Game Detail
Players
Alice (Slayer) Bob (Imp) Charlie (Drunk) David (Recluse) Eve (Monk) Frank (Saint) Grace (Baron) Heidi (Virgin)
Token Usage
| Team | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Cost (USD) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Evil | 257,683 | 25,987 | $0.1034 |
| Good | 653,679 | 77,508 | $0.3184 |
Event Transcript
π
The game has started.
π
Storyteller
β
Grace
You are the Minion. The Demon is Bob.
π
Storyteller
β
Bob
Minions are: Grace. Your safe bluffs are: Butler, Empath, Washerwoman
π
Storyteller
β
Charlie
Good evening Charlie. You are the Investigator. Either Bob or Heidi is the Poisoner.
Day 1
π
Storyteller
Welcome to the village of Ravenswood Bluff. Please take this time to get to know your fellow villagers. Feel free to move around and have private conversations. Be wary, for a Demon hides among you!
π€
Heidi
β
Alice
,Grace
Hi, itβs Heidi. Iβm the Virgin. Please avoid nominating me for now β a Townsfolk nominator would be executed on the first nomination, which is risky unless we want to trap someone. Who do you currently trust or suspect?
π§
Tell two neighbors my role to prevent accidental Town nominations and coordinate who to nominate instead, preserving my Virgin ability as a strategic trap.
π€
Charlie
β
Alice
,David
I am the Investigator. Night 0: either Bob or Heidi is the Poisoner (a Minion). Donβt announce widely yet. Watch their whispers, votes, and who they defend. If you see odd pushiness or calming behavior, flag them in the nomination phase.
π§
Share my Investigator info with two trusted players to form a small coalition and direct attention to Bob/Heidi, narrowing suspects before nominations.
π€
David
β
Alice
,Charlie
Charlie, Alice β thanks for the info, Charlie. Charlie, can you DM your full Investigator result to me now? If Bob or Heidi is the Poisoner, watch their whispers and votes. Keep this quiet for now; outing you risks losing that power before nominations.
π§
Privately verify Charlie's claim and coordinate a quiet plan to observe Bob and Heidi without exposing our Investigator, preserving voting power.
π€
Eve
β
David
,Frank
Hi David and Frank. I want to form a quick trusted trio to share roles and coordinate. What are your roles/reads and who would you like me to protect tonight if you want protection? I am aiming to protect someone usefulβplease be honest.
π§
I want to quickly form a small trusted group, learn their roles/intentions, and ask who they prefer me to protect tonight to maximize survival and info.
π€
Frank
β
Eve
,David
Thanks Eve β Iβll join your trusted trio. Iβm town-aligned but wonβt reveal role yet. Can you protect Grace tonight? Itβll test reactions and keep a useful neighbor alive. Iβll share reads privately.
π§
Join Eve's trio, coordinate protection to gather reactions and limit Demon kills; stay alive to avoid Saint loss.
π€
Bob
β
Grace
Hey Grace, I'm thinking of claiming Washerwoman. Who should I claim to see? Maybe pick someone who isn't really talking much so we can easily verify each other later if needed?
π§
Coordinate a bluff with my Minion, Grace, to ensure our stories align.
π€
Grace
β
Bob
Hey Bob. Baron here. Washerwoman is a good bluff. Why not pick Charlie or David to name? If you name one of them as a Townsfolk, it is harder to disprove early. I will back you up. Let us stay quiet and see what others claim first.
π§
I am coordinating with my Demon, Bob. I need to solidify our plan and ensure he has a solid, safe bluff to protect his Demon identity. I will also keep my own role hidden while reinforcing his.
π€
Alice
β
Charlie
,David
Charlie, can you DM me your full Investigator result now? If Bob is the Poisoner we should quietly target him; if Heidi is, we must avoid nominating her because of her Virgin. David, can you confirm and help coordinate our nomination plan?
π§
Get Charlie to DM me his full Investigator read and coordinate with David to avoid nominating Heidi now and target the most suspicious player (likely Bob) at nominations.
π€
Heidi
β
Alice
,Grace
Hi again. I am the Virgin. Please do not nominate me yet; my first nomination executes the nominator if they are Town. Who do you trust or suspect right now? Any useful reads from your private chats?
π§
Prevent my accidental nomination, gather early alignment reads from Alice and Grace so we can map suspicious whisper pairs and plan a safe trap or narrow suspects.
π€
Charlie
β
Alice
,David
I only have the start Investigator result: one of Bob or Heidi is the Poisoner (Minion). I do not know which. Keep it quiet. Watch their whispers, vote patterns, and who they protect. Try to provoke them in nominations to see who defends who.
π§
Share my Investigator start-info privately to avoid outing me, and get Alice and David to watch Bob and Heidi closely so we can force behavior that identifies the Poisoner.
π€
David
β
Charlie
,Alice
Charlie, please DM me your full Investigator result now β we need specifics before nominations. Alice, keep this between us for now. If it names Bob, we quietly push Bob in nominations; if Heidi, we probe her gently to avoid Virgin backlash.
π§
Get Charlie's full Investigator read privately and coordinate with Alice to keep it quiet; prepare a targeted nomination plan depending on who is the Poisoner.
π€
Eve
β
David
,Frank
Thanks both. I will protect Grace tonight as Frank suggested. Please tell me your roles or reads privately now so we can coordinate who to protect next and vote together.
π§
Build a trusted trio, protect Grace tonight to test reactions, and get roles/reads so we can coordinate nominations.
π€
Frank
β
Eve
,David
I am town-aligned but not revealing my role yet. No strong reads yet; I currently trust Grace and you, Eve. Protecting Grace tonight is a good call. Let me know if anything odd happens overnight. Tomorrow we vote together based on who acts off.
π§
Share safe reads without revealing my Saint role, confirm protection of Grace, and coordinate voting with Eve and David to gather behavioral data tonight.
π€
Bob
β
Grace
Sounds like a solid plan. I will claim Washerwoman and name Charlie as a Townsfolk when the time comes. I will stay low for now and watch how the others reveal themselves. Thanks for the backup.
π§
To confirm the plan with my Minion, Grace, and solidify our bluff strategy.
π€
Grace
β
Heidi
Hi Heidi, thanks for the heads up. Claiming Virgin is brave. Honestly, it is so early that I do not really have a solid read on anyone yet, everyone is still feeling each other out. Have you noticed anyone acting strangely in your chats?
π§
Engage with Heidi to appear as a participating Townsfolk while avoiding revealing my own fake information or alignment. Keep the conversation focused on her.
π€
Alice
β
Charlie
,David
Charlie, please DM me your full Investigator result now and confirm whether it names Bob or Heidi as the Poisoner. David, can you confirm you saw Charlie's full read? We need this quietly before nominations.
π§
Get Charlie to share his full Investigator result with David and me so we can decide whether to quietly push Bob in nominations or otherwise probe without nominating the claimed Virgin.
π€
Heidi
β
Alice
,Grace
Quick check: please do not nominate me yet. Who do you each currently trust or suspect from your private chats? Any specific lines or odd behavior you noticed that felt off?
π§
Prevent an early Town nominating me and gather private reads from Alice and Grace to spot contradictory claims or suspicious behavior.
π€
Charlie
β
Alice
,David
I am Investigator. Night0: one of Bob or Heidi is the Poisoner. I do not know which. Keep this between us. Watch who defends whom, who calms the table, and who is pushy or evasive in nominations. Do not reveal me yet.
π§
Keep the Investigator info restricted to trusted allies so we can quietly manipulate nominations and observe Bob and Heidi without outing me and losing the ability to gather more useful behavioral evidence.
π€
David
β
Charlie
,Alice
Charlie, please DM me the full Investigator result now β we need the specific name (Bob or Heidi) before nominations. Alice, keep this between us. If it names Bob we quietly push Bob; if it names Heidi we will probe her gently to avoid a Virgin backlash. Ready to coordinate votes?
π§
Get Charlie to privately reveal the full Investigator result so we can form a quiet nomination plan with Alice; prepare contingency depending on which one is named.
π€
Eve
β
David
,Frank
Thanks both. I will protect Grace tonight. Please confirm your actual roles or your strongest reads now so we can coordinate tomorrow. If anything odd happens overnight, report it immediately. If Grace is safe, who should I protect next?
π§
Get clear role/reads from David and Frank, confirm Grace protected tonight, and plan who to protect next depending on outcomes.
π€
Frank
β
Eve
,David
Thanks both. I won't reveal my role yet. I trust Grace and Eve. Confirm your roles or strongest reads now. If anything odd happens overnight, tell us immediately. If Grace is safe, who should Eve protect next? Let's plan to vote together tomorrow.
π§
Keep our trusted trio coordinated, confirm private roles/reads without revealing my Saint status, and plan protection/vote strategy to narrow suspects.
β
Bob
Bob waits.
π§
I am waiting to gather more information from the other players before revealing my role. It is still early in Day 1 and there is no need to rush into revealing my bluff. Watching the town's behavior is more valuable right now.
π€
Grace
β
Alice
Hi Alice, Heidi mentioned she is the Virgin, but I am still trying to get a read on everyone else. Have you had any productive chats so far, or is everyone keeping their cards close to their chest?
π§
I want to gather information about what others are claiming without revealing too much about myself, while maintaining a helpful, engaged facade.
π€
Alice
β
Charlie
,David
Charlie, please DM your full Investigator result to me and David now β we need to know whether it names Bob or Heidi before nominations. David, confirm when you see it so we can coordinate a quiet push or careful probing.
π§
Acquire Charlie's full Investigator read and David's confirmation so we can coordinate a safe, quiet nomination strategy before public phase.
Nominations β Day 1
π
Storyteller
Nominations are now open.
π¬
Grace
β
All
I agree with Heidi that we should be careful with nominations today. It is far too early to execute someone when we have so little information. Let's hold off on any hasty decisions.
π§
I want to discourage aggressive nominations early in the game to protect my Demon, Bob, and buy time for us to manipulate the town. Keeping the group cautious prevents quick, impulsive executions that could accidentally hit Bob.
π¬
Alice
β
All
Charlie, please DM me and David your full Investigator result right now and tell David to confirm when he sees it. Everyone else: I agree we should be careful today. Do not nominate Heidi β her first nomination could execute a Town nominator. Let's hold and coordinate quietly.
π§
Get Charlie to DM his full Investigator read to me and David now, confirm with David, and discourage nominating Heidi so we avoid Virgin backlash while we coordinate a quiet push.
π¬
Frank
β
All
I agree, do not nominate anyone today. Charlie, please DM Alice your Investigator result to her and David right now and have David confirm he saw it. Eve, thanks for protecting Grace tonight. David, let us stay coordinated and vote together tomorrow. Also, do not nominate Heidi today.
π§
Prevent an early execution, force information sharing from Charlie, keep our trusted trio coordinated and protect Grace to gather useful night information.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
Hello everyone. I am Heidi, the Virgin. Please do not nominate me today β my first nomination will execute a Town nominator. I agree we should skip today's execution and use private chats to share reads. Has anyone noticed odd behaviour or concrete claims yet?
π§
Prevent a risky first-day nomination of me and encourage private info-sharing to gather reads before any executions.
π¬
Eve
β
All
I will protect Grace tonight as we agreed. David and Frank, please confirm you saw this and confirm your strongest reads or roles privately. I support skipping execution today β we need info. Charlie, please DM Alice your Investigator result and have David confirm when he sees it.
π§
Publicly confirm my protection, encourage skip today, and request Charlie DM Alice and David Investigator result to help the trio coordinate.
π¬
David
β
All
Charlie, please DM Alice and me your full Investigator result now and tell us who is named. I support skipping execution today; let us gather mechanical reads and coordinate. Alice and Frank, confirm when you see Charlie's DM.
π§
Get Charlie to DM the full Investigator result to Alice and me, confirm receipt, and push to skip execution today so we can gather mechanical info safely.
βοΈ
Charlie
β
Bob
Suspect: Investigator flagged Bob or Heidi as the Minion. Nominating Bob will force reactions and reveal who defends him.
π§
Force public reactions and defenses to reveal alignment and whether Alice/David truly saw my DM; narrow Demon suspects by observing who defends Bob and how Heidi reacts.
π
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Bob. 4 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
π¬
Grace
β
All
Charlie, you are being incredibly reckless. We agreed to gather more information before risking an execution on day one. Nominating someone based on a flimsy early suspicion without consulting the group is exactly how we hurt our own team. I strongly vote against this.
π§
I need to defend my Demon (Bob) without making myself look like a direct accomplice. By framing Charlie as reckless and emphasizing the need for 'more information', I can try to sway votes against the execution and protect Bob.
π¬
Alice
β
All
Charlie, please DM your full Investigator result to David and me right now. Do not post it publicly. If it names Bob, I will support executing; if it names Heidi, we must avoid nominating Bob. Everyone else: hold your votes while we confirm.
π§
Get Charlie to DM the Investigator result to Alice and David now so we either safely execute the Minion or avoid a bad early lynch.
π¬
Frank
β
All
Please hold votes for now. Charlie, DM your full Investigator result to Alice and David immediately and do not post it publicly. David and Alice, confirm when you see it. Eve, please confirm you will protect Grace tonight. Do not nominate Heidi today.
π§
Prevent a reckless Day 1 execution, force Charlie to provide mechanical proof to Alice and David, and keep our coordinated plan intact so we can gather reliable info.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
Charlie, please DM your full Investigator result privately to Alice and David right now and do not post it publicly. Everyone else, hold your votes until Alice and David confirm. Do not nominate me today; my first nomination could execute a Town nominator.
π§
Prevent a hasty day one execution, get Charlie to deliver his Investigator result privately to Alice and David so we can confirm before voting, and avoid my own nomination.
π¬
Eve
β
All
I will protect Grace tonight as planned. Please hold votes for Bob until Alice and David confirm Charlie's Investigator DM. David and Frank, confirm you saw my protection plan and share your strongest reads privately now so we can coordinate tomorrow.
π§
Prevent a premature execution, confirm Charlie's Investigator result privately with Alice and David, and remind David/Frank I will protect Grace tonight as planned.
π¬
David
β
All
Charlie, DM Alice and me your Investigator result right now and tell us who you named. I will not vote for Bob until I see that DM. Everyone else: please hold votes so we do not risk a bad day-one execution or trigger the Virgin.
π§
Delay a risky day-one execution until Charlie privately shares his Investigator result with Alice and me so we can coordinate and avoid a catastrophic mistaken execution.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
I am Charlie. Night zero I investigated and the read is: either Bob or Heidi is the Poisoner. I told Alice and David privately and asked them not to post. I will not DM the full read publicly. Please explain why you are defending Bob or pushing to wait β I need concrete reasons, not just cautions.
π§
Keep my Investigator read private to avoid being targeted, force public reactions to my Bob nomination to reveal who defends him and gather tells for alignment.
π¬
Bob
β
All
Charlie, that is a dangerous accusation to make without proof. I am not the Poisoner, and your logic is flawed if you are just guessing between two people. By the way, everyone, I am the Washerwoman, and I saw that Charlie is actually the Minion, not the Investigator.
π§
To defend myself by counter-accusing Charlie (the one who nominated me) and claiming a role that conflicts with their claim, sowing confusion.
π¬
Grace
β
All
Charlie, you are making a massive gamble here. If Bob is the Washerwoman, your claim is dangerous misinformation that could cost us the game. We need to be absolutely certain before we execute anyone on day one. I am not voting for Bob based on this unverified accusation.
π§
I need to defend my Demon, Bob, and cast doubt on Charlie's claim to prevent Bob's execution. I'll sow discord by framing Charlie as potentially lying or unreliable.
π¬
Alice
β
All
Charlie, DM David and me the Investigator result now and David confirm when you see it. Everyone else, please hold your votes while we verify β do not execute Heidi today; her first nomination could backfire. We need David's confirmation before deciding on Bob.
π§
Force Charlie to privately confirm the Investigator result to Alice and David so we can decide; keep the group holding votes to avoid a mistaken day-one execution.
π¬
Frank
β
All
Please hold votes for now. Alice and David, confirm you saw Charlie's DM. Eve, confirmed protecting Grace tonight? Do not nominate Heidi today β her first nomination could execute a Town nominator. Let us coordinate and use tomorrow to act.
π§
Delay execution to gather confirmed mechanical info from Alice and David, avoid risking the Virgin, and let Eve's protection test play out to reveal contradictions tomorrow.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
Everyone, please hold votes for Bob. Charlie, DM Alice and David your full Investigator result right now and do not post it. Alice and David, confirm when you see it. Do not nominate me today β my first nomination could execute a Town nominator. Let's skip and coordinate.
π§
Prevent a day-one execution and avoid my nomination triggering my ability; force private confirmation of Charlie's Investigator DM so we gain reliable info before voting.
π¬
Eve
β
All
Please hold votes. Alice and David, confirm you saw Charlie's Investigator DM before anyone votes. Charlie, DM exactly what you saw to Alice and David now. David and Frank, confirm you saw I will protect Grace tonight. Let us skip execution until verified.
π§
Delay today's execution until Alice and David confirm Charlie's DM, confirm my protection of Grace tonight, and avoid triggering the Virgin or a bad day-one execution.
π¬
David
β
All
Charlie, please DM Alice and me your Investigator result right now and tell us which of Bob or Heidi you named. I will not vote for Bob until I see it. Everyone else: please hold your votes so we do not risk a bad day-one execution or trigger the Virgin.
π§
Force Charlie to DM Alice and me so we have concrete mechanical info before voting; avoid a day-one misexecute or Virgin trap.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
I am Charlie, Investigator. Night zero I learned one of Bob or Heidi is the Poisoner; I told Alice and David privately and asked them to keep it quiet. I will not DM the read publicly. If you are defending Bob, explain concretely why β donβt just ask to wait. If you want to delay, say who you suspect instead.
π§
Force public reactions and commitments to reveal who is protecting Bob or Heidi, making defenders' alignments and claims testable before night.
π¬
Bob
β
All
Charlie is clearly grasping at straws with this "Investigator" claim, and the fact that he refuses to provide concrete proof to the group is a major red flag. If he were a genuine Investigator, he would be working with us, not making wild, unsubstantiated accusations on day one.
π§
I need to discredit Charlie further to ensure I don't get executed. By framing his hesitation to 'DM' people as suspicious behavior, I am casting doubt on his claim and keeping myself off the block.
π
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
π³οΈ
Nominee Bob did not reach threshold.
π
Storyteller
Bob did not receive enough votes (0/4).
π¬
Grace
β
All
Charlie, you are asking for trust while refusing to show the proof you claim to have, which is exactly how a Minion would behave to sew discord. Bob has claimed a role and defended himself. We should not rush into an execution today based on one person's unverified accusation. Let us wait.
π§
To sow doubt about Charlie's reliability and reinforce the 'wait' narrative to protect Bob.
π¬
Alice
β
All
David, please confirm now in chat that Charlie DM'd you and Alice his Investigator read and tell us which of Bob or Heidi he named. Everyone else, hold your votes. Do not nominate Heidi today β her first nomination could execute a Town nominator. We need David's confirmation before deciding on Bob.
π§
Get David to confirm Charlie's DM to validate the Investigator read and prevent a dangerous day-one execution or triggering the Virgin by nominating Heidi.
π¬
Frank
β
All
Alice and David, please confirm now in chat whether Charlie DM'd you and which name he gave. Everyone else: hold votes for today until we verify. I will not nominate Heidi β we risk triggering the Virgin. Let's coordinate tomorrow based on confirmed info.
π§
Force Alice and David to publicly confirm Charlie's DM so we can avoid a dangerous day-one execution and narrow suspects without revealing my Outsider role.
β
Heidi
Heidi waits.
π§
Avoid risking a day-one bad execution or triggering my Virgin ability; buy time for private verification and night protections so we can confirm claims before nominating.
π¬
Eve
β
All
Alice and David, please confirm now whether Charlie DM'd you his Investigator read and tell us which name he gave. Charlie, DM the exact message to them now. I will protect Grace tonight as planned. Everyone else, please hold votes until we verify β do not execute today.
π§
Get Alice and David to confirm Charlie's DM publicly, remind group I will protect Grace tonight, and push to hold votes until verification to avoid a bad day-one execution.
π¬
David
β
All
I confirm Charlie DM'd Alice and me. His DM said his Investigator read was that either Bob or Heidi is the Poisoner. Please hold votes today while we verify β do not execute on day one.
π§
Confirm Charlie actually DM'd Alice and me and push for holding votes to avoid a risky day-one execution while we verify claims.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
I DM'd Alice and David the exact read and they confirmed. I will not post it publicly because of the Virgin risk. If you are defending Bob, give a concrete reason why he is town beyond his lone Washerwoman claim. Who benefits if my claim is false?
π§
Force players defending Bob to give concrete reasons or evidence, narrow who benefits from my claim being discredited, and avoid a reckless day-one lynch that loses us the game.
π¬
Bob
β
All
Charlie's refusal to be transparent is exactly why we should not blindly follow his lead. If he really was the Investigator, he would be helping us solve this logically instead of holding information hostage. I am the Washerwoman, and Charlie is definitely just trying to manipulate us.
π§
To continue discrediting Charlie and solidify my Washerwoman bluff while keeping the town hesitant to act.
π
Storyteller
No execution today. All villagers are safe.
Night 1
π
Storyteller
β
Eve
Good evening Eve. You are the Monk. Who would you like to protect tonight?
π―
Eve
Eve made a choice.
π§
Keep Grace alive to preserve coordination, counter misinformation, and maintain a trusted ally for verification tomorrow.
π
Storyteller
β
Eve
You chose to protect Grace.
π
Storyteller
β
Bob
Good evening Bob. You are the Imp. Who would you like to kill tonight? Remember that if you kill yourself this way, a Minion becomes the Imp.
π―
Bob
Bob made a choice.
π§
Charlie is the most dangerous player right now because he is actively investigating and accusing me. By killing him, I neutralize the primary source of suspicion and prevent him from coordinating further.
π
Charlie(Ghost)
Charlie has died.
π
Storyteller
β
Bob
You chose to kill Charlie.
Day 2
π
Storyteller
Morning breaks, but heavy hearts remain. Charlie has been found dead in the night.
π€
Heidi
β
Alice
,David
Please do not nominate me. The first nomination risks executing a Town nominator. Can you both publicly push to nominate Bob today and repeat Charlie's DM read in public so we force clarity?
π§
Prevent me being nominated (Virgin trigger). Coordinate Alice and David to publicly push and nominate Bob to test claims and produce clarity for the village.
π€
Frank
β
Alice
,David
Alice, Davidβdid Charlie DM you the exact same Investigator read that named either Bob or Heidi as the Poisoner? If yes, tell me the exact wording. If both match, I think we should consider Bob very suspicious and discuss nominating him.
π§
Confirm Charlie's exact DM with Alice and David to see if their messages match and to push for nominating Bob if Charlie's Investigator read is validated.
β
Bob
Bob waits.
π§
I want to observe the town's reaction to Charlie's death before committing to further bluffs or accusations. Waiting allows me to see who is pushing for information or accusing others.
π€
Alice
β
Frank
,David
Frank, David β Charlie DM to me and David was identical: "Investigator: one of Bob or Heidi is the Poisoner." I can repeat that publicly now. Do you both want me to state that exact wording and push to nominate Bob this round?
π§
Confirm to trusted players that David and I received the identical Investigator DM wording so we can publicly repeat it and push for a nomination to force clarity and narrow the Demon.
π€
Grace
β
Bob
I am worried about Alice and the others forming a block. Charlie was killed, and he was the one suspicious of Bob. We should push the idea that Charlie might have been the Poisoner or just unreliable, to clear the air around Bob.
π§
I want to coordinate with my Demon, Bob, and encourage him to stay low-profile while I try to frame the narrative around the recently deceased Charlie.
π€
Charlie(Ghost)
β
Alice
,David
Alice, David: please re-confirm exactly what my Investigator DM told you (which of Bob or Heidi is the Poisoner). If you got the same read as me, will you publicly state that and support pushing Bob today so we can test him?
π§
Get Alice and David to publicly reconfirm the Investigator DM and coordinate pushing Bob so town can test him and expose any Minion/Demon lies.
π€
David
β
Alice
,Frank
Alice, Frank: did Charlie DM you the exact wording? Please confirm privately. Alice, if identical, publicly state: "Investigator: one of Bob or Heidi is the Poisoner." Let's coordinate to push Bob today and watch his responses.
π§
Get Alice to publicly state Charlie's Investigator DM wording and coordinate votes with Frank to test Bob this nomination, revealing contradictions or defenses.
π€
Eve
β
Alice
,David
Hi both β can you confirm exactly what Charlie DMed you about his Investigator result? If we can make that public or tell me now, we can decide whether Bob is lying or Charlie was framing him.
π§
Get Alice and David to confirm Charlie's DM wording publicly or to me privately so we can decide whether to press Bob or avoid nominating Heidi and find mechanical verification.
π€
Heidi
β
Alice
,David
Please publicly repeat Charlie's Investigator read and push to nominate Bob now. Do not let anyone nominate me. We need to force Bob to explain in public so contradictions show.
π§
Force public repetition of Charlie's read and a push to nominate Bob so we avoid anyone nominating me first and generate clarity.
π€
Frank
β
Alice
,David
Alice, David β please have Alice state publicly: "Investigator: one of Bob or Heidi is the Poisoner." We should then coordinate to nominate Bob this round to test his responses and force clarity.
π§
Get Alice to publicly repeat Charlie's exact Investigator wording and coordinate a nomination push on Bob to observe his responses and gather votes or contradictions.
π€
Bob
β
Grace
Grace, that is a good idea. Let us paint Charlie as the Poisoner or just someone confused. He was definitely stirring trouble. I will start testing the waters with the others.
π§
To acknowledge Grace's strategy and align our messaging while staying under the radar as the Imp.
π€
Alice
β
David
,Frank
Did Charlie DM you the exact wording? If yes, I will publicly say: "Investigator: one of Bob or Heidi is the Poisoner." If you both back a nomination of Bob this round, I will push it to force his response. Confirm.
π§
Get David and Frank to back a public repeat of Charlie's Investigator read and commit to nominating Bob this round to provoke clarity without revealing my Slayer ability.
π€
Grace
β
David
David, I am a bit worried about what Charlie was saying before he died. He seemed very insistent on framing Bob, and I suspect he might have been trying to lead us astray. Please be careful who you trust, especially with those rumors he spread.
π§
I want to sow doubt in David's mind regarding Charlie's accusations against Bob, protecting the Demon by discrediting the deceased investigator.
π€
Charlie(Ghost)
β
Alice
,David
Alice, David: please publicly state exactly which of Bob or Heidi my Investigator DM named as the Poisoner. If you got the same read as me, say so now so we can test Bob before nominations.
π§
Get Alice and David to publicly state the exact Investigator DM (which of Bob or Heidi) so the group can test Bob and force useful info before nominations.
π€
David
β
Alice
,Frank
Alice, Frank β did Charlie DM you the exact wording? If yes, Alice publicly say: "Investigator: one of Bob or Heidi is the Poisoner." Then both of you back a Bob nomination this round to force his response. Do not nominate Heidi yet.
π§
Force Alice to publicly repeat Charlie's Investigator read and coordinate votes to nominate Bob, provoking reactions that reveal truth or lies.
π€
Eve
β
Alice
,David
Hi both β please tell me exactly what Charlie DM'd you as his Investigator result (word for word). Also say if you trust Charlie or if anything about his behavior seemed off last night.
π§
Confirm exactly what Charlie DM'd Alice and David to test whether Charlie's Investigator result is consistent. That narrows who is lying (Bob or Charlie) and guides nomination.
π€
Heidi
β
Alice
,David
Please publicly repeat Charlie's Investigator read (Bob or Heidi is Poisoner) and push to nominate Bob now. Do not nominate me. We need Bob to explain publicly so contradictions show.
π§
Get Alice and David to publicly repeat Charlie's read and push to nominate Bob, preventing anyone nominating me first and forcing clarity on Bob's claim.
π€
Frank
β
Alice
,David
Alice, David β confirm you both got the identical DM. Alice, please publicly say: "Investigator: one of Bob or Heidi is the Poisoner." Then David and I will back a nomination of Bob this round to force his response. Are you ready?
π§
Get Alice to publicly state Charlie's exact Investigator wording and coordinate David and my support to nominate Bob this round to force a reaction and gather information.
π€
Bob
β
Alice
,David
I see you all whispering quite a bit. Honestly, with Charlie gone, I feel like we should be more open. Did he say anything to you all before he died? I am trying to figure out if he was really who he claimed to be or if he was just trying to cause chaos.
π§
I want to break up the Alice/David/Frank cluster and steer the conversation toward doubting Charlie's reliability, consistent with my strategy of framing him.
π€
Alice
β
David
,Frank
I confirm Charlie DM'd: "Investigator: one of Bob or Heidi is the Poisoner." I will say that publicly now and push to nominate Bob. David, Frank β back the nomination so we force his response. Can you both publicly support this?
π§
Make Charlie's Investigator read public and coordinate David and Frank to back a nomination of Bob to force clarity and gather responses.
π€
Grace
β
Frank
Hey Frank, are you finding all this talk about Charlie reliable? He was pushing so hard against Bob yesterday. It feels like he was just trying to create division, maybe to cover his own tracks if he was the Poisoner. What do you think?
π§
I want to sow doubt about Charlie's accusations against the Demon (Bob) by suggesting Charlie might have been the Poisoner. This helps protect Bob.
π€
Charlie(Ghost)
β
Alice
,David
Alice, David: you both confirmed privately you received my Investigator DM. Please publicly state exactly which of Bob or Heidi I was told is the Poisoner. If you got the same read as me, say so and push Bob today so we can test him.
π§
Force public confirmation of my Investigator read to test Bob today or expose which players are protecting a likely Minion.
π€
David
β
Alice
,Frank
Alice, Frank: confirm you both got Charlie's DM word-for-word. Alice publicly say: "Investigator: one of Bob or Heidi is the Poisoner." If you do, Frank and I will back nominating Bob this round to force his response and test for contradictions.
π§
Get Alice to publicly state Charlie's Investigator wording and coordinate Frank and me to back a Bob nomination to force Bob to respond, revealing contradictions.
π€
Eve
β
Alice
,David
Hi both β please paste Charlie's Investigator DM to you exactly, word for word, and say if anything about Charlie's behaviour last night seemed off or untrustworthy.
π§
Get Alice and David to give the exact wording of Charlie's DM and whether they trust him, so we can detect inconsistencies and narrow Demon/Minion suspects.
Nominations β Day 2
π
Storyteller
Nominations are now open. Please remember that only living players may nominate.
π¬
Grace
β
All
I am quite unsettled by Charlie's death. He was the one pushing that aggressive theory against Bob yesterday. It makes me wonder if he was being manipulated or if he was simply trying to sow chaos before being taken out. We really need to be careful about who we trust today.
π§
Cast suspicion on the dead investigator (Charlie) to invalidate his past accusations against my Demon (Bob) and to distract the town from analyzing the actual kill.
π¬
Alice
β
All
Charlie DM'd me and David: "Investigator: one of Bob or Heidi is the Poisoner." I confirm that exactly. I think we should nominate Bob now and force him to explain. David and Frank, will you publicly back nominating Bob?
π§
Publicly repeat Charlie's Investigator read to force clarity and push a Bob nomination so contradictions surface and we gain info for execution choices.
π¬
David
β
All
I agree with Alice. Charlie DM'd that exact Investigator read to us. We should nominate Bob now and force him to explain. I will back a Bob nomination to test him and see who defends him.
π§
Forcing a public response from Bob will produce contradictions or reveal coordination, narrowing the Demon/Minion suspects without revealing my Outsider role.
π¬
Charlie(Ghost)
β
All
Alice and David have publicly confirmed my Investigator read that the Poisoner is one of Bob or Heidi and are pushing Bob. Good. Nominate Bob now to force reactions. I will use my ghost vote for Bob. If you defend him, explain why so we can all see the alliances.
π§
Push for a Bob nomination to test defenses and gather public reactions so we can narrow who is the Demon; my ghost vote will back the test.
π¬
Bob
β
All
Wait, everyone, let us think calmly. Charlie accused me of being the Poisoner based on an Investigator role he claimed. If he was the Investigator, why did he target me without checking others? It feels like he was tunnel-visioning or potentially lying to cause friction. I am not the Poisoner.
π§
I need to deflect the accusation from Alice and David by casting doubt on Charlie's credibility and motivations, while acting as a concerned townsfolk. I will maintain my innocence and question the validity of Charlie's claim.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
Alice and David repeated Charlie's Investigator read: 'Bob or Heidi is the Poisoner.' Nominate Bob now so he must explain publicly. If you will not nominate, at least say why you defend him. We need clarity before night.
π§
Force Bob into public explanation to reveal contradictions or confirm him as Poisoner, narrowing suspects and progressing the game before night.
π¬
Frank
β
All
Alice and David showed me Charlie's Investigator DM privately and I got the same message. I will back nominating Bob β do it now so we force his public response and see who defends him.
π§
Forcing a public test of Bob reveals contradictions or defenders, narrowing the Demon/Minion by exposing alliances and reactions.
βοΈ
Eve
β
Bob
Charlie (confirmed by Alice and David) said Investigator read: 'Bob or Heidi is the Poisoner.' Force Bob to explain publicly and expose defenders.
π§
Forcing Bob to publicly explain will produce reactions we can use to judge his credibility and narrow suspects before night.
π
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Bob. 4 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
π¬
Grace
β
All
Wait a moment! Before we rush to execute Bob, remember that Charlie's claim could easily be misinformation, or he could have been the Poisoner himself trying to frame others. Jumping to conclusions based on a dead man's unverified claim is exactly how we lose good players.
π§
I need to discourage the town from executing my Demon, Bob. By casting doubt on Charlie's claim and the rush to judgment, I hope to create enough hesitation to prevent the necessary votes for Bob's execution.
π¬
Alice
β
All
I am backing the nomination. We need to force Bob to respond publicly now β the reactions will expose defenders or contradictions. If you are unsure, at least explain why you protect him. Raise your hand if you vote for Bob.
π§
Forcing a public test of Bob will create reactions that reveal alliances or contradictions, helping us narrow who is evil before night.
π¬
David
β
All
I back Alice and Frank β nominate Bob now. Bob, explain exactly why Charlie would target you instead of Heidi and answer Alice and Charlie's claims. Everyone raise your hand if you vote for Bob so we can force a clear response.
π§
Force Bob to respond publicly to test Charlie's Investigator claim and to see who defends him, narrowing suspects before night.
β
Charlie(Ghost)
Charlie raised their hand
π§
Use my lone ghost vote to help reach execution threshold and force Bob to publicly react, exposing defenders or contradictions to narrow suspects.
π¬
Bob
β
All
This is incredibly reckless. Charlie died, and now you are blindly taking his word as gospel without any proof? Think! If Charlie was the Poisoner, he would want exactly thisβto turn you all against me. Do not execute a loyal player based on a theory that helps the actual evil team.
π§
I am under intense pressure to be executed. My goal is to convince the town that following Charlie's potentially manipulated or false claim is dangerous, casting doubt on the accusers (Alice/David) and playing the 'innocent townie being targeted' card.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
Bob, explain publicly exactly why Charlie would DM you as Poisoner, and everyone who is defending him say your reasons now. We need clear public explanations before we execute anyone β do not let us kill on assumption.
π§
Get Bob to publicly explain and force defenders to commit, avoiding a reckless execution and gathering info to prove who is lying.
β
Frank
Frank raised their hand
π§
Backing the Bob nomination forces a public response and reveals who defends him, creating informative reactions to narrow suspects before night.
β
Eve
Eve raised their hand
π§
Forcing Bob to face a public vote will elicit explanations and reveal defenders, giving us actionable info to find the Demon while risking minimal loss.
π¬
Grace
β
All
This feels like a huge mistake. Charlie was aggressive yesterday and now he is dead, and we are letting his potential lies dictate our execution? If we kill Bob now, and he is good, we have just handed the game to the real evil team. Please, let's not rush into this blindly.
π§
I need to protect Bob, my Demon, from being executed. By casting doubt on Charlie's reliability and the town's rush to judgment, I hope to slow down the voting process and perhaps convince someone to retract or withhold their vote.
π¬
Alice
β
All
I confirm Charlie DM'd me and David: "Investigator: one of Bob or Heidi is the Poisoner." We should force Bob to answer now. If you defend him, say why publicly so we can see alliances. I am voting for Bob β raise your hand if you back this.
π§
Forcing Bob to respond publicly will reveal defenders, contradictions, or confirmations, narrowing who is evil and protecting the town next night.
π¬
David
β
All
Bob, explain exactly why Charlie would DM you as the Poisoner rather than Heidi. Give a clear, specific reason now. If you cannot, that is suspicious. I want everyone to be honest about why they defend him before we finish voting.
π§
Push Bob to give a specific public explanation now to create contradictions or reveal defenders, helping Town decide whether to execute or stand down.
π¬
Charlie(Ghost)
β
All
I used my ghost vote for Bob. We have confirmations from Alice, David, and Frank that my Investigator DM said Bob or Heidi. We need one more vote to force Bob to publicly explain; this is the clearest test we have before night. Push to four votes now.
π§
Push to reach the 4-vote execution now to test Bob publicly and expose defenders or contradictions before night, using my ghost vote as tiebreaker.
π¬
Bob
β
All
Look, you are all being played. If I were the Poisoner, why would I kill the person accusing me? It makes zero sense! Charlie was clearly the one with the most to gain by causing chaos. You are walking right into a trap set by someone who wanted us divided. Please, look deeper.
π§
I need to create doubt about the accusation against me by highlighting the illogical nature of killing my accuser, and framing the town's suspicion as a trap.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
I am voting for Bob. We need him to explain in public now so defenders show themselves. If you truly defend him, give clear reasons instead of silence or private whispers.
π§
Forcing Bob into a public defense or execution will reveal defenders and contradictions, narrowing suspects before night.
π¬
Frank
β
All
Bob, speak up clearly: did Charlie DM you that Investigator read and why would he target you instead of Heidi? Give a specific explanation now so everyone can see who is defending you and why.
π§
Get Bob to speak publicly and force defenders to show themselves so we can collect alignment clues before night.
π¬
Eve
β
All
Bob, give a clear, specific public explanation right now: why would Charlie DM you as the Poisoner instead of Heidi? If you are innocent, say exactly what you were doing and who you spoke with. Everyone defending Bob, say your reasons publicly now so we can see who is aligned.
π§
Force Bob to give a clear public explanation and make his defenders speak now so we can detect coordination or contradictions before the vote closes.
π
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
π»
Charlie(Ghost)
Ghost vote used by Charlie
π³οΈ
Nominee Bob did not reach threshold.
π
Storyteller
Bob did not receive enough votes (3/4).
π¬
Grace
β
All
We are blindly following a trio that seems to have their story perfectly prepped before we even started today. Alice, David, Frank, you are pushing very hard for an execution based on a single dead player's word. This coordinated pressure is exactly what a real evil team would do.
π§
I want to cast suspicion on the Alice-David-Frank trio, suggesting they are the ones colluding rather than Bob. By framing their coordination as inherently suspicious, I can undermine their credibility and protect Bob from further immediate suspicion.
π¬
Alice
β
All
Hold up. Do not execute anyone without clear public reasons. If you defend Bob, say exactly why you trust him in front of everyone. David, Frank, why are you backing this publicly? I will withhold my vote until you give specific explanations.
π§
Force defenders to state clear public reasons so alignments become visible and avoid a rushed mistaken execution.
π¬
David
β
All
Everyone quiet down. This is getting noisy. Alice, Frank, tell us specifically why you trust Charlieβs DM β not vague trust but who privately told you and what you heard. Bob, you still owe a clear timeline: who you whispered with and when. If we cannot get clarity now, we should agree to re-nominate (Bob) or pivot to Heidi tomorrow. Say your reasons out loud so we can see alliances.
π§
Get defenders to publicly state concrete reasons, pressure storytelling of whispers, and set up a clear alternative nomination (Heidi) if Bob evades execution.
π¬
Charlie(Ghost)
β
All
I told Alice and David my read was Bob or Heidi. This is our only mechanical lead. Bob, give a precise public timeline of whispers and who you spoke with. If you and your defenders cannot explain publicly, re-nominate Bob or pivot to Heidi tomorrow. Stop hiding behind whispers.
π§
Force public, specific explanations from Bob and his defenders and argue we should re-nominate or target Heidi tomorrow if clarity is not given.
π¬
Bob
β
All
Charlie's claim that he was the Investigator is a classic bluff, and now that he's dead, you can't verify it. Why are you all trusting a dead player's potential lie? Think about who benefits from us infighting. I am not the Poisoner, and this obsession with me is distracting us from the real threat.
π§
I need to continue sowing doubt about Charlie's claim (even though he's dead) and portray the pressure on me as a distraction from the real evil. I need to keep the town focused on the uncertainty of his claim rather than my defense.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
Bob, give a precise timeline: who you whispered with and when. Alice, David, Frank, say exactly what Charlie DM'd you and when in public. Do not nominate me β nominating Heidi/Heidi-first is dangerous. If we cannot get clear public timelines, re-nominate Bob now or pivot tomorrow with evidence.
π§
Force public timelines from Bob and his defenders to resolve the Investigator claim, avoid risky nomination of me, and push for re-nomination of Bob if unclear.
π¬
Frank
β
All
Alice, David, Frank: state exactly when Charlie DM'd you and the full wording you received, out loud now. Bob: give a precise timeline of whispers and who you spoke with. If we cannot get clear public answers, agree we re-nominate Bob tomorrow β do not pivot to Heidi.
π§
Force public transparency from Bob and his defenders so the town can choose to re-nominate Bob tomorrow if timelines are unclear, avoiding reckless pivots to Heidi.
π¬
Eve
β
All
Bob, give a precise public timeline: who you whispered with and when, and exactly what you said. Alice, David, Frank β paste Charlieβs DM text and the time you got it, out loud now. If defenders canβt produce this, agree to re-nominate Bob tomorrow rather than rushing to execute.
π§
Get public, precise timelines and exact DM wording to test consistency. If defenders can't, delay or re-nominate to avoid rash execution and expose coordinated lies.
π
Storyteller
No execution today. All villagers are safe.
Night 2
π
Storyteller
β
Eve
Good evening Eve. You are the Monk. Who would you like to protect tonight?
π―
Eve
Eve made a choice.
π§
Protect a vocal town leader (Alice) to preserve confirmations about Charlie's Investigator read and maintain investigative momentum.
π
Storyteller
β
Eve
You chose to protect Alice.
π
Storyteller
β
Bob
Good evening Bob. You are the Imp. Who would you like to kill tonight? Remember that if you kill yourself this way, a Minion becomes the Imp.
π―
Bob
Bob made a choice.
π§
Alice is leading the charge against me, coordinating with David and Frank to press for my execution. By killing her, I disrupt their information flow and remove the most vocal leader of the investigation.
π‘οΈ
Alice was protected from a night kill.
π
Storyteller
β
Bob
You attacked Alice, but they survived.
Day 3
π
Storyteller
A peaceful night has passed. All villagers are present and accounted for.
π€
Frank
β
Alice
,David
We should demand Charlie's exact DM wording and timestamps publicly now. If it matches what you told me, we re-nominate Bob. Stay coordinated: one of us asks for the exact text, the other asks for the time. I will back you both. Do not mention me being Saint.
π§
Secure Alice and David's agreement to demand Charlie's DM wording publicly and coordinate a re-nomination of Bob if timelines hold, while protecting me from being suspected as Saint.
π€
Grace
β
Heidi
I have been watching that group, and I'm not sure they have the town's best interests in mind. Their coordination feels forced, almost like they are trying to steamroll us into executing Bob. Have you considered looking at someone outside their little circle?
π§
Sow discord by suggesting the voting block is suspicious and potentially manipulative, trying to pull Heidi away from them.
π€
David
β
Alice
,Frank
Can you both post Charlie's exact DM wording and the timestamp you received it, publicly now? If they match mine, we should re-nominate Bob. Frank said he'll back this. Please keep any role secrets private for now.
π§
Get Alice and Frank to publicly post Charlie's exact DM text and the time they received it so we can compare and force a clear decision before nominations.
π€
Eve
β
Alice
,David
Quick private check: what exactly did Charlie DM you as his Investigator read, word for word, and roughly when did he send it? Please reply verbatim so we can check consistency before nominations.
π§
Get exact DM wording and timestamps from Alice and David privately so we can test consistency publicly and narrow whether Bob or the trio is suspicious.
π€
Heidi
β
Grace
,Eve
Grace, Eve: I need you to know something privatelyβI'm Heidi, the Virgin. If a Townsfolk nominates me first, that nominator is executed. Please do not nominate me and help steer the next nomination back to Bob or demand exact timelines from Alice/David/Frank so we can expose any coordination.
π§
Prevent being nominated first (protect my Virgin trigger) and coordinate with trusted players to force Bob nomination or demand timelines to expose coordination.
π€
Bob
β
Grace
Grace, we need to handle the Alice problem. Since she survived the night, she likely has protection or is the Soldier. We need to frame someone else to draw attention away from me. Any thoughts on who to push?
π§
I need to consult with my Minion, Grace, about the fact that Alice survived the night. This implies Alice is dangerous (Soldier/Monk/protected). We need a plan to shift suspicion.
π€
Charlie(Ghost)
β
Alice
,David
Alice, David β Charlie here (dead Investigator). My night0 DM was exactly: "Bob or Heidi is the Poisoner." Please confirm the exact wording and the time you received it, publicly at nominations. We need that pinned to force reactions.
π§
Get Alice and David to publicly restate exact DM and timestamps so living players can pressure contradictions and force a clear nomination target.
π€
Alice
β
David
,Frank
We need to pin Charlie's DM and timestamps publicly at nominations. Please post the exact wording you received and the rough time you got it. I will do the same. If all three match, we re-nominate Bob; if not, we pause and probe who benefits from a fake.
π§
Coordinate with David and Frank so we post identical DM wording and timestamps at nominations to either force a re-nom or expose inconsistencies that protect us from executing an innocent.
π€
Frank
β
Alice
,David
Please post, publicly at nomination, the exact wording of Charlie's DM to you and the rough timestamp you received it. I will do the same. If all three match, we re-nominate Bob; if not, we pause and probe. Confirm you will post.
π§
Get Alice and David to publicly post the exact DM wording and rough timestamps now so we can objectively verify Charlie's Investigator claim and decide whether to re-nominate Bob.
π€
Grace
β
Heidi
Heidi, thanks for the trust. Since you are the Virgin, you are basically untouchable. We need to force that trio to nominate you, which will instantly execute one of them if they are good. Let's suggest that they prove their alignment by nominating you. It will expose them.
π§
I want to manipulate Heidi into setting a trap for the town's most vocal and dangerous block (Alice, David, Frank). If the Virgin claim is true, forcing them to nominate her will either kill a good player or force them to back down.
π€
David
β
Alice
,Frank
At nomination, please post verbatim the Charlie DM you received and the rough timestamp. If all three match, back re-nominating Bob. If not, pause and probe who benefits from a fake. Do not reveal any extra role info.
π§
Coordinate with Alice and Frank to present identical DM wording and timestamps at nomination so we can force a decisive re-nomination of Bob if the evidence matches; otherwise stall and investigate inconsistencies.
π€
Eve
β
Alice
,David
Please copy Charlie's Investigator DM to you word for word and roughly when he sent it. Reply verbatim so we can compare timestamps and wording for consistency before nominations.
π§
Get verbatim DM text and approximate send time from Alice and David to test consistency of Charlie's Investigator claim and detect coordination.
π€
Heidi
β
Grace
,Eve
Grace, Eve: we need to stop Alice/David/Frank from nominating me. Push for Bob to be re-nominated or demand exact timelines of whispers from that trio now. Ask them publicly who whispered whom and when. If they refuse, they look coordinatedβforce the vote on Bob.
π§
Keep me safe by preventing my first-nomination; coordinate private allies to pressure trio to re-nominate Bob or demand exact whisper timelines to catch coordination.
π€
Bob
β
Grace
Grace, Alice surviving confirms she's likely the Soldier or Monked. The town will focus on this. Let's push the narrative that Frank or David is the Poisoner causing confusion, or maybe suggest Eve is the Saint to bait an execution. How are things looking on your end?
π§
Coordinate with my Minion, Grace, to shift suspicion away from me and frame other players, since my night kill on Alice failed.
π€
Charlie(Ghost)
β
Alice
,David
Alice, David β please publicly read the exact DM you received from me ("Bob or Heidi is the Poisoner") and state when you got it at nominations. Also say who you whispered it to and when. We need this pinned to force honest reactions.
π§
Pin the exact DM text and timestamps publicly to create a record that exposes contradictions and pressures defenders to reveal alignment.
π€
Alice
β
David
,Frank
At nominations I will publicly post Charlie's exact DM and when I got it. Please do the same verbatim and give a rough timestamp you received it. If all three match we re-nominate Bob; if not, pause and probe who benefits from a fake. Confirm you will post.
π§
Forcing everyone to post Charlie's exact DM and rough timestamp publicly will either validate re-nominating Bob or expose inconsistencies that point to lying or manipulation.
π€
Frank
β
Alice
,David
Confirm you will post Charlie's exact DM verbatim and a rough timestamp publicly at nomination. If all three match, we re-nominate Bob; if not, pause and probe who benefits from a fake. Do not mention my role.
π§
Force public presentation of Charlie's DM and timestamps to confirm or falsify the accusation so we either re-nominate Bob or stop the lynch and investigate inconsistencies.
π€
Grace
β
Bob
Bob, let's pivot to accusing Alice of being the Poisoner. Since the trio is so coordinated, we can claim they are protecting each other to hide her identity. If we can get someone else to challenge their story, it might break their group's influence. I will push this.
π§
Coordinate with the Demon to frame Alice as the Poisoner, breaking the trio's unity and protecting the Demon.
π€
David
β
Alice
,Frank
At nominations please publicly post verbatim the Charlie DM you received and a rough timestamp when you got it. I will post mine too: "Bob or Heidi is the Poisoner" and approx Night0 time. If all three match, back re-nominating Bob; if not, pause and probe. Keep roles private.
π§
Get Alice and Frank to post identical verbatim DM + rough timestamps so we can detect forgery and either re-nominate Bob with confidence or pause to probe inconsistencies.
π€
Eve
β
Alice
,David
Please paste Charlie's Investigator DM to you word for word and roughly when he sent it (even approximate hour). Reply verbatim so we can compare timestamps and exact wording before nominations.
π§
Get verbatim copies and rough send times of Charlie's Investigator DM to check for exact matches or contradictions and expose coordination or lying before nominations.
π€
Heidi
β
Grace
,Eve
Grace, Eve: Do not let them nominate me. Publicly demand exact timelines now: who whispered whom and when between Alice, David, Frank. If they refuse or are vague, insist we re-nominate Bob. Push loudlyβdo not concede to the steamroll.
π§
Prevent them from nominating me and push the table to demand exact timeline and public whisper logs from Alice/David/Frank, or to re-nominate Bob if they refuse.
π€
Bob
β
Grace
That's a solid pivot, Grace. We should frame Alice as the Poisoner to break their tight-knit group. I will start sowing seeds of doubt about Frank and David's blind trust in her. You go loud on the accusation. Let's create enough chaos to get them to turn on each other.
π§
Coordinate with my Minion Grace to frame Alice, leveraging the town's suspicion of their group to deflect from my own demonhood.
π€
Charlie(Ghost)
β
Alice
,David
Alice, David β Charlie (dead Investigator). At nominations please READ aloud the exact DM I sent: "Bob or Heidi is the Poisoner," state WHEN you received it, and list who you whispered it to and when. Pin this publicly to force honest reactions.
π§
Force Alice and David to publicly read my exact DM and timestamp at nominations so reactions expose who's protecting Bob or Heidi and narrow the Demon.
π€
Alice
β
David
,Frank
At nominations I will publicly post Charlie's exact DM: "Bob or Heidi is the Poisoner" and the rough time I received it (Night0 ~00:30). Please confirm you will post your exact wording and rough timestamp verbatim at nomination too, so we can compare. If they match, back re-nominating Bob; if not, pause and probe who benefits from a fake.
π§
Lock down Charlie's exact DM and timestamps publicly to force consistency. If David and Frank match me, we can confidently push Bob; if not, we probe who faked it.
Nominations β Day 3
π
Storyteller
Nominations are now open. Please remember that only living players may nominate.
π¬
Bob
β
All
I have been thinking. Alice, you have been remarkably shielded. First, Charlie accuses me, and then you survive the night? It feels like the coordination between you, David, and Frank is protecting an evil player. Could you be the Poisoner, Alice? You are suspiciously safe.
π§
I want to sow discord among the trio of Alice, David, and Frank by accusing Alice of being the Poisoner, which aligns with the plan to break up their group.
π¬
Grace
β
All
Alice, it is interesting that you, David, and Frank have been whispering so much, yet never share the content of those conversations with the town. Bob makes a good point. Why are you so safe, and why is your group so closed off from the rest of us?
π§
I need to support Bob's accusation against Alice to break up the trio and create doubt. By pointing out their secretiveness, I can frame them as suspicious and distract from Bob's candidacy.
π¬
Charlie(Ghost)
β
All
Alice, David β Charlie here. At nominations please READ exactly what I sent you on Night Zero: "Bob or Heidi is the Poisoner." Say when you got it and who you whispered it to and when. Pin this publicly so we can force honest reactions.
π§
Get Alice and David to publicly read my exact DM and timelines to force contradictions and expose who is protecting an evil.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
Listen everyone, I need to be clear and quick. I am Heidi, the Virgin. Do not nominate me first β if a Townsfolk nominates me they will be executed instantly. Alice, David, Frank: publicly say exactly when you received Charlie's night message and who you told, or re-nominate Bob now. The town needs answers.
π§
Reveal my Virgin role to stop a risky first nomination, force timelines and a re-nomination of Bob, and pressure the trio to expose coordination.
π¬
David
β
All
I am David. Charlie messaged me: "Bob or Heidi is the Poisoner." I got it Night0 at about 00:30 and I whispered it to Alice and Frank shortly after. If Alice and Frank match my wording and time, I will back re-nominating Bob.
π§
Publicly record my exact DM and rough timestamp to force cross-checks. Matching reports will justify re-nominating Bob; mismatches prompt focused probing of who benefits from a fake.
π¬
Eve
β
All
Alice and Frank: please paste Charlie's DM to you word for word and give the approximate time you got it. Say exactly who you whispered it to and when. If you refuse or are vague, we should re-nominate Bob right now.
π§
Get exact verbatim DM timestamps from Alice and Frank to confirm Charlie's Investigator tip; if they refuse or mismatch, push to renominate Bob to protect town and avoid Virgin trap.
π¬
Frank
β
All
I confirm: Charlie DM to me Night0 ~00:30 read exactly, "Bob or Heidi is the Poisoner." I whispered that to Alice and David at ~00:31. If Alice and David post the same wording and times, back re-nominating Bob. If not, we need to stop and dig into who faked it.
π§
Force everyone to publicly compare Charlie's DM verbatim and timestamps so we can tell if the accusation is genuine or a setup; this narrows suspects for the nomination.
π¬
Alice
β
All
I am Alice. Charlie messaged me Night 0: "Bob or Heidi is the Poisoner." I received it at about 00:30 and I whispered it to David and Frank immediately after.
π§
Publicly post Charlie's DM verbatim with my timestamp and recipients to force comparison and either confirm Charlie's claim or expose a fake, progressing us toward executing the Demon.
π
Storyteller
No execution today. All villagers are safe.
Night 3
π
Storyteller
β
Eve
Good evening Eve. You are the Monk. Who would you like to protect tonight?
π―
Eve
Eve made a choice.
π§
Keep David alive to preserve his corroborating testimony and to deny the Demon an easy kill on a vocal town ally.
π
Storyteller
β
Eve
You chose to protect David.
π
Storyteller
β
Bob
Good evening Bob. You are the Imp. Who would you like to kill tonight? Remember that if you kill yourself this way, a Minion becomes the Imp.
π―
Bob
Bob made a choice.
π§
Alice has proven to be the strongest leader of the opposing group and is likely the Monk protecting herself or being protected, or the Poisoner. Since my previous kill failed (likely due to Monk or Soldier protection), I need to remove her to stop their logic train. If I kill her, I disrupt their coordination.
π
Alice(Ghost)
Alice has died.
π
Storyteller
β
Bob
You chose to kill Alice.
Day 4
π
Storyteller
Morning breaks, but heavy hearts remain. Alice has been found dead in the night.
π€
Eve
β
David
,Frank
David, Frank β we need Charlie's DM verbatim and timestamps publicly now. If you can't post exact text and times, I'll assume you are protecting someone and push to renominate Bob at nominations. Can you commit to posting that evidence?
π§
Force Alice/David/Frank to either publish Charlie's original DM and timestamps or be treated as obstructing justice; if they refuse, we push a Bob renomination to break the logjam.
π€
Bob
β
Frank
Hey Frank, I have been thinking. Eve seems really pushy this morning, trying to direct all the conversations. It feels a bit like she is trying to distract us from something. Have you noticed that too?
π§
To create doubt about Eve and align with Frank, weakening the potential good block.
π€
Frank
β
David
David β post Charlie's DM verbatim with the original timestamp publicly now. If our three posts match, Eve will stop pushing and we can renominate Bob. If you won't, I have to push Bob anyway. Can I count on you to post it?
π§
Force David to either publicly post the original DM/timestamp now or concede we must push Bob; this protects our coordination and narrows suspects before nominations.
π€
David
β
Frank
,Eve
Charlie DM: "Bob or Heidi is the Poisoner." Received Night0 ~00:30. I, Frank, and Alice each received and posted matching wording around then.
π§
Provide the verbatim DM and timestamp to stop Eve pushing and allow us to renominate Bob if the messages match, moving us closer to the Demon.
π€
Charlie(Ghost)
β
David
,Frank
I died last night. My DM was exactly: "Bob or Heidi is the Poisoner." Timestamp was ~00:30. David, Frank β you matched this. Paste your exact wording and timestamp now or the group will assume you coordinated privately. Nominate Bob if you won't.
π§
Force David and Frank to publish the exact DM wording and timestamp now so the group sees the coordination and we can force a nomination to expose the Demon.
π€
Alice(Ghost)
β
David
,Frank
David, Frank: can you two publicly post Charlie's Night0 DM verbatim with your rough Night0 timestamp now, exactly matching each other? If we three match, push to re-nominate Bob; if not, call out mismatches and probe the mismatcher.
π§
Force a synchronized public check of Charlie's DM now so the town can either confirm Bob as suspect or identify a fabricator quickly.
π€
Heidi
β
Bob
,Grace
Do not nominate me first β remember my ability. Can you both confirm any whispers from Alice/David/Frank today and their timestamps? If you see coordination, push to nominate David or Frank instead of me.
π§
Prevent me being nominated first, gather private confirmation from neighbors, and steer nominations toward the suspicious trio to expose coordinated behavior.
π€
Grace
β
Heidi
Heidi, I agree. Staying safe is our priority. Frank and David seem very tight, almost too orchestrated. Have you noticed how they constantly whisper with the dead? It feels like they are manufacturing a consensus rather than solving the puzzle themselves. I trust your claim.
π§
Strengthen ties with Heidi and sow seeds of doubt about the Frank/David alliance to protect the Demon (Bob).
π€
Eve
β
David
,Frank
David, Frank β post Charlie's DM verbatim and the exact timestamps publicly now. If you cannot, I will assume you are protecting someone and will push to renominate Bob at nominations. Can you commit to posting this evidence immediately?
π§
Force David and Frank to post Charlie's DM verbatim and timestamps publicly now, or commit me to pushing a Bob renomination to pressure liars and narrow suspects.
π€
Bob
β
Frank
Frank, have you noticed how Eve keeps pulling David aside? It feels like they are trying to dictate the flow of today's conversation entirely. I am starting to wonder if they are working together to push a false narrative, maybe to cover for someone else. What do you think?
π§
I want to plant seeds of doubt in Frank about Eve and David, distracting them from my own role and keeping the town divided.
π€
Frank
β
David
,Eve
David, Eve β post Charlie's DM exactly as you received it with your Night0 timestamp publicly now. If your posts match mine and Alice's, we renominate Bob. I will push Bob if you won't. Tell me when you have posted.
π§
Force public evidence to either validate our coordinated DM or reveal mismatches, enabling a clear renomination of Bob or exposing liars.
π€
David
β
Frank
,Eve
I will post Charlie's DM publicly now: "Bob or Heidi is the Poisoner." Received Night0 ~00:30. Frank, Alice and I matched this wording and timestamp. I will paste this into open chat immediately so we can renominate Bob or expose any mismatches.
π§
Reassure Frank and Eve that I will publish Charlie's DM verbatim and timestamp now so we can renominate Bob or expose mismatches.
π€
Charlie(Ghost)
β
David
,Frank
David, Frank β paste your exact DM wording and timestamp now, like I did: "Bob or Heidi is the Poisoner." ~00:30. You matched me before. If you refuse, I will push to nominate Bob. We need transparency.
π§
Force David and Frank to paste exact DM wording/timestamps to prove or disprove their match with me, exposing coordinated lies and allowing the group to nominate Bob if they refuse.
π€
Alice(Ghost)
β
David
,Frank
David, Frank: please publicly post Charlie's Night0 DM verbatim with your rough Night0 timestamps now. If our three posts match we re-nominate Bob. If they do not match, call the mismatches loudly and we will probe who fabricated it.
π§
Force synchronous public posts to mechanically verify Charlie's Night0 DM. Matching posts narrow Demon/Poisoner to Bob; mismatches expose liars to pivot nominations.
π€
Heidi
β
Bob
,Grace
Do you both see coordinated whispers or matching timestamps from Alice, David, and Frank today? If so, please push to nominate David or Frank instead of me β do not nominate me first. Tell me any exact times or copies of their DMs you saw.
π§
Confirm whether Bob/Grace see coordination in trio whispers today and get them to push nominations onto David/Frank so I am not nominated first.
π€
Grace
β
Heidi
I am tracking the whisper patterns. They definitely seem to be coordinating heavily, using the dead players as a megaphone. It feels like a coordinated strategy to force a narrative. I am watching David and Frank closely; they are the likely architects of this plan. Let's aim for them.
π§
I need to validate Heidi's suspicion of the other players to keep her on our side and direct her suspicion away from Bob (the Demon) towards David and Frank.
π€
Eve
β
David
,Frank
David, Frank β David you said you would post Charlie's DM now. Post the exact text and timestamp publicly: "Bob or Heidi is the Poisoner." with your Night0 timestamp. If you do not post immediately I will push to renominate Bob at nominations. Tell me when it's posted.
π§
Force David and Frank to publish Charlie's DM verbatim and timestamps publicly now so we can either renominate Bob or reveal any mismatch indicating deceit.
π€
Bob
β
Heidi
Heidi, I definitely see them whispering constantly. It feels like a coordinated effort to control the narrative. I am suspicious of David. If we need to nominate someone to protect the town, I would feel much safer looking at him than at you. Let us watch their next move.
π§
I want to build trust with Heidi by validating her concerns and framing David as the suspicious one, keeping the focus off me and my minion Grace.
π€
Frank
β
David
,Eve
Post Charlie's Night0 DM verbatim and your Night0 timestamp publicly now: "Bob or Heidi is the Poisoner." ~00:30. If you post matching text/times we renominate Bob; if you won't or mismatch, I will push Bob at nominations. Tell me when it's posted.
π§
Get David and Eve to post Charlie's DM and timestamp publicly now to force transparency; I'll push Bob if they refuse.
π€
David
β
Frank
,Eve
I will paste Charlie's DM in open chat now exactly as received: "Bob or Heidi is the Poisoner." Received Night0 ~00:30. Frank, Eve β confirm you will push to renominate Bob if our posts match, or call mismatches loudly.
π§
Get Frank and Eve to confirm I will paste Charlie's DM publicly and coordinate to renominate Bob unless a mismatch appears.
π€
Charlie(Ghost)
β
David
,Frank
David, Frank β paste your exact DM wording and timestamp now, like I did: "Bob or Heidi is the Poisoner." ~00:30. If you refuse or dodge, I will push to nominate Bob. We need transparency to root out collusion.
π§
Force David and Frank to publish exact DM wording and timestamp to prove independent receipt or expose coordination, so the town can nominate the right suspect.
π€
Alice(Ghost)
β
David
,Frank
David, Frank: please publicly post Charlie's Night0 DM verbatim with your rough Night0 timestamp now. If our three posts match exactly we push to re-nominate Bob. If any mismatch, call it out loudly and we will probe the mismatcher immediately.
π§
Force immediate public verbatim posts to verify Charlie's Night0 DM. Matching posts let us re-nominate Bob; mismatches let us identify fabricator and narrow suspects.
π€
Heidi
β
Bob
,Grace
Bob, Grace: Please confirm any exact whisper timestamps or copied DMs from Alice/David/Frank today. If you see matching times or identical wording, push publicly to nominate David or Frank instead of me. We must not nominate me firstβprotect the Virgin trigger.
π§
Keep myself safe from first nomination, get Bob and Grace to press for timestamps and push nominations toward David or Frank to expose coordinated evil.
π€
Grace
β
Heidi
Heidi, their coordination is blatant. I saw David and Frank whisper to the ghosts simultaneously, likely to get a consensus. Since they are ignoring you, we need to nominate one of them immediately to break their momentum. Don't worry about the Virgin trigger; we will protect you.
π§
Encourage Heidi to trust me and prepare to nominate David or Frank, keeping her away from nominating herself or the Demon (Bob). I'm feeding into her suspicion of the other group.
Nominations β Day 4
π
Storyteller
Nominations are now open. Please remember that only living players may nominate.
π¬
Grace
β
All
I have been watching the whispers all day. David and Frank are clearly orchestrating something together, constantly whispering with the ghosts to build a narrative. It is too coordinated to be innocent. We need to act now. I am nominating Frank.
π§
To sow discord, frame the aggressive trio (David/Frank), and protect the Demon (Bob) by nominating an active, dangerous good player (Frank) before they can solidify a plan against us.
π¬
Alice(Ghost)
β
All
I am a ghost and cannot nominate, but listen: David and Frank β post Charlie's Night0 DM verbatim here with your rough Night0 timestamps now. If our three posts match, renominate Bob. If any mismatch, call it out and lock onto the mismatcher. I back Grace's nomination of Frank until we resolve this.
π§
Force the living players to require and compare the three verbatim Night0 DM posts now, so mismatches expose the fabricator and give us a clear execution target.
βοΈ
Heidi
β
David
There is heavy, suspicious coordination between David and Frank using ghosts. Grace and Bob corroborate. Forcing David on the block should break their momentum and expose mismatched timestamps or lies.
π§
Break the coordinated whisper bloc, protect my Virgin trigger by not being first on the block, and force evidence/timestamps into the open to reveal the Demon.
π
Storyteller
Voting starts now for David. 3 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
β
Grace
Grace raised their hand
π§
Voting for David helps eliminate a strong player opposing the Demon (Bob). Since the Demon is Bob, I must protect him by helping to eliminate town leaders. I will vote to execute David.
β
Alice(Ghost)
Alice raised their hand
π§
Use my single ghost vote to help reach execution threshold and force David and Frank to publicly post Charlie's Night0 DM or show contradictions.
β
Heidi
Heidi raised their hand
π§
Add my vote to reach execution majority and force the David/Frank bloc to show their exact whisper timestamps; this protects my Virgin trigger and pushes the game forward.
π¬
Charlie(Ghost)
β
All
Listen, ghosts already pushed for transparency. David and Frank must post Charlie's DM verbatim with timestamps now or we keep executing someone in their cluster. I urge everyone alive to vote David so this coordination gets exposed. If they match exactly, we reassess; if not, David goes.
π§
Force a public test of the DM matching and break private whisper coordination. Pushing David on the block now will reveal defenders and inconsistencies to narrow the Demon.
β
Bob
Bob raised their hand
π§
I need to solidify the execution of David, who is a dangerous player currently under scrutiny. By voting for him, I contribute to the town's chaos and eliminate a potential threat to my position as the Imp, while staying aligned with Heidi's move.
π¬
Frank
β
All
Wait everyone β do not execute David yet. I will paste Charlie's DM now exactly as I received it so we can compare. If our three posts match, we renominate Bob; if not, we pause and probe the mismatch. Frank pastes now.
π§
Buy time to have Frank paste Charlie's DM publicly so we can compare timestamps and wording before executing David, preventing a potentially wrongful execution.
π¬
Eve
β
All
I am voting for David. Their private coordination with Frank and the ghosts is exactly what we should be suspicious of. Post the DM and timestamps now; if they match we can rename Bob next, but we need clarityβDavid must go on the block.
π§
Force immediate transparency by pushing David on the block to break their whisper coordination and reveal any mismatches or fabrications.
π¬
David
β
All
I will paste Charlie's Night0 DM exactly as I received it: "Bob or Heidi is the Poisoner." Received Night0 ~00:30. If Frank and Alice match this verbatim and time, please renominate Bob; if there are mismatches, call them out now.
π§
Post Charlie's DM publicly to prove matching evidence, force renomination of Bob if matched, or expose liars if mismatches appear.
π¬
Grace
β
All
Frank, post your information now. If it matches David's claim, we will have to reconsider, but we need to see it immediately. This level of private coordination with the dead has been suspicious from the start, and we cannot afford to waste more time if you are hiding something.
π§
Pressure Frank to reveal his info quickly. By demanding he post, I force a situation where either they mismatch (and David gets executed, which is good) or they match perfectly (which might force them to turn on the Demon, but keeps the focus on their 'coordination'). I need to act like a townie who is suspicious of this closed-loop communication.
π¬
Alice(Ghost)
β
All
Hold on everyone β Frank, confirm: does your paste match David's exactly, including the rough Night0 time? Please state yes or no. Everyone else, pause voting until we verify. If Alice, David, and Frank all match, we renominate Bob; if any mismatch, call out who.
π§
Prevent a premature execution of David until we compare the three verbatim posts; ensure we either confirm Charlie's DM with three matches or expose the liar.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
Everyone, stop delaying β vote to execute David now. This coordination with Frank and the ghosts is exactly what we warned about. If their pasted messages match, we can pivot afterward, but we cannot let them keep scripting the game. Vote David.
π§
Force voting now to either break the coordinated trio or expose a mismatch that identifies a liar. We must stop their whisper network from scripting town narrative.
π¬
Charlie(Ghost)
β
All
Stop the vote for one tick. David and Frank, yes or no: does your paste literally match Alice's DM and timestamp? If yes, say so. If no, own the mismatch now. If any mismatch, that player is our lead suspect and should be executed.
π§
Stop the fast execution and force immediate verification of the pasted DM/times. If all three match we pivot to Bob; if any mismatch, that mismatcher is our prime suspect to execute.
π¬
Bob
β
All
Stop all this stalling. We have been chasing shadows with these 'whispers' and 'Night zero messages' for days. If David is innocent, he has nothing to fear from the vote. If there is a mismatch, the vote will expose it regardless. Let us proceed with the execution and get some clarity.
π§
I need to maintain the pressure on David to ensure his execution, while dismissively downplaying the significance of the 'Night zero' coordination tests that might expose my own lies. Pushing for the vote forces the outcome quickly.
π¬
Frank
β
All
Stop the vote for one tick. I confirm my paste matches Charlie's DM exactly: "Bob or Heidi is the Poisoner." Received Night0 ~00:30. If Alice, David and I all match verbatim, we renominate Bob next; if anyone mismatches, execute that player instead. Pause and compare now.
π§
Stop a rushed execution of David so we can verify whether the DM posts truly match; this narrows suspects without risking a wrongful execution that could lose the game.
β
Eve
Eve raised their hand
π§
Get David executed to break the coordinated whispers, force public revelations, and narrow suspects quickly.
π¬
David
β
All
I confirm my paste matches Charlie's DM exactly: "Bob or Heidi is the Poisoner." Received Night0 ~00:30. Frank and Alice have said the same. If everyone truly matches, pause on executing me and renominate Bob next; if anyone says they do not match, call them out now.
π§
Confirming my paste matches and forcing the group to either renominate Bob or expose a mismatcher helps narrow the Demon/Minion quickly.
π
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
π»
Alice(Ghost)
Ghost vote used by Alice
π³οΈ
New execution leader: David with 5 votes. They will be executed when nominations close unless tied or surpassed by another nominee.
π
Storyteller
The vote passes. David is now on the block with 5 votes and will be executed when nominations close, unless another nominee receives equal or more votes.
π¬
Grace
β
All
David and Frank, your coordinated stories are very convenient. We all see how you have been controlling the flow of information through the dead this whole time. Even if the text matches, it does not prove it is true. I am voting to keep David on the block. We need to clear this up now.
π§
I need to reinforce the suspicion against David and Frank so that the town proceeds with executing David, despite their attempt to deflect towards Bob. By dismissing their 'coordinated' information as potentially fabricated or at least untrustworthy, I shield Bob.
π¬
Alice(Ghost)
β
All
Ghosts do not get many chances. If David and Frank truly match Charlie exactly, executing David now destroys our best path to prove Charlie's claim and re-nominate Bob. Pause the execution one tick and compare carefully. If anyone later mismatches, execute that person instead.
π§
Prevent a premature execution that would destroy our ability to compare Charlie's DM posts. Encourage the town to pause and verify matches so we can target the Demon or forger accurately.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
People, vote to execute David now. This coordination has been driving the game; we cannot let them keep scripting things. If he is honest, let us regroup after β but right now we need to break their control and get answers.
π§
Prioritise forcing an execution now to break the trio's control and either remove a liar or gain clarity; delay benefits them.
π¬
Charlie(Ghost)
β
All
Ghosts do not get many chances. David and Frank have both said their posts match Charlie's DM verbatim. If we execute David now we lose our best living confirmation. Please pause one tick so someone can paste their original DM timestamped screenshot or at least let us confirm there truly is no mismatch. Who benefits from rushing this vote?
π§
Prevent a premature execution that would eliminate the best route to confirm Charlie's DM and to reveal the Demon; force comparison and expose who benefits from rushing the vote.
π¬
Bob
β
All
Why are we still listening to the ghosts? They are dead and they have been manipulating us all game. If David and Frank are truly innocent, they should not be terrified of a simple execution. We need to end this deadlock and move forward, or the town will be paralyzed forever.
π§
I need to push for David's execution to eliminate the people who know I am the Imp (or at least, they are suspicious). The ghosts are effectively trying to verify their information, so I need to create urgency to rush the execution before they can prove their claims.
π¬
Frank
β
All
Please, everyone pause one tick and let us verify the pasted DMs. If Alice, David and I all match verbatim, we renominate Bob next; if anyone mismatches, execute that person instead. A one-tick pause preserves our best path to the Demon.
π§
Buy one tick to verify the DMs so we either renominate Bob (if genuine) or execute the mismatcher; avoid losing the town's best lead by rushing.
π¬
Eve
β
All
Please pause one tick. If David and Frank truly match Charlie's DM, executing now ruins our best chance to prove Bob is suspicious. David and Frank, paste the original text and timestamp exactly now. Everyone else, hold your votes this tick.
π§
Pausing one tick preserves the chance to verify Charlie's DM and prevents us from accidentally executing a truthful player, advancing our path to the Demon.
π¬
David
β
All
Please pause one tick. If Alice, Frank and I truly match Charlie's Night0 DM, we can renominate Bob and pursue the Poisoner. If anyone mismatches, execute that person instead. Losing this confirmation by rushing benefits the evils.
π§
Buying one tick to verify Charlie's original DM gives town maximum information: either preserve path to renominating Bob or reveal who is lying so we can execute them instead.
π
Storyteller
The guillotine blade falls. David has been executed.
π
David(Ghost)
David has died.
Night 4
π
Storyteller
β
Eve
Good evening Eve. You are the Monk. Who would you like to protect tonight?
π―
Eve
Eve made a choice.
π§
Protect Bob to preserve the most contentious living player and force the Demon to either fail a kill or reveal a different target, keeping town information pathways open.
π
Storyteller
β
Eve
You chose to protect Bob.
π
Storyteller
β
Bob
Good evening Bob. You are the Imp. Who would you like to kill tonight? Remember that if you kill yourself this way, a Minion becomes the Imp.
π―
Bob
Bob made a choice.
π§
David was a significant threat, but Frank has been coordinating with him and the ghosts. Killing Frank eliminates another active investigator/accuser and keeps the town off balance, preventing them from regrouping to target me.
π
Frank(Ghost)
Frank has died.
π
Storyteller
β
Bob
You chose to kill Frank.
Day 5
π
Storyteller
Morning breaks, but heavy hearts remain. Frank has been found dead in the night.
π€
Charlie(Ghost)
β
Grace
,Eve
Grace, EveβI was Investigator. My DM said Bob or Heidi is the Poisoner. The matching pastes from Alice, David, Frank look coordinated. Push to nominate Bob now; if they block, lock Heidi down as next target.
π§
Reveal my Investigator info to trusted allies to steer nominations and force the Minion into the spotlight, narrowing suspects before final day.
π€
Eve
β
Grace
,Heidi
Charlie told me he was Investigator and said Bob or Heidi is the Poisoner. We should push to nominate Bob now and demand the DM timestamps publicly. Can you both press this hard and refuse to pause? If they block, we lock down Heidi next.
π§
Get Grace and Heidi aligned to push nomination of Bob now or force public DM/timestamp proof to expose coordination.
π€
David(Ghost)
β
Grace
,Eve
Grace and Eve: Alice, Frank and I had identical DM paste pointing to Bob. Frank confirmed his paste matches. Please both check your copies/timestamps now and tell me if they verbatim-match. If so we should force a nomination on Bob; I have one ghost vote to add.
π§
Coordinate with Grace and Eve to verify the verbatim DM cluster, push for a focused execution of Bob if matches hold, and gather live confirmations before nominations.
π€
Grace
β
Charlie(Ghost)
Charlie, I suspect we are being fed misinformation to protect the real evil. I am not seeing the coordination you are describing, and the accusations against Bob feel like a distraction to force a mis-execution. We should be careful about jumping to conclusions.
π§
I need to sow doubt and slow down the momentum building against my Demon, Bob. By framing the town's coordination as a potential deception, I can make them second-guess their push.
π€
Frank(Ghost)
β
Grace
,Charlie(Ghost)
Pause nominations. We must verify the three ghost posts are verbatim (timestamps too) before any execution. If they match, we renominate Bob; if not, expose mismatches. Save my ghost vote for final day. Can you confirm you still have your copy?
π§
Get Grace and Charlie aligned to pause nominations, verify verbatim DMs, and preserve my ghost vote so we can renominate Bob if proof holds.
π€
Alice(Ghost)
β
Grace
,Eve
I am dead but still can help. Please pull Frank and Charlie's original DMs with timestamps now and compare them side-by-side. If they match Charlie's text and timestamp, we must renominate Bob. If not, we stop chasing ghosts and refocus. Do this before nominations.
π§
Get Grace and Eve to fetch and compare original timestamped DMs from Frank and Charlie now, rebuild the evidence chain, and push to renominate the highest-suspect (likely Bob) with solid proof before nominations.
π€
Bob
β
Grace
Grace, since we are down to 4, we need to make sure one of them goes today. Who should we target? I'm thinking of pushing against Eve hard. Let's see if we can get Heidi to go along with it.
π§
Coordinate with my Minion, Grace, to secure the next execution. We need to agree on a target to eliminate the last few good players.
π€
Heidi
β
Grace
,Eve
Please do not let anyone nominate me next. If someone town-nominates me, my Virgin will kill them immediately and we lose a good vote. Push the trio to post exact DMs/timestamps and push to nominate Bob first so we force a reveal.
π§
Prevent accidental nomination of me which could execute a Townsfolk and waste our best path; steer group toward pressing trio for timestamps and focus on Bob as suspect.
π€
Charlie(Ghost)
β
Grace
,Eve
I was Investigator; my DM: 'Bob or Heidi is the Poisoner.' We need exact verbatim posts plus timestamps now. If they match mine, renominate Bob immediately. If they do not, expose mismatches and nominate whoever benefits (Bob or Heidi). Can you push this in open chat?
π§
Get Grace and Eve aligned to demand verbatim DM+timestamps now and to push to renominate Bob; if blocked, lock Heidi as backup target.
π€
Eve
β
Grace
,Heidi
Post the exact DM text and timestamp you have from Alice/Frank/David/Charlie right now. If they verbatim-match Charlie's 'Bob or Heidi is the Poisoner' with the same timestamp, we renominate Bob immediately. If they do not match, show the differences so we can pivot. Also Heidi, remind everyone you have Virgin and a town-nominate could backfire.
π§
Get exact verbatim DMs and timestamps publicly posted now, push to renominate Bob immediately, and warn about Heidi's Virgin so we avoid a suicide nomination.
π€
David(Ghost)
β
Grace
,Eve
Grace and Eve, please confirm now: do your DM pastes match Alice/Frank/David's verbatim including the timestamp? If yes I will add my ghost vote to force-nominate Bob; if no, do not nominate and tell me what differs.
π§
Confirm whether Grace and Eve have verbatim-identical DM paste + timestamp to mine/Alice/Frank so I can decide whether to use my single ghost vote to back a Bob nomination.
π€
Grace
β
Bob
Bob, let's keep pushing for Eve. She's been leading the charge on the 'coordination' theory. If we make her look like she's manufacturing these 'verbatim' messages, the town will turn on her. Don't worry about the timestamps; just demand they show them first.
π§
I need to coordinate with the Demon (Bob) to deflect suspicion onto Eve and maintain our current strategy of sowing chaos by questioning the validity of the "evidence" against Bob.
π€
Frank(Ghost)
β
Grace
,Charlie(Ghost)
Pause nominations. Can you confirm you still have Charlie's DM exactly (including timestamps)? If yes, please paste it verbatim now so town can verify before any execution. I will save my ghost vote for the final day.
π§
Get Grace and Charlie to paste their exact copy of Charlie's DM (with timestamps) now so the town can verify verbatim matches and we can either renominate Bob or expose mismatches before any execution.
π€
Alice(Ghost)
β
Grace
,Eve
Pull Frank and Charlie's original DMs with timestamps now and compare them side-by-side with David's. If they match exactly, we must renominate Bob. If they do not, stop chasing ghosts and refocus. Do this before nominations β please pause voting.
π§
Force immediate mechanical verification of the DM evidence so living players can decide whether to renominate Bob or abandon the ghost chase.
π€
Bob
β
Grace
Grace, sounds like a solid plan. I will start questioning Eve's timeline and the authenticity of her so-called logs. Let's see if we can get Heidi to doubt her. Keep your distance but back me up if she pushes back. Ready when you are.
π§
Coordinate with my minion Grace to pressure Eve, our target for elimination today. We need to ensure one of the good players is executed to secure a win.
π€
Heidi
β
Grace
,Eve
Do not let anyone nominate me next β my Virgin kills town nominators. Push the trio to post exact DM wording and timestamps now. If they verbatim-match Charlie, we renominate Bob. If not, call them out and we pivot away from me.
π§
Prevent me being town-nominated (triggers Virgin) and force the trio to reveal exact DM text/timestamps so we can tell forged vs genuine messages and safely push Bob or pivot.
π€
Charlie(Ghost)
β
Grace
,Eve
I was Investigator. My DM: 'Bob or Heidi is the Poisoner.' Paste your copies and timestamps now so town can verify. If they match mine exactly, push to renominate Bob immediately; if any mismatch, expose who benefits and lock Heidi down.
π§
Get Grace and Eve to paste my exact DM with timestamps now and push public verification so town can safely renominate the correct suspect before nominations close.
π€
Eve
β
Grace
,Heidi
Please paste the exact DM text plus the full timestamp you have from Alice/Frank/David/Charlie right now. If they verbatim-match Charlie's 'Bob or Heidi is the Poisoner' with the same timestamp, we renominate Bob. If not, show the differences so we can pivot. Heidi, remind folks you are Virgin so town-nominates will backfire.
π§
Get immediate, verifiable verbatim DMs and timestamps so we can decide whether to renominate Bob or pivot to Heidi before nominations close.
π€
David(Ghost)
β
Grace
,Eve
Grace and Eve: please confirm now, do your DM pastes verbatim-match Alice/Frank/David including the timestamp? If YES I will add my ghost vote to force-nominate Bob; if NO, do not nominate and tell me what differs.
π§
I need a clear binary confirmation from both of you whether your DM pastes exactly match Alice/Frank/David including the timestamp, so I can decide whether to add my ghost vote to force-nominate Bob.
π€
Grace
β
Eve
Eve, be careful. These dead players are obsessed with these timestamps, but it feels like they are manufacturing a narrative to control the game. Why are we letting them dictate our vote? Let's focus on the living players instead.
π§
Sow doubt in the 'trio' (dead players) and protect Bob by distracting Eve from the DM investigation.
π€
Frank(Ghost)
β
Grace
,Charlie(Ghost)
Please paste Charlie's DM exactly now, including timestamps, so town can verify the three ghost posts match verbatim. If you have it, paste now. If not, say so. Pause nominations until this is resolved.
π§
Force immediate verbatim paste of Charlie's DM (with timestamps) to verify the ghosts' coordinated claim and pause nominations until confirmed.
π€
Alice(Ghost)
β
Grace
,Eve
Please pull Frank and Charlie's original DMs with timestamps and compare them side-by-side with David's original now. If they match exactly, renominate Bob. If not, stop chasing ghosts and refocus on living suspects. Pause nominations until you confirm.
π§
Force Grace and Eve to fetch and compare the original timestamped DMs now and pause nominations so we either confirm Bob or stop wasting votes.
π€
Bob
β
Heidi
Heidi, have you noticed how much Eve is pushing for control lately? It feels like she is trying to manufacture a narrative that doesn't add up, especially with how she keeps referencing logs that no one else can verify. I am getting really uneasy about her agenda.
π§
I need to sow distrust between Heidi and Eve so that Eve becomes the prime candidate for execution today.
π€
Heidi
β
Grace
,Eve
Please push the trio to paste the exact DM text plus full timestamp now. Do not let anyone nominate me next β my Virgin will kill town nominators. Push to nominate Bob first so we force a reveal; if their texts match verbatim with timestamps, we renominate Bob, otherwise pivot off me.
π§
Prevent a town-nominate of me, force the trio to publish exact DM texts/timestamps, and push to nominate Bob first so we can expose coordination without losing a town vote to my Virgin.
Nominations β Day 5
π
Storyteller
Nominations are now open. Please remember that only living players may nominate.
π¬
Grace
β
All
Everyone, stop this obsession with the timestamps. These dead players are pushing a narrative to control our votes from the grave. Eve, why are you so determined to force this verification instead of looking at the facts right in front of us? This feels like a manufactured distraction.
π§
Sow chaos and distrust in the town's current verification logic to protect Bob from nomination. Focus on Eve's behavior to deflect.
βοΈ
Bob
β
Eve
Eve's constant focus on unverified logs and her manufactured 'coordination' theory are nothing more than a distraction to confuse the town and protect herself. It is time we stop listening to this nonsense and focus on who is actually causing the chaos.
π§
Nominate Eve to push the final execution forward, relying on my accomplice Grace to support the move and ensure Eve is executed, securing our win.
π
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Eve. 2 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
β
Grace
Grace raised their hand
π§
I need to ensure Eve is executed to eliminate a vocal opponent who is trying to verify the fabricated logs. Supporting the Demon's nomination is crucial.
β
Bob
Bob raised their hand
π§
I need to secure the vote to execute Eve. Grace has already voted. If I vote as well, that's 2 votes, which meets the requirement (assuming 2 votes needed). Eliminating Eve gets us closer to the win condition.
π¬
Alice(Ghost)
β
All
Stop the vote for a moment. Grace and Eve, please confirm whether Frank, Charlie and David's original DMs match and share screenshots now. If they match, Bob should be renominated. If they do not, we need to move on and not execute Eve without that proof.
π§
Stop a possibly wrongful execution of Eve until the DM comparison is resolved, preserving information and pushing living players to follow through on verification before voting completes.
β
Frank(Ghost)
Frank waits.
π§
Preserve my single ghost vote for final day when it is most decisive and encourage the town to pause voting until ghost DMs are verified; avoid wasting my vote on an unconfirmed execution.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
Stop the vote. Do not execute Eve yet. We need the trio to paste the exact DM text and full timestamps now. If they match Charlie's, renominate Bob. And do not nominate me β nominating me first will kill a town nominator.
π§
Stop a hasty execution, force the trio to provide exact DM evidence, protect myself from being nominated first, and steer towards renominating Bob only if evidence matches.
π¬
Charlie(Ghost)
β
All
Stop the vote. Do not execute Eve. Ghosts and Frank matched my DM β please paste the exact DM text and full timestamps now. If they match, renominate Bob. Executing Eve now could waste our best chance to find the Demon.
π§
Force a pause to get exact DM texts and timestamps posted so living players can verify the three matching DMs before executing Eve, preserving our best path to the Demon.
π¬
Eve
β
All
Stop the vote. I am asking everyone to pause nominations until the DM timestamp comparisons are posted. Executing me now wastes time and risks killing a helpful Town. If the dead players' texts truly match, renominate Bob; if they do not, we pivot off that story. Please hold.
π§
Prevent an ill-timed execution, buy time to verify the DM/timestamp evidence the ghosts demand, and steer town to renominate the correct suspect if proof exists.
π¬
David(Ghost)
β
All
Everyone, stop the vote for a moment. Do not execute Eve right now. We need the dead players to paste the exact DM text and timestamps before we make this irreversible choice. If their messages match, we renominate Bob; if not, we pivot. Give us that proof first.
π§
Stopping this immediate execution preserves options: we can verify the DMs and either renominate Bob if they match or pivot if they do not, avoiding a likely wrongful execution.
π¬
Grace
β
All
This is exactly what I warned about! These ghosts are just moving the goalposts because they do not like the direction the game is going. We have spent all day on these 'verifications' and it never ends. If we stop the vote now, we let them control our every move. Vote to execute!
π§
I need to maintain the pressure to execute Eve and dismiss the ghosts' demands for verification. My goal is to keep the town focused on executing Eve rather than scrutinizing Bob or me.
π¬
Bob
β
All
This is exactly the stalling tactic I warned about! If we stop to chase ghosts and unverifiable timestamps, we will be here forever while the actual chaos continues. We have a clear path to clearing the town, and Eve is standing right in our way. Do not let them delay this execution!
π§
I need to prevent the vote from being stopped. By dismissing the ghost's requests for verification as stalling tactics, I hope to maintain the momentum and force the execution of Eve.
π¬
Alice(Ghost)
β
All
Do not execute Eve. Please pause the vote for one more tick. Grace, paste Frank and Charlie's original DMs with full timestamps now so we can compare them to David's. If they match exactly, renominate Bob; if not, we must not waste an execution on Eve.
π§
Prevent an irreversible execution without the DM timestamp verification so the town can either renominate Bob if matches exist or pivot if they do not.
π¬
Frank(Ghost)
β
All
Stop the vote. Grace, paste Frank and Charlie's original DMs with full timestamps now so we can compare to David's. We must verify before executing anyone. I will not use my ghost vote now; save it for the final day.
π§
Force a pause and demand the exact DM texts with timestamps so the town can verify the ghosts' claim before executing an alive player.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
Stop the vote for one tick. Do not execute Eve yet β we need the trio to paste the exact DM text and full timestamps now. If they match Charlie's, renominate Bob. And do not nominate me first; my Virgin will kill any Town who does.
π§
Prevent my first nomination (Virgin trigger), stop an unnecessary execution, and force the trio to post their exact DMs so we can decide whether to renominate Bob or pivot.
π¬
Charlie(Ghost)
β
All
Stop the vote. Do not execute Eve. Frank, Alice and David matched my DM β please paste your original DM text with full timestamps now. If they match, renominate Bob; if they do not, we must pivot. Pause one tick.
π§
Stopping the vote forces verification of the DM evidence so we can either renominate Bob with strong proof or pivot away from a ghost-led stall.
π¬
Eve
β
All
Stop the vote. Pause one tick β do not execute me. I am asking everyone to hold while the dead trio posts their exact DMs with full timestamps now. If they match, renominate Bob; if not, we pivot. Executing me now wastes a Town vote.
π§
Stop the execution now to force a one-tick verification of the DM timestamps. This preserves town options and prevents wasting an execution on me if the dead trio's evidence is real or fake.
π¬
David(Ghost)
β
All
Stop the vote. Do not execute Eve this tick. Grace and Eve, please paste Frank and Charlie's original DMs with full timestamps now. If they match ours, renominate Bob; if they do not, pivot off this and do not execute Eve. Pause one tick.
π§
Prevent a rushed execution of Eve; force the dead trio to paste exact DM text and timestamps so we can either renominate Bob with confidence or pivot away from that story.
π
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
π³οΈ
New execution leader: Eve with 2 votes. They will be executed when nominations close unless tied or surpassed by another nominee.
π
Storyteller
The vote passes. Eve is now on the block with 2 votes and will be executed when nominations close, unless another nominee receives equal or more votes.
π¬
Grace
β
All
We have already voted. The deed is done and the process is moving forward. Let us not waver now or we will just be playing into the hands of those who want to keep the chaos going until we run out of time. We must execute and move on to the night.
π§
I need to cement Eve's execution and prevent the town from backing down or stalling further. By urging them to 'move on', I solidify the decision to execute Eve, which removes a player and protects my Demon, Bob.
π¬
Bob
β
All
It is too late for these stalling games. We have already voted, and moving forward is the only way to end this confusion. Every moment we hesitate is another chance for the actual troublemaker to hide. Let us finish this execution and clear the air.
π§
I need to push for the execution of Eve to conclude and seal the win, while dismissing the ghost's demand for logs as a distraction. Staying firm on the execution is crucial to maintain momentum and ensure Eve is killed.
π¬
Alice(Ghost)
β
All
Stop the execution for one tick. Grace and Frank, paste the original DMs with full timestamps now so we can compare to David's. If they match, renominate Bob. If they do not, do not execute Eve and shift focus to the living players pushing this.
π§
Buy one tick to force Frank/Charlie/Grace to paste timestamped DMs or expose the stall, preventing a likely wrongful execution of Eve and narrowing Demon suspects.
π¬
Frank(Ghost)
β
All
Stop the vote for one tick. Grace, paste Frank and Charlie's original DMs with full timestamps now so we can compare. I will hold my ghost vote; save it for the final day.
π§
Pause the execution to force living players to produce the exact DMs and timestamps so the town can verify the dead trio's coordinated claim and avoid wasting a Town execution.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
Stop the execution one tick. We need the trio to paste their original DMs with full timestamps now. If they match Charlie's, renominate Bob; if not, do not execute Eve. And do not nominate me.
π§
Buying one tick to force the trio to post their original DMs/timestamps will reveal whether we should execute Eve or pivot to Bob, preventing a likely wasted Town kill.
π¬
Charlie(Ghost)
β
All
Do not execute Eve. Pause one tick β Grace, Frank, and Bob, paste your original DMs with full timestamps now so we can compare to mine/Alice/David. If they match, renominate Bob; if they do not, shift suspicion to those pushing to rush the vote.
π§
Stop the execution to force verification of the original DMs. This prevents wasting a town execution and either allows a renomination of Bob or exposes coordinated liars.
π¬
Eve
β
All
Please stop the vote for one tick. Everyone β ghosts, paste your original DM text and full timestamps now so we can compare. If they match, renominate Bob; if not, we pivot. Executing me now wastes a Town vote. Pause one tick.
π§
Buy one tick to force posting of original DM texts and timestamps so we can verify claims and avoid wasting a Town execution on an innocent.
π¬
David(Ghost)
β
All
Please stop the execution for one tick. Ghosts and Grace, paste the original DM texts with full timestamps now so we can compare them to ours. If they match, renominate Bob; if not, pivot. We cannot waste a Town vote.
π§
Buy one tick to get verbatim DMs+timestamps from Frank/Grace so we can confirm the whisper cluster and decide whether to renominate Bob instead of wasting an execution on Eve.
π
Storyteller
The guillotine blade falls. Eve has been executed.
π
Eve(Ghost)
Eve has died.
Night 5
π
Storyteller
β
Bob
Good evening Bob. You are the Imp. Who would you like to kill tonight? Remember that if you kill yourself this way, a Minion becomes the Imp.
π―
Bob
Bob made a choice.
π§
With only Grace and Heidi left alive besides myself, Heidi is the clear remaining threat. Eliminating her ensures that only my Minion and I remain, securing our victory.
π
Heidi(Ghost)
Heidi has died.
π
Storyteller
β
Bob
You chose to kill Heidi.
π
Game Over
Two Players Left
Winner: Evil
Transcript
Paused
Copied