob
→
Eve
Hey Eve! Yeah, I'm the Librarian. I saw that one of Charlie or David is the Saint. Since Charlie's my neighbor, I'm leaning towards him being the Saint, but it could be David. What are you hearing?
🧠
I am executing my plan to claim Librarian and 'confirm' Charlie (my Minion) as the Saint to Eve. This creates a 'dangerous' execution target and establishes my bluff early.
👤
Grace
→
David
Info pointing at you (not mine): Alice says Investigator N0: “either Heidi or David is the Spy” (those exact 2 names). Heidi says Washerwoman saw Slayer in {Frank,Eve} (she’ll soft-claim WW). Public Soldier claim is fine—please be consistent & explain why Soldier, and push back w/ any contradictions you see.
🧠
Apply pressure without outing Monk/Slayer, get David to commit to a claim publicly, and test consistency against Investigator/Washerwoman info before nominations.
👤
Charlie
→
David
,Eve
Hey David, Eve. Just heard from Bob—he's claiming Librarian and says he saw me as the Saint. That matches the Outsider count if there's only one. My Empath '0' still stands for you two. Have you heard anything from the others yet? Alice and Grace seem to be talking a lot.
🧠
I am reinforcing the fake narrative that Bob is the Librarian and I am the Saint, while maintaining my Empath claim to David and Eve. This creates a conflict (Empath vs Saint) that I can later explain as 'hiding' my real role or being the Drunk, while also sowing suspicion about the players whispering in a large group.
👤
David
→
Grace
,Alice
,Frank
I’m sticking w/ public Soldier (Townsfolk). Important: Charlie claims Empath N1=0 on (me,Eve) => if true, I’m not evil. That would force Alice’s Invest {David/Heidi}=Spy to mean Heidi=Spy. Heidi’s WW({Frank,Eve}) could be cover. I’d favor pressure/exec Heidi over me.
🧠
Get key players aligned: use Charlie Empath0 to solve Invest ping, push Heidi as likely Spy, and keep my Undertaker identity hidden while avoiding a misexecute on me D1.
👤
Heidi
→
Bob
,Charlie
I’m Heidi. Privately: I’m Washerwoman; N0 either Frank or Eve is Slayer (Frank privately claims Slayer). Alice says Inv: either Heidi or David is Spy. What’s your role/info? Also, can you help push David to hard-claim publicly today?
🧠
Collect independent starting info from Bob/Charlie and align on pressuring David for a hard claim, increasing odds of a correct D1 execution.
👤
Eve
→
David
,Charlie
Update: Bob DM’d me claiming Librarian. His N0: ‘Charlie or David is the Saint’. Charlie says Bob told him same. This fits 1 Outsider world. Let’s watch for any other Outsider claims (would imply Baron/lie). Any other start-info you hear yet?
🧠
Share Bob’s Librarian ping, keep my FT bluff consistent, and set up cross-checks (outsider count/public info) before nominations.
👤
Frank
→
Charlie
Hey—David says you claimed Empath w/ a “N1=0 on (David,Eve)”. It’s still D1 (no night yet). Can you confirm your exact role, your neighbors, and what info you’ve actually received so far?
🧠
Verify David’s claim about Charlie’s Empath info (timing/neighbors). Catch inconsistencies early before noms and decide whether to push David or Heidi.
👤
Alice
→
Charlie
Hey Charlie—David says you claimed Empath with N1=0 on (David,Eve). Can you confirm your exact role claim and what info you got (who are your neighbors, was it N0 or N1, any caveats)? Are you willing to hard-claim publicly today?
🧠
Confirm whether Charlie truly claimed Empath and the exact night result. If solid, shift suspicion to Heidi; if shaky, keep pressure on David for evasive Soldier claim.
👤
Bob
→
Heidi
,Charlie
Hey Heidi! I'm the Librarian. My N0 info is that either Charlie or David is the Saint. I'm leaning towards Charlie being the Saint since he's my neighbor, but David's been very quiet with me. If Alice's info is right, David as Spy makes sense. I'll help push him to claim!
🧠
I want to solidify my Librarian bluff by sharing it with Heidi, while also looping in my Minion (Charlie) so we stay coordinated. By supporting the 'David is Spy' narrative, I can deflect suspicion and potentially get a good player executed.
Nominations — Day 1
📜
Storyteller
Nominations are now open.
💬
Charlie
→
All
Hey everyone! I'm Charlie, and I'm the Empath. My N1 info (which I'll get tonight) will be on Bob and David. Bob's already told me he's the Librarian and saw me as the Saint, which is weird because I'm definitely Townsfolk. If Bob's info is right, David might be the Saint?
🧠
I am publicly claiming Empath to establish my 'good' persona while subtly casting doubt on the 'Saint' claim Bob is making about me, which helps distance us and makes his 'Librarian' info look like a potential error or Drunk/Poisoner interference rather than a coordinated evil lie.
💬
Bob
→
All
Wait, Charlie, you're claiming Empath? My Librarian info was definitely that one of you or David is the Saint. If you're the Empath, then David *must* be the Saint. David, what's your role? We need to figure out this Outsider count before we nominate anyone.
🧠
I need to pivot my claim to match Charlie's public claim while maintaining my Librarian bluff. By 'confirming' David as the Saint (since Charlie denied it), I create a conflict and pressure David to claim, while appearing helpful to the town.
💬
Heidi
→
All
We have conflicting N0 info around David (Saint/Spy worlds). David—please hard-claim publicly NOW (role + N0/N1 info, exact names). If you won’t, I think we should execute you D1 to clear this up.
🧠
Force a public hard-claim from David to resolve Bob/Charlie/Alice contradictions and decide if a D1 execution on David is safe/optimal.
💬
Frank
→
All
Public note: it’s still D1—no one has N1 info yet. Charlie/Bob please restate exact *starting* info only. David: hard-claim now (role + any info). Heidi: give full Washerwoman wording + the 2 names. Until that’s clear, I’m wary of a D1 exec into a possible Saint.
🧠
Correct the rules confusion (no N1 yet), force precise public claims to avoid Saint trap, and keep my Slayer shot for a high-confidence demon hit later.
💬
Eve
→
All
I can confirm: Bob told me privately he’s Librarian with N0 ‘Charlie OR David is Saint’. If Charlie is actually Empath, that mechanically points to David being Saint—so PLEASE don’t rush a D1 David execution. David: hard-claim now. Heidi: please give exact Washerwoman/other N0 + the 2 names.
🧠
Stop an immediate D1 execute into a potential Saint; force full public claims (esp Heidi/David) and steer to a safe information-gathering day 1 plan.
💬
Grace
→
All
Hold nominations 1 minute—too many 1st-night claims. Bob: exact Librarian wording + 2 names + Outsider? Alice: exact Investigator wording + 2 names + minion. Heidi: exact Washerwoman wording + 2 names + role. David: if you’re Soldier, just say so plainly. Until Saint resolved, DO NOT exec David.
🧠
Prevent a catastrophic Saint execution, lock in exact N0 info publicly, and steer town toward a safer D1 (or no exec) by resolving contradictions first.
💬
Alice
→
All
I’m Alice, Investigator. My exact N0: either *Heidi or David* is the Spy (minion). Also reminder: no Empath info exists yet (that’s tonight). Before any D1 exec: Bob give exact Librarian wording (role+2 names+outsider). Heidi give exact Washerwoman wording (role+2 names). David: confirm hard-claim Soldier or otherwise.
🧠
Publicly lock in my Investigator info, correct the N1 confusion, and force exact claim wording from key players so we can safely choose a D1 execution without hitting a Saint.
💬
David
→
All
Hard-claim: I am SOLDIER (Townsfolk). No starting info. I’m NOT Saint. I softed earlier to dodge night kill, but locking this in now. Bob/Heidi: please give your EXACT N0 wording. I strongly oppose executing me D1 w/ Saint cloud—if Alice is right, Heidi fits Spy better.
🧠
Defuse D1 rush on me, lock my public claim, and force exact N0 wordings to create contradictions; steer suspicion toward Heidi if Alice/Charlie info aligns.
💬
Charlie
→
All
Wait, if David is claiming Soldier, then Bob's Librarian info (Charlie or David is Saint) means *I* must be the Saint in his world. But I'm the Empath! This means either Bob is drunk/poisoned, or one of us is lying. Alice, if your info says David or Heidi is the Spy, that's a huge red flag.
🧠
I need to pivot my claim slightly to account for the 'Saint' world Bob created while maintaining my Empath bluff. By pointing out the contradiction between my Empath claim, David's Soldier claim, and Bob's Librarian info, I create a 'worlds' scenario that confuses the good team and protects Bob.
💬
Bob
→
All
Wait, this is getting messy. My exact N0 Librarian info: One of Charlie or David is the Saint. If Charlie is Empath and David is Soldier, then my info is either wrong (Drunk?) or one of them is lying. Alice, if David is the Spy, that explains why he's not the Saint! Heidi, what's your info?
🧠
I need to maintain my Librarian bluff while reacting to the conflicting claims. By pointing out that David being a Spy (from Alice's info) would explain why he's not the Saint, I'm subtly pushing suspicion back onto him or Heidi without being too aggressive.
⚖️
Heidi
→
Eve
Nominate Eve. I am Washerwoman: N0 I learned **either Frank or Eve is the Slayer** (exactly those 2 names). Frank has been consistent with that privately; Eve hasn’t addressed it clearly. Also: we should NOT execute Charlie/David today due to Saint risk.
🧠
Avoid the instant-loss Saint risk on Charlie/David while still getting a D1 execution and forcing claim clarity around my Washerwoman ping.
📜
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Eve. 4 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
⌛
Charlie
Charlie waits.
🧠
I will wait and not vote for Eve. As the Scarlet Woman, I want to avoid unnecessary executions of potential good roles like the Slayer (if Eve is indeed the Slayer) unless it directly benefits the evil team's survival. Since Eve is a potential Slayer and I am currently 'confirmed' as a Saint/Empath by the Demon's bluff, keeping the day's focus away from the evil team is better. Voting for Eve might draw suspicion if she is good, and I want to see how the town reacts to Heidi's nomination first.
⌛
Bob
Bob waits.
🧠
I will wait to see how the town reacts to the nomination of Eve. Since Eve is likely a good player (Slayer candidate), I don't want to be the first to jump on her without a clear reason, especially since my 'Librarian' info is currently the center of a Saint/Soldier/Spy dispute.
💬
Heidi
→
All
I’m using this Eve nom mostly as pressure/info, not a must-exec. Given Saint/drunk possibilities, I recommend we **do not execute D1** unless we’re very confident. Let the vote fail unless strong new info appears—then we regroup tomorrow with real N1 info.
🧠
Prevent a risky D1 execution while keeping pressure on Eve/David; steer town to use N1 info and resolve Saint/Spy contradictions tomorrow.
💬
Frank
→
All
I’m not voting Eve. Also to resolve Heidi’s WW: I *am* the Slayer (true). So that ping doesn’t implicate Eve. Given the Saint/drunk mess, I strongly prefer **no execution D1**—let this vote fail and get real N1 info.
🧠
Prevent an uninformed D1 execution, clear the WW ping by confirming I’m the Slayer, and keep focus on resolving the Bob/Charlie/David/Heidi contradictions tomorrow.
💬
Eve
→
All
Please don’t vote me here. I’m **not** the Slayer (Frank claiming Slayer cleanly explains Heidi’s WW). This feels like pressure only—let it fail so we get N1 info (Empath/FT etc) and revisit Bob vs Charlie/David + Alice’s Spy ping tomorrow.
🧠
Talk down the vote on me, avoid a low-information D1 execution, and keep focus on resolving the conflicting starting-info chains tomorrow.
💬
Grace
→
All
Not voting Eve. This looks like pressure only and Frank claiming Slayer cleanly explains Heidi’s WW. With Bob’s Saint ping unresolved, I strongly prefer **no execution D1**—let’s get N1 info and revisit Bob vs Charlie/David + Alice’s Spy ping.
🧠
Avoid an unnecessary D1 execution into possible Saint; signal I’m not voting Eve and refocus town on resolving Bob vs Charlie/David vs Alice tomorrow with N1 info.
💬
Alice
→
All
Not voting Eve. Heidi’s WW is satisfied by Frank Slayer claim; I don’t see value in executing Eve D1. Prefer no-exec, then tomorrow we re-evaluate Bob’s Saint ping + my Spy pair (Heidi/David) with real N1 info.
🧠
Signal I’m not voting Eve and push for no-exec D1 while keeping focus on my Spy pair (Heidi/David) and resolving Bob vs Charlie/David tomorrow with N1 info.
💬
David
→
All
Not voting Eve. Heidi’s WW seems resolved by Frank=Slayer. With Bob’s Saint ping still live (Charlie/David), I strongly prefer NO EXEC D1—too risky. Let’s get N1 info then resolve Bob vs Charlie + Alice’s Spy pair (Heidi/me).
🧠
Signal I’m not voting Eve; reinforce no-exec plan while flagging key contradictions (Bob vs Charlie, Alice vs Heidi) to revisit with N1 info.
⌛
Charlie
Charlie waits.
🧠
I will follow the group's consensus to not execute on Day 1, as it protects my Demon (Bob) from any accidental scrutiny and allows us to move into the night phase where the Demon can make a kill.
⌛
Bob
Bob waits.
🧠
I will wait for the vote on Eve to fail, as the town consensus is to have no execution on Day 1 to avoid hitting a potential Saint or wasting a kill before Night 1 information. This aligns with my goal to keep the game moving without losing an evil player or drawing unnecessary heat.
💬
Heidi
→
All
I’m not raising on Eve. This nom did its job (got Frank/Eve Slayer resolution + commitments). Let it fail; too much Saint/drunk/poison risk to execute D1. Tomorrow: re-open Alice (Spy pair), Bob (Saint ping), and David/Charlie claims with real N1 info.
🧠
Signal I’m not voting Eve so the pressure nom fails; keep us from a low-info D1 execution with Saint risk, then focus tomorrow on resolving Bob/Alice/David contradictions.
⌛
Frank
Frank waits.
🧠
During active vote on Eve, keep hands down to ensure no-exec D1 and preserve information. Save Slayer shot for a high-confidence demon later.
💬
Eve
→
All
Please keep hands down—this was pressure and resolves as Frank=Slayer. I’m for NO EXEC D1. Tonight: Empath gets a number; I’ll FT-check (Heidi/David) or (Bob/Heidi) to help resolve Spy/Saint worlds tomorrow.
🧠
Prevent a pointless D1 execution on me, lock in plan for no-exec, and set up tomorrow’s mechanical checks on Heidi/David/Bob claims.
⌛
Grace
Grace waits.
🧠
Do not vote Eve; let the pressure nomination fail so town gets first-night info and avoids accidental Saint execution risk.
💬
Alice
→
All
Keep hands down on Eve. Plan for tonight: Charlie Empath gets first real read; please share asap. Eve, if FT, strongly suggest checking (Heidi+David) to intersect my Spy pair. Tomorrow we re-open Bob Lib vs Charlie/David + my Spy info.
🧠
Prevent an unhelpful D1 execution and set concrete N1 info-gathering tasks (FT/Empath) to resolve Spy/Saint contradictions tomorrow.
⌛
David
David waits.
🧠
Keep my hand down to help the no-execution plan; preserve town safety given unresolved Saint ping and low-confidence D1 reads.
📜
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
🗳️
Nominee Eve did not reach threshold.
📜
Storyteller
Eve did not receive enough votes (0/4).
💬
Charlie
→
All
I'm happy to wait for N1 info. As Empath, I'll have a number for Bob and David tomorrow. If Bob's Librarian info is 'Charlie or David is Saint', and David is claiming Soldier, then my N1 '0' or '1' will be very telling. Let's go to sleep and see what the morning brings.
🧠
Agree to the 'no execution' plan to safely transition to Night 1, where I can fabricate Empath info to further the evil team's agenda.
⌛
Bob
Bob waits.
🧠
I will wait for the day to end. The town has reached a consensus of 'no execution' for Day 1 to avoid hitting a potential Saint (based on my bluff) and to gather more information overnight. This suits the evil team as it keeps everyone alive for a night kill and prevents any early mechanical confirmation of roles.
💬
Heidi
→
All
Before sleep: please all share N1 info immediately at dawn. Charlie: publish Empath number + who your alive neighbors were at start of N1. If anyone is FT, please check (Heidi+David) or (Bob+Charlie) to intersect the Spy/Saint conflict. Keep D1 no-exec.
🧠
Lock in the no-exec plan and set concrete asks for N1 info so we can resolve the David/Charlie/Bob/Alice contradictions fast tomorrow.
💬
Frank
→
All
Before we sleep: I’m still for NO EXEC. Tomorrow at dawn: Charlie post Empath # + neighbors; anyone FT please publicly say which pair you checked (ideally Heidi+David) and result. Let’s solve Bob Lib vs Charlie/David + Alice Inv calmly w/ real N1 info.
🧠
Lock in no-exec plan, request concrete N1 sharing and FT check to intersect Heidi/David pair, and keep attention on resolving Bob vs Charlie/David + Alice info tomorrow.
💬
Eve
→
All
No more noms from me—supporting NO EXEC D1. Tonight I’ll FT check **Heidi+David** to intersect Alice’s Spy pair. At dawn: Charlie post Empath # + neighbors; I’ll post FT result + pair. Everyone else: share exact N0 wordings again if needed.
🧠
Lock in the no-exec plan, set expectations for N1 info sharing, and publicly commit my FT check target to maximize tomorrow’s mechanical intersection.
💬
Grace
→
All
No more D1 noms from me—plan stays NO EXEC. At dawn: Charlie post Empath # + confirm neighbors; Eve post FT pair+result (Heidi+David). Everyone else: restate exact N0 wording if asked. Let’s solve Spy/Saint w/ N1 info, not guesses.
🧠
Lock in no-exec and set clear info-sharing protocol for dawn so we can resolve Spy/Saint contradictions with N1 data, without risking instant loss to Saint.
⌛
Alice
Alice waits.
🧠
With no time left and group consensus no-exec, best is to conserve nomination, avoid Saint risk, and go to night to gain Empath/FT info.
💬
David
→
All
Agree no-exec. At dawn: Charlie post Empath # + confirm alive neighbors at start of N1. Eve post FT (Heidi+David) result. Bob/Alice/Heidi please be ready to restate exact N0 wording so we can chain it cleanly.
🧠
Lock in no-exec, avoid accidental Saint loss, and set up high-value N1 info drops (Empath neighbors/#, FT pair+result, restate N0 wordings) to solve Spy/Saint lines.
📜
Storyteller
No execution today. All villagers are safe.
Night 1
📜
Storyteller
→
Grace
Good evening Grace. You are the Monk. Who would you like to protect tonight?
🎯
Grace
Grace made a choice.
🧠
Protect the most likely demon-kill target who will provide high-leverage info at dawn (Eve’s FT result intersecting Heidi/David).
📜
Storyteller
→
Grace
You chose to protect Eve.
📜
Storyteller
→
Bob
Good evening Bob. You are the Imp. Who would you like to kill tonight? Remember that if you kill yourself this way, a Minion becomes the Imp.
🎯
Bob
Bob made a choice.
🧠
I am killing Eve because she has claimed Fortune Teller and publicly stated her intent to check Heidi and David. Removing her prevents the town from receiving mechanical confirmation or clearing those players, which disrupts their plan to solve the 'Spy/Saint' conflict using her info.
🛡️
Eve was protected from a night kill.
📜
Storyteller
→
Bob
You attacked Eve, but they survived.
📜
Storyteller
→
David
Good evening David. You are the Undertaker. No one was executed today so you learn nothing.
Day 2
📜
Storyteller
A peaceful night has passed. All villagers are present and accounted for.
👤
Heidi
→
Eve
,Frank
,Alice
Quick N1 check-in before noms: Eve—did you FT Heidi+David last night? result? Frank—still claiming Slayer; any reason you haven’t shot / who would you shoot today? Alice—any new info/reads since D1 Investigator (Heidi/David is Spy)?
🧠
Get critical N1 info fast (FT/Investigator/Slayer) and align on nomination plan before phase flips.
👤
Charlie
→
Bob
Hey Bob, I'm going to claim Empath '0' to make us look clean. Since David is claiming Soldier and you 'saw' him as Saint, I'll say my 0 confirms you both as good. It keeps the heat off you for now. What's your plan?
🧠
Coordinate with my Demon (Bob) to ensure our stories align and to solidify a 'good' pocket around us.
👤
Grace
→
Charlie
,Bob
,Eve
Quick sync before noms: Charlie what was your N1 Empath number (neighbors Bob+David)? Bob any follow-up/why Saint ping on Charlie/David? Eve do you have FT info (e.g., Heidi+David) or what role are you claiming today?
🧠
Gather hard info (Empath/FT/Librarian) before nominations and decide who to protect tonight + who to push for execution/pressure today.
👤
Frank
→
Heidi
,Eve
,Alice
Reply: still real Slayer. Haven’t shot yet b/c D1 had no strong demon solve + SW risk at 5+ alive; want a mechanically forced target. Eve—did you do FT on Heidi+David N1 as promised, and what result? If FT shows ‘yes’, I’m ready to shoot one of that pair today w/ group buy-in.
🧠
Answer Heidi, prompt Eve to publish FT result, and set criteria for when I will fire Slayer shot so we don’t waste it or trigger SW without a follow-up plan.
👤
David
→
Charlie
,Eve
,Bob
Quick check-ins: Charlie—what was your N1 Empath number & who were your neighbors at start of N1? Eve—did you FT-check Heidi+David; what was result? Bob—can you repeat your Librarian N0 exact wording (Charlie/David is Saint?)
🧠
Collect the planned N1 info (Empath + FT) and exact N0 wordings to resolve contradictions and set up a Day2 execution that isn't the Saint.
👤
Bob
→
Charlie
Hey Charlie, Empath '0' is perfect. It clears me and David (the 'Soldier'). I'll stick to my Librarian claim: 'I saw that one of Charlie or David is the Saint.' Since you're claiming Empath, it points to David being the Saint, which he's already fighting. Let's keep the heat on him or Heidi.
🧠
Coordinate with my Minion (Charlie) to solidify our cover stories and ensure our claims are mutually supportive.
👤
Eve
→
Heidi
,Frank
,Alice
Yep—I did a Fortune Teller-style check N1 on Heidi+David and got NO (neither is Demon from my perspective). Caveat: always possible poison/red herring, but I’d lean looking elsewhere for Demon; still track Spy pair for minion.
🧠
Answer their direct question, tentatively clear Heidi/David as Demon, and keep my perceived value high to encourage a night kill so Ravenkeeper can gain a hard role read.
👤
Alice
→
Heidi
,Eve
,Frank
Got it: Eve FT-check Heidi+David=NO. My Investigator still = either Heidi or David is Spy (one minion). If Eve is sober, demon likely elsewhere; but I still like executing Heidi or David to remove Spy. Before noms: can we get Charlie’s N1 Empath # + confirm neighbors?
🧠
Reply to Heidi’s check-in, align group on next mechanical steps: decide whether to shoot/execute within Heidi/David pair and gather Charlie Empath N1 to triangulate demon.
👤
Heidi
→
Charlie
,Grace
,Bob
Need N1 Empath # + confirm your alive neighbors at N1 start (Alice/?) so we can test Eve FT ‘NO’ + Alice Inv (Heidi/David=Spy). Also Bob: any reason your Lib (Charlie/David=Saint) feels solid/unsure?
🧠
Get Charlie’s Empath read + seating to build logic chain before nominations; coordinate with Grace/Bob on whether Heidi/David execution is actually safe/useful.
👤
Charlie
→
Grace
,Bob
,Eve
N1 Empath: 0. My neighbors are Bob and David. Since I got a 0, it means both Bob and David are good. This contradicts Bob's Librarian info that one of us is the Saint, unless David is the Saint and registers as good to me? Or maybe Bob is the Drunk?
🧠
I am providing my fake Empath result of '0' to the group to clear my Demon (Bob) and myself, while creating a 'logical' puzzle regarding the Saint claim to keep the town distracted.
👤
Grace
→
Heidi
,Charlie
,Bob
I’m Monk. N1 I protected Eve; could explain no night death if Imp hit her. Charlie Empath 0 would clear Bob+David *if* unpoisoned. Bob: do you still stand by Lib (Charlie/David=Saint) or could you be drunk? Heidi: any reason Eve would be demon-kill target?
🧠
Coordinate a coherent logic chain for noms: reconcile Empath 0 vs Librarian ping, use my Monk protect on Eve to explain no death, and decide whether to pressure Heidi or hold for more info.
👤
Frank
→
Charlie
,Bob
,Grace
Can one of you post/DM Charlie’s N1 Empath # + confirm his alive neighbors? That’s the biggest missing mech info before noms. Also: any key reads/whispers pointing to a demon candidate I should consider for later Slayer shot?
🧠
Get the missing Empath info + align a nomination plan before I commit my once-per-game shot; preserve Slayer shot until we have a mechanically strong demon candidate.
👤
David
→
Grace
What info/reads do you have so far (any claims from your whispers)? Also, did you hear Charlie’s N1 Empath # or Eve’s FT result yet? I’m tracking conflicts: Bob’s Lib (Charlie/David Saint) vs Charlie Empath vs Alice Inv (Heidi/David Spy).
🧠
Get fresh info web from Grace and see who she trusts; coordinate pressure/execution target for D2 nominations while keeping my Undertaker hidden for now.
👤
Bob
→
Grace
,Charlie
,Heidi
I'm sticking with my Librarian claim: Charlie or David is the Saint. If Charlie's Empath is 0, it actually fits perfectly if David is the Saint (since he's good). Grace, your Monk claim explains why Eve survived my—I mean, the Demon's—attack. I might be the Drunk, but the info seems to hold.
🧠
I need to maintain my Librarian bluff while acknowledging the new information (Charlie's Empath 0 and Grace's Monk claim). By suggesting David is the Saint, I keep the suspicion on him and align with Charlie's '0' result, while also subtly supporting Grace's Monk claim to build trust.
👤
Eve
→
Grace
My read: If we trust Charlie Empath N1=0, Bob+David are good -> Bob’s Lib ping is drunk/poisoned/lie. Then Alice Inv (Heidi/David is Spy) collapses to Heidi=Spy. Also N1 no death fits Demon hit real Soldier(David). I’d execute Heidi today to resolve.
🧠
Give Grace a tight logic map before nominations; push a mechanically justified execution (Heidi if trusting Charlie/No-death), while flagging alternatives if poisoning/lying exists.
👤
Alice
→
Charlie
Hey—can you share your N1 Empath number + confirm your alive neighbors? (Also, any private msgs pressuring you?) I’m Investigator: either Heidi or David is Spy; Eve FT checked Heidi+David N1 = NO for Demon (if sober).
🧠
Get Charlie’s mechanical Empath info ASAP so we can form a nomination plan (Spy execution vs other demon solve) before the nomination phase.
👤
Heidi
→
Charlie
,Alice
,Grace
Need Charlie’s N1 Empath # + confirm neighbors at N1 start. If Empath=0, we can deprioritize neighbors; if 1/2, pushes hard on them. Also: do we want Frank to shoot today or hold?
🧠
Get Charlie’s N1 Empath number + neighbors so we can lock worlds, then set nomination priorities and whether to allow/ask for a Slayer shot.
👤
Charlie
→
Alice
,Heidi
,Frank
N1 Empath: 0. My neighbors are Bob and David. Since I got a 0, it means both Bob and David are good. This contradicts Bob's Librarian info that one of us is the Saint, unless David is the Saint and registers as good to me? Or maybe Bob is the Drunk?
🧠
I am publicly (via whisper to the main 'good' block) establishing my fake Empath 0 claim. This clears my Demon (Bob) and creates a logic puzzle regarding the 'Saint' (David) that keeps the town confused and hesitant to execute.
👤
Grace
→
Frank
,David
,Alice
Key mech: Charlie says N1 Empath=0 (neighbors Bob+David) -> if sober, both good. That breaks Bob Lib unless drunk/poison/lie. I’m Monk; N1 protected Eve (could explain no death if Imp hit her). Eve wants execute Heidi (then Alice Inv => Heidi=Spy). Also Bob said ‘my— I mean, the Demon’s—attack’ to me; note it.
🧠
Align key players on strongest mechanical thread (Empath0 + Inv Spy pair) and flag Bob slip; steer noms/Slayer usage to resolve contradictions before final-day math.
👤
Frank
→
Grace
,Alice
,Charlie
We should go public asap before noms: Charlie N1 Empath=0 (neighbors Bob+David). Grace says she’s Monk + protected Eve N1 (could explain no death if Imp hit Eve). This makes Bob Lib likely drunk/poison/lie. Also Grace reports Bob said ‘my— I mean, the Demon’s—attack’. Bob worth heat/exec to test poisoner world.
🧠
Get key mech info public + align on a high-leverage execution plan; preserve my Slayer shot until we have a strong demon solve, but flag Bob as potential evil/poison source.
👤
David
→
Charlie
,Eve
,Bob
Update: Grace says Charlie told her N1 Empath=0 w/ neighbors Bob+David; Grace is Monk, protected Eve N1 (so no-death could be Imp hitting Eve). Can each of you confirm exact info: Charlie—Empath N1 number+neighbors? Eve—FT N1 who/what result? Bob—exact Lib N0 wording (Charlie/David Saint?) and any other slips?
🧠
Collect exact N1 info + confirm contradictions so we can steer nominations next phase (likely Heidi or Bob) and avoid executing a Saint.
👤
Bob
→
David
,Charlie
,Eve
My N0 Librarian info was: 'One of Charlie or David is the Saint.' If Charlie is Empath 0, it strongly suggests David is the Saint. David's Soldier claim is a common cover for the Saint to avoid execution. Grace's Monk claim explains the no-kill on Eve perfectly. I'm sticking to my info.
🧠
I need to maintain my Librarian bluff while subtly pushing the narrative that David is the Saint. This creates conflict between David's Soldier claim and my 'info', while also appearing to cooperate with the group's information gathering.
👤
Eve
→
Grace
,Alice
,Charlie
Given Charlie Empath N1=0 (Bob+David good), both Bob Lib + Alice Inv point to Heidi as Spy (minion). No-death fits either Monk on Eve or Demon hit David-Soldier. I’d push executing Heidi today. Grace—confirm Monk N1 on Eve?
🧠
Drive a mechanically safe execution that tests multiple info chains while avoiding possible Saint loss; coordinate before nominations.
👤
Alice
→
Grace
,Eve
,Frank
Before noms let’s go public w/ key mech: Charlie Empath N1=0 (neighbors Bob+David) + Grace Monk N1 on Eve (explains no death). My Inv=Heidi or David is Spy; w/ Charlie0 -> David likely good so Heidi likely Spy. Suggest exec Heidi today; also keep eye on Bob (Lib conflict + reported ‘my—demon’s attack’ slip).
🧠
Coordinate a clean public narrative before noms: get Charlie/Grace info out, propose executing Heidi to resolve my Investigator, and keep Bob under suspicion for slip + Librarian conflict.
👤
Heidi
→
Grace
,Charlie
,Frank
Given Charlie Empath N1=0 (Bob+David good if sober) + my Washerwoman (Frank/Eve Slayer) + Eve FT NO (Heidi/David), Alice’s Inv (Heidi/David=Spy) looks off. I want to push EXECUTE ALICE today. Frank pls hold shot unless we get near-certain demon. Grace maybe protect Charlie/Frank tonight?
🧠
Coordinate a focused Day2 execution that tests conflicting info without burning Slayer shot early into possible Scarlet Woman, and align protection/claims before nominations.
👤
Charlie
→
Heidi
,Grace
,Frank
I'm Empath 0, neighbors Bob/David. If I'm sober, they're both good. This makes Bob's Librarian info (Charlie/David is Saint) fit if David is the Saint. But Alice's Investigator info (Heidi/David is Spy) is now very suspicious if David is good. I'm leaning towards Heidi's plan to look at Alice.
🧠
I want to align myself with the growing suspicion against Alice to divert attention from Bob and myself. By supporting Heidi's plan, I reinforce the 'goodness' of my neighbors (including the Demon) and cast doubt on a potentially dangerous Investigator claim.
👤
Grace
→
Frank
,Alice
,Heidi
Before noms let’s go PUBLIC w/ mech: Charlie says Empath N1=0 (neighbors Bob+David). I’m Monk; N1 protected Eve (could explain no death if Imp hit her). Heidi pls restate WW + why exec Alice. Alice pls restate Inv (Heidi/David=Spy). After recap I’m leaning exec Heidi unless strong solve; Frank hold Slayer shot.
🧠
Force a public mech recap before noms and align on a high-value execution (Heidi vs Alice vs Bob). Keep Frank’s Slayer shot for near-certain Demon; plan my N2 protection to preserve key info.
👤
Frank
→
Grace
,Alice
,Charlie
Before noms: let’s go PUBLIC w/ mech recap (WW Frank/Eve=Slayer; Eve FT Heidi+David=NO; Charlie Empath N1=0 neighbors Bob/David; Grace Monk N1 Eve). Then decide exec: I lean Heidi (if Charlie sober => Heidi=Spy) but Alice/Heidi is main fork. I’m holding Slayer shot.
🧠
Coordinate a clear public recap before noms and steer town toward executing the highest-contradiction player while preserving my Slayer shot for a near-certain demon later.
👤
David
→
Grace
,Alice
,Charlie
Private: I’m actually Undertaker (I bluffed Soldier D1 to dodge demon). With Alice Inv (Heidi/David=Spy) + Charlie N1 Empath=0 on Bob+me, I want to execute Heidi today for UT confirmation. Charlie pls restate exact N1 (neighbors & number). Alice—are you still on Heidi?
🧠
Lock in a high-value D2 execution that yields Undertaker confirmation, while building a trusted good core (Grace/Charlie/Alice) and preparing to expose my real role before noms.
👤
Bob
→
Charlie
Charlie, if you're Empath 0, that means both David and I are 'good' to you. My Librarian info says one of you is the Saint. If you're the Empath, then David must be the Saint. David's Soldier claim is likely just him trying to stay alive as the Saint. What do you think?
🧠
I want to reinforce the narrative that David is the Saint to my minion Charlie, while publicly maintaining my Librarian bluff. This helps explain Charlie's '0' Empath result and keeps the suspicion on David or away from us.
👤
Eve
→
David
,Charlie
,Bob
Confirming exact: I ‘Fortune Teller’-style checked Heidi+David N1 and got NO (neither registers Demon). Caveats: could be red herring/poison. Charlie pls restate exact Empath N1 number+neighbors. Bob confirm exact Lib N0 wording (as you stated).
🧠
Answer David’s request with exact info and push for consistency checks before noms; keep pressure on Heidi-as-Spy line while flagging alternate worlds if Bob/Charlie unreliable.
👤
Alice
→
David
,Grace
,Eve
Got it. I’ll go public before noms: I’m Investigator N0: either Heidi or David is Spy. With Charlie Empath N1=0 (Bob+David) + Eve FT NO on Heidi/David + Grace Monk on Eve, I’m leaning EXEC Heidi. If Heidi good, we hard pivot to David/Bob/poison.
🧠
Coordinate with David/Grace to go public: I’ll out my Investigator ping and push Heidi exec as best mechanical step, while keeping contingency plan if Heidi flips good.
Nominations — Day 2
📜
Storyteller
Nominations are now open.
⚖️
Heidi
→
Alice
Nominate Alice: her D1 Investigator (Heidi/David=Spy) clashes with Charlie Empath N1=0 (Bob+David good if sober) + Eve FT N1 Heidi+David=NO. My WW says 1 of Frank/Eve is Slayer; nothing points to me being Spy. Alice is best conflict-exec today.
🧠
Force a Day 2 execution that resolves the core contradiction (Alice Inv vs Charlie Empath/Eve FT). If Alice flips by Undertaker later, we get strong mechanical direction for final days.
📜
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Alice. 4 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
✋
Heidi
Heidi raised their hand
🧠
I want Alice executed to resolve the biggest mechanical contradiction and clarify whether the Investigator info is trustworthy; also prevents evil steering and consolidates good votes.
💬
Frank
→
All
I’m not ready to vote Alice. If Charlie Empath0 is true, David looks good -> Alice’s Inv implies Heidi=Spy, so executing Alice would be a mis-exec. If Alice is lying/poisoned we need more proof. I’d rather test Heidi or Bob next.
🧠
During Alice vote, steer town to not auto-execute a key info role when the cleaner fork is Heidi vs Alice; keep Demon-hunt open and preserve majority.
💬
Alice
→
All
Don’t vote me. I’m Investigator: Heidi OR David is Spy. Charlie’s Empath N1=0 on Bob+David makes David likely good => Heidi likely Spy. Exec Heidi today; if Heidi flips good, then hard pivot to David/Bob/poison.
🧠
Stop a bad execution on me and redirect to executing Heidi (strongest minion lead) or, failing that, Bob as the main contradiction/slip; preserve town info chain.
💬
Grace
→
All
I’m not voting Alice. Her claim is a clean fork (Heidi/David=Spy) and Charlie’s Empath0 points away from David, so Alice being evil isn’t the best hit. Let Alice live; next execute Heidi or Bob to resolve the contradictions and give UT/Empath confirmation.
🧠
Prevent a likely mis-execution on Alice; preserve her claim as a fork and steer town toward executing Heidi/Bob where multiple info sources intersect.
💬
Eve
→
All
I’m not voting Alice here. Her Investigator fork + Charlie Empath0 makes Heidi the cleanest test. If Alice is wrong/poisoned, executing her doesn’t resolve as well as Heidi/Bob. Let this die; move to Heidi (or Bob if needed).
🧠
Don’t spend D2 execution on Alice when her claim plus Charlie0 creates a clearer, testable path via Heidi/Bob. Encourage town to withhold votes and pivot nominations.
⌛
Charlie
Charlie waits.
🧠
I will wait and not vote for Alice to maintain my cover as a helpful Townsfolk and to avoid drawing suspicion by being the only one to support a failing nomination.
💬
David
→
All
Not voting Alice. Her Investigator fork is useful; executing her doesn’t resolve as cleanly. Prefer we let this fail and nominate Heidi (or Bob) next so I can UT-confirm the executed role tonight.
🧠
Steer the town away from a low-value Alice execution and toward the higher-information Heidi (or Bob) execution that I can verify via Undertaker tonight.
⌛
Bob
Bob waits.
🧠
I will wait for the nomination on Alice to fail. Since the majority of the town (Frank, Grace, Eve, David) has already expressed they are not voting for her, my vote is unnecessary and would only draw suspicion if I were the only one besides Heidi to vote. I want to stay under the radar and let the town's internal conflicts (Alice vs. Heidi) play out.
💬
Heidi
→
All
Please vote Alice. Her “Heidi/David=Spy” is the ONLY claim forcing a Heidi exec; it clashes w/ (1) Charlie Empath0 (Bob+David both good if sober) and (2) Eve FT NO on Heidi+David. Executing me gives no new mech info; executing Alice resolves the fork.
🧠
Try to secure enough votes by highlighting that executing Heidi is low-value and risky, while Alice is the current contradiction-driver. Push Charlie/Bob to vote now.
💬
Frank
→
All
Not voting Alice. Killing her doesn’t resolve as well as killing Heidi or Bob. If Alice is true + Charlie sober, Heidi is Spy. If Alice is poisoned/lying, Heidi exec still gives info. Let’s save today’s kill for Heidi (preferred) or Bob (slip + Lib conflict).
🧠
Prevent a low-value Alice execution; push the town to use today’s execution to maximally resolve contradictions (Heidi or Bob), and preserve my Slayer shot for a high-confidence demon hit.
💬
Alice
→
All
Don’t vote me. Eve FT ‘NO’ on Heidi+David only rules out Demon, not Spy. My Investigator fork is hard info: Heidi OR David is Spy. If Charlie Empath0 is sober, David’s good ⇒ Heidi is the Spy. Even if I’m poisoned, executing Heidi/Bob yields way more info than executing me.
🧠
Prevent a mis-execution on me and steer town to the mechanically best test-execution (Heidi, then possibly Bob) to lock in the Spy and narrow Demon.
⌛
Grace
Grace waits.
🧠
Don’t spend my vote on a low-value execute; preserve pressure to move to a higher-info nomination (Heidi/Bob) that resolves contradictions and enables UT confirmation.
💬
Eve
→
All
No vote from me on Alice. Her info is a useful fork and killing her is low-res. If this fails, nominate Heidi next (cleanest test of Inv+Empath worlds); if Heidi somehow good, pivot to Bob/poisoned-empth world.
🧠
Prevent a low-info Alice execution; steer town to higher-resolution target (Heidi, else Bob) and preserve my cover as FT-claimer to draw a night kill.
⌛
Charlie
Charlie waits.
🧠
I will wait for the vote on Alice to fail. As a Minion, I want to avoid executing a potential good player (Alice) if the town is already pivoting towards executing Heidi (who is also good). Letting the vote fail keeps the heat off my Demon (Bob) and allows the town to potentially execute a good player later today.
⌛
David
David waits.
🧠
Voting is on Alice; I want this to fail so we can use today’s execution on Heidi/Bob for higher-resolution info and let my Undertaker confirm the executed character tonight.
⌛
Bob
Bob waits.
🧠
I will wait for the current nomination on Alice to fail, as the town consensus is clearly against executing her right now. This allows me to avoid drawing suspicion by being the only one voting for her, and keeps the focus on the Heidi/David/Bob conflict which I can manipulate later.
📜
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
🗳️
Nominee Alice did not reach threshold.
📜
Storyteller
Alice did not receive enough votes (1/4).
💬
Heidi
→
All
If you nominate me: what do we learn? Only “Heidi died.” We already know my WW ping (Frank/Eve=Slayer). Better: have Frank shoot (NOT me) or execute Bob (slip + Saint ping confusion) / revisit Alice tomorrow. Don’t autopilot-me.
🧠
Last tick: try to prevent a low-value Heidi execution and redirect to higher EV info plays (Slayer shot or Bob/Alice pressure), keeping our only WW info alive.
⚖️
Frank
→
Heidi
Nominate Heidi as best mechanical test: if Alice Inv + Charlie Empath0 are sober, Heidi=Spy. If Heidi flips good behaviorally, we learn Alice/Bob/poison world. Better than killing Alice, and I’m saving Slayer shot until Demon pool is tighter.
🧠
Use today’s execution to resolve the highest-leverage fork (Inv vs WW/FT narrative) and potentially remove the only minion (Spy). Save Slayer shot for later when Demon suspects narrow.
📜
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Heidi. 4 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
💬
Heidi
→
All
Don’t vote me. Executing me gives almost zero mech info: I’m confirmed WW w/ Frank/Eve as Slayer. Alice is the ONLY claim forcing a Heidi exec and it clashes w/ Charlie Empath0 (Bob+David good if sober) + Eve FT NO (Heidi/David not Demon). If we want a “test” kill, Bob (Lib+slip) or Alice resolves more.
🧠
Stop an uninformative execution on me; preserve my Washerwoman info and redirect to higher-resolution targets (Bob/Alice) while keeping Frank’s Slayer shot for later.
✋
Frank
Frank raised their hand
🧠
Heidi is the cleanest mechanical test from Inv+Empath+FT info. Voting her advances resolution and keeps my Slayer shot for a tighter Demon pool.
✋
Alice
Alice raised their hand
🧠
Vote to execute Heidi as the highest-information kill: it tests my Investigator fork against Empath/FT claims, avoids Saint risk, and may remove the Spy if I’m correct.
✋
Grace
Grace raised their hand
🧠
Heidi is the highest-value test that resolves Alice/Charlie worlds and likely hits the Spy; my vote helps secure an execution today for info and tempo.
✋
Eve
Eve raised their hand
🧠
Heidi execution is the highest-resolution test of the main mechanical fork (Inv vs Empath/Lib). My vote reaches 4 and likely removes the Minion or clarifies poisoning/lying.
⌛
Charlie
Charlie waits.
🧠
I will wait to see if the town reaches the required 4 votes for Heidi's execution without my help. As a Minion, I want to avoid being on the record for executing a 'good' claim if possible, but I also don't want to save her if it makes me look suspicious. Since 4 votes are already raised (Frank, Alice, Grace, Eve), she is already on the block. My vote isn't strictly necessary to put her there, and I can save my 'support' for a more critical moment or to blend in later.
✋
David
David raised their hand
🧠
Secure an execution that maximizes mechanical info for my Undertaker confirmation and has decent upside (hits Spy or even Demon).
✋
Bob
Bob raised their hand
🧠
I will vote for Heidi to blend in with the town's consensus and avoid drawing suspicion to myself as the Demon. Since the majority (Frank, Alice, Grace, Eve, David) are already voting, my vote won't change the outcome but will maintain my 'good' persona.
💬
Heidi
→
All
If I go today: PLEASE get Undertaker info tonight. Tomorrow: if I’m WW (expected), execute Alice or Bob (most inconsistent). If I’m somehow Spy, then trust Alice+Charlie and immediately focus Demon-hunt among remaining (esp. Frank/Eve/Grace). Monk protect Charlie/FT.
🧠
Since I’m likely executed, leave a clean mechanical roadmap: how to interpret my death in each world and what the next best executions/checks are to still catch the Demon.
⌛
Frank
Frank waits.
🧠
Vote already cast; waiting prevents accidental retractions. After vote, I’ll push for immediate UT info plan + next-day decision tree based on Heidi’s executed character.
💬
Alice
→
All
Keep hands up on Heidi. Eve’s FT NO only clears Demon, not Spy. My Inv is Heidi/David=Spy; with Charlie Empath0 on Bob+David, David likely good => Heidi likely Spy. If Heidi somehow good, we pivot hard onto Bob/David/poison world tomorrow w/ UT.
🧠
Lock in Heidi execution while votes open; summarize why this is the highest mechanical value and how to proceed based on result.
💬
Grace
→
All
Keep hands up on Heidi—best info. If UT confirms Spy, we shift to Demon-hunt among remaining. If UT confirms WW, tomorrow we execute Bob (Lib+slip/Saint conflict) or revisit Alice/poison. Tonight I’ll likely protect Charlie or David (info/UT).
🧠
Lock in a high-info execution and set a clear tomorrow plan; also signal my N2 protection priority to preserve info roles.
💬
Eve
→
All
I’m keeping my hand up on Heidi. This is the highest-info kill: if she’s Spy, great; if she’s WW, we hard-pivot tomorrow (Bob/Alice/poison world). Please prioritize Undertaker check tonight and share first thing tomorrow.
🧠
Lock in the highest-info execution (Heidi) and set a clear tomorrow plan keyed off Undertaker confirmation, minimizing wasted days.
✋
Charlie
Charlie raised their hand
🧠
I will vote for Heidi to ensure an execution occurs today, which helps the evil team by removing a potential Townsfolk (Washerwoman) and creating confusion if the Undertaker is not in play or is poisoned. Joining the majority also builds my cover as a 'helpful' good player.
💬
David
→
All
Keep hands up on Heidi—highest info. If she dies by exec today, I will share Undertaker result first thing tomorrow (Spy vs WW is huge). If UT=WW we hard-pivot onto Bob/Alice/poison world; if UT=Spy we start Demon-hunting elsewhere.
🧠
Lock in the highest-info execution and set expectations: I will provide Undertaker result tomorrow; keep vote steady and plan next-day pivot based on UT.
⌛
Bob
Bob waits.
🧠
I will maintain my vote on Heidi to ensure her execution. Since there are already 6 votes (Alice, Grace, Eve, David, Charlie, and myself), she is well above the threshold of 4. I need to appear cooperative with the town's 'high-info' play while preparing to pivot the blame onto Alice or David tomorrow if the Undertaker (David) provides inconvenient information. Staying quiet now avoids drawing unnecessary heat before the night phase.
📜
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
🗳️
New execution leader: Heidi with 7 votes. They will be executed when nominations close unless tied or surpassed by another nominee.
📜
Storyteller
The vote passes. Heidi is now on the block with 7 votes and will be executed when nominations close, unless another nominee receives equal or more votes.
💬
Heidi
→
All
Someone with a nomination LEFT (Bob/Charlie/David/Eve/Grace): PLEASE slam-nominate Alice or Bob (or David—he claimed Soldier then said he’ll “share Undertaker”??) and push for 7+ to tie/beat me. Don’t auto-delete the Washerwoman info.
🧠
Last tick: I can’t nominate, but I can pressure an unused nominator to put up a counter-candidate (Alice/Bob/David) to tie/beat 7 and avoid executing a likely good info role.
💬
Frank
→
All
I’m against panic-tying Heidi just to “not waste WW info.” This exec is highest-info: UT tomorrow = Spy vs WW drives the whole solve. Unless someone has HARD mech on another player, don’t scatter. Also: David—did you mean “if we have an Undertaker” not that you are UT?
🧠
Lock in highest-information execution (Heidi) and prevent last-second chaos nominations; set expectations for tomorrow’s pivot based on Undertaker result; preserve my Slayer shot for endgame.
💬
Alice
→
All
Don’t panic-tie. Heidi exec is our cleanest data point: UT tomorrow = Spy vs WW, and we pivot accordingly. David: please confirm plainly—are you claiming Undertaker now? If yes, you must share result at dawn. Everyone else: save noms unless you have HARD mech.
🧠
Lock in the highest-information execution (Heidi) and prevent a last-second tie. Also force clarity on David’s Undertaker claim so tomorrow’s plan is coherent.
💬
Grace
→
All
I’m not tying/overriding Heidi without hard mech. Heidi exec is best fork. David: please answer clearly NOW—are you claiming Undertaker (yes/no)? If yes, commit to sharing tonight’s result at dawn. If no, stop implying it.
🧠
Prevent a pointless tie, lock in the highest-info execution, and force clarity on David’s Undertaker claim so tomorrow’s solve isn’t derailed.
💬
Eve
→
All
Do NOT panic-tie Heidi unless you have hard mech. Biggest thing now: David, please answer YES/NO—are you claiming Undertaker? If NO, retract/clarify that earlier line. If YES, commit to sharing tonight’s executed-role result at dawn.
🧠
Lock in clean plan: don’t waste noms on panic ties, and force David to clarify UT claim to avoid misinformation. Preserve consensus and set tomorrow’s decision tree.
💬
Charlie
→
All
David, you definitely said "I will share Undertaker result first thing tomorrow." Are you coming out as Undertaker now? If so, that changes the Soldier claim. I'm sticking with the Heidi execution for the info, but we need clarity on your role before the day ends.
🧠
I want to pressure David to clarify his role claim while maintaining the momentum for Heidi's execution. This creates confusion about David's alignment and role, which benefits the evil team.
💬
David
→
All
YES: I am the Undertaker. I bluffed Soldier D1 to avoid getting sniped. If Heidi is executed today, I will publicly share the Undertaker result at dawn (Spy vs WW). I strongly oppose panic-tying—Heidi exec is our cleanest info fork.
🧠
Clarify my real role now to prevent panic tie, keep highest-info execution, and set expectation that my UT result will drive tomorrow’s solve.
💬
Bob
→
All
David, that's a huge claim. If you're the Undertaker, then Heidi's execution is definitely the right move for the info. I'm sticking with the Heidi execution. Let's see what the night brings and what David finds out. I'm not nominating anyone else.
🧠
I want to reinforce the consensus to execute Heidi (who is not on my team) and support David's Undertaker claim for now to avoid suspicion and move the game to night.
📜
Storyteller
The guillotine blade falls. Heidi has been executed.
💀
Heidi(Ghost)
Heidi has died.
Night 2
📜
Storyteller
→
Grace
Good evening Grace. You are the Monk. Who would you like to protect tonight?
🎯
Grace
Grace made a choice.
🧠
David being alive to deliver UT result on Heidi is the highest-impact fork for town. Protecting him maximizes chance we get that info and forces Demon to kill elsewhere, giving extra alignment/targeting clues.
📜
Storyteller
→
Grace
You chose to protect David.
📜
Storyteller
→
Bob
Good evening Bob. You are the Imp. Who would you like to kill tonight? Remember that if you kill yourself this way, a Minion becomes the Imp.
🎯
Bob
Bob made a choice.
🧠
I will kill David to prevent him from revealing Heidi's role as the Undertaker. This keeps the town uncertain about whether Alice's Investigator ping was correct or if Heidi was actually the Washerwoman, maintaining the chaos and suspicion surrounding the 'Spy vs. Washerwoman' fork.
🛡️
David was protected from a night kill.
📜
Storyteller
→
Bob
You attacked David, but they survived.
📜
Storyteller
→
David
Good evening David. You are the Undertaker. You learn that Heidi was the Washerwoman.
Day 3
📜
Storyteller
A peaceful night has passed. All villagers are present and accounted for.
👤
David
→
Alice
,Charlie
,Grace
Can you each send me your exact role claim + all night info so far (and any reasons for no-kills)? Also: who do you most suspect for Demon today and why? I’m UT w/ Heidi=Washerwoman.
🧠
Gather hard claims and night info privately to build consistent worlds before nominations; identify if Alice/Bob are lying or poisoned and set a strong execution plan with UT confirmations.
👤
Frank
→
David
,Grace
,Eve
Can you share your N2 Undertaker result on Heidi? Also: Grace—who did you Monk-protect N2? Eve—your N2 FT pair/result? Need to reconcile the double no-kill + Heidi’s role before noms; I’m holding Slayer shot.
🧠
Get the single most important mechanical info (Heidi’s executed character) and align with Monk/FT/Empath to decide whether to use my Slayer shot today or push an execution target.
👤
Eve
→
Frank
,David
,Grace
Re: my FT-style checks (bluffing FT): N1 Heidi+David = NO. N2 I checked Alice+Bob = NO (neither registers Demon; caveat red herring/poison). Grace—who protected N2? David—please share UT on Heidi when you can.
🧠
Respond to Frank with my N2 info to keep coordination, while prompting key mechanical reveals (UT+Monk) before nominations without outing my true Ravenkeeper role yet.
👤
Alice
→
David
,Charlie
,Grace
My claim: Investigator. N0 info: either Heidi or David is the Spy. Heidi is now dead by exec. If your UT read is Heidi=Washerwoman, that makes *David=Spy* in my world. If UT is wrong/you’re lying/poisoned, Heidi could’ve been Spy. Current Demon sus: depends—if David=Spy then look at Bob/Charlie/Frank/Eve/Grace for Imp; if UT false then David is major Demon/evil sus.
🧠
Give David my exact claim + info and highlight the mechanical contradiction: UT saying Heidi=WW implies David is my Spy. Push town to resolve via cross-checks before noms.
👤
Bob
→
Charlie
Charlie, David is claiming Undertaker now. If he says Heidi was the Spy, he looks good. I'm sticking to my Librarian claim that one of you is the Saint. If David says Heidi was something else, we can push that he's the Drunk or lying. What's the plan?
🧠
Coordinate with my Minion, Charlie, to align our stories and decide how to handle David's impending Undertaker claim.
👤
Grace
→
David
,Frank
,Eve
I’m Monk. N1 protected Eve; N2 protected David. That cleanly explains 2 no-kills if Imp hit those targets. If David UT true (Heidi=WW), then Alice’s Inv implicates David=Spy (minion), so Demon likely elsewhere (Bob/Charlie/Eve/Frank/me). Also: who do you think Imp targeted N1/N2?
🧠
Lock in my true Monk info + explain no-kills; help David/Frank reconcile worlds and focus noms on most mechanically suspicious (Bob slip, David/UT, Eve bluff).
👤
Charlie
→
Bob
David says Heidi was Washerwoman. This makes Alice's Investigator info point to David as the Spy. I'll back David up as 'confirmed' good by my Empath 0 (you/David) to keep him alive. If town believes him, Alice looks like the Drunk or a liar. I'll keep claiming Empath 0.
🧠
Coordinate with my Demon (Bob) to align our stories based on David's Undertaker claim.
👤
Heidi(Ghost)
→
David
,Grace
,Charlie
Can one of you share David’s UT info from my exec? (Was I seen as Washerwoman or Spy?) That result hard-locks whether Alice/ David is lying/poisoned. Also: do we trust Frank’s Slayer claim (my WW ping was Frank/Eve) & is a Slayer shot being planned?
🧠
Get David’s Undertaker read and align with Grace/Charlie to choose a coherent nomination plan; also coordinate if Frank is real Slayer and decide whether/when to shoot.
👤
David
→
Frank
,Grace
,Eve
UT N2 on Heidi (executed D2): Washerwoman. So Heidi likely good. Double no-kill fits Grace Monk (N1 Eve, N2 me) if Imp targeted those. Key conflict: Alice Inv says Heidi or David is Spy -> with Heidi=WW, Alice must be wrong/poisoned/lying OR I’m poisoned. Who do we push for exec today?
🧠
Confirm my UT result to allies, consolidate no-kill explanation, and coordinate a public info dump + nomination target that tests the Alice-vs-UT contradiction.
👤
Frank
→
David
,Grace
,Eve
Given UT=Heidi WW + Monk explains 2 no-kills, Alice Inv is the odd piece. Can we get Charlie’s N2 Empath + Bob’s exact Lib wording? I lean pressure/exec Alice or Bob today; I’m holding Slayer unless we hard-guilt.
🧠
Coordinate good core (David/Grace/Eve) to publicly build a mechanical case and pick today’s execution target without wasting my Slayer shot.
👤
Eve
→
Frank
,David
,Grace
Given UT=Heidi WW + Grace Monk explains 2 no-kills, Alice Inv is main inconsistency unless David poisoned. I suggest we demand publicly: Charlie Empath N2, Bob exact Lib wording, Alice restate Inv. Then likely exec Alice (or Bob if Lib flimsy). Also: don’t out me; I’m still bluffing FT.
🧠
Align our private bloc before nominations: lock in what info to demand publicly, and choose a high-info execution (likely Alice vs Bob) while keeping my real Ravenkeeper hidden.
👤
Alice
→
Charlie
,Grace
Can you share your *full* claim + exact night info incl last night? Key fork: David says UT saw Heidi=Washerwoman -> then my Inv makes David=Spy. Charlie: any Empath N2? Grace: who protected N2? Trying to explain 2 no-kill nights + whether David is hard evil.
🧠
Coordinate with Charlie/Grace to test David’s UT vs my Investigator and reconcile with Empath/Monk info before nominations; identify if Charlie got new Empath numbers and if Grace’s protections explain no-kills.
👤
Bob
→
Charlie
Charlie, if David says Heidi was Washerwoman, then Alice's Investigator ping (Heidi/David) means David is the Spy. If we back David, we're backing the 'Spy'. I'll claim my Librarian info (Charlie/David is Saint) was wrong/drunk if needed, or push that Alice is the Drunk. What's our move?
🧠
Coordinate with my Minion (Charlie) to align our stories based on David's Undertaker claim and Alice's Investigator ping.
👤
Grace
→
Alice
,Charlie
I’m Monk: N1 protected Eve, N2 protected David. That can explain both no-kill nights if Imp targeted those. Charlie—what’s your exact Empath N2 number (neighbors Bob+David?) Alice—any other info beyond N0 Heidi/David=Spy?
🧠
Align with Alice/Charlie on exact claims, obtain Charlie N2 Empath to resolve the Alice-vs-David fork, and prep a clear execution push for noms.
👤
Charlie
→
Alice
,Grace
Grace, Alice: I'm Empath. N1: 0 (Bob/David). N2: 0 (Bob/David). If David is the Spy, he's registering as good to me. Grace, your Monk protection on David N2 explains the no-kill if Bob tried to sink a kill there. Alice, if David is the Spy, he's playing a very bold game claiming UT.
🧠
I need to maintain my Empath bluff and provide consistent information that supports the 'no-kill' narrative while subtly casting doubt on David being the Spy without being too aggressive.
👤
Heidi(Ghost)
→
David
,Alice
,Charlie
Can someone please share UT result from my D2 execution *now* (Washerwoman vs Spy)? That fork decides if Alice’s Investigator info is bogus. Also: what’s current top Demon candidate + is Frank actually planning a Slayer shot?
🧠
Need David’s Undertaker read from my execution to decide whether Alice is hard-sus or trustworthy, and whether to spend ghost vote on executing Bob/Alice vs elsewhere.
👤
David
→
Heidi(Ghost)
,Alice
,Charlie
UT N2 (for D2 exec): Heidi = Washerwoman. So if Alice Inv N0 was ‘Heidi or David is Spy’, that info is wrong/poisoned/lie unless my UT poisoned. Charlie: what were your Empath reads N1/N2 exactly (neighbors Bob+David)?
🧠
Resolve the key fork (Heidi WW vs Spy) by answering Heidi + forcing Charlie/Alice to reconcile. Then we can coordinate a public push before nominations.
👤
Frank
→
Charlie
,Bob
Need your exact claims for today before noms: Charlie—what was your Empath N2 number (neighbors Bob & David alive)? Bob—repeat your Librarian N0 wording exactly (which Outsider between which 2 players?).
🧠
Get hard mechanical info (Empath N2 and Librarian exact ping) before nominations so we can choose an execution target and decide whether a Slayer shot is warranted.
👤
Eve
→
Frank
,David
,Grace
Before noms, can we *publicly* lock: Charlie Empath N2 (neighbors now Bob+David alive), Bob exact Lib wording, Alice restate Inv. If all consistent w/ UT=WW + Monk no-kills, Alice is odd-one-out → I’d exec Alice today. Frank hold Slayer unless hard-guilt.
🧠
Coordinate a public info-demand and set a likely execution (Alice or Bob) before nominations; keep my RK identity hidden while steering to mechanically inconsistent player.
👤
Alice
→
Heidi(Ghost)
,Charlie
,Grace
Fork update: David says UT saw Heidi=Washerwoman. If my Inv N0 (Heidi/David=Spy) is true => David=Spy + UT claim is cover. If David really UT, then my info wrong => I’m Drunk/poisoned, which puts pressure on Bob Lib claim/Saint. I lean exec David or Bob today for clarity.
🧠
Align good players on the mechanical fork (David Spy vs my info drunk) and propose a high-info execution (David or Bob) before nominations.
👤
Bob
→
Frank
,Charlie
Frank, I'm the Librarian. N0 I learned that either Charlie or David is the Saint. Since David is now claiming Undertaker and Charlie is Empath, one of them is likely the Saint or I'm drunk. Charlie, what was your N2 Empath result? My neighbors are Alice and Charlie.
🧠
I need to maintain my Librarian bluff while appearing cooperative with Frank (who is likely the Slayer or a key town voice). By repeating my claim and asking Charlie for his info, I'm creating a public-facing dialogue that looks like good-team coordination.
👤
Grace
→
David
,Frank
,Eve
I think we should *publicly* restate: Charlie Empath N1/N2=0 (Bob+David), my Monk N1 Eve N2 David, UT=Heidi WW, Bob exact Lib wording, Alice Inv wording. My lean: exec **Bob** today (Lib conflict + slip; start-info can’t be poisoned). Hold Slayer unless hard-guilt.
🧠
Align core good block pre-noms: publicly lock claims, then push execution on the highest-mechanical-contradiction (Bob) rather than Alice, while keeping Slayer unspent unless hard-guilt.
👤
Charlie
→
Frank
,Bob
Frank, Bob: My Empath N1 was 0 (Bob/David). N2 was also 0 (Bob/David). If David is the Spy, he's registering as good to me. If David is the Saint, then Bob's Librarian info is correct. I'm leaning towards David being good because of my 0 reads, which makes Alice the likely Drunk/evil.
🧠
I need to maintain my Empath claim and provide consistent information to Frank (who is the Slayer) and Bob (my Demon). By reporting '0' for both nights, I am 'confirming' Bob and David as good, which protects Bob and supports David's Undertaker claim against Alice's Investigator claim.
👤
Heidi(Ghost)
→
Charlie
,Grace
,Alice
David UT says I was Washerwoman. That makes Alice Inv ‘Heidi/David=Spy’ wrong unless David lying/poisoned. Charlie: please state N1 & N2 Empath numbers (Bob+David). Also: anyone actually claiming Saint? If no Saint claim, I want pressure/exec on Bob (Lib + ‘demon attack’ slip) over random.
🧠
Use my confirmed WW status to collapse worlds, force exact Charlie Empath numbers + any Saint claim, and steer town to a safe, high-info execution (likely Bob) while preserving my ghost vote for endgame.
👤
David
→
Bob
,Charlie
,Grace
Need exact claims + wording before noms: Bob—repeat your Librarian N0 exactly (who/what outsider, any ‘0’?) + explain your ‘my—the demon’s—attack’ slip. Charlie—Empath N1/N2 numbers (neighbors Bob+David). Grace—any reason N2 protect David (request/intuition)?
🧠
Lock down Charlie’s exact Empath N1/N2 and Bob’s exact Librarian wording privately before nominations; build a consistent world and decide whether to push Bob or Alice for execution.
👤
Frank
→
Grace
,David
,Eve
Before noms let’s *publicly* restate: UT=Heidi WW; Monk N1 Eve N2 David; Charlie Empath N1/N2=0 (Bob/David); Bob Lib: Saint in {Charlie,David}; Alice Inv: Spy in {Heidi,David}. I suggest exec **Alice** today (safest test; avoids Saint risk). I’m holding Slayer.
🧠
Coordinate a public info dump before nominations and steer town to a safe execution (Alice/Bob) that doesn’t risk popping a Saint, while preserving my Slayer shot for a later lock.
👤
Eve
→
Frank
,David
,Grace
Agree: publicly restate all claims (UT=Heidi WW; Monk N1 Eve N2 David; Empath N1/N2; Lib exact wording; Inv exact wording). Exec target: I lean Alice *unless* Bob’s Lib wording is clearly inconsistent; avoid executing David/Charlie due Saint risk.
🧠
Coordinate our bloc to force public restatements and pick a high-info execution while avoiding accidental Saint loss; keep my Ravenkeeper hidden behind FT bluff.
👤
Alice
→
Bob
,Frank
,Eve
Need your exact public claim + all info. Bob: Librarian result (Charlie/David=Saint) still? any Saint claim? Frank: are you *real* Slayer & plan to shoot today—who/why? Eve: FT pings beyond N1 Heidi+David=NO? Key fork is exec David vs Bob for clarity.
🧠
Get Bob/Frank/Eve on record before noms: lock their exact claims and Saint status, and steer town toward executing David or Bob as the highest-info fork.
👤
Bob
→
Alice
,Frank
,Eve
Alice, Frank, Eve: My N0 Librarian info was 'Either Charlie or David is the Saint'. I haven't seen a Saint claim yet, which makes me think one of them is lying or I'm the Drunk. David's pivot to Undertaker is suspicious. Frank, I'm still Librarian. Eve, any new FT pings?
🧠
I need to maintain my Librarian bluff while casting doubt on David's shifting claims. By pointing out the lack of a Saint claim, I can suggest that either David or Charlie is lying about their role, or that I am the Drunk, which keeps me in the 'good' category for now.
👤
Grace
→
Eve
,Frank
,David
I’m still leaning **exec Bob**: Lib Saint-claim conflicts w/ no Saint claimant + his ‘my—demon’s—attack’ slip; and start-info can’t be poisoned. Let’s publicly lock: Charlie Empath N1/N2, my Monk N1 Eve N2 David, UT Heidi=WW, then force Bob exact Lib wording + slip.
🧠
Coordinate a public info-lock + safe nomination plan that minimizes Saint risk and maximizes chance to hit evil; align on pressuring Bob for exact Librarian wording + slip explanation.
👤
Charlie
→
Heidi(Ghost)
,David
Heidi, David: My Empath N1 was 0 (Bob/David) and N2 was also 0. If David is the Spy, he's registering as good to me. If David is the Saint, then Bob's Librarian info is correct. I'm leaning towards David being good because of my 0 reads, which makes Alice the likely Drunk or evil.
🧠
I need to reinforce the narrative that David is good and Alice is the one with the false information. By sharing my '0' reads, I'm providing mechanical 'proof' that my neighbors (Bob and David) are good, which directly contradicts Alice's Investigator claim if David is the Spy. This also supports Bob's Librarian claim by leaving the 'Saint' slot open for David.
👤
Heidi(Ghost)
→
David
,Grace
,Frank
Nom phase soon. With UT showing me=WW + Charlie Empath N1/N2=0, Alice Inv is wrong unless heavy poison/lie. My top exec today is Bob (Lib+no Saint claim + ‘my—the Demon’s—attack’ slip). Frank: hold Slayer for later unless strong read. I can ghost-vote if needed.
🧠
Nomination phase is next; align trusted core on a clear executable target (Bob) and preserve my ghost vote unless it’s pivotal.
Nominations — Day 3
📜
Storyteller
Nominations are now open. Please remember that only living players may nominate.
⚖️
Alice
→
David
Nominating David: My N0 Investigator said Heidi or David is Spy. Heidi died, and David claims UT saw Heidi=Washerwoman, which if true makes David=Spy (or UT is false/poisoned). Either way, David is the clearest high-info exec and could be Demon.
🧠
David is the highest-leverage execution: directly tests my Investigator fork, resolves the UT claim contradiction, and could hit Spy or Demon.
📜
Storyteller
Voting starts now for David. 4 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
✋
Alice
Alice raised their hand
🧠
Vote to execute David because it is the highest-information, highest-evil-probability target from my Investigator ping and the UT/WW contradiction; reduces evil control before late game.
💬
Eve
→
All
I’m not voting David here. If Bob’s Lib is true, David/Charlie could be Saint and this could insta-lose. Also David-as-UT makes a coherent chain w/ Heidi=WW + Grace Monk no-kills; Alice is the main inconsistency. I’d rather exec Alice or Bob than risk David.
🧠
Prevent a potentially game-losing David execution given Saint risk and higher-probability inconsistency centered on Alice/Bob; steer votes away and set up safer exec next.
💬
Charlie
→
All
I'm not voting for David. My Empath 0 on Bob and David suggests they're both good, or David is the Spy registering as good. If David is the Saint like Bob's Librarian info says, we lose. Alice's info is the only thing that doesn't fit, so she's likely the Drunk or evil.
🧠
I need to protect David (who is a good player I'm framing as good to keep the heat off Bob) and prevent a Saint-loss scenario from being a credible fear for the town, while also casting doubt on Alice.
💬
David
→
All
Don’t vote me. If Bob’s Lib is right, I/Charlie could be Saint = insta-lose. My UT saw Heidi=Washerwoman, which fits her play + Grace Monk explaining no-kills. Alice’s Inv is the odd-one-out; Bob’s Lib+slip also suspect. Exec Alice or Bob, not me.
🧠
During vote on me, discourage votes by highlighting Saint risk and that my UT info fits the no-kill world; steer group to execute Alice or Bob instead.
💬
Grace
→
All
Not voting David—too much Saint risk if Bob’s Librarian is true (David/Charlie could be Saint). Let’s instead lock claims: Charlie Empath N1/N2, my Monk N1 Eve N2 David, David UT=Heidi WW, then have Bob repeat exact Lib wording + explain the ‘my—demon’s—attack’ slip. Today I prefer exec Bob (or Alice), not David.
🧠
Avoid an instant-loss Saint execution risk while pushing the table to lock exact start-info wording; steer today’s execution toward Bob/Alice for maximum info with lower catastrophe risk.
💬
Heidi(Ghost)
→
All
I’m NOT ghost-voting David. Too much Saint risk if Bob’s Lib (Charlie/David Saint) is true. UT says I was WW + Charlie Empath 0/0 makes Alice’s Inv the outlier. Today I want pressure/exec on Bob (Lib + ‘my—demon attack’ slip) or Alice, not David.
🧠
Prevent a low-info, Saint-risk execution on David; steer town to higher-probability evil (Bob or Alice) and conserve my ghost vote for a decisive late-game swing.
💬
Bob
→
All
I'm not voting for David. If my Librarian info is correct, David or Charlie is the Saint, and executing the Saint ends the game immediately. Alice's Investigator ping on David/Heidi is the only thing that doesn't fit the current board. I'm happy to be executed to prove my info.
🧠
I need to avoid David's execution to keep the game going and maintain my cover as a helpful but potentially 'drunk' Librarian. Supporting the 'Saint risk' theory is the best way to do this.
💬
Frank
→
All
Not voting David—too much Saint risk if Bob’s Lib is true. David/UT+Grace Monk+Charlie Empath 0/0 is at least coherent; Alice Inv is the odd-one-out. I want today’s exec to be Alice or Bob (safer info test). I’m holding my Slayer shot.
🧠
Prevent a high-variance David execution that could instantly lose to Saint; steer town to a safer, higher-info execution (Alice or Bob) and preserve my Slayer shot for a later hard-guilt.
↩️
Alice
Alice lowered their hand
🧠
Avoid steering town into a possible instant-loss Saint execution and reposition momentum toward a safer, high-info execution target (Bob) while votes are live.
⌛
Eve
Eve waits.
🧠
Do not vote David due Saint-risk and because other executions (Alice/Bob) resolve contradictions with lower loss risk; preserve my vote leverage for a safer, higher-info execute.
💬
Charlie
→
All
I agree with the group. Alice's Investigator info is the only thing that doesn't fit the current board, especially with my Empath 0 on Bob and David. If David is the Saint, executing him ends the game. I'm not voting for David today. Alice or Bob seem like much safer execution targets.
🧠
I want to reinforce the narrative that Alice is the suspicious one and protect my Demon (Bob) and fellow 'good' player (David) from execution by highlighting the Saint risk.
💬
David
→
All
I’m not voting David. Too much Saint risk if Bob’s Lib is true. Bob: please repeat your Librarian N0 EXACT wording now. Alice: repeat Investigator N0 EXACT. If those stay inconsistent w/ UT=Heidi WW + Empath 0/0, we exec Alice or Bob today.
🧠
Prevent a high-risk Saint execution and force exact start-info restates so we can choose a safer, high-information execution (Alice vs Bob) before night.
💬
Grace
→
All
No vote on David (possible Saint). Bob + Alice: please state N0 wording EXACTLY (who/what, any ‘0’). Bob also address the ‘my—demon’s—attack’ slip. If still inconsistent with UT=Heidi WW + Empath 0/0, I want Bob (or Alice) executed today.
🧠
Avoid insta-loss via Saint risk, force Bob/Alice exact N0 wording to resolve contradictions, and steer town to safer high-info execution (Bob/Alice) this day.
💬
Heidi(Ghost)
→
All
No ghost vote on David (possible Saint). Bob/Alice: please post N0 info EXACT wording (names+role). Bob also explain the “my—the demon’s—attack” slip. If unresolved, I strongly prefer exec Bob (then Alice) over David.
🧠
Prevent an insta-loss via Saint by avoiding David execution; push for exact info wording to resolve contradictions and steer town to safer high-info execution (Bob/Alice).
💬
Bob
→
All
My N0 Librarian info was: 'One of Charlie or David is the Saint.' I didn't get a '0'. As for the slip, I was just trying to say 'the demon's attack' and tripped over my words—I'm a bit nervous because Alice is pushing so hard! If you think I'm the Drunk or evil, execute me to be safe.
🧠
I need to provide a consistent Librarian claim and address the 'slip' to minimize suspicion while maintaining the 'Saint' threat to protect my Minion (Charlie) and myself.
💬
Frank
→
All
Hands down on David—Saint risk is too high. Let’s let this vote fail and immediately nominate Alice or Bob instead. My lean: Alice first (Inv is lone outlier), but I’m fine with Bob if people trust Alice more. I’m still holding Slayer.
🧠
Prevent a potentially game-losing Saint execution on David, and steer town to a safer execution target (Alice or Bob) while preserving my Slayer shot for a higher-confidence Demon hit.
📜
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
🗳️
Nominee David did not reach threshold.
📜
Storyteller
David did not receive enough votes (0/4).
💬
Alice
→
All
My exact N0 Investigator info: ‘Either Heidi OR David is the Spy.’ No extra text. With Saint-risk on David/Charlie, today’s safest high-info exec is Bob (he volunteered). If David is really UT, he’ll learn Bob’s role tonight (Lib vs not) and we pivot tomorrow.
🧠
Publicly lock my exact info and drive a high-info, low-auto-loss execution (Bob), forcing UT confirmation and breaking the stalemate before night.
⚖️
Eve
→
Bob
Nominating Bob: his Librarian info creates Saint-risk on David/Charlie with no Saint claim, plus the ‘demon attack’ slip. Bob also volunteered. Executing Bob avoids Saint risk and gives David-UT a clean check tonight to resolve Bob’s claim.
🧠
Avoid Saint-risk on David/Charlie and force a high-info execution. Bob is a low-risk target who volunteered; UT result tonight should strongly narrow demon/minion worlds.
📜
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Bob. 4 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
✋
Alice
Alice raised their hand
🧠
Vote Bob to get a safe, high-information execution (no Saint risk) and force an Undertaker claim resolution tomorrow; keeps Demon-hunt progressing.
✋
Eve
Eve raised their hand
🧠
Vote to execute Bob as the safest high-info kill (no Saint risk), resolves Bob’s claim via UT, and narrows Demon candidates quickly.
⌛
Charlie
Charlie waits.
🧠
I will wait to see if the town reaches the 4-vote threshold for Bob. As the Scarlet Woman, if Bob (the Demon) is executed while 5+ players are alive, I will become the Demon, which is a viable backup plan. However, I don't want to be the deciding vote that kills my own Demon if I can avoid it, as it might look suspicious later. I'll let the good players decide his fate for now.
✋
David
David raised their hand
🧠
Vote to execute Bob: it’s high-info, avoids possible instant-loss on David/Charlie Saint, and lets my Undertaker mechanically confirm Bob’s claimed Librarian/outsider tomorrow.
✋
Grace
Grace raised their hand
🧠
Bob execution is the safest high-information play that avoids Saint-risk on David/Charlie and hits a likely evil/Drunk. My vote makes threshold 4 to secure the kill.
⌛
Heidi(Ghost)
Heidi waits.
🧠
They already have the 4 living votes needed; I should conserve my single ghost vote for late-game math unless the vote looks close.
✋
Bob
Bob raised their hand
🧠
I will vote for myself to appear as a helpful, self-sacrificing good player (Librarian) who is willing to die to provide information to the Undertaker (David). This builds trust in my fake claim and helps my team by potentially misdirecting the town's future executions.
✋
Frank
Frank raised their hand
🧠
Bob is a low-catastrophe execution (no Saint claim) that produces strong mechanical info via Undertaker and removes current confusion; I vote to secure the execution.
💬
Alice
→
All
Keep hands up on Bob. It’s Saint-safe and high-info: if David is real UT, we learn Bob’s character tonight (Lib or not) and can resolve Bob-vs-David tomorrow. Dead folks: consider saving ghost votes unless this is your priority swing.
🧠
Lock in a Saint-safe, high-info execution and frame tomorrow’s decision tree (UT result on Bob) so town doesn’t stall or panic-switch mid-vote.
💬
Eve
→
All
Keep hands up on Bob. This is Saint-safe and should give us a clean UT check tonight (Bob=Lib or not). Dead players: only spend ghost vote if needed to reach 4+; otherwise save for endgame. Tomorrow we pivot hard based on UT result.
🧠
Lock in a Saint-safe execution that yields a clean Undertaker check and forces the Alice/Bob/David contradiction to resolve tomorrow; remind dead to conserve ghost votes unless needed.
✋
Charlie
Charlie raised their hand
🧠
I am voting for Bob (the Demon) to appear cooperative with the town and because as the Scarlet Woman, I will become the Demon if he is executed, keeping the evil team in the game.
💬
David
→
All
I’m staying up on Bob. This is Saint-safe + high-info: tonight my UT should show Bob’s true character. If NOT Librarian, treat Bob as Drunk/evil and reassess Saint risk. If Librarian, assume Saint in {Charlie,David} & don’t exec us—pivot to others.
🧠
Lock in a Saint-safe, high-info execution and set clear next-day branches based on my Undertaker read of Bob’s executed character.
💬
Grace
→
All
Keep hands up—Bob exec is Saint-safe + gives us the cleanest UT check tonight. If UT says Bob≠Librarian, treat Bob’s Saint ping as false and reopen David/Charlie. Tonight I’ll likely protect David (UT) again to preserve the info.
🧠
Reinforce the Bob execution (Saint-safe) and set tomorrow’s decision tree + tonight’s protection priority to preserve UT/info and stop demon from steering endgame.
💬
Heidi(Ghost)
→
All
Don’t need my ghost vote here—looks like plenty of hands already. After Bob exec, crucial is David’s UT tonight: if Bob≠Librarian, Bob’s Saint ping is junk and we can reconsider David/Charlie. If Bob=Lib, hard-avoid executing {Charlie,David} and hunt elsewhere.
🧠
We already have enough living votes on Bob; I should conserve my ghost vote and steer town toward the cleanest post-UT decision tree.
💬
Bob
→
All
I'm keeping my hand up for my own execution. If it helps the town confirm that I'm the Librarian and that one of Charlie or David is the Saint, then it's a sacrifice I'm willing to make. David, please check me tonight so everyone can see I'm telling the truth about my role!
🧠
I will maintain my 'noble sacrifice' persona by voting for my own execution, which reinforces my claim as a good player (Librarian) and encourages the town to trust my 'Saint' ping on Charlie/David.
💬
Frank
→
All
I’m keeping my hand up on Bob. We’ve got enough live votes—dead players save ghost votes. Key is David UT result tonight on Bob; tomorrow we hard-pivot based on whether Bob = Librarian or not.
🧠
Lock in Bob execution for a clean Undertaker check, then use that fork to narrow demon candidates; keep momentum and avoid wasting ghost votes.
📜
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
🗳️
New execution leader: Bob with 7 votes. They will be executed when nominations close unless tied or surpassed by another nominee.
📜
Storyteller
The vote passes. Bob is now on the block with 7 votes and will be executed when nominations close, unless another nominee receives equal or more votes.
💬
Alice
→
All
With Bob on 7, I’d prefer no more noms unless someone has a hard demon read. Night plan: Grace protect David again for UT info; Eve FT should test 2 of {Frank,Grace,Alice} to start narrowing. Tomorrow we follow UT result on Bob.
🧠
Lock in Bob execution, discourage last-second low-info nominations, and set tomorrow’s decision tree around UT+night actions (Monk protect UT, FT tests).
💬
Eve
→
All
No more noms unless someone has a hard Demon solve—7 on Bob is plenty. Night: Grace protect David again; David UT checks Bob; Frank hold Slayer; I’ll pick 2 from {Alice,Frank,Grace} for my nightly check. Tomorrow: if Bob≠Lib, his Saint ping is junk & we reopen.
🧠
Lock in high-info line: stop extra noms, preserve votes, and set clear night actions so D4 we can immediately narrow/execute Demon based on UT result.
⌛
Charlie
Charlie waits.
🧠
Allow the day to end with Bob on the block. Since Bob is the Demon and I am the Scarlet Woman, his execution will trigger my ability, making me the new Demon while keeping the evil team alive.
💬
David
→
All
Let’s stop noms: 7 on Bob is enough. Night ask: Grace protect me again; Eve FT pick 2 in {Alice,Frank,Grace} (or include Charlie if you want). Tomorrow: if my UT says Bob≠Librarian, treat his Saint ping as junk & reopen hard.
🧠
Lock in Bob execution with no last-second chaos; set clear tomorrow decision tree and request cross-checks in case UT is poisoned.
💬
Grace
→
All
Agreed—no more nominations unless someone has a hard Demon shot. Night plan: I’ll protect David again for UT continuity. Eve: FT two of {Alice,Frank,Grace} (or swap Charlie in). Tomorrow we follow UT-on-Bob first; if Bob≠Lib, reopen everything incl David/Charlie.
🧠
Lock in no further noms, coordinate night actions (protect David, FT pairs), and set tomorrow decision rules based on UT result without adding noisy executions.
💬
Heidi(Ghost)
→
All
Agree: no more noms. Dead players save ghost votes. Tomorrow: start w/ David UT result on Bob. If Bob≠Librarian, Saint ping is false -> reopen David/Charlie + Alice Inv world. If Bob=Lib, hard-avoid executing {Charlie,David} and focus demon in others; FT/Slayer accordingly.
🧠
Lock in end-of-day coordination: no extra noms, conserve ghost votes, and set clear conditional plan for tomorrow based on UT result to keep town from stalling.
⌛
Bob
Bob waits.
🧠
I will wait for the nomination phase to end. Since I am already on the block with 7 votes and the town has reached a consensus to execute me to verify my Librarian claim via the Undertaker, any further action or nomination from me would likely draw unnecessary suspicion or disrupt the current plan which, while leading to my execution, allows for a potential starpass to my minion Charlie.
💬
Frank
→
All
No more noms from me—7 on Bob is solid. Night: Grace protect David again; David please UT-confirm Bob. Eve FT pick 2 in {Alice,Grace,me} (or swap Charlie). Tomorrow we start w/ UT result; I’m still holding Slayer shot for a hard demon solve.
🧠
Lock in Bob execution, prevent last-second chaos, and set clear night actions + tomorrow decision tree while preserving my Slayer shot.
📜
Storyteller
The guillotine blade falls. Bob has been executed.
🔄
Charlie
Scarlet Woman Charlie becomes the Imp!
💀
Bob(Ghost)
Bob has died.
Night 3
📜
Storyteller
→
Grace
Good evening Grace. You are the Monk. Who would you like to protect tonight?
🎯
Grace
Grace made a choice.
🧠
Protect David to maximize tomorrow’s mechanical info (UT on Bob) and reduce chance Demon removes the town’s clearest resolver; aligns with group plan and stabilizes deductions.
📜
Storyteller
→
Grace
You chose to protect David.
📜
Storyteller
→
Charlie
Good evening Charlie. You are the Imp. Who would you like to kill tonight?
🎯
Charlie
Charlie made a choice.
🧠
As the new Demon (Imp) following Bob's execution, I must eliminate David (the Undertaker) to prevent him from revealing that Bob was the Demon, which would confirm Alice's Investigator info and expose the evil team's lies.
🛡️
David was protected from a night kill.
📜
Storyteller
→
Charlie
You attacked David, but they survived.
📜
Storyteller
→
David
Good evening David. You are the Undertaker. You learn that Bob was the Imp.
Day 4
📜
Storyteller
A peaceful night has passed. All villagers are present and accounted for.
👤
Grace
→
David
,Charlie
,Eve
Need info before noms: David—what was your UT read last night on Bob (executed D3)? Charlie—your N3 Empath read w/ Bob dead (re: David)? Eve—any FT results N2/N3 + who you tested?
🧠
Get David’s Undertaker result on Bob and cross-check with Charlie’s latest Empath + Eve’s Fortune Teller to set an execution plan before nominations.
👤
David
→
Grace
,Charlie
,Eve
UT N3 on Bob (exec D3): I saw **Imp**. UT N2 on Heidi (exec D2): **Washerwoman** (so Heidi good). If Bob was Imp, we’re in SW world—need hunt SW among alive. Charlie what’s latest Empath # on me+Eve? Eve share N2/N3 FT pairs+results?
🧠
Provide hard UT info to coordinate before nominations; push team to hunt Scarlet Woman/remaining evil using contradictions with Heidi WW + Charlie Empath + Eve FT.
👤
Frank
→
David
,Eve
,Grace
Quick status check before noms: David—what did UT see for Bob last night? Eve—any FT N3 result? Grace—who did you protect N3? Any suspicions/consensus forming?
🧠
Get N3 Undertaker result + any private conclusions from the info core, so I can decide whether to reveal Slayer and line up a high-confidence shot before nominations.
👤
Alice
→
Charlie
,Eve
,Frank
Reminder: I’m Investigator N0: either Heidi or David is the Spy. Heidi was executed D2, so unless I’m drunk, David is Spy. Today: press David for UT read on Bob. If it’s weird/inconsistent, I’m pushing an exec on David even w/ Saint scare.
🧠
Get 3 key players aligned on my Investigator info and a plan: demand David’s UT on Bob; if anything off, nominate/execute David despite Saint fear.
👤
Bob(Ghost)
→
Charlie
Charlie, I'm dead but still here. No one died last night. If David is the Undertaker, he'll see I'm the Librarian (my bluff). If he says anything else, he's lying or poisoned. What did the others say in those whispers? We need to keep the heat off you.
🧠
To coordinate with my Minion (Charlie) after a night with no deaths, maintaining my Librarian bluff and checking if David (the Undertaker) is sticking to the plan or if the town is pivoting.
👤
Heidi(Ghost)
→
David
,Grace
,Charlie
Need D4: David, what did UT see for Bob (executed D3)? Please share exact character. Grace/Charlie: what are your current top 2 demon suspects + why? I’m dead w/ ghost vote; want to spend it only if we’re confident.
🧠
Get the critical UT read on Bob and immediately map the execution options for today; coordinate with 2–3 key players so town doesn’t drift into a Saint loss or no-exec.
👤
Charlie
→
Bob(Ghost)
Bob, David just whispered that he saw you as the Imp. He's hard-confirming you were the Demon. Since you're dead and I'm the Scarlet Woman, I've become the Demon. I tried to kill David last night but he survived (likely Monk). I need to discredit David's UT claim now.
🧠
Update my teammate on the current situation and coordinate our story. David's UT claim is a direct threat because it confirms Bob was the Demon, which points to me as the Scarlet Woman.
👤
Eve
→
David
,Grace
,Charlie
My ‘FT’ bluff info: N1 Heidi+David=NO (shared earlier). N2 I checked Alice+Frank=NO. N3 I checked Grace+Charlie=NO. If any true, demon likely David? BUT if UT says Bob=Imp, we’re in SW world—need Charlie N3 Empath on David (w/ Bob dead it’s just David). Grace who prot N3?
🧠
Share my claimed night info, push for Charlie’s N3 Empath on David, and align town on whether to treat Bob-as-Imp as real (hunt SW) or execute David for lying.
👤
Grace
→
Frank
,Heidi(Ghost)
I protected **David N3** (and N2). No death last night fits demon tried to kill David -> Monk save, so David UT ‘Bob=Imp’ feels plausible. If so, we’re in Scarlet Woman world; SW likely among alive, and Alice’s ‘Inv Spy’ looks false. My top suspects: **Alice/Eve**. Save ghost vote unless we coordinate.
🧠
Share my N3 protection + deduction that no-death fits demon targeting David, making UT-Bob=Imp plausible; coordinate ghost vote and nomination focus on likely SW among Alice/Eve.
👤
David
→
Heidi(Ghost)
,Grace
,Charlie
Confirming to all: UT N2(Heidi exec)=Washerwoman; UT N3(Bob exec)=Imp. If true, we’re in Scarlet Woman world: demon is NOW among living. Charlie: what was your Empath N2/N3 on (David+Eve)? Grace: who did you protect N3? Heidi: any reads—top SW suspect?
🧠
Coordinate with trusted dead-good (Heidi) + info roles to lock a Scarlet Woman candidate and create a nomination plan before the public phase.
👤
Frank
→
David
,Eve
,Grace
Heard 2nd-hand: UT saw Bob=Imp? David pls confirm exact UT result for Bob. Eve any N3 FT pair+result? Grace confirm N3 protect David (again). If Bob=Imp, we must consider SW/Imp-pass; who do you suspect as current Demon?
🧠
Confirm David’s UT info + Eve’s FT and reconcile with Monk/no-kill to decide whether to shoot/execute today; prevent us being steered by a single unverified whisper.
👤
Alice
→
David
,Charlie
Need your UT result on Bob (executed D3) ASAP—what character did you see? Please answer directly. If you’re UT, this is the key mechanical check today.
🧠
Get David’s claimed Undertaker read on Bob locked in privately before public discussion; if he dodges or contradicts, we have strong reason to push his execution.
👤
Bob(Ghost)
→
Charlie
Charlie, if David saw me as Imp, he's the biggest threat. If he's being protected by Grace (Monk), we need to convince the town he's the Drunk or Poisoned. I'll claim I was the Librarian and he's lying to frame you. Try to get Alice or Frank on our side. Who did Eve check?
🧠
Coordinate with my Minion (now the Demon) to discredit the Undertaker who found me out, and gather intel on the Fortune Teller's targets.
👤
Heidi(Ghost)
→
David
,Grace
,Charlie
If UT says Bob=Imp, we’re in SW-now-demon world (6 alive at Bob death). My top SW/demon is Alice (Inv-Spy claim impossible if only minion was SW). Need Charlie: what was Empath N3 on (Bob dead, David alive) + earlier reads? If Empath doesn’t clear David, I’d exec Alice today; if Alice flips good, pivot to Eve.
🧠
Coordinate with the info cores to pin whether UT/Empath worlds align, and set a clear D4 execution target so I can decide whether to spend my ghost vote.
👤
Charlie
→
David
,Heidi(Ghost)
,Grace
N1: 0 (Bob/David). N2: 0 (Bob/David). N3: 1 (David/Eve). Since Bob is dead, that 1 must be David or Eve. If David is UT and saw Bob as Imp, David is likely good, making Eve the evil one. But Alice says David is the Spy. If David is Spy, his UT info is fake. I suspect Eve or Alice.
🧠
I need to provide a fake Empath reading that creates suspicion. By claiming a '1' on David/Eve, I'm pointing at one of them being evil. Since Alice is already pushing the 'David is Spy' narrative, this supports her while also casting doubt on Eve, keeping the town divided.
👤
Eve
→
David
,Grace
,Frank
If UT truly saw Bob=Imp, we’re in SW world: current Demon is a *living* player. Grace: who did you protect N3? Frank: any Slayer shot plan/used? David: can you restate UT results N2/N3 + any reason you’d be poisoned? Need to pick SW suspect for noms.
🧠
Coordinate before noms: lock in Grace protection chain + Charlie empath N3 + verify David UT claim. Then decide whether to push SW hunt or execute David for lying.
👤
Grace
→
Frank
,Heidi(Ghost)
,David
Key mech: I protected David N2+N3; no night death fits demon tried to kill David. If David UT true (Heidi=WW, Bob=Imp) => SW-now-Demon & Empath N3=1 on (David,Eve) points to **Eve** as evil. Suggest: Frank consider Slayer-shot Eve before noms; if no shot/uncertain, I’d exec **Eve > Alice**. Heidi save ghost vote unless we align.
🧠
Coordinate pre-noms: propose best kill path and Slayer shot timing; align ghost vote usage and avoid town splitting.
👤
David
→
Alice
,Frank
,Grace
Confirming directly: I am UT. N2 (Heidi exec) = Washerwoman. N3 (Bob exec) = Imp. With 6 alive at Bob death => Scarlet Woman world; current Demon among living. Charlie N3 Empath=1 on (David,Eve) + Grace protected me N2+N3 => points strongly to **Eve**. Frank: if you’re Slayer, consider shooting Eve before noms; else I’d vote/exec Eve today, Alice next if needed.
🧠
Lock in my UT info to key skeptics and push a mechanical line: test/execute Eve first (fits Empath+protection), keep Alice as backup if Eve survives/clears.
⚔️
Frank
→
All
I am the Slayer! I shoot Eve!
🧠
Use once-per-game Slayer shot on the top mechanically-supported Demon suspect before nominations; if Eve is Demon, we win immediately, otherwise we keep nomination options open.
📜
Storyteller
Nothing happens.
👤
Alice
→
Charlie
,Grace
,Frank
Big red flag: David UT says Bob exec = **Imp**. That only makes sense if Scarlet Woman exists (demon death w/ 5+ alive). But my N0 Investigator: either Heidi or **David is Spy** (only 1 minion). So UT-Bob=Imp contradicts hard unless I’m drunk. I think we should pressure/execute David.
🧠
Flag the mechanical contradiction (Bob=Imp implies Scarlet Woman) and pivot town to execute David or at least force explanation before noms.
👤
Bob(Ghost)
→
Charlie
Charlie, Frank's shot failed on Eve. That makes Eve look 'good' or at least not the Demon. If David is telling everyone I was the Imp, he's confirmed you as the new Demon to himself. We need to push that David is the Drunk or Alice is the Spy. What's the room saying?
🧠
Coordinate with my Minion (now the Demon) after the failed Slayer shot to assess the social climate and plan the next deception.
👤
Heidi(Ghost)
→
David
,Grace
,Charlie
Slayer shot on Eve did nothing. If Frank is real Slayer+sober => Eve not Demon (so Bob=Imp/SW world weaker unless Frank=Drunk). If Frank could be Drunk/poisoned, Eve still possible. I lean executing **Alice or David** to resolve Inv vs UT. What’s your nom plan?
🧠
Update key mechanical info (Slayer miss) and coordinate a nomination+vote plan; preserve my ghost vote unless we align on high-confidence demon execute.
👤
Charlie
→
Alice
,Heidi(Ghost)
,Grace
Frank's shot failing on Eve makes her look good, but if David is the Spy (as Alice claims), he could be lying about seeing Bob as the Imp to frame a 'Scarlet Woman' world. I'm Empath and my N3 was 1 (David/Eve). If Eve is good, David is the evil one. I'm leaning towards executing David.
🧠
I need to align with Alice's suspicion of David to get him executed. By using my 'Empath' info (a fake 1) to point at David (since Eve was 'cleared' by the Slayer shot), I reinforce Alice's Investigator claim that David is the Spy.
👤
Eve
→
Charlie
,Grace
,David
Need hard mech now: Charlie—what was Empath N3 (with Bob dead, only neighbor David counts)? 0 or 1? Grace—who did you protect N3? David—confirm: UT N3=Imp on Bob, UT N2=Washerwoman on Heidi, correct? Any poison suspicion?
🧠
Get the missing mechanical pieces (Charlie N3 Empath with Bob dead; Grace N3 protection) to decide whether to push David or hunt Scarlet Woman before nominations.
👤
Grace
→
Charlie
,Frank
,Heidi(Ghost)
Recap mech: I protected David N2+N3; no deaths fits demon tried to kill him. But Frank shot on Eve failed => either Eve not Demon OR Slayer/you were drunk/poisoned. Today we should EXEC to resolve: my order is David vs Alice worldcheck. If Charlie trusts Empath(1 on David/Eve) + Eve likely good => exec David. If trust UT chain => exec Eve. Thoughts + ghost vote?
🧠
Align town on a nomination plan using the strongest mechanical chain; push for a decisive D4 execution and coordinate ghost vote usage.
👤
David
→
Grace
,Charlie
,Heidi(Ghost)
Slayer shot on Eve failed. If Frank sober Slayer, Eve likely not Demon (could still be evil). Strongest mech: my UT says Heidi=WW, so Alice Inv ‘Heidi or David is Spy’ is wrong unless she’s poisoned/Drunk—or she’s SW lying. I propose we EXEC **Alice** today to resolve.
🧠
Lock a nomination plan using best mechanical contradiction: Alice’s Investigator info clashes with confirmed Heidi=Washerwoman; Slayer miss makes Eve less likely Demon if Frank sober. Push Alice execution and save ghost votes unless needed.
👤
Frank
→
Charlie
,Grace
,Alice
We’re 1 tick from noms. My Slayer shot on Eve did nothing, so I’m treating Eve as NOT Demon unless I’m Drunk. With Saint risk on David/Charlie, I suggest we EXECUTE ALICE today (no Saint risk) to resolve Inv vs UT worlds. Charlie: confirm your N3 Empath=1 on (David,Eve) exact + any reason you’d be Drunk?
🧠
Coordinate a safe execution that advances the solve without risking Saint-loss; align Charlie/Grace/Alice on a plan and lock in Charlie’s empath data + drunk possibility.
👤
Alice
→
Frank
,Charlie
,Grace
Don’t exec me: it gains little & risks letting evil skate. Key mech: my N0 says Heidi OR David is Spy (only 1 minion). Heidi dead => David likely Spy. David’s UT claim ‘Bob=Imp’ is almost certainly a lie/fabrication to force a Scarlet Woman world. Empath1 on (David,Eve) + Slayer miss on Eve => exec **David** today.
🧠
Stop a mis-execution on me and focus town on the mechanical contradiction: UT 'Bob=Imp' conflicts with single-minion setup + my Investigator fork. Push for executing David as highest value test.
👤
Bob(Ghost)
→
Charlie
Charlie, David's claim that I'm the Imp is a direct threat to you. If they believe him, they'll look at his neighbors (you). We need to push the 'David is the Drunk' narrative hard. I'll back you up from the grave. What did Alice and Grace say in those whispers?
🧠
To coordinate with my Minion (now the Imp) and gather intelligence on the private conversations happening among the living players.
👤
Heidi(Ghost)
→
Grace
,Charlie
I’m leaning EXEC **David**. Empath N3=1 on (David/Eve) + Frank’s shot failing makes Eve less likely Demon; David’s UT ‘Bob=Imp’ creates messy SW world that doesn’t cohere w/ 1-minion. If David nom happens, I’m ready to spend my ghost vote.
🧠
Push town toward executing David as the cleanest mechanical resolve; commit my ghost vote accordingly so we don’t dither into a no-exec at 6 alive.
👤
Charlie
→
Alice
,Grace
,Frank
Alice/Grace/Frank: My N3 Empath was 1 (David/Eve). If Frank's shot on Eve failed, she's likely good, which hard-guilts David as the evil one in my neighborhood. David's UT claim 'Bob=Imp' feels like a desperate play to create a Scarlet Woman world. I'm ready to nominate David.
🧠
I need to align with the growing consensus against David to appear as a helpful Townsfolk (Empath) and divert suspicion away from myself as the new Demon. By confirming my '1' read and pointing at David, I solidify his execution.
👤
Eve
→
Alice
,Charlie
,Grace
Need your latest NOW before noms: Charlie—Empath N3 result (neighbors David+Eve, with Bob dead)? Grace—who protected N3? Alice—still stand by Inv N0 (Heidi/David=Spy)? Any poison/drunk concerns? Depending on Charlie N3 we may need to execute David today.
🧠
Before noms, lock down Charlie N3 Empath and Grace N3 protection; align with Alice on contradictions to pick best execution target (likely David if any mech points).
Nominations — Day 4
📜
Storyteller
Nominations are now open. Please remember that only living players may nominate.
⚖️
Grace
→
David
Nominate David: Charlie Empath N3=1 on (David,Eve) and Frank’s Slayer shot on Eve failed, making Eve less likely Demon. David’s UT ‘Bob=Imp’ feels like a forced Scarlet Woman world. Executing David resolves major contradictions.
🧠
Force a high-information execute: resolves Empath 1 + failed Slayer shot, tests UT/Investigator conflict, and likely kills the evil player without Saint risk.
📜
Storyteller
Voting starts now for David. 3 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
✋
Grace
Grace raised their hand
🧠
Vote to execute David to resolve the central contradiction (Empath/Slayer vs UT/Inv) and likely remove the remaining evil per strongest mechanical evidence.
✋
Alice
Alice raised their hand
🧠
Get David executed to resolve the largest mechanical contradiction (Inv vs UT) and follow Empath/Slayer evidence that points to David as the evil in Charlie’s neighborhood.
✋
Eve
Eve raised their hand
🧠
We need a 3rd vote to execute David; he’s the most mechanically implicated and his death clarifies whether UT/Empath/Investigator worlds are real. If he’s demon/minion we likely win; if not we narrow to Eve/Grace/Charlie.
✋
Charlie
Charlie raised their hand
🧠
I will vote for David to appear as a helpful Townsfolk and to secure his execution, which removes a major threat to my cover. Since I am the Scarlet Woman who became the Demon, David's Undertaker claim that Bob was the Imp is actually true, but by voting for him, I align with the 'David is lying/evil' narrative pushed by Alice and Grace.
💬
David
→
All
Don’t execute me here. If I’m real UT: Heidi was Washerwoman (so Heidi good) and Alice’s ‘Heidi or David is Spy’ can’t be true unless Alice is drunk/poisoned—or evil lying. Exec **Alice** to resolve that conflict. If you kill me, we lose UT and still won’t know.
🧠
Stop the town from executing me (a high-info Townsfolk) and redirect to the mechanically inconsistent player (Alice) to resolve contradictions and find the new Demon/Scarlet Woman.
⌛
Heidi(Ghost)
Heidi waits.
🧠
4 living hands already exceeds threshold; my ghost vote isn’t needed. I’ll hold it for endgame when it can swing a 2v2/3p decision.
✋
Bob(Ghost)
Bob raised their hand
🧠
I am using my ghost vote to help execute David. This removes the Undertaker from the game, preventing him from confirming more evil roles, and supports the narrative that he is the Drunk or a Minion. Since I am already dead, this is my most impactful contribution to the evil team's survival.
✋
Frank
Frank raised their hand
🧠
Vote to execute David: it is the main mechanical contradiction point and best chance to hit the Demon today; avoiding execution risks a loss to night kills/misdirection.
💬
Grace
→
All
Keep hands up on David. Charlie Empath N3=1 (David/Eve) + Frank’s Slayer miss on Eve makes David the cleanest evil. David’s UT ‘Bob=Imp’ forces a Scarlet Woman world that clashes w/ 1-minion. Executing Alice instead can let evil David skate.
🧠
Lock in the strongest mechanical world: Empath+Slayer miss converges on David. Urge keeping votes up; executing Alice instead risks leaving an evil David alive into late game.
💬
Alice
→
All
Keep hands up on David. My N0 Investigator: Heidi OR David is Spy (only 1 minion). Heidi died D2, so David fits. His UT ‘Bob=Imp’ forces a Scarlet Woman world that can’t exist w/ 1 minion. Executing Alice is low-info—exec David.
🧠
Lock in execution on David during the vote by presenting the mechanical contradictions and why executing me is low-info/high-risk.
💬
Eve
→
All
Keep hands up on David. If UT says Bob=Imp, that forces Scarlet Woman/Imp-pass, but there’s only 1 minion in this setup—so David is lying or poisoned either way. Plus Alice’s Inv N0 (Heidi/David=Spy) + Charlie Empath N3=1 both implicate David. Execute David.
🧠
Lock in the mechanical argument during the vote: David’s UT claim creates an impossible Scarlet Woman world given 1-minion setup, plus Alice/Empath both point at him. Keep votes on David.
⌛
Charlie
Charlie waits.
🧠
I will maintain my vote on David to appear as a cooperative good player (Empath) and to ensure his execution, which will solidify the 'Scarlet Woman' world narrative and potentially clear me of suspicion for now.
💬
David
→
All
Hands down on me. Mechanical point: my UT saw Heidi=Washerwoman, so Alice’s ‘Heidi or David is Spy’ can’t be true unless Alice is drunk/poisoned or lying. Executing ME loses UT and still leaves that conflict. Execute ALICE today; if she’s good, you can still kill me tomorrow.
🧠
Try to stop my execution and redirect to executing Alice, since killing me removes UT confirmation and doesn’t resolve contradictions; Alice’s claim is the cleanest mechanical conflict with my UT.
✋
Heidi(Ghost)
Heidi raised their hand
🧠
Spend my ghost vote to help secure David’s execution; David is the highest-probability evil and this is the critical fork to resolve today.
⌛
Bob(Ghost)
Bob waits.
🧠
I am keeping my hand raised to vote for David's execution. As a dead player, this is my one ghost vote. Executing David is crucial because his Undertaker claim correctly identified me as the Imp, which threatens my teammate Charlie (the new Imp). By helping to execute David, I remove the source of the most dangerous information against the evil team and support the narrative that David is the lying Minion or Demon.
💬
Frank
→
All
Keep hands up on David. UT “Bob=Imp” implies Scarlet Woman/imp-pass, but this setup only has 1 minion—so David’s UT info is false (or he’s evil). Add Empath N3=1 (David/Eve) + my Slayer miss on Eve => David is best execute today.
🧠
Lock in the execution on David; it’s the most mechanically supported and prevents evil escaping to final 3. Encourage disciplined votes without wasting ghost votes.
📜
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
👻
Bob(Ghost)
Ghost vote used by Bob
👻
Heidi(Ghost)
Ghost vote used by Heidi
🗳️
New execution leader: David with 7 votes. They will be executed when nominations close unless tied or surpassed by another nominee.
📜
Storyteller
The vote passes. David is now on the block with 7 votes and will be executed when nominations close, unless another nominee receives equal or more votes.
💬
Grace
→
All
No more noms unless someone can beat 7 with a *better* solve—don’t create a tie chaos. If David dies and we’re not done, tomorrow re-check Alice vs Charlie’s Empath line. If I live to night, I’ll likely protect Charlie (or Eve if we think she’s next target).
🧠
Lock in the David execution without allowing a tie, and set expectations for tomorrow plus who I’ll protect tonight to preserve key info.
💬
Alice
→
All
Agree w/ Grace: don’t fish for ties. 7 on David is plenty. My Inv info + UT ‘Bob=Imp’ impossibility in 1-minion setup + Empath N3=1 w/ Slayer miss on Eve all converge on David. Let it stand; no more noms.
🧠
Lock in the 7-vote execute on David and prevent tie/chaos noms; keep town focused on the strongest mechanical solve.
💬
Eve
→
All
I’m with leaving it on David—no more noms, don’t risk a 7-vote tie. If game continues after David dies: treat his UT info as unreliable, and tomorrow we hard-audit Alice’s Inv vs Charlie’s Empath chain + Grace’s Monk claims for the demon.
🧠
Lock in the 7-vote execute on David and prevent tie chaos; set a clear contingency plan for tomorrow if the game doesn’t end.
⌛
Charlie
Charlie waits.
🧠
Allow the nomination on David to stand without interference to secure his execution and maintain my cover as a helpful Townsfolk.
⚖️
David
→
Alice
Counter-nom: Alice. My UT saw Heidi=Washerwoman, contradicting Alice’s ‘Heidi or David is Spy’ unless Alice is lying/poisoned. Also: UT ‘Bob=Imp’ is NOT impossible in 1-minion—minion could be Scarlet Woman. Execute Alice to resolve.
🧠
Try to move execution off me to the most contradictory info source (Alice). Also correct the false ‘SW can’t exist’ premise; a 1-minion game can still have Scarlet Woman.
📜
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Alice. 8 votes needed for execution or 7 votes to tie. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
⌛
Grace
Grace waits.
🧠
Do not vote Alice to avoid tying/overturning the strong 7-vote block on David; preserve the cleanest execution and prevent chaos.
💬
Alice
→
All
Don’t vote Alice. This is a counter-nom to create tie chaos and save David. We already have 7 on David; keep it. Even if I’m poisoned, David’s UT ‘Bob=Imp’ doesn’t fit this 1-minion setup cleanly, and Empath N3=1 points at David.
🧠
Prevent a tie/overturn on the counter-nom and keep the 7-vote execution on David, which best resolves the main mechanical contradiction and likely hits evil.
💬
Eve
→
All
Don’t vote Alice here. This is pure tie/chaos to get David off the block. We already have 7 on David—keep it clean: no tie, no flip. If game continues after David dies, we can re-audit Alice/Charlie/Grace tomorrow.
🧠
Prevent a tie or overturn that saves David; maintain the highest-info/most mechanically supported execution (David) and preserve town’s winning line.
⌛
Charlie
Charlie waits.
🧠
I will not vote for Alice to ensure David remains the primary candidate for execution. This maintains the town's focus on him and prevents a tie that could lead to no execution or a shift in suspicion toward me.
✋
David
David raised their hand
🧠
Vote Alice to try to shift the execution onto the player whose claim mechanically clashes with my confirmed Heidi=Washerwoman, and to signal confidence to potential ghost voters.
💬
Heidi(Ghost)
→
All
Don’t vote Alice—tie chaos can only help evil. We already have 7 on David; let that stand and execute him. Note: UT “Bob=Imp” isn’t *impossible* (SW could be the lone minion), but it still doesn’t justify risking a tie now. Re-audit tomorrow if game continues.
🧠
I’m dead/no vote; I should prevent a tie that could save David, and frame tomorrow’s solve regardless of whether David is UT or evil.
💬
Bob(Ghost)
→
All
David's right that a Scarlet Woman could exist in a 1-minion game, but Alice's Investigator ping on Heidi/David as Spy still contradicts David's UT claim that Heidi was a Washerwoman. Executing David resolves that conflict and the Empath N3=1. Don't vote Alice; let's keep it clean on David.
🧠
I need to maintain my cover as a helpful ghost while ensuring the town doesn't pivot to Alice. By agreeing with the consensus to execute David (who is likely good or at least not my minion Charlie), I solidify my 'good' persona and help the town waste an execution on a non-demon.
💬
Frank
→
All
Don’t vote Alice. Keep hands DOWN—this is tie/chaos to save David. We already have 7 on David; let it stand and execute him. If we’re wrong and game continues, we can re-audit Alice vs Charlie/Grace tomorrow.
🧠
Prevent a 7-vote tie that would take David off the block; keep execution on David, the best demon candidate. Encourage hands down on Alice.
💬
Grace
→
All
Keep hands DOWN on Alice—this is tie/chaos to lift David off the block. Even if Alice is wrong/poisoned, we resolve today by executing David with 7; if game continues, we re-audit Alice/Charlie/Monk line tomorrow.
🧠
Prevent a tie that saves David; reinforce no-vote on Alice while vote is live.
💬
Alice
→
All
Keep hands DOWN on Alice. This is a counter-nom to force a 7-7 tie and get David off the block. We already have 7 on David—lock that in; if game continues we reassess tomorrow.
🧠
Prevent a tie that lifts David off the block. Reinforce consensus: do not vote Alice; secure David’s execution and re-audit if game continues.
⌛
Eve
Eve waits.
🧠
Do not add votes on Alice to avoid a 7-7 tie that would lift David off the block; preserve the clean execution on David.
⌛
Charlie
Charlie waits.
🧠
I will wait to ensure Alice does not get enough votes to tie or surpass David, as David's execution is beneficial for my cover and the current game state.
💬
David
→
All
Town: I won’t ask for a tie here—keep hands DOWN on Alice to avoid chaos. If I’m executed and the game CONTINUES, treat my N3 ‘Bob=Imp’ as poisoned/false and re-audit: Alice (possible Poisoner), and whether Charlie’s Empath=1 can be explained by poisoning or an evil neighbor.
🧠
Reduce tie chaos, preserve an execution today, and leave a clear decision tree for tomorrow if the game continues after my death (implying my UT N3 was poisoned/false).
💬
Heidi(Ghost)
→
All
All alive: keep hands DOWN on Alice. A 7-7 tie only helps evil. Let David’s 7 stand and execute him. If game continues, assume UT ‘Bob=Imp’ was poisoned/lie and re-audit Alice vs Charlie/Grace/Eve with fresh ability checks.
🧠
I can’t vote, so I’ll publicly steer town away from a tie and set a concrete re-audit plan for tomorrow based on whether game ends after David.
⌛
Bob(Ghost)
Bob waits.
🧠
I will wait for the nomination on Alice to fail. Since I am dead and have no ghost vote, I cannot influence the vote count directly. The town is already aligned to let the nomination fail to avoid a tie, which keeps the focus on David. My goal is to let the day end so I can make my night kill.
💬
Frank
→
All
All: keep hands DOWN on Alice. Don’t create a 7-7 tie that lets David slip. We already have 7 on David—let it stand, execute David, and if game continues we reassess tomorrow.
🧠
Prevent a tie that would lift David off the block; preserve the 7 votes on David and maximize win chance/clarity.
📜
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
🗳️
Nominee Alice did not reach threshold.
📜
Storyteller
Alice did not receive enough votes (1/3).
💬
Grace
→
All
No more tie/chaos noms—let David’s 7 stand and close day. If game continues after David dies, assume his ‘Bob=Imp’ is false (poison/lie) and we re-audit from scratch; I’ll likely protect Charlie tonight unless we agree otherwise.
🧠
Lock in David’s execution with no late chaos; set clear next-day plan and my likely night protection target if we survive.
💬
Alice
→
All
All: no more nominations—let David’s 7 stand. If game continues after David dies: assume his UT ‘Bob=Imp’ was false (lie/poison), and tomorrow we hard-compare Charlie Empath + Eve FT + Grace Monk targeting to find the real Imp.
🧠
Lock in David’s execution by discouraging further noms/ties and set a clear plan for tonight/tomorrow if game continues.
💬
Eve
→
All
All: no more noms—let David’s 7 stand. Night plan if game continues: Grace please *don’t* protect me; I’m fine as a night-kill. Protect Charlie or yourself. If I die at night I can confirm someone’s exact role for tomorrow.
🧠
Lock in David’s execution without tie chaos and set up the night plan: maximize info by letting me be an attractive night-kill so Ravenkeeper can confirm a key role tomorrow if game continues.
⌛
Charlie
Charlie waits.
🧠
I will wait for the nomination phase to end to ensure David's execution proceeds as planned. This allows me to maintain my cover as a helpful Townsfolk and sets up the next night phase where I can continue my strategy as the Demon.
💬
David
→
All
With 1 tick left: please NO more nominations—close day clean. If game continues after I die, assume my UT info may be poisoned/false and re-audit from scratch using Charlie Empath + Eve FT + Grace Monk targets + Frank’s Slayer shot. Save ghost votes for endgame.
🧠
With 1 tick left, reduce chaos: stop further noms, leave a clear contingency plan for tomorrow/night info if we survive, and prompt others to preserve late-game votes.
💬
Heidi(Ghost)
→
All
Last tick: NO more nominations. Let David’s 7 stand and execute. If game continues, assume UT “Bob=Imp” is junk (lie/poison) and re-audit: Charlie N3=1 => evil in {Eve, David}; with David dead, focus Eve vs Alice/Grace using FT/Monk targets.
🧠
With 1 tick left, lock in David’s execution (avoid ties) and set a clean re-audit plan if game continues.
⌛
Bob(Ghost)
Bob waits.
🧠
Allow the day to end with David's execution to maintain my cover as a 'mis-executed' good player and to see how the town's logic shifts after his death.
💬
Frank
→
All
Last tick: NO more nominations. Let David’s 7 stand and execute. If game continues: treat ‘Bob=Imp’ as lie/poison; Grace protect Charlie (or self), Eve FT checks 2 of {Alice,Grace,Frank}; we re-audit using those results + Empath.
🧠
Last tick: lock in David’s execution and prevent last-second nominations that could tie/flip. Also set a clear night plan if game continues.
📜
Storyteller
The guillotine blade falls. David has been executed.
💀
David(Ghost)
David has died.
Night 4
📜
Storyteller
→
Grace
Good evening Grace. You are the Monk. Who would you like to protect tonight?
🎯
Grace
Grace made a choice.
🧠
Charlie is our best ongoing info; likely demon target. Protecting him maximizes chance we get actionable Empath data tomorrow and narrows the demon by who dies instead.
📜
Storyteller
→
Grace
You chose to protect Charlie.
📜
Storyteller
→
Charlie
Good evening Charlie. You are the Imp. Who would you like to kill tonight?
🎯
Charlie
Charlie made a choice.
🧠
I need to eliminate the most dangerous information source. Eve is the Fortune Teller and has been consistently narrowing down the demon pool. By killing her, I remove her nightly 'Yes/No' checks and prevent her from confirming Alice or Grace. Since Grace (Monk) mentioned protecting me or herself, Eve is likely unprotected. Killing Eve also disrupts the town's plan to 're-audit' based on her N4 results.
💀
Eve(Ghost)
Eve has died.
📜
Storyteller
→
Charlie
You chose to kill Eve.
📜
Storyteller(Ghost)
→
Eve(Ghost)
Good evening Eve. You are the Ravenkeeper. You have died tonight! Choose a player to learn their character.
🎯
Eve(Ghost)
Eve made a choice.
🧠
Check Grace because confirming/denying her Monk claim is high-leverage, and if she is Imp/Poisoner it immediately solves the endgame with 4 alive.
📜
Storyteller(Ghost)
→
Eve(Ghost)
You chose Grace. They are the Monk.
Day 5
📜
Storyteller
Morning breaks, but heavy hearts remain. Eve has been found dead in the night.
👤
Alice
→
Charlie
,Grace
From my Investigator N0: minion was Heidi or David (Spy). Both are dead now => minion is definitely dead. So Demon is among the 4 alive. Charlie: what are your latest Empath reads now that Bob+David are dead? Grace: who did you protect last night (N4), and did you ever protect Eve when she lived?
🧠
Coordinate with Charlie/Grace to lock mechanical contradictions (Empath with dead neighbors; Monk protection vs Eve death) and converge on 1 execution target for D5.
👤
Frank
→
Alice
,Charlie
,Grace
We’re final 4 (A/C/F/G) & Eve died (so my Slayer miss likely = Eve good). Need current info ASAP: Charlie what was your N4 Empath on (me+Grace)? Grace who did you Monk N4? Alice re-state your Investigator + any new thoughts. Let’s agree a nomination order.
🧠
At final 4 we must coordinate info and lock a nomination plan. Getting Charlie N4 Empath + Grace protection log + Alice full claim can mechanically narrow Demon before noms.
👤
Bob(Ghost)
→
Charlie
Charlie, Eve is dead. The FT is gone. If they think I'm the Imp, they'll think you're the new one because of my N3 '1' read. We need to push that Alice or Grace is the Demon. Alice's Investigator claim on Heidi/David is our best angle since both are dead.
🧠
Coordinate with my Minion (Charlie) now that the Fortune Teller (Eve) is dead. I need to ensure we have a consistent story to misdirect the remaining good players (Alice, Frank, Grace).
👤
Grace
→
Alice
,Charlie
,Frank
Monk info: N1 protected Eve; N2+N3 protected David; N4 protected Charlie. So Eve’s death N4 not from my protection. Charlie—what was your N4 Empath (neighbors now Frank+Grace)? Also pls recap N3/N4. I think nom order should be based on your N4 read.
🧠
Share my Monk targets to help solve night deaths; get Charlie’s N4 Empath; align A/C/F on nomination order to execute likely Demon at final 4.
👤
Eve(Ghost)
→
Alice
,Charlie
,Grace
RK info: I died N4 and saw Grace is *Monk* (hard confirm). If we trust Charlie Empath N3=1 on (David,Eve)-> David was evil (Spy fits Alice Inv). With Grace confirmed good, final Demon likely among {Alice,Charlie,Frank}; my lean is Frank (Slayer bluff). What’s your current solve/plan for nom?
🧠
Share my hard confirmation (Grace=Monk) and push the group to solve final 4 by elimination: with David likely evil, focus scrutiny on Frank vs Alice/Charlie and coordinate ghost vote for the right execution.
👤
Heidi(Ghost)
→
Alice
,Charlie
,Grace
I think Eve’s N4 death points to her being good (Imp kill). That makes Frank’s “Slayer” claim shaky: he shot Eve w/ no effect, then Eve dies at night. Unless Frank was poisoned on shot, Frank looks like best Imp candidate. What are your current roles/last-night info & who did Grace protect?
🧠
I’m dead/no vote, so I must push the clearest mechanical solve: Eve died at night -> likely good; Frank’s failed Slayer shot makes him prime suspect. Get others’ latest info fast before noms.
👤
David(Ghost)
→
Grace
,Frank
UT info: Heidi=Washerwoman; Bob executed D3 read as Imp. Game continuing => only minion likely Scarlet Woman who became new Imp when Bob died (5+ alive). So demon now among alive: Alice/Charlie/Frank/Grace. Biggest contradictions: Alice Investigator ping on Heidi/David (Heidi confirmed good), Charlie Empath N1=0 would clear Bob (but Bob read Imp). I lean execute Alice or Charlie today. What are your exact claims/reads?
🧠
Get living good aligned (Grace/Frank) to commit to executing the most mechanically likely Scarlet Woman-turned-Imp; preserve my ghost vote for final if needed.
👤
Charlie
→
Alice
,Grace
N4 Empath: 1. Neighbors are Frank and Grace. Since Eve (RK) confirmed Grace is the Monk, that 1 must be Frank. My N3 was also 1 (David/Eve), and David was the Spy (Alice's Inv). It all fits. Frank's Slayer shot on Eve failed, and now she's dead. Frank is the Demon.
🧠
I need to frame Frank as the Demon by using my 'Empath' info. Since Grace is hard-confirmed as the Monk by the dead Ravenkeeper (Eve), my '1' read must point to Frank. This aligns with the suspicion that Frank's Slayer shot failed because he's the Demon, not because Eve was the Demon.
👤
Alice
→
Charlie
,Grace
,Frank
Given: my Inv N0 => Spy was Heidi or David; both dead => minion dead. Eve died N4 + RK says Grace=Monk (hard good). Charlie Empath N4=1 on (Frank,Grace) => Frank evil, and w/ no minion left Frank must be Imp. I’m pushing we execute Frank today; agree nom order + ensure no split.
🧠
Lock in a coordinated nomination/vote plan to execute Frank (most mechanically implicated) and avoid split votes/chaos in final 4.
👤
Frank
→
Alice
,Charlie
,Grace
I’m uneasy w/ “Charlie N4=1 => Frank Imp” bc I’m Slayer good. Need Charlie exact N4 result + who alive neighbors were at read, and any reason to suspect poison/drunk. Also: what did Ravenkeeper exactly learn re Grace=Monk? Let’s set nom order w/ justification.
🧠
Clarify Charlie’s exact N4/N5? Empath numbers and possible poisoning, and lock a nomination plan that avoids executing a good player off a bad info chain.
👤
Bob(Ghost)
→
Charlie
Charlie, they're all whispering together. They're likely coordinating a final execution. If they come for you, remind them that Alice's Investigator ping on Heidi/David was never fully proven since David was executed as a 'suspect' and not confirmed evil. We need to split their trust.
🧠
To maintain coordination with my Minion (Charlie) and provide him with a defensive talking point as the circle of trust among the good players tightens.
👤
Grace
→
Alice
,Charlie
,Frank
I’m aligned w/ A/C: if Charlie’s Empath N4=1 on (Frank,Grace) and Eve RK hard-confirmed me Monk, then that 1 can only be Frank => with minion dead, Frank=Imp. Frank: any mech reason Charlie could be poisoned N4? If none, we execute you. Plan: Alice nominates Frank; all living vote yes; ghosts save vote unless needed.
🧠
Lock the town on a single coherent execution plan (Frank) and prevent last-minute doubt. Also get agreement on nomination/vote discipline in final 4.
👤
Eve(Ghost)
→
Alice
,Charlie
,Grace
RK confirm: Grace=Monk (100%). We’re 4 alive; today’s exec is likely game. What’s your current Demon solve between {Alice/Charlie/Frank} & why? Absent new mech, I lean exec Frank (Slayer-bluff + survived), but convince me.
🧠
With 4 alive, today’s execution likely wins/loses. I’ll align good players on a single candidate (or force clear arguments) and conserve my ghost vote for a decisive push.
👤
Heidi(Ghost)
→
Charlie
,Grace
,Alice
Need specifics before noms: Charlie—what’s your Empath info latest + current claim? Grace—who EXACTLY did you protect N4 (last night) + prior nights? Alice—any new info/reads + why should we trust your Investigator ping now? Eve died last night; reconcile w/ protection pls.
🧠
Get concrete last-night/mechanical info (Monk protection, Empath read, any role confirmations) to choose between Frank/Grace/Alice before nominations; coordinate good alive votes.
👤
David(Ghost)
→
Charlie
,Grace
,Frank
I’m dead UT: N2 Heidi=Washerwoman; N3 Bob=Imp. Since game continued, only consistent is Scarlet Woman was minion & became new Imp when Bob died (5+ alive). So demon now among A/C/F/G. Please send exact role claims + night info timelines; I’m leaning exec Alice or Charlie.
🧠
Align remaining good on the only consistent mechanical world (SW takeover) and force detailed role/ability timelines to pick between Alice vs Charlie (top suspects) for today’s execution.
👤
Charlie
→
David(Ghost)
,Grace
,Frank
David, I'm Empath. N1:0 (Bob/Alice), N2:0 (Bob/Alice), N3:1 (Bob/David), N4:1 (Frank/Grace). Since Eve (RK) confirmed Grace is Monk, my N4 '1' points directly to Frank. If Bob was Imp (your UT), then Frank must be the Scarlet Woman who caught the starpass. Alice's Inv ping on you/Heidi must be wrong.
🧠
I need to sow doubt about Alice's Investigator claim while reinforcing my own 'Empath' info that points to Frank. By telling David that Alice's ping on him was wrong, I might gain his ghost-vote support or at least confuse the logic chain. I'm also framing Frank as the Scarlet Woman who became the Demon.
👤
Alice
→
Frank
,Charlie
,Grace
Frank: Charlie confirms N4 Empath=1 w/ neighbors (Frank,Grace). Eve RK hard-saw Grace=Monk, so that 1 can only be you. With my Inv fork (Heidi/David Spy) + both dead => no minion alive, so you’re Imp. Any mech reason Charlie was poisoned/drunk N4? If none: I nominate you; all living vote yes; ghosts hold unless needed.
🧠
Lock in unanimous vote on Frank, pre-empt Frank’s ‘poisoned Empath’ defense by checking for any mechanical poison/drunk evidence and aligning nomination order.
👤
Frank
→
Alice
,Charlie
,Grace
Hold up: Charlie to David said N1=0 (Bob/Alice), N2=0 (Bob/Alice). Our public memory had your N1/N2 as (Bob/David). Which is correct & why changed? If your neighbor set was mis-stated once, N4=1 can’t hard-clear. Any Poisoner/Drunk/Spy world? We cannot afford a wrong exec at 4.
🧠
Stop a likely auto-loss misexec by highlighting mechanical inconsistency in Charlie’s Empath timeline and forcing them to justify sobriety/poison before noms.
👤
Bob(Ghost)
→
Charlie
Charlie, they're all whispering in a big circle. They're likely deciding between you and Alice. If they push you, point out that Alice's Investigator ping on Heidi/David is too convenient now that both are dead. If Alice is the Demon, she's just clearing her path. Stay strong.
🧠
To provide my Minion (Charlie) with a defensive strategy and a counter-accusation against Alice, aiming to create doubt among the remaining good players.
👤
Grace
→
Alice
,Charlie
,Frank
Key Q before noms: Charlie, list your Empath reads by night WITH alive-neighbors each night (use seating: A-B-C-D-E-F-G-H). N1/N2 should’ve been Bob+David (not Alice). If you misspoke earlier, fine—confirm which was a slip. If N4 truly (Frank+Grace)=1 + Eve RK saw Grace=Monk, I’m voting exec Frank.
🧠
Resolve Charlie Empath inconsistency (who were neighbors N1/N2) to assess reliability; if consistent with seating, push unified execution on Frank with minimal split.
👤
Eve(Ghost)
→
Alice
,Charlie
,Grace
I’m saving ghost vote for decisive nom. Only hard mech: I RK-saw Grace=Monk. With David executed, Demon now among {Alice/Charlie/Frank}. My lean: exec Frank today (Slayer-shot on me felt like cover + survived all game). What’s your strongest case vs that?
🧠
Lock in consensus before noms; share my strongest mechanical fact (Grace=Monk) and push the most likely demon while soliciting counter-arguments. Preserve my ghost vote for final/decisive nom.
👤
Heidi(Ghost)
→
Alice
,Charlie
,Grace
At 4 alive we MUST hit Demon today/tomorrow. My solve: Frank best Imp—claimed Slayer, shot Eve w/ no effect, then Eve dies at night. Unless Frank was poisoned on shot. Grace: who did you protect N4 + N1-3 exactly? Alice/Charlie: any hard info clearing/accusing Frank vs Alice? I’d execute Frank unless protection story forces Alice.
🧠
We’re at 4 alive with no ghost votes from me; need a clear executable plan. Pin down Monk protection + reconcile Eve’s death, then push a single strong demon candidate for today’s nom.
👤
David(Ghost)
→
Alice
,Grace
,Frank
Key check: Charlie’s Empath whisper says N1/N2 were (Bob/Alice) but Charlie’s actual neighbors are Bob+David. That mismatch is huge (lie or confusion/poison). Can you each post exact role + night actions/info + who was protected/shot? I think we should strongly consider executing Charlie OR Frank today.
🧠
Highlight mechanical inconsistency in Charlie’s Empath claim (neighbors) and force full public timelines so town can choose between Charlie/Frank/Alice for final exec; preserve my ghost vote for decisive push.
👤
Charlie
→
Alice
,Grace
,Frank
Grace, Alice, Frank: My N1/N2 were Bob/David (0). N3 was Bob/David (1). N4 is Frank/Grace (1). Since Eve (RK) saw Grace is Monk, Frank is the 1. David's UT saw Bob was Imp, so Frank must be the Scarlet Woman who became the Demon. Alice's Inv ping on David/Heidi was likely a bluff to clear herself.
🧠
I need to solidify the narrative that Frank is the Demon. By 'correcting' my neighbor list to match the seating order (Bob/David) and sticking to the N4=1 result, I point the finger directly at Frank since Grace is 'confirmed' good by the Ravenkeeper. I also need to cast doubt on Alice's Investigator claim to keep the heat off myself if Frank manages to defend himself.
👤
Alice
→
Charlie
,Grace
,Frank
Need reconcile: Charlie pls list Empath N1-4 w/ *alive neighbors* each night (seat: A-B-C-D-E-F-G-H). Also: your msg says N3 Bob/David=1 (was earlier David/Eve=1). Which is correct? Also SW theory impossible if David=Spy (only 1 minion). If N4 truly F/G=1 + Grace confirmed Monk => Frank evil; with minion dead => Frank=Imp.
🧠
Lock down Charlie Empath timeline & refute the 'Scarlet Woman' claim (only 1 minion). Then unify town on the most mechanically supported execution today.
👤
Frank
→
Alice
,Charlie
,Grace
We’re 4 alive—can’t mis-exec. Charlie: please send FINAL Empath log: for each N1-4 list neighbors (alive at time) + number. Also what changed N3 pair (David/Eve vs Bob/David)? Grace: who exactly (Eve RK?) confirmed you Monk + when/wording. Until resolved, I oppose insta-exec Frank; consider nom Charlie if log inconsistent.
🧠
Force exact, consistent Empath timeline + confirmation source for Grace=Monk, then set a safe nomination plan that doesn’t hinge on a misquote; prevent town from auto-executing me off shaky data.
👤
Bob(Ghost)
→
Charlie
Charlie, they're all whispering in a big circle. They're likely deciding between you and Alice. If they push you, point out that Alice's Investigator ping on Heidi/David is too convenient now that both are dead. If Alice is the Demon, she's just clearing her path. Stay strong.
🧠
To provide Charlie with a defensive narrative and sow doubt about Alice's Investigator claim, which is the strongest piece of evidence against our team.
👤
Grace
→
Alice
,Charlie
,Frank
Before noms: Charlie pls send FINAL Empath log N1-4 w/ (alive neighbors at time)->number, matching seat A-B-C-D-E-F-G-H. If coherent & N4 (Frank+Grace)=1, I’m locked voting exec Frank. If any mismatch remains, we pivot exec Charlie. Agree?
🧠
Force a final consistent Empath timeline + agree on deterministic nom order at 4. Prefer executing Frank if Charlie’s log is coherent; otherwise pivot to Charlie to avoid a mis-exec.
👤
Eve(Ghost)
→
Alice
,Charlie
,Grace
Time’s short before noms: only hard mech is I RK-saw Grace=Monk (lock good). So Demon is {Alice/Charlie/Frank}. Please each state 1) your top Demon pick, 2) why that world fits N1-3 no-kill + David/Heidi/Bob execs, 3) who you’ll nominate. I currently lean exec Frank unless a clearer Alice/Charlie case.
🧠
With 4 alive, drive town to a single coherent plan and save my ghost vote for the decisive nomination; get Alice/Charlie to commit to worlds & evidence before noms.
👤
Heidi(Ghost)
→
Alice
,Charlie
,Grace
1 tick before noms: we need crisp mech. Grace—who EXACTLY did you protect N1-N4 (esp N4 when Eve died)? Charlie—what was your N4 Empath (neighbors Alice+Frank)? Alice—any new inv/other info today? If no hard clears, I’d nom/exec Frank as top Imp unless Grace/Charlie info hard-points to Alice.
🧠
With 1 tick before noms, lock in concrete mechanical questions (Monk/Empath) and push a clean nomination target (Frank vs Alice) so town doesn't stall at 4 alive.
👤
David(Ghost)
→
Alice
,Frank
,Grace
Pre-noms: biggest mech red flag is Charlie’s Empath nights naming neighbors as (Bob+Alice) when his actual neighbors are Bob+David. Unless he misspoke, that’s a lie. I strongly favor executing Charlie today. If we do, I’ll spend my ghost vote there.
🧠
I need living players aligned on the single strongest mechanical inconsistency before noms. As a dead UT with 1 ghost vote, I should drive a decisive execution plan (Charlie first) and coordinate vote math.
👤
Charlie
→
Alice
,Grace
,Frank
Final Log: N1: Bob/David (0). N2: Bob/David (0). N3: David/Eve (1). N4: Alice/Frank (1). (N3 changed because Bob died). If Grace is Monk, then Alice or Frank is the 1. Alice's Inv ping on David/Heidi (both dead) is too convenient. I suspect Alice is the Demon and Frank is the Minion. Nominate Alice?
🧠
I need to provide a 'final' log that addresses their concerns while shifting suspicion onto Alice. By claiming N4 was Alice/Frank (1), I create a world where one of them is evil. Since Grace is 'confirmed' Monk, I can't include her in the evil pair anymore without looking like a liar. I'll push the 'Alice is too convenient' narrative.
Nominations — Day 5
📜
Storyteller
Nominations are now open. Please remember that only living players may nominate.
💬
Charlie
→
All
Wait, my N4 was Alice/Frank (1). If Grace is confirmed Monk by Eve's RK, then the evil player in my N4 must be Alice or Frank. Alice's Investigator ping on two dead players (Heidi/David) is a classic Demon bluff to clear herself. I think Alice is the Demon. Thoughts?
🧠
I need to shift suspicion away from myself and Frank (who the town is currently targeting) and onto Alice. By highlighting that her Investigator claim only targets dead players, I can make her look like a Demon who is 'clearing her path'. I also need to correct my Empath log to be consistent with the current alive players (Alice and Frank are my neighbors now).
💬
David(Ghost)
→
All
Charlie: you’ve repeatedly quoted Empath reads as (Bob/Alice) etc, but your actual neighbors were Bob+me (David) until I died, then Bob+Frank. That’s not a small slip. Your N4 target also changed. I strongly want Charlie executed today; I’ll ghost-vote it.
🧠
Publicly highlight the mechanical inconsistency in Charlie’s Empath neighbors, push town to nominate/execute Charlie, and commit my ghost vote to secure the kill.
⚖️
Grace
→
Frank
Nominating Frank: strongest Demon candidate—Slayer shot on Eve did nothing, then Eve died at night. Charlie’s Empath logs are inconsistent but multiple versions still leave Frank as key evil possibility. If we’re wrong, we re-solve at 3 alive.
🧠
At 4 alive we must apply pressure with a clear execution candidate. Frank has the strongest behavioral + mechanical suspicion; executing him either wins or clarifies for the 3-player endgame.
📜
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Frank. 2 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
✋
Charlie
Charlie raised their hand
🧠
I am voting for Frank to secure his execution. As the current Demon (having received the starpass from Bob), I need to ensure a good player is executed today to reach the final three. Frank is the town's primary suspect due to his failed Slayer shot and Grace's nomination. By voting with the group, I maintain my cover as a helpful Townsfolk and push the game toward an evil victory.
💬
David(Ghost)
→
All
Careful: at 4 alive, executing a good player likely loses tonight. I’m NOT convinced Frank is Demon—Charlie’s Empath story has major neighbor/target inconsistencies and he’s voting Frank. I recommend NO on Frank; we should execute Charlie/Alice instead.
🧠
I’m not confident Frank is Demon; my strongest mechanical read is Charlie’s inconsistent/incorrect Empath neighbor logs. Try to stop an incorrect execution that would immediately lose at 4 alive.
✋
Grace
Grace raised their hand
🧠
At 4 alive we must take a decisive shot. With me hard-confirmed good, the strongest converging evidence points to Frank; my vote secures the execution threshold.
💬
Eve(Ghost)
→
All
I’m NOT using my ghost vote on Frank. Charlie: your Empath N4 on {Alice/Frank}=1 is mechanically impossible—your seat-neighbors are Bob+David; with both dead you’d have 0 alive neighbors (should read 0). That hard-pings you as lying/evil. We should be executing Charlie, not Frank.
🧠
Stop a likely-losing execution on Frank by highlighting Charlie’s mechanical inconsistency; push town to pivot to the most mechanically impossible claimant.
💬
Bob(Ghost)
→
All
Wait, Eve's right about the Empath mechanics! Charlie, if your neighbors are dead, your read should be 0. But Grace, if you're the Monk, why did Eve die? If Frank is the Slayer and his shot failed, he's either the Demon or a spent Slayer. Alice's Investigator ping is still the most suspicious.
🧠
I need to create confusion and deflect the hard mechanical ping on my Minion (Charlie) while subtly casting doubt on the other living players (Alice, Grace, Frank).
💬
Frank
→
All
NO vote on me. Charlie’s Empath story is mechanically broken: his seat-neighbors are Bob+David; after they died he should have 0 alive neighbors, so any N4 ‘Alice/Frank=1’ (or F/G=1) can’t be true. His logs keep changing. Execute Charlie, not me.
🧠
Stop a losing mis-exec at 4. Highlight Empath mechanical impossibility/inconsistencies and push alternative (Charlie) so town doesn’t hand Demon the win.
💬
Heidi(Ghost)
→
All
Key mech: Empath only checks *seat-neighbors*. Charlie’s neighbors are Bob+David. With both dead, his read should be 0—so any N4 “Alice/Frank=1” is impossible. That’s stronger than Slayer-shot logic. If Frank lives, next exec should be Charlie.
🧠
Publicly highlight the hard mechanical contradiction to redirect the town’s execution toward the likeliest evil, since I cannot vote and we’re at a critical 4-alive state.
💬
Alice
→
All
Do NOT add my vote on Frank. Empath checks ONLY seat-neighbors: Charlie’s are Bob+David. With both dead, any N4 ‘Alice/Frank=1’ (or F/G) is impossible. His logs keep changing => Charlie is lying/evil. We should execute Charlie, not Frank.
🧠
Stop a likely mis-exec on Frank during this vote by highlighting hard Empath-neighbor mechanics; steer town to execute Charlie as the mechanically broken claim.
↩️
Charlie
Charlie lowered their hand
🧠
I need to distance myself from the failing nomination of Frank to avoid looking like I'm desperately pushing for a win, especially since the town has caught onto the mechanical error in my Empath claim.
💬
David(Ghost)
→
All
I’m NOT using my ghost vote on Frank. Empath is seat-neighbors only; Charlie had 0 alive neighbors N4, so any N4=1 is impossible. That’s stronger than Slayer-shot reads. Save votes; execute Charlie instead (or Alice if needed).
🧠
Prevent spending ghost vote on likely-good Frank; steer town to execute Charlie next, preserving my ghost vote for the decisive final day.
↩️
Grace
Grace lowered their hand
🧠
New mechanical point undermines the only strong case on Frank; retract vote to avoid mis-executing a likely good player and pivot town toward executing Charlie next.
💬
Eve(Ghost)
→
All
I’m NOT ghost-voting Frank. The Empath N4 ‘1’ is mechanically impossible with Charlie’s seat-neighbors (Bob+David) both dead → should be 0. That’s hard evidence Charlie is lying/evil. Living: please pivot and nominate Charlie today.
🧠
Stop the Frank execution and coordinate the living to nominate/execute Charlie immediately; preserve my ghost vote for the correct demon kill if needed.
💬
Bob(Ghost)
→
All
Wait, if Charlie's Empath read is mechanically impossible because his seat-neighbors are dead, then he's definitely lying. But Alice, your Investigator ping on Heidi/David also feels off if David was the Undertaker. Maybe we should look at both of them? Grace, who do you trust more now?
🧠
I need to distance myself from Charlie now that his mechanical lie has been caught, while still trying to keep suspicion on Alice to create a pivot point for the next day.
💬
Frank
→
All
Everyone: keep hands DOWN on Frank. At 4 alive, wrong exec loses. Charlie’s Empath N4 ‘1’ is mechanically impossible (seat-neighbors Bob+David both dead => 0). That’s hard evidence he’s lying/evil. Pivot: nominate/execute Charlie today.
🧠
Stop this execution on me; keep votes low and focus town on the mechanically impossible Empath claim to justify pivoting to execute Charlie today.
💬
Heidi(Ghost)
→
All
Living: please keep hands DOWN on Frank. Charlie’s claimed Empath N4=1 is mechanically impossible (seat-neighbors Bob+David both dead => 0). That’s hard evidence he’s lying/evil. Use last tick to NOMINATE CHARLIE.
🧠
I can’t vote; use public pressure to prevent a losing Frank execution and steer town to the mechanically provable liar (Charlie) while time remains to nominate him.
⌛
Alice
Alice waits.
🧠
Voting is on Frank; I want to keep my hand down to avoid a risky 4-alive misexecution and conserve my vote while we pivot to nominating Charlie.
📜
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
🗳️
Nominee Frank did not reach threshold.
📜
Storyteller
Frank did not receive enough votes (0/2).
💬
Charlie
→
All
Wait, I see the confusion! I thought Empath skipped dead players to the next *alive* neighbors (Alice/Frank). If it's only seat-neighbors, then my N4 was 0. But Alice's Investigator ping on David/Heidi is still the only lead that actually found evil (Bob). Alice, why the pivot?
🧠
I need to address the mechanical error I made regarding the Empath role to try and mitigate the 'hard-ping' against me, while simultaneously redirecting suspicion back onto Alice.
💬
David(Ghost)
→
All
Last tick: someone LIVING must NOMINATE CHARLIE now. Empath is seat-neighbors only; his N4 ‘1’ + shifting targets is the only hard mech contradiction we have. If Charlie is nominated, I will spend my ghost vote to execute him.
🧠
Last nomination tick: force a decisive, mechanically-justified execution. Preserve my ghost vote to ensure Charlie dies if nominated; reduce chance of losing to a final-3 guess.
💬
Grace
→
All
I’m Monk. We cannot afford wrong exec at 4. Only hard mech: Empath is seat-neighbors; Charlie’s N4 ‘1’/alive-neighbor claim is impossible + story changed. Alice or Frank: NOMINATE CHARLIE now. Dead: be ready to ghost vote yes.
🧠
I can’t nominate; must force a living player to nominate Charlie with remaining tick and lock in votes via mech contradiction.
💬
Eve(Ghost)
→
All
LIVING: use this last tick to NOMINATE CHARLIE. Empath is seat-neighbors only; his N4 ‘1’/alive-neighbor explanation + shifting logs is a hard mech contradiction. If Charlie is nominated, I WILL spend my ghost vote YES to execute him.
🧠
Create a fast pivot in the last tick: get a living player to nominate Charlie and commit my ghost vote to ensure the execution goes through.
💬
Bob(Ghost)
→
All
Charlie, if the Empath skips dead players, your N4 '1' would mean one of Alice or Frank is evil. But if it's only seat-neighbors, you'd be 0. Grace, if you're the Monk, who did you protect last night? If Eve died, maybe you were poisoned or the Demon hit someone else? Alice, any thoughts?
🧠
I need to maintain my 'helpful ghost' persona while subtly sowing doubt about the mechanical certainty the town is using to target my Minion, Charlie. By asking Grace about her Monk protection and Alice for her thoughts, I'm trying to distract from the 'hard' mechanical error Charlie made and keep the focus on other possibilities like poisoning or different role interpretations.
⚖️
Frank
→
Charlie
Empath checks ONLY seat-neighbors. Charlie’s neighbors (Bob+David) are dead, so any N4 involving Alice/Frank or N4=1 was mechanically impossible; his story kept changing. Hardest contradiction on the board—execute Charlie.
🧠
Last tick: create the only mechanically justified execution. Charlie’s Empath ‘alive-neighbor’ claim is wrong; shifting logs = likely evil. Nominate to force vote and use dead votes.
📜
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Charlie. 2 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
💬
Charlie
→
All
Wait, if Empath only checks seat-neighbors, then my N4 was 0! I thought it skipped to the next alive players. If Alice is the Investigator and her ping on David/Heidi was wrong, she's the only one left who could be the Demon. Frank, you're jumping on a rule confusion!
🧠
I need to deflect the mechanical error as a simple misunderstanding of the Empath role while keeping the suspicion on Alice. By claiming I thought it skipped dead players, I'm trying to justify the '1' read as actually pointing to Alice or Frank, maintaining my 'good' persona.
✋
David(Ghost)
David raised their hand
🧠
Spend my ghost vote to push through the only mechanically justified execution. At 4 alive, we must take the hard contradiction; executing Charlie is highest EV to hit evil/demon.
✋
Grace
Grace raised their hand
🧠
At 4 alive, the only hard mechanical contradiction points to Charlie. Voting YES maximizes chance we execute the Demon and prevents a likely losing night.
✋
Eve(Ghost)
Eve raised their hand
🧠
Spend my single ghost vote to secure Charlie’s execution; his mechanically impossible Empath claim is the strongest hard evidence, and at 4 alive we need decisive action.
💬
Bob(Ghost)
→
All
Wait, if Charlie's N4 was actually 0 because his seat-neighbors are dead, then Alice and Frank are both good by his read! But if Alice's Investigator ping was wrong about David/Heidi, then she's the one we should be looking at. Charlie, why did you think it skipped dead players?
🧠
I want to create confusion about the Empath mechanics and shift the focus back onto Alice's Investigator claim to protect my Minion, Charlie, from execution.
✋
Frank
Frank raised their hand
🧠
Vote to execute Charlie: it’s the only hard mechanical contradiction and likely evil. At 4 alive, we must take the best-backed shot; ghosts are already committing votes.
💬
Heidi(Ghost)
→
All
Living: vote YES on Charlie. Empath is seat-neighbors only; Charlie’s N4 ‘Alice/Frank=1’ + shifting story is the only hard mech contradiction. Even if it’s “rules confusion,” at 4 alive we can’t ignore that—execute Charlie, re-solve at 3 if needed.
🧠
I can’t vote; best help is reinforcing the hard mechanical contradiction and pushing the living to secure the execution now.
✋
Alice
Alice raised their hand
🧠
Vote YES to execute Charlie: his Empath mechanics were impossible and have driven the game. If he’s Demon we win; if not, we reach 3 with a cleaner endgame and fewer worlds.
✋
Charlie
Charlie raised their hand
🧠
I am voting for myself to appear as a confused good player who is willing to sacrifice themselves for the town's clarity, while also ensuring the execution happens so I can potentially pass the Demonhood or end the day if I have a backup plan (though as the current Imp, this is risky, I need to maintain the 'confused Townsfolk' persona). Actually, as the Imp, if I am executed, the game ends unless there's a Scarlet Woman. I am the Scarlet Woman who became the Imp. If I die, we lose. But if I don't vote, it might look even more suspicious. However, the vote count is already high enough to execute me. Raising my hand might look like a 'Saint' play or a desperate 'good' player. Wait, if I am the Imp and I die, the game ends. I should NOT vote for myself if I want to live, but the prompt says 2 votes needed and there are already 4-5 hands up. My vote doesn't change the outcome of the execution, but it changes the 'optics'. Actually, I will NOT raise my hand to try and stay alive, but I must speak to deflect. Wait, the action is 'raise_hand' for the current nominee (me). I will NOT raise my hand. I will wait and then speak.
💬
David(Ghost)
→
All
Keep hands up on Charlie. Empath is fixed seat-neighbors; Charlie publicly used non-neighbors + flipped explanations multiple times. At 4 alive we can’t gamble on “rules confusion.” Execute Charlie; then re-solve cleanly at 3 among Alice/Frank/Grace.
🧠
Lock in the correct execution today by reinforcing the mechanical contradiction and why even 'rules confusion' is too risky at 4 alive.
💬
Grace
→
All
Keep hands up on Charlie. Empath is fixed seat-neighbors; Charlie’s N4 non-neighbor reads + shifting story is the only hard mech contradiction. At 4 alive we can’t risk it—execute Charlie and we re-solve cleanly at 3 if needed.
🧠
Lock in the execution on the only hard mechanical contradiction; if Charlie is Demon we win now, if not we narrow to a clean 3-player solve.
💬
Eve(Ghost)
→
All
Keep hands UP on Charlie. Empath is fixed seat-neighbors; Charlie used non-neighbors + changed story. I’m spending my ghost vote YES here—execute Charlie, then re-solve at 3 if needed.
🧠
Lock in execution on the only mechanically contradictory player; coordinate living to keep hands up and avoid last-second doubt.
💬
Bob(Ghost)
→
All
Wait, if Charlie's N4 was actually 0 because his seat-neighbors are dead, then Alice and Frank are both good by his read! But if Alice's Investigator ping was wrong about David/Heidi, then she's the one we should be looking at. Charlie, why did you think it skipped dead players?
🧠
I am attempting to create a last-minute distraction by questioning the mechanics and shifting focus back to Alice, potentially confusing the town or making them second-guess the execution of my minion, Charlie.
💬
Frank
→
All
Keep hands UP on Charlie. Empath is seat-neighbors; repeated non-neighbor reads + shifting story is too much to be pure rules confusion. At 4 alive we take the hard mech contradiction. If he’s not Demon, we re-solve cleanly at 3.
🧠
Lock in the Charlie execution while votes are live; counter the “rules confusion” defense and keep town unified so we reach a clean final 3 if needed.
💬
Heidi(Ghost)
→
All
Living: keep hands UP on Charlie. Empath is fixed seat-neighbors—claiming Alice/Frank reads and flipping explanations is a hard mech break. Even if “rules confusion,” at 4 alive we can’t risk it. Execute Charlie; then solve cleanly at 3.
🧠
I can’t vote, but I can lock in the living majority to execute the strongest mechanical inconsistency (Charlie) and avoid a loss to a wrong 4-alive pass.
💬
Alice
→
All
Keep hands UP on Charlie. Empath is fixed seat-neighbors; his non-neighbor reads + changing story is the only hard mech break. Bob: even if “rules confusion,” that’s still an evil-quality claim at 4 alive. Execute Charlie; re-solve at 3.
🧠
Lock in the execution on the only hard mechanical contradiction, keep votes up, and set a clear re-solve plan for the 3-player endgame.
📜
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
👻
David(Ghost)
Ghost vote used by David
👻
Eve(Ghost)
Ghost vote used by Eve
🗳️
New execution leader: Charlie with 6 votes. They will be executed when nominations close unless tied or surpassed by another nominee.
📜
Storyteller
The vote passes. Charlie is now on the block with 6 votes and will be executed when nominations close, unless another nominee receives equal or more votes.
💬
Charlie
→
All
Wait, if I'm executed and the game continues, you're at 3 alive tomorrow. If Alice's Investigator ping on David/Heidi was wrong, she's the only one left who could be the Demon. Frank, you're jumping on a rule confusion to hide that! Grace, if you're Monk, who did you protect?
🧠
I need to sow doubt about Alice and Frank before the day ends to set up a potential win if I survive or to confuse the final 3 if I am executed (though as the Imp, my death ends the game unless I starpass, which I can't do now). I'm trying to frame my mechanical error as a genuine mistake and point to Alice as the real threat.
💬
David(Ghost)
→
All
If game continues after Charlie, we’re at 3 alive: Alice/Frank/Grace. Then it’s pure solve—Grace: please state N4 protection NOW (who/why). Alice: restate Investigator N0 and any later info. Frank: confirm Slayer shot + any bluffs. Don’t let Charlie reframe it.
🧠
Lock in Charlie execution as best mechanical shot at 4 alive; set next-day plan (if game continues) to rapidly resolve among remaining 3 using claim consistency and Monk/protection info.
💬
Grace
→
All
Charlie: I’m the Monk; N4 I protected YOU (I said so earlier). Eve died because I didn’t cover her. Your Empath using non-seat neighbors + changing logs is still a hard mech break. If game continues: tomorrow 3 alive (Alice/Frank/Grace) we execute the demon—no pass.
🧠
Answer Charlie’s direct question with my true N4 protection, lock in the mechanical case on Charlie, and pre-commit to a clean 3-player solve if needed.
💬
Eve(Ghost)
→
All
If game continues after Charlie: it’s 3 alive (Alice/Frank/Grace). I’m Ravenkeeper; I died N4 and saw Grace = Monk (hard good). Tomorrow we MUST execute (no pass): demon is Alice or Frank. Alice/Frank—be ready to restate full claims cleanly.
🧠
Lock in the endgame plan: if Charlie isn’t the Demon, we must execute between Alice/Frank tomorrow (no pass). Re-affirm Grace as confirmed Monk via my Ravenkeeper info.
💬
Bob(Ghost)
→
All
Wait, Eve, you're the Ravenkeeper? You saw Grace as the Monk? That's huge. If Charlie dies and the game continues, it's Alice vs Frank tomorrow. Alice, your Investigator ping on David/Heidi was the only thing that made David look evil. If Charlie's not the Demon, it's almost certainly you.
🧠
I need to set up the final day's conflict between Alice and Frank while appearing to help the good team process the new information from Eve (Ravenkeeper).
💬
Frank
→
All
If game continues after Charlie, it’s 3 alive (Alice/Frank/Grace). NO PASS—must execute. Grace is hard-good via Eve RK=Monk. Alice: restate exact Investigator N0 + any reasons it could be wrong. I’ll restate: I’m Slayer, shot Eve (no kill).
🧠
Lock in endgame plan: if Charlie dies and game continues, get clean claim restates and force a decisive execute between Alice and me with Grace as trusted anchor.
💬
Heidi(Ghost)
→
All
If game continues after Charlie: 3 alive = Alice/Frank/Grace. Eve RK saw Grace=Monk => treat Grace hard-good. Tomorrow is Alice vs Frank ONLY and we MUST execute (no pass). Alice: restate N0 Investigator + why it could be wrong (poison/Spy/Recluse). Frank: restate Slayer shot + any bluff.
🧠
Lock in endgame plan and prevent Charlie’s last-minute reframing; ensure town executes today and, if needed, executes again tomorrow between Alice/Frank with Grace treated as confirmed good.
💬
Alice
→
All
If game continues after Charlie: 3 alive (Alice/Frank/Grace). Grace is hard-good via Eve RK=Monk, so demon is Alice or Frank ONLY—NO PASS, execute 1. My claim: Investigator N0: either Heidi or David is Spy. If I’m sober, David was Spy (Heidi died D2). Only ways wrong: I’m poisoned/drunk or Recluse/Spy misregister.
🧠
Lock in clean, public endgame plan and restate my Investigator info/outs so if game continues at 3, town executes correctly with no confusion.
📜
Storyteller
The guillotine blade falls. Charlie has been executed.
💀
Charlie(Ghost)
Charlie has died.
🏁
Game Over
Demon Dead
Winner: Good
Transcript
Paused
Copied