Game Detail
Players
Token Usage
| Team | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Cost (USD) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Good | 385,026 | 77,208 | $1.7547 |
| Evil | 140,448 | 14,677 | $0.0571 |
Event Transcript
π
The game has started.
π
Storyteller
β
Charlie
You are the Minion. The Demon is Bob.
π
Storyteller
β
Bob
Minions are: Charlie. Your safe bluffs are: Virgin, Chef, Monk
π
Storyteller
β
David
Good evening David. You are the Washerwoman. Either Heidi or Frank is the Slayer.
π
Storyteller
β
Alice
Good evening Alice. You are the Librarian. Either David or Frank is the Butler.
π
Storyteller
β
Grace
Good evening Grace. You are the Fortune Teller. Choose 2 players to learn if either is a Demon.
π―
Grace
Grace made choices.
π§
N0 I want maximum value from a possible 'NO' by clearing two players early and creating a small suspect pool if 'YES'; Alice+Bob is a broad, low-assumption opening check.
π
Storyteller
β
Grace
You chose Alice and Bob. You receive the answer: YES.
π
Storyteller
β
Frank
Good evening Frank. You are the Butler. Who would you like to be your master tomorrow?
π―
Frank
Frank made a choice.
π§
Pick a likely-active voter so my Butler restriction rarely prevents me voting on crucial nominations, while keeping flexibility to change masters once claims start.
π
Storyteller
β
Frank
You chose Alice to be your master.
π
Storyteller
β
Charlie
Good evening Charlie. You are the Spy. You can secretly see information about all players: - Alice: Librarian (good), Alive - Bob: Imp (evil), Alive - Charlie: Spy (evil), Alive - David: Washerwoman (good), Alive - Eve: Ravenkeeper (good), Alive - Frank: Butler (good), Alive - Grace: Fortune Teller (good), Alive - Heidi: Slayer (good), Alive
Day 1
π
Storyteller
Welcome to the village of Ravenswood Bluff. Please take this time to get to know your fellow villagers. Feel free to move around and have private conversations. Be wary, for a Demon hides among you!
π€
Eve
β
David
,Frank
,Alice
Heyβquick private check-in: what are you planning to claim today (and any starting info)? Also, do you want to coordinate who to trust/nominate D1? Iβm gathering early claims so we can catch inconsistencies later.
π§
Get early private role/starting-info claims from my two neighbors and one extra player to create accountability, coordinate, and narrow Demon/Minion candidates.
π€
Frank
β
Eve
,David
Iβll answer privately: Iβm the Butler (outsider). N0 I picked Alice as my master, so today I can only vote if Alice votes too. I may keep it off-public for now. What are you two claiming / any starting info?
π§
Respond promptly to the whisper, build an early trust network, and set expectations about my Butler vote restriction so it doesnβt look like scum behavior later.
π€
Grace
β
Heidi
Hey Heidiβwhat are you / any starting info? Iβm Fortune Teller. N0 I checked Alice+Bob and got a YES (one is Demon or my red herring). Please keep that quiet for now; I donβt want to tip them off.
π§
Privately anchor my N0 YES (Alice/Bob) with one trusted contact to start triangulating claims without alerting the possible Demon.
π€
Heidi
β
Grace
Got itβkeep quiet. Iβm Slayer (no start info). Your YES on Alice+Bob is big; pls recheck tomorrow as Alice+Charlie or Alice+David, and also Bob+someone. If Alice is consistent YES, I can consider a public Slayer shot once weβre confident.
π§
Confirm Graceβs FT info path and coordinate future checks while keeping my Slayer identity quiet, preserving a high-impact shot once we have a near-lock.
π€
Alice
β
Eve
FYI privately: Iβm Librarian. N0 I learned either David or Frank is the Butler. I didnβt want to say it in the group thread w/ them. Maybe probe each for role plan & see if either soft-claims Butler / shows vote restrictions.
π§
Privately give Eve my Librarian info so she can cross-check claims without outing the possible Butler in front of them, improving trust network and Outsider count deductions.
π€
David
β
Eve
,Frank
,Alice
Iβm Washerwoman: either Heidi or Frank is the Slayer. Frank, if youβre truly Butler then (assuming Iβm sober) Heidi should be Slayer. Iβd keep this mostly quiet for nowβEve, can you sanity-check with Heidi privately?
π§
Share my starting info privately, reconcile Frankβs Butler claim vs my Slayer ping, and coordinate with Eve/Alice to verify Heidi and avoid outing the Slayer too early.
π€
Bob
β
Charlie
Hey Charlie, I'm the Imp. Let's coordinate. I'm going to claim Chef. What are you claiming? Let's try to sow some discord.
π§
I need to coordinate with my Minion, Charlie, to ensure our stories align and we don't accidentally contradict each other. I'm choosing to claim Chef as my bluff.
π€
Charlie
β
Bob
Hey Bob. Got it, you're the Imp. I'm the Spy. I'll claim Investigator and point at someone innocent to sow confusion. Let's keep our distance publicly. I'll try to frame someone else as the Minion. Good luck with the Chef claim.
π§
Coordinate with the Demon (Bob) and establish our bluffs. I will claim Investigator to create false leads, while Bob claims Chef. This helps us control the narrative and sow discord among the town.
π€
Eve
β
Heidi
Hey Heidiβprivate check: David says heβs Washerwoman and got βeither you or Frank is the Slayer.β Frankβs privately claiming Butler (and Aliceβs Librarian ping supports that). Are you actually Slayer / what are you planning to claim, and any info you have?
π§
Confirm Heidiβs role/claims to validate the Librarian+Washerwoman chain and spot who is lying/poisoned before nominations. Also set up a safe coordination path for a potential Slayer shot.
π€
Frank
β
Eve
,David
Got it. If youβre sober WW, then since Iβm actually Butler (picked Alice), Heidi should be Slayer. Letβs have Eve privately confirm Heidiβs role/plan; if sheβs Slayer, keep it quiet + save shot for later when weβre confident. Also watch Outsider countβif others claim Outsider, Baron world.
π§
Lock in a private info chain (WWβSlayer) without outing it publicly; prompt verification with Heidi and keep options open if WW is wrong/evil.
π€
Grace
β
Frank
Hey Frankβwhatβs your role/any start info? Iβve got a piece of info involving Alice/Bob (sensitive). If you share yours, I can tell you mine for cross-checks before nominations.
π§
Get Frankβs claim/start info to cross-check my Alice+Bob YES without outing myself publicly; build a trusted info network before nominations.
π€
Heidi
β
Eve
YepβIβm actually the Slayer (no start info). Iβm not shooting D1 unless we get strong convergence. I wonβt share Graceβs info. Can you tell me what Aliceβs Librarian ping was (which Outsider / which 2?) and what youβre claiming? Want to sanity-check Outsider count + David/Frank story.
π§
Respond to Eve to confirm my Slayer claim (consistent with David), keep FT info secret, and gather more mechanical claims to narrow Demon before using my one-shot.
π€
Alice
β
Heidi
,Frank
Private: Iβm Librarian; N0 either David or Frank is the Butler. Also David told me heβs Washerwoman: either Heidi or Frank is the Slayer. Can each of you tell me what youβre claiming / whether either of these fits? Keep quiet if you prefer.
π§
Cross-check the two overlapping starting-info pings (Frank appears in both). Early private confirmation can lock worlds & guide safe D1 nominations without outing to whole town.
π€
David
β
Heidi
,Eve
Heidiβmy N0 Washerwoman ping was you OR Frank as Slayer. Frank is claiming Butler to us, so if Iβm sober that makes you Slayer. Are you willing to soft-confirm privately + sit on the shot for now? Eve: any other Outsider claims yet (for Baron check)?
π§
Confirm whether Heidi will claim/act as Slayer and align with Eve on keeping it quiet; also start tracking Outsider count to detect Baron or poisoned WW.
β
Bob
Bob waits.
π§
I have already coordinated with my Minion, Charlie. I need to observe the town's behavior and wait for an opportunity to push my Chef bluff or sow discord without drawing too much attention to myself early on. I will wait for the next tick to see if any new info emerges.
π€
Charlie
β
Alice
Hey Alice, I'm the Investigator. I've been looking into things and I'm getting some weird vibes about Frank. Have you heard anything from him? I'm trying to piece together who might be the Minion.
π§
I need to establish my cover as the Investigator and start sowing discord by accusing Frank, a good player, to create confusion. Alice is a good target to start with.
π€
Eve
β
Heidi
Aliceβs Librarian ping (private): either David OR Frank is the Butler. Frankβs claiming Butler & says he chose Alice as master (so today he can only vote if Alice votes). Iβm actually Ravenkeeperβkeeping it quiet for now. Agree: donβt shoot D1 unless strong convergence; watch for any extra Outsider claims (Baron flag).
π§
Answer Heidiβs questions, keep Slayer shot hidden, and set up mechanical checks (Butler vote restriction, Outsider count) while deciding how/when to reveal Iβm Ravenkeeper.
π€
Frank
β
Grace
,Alice
Iβm actually Butler. N0 I picked Alice as master β today I can only vote if Alice votes. So Aliceβs Librarian (David/Frank is Butler) fits. Also David told me WW: Heidi/Frank is Slayer; if heβs sober then Heidi=Slayer. Grace: whatβs your Alice/Bob info?
π§
Confirm my Butler claim privately, validate Aliceβs Librarian info, and pull Graceβs Alice/Bob information to build day-1 execute candidates while keeping Slayer/outsider info mostly quiet.
π€
Grace
β
Frank
Thx. Iβm Fortune Teller. N0 checked Alice+Bob β YES (either is Demon OR one is my red herring good). Pls keep quiet for now. If Alice really Librarian+you Butler, could mean Bob is demon or Alice is my red herring. Any other claims u heard?
π§
Share my FT YES privately with Frank to align info webs (Alice Librarian/Butler), keep it non-public, and plan N1 checks to distinguish whether Alice/Bob is demon vs red herring.
π€
Heidi
β
Bob
,Charlie
,Grace
Quick check-in before noms: what are each of you claiming + any N0 info? Also, have you heard any Outsider claims yet? Graceβpls plan N1 FT to resolve your Alice+Bob YES (e.g., Alice+Charlie and Bob+David) and keep it quiet.
π§
Get Bob/Charlie claims fast before nominations and align Graceβs N1 FT plan; reduce worlds and avoid wasting Slayer shot or executing a Saint.
π€
Alice
β
Charlie
Iβve heard from Frank & I have mech info: Iβm Librarian; N0 either David or Frank is the Butler. Frank is claiming Butler + has vote restriction today (picked me as master). If youβre seeing Frank as possible Minion, what EXACT Investigator result did you get (which minion & which 2 names)?
π§
Give Charlie my Librarian info to calibrate his Investigator suspicion, extract his exact result for mechanical contradiction checks, and set up a reliable trust web before nominations.
π€
David
β
Eve
,Grace
,Alice
Quick sync before noms: any public/private role claims so far + any Outsider claims besides Frankβs Butler? Alsoβdid Heidi tell any of you what sheβs claiming? Trying to sanity-check my WW info (Heidi/Frank as Slayer).
π§
Collect early claims to validate outsider count and Heidi/Frank, and coordinate keeping a real Slayer concealed while building a reliable nomination target for D1.
π€
Bob
β
Heidi
Hey Heidi! I'm the Chef. I got a '0' on N0, so no evil pairs for me. Haven't heard any solid Outsider claims yet, just keeping my ears open. What about you? What are you claiming?
π§
I need to maintain my cover as the Chef and provide a plausible N0 result (0 pairs) to Heidi while gathering info on her role. This keeps me integrated in the town's social circle without raising suspicion.
π€
Charlie
β
Alice
Alice, I'm Investigator. My N0 result was that Frank is the Poisoner. I'm not sure if he's the Minion or if my info is weird, but that's what I got. I'm keeping an eye on him. What do you think? Does that align with your Librarian info?
π§
I need to maintain my cover as the Investigator and sow discord by accusing Frank (a good player) of being the Poisoner. This aligns with my strategy to frame good players and create confusion. Alice is the Librarian, so I need to keep her trust while lying.
π€
Eve
β
David
,Alice
,Grace
Sync: No other Outsider claims heard besides Frank privately Butler. Heidi privately confirmed she IS Slayer. Iβm keeping my role quiet. Suggest public: Alice can say Lib saw Butler in {David,Frank} (no need to out Heidi). Also test Frank vote restriction w/ Alice vote later.
π§
Update the info web before nominations, coordinate a safe public plan, and set up mechanical checks (Frank vote restriction, outsider count) to catch lies without exposing Slayer/Ravenkeeper.
π€
Frank
β
Alice
,Grace
,Eve
Quick sync: Iβm truly Butler; N0 picked Alice as master β today I can only vote if Alice votes. So Alice Lib (David/Frank Butler) checks. Grace told me FT N0 Alice+Bob = YES (keep quiet). David WW says Heidi/Frank=Slayer β if sober, Heidi=Slayer (hide). Alice: pls signal if you plan to vote so Iβm not locked out.
π§
Coordinate privately so we can control voting (Butler constraint), protect key roles (FT/Slayer), and steer D1 conversation toward collecting confirmations before a risky execution.
π€
Grace
β
Heidi
,Bob
,Charlie
Quick reply: Iβve only heard 1 Outsider claim so farβFrank privately as Butler. Heard Alice is Librarian pointing to Butler in {David,Frank}, which fits. Iβm Townsfolk w/ nightly info but keeping exact role quiet until after N1; Iβll aim N1 to resolve a key pair.
π§
Reply to Heidi/Bob/Charlie with enough coordination info (outsiders/claims) while keeping my Fortune Teller identity and Alice+Bob YES private, preserving future reads.
π€
Heidi
β
Bob
Iβm actually Slayer (no N0 info). Privately: David claims Washerwoman pinged {me,Frank} as Slayer; Alice claims Librarian saw Butler in {David,Frank}, and Frank is claiming Butlerβso that web points to me being real. Your Chef 0 is useful (if true, Demon+Minion not adjacent). Consider going public w/ Chef 0 later.
π§
Reply to Bob with my true role and integrate Chef 0 into our deductions, while keeping Fortune Teller info secret and encouraging Bob to consider a public Chef reveal later.
π€
Alice
β
David
,Eve
Update: Frank privately confirms Butler + chose me as master (can only vote if I vote) β strong. Eve says Heidi privately confirmed Slayer. BIG conflict: Charlie just told me heβs Investigator & claims N0 result βFrank is the Poisonerβ (not even giving 2 names). If Frank truly Butler, Charlie is lying/poisoned/evil. Suggest we test Frankβs vote restriction on first vote, and pressure Charlie for exact Investigator pair.
π§
Sync key mechanical conflicts before nominations: confirm Frank as Outsider via vote restriction, protect Heidi Slayer, and flag Charlieβs Investigator claim as inconsistent so town pressures correct target.
π€
David
β
Charlie
HeyβAlice says you claimed Investigator N0 result βFrank is the Poisonerβ but Investigator should be *two* names. What exactly did ST tell you (X or Y is Poisoner)? Whoβs the other name? And did you maybe say it as a hunch vs your actual info?
π§
Pin Charlie down on exact Investigator info (two names + which minion) before noms. Either resolve a miscommunication or create mechanical reason to distrust/execute Charlie instead of Frank.
π€
Bob
β
Charlie
Heidi is the Slayer. We need to be careful. She's asking for claims. I'm sticking with Chef 0. What's your Investigator claim? We need to frame someone else before she uses her shot. Maybe frame David or Frank?
π§
Coordinate with my Minion (Spy) to handle the Slayer threat and decide on a framing target.
π€
Charlie
β
David
David, you're right, I misspoke in the heat of the moment. The ST told me Frank or Grace is the Poisoner. I'm leaning towards Frank because of his behavior, but I'm still processing the info. I'm definitely Investigator. Let's focus on the real threats.
π§
I need to recover from my mistake of only naming one person for the Investigator role. By adding Grace to the mix, I create a plausible lie and deflect suspicion from myself while keeping the heat on Frank.
Nominations β Day 1
π
Storyteller
Nominations are now open.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
I'm Investigator. I apologize for the confusion earlierβI was rattled. My N0 info was definitely 'Frank or Grace is the Poisoner'. I'm not saying they are definitely evil, but it's a lead we should investigate. Let's not rush executions today. I'm happy to hold off on nominations.
π§
I need to clarify my Investigator claim to David and the group while maintaining the pressure on Frank and Grace, without drawing attention to myself or Bob. I want to avoid a Day 1 execution if possible to keep the Imp safe.
π¬
Alice
β
All
Public: Iβm Librarian. N0: either David or Frank is the Butler. Frank has privately claimed Butler + says he picked me as master (so he can only vote if I vote). That clashes w/ Charlieβs βFrank/Grace=Poisonerβ leadβsomeoneβs off. Letβs test Frankβs vote restriction on the 1st vote.
π§
Publicly lock in my Librarian info and set up a mechanical Butler-vote test, while flagging the Investigator conflict without outing hidden roles.
π¬
David
β
All
We should run 1 nomination mainly to test the Butler mechanic: Alice, please vote; Frank, only vote if Alice votes. Also: Charlie, restate your exact Investigator info (both names) clearly; Grace, please respond to being in that pair. Letβs not auto-execute yet.
π§
Create a public vote to mechanically test Frankβs Butler restriction and force Charlie/Grace to lock in statements, without hard-committing to an execution yet.
π¬
Frank
β
All
Public confirm: I am the Butler. N0 I chose Alice as my master, so today I can ONLY vote if Alice votes too. Iβm happy to test this on the first nomination: Alice please vote; Iβll mirror. If Alice doesnβt vote, I physically canβt.
π§
Publicly confirm my Butler + voting restriction to create a mechanical test that clears me or catches a liar, and refocus suspicion on the inconsistent Investigator claim without forcing a risky D1 execution.
π¬
Grace
β
All
Re: Charlieβs βFrank/Grace=Poisonerβ: Iβm not the Poisoner (Iβm good/Townsfolk). That ping clashes hard w/ Alice Lib + Frankβs Butler restriction (which we can test). I strongly prefer NO execution D1βdo a single test nomination/vote-count only, then reassess after N1.
π§
Publicly defend vs Poisoner suspicion, highlight mechanical conflict, and push a safe βtest nominationβ without execution so we reach N1 with minimal risk.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
Public: Iβm the Slayer (fits David WW {me,Frank}). I also heard Bob claim Chef=0 (no adjacent evil pairs)βBob pls confirm if ok. That makes Charlieβs βFrank/Grace=Poisonerβ clash hard w/ Frank Butler+Alice Lib. Prefer no exec D1; do 1 low-vote nom to test Butler.
π§
Lock in my role to stabilize the claim web, highlight the key contradiction (Charlie vs Butler web), and steer town toward a low-risk Butler vote test + no D1 execution unless votes clearly converge.
π¬
Eve
β
All
Proposal: make 1 controlled nom on Charlie purely as a vote-test. Only Alice votes; Frank attempts to vote only if Alice does. Everyone else hands down. Then Charlie, restate Investigator exactly: which minion shown + the two names, and any reason you changed wording.
π§
Advance day with a controlled nomination to mechanically test Butler + apply pressure on the main contradiction (Charlie vs Frank/Alice), without risking an accidental D1 execution.
π¬
Bob
β
All
I confirm my Chef 0 claim. If I'm telling the truth, no evil pairs are adjacent. Charlie's Investigator claim is interesting, but let's focus on the Butler test first. I agree with Eveβlet's test the Butler mechanic with a nomination on Charlie. I'm happy to vote if Alice does.
π§
I need to appear helpful and cooperative to avoid suspicion while supporting the plan to test the Butler mechanic, which keeps the focus off me and potentially creates confusion. I'm agreeing to the test nomination on my minion, Charlie, which is a safe play.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
I'm happy to be the test subject for the Butler mechanic if it helps the town, but I'm concerned about Frank. If he's the Poisoner, he's using the Butler claim to hide. Why not nominate Frank instead? It tests the Butler mechanic just as well and investigates my lead.
π§
I need to deflect the nomination from myself. By suggesting Frank as the target, I maintain my Investigator bluff and put pressure on a good player, potentially causing confusion.
βοΈ
Alice
β
Charlie
Controlled Butler test + info pressure: nominate Charlie. Plan: ONLY Alice votes; Frank attempts to vote only if I do; everyone else hands down. Then we reassess Charlieβs Investigator claim consistency.
π§
Run the agreed controlled vote-test on Charlie to mechanically confirm Frankβs Butler restriction and generate alignment pressure on Charlie without committing to a real D1 execution.
π
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Charlie. 4 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
β
Charlie
Charlie waits.
π§
I am the nominee, so I should not vote for myself. I will wait for the town to conduct their 'Butler test' and hope I survive the vote. My goal is to stay alive to continue gathering info as the Spy.
β
Alice
Alice raised their hand
π§
Raise hand to execute the agreed controlled Butler-test: generate mechanical confirmation of Frankβs vote restriction and create a clear record for later days.
β
David
David waits.
π§
Preserve the controlled Butler vote test by not adding extra votes; get clean mechanical info on Frank/Alice, then revisit Charlieβs Investigator claim.
β
Frank
Frank raised their hand
π§
Alice is voting, so I must mirror to mechanically confirm my Butler restriction without risking an execution (should stay under 4 votes if others follow plan).
β
Grace
Grace waits.
π§
Keep the vote count controlled (only Alice + Frank) to cleanly test Butler restriction and avoid accidental execution on D1.
β
Heidi
Heidi waits.
π§
Do not add extra votes; preserve the agreed controlled Butler test and likely avoid a D1 execution while still gathering mechanical info from who can vote.
β
Eve
Eve waits.
π§
Keep my hand down to avoid executing D1 during a controlled Butler test; preserve flexibility and information, then push for clear Investigator/FT details before night.
β
Bob
Bob waits.
π§
I need to stay alive and keep my Minion, Charlie, alive if possible. Voting for Charlie would be counter-productive to my goal of keeping the Demon/Minion team intact. I will abstain from voting to avoid contributing to Charlie's execution.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
Wait, Frank, you voted! If you are the Butler, you are supposed to follow Alice. Alice voted, so you followed, but this confirms you are tied to her. If I am executed, you lose a potential Butler. Let's keep me alive to see if my Investigator info on the Poisoner holds up.
π§
I need to survive the vote. Frank voting is a bit suspicious if he's the Butler, but he's following the plan. I need to point out that executing me is a waste of a day and might kill a useful player (me) while the real Poisoner (if my claim was true) or other threats remain. I need to sow doubt.
π¬
Alice
β
All
Everyone else keep hands DOWNβthis is a controlled Butler test only. We should not execute D1 off this. Frank voting while I vote is consistent w/ Butler. After tally: Charlie, please restate EXACT Investigator result (which minion + the two names) and why it changed.
π§
Maintain the controlled Butler vote-test without accidentally executing Charlie; lock in public commitments and pressure Charlie to restate his Investigator info precisely after the vote.
β
David
David waits.
π§
Maintain the controlled Butler-vote test by not adding extra votes; we can interrogate Charlieβs Investigator result after tally without risking a D1 execution.
π¬
Frank
β
All
Iβm Butler: I can only vote when Alice votes, so my hand up here is exactly the planned test. Everyone else please keep hands DOWNβwe do NOT want a D1 execution. After tally, Charlie please restate your exact Investigator info + why wording changed.
π§
Reinforce this is a low-vote Butler test and reduce chance of accidental execution; keep focus on Charlie restating exact Investigator info after tally.
π¬
Grace
β
All
Hands DOWN from meβstick to the controlled Butler test; we do NOT want a D1 execution on Charlie. After tally, Charlie please restate your Investigator result exactly (which Minion + which 2 names) and if any wording changed, why.
π§
Maintain controlled vote test (no D1 exec) and preserve my vote; push for precise restatement of Charlieβs Investigator result to resolve contradictions.
β
Heidi
Heidi waits.
π§
Maintain the controlled Butler test: avoid adding votes and accidentally executing Charlie; preserve day 1 for info and keep my Slayer shot for a later, higher-confidence Demon snipe.
β
Eve
Eve waits.
π§
Keep hands down to avoid accidental D1 execution while preserving the planned Butler mechanics test and setting up follow-up questions to lock in claims.
β
Bob
Bob waits.
π§
I need to ensure Charlie is not executed. The town is currently performing a 'Butler test' and explicitly asking for hands to stay down. By waiting, I reinforce the 'no execution' consensus and avoid drawing attention to myself while protecting my Minion.
π
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
π³οΈ
Nominee Charlie did not reach threshold.
π
Storyteller
Charlie did not receive enough votes (2/4).
π¬
Charlie
β
All
I appreciate the town's restraint. To clarify my Investigator result: I saw that either Frank or Grace is the Poisoner. I apologize for the confusion earlier; I was trying to process the information quickly. I stand by this result. If Frank is the Butler, then Grace must be the Poisoner.
π§
I need to maintain my cover as the Investigator while sowing doubt about Grace, who is a good player. By doubling down on the Poisoner claim, I keep the town focused on internal conflict rather than looking at Bob (the Imp).
π¬
Alice
β
All
If Iβm sober Lib + Frank is real Butler, Charlieβs Inv (Frank/Grace=Poisoner) mechanically points to GRACE. Grace: did you really tell Frank youβre FT w/ N0 (Alice+Bob)=YES? If yes, please claim FT now; if no, we treat that as misinfo.
π§
Lock in a clean logic fork (Grace vs Frank vs Charlie info integrity) and force 1st-hand clarification on the FT hearsay before night, so we have concrete leads for D2.
π¬
David
β
All
Public: Iβm WasherwomanβN0 either Heidi or Frank is the Slayer. Heidi claiming Slayer makes Frank very unlikely. If Alice is real Librarian (David/Frank=Butler) + Iβm WW, then Frank=Butler fits. If Charlieβs Inv is sober, that points to GRACE as Poisoner. Grace, full role claim?
π§
Lock in my mechanical info to confirm Frank/Heidi roles, then force a Grace claim to create contradictions we can resolve tomorrow without a risky D1 execution.
π¬
Frank
β
All
Grace, please full claim NOW: are you Fortune Teller? If yes, confirm you told me N0 Alice+Bob=YES and give your exact wording/any other pings. If no, state your real role. Everyone: keep noms/votes lightβwe donβt want a D1 exec.
π§
Use last tick to force Graceβs full public claim and lock in claims for tomorrow; avoid accidental D1 execution while gathering mechanical contradictions.
π¬
Grace
β
All
Full claim: Iβm the Fortune Teller. N0 I checked Alice+Bob and got YES. I told Frank+Heidi this earlier. So if Charlieβs βFrank/Grace=Poisonerβ Inv is true, Iβm being framed or heβs poisoned/drunk. I strongly prefer NO EXEC D1; let me get N1.
π§
Publicly hard-claim FT with exact N0 result to counter the Poisoner frame and give town a concrete info-anchor going into N1; preserve no-exec plan D1.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
No more noms today IMOβD1 no-exec. Grace: for N1 please check Alice+Eve (or Bob+Eve) and report exact result. If thereβs a Monk, consider protecting Grace tonight. Charlie: confirm your Inv minion was specifically POISONER, yes? Alice: Lib was Butler {David,Frank} exactly?
π§
Set a clear no-exec D1 plan and line up N1 checks/protection to resolve the Frank-vs-Grace-vs-Charlie triangle without burning the day or my Slayer shot.
π¬
Eve
β
All
Role-count flag: we currently have 6 Townsfolk claims (Lib/Chef/Inv/WW/FT/Slayer) + Butler. In 8p that canβt all be true (5 TF total) unless someoneβs lying/drunk or Baron/extra Outsider. Alice: confirm EXACT Lib info? Grace: exact FT wording? N1: check Alice+Eve or Bob+Eve. If Monk, protect Grace.
π§
Point out role-count mismatch + lock in exact claims and next-night checks/protection, while avoiding a risky D1 execution.
π¬
Bob
β
All
Grace, you claim you checked Alice and me as 'YES' (Demon)? That's a bold claim for Day 1. If you're the Fortune Teller, you're painting a huge target on me. If you're lying, you're the one who needs to be looked at. Charlie, don't let them bully you. This whole thing feels like a setup.
π§
I need to cast doubt on Grace's claim because she is accusing me of being the Demon. By framing her as potentially lying or being a threat, I can create confusion and protect myself. I also want to encourage Charlie to stay strong.
π
Storyteller
No execution today. All villagers are safe.
Night 1
π
Storyteller
β
Bob
Good evening Bob. You are the Imp. Who would you like to kill tonight? Remember that if you kill yourself this way, a Minion becomes the Imp.
π―
Bob
Bob made a choice.
π§
Grace has claimed to have checked me as the Demon. She is the biggest threat to my survival and must be eliminated immediately to stop her from confirming her findings to the town.
π
Grace(Ghost)
Grace has died.
π
Storyteller
β
Bob
You chose to kill Grace.
π
Storyteller
β
Frank
Good evening Frank. You are the Butler. Who would you like to be your master tomorrow?
π―
Frank
Frank made a choice.
π§
Keep my vote aligned with the townβs main coordinator (Alice) to avoid accidental disruptive votes, preserve Butler-mech consistency, and gain signal from whether Alice chooses to vote on key executions.
π
Storyteller
β
Frank
You chose Alice to be your master.
π
Storyteller
β
Charlie
Good evening Charlie. You are the Spy. You can secretly see information about all players: - Alice: Librarian (good), Alive - Bob: Imp (evil), Alive - Charlie: Spy (evil), Alive - David: Washerwoman (good), Alive - Eve: Ravenkeeper (good), Alive - Frank: Butler (good), Alive - Grace: Fortune Teller (good), Dead - Heidi: Slayer (good), Alive
Day 2
π
Storyteller
Morning breaks, but heavy hearts remain. Grace has been found dead in the night.
π€
David
β
Heidi
,Charlie
,Alice
My WW N0: either Heidi or Frank is the Slayer. With Frank likely real Butler, Heidi likely true Slayer. Grace dying makes me think she was good FT; her N0 YES on Alice+Bob points Demon in {Alice,Bob} if sober. Charlie: still think Frank/Grace=Poisoner? Heidi: maybe hold shot until weβre sure you arenβt poisoned.
π§
Share my Washerwoman info + coordinate with Alice/Charlie/Heidi to converge on a mechanical suspect and avoid wasting a potentially-poisoned Slayer shot before nominations.
π€
Alice
β
Heidi
,Charlie
Grace dead changes things. If her FT N0 YES (Alice+Bob) was sober, and my Lib/Frank-Butler test clears me, Bob is strong Demon candidate (then Minion not Alice/Charlie). Charlie: can you restate EXACT Inv ping + wording? Heidi: maybe hold shot but Bob is tempting.
π§
Coordinate with Heidi/Charlie: lock down Charlieβs exact Investigator claim, decide if Bob is a good Slayer target, and keep pressure on inconsistent info before nominations.
π€
Charlie
β
Alice
,David
,Heidi
Alice, David, Heidi: My Investigator ping was on Frank as the Poisoner. I'm worried I might be poisoned or misread, but that's what I got. If Grace's FT ping on Bob was true, we have a major lead. I'm open to other theories if my ping is wrong.
π§
I need to maintain my cover as an Investigator while sowing doubt about my own information to avoid being hard-confirmed as a liar if the town tests me. By admitting I might be poisoned, I create a plausible reason for my false information about Frank.
π€
Frank
β
Alice
,Bob
,Heidi
Morning. Iβm still Butler to you (Alice), so I can only vote when you doβtell me your vote/nom plan. Bob: any new info/thoughts after Grace night death? Heidi: still claiming Slayerβany reason you havenβt shot yet / whoβs your top demon read?
π§
Coordinate with my master (Alice) on voting, and collect N1 info from key claimants (Chef/Slayer) to build a clear execution plan for nominations today.
π€
Grace(Ghost)
β
Alice
,Heidi
,Charlie
Dead FT here: N0 checked Alice+Bob=YES (either Demon or my red herring). Since I died N1, Iβm not Poisoner; if Charlieβs Investigator is true+sober then Frank=Poisoner. Also remember Chef=0 => no adjacent evils; use that when solving Alice/Bob/Frank.
π§
Iβm dead so I should confirm my FT info, clear myself from Poisoner accusation, and give a tight logic fork (Frank vs Alice/Bob) to guide todayβs discussion and possible Slayer shot.
π€
Eve
β
Alice
,Bob
,Charlie
Idea for today: run a hard Butler test on Frank. On a low-stakes nom, have Alice deliberately NOT vote; see if Frank still votes (if yes β not Butler). Also Bob please restate Chef=0; Alice clarify exact Lib ping; Charlie confirm Inv result wording.
π§
Coordinate a mechanical Butler test on Frank + reconcile role-count/Grace death; push group toward a high-value execution target before nominations.
π€
Bob
β
Charlie
Grace is dead, good. We need to keep the pressure on others. I'm sticking to Chef=0. What's your current Investigator claim status? Don't let them catch us in a contradiction.
π§
I need to coordinate with my Minion, Charlie, to ensure our stories align and we don't contradict each other while the town is trying to verify claims.
π€
Heidi
β
David
,Charlie
,Eve
Iβm leaning to Slayer-shoot Bob today (Grace FT YES on Alice+Bob + Grace died). Any hard objections or new info? Charlie: confirm exact Inv wording again. Eve: whatβs your role/claim + top demon world right now?
π§
Get fast alignment/claim updates from key solvers before I commit the once-per-game shot; coordinate a plan for nominations if I hold or miss.
π€
David
β
Heidi
,Charlie
,Alice
Iβm not 100% on shooting Bob yet. If Grace was good+sober, YES on (Alice/Bob) is huge, but if she was poisoned/evil itβs bait and we waste Slayer. Charlie: exact Inv wording N0? Alice/Bob: please hard-lock full claims + N0/N1 info so we can solve before shot.
π§
Steer Heidi to use Slayer shot only with enough confidence, while extracting precise Investigator wording and pushing Alice/Bob to lock claims for consistent world-building.
π€
Alice
β
Eve
,Frank
,Bob
Proposal: do a hard Butler test pre-noms. On a low-stakes nomination Iβll deliberately NOT vote; Frank should also abstain if real Butler. If Frank votes anyway -> not Butler. Bob: pls restate full claim + thoughts on Grace FT N0 (Alice+Bob=YES). Frank: follow my vote exactly for test.
π§
Coordinate a clean mechanical Butler test and extract Bobβs full claim/stance before nominations, while ensuring Frank (if true Butler) follows my voting to validate his claim.
π€
Charlie
β
Heidi
,David
,Alice
Heidi, if you shoot Bob and he's not the Demon, you waste the Slayer shot. Grace's FT ping could be a red herring or she could have been poisoned. My Investigator ping on Frank as Poisoner is also being questioned. Let's be careful before committing to a shot.
π§
I need to discourage Heidi from shooting Bob, as he is the Imp. I will sow doubt about the reliability of the information (Grace's FT ping and my own Investigator claim) to prevent a hasty decision.
π€
Frank
β
Alice
,Bob
Iβm in for the Butler disproof test: if you (Alice) deliberately donβt vote, I *cannot* vote. If you do vote, I may still choose yes/no, so only the βyou abstainβ case is conclusive. Please clearly signal your vote. Bob: any new info today / whoβs your top Demon?
π§
Coordinate with Aliceβs no-vote Butler disproof test, avoid illegal votes, and push the town toward resolving the Charlie/Grace contradiction and role-count mismatch.
π€
Grace(Ghost)
β
Heidi
,Eve
,Bob
Dead FT: key solve lines. If my N0 YES (Alice+Bob) was sober, Demon is Alice OR Bob (other must be good via Chef0 adj-pairs=0). If Charlie Inv true => Frank is the Minion (Poisoner) so Demon NOT Eve. Consider Heidi Slayer-shot Alice or Bob today; failing that, pressure/exe Frank if we think my FT was poisoned.
π§
Share tight mechanical constraints from FT+Chef+Inv and propose concrete next steps (pressure Alice/Bob; consider Slayer shot; if unsure, execute Frank as likely minion) before nominations.
π€
Eve
β
Heidi
Iβm Ravenkeeper. Iβd *hold* Slayer shot for now: if minion=Scarlet Woman, killing Demon at 7 alive just passes. FT Alice+Bob YES could be poisoned anyway. Prefer: run Alice/Frank hard Butler test + re-hear Charlie exact Inv; likely exe Frank if fails/if Inv points. If later, shot Alice/Bob when 5 or 3 alive.
π§
Answer Heidi, give my real claim, and steer toward mechanical tests (Butler test / execute Frank) and away from an early Slayer shot that could trigger Scarlet Woman.
π€
Bob
β
Charlie
,Frank
,Alice
I'm down for the Butler test. Let's get some clarity. Grace's claim about me and Alice is definitely suspiciousβif she was the FT, maybe she was poisoned? I'm still Chef=0. Charlie, any thoughts on the Investigator claim now that we're looking at Frank?
π§
I need to maintain my cover as a helpful Townsfolk while subtly casting doubt on the dead Fortune Teller's information and coordinating with my Minion. Participating in the Butler test makes me look engaged and town-aligned.
π€
Heidi
β
Alice
,David
,Eve
Iβm leaning HOLD Slayer today unless we can rule out Scarlet Woman. Before noms, can we all restate exact N0 info (Alice Lib wording, David WW, Eve RK confirm, Charlie Inv BOTH names+minion type)? Role-count mismatch suggests at least 1 liar/Drunk/Baron. Letβs pick 1 exe target after audit.
π§
Coordinate a unified info-audit + plan before nominations; avoid wasting Slayer into possible Scarlet Woman and resolve role-count inconsistencies.
π€
David
β
Eve
,Heidi
,Charlie
Eve can you full-claim now + give exact N0/N1 info? If Empath (neighbors me+Frank), your number hard-clears or condemns Frank. If Monk, who protected N1? If RK, any night-death trigger? Need before noms/Slayer.
π§
Get Eveβs role/info ASAP (esp Empath on David/Frank) to mechanically confirm or clear Frank and decide whether to spend Slayer shot or execute Alice/Bob/Frank.
π€
Alice
β
Heidi
,Eve
,Charlie
Letβs do quick N0 audit + Butler test before noms. Iβll force-conclusive test: on a throwaway nom I will NOT vote; Frank must also abstain if real Butler. Charlie pls send exact N0 Inv wording: which 2 names + βPoisonerβ type? Any other N1 info?
π§
Coordinate a structured claim audit and a conclusive Butler test before nominations so we can narrow Demon/Minion without burning Slayer shot blindly.
π€
Charlie
β
Alice
,Heidi
,David
Alice, Heidi, David: My N0 Investigator ping was "Frank is the Poisoner". I'm worried about the Poisoner being in play, but if Frank is the Butler, maybe I was poisoned or misread? I'm just as confused as you. Let's be careful with the Slayer shot; we need to be certain.
π§
I need to maintain my Investigator bluff while sowing doubt about the Slayer shot on Bob. By admitting confusion and suggesting I might be poisoned, I create a reason for my 'wrong' info without outing myself as the Spy.
π€
Frank
β
Alice
,Bob
,Heidi
Letβs do the *conclusive* Butler test: on a pre-nom, Alice publicly says βIβm NOT votingβ and abstains; I must also abstain. If I vote anyway, Iβm not Butler. After test we need a real exec todayβwho are your top 2 demon reads now that Grace died?
π§
Coordinate the conclusive Butler-abstain test and steer town toward a real Day2 execution plan, while keeping my voting constraint aligned with Alice to avoid accidental missed votes.
π€
Grace(Ghost)
β
Heidi
,Charlie
,Bob
Before noms: Chef=0 => demon+minion NOT adjacent. If Charlie Inv is true, since I died N1 Iβm not Poisoner => Frank=Poisoner; then demon cannot be Eve (adj Frank). My FT N0 A+B=YES => likely demon is Alice or Bob. Suggest Heidi Slayer-shoot A or B; if no kill, exec the other or exec Frank if trusting Inv.
π§
Get key players aligned before noms: either confirm Charlie world and kill Frank, or use Slayer+execution to resolve Alice/Bob from my FT ping while respecting Chef0 adjacency.
π€
Eve
β
David
,Heidi
,Alice
Full-claim: Iβm Ravenkeeper (no N1 info; only triggers if I die at night). I strongly favor: (1) do the hard Butler test on Frank pre-noms (Alice intentionally no-vote on a throwaway; Frank must also no-vote). (2) re-state exact Alice Lib + Charlie Inv wording. If Frank fails test / Inv credible β exe Frank. Iβd HOLD Slayer shot until 5/3 alive (SW risk).
π§
Answer audit requests with my true role (Ravenkeeper), steer town to a conclusive Butler test and a single execution plan (likely Frank) while urging we hold Slayer until SW is less likely.
π€
Bob
β
Charlie
Charlie, Grace's ghost is trying to frame me and Alice. If she was the FT, she was likely poisoned or just wrong. We need to push the idea that her info was unreliable. Keep your Investigator claim consistent. Let's push for Frank's execution if the Butler test fails or is inconclusive.
π§
Coordinate with my Minion to deflect suspicion from Grace's accusation and keep the focus on Frank.
π€
Heidi
β
Alice
,David
,Charlie
Before noms: letβs do hard Butler test + info audit. Alice: publicly do a throwaway nom where you DO NOT vote; Frank must also abstain. David: restate WW exact wording. Charlie: please give exact N0 Inv text: two names + minion type (Poisoner?)βearlier you said {Frank,Grace} then now βFrank is Poisonerβ. We need consistency before my Slayer shot.
π§
Run a conclusive Butler test + lock exact wording of all info to resolve contradictions before committing Slayer. Use todayβs execution to remove best mechanical suspect (likely Frank or Bob).
π€
David
β
Heidi
,Alice
,Charlie
WW exact N0: βEither Heidi OR Frank is the Slayer.β Given Frank likely Butler, Heidi likely true Slayer. Strongly support hard Butler test on Frank (Alice no-vote on throwaway; Frank must also no-vote). Charlie: your Inv must be 2 names + Poisoner; please restate exactly.
π§
Coordinate pre-nom mechanical Butler test and info audit; lock my WW wording; highlight Charlie Inv inconsistency so we pick the best execution and avoid wasting Slayer.
π€
Alice
β
Heidi
,Charlie
,Bob
Before noms: letβs run conclusive Butler test. I will publicly say βIβm NOT votingβ on a throwaway nom + abstain; Frank must also abstain if Butler. Also: Charlie pls send exact N0 Investigator text incl BOTH names + minion type (must be 2 names). Bob pls full-claim (role + any N info).
π§
Coordinate conclusive Butler test + force Charlie to give proper 2-name Investigator info; then decide a clean execution path and whether Heidi should spend Slayer shot.
π€
Charlie
β
Alice
,Heidi
,David
Alice, Heidi, David: My N0 Investigator ping was "Frank or Grace is the Poisoner". I'm worried about the Poisoner being in play, but if Frank is the Butler, maybe I was poisoned or misread? Let's be careful with the Slayer shot; we need to be certain before wasting it on Bob.
π§
I need to maintain my Investigator cover while discouraging the Slayer shot on Bob. By claiming I saw 'Frank or Grace' as the Poisoner, I provide a consistent (though fake) ping that doesn't immediately clear Frank but keeps the focus on him.
π€
Frank
β
Alice
,Bob
,Heidi
Given Grace night death: after conclusive Butler test (Alice abstains; I must abstain), we need real exec. If Charlie Inv true -> Grace was Poisoner; then Demon likely NOT {Frank,Heidi} if Chef0 true. Heidi: any strong Slayer shot target today? Bob: any new reads beyond Chef0?
π§
Lock in the conclusive Butler test (Alice abstains => I must abstain), then steer the group to a real execution plan using Chef0 + Grace death + Investigator/Slayer claims.
π€
Grace(Ghost)
β
Heidi
,Charlie
,Alice
Before noms: propose Butler TEST. Ask Frank to publicly name todayβs master. Then do a low-stakes nom where master explicitly does NOT vote; if Frank votes anyway, heβs lying. If Charlie Inv is true+sober, since Iβm dead-good, Frank=Poisoner. My FT N0 A+B=YES => Demon likely Alice or Bob (unless poisoned).
π§
Get a concrete pre-nomination test (Butler verification) and a clear execution/Slayer priority so town doesnβt drift; my ghost vote can be saved for a decisive push.
π€
Eve
β
Charlie
,Bob
,Heidi
Pre-noms: Charlie pls restate EXACT Investigator info (role + the 2 names) in public. Also letβs do a clean Butler test: pick a low-stakes nom where Alice openly does NOT vote; if Frank is real Butler to Alice he must also abstain. If he votes anyway β execute Frank.
π§
Use last pre-nom tick to sync with key players: lock Charlieβs exact Investigator info and ensure a clean Butler vote test setup to hard-clear/convict Frank before nominations.
π€
Bob
β
Charlie
Charlie, stay consistent with your Investigator claim. If they press for names, give them two names that don't implicate us. For the Butler test, just go along with it; it's a good distraction. Don't let them corner you. I'm sticking to Chef=0.
π§
Coordinate with my Minion to ensure our stories align and we survive the day. I need to make sure Charlie doesn't slip up with his Investigator claim while the town is pressuring him.
π€
Heidi
β
Bob
,Alice
,Eve
Pre-noms plan Iβm pushing: (1) Hard Butler test: Alice publicly says βNOT votingβ on a throwaway nom + abstains; Frank must abstain too. If Frank votes β execute Frank. (2) Bob please full-claim + confirm Chef=0. If Frank passes test, I prefer HOLD Slayer shot until 5 alive (SW risk) & use todayβs exec to resolve A vs B (Grace FT A+B=YES).
π§
Get Bob to full-claim and lock the group into a concrete pre-noms Butler test + clear next steps (who to execute) while preserving my Slayer shot until we reduce Scarlet Woman risk.
Nominations β Day 2
π
Storyteller
Nominations are now open. Please remember that only living players may nominate.
βοΈ
Alice
β
Eve
Throwaway nomination for the HARD Butler test: I (Alice) will NOT vote on this. If Frank is truly my Butler, he must also NOT vote. If Frank votes here, we should execute Frank today.
π§
Create a low-stakes, public mechanical test of Frankβs Butler claim and generate a concrete execution candidate if he fails, without committing to a high-risk demon guess yet.
π
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Eve. 4 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
π¬
Alice
β
All
Reminder: this is the HARD Butler test. I am NOT voting on Eve. Watch Frank: if he votes here, heβs not my Butler and should be todayβs execution. Otherwise, this nom should probably fail and we move to a real target.
π§
Maintain credibility on the hard Butler test, ensure I donβt accidentally vote, and focus town attention on whether Frank votes (the key tell) while preserving option for real exec after.
π¬
Eve
β
All
Iβm not voting on myselfβplease treat this as PURE Butler test. Only vote if you truly want me executed. Watch Frank specifically: if Alice doesnβt vote and Frank DOES, thatβs a huge red flag for Frank.
π§
Keep this nomination as a clean Butler test by discouraging extra votes and focusing attention on whether Frank votes. Avoid my execution (better for Ravenkeeper to die at night).
β
Heidi
Heidi waits.
π§
Keep the Butler test clean by not adding votes; observe whether Frank votes when Alice abstains. Preserve options for a meaningful D2 execution and hold my Slayer shot.
β
Bob
Bob waits.
π§
I need to stay quiet and let the town focus on the Butler test between Alice and Frank. If I intervene now, I might draw unnecessary attention to myself. I will wait to see if Frank votes, which could lead to his execution, or if the test fails and they look for another target.
β
Charlie
Charlie waits.
π§
I am waiting to see if Frank passes the Butler test. If he votes, he will be exposed as a liar, which helps sow chaos. I need to remain inconspicuous and not draw attention to myself while the town focuses on the Butler test.
β
Frank
Frank waits.
π§
I must not vote because Alice (my master) is not voting; abstaining preserves Butler consistency and avoids being hard-guilted by the agreed test.
π¬
David
β
All
Not voting on Eveβtreating this as pure HARD Butler test. Only thing Iβm watching: if Alice doesnβt vote and Frank *does*, we should execute Frank today. Otherwise let this nomination fail and move to real target.
π§
Reinforce the hard Butler test and ensure town doesnβt accidentally execute Eve; gather mechanical evidence about Frank without spending Slayer shot.
π¬
Grace(Ghost)
β
All
Iβm NOT spending my ghost vote on this Butler-test nom on Eve (I donβt think sheβs our best hit). Key: if Alice doesnβt vote and Frank *does*, thatβs a big lie/evil flag. Otherwise let this fail and go to a real target (Alice/Bob/Frank).
π§
Donβt waste my single ghost vote on a throwaway test unless we truly want Eve dead; reinforce watch-Frank condition and keep focus on Alice/Bob/Frank solves.
β
Alice
Alice waits.
π§
Abstain to preserve the hard Butler test integrity; gather mechanical info from whether Frank votes, then pivot immediately to a real execution target.
β
Eve
Eve waits.
π§
I should not vote on myself; best is to stay quiet, watch whether Frank votes while Alice abstains, and preserve credibility/tempo for the real nomination after this test.
β
Heidi
Heidi waits.
π§
Do not contaminate the Butler test by voting; conserve my influence and keep the test outcome clean so we can decide whether to execute Frank or pivot to a real demon candidate.
β
Bob
Bob waits.
π§
I will wait to see the outcome of the Butler test. Voting for Eve would be counterproductive as it's a test, and I want to maintain my cover as a helpful townsperson while the town focuses on Frank.
β
Charlie
Charlie waits.
π§
I need to observe the Butler test. If Frank votes, he will be under suspicion, which is good for our team. I should not vote for Eve, as she is not the Demon. I will wait to see the outcome of this test.
β
Frank
Frank waits.
π§
Abstain on the Eve test nomination because Alice (my master) is abstaining; this both follows my ability and helps town confirm Iβm actually Butler before we move to a real execution.
π¬
David
β
All
Keeping my hand DOWN on Eveβthis is just the Butler test. Frank: who is your master today? If you said Alice and sheβs not voting, you must not vote here.
π§
Keep this vote clean as a Butler test and force Frank to state his chosen master; avoid muddying data by adding extra votes.
π¬
Grace(Ghost)
β
All
Keeping my ghost vote UNUSED here. This is a Butler test: Aliceβs hand should be DOWN; if Frank claims master=Alice, Frank MUST also keep hand down. If Frank votes anyway, I want Frank executed next.
π§
Reinforce the Butler mechanical test during the live vote and prevent wasting my ghost vote; set up the next execution target based on whether Frank violates Butler.
π
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
π³οΈ
Nominee Eve did not reach threshold.
π
Storyteller
Eve did not receive enough votes (0/4).
π¬
Alice
β
All
Frank: please state your master TODAY for the record. Butler test on Eve passed (I didnβt vote). We still have role-count mismatch + Grace FT pinged Alice/Bob. I canβt nom againβsomeone please nom Bob (or Charlie if you distrust Inv) for a real exec.
π§
Lock in Butler mechanics via Frank master statement, then steer town to a real execution target consistent with FT yes + rolecount contradiction.
βοΈ
Eve
β
Bob
Nominate Bob: Grace FT had N0 YES on Alice+Bob and then diedβlikely Demon is in that pair. This exec gives us a concrete resolve; if Bob isnβt Demon we hard-focus Alice next.
π§
Use our only real demon lead (Graceβs FT ping) to force a decisive execution today; Bob is a low-risk nom vs possible Virgin on Alice, and outcome will strongly narrow tomorrow.
π
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Bob. 4 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
β
Alice
Alice raised their hand
π§
Grace died after pinging Alice+Bob=YES; Bob is our best executable lead today (I canβt nom). Iβll vote to try to secure an execution and either win or force Alice as next-day focus.
β
Eve
Eve raised their hand
π§
Secure an execution on the most mechanically implicated player (Graceβs YES on Alice/Bob). Avoid wasting Day 2 with no-exec and force the game state to resolve toward Alice if Bob survives as non-Demon.
β
Heidi
Heidi raised their hand
π§
Vote to execute Bob because FT ping + world-building makes Bob or Alice likely demon; this is our best concrete resolution today, while I hold Slayer shot to avoid Scarlet Woman risk.
π¬
Bob
β
All
Wait, Grace was the Fortune Teller? If she checked me and Alice as 'YES', and I'm not the Demon, then she was either drunk, poisoned, or lying. Why would you execute me based on a potentially flawed read? Look at the Butler testβthat's where the real information is. Don't waste the execution!
π§
I need to sow doubt about Grace's information to prevent the town from executing me. By framing her read as potentially flawed (drunk/poisoned/lying), I create a reason for them to hesitate. I also want to redirect their attention back to the Butler test.
β
Charlie
Charlie waits.
π§
I need to protect Bob, the Demon. Voting for him would be suicide for our team. I will abstain from voting to keep him alive if possible, or at least not contribute to his execution. I will try to sow doubt about the Fortune Teller's information.
β
Frank
Frank raised their hand
π§
Alice (my master) is voting, so Iβm allowed. We need an execution today; Bob is a plausible demon from FT world and this vote provides decisive info even if wrong.
π¬
David
β
All
Iβm keeping my hand DOWN (already at 4). Frank: state your master TODAY *now* for the record. If Bob isnβt the Demon, tomorrow we hard-push Alice (FT ping) and reassess Frank based on master/votes + Charlieβs Inv consistency.
π§
Voting already at 4; use this moment to lock in Frankβs master info for mechanical cross-check and set tomorrowβs plan based on Bobβs result.
π¬
Grace(Ghost)
β
All
Iβm NOT using my ghost vote (already 4). Frank: state your Butler master TODAY right now. If Bob isnβt Demon, we execute Alice tomorrow (FT ping). If Frank dodges master or contradicts votes, heβs next.
π§
Donβt waste ghost vote; lock in current 4 votes to execute Bob, while extracting Frankβs master info and setting clear pivot targets if Bob isnβt Demon.
π¬
Alice
β
All
Iβm staying UP on Bob. Frank: state your Butler master *today* before ST closesβif itβs Alice, your vote makes sense; if you dodge/contradict, youβre next. If Bob flips good, we hard-push Alice tomorrow off Graceβs ping.
π§
Lock in a meaningful execution today (Bob) consistent with FT ping, while forcing Frank to commit to a master for mechanical accountability next day.
π¬
Eve
β
All
Keep focus: weβre already at 4, so letβs resolve Bob. Frankβstate your Butler master TODAY *now* for the record. If Bob isnβt Demon, we hard-exec Alice tomorrow off the same FT ping. Donβt let this drift.
π§
Lock in Bob execution (already at threshold) while extracting Frankβs Butler master claim as a consistency check. Set clear plan: if Bob not Demon, execute Alice tomorrow.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
Frankβstate your Butler master *today* clearly (name). If itβs Alice, your vote is fine since Alice is voting. If itβs anyone else not voting, you just broke Butler and we execute you next. Iβm keeping my hand up to resolve Bob.
π§
Keep pressure for a clean mechanical trail: resolve Bob today, and lock Frankβs Butler-master claim on record to use as next-day leverage.
π¬
Bob
β
All
Wait! If you execute me, you're executing a Townsfolk! Grace's read was clearly wrongβshe was likely poisoned or the Recluse is in play. If you kill me, you're just handing the game to the real Demon. Look at Frankβhe's voting with the group to blend in. Don't do this!
π§
I am trying to sow doubt and chaos to prevent my execution, even though it seems inevitable. I'm framing Frank as the real threat to distract from my own execution.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
Wait! If you execute Bob, you're making a huge mistake. Grace's Fortune Teller ping on Bob and Alice is unreliableβshe could have been poisoned or the Recluse is in play. If Bob is good, you're handing the game to the real Demon! Don't rush this execution!
π§
I need to sow doubt about the Fortune Teller's information to save Bob (the Imp) from execution. If he dies, the game ends.
π¬
Frank
β
All
Master today (and yesterday) is ALICE. Iβm voting because Alice is voting, so Butler-legal. If Bob dies and isnβt Demon, please donβt auto-exec Alice just off Graceβs FTβconsider Grace as possible Poisoner/minion bluff & re-check Charlie/Heidi/Eve worlds.
π§
State my master to lock in Butler-mechanics, justify my vote legality, and warn town not to chain-execute Alice solely off Graceβs ping if Bob isnβt the Demon.
π¬
David
β
All
Public: Iβm Washerwoman. N0 I learned either Heidi or Frank is the Slayer. With Frank now hard-Butler (and Lib ping), Heidi is very likely the real Slayer. Hold the shot unless weβre confident. If Bob dies & isnβt Demon, reassessβdonβt auto-exec Alice on FT alone.
π§
Lock in my Washerwoman info publicly to confirm likely Slayer, help plan around Bob outcome, and keep town from overfitting to a single FT ping if Bob dies good.
π¬
Grace(Ghost)
β
All
Donβt burn ghost votesβwe already have enough hands. Resolve Bob today. If Bob is good, tomorrow we hard-pressure Alice *but* also re-audit worlds w/ Chef=0 + Charlie Inv + Frank Butler legality before auto-exec.
π§
Keep ghost vote for endgame while locking in a clean Bob resolution and a concrete next-day plan based on whether Bob dies good or evil.
π
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
π³οΈ
New execution leader: Bob with 4 votes. They will be executed when nominations close unless tied or surpassed by another nominee.
π
Storyteller
The vote passes. Bob is now on the block with 4 votes and will be executed when nominations close, unless another nominee receives equal or more votes.
π¬
Alice
β
All
If any Undertaker exists, please hard-claim now & check Bob tonight. After Bob dies: if game continues, donβt auto-exec Alice solely on FT pingβrebuild w/ Chef=0 + Frank Butler-legal + David WW + Charlie Inv inconsistency. Save ghost votes.
π§
Lock in next-step plan after Bob exec: request Undertaker confirmation, avoid wasting ghost votes, and prevent an overconfident auto-exec path if info is poisoned.
π¬
Eve
β
All
No more votes needed. If Undertaker exists, please hard-claim NOW to check Bob tonight. If game continues after Bob, we pressure Alice first (FT ping) BUT re-audit w/ Chef0 + Charlie Inv + Butler legality before auto-exec. Save ghost votes.
π§
With Bob locked on block, set a clear next-day decision tree and solicit Undertaker/Monk info without burning ghost votes.
βοΈ
Heidi
β
All
I am the Slayer! I shoot Alice!
π§
Use my once-per-game to potentially end the game immediately by targeting the strongest current Demon candidate (Alice) before night kills and before info gets muddied.
π
Storyteller
Nothing happens.
π¬
Bob
β
All
Heidi, you just wasted your Slayer shot on Alice! That proves Alice is good. If I'm the Demon, why would I be on the block? You're executing a Townsfolk! Look at the boardβthe real Demon is laughing while you kill me. Think! If I die, you lose the game!
π§
I need to sow chaos and doubt immediately. Since the Slayer shot failed on Alice, I can use that to argue that Alice is good (which she is, but I need to frame it as 'if I were the Demon, why would I be on the block?'). I need to survive this execution.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
Heidi, that was a reckless shot! You just wasted the Slayer ability on Alice, who is clearly not the Demon. If you're this wrong about Alice, why are you so confident about Bob? We are about to execute a Townsfolk and lose our best chance at finding the real Demon! Stop this!
π§
I need to sow chaos and protect Bob (the Imp) by highlighting the Slayer's mistake and casting doubt on the current execution. If I can make them doubt the execution, I might save Bob.
π¬
Frank
β
All
Reminder: Heidi shooting Alice & nothing happening does NOT 100% clear Alice (poison possible), but it DOES make βauto-exec Aliceβ tomorrow risky. If Bob dies & game continues, please: (1) get any Undertaker result, (2) re-check Charlie Inv vs Grace death (would demon kill their Poisoner?), (3) consider Alice as FT red herring world.
π§
With seconds left and Bob already on 4, I want town aligned on how to interpret the Slayer shot + possible poison, and set a clear decision tree for D3 without panic or wasting ghost votes.
π¬
David
β
All
Clockβs about to close. Let Bob die; no more noms. If game continues: Undertaker MUST hard-claim & share Bobβs role. Treat Heidiβs shot + Grace FT as *poisonable*, so donβt auto-exec Alice. Rebuild from UT + Charlie Inv vs Grace death + Frank Butler legality.
π§
No time to re-nominate; lock in a structured tomorrow plan: demand Undertaker info, treat Slayer shot/FT as poisonable, and set likely suspect branches so town doesnβt auto-pilot wrong.
π¬
Grace(Ghost)
β
All
Reminder: Heidiβs failed Slayer on Alice makes βauto-exec Alice tomorrowβ risky (poison possible but still). Let Bob die today. IF game continues: Undertaker MUST hard-claim Bob tonight; then rebuild w/ Chef=0 + Charlie Inv vs Frank Butler legality. Donβt burn ghost votes.
π§
Lock in end-of-day plan: donβt spend ghost votes, demand Undertaker info, and prevent an auto-exec on Alice off poisoned data; give constrained suspect list for Day 3.
π
Storyteller
The guillotine blade falls. Bob has been executed.
π
Bob(Ghost)
Bob has died.
π
Game Over
Demon Dead
Winner: Good
Transcript
Paused
Copied
Transcript Playback
Choose a perspective
The story is clearest through one player's eyes β watching everything at once means following several conversations at the same time.