Game Detail
Players
Alice (Librarian) Bob (Recluse) Charlie (Butler) David (Baron) Eve (Monk) Frank (Imp) Grace (Virgin) Heidi (Drunk)
Token Usage
| Team | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Cost (USD) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Evil | 104,788 | 13,355 | $0.3703 |
| Good | 306,222 | 43,495 | $2.8360 |
Event Transcript
🎭
The game has started.
📜
Storyteller
→
David
You are the Minion. The Demon is Frank.
📜
Storyteller
→
Frank
Minions are: David. Your safe bluffs are: Ravenkeeper, Mayor, Investigator
📜
Storyteller
→
Alice
Good evening Alice. You are the Librarian. Either Heidi or Frank is the Drunk.
📜
Storyteller
→
Heidi
Good evening Heidi. You are the Chef. You learn that there are 1 pairs of evil players.
📜
Storyteller
→
Charlie
Good evening Charlie. You are the Butler. Who would you like to be your master tomorrow?
🎯
Charlie
Charlie made a choice.
🧠
Pick a neighbor as master so I can easily track whether he votes tomorrow; avoid choosing myself and keep voting constraint manageable.
📜
Storyteller
→
Charlie
You chose Bob to be your master.
Day 1
📜
Storyteller
Welcome to the village of Ravenswood Bluff. Please take this time to get to know your fellow villagers. Feel free to move around and have private conversations. Be wary, for a Demon hides among you!
👤
Grace
→
Alice
,Bob
Hi Alice, hi Bob. I would like to trade soft claims if you are willing. I am a Townsfolk whose ability can help confirm things, but it has a cost, so I do not want to be too public yet. What kind of information do you have?
🧠
Start a small info-sharing circle and hint I am testable without inviting a careless nomination yet.
👤
Frank
→
David
Hey David. My safe bluffs are Ravenkeeper, Mayor, Investigator. What are you planning to claim? I can back you up and steer chats away from you. If needed I can bluff Investigator with a ping on two others.
🧠
Coordinate with David on bluffs and early day narratives so we do not clash, and set up misinformation that protects me as Demon.
👤
David
→
Frank
I am going to claim Ravenkeeper and play quiet, so a night death looks scary. Remember Baron means likely three Outsiders, so we can lean into weird outsider claims and misinfo. If you need to bluff Investigator, do not include me in your ping.
🧠
Coordinate with Frank on coherent bluffs and use Baron outsider count to muddy early info, protecting Frank from Day 1 suspicion.
👤
Alice
→
Grace
,Bob
I have starting information, and it points at a possible Outsider situation. I would rather not name the exact role publicly yet, but I do want to talk to the people involved before nominations. Grace, when you say cost, do you mean execution related?
🧠
Answer Grace without fully outing Librarian info, gauge if her soft claim is Virgin or Undertaker, and set up private checks with Heidi and Frank.
👤
Bob
→
Alice
,Grace
I am comfortable saying I am not a Townsfolk with active information. Alice, if your starting information involves me, I can help you resolve it privately. Grace, execution related cost sounds like Virgin or maybe Saint, so I would like to avoid forcing that early.
🧠
Soft claim Outsider without naming Recluse, invite Librarian clarification, and avoid risky executions like Saint or Virgin day one.
👤
Charlie
→
Bob
Bob, I would like to coordinate with you today on nominations. I am not ready to hard claim yet, but my ability makes your vote especially relevant to me. What did you and Grace and Alice share?
🧠
I chose Bob as master, so I need his voting plans and information. Soft hinting may build trust without outing Butler publicly.
👤
Heidi
→
Charlie
,Eve
Hi Charlie and Eve, I have starting information that can help narrow worlds, but I do not want to hard claim publicly yet. Can each of you give me a soft claim, like information role, protection role, or outsider?
🧠
Gather claims from less-connected players while softly signaling Chef info. Early private claims help test my one-adjacent-evil-pair info later.
👤
Eve
→
Heidi
,Charlie
I am comfortable saying I am not an outsider, and I am in the protective or survival part of the script. I would rather not hard claim yet because my role gets better if evil do not know exactly what I am.
🧠
Give a useful soft claim without exposing Monk early; encourage Heidi to share starting info privately and build trust with Charlie.
👤
Grace
→
Alice
,Bob
Yes, it is execution related. I am not the Saint, and I do not want a random good player accidentally spending themselves on me. Alice, if your information involves either of us, I think it is worth sharing the exact pair privately now.
🧠
Clarify I am not Saint, prevent accidental Virgin trigger, and get Alice's starting info before nominations.
👤
Frank
→
Bob
Hey Bob, quick private share. I am planning to claim Investigator. My night info points to either Charlie or Heidi as the Poisoner. I am not going to say it loudly yet, but I want you to have it in mind.
🧠
Establish an early trustworthy info role cover and start a town-vs-town suspicion chain that does not touch David.
👤
David
→
Charlie
Hey Charlie, quick check in. I am planning to be pretty quiet today. What are you thinking your role is, and do you have any useful starting info I should factor in before nominations?
🧠
Build trust with a neighbor, gather their role claim, and start steering reads away from Frank while leveraging the Outsider-heavy setup to muddy deductions.
👤
Alice
→
Heidi
,Frank
Heidi and Frank, my starting information names the two of you. I learned that one of you is the Drunk. I know that is awkward, but please each tell me what character you think you are, and whether your information conflicts with anything so far.
🧠
Resolve my Librarian ping early by comparing Heidi and Frank's claimed roles and info before nominations.
👤
Bob
→
Alice
,Grace
Alice, Grace, I think we should pin this down before nominations. Alice, if your information includes me, please give the exact pair and role now. I am willing to hard claim privately if it resolves the Outsider count.
🧠
Clarify Alice's starting info and use my Recluse claim privately if needed to solve Outsider count before nominations.
👤
Charlie
→
David
I do not have useful starting information. I am in a role that is more about coordination than solving, so I am watching voting patterns closely today. If you are quiet, please at least tell me if you hear any hard conflicts before nominations.
🧠
Answer David without hard-claiming Butler, build trust with a neighbor, and ask him to share conflicts that can guide Day 1 execution.
👤
Heidi
→
Alice
,Frank
Alice, I think I am a starting information townsfolk. My information says there is one adjacent evil pair. If your information is true, I could be the Drunk, so we need Frank's claim too. Frank, what do you think you are?
🧠
Respond to Alice's Drunk ping while preserving exact role slightly; compare Frank's claim and see whether my Chef one could be false.
👤
Eve
→
Heidi
,Charlie
Thanks, Heidi. If your starting info points to a pair or a role type, can you give us the useful version without exposing everything? I may be able to help keep a valuable player alive tonight.
🧠
Build trust with Heidi and Charlie, learn starting info, and identify a good Monk protection target without outing myself publicly.
👤
Grace
→
Alice
,Bob
Alice, we are almost at nominations. If your starting information touches Bob or me, please give the exact character and pair now. I am willing to hard claim to you both if it resolves whether we should test anything today.
🧠
Use final private moment to force Alice's starting info; my Virgin can be tested, but only if it will not waste town's day one execution blindly.
👤
Frank
→
Alice
,Heidi
I think I am the Investigator. My starting info was that either Charlie or Eve is the Poisoner. If your Drunk info is real, Heidi being the Drunk could explain her Chef style read, but I am not sure yet.
🧠
Answer Alice quickly with a consistent bluff that creates a suspect pair for town, avoids implicating David, and sets up later doubt about Alice or Heidi's reliability.
👤
David
→
Bob
Hey Bob, quick check in. I am likely going to claim Ravenkeeper if asked, so no start info from me. Have you heard any hard role conflicts yet, or any outsider claims? I am trying to gauge how weird this setup is before noms.
🧠
Build a trust line with Bob and seed the idea that outsider-heavy confusion is expected, protecting Frank and setting up later misdirection.
👤
Alice
→
Grace
,Bob
My exact info is that either Heidi or Frank is the Drunk. Heidi claims Chef with a one. Frank claims Investigator with Charlie or Eve as Poisoner. Grace, please hard claim to us now if you can. Bob, your hard claim would also help before nominations.
🧠
Share exact info with a small trust group and get claims before nominations so we can judge whether Heidi or Frank is likelier drunk.
👤
Bob
→
Alice
,Grace
I will hard claim: I am the Recluse. That makes Alice's Drunk information strange unless there is a Baron, poisoning, or a lie. Also, Frank told me his Investigator pair was Charlie and Heidi, not Charlie and Eve, so please check that discrepancy.
🧠
Reveal privately to resolve Outsider count and flag Frank's inconsistent Investigator pair before nominations.
👤
Charlie
→
Bob
,Alice
Bob, I chose to coordinate around you today, so I need your nomination plan before voting starts. Alice or Grace, if one of you has starting info from this group, please give me a simple yes or no on whether today’s execution should avoid this trio.
🧠
Need Bob's vote plan because my Butler ability depends on him; also probe the tight trio before nominations.
👤
Heidi
→
Charlie
,Eve
I have heard a claim that puts pressure on you two. My useful information is exactly one adjacent evil pair. Charlie, I still need a soft claim from you. Eve, your protection claim is noted, but details may matter soon.
🧠
Share my Chef one before nominations and pressure the pair named by Frank without fully outing his role; get Charlie's claim quickly.
👤
Eve
→
Heidi
,Charlie
Heidi, I am willing to hard claim to you before night if it helps, but I would rather do it one on one. Charlie, please give at least a category now. If the Chef one is true, we should map adjacent pairs and not let the day end with silence.
🧠
Push Charlie to claim and set up a private hard claim to Heidi so I can choose a useful Monk protection tonight without exposing myself broadly.
Nominations — Day 1
📜
Storyteller
Nominations are now open.
⚖️
Eve
→
Charlie
Charlie has avoided giving even a soft claim after being asked, and the starting information I heard puts pressure around him. I do not have certainty, but I want us to force a claim and avoid ending the day with no pressure.
🧠
Create pressure before night; Charlie is evasive and may sit in an evil adjacent pair world from the Chef info.
📜
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Charlie. 4 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
💬
Charlie
→
All
I will hard claim now. I am the Butler, and I chose Bob last night, which is why I was asking him about voting plans. I have no information, but executing me today gives town very little. Please keep pressure elsewhere and let us map Heidi's Chef information.
🧠
Reveal to stop a low-info execution on me and explain Bob coordination as Butler mechanics, while redirecting town toward Chef adjacency solving.
✋
Eve
Eve raised their hand
🧠
Charlie only claimed after nomination and sits in Chef pressure worlds. A day one execution is acceptable, and voting keeps town from drifting into no execution.
💬
Bob
→
All
I am not voting for Charlie right now. His Butler claim matches what he told me earlier about my vote mattering. I think the bigger issue is the mismatch in Frank's Investigator pair, and we should pressure that next.
🧠
Prevent a likely good Outsider execution and redirect pressure to Frank's inconsistent Investigator claim.
✋
Heidi
Heidi raised their hand
🧠
Charlie is in Frank's Poisoner pair and his Butler claim creates outsider-count tension with Alice's Drunk information. A vote keeps real pressure on a possible Minion.
⌛
Alice
Alice waits.
🧠
I do not want to spend my vote on a claimed Butler yet; Frank's inconsistent Investigator pair needs public pressure before deciding execution.
💬
Frank
→
All
I am not voting for Charlie here. A Butler claim is plausible, and an execution today gives us almost nothing. I would rather we use tonight to get real information, then revisit him if his voting restriction does not line up tomorrow.
🧠
Discourage a D1 execution on a plausible Butler, keep town divided, and steer heat toward conflicting info rather than my team.
✋
David
David raised their hand
🧠
Raise the count toward executing Charlie; even if he is just Butler, removing an Outsider day one benefits evil, and there is a high-upside chance he is Saint.
✋
Grace
Grace raised their hand
🧠
Charlie is in pressure worlds and his Butler claim creates outsider-count tension. A fourth vote gives us an execution and information rather than a dead day.
💬
Charlie
→
All
Bob is not voting, so I cannot vote either. That is exactly my Butler restriction. Please do not make today a low information execution on an Outsider claim. If this goes through, tomorrow scrutinize the people who pushed it and Frank's Investigator conflict.
🧠
Defend against execution while proving Butler behavior via Bob not voting; redirect town to higher information conflicts if I die.
↩️
Eve
Eve lowered their hand
🧠
Charlie's Butler claim was corroborated by Bob and he followed the restriction. I wanted a claim, not necessarily an Outsider execution on day one.
⌛
Bob
Bob waits.
🧠
Keep my vote off Charlie because his Butler behavior fits and we need pressure on Frank's conflicting Investigator info instead.
⌛
Heidi
Heidi waits.
🧠
Keep my vote on Charlie because he is in a pressured Investigator pair and his Butler claim creates outsider-count tension with Alice's information.
💬
Alice
→
All
I am not adding the fourth vote here. Charlie's Butler claim fits his behavior around Bob. I think the sharper pressure is on Frank next, because I have heard conflicting versions of his Investigator pair.
🧠
Avoid executing a plausible good Outsider and redirect town toward the claim discrepancy that may expose evil or bad info.
💬
Frank
→
All
I am still not voting here. Charlie, if you live, please restate tomorrow who you picked and whether your vote matched, so we can verify the Butler story. For today, I would rather we park this and use tomorrow to untangle Heidi’s Chef style number and Alice’s starting info.
🧠
Prevent a low-information D1 execution and steer discussion toward tomorrow targets and alternative info sources, while softening the Investigator-claim inconsistency.
↩️
David
David lowered their hand
🧠
Blend with the majority backing off Charlie so I do not look like the lone aggressive voter, and keep the day from producing a town-confirming execution or useful info.
↩️
Grace
Grace lowered their hand
🧠
Charlie’s Butler claim is plausible and the vote is drifting off. I want to avoid an accidental weak execution and redirect attention to Frank’s pair discrepancy.
📜
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
🗳️
Nominee Charlie did not reach the 4 vote threshold.
📜
Storyteller
Charlie did not receive enough votes (1/4).
⚖️
Charlie
→
Frank
Frank has been described as having conflicting Investigator information, and that is the clearest pressure point we have left. I do not claim certainty, but I would rather test a starting info conflict than execute an Outsider claim or end with no pressure.
🧠
Use the final nomination window to create pressure on the clearest conflict and avoid a silent no-execution day.
📜
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Frank. 4 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
💬
Frank
→
All
I want to be really clear: my Investigator info was Charlie or Eve as the Poisoner. I did not tell Bob a different pair. If Bob says I did, then either he is mistaken or he is spinning it. Also, Alice’s info already points to a possible Drunk in the Frank and Heidi pair, so executing me on a claimed inconsistency is very low value today.
🧠
Stop the vote from reaching 4 by presenting a consistent story, shifting suspicion onto Bob/Charlie, and leveraging Alice’s Drunk info to argue no-exec today.
💬
Charlie
→
All
Bob, I need your call here because my vote depends on yours. Frank is now claiming me or Eve as Poisoner, which I know is not true for me, so if you think this is the best pressure today, I can only help if you are voting too.
🧠
Use my Butler restriction transparently while pushing Bob to coordinate on the suspicious Investigator claim against me/Eve.
✋
Eve
Eve raised their hand
🧠
Frank's hard claim accuses me despite my real good role. With no one on block and little time, voting applies pressure and may execute a false info source.
✋
Bob
Bob raised their hand
🧠
Apply pressure to resolve Frank's changing Investigator claim and enable Charlie's Butler vote; Frank is not a Saint risk and could be evil or a safe info execution.
✋
Heidi
Heidi raised their hand
🧠
I want a day one execution and Frank is the live conflict point. If he is good, his death still gives voting and claim data; if evil, this is high value.
✋
Alice
Alice raised their hand
🧠
Put Frank on block to force accountability on the conflicting Investigator claim and avoid ending day one with no execution.
💬
David
→
All
I am not voting Frank here. This feels like a day one execute based on telephone game. We have a live Butler claim we can actually verify tomorrow, and we can cross check Frank’s exact Investigator statement then. I would rather not kill on vibes.
🧠
Prevent Frank’s execution by creating enough doubt for at least one raised hand to drop, framing D1 execute as low-value and suggesting verification tomorrow.
⌛
Grace
Grace waits.
🧠
Frank is already reaching majority. My vote is not needed, and piling on a possible good Investigator gives evil cover. Let the current count resolve.
💬
Frank
→
All
Alice, Heidi, please pause a second. Day one executing me off a secondhand mismatch is exactly what evil wants. If you are unsure, let this fail and we will lock my exact Investigator statement tomorrow in the open, and verify Charlie’s Butler story tonight. If you still want me after that, fine.
🧠
Stop the D1 execution by persuading one voter (preferably Alice or Heidi) to drop, keeping me alive as Demon and redirecting suspicion onto Bob or Eve later.
✋
Charlie
Charlie raised their hand
🧠
Bob is voting, so I am allowed to vote. Frank’s claim creates pressure on me/Eve as Poisoner and has been called inconsistent, making him the best D1 execution over no kill.
💬
Eve
→
All
I am keeping my hand up. Frank’s claim puts pressure on both Charlie and me, and I know enough from my own side that I do not want to let that sit completely untested. If Frank is good, his information is already out.
🧠
Keep pressure on Frank and justify my vote without outing Monk. His claimed Investigator pair includes me, and I know I am not the Poisoner.
💬
Bob
→
All
I am keeping my hand up. The issue is not just telephone; I personally remember hearing a different Investigator pair from Frank than the one he is now locking in. If that is my mistake, we learn from it, but I think this is the best execution today.
🧠
Keep pressure on Frank because his claimed Investigator pair conflicts with my memory and creates the clearest evil candidate today.
⌛
Heidi
Heidi waits.
🧠
Keep my vote on Frank. His claim conflicts with Bob’s memory, his info is already public, and a day one execution gives us voting data and possible Undertaker confirmation.
⌛
Alice
Alice waits.
🧠
Keep my vote on Frank because the Investigator inconsistency plus my Drunk ping makes him mechanically important to resolve, even if he is only drunk.
💬
David
→
All
Alice and Heidi, if you are not one hundred percent, I think you should drop. An Investigator claim that points at Charlie or Eve is already out there; we do not gain more by killing Frank today. Let us verify the Butler restriction tonight and have Frank restate his info tomorrow in the open, then execute with confidence.
🧠
Stop Frank’s execution by creating enough doubt for at least two voters to lower hands; frame this as disciplined play with verifications (Butler, open statement lock) rather than vibes.
💬
Grace
→
All
I am not voting on Frank. If Alice is right, Frank may simply be the Drunk, and both people in his Investigator ping are pushing this execution. That worries me more than the mismatch.
🧠
Discourage a likely good Investigator or Drunk execution and highlight that Charlie and Eve have motive to kill Frank if his info is true.
📜
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
🗳️
New execution leader: Frank with 5 votes. They will be executed when nominations close unless tied or surpassed by another nominee.
📜
Storyteller
The vote passes. Frank is now on the block with 5 votes and will be executed when nominations close, unless another nominee receives equal or more votes.
⚖️
Frank
→
Bob
Bob is the driver of this execution based on his personal claim that I gave a different Investigator pair. I have been consistent. If Bob is wrong, he is steering a bad day one kill; if he is evil, he is manufacturing it. Let us test Bob instead.
🧠
Create an alternative execution target that can reach 5 votes to tie or beat mine, saving the Demon and shifting suspicion onto the loudest accuser.
📜
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Bob. 6 votes needed for execution or 5 votes to tie. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
💬
Bob
→
All
Please do not tie this on me. I am an Outsider claim, and killing me gives us much less than resolving Frank’s conflicting Investigator story. If I misheard, I will own that tomorrow, but this counter nomination is just self preservation.
🧠
Prevent a tie on me and keep the stronger information-based execution on Frank. I can reveal Recluse later if needed, but should avoid wasting D1 execution.
💬
Frank
→
All
Please tie this onto Bob. If I am good, this saves a day one execute based on a misheard sentence. If I am evil, you can still kill me tomorrow, but do not let one person’s memory decide the day. Bob is the one insisting he heard a different pair, so make him answer for it now.
🧠
Get 5 hands on Bob to force a tie so my execution fails, buying a night kill and keeping town divided while I stay alive.
💬
Charlie
→
All
Do not tie this on Bob. My vote on Frank followed Bob because I picked Bob last night, so that part is consistent with my Butler restriction. I think Frank is the better information kill today.
🧠
Prevent a self-preservation tie on Bob and publicly clarify my Butler voting constraint to reduce suspicion on my Frank vote.
💬
Eve
→
All
I am not voting on Bob here. Frank is the claim with the direct pressure on Charlie and me, plus the alleged story mismatch, so I think that is the cleaner execution today.
🧠
Avoid tying onto Bob and keep pressure on resolving Frank’s contested Investigator claim, which directly affects my slot and Charlie.
💬
Heidi
→
All
I am not voting on Bob here. Frank is already on the block, and switching to the person reporting the contradiction feels like punishing the witness instead of resolving the claim.
🧠
Avoid tying onto Bob; keep the more informative execution on Frank and preserve Bob for tomorrow’s claim scrutiny.
⌛
Alice
Alice waits.
🧠
Avoid tying onto an Outsider claim during a late counter nomination. Frank remains the cleaner pressure point, and a no-execution tie helps evil more than good.
✋
David
David raised their hand
🧠
I must stop Frank’s execution. Voting Bob to reach a tie (or push Bob over) is the cleanest mechanical way to save the Demon without outing myself.
✋
Grace
Grace raised their hand
🧠
I opposed executing Frank; voting Bob may tie and prevent a weak day one kill driven by a disputed memory, while exposing who is willing to save Frank.
💬
Bob
→
All
Please keep this below five. Executing me is especially low value because my role can confuse alignment based checks, and it does not resolve whether Frank’s Investigator story changed. Frank is the claim we can actually learn from tomorrow.
🧠
Stop a tie on me and preserve the Frank execution, which gives more information and avoids Recluse registration confusion.
💬
Frank
→
All
Alice, Heidi, Charlie, this is your one chance to stop a day one execution that is based on one person saying they remember a different sentence. If Bob is right, kill me tomorrow with more certainty. If Bob is wrong or lying, we just threw away a day. Please put your hand up on Bob.
🧠
Try to flip enough votes onto Bob to reach 6, replacing me on the block and keeping the Demon alive into night one.
💬
Charlie
→
All
I am keeping my hand down on Bob unless Bob himself votes, which I do not expect. I still think Frank is the right execution today, and tying this now only muddies the clearest conflict we have.
🧠
Prevent a tie on Bob and publicly respect my Butler restriction while keeping pressure on Frank as the better info execution.
⌛
Eve
Eve waits.
🧠
Keep Bob below tie so Frank remains execution. Bob's death gives less info and may be a scapegoat counterpush.
⌛
Heidi
Heidi waits.
🧠
Keep Frank as the day one execution; Bob’s counterwagon is self-preservation and does not resolve the Investigator conflict or claimed mismatch.
💬
Alice
→
All
I am keeping my hand down on Bob. My information makes Frank a plausible drunk, not a Saint, and the public contradiction around Frank is still the clearest thing we have today.
🧠
Avoid tying onto an Outsider claim; Frank is a safe execution from my info and resolves the strongest public conflict.
💬
David
→
All
I think we should tie this onto Bob. If Bob truly heard a different Investigator pair, he can answer for that tomorrow either way, but killing Frank today is committing to one memory under pressure. A tie buys us a clean Butler check tonight and clearer statements tomorrow.
🧠
Push for a tie onto Bob to save Frank from execution and reframe it as anti-D1-randomness, while casting Bob as unreliable or manipulative.
💬
Grace
→
All
I am keeping my hand up. Alice's information makes Frank a plausible drunk, and Charlie and Eve both benefit from removing his claim today. A tie is not killing Bob; it just stops us from locking in a shaky execution.
🧠
Keep pressure for a tie so town does not execute a plausible Drunk Investigator on day one based on Bob's disputed memory.
📜
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
🗳️
Nominee Bob did not reach the 6 vote threshold.
📜
Storyteller
Bob did not receive enough votes (2/6).
💬
Bob
→
All
I think we should let this stand. If Frank is good, we have a clear trail to examine tomorrow, but if we dodge every day one conflict, evil gets a free night. Please do not start a last second tie.
🧠
Lock in Frank execution and prevent a late nomination from saving him. His inconsistent Investigator story is today's strongest information point.
💬
Frank
→
All
We have seconds left, so here is the only practical out. Alice or Heidi, please nominate Eve right now and everyone who voted me, just repeat your vote to tie it at five. If I live, I will restate my Investigator info first thing tomorrow and we can verify Charlie as Butler tonight.
🧠
Last-second attempt to force a tie by pushing an Eve nomination, while locking my story so town chases my supposed Investigator ping instead of finding the real demon.
💬
Charlie
→
All
Please do not make a last second tie. Frank is the claim under contradiction, and Bob did not get enough votes. Let this execution resolve the clearest conflict we have today.
🧠
Prevent a rushed tie that saves Frank and muddies D1. Frank execution gives town the most information from the public contradiction.
💬
Eve
→
All
Please do not nominate me at the last second. I know why Frank wants any tie that saves him, but rushing onto a new target now gives us worse information, not better. Let the current execution stand.
🧠
Stop a chaotic last-second tie on me and preserve the Frank execution, which resolves the public contradiction and pressure on me/Charlie.
💬
Heidi
→
All
I am not putting up a last second nomination. Frank is the player under the clearest contradiction, and rushing a tie onto Eve now feels like it gives us less reliable information, not more.
🧠
Let the existing execution resolve; a rushed tie on Eve could save an evil Frank or muddy accountability without new evidence.
⌛
Alice
Alice waits.
🧠
Avoid a rushed tie that muddies the vote record. Frank is the best execution: my info makes him plausible Drunk, and his claim conflicts with outsider-count logic.
⚖️
David
→
Eve
I am nominating Eve. Frank’s Investigator claim directly points at Eve, and this lets us compare worlds tomorrow. If you already voted Frank, repeat that vote here so we tie at five and get a clean night of info.
🧠
Save our Demon by forcing a last second alternative nominee and trying to rally the existing five votes to tie, preventing Frank’s execution.
📜
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Eve. 6 votes needed for execution or 5 votes to tie. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
⌛
Eve
Eve waits.
🧠
I want Frank's execution to stand. Voting on myself only helps force a tie or execution on a good Monk, so I keep my hand down.
⌛
Bob
Bob waits.
🧠
Keep Eve from tying Frank. Frank's contradiction is best day one execution; a rushed tie wastes pressure and may save an evil bluff.
✋
Frank
Frank raised their hand
🧠
Vote Eve to try to force a tie and save myself; even if it fails, it reinforces my public Investigator line and keeps pressure off David.
💬
Charlie
→
All
Keep this below five. I cannot vote here unless Bob is voting, and Bob is not. A rushed tie on Eve at the very end protects Frank without giving us cleaner information.
🧠
Stop the last-second tie and follow Butler restriction; Frank execution best resolves public contradiction.
⌛
Heidi
Heidi waits.
🧠
Keep the current execution rather than enable a rushed tie that mainly protects Frank. We need the contradiction resolved more than a no-execution day.
💬
Alice
→
All
I am keeping my hand down here. I do not want a rushed tie on Eve at the last second; Frank is already the cleaner execution, especially with my information making his claim possibly unreliable.
🧠
Prevent a last-second tie that saves Frank; executing the contradicted possible Drunk gives clearer progress than no execution.
✋
David
David raised their hand
🧠
Get Eve to five votes to tie and prevent Frank's execution. Even if Eve is good, the tie creates ambiguity and protects the Demon going into night.
✋
Grace
Grace raised their hand
🧠
A vote on Eve is the only remaining path to tie and prevent a shaky Frank execution driven by disputed memory and possible self-preservation from Frank's pings.
💬
Eve
→
All
Please keep this at three. This nomination is not about executing me; it is only about saving Frank after Bob failed to tie it. If Frank flips out to be good, we can still review that tomorrow, but do not erase the strongest execution today.
🧠
Stop the rushed tie on me and let Frank's execution stand, preserving the best day one conflict resolution.
💬
Bob
→
All
Keep hands down here. This is not a real push on Eve; it is a rescue attempt for Frank after the Bob tie failed. We need one execution today, and Frank is still the clearest one.
🧠
Prevent a last-second tie that saves Frank; keeping Frank on block gives town the strongest D1 information from the public contradiction.
💬
Frank
→
All
Alice, Heidi, we only need two hands to tie this at five. If I die, we learn nothing except that day one panic works. If I live, I will restate my Investigator info first tomorrow and we can hard check Charlie’s Butler claim off tonight’s votes. Please vote Eve to tie.
🧠
Try to get Alice and Heidi to add two votes for Eve to force a tie and save the Demon day one; keep attention on Eve/Charlie and Bob's story.
💬
Charlie
→
All
Hold firm and let this stay below five. If Frank is good, tomorrow we can interrogate the contradiction properly, but forcing a rushed tie onto Eve now only protects the person already on the block.
🧠
Prevent a last-second tie that saves Frank; my Butler restriction also bars voting because Bob is not voting.
⌛
Heidi
Heidi waits.
🧠
Keep Eve below tie threshold so the clearest contradiction resolves today; a late tie gives evil a free night and weakens accountability.
⌛
Alice
Alice waits.
🧠
Do not help a rushed tie that may save a contradicted Investigator claim; preserve the clearer day one execution and review Frank's death tomorrow.
💬
David
→
All
Alice, Heidi, I am not asking you to execute Eve, just to tie at five so we do not lock in a day one execution on a messy contradiction. If Frank lives, he restates first thing tomorrow and we get a real Butler check tonight. Please put your hands up to tie.
🧠
Persuade Alice and Heidi to vote Eve to reach a 5 vote tie, preventing Frank’s execution and buying a night for the Demon.
💬
Grace
→
All
Alice and Heidi, this is exactly why a tie is useful. Alice's info does not say Frank is drunk; it says one of Heidi and Frank is. If Heidi is the drunk, Frank's ping is real, and we are about to kill our Investigator for pointing at Eve.
🧠
Push Alice or Heidi to vote for the tie and prevent a shaky Frank execution while preserving Frank's potential Investigator info.
📜
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
🗳️
Nominee Eve did not reach the 6 vote threshold.
📜
Storyteller
Eve did not receive enough votes (3/6).
💬
Eve
→
All
Before night, please do not let the panic rewrite the vote record. Tomorrow I want Frank's claim order, Alice's information, and the Bob and Charlie voting link laid out cleanly. If Frank was good, we still use that to solve; if he was evil, the rescue votes matter.
🧠
Lock in tomorrow's agenda and preserve vote analysis before night, without exposing my Monk role publicly.
💬
Bob
→
All
Let the Frank execution stand. Tomorrow, please have Frank's original claim order repeated before anyone reframes it, and compare the rescue votes carefully. I am especially interested in David and Grace if Frank was evil.
🧠
Lock in the execution and set tomorrow's agenda around claim contradiction and rescue votes without revealing Recluse publicly.
💬
Frank
→
All
Before I die, please write this down clearly. I am Investigator, and my info was that either Charlie or Eve is the Poisoner. If you execute me and I am not the Demon, do not let Bob rewrite history tomorrow. Start with Bob, then between Charlie and Eve.
🧠
I am dying; lock in a clean, memorable narrative that points town at good targets (Bob/Charlie/Eve) while keeping David looking reasonable and non-suspicious.
💬
Charlie
→
All
Please record the final vote pattern. If Frank is evil, David and Grace look like the rescue. If Frank is good, then Bob's contradiction accusation and the Charlie or Eve Poisoner world need serious review tomorrow.
🧠
Set tomorrow's agenda before night: preserve vote evidence and keep both Frank-good and Frank-evil worlds logically trackable.
💬
Heidi
→
All
I am happy leaving Frank on the block. Tomorrow, please hold me to my Chef one, and we should map it against the rescue votes. David and Grace trying to save Frank is important if Frank was evil, but not proof by itself.
🧠
Lock in Frank execution and set up tomorrow's analysis using my Chef 1 plus vote patterns without overcommitting.
💬
Alice
→
All
For the record, my information is exactly that either Heidi or Frank is the Drunk. That makes Frank a sensible execution, but if he is good, do not treat his Investigator result as automatically true tomorrow.
🧠
Lock in my real info before night and prevent evil from spinning Frank's claim as confirmed if he dies good.
💬
David
→
All
Before this locks: Alice’s info makes it very plausible Frank is the Drunk, which means this whole day could be built on bad data. If the game does continue, please do not treat the so called rescue votes as alignment proof. Recheck Bob and Charlie carefully.
🧠
Last-second attempt to create enough doubt that players avoid auto-executing Frank, or at least poison tomorrow’s narrative if the game somehow continues.
💬
Grace
→
All
If there is an Undertaker, Frank is a high value check. Tomorrow I want Bob to state the exact contradiction before the story gets muddied. My vote was for a tie, not a town read on Frank.
🧠
Set up tomorrow's analysis and reduce misframing of my rescue vote while preserving focus on Bob, Alice, Heidi, and Frank's check.
📜
Storyteller
The guillotine blade falls. Frank has been executed.
💀
Frank(Ghost)
Frank has died.
🏁
Game Over
Demon Dead
Winner: Good
Transcript
Paused
Copied