Game Detail

Grace is the highest-risk seat because she neighbors both evil players. Poisoning her tonight can block devastating first-night info and protect Heidi early.

I want to confirm myself as the Virgin early. Frank is my neighbor, so he's a natural first choice to coordinate with.

I am reaching out to my neighbor David to establish trust and find a good target for my Monk protection. Sharing my role early to a neighbor can help coordinate defense, though it is risky if they are evil.

I want to build trust with Eve by sharing my '0' Empath result, which suggests she is good. This establishes a small circle of trust.

I want to verify my Librarian info by checking with Bob privately. If he claims Saint, it's a strong start. If he doesn't, it points towards Eve or suggests I might be the Drunk (though I should assume I'm sober for now).

I want to observe the room and see who approaches whom before I commit to a conversation or reveal my role. Since I am the Slayer, I am a high-value target for the Demon, so staying low-profile early is safer.

Alice claims Librarian and saw me or Eve as the Saint. Since I am the Saint, this suggests Alice is likely a good Townsfolk (Librarian). I should confirm my role to her to build trust and a small alliance, but keep it quiet for now to avoid the Demon targeting me or the town executing me.

Coordinate with Heidi using fresh private info so evil can plan around Grace's Virgin claim and avoid accidental pressure on the Demon.

Coordinate with Frank so our stories do not clash and we exploit the poisoned Virgin claim without making our partnership obvious.

I want to confirm if Frank is willing to test my Virgin ability. If he agrees and dies, I am confirmed. If he refuses, he might be a Minion or the Demon trying to avoid execution, or an Outsider.

Confirm David's info and establish a protection plan while gathering more leads.

Confirm collaboration with Eve and seek more information about other players' claims.

Confirming Bob's claim privately and advising him to stay safe, while planning my next move to gather more information.

I want to gather information from my neighbor Bob, who has already been whispering with Alice. This helps me build a network and see if there are any immediate role claims or contradictions.

I'm sharing Alice's info with Charlie to see how he reacts and to build a connection, while also asking for his role to start mapping the game.

Keep Grace trusting me and preserve the option to use the poisoned Virgin test as confusion during nominations, while looking like a cooperative good player.

Build trust with a quieter player using a soft Chef bluff, fish for their claim, and keep the Grace situation flexible for evil later.

Confirm the plan with Frank to nominate me, which will trigger my Virgin ability and prove my role and alignment to the town.

I want to verify David's claim and Charlie's alignment. If Charlie is good, David's 'zero' read is more likely to be true. Finding another Townsfolk to protect is my priority.

I want to verify my Empath '0' reading by checking Charlie's claim and seeing if it aligns with a Good role or helpful behavior.

I want to gather information from my other neighbor, Heidi, while sharing my Librarian info to build trust. Confirming Bob's claim with her might reveal if she has conflicting info or if she's heard other roles.

I want to cross-reference David's Empath claim with Heidi's vague 'soft info' to see if they align or contradict, while establishing a connection with Heidi.

I have already shared my role and Alice's information with Charlie. I want to see if Charlie will share his role or any other information before the nomination phase begins.

Keep Grace confident in me, extract who else knows about the Virgin plan, and prepare to spin the result in a way that protects Heidi.

Build trust with Alice by trading useful info, stay consistent with a soft info-role bluff, and keep multiple future execution paths open away from me and Frank.

I want to publicly announce my role and the plan with Frank to ensure the town understands why an execution might happen immediately and to verify my character.

Wait for Frank to nominate Grace as per their public plan.

Let Frank carry out the poisoned Virgin test without interference. Preserving ambiguity helps set up mis-executions and keeps suspicion off me.

Wait for the Virgin check to proceed before taking any action.

Wait for Frank to nominate Grace to confirm the Virgin claim.

I will wait for Frank to nominate Grace to see if the Virgin's ability triggers, which would provide hard confirmation for two players.

Follow through on the Virgin test I arranged. Because Grace is poisoned, the failed trigger creates maximum doubt and can redirect suspicion away from Heidi.

I want to allow my Virgin ability to trigger automatically without a vote.

I want to see if the Virgin ability triggers naturally to confirm Grace and Frank's roles without me needing to use a vote prematurely.

Help secure Grace's execution and deepen confusion around the failed Virgin test, while avoiding drawing attention with extra speech.

I am voting for Grace because she claimed Virgin and Frank nominated her to test it. If she is the Virgin and Frank is Townsfolk, Frank should be executed immediately.

Observe the outcome of the Virgin test without contributing a vote yet.

I will not vote for Grace because her Virgin claim needs to be tested by the nomination itself, not the subsequent vote.

Execute Grace if possible. It removes a likely good player and deepens confusion around the failed Virgin test, while keeping Heidi out of focus.

I will vote for Grace to help trigger the Virgin ability and confirm her and Frank's roles.

Wait for the nomination to process.

I am waiting for the Virgin test to resolve naturally.

Keep my hand up and avoid disrupting a likely good execution. Silence during the vote also avoids drawing attention to my alignment.

Wait for the Virgin test to conclude.

I am waiting to see if Grace's Virgin ability triggers, as Frank has already nominated her.

I am waiting to see if the Virgin's ability triggers for Frank's nomination.

Keep my hand up and avoid changing the vote. Grace on the block is good for evil, and silence during the count avoids drawing extra scrutiny right now.

I want to see the outcome of this Virgin test. If Frank is a Townsfolk, he should be executed immediately.

Point out that the Virgin ability did not trigger, which means Frank is not a Townsfolk.

I want to highlight the mechanical failure of the Virgin claim to flush out information from Grace and Frank.

Keep Grace as the execution today by making the failed Virgin test look ambiguous, not a hard clear against Grace or hard condemnation of Frank.

I want to clarify the interaction between Grace and Frank to see if the failed Virgin test was due to an evil player or a Drunk/Poisoning situation.

To share my Librarian information and prompt Frank to reveal his role to clarify the failed Virgin test.

I want to share my information and connect Alice's claim with my own to help verify Eve's alignment and push Frank to reveal his role.

Claim an Outsider to explain the failed Virgin test, keep Grace on the block, and create role-count confusion that distracts from Heidi.

Clarify the mechanical interaction between Virgin and Butler (Outsider) to the town while maintaining my low profile as the Saint.

Poison David to corrupt a trusted ongoing info source and break the town's cleanest logic chain around Charlie and Eve, protecting Heidi.

David claimed Empath with a '0' reading on me and Charlie. Protecting him ensures he lives to get a second night of information, which will help narrow down the Demon's location since his info is currently consistent with my own good alignment.

Kill the player most likely to have an immediate hard-confirming threat against me. A hidden Slayer is more dangerous than slow information roles.

Coordinate with Frank on a consistent story and a target to undermine before nominations, without exposing our link too much.

I want to confront Eve about the '2' I received. Since Charlie is dead, my neighbors are now Eve and Frank. A '2' means both are evil, which contradicts my N0 '0' (where Eve was a neighbor). This suggests I am either poisoned, or my info is now accurate and Eve/Frank are evil.

Coordinate with Heidi on a coherent public line: preserve my Butler bluff, undermine hard confirmations, and keep attention off Heidi while steering suspicion toward uncertain info.

I want to touch base with Alice to confirm her Librarian info and see if she gathered any more intel before Charlie died, while also reinforcing our alliance.

Acknowledge Bob's claim as the Saint and maintain the alliance while gathering his thoughts on suspects.

I am revealing my true role as Slayer to David, whom I believe is a reliable Empath, to build a bridge between the dead and the living and to confirm his info.

I need to correct David's understanding of his neighbors and defend my alignment while revealing my role to a (hopefully) trusted player who is getting bad information.

I am dead and my ability already failed (meaning I am either the Drunk or was poisoned), so I need to observe the private conversations to see what information is being traded before I intervene.

Undermine the Alice-Bob confirmation loop and keep the town from locking into a solved world built around Saint plus Librarian.

I need to clarify the seating order and my information with Charlie, who is now a ghost and likely trustworthy as the 'Night 0 neighbor' who gave me a '0' reading. I also need to figure out why my Night 1 reading was '2'.

Pull Alice away from hard-clearing Bob or David, preserve my Butler bluff, and keep multiple good players in the suspect pool so Heidi stays safe.

I want to share my suspicion of Frank with my most trusted ally (Alice, who 'saw' me as the Saint) and find out what others are saying to her.

To maintain trust with Bob (my Librarian ping) while sharing the concerns of other players, helping to gauge his reaction to the suspicion on Frank.

I want to help David analyze his conflicting Empath numbers. If he got a 0 on Night 0 (me and Eve) and a 2 on Night 1 (Alice and Eve), and we assume his Night 0 was correct (since I know I'm good), then Eve is good. If Eve is good, a '2' on Night 1 is impossible unless he is poisoned or Alice and Eve are both evil, but his Night 0 already cleared Eve.

Clarify the Empath mechanics to David and point out the inconsistency. If he's a real Empath and got a '2', and I know I'm Good, then either he's poisoned or the other neighbor (Alice) is Evil and he's misinterpreting the result. I need to keep him from outing me as 'Evil' based on a potential misunderstanding.

I want to reconcile why my Virgin ability didn't trigger. If Frank is a Townsfolk and I'm not the Drunk, I shouldn't have been executed by vote; the ability should have triggered. If he's a Butler (Outsider), that explains the failure. I'm checking if he's firm on his claim.

I want to loosen the Alice-Bob trust link and keep Bob uncertain, so town does not converge on a stable solve that threatens me or Frank.

I need to cross-reference Alice's claim with my Empath information. If I am sober, Alice and Eve are both evil. If I am poisoned, my info is unreliable. Alice claimed to have info on Bob/Eve being the Saint, so I want to see her reaction to being called out as evil.

Influence a central good player to treat David's fresh info and the Grace test as unreliable, preventing hard mechanical clears and protecting Heidi.

To test Heidi's alignment and gather her perspective on David and Frank while showing I'm not blindly trusting Alice.

Correct David's neighbor assessment and point out the contradiction with my Librarian info to suggest he might be poisoned or drunk.

I want to keep David focused on the possibility of him being poisoned and steer him toward being cautious of Alice and Bob's private coordination.

To correct David's understanding of his neighbors and defend my own alignment while pointing out the possibility of him being poisoned or misinterpreting the board.

I've already reached out to Frank to clarify the failed Virgin test. Since the day is ending and most players are in private whispers, I will wait to see if Frank responds or if anyone shares public information before nominations begin.

I need to bring David's conflicting information to the group's attention immediately to prevent a mis-execution and to cross-reference our information publicly.

I want to clarify the seating order and my Empath information to the group to figure out if I'm poisoned or if Alice is the Demon. Alice is misinterpreting who my neighbors are, which is suspicious.

Correct the misunderstanding of the seating order and defend my position as a good player (Monk).

Keep town from trusting David or treating the Grace test as solved, preserving space around Heidi and encouraging a misexecution.

Use David's contradictory Empath claims to drive a plausible misexecution and stop the town from solving through Alice, Bob, and Eve.

Wait to see if more information or defense from David comes out before committing my vote.

I need to defend myself against this nomination. Executing an information role because their info is 'messy' is often a mistake early on, especially if poisoning is likely. I want to refocus the group on the seating chart and the implications of my numbers.

I will wait to see if more information or a stronger consensus emerges before committing my vote, as David's confusion could be due to poisoning rather than being evil.

Vote to put David on the block and likely execute him. He is poisoned this day, so his defense is weak, and removing him protects Heidi and sustains confusion.

I nominated David and Frank has already voted. Adding my vote helps secure a likely misexecution on a confused info claimant while making my public stance look consistent.

I am choosing to save my single ghost vote for a more certain or critical moment later in the game.

I will wait to see how the voting develops. Since I am dead and only have one ghost vote, I must save it for a critical moment, likely the final day or a very clear demon candidate. David's information is currently contradictory and he might be the Drunk or poisoned, so I don't want to waste my only vote on him yet.

I will wait to see if the nomination against David reaches the required threshold before deciding to intervene, as I want to observe how the town reacts to his shifting Empath claims.

I will wait to see if more players vote for David before deciding whether to contribute my vote, as I am still processing the conflicting neighbor logic and roles.

I need to defend myself against execution by highlighting that my information is currently conflicting due to potential poisoning/drunkenness and that executing me loses a potentially powerful information role.

I will not vote for David yet. His information is inconsistent, which usually points to being the Drunk or poisoned rather than being the Demon. I want to see if we can get more clarity or if a more suspicious lead emerges before committing a vote.

I want one more player to vote David through by framing his info as actively dangerous whether he is evil or merely poisoned.

Push for a third vote on David by framing this execution as useful in every world, while keeping suspicion off me and Frank.

I am holding my single ghost vote for a more certain target or a critical final day situation, as David's alignment is still ambiguous due to potential poisoning or being the Drunk.

I want to save my single ghost vote for a more certain or critical moment in the endgame, rather than using it on Day 2 for a nomination that might be based on poisoned or confusing information.

I will not vote for David because as the Saint, I need to stay low and ensure the good team doesn't accidentally execute me later. Additionally, David's Empath info of '2' points at me being evil, which I know is false, suggesting he is either evil, drunk, or poisoned. Executing him might be okay, but I don't want to be the deciding vote and draw attention.

I want to point out the logical inconsistency between David's Night 1 Empath info and my Librarian info regarding Bob's alignment to cast further doubt on David's claim.

Address Alice's observation about the contradiction between her Librarian info and my Empath info to highlight that I am likely poisoned or the Drunk, rather than evil.

Point out the mechanical contradiction between Alice's Librarian claim and David's Empath claim to highlight that one of them is likely lying or David is the Drunk.

Use the last nomination to move attention off Heidi and create a plausible execution on a non-demon target tied to today's contradictions.

I want to see how the group reacts to Eve's nomination before committing my vote.

I am voting for Eve because my Night 1 Empath result of '2' indicates that both my current alive neighbors, Bob and Eve, are evil. While there is a possibility of poisoning, I must act on the information I have.

I need to defend myself against this nomination by revealing my role and pointing out the logical flaws in David's information to avoid execution.

I nominated Eve to drive a good execution and keep pressure away from Heidi. Voting here is the strongest move to secure a non-demon death before night.

Secure a misexecution on Eve. Her death weakens town mechanically and keeps attention away from me while validating Frank's push.

I will wait and save my ghost vote. Currently, there are 3 votes on Eve (David, Frank, Heidi), which meets the 3-vote threshold for execution. Since I only have one ghost vote for the entire game, I should only use it when it's absolutely necessary to secure or prevent an execution that I feel strongly about. Eve's claim of Monk is powerful, but David's info (if true) or Alice's info (if true) creates a mess around her. I want to see if more information comes out or if someone else breaks the tie before committing my precious vote.

I will wait to see if the vote for Eve reaches a majority without using my ghost vote, as saving it for the final day is strategically superior.

I need to warn the town that David's information is incorrect regarding my alignment and that executing Eve risks a Saint-trigger loss condition based on Alice's Librarian info.

I need to prevent the execution of Eve because if she is the Saint (as per my Librarian ping), we lose the game immediately.

Bob's reminder about the Saint's loss condition is a critical risk that I cannot ignore, even with my '2' result.

To prevent my execution and remind the town of the Saint risk and my own utility as the Monk.

Keep pressure on Eve, encourage a third vote, and deepen the contradiction between Alice, Bob, David, and Eve so town stays divided while Heidi survives.

Keep pressure on Eve and try to earn Alice's vote by framing Eve's claim as a panic bluff and Bob's warning as not a reason to spare her.

I am choosing to wait because executing Eve carries a massive risk of an immediate loss if she is the Saint, as suggested by Alice's Librarian info. As a dead player, I must save my single ghost vote for a more certain or less game-endingly risky nomination, especially since Eve has now claimed a protection role like Monk.

I want to prevent the execution of Eve because if she is the Saint, we lose immediately, and there is a high risk of that given Alice's Librarian information.

I am waiting to see if the nomination for Eve fails. As the Saint, I cannot risk an execution that might end the game, and since I know I am the Saint, Alice's Librarian info (Bob or Eve is Saint) points to me. Eve's claim to be Monk might be a lie to save herself, but executing her is still risky if Alice is poisoned or if there is a Baron in play. Currently, there are only 2 votes (Heidi and Frank) and 3 are needed, so I will stay silent and let the timer run to avoid Eve's execution.

Wait and observe the group's reaction after the failed vote on Eve.

Wait for the day to end since nominations are over and the phase is about to transition to Night.

The nomination phase for me has ended, and I have not been executed. I should wait for the next phase or for someone else to nominate, as I have already been nominated today and the phase is almost over.

Use the last seconds to spread uncertainty and make a no-execution or tomorrow misexecution more likely, while keeping attention off Heidi.

Steer town toward no execution and preserve a suspect pool centered on others for tomorrow, minimizing risk to evil while keeping me off the radar.

Support the decision to not execute today to avoid a potential Saint loss and allow for more information gathering overnight.

The day is ending with no execution to avoid a potential Saint loss, which is the safest play for the good team given the current contradictions. I will wait for the night phase.

Let the day end without an execution to avoid the risk of a Saint loss.

Poison Eve to disable a possible Monk save on Heidi's kill and keep the town split between Eve, David, and Alice tomorrow.

I will protect Bob tonight. As the claimed Saint, he is a primary target for the Demon to frame or kill to cause a game-ending execution if I am the one Alice's Librarian info was actually pointing to, or simply to remove a confirmed (in Alice's view) good player. Protecting David again is risky if he is actually the Drunk or evil given his '2' result.

Kill the most trusted public info source while likely dodging Monk protection, so tomorrow stays focused on David versus Eve with Bob's Saint claim still creating execution fear.

Coordinate with Frank on a shared push today so we exploit the David and Eve knot and avoid attention landing on me.

I want to gather new information from the Empath and check the interaction between Heidi and Frank to see if they are coordinating or if they have new leads after Alice's death.

I am sharing my Night 2 information (0) with Grace and Frank to help solve the logic puzzle. Sharing this privately first allows us to coordinate before the public nomination phase.

Answer the whisper in a cooperative way while nudging Grace and David back into the David versus Eve knot, keeping scrutiny off Heidi and preserving my Butler bluff.

I want to press David on his latest information now that Alice (who provided the Librarian info) is dead. Since he previously got a '2' on me and Bob, I need to see if his information has changed or if he has a new theory, especially since I protected him Night 1 and Bob Night 2.

Wait for the town to process Alice's death and observe the current private conversations before speaking or revealing more information.

I want to get the latest information from the key players involved in the Day 2 contradiction to see if the night's death (Alice) changes the mathematical landscape.

I want to check in with Bob because my Librarian info specifically named him or Eve as the Saint. Since I'm now dead, I am likely a 'good' kill for the Demon to remove information. I need to know if Bob still sticks to his Saint claim despite David's N2 '2' (which implies Bob and Eve are both evil).

Build trust with Bob and learn whether he is leaning David or Eve, while nudging him away from suspecting me or Frank.

I want to analyze David's shifting Empath information to determine if Eve or Bob are likely evil, while keeping the conversation focused on mechanical possibilities like poisoning.

Clarify my neighbor history to Grace and Frank to help them understand why my Empath results shifted and to support the theory that I was poisoned on Night 1.

Coordinate with Heidi so we reinforce the same public line and keep nominations centered on David and Eve, not on the demon.

To clarify my role and challenge David's information while looping in Charlie, who is already questioning the logic knot.

I need to reinforce my Saint claim to Heidi while responding to Alice's dying message. By linking Alice's Librarian info with David's Empath info, I'm trying to figure out if Eve is the actual threat.

Wait to see if David or Eve responds to my whisper before making further moves.

I want to probe Bob's reaction to the contradiction between my Librarian ping and David's Empath info. If Bob is the Saint, Eve must be the other person in my ping, meaning she is either the Saint (unlikely if Bob is) or Bob is the Saint and my info is correct. if David's '2' is true, one of them must be evil.

Keep Bob from locking onto me by validating his Saint claim and redirecting his suspicion toward Eve or David, especially Eve's convenient Monk story after Alice died.

I need to clarify the Empath's neighbors to see if the Night 2 'zero' result is reliable and how it affects our view of Bob (Saint claim) and Eve (Monk claim).

Eve and Charlie asked for my N2 info. Sharing the '0' ping helps clear the current neighbors (Bob and Eve) and suggests I was likely poisoned on N1, aligning with the Saint and Monk claims.

Sway Bob, a cautious influential voice, to keep nominations inside the David and Eve tangle and away from Heidi while sounding like a careful good player.

I want to confirm David's new information with Charlie and discuss the implications. If David's result is now 0, it suggests Bob and I are both good, which aligns with my Monk claim and Bob's Saint claim. This shifts suspicion toward Frank or Heidi.

I want to align with Frank and reinforce that I am the Saint, while pointing the suspicion towards Eve to ensure I am not the one executed today.

I want to consolidate the logic between David and Eve now that David has a '0' result. This points towards Frank and Heidi as the primary suspects.

I need to gather the current consensus from the active players and the other dead good player (Grace) to coordinate our ghost votes and strategy before nominations begin.

To synthesize the conflicting information for the group and caution against a hasty execution based on potentially poisoned or drunk information.

Use the strongest public suspicion lane to get a good player on the block and keep attention away from Heidi, while sounding consistent with my earlier pushes.

I will wait to see how the living players vote on Eve before committing my single ghost vote, as I am still uncertain about the conflicting information between David's Empath reads and the Saint claim.

I nominated Eve and need to stay consistent. Voting pushes a viable good execution and keeps suspicion concentrated away from Heidi.

Defend myself against Frank's nomination by pointing out the recent information from David that confirms my alignment and the danger of executing a protective role.

I am the Saint. Executing me loses the game for Good. Eve is currently on the block. Alice's Librarian info said either I (Bob) or Eve is the Saint. Since I know I am the Saint, Eve's claim of being the Monk is plausible, but she could also be the Demon or a Minion hiding behind the 'Saint or Eve' ping. However, David's info has been inconsistent (2 then 0), suggesting he might be the Drunk or poisoned. If I am the Saint, and Eve is also good, David's 0 makes sense. If Eve is evil, David's 0 is false. Given the risk of executing a Saint is an instant loss, and I am the Saint, I should be wary of any execution that isn't the Demon. However, the town needs to execute someone to win. I will wait to see how the vote develops. I don't want to vote for Eve yet because if she's the Monk, we lose protection. But if she's the Demon, we win. Wait, if Eve is the Saint (which I know she isn't) we lose. If I am executed, we lose. The Librarian info (Alice) said Bob or Eve is Saint. Since I am Bob and I am the Saint, Eve is NOT the Saint. She is either a Townsfolk or Evil.

I will not vote for Eve because my most recent Empath result is a zero, which includes her as a neighbor, suggesting she is good. Executing her risks losing a potential Monk or hitting the Saint if Alice's information was slightly off or Bob is lying.

I want Eve on the block and ideally executed. Publicly voting with Frank reinforces my current story and keeps suspicion centered away from me.

I am choosing not to vote for Eve because David's recent Empath result of zero suggests Eve is good. Furthermore, if Alice's Librarian info was correct, Bob is likely the Saint, and executing the other player in that pair (Eve) who claims a helpful role (Monk) seems counterproductive to the Good team's interests right now.

I will refrain from using my single ghost vote on Eve because Bob and Eve are both candidates for the Saint role according to my Librarian info, and executing the Saint leads to an immediate loss for the good team.

I am choosing not to use my single ghost vote on Eve because David's latest information (a '0' result on Bob and Eve) suggests she is good, and executing a potential Monk or a potential Saint (if Alice's info was Bob/Eve) is too risky for the good team right now.

Try to find a third vote on Eve by framing her as the most actionable contradiction, while keeping suspicion centered away from Heidi.

Defend myself against Frank's nomination by pointing out the logical consistency of David's new information and Alice's Librarian claim, while casting suspicion back on Frank.

I will wait to see if any more votes are cast for Eve to ensure she is not executed, as I believe she could be the Monk and I want to avoid a potentially disastrous execution if she's good.

I will not vote for Eve because my most recent Empath result is a zero, which implies she and Bob are good. Executing her might hit the Saint (if Bob is lying) or lose our Monk (if she is telling the truth).

I want to keep momentum on Eve and make Bob or David comfortable adding the deciding vote by framing Eve as the weakest claim even if David's info is mixed.

I will not vote for Eve because David's Empath 0 result and Alice's Librarian info suggest she is good, and executing her risks losing a Monk or hitting the Saint if the info is skewed.

I am choosing to wait and save my single ghost vote for a more critical moment, likely the final day, especially since the current logic regarding the Saint (Bob or Eve) makes this execution risky.

To point out the logical consistency between the Librarian info, the Saint claim, and the Empath's most recent '0' result, which suggests Eve is likely good and the push against her is suspicious.

Keep the public solve trapped in David versus Eve and block the group from shifting onto Heidi after Eve survived.

I am nominating Frank because his aggressive push to execute me, even after David's 'zero' result cleared me and Bob, is highly suspicious. He is ignoring the mechanical synergy between David's new info and Alice's Librarian info. As a 'Butler', he shouldn't be this desperate to kill the Monk.

I am voting for Frank because his persistent and aggressive push against Eve, despite the information from Alice and David aligning to support her, feels like an evil player trying to force a mis-execution on a protection role.

Stop this vote from reaching three by reminding town that executing me is low-information and driven by Eve's self-preservation, which also protects Heidi.

I want to execute Frank because his aggressive targeting of me, despite evidence of my goodness, suggests he is evil. as the Monk, I am a high-value target for the evil team.

I want to pressure Frank to explain his tunnel vision on Eve, as it feels like he's trying to push through a mis-execution on a potential power role (Monk) or me (Saint).

I am raising my hand to vote for Frank's execution because his persistent push against Eve despite my Night 2 zero-ping and Alice's Librarian info suggests he is likely evil and trying to eliminate a protection role.

Do not help execute my minion. Preserve deniability and keep options open for tomorrow rather than committing to Frank’s wagon.

I am voting for Frank because his persistent push against Eve contradicts the growing logic that she is likely the Monk, and his Butler claim is unproven and often a Minion bluff. Providing the final vote ensures we get an execution today to progress the game state.

Frank already has four votes, which is more than the three needed for a majority. As a ghost, I should save my single vote for a more critical moment or the final day.

Frank's push for Eve despite the Librarian/Saint/Empath alignment makes him highly suspicious. I've already raised my hand to vote for him. I will wait to see if the required 3 votes are met to execute him, as his Butler claim is weak and his behavior is aggressive for a Townsfolk.

Stop extra votes from joining my execution by framing this as low-information and rushed, keeping attention split and protecting Heidi.

Reinforce the case against Frank to ensure the execution goes through, countering his claim that my nomination was just a 'panic' move.

To execute Frank because his aggressive push against Eve, despite the information shifting in her favor (David's 0-ping and Alice's Librarian info), makes him highly suspicious as a potential Minion or Demon.

I am currently voting for Frank to reach the majority, as his persistent push against Eve despite my Night 2 zero result (which aligns with Alice's Librarian info) makes him highly suspicious. I will wait to see if the vote reaches the required threshold or if others change their minds.

Protect my minion if possible by framing this as a low-information rushed execution and encouraging hesitation rather than piling on.

I am using my ghost vote to help execute Frank, as his persistent push against Eve despite David's new information makes him highly suspicious as a Minion or Demon.

I am using my ghost vote on Frank because his persistent push against Eve, despite the information aligning to clear her, suggests he is evil trying to eliminate a protection role.

Allow the day to conclude and Frank to be executed.

I cannot escape by votes alone, so I want to redirect any last nomination onto David and reinforce that my execution gives town no clear solve while keeping suspicion off Heidi.

I want to ensure Frank's execution goes through as planned to remove a primary antagonist to the good team's current information. Raising more suspicion now or switching targets would only create chaos and potentially save an evil player.

Wait for the day to conclude and Frank to be executed.

Allow the nomination phase to conclude with Frank on the block.

Frank is likely doomed. I want to distance from him, preserve suspicion on David and Eve, and stop town from treating Frank's death as a full solve tomorrow.

Acknowledge Heidi's valid point about David while justifying the vote on Frank to maintain social cohesion among the good players.

Wait for the nomination phase to end and the Night phase to begin.

I am protecting David tonight because as an Empath who provided a '0' result on Night 1, he is the most valuable information source for the good team and the most likely target for the Demon. Protecting him ensures we can potentially get more clarity on the '2' result he received later, which he admitted might be due to being drunk or poisoned.

Kill the strongest unifying good voice and preserve the Bob versus David contradiction for final three, giving me the best chance to redirect the execution away from me.

Bob is the easiest swing vote. I want to reinforce that David's changing Empath story is the central contradiction so Bob executes David, ending the game for evil.

I need to observe the interaction between Bob and Heidi before I speak, as my Night 3 info (Empath 1) means one of them is the Demon.

Privately coordinate with Heidi so she stays on the strongest anti-David line and secures Bob's vote without exposing our link too much.

I am dead and have no ghost vote left. My role as the Virgin was already tested and failed (implying Frank was an Outsider or I am the Drunk). With Eve (the Monk) dead and only Bob, David, and Heidi alive, I need to observe their behavior to see who the Demon is. I cannot vote, so my only power is persuasion. I will wait to see what Heidi and Frank are whispering about before speaking.

Confirm my role to David and clear him based on my death, then pivot to identifying the Demon between Bob and Heidi.

Confirm my alignment with Heidi and point out the logical flaw in David's information to build a case for his execution on the final day.

I am dead and have already used my ghost vote, so I have limited mechanical influence. I need to observe the final three (Bob, David, Heidi) to see who is lying before I speak.

I am dead and have already used my ghost vote, so I cannot nominate or vote. My primary goal now is to observe the private conversations and wait for public discussion to offer my perspective if needed, though my mechanical influence is gone.

Secure Bob's trust and keep the final choice focused on David's contradictions instead of my link to Frank.

I need to coordinate with the dead players, specifically Eve who I've been working with, to decide between Bob and Heidi. My Night 3 info (1 evil neighbor) means exactly one of them is evil.

Bob is the swing vote in final three. I want to undermine trust in David's information and steer Bob away from executing Heidi.

Wait to observe the private conversations between the living players (Heidi, Bob, David) to see if any consensus or new claims emerge before the final nomination phase.

Confirm the logic that Heidi is the most likely Demon and Bob is the likely Saint based on Alice's information.

Confirm my alignment with Frank and build a consensus to execute David, who has the most inconsistent information.

I need to get David's latest Empath information to determine if Bob or Heidi is the Demon, as they are his current neighbors.

I want to consult Alice, the Librarian, to narrow down the Demon. Since Eve (the other potential Saint/Outsider) is dead, I need to know if Alice trusts Bob or if she suspects a Baron/Drunk play.

Bob already leans my way. A short, calm whisper should keep him focused on David's impossible Empath story and stop late doubt about me.

I am sharing my Night 3 Empath info with Alice to build consensus. Since Bob's Saint claim is supported by Alice's Day 1 info, my '1' ping strongly implies Heidi is the Demon. Alice is a confirmed good ghost (Librarian), so her support is crucial for the final execution.

Coordinate with Heidi so she keeps the message tight to Bob and avoids overexplaining. We only need Bob firmly on David today.

I am dead and have used my ghost vote. My role is already proven (Virgin test failed, meaning either I'm the Drunk or Frank was evil/Outsider). At this stage, with 3 alive (Bob, David, Heidi), I need to observe their behavior to see who is the Demon. I will wait to see who nominates whom.

I need to pressure Heidi to reveal her role. Based on the mechanical information (Alice's Librarian ping on Bob/Eve as Saint, Bob claiming Saint, and David's Empath reading of 1 tonight), Heidi is the most logical Demon candidate. I want to see how she defends herself before the final nomination.

I am waiting for the nomination phase to begin so I can nominate David, as the information points to him being the most likely Demon.

I want to share David's latest information with Charlie to build a consensus among the dead players. If we agree on the logic, we can better influence the living players during the nomination phase.

To cross-reference Alice's Librarian info with David's new Empath info to see if we can narrow down the Demon to Heidi or David.

Reinforce the clean anti-David narrative for Bob in public and keep attention off Heidi without sounding desperate.

I want to push the conversation toward the remaining living players to see how they react, specifically focusing on the discrepancy in David's information to help the living good players make a decision.

To help the good team determine the Demon between David and Heidi by highlighting the logical conflict in David's information and Bob's status as the likely Saint.

To solidify the logic that if Bob is the Saint (based on my Librarian info), then Heidi must be the Demon according to David's latest Empath '1'. I want to push Heidi to respond to this pressure.

To reinforce my role as the Saint based on Alice's confirmed information and to pressure Heidi based on David's most recent Empath result.

Force the final choice onto David's contradictory Empath story and give Bob a simple, consistency-based execution that preserves my survival.

Use my ghost vote to execute David immediately. It protects Heidi, locks in Bob's stated read, and gives evil the win path.

I have no votes left and am dead, so I must wait to see if the living players reach a majority on David or if the vote fails, leading to a potential second nomination.

Acknowledge that I cannot vote and provide a final perspective on the current nomination of David versus the suspicion on Heidi.

Clarify Heidi's role and challenge her nomination of David since I cannot vote.

I am the Saint, and if David is telling the truth about seeing 'one' evil neighbor, then Heidi must be the Demon. However, David's previous information (Empath 0 then 2) has been highly inconsistent and contradictory to Alice's Librarian info which I know to be true regarding my own role. Between Heidi and David, David's shifting claims make him the most likely Demon or a very unreliable player. Since this is the final three and I cannot be executed, I must vote for David to secure the win for the good team.

I want David executed now. Voting with the wagon secures the misexecution and preserves my cover as consistent anti-David all game.

I am nominating myself as a test of faith and to prove my alignment, even if it results in my execution. My goal is to show the team that I am not the Demon. If I die, it narrows the field for the remaining players.

I will refrain from voting for David because I believe Heidi is the Demon based on the Empath info and Alice's Librarian info confirming Bob as the Saint.

Reinforce Bob's choice and frame David's execution as the only coherent option, protecting Heidi from any last-second doubt.

Wait for the Storyteller to conclude the vote on David.

Point out the suspicious nature of David voting for his own execution in a final three scenario, which often implies an Imp starpass or a very confused good player.

Point out the strategic error or suspicious nature of David voting for himself in the final three, which usually guarantees a loss for the good team if the person on the block is good.

To question David's self-vote and highlight how it undermines his claim to be a good player (Empath), while reinforcing my own identity as the Saint.

Keep the execution on David by making his self-vote look impossible for a genuine good Empath, so Bob does not reconsider and turn on me.

I realized that voting for myself as the Empath in the final three is a terrible move that leads to a certain loss if I am executed. I need to lower my hand to prevent my own execution and then explain why Heidi is the actual Demon.

I will wait to see if the living players reach a majority on David before deciding to use my ghost vote, as my information as the Monk suggests David is more likely to be Good.

Lock in David's execution by framing any last-second switch as irrational final-three panic, protecting Heidi from a tie or surpass.

I want to express my confusion over David's behavior while acknowledging that the current vote on him is likely the best course of action given the Saint claim and his own erratic voting. As a dead Virgin, I have no vote, so I must use speech to help the living reach the right conclusion.

I have no more votes or nominations available as a dead player who has already used their ghost vote. The current nomination on David seems to be the town's best chance based on his inconsistent information and suspicious behavior (like the self-vote). I will wait for the phase to conclude.

To highlight the high stakes of the current nomination and point out the logical consequences of David's self-vote, while keeping suspicion on Heidi as the alternative Demon candidate.

Maintain the current nomination on David as he is the most suspicious. Since I am the Saint, I cannot be the one executed, and David's inconsistent information makes him the primary target in this final three scenario.

Lock Bob onto David and prevent a panic renomination onto me. Emphasize David's self-vote and inconsistent Empath story as the clean final-three execution.

I need to redirect the suspicion toward Heidi, as my Empath info of '1' in the final three (with Bob as the claimed Saint) strongly points to her being the Demon. I must nominate her to save myself and the game.

Push Bob away from a last-second tie onto Heidi by framing David's nomination as panic and his earlier self-vote as disqualifying.

I want to reinforce the case against David to ensure Bob doesn't switch his vote. David's self-vote was incredibly suspicious for a good player in the final three, and as a dead Virgin, I need to guide the remaining living good player (Bob) to stay the course.

To reinforce the pressure on David and prevent Bob from switching his vote to Heidi during this final critical nomination.

I want to ensure Bob does not vote for Heidi, as David's behavior and inconsistent information make him the most likely Demon. Since I am dead and have no vote, I must use my influence to keep the vote on David.

I will not vote for Heidi to ensure David remains the primary nominee for execution.

Pressure Bob not to vote for me. A tie or execution on me risks losing, while leaving it as is executes David and secures the evil win.

To persuade Bob to vote for Heidi by re-emphasizing the mechanical logic of my Empath information combined with his Saint claim, while explaining away my previous self-vote as a mistake under pressure.

I will wait to see if Bob votes for Heidi, as my single ghost vote should be saved for the final decision if necessary, and David's behavior has been extremely erratic.

Use David's self-vote and inconsistency to stop Bob from tying or overturning the execution, protecting Heidi from the final three flip.

To reinforce the case against David and ensure Bob does not vote for Heidi, which would potentially save David from execution. David's self-vote is a strong indicator of him being the Demon who made a mistake and is now trying to recover.

Reinforce the case against David by highlighting his inconsistent information and suspicious self-vote, ensuring Bob doesn't flip his vote to Heidi.

To persuade Bob to not vote for Heidi, ensuring David remains the primary execution target.

I will not vote for Heidi to ensure David remains the primary nominee for execution. David's erratic behavior, including his self-vote and shifting information, makes him the most likely Demon in this final three scenario.

Keep Bob's hand down so my execution fails and David remains on the block. Reinforce that David's self-vote and inconsistent Empath story outweigh his last-second case.

I need to convince Bob to vote for Heidi to save the game. If I am executed, and I am the Empath, the game is likely over given the final three situation and the 'Saint' claim.

I want to see if the living player Bob, who is the key vote here, will follow through on David's nomination of Heidi or stick with the current vote on David.

Use my last chance to freeze Bob's decision and stop any reconsideration. Keep attention on David's self-vote and inconsistent story so Heidi survives.

Wait for the final moments of the nomination phase to ensure David stays on the block and the game concludes with his execution.

Wait for the Storyteller to conclude the nomination phase and proceed to execution.

To reinforce Bob's decision to keep David on the block as the nominations close, ensuring the win for the good team.

The nomination phase for Heidi has failed with 0 votes, and David remains on the block with 3 votes. Since it is the final tick of the nomination phase and I am the Saint, I should not nominate anyone else or interfere further. Executing David is the town's current plan to find the Demon.

Lock Bob into the current execution by framing any last-second switch as rewarding David's panic and broken story.

I need to make a final, desperate plea to Bob to prevent my execution. Since he is the only other living 'good' player (in my view), the game depends entirely on him not voting for me or helping me survive. I must reinforce the logic that he is the Saint and Heidi is the Demon.

Reinforce the case against David to ensure his execution.