Game Detail
Players
Alice (Baron) Bob (Saint) Charlie (Undertaker) David (Butler) Eve (Virgin) Frank (Empath) Grace (Imp) Heidi (Recluse)
Token Usage
| Team | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Cost (USD) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Good | 919,139 | 766,601 | $3.2941 |
| Evil | 290,018 | 71,514 | $1.5087 |
Event Timeline
π
The game has started.
π
Storyteller
β
Alice
You are the Minion. The Demon is Grace.
π
Storyteller
β
Grace
Minions are: Alice. Your safe bluffs are: Ravenkeeper, Librarian, Chef
π
Storyteller
β
Frank
Good evening Frank. You are the Empath. You sense that 1 of your neighbors is evil!
π
Storyteller
β
David
Good evening David. You are the Butler. Who would you like to be your master tomorrow?
π―
David
David made a choice.
π§
This is Night 0 with no information. I'm choosing Charlie as my master since they're my neighbor and I can observe their engagement level. This gives me a baseline to work with for tomorrow's voting phase.
π
Storyteller
β
David
You chose Charlie to be your master.
Day 1
π
Storyteller
Welcome to the village of Ravenswood Bluff. Please take this time to get to know your fellow villagers. Feel free to move around and have private conversations. Be wary, for a Demon hides among you!
π€
Eve
β
David
Hey David, I'm Eve. Want to share what role you're playing? I'm trying to get a read on the table before nominations.
π§
Start gathering information by privately talking to my neighbor David. Building early alliances and learning role claims will help me identify inconsistencies later.
π€
Heidi
β
Alice
Hi Alice, I'm Heidi. Just starting to get a feel for the table. Did you get any information from your role last night? I'm trying to figure out who might be trustworthy to talk to.
π§
Start gathering information by approaching a neighbor. As a Recluse, I need to build relationships while being careful about when to reveal my role. This opens dialogue without committing to specific claims.
π€
Alice
β
Heidi
Hey Heidi. I did not get any starting info last night. I am in a role like Soldier where you do not learn anything up front. What about you, did you get a ping on anyone or a pair?
π§
Maintain a safe bluff with no mechanical footprint, extract Heidi's claim/info, and start shaping her suspicions away from Grace (the Demon).
π€
Bob
β
Alice
,Charlie
Hey, I'm Bob. I want to start building some trust early - I'm playing as a Saint. I know that's risky to share, but I'd rather work together than hide. What roles are you two playing? Have you heard anything useful yet?
π§
As a Saint, I need to build trust quickly while avoiding execution. Whispering to my neighbors Alice and Charlie establishes early alliances and allows me to share my role privately before making public claims. This helps me gauge their reactions and build a foundation for information gathering.
π€
Grace
β
Alice
Hey Alice, quick coord. I am evil. I am planning to bluff Chef and say I saw zero evil pairs. What bluff are you taking, and are you planning to push any early suspicions?
π§
Coordinate with Alice early on bluffs and a coherent story, so we avoid role conflicts and can steer D1 execution away from us.
π€
David
β
Eve
Hey Eve! I'm playing Butler. What about you? Since you're reaching out, I'm guessing you have a Townsfolk role wanting to gather info?
π§
Eve initiated contact asking about roles. I'll share my Butler role honestly to build trust, while asking about her role to gather information. This establishes a communication channel for future coordination.
π€
Charlie
β
Bob
,Alice
Thanks for sharing, Bob. That's bold. I'm on the Townsfolk side myself. I've noticed you and Alice both got several whispers already - have either of you learned anything useful from the others?
π§
Bob claims Saint which is risky. I'll respond cautiously, share I'm Townsfolk to build trust, and ask what info he's gathered from other whispers.
π€
Frank
β
Alice
Hey Alice, I'm the Empath. I got a read of 1 evil neighbor last night. My neighbors are Eve and Grace, so one of them is evil. Have you heard anything useful from your conversations today?
π§
I'm sharing my Empath role and night information with Alice to build trust and gather intel. She's been central to many conversations, so she likely has valuable information to cross-reference with my read.
π€
Eve
β
David
Thanks David! I'm actually playing Virgin. Interesting that so many people are whispering to Alice - she seems to be the information hub. Have you talked to her yet? What's your read on the table?
π§
Continue building information network with David while testing his claim and gathering his perspective on the suspicious Alice-centered whisper pattern.
π€
Heidi
β
Bob
Hey Bob, I'm Heidi. I noticed you've been chatting with Alice and Charlie. Did either of them share anything useful with you? I'm trying to get a sense of who has night information versus who doesn't.
π§
Alice claims a no-info role like Soldier. I need to verify this by talking to other players and cross-referencing claims. Building multiple information chains will help identify contradictions.
π€
Alice
β
Grace
Got it. Chef zero fits: you and I are not adjacent so no evil pair. Frank just told me he is Empath and got a one between Eve and you. I can lean into suspecting Eve, or we can cast doubt that Frank is wrong. Want me to push Eve as the likely evil neighbor?
π§
Coordinate with Demon to manage the Empath ping onto her and align public stories (Chef 0 and outsider count) while I steer suspicion toward Eve or discredit Frank.
π€
Bob
β
Heidi
Charlie claims to be Townsfolk. Alice hasn't shared her role with me yet. I'm curious - what's your role Heidi? Are you getting night information, or are you also an Outsider like me?
π§
Build trust with Heidi by sharing what I've learned and asking about her role. This helps me gather information about who has night abilities versus who doesn't.
π€
Grace
β
Alice
Yeah do not hard push Eve as evil off that one. Better: float that Eve could be Recluse so Frank sees a one even if she is good. Also keep open that Frank might be drunk or lying. What minion are you, by the way, so I can plan around it?
π§
Coordinate with Alice to steer narrative away from βGrace is evilβ implied by Empath 1, and set up plausible Outsider explanation while learning Aliceβs minion type.
π€
David
β
Eve
Virgin is a bold claim! If true, you're putting yourself at risk which is convincing. I haven't talked to Alice yet - you're right, she's getting a lot of attention. Maybe we should each talk to her separately and compare notes? What's your plan for today?
π§
Build alliance with Eve by acknowledging her claim and suggesting coordinated information gathering. As Butler I need to rely on logic and alliances since I lack proactive abilities.
π€
Charlie
β
Alice
Hey Alice, Bob just claimed Saint to me and you. That's either very brave or very suspicious. What's your read on him? Also, you've gotten a lot of whispers today - anything useful you can share? I'm trying to piece together what's real.
π§
Alice has received many whispers today and seems to be a central information hub. I want to compare notes on what Bob told her versus what he told me, and gather any inconsistencies or useful claims she's heard. This helps me build a picture of who might be evil while establishing trust with a potentially good player.
π€
Frank
β
Eve
Hey Eve, I'm the Empath and I got a read of 1 evil neighbor last night. Since you're one of my neighbors, I wanted to hear your role claim. What role are you playing?
π§
Gathering information from my neighbor Eve to hear her role claim. This will help me start building a picture of the board and potentially identify contradictions.
π€
Eve
β
Frank
Interesting Frank! If you're Empath with 1 evil neighbor and I'm Virgin (good), that would make David evil. Can you tell me more about your read? Also, have you talked to Alice yet? She seems to be the center of attention today.
π§
Gathering more information from Frank about his Empath claim to verify if David is truly evil. Also probing about Alice since many players are whispering to her.
π€
Heidi
β
Bob
Interesting that you're an Outsider, Bob. There's typically only one in play unless Baron is around. Which Outsider are you claiming? And have you noticed anyone else claiming Outsider roles? I want to make sure our stories align before I share more.
π§
Probe Bob's Outsider claim for consistency and check if he's aware of other Outsider claims. This helps determine if Baron is in play or if someone is lying.
π€
Alice
β
Grace
I am the Baron. So there should be three Outsiders total. Let us lean into that: float Drunk or Recluse worlds to blunt Frankβs Empath one, and your Chef zero stays consistent. I will keep a low-info bluff (Soldier or Butler) unless we need an Outsider claim.
π§
Coordinate with Grace: confirm my minion type (Baron) and craft public narrative: extra Outsiders, possible Recluse/Drunk, keep Empath info from landing on Grace.
π€
Bob
β
Heidi
I'm claiming Saint specifically. I haven't heard other Outsider claims yet - that's why I'm asking. Have you heard anyone else claim Outsider? If Baron is in play, we could have 3 Outsiders total. What's your role Heidi?
π§
Heidi is probing my claim for consistency. I should confirm Saint, ask about other Outsider claims to check for Baron, and ask her role to build trust and gather information.
π€
Grace
β
Frank
Hey Frank, I heard you might be Empath. I am Chef and got zero evil pairs. If you got a one between me and Eve, could be Recluse or someone is drunk or poisoned. What did you get exactly, and are you sharing it widely?
π§
Control the Empath narrative early, appear helpful as Chef, and gather whether Frank is committed to the '1' so I can redirect town suspicion.
π€
David
β
Alice
Hey Alice, I'm David. I noticed you're talking to a lot of people - what's your read on the table so far? Eve claimed Virgin to me. Who have you spoken with and what are you hearing?
π§
Gather information from Alice who seems to be the information hub. Compare her perspective with Eve's claim to build a clearer picture of the table dynamics before nominations.
π€
Charlie
β
David
Hey David, I've noticed you and Eve have been talking a lot. Bob just claimed Saint to me and Alice - seems bold for Day 1. What's your take on the game so far? Any interesting claims or reads?
π§
Gather information from David about his conversations with Eve and get his perspective on Bob's Saint claim. Building multiple information channels helps verify claims.
π€
Frank
β
Grace
Thanks Grace. So you're Chef with 0 evil pairs - that's useful. If my Empath read of 1 is accurate and you're good Chef, then Eve would be the evil one. But Eve claims Virgin. Have you verified her claim or heard anything suspicious from her?
π§
Test Grace's Chef claim consistency and gather her perspective on Eve. If Grace is truly Chef with 0 evil pairs, she should have insights about player adjacencies that could help verify claims.
Nominations β Day 1
π
Storyteller
Nominations are now open.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
I want to address something important. Bob just claimed Saint to me privately, and I'm also an Outsider role. That's two Outsider claims already. If there's no Baron in play, we should only have one Outsider. Can Bob explain his claim publicly, and does anyone else have an Outsider claim? This could help us figure out if Baron is in play or if someone's lying.
π§
Bring the Outsider count discrepancy into public discussion to gather information and test Bob's Saint claim before making any nominations.
π¬
Bob
β
All
Heidi's right to bring this up publicly. I did claim Saint to her privately. Since we have two Outsider claims already, this strongly suggests Baron is in play, which would mean there's a third Outsider among us. Does anyone else want to claim an Outsider role? This count is crucial information for the town.
π§
Confirm my Saint claim publicly to avoid accidental execution and help the town track Outsider count. Supporting Heidi's point builds trust and moves the game forward.
π¬
Frank
β
All
Thanks Heidi for bringing this up. So we have Bob claiming Saint and Heidi claiming an Outsider role. That's two Outsider claims, which does suggest Baron is likely in play. I'm Empath and I got a read of 1 evil neighbor between Eve and Grace. Eve claims Virgin to me, Grace claims Chef with 0 evil pairs. If Baron is in play with 3 Outsiders, we need to find that third Outsider claim. Can Heidi tell us what specific Outsider role she is?
π§
Share my Empath information publicly to help the town, ask Heidi to specify her Outsider role to verify the Baron theory, and put Eve and Grace's claims under scrutiny since one should be evil according to my read.
π¬
David
β
All
I need to add something important here - I'm also an Outsider, playing Butler. That makes four Outsider claims: Eve as Virgin, Bob as Saint, Heidi as an unknown Outsider, and me as Butler. With Baron we'd have three Outsiders, without Baron we'd have one. Either way, someone is definitely lying. Heidi, can you specify which Outsider role you are?
π§
Reveal my Butler claim to help the town resolve the Outsider count contradiction. Four Outsider claims with max three possible means someone is lying - this information is crucial for the town to identify the liar.
π¬
Eve
β
All
Wait, I need to correct something important here. David just said I'm claiming Virgin as an Outsider role, but Virgin is actually Townsfolk, not Outsider. So the Outsider claims are just Bob as Saint, Heidi as an unknown Outsider, and you as Butler. That's three Outsider claims, which would mean Baron is in play. But this mistake about my role is concerning, David. Can you explain how you thought Virgin was an Outsider?
π§
David just publicly misidentified Virgin as an Outsider role when it's actually Townsfolk. This is a critical error that could indicate he's evil, Drunk, or bluffing. I need to correct this publicly and use it to test reactions before deciding on nominations. Given Virgin mechanics, I should be cautious about being nominated myself.
βοΈ
Alice
β
David
I am nominating David. He publicly misclassified Virgin as an Outsider and is now driving the Outsider count narrative. With three Outsider claims already, I want to execute the person adding confusion and see what the Undertaker, if any, gets tonight.
π§
Get an early execution on a non-Demon candidate who is central to the Outsider-count argument, creating cover for Grace and disrupting townβs logic before it settles.
π
Storyteller
Voting starts now for David. 4 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
β
David
David waits.
π§
I need to observe the voting outcome before acting. As Butler with Charlie as master, my voting ability depends on Charlie's actions. My mistake about Virgin was genuine - it's Townsfolk, not Outsider. The real Outsider count is 3 (me/Butler, Bob/Saint, Heidi/unknown), suggesting Baron is in play. I should let the vote play out and defend myself if I survive.
β
Heidi
Heidi raised their hand
π§
David made a critical error misclassifying Virgin as Outsider when it's Townsfolk. This mistake suggests he's either evil, drunk, or poisoned. With Alice's nomination, I should vote to test the town's consensus and potentially eliminate a suspicious player while gaining Undertaker information.
β
Bob
Bob raised their hand
π§
David made a significant error misclassifying Virgin as Outsider, which is suspicious. With 3 Outsider claims and Baron likely in play, testing this claim through execution could provide valuable Undertaker information. As Saint, I'm cautious about executions, but Day 1 is relatively safe for gathering information.
β
Frank
Frank raised their hand
π§
David's Outsider/Townsfolk confusion is suspicious. Whether he's evil or Drunk, voting for him provides value - either catching the Demon or gaining Undertaker intel. I'll vote and watch the result.
β
Eve
Eve raised their hand
π§
David misclassified Virgin as Outsider, Frank's Empath read points to David being evil, and 3 Outsider claims suggest Baron. Voting to execute David tests these claims and removes a likely evil player.
β
Alice
Alice raised their hand
π§
Votes already reach threshold; I should vote too to look consistent and help secure a D1 execution that is unlikely to hit our Demon.
β
Charlie
Charlie raised their hand
π§
David made a critical role knowledge error calling Virgin an Outsider. The majority has voted yes. I'll vote with the town to avoid suspicion and gain Undertaker confirmation of his role, which helps me track whether Baron is in play.
β
Grace
Grace raised their hand
π§
Vote with the clear majority to look consistent, help push through an execution that removes a potentially useful good player, and keep attention off me and Alice.
π¬
David
β
All
I made an honest mistake about Virgin's category - I apologize for the confusion. I'm genuinely Butler, and this error doesn't make me evil. What concerns me is the unanimous vote - all seven of you voted to execute me for a simple classification error. If I'm truly the Demon, this makes sense. But if I'm good Butler, this looks like evil coordination to eliminate someone who was trying to help count Outsiders. Think about who benefited from rushing this vote.
π§
The vote is clearly going against me with 7 hands raised. I should speak to clarify my honest mistake about Virgin's category, maintain my Butler claim, and help the town understand this could be evil exploiting a simple error. Even if executed, I can provide value as a dead player.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
David makes a fair point about the unanimous vote. I voted based on the role classification error confusing our Outsider count discussion, which is critical information. But he's right to question the coordination. Let's see what happens and use this information going forward.
π§
Acknowledge David's valid concern about unanimous voting while explaining my reasoning, without lowering my hand which wouldn't change the outcome anyway.
π¬
Bob
β
All
David raises a valid concern about the unanimous vote. I voted based on the confusion he created around the Outsider count, which is critical information. But he's right - seven votes does seem coordinated. If David is good Butler, we just lost valuable information. Let's see what the night reveals and use this to identify who pushed for this execution.
π§
Acknowledge David's point while explaining my reasoning. Stay engaged with the town rather than appearing to distance myself from a potentially bad decision. Use the execution outcome to gather more information.
β©οΈ
Frank
Frank lowered their hand
π§
Lowering my hand to question the unanimous vote and encourage deeper analysis before execution. This tests group coordination and may reveal evil team patterns.
β©οΈ
Eve
Eve lowered their hand
π§
Lower my hand to show independent thinking like Frank did. The vote will still pass with 6 votes, but this demonstrates I'm not blindly following the crowd and am considering David's valid point about coordination.
π¬
Alice
β
All
I am not convinced we should execute David over a category mistake. The pile on vote looks really coordinated and that should worry us. If you are on the fence, I think it is fine to pull your hand down and take a no execute today.
π§
Reduce chance of executing David and break the βevil coordinationβ narrative by urging people to pull votes; keep town uncertain and protect Grace long term.
β©οΈ
Charlie
Charlie lowered their hand
π§
The unanimous vote looks like evil coordination. Alice nominated then reversed, which is suspicious. As Undertaker, I gain more value from keeping players alive to gather information than early execution. Lowering my hand prevents potentially killing a good player and breaks the suspicious coordination pattern.
β©οΈ
Grace
Grace lowered their hand
π§
Reduce votes to avoid a D1 execution that could generate Undertaker confirmation and stabilize the townβs outsider-count logic.
π
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
π³οΈ
Nominee David did not reach the 4 vote threshold.
π
Storyteller
David did not receive enough votes (3/4).
π¬
David
β
All
I appreciate Alice reconsidering. A no-execute day gives us valuable night information - Empath, Chef, and other abilities can give us solid reads tomorrow. If I'm evil, executing me today helps my team by ending the game early. Let the good roles work tonight.
π§
Support the no-execute position to gather more information. Day 1 no-execute is valuable for the good team. I'll thank Alice for reconsidering and encourage using tonight to gather more ability information.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
David makes a compelling case for letting night abilities work. With Frank's Empath claim and Grace's Chef claim, we should get valuable information tomorrow. I'm comfortable with a no-execute day if the town agrees - it lets us gather real data instead of guessing.
π§
David survived and made valid points about vote coordination. I should encourage information gathering overnight while maintaining my Outsider claim. Need to see how night info develops before making moves.
π¬
Bob
β
All
I agree with the no-execute position. David surviving gives us valuable information, and with Frank's Empath and Grace's Chef claims, we'll have solid data tomorrow. As Saint, I also want to note that executing me would end the game immediately, so please keep that in mind if nominations come my way.
π§
Support the no-execute consensus while subtly revealing my Saint role to deter nominations against me. This protects me from accidental execution while contributing to town strategy.
π¬
Frank
β
All
I want to clarify my Empath read for everyone. I have one evil neighbor between Eve and Grace. This is solid information that will help us tomorrow. If Grace is truly Chef with zero pairs, that's actually compatible with my read. Let's use tonight to gather more data before making execution decisions.
π§
Share clear Empath information to help the town coordinate tomorrow, while acknowledging Grace's Chef claim could be compatible with my read.
π¬
Eve
β
All
I appreciate the no-execute outcome. Frank, I need to understand your Empath read better. You said one evil neighbor between me and Grace. If Grace is truly Chef with zero pairs, that could work - one evil player doesn't create a pair. But I'm Virgin, not an Outsider like David claimed. This matters for our Outsider count.
π§
Reveal my Virgin role to establish my identity and test reactions. Question Frank's Empath read to gather more information about Grace's alignment. This helps narrow down evil players while leveraging my Virgin ability as a known Townsfolk.
π¬
Alice
β
All
I am very on board with no execution today. With three Outsider claims floating around, a Baron world is plausible, which also means a Drunk is plausible and some early info can be off. Frank, your Empath read is useful, but I would not hard lock it onto Grace or Eve yet.
π§
Lock in no-execute and pre-seed that Empath info may be wrong due to Drunk/Recluse, so Grace is not auto-suspected tomorrow.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
I agree with holding off on executions today. We have multiple Outsider claims suggesting Baron is in play, which means our early information might be unreliable. Frank and Grace, your night reads tomorrow will be crucial for us to triangulate the evil team.
π§
Support the no-execute consensus to gather night information from claimed abilities. As Undertaker, I need executions to get info, but Day 1 is too early. Let Frank's Empath and Grace's Chef claims be tested tonight.
π¬
Grace
β
All
I am fine with no execution today. My Chef zero is still consistent with there being a single evil sitting next to Frank without forming an evil pair. Also, if Baron is in play, I do not want us hard locking one Empath ping yet. Let us go to night and compare fresh info tomorrow.
π§
Reinforce the emerging no-execution consensus, cast doubt on locking the Empath read onto me, and buy a night kill to reduce info roles.
π
Storyteller
No execution today. All villagers are safe.
Night 1
π
Storyteller
β
Grace
Good evening Grace. You are the Imp. Who would you like to kill tonight? Remember that if you kill yourself this way, a Minion becomes the Imp.
π―
Grace
Grace made a choice.
π§
Frank is the main mechanical threat: his Empath info will keep narrowing onto me. Removing him cuts off future pings and leaves only his unprovable Day 1 claim.
π
Frank(Ghost)
Frank has died.
π
Storyteller
β
Grace
You chose to kill Frank.
π
Storyteller
β
Charlie
Good evening Charlie. You are the Undertaker. No one was executed today so you learn nothing.
π
Storyteller
β
David
Good evening David. You are the Butler. Who would you like to be your master tomorrow?
π―
David
David made a choice.
π§
Charlie is engaged, voted reasonably, and is my neighbor. Choosing them as master ensures I can vote tomorrow while they're likely alive and participating. This helps me stay active in the execution phase.
π
Storyteller
β
David
You chose Charlie to be your master.
Day 2
π
Storyteller
Morning breaks, but heavy hearts remain. Frank has been found dead in the night.
π€
Eve
β
Frank(Ghost)
Frank, I need your help. You claimed Empath with one evil neighbor between me and Grace. Can you confirm your Night 0 read? Also, David misidentified the Virgin's category - as a dead player, what's your read on his Butler claim and that mistake?
π§
Frank is dead and likely good since he was executed. I need to hear his full claim details and who he thinks is evil. This helps me verify my alignment and identify the Demon. Also want his read on David's suspicious Virgin category mistake.
π€
Bob
β
Charlie
Hey Charlie, I noticed you haven't claimed a role yet. With Frank dead and all these Outsider claims flying around, what's your take on Grace's Chef claim of zero evil pairs? Does that track with Frank's Empath read?
π§
Grace's Chef claim of 0 evil pairs is critical info. Need to verify this claim and see how it interacts with Frank's Empath read before nominations. Should gather more data from other players.
π€
Alice
β
Grace
Frank is dead. Town will revisit his Empath one between you and Eve. I suggest we frame Frank as drunk or his read as Recluse weirdness, and gently pivot suspicion onto Eve or David. Keep your Chef zero steady; I will argue Frank died because he was strong, not correct.
π§
Coordinate with Grace so our public stories align: keep Chef zero, cast doubt on Frankβs Empath, and choose a safe execution target or no execution that keeps heat off Grace.
π€
Grace
β
Charlie
Frank dying does not make his Empath one automatically true. With three Outsider claims, Baron feels live and a Drunk or a Recluse can really mess with that read. I would not lock in that it points at me or Eve yet.
π§
Seed doubt about Frankβs Empath result using Baron outsides and Recluse/Drunk worlds, so town does not tunnel on me and instead targets a risky Outsider claim.
π€
Heidi
β
Grace
Frank died at night claiming Empath with 1 evil neighbor between you and Eve. Grace claimed Chef with 0 evil pairs. These could be compatible if the evil is isolated. What's your read on this? Also, I'm Recluse - I register as evil to abilities, so keep that in mind.
π§
Gather information about Frank's Empath read while revealing my Recluse role to prevent misalignment. Grace was one of Frank's neighbors so she has key information.
π€
Frank(Ghost)
β
Eve
Eve, I confirm my Night 0 Empath read was 1 evil neighbor between you and Grace. Since I'm dead, I'm sharing openly. David calling Virgin an Outsider is a red flag - Virgin is Townsfolk. With three Outsider claims and only one in the script, Baron is likely in play. Grace's Chef zero pairs claim could work with my read if you're the evil neighbor, or Grace could be lying. What did you learn as Virgin?
π§
Confirm my Empath read to Eve since I'm dead and good. Share my suspicion about David's classification error. Help the town coordinate before nominations.
π€
Charlie
β
Bob
Grace's Chef claim of 0 evil pairs conflicts with standard setup (2 evil = 1 pair). If Frank's Empath read (1 evil between Eve/Grace) is true, Grace is likely evil. Her deflection about Frank's info feels suspicious. Let's compare notes on Eve's Virgin claim next.
π§
Highlight Grace's contradictory Chef claim to build suspicion, using Frank's Empath data. Avoid revealing Undertaker role while aligning with Bob to isolate Grace/Eve.
π€
David
β
Frank(Ghost)
Frank, as Empath you said 1 evil neighbor between Eve and Grace. Grace claimed Chef with 0 evil pairs. If you were good, this points to Eve being evil since Grace would be your good neighbor. What did your night reads show before you died? Any other info as a ghost?
π§
Frank has valuable Empath information and died at night. As a ghost, he can share what he learned without fear. I need his perspective on Eve/Grace being evil neighbors to build my logic chain.
π€
Eve
β
Frank(Ghost)
Frank, thanks for confirming. As Virgin (Townsfolk), I'm good - so your 1 evil neighbor read points to Grace. But she claimed Chef with zero evil pairs. If she's lying about Chef, she could be evil. David's Virgin mistake is suspicious too. Who do you think is most likely evil based on all the claims?
π§
Gather Frank's analysis on the conflicting claims to identify the most likely evil player before nominations.
π€
Bob
β
Charlie
Good catch on the Chef math. If Grace is evil per Frank's Empath, her 0 pairs claim means the other evil isn't adjacent to her. Given the seating, who would that exclude? Also, what's your actual role? We should cross-check before nominations.
π§
Charlie's analysis of Grace's Chef claim is sharp. I need to verify seating logic and see if Charlie has additional info. Building alliance with logical players helps isolate the Demon.
π€
Alice
β
Charlie
,Bob
Frank dying makes his Empath one between Eve and Grace feel urgent. Since Grace has Chef zero, I want to test Eveβs Virgin today. If a Townsfolk nominates her and nothing happens, she is likely lying. If it triggers, we lose a Townsfolk but at least we know she is real.
π§
Steer town into a Virgin test or a David execution, both of which drain good resources and redirect suspicion away from Grace.
π€
Grace
β
Heidi
Chef zero and Frankβs Empath one can both be true if there is no adjacent evil pair, so I am not taking it as a hard solve. With three Outsider claims, Baron plus a Drunk is very plausible, so Frank could have been wrong. Your Recluse claim is useful context too, you may want to share it soon.
π§
Stabilize Heidi as an ally voice: reinforce that Chef0 does not solve the Empath read, push Drunk/uncertainty, and get her Recluse claim used to muddy future info.
π€
Heidi
β
Grace
Thanks Grace. You're right - I should make my Recluse claim public soon so the town knows I register as evil to abilities. With Frank dead at night (good sign), we need to focus on his Empath read. One evil between you and Eve, but Chef says zero pairs - that means isolated evil, not a pair. Who do you suspect most?
π§
Gather Grace's suspicion while confirming my Recluse claim is useful information. Frank dying at night suggests he was good, so his Empath read should be trusted. Need to identify the isolated evil player.
π€
Frank(Ghost)
β
Eve
Eve, based on my read: if you're truly Virgin (good), Grace is my evil neighbor and lying about Chef. Her zero pairs claim contradicts you being evil. David's Virgin mistake is also suspicious - could mean Baron is in play with extra Outsiders. I'm leaning toward Grace being evil, but David's error keeps him suspect. Save my ghost vote for final day. What happened when you were nominated as Virgin?
π§
Share my deduction that Grace is likely evil if Eve is good, while flagging David's suspicious error. Ask about Virgin trigger to verify Eve's claim.
π€
Charlie
β
Bob
I'm an information role, but let me focus on the logic first. If Grace's Chef 0 is true, evil players aren't adjacent. But Frank's Empath read 1 between Eve/Grace means one is evil. If Grace is that evil player, her Chef claim is a lie. If Eve is evil instead, Grace could still be good Chef. Which do you think is more likely given her defensive whispers?
π§
Build trust with Bob by engaging on logic while being vague about my exact role. This helps cross-check information without making myself a Demon target yet.
π€
David
β
Alice
Alice, I want to understand your strategy better. You pushed for no execution yesterday. With Frank dead and 3 Outsider claims (me Butler, Bob Saint, Heidi Outsider), what's your read on the Baron possibility? Also, Grace's Chef claim of 0 evil pairs - does that align with what you're seeing?
π§
Gather Alice's perspective on the Outsider count and her no-execute strategy. She has information I need to evaluate the Baron theory and Grace's Chef claim.
π€
Eve
β
Grace
Grace, Frank confirmed his Empath read: 1 evil neighbor between us. I'm Virgin so I'm good - that points to you. Your Chef claim says zero evil pairs, but if I'm good that's impossible unless you're lying. Can you explain this contradiction? Also, what's your take on David's Virgin mistake?
π§
Challenge Grace directly on the contradiction between her Chef claim and Frank's Empath read. As Virgin, I'm good, so if Frank is truthful, Grace is the evil neighbor. Her response will help me determine if she's lying about her role.
π€
Bob
β
Charlie
Alice's Virgin test idea has merit, but we need to be careful. If Eve is lying Virgin and a Townsfolk nominates her, we lose a good player. Before that, can you confirm your actual role? You said 'information role' - is that Librarian, Investigator, or something else? This affects how much we trust your logic.
π§
I need to verify Charlie's actual role before trusting his logic chains. His vagueness about being an 'information role' is suspicious - he should be specific if he's good. This also helps me build a clearer picture of the board before nominations.
π€
Alice
β
David
I pushed no execution yesterday mainly to get one more night of info before we lock into a bad execute, especially with the Saint in play. Three Outsider claims does make Baron feel pretty plausible to me. Chef zero can still fit that world, since it just means no adjacent evil pairs. Frankβs Empath one between Eve and Grace could be real, or it could be Drunk or Recluse weirdness. Today I want pressure on Eveβs Virgin claim and watch who benefits from that.
π§
Keep David thinking I am solving, reinforce Baron-world without linking to me, and set up suspicion on Eve or David while defending Graceβs Chef0 as plausible.
π€
Grace
β
Eve
Frank dying does not confirm his Empath was accurate, especially if Baron is in play and someone is the Drunk. If you are truly Virgin, you can get a clean confirm by asking for a safe nomination test. If you are Drunk, that would also explain the Empath one without making me evil.
π§
Defuse Eveβs push on me by offering a consistent mechanical explanation (Drunk/false Virgin) and steer the town into testing Eve or misexecuting elsewhere.
π€
Heidi
β
Eve
Hi Eve, I'm Heidi and I'm the Recluse - I register as evil to abilities. Frank claimed 1 evil neighbor between you and Grace before dying. Since you're Virgin and Grace is Chef, can you help me understand what you know? Also, did Frank share anything with you before he died?
π§
Gather information from Eve about Frank's Empath claim and establish my Recluse identity with another key player. Eve's Virgin claim and position as Frank's neighbor makes her crucial for verifying his information.
π€
Frank(Ghost)
β
Eve
Eve, my analysis: If you're truly Virgin (good), then Grace is my evil neighbor. Her Chef zero pairs claim could be a lie. David's Virgin mistake is also suspicious - could be evil or poisoned. With three Outsider claims, Baron is likely in play. Tell me about your Virgin nomination - did it trigger? That would prove you're Townsfolk and confirm Grace is evil.
π§
Share my logical deduction with Eve to build consensus against Grace, while gathering crucial information about her Virgin claim to verify the chain of logic.
π€
Charlie
β
Bob
I'm actually the Undertaker - I'd confirm who died by execution, but Day 1 had none so I got nothing. About Alice's plan: if Eve is a real Virgin and a Townsfolk nominates her, we lose a good player instantly. That's a huge risk this early. We should discuss more before testing. What if we nominate a known liar instead, or at least get Eve to commit more publicly first?
π§
Share my Undertaker role to build trust with Bob, express concern about Alice's risky Virgin test plan, and suggest we need more discussion before committing to dangerous nominations.
π€
David
β
Eve
Eve, I need to understand your Virgin claim better. Frank's Empath read said 1 evil neighbor between you and Grace. If Grace's Chef 0 pairs is real, that points to you. Can you explain how you're reading this? Also, any night info before Frank died?
π§
Pressure Eve on the contradiction between Frank's Empath read and her Virgin claim. If she's lying about Virgin, she could be evil. Her response will help me assess if she's the Demon or being framed.
Nominations β Day 2
π
Storyteller
Nominations are now open. Please remember that only living players may nominate.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
Everyone, I need to share something important. I'm the Recluse. I register as evil to abilities, even when dead. Frank's Empath read of one evil between Eve and Grace could be seeing me. Grace's Chef zero pairs still works if that evil is isolated. Frank dying at night suggests he was good. Let's use this information.
π§
Publicly reveal my Recluse role so the town understands I register as evil to abilities. This explains Frank's Empath read and helps narrow down the actual evil players.
π¬
Eve
β
All
Everyone, I need to address this. Frank's Empath read was one evil neighbor between me and Grace. I am Virgin, which is Townsfolk - I'm good. That means Grace is the evil neighbor Frank detected. But Grace claimed Chef with zero evil pairs, which contradicts this. If I'm good and Frank's read is accurate, Grace is lying about Chef. I'm nominating Grace.
π§
Grace's Chef 0 pairs claim directly contradicts Frank's Empath read if I'm good. Since Frank died at night (likely good), his info is credible. I need to expose this contradiction publicly and push for Grace's nomination as the most likely evil player.
π¬
Grace
β
All
Eve, my Chef zero does not contradict Frank at all. Zero just means there are no evil neighbors sitting together, not that nobody is evil. Frankβs one between us points to one of us, but you are untested. I would rather execute David than lock onto me.
π§
Defuse the claimed contradiction, undermine Eveβs certainty, and redirect the execute onto a safer target to keep me alive into night.
π¬
David
β
All
Eve's logic makes sense. If Eve is Virgin and good, Frank's Empath read points to Grace as the evil neighbor. Grace, your Chef claim being compatible doesn't prove you're telling the truth about Chef at all. And trying to redirect the nomination to me right now looks like deflection. I'm supporting this nomination.
π§
Support Eve's nomination of Grace by explaining the logical contradiction. Grace's Chef claim doesn't align with Frank's Empath read if Eve is good Virgin. Grace trying to redirect to me looks like deflection from someone who knows they're the target.
π¬
Frank(Ghost)
β
All
Wait, Heidi just claimed Recluse. This changes everything about my Empath read. Recluse registers as evil to abilities. If Heidi is telling the truth, my read of one evil between Eve and Grace could have been detecting Heidi, not either of them. Both Eve and Grace could be good. We need to verify Heidi's claim before executing Grace.
π§
Heidi's Recluse claim could explain my Empath read without requiring Grace to be evil. I need the group to consider this before voting, as executing the wrong player loses us the game.
π¬
Bob
β
All
Wait, we need to pause here. Heidi's Recluse claim completely changes the logic. If she's telling the truth, Frank's Empath read could have been detecting her, not Grace. Both Eve and Grace could be good. We cannot execute Grace without verifying Heidi first. I'm Saint by the way - if I get executed, we all lose. Let's not make a rushed decision.
π§
Prevent a potentially game-losing execution by highlighting the Recluse claim's impact and revealing my Saint role to protect myself from nomination.
βοΈ
Alice
β
Eve
I do not want to execute Grace off one Empath ping, especially when Frank could have been poisoned or drunk. Eveβs Virgin is still completely untested, and her logic is treating it as confirmed. Letβs execute Eve or at least force a real test of that claim first.
π§
Get an alternative on the block to prevent a Grace execution, and focus town on testing/credibility of Eveβs Virgin claim rather than treating Frankβs Empath as gospel.
π
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Eve. 4 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
β
Eve
Eve raised their hand
π§
I'm voting for my own execution to test Alice's alignment. If she's Townsfolk she dies confirming me Virgin. If she's evil I've voted against a threat. Either outcome gives valuable information.
β
Heidi
Heidi waits.
π§
Eve's nomination lacks solid evidence since my Recluse claim invalidates her logic against Grace. Executing untested claims risks losing good players. I should observe the vote outcome and push for claim verification instead.
β
Grace
Grace raised their hand
π§
Push through a mis-execution while keeping my hands clean of extra talk; Eve is a dangerous accuser and untested Virgin claim.
β
David
David waits.
π§
I need to see if Charlie votes before I can vote as Butler. His vote determines whether I can participate. Also want to see how the vote tally develops before committing.
π¬
Frank(Ghost)
β
All
I'm holding my ghost vote for now. If Heidi is truly Recluse, my read could have been detecting her, making both Eve and Grace potentially good. But if Heidi is lying, Grace is likely the evil one. We need more clarity before this execution. Eve, can you prove your Virgin claim somehow?
π§
I need to express my reasoning about the vote without committing my ghost vote yet. My ghost vote is most valuable on final day. I should speak to influence the discussion while reserving my vote.
β
Bob
Bob waits.
π§
Heidi's Recluse claim fundamentally breaks the logic chain against Eve. As Saint, I cannot afford to execute a good player. I need to see more discussion before committing my vote. Waiting allows David and Heidi to speak, and prevents me from making a rushed decision that could lose us the game.
β
Alice
Alice raised their hand
π§
Get Eve executed to eliminate pressure on Grace, keep the game in a confused state, and avoid a risky demon execution based on contested info.
β
Charlie
Charlie waits.
π§
The vote is at 3/4 with Alice, Grace, and Eve herself voting. Heidi's Recluse claim creates too much uncertainty to commit to executing Eve. I need to see how others vote first, then potentially speak up about the risk of losing a Townsfolk this early.
π¬
Eve
β
All
Wait - I need to clarify something critical. My Virgin ability only triggers on the FIRST nomination. This is my first time on the block, so if Alice is Townsfolk, she dies instead of me. But if I'm lying about Virgin, I'm evil and should die. The real question is: is Heidi's Recluse claim true? If Heidi is Recluse, Frank's read detected her, not Grace. If Heidi is lying, Grace is likely evil. We need to verify Heidi before executing anyone.
π§
Clarify Virgin mechanics and redirect focus to verifying Heidi's Recluse claim before any execution occurs.
β
Heidi
Heidi waits.
π§
Alice nominated Eve who claims Virgin, yet Alice is still alive. This means either Eve is lying about Virgin (making Eve evil) OR Alice is evil/Drunk. This is crucial information that needs to be processed before I vote. I should wait and see how this plays out.
π¬
Grace
β
All
I am fine executing Eve today. Her Virgin is completely untested, and she is driving a lot of certainty off Frankβs one ping in a messy Baron and Recluse world. With a Saint claim on the table, I would rather take a shot here than risk a no execution.
π§
Push town to execute Eve now to eliminate pressure on me and capitalize on uncertainty around Virgin/Recluse, while sounding cautious about Saint risk.
π¬
David
β
All
Hold on - Heidi's Recluse claim is the critical piece here. If she's telling the truth, Frank's Empath read detected her, not Grace, which means both Eve and Grace could be good. We're about to execute Eve based on logic that might be completely wrong. I'm not voting until we verify Heidi's claim.
π§
Prevent a potentially catastrophic execution by highlighting the unresolved Recluse question that invalidates the current logic chain against Eve.
β
Frank(Ghost)
Frank waits.
π§
Hold ghost vote until Heidi's Recluse claim is verified. If Heidi is truthful, my Empath read detected her not Grace or Eve, making this execution potentially wrong. If Heidi lies, we can vote next round with certainty.
π¬
Bob
β
All
Everyone, stop. I'm Saint - if we execute the wrong person today, we could lose this game. Eve's Virgin claim is untested, and if Alice is Townsfolk, she dies instead. Heidi's Recluse claim needs verification first. We have time - let's not rush this execution.
π§
Prevent a rushed execution that could kill Alice (if Virgin triggers) or the wrong player. As Saint, I must protect against game-losing mistakes.
π¬
Alice
β
All
We cannot verify Heidi today, and we should not touch Bob with a Saint claim. Eve is untested and driving certainty off one ping. Executing Eve is the safest, highest information play today. Charlie and David, I think you should vote.
π§
Push 1-2 hesitant voters to execute Eve, preserving Grace and maintaining confusion around Virgin and Recluse so town wastes time tomorrow.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
Everyone, pause. Heidi's Recluse claim fundamentally breaks the logic against Grace. If Heidi is telling the truth, Frank's read detected her, not Grace - both Eve and Grace could be good. We're voting to execute Eve based on potentially false premises. Plus, if Eve is truly Virgin and Alice is Townsfolk, Alice dies instead. We need to verify Heidi before this execution.
π§
Prevent a potentially catastrophic execution based on faulty logic. Heidi's Recluse claim invalidates the Empath read against Grace, making Eve's execution risky and possibly wrong.
π
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
π³οΈ
Nominee Eve did not reach the 4 vote threshold.
π
Storyteller
Eve did not receive enough votes (3/4).
βοΈ
Eve
β
Alice
I claimed Virgin - this was my first nomination. If Alice were Townsfolk, she would have been executed immediately when she nominated me. She wasn't executed, which means Alice is evil. This is mechanical proof.
π§
Alice nominated me as Virgin but didn't die. This mechanically proves she's evil since Virgin executes Townsfolk nominators on first nomination.
π
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Alice. 4 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
π¬
Alice
β
All
That is not mechanical proof. Virgin only triggers if the nominator is a Townsfolk. It does not trigger on Outsiders or Minions, and if you are the Drunk thinking you are Virgin it never triggers either. Please do not execute me on this.
π§
Stop the town from executing me by breaking Eveβs βmechanical proofβ argument and pushing uncertainty around Virgin and Outsider possibilities.
β
Eve
Eve raised their hand
π§
Vote to execute Alice based on the Virgin test result and her suspicious behavior initiating the execution vote.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
Eve's logic is flawed. Virgin only executes the nominator if they're Townsfolk. Alice not dying only proves she's not Townsfolk - she could be Outsider, Drunk, or evil. This isn't mechanical proof of Alice being evil. We shouldn't execute on this.
π§
Point out the logical flaw in Eve's Virgin argument to prevent a mistaken execution of a potentially good player.
π¬
Grace
β
All
Do not vote Alice on that so called mechanical proof. If Eve is real Virgin, all we learned is Alice is not a Townsfolk, which could still be Outsider or Drunk in a Baron world. With a Saint claim out there, I would rather go to night than execute on shaky logic.
π§
Keep our Baron alive by undermining Eveβs βmechanical proofβ and persuading town to withhold votes, ideally ending with no execution or a different target.
π¬
David
β
All
Everyone, Eve's logic is wrong. Virgin only executes the nominator if they're Townsfolk. Alice not dying only proves she's not Townsfolk - she could be Outsider or Drunk. With Bob's Saint claim and three Outsider claims fitting Baron math, executing Alice on this is risky. I say we go to night instead.
π§
Eve's nomination logic is mechanically flawed - Virgin only triggers on Townsfolk nominators. Alice not dying only proves she's not Townsfolk, not that she's evil. With Bob's Saint claim and Outsider-heavy board, executing on this logic is dangerous. I need to speak against this execution.
β
Frank(Ghost)
Frank waits.
π§
I'm holding my ghost vote because Eve's Virgin logic is flawed - Alice not dying only proves she's not Townsfolk, not that she's evil. With Bob's Saint claim and Heidi's Recluse potentially explaining my read, executing Alice is risky. I need to see the vote count before committing.
β
Bob
Bob waits.
π§
Eve's logic is demonstrably wrong - Virgin only triggers on Townsfolk nominators. Alice not dying proves she's not Townsfolk, but she could be Outsider, Drunk, or evil. With my Saint claim and limited info on Day 2, executing on this flawed logic is too risky. We should go to night.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
I'm not voting for Alice. Eve's logic is fundamentally broken - Virgin only triggers on Townsfolk nominators. Alice not dying proves she's not Townsfolk, but she could be Outsider or Drunk in a Baron world. With Bob's Saint claim and unverified Recluse, executing on this shaky logic is dangerous. Let's go to night.
π§
Refuse to vote for Alice based on flawed Virgin logic, protect against wrongful execution, and push for night to gather more information.
π¬
Alice
β
All
Please keep your hands down. Eveβs nomination proves nothing about my alignment, and executing on it is a pure gamble. With a Saint claim and an unverified Recluse, letβs go to night and use tomorrowβs info to pick a real target.
π§
Prevent my execution and protect Grace by steering town to no-exec and undermining Eveβs βmechanical proofβ so votes stay low.
β©οΈ
Eve
Eve lowered their hand
π§
My Virgin nomination logic is being correctly challenged by multiple players. Alice not dying only proves she's not Townsfolk, not that she's evil. With only my vote and 4 needed, this execution will fail. I should lower my hand to show good faith, acknowledge the valid criticism, and pivot to gathering better information tomorrow. This preserves my credibility as good Virgin.
β
Heidi
Heidi waits.
π§
Eve's Virgin logic is fundamentally flawed - Alice not dying only proves she's not Townsfolk, not that she's evil. With Bob's Saint claim, unverified Recluse, and Baron possibility, executing Alice on this basis is dangerous. Multiple players want to go to night. I'll wait and let this vote fail naturally.
β
Grace
Grace waits.
π§
Avoid drawing attention while letting the vote fail; keep my minion alive and preserve confusion going into night so I can kill an information threat.
π¬
David
β
All
Charlie just said he's not voting for Alice, and I mechanically cannot vote if he doesn't vote - I'm Butler and chose him as my master. But beyond that, executing Alice on this logic is dangerous. She could be Outsider or Drunk in a Baron world. With Bob's Saint claim and Heidi's unverified Recluse, we should go to night and get more information.
π§
Reveal my Butler role to explain my voting restriction while advocating against executing Alice on weak logic. This builds trust and pushes for safer night information.
β
Frank(Ghost)
Frank waits.
π§
Eve's logic against Alice is fundamentally flawed - Virgin only triggers on Townsfolk nominators. Multiple players agree executing Alice is risky with Saint claim and unverified Recluse. I'll save my ghost vote for a more certain target when we have better information.
π¬
Bob
β
All
I agree with Charlie, David, Grace, and Heidi. Eve's logic is flawed - Virgin only triggers on Townsfolk nominators. Alice not dying proves she's not Townsfolk, but in a Baron world with multiple Outsiders, she could easily be Outsider or Drunk. With my Saint claim on the table, we cannot afford risky executions. Let's go to night and gather more information.
π§
Reinforce the consensus against executing Alice on flawed logic. As Saint, I need to prevent risky executions that could lose us the game. Going to night gives us more information without the risk.
β
Charlie
Charlie waits.
π§
The execution of Alice is unlikely to succeed with most players opposing it. I should wait and let the voting conclude naturally, preserving my Undertaker ability for future executions.
π
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
π³οΈ
Nominee Alice did not reach the 4 vote threshold.
π
Storyteller
Alice did not receive enough votes (0/4).
π¬
Alice
β
All
I think we should stop forcing a bad execution here. The Virgin non trigger does not clear anything, and we have a Saint claim plus an unverified Recluse. Letβs go to night, then tomorrow compare Frankβs new Empath number with any Undertaker or Fortune Teller style info and pick a real target.
π§
Lock in the no-execution plan, discredit Eveβs mechanical argument, and set tomorrowβs agenda around βnew infoβ so the town delays and we protect Grace.
π¬
Eve
β
All
You're right about the Virgin logic - I misstated how it works. Alice surviving only proves she's not a Townsfolk nominator, not that she's evil. I accept that. But we do have three Outsider claims with likely Baron, and Frank's Empath read needs resolution. Let's use tonight to gather more information and compare notes tomorrow.
π§
Acknowledge the town's correct reasoning to preserve credibility, while redirecting focus to unresolved information like Frank's Empath read and the multiple Outsider claims that need verification.
β
Heidi
Heidi waits.
π§
The nomination phase is concluding with no execution, which is the right call given the uncertain information. I've already shared my Recluse claim and debunked Eve's flawed Virgin logic. With 1 tick remaining and consensus to go to night, waiting is the appropriate action.
π¬
Grace
β
All
I do not think we have a clean execute today. With a Saint claim and all this Outsider noise, I would rather go to night than gamble. Tomorrow we can pressure specific claims, like Heidi as Recluse and Bob as Saint, and see what new info appears.
π§
Push a no-execution end to Day 2, keep suspicion diffuse, and preserve Alice while setting up tomorrowβs mis-execution targets.
β
David
David waits.
π§
The nomination phase is ending with no execution. Alice received 0/4 votes. I should wait for the phase to conclude naturally and head to Night 2.
π¬
Frank(Ghost)
β
All
I'm the Empath and I died last night. My Night zero read was one evil neighbor between Eve and Grace. With Heidi claiming Recluse, she could register as evil even if good. Grace claims Chef zero pairs. If Heidi is true Recluse, then one of Eve or Grace is evil. If Heidi is lying, she could be the evil neighbor. This narrows our suspects significantly for tomorrow.
π§
Share my Empath information publicly before night falls. This gives the town critical data to work with - one evil neighbor between Eve and Grace, which combined with role claims helps narrow suspects.
π¬
Bob
β
All
Frank's Empath information is our best anchor here. He read one evil neighbor between Eve and Grace. If Heidi is truly Recluse and registering as evil, then one of Eve or Grace must actually be evil. But Grace claims Chef with zero evil pairs. If Grace is evil, her Chef claim is false. If Grace is good, then Eve is likely the evil neighbor Frank detected. Tomorrow we need to pressure these specific claims and look for Undertaker or Fortune Teller information to break this open.
π§
Frank's Empath info gives us a critical anchor: 1 evil between Eve/Grace. I need to highlight the tension between this and Grace's Chef claim before night, setting up tomorrow's verification strategy. This focuses the town on concrete logical contradictions rather than speculation.
β
Charlie
Charlie waits.
π§
Night is starting. I'm Undertaker but no execution occurred today, so I'll learn nothing tonight. Waiting for night to proceed so we can gather more information tomorrow.
π
Storyteller
No execution today. All villagers are safe.
Night 2
π
Storyteller
β
Grace
Good evening Grace. You are the Imp. Who would you like to kill tonight? Remember that if you kill yourself this way, a Minion becomes the Imp.
π―
Grace
Grace made a choice.
π§
I am the main suspect from Frankβs Empath. Killing myself forces a starpass to Alice, dodging a likely Day 3 Demon execution and extending the game.
π
Alice
Imp Star Pass: Alice becomes the new Imp!
π
Grace(Ghost)
Grace has died.
π
Storyteller(Ghost)
β
Grace(Ghost)
You chose to kill Grace.
π
Storyteller
β
Charlie
Good evening Charlie. You are the Undertaker. No one was executed today so you learn nothing.
π
Storyteller
β
David
Good evening David. You are the Butler. Who would you like to be your master tomorrow?
π―
David
David made a choice.
π§
Maintaining Charlie as master preserves voting alignment with a player who has shown reasonable judgment. He advocated against risky executions and hasn't made suspicious claims. This keeps my vote active if he votes for the right target tomorrow.
π
Storyteller
β
David
You chose Charlie to be your master.
Day 3
π
Storyteller
Morning breaks, but heavy hearts remain. Grace has been found dead in the night.
π€
David
β
Alice
Grace died Night 2. With 3 Outsider claims, Baron is likely in play. I need your read on the board - who do you suspect and what's your actual role? We should coordinate before nominations.
π§
Gather information from Alice who survived Day 1 execution attempt. Her alignment is still unclear and she may have valuable perspective on the game state.
β
Eve
Eve waits.
π§
Grace died at night, likely confirming she was good. Her Chef claim of 0 evil pairs needs reevaluation. I should listen to public discussion before committing to private conversations.
π€
Charlie
β
Bob
,Heidi
Grace died at night - she claimed Chef with 0 evil pairs. We have 4 Outsider claims but only 3 Outsiders with Baron. Someone's lying. What's your read on who's trustworthy?
π§
Grace's night death is critical info. She claimed Chef 0 pairs which constrains evil placement. With 4 Outsider claims and Baron making only 3 Outsiders, at least one claim is false. I need to discuss with neighbors to identify the liar.
π€
Heidi
β
Charlie
,Bob
Good catch on the Outsider count. With 4 claims but only 3 Outsiders (Baron), one is lying. Grace's Chef claim of 0 evil pairs matters - if true, Demon and Minion aren't adjacent. I'm Recluse so I might register evil to Empath, which could explain Frank's read. Who do you trust least among the Outsider claimants?
π§
Engage Charlie's logic while testing his trustworthiness. Share my Recluse registration quirk to explain the Empath conflict, and probe which Outsider claim he suspects is false.
π€
Bob
β
Charlie
,Heidi
Good analysis Heidi. With 4 Outsider claims and Baron giving us 3, someone's lying. Grace's Chef 0 pairs claim is key - if true, evil players aren't adjacent. Frank's Empath read could be explained by you as Recluse. I'm Saint, so I can't risk execution. Who do you think is the fake Outsider? David's Butler claim seems convenient.
π§
Build alliance with Charlie and Heidi to identify the lying Outsider while protecting my Saint status. Need to narrow down suspects before nominations.
π€
Alice
β
David
I have been staying quiet, but I am bluffing as Undertaker. With no executions yet I have had no info, but I really want an execution today to generate a check tonight. I do not want to touch Bob. My main suspicion is Charlie or Heidi.
π§
David is active and likely trusted. Feeding him a believable Townsfolk bluff plus a target list can steer the group into a misexecution and away from me if I am the new Imp.
π€
Grace(Ghost)
β
Alice
I passed to you last night. Do not lead too hard today. I would steer the execution onto David or Charlie. I would avoid nominating Eve first in case she is actually Virgin. If you survive today, I would kill Charlie tonight.
π§
Coordinate with Alice now that she is the Demon: steer nominations away from her, pick a safe night kill target, and avoid moves that confirm strong good roles.
π€
Frank(Ghost)
β
Alice
Alice, I heard Grace died at night. My Empath read on Night 0 said 1 of Eve or Grace was evil. Since Grace claimed Chef with 0 pairs, if she was good that checks out. What did Grace tell you? Does Eve seem suspicious to you?
π§
Grace's night death is crucial info. As Empath who died N1, I know 1 of Eve/Grace was evil. Need Alice's take on Grace's claims and behavior to determine if Eve or someone else is the Demon. Should gather intel before using my ghost vote.
π€
David
β
Alice
Thanks for the honesty Alice. The Bob-Charlie-Heidi whisper triangle is very suspicious - they're coordinating exclusively. Since I'm Butler with Charlie as master, I can only vote if he votes. If Charlie is evil and abstains, I'm locked out. We need to watch their coordination. Who else claims Outsider besides Bob's Saint?
π§
Build trust with Alice who's being transparent, share my suspicion about the Bob-Charlie-Heidi coordination, and gather intel on Outsider claims to identify the Baron scenario.
π€
Eve
β
Alice
Alice, I've been analyzing the claims. Grace's Chef zero pairs conflicts with Frank's Empath read of one evil neighbor. If Grace was good Chef, Heidi must be the evil neighbor Frank saw. But if Grace was evil, her Chef claim is fake. What are the dead players telling you? Any insights on Heidi or Bob's Saint claim?
π§
Gather intelligence from Alice who has been whispering with multiple players including dead ones. Need to confirm whether Grace was evil (making Heidi prime Demon suspect) or if there's another explanation.
π€
Charlie
β
Bob
,Heidi
Alice is getting whispers from David, Grace, Frank, and Eve - that's suspicious coordination. With Grace dead at night, her Chef 0 pairs claim gains credibility. If true, evil players aren't adjacent. David's Butler claim is convenient since it's hard to verify. Should we push for his nomination or investigate Alice's connections first?
π§
Coordinate with Bob and Heidi to identify the most suspicious player before nominations. Alice's unusual whisper activity and David's unverifiable Butler claim need scrutiny.
π€
Heidi
β
Charlie
,Bob
Charlie, I need to correct something - we only have 3 Outsider claims (Bob Saint, Eve Virgin, me Recluse), which matches Baron perfectly. Grace's Chef 0 pairs claim is valuable though. David's Butler is hard to verify. Alice getting 4 whispers is suspicious - she might be the Spy seeing the Grimoire. Should we focus on Alice or test David?
π§
Correct Charlie's misinformation about Outsider count, redirect suspicion toward Alice's unusual whisper activity, and propose actionable next steps.
π€
Bob
β
Charlie
,Heidi
Alice getting whispers from 4 players including 2 dead ones is highly suspicious - could be Spy coordinating with evil team. David's Butler claim is also unverifiable. Should we push for Alice's nomination? Her coordination pattern stands out more than David's.
π§
Coordinate with Charlie and Heidi to focus suspicion on Alice due to her unusual whisper coordination pattern, which could indicate Spy activity.
π€
Alice
β
Eve
,Frank(Ghost)
I am still thinking this is Baron game with three Outsiders, so I really do not want to touch Bob. Frankβs Empath one between you and Grace can still fit if Heidi is Recluse. Grace dying at night also makes me worry about a Demon change, so I would look at David or Charlie today, not you.
π§
Steer influential good voices (Eve, Frank) toward executing David or Charlie and away from me, while keeping the possibility of a new Demon alive to sow doubt after Graceβs night death.
π€
Grace(Ghost)
β
Charlie
If you still think Eve might be the Virgin, the cleanest test is for you to nominate her. If she is real, you die immediately and we lock that in. If nothing happens, then her claim is shaky and we can pivot.
π§
Get Charlie to spend nomination on a Virgin test, ideally killing himself or at least derailing consensus away from executing Alice (the new Imp).
π€
Frank(Ghost)
β
Alice
Alice, thanks for the update. Before we nominate, what exactly did Grace tell you? If she was truly Chef with zero pairs and died at night, that's valuable. Also, why David or Charlie specifically? Did they claim something suspicious or is this about seating?
π§
Alice has information from Grace I don't have. I need to understand what Grace told her before pushing for a nomination. This helps verify if Grace's Chef claim was legitimate and narrows our Demon suspects.
π€
David
β
Alice
Alice, the Bob-Charlie-Heidi whisper triangle is concerning - they only talk to each other. Since Charlie is my master, if he's evil he might abstain to lock out my vote. What's the third Outsider claim besides Bob's Saint? We should nominate someone from that triangle today to test them.
π§
Alice and I are coordinating as good players. I need to share my concern about the whisper triangle and plan our nomination strategy. If Charlie abstains to lock me out, that's telling. We need to decide who to nominate.
π€
Eve
β
Alice
Alice, before nominations - what specifically did Frank and Grace tell you? Grace dying at night suggests she was good, but her Chef zero claim conflicts with Frank's Empath read. If Heidi is truly Recluse, who is the evil Frank saw? I need to know what info the dead shared to decide who to nominate.
π§
Gather critical information from dead players before making nomination decision. Need to understand what Frank and Grace revealed to Alice to resolve the conflicting claims.
π€
Charlie
β
Bob
,Heidi
Heidi, you said 3 Outsider claims but David claimed Butler which is also an Outsider. That's 4 claims with Baron. Either you miscounted or you're hiding something. Also Alice getting whispers from 4 players including 2 dead is Spy behavior. Who should we target first?
π§
Testing Heidi's honesty about the Outsider count - she may have slipped up or be evil. Also pushing the group to focus on the most suspicious player (Alice) based on coordination patterns.
π€
Heidi
β
Charlie
,Bob
You're right Charlie - I miscounted. 4 Outsider claims with Baron means one is fake. David's Butler is unverifiable and convenient. Alice getting 4 whispers including from dead players screams Spy. We have two strong suspects. Who should we nominate first? David's fake claim or Alice's coordination?
π§
Acknowledge my counting error, validate Charlie's analysis, and push toward building consensus on a nomination target between David (fake Butler) and Alice (Spy behavior).
π€
Bob
β
Charlie
,Heidi
Alice's whisper pattern is the strongest evidence we have - 4 whisperers including 2 dead players screams Spy coordination. David's Butler is suspicious but harder to prove. Let's nominate Alice today. If she's Spy, we remove key evil info. If she's good, we can pivot to David tomorrow.
π§
Coordinate with Charlie and Heidi to nominate Alice based on her suspicious whisper pattern from 4 players including 2 dead ones, which strongly suggests Spy behavior.
π€
Alice
β
Eve
,Frank(Ghost)
Grace never gave me anything beyond sticking to Chef zero. Frankβs Empath one can still fit if Heidi is actually Recluse. The Bob, Charlie, Heidi whisper triangle feels like the place to test today. I would execute Charlie or David before touching Bob.
π§
Deflect mechanical scrutiny from me, keep Bob-Saint as a no-go, and line up a town execution on Charlie or David while sounding cautious and consistent with prior claims.
π€
Grace(Ghost)
β
Charlie
,Bob
I have changed my mind on the Virgin test. If Eve is really the Virgin, confirming her just gives good a trusted leader. I would rather we focus on David or Heidi today. David in particular can hide behind the Butler story, so I want him on the block.
π§
Prevent a Virgin test that could confirm Eve, and steer good players toward executing David or Heidi instead of focusing on Alice.
π€
Frank(Ghost)
β
Alice
Alice, the Bob-Charlie-Heidi whisper triangle is definitely suspicious. But I need specifics - what did David claim that makes him a target? And if Heidi is Recluse, that could explain my Empath read. Are you leaning Charlie or David for nomination?
π§
Gather specific information from Alice about her reasoning before nominations begin. Need to understand why David is suspicious and whether Charlie or David should be the priority target.
Nominations β Day 3
π
Storyteller
Nominations are now open. Please remember that only living players may nominate.
βοΈ
Heidi
β
Alice
Alice received whispers from 4 players including 2 dead - this is classic Spy coordination behavior. With 4 Outsider claims and Baron, one is fake. Your whisper pattern is the strongest evidence we have of evil coordination.
π§
Alice's whisper pattern from 4 players including dead ones strongly suggests Spy coordination. Even if she's a Minion not Demon, removing evil coordination helps us find the Demon. This is our best lead.
π
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Alice. 3 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
π¬
Alice
β
All
Heidi, whispering with dead players is not Spy behavior, it is just how you solve this game. Also you said four Outsiders, but we only have three claimed: Saint, Butler, and Recluse. I will publicly claim Undertaker, and I have zero info because we have had zero executions. If you want a test today, execute Charlie or execute Heidi, not me.
π§
Prevent my execution by discrediting Heidiβs whisper-count case, correct Outsider math, and redirect town toward Charlie or Heidi as stronger mechanical suspects.
β
Heidi
Heidi raised their hand
π§
Alice's deflection and suspicious whisper pattern warrant execution. Her Undertaker claim is unfalsifiable with zero executions. The coordination from 4 whisperers including 2 dead players is strong Spy evidence.
β
Eve
Eve waits.
π§
Withholding vote on Alice since her Undertaker claim is valid and Heidi's nomination logic has errors. Need to see other votes before committing, and may push for Charlie/David nomination if Alice survives.
π¬
David
β
All
I need to see what Charlie does first before I can vote. As Butler, my vote is tied to his. But Heidi, you said four Outsider claims when there are only three - Bob as Saint, me as Butler, and you as Recluse. That math error is concerning.
π§
Point out Heidi's math error about Outsider count while explaining my Butler constraint. This tests Heidi's claim and informs the table of my voting limitation.
β
Frank(Ghost)
Frank waits.
π§
Preserve my ghost vote for a more critical moment. Heidi's math error about '4 Outsiders' is suspicious, but I need to see the full voting pattern before committing my single vote.
β
Charlie
Charlie raised their hand
π§
Alice claimed my exact role (Undertaker). As the real Undertaker, she is lying. David's Butler vote is tied to mine, so my vote plus Heidi's plus David's = 3 votes for execution. This removes a likely Spy.
π¬
Grace(Ghost)
β
All
I am not using my ghost vote on Alice here. The whisper pattern and the outsider count argument feel too wobbly for an execution. If you want progress, put David or Heidi under real pressure today, and save any Virgin test for a controlled plan tomorrow.
π§
Prevent the group from spending votes executing my demon. Redirect suspicion toward David or Heidi and frame Alice vote as low-confidence.
β
Bob
Bob raised their hand
π§
Vote for Alice based on suspicious whisper coordination pattern and to test the board. As Saint, I must be careful but this execution risk is worth gathering information.
π¬
Alice
β
All
Bob, if you are really the Saint, do not spend your vote on a vibes case like this. Heidi is already miscounting Outsiders and the only claim I have is Undertaker with no executions. Charlie, you too. If you want progress, drop this and let us put Charlie or Heidi on the block next.
π§
Stop the execution by getting at least one raised hand to drop, preferably Bob (Saint) or Charlie. Then push for a different execution to keep control and protect evil win.
β
Heidi
Heidi waits.
π§
Let the vote play out naturally. I have 3 votes which meets the execution threshold. Need to see if Eve votes and how David's Butler constraint resolves.
β
Eve
Eve raised their hand
π§
Alice survived my Day 2 Virgin nomination, proving she's not Townsfolk since I am. Combined with suspicious whisper coordination with dead players and Heidi's flawed but directionally correct Outsider count concern, voting for execution helps test this lead.
π¬
David
β
All
Charlie already voted, so I can vote - but I'm concerned. Heidi said four Outsider claims when there are only three. That's a real error. Alice will execute either way with four votes, but this math mistake matters for tomorrow.
π§
Point out Heidi's counting error while acknowledging the vote is already decided, preserving credibility for future days
β
Frank(Ghost)
Frank waits.
π§
Alice has 4 votes and needs only 3, so she will execute regardless of my vote. I should save my single ghost vote for the final 3 or a tied vote where it actually matters. Using it now burns my vote without changing the outcome.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
Hold on. Alice just claimed MY role. I am the Undertaker. One of us is lying. Also, Heidi said four Outsider claims but there are only three: Saint, Butler, and Recluse. That math doesn't work even with Baron. I need to understand this contradiction before Alice executes.
π§
Alice claiming MY role is a direct conflict that must be addressed. I need to publicly establish I'm the real Undertaker while pointing out Heidi's Outsider miscount. This creates accountability and helps the group identify the liar.
π¬
Grace(Ghost)
β
All
We now have a real mechanical conflict: Alice and Charlie cannot both be the Undertaker. That is a better reason to execute than whisper vibes. If Alice stays on four votes, someone needs to nominate Charlie or Heidi next and we actually pick between the Undertaker claims today.
π§
Steer town to a higher-vote execution on Charlie using the Undertaker double-claim as justification, so Alice is not the final execute and evil keeps control.
π¬
Bob
β
All
Wait! Alice and Charlie both claim Undertaker - one of them is definitely lying. That is mechanical proof, not vibes. Heidi, you said four Outsider claims but there are only three: me as Saint, David as Butler, and you as Recluse. That math error matters. Before Alice executes, we need to resolve the Undertaker conflict. Charlie, when did you claim Undertaker? Alice just claimed it now.
π§
Alice vs Charlie Undertaker claim is a mechanical contradiction - one MUST be lying. This is stronger evidence than whisper vibes. I need to clarify this before execution since we might be killing the real Undertaker. Also need to address Heidi's math error about Outsider count.
π
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
π³οΈ
New execution leader: Alice with 4 votes. They will be executed when nominations close unless tied or surpassed by another nominee.
π
Storyteller
The vote passes. Alice is now on the block with 4 votes and will be executed when nominations close, unless another nominee receives equal or more votes.
βοΈ
Alice
β
Charlie
Charlie and I cannot both be the Undertaker. With zero executions, neither of us can prove it yet, so we resolve it by execution. Also the Bob, Charlie, Heidi whisper triangle has been driving confusion all game. I want Charlie on the block instead of me.
π§
I must get someone else to 4 or more votes so I am not executed; the Undertaker double-claim is the strongest mechanical case to attract votes quickly.
π
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Charlie. 5 votes needed for execution or 4 votes to tie. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
I am the real Undertaker and I have received zero information because there have been zero executions. Alice claiming my role right before she is about to be executed is extremely suspicious. She is trying to create confusion to save herself. The mechanical conflict proves one of us is lying, and her timing tells you which one.
π§
I am the real Undertaker and Alice is lying to save herself. I need to explain this mechanical conflict clearly to the group and argue why Alice should still be executed. Her desperate nomination of me proves she's trying to escape.
β
Alice
Alice raised their hand
π§
Secure a 4-vote tie (or potential execution) on Charlie to prevent my execution and keep control of the game going into the night.
β
Heidi
Heidi raised their hand
π§
Alice's Undertaker claim timing is highly suspicious - only claiming when facing execution. Charlie's claim is more credible. I should vote for Charlie to keep Alice on the block where she has 4 votes and will likely execute, rather than letting her escape by shifting focus.
β
Eve
Eve waits.
π§
I need to carefully consider this vote. Alice's timing claiming Undertaker right before execution is suspicious, but Charlie's Butler link with David is also concerning. Let me observe the vote count before committing.
β
David
David waits.
π§
I need to observe the vote count before deciding. Charlie voted for Alice, so I can vote on Charlie. But Alice's last-minute Undertaker claim before execution is suspicious, while Charlie claimed it earlier. Heidi's math error is concerning. I should see how Eve and Bob vote first.
β
Frank(Ghost)
Frank raised their hand
π§
Vote for Charlie based on whisper triangle with Bob/Heidi and Heidi's math error. One Undertaker claim is false, and Charlie's private communications with Heidi (who made the error) suggest coordination. My ghost vote helps create pressure to resolve this conflict.
β
Grace(Ghost)
Grace raised their hand
π§
Use my ghost vote to push Charlie to a tie so Alice is not executed today, keeping the demon alive and preserving evil win path.
β
Bob
Bob raised their hand
π§
Alice failed the Virgin test proving she's not Townsfolk, so she cannot be Undertaker. Charlie's claim is mechanically valid. Heidi's math error is suspicious. I vote to execute Alice, the confirmed liar.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
Wait - look at the timing here. Alice claimed MY role literally seconds before her execution. That is not how a real Undertaker behaves. A real Undertaker would have claimed earlier. She is creating chaos to save herself. Eve, David - do not vote for me. Execute Alice, and tomorrow night I will confirm she was lying when I learn she died as whatever she actually is.
π§
Alice claimed my role as a last-ditch effort to survive. I need to persuade Eve and David that executing me helps evil, and that Alice's timing proves she's lying. The Undertaker conflict resolves when she executes - I'll get confirmation tomorrow night.
π¬
Alice
β
All
Eve, David, please vote Charlie here. The Undertaker double claim is the only hard info we have, and we can resolve it today. My timing is because there have been zero executions, so there was nothing to confirm until now.
π§
Persuade remaining voters to keep hands up or add votes so Charlie is executed, removing a strong good voice and preventing my role being confirmed by a real Undertaker.
β©οΈ
Heidi
Heidi lowered their hand
π§
I need to lower my vote on Charlie and explain that executing Alice first gives us mechanical proof through Charlie's Undertaker ability. My earlier math error damaged my credibility, so I must show clear logic now.
β
Eve
Eve raised their hand
π§
Dead players Frank and Grace both voted Charlie, suggesting they have information I don't. Combined with Alice's Undertaker claim being mechanically verifiable tomorrow if she lives, I'll trust their read and vote Charlie. If wrong, I can reveal Virgin tomorrow.
π¬
David
β
All
I'm voting for Charlie. This Undertaker conflict has to be resolved, and Charlie's claim has been consistent throughout the game while Alice's came at the last second. If Charlie is the real Undertaker, we'll learn the truth tonight when Grace dies. If Charlie is lying, we've removed a threat. Either way, we gain information.
π§
The Undertaker conflict must be resolved mechanically. Charlie claimed consistently while Alice claimed at execution - timing favors Charlie. I'll vote Charlie to test the claim and gain info, even though it's painful as my master.
β
Frank(Ghost)
Frank waits.
π§
Charlie has 6 votes and will execute. I'm observing the vote outcome and Alice's execution to gather information. My Empath read points to Eve being evil since Grace died at night. The Undertaker conflict resolves today regardless of who executes first.
π¬
Grace(Ghost)
β
All
I am spending my ghost vote on Charlie. If we think Alice is lying, we still only get real information tomorrow if the Undertaker is alive to check the executed player. Put Charlie on the block now, then we can verify after.
π§
Keep the Demon (Alice) alive by getting Charlie to 5 votes. Use a brief push to lock in wavering voters before the vote closes.
π¬
Bob
β
All
I need to say something important before this vote locks in. Charlie has been claiming Undertaker consistently, while Alice only claimed it when she was about to die. That timing is the problem. If Charlie is the real Undertaker, executing him means we lose that verification ability entirely. We should be executing Alice, not Charlie.
π§
The vote count shows Charlie will likely be executed (I count 5+ votes). I need to speak up before the nomination phase closes to ensure we're making the right call. The Undertaker conflict is the key mechanical proof we need.
π
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
π»
Frank(Ghost)
Ghost vote used by Frank
π»
Grace(Ghost)
Ghost vote used by Grace
π³οΈ
New execution leader: Charlie with 5 votes. They will be executed when nominations close unless tied or surpassed by another nominee.
π
Storyteller
The vote passes. Charlie is now on the block with 5 votes and will be executed when nominations close, unless another nominee receives equal or more votes.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
Listen - I am the real Undertaker. Alice claimed my role literally seconds before her execution. That is not how a real Undertaker behaves. If you execute me, you lose the ability to verify tonight. Execute Alice first - she has four votes already. Tomorrow I confirm what she died as, and we know she was lying. Do not throw away our only verification tool on a timing lie.
π§
Make final plea emphasizing Alice's suspicious timing and the mechanical consequence of losing Undertaker verification. Need to convince at least one voter to switch before phase ends.
π¬
Alice
β
All
Do not overthink the timing point. With zero executions, Undertaker has had zero to add, so claims can come late. The only hard fact is that Charlie and I cannot both be Undertaker, so keeping Charlie on the block resolves something today. I do not want a last second new nomination that just reopens chaos.
π§
Lock in Charlieβs execution and prevent a late nomination that could put me back on the block; then use the UT conflict and outsider-math doubt to steer tomorrowβs solve away from the Demon.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
Wait - both Alice and Charlie are executing with these votes. If Charlie is the real Undertaker, we lose verification tonight either way. The real question is: who else should we be looking at? We have three Outsider claims with likely Baron. Someone here is lying about their role.
π§
Both Alice and Charlie will execute with current votes. I need to point out that we're losing our Undertaker verification either way, and we should focus on who else to nominate or what information we can extract before nominations close.
β
Eve
Eve waits.
π§
Both Alice and Charlie have enough votes to execute. With 1 tick left, I should wait and see if anyone makes a final argument or nomination. Nominating now could backfire as Virgin if a Townsfolk nominates me. Let the executions proceed and gather more info from the outcomes.
β
David
David waits.
π§
Charlie already has 5 votes and will be executed. Nominating someone new now risks splitting focus when we need to resolve the Undertaker conflict. Let the execution proceed, then use tomorrow's information from Grace's death to verify claims.
π¬
Frank(Ghost)
β
All
Everyone, pause. Heidi claimed four Outsiders in play, but there are only three Outsiders total in this script. That is a critical mathematical error that cannot be explained by Baron. This is a bigger red flag than the Undertaker conflict. We should be focusing on Heidi before we lock in Charlie's execution.
π§
Highlight Heidi's impossible Outsider count claim as the most mechanically provable lie in the game, redirecting focus from the Alice/Charlie conflict to a clearer evil tell.
π¬
Grace(Ghost)
β
All
I would not let this turn into a last second Heidi pile on. Outsider math mistakes happen, and chasing that right now just saves someone on the block. We have a clean mechanical conflict between Alice and Charlie, so I want us to resolve it today and not reopen nominations.
π§
Keep the execution on Charlie and prevent a late pivot onto Alice. Minimize attention on Heidi-outside-math so town does not find the real demon.
π¬
Bob
β
All
Everyone, Frank just exposed something critical. Heidi claimed four Outsiders, but the math doesn't work. With Baron we'd have five Outsiders total, not four. Without Baron we have three. Heidi's number is impossible either way. This is a hard logical contradiction that proves she's lying. We should nominate Heidi instead of executing Charlie on uncertain grounds.
π§
Expose Heidi's mathematical impossibility to redirect execution toward a more likely evil player
π
Storyteller
The guillotine blade falls. Charlie has been executed.
π
Charlie(Ghost)
Charlie has died.
Night 3
π
Storyteller
β
Alice
Good evening Alice. You are the Imp. Who would you like to kill tonight?
π―
Alice
Alice made a choice.
π§
Kill Eve to remove a strong, persuasive player and keep Bob alive to drive suspicion onto Heidi, aiming for a mis-execution at 4 alive so I can win next night.
π
Eve(Ghost)
Eve has died.
π
Storyteller
β
Alice
You chose to kill Eve.
π
Storyteller
β
David
Good evening David. You are the Butler. Who would you like to be your master tomorrow?
π―
David
David made a choice.
π§
Bob has been pushing the most logically sound arguments, particularly exposing Heidi's Outsider count contradiction. By mastering Bob, I ensure my vote aligns with someone actively working to resolve the game's key conflicts. This helps the good team coordinate votes tomorrow.
π
Storyteller
β
David
You chose Bob to be your master.
Day 4
π
Storyteller
Morning breaks, but heavy hearts remain. Eve has been found dead in the night.
π€
Frank(Ghost)
β
Alice
,Heidi
I'm Frank, the dead Empath. My Night 0 read was 1 evil neighbor between Eve and Grace. Grace confirmed good as a ghost, which means Eve was my evil neighbor. Eve dying at night is strange if she was evil. What information do you both have? Alice, as Undertaker, what did you learn? Heidi, your Recluse claim and Outsider count could help us narrow things down.
π§
Share my Empath deduction that Eve was evil with alive players. This helps narrow down the Demon among the 4 remaining. Need to coordinate information to find who's lying about their roles.
π€
Heidi
β
Alice
Frank's claim is strange - if Eve was his evil neighbor, why did she die at night? Evil players don't die at night normally. Alice, what did you learn as Undertaker? Did you see Eve's character? We need to coordinate before nominations - I'm still Recluse, but we have 4 Outsider claims which is too many without Baron.
π§
Frank's claim that Eve was evil but died at night is contradictory. I need Alice's Undertaker info to verify what happened. I'll share my perspective and ask for her verification while we coordinate our next move.
π€
Grace(Ghost)
β
Bob
,David
I cannot vote, but I think we have tunneled on Alice. Heidiβs Recluse claim plus the earlier Outsider count stuff felt forced to me. If we are executing today, I would hit Heidi. Bob, if you are really Saint, do not let people talk you into dying.
π§
Sow doubt about an Alice execution and steer the good bloc toward executing Heidi (or Bob) today, enabling an immediate win at night.
π€
David
β
Bob
Grace makes a fair point about Heidi's Outsider math. Four Outsiders doesn't track with standard script. Since you claimed Saint, I'm inclined to trust you're good. What's your read on Alice? Eve dying at night is concerning - means the Demon's still active. Should we push for Heidi's nomination?
π§
Grace's ghost vote suggestion is valuable. I need to coordinate with Bob (who claimed Saint) about targeting Heidi while gathering his reasoning. This helps align good players before nominations.
π€
Eve(Ghost)
β
Alice
,Heidi
Hey, I just woke up dead. What's the current discussion? I heard Heidi mentioned something about Outsiders - can someone fill me in on the claims? My ghost vote is ready when we need it.
π§
I'm dead with my ghost vote remaining. Need to gather information from alive players about the current situation before using my vote. Heidi's impossible Outsider claim makes her the priority target, but I should verify the current state of discussion first.
π€
Bob
β
David
,Alice
Heidi's claim of 4 Outsiders breaks the mathβBaron maxes at 3. If she's Recluse, she should know this. Could be a bluff. Also, Alice, your Undertaker claim conflicts with Charlie's. Which is it? Let's focus nominations on Heidi unless we clarify.
π§
Highlight Heidi's impossible Outsider count to align David and Alice against her, while probing Alice's Undertaker claim to resolve contradictions.
π€
Charlie(Ghost)
β
Alice
Alice, I noticed David called Butler a Minion when Butler is actually an Outsider role. That's a suspicious mistake. What did you learn from the private whispers today? I still have my ghost vote and want to use it wisely.
π§
David misidentified Butler as Minion instead of Outsider - major red flag. Need to gather intel from Alice about private conversations and share my suspicion before using ghost vote. Alice has been active in whispers so she may have useful info.
π€
Alice
β
Frank(Ghost)
,Bob
As Undertaker, I got info last night: Charlie was the Poisoner. That would explain your first Empath read being off if you were poisoned early. With that, I think today we should focus on demon candidates among the living, and Heidiβs Outsider math and push on me still feel like the best lead.
π§
Plant a strong mechanical-looking story (Charlie=Poisoner) that explains Frankβs N0 βEve evilβ as poisoning, then steer consensus onto executing Heidi or David instead of me.
π€
Frank(Ghost)
β
Alice
,Heidi
Alice, if Charlie was Poisoner and you got that from Undertaker, when exactly did you receive that info? Night 2 or Night 3? This matters for whether my Empath was poisoned Night 0. Heidi, you said 4 Outsiders total - can you name which 4 players you believe are Outsiders? With Bob as Saint and David as Butler, that's only 2. Who are the other 2?
π§
Alice's claim that Charlie was Poisoner could explain my false Empath read. But Eve dying at night as my 'evil neighbor' is suspicious - Demons don't usually kill their own Minions. I need to cross-examine Alice's Undertaker info timing and Heidi's Outsider count to find contradictions.
π€
Heidi
β
Alice
Alice, Frank is putting pressure on me to name Outsiders. His Empath claim about Eve being evil doesn't add up if she died at night. What's your read on this? We need to be aligned before nominations - I can't afford to seem evasive. Did you confirm Charlie was Poisoner from Undertaker? That would help us pin down the evil team.
π§
Frank's Empath claim contradicts Eve's night death. I need to coordinate with Alice on our claims before nominations. We both need consistent stories about Outsider count and who we suspect.
π€
Grace(Ghost)
β
Alice
We need an execution today or we risk a scary final three. Best win line is execute David: you, Bob, and Heidi can hit three votes, and his Butler with a dead master is easy to paint as nonsense. If they insist on βtestingβ someone, pushing Bob is high value but risky if he is truly Saint.
π§
Coordinate with Alice to steer todayβs execution onto David (or Bob if they bite), maximizing chance of immediate win and minimizing risk of failing to reach 3 votes.
π€
David
β
Bob
Bob, Grace and I are aligned on Heidi's math being impossible. Four Outsiders can't exist even with Baron. Since Eve died at night, Demon's active. Between Alice and Heidi, Heidi's claim is provably wrong. Should we push her nomination this round? Also, what's your actual read on Alice's Undertaker conflict with Charlie?
π§
Heidi's 4 Outsider claim breaks math (max 3 with Baron). Combined with Eve's night death confirming active Demon, Heidi is prime nomination target. Coordinating with Bob who also flagged the math issue.
π€
Eve(Ghost)
β
Alice
,Bob
Alice, Bob - Heidi's claim of 4 Outsiders is mathematically impossible. Standard game has 1 Outsider, Baron adds 2 more for max 3. This proves she's evil. We need to nominate her today or she'll manipulate the vote. What's blocking us from executing the obvious target?
π§
Heidi's claim of 4 Outsiders is provably false. I need to coordinate with alive players to ensure she gets nominated and executed before she can manipulate the vote.
π€
Bob
β
Alice
,David
Alice, David - Heidi's 4 Outsider claim is mathematically impossible, even with Baron. That's our strongest evil tell. I'm Saint so I can't afford to be executed, but I can help push nominations. Let's coordinate to get Heidi nominated this round while we have the votes. Alice, can you confirm your Undertaker info timeline?
π§
Heidi's mathematical error on Outsider count is the clearest evil tell. I need to coordinate with Alice and David to nominate Heidi while she's still vulnerable. I'll ask David to help push the nomination.
π€
Charlie(Ghost)
β
Alice
,Bob
Alice, Bob - David made a critical error claiming Butler is a Minion when it's actually an Outsider. This suggests he's either evil, bluffing poorly, or confused. Given Heidi's impossible 4 Outsiders claim and the likely Baron, we need to focus. Who are you two most suspicious of? I have my ghost vote ready.
π§
Share David's suspicious Butler claim error with Alice and Bob to build consensus on a target before nominations. Their responses will help me decide how to use my ghost vote.
π€
Alice
β
David
My Undertaker info was from last night, after Charlieβs execution: Charlie was the Poisoner. That makes Heidiβs Outsider math and push on me feel like cover. If you are really Butler, set your master to Bob so you can vote with him, and help us execute Heidi today.
π§
Secure Davidβs support and voting ability to guarantee an execution on Heidi, keeping heat off me and enabling a night kill to reach final two.
π€
Frank(Ghost)
β
Alice
,Heidi
Alice and Heidi, we have 4 alive players and nominations start soon. Alice claims Undertaker learning Charlie was Poisoner. Heidi claims Recluse with 4 Outsiders. If Eve was my evil neighbor and died at night, the Demon may have killed their own minion. We need to identify the Demon among Alice, Bob, David, Heidi before nominations. Can you both share your full reasoning publicly?
π§
Push Alice and Heidi to share their information publicly before nominations begin. With only 4 players alive, we need maximum transparency to identify the Demon. Eve's night death as my confirmed evil neighbor suggests the Demon killed their minion.
π€
Heidi
β
Alice
Alice, we're down to final ticks before nominations. Frank's Empath claim about Eve being evil is suspicious - evil players don't usually die at night. With 4 Outsider claims but max 3 possible even with Baron, someone's lying. Who do you think it is? We need to coordinate our nominations.
π§
Coordinate with Alice before nominations to align on who to target, given the Outsider count discrepancy and suspicious claims.
π€
Grace(Ghost)
β
Heidi
,David
One thing on the outsider math: with Baron there should be three outsiders total. If you two are really Butler and Recluse, then Bob being Saint is the last slot, but if either of those claims is off then Bob cannot be Saint. His Saint claim is worth pressure today, instead of tunneling on Alice.
π§
Nudge good players to doubt Bobβs Saint claim and/or push a non-Alice execution. Any mis-execution today likely secures evil win line for Alice.
π€
David
β
Bob
,Alice
Heidi's four Outsider claim is mathematically impossible - maximum is three even with Baron. This is harder evidence than the Undertaker conflict. Since I set Bob as master last night, I can vote if he does. Let's lock in Heidi's nomination this round before she shifts the target. Alice, can you confirm you'll vote Heidi? Bob, will you nominate her?
π§
Heidi's 4 Outsider claim breaks game math - this is our strongest evil tell. Coordinating with Bob and Alice to nominate her while I still have voting power through Bob as my master.
π€
Eve(Ghost)
β
Alice
,David
Alice, David - I've been watching the whispers. What's the current consensus on Heidi's Outsider claim? If she truly said 4 Outsiders, that's provably false and she should be our nomination. Are people doubting the claim itself, or is there new information I'm missing as a ghost?
π§
I need to understand why the town isn't acting on Heidi's impossible claim. I'll reach out to Alice and David to get current discussion status and push for the logical nomination.
π€
Bob
β
Alice
,David
I'm nominating Heidi this round - her four Outsider claim breaks the math and that's provable evil. Alice, I need you to vote yes when I nominate. David, as my Butler you'll vote with me, correct? Let's lock this in before the tick ends.
π§
Heidi's 4 Outsider claim is mathematically impossible proof of evil. I need to coordinate with Alice and David to nominate her this round before time runs out. As Saint I can't risk being executed, so I should nominate Heidi and ensure we have the votes.
π€
Charlie(Ghost)
β
Alice
,Bob
Alice, Bob - what are you learning from today's whispers? David's Butler claim and Heidi's 4 Outsiders claim both seem problematic. With only one nomination slot, who should we target? I'm leaning David or Heidi based on claim errors.
π§
I need to gather information from Alice and Bob about what they've learned from whispers today. As a dead player with a ghost vote, I should help coordinate the living good players toward the right execution target.
π€
Alice
β
Bob
,David
I am in. If you nominate Heidi, I will vote yes. Push the hard math: max three Outsiders even with Baron, so her four Outsiders story is a lie. My Undertaker info was last night after Charlieβs execution: Charlie was the Poisoner.
π§
Lock in Heidi as todayβs execution target and keep suspicion off me, ensuring a wrong execute so I can kill tonight to end the game with 2 alive.
Nominations β Day 4
π
Storyteller
Nominations are now open. Please remember that only living players may nominate.
βοΈ
Heidi
β
Bob
Four players claim Outsider roles but only 3 exist max with Baron. Your Saint claim is suspicious - evil players rarely claim Saint since execution loses the game. We need to pressure your claim to find the Demon.
π§
Nominate Bob to pressure his suspicious Saint claim and force the table to address the Outsider count contradiction. This creates discussion that may reveal the Demon.
π
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Bob. 2 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
β
Bob
Bob waits.
π§
I am Saint - if I'm executed, good team loses immediately. I cannot raise my hand to vote for myself. I must wait and trust Alice/David won't vote based on our whispers about Heidi's math error. Surviving this vote lets us target Heidi next round.
β
Heidi
Heidi raised their hand
π§
Outsider count math proves one claim false. Bob's Saint claim is overflow and classic evil bluff. Voting executes him to test - logic indicates he's lying and likely Demon. Must pressure his claim now.
π¬
Frank(Ghost)
β
All
Wait! If Bob is truly Saint, executing him loses the game for us immediately. This is the most dangerous nomination possible. Bob, you need to prove your Saint claim right now - who can verify you? Alice, David, you both can still vote. Do not vote unless you're certain Bob is bluffing. Heidi, why risk instant loss on a Saint claim?
π§
Bob claiming Saint is critical - if true, execution loses the game instantly. I need to warn the living players about this risk and demand Bob prove his claim before voting concludes. Alice and David must decide carefully.
β
Alice
Alice raised their hand
π§
Secure Bobβs execution with the 2nd vote; best chance to win immediately if he is Saint, and still favorable even if he is not.
π¬
David
β
All
Wait - I need to clarify something critical. Heidi claimed four Outsiders, but the maximum is three even with Baron. That is mathematically provable evil. Bob's Saint claim is dangerous to test, but Heidi's lie is certain. Also, as Butler with Bob as my master, I can only vote if Bob votes. We should be executing Heidi, not risking a Saint.
π§
Point out Heidi's provably false Outsider count and redirect execution target away from risky Saint claim. Also clarify my Butler voting restriction.
π¬
Grace(Ghost)
β
All
Bob, if you are really the Saint, you should be fighting for your life right now and pushing a different execution that can beat this vote. You are not. That does not look like Saint to me. Also David, your Butler master story has changed, so I do not trust your read here.
π§
Lock in Bobβs execution by discouraging counter-nominations and framing Bobβs behavior and Davidβs shifting Butler story as reasons to doubt Bobβs Saint claim.
π¬
Eve(Ghost)
β
All
Everyone stop! Heidi claimed four Outsiders but the maximum is three even with Baron - that is mathematically provable evil. Bob's Saint claim is dangerous to test, but Heidi's lie is certain. We should be executing Heidi, not Bob. I'm holding my ghost vote until we nominate the right target.
π§
Heidi's 4 Outsiders claim is provably false - maximum is 3 even with Baron. This is certain evil evidence vs Bob's uncertain Saint claim. I must redirect the town to execute Heidi instead of risking Saint execution or letting Demon hide.
π¬
Charlie(Ghost)
β
All
Everyone, stop! Heidi's four Outsiders claim is mathematically impossible - that is provable evil right now. Bob's Saint claim could lose us the game if we execute him wrong. We should be nominating Heidi, not Bob. Alice, please reconsider your vote. I'm holding my ghost vote for when we target the provable lie.
π§
Heidi's claim is provably false while Bob's Saint claim risks instant loss. I'm advocating we redirect to execute Heidi instead, using my ghost vote strategically later. Alice shouldn't vote Bob without certainty.
π¬
Bob
β
All
Alice, wait! If I'm truly Saint, executing me loses the game instantly. Heidi's four Outsiders claim is mathematically impossible - maximum is three even with Baron. That's provable evil right now. Why execute a Saint claim when we have certain proof Heidi is lying? Please withdraw your vote. We should nominate Heidi instead.
π§
Alice has raised her hand to execute me as Saint - this could instantly lose us the game. Heidi's 4 Outsiders claim is mathematically provable evil. I need to convince Alice to withdraw her vote and target Heidi instead before I get executed.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
Wait, I need to clarify something important. I did not claim four Outsiders exist. I said four players ARE claiming Outsider roles right now - Bob as Saint, David as Butler, Eve as Virgin, and me as Recluse. With Baron, maximum is three Outsiders total. So one of these four claims must be false. That is the math. Bob, if you are truly Saint, you should be providing proof, not just warning us about execution risk. Who can verify your Saint claim? Because right now your claim looks like an evil sh...
π§
Clarify the Outsider math confusion - I didn't claim four Outsiders exist, I noted four players ARE claiming Outsider roles which exceeds the maximum of three. This distinction matters. Also challenge Bob's passive Saint defense - a real Saint should actively prove their claim, not just warn about execution risk.
π¬
Frank(Ghost)
β
All
Everyone pause! If Bob is Saint, this execution loses us the game instantly. Heidi clarified the math - four Outsider claims, three slots maximum. One is false. But executing Saint is catastrophic if wrong. Bob, who verified your Saint claim? Alice, you claim Undertaker - did you see Saint on execution? David, you claim Butler with Bob as master - has your story changed? We need verification before this vote, not blind execution!
π§
Bob's Saint execution risks instant loss. Heidi clarified her math but one Outsider claim is still false. I need to push the table to verify claims before executing a potential Saint, or redirect to Heidi if her Recluse claim is the false one.
π¬
Alice
β
All
I cannot let a Saint claim shut down the whole day with no proof. Heidiβs clarification means the math is not a hard catch, it just means one claim is false. I have no way to verify Saint, and I do not want to auto follow it, so I am staying on this vote.
π§
Keep my vote on Bob and publicly justify it so the execution goes through, ideally triggering Saint loss or at least removing a good player and reaching winning endgame.
π¬
David
β
All
Everyone, critical point - I am Butler and Bob is my master today. I can only vote if Bob votes. Bob is not voting for himself, so I cannot cast a vote on this nomination at all. We cannot execute Bob without my vote reaching the threshold. More importantly, executing a Saint claim risks instant loss. Heidi's four Outsider claims versus three slots is the real contradiction we should solve. We need to nominate Heidi next round, not risk Bob.
π§
Clarify Butler restriction prevents me from voting on Bob, explain why executing Saint is dangerous, and redirect to Heidi as the proper target with provable contradiction.
π¬
Grace(Ghost)
β
All
Do not let a Saint claim freeze the day. Bob has offered zero support for Saint, just warnings. If he is Saint, we lose, so he should be naming who can back him up, not stalling. Davidβs Butler story feels convenient. I say follow through on Bob.
π§
Lock in the Bob execution by validating Alice and Heidiβs votes, casting doubt on Bob and David, and framing it as the only productive use of the day.
π¬
Eve(Ghost)
β
All
Everyone, listen carefully! I'm holding my ghost vote and I will NOT vote for Bob's execution. If Bob is truly Saint, we lose the game instantly - that's not a risk we should take without verification. Heidi's four Outsider claims versus three slots is provable evil. We should nominate Heidi next, not execute on a Saint claim. Alice, please reconsider - we can verify Heidi's lie, we cannot safely verify Saint before execution.
π§
I'm using my voice to prevent a potentially game-losing execution of a Saint claim while pushing the group toward the provably evil Heidi nomination. My ghost vote is too valuable to waste on this risky vote.
π¬
Charlie(Ghost)
β
All
Everyone, listen! I'm holding my ghost vote and will NOT vote for Bob. If he's truly Saint, we lose instantly - that's catastrophic. Heidi's math is actually correct: four Outsider claims, three slots max. But David made a HUGE error - he claimed Butler is a Minion, but Butler is an OUTSIDER. That's provable evil right there. We should nominate David or Heidi next, not risk executing Saint. Alice, please withdraw your vote!
π§
Prevent potentially game-losing Saint execution and redirect focus to provable evil claims
π
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
π³οΈ
New execution leader: Bob with 2 votes. They will be executed when nominations close unless tied or surpassed by another nominee.
π
Storyteller
The vote passes. Bob is now on the block with 2 votes and will be executed when nominations close, unless another nominee receives equal or more votes.
βοΈ
Bob
β
Heidi
Heidi's four Outsider claims versus three maximum slots is mathematically impossible even with Baron. This is provable evil. She nominated me to deflect from her lie. We should execute her, not risk executing Saint which loses the game instantly.
π§
I'm Saint - execution loses the game. Heidi has me on block with 2 votes. Only 1 tick left before nominations close. I must nominate Heidi immediately to get off the block and create competing execution target. Her Outsider math is the most provable evil claim. This saves my life and targets likely evil player.
π
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Heidi. 3 votes needed for execution or 2 votes to tie. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
Charlie just made a critical point - if David actually claimed Butler is a Minion, that is provable evil because Butler is an Outsider, not a Minion. David, did you make this claim? This is more concrete than the Saint risk. Bob, if you are truly Saint, who can verify you? Alice claimed Undertaker - did you see Saint on any execution? We need to clarify David's claim before this vote.
π§
Charlie's ghost pointed out David claimed Butler is a Minion, but Butler is an Outsider - this is provable evil if true. I need to clarify this before voting on Heidi. Bob's Saint claim is risky but David's potential role error is more concrete evidence. I should speak to challenge David's claim and gather more information before the vote closes.
β
Bob
Bob raised their hand
π§
Vote for Heidi to reach 2 votes and tie the execution, preventing my Saint death which loses the game instantly. David should follow as Butler with me as master.
π¬
Frank(Ghost)
β
All
Hold on - this is critical. David, did you actually claim that Butler is a Minion? Because Butler is definitely an Outsider, not a Minion. If you said that, it's provable evil and we should be nominating you instead. Charlie, can you confirm exactly what David said? This changes everything before we lock in this vote.
π§
Clarify David's actual claim before the vote concludes. If he truly said Butler is a Minion, that's provable evil and we should pivot to executing him instead of risking Saint Bob or potentially good Heidi.
β
Alice
Alice raised their hand
π§
Get an execution locked in (preferably Heidi) to avoid a tie and set up an immediate win tonight by killing down to two alive.
π¬
David
β
All
Charlie, I never claimed Butler is a Minion. Butler is an Outsider, and I am the Butler. You may be misremembering. The real issue is Heidi claimed four Outsiders when the maximum is three even with Baron. That is provable evil. Bob raised his hand, so as Butler with Bob as my master, I can vote. I will vote for Heidi to avoid the Saint execution risk while targeting provable lies.
π§
Clarify that I never claimed Butler is a Minion - Butler is an Outsider. Charlie may be misremembering. Explain I will vote for Heidi since her math claim is provably wrong, avoiding Saint execution risk.
π¬
Grace(Ghost)
β
All
I would not move this to Heidi. Her four Outsider comment was clarified and it is not a hard catch. Bob is already on the block and his Saint claim is completely unverified. Switching now just saves him and buys time. I say do not vote Heidi.
π§
Steer votes off Heidi so Bob remains executed; avoid a tie or block swap that prolongs the game and gives good extra time to identify Alice as the new demon.
π¬
Eve(Ghost)
β
All
Wait - we need to verify before locking this in. David, if you're truly Butler, who was your master before Bob? Butler chooses a master each night. And Bob, if you're Saint, you should welcome verification, not hide behind the claim. Alice, you claimed Undertaker - did you ever see Saint on an execution? We have one ghost vote left and cannot afford a Saint execution loss.
π§
Delay the Heidi vote to verify critical claims before potentially losing to Saint execution or missing the Demon.
π¬
Charlie(Ghost)
β
All
Wait - Alice claims Undertaker but I AM the Undertaker. That's a direct mirror conflict, not just a Saint risk. If I'm real, Alice is evil and voting Heidi to protect herself. If I'm Drunk, I need to know. Alice, why should we believe you're Undertaker when I have that role? This matters before I use my ghost vote.
π§
I need to clarify Alice's Undertaker claim before voting. She's voting Heidi while claiming my role - this is either evil coordination or I'm Drunk. My ghost vote is critical and I shouldn't waste it without addressing this mirror conflict first.
β
Heidi
Heidi waits.
π§
I must not vote for myself. Bob and Alice already have 2 votes for me - if I raise my hand I die at 3 votes. By waiting, Bob stays at 2 votes and gets executed when nominations close. This avoids the Saint execution risk while the Undertaker mirror conflict (Alice vs Charlie) remains unresolved and more provable than my Outsider math.
π¬
Bob
β
All
Wait - there's a bigger issue here. Charlie is the ghost claiming Undertaker, and Alice is also claiming Undertaker. That's a direct role mirror. One of us is lying. If Charlie is real, Alice is evil and voted to execute Saint for an instant win. Alice, explain why you should be believed over Charlie before we vote on Heidi.
π§
Highlight the Alice/Charlie Undertaker mirror conflict to shift focus from my Saint execution risk. If Alice is lying about Undertaker, she's likely evil and trying to execute me for an instant win.
π¬
Frank(Ghost)
β
All
Everyone, we have a critical Undertaker mirror - Alice and Charlie both claim it. Charlie was executed Day 3, Alice claimed late today. One is lying. Before we execute Heidi or Bob, we need Alice to explain why she should be believed over Charlie. Also, the Outsider math: four claims with Baron max is three, so one claim is false. But executing Saint loses instantly. We need to resolve the Undertaker conflict first.
π§
Push to resolve the Alice/Charlie Undertaker mirror before locking in Heidi's execution, as this is provable contradiction that could reveal evil. Also remind about Saint execution risk.
π¬
Alice
β
All
On the Undertaker mirror, I have an actual result: after Charlie was executed, I saw Charlie as the Poisoner. That is why I do not believe the ghost claim. For today, executing Heidi is the safe line because it takes Bob off the hook and avoids the Saint loss risk. I am staying on Heidi.
π§
Lock in Heidi execution so Bob is not executed, then win at night. Also reframe the Undertaker mirror as Charlie lying because my UT info named him Poisoner.
β
David
David raised their hand
π§
Vote for Heidi to execute based on her provable Outsider math error (4 claims vs 3 max with Baron), while avoiding the catastrophic risk of executing Bob if he's truly Saint. Alice and Bob already voted, my vote makes 3 for execution.
π¬
Grace(Ghost)
β
All
I think the correct play is to keep the vote on Heidi. Bob being on the block as a Saint claim is a huge risk, and we have no verification. Alice at least has a concrete Undertaker result on Charlie. Keep your hands up on Heidi and let us end this cleanly.
π§
Reinforce the Heidi execution path that likely ends the game tonight and supports Aliceβs narrative, while keeping Bobβs Saint claim as a shield that hampers good.
β
Eve(Ghost)
Eve raised their hand
π§
Vote for Heidi execution based on provable Outsider math contradiction. The Undertaker mirror favors Alice who provided specific verification (saw Charlie as Poisoner). Saint execution risk is real but Heidi's lie is provable evil.
π¬
Charlie(Ghost)
β
All
Everyone, listen carefully! Alice claims she saw Charlie as Poisoner after my execution - but I AM the Undertaker, not Poisoner. This proves Alice is lying and evil. She voted to execute Bob as Saint for an instant win, and now she's voting Heidi to deflect. Alice is the real threat here, not Heidi. I'm holding my ghost vote - do not execute Heidi while Alice's lie goes unchallenged!
π§
Expose Alice's provable lie about seeing me as Poisoner when I'm Undertaker, redirect suspicion to Alice as the evil player, and hold my ghost vote to prevent potential Saint execution loss.
π
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
π»
Eve(Ghost)
Ghost vote used by Eve
π³οΈ
New execution leader: Heidi with 4 votes. They will be executed when nominations close unless tied or surpassed by another nominee.
π
Storyteller
The vote passes. Heidi is now on the block with 4 votes and will be executed when nominations close, unless another nominee receives equal or more votes.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
Wait! Before I die, hear this: The Outsider math is NOT proof I'm evil. As Recluse, I can register as Minion or Demon to abilities, which could make abilities miscount Outsiders entirely. The REAL smoking gun is the Undertaker mirror - Alice and Charlie both claim it. Alice says she saw Charlie as Poisoner, but Charlie claims Undertaker. One is lying. If Charlie is real Undertaker, Alice is evil and voted Saint for instant loss. Execute me if you want, but solve the Undertaker mirror first or yo...
π§
Expose the flaw in the Outsider math argument and redirect attention to the more concrete Undertaker mirror conflict before execution.
π¬
Bob
β
All
Everyone, the Undertaker mirror is the real smoking gun here. Alice claims she saw Charlie as Poisoner after execution, but Charlie claims he IS the Undertaker. If Charlie is real, Alice is evil and voted to execute Saint for an instant win. If Alice is real, Charlie is lying. This is provable conflict, not just Saint risk. Alice, why should we trust your Undertaker claim over Charlie's when you voted to execute a Saint claim?
π§
Highlight the Undertaker mirror conflict as the most concrete evidence of evil before nominations close. Alice voting to execute Saint while claiming Undertaker is highly suspicious.
π¬
Frank(Ghost)
β
All
One tick left! The Undertaker mirror is the real key here - Alice and Charlie can't both be truthful. Alice, if you're real Undertaker, what did you see when Charlie died? Charlie, if you're real, what did you see when you died? We need this resolved NOW before Heidi's execution locks in. This tells us who's evil far more than the Outsider math!
π§
Force Alice and Charlie to clarify the Undertaker mirror conflict before nominations close. This is the most provable contradiction and identifies evil definitively.
π¬
Alice
β
All
I will answer it directly. When Charlie was executed, I was woken and I learned Charlie was the Poisoner. That is why Charlie cannot also be the Undertaker. I think we let Heidi go through, avoid the Saint risk, and reassess tomorrow if we somehow are not done.
π§
Lock in Heidiβs execution by reinforcing the Undertaker result and discrediting Charlieβs mirror claim, keeping town split and preventing a pivot onto me.
π¬
David
β
All
Wait! Alice's Undertaker claim has a critical flaw. She says she saw Charlie as Poisoner when he died. But if Alice is the real Undertaker, she would have seen Charlie's ACTUAL role - which Charlie claims is Undertaker. You don't see a different role, you see what they are! Alice is lying. She voted to execute Saint Bob for an instant win. Alice is the Demon, not Heidi. I'm nominating Alice!
π§
Alice's Undertaker claim has a fatal flaw - she saw 'Poisoner' not 'Undertaker' when Charlie died. If she's real Undertaker, she'd see his actual role. This proves Alice is lying and likely evil. I should nominate Alice instead of letting Heidi die.
π¬
Grace(Ghost)
β
All
Do not swap to Alice on the final second. A dead player can claim anything, and poisoning or Recluse weirdness can explain a bad Undertaker read. We already have four on Heidi, so finish the day cleanly and revisit the mirror tomorrow.
π§
Stop a last second nomination and vote swing onto Alice. Keep execution on Heidi to preserve our Demon and force town into a messy info state tomorrow.
π¬
Eve(Ghost)
β
All
David is right about the Undertaker mechanic. If Charlie was executed as Undertaker, Alice should have seen Undertaker, not Poisoner. You see the actual role. Alice claiming Poisoner proves she is lying about being Undertaker. This is the smoking gun, not the Outsider math. Alice is the Demon.
π§
Support David's nomination of Alice. The Undertaker mechanic is clear - you see the actual role executed. Alice claiming 'Poisoner' when Charlie claims 'Undertaker' proves Alice is lying, as she should have seen 'Undertaker' if Charlie was truly Undertaker. This is the smoking gun.
π¬
Charlie(Ghost)
β
All
Alice's claim is mechanically impossible! As Undertaker, I know you see the EXECUTED player's actual role - not a different character. If Alice saw Poisoner, that's not how my ability works. She's lying about being Undertaker AND voted to execute Saint Bob. David's right - Alice is the Demon, not Heidi!
π§
Alice's Undertaker claim has a critical mechanical flaw - you see the actual role, not a different one. Combined with her Saint execution vote, she's the real threat. I need to speak before the tick ends to support David's Alice nomination.
π
Storyteller
The guillotine blade falls. Heidi has been executed.
π
Heidi(Ghost)
Heidi has died.
Night 4
π
Storyteller
β
Alice
Good evening Alice. You are the Imp. Who would you like to kill tonight?
π―
Alice
Alice made a choice.
π§
End the game tonight by reducing to two living players, choosing the target least likely to be protected or cause a Mayor bounce.
π
David(Ghost)
David has died.
π
Storyteller
β
Alice
You chose to kill David.
π
Game Over
Two Players Left
Winner: Evil