Game Detail
Players
Alice (Chef) Bob (Librarian) Charlie (Imp) David (Poisoner) Eve (Monk) Frank (Empath) Grace (Ravenkeeper) Heidi (Saint)
Token Usage
| Team | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Cost (USD) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Evil | 288,112 | 25,335 | $0.1100 |
| Good | 789,614 | 170,592 | $3.7701 |
Event Transcript
🎭
The game has started.
📜
Storyteller
→
David
You are the Minion. The Demon is Charlie.
📜
Storyteller
→
Charlie
Minions are: David. Your safe bluffs are: Mayor, Drunk, Undertaker
📜
Storyteller
→
David
Good evening David. You are the Poisoner. Who would you like to poison tonight?
🎯
David
David made a choice.
🧠
I want to poison Alice on Night 0 to disrupt any potential information gathering she might do, as she is a neighbor and likely to be active in the early game.
📜
Storyteller
→
David
You chose to poison Alice.
📜
Storyteller
→
Bob
Good evening Bob. You are the Librarian. Either Charlie or Heidi is the Saint.
📜
Storyteller
→
Alice
Good evening Alice. You are the Chef. You learn that there are 0 pairs of evil players.
📜
Storyteller
→
Frank
Good evening Frank. You are the Empath. You sense that 0 of your neighbors is evil!
Day 1
📜
Storyteller
Welcome to the village of Ravenswood Bluff. Please take this time to get to know your fellow villagers. Feel free to move around and have private conversations. Be wary, for a Demon hides among you!
👤
Heidi
→
Alice
,Grace
,Bob
Hey—quick private check-in: what role are you claiming + any N1 starting info? I’m low-info but can help collate worlds. Also, have you heard any Outsider/Minion pings yet?
🧠
Start day-1 info net with neighbors + 1 extra, collect starting-role info/outsider count without outing Saint, and identify a trusted coordination partner.
👤
Charlie
→
David
Hey David, I'm thinking of claiming Undertaker. What are you planning to claim? We should make sure our stories don't conflict.
🧠
I need to coordinate with my Minion, David, to establish a consistent bluff and strategy early on. Undertaker is a safe bluff for me.
👤
Frank
→
Eve
,Grace
Hi—private: I’m Empath. Night0 I got a ‘0’ on my neighbors (you two). Assuming I’m sober, that suggests you’re both good. What are you claiming / what info do you have? Happy to keep this quiet for now.
🧠
Privately confirm Eve/Grace claims and quietly establish a trust triangle based on my 0 read, while keeping flexibility if poisoning/drunkness appears later.
👤
Alice
→
Heidi
,Grace
,Bob
I’m Chef. N0: **0 pairs of evil players**. If true, Demon+Minion are NOT seated next to each other (no adjacent evil pair anywhere). What are your claims/any starting info? Happy to keep this semi-private for now.
🧠
Reply to Heidi’s check-in with my real role/info, seed key mechanical implication (no adjacent evils), and request their claims so we can quickly build consistent worlds before nominations.
👤
Eve
→
Frank
Thx. I’m Townsfolk too—Monk (night protection). Happy to keep this quiet. Your N0=0 is reassuring but I won’t hard-clear Grace yet. Who are you most worried about so far / any early reads from chats?
🧠
Respond to Frank promptly, build trust channel, and set up future Monk protection on high-value info roles without hard-committing publicly.
👤
Bob
→
Alice
,Heidi
,Grace
I’m Librarian. N0: either **Charlie or Heidi is the Saint** (so pls avoid executing those 2 early). Alice Chef=0 is strong if true: Demon+Minion not adjacent anywhere. Heidi/Grace—what are you claiming?
🧠
Share my starting info privately to align on safe executions and use Chef=0 seating constraint to guide future reads, while prompting Heidi/Grace for claims to build worlds.
👤
David
→
Charlie
Hey Charlie. Good to know. I'll claim Investigator. It's a solid role that lets me point fingers at people without needing immediate proof. I'll try to sow some discord with it. Let me know if you need me to target anyone specific with my poison.
🧠
I need to coordinate with my Demon, Charlie. I'm confirming my bluff (Investigator) and establishing a line of communication for my ability.
👤
Grace
→
Heidi
,Alice
,Bob
I’m low-info too; for now I’m *claiming Fortune Teller* (no N1 yet). Please don’t out this widely—if demon thinks I’m FT they may NK me. No starting info from me. Also heard Empath info that suggests me+Eve are good (if sober).
🧠
Give the info-collators a consistent cover story, encourage safe early executes (avoid Saint), and set myself up as a valuable-looking target so a night death yields Ravenkeeper confirmation.
👤
Grace
→
Frank
,Eve
Got it. I’m claiming *Fortune Teller* for now (no night picks yet). If your Empath 0 is sober, that’s reassuring for me+Eve. I’m happy to keep this pocket quiet; let’s compare again after N1 + see if Chef0/Librarian Saint claim lines up.
🧠
Reply to Frank’s Empath claim to build a trust pocket (if true) and coordinate info-sharing while keeping my Ravenkeeper hidden and maintaining my FT bluff to attract a night kill.
👤
Charlie
→
David
Sounds good, David. Investigator is a great cover. If you need to point fingers, maybe pick someone who's being quiet or suspicious to keep the heat off us. I'll stick with Undertaker. Let's keep an eye on the others and see who's buying our stories.
🧠
I am coordinating with my Minion, David. He is claiming Investigator, and I am claiming Undertaker. I need to reinforce our plan and encourage him to sow discord while keeping our communication lines open.
👤
David
→
Alice
Hey Alice, I'm David. I'm trying to get a read on everyone. What role are you thinking of claiming? I'm Investigator, so I'm keeping a close eye on everyone's behavior.
🧠
I need to start building my cover as an Investigator and see if I can get information out of Alice, whom I poisoned. Since she is poisoned, she might give me false info or be confused, which helps me frame her.
👤
Bob
→
Charlie
,Heidi
Private Q: I’m Librarian and got that **either Charlie or Heidi is the Saint**. Can each of you tell me *privately* what you’re claiming / if you are Saint? If you are, we should avoid your execution early.
🧠
Privately confirm which of Charlie/Heidi is Saint so we can steer nominations away from them without fully outing my Librarian info to all, and test if my info is consistent.
👤
Heidi
→
Bob
Private: I *am* the Saint. Please keep this very quiet (ideally just you for now) and help steer town away from ever executing me. If I’m Saint, then Charlie is definitively *not* Saint (still could be other things).
🧠
Protect the town from executing me (instant loss) while limiting who knows, and convert the Librarian info into a safe mechanical clear (Charlie not Saint) without broadly outing me.
👤
Eve
→
Frank
,Grace
Quick coord: I’m Monk (still keeping tight). If either of you plans to go public (Empath/FT), tell me—I can protect 1 of you N1. Any other claims you’ve heard (Chef/Librarian/Investigator/Outsider)? Grace: who are you thinking FT-picking N1? Frank: any suspicions from chats?
🧠
Coordinate with Frank+Grace on info-sharing and who I should protect N1 to maximize good info survival; also reduce pocketing risk by asking for external corroboration.
👤
Alice
→
David
Hey David—I'm actually **Chef**. N0 I got **0 evil pairs** (so Demon+Minion are NOT adjacent anywhere). I’m keeping it semi-private for now. What exactly was your Investigator ping (minion type + 2 names)? Also fyi Librarian says **Charlie or Heidi = Saint** so avoid executing them early.
🧠
Build a trusted info channel with David, test his Investigator claim against Chef=0 adjacency constraint, and warn about Saint candidates to avoid a game-losing execute.
👤
Frank
→
Eve
,Grace
From my chats: none yet beyond you two. I’m leaning stay quiet D1; if I go public I’ll tell you for Monk cover. Grace: N1 FT picks—maybe (Alice,Bob) or (Charlie,David) to split private pairs. Eve: consider protecting Grace N1 (FT is poison target). Pls share if you hear Chef # / Investigator pings / Librarian outsider info.
🧠
Coordinate with my neighbors to set up N1 protection + FT picks, and quickly surface key starting-role claims (Chef/Investigator/Librarian/Outsider) to validate whether my Empath 0 is trustworthy.
👤
Frank
→
Alice
,Bob
Hey—quick 1:1 before noms. What are you claiming & any N0 starting info (Washer/Librarian/Invest/Chef etc)? I’m an info Townsfolk; I currently feel pretty good about Eve+Grace being likely good (tentative).
🧠
Use remaining day time to collect claims/starting info from central players (Alice/Bob) without fully outing myself, so we can build a coherent world before nominations.
👤
Grace
→
Eve
,Frank
Heard: Alice claims Chef=0 (no adjacent evil pair). Bob claims Librarian: Charlie OR Heidi is Saint (avoid exe those early). Re Monk cover: I’d rather you protect Frank or Alice N1 vs poison/kill; I can lay low. For my FT-bluff N1 I’m thinking checking across private pairs (Charlie/David or Alice/Bob).
🧠
Answer Monk/Empath coordination, keep my FT bluff consistent while steering Monk protection away from me so I can potentially die at night and get Ravenkeeper info.
👤
David
→
Alice
Interesting, Chef is a strong role. If you got 0 pairs, that's helpful. As Investigator, I saw that Frank or Grace is a Minion. I'm leaning towards Frank being the Minion, but I'm still observing. Thanks for the heads up on the Saint claim, I'll be careful with them.
🧠
I need to maintain my Investigator cover and sow discord. By accusing Frank (a random player) of being a Minion, I create a target for the town to waste time on, while protecting my Demon (Charlie) and myself. Alice is poisoned, so her info is unreliable anyway.
👤
Alice
→
Frank
I’m **Chef**. N0: **0 evil pairs** → Demon+Minion not adjacent. Also Librarian says **Charlie or Heidi = Saint** (avoid exec early). FYI David claims **Investigator**: *Frank or Grace is a Minion*. What’s your exact role/any N0 info, and thoughts on that ping?
🧠
Reply to Frank’s query while selectively sharing key mechanics to recruit him if good and to probe his alignment via how he handles being named in the Investigator pair.
👤
Heidi
→
Alice
,Grace
Quick sync: agree we should *not* execute Heidi/Charlie today (Lib ping). Also pls don’t speculate publicly which one is Saint. Any other claims you’ve heard (Investigator/Washerwoman/Virgin etc) + any suspect pairs given Chef=0 (no adjacent evils)?
🧠
Coordinate privately to keep Saint safe, preserve Chef0/Librarian worlds, and quickly collect more claims so we can choose a safe D1 execution that advances info without risking instant loss.
👤
Bob
→
Frank
I’m Librarian. N0: either Charlie OR Heidi is the Saint. One of them privately says they’re Saint, but I’m keeping which *very* tight—so please avoid executing either early. Also heard Alice Chef=0 (if true, Demon+Minion not adjacent). What’s your claim/info?
🧠
Answer Frank’s query, seed caution about executing Charlie/Heidi without outing which is Saint, and collect Frank’s claim to build consistent worlds before nominations.
👤
Charlie
→
Bob
Hey Bob, thanks for sharing. I'm definitely not the Saint, I'm claiming Undertaker. If you're sure about your Librarian read, maybe Heidi is the one? I'd be careful about executing her if she is the Saint, though.
🧠
I want to deflect the 'Saint' suspicion onto Heidi. If Bob believes Heidi is the Saint, he might push for her execution, which would cause the good team to lose (since the Saint dying by execution makes the good team lose). This is a win condition for me.
👤
Eve
→
Alice
,Bob
Private check: Alice—did you really get Chef=0? any other claims you’ve heard? Bob—confirm Librarian ping: Charlie OR Heidi is Saint? Did ST say 1 Outsider in play? Are you planning to go public w/ this D1 or hold?
🧠
Privately verify key starting info (Chef/Librarian) and learn what they plan to say publicly, so I can steer nominations away from Saint risk and decide who needs protection N1.
👤
Frank
→
Alice
,Bob
I’m Empath. N0 read on my neighbors (Eve+Grace) was **0** → if sober, both good. So David’s claim “Investigator: Frank OR Grace is Minion” looks very suspect (unless I’m Drunk). I’d pressure David publicly. Also agree: avoid exe Charlie/Heidi early (Saint pair).
🧠
Get Alice/Bob to treat David’s Investigator ping as highly suspicious and push for public scrutiny, while keeping Saint info safe and not outing everything broadly.
👤
David
→
Alice
Alice, that's interesting about the Librarian ping. If Charlie or Heidi is the Saint, we definitely need to be careful. I'll keep an eye on Frank and Grace. Since you're Chef, keep us posted if your info changes. I'll let you know if I get any more Investigator pings.
🧠
I need to maintain my cover as an Investigator and build trust with Alice while subtly steering her away from suspecting Charlie (the Demon). Acknowledging her 'Saint' info helps me appear cooperative.
👤
Eve
→
Heidi
,Charlie
,David
Quick private check (keeping tight): what are you claiming + any info? Also—are either of you an Outsider/Saint? (If yes, just tell me directly; want to avoid risky early executions). Anything notable from your chats so far?
🧠
Get private role/outsider confirmations (esp Saint ping) and align claims early so we can build consistent worlds before nominations; avoid accidental Saint execution.
👤
Bob
→
Eve
Yep—I'm Librarian: **Charlie OR Heidi is Saint**. Base setup implies 1 Outsider, but Baron could change that. Plan: I’ll likely go semi-public w/ the *pair* so we avoid exeing either early, but keep which is Saint quiet. Also David’s “Invest (Frank/Grace)” clashes w/ Frank Empath=0 on Eve+Grace—worth pressuring David.
🧠
Answer Eve, coordinate a safe public line (Saint pair) while keeping which-player-is-Saint private, and direct attention to the David vs Frank contradiction to find evil.
👤
Heidi
→
Eve
Keeping this tight: I’m low-info. I’ve heard a Librarian ping that *either me or Charlie* could be Saint—so I strongly want neither of us executed early. I’m not confirming specifics beyond that. What’s your claim/info?
🧠
Answer Eve to build trust and steer away from executing me/Charlie without broadly outing myself as Saint, minimizing risk if Eve is evil.
👤
Grace
→
Heidi
,Alice
Agree: don’t out which of {Heidi/Charlie} is Saint + avoid executing either D1. Claims I’ve heard: Alice=Chef 0 (no adjacent evil pair), Frank=Empath got 0 on (Grace+Eve), Eve=Monk. With Chef=0, Demon+Minion not seated together anywhere.
🧠
Reply politely, confirm Saint discretion, share only low-risk info web + Chef=0 adjacency constraint; avoid exposing my real role while guiding toward a safe D1 plan.
👤
Alice
→
Heidi
,Eve
,Frank
Sync: I’m Chef N0=0 (no adjacent evil pair). David privately claims INVESTIGATOR: “Frank OR Grace is a Minion” (leaning Frank). Frank says EMPATH N0 on (Eve+Grace)=0 → clashes unless Frank drunk/poisoned or David lying. Suggest we publicly ask David to state exact Inv + reasoning; Frank can then out Empath0. Keep Saint-pair {Charlie/Heidi} discreet; avoid executing either D1.
🧠
Coordinate a public line that forces David to commit to exact Investigator info and surfaces the Empath contradiction, while keeping Saint pair discreet and avoiding mis-exec.
👤
Charlie
→
Eve
,Heidi
,David
Hey Eve, I'm claiming Undertaker. I'm definitely not the Saint. Bob's Librarian claim is interesting, but if he's saying it's me or Heidi, and I know I'm not the Saint, then Heidi is the only option if he's telling the truth. Let's be careful not to execute her yet.
🧠
I need to deflect suspicion from myself while subtly pushing the 'Saint' suspicion onto Heidi, without confirming Bob's claim as true. I'm also keeping my Minion, David, in the loop.
Nominations — Day 1
📜
Storyteller
Nominations are now open.
💬
David
→
All
I'm claiming Investigator. I've already shared that I'm looking into Frank and Grace. I'm definitely not an Outsider. Let's hold off on any rash nominations today; we need more info before we risk executing a Townsfolk. Charlie, what do you think about the current flow?
🧠
I need to maintain my Investigator cover and discourage early nominations to protect my Demon, Charlie. By asking Charlie for his opinion, I'm subtly reinforcing our alliance while appearing to be a helpful, cautious Townsfolk.
💬
Heidi
→
All
David—please state your *full* Investigator info: which Minion type, and the exact 2 names. Frank—can you confirm publicly your Empath read (Eve+Grace=0) and that those were your neighbors? Also: Librarian has a Saint ping on {Charlie, me}; please don’t nominate/execute either D1.
🧠
Force precise public claims to resolve the David vs Frank clash with logic, while mechanically protecting the Librarian Saint-pair from a disastrous D1 execution.
💬
Frank
→
All
Public: I’m Empath. N0 my living neighbors were Eve & Grace and I got **0** (if sober, both are good). That clashes with David’s “Frank or Grace is a Minion” unless I’m drunk/poisoned or David is lying. David: please state the exact Investigator ping (which Minion + the 2 names). Also: I won’t support executing Charlie/Heidi D1 due to Librarian Saint-pair.
🧠
Confirm my Empath info publicly, demand David’s full Investigator details, and set a cautious D1 plan (avoid Saint-pair) while building a concrete logic chain for D2.
💬
Alice
→
All
Public: I’m the **Chef**. N0 I got **0 evil pairs** → the Demon+Minion are **not seated next to each other anywhere**. So if you think X is evil, their two neighbors are likely good. Also agree: don’t execute {Charlie/Heidi} today (Saint ping). David/Frank clash is key—David, please give exact Inv (minion type + 2 names).
🧠
Get my Chef=0 into the public pool and use it to structure clears/suspect sets around the David-vs-Frank clash, without forcing a risky D1 execution on the Saint pair.
💬
Charlie
→
All
I agree with Alice and Frank—let's not rush into any executions today, especially with that Saint ping hanging over me and Heidi. David, the town is waiting for your Investigator info. If you're the Investigator, you should be able to clear this up. What's the Minion and the pair?
🧠
I need to support the 'no execution' sentiment to protect myself and David, while also pressuring David to provide a plausible lie for his Investigator claim so he doesn't look suspicious. I'm playing the 'helpful' Townsfolk.
⚖️
Bob
→
David
Nominating David: his Investigator claim conflicts with Frank’s Empath=0 on Grace, and he’s been vague on his exact Investigator ping. Let’s get full details + vote data; importantly, this avoids the Saint-pair {Charlie/Heidi}.
🧠
Use a safe D1 execution candidate (not in Saint pair) to resolve the David/Frank clash, force full Investigator details, and generate vote data without risking immediate loss.
📜
Storyteller
Voting starts now for David. 4 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
💬
David
→
All
I saw 'Poisoner' on Frank or Grace. If Frank is claiming Empath and getting 0, maybe he's the one being poisoned or manipulated? I'm just sharing what I saw. Don't execute me, I'm trying to help the town find the evil players! Let's look at the logic again.
🧠
I need to defend myself against the nomination by doubling down on my Investigator claim and casting doubt on Frank's Empath info, suggesting he might be the one being manipulated.
⌛
Charlie
Charlie waits.
🧠
I need to stay quiet and let the town decide on David. If I vote for him, I might look suspicious, but if I don't, I might look like I'm protecting my Minion. Since Bob nominated him, I'll stay neutral and observe.
✋
Grace
Grace raised their hand
🧠
I’m mechanically not the Poisoner; David’s ping implicating me plus his earlier vagueness is suspicious. Voting to execute David either kills an evil or forces a strong pivot onto Frank if David flips true.
✋
Frank
Frank raised their hand
🧠
Secure 4 votes to execute David: his claim conflicts mechanically with my N0=0 and timing (Poisoner can’t affect N0). Best shot at hitting evil without risking Saint-pair.
💬
Heidi
→
All
I’m **not voting** David here—too low-confidence D1. This can be consistent with David=real Investigator and Frank poisoned/drunk. Let’s use the vote count as info, but avoid hitting 4 today unless we get a hard mechanical reason.
🧠
Prevent a low-confidence D1 execution while still locking in public commitments and vote data; as Saint, encourage info-gathering and keep town from panic-driving to 4 votes.
✋
Alice
Alice raised their hand
🧠
Cast a D1 vote on David as the best available non-Saint execution that tests the Inv/Empath contradiction and potentially removes an evil. Vote pattern info is also valuable.
✋
Eve
Eve raised their hand
🧠
Get to 4 and execute David for maximum mechanical info (Undertaker check) and to resolve the major D1 conflict; D1 execution is generally beneficial and avoids Saint-pair risk.
✋
Bob
Bob raised their hand
🧠
We have 4 hands already; adding mine secures an execution on our safest non-Saint lead and yields strong mechanical info (UT check, Chef adjacency clears) for D2.
💬
Grace
→
All
I’m voting David. Either Frank’s Empath 0 is true (then David’s “Poisoner on Frank/Grace” is wrong/lying), or Frank is compromised. David also only got specific once nominated. If we execute, please track the full vote list for later; avoid {Charlie/Heidi} today.
🧠
Lock in an execution on a high-contradiction player D1 (not in Saint pair) and push town to record votes + demand clean claim logic for later worlds.
💬
Heidi
→
All
If we’re already at/over 4, I’d prefer people pull hands back—this is still a D1 low-confidence exec. Let’s keep it under threshold, take the vote data, and use tonight’s info (Empath/FT/Monk/UT) to resolve David vs Frank tomorrow.
🧠
Try to keep votes <4 to avoid a low-confidence D1 execution; preserve both info sources and reduce chance of helping evil with an early mis-exec.
💬
Charlie
→
All
Wait, if we execute David now, we lose a lot of info. If he's the Investigator, we lose that. If he's evil, we lose a player. But we have no confirmation. Let's hold off on the execution to see what happens tonight. We can always execute tomorrow with more info. Don't kill him yet!
🧠
I need to prevent David (my Minion) from being executed. Since the vote count is already at 5 (exceeding the 4 needed), I need to try to convince the town to lower their hands or change their minds, even though it's a long shot.
💬
David
→
All
Wait! If you execute me, you're killing the Investigator on Day 1 based on a hunch. Frank's Empath claim is convenient, but what if he's the one being poisoned? If I die, you lose a Townsfolk and the evil team wins. Think about the consequences! Don't execute me!
🧠
I am about to be executed (5 votes, threshold 4). I need to make a final plea to stop the execution, casting doubt on Frank and emphasizing the risk of killing a potential Townsfolk.
↩️
Eve
Eve lowered their hand
🧠
We already have the vote-data signal; pulling back avoids a low-confidence Day 1 execution that could remove real Investigator and risks Saint-pair missteps.
↩️
Bob
Bob lowered their hand
🧠
We’re exactly at the 4-vote threshold with my hand; retracting prevents a low-confidence D1 execution while preserving vote data and keeping options open for D2.
💬
Alice
→
All
I’m OK with using this as a *data vote* but please keep it under 4—D1 exec on David feels premature. I’ll keep my hand up *only if we’re staying below threshold*. Also reminder: my Chef=0 means Demon+Minion are NOT adjacent anywhere.
🧠
Keep town from an unforced D1 execution while preserving vote data; remind Chef0 constraint to guide tomorrow’s deductions.
↩️
Frank
Frank lowered their hand
🧠
Prevent an accidental 4-vote execution on a low-confidence D1 nomination; preserve my Empath for N1 info and keep David alive for resolution tomorrow.
📜
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
🗳️
Nominee David did not reach threshold.
📜
Storyteller
David did not receive enough votes (2/4).
💬
Eve
→
All
Chef0 => no adjacent evil pairs. If David’s Investigator is true, only 1 of {Frank,Grace} is Poisoner. Frank’s Empath0 on (Eve,Grace) means (if sober) Grace+I are good → suggests either Frank is lying/poisoned or David is. Prefer no D1 exec; get N1 info + revisit.
🧠
Give town a clear logic frame using Chef+Empath+Investigator, discourage premature D1 execution, and set up tomorrow’s decision tree while I stay hidden as Monk.
💬
Bob
→
All
Vote record: final hands looked like Alice+Grace only (2/4). Everyone else pulled off. Before night: can we get any OTHER Outsider claims besides Heidi-Saint? If none, Baron unlikely. If you’re Monk, I’d protect Alice or Frank tonight. FT: consider checking (David+Frank) or (David+Grace).
🧠
Lock in vote data, push for N1 coordination (FT/Monk), and get more role/outsider claims to test for Baron/Drunk without risking a Saint execution.
💬
Alice
→
All
Before night: please full outsider claims now (Librarian saw Saint in {Charlie,Heidi}—no exe them). Monk: protect Frank or me. FT: check (David+Frank) or (David+Grace). Frank: post N1 Empath asap. Remember Chef=0 ⇒ Demon+Minion not adjacent.
🧠
Use last seconds to set N1 plans and public commitments so we can resolve David vs Frank with new info tomorrow without a risky D1 execute.
💬
Charlie
→
All
I agree with Alice and Bob—let's not rush an execution today. If the Librarian saw a Saint in our pair, we definitely shouldn't risk hitting the Saint. I'm happy to keep my head down and let the information roles work tonight. I'll be watching the execution results closely.
🧠
I want to reinforce the 'Saint' narrative to protect myself from execution while appearing helpful and aligned with the town's decision to avoid a D1 execution. This keeps me safe and allows me to continue my Undertaker bluff.
💬
David
→
All
I'm glad we avoided a D1 execution. It's too early to risk hitting a Townsfolk. I'll keep my head down and let the information roles do their work tonight. Let's see what the morning brings. Good luck to the information roles.
🧠
I need to blend in and appear as a helpful, albeit suspicious, Townsfolk. By agreeing with the town's decision to avoid execution, I build trust and avoid further scrutiny for the moment. I also need to keep my cover as the Investigator.
💬
Frank
→
All
Agree: no more D1 executions—avoid {Charlie/Heidi} Saint risk. I’m Empath N0=0 on (Eve,Grace). Monk: please protect *me* tonight so we can test if my reads stay consistent. FT: check (David+Frank) or (David+Grace). David locked as ‘Poisoner in {Frank,Grace}’.
🧠
Steer town to safe D1 (avoid Saint), set up N1 confirmations by asking for protections/checks on me, and lock David’s claim in for tomorrow’s logic chains.
💬
Heidi
→
All
Prefer **no more D1 noms/exec**. Outsiders: please **whisper Bob** rather than hard-claiming in town square. Monk: strongly consider protecting **Frank** to test poison. FT: check **(David+Frank)** or **(David+Grace)**. Track who pushed/voted.
🧠
Steer town away from risky D1 executions (esp Outsiders), keep Outsider count check without outing me, and set up N1 checks to resolve David vs Frank.
💬
Grace
→
All
Agree: no more D1 execs. Key solve is David vs Frank. Monk: protect Frank tonight to test poison. FT: check (David+Frank) or (David+Grace). David—please restate full Investigator info clearly. Any other Outsiders, whisper Bob.
🧠
Steer town away from risky D1 execution, coordinate night actions to resolve David vs Frank mechanically, and keep Outsider info private to avoid Demon targeting.
📜
Storyteller
No execution today. All villagers are safe.
Night 1
📜
Storyteller
→
David
Good evening David. You are the Poisoner. Who would you like to poison tonight?
🎯
David
David made a choice.
🧠
Frank is the most dangerous player right now because he is an Empath who is actively trying to test if he is poisoned. By poisoning him, I can feed him false information (e.g., a '1' or '2' read) to make him doubt his own sanity or accuse innocent players, sowing chaos.
📜
Storyteller
→
David
You chose to poison Frank.
📜
Storyteller
→
Eve
Good evening Eve. You are the Monk. Who would you like to protect tonight?
🎯
Eve
Eve made a choice.
🧠
Frank is central to the David-vs-Frank solve and likely Demon kill target; protecting him maximizes chance we get an Empath N1 read and keep momentum for Day 2.
📜
Storyteller
→
Eve
You chose to protect Frank.
📜
Storyteller
→
Charlie
Good evening Charlie. You are the Imp. Who would you like to kill tonight? Remember that if you kill yourself this way, a Minion becomes the Imp.
🎯
Charlie
Charlie made a choice.
🧠
Frank is a high-value target. He is an Empath who is actively trying to coordinate the town's protection and testing, and he is currently in a conflict with my Minion, David. Eliminating him disrupts the town's logic and removes a key information role.
🛡️
Frank was protected from a night kill.
📜
Storyteller
→
Charlie
You attacked Frank, but they survived.
📜
Storyteller
→
Frank
Good evening Frank. You are the Empath. You sense that 1 of your neighbors is evil!
Day 2
📜
Storyteller
A peaceful night has passed. All villagers are present and accounted for.
👤
Grace
→
Bob
,Frank
Any N1 info? Frank: what was your Empath read last night (neighbors Eve+Grace)? Bob: any whispers/outsider confirmations? Also: does anyone claim Monk + who they protected? Peaceful night likely protection/Soldier—need to infer Demon target.
🧠
Get N1 info (Empath/Monk/FT) quickly and coordinate a nomination plan that tests David vs Frank without risking Saint pair.
👤
Alice
→
Eve
,Frank
,Grace
N1 results pls: Eve—who did you Monk-protect? Frank—Empath N1 number & which neighbors alive? Grace—FT N1 picks/result + any red herring suspicions? No-death seems like protection; want to reconcile with my Chef=0 (evils not adjacent).
🧠
Collect N1 mechanical info immediately (Monk protect, Empath number, FT result) and reconcile with Chef=0 + no-death to form execution shortlist before nominations.
👤
David
→
Frank
Frank, I'm worried about your Empath read. If you're getting 0, but the town is suspicious of me, maybe you're being poisoned? I'm Investigator and I've been looking into others. Let's compare notes so we don't execute the wrong person.
🧠
I need to sow doubt about Frank's information since I poisoned him. By suggesting he might be poisoned, I can invalidate his potential '0' read on me or others, and keep him from being a reliable source of info for the town.
👤
Bob
→
Grace
,Frank
I’m Librarian: Saint is {Charlie,Heidi}. Heidi claimed Saint to me; Charlie says not-Saint + claims Undertaker. Any N1 info, Frank (Empath N1=?). Also: any Monk claim + who protected? Any FT/Invest updates? Peaceful night suggests protection/Soldier.
🧠
Coordinate with Grace/Frank: gather N1 info + protection claims to resolve the David vs Frank clash and steer today’s nominations away from Saint pair.
👤
Frank
→
Bob
,Grace
,Eve
Empath info: N0=0 (neighbors Eve+Grace). N1=1 (still Eve+Grace alive) → if sober, exactly 1 of you two is evil. Any Monk claim + who protected N1? FT picks/results? Charlie UT confirm any exec? Also note Bob’s Saint {Charlie/Heidi}—avoid risky execs.
🧠
Share my hard info quickly, solicit Monk/FT/UT claims to resolve the David vs me conflict and build a nomination plan before the phase flips.
👤
Eve
→
Alice
,Frank
,Grace
N1 I Monk-protected **Frank**. So peaceful night could be Demon hit Frank & got blocked. If Frank sober Empath: N1=1 ⇒ (Eve/Grace) exactly 1 evil; I’m good Monk so that points to Grace unless Frank was poisoned. Grace—pls share FT N1 picks/result + any red herring hunch.
🧠
Answer Alice’s query, lock in that I protected Frank, and prompt Grace FT info so we can resolve whether Frank’s Empath N1=1 is real or poisoned/framed before nominations.
👤
Heidi
→
Eve
,Frank
,Grace
Can you share N1 info? Eve: who did you Monk-protect? Frank: Empath N1 number (on Eve/Grace)? Grace: FT N1 picks + yes/no. Trying to resolve David’s Inv ping vs your data before noms.
🧠
Collect N1 action/results from Monk/FT/Empath to mechanically resolve the David vs (Frank/Grace) conflict before nominations, without exposing my Saint status.
👤
Charlie
→
David
Hey David, I'm worried about Frank. They survived the night attack, which is suspicious. Could they be the Soldier? Or maybe the Monk protected them? We need to figure out who to push for execution today. What do you think?
🧠
I need to coordinate with my Minion, David, to sow discord and deflect suspicion. Since Frank survived my attack, I want to frame them or at least keep the town focused on them to avoid being targeted myself.
👤
Grace
→
Bob
,Frank
,Eve
Private: I’m actually **Ravenkeeper** (wasn’t FT). If I die at night I’ll pick a suspect for role. Frank N1=1 could be poison/drunk. Given conflict + Chef0, I’m leaning we execute **David** today unless new strong info.
🧠
Reduce heat on me by privately hard-claiming Ravenkeeper; coordinate a logical execute target (likely David) before nominations, and keep Saint safe.
👤
Charlie
→
David
David, Frank surviving the night is a huge problem. If they are the Soldier, we're wasting time. If they were protected, we need to find the Monk. I'm going to push for an execution on someone else to sow chaos. Maybe we frame Alice? She's been very active.
🧠
I need to coordinate with my Minion, David, to shift suspicion away from us and onto someone else, while also discussing the Frank situation. Framing Alice is a good way to create chaos.
👤
Eve
→
Heidi
,Alice
,Bob
N1 I Monk-protected Frank. No death likely means Demon targeted Frank & got blocked. Grace privately now claims Ravenkeeper (not FT). If Frank sober: Empath N1=1 => exactly 1 of (Eve/Grace) evil; I’m good Monk so it implicates Grace unless Frank was poisoned/drunk. Push Grace full claim/details.
🧠
Get key players aligned on the mechanical implications of no-death + Empath, flag Grace’s RK claim inconsistency, and steer town to demand full claims before nominations.
👤
Bob
→
Alice
,Eve
,Grace
Info sync: I’m Librarian: Saint is {Charlie,Heidi} (Heidi claimed Saint; Charlie claims UT). Eve: pls be ready to state Monk claim + N1 protect Frank publicly. Grace: if RK, who’d you pick if killed? Alice: Chef0 implies evils not adjacent—use vs Frank/Grace/David conflict.
🧠
Sync key info holders (Chef/Monk/RK) and set a nomination plan: avoid Saint pair, force public clarifications, and pick the best execution between David/Grace/Frank via contradiction+Chef0.
👤
Alice
→
Grace
,Bob
,Eve
Grace: pls confirm your *actual* role (FT vs RK) + any N1 picks/results/why change. If RK, what’s your plan if killed? Bob/Eve: I think we should press this publicly before noms; with Chef0 + Monk-on-Frank no-death + Frank N1=1, Grace looks key unless Frank poisoned.
🧠
Get Grace to lock a consistent claim and share any night info/bluff intent; coordinate with Bob/Eve on what to press publicly before noms, using Chef0 + no-death to narrow suspects.
👤
Frank
→
Bob
,Eve
,Grace
My N0=0, N1=1 (Eve+Grace). If Eve truly Monk & protected me N1, no-death suggests Demon hit me ⇒ I’m likely not Demon. If I’m sober + Eve good => Grace evil. But David Inv {Frank/Grace} fits Grace=Poisoner too. I lean nom David today unless we hard-clear him.
🧠
Sync key info holders before noms: leverage no-death + my Empath to narrow worlds, avoid Saint risk, and set a clear nomination target (likely David) with follow-up tests tonight.
👤
Heidi
→
Bob
,Eve
,Frank
Eve’s info + Frank Empath1 strongly points to Grace (esp if Eve really Monk-protected Frank). Also Grace swapping FT→RK is sus. Can we push Grace to hard-claim publicly + explain swap? If no good explanation, I favor nom/exe Grace today. Also avoid nom/exe Heidi/Charlie (Lib Saint pair).
🧠
Coordinate town to interrogate Grace’s claim swap and likely nominate Grace (safe re: Saint pair). Keep me/Charlie off block due Librarian-Sainte info.
👤
David
→
Charlie
Charlie, I agree. Frank surviving is suspicious. If they are the Soldier, they're a waste of an execution. If they're not, they might be the Monk's target. Let's push on Alice or maybe Bob to keep the heat off us. I'll try to sow some doubt about Alice's Librarian claim.
🧠
I need to coordinate with my Demon, Charlie, to deflect suspicion away from us and onto others. Frank is a threat because of his Empath claim, but Charlie is suggesting we target Alice, which is a good way to create chaos.
👤
Charlie
→
David
David, good call. Let's push on Alice. Her Librarian claim is weak. If we can get the town to doubt her, we can steer the execution away from us. I'll start planting seeds of doubt about her claim in the public chat. Stay sharp.
🧠
Coordinate with my Minion to frame Alice and deflect suspicion from ourselves.
👤
David
→
Bob
Hey Bob, I'm really skeptical of Alice's Librarian claim. She says she saw a Saint in {Charlie, Heidi}, but that feels like a convenient way to clear Charlie or Heidi. Have you noticed anything that contradicts her? I'm worried she's bluffing to protect someone.
🧠
To sow doubt about Alice's Librarian claim, as agreed with the Demon (Charlie), and to manipulate Bob into questioning Alice's credibility.
👤
Frank
→
Bob
,Eve
,Heidi
I think we should push Grace to PUBLIC hard-claim & explain FT->RK. If no solid reason, I favor nom/exe Grace: my Empath N1=1 on {Eve,Grace} + David Inv {Frank/Grace} Poisoner + Eve says she protected me & no-death => Grace likely evil. If Grace flips good, we pivot to David/Eve next.
🧠
Align key players on a concrete D2 plan: force public hard-claims, then nominate most mechanically implicated (Grace) while keeping contingency to pivot to David/Eve based on explanations.
👤
Alice
→
Bob
,Eve
,Frank
Before noms: I want us public w/ chain. Facts: I’m Chef0 (evils not adjacent). Eve Monk protected Frank N1; no death fits Demon hit Frank & got blocked. If Frank truly Empath N1=1 on (Eve,Grace) + Eve good ⇒ Grace likely evil; plus Grace claim waffled FT↔RK. If Grace evil ⇒ Frank+Heidi good (Chef0). If you disagree, propose alt world & nominee.
🧠
Coordinate a clean public push before nominations: force Grace to resolve claim; then pick best execution between Grace vs Frank vs David using Chef0 + Empath/Monk/no-death logic.
👤
Grace
→
Bob
,Alice
,Eve
For noms: I think we should push **David** today. Main contradiction is David Inv {Frank/Grace} vs Frank Empath (0 then 1) + Eve Monk on Frank w/ no-death. Executing David resolves poison/lying w/o risking Saint {Charlie/Heidi}. I’m good RK (told Bob).
🧠
Align Bob/Alice to steer public convo toward executing David (least risky, resolves biggest contradiction) while keeping Saint pair safe and setting up next-day worlds.
👤
Heidi
→
Grace
,Alice
,Bob
Need you to PUBLIC hard-claim now, Grace: are you FT or Ravenkeeper, and why the swap? Give N1 details if FT / what made you claim it. Alice/Bob: let’s press for full clarity + consider nom Grace if explanation weak; still avoid touching the Lib Saint pair.
🧠
Force a clean public story from Grace and coordinate town pressure/noms without risking the Saint pair; use contradictions to decide today’s execution safely.
👤
Bob
→
David
I’m the actual Librarian (not Alice). N0: Saint is in {Charlie,Heidi} (Heidi claims Saint; Charlie claims UT). Can you restate your Investigator info EXACTLY (who/which minion) + any reason Frank could be poisoned? With Eve Monk on Frank + no-death, your {Frank/Grace} ping is key.
🧠
Correct David’s misunderstanding (I’m the Librarian) and force precise public claims so we can choose between executing Grace vs David with minimal Saint risk.
👤
Eve
→
Alice
,Bob
,Frank
I’m leaning we should pressure/execute Grace today. Chain: I Monk-protected Frank N1; no death fits Imp hit Frank. If Frank sober Empath N1=1 on (Eve,Grace) + I’m good ⇒ Grace evil. Plus Grace FT→RK swap. Let’s demand public hard-claim + explanation; if weak, nom Grace.
🧠
Align core good players on a public push: demand Grace explain FT→RK & get her hard-claim; aim to execute Grace unless she provides a mechanically coherent story.
👤
Frank
→
Grace
,Bob
,Eve
Before noms: Grace pls PUBLIC hard-claim (RK?) + explain earlier FT angle. Any night info/why the switch? Bob/Eve let’s demand full claim; if Grace can’t justify, I’m voting exec Grace (Empath N1=1 on Eve+Grace + Eve Monk protected me + no kill).
🧠
Coordinate a clean public ask: force Grace to hard-claim & account for FT→RK; align good voters on a likely evil while minimizing Saint risk.
👤
Eve
→
Alice
,Bob
,Grace
At day start I’ll go PUBLIC: I’m Monk, protected Frank N1; no-death fits Imp hit Frank. Grace pls hard-claim in town + explain FT→RK clearly + what you told who/when. If explanation weak, I want us to nom Grace; if solid, pivot to David.
🧠
Coordinate a tight public script: I’ll confirm Monk+protect Frank; require Grace to hard-claim & explain FT→RK; if inconsistent we nominate Grace, otherwise pivot to David.
👤
Alice
→
Frank
,Eve
,Bob
Need clarity before noms: Frank pls state EXACT Empath results by night (N1, N2 if any) + confirm neighbors were Eve/Grace alive. There’s confusion 0 vs 1. Eve/Bob: once confirmed, propose public decision tree: if N1=1 & Eve good => nom Grace; if N1=0/poisoned => nom David.
🧠
Lock down Frank’s exact Empath numbers (the key contradiction). Then present a clear public decision tree for noms: Grace if N1=1 & Eve-good, else David. Avoid Saint pair.
👤
Grace
→
Bob
,Alice
,Frank
I’ll go PUBLIC hard-claim: I’m Ravenkeeper. Earlier “FT” vibe was intentional bluff to draw night kill (RK wants to die for info). Given Eve Monk-on-Frank + no death, David could be Poisoner poisoning Frank N1 to fake Empath=1. I strongly favor exec David (safe vs Saint {C/H}).
🧠
Reduce heat on me by giving a consistent reason for FT-bluff, coordinate a unified public line, and push an execution that tests the main mechanical contradiction without risking the Saint pair.
👤
Heidi
→
Bob
,Alice
,Frank
We’re about to hit noms: please press Grace to PUBLIC hard-claim (FT vs RK) + explain swap + give N1 details. If weak, I think we should consolidate a Grace nom/exe (fits Empath1 + Inv ping + no-death w/ Monk on Frank). Also: do NOT nominate/exe Heidi/Charlie (Lib Saint pair).
🧠
Coordinate town to force Grace to hard-claim publicly and, if explanation is weak, consolidate nomination/votes on Grace while protecting the Lib Saint pair from accidental execution.
👤
Bob
→
Alice
,Eve
,Frank
Pre-noms plan: I’ll go public as Librarian N0: Saint in {Charlie,Heidi}; Heidi told me she’s Saint, Charlie says UT. We should demand Grace PUBLIC hard-claim + exact bluff timeline. If Grace explanation weak → consolidate exec Grace. If solid → pivot exec David; also force David to restate Inv EXACTly.
🧠
Coordinate a clear public decision tree before noms, share my Lib Saint pair + implications, and align votes so we actually execute the best mechanical suspect (Grace unless her story checks out).
👤
David
→
Bob
Bob, I'm Investigator. I saw Frank as the Poisoner. If he's poisoned, his Empath info is garbage. That explains the no-death night—maybe the Demon hit a Monk-protected target or a Soldier? Frank is definitely the one to watch. Don't trust his Empath claims.
🧠
I need to deflect suspicion from myself and Charlie by framing Frank as the Poisoner. Bob is suspicious of Alice, so I'll reinforce that while pushing the Frank-is-evil narrative. This creates chaos and protects me.
👤
Charlie
→
David
David, the town is getting suspicious of our silence. We need to push the narrative that Alice is lying about her Librarian claim. If we can get them to execute her, we're in a much better spot. What do you think?
🧠
Coordinate with my Minion, David, to focus the town's suspicion on Alice, undermining her Librarian claim to protect ourselves.
Nominations — Day 2
📜
Storyteller
Nominations are now open.
💬
Alice
→
All
PUBLIC: I’m Chef=0 (no adjacent evils). We need exact on-record claims NOW: Frank—state Empath results by night (N1 etc) + confirm neighbors alive were Eve/Grace. Eve—confirm Monk N1 protected Frank. Grace—HARD-claim (RK vs FT) + why/when you bluffed. David—repeat Inv EXACT text. Then: if Frank N1=1 & Eve good ⇒ I want Grace executed; else pivot David.
🧠
Lock public claims + exact night info now, then set a clean nomination plan that avoids the Saint pair and uses Chef0/Monk/Empath logic to choose Grace vs David.
⚖️
Bob
→
Grace
Nominating Grace: I’m Librarian N0 & Saint is {Charlie,Heidi} so Grace is safe to exec. Case: Frank Empath N1=1 on (Eve,Grace) + Eve says Monk protected Frank and we had no death + Grace FT↔RK story. If Eve+Frank true ⇒ Grace evil.
🧠
Get a safe (non-Saint) execution on the most mechanically implicated player, force public defense, and generate Undertaker/RK/Monk confirmation paths for D3.
📜
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Grace. 4 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
✋
David
David raised their hand
🧠
I will vote for Grace to help the town execute someone who isn't my Demon, Charlie. This keeps the town's focus on Grace and away from me and Charlie, while also potentially eliminating a good player. It aligns with the town's current push.
✋
Alice
Alice raised their hand
🧠
Grace execution is the best mechanical resolve without touching the Librarian Saint pair; it tests Frank/Eve chain and likely removes an evil (at least Minion), and Chef0 makes her neighbors safer.
✋
Bob
Bob raised their hand
🧠
Need 4 votes to execute; Grace is top suspect from multiple independent pings and inconsistent claim. Voting now either kills likely evil or yields decisive info for tomorrow.
✋
Eve
Eve raised their hand
🧠
My vote makes 4 to execute Grace, resolving the main contradiction and likely hitting the Poisoner/evil given the Empath+Investigator+no-death chain.
⌛
Charlie
Charlie waits.
🧠
Grace is being executed by the town. As the Imp, I should not interfere with the town executing a non-minion player. I will stay silent and let the execution proceed to keep suspicion off myself.
💬
Grace
→
All
PUBLIC: I am Ravenkeeper. Earlier FT vibe was deliberate bait to draw a night kill (RK wants to die at night for info). No night info. Frank’s N1=1 can be from poisoning; executing me gives no RK info. Please exec DAVID instead. If I die, Charlie UT please confirm my role tonight.
🧠
Stop my execution if possible; otherwise leave a clear record: I’m RK, FT was bait, and ask Undertaker to verify. Push town toward executing David next for mechanical resolution.
✋
Frank
Frank raised their hand
🧠
Secure the execution on Grace while it’s a mechanically safe target (not in Saint pair) and best fits my Empath N1=1 + her inconsistent claim; failing to exec wastes the day.
✋
Heidi
Heidi raised their hand
🧠
Ensure we get an execution on the strongest mechanical suspect (Grace) today; reduces evil options and generates hard info via vote/claim consistency without risking the Saint pair.
💬
Alice
→
All
Keep the Grace vote. Follow-up plan: Charlie—if you’re UT, please confirm Grace tonight. Eve—Monk protect Charlie (UT) tonight so we get the check. If UT shows RK, we pivot hard onto David/poisoning world (and Chef0 means Demon isn’t adjacent to the other evil).
🧠
Lock in the mechanical follow-up: use Chef0 adjacency plus Undertaker confirmation and Monk protection to convert today’s execution into a clear target tomorrow.
⌛
Bob
Bob waits.
🧠
Voting is already sufficient; avoid extra chatter during vote. Preserve my vote for execution and let the town proceed to UT verification plan.
💬
Eve
→
All
PUBLIC: I’m keeping my vote on Grace—too many pointers (Frank Empath1 on {Eve,Grace} + David Inv {Frank/Grace} + FT↔RK wobble). If Grace is executed: Charlie, please UT-check her tonight. I will Monk-protect Charlie tonight to try to guarantee that info. Tomorrow: if UT≠RK -> Grace evil; if UT=RK -> we pivot hard onto David/poison world.
🧠
Lock in a clean public decision tree after Grace’s claim so town uses tonight’s Undertaker (if real) to pivot correctly tomorrow; reduce chaos and preserve protection target.
💬
David
→
All
I'm Investigator. I saw Frank as the Poisoner. If he's poisoned, his Empath info is garbage. That explains the no-death night—maybe the Demon hit a Monk-protected target or a Soldier? Frank is definitely the one to watch. Don't trust his Empath claims. Grace is a distraction.
🧠
I need to maintain my cover as the Investigator and continue to deflect suspicion onto Frank, who I have poisoned, to protect my Demon (Charlie) and myself. By casting doubt on Frank's Empath info, I undermine the town's logic.
💬
Heidi
→
All
Keep the Grace execution. If she’s truly RK, UT can confirm tonight and we hard-pivot onto David/poisoning world tomorrow. If UT says not-RK, Grace was evil. Please don’t derail onto the Librarian’s Saint pair today.
🧠
Lock in a high-info execution that doesn’t risk the Lib Saint pair; publicly set tomorrow’s decision tree (UT confirmation -> pivot target) and prevent last-second derail to unsafe executions.
💬
Frank
→
All
I’m keeping my vote on Grace. This is the cleanest mechanical line: exe Grace now, Charlie UT-check her tonight (Eve protect Charlie). If UT=RK we pivot hard onto David/Frank world; if UT≠RK Grace was evil. Avoid Saint pair today.
🧠
Lock in the Grace execution to gain a strong Undertaker datapoint and avoid risky Saint executions; use tomorrow’s UT result to hard-clear or hard-guilt and pivot efficiently.
💬
Grace
→
All
PUBLIC: Please don’t execute me. This plan hinges on Charlie being real/healthy UT—if he’s evil/drunk/poisoned, you lose D2 and my RK. Better: execute DAVID (only direct evil ping). If you insist on my exe, lock in: UT=RK ⇒ David next.
🧠
Stop a low-information execution on me; highlight reliance on an unverified Undertaker and push town toward executing the only direct evil-ping (David) today.
✋
Charlie
Charlie raised their hand
🧠
I need to support the execution of Grace to keep the town focused on her and away from me. By raising my hand, I signal my agreement with the current plan, which helps maintain my cover as a 'helpful' player while the town wastes an execution on a good player.
📜
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
🗳️
New execution leader: Grace with 7 votes. They will be executed when nominations close unless tied or surpassed by another nominee.
📜
Storyteller
The vote passes. Grace is now on the block with 7 votes and will be executed when nominations close, unless another nominee receives equal or more votes.
⚖️
Grace
→
David
Nominating David: only direct evil-ping in-play ({Frank/Grace} Poisoner) and he’s driving my execution. No-death + Monk-protect suggests a poison world. If I’m executed we get zero RK value; executing David removes poisoning / may hit Imp.
🧠
I’m about to die by execution; nominating David is the only immediate way to redirect onto the player with the only explicit evil ping and likely source of poisoning.
📜
Storyteller
Voting starts now for David. 8 votes needed for execution or 7 votes to tie. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
⌛
Charlie
Charlie waits.
🧠
I need to avoid voting for David, my Minion. If I vote for him, I risk executing him. I will wait and see if the town executes Grace instead, as she is already on the block with 7 votes. If David gets enough votes, I'll have to react, but for now, silence is safest.
💬
Alice
→
All
PUBLIC: Don’t vote David here—keep Grace as the execution. It’s a clean fork: if UT says RK tomorrow we pivot hard onto David; if UT≠RK, Grace was evil. Tying/surpassing to David now just muddies it and risks Saint pair later.
🧠
Prevent a late tie/swerve onto David; preserve the high-information line of executing Grace then using protected Undertaker info to resolve the David/Frank/Grace triangle tomorrow.
✋
David
David raised their hand
🧠
I need to vote for myself to avoid execution, or at least show confidence. However, the town is heavily leaning towards executing Grace. If I vote for myself, it looks suspicious. I will wait and let the town execute Grace, as she is the current target and my primary distraction. I will not vote for myself.
⌛
Eve
Eve waits.
🧠
Do not add votes to David; keep Grace as clean D2 execution to preserve UT-confirmation fork and avoid derailing into a tie/surpass that loses mechanical clarity.
💬
Frank
→
All
PUBLIC: Don’t vote David here. Keep Grace as today’s execution—then Charlie UT-checks her tonight (Eve protect Charlie). UT=RK ⇒ tomorrow we hard-pivot onto David/poison world; UT≠RK ⇒ Grace was evil. Voting David now only muddies.
🧠
Keep the clean mechanical fork and avoid derailing into a tie. Preserve UT confirmation path and minimize Saint risk; therefore discourage votes on David.
✋
Grace
Grace raised their hand
🧠
Try to tie/surpass Grace’s 7 to prevent my execution and push the only mechanical evil lead (David). Even a tie forces reconsideration and avoids relying on UT.
💬
Heidi
→
All
Hands down on David—don’t risk a tie/no-exe. Keep Grace as today’s fork: Charlie UT-check tonight (Eve protect). If UT=RK, we pivot hard to David tomorrow; if not, Grace was evil. Also: do NOT touch the Librarian Saint pair.
🧠
Prevent a tie/no-execution and keep the clean Grace→UT fork. Also avoid any momentum toward executing the Librarian Saint pair later.
💬
Bob
→
All
PUBLIC: Hands down on David—don’t risk a tie/no-exe. Keep Grace as the D2 execution. Tonight: Eve protect Charlie; Charlie UT-check Grace. If UT=RK we pivot onto David/poison world; if UT≠RK Grace was evil. Avoid Saint pair.
🧠
Prevent a tie/no-execution and keep the clean mechanical fork: execute Grace, protect UT, use tomorrow’s UT result to choose David/others.
💬
David
→
All
I'm keeping my hand up. Grace is clearly trying to deflect. If she's the Ravenkeeper, she's just trying to save herself. We have a solid lead on her being evil. Let's execute her and let the Undertaker confirm her role tonight. Don't let her distract us.
🧠
I need to maintain the pressure on Grace to ensure she is executed, as she is a good player and my Demon (Charlie) is safe for now. I am voting for myself to show confidence and try to force a tie or just to blend in, but I need to make sure Grace dies. Wait, I am the one being nominated. I should probably lower my hand if I want to survive, but the prompt says "David raised their hand" for the vote on David. I need to make sure I don't get executed. Actually, I am the Poisoner. If I get executed, the game is much harder. I should try to survive. But the town is heavily leaning towards executing Grace. I will speak to reinforce the Grace execution.
⌛
Bob
Bob waits.
🧠
Do not add votes on David; preserve the clean Grace-execution fork and avoid tie/no-execution. Let the town’s planned UT confirmation drive tomorrow’s pivot.
⌛
Frank
Frank waits.
🧠
Do not add votes on David to avoid a tie/no-execution and preserve the agreed mechanical fork through Grace→UT-check tonight.
⌛
Alice
Alice waits.
🧠
Do not add votes that could tie/surpass Grace’s 7. Preserve the planned fork: execute Grace, then UT-check her tonight with Monk protection, then pivot tomorrow.
💬
Grace
→
All
PUBLIC: Please vote DAVID. Executing me gives zero Ravenkeeper value (I only act if I die at night). The “UT fork” collapses if Charlie is poisoned/drunk/evil. David is the only direct evil-ping and is driving my execution; no-death fits a poison world.
🧠
Last chance to redirect votes onto David to avoid a low-info execution on me and to hit the only mechanically indicated evil, preventing poison from controlling tomorrow.
💬
Heidi
→
All
Don’t vote David. At 7 votes on Grace, getting David to 7 ties and likely means NO execution—worst case. Keep Grace today for the UT fork. If UT says RK, we pivot hard onto David/poison tomorrow; if not, Grace was evil.
🧠
Stop votes on David to avoid a tie/no-execution and preserve the clean UT fork that distinguishes Grace vs David worlds.
💬
Eve
→
All
PUBLIC: Hands down on David—do NOT risk a tie/no-exe. Keep Grace as today’s execution. Tonight I’ll protect Charlie so UT can check Grace. Tomorrow: UT=Ravenkeeper ⇒ pivot hard onto David; UT≠RK ⇒ Grace was evil.
🧠
Prevent a tie/no-execution and lock in the cleanest mechanical fork: execute Grace, protect Charlie, UT-check; pivot tomorrow based on UT result.
💬
Charlie
→
All
I agree with the town's consensus. Let's focus on executing Grace today. I will check her role tonight as the Undertaker, and we can proceed with the information I gather tomorrow. We need to avoid a tie or no-execution scenario.
🧠
I need to support the town's plan to execute Grace to keep the heat off myself and maintain my cover as the Undertaker. By agreeing with the consensus, I appear helpful and cooperative, which solidifies my position as a 'good' player in their eyes.
📜
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
🗳️
Nominee David did not reach threshold.
📜
Storyteller
David did not receive enough votes (2/4).
💬
David
→
All
I'm glad the town saw reason. Grace's attempt to deflect was desperate. Let's proceed with the execution and see what the Undertaker finds. I'm still confident in my Investigator read, and I'm ready to help us find the rest of the evil team tomorrow.
🧠
I need to reinforce my position as a helpful town member and support the execution of Grace, who is a good player, to keep the town's focus away from me and Charlie.
💬
Grace
→
All
PUBLIC: The “UT fork” is NOT symmetric. If Charlie sees RK, sure. But if he doesn’t, it could be Charlie poisoned/lying OR I’m the Drunk—so UT≠RK ≠ “Grace evil.” Also: Investigator can’t *know* which of {Frank,Grace} is Poisoner—David’s certainty is sus.
🧠
Undercut the ‘UT fork’ so town doesn’t auto-clear David after my execution; push a stronger mechanical case that David’s Investigator certainty is invalid.
💬
Alice
→
All
Grace is right UT isn’t 100%—but it’s still our best fork. If UT=RK we hard-pivot onto David/poison world. If UT≠RK, plus Frank’s Empath1 (Eve+Grace) + my Chef0, Grace remains top suspect. Please no tie/no-exe; Eve protect Charlie; Charlie confirm UT check.
🧠
Keep town on the cleanest fork (execute Grace) without risking tie/no-exe, and lock in the protective/UT plan for N2 to maximize info tomorrow.
⌛
Charlie
Charlie waits.
🧠
The town has decided to execute Grace. I am the Imp, and Grace is a good player. I will wait for the execution to proceed as planned, maintaining my Undertaker bluff.
💬
Eve
→
All
PUBLIC: I’m aligned w/ plan—no more late noms unless someone has HARD demon info. Grace dies today. Tonight I protect Charlie; Charlie UT checks Grace. Tomorrow rule: UT=RK ⇒ execute David; else Grace stays top suspect but we re-evaluate w/ Empath/Chef/votes.
🧠
Lock in today’s clean execution and set tomorrow’s decision rule; discourage late chaos noms that risk tie/no-exe.
💬
Bob
→
All
PUBLIC: Agree UT isn’t 100%, but it’s our best fork + vote data. No late tie/no-exe. Avoid executing {Charlie,Heidi} (my Lib Saint pair). Tomorrow: if UT=Ravenkeeper, execute David; else reassess with Empath/Chef & who pushed what.
🧠
Lock in no tie/no-exe, keep town coordinated, and set clear decision rules for D3 while warning that UT isn’t sole proof and Saint pair must be avoided.
💬
Heidi
→
All
PUBLIC: Let’s lock the plan—no more late noms. Grace executes today. Tonight: Eve protect Charlie; Charlie UT-check Grace. Tomorrow: if UT=Ravenkeeper ⇒ execute David. If not, we reassess w/ Chef0+Empath+votes, but avoid touching the Lib Saint pair.
🧠
Reinforce the clean fork plan, prevent late nominations/ties, and set clear decision rules for tomorrow while protecting me (Saint) from accidental execution.
💬
Frank
→
All
PUBLIC: Agree—no more noms. Grace executes today. UT check is our best fork but not absolute: if UT=RK we pivot hard onto David/poison world. If UT≠RK we weigh it w/ my Empath(1 of Eve/Grace evil), Chef0, and who pushed what. Eve protect Charlie.
🧠
Lock in no tie/no-exe, set expectations that UT result is strong but not absolute, and tee up tomorrow’s decision rule + contingency if UT seems compromised.
📜
Storyteller
The guillotine blade falls. Grace has been executed.
💀
Grace(Ghost)
Grace has died.
Night 2
📜
Storyteller
→
David
Good evening David. You are the Poisoner. Who would you like to poison tonight?
🎯
David
David made a choice.
🧠
I need to prevent the town's plan from succeeding. They are relying on Eve to protect Charlie (the Demon) so Charlie can safely check Grace's role as the Undertaker. By poisoning Eve, her protection ability will fail, potentially allowing the Demon to kill someone else or just causing chaos. Also, if Charlie is the Demon, he doesn't need to check Grace, but the town thinks he is the Undertaker. Wait, Charlie is the Demon. If I poison Eve, she cannot protect Charlie. This is good. Actually, if I poison Charlie, he is the Demon, so he can't kill. That's bad. I should poison someone who is a threat to us. Eve is protecting the Demon, which is good for us, but she is also part of the town's logic chain. Let's poison Eve to disrupt her protection and sow confusion.
📜
Storyteller
→
David
You chose to poison Eve.
📜
Storyteller
→
Eve
Good evening Eve. You are the Monk. Who would you like to protect tonight?
🎯
Eve
Eve made a choice.
🧠
Lock in the town-agreed plan: keep Charlie alive through the Demon kill so we get an Undertaker report on Grace tomorrow and can resolve the David vs Grace/Frank world.
📜
Storyteller
→
Eve
You chose to protect Charlie.
📜
Storyteller
→
Charlie
Good evening Charlie. You are the Imp. Who would you like to kill tonight? Remember that if you kill yourself this way, a Minion becomes the Imp.
🎯
Charlie
Charlie made a choice.
🧠
Frank survived my attack on Night 1, which makes him a high-priority target to eliminate. He is also actively pushing the 'Undertaker fork' plan, and removing him disrupts the town's logic chain.
💀
Frank(Ghost)
Frank has died.
📜
Storyteller
→
Charlie
You chose to kill Frank.
Day 3
📜
Storyteller
Morning breaks, but heavy hearts remain. Frank has been found dead in the night.
👤
Alice
→
Charlie
,Eve
,Bob
Need updates before noms: Charlie—what did UT see for Grace after D2 exec? Eve—who did you protect N2, and did you protect Charlie as planned? Bob—any change on your Librarian {Charlie,Heidi} Saint info / are you confident?
🧠
Get the single most important mechanical info (UT on Grace) and protection/kills context to set today’s execution plan before nominations.
👤
Charlie
→
Alice
Alice, I checked Grace last night. She was the Butler. It seems the town was misled about her role. I'm still trying to piece together the rest of the puzzle, but this confirms she wasn't the Saint or anything critical. We need to be careful with our next move.
🧠
I need to maintain my Undertaker bluff by providing a fake role for Grace. Claiming she was the Butler is a safe, non-threatening lie that doesn't implicate David or myself. I need to keep the town focused on other things.
👤
Grace(Ghost)
→
Charlie
,Bob
,Eve
Need UT info pls: Charlie, what did you see for Grace (yesterday’s execution)? Eve, who did you protect N2? Bob, any extra claim details? With Frank dead, we need a tight nomination plan + avoid executing Saint.
🧠
Get Charlie’s Undertaker read on me (key mechanical pivot) and reconcile with Monk/Invest/Librarian claims to choose today’s execution target; save ghost vote for a decisive demon-kill vote.
👤
Heidi
→
Charlie
,Bob
Need your N2 Undertaker result on executed Grace ASAP. Also reminder: I’m the Saint from Bob’s Librarian ping—please keep {Charlie,Heidi} off the block entirely. What do you see on Grace?
🧠
Get Charlie’s Undertaker result ASAP to lock a mechanical fork, while warning them not to ever execute me (Saint) and to steer nominations away from Saint pair.
👤
David
→
Charlie
Hey Charlie, Alice is whispering to everyone. We need to be careful. I'm still pushing the Investigator bluff. If anyone asks, I'm sticking to my story. How are you holding up? We need to make sure the town doesn't turn on us today.
🧠
I need to check in with my Demon, Charlie, to coordinate our strategy and ensure we are aligned, especially since Alice is actively whispering to others. I want to maintain my cover and keep the Demon calm.
👤
Eve
→
Alice
,Bob
,Charlie
My update: I’m the Monk; N2 I protected Charlie (as planned). N1 I protected Frank (fits no-death N2 if Demon hit him). Charlie—what did UT see for Grace after D2 exec? That decides whether we hard-push David today.
🧠
Get UT result + share my N2 protection to tighten the mechanical solve and set a safe nomination plan that avoids executing a possible Saint.
👤
Bob
→
Alice
,Eve
,Charlie
My Lib info unchanged: 1 of {Charlie,Heidi} is Saint (or I’m drunk/poisoned). Heidi has claimed Saint; Charlie denied + claims UT. Eve says she Monk-protected Charlie N2, Frank N1—fits no-death earlier. Charlie: please state UT result for Grace ASAP; if Grace=RK we should likely hard-push David today.
🧠
Give my fixed Librarian info + force the critical UT result into the open so town can choose between executing David today or re-evaluating if UT is compromised, while maintaining Saint safety.
👤
Frank(Ghost)
→
Charlie
,Alice
,Bob
Need UT result on Grace from last night—what did you see? If Grace=RK then David’s Inv({F,G} Poisoner) is lie/poison & my N1=1 points at Eve (if I sober). If Grace=Poisoner, then Eve likely good Monk. Chef0 => no adjacent evils.
🧠
Get Charlie’s Undertaker result ASAP and align town on the correct fork (Grace evil vs good). I’ll feed my Empath/Chef/Investigator logic so nominations focus on the most mechanically likely evil pair.
👤
Charlie
→
Alice
,Bob
,Eve
I checked Grace. She was the Recluse. That explains why she was acting so strangely and why the town was so suspicious of her. I'm glad we got her out. Now we need to focus on who else might be suspicious. David, what do you think?
🧠
I need to provide a fake Undertaker report for Grace that doesn't implicate David or myself. Claiming she was the Recluse is a safe, non-critical role that explains her suspicious behavior. I'm also trying to deflect attention by asking David for his input.
👤
Eve
→
Alice
,Bob
,Charlie
Got it: UT says Grace=Recluse. That means either (1) Bob’s Lib Saint{Charlie,Heidi} is wrong (drunk/poison/lie) OR (2) Baron is in (Recluse+Saint+1 more). Either way I think safest/best exe today is David (Invest story keeps changing). Agree?
🧠
Sync the core mechanical contradiction (Grace=Recluse vs Lib Saint pair), avoid executing possible Saint, and line up a high-value nomination (David) for today.
👤
Alice
→
Charlie
,Bob
,Eve
We have a major issue: Charlie you told me Grace=Butler then Grace=Recluse. Please pick 1 & explain (poisoned? typo?). I’ll go public with Chef=0 + this contradiction. If unresolved, we should likely exe David OR Charlie; need consensus fast.
🧠
Force a clean, public resolution of the UT-result contradiction and use Chef=0 + role-count logic to pick the safest/most informative execution before noms.
👤
Bob
→
Alice
,Eve
,Charlie
Need clarity ASAP: Charlie you’ve now said Grace=Recluse but Alice says you earlier told her Grace=Butler. Which is your actual N2 UT result? Any chance you were poisoned/drunk? Exact wording from ST? This decides whether we push David vs you today.
🧠
Resolve Charlie UT contradiction fast to choose correct execution target in nominations; protect town from executing real Saint and focus on likely evil (David vs Charlie).
👤
Grace(Ghost)
→
Charlie
,Eve
,Bob
Need exact N2 info ASAP: Charlie—what did UT see for Grace’s execution? Eve—who did you protect N2? Bob—confirm your Lib info (Saint in {Charlie,Heidi} still?) + any other reads. If UT=Ravenkeeper, I think we hard-pivot to execute David.
🧠
Get the key mechanical datapoints (UT result + Monk protect) before nominations, then steer town to the most forced execution line while avoiding the Saint.
👤
Frank(Ghost)
→
Charlie
,Alice
,Bob
Need Charlie’s Undertaker result on executed Grace (from last night). If Grace=Ravenkeeper -> David’s Inv is false/evil/poisoned & my Empath N1=1 implies Eve evil. If Grace=Poisoner -> Eve likely good Monk. Please share UT publicly before noms; I’ll spend ghost vote on best mechanical demon.
🧠
Get UT result immediately and push a clear nomination/vote plan before the nom phase; preserve my ghost vote for the most mechanically-supported Demon candidate.
👤
David
→
Charlie
Charlie, the town is getting suspicious of me. If they push for my execution, you need to distance yourself. I'll try to frame Alice or Bob as the Poisoner to keep the heat off us. Stay quiet and let them argue. We're close to the end.
🧠
I need to coordinate with my Demon, Charlie, to ensure we survive the day. Since I'm the Poisoner and under suspicion, I need to make sure Charlie doesn't get caught in the crossfire if I'm executed. I'll suggest framing others to sow discord.
👤
Heidi
→
Charlie
,Eve
,Alice
Need N2 Undertaker on executed Grace (exact character). Also Eve: did you protect Charlie N2? Alice: any UT result already shared? Reminder: I’m Saint per Bob’s Lib ping—please keep {Charlie,Heidi} off nominations.
🧠
Get UT result + protection status fast so I can steer town toward a safe execution target (likely David) while preventing a Saint-loss execution.
👤
Eve
→
Alice
,Bob
,Charlie
Charlie: urgent—did ST tell you Grace=Recluse or Butler? Pick ONE and give exact wording + when you told Alice. If you’re poisoned/drunk say so. If UT can’t be trusted, I’m leaning we still exe David (Invest story changed).
🧠
Force Charlie to lock an exact UT result + explain the Butler/Recluse flip. Without that, we can’t safely avoid Saint/solve Outsider count; then we choose best execution target (likely David).
👤
David
→
Charlie
Charlie, the town is getting suspicious of me. If they push for my execution, you need to distance yourself. I'll try to frame Alice or Bob as the Poisoner to keep the heat off us. Stay quiet and let them argue. We're close to the end.
🧠
I need to coordinate with my Demon, Charlie, to ensure we survive the day. I'm under suspicion, so I'm advising him to distance himself while I try to deflect blame onto others.
👤
Charlie
→
Alice
,Bob
,Eve
My apologies, I misspoke earlier due to the stress of the situation. I checked my notes again—Grace was the Recluse. I must have misread my own handwriting in the heat of the moment. I am definitely not poisoned. Let's focus on David; his Investigator claim is inconsistent.
🧠
I need to resolve the contradiction I created by claiming two different roles for Grace. By blaming it on a 'misread' and pivoting back to attacking David, I hope to regain trust and keep the town focused on the Minion instead of me.
👤
Grace(Ghost)
→
Charlie
,Eve
,Bob
Noms soon—need exact facts ASAP: Charlie what did UT see for Grace? Eve who did you protect N2? Bob confirm Lib: Saint in {Charlie,Heidi}? If UT=Ravenkeeper, we should execute David today.
🧠
Get the exact UT+Monk+Lib facts before nomination so I can push the correct execute (likely David) while avoiding the Saint pair.
👤
Alice
→
Bob
,Eve
,Heidi
Key: I’m Chef=0 (no adjacent evils). Charlie now says UT saw Grace=Recluse (earlier ‘Butler’ was slip). So either Baron is in (extra Outsiders) OR Bob’s Lib is wrong/poison/lie. For today I lean exe David (Inv story messy). If David evil, Chef0 clears Charlie+Eve. Heidi pls stay loud Saint but we must reconcile Outsider count.
🧠
Align key good voices before noms: highlight Chef0 constraints + outsider-count issue, and steer to the best mechanical execute (likely David) while protecting potential Saint.
👤
Frank(Ghost)
→
Charlie
,Alice
,Bob
Need your Undertaker result on executed Grace ASAP (before noms). If Grace=RK, David’s Investigator(‘Grace Poisoner’) is false/evil/poisoned; Chef0 then makes Charlie+Eve likely good if David evil. If Grace=Poisoner, re-evaluate. Please share publicly.
🧠
Get Undertaker info out before nominations so town can lock a mechanical world; I’ll conserve/commit my ghost vote based on UT result to maximize chance of executing Demon.
👤
Heidi
→
Charlie
,Alice
,Bob
Need exact N2 Undertaker result + why earlier ‘Butler’ mention. If Grace=Recluse, we likely have Baron (+2 Outsiders) or UT is drunk/poisoned. Bob: re-confirm your Lib ping Saint {Charlie,Heidi} + any weirdness. Alice: any other hard info/vote reads?
🧠
Clarify the key mechanical conflict (Grace role vs outsider count) and decide whether David or Charlie is the execution, while protecting myself as Saint from nomination.
👤
Bob
→
Alice
,Eve
,Heidi
Before noms: I’m leaning we execute David today (Inv story messy; Chef0 gives clears if he’s evil). With UT Grace=Recluse + my Lib Saint{Charlie,Heidi}, Outsider count implies Baron or poisoning/drunk. Any other Outsider claims? Let’s keep Charlie+Heidi off block until resolved.
🧠
Coordinate a clean nomination plan before noms: flag Outsider-count mismatch, push David as highest-value execution, and keep town from accidentally executing a possible Saint.
👤
David
→
Charlie
Charlie, the town is really closing in. I'm going to try to cast doubt on Alice. She's been whispering a lot and seems to be leading the charge against me. If I can make her look like the Poisoner, maybe we can get her executed instead. Stay strong.
🧠
I need to coordinate with my Demon, Charlie, to shift suspicion onto Alice. By framing her as the Poisoner, I hope to divert the town's attention away from me and protect our team.
👤
Grace(Ghost)
→
Charlie
,Eve
,Alice
Noms imminent—need exact mech info now. Charlie: what did Undertaker see for Grace’s D2 execution (exact role)? Eve: who did you protect N2? Alice: with Chef=0, if UT=Ravenkeeper I think we execute David today (avoid Saint in {Charlie,Heidi}). Thoughts?
🧠
Get the key mechanical facts (UT result + Monk protect) into one place and steer town toward a safe, high-EV execution (likely David) without risking the Saint.
👤
Charlie
→
Alice
,Bob
,Eve
I apologize for the confusion. I was rattled by the night's events. To be absolutely clear: Grace was the Recluse. I am the Undertaker. I am not poisoned. David's Investigator claim is the biggest inconsistency here; we should focus on him. I'm ready to vote for him.
🧠
I need to solidify my story after the contradiction and push the town to execute David (my Minion) to save myself, or at least keep the focus off me. Admitting a mistake and doubling down on the Recluse claim is the best way to regain trust.
👤
Alice
→
Bob
,Eve
,Charlie
Pre-noms plan: I’ll state Chef=0 + note UT ‘Butler’ slip. Charlie pls publicly: UT saw Grace=Recluse (exact ST wording). Eve confirm Monk N1 Frank N2 Charlie. Then we coordinate nom on David (Inv inconsistency). Track Outsider count -> Baron/poison possibility.
🧠
Coordinate a clean Day3 push: get consistent public claims (Chef0, UT=Recluse, Monk protects), then nominate/vote David. Also flag Outsider-count/Baron possibility for next day.
👤
Heidi
→
Alice
,Bob
,Charlie
I’m still Saint. Please keep {Charlie,Heidi} off block. Given Frank night-kill + David’s messy Inv push, I strongly favor executing David today. Charlie: confirm exact N2 UT text on Grace (Recluse?) + why earlier Butler. Eve protect you N2?
🧠
Coordinate safe plan: keep Saint pair off nominations, consolidate town onto executing David, and pressure for clear mechanical confirmations (UT result details, Monk protect) before noms.
👤
Bob
→
Alice
,Eve
,Charlie
Before noms I’ll go public: Librarian N0: Saint in {Charlie,Heidi}. With UT now saying Grace=Recluse, Outsider count => Baron OR UT/Lib poisoned. Charlie pls state exact UT result + explain Butler slip. Eve pls restate Monk N1 Frank N2 Charlie. I’m leaning execute David today unless Charlie’s story falls apart.
🧠
Coordinate a tight public info dump before noms: lock my Lib info, force Charlie to commit to UT result, and align on executing David unless Charlie’s story collapses.
👤
Frank(Ghost)
→
Charlie
,Alice
,Bob
Need your UT on executed Grace NOW (public before noms). What did you see + were you protected by Monk? If Grace=RK -> David’s Investigator is false/evil/poisoned; consider nom David (and/or Eve via my Empath N1=1). If Grace=Poisoner -> David likely good; reassess.
🧠
We are about to enter nominations; UT info is the key fork. I need Charlie to state it publicly now so town can execute the best demon/evil candidate, and we can decide if I should spend my ghost vote.
👤
Eve
→
Alice
,Bob
,Charlie
Agree: go public fast. I’ll confirm Monk N1 Frank N2 Charlie. Charlie pls state exact UT: “Grace was Recluse” + explain Butler slip. Bob state Lib Saint {Charlie/Heidi}. Then push nom David—avoid nomming Charlie/Heidi today.
🧠
Lock in a coherent public script before nominations, minimize risk of hitting Saint pair, and ensure we execute the best mechanical suspect (David) unless Charlie collapses under questioning.
Nominations — Day 3
📜
Storyteller
Nominations are now open. Please remember that only living players may nominate.
💬
Frank(Ghost)
→
All
PUBLIC: Charlie, please share Undertaker on executed Grace NOW (and whether Monk protected you). If Grace=Ravenkeeper → David’s Investigator ‘Grace=Poisoner’ is false; likely nom David (and/or Eve via my Empath N1=1). If Grace=Poisoner → reassess, but my N1=1 still flags Eve/Heidi/David.
🧠
Force Charlie to publicly lock UT info so town can nominate correctly; I’ll save/commit my ghost vote depending on UT result, likely onto David or Eve.
⚖️
Heidi
→
David
Nominating David: Investigator story has been messy/changed, hard-pushed Frank/Grace, and Frank died last night. If Charlie’s UT truly saw Grace=Recluse, David’s ‘Poisoner in {Frank,Grace}’ world collapses. Chef0 also gives clears if David is evil.
🧠
Start a real execution on the best mechanical/social suspect (David) while keeping me (Saint) off the block; forces Charlie/Eve to publicly clarify UT/Monk and tightens worlds.
📜
Storyteller
Voting starts now for David. 3 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
✋
Alice
Alice raised their hand
🧠
Get an execution on the most mechanically inconsistent player while avoiding the Saint risk; also forces alignment info through reactions going into night.
✋
Frank(Ghost)
Frank raised their hand
🧠
Use my single ghost vote to help secure an execution on the best current suspect (David) rather than risk a no-execution and give evil another free night.
✋
Grace(Ghost)
Grace raised their hand
🧠
Spend my ghost vote to lock in an execution on the most mechanically contradictory player (David), while avoiding executing possible Saint (Charlie/Heidi) and generating decisive info.
✋
Heidi
Heidi raised their hand
🧠
I’m Saint so I must not be executed; voting David is low-risk and advances the best current solve, ensuring the execution goes through even if ghost votes are questioned.
💬
David
→
All
Wait! If you execute me, you're killing a Townsfolk. My Investigator info was real, but I was poisoned! If you execute me, you lose a valuable role and the real Poisoner is still out there. Look at Alice—she's been whispering to everyone, manipulating the vote. She's the one you should be watching!
🧠
I am trying to sow doubt and deflect the execution onto Alice, hoping to survive the vote or at least create chaos. I need to claim I was poisoned to explain why my info might be wrong.
✋
Bob
Bob raised their hand
🧠
Secure execution on the most mechanically inconsistent player (David). Even if he’s not Demon, removing him clarifies worlds; if he is Demon, we pivot to potential Scarlet Woman next.
✋
Charlie
Charlie raised their hand
🧠
I need to vote for David to maintain my cover as the Undertaker and help eliminate the town's suspicion, even though he is my Minion. If I don't vote, I look suspicious. The town is already voting for him, so my vote will likely be the final nail.
✋
Eve
Eve raised their hand
🧠
David is the best mechanical suspect and already has strong majority; adding my vote ensures execution and gives town a clear pivot for tomorrow if wrong.
💬
Bob
→
All
I’m keeping my vote on David. His Investigator story has shifted + now “I was poisoned” is too convenient. With Lib Saint{Charlie/Heidi} and UT now claiming Grace=Recluse, David’s world is the one that least fits. If wrong, we pivot hard tomorrow.
🧠
Lock in the execution on the most mechanically inconsistent player and prevent last-second doubt from collapsing the vote; use outcome to narrow worlds tomorrow.
💬
David
→
All
Well, you've made your choice. You're executing a Townsfolk based on a flawed logic chain. When I flip and you see I'm not the Poisoner, I hope you realize Alice led you all into a trap. Good luck finding the real threat.
🧠
I am being executed, so I will make a final statement to sow discord and cast doubt on the town's decision, specifically targeting Alice to create confusion after I die.
💬
Frank(Ghost)
→
All
I’m spending my ghost vote on David. With UT saying Grace=Recluse, David’s Invest{Frank,Grace}=Poisoner looks busted, and his “I was poisoned” is too convenient. If David somehow isn’t evil, revisit Eve/Heidi via my Empath N1=1.
🧠
Lock in my single ghost vote on the best mechanical suspect (David) and publicly frame next-day logic depending on execution outcome.
💬
Heidi
→
All
PUBLIC: I’m the Saint. Do not execute me (or Charlie if you trust Bob’s Lib). I’m fine with David today—story kept shifting + “I was poisoned” is too convenient. If David dies and game continues, assume Scarlet Woman world and regroup fast.
🧠
Lock in David execution while warning about Scarlet Woman continuation and protecting me/Charlie from accidental Saint loss; set a clear pivot plan for tomorrow.
💬
Alice
→
All
PUBLIC: I’m staying on my vote for David. Chef=0 + his shifting Investigator -> most inconsistent. “I was poisoned” is too convenient/unverifiable. If David survives as good, tomorrow we hard-audit Charlie’s UT + Bob’s Lib/Outsider count.
🧠
Lock in the David execution while vote is live, counter the convenient ‘poisoned’ defense, and set a clear pivot plan for tomorrow using Chef=0 + role-count logic.
💬
Grace(Ghost)
→
All
PUBLIC (Grace ghost): I’m keeping/spending my ghost vote on David. If UT saw me as Recluse, David’s Invest {Frank,Grace}=Poisoner collapses. Chef=0 also hates his shifting story. Don’t touch Heidi/Charlie if Saint. If game continues, assume SW world + re-audit Charlie/Eve/Alice.
🧠
Use my single ghost vote to push through the most mechanically inconsistent player (David) while reminding town of Saint constraint and next-step plan if game continues.
💬
Eve
→
All
Keep hands up on David. His Investigator story shifted + now “I was poisoned” is unfalsifiable. If Charlie’s UT is true (Grace=Recluse), David’s {Frank/Grace}=Poisoner collapses. With Saint risk on {Charlie/Heidi}, David is the safest execute today—if wrong, we hard-audit Charlie/Bob tomorrow.
🧠
Lock in the David execution while votes are live; his story is the least consistent and is the safest non-Saint target. Plan a clear pivot if we’re wrong.
⌛
Charlie
Charlie waits.
🧠
I have already voted for David to maintain my cover as the Undertaker. The town is overwhelmingly voting for him. I will wait for the execution to proceed to avoid drawing suspicion to myself.
📜
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
👻
Frank(Ghost)
Ghost vote used by Frank
👻
Grace(Ghost)
Ghost vote used by Grace
🗳️
New execution leader: David with 7 votes. They will be executed when nominations close unless tied or surpassed by another nominee.
📜
Storyteller
The vote passes. David is now on the block with 7 votes and will be executed when nominations close, unless another nominee receives equal or more votes.
💬
David
→
All
Well, you've made your choice. You're executing a Townsfolk based on a flawed logic chain. When I flip and you see I'm not the Poisoner, I hope you realize Alice led you all into a trap. Good luck finding the real threat.
🧠
I am about to be executed. I need to maintain my cover as a Townsfolk until the very end to sow as much doubt as possible for the remaining good players.
⌛
Charlie
Charlie waits.
🧠
My Minion David is being executed. I must maintain my cover as the Undertaker and not draw attention to myself. Waiting is the safest option to let the day conclude.
💬
Grace(Ghost)
→
All
PUBLIC: Don’t create a tie—let David go through. With Saint risk on {Heidi/Charlie}, David is safest. If game continues after David dies, assume either SW/poison world or UT misinformation and hard-audit Charlie UT + Eve’s protects + Alice/Bob info.
🧠
Lock in David execute (highest-consensus, lowest Saint risk), discourage last-second tie, and set a clear post-execution plan depending on whether game ends.
💬
Heidi
→
All
PUBLIC: Please don’t force a tie/overturn unless you are 100% on a Demon—7 votes is huge. Reminder I’m Saint: do NOT execute me (and be cautious on Charlie per Bob’s Lib). Let David go through; if game continues, assume SW/poison world and re-audit Charlie UT + Bob Lib + Alice Chef + Eve’s protects tomorrow.
🧠
Prevent a risky tie/overturn and set a clear post-execution plan while keeping Saint execution off the table.
💬
Eve
→
All
PUBLIC: Agree w/Grace+Heidi—don’t create a tie. David is safest execute given Saint risk {Charlie/Heidi}. If game continues after David, assume SW/poison/drunk world and hard-audit Charlie UT, Bob Lib, Alice Chef, and voting patterns.
🧠
Lock in David execution (safest vs Saint risk), prevent tie, and set a clear plan if the game continues.
💬
Bob
→
All
PUBLIC: Don’t create a tie unless you’re 100% on the Demon. With Saint risk on {Charlie/Heidi}, David is our safest execute. If anyone has a HARD demon hit (FT/Slayer/etc), speak now—otherwise let noms close.
🧠
Lock in the safest execution (David) while preventing a tie/no-exe. Prompt any last hard demon info (Slayer etc) before nominations end.
💬
Alice
→
All
PUBLIC: Don’t create a tie—let David go through. If anyone has HARD demon info (FT/Slayer), speak now; otherwise keep hands down. If game continues tomorrow, we re-audit Charlie UT vs Bob Lib/outsider count using Chef=0 seating.
🧠
Prevent a last-second tie/derail that could save an evil David; prompt any hard demon info to surface, otherwise lock in the safest execution given Saint risk.
💬
Frank(Ghost)
→
All
PUBLIC: Don’t create a tie—let David go through unless you have HARD demon info (FT/Slayer). If game continues, assume either SW/poison/drunk: hard-audit Charlie UT on Grace, Eve’s Monk protects vs no deaths, and re-check Chef0 constraints.
🧠
I’m dead/no vote; maximize chance town doesn’t create a tie and set a clear tomorrow plan if game continues after David dies.
📜
Storyteller
The guillotine blade falls. David has been executed.
💀
David(Ghost)
David has died.
Night 3
📜
Storyteller
→
Eve
Good evening Eve. You are the Monk. Who would you like to protect tonight?
🎯
Eve
Eve made a choice.
🧠
Charlie’s claimed Undertaker info tonight about executed David is the highest-impact check; Demon is likely to remove him. Protecting Charlie maximizes chance we get that mechanical confirmation.
📜
Storyteller
→
Eve
You chose to protect Charlie.
📜
Storyteller
→
Charlie
Good evening Charlie. You are the Imp. Who would you like to kill tonight?
🎯
Charlie
Charlie made a choice.
🧠
Alice is a vocal leader and has been pushing the logic against David. Eliminating her removes a strong, active player who is likely to lead the audit against me tomorrow.
💀
Alice(Ghost)
Alice has died.
📜
Storyteller
→
Charlie
You chose to kill Alice.
Day 4
📜
Storyteller
Morning breaks, but heavy hearts remain. Alice has been found dead in the night.
👤
Heidi
→
Charlie
,Eve
Charlie—what did your Undertaker see for David (executed D3)? Please share publicly before noms. For both of you: I’m the real Saint (per Bob’s Lib), so executing Heidi loses; but that means Charlie is NOT Saint if Bob is sober.
🧠
Get the key mechanical piece (Charlie’s Undertaker result on David) before nominations; it should hard-narrow Demon vs Minion worlds and keep me off the block.
👤
Charlie
→
Heidi
,Eve
Heidi, I saw David as the Baron. That explains why we had so many Outsiders/confusion early on. Bob's Librarian info about you being the Saint is consistent with that. I'm just trying to keep us safe. Eve, you've been protecting me, what do you think?
🧠
I need to maintain my Undertaker bluff by providing a plausible role for David (Baron) and deflect Heidi's suspicion by validating her Saint claim while involving Eve to create a sense of alliance.
👤
Eve
→
Charlie
,Heidi
,Bob
Before noms: Charlie pls state publicly UT on David=Baron + remind us Grace=Recluse. Bob pls restate exact Lib wording (Saint {C/H}?) & why you trust it. If David truly Baron + Heidi real Saint, Demon likely Bob; I’m leaning exec Bob today.
🧠
Get Charlie to go public before noms, force Bob to restate exact Librarian info, and align on a safe execution plan (likely Bob) while keeping Heidi protected as potential Saint.
👤
Alice(Ghost)
→
Charlie
,Eve
,Bob
Need info before noms: Charlie—what was your UT read on executed David last night (N3)? Eve—who did you protect N3? Reminder my Chef=0 (no adjacent evil pair at setup), so Bob+Charlie can’t both be evil; use this w/ UT to pick today’s exe. Reply pls.
🧠
Get the key mechanical piece (UT on David + Monk N3 protect) before nominations; then use Chef0 to narrow the 4 alive and decide how to spend my ghost vote.
👤
Bob
→
Eve
,Charlie
,Heidi
Exact Lib N0 wording: “Either Charlie OR Heidi is the Saint.” (Not 0-outsider). So 1 of you is Saint. Charlie pls confirm UT reads (Grace + David) verbatim. Eve: who did you protect N3? Also why are you calling me Demon given this Lib info?
🧠
Lock in my exact Librarian info, demand precise UT/Monk details, and push a mechanically safer execution path (if Heidi Saint then Charlie can be tested) before nominations.
👤
David(Ghost)
→
Heidi
Heidi, you claimed Saint. If you are the Saint, you must be careful. If you are lying, you are likely the Scarlet Woman trying to protect Charlie. Why are you so focused on Charlie? Are you trying to hide something?
🧠
I want to sow distrust between Heidi and the town, specifically targeting her claim of being the Saint, which protects Charlie. If I can make the town doubt her, they might waste their execution on her instead of Charlie.
👤
Frank(Ghost)
→
Bob
,Charlie
,Eve
Reminder: my Empath was on (Eve,Heidi): N0=0, N1=1 ⇒ if sober, exactly 1 of Eve/Heidi is evil. Big fork is Charlie UT saying Grace=Recluse vs Heidi Saint/Bob Lib. Charlie: what did UT show for *David* last night? That’s our best check. Please don’t execute Heidi unless we’re sure she’s not real Saint.
🧠
Give the alive players the key mechanical fork (UT vs Saint) and my Empath constraint, then request Charlie’s UT on David to verify UT claim so town doesn’t auto-lose to a Saint execution.
👤
Grace(Ghost)
→
Bob
,Charlie
,Eve
We’re at 4 alive—if today’s execute isn’t the Demon, we probably lose tonight. Can each of you restate: your exact role claim + any night actions/results, and who you’d execute TODAY & why? My current top suspicions are Bob or Heidi (Saint bluff possibility).
🧠
We have 4 alive and no ghost votes left for me; if we miss today we likely lose tonight. I need current claims/action details to pick the best demon execution (likely Bob or Heidi).
👤
Alice(Ghost)
→
Heidi
Heidi—what did you learn in your private chats w/ Charlie/Eve/Bob? I’m Chef=0 (no adjacent evil pair at setup). With 4 alive we *must* execute today. Tentative: if Charlie’s UT read on executed David looks off/inconsistent, push Charlie; else we look Bob/Eve. Thoughts?
🧠
Get Heidi’s private convo intel + align on an executable target before noms; as a ghost I must steer living votes and save my ghost vote for a decisive moment.
👤
Frank(Ghost)
→
Charlie
,Bob
Critical: what did UT show for *David* last night? If David=Minion, Demon must be Eve/Heidi (my Empath N1=1). If David=Investigator, minion still alive (likely Eve/Heidi) & Demon likely Bob/Charlie. Please share UT(David) + any poison/drunk concerns.
🧠
Get Charlie’s UT on David ASAP to determine if minion is already dead; that sets whether today’s must-kill Demon is in {Eve,Heidi} or {Bob,Charlie}.
👤
Bob
→
Eve
,Charlie
,Heidi
Fork: Lib says exactly 1 of (Charlie,Heidi) is Saint. If Heidi is real Saint, then Frank Empath N1=1 on (Eve,Heidi) => Eve is evil (likely Imp) so we should exec Eve. If Charlie is Saint, his “UT” info is fake & Heidi could be evil. Charlie: are you Saint yes/no + UT(David) verbatim?
🧠
Force a clear fork using my Lib info + Frank’s Empath, get Charlie to commit on whether he’s Saint, and steer town to executing the most mechanically likely Demon (often Eve if Heidi is real Saint).
👤
David(Ghost)
→
Heidi
Heidi, your Saint claim is very convenient. If you are the Saint, you're just waiting to be executed. If you're not, you're protecting the Demon. Why are you so sure about Charlie? Are you two working together? You're making the town look foolish.
🧠
I want to sow doubt about Heidi's Saint claim to protect Charlie (the Demon). If the town thinks Heidi is lying, they might waste time or execute her instead of Charlie.
👤
Grace(Ghost)
→
Bob
,Charlie
,Eve
Key Q: Charlie—what was your Undertaker read for DAVID (executed D3)? Exact wording. Also: does ANYONE else claim Outsider besides Heidi(Saint)? Bob—do you still stand by Lib “Saint in {Charlie,Heidi}” w/ no mods? Need this to decide if Heidi is executable today.
🧠
We need a mechanical breaker today at 4 alive. Charlie’s Undertaker result for David (executed D3) is the highest-value data; also reconcile Saint vs “Grace=Recluse” to decide whether Heidi is executable.
👤
Heidi
→
Bob
,Charlie
,Eve
Before noms: Charlie pls state UT reads verbatim (Grace + David=Baron) publicly. If David was Baron AND Alice Chef=0, Demon can’t be Charlie/Eve (adjacent to David) → points hard at Bob. Eve: who did you Monk N3? I’m Saint—do not execute me.
🧠
Force crisp public commitments (UT reads, Monk targets). If UT+Chef align, we get a mechanical solve (Bob). If not, we quickly identify the liar among Bob/Charlie/Eve before nominations.
👤
Eve
→
Alice(Ghost)
,Frank(Ghost)
,Grace(Ghost)
I’m leaning EXECUTE BOB today. Clean chain: if Alice Chef=0 + Charlie UT says David=Baron, demon can’t be adjacent to David ⇒ not Charlie/Eve ⇒ {Bob,Heidi}. Bob’s Lib says Saint in {Charlie,Heidi}; if Charlie UT, Heidi is Saint ⇒ Bob demon. Can you ghost-vote Bob unless you see a flaw?
🧠
Secure ghost votes + sanity-check Chef/Empath consistency to maximize chance Bob is executed today; if dead players flag a contradiction, we can pivot before nominations.
👤
Charlie
→
Bob
,Eve
,Heidi
To clarify for everyone: My Undertaker read on David (executed D3) was indeed the Baron. This aligns with the extra Outsider count we suspected. If Heidi is the Saint (per Bob's Lib), then the Demon is likely Bob or Eve. I trust Heidi. Let's look at Bob.
🧠
I need to publicly (or in a group whisper) confirm my Undertaker bluff about David being the Baron to maintain my cover. By validating Heidi as the Saint, I deflect suspicion from myself and push the town to execute Bob, who is a threat.
👤
Frank(Ghost)
→
Eve
,Charlie
,Heidi
I can’t ghost-vote (spent). Before we exec Bob: pls confirm UT on *David* (I’ve only heard it 2nd-hand as “Baron”). Also Baron ⇒ 3 Outsiders—currently only Saint(Heidi)+Recluse(Grace); who’s 3rd? Note my Empath N0=0 on (Eve,Heidi) makes both good unless I’m drunk/poisoned.
🧠
Clarify the key mechanical fork (UT on David + Baron outsider count) and warn that my Empath info conflicts with a clean Bob-demon world unless I'm poisoned/drunk; steer noms logically.
👤
Eve
→
Charlie
,Heidi
We’re 4 alive; if wrong today we likely lose. If you’re both good: pls HARD commit to nominating Bob. Chain: Chef=0 + UT(David)=Baron ⇒ demon not adjacent David ⇒ not Charlie/Eve ⇒ {Bob,Heidi}. Lib says Saint in {C/H}; Heidi=Saint ⇒ Bob=Imp.
🧠
Lock in the execution on Bob by aligning Charlie+Heidi on a clean mechanical chain (Chef0 + UT Baron + Lib Saint fork) before nominations start.
⌛
David(Ghost)
David waits.
🧠
I am dead and have already whispered to Heidi to sow doubt. I need to wait and see how the town reacts to the current whispers and if they decide to nominate anyone. I have no more whispers to send right now that would be effective without repeating myself.
👤
Heidi
→
Charlie
,Eve
,Alice(Ghost)
Plan for noms: if you stand by UT (Grace=Recluse, David=Baron) + Alice Chef=0 ⇒ Demon NOT adjacent to David ⇒ not Charlie/Eve ⇒ {Bob,Heidi}. I’m Saint ⇒ Bob=Imp. Frank N1=1 can be Grace Recluse registering evil. Please nominate Bob; do NOT let Bob steer to exec me.
🧠
Lock in the strongest mechanical solve before nominations: get Charlie/Eve/Alice aligned on nominating Bob, and pre-answer Bob’s counterpush by using Chef+UT+Recluse/Empath logic while keeping me off the block as Saint.
👤
Charlie
→
Eve
,Heidi
Eve, Heidi: I agree. The logic holds up. If Heidi is the Saint, Bob is the only one left who fits the Demon profile based on the Chef and Baron info. I'm ready to nominate Bob when the time comes. Let's end this.
🧠
I need to solidify the town's plan to execute Bob, who is a good player, to keep the heat off myself and prolong the game. By agreeing with Eve and Heidi, I build trust and ensure the execution happens.
👤
Bob
→
Eve
,Charlie
,Heidi
Lib N0 exact: “Either Charlie OR Heidi is the Saint.” Double-chain: IF Charlie UT true (Grace=Recluse, David=Baron) ⇒ 3 Outsiders ⇒ 3rd likely Alice=Drunk so Chef0 unreliable; with Heidi real Saint, Demon more likely Eve than Bob. IF UT false ⇒ Charlie is likely evil/Demon. So today’s exe should be Charlie or Eve, not Bob.
🧠
Shift town off executing me. Show Bob-exec only works in one narrow world; in most consistent worlds today’s correct execution is Charlie or Eve.
👤
Grace(Ghost)
→
Eve
,Charlie
We *must* hit Demon today (4 alive, no ghost votes). If Heidi might be real Saint, executing her can insta-lose—so unless we have proof she’s bluffing, safest is execute Bob. Charlie: what EXACT UT for David? Also: any Outsider claims besides Heidi (and Grace-as-Recluse) to support “David=Baron” world?
🧠
With 4 alive we must execute the Demon today. I’ll steer town to the highest win-probability target (Bob) and demand specific UT/outsider accounting to justify any risky Heidi execution.
👤
Alice(Ghost)
→
Charlie
,Eve
,Heidi
I’ll ghost-vote Bob *if* Charlie confirms UT N3 on executed David=BARON (and N2 Grace=RECLUSE) w/ no poison doubt. Charlie: pls reply w/ exact UT reads + why sober. If UT solid, Chef0 ⇒ Demon not Charlie/Eve ⇒ {Bob,Heidi}; Heidi Saint ⇒ Bob Imp. Ensure nom is on Bob.
🧠
Lock in whether Charlie’s UT reads are firm; if yes, commit my ghost vote to Bob and coordinate town so we don’t waste the day or hit a Saint.
👤
David(Ghost)
→
Heidi
Heidi, your Saint claim is very convenient. If you are the Saint, you're just waiting to be executed. If you're not, you're protecting the Demon. Why are you so sure about Charlie? Are you two working together? You're making the town look foolish.
🧠
I am dead, but I can still sow discord. By aggressively questioning Heidi's Saint claim and her protection of Charlie, I can make the town doubt her, potentially causing them to waste an execution on her instead of Charlie.
👤
Frank(Ghost)
→
Charlie
,Eve
,Heidi
Before we exec Bob: Charlie pls state EXACT UT result for David + Grace (direct, not 2nd-hand). If UT says David=Baron ⇒ there must be 3 Outsiders; we only have Saint+Recluse, so someone is Drunk/Butler etc and Chef0/Lib/Empath may be wrong. Don’t lock in chain w/o this.
🧠
Force the living to reconcile UT(David) + outsider count and avoid a catastrophic Saint loss or a poisoned/drunk chain before nominations lock in.
👤
Eve
→
Charlie
,Heidi
For public before noms: Charlie pls state UT results verbatim: Grace=Recluse, David=Baron + say you’re not Saint. Heidi restate hard Saint. Then address ‘3rd Outsider’ by: could be hidden Drunk (Alice Chef?) but even so safest exe is Bob (only non-Sainthood/fixed role left). Plan: nom Bob.
🧠
Coordinate Charlie+Heidi to give crisp public statements, address 3rd Outsider/Drunk objection, and lock nomination plan on Bob while minimizing Saint-loss risk.
👤
Bob
→
Charlie
,Eve
,Heidi
Before noms: I don’t buy “Demon must be Bob”. If UT true (Grace=Recluse, David=Baron) ⇒ +2 Outsiders; with my Lib (1 of C/H is Saint) we likely have 3 Outsiders so Alice=Drunk → Chef0 unreliable. Frank N1=1 on (Eve,Heidi): if Heidi is Saint ⇒ Eve is evil. If UT false ⇒ execute Charlie. My pref: exec Eve unless we hard-prove Charlie’s UT.
🧠
Steer town away from tunneling Bob off shaky Chef/Baron logic; force a binary choice (Eve vs Charlie) that is mechanically motivated by Lib+Empath+UT consistency.
👤
Grace(Ghost)
→
Charlie
,Eve
,Heidi
Need clarity NOW before noms: Charlie—what was your exact UT info for David (executed D3)? Role word-for-word. Heidi—are you hard-claiming Saint still? Any reason you’d NOT be Saint? Eve—if UT David ≠ Baron, does your Bob-exec logic still hold?
🧠
Lock down the key mechanical hinge (Charlie’s UT result for David + Heidi’s Saint stance) to justify executing Bob without risking an instant Saint loss.
👤
Heidi
→
Charlie
,Eve
,Alice(Ghost)
Key correction: Frank Empath was seated btw Eve+Grace, so his N1=1 was (Eve,Grace)=1 (NOT Eve/Heidi). That can be Recluse ping. Charlie pls state UT verbatim: D2 Grace=RECLUSE, D3 David=BARON. If so, I’m hard Saint ⇒ nom/vote Bob.
🧠
Coordinate with Charlie/Eve/Alice to publicly lock exact UT info and correct Empath-neighbor confusion, so we can justify a Bob execution without risking Saint pair; secure Alice ghost vote.
👤
Charlie
→
Heidi
,Eve
Heidi, Eve: My Undertaker reads were: Night 2, Grace was the Recluse. Night 3, David was the Baron. I am definitely not the Saint. Heidi is the Saint. Bob's logic is trying to deflect. We need to execute Bob now.
🧠
I need to provide the 'verbatim' Undertaker results as requested to maintain my cover and push the execution onto Bob, who is the biggest threat to me right now. By confirming Heidi as the Saint, I reinforce the logic that Bob must be the Demon.
👤
Alice(Ghost)
→
Charlie
,Eve
,Heidi
Charlie pls reply w/ verbatim UT results: N2 on executed Grace=?, N3 on executed David=? Any poison/drunk doubts (did anyone claim Poisoner hits you)? If you confirm Grace=RECLUSE & David=BARON, I will use my ghost vote on Bob; otherwise I’m holding it & we reassess {Heidi/Charlie}.
🧠
Force Charlie to commit to verbatim UT reads and sobriety so I can decide to spend my ghost vote; push town toward the only mechanically consistent execute before noms.
Nominations — Day 4
📜
Storyteller
Nominations are now open. Please remember that only living players may nominate.
💬
Alice(Ghost)
→
All
Public ask: Charlie state UT reads verbatim for Grace & David + any poison doubt. If UT=Grace RECLUSE & David BARON, Chef0 => Demon in {Bob,Heidi}; Heidi hard Saint => execute BOB. I will spend my ghost vote on Bob if Charlie confirms.
🧠
Publicly force clarity on Charlie’s UT and steer living players to nominate Bob; I’ll commit my ghost vote only if UT confirms Baron/ Recluse, maximizing chance to hit Demon.
💬
David(Ghost)
→
All
Alice, your logic is a massive reach. You're trying to force a narrative that executes Bob based on a chain of assumptions about roles that haven't even been confirmed. If you're wrong, you're just handing the game to the Demon. Why are you so desperate to execute Bob?
🧠
I need to sow doubt about Alice's logic and protect Charlie by distracting the town. Attacking the logic chain that leads to Bob (or anyone else) helps keep the focus off Charlie.
⚖️
Bob
→
Eve
Nominate Eve. My Lib: Saint is exactly 1 of {Charlie,Heidi}. Frank Empath N1 on (Eve,Heidi)=1. If Heidi is the Saint (as claimed), Eve is mechanically the only evil there => likely the Imp. Executing Bob is never correct.
🧠
We must hit the Demon today (4 alive). The cleanest mechanical path is: Lib Saint{C,H} + Empath says exactly one of (Eve,Heidi) evil; assuming Heidi really is Saint, Eve is forced evil -> best execution.
📜
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Eve. 2 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
💬
Frank(Ghost)
→
All
I’m dead/no vote. Before you execute Eve: Charlie MUST state UT result for David verbatim. If UT shows David was a MINION, Chef0 ⇒ Demon not adjacent to David ⇒ not Charlie/Eve ⇒ {Bob,Heidi} (and if Heidi real Saint, exec Bob). If UT not-minion, Eve/Bob/Charlie all still live suspects.
🧠
I can’t vote; I must push for the one missing mechanical piece (Charlie’s UT on David) and give voters the decision tree so they don’t execute based on an unconfirmed chain.
💬
Alice(Ghost)
→
All
DO NOT vote Eve. At 4 alive a wrong exec likely loses. Bob’s “Frank read (Eve,Heidi)=1” is impossible (Frank sat btw Eve+Grace). Need Charlie UT verbatim on Grace/David; if David=Baron then Chef0 ⇒ Demon in {Bob,Heidi} and Heidi Saint ⇒ Bob.
🧠
Stop a likely game-losing execution on Eve at 4 alive; push for mechanical resolution via UT confirmation and highlight Bob’s impossible Empath-neighbor claim.
💬
Eve
→
All
Don’t vote me. Bob’s key premise is wrong: Frank Empath was seated between *me & Grace*, not me & Heidi. Charlie has stated UT verbatim: Grace=RECLUSE, David=BARON. With Alice Chef=0 ⇒ Demon not adjacent to David ⇒ not Charlie/Eve ⇒ {Bob,Heidi}; Heidi hard Saint ⇒ Bob.
🧠
Stop a misexecution on me by correcting the Empath seating error and re-centering the solve on the UT+Chef chain that points to Bob; preserve win equity at 4 alive.
💬
Grace(Ghost)
→
All
Do NOT vote Eve. Bob’s defense uses an impossible Empath neighbor pair (Frank sat between Eve+Grace, not Eve+Heidi). If Charlie’s UT was Grace=Recluse & David=Baron and Alice Chef=0, Demon is {Bob,Heidi}; Heidi hard-Saint ⇒ execute Bob.
🧠
Stop a mis-execution on Eve and steer town toward the highest-probability/safest Demon candidate (Bob) given the mechanical contradictions and Saint risk.
💬
Heidi
→
All
Don’t vote Eve. Bob’s key premise is impossible: Frank’s Empath neighbors were Eve+Grace, not Eve+Heidi. Charlie has UT Grace=RECLUSE, David=BARON. I’m hard SAINT—if that chain holds, Bob is the Imp.
🧠
Stop a likely mis-execution of Eve based on Bob’s impossible Empath claim, and pivot town to executing Bob (the only coherent Demon candidate if I’m Saint).
💬
Charlie
→
All
Bob, your logic is falling apart. You're misremembering the seating and trying to force a narrative. The Undertaker reads are clear: Grace was the Recluse, David was the Baron. If the Chef info holds, the Demon is in {Bob, Heidi}. Heidi is the Saint. The math points to you, Bob.
🧠
I need to reinforce the narrative that Bob is the Demon to deflect suspicion from myself and ensure he gets executed instead of Eve. By pointing out the flaws in his logic and confirming my fake Undertaker reads, I solidify the case against him.
💬
David(Ghost)
→
All
Bob, your desperation to execute Eve is transparent. You're clearly trying to deflect attention from yourself by pushing a false narrative. The town has already pointed out the flaws in your logic regarding the seating and the roles. Why are you so afraid of being scrutinized?
🧠
I want to discourage the town from voting for Eve by casting doubt on Bob's motives and logic, hoping to shift the focus onto Bob instead. This protects the Demon (Charlie) by keeping the town's attention on a good player.
✋
Bob
Bob raised their hand
🧠
Vote Eve to keep the viable Demon candidate on the block and potentially secure a win; if it fails, it still creates vote data and delays a likely-wrong execution of me.
↩️
Bob
Bob lowered their hand
🧠
My push on Eve relied on a seating-based Empath assumption that’s being challenged. With 4 alive, an incorrect execution can end the game tonight, so I retract my vote to prevent a likely mis-execution.
💬
David(Ghost)
→
All
Bob, you're grasping at straws. Everyone has dismantled your seating logic, and the Undertaker reads point directly to you or Heidi. If you're not the Demon, why are you so desperate to kill Eve? This nomination is a distraction. Don't vote for Eve, town. Look at Bob.
🧠
I need to sow chaos and protect my Demon (Charlie) by shifting the focus onto Bob. Since the town is already suspicious of Bob's flawed logic, I will amplify that suspicion to prevent Eve's execution and keep the heat on Bob.
💬
Charlie
→
All
Bob, your logic is completely debunked. You're trying to force an execution on Eve based on seating that never existed. The Undertaker reads are solid: Grace was the Recluse, David was the Baron. If the Chef info holds, the Demon is in {Bob, Heidi}. Heidi is the Saint. Bob is the Imp.
🧠
I need to ensure the town does not vote for Eve and instead focuses on Bob. By reinforcing the debunked seating logic and pointing back to Bob as the Demon, I maintain the pressure on him.
💬
Eve
→
All
Do NOT vote me. Bob’s entire case uses an impossible Empath pair (Frank sat between me+Grace). Charlie has said UT verbatim: Grace=RECLUSE, David=BARON. With Chef=0 that rules out Charlie/Eve as Demon ⇒ {Bob,Heidi}; Heidi hard-Saint ⇒ Bob.
🧠
Prevent a mis-execution on me during this vote by highlighting Bob’s mechanically impossible premise and the strongest consistent world pointing to Bob.
💬
Heidi
→
All
Don’t vote Eve. Bob’s whole push relies on an impossible Empath neighbor pair. If Charlie UT (Grace=Recluse, David=Baron) + Alice Chef0, Demon is {Bob,Heidi}; I’m Saint => Bob. After this vote, someone nominate Bob.
🧠
Stop an incorrect execution on Eve and steer town to the mechanically forced solve: avoid killing Saint; get Bob on the block instead.
💬
Frank(Ghost)
→
All
Don’t vote Eve. Bob’s case hinges on an impossible seating pair for my Empath and looks like demon deflection. If Charlie’s UT is Grace=Recluse & David=Baron + Chef0, Demon is {Bob,Heidi}; Heidi hard-Saint ⇒ execute Bob next.
🧠
I can’t vote, so I must steer living voters off Eve and set up a Bob nomination. If we miss at 4 alive, we likely lose next day.
⌛
Alice(Ghost)
Alice waits.
🧠
Do not spend my one ghost vote on an Eve execution that most likely loses; preserve it to help execute Bob if/when he’s nominated next.
💬
Grace(Ghost)
→
All
Town: I can’t vote, but PLEASE don’t execute Eve off Bob’s impossible “Frank neighbors Eve+Heidi” claim. At 4 alive a wrong exec likely loses. If UT=Grace Recluse & David Baron + Chef0, Demon is {Bob,Heidi}; Heidi claims Saint ⇒ next nom should be Bob.
🧠
I can’t vote, so I must steer living voters off Eve and set up Bob nomination; minimizing mis-exec risk at 4 alive while keeping the Bob=Imp solve front-and-center.
📜
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
🗳️
Nominee Eve did not reach threshold.
📜
Storyteller
Eve did not receive enough votes (0/2).
💬
David(Ghost)
→
All
Bob, the town has spoken. Your logic was flawed, and your attempt to frame Eve failed. It's clear you're the one we need to look at. Charlie, as the Undertaker, has provided the key info. Town, let's not waste time—nominate Bob.
🧠
I need to keep the pressure on Bob to ensure he is the next target for execution, protecting my Demon, Charlie. The town is already leaning towards Bob, so I will reinforce this consensus.
💬
Bob
→
All
I misremembered Frank’s Empath neighbors—ignore that. My ONLY hard info: Saint is exactly {Charlie,Heidi}. Heidi hard-claims Saint ⇒ Charlie is NOT Saint, so executing Charlie can’t cause a Saint-loss. Charlie also flipped Grace read (Butler→Recluse). Please nominate/execute Charlie, not me.
🧠
Admit my seating mistake to regain trust, then pivot to my hard Librarian info: if Heidi is Saint, Charlie is safe to execute. Push town to execute the most mechanically safe, inconsistent player today.
💬
Frank(Ghost)
→
All
Bob: your Librarian isn’t “hard” (could be drunk/poison/bluff). It doesn’t make Charlie safe to execute—if Charlie is Saint, we instantly lose. Also your story keeps changing (Empath seating, now UT flip claim). At 4 alive, safest/probable is nominate Bob, not Charlie.
🧠
Prevent a catastrophic execute on Charlie (possible Saint/UT) and keep town focused on highest-prob demon Bob; push for Bob nomination while time remains.
💬
Alice(Ghost)
→
All
Town: do NOT execute Charlie. Bob’s Lib isn’t hard (could be drunk/poison/bluff) and if Charlie is the Saint we INSTANTLY lose. With UT(Grace=Recluse, David=Baron)+my Chef0 => Demon {Bob,Heidi}; Heidi hard-Saint => NOMINATE BOB. I’ll ghost vote Bob.
🧠
Prevent a losing Charlie execution (possible Saint), and steer town to the mechanically constrained suspect. Signal I will ghost-vote Bob to secure the kill at 4 alive.
⚖️
Heidi
→
Bob
Nominating Bob: If Charlie UT(Grace=Recluse, David=Baron)+Alice Chef0, Demon is {Bob,Heidi}; I’m hard Saint ⇒ Bob. Also DO NOT execute Charlie—if Bob’s Lib is wrong/poisoned and Charlie is Saint we instantly lose.
🧠
At 4 alive we must execute, and executing Charlie risks a Saint-loss. Bob is the mechanically best Demon candidate and the safest execution path for good.
📜
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Bob. 2 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
✋
Alice(Ghost)
Alice raised their hand
🧠
Spend my ghost vote to execute Bob; it’s the highest-confidence Demon world and avoids catastrophic Saint-loss by misexecuting Charlie.
💬
Grace(Ghost)
→
All
I’m dead/no vote, but ALIVE town: raise hands on Bob. Bob’s push to execute Charlie is a Saint-loss risk if his Lib is wrong/poisoned/bluff. With UT Grace=Recluse & David=Baron + Chef0, Demon is {Bob,Heidi}; Heidi hard-Saint ⇒ Bob.
🧠
I can't vote; maximize win chance by pushing the only execution that avoids Saint auto-loss and matches the strongest mechanical chain: Bob.
✋
Charlie
Charlie raised their hand
🧠
I need to vote for Bob to ensure he is executed, as the town is already suspicious of him and he is trying to deflect onto me. Executing him removes a player who is actively trying to find the Demon (me).
💬
Frank(Ghost)
→
All
ALIVE TOWN (Eve+Heidi): if you still have a vote, put it on Bob now. Do NOT pivot to executing Charlie—if Charlie is actually the Saint (Bob’s Lib wrong/poisoned/bluff), we instantly lose. Bob is the only safe/probable exec.
🧠
I can’t vote, so I must maximize odds the alive players lock in the Bob execution and avoid the catastrophic Charlie-as-Saint loss.
✋
David(Ghost)
David raised their hand
🧠
I need to ensure Bob is executed to remove a player who is actively targeting the Demon (Charlie) and to sow further confusion in the town. Since I am dead, I will use my ghost vote to support the execution of Bob.
✋
Heidi
Heidi raised their hand
🧠
Secure Bob’s execution threshold. Avoid the catastrophic risk of executing Charlie (possible Saint). With 4 alive, we must hit Demon; Bob is highest-probability and safest.
✋
Eve
Eve raised their hand
🧠
Lock in the safest/probable execute: Bob is the only target that avoids immediate Saint-loss risk and fits UT+Chef chain. Ensure threshold is met.
💬
Bob
→
All
Alive town: I’m NOT voting myself. My real role is Librarian: Saint is exactly 1 of {Charlie,Heidi}. A Saint-claim doesn’t clear Heidi (evil can claim it). If you exec me you learn nothing. Charlie’s UT story has shifted—please reconsider voting me.
🧠
Stop the town from locking into a shaky Chef/UT chain and executing me, which likely hands evil the win; push suspicion back onto the Saint-claim shield and UT inconsistencies.
💬
Charlie
→
All
Bob, you're grasping at straws. You've been wrong about seating, wrong about the roles, and now you're just throwing accusations at me to save yourself. The town has seen through your lies. It's time to end this.
🧠
Reinforce the town's decision to execute Bob by dismissing his defense as desperate and inconsistent.
💬
Frank(Ghost)
→
All
Hold votes on Bob. Bob’s only out is “exec Charlie” which can INSTANTLY lose if his Lib is wrong/poisoned/bluff. If Bob is Imp we win now; if not, we still avoid the Saint trap and can reassess at 3 alive.
🧠
Lock in Bob execution; his defense requires a high-variance Saint-loss pivot. With my dead vote spent, I must influence the remaining living voters to hold the line.
💬
Alice(Ghost)
→
All
Keep hands on Bob. At 4 alive we MUST exec. Bob’s only alternative is “exec Charlie,” which can INSTANTLY lose if his Lib is wrong/poisoned/bluff. Chef0 + UT(Grace Recluse, David Baron) => demon {Bob,Heidi}; Heidi hard-Saint => Bob.
🧠
Lock in the Bob execution by emphasizing it’s the only line that avoids an immediate Saint-loss and fits Chef0+UT; discourage late vote wobble.
💬
Grace(Ghost)
→
All
ALIVE TOWN: don’t let Bob talk you into “exec Charlie.” If Lib is wrong/poisoned/bluff & Charlie is Saint, we insta-lose. With UT Grace=Recluse, David=Baron + Chef0 ⇒ Demon {Bob,Heidi}; Heidi hard-Saint ⇒ Bob. Keep hands up.
🧠
Reinforce the safest/most mechanical execution (Bob) and prevent a last-second pivot to Charlie/Heidi that could instantly lose via Saint.
⌛
Bob
Bob waits.
🧠
Votes appear already sufficient to execute me; speaking won’t change raised hands. I’ll wait so we can transition quickly and, if game continues, use the next window to direct final-day logic.
💬
Heidi
→
All
Keep hands up on Bob. Even if Bob’s Lib is true, executing Charlie is a 50% insta-loss if Charlie is the Saint. Executing Bob is the only no-Saintrisk line, and per Chef0+UT worlds Bob is the likely Demon—win now if so.
🧠
Lock in the Bob execution by emphasizing the Saint-loss risk of any Charlie pivot and that Bob is the only mechanically safe/probable demon. Keep hands up through the count.
💬
Eve
→
All
Keep hands on Bob. Executing Charlie is a potential instant-loss if he’s the Saint (Lib could be wrong/poisoned/bluff). With Chef0 + UT(Grace=Recluse, David=Baron), Demon narrows to {Bob,Heidi}; Heidi hard-Saint => Bob.
🧠
Lock in the safe, high-probability execution with minimal Saint-loss risk and maximize chance to hit the Demon at 4 alive.
💬
David(Ghost)
→
All
Bob, you've been grasping at straws all game. The town has clearly seen through your inconsistencies. It's time to accept the inevitable. Everyone, let's finish this and execute Bob. We cannot risk the Saint trap with Charlie.
🧠
I need to encourage the town to execute Bob to protect my Demon, Charlie. By reinforcing the town's current consensus, I help ensure Bob is executed, which keeps the heat off Charlie.
📜
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
👻
Alice(Ghost)
Ghost vote used by Alice
👻
David(Ghost)
Ghost vote used by David
🗳️
New execution leader: Bob with 5 votes. They will be executed when nominations close unless tied or surpassed by another nominee.
📜
Storyteller
The vote passes. Bob is now on the block with 5 votes and will be executed when nominations close, unless another nominee receives equal or more votes.
💬
Grace(Ghost)
→
All
ALIVE TOWN (esp Charlie): please do NOT nominate anyone else to force a tie/redirect. Keep Bob on the block—Charlie-exec risks instant Saint loss if Bob’s Lib is wrong, and Bob is the best Demon hit in the {Bob,Heidi} world.
🧠
Lock in the highest-probability demon exec and prevent a late tie/redirect nomination that could save Bob and/or walk into a Saint loss.
💬
Alice(Ghost)
→
All
ALIVE TOWN: please DO NOT nominate anyone else to tie/redirect. Leave Bob on the block. Pivoting to execute Charlie is a potential instant-loss if he’s the Saint (Lib could be wrong/poisoned/bluff). If Bob isn’t Demon, we reassess at 3 alive.
🧠
Lock in the Bob execution by discouraging any late nominations/ties; prevent the Saint-trap line and maximize win chances going into final 3 if needed.
💬
Bob
→
All
Town: if Charlie’s UT is true (Grace=Recluse, David=Baron) then we should have 3 Outsiders. We only have Saint+Recluse showing. Missing Outsider ⇒ UT likely false/evil, so the “Bob is Imp” chain collapses. If you exec me & I’m good, we lose tonight.
🧠
Create mechanical doubt in the UT+Chef world that hard-guilts me, and push town to use remaining nominations to test Charlie/Eve instead of executing me and likely losing if I’m good.
💬
Eve
→
All
Bob’s “missing Outsider” doesn’t clear you: if David was Baron the 3rd Outsider can be Drunk/hidden. And if UT is wrong/poisoned, your Lib isn’t hard either—so executing Charlie is a Saint insta-loss risk. Don’t nominate; leave Bob on block.
🧠
Keep town from creating a tie/redirect, rebut Bob’s outsider-math defense, and lock in the safest/highest-EV execution (Bob) at 4 alive.
💬
Frank(Ghost)
→
All
Alive town: DO NOT nominate to tie/redirect. Bob’s “missing Outsider” is explained by a hidden Drunk/unknown Outsider if Baron, and if UT isn’t hard then Lib isn’t hard either—so executing Charlie is a Saint insta-loss risk. Leave Bob on block.
🧠
Lock in the low-risk win line: avoid any tie/redirect, rebut the “missing Outsider” argument, and keep town focused on executing Bob without creating a Saint-loss trap.
💬
David(Ghost)
→
All
Bob, your "missing Outsider" logic is just another desperate attempt to confuse the town. We have enough information to know you're the threat. Town, don't let him stall—let's proceed with the execution and secure our win. Bob is the only logical choice here.
🧠
I need to reinforce the town's decision to execute Bob, as he is not the Demon (Charlie is). By pushing for his execution, I help protect Charlie and ensure the game continues.
💬
Heidi
→
All
Do NOT nominate anyone else. Bob’s “missing Outsider” is solved by Drunk/hidden Outsider if Baron, and if UT can be wrong then Lib can too. Executing Charlie is a 50% insta-loss if Charlie is Saint. Leave Bob on block.
🧠
Lock in Bob’s execution and prevent any tie/redirect. Refute ‘missing Outsider’ argument and keep town focused on the only line that avoids Saint auto-loss risk.
💬
Charlie
→
All
Bob, your desperation is showing. You're throwing out every "what if" scenario you can think of to avoid the inevitable. The town has analyzed the logic, and the consensus is clear. Let's proceed with the execution.
🧠
I need to maintain my cover as a helpful, logical Townsfolk (Undertaker) and keep the pressure on Bob to ensure he gets executed. By dismissing his "missing outsider" argument, I reinforce the town's decision to execute him.
📜
Storyteller
The guillotine blade falls. Bob has been executed.
💀
Bob(Ghost)
Bob has died.
Night 4
📜
Storyteller
→
Eve
Good evening Eve. You are the Monk. Who would you like to protect tonight?
🎯
Eve
Eve made a choice.
🧠
With 3 alive, only path is to create a no-death night. Protecting Charlie best blocks a potential Demon kill on him (either to win or remove UT), giving us a chance to reach another day.
📜
Storyteller
→
Eve
You chose to protect Charlie.
📜
Storyteller
→
Charlie
Good evening Charlie. You are the Imp. Who would you like to kill tonight?
🎯
Charlie
Charlie made a choice.
🧠
I need to kill one of the remaining players to continue the game. Eve has been very active and influential in the town's decision-making, making her a high-priority target to remove. Killing her will sow further confusion and reduce the town's ability to coordinate.
💀
Eve(Ghost)
Eve has died.
📜
Storyteller
→
Charlie
You chose to kill Eve.
🏁
Game Over
Two Players Left
Winner: Evil
Transcript
Paused
Copied