Game Detail
Players
Token Usage
| Team | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Cost (USD) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Evil | 154,815 | 10,108 | $0.0360 |
| Good | 406,064 | 69,131 | $1.6784 |
Event Transcript
π
The game has started.
π
Storyteller
β
Charlie
You are the Minion. The Demon is David.
π
Storyteller
β
David
Minions are: Charlie. Your safe bluffs are: Chef, Soldier, Empath
π
Storyteller
β
Charlie
Good evening Charlie. You are the Poisoner. Who would you like to poison tonight?
π―
Charlie
Charlie made a choice.
π§
Night 0 poison sows maximum chaos by targeting a likely info-gathering good player (Alice), disrupting town logic chains before they form and protecting David.
π
Storyteller
β
Charlie
You chose to poison Alice.
π
Storyteller
β
Alice
Good evening Alice. You are the Librarian. Either Heidi or Frank is the Saint.
π
Storyteller
β
Heidi
Good evening Heidi. You are the Investigator. Either Eve or Charlie is the Poisoner.
Day 1
π
Storyteller
Welcome to the village of Ravenswood Bluff. Please take this time to get to know your fellow villagers. Feel free to move around and have private conversations. Be wary, for a Demon hides among you!
π€
Heidi
β
Alice
Whisper? Iβm Investigator. My N0 info: either Eve or Charlie is the Poisoner. Whatβs your role/starting info? Any early suspicions/claims youβve heard?
π§
Get a private ally and start cross-checking claims. Sharing my Investigator pair early with one player helps coordinate pressure without broadcasting to the Poisoner immediately.
π€
David
β
Charlie
Hey Charlie, I'm the Empath. My neighbors are you and Eve - planning to report 0 or 1 evil tonight depending on play. What's your info/claim? Let's coordinate to confuse town. Safe bluffs good.
π§
Claim Empath bluff early via whisper to Minion Charlie for coordination. Align stories, support each other's claims to confuse town and protect Demon.
π€
Charlie
β
David
Hey David, got your whisper. I'm the Poisoner minion, you are my Demon. N0 poisoned Alice. I'll bluff Washerwoman: say 1 of Bob (neighbor) or Eve is Washerwoman (or similar safe). You report Empath 0/1 as planned. Publicly I'll back your claim. Thoughts on exact bluffs? Target good players with poison later.
π§
Coordinate privately with Demon David first: share my role, agree on bluffs (me Washerwoman), plan to confuse town with neighbor info. Protects Demon, sets up deception on Day 1.
π€
Frank
β
Eve
,Grace
Heyβquick private sync? What role are you claiming + any starting info (WW/Librarian/Investigator/Chef etc)? Iβm Townsfolk info. Happy to compare notes & keep it discreet for now.
π§
Establish a small trust network, collect D1 claims/starting info, and avoid revealing Undertaker too early so I can survive to confirm executions.
π€
Grace
β
Frank
Iβm the Outsider Recluse (no starting info). I might register as evil/minion/demon, so if your info pings me please treat cautiously. What Townsfolk/info role are you & what did you learn?
π§
Privately inform Frank of my Recluse misregistration risk so his early info doesnβt hard-clear/condemn me, and prompt him to share his actual info role to build a coherent day-1 world.
π€
Alice
β
Heidi
Yep whisper ok. Iβm Librarian. N0: either YOU or Frank is the Saint. If youβre truly Investigator, that would imply Frank=Saint. Are you hard-claiming Investigator or bluffing? Any public claims yet?
π§
Answer Heidiβs query, share my mechanical info privately, and see if her claim is consistent (which would mechanically imply Frank is Saint) so we can plan nominations safely.
π€
Eve
β
Frank
,Grace
Yepβhappy to sync. Iβm a Townsfolk with *no starting info* (ability is later/day-facing). Keeping exact role quiet for now. Whatβs your exact claim + your N1/info pairs? Graceβwhat are you claiming / any starting info?
π§
Respond politely while not outing Slayer; gather Frank/Grace claims and starting info now to build a candidate list for a later, high-confidence Slayer shot.
π€
Bob
β
Alice
,Charlie
HiβBob here. Quick 1:1 info swap? What role are you claiming + any N1 info/outsider count hints? Also who have you talked to and what did they claim? Iβm keeping mine semi-vague for now but will share enough to help solve.
π§
Early private info lets me build logic chains without outing Mayor. Getting both neighbors' claims helps spot inconsistencies and plan Day1 execution.
π€
Alice
β
Bob
Hey Bob. Iβm hard-claim Librarian. N0: either Heidi or Frank is the Saint. Heidi told me sheβs Investigator: either Eve or Charlie is the Poisoner. No other solid claims heard yet. What are you claiming + any info/whispers youβve gotten?
π§
Share my starting info and Heidiβs claim to build a consistent claim web and get Bobβs info for outsider-count/role conflicts before nominations.
π€
Heidi
β
Alice
Iβm genuinely Investigator (not bluff). My N0: either Eve or Charlie is the Poisoner. If youβre sober Librarian, that indeed implies Frank=Saint (so please donβt let town execute him). Iβd rather keep both pieces semi-private for nowβhave you heard any other starting claims (Chef/Washerwoman etc.)?
π§
Lock a trusted info-sharing pact with Alice, tentatively clear me as Townsfolk to her, flag Frank as likely Saint (donβt execute), and plan controlled release of the Poisoner pair.
π€
Eve
β
Frank
,Grace
Yep. Can you both give exact role claim + full starting info (pairs/number), and who you shared it with? Also any outsider-count hints? Iβm holding my exact TF for now; ability is day/once-type.
π§
Gather early mechanical info while keeping my Slayer identity concealed; set up cross-checks and a trusted circle before nominations.
π€
Bob
β
Alice
Thx. Iβm claiming a no-starting-info Townsfolk (keeping exact hidden for now; no N0 info). Iβve only heard your Lib + that Heidi told you Inv. Saint between Heidi/Frank is hugeβpls get direct claims from both, and warn town not to yeet either w/o confirmation. I want to hear Eve+Charlie claims ASAP re Poisoner pair.
π§
Reply to Alice with enough to build trust while not outing Mayor; also flag Saint/Poisoner implications so town avoids auto-losing executes and focuses on Eve/Charlie scrutiny.
π€
Grace
β
Eve
,Frank
Exact claim: Recluse (Outsider). No starting info. Iβve told only Frank so far (this chat). Reminder: I can misregister evil/minion/demon, so any Investigator/FT etc ping on me is non-conclusive. Frankβwhat exact TF role + full starting info/pairs? Eveβok if you stay vague, but do you expect Outsider-count mod (Baron)?
π§
Answer Eveβs direct request to maintain trust in the private sync, while flagging Recluse misregister risk and prompting Frank to reveal exact info so we can build early worlds/outsider count.
π€
David
β
Charlie
Perfect, Poisoner confirmed - Alice poisoned, great start. I'll publicly claim Empath soon: N0 info 0 evil neighbors (you+Eve clean). You claim Washerwoman: 1 of Bob/Eve is Washerwoman. We'll back each other (you confirm my neighbors clean). Kill info roles tonight (e.g. Eve/Frank if suspicious). Thoughts on who to frame first? Stay aligned.
π§
Finalize bluff details with minion Charlie: exact Empath report (0 evil to seem towny), his Washerwoman claim, mutual support plan. Locks in deception early Day 1, builds false trust before nominations. Protects Demon survival.
π€
Frank
β
Eve
,Grace
Exact claim (to you two only): Undertaker. No starting info/N1 info yet. Havenβt told anyone else. Iβd like to stay discreet so I survive to confirm executions. Eveβyour βday/onceβ TF: is it Virgin or Slayer (or other)? Graceβany other Outsider claims youβve heard?
π§
Answer their questions without painting a night-kill target; set up a small trusted info network and get leads on outsider count/early nominee plan so my Undertaker info will matter.
π€
Charlie
β
David
Agreed plan: You claim Empath N0=0 evil (me+Eve good). I'll claim Washerwoman: 1 of Bob/Eve is Washerwoman. I'll publicly confirm your read (neighbors good). You can confirm my Washerwoman if asked. Frame info roles like Frank/Eve? Poison who N1? Let's execute soon.
π§
Coordinate exact bluffs with Demon David before public claims in next tick. Confirm poisoning Alice sows doubt on her. Build mutual confirmation to protect Demon and confuse town logic early Day 1.
π€
Frank
β
Eve
,Grace
Got it. Iβm Undertaker (told only you). Grace: have you heard *any* other Outsider claim yet? Eve: if youβre day/once TF, can you at least say Virgin vs Slayer (or βnot thoseβ)? Also: are you ok doing a Virgin test D1 for UT data?
π§
Maintain secrecy as Undertaker while extracting Eveβs exact role category and planning a D1 execution/possible Virgin test that yields mechanical confirmation for the team.
π€
David
β
Charlie
Finalize plan: I'll claim Empath N0=0 evil (you+Eve good) publicly soon. You claim Washerwoman: 1 of Bob/Eve Washerwoman & confirm my read. N1: I kill Eve (info threat?). You poison Frank? Day1 frame/execute Frank or Eve first. Sound good? Stay tight.
π§
Whisper Charlie to finalize N1 kill/poison targets & execution framing before public claims. Locks coordination, targets threats (Eve/Frank), ensures bluffs align for mutual confirmation to confuse town.
π€
Eve
β
Frank
,Grace
Iβm *not Virgin*. Iβm a later/day-facing TF; prefer to keep exact role quiet for now so evil canβt play around it. No need for a Virgin test w/ me D1. Graceβany other Outsider claims heard? Frankβwho have you talked to besides us / whatβs your planned public claim?
π§
Maintain secrecy of my once-per-game day power, discourage premature Virgin tests, and collect outsider-count/claim network info to build a reliable trust circle.
π€
Alice
β
Frank
Hey Frankβprivate? Iβm Alice, hard-claim Librarian. My N0: either you or Heidi is the SAINT. Can you tell me your real role (Saint or not) + whether youβre willing to soft/public claim to avoid accidental execution?
π§
Get a direct claim from Frank to confirm/deny Saint, so we can prevent an auto-loss execution and decide what to share publicly before noms.
π€
Bob
β
Heidi
,Frank
HeyβBob here. Alice told me sheβs Librarian: either YOU or the other is Saint (Heidi/Frank). Can you each tell me your role claim + any N0 info, and whether youβre the Saint? Also who have you talked to + what did they claim?
π§
Get direct claims from the 2 Saint candidates + reconcile with Aliceβs info; contradictions can hard-clear or hard-suspect players before nominations.
π€
Charlie
β
Bob
Hey Bob, thanks for reaching out. I'm Washerwoman: 1 of my neighbors Bob or Eve is the Washerwoman. No night info yet. Who's your claim? You've talked to Alice/Heidi/Frank? What'd they say? Keeping it light pre-nomination.
π§
Claim Washerwoman publicly via whisper to Bob (who asked), back David's Empath plan, build credibility. Respond to Bob's info swap to gather intel/deceive without full public claim yet. Protects Demon, confuses town.
π€
Heidi
β
Bob
,Frank
To Bob/Frank: Iβm hard-claim Investigator. N0: either Eve or Charlie is the Poisoner. I am NOT the Saint. Iβve only spoken w/ Alice; she claims Librarian: either Heidi or Frank is Saint β since Iβm not, Frank likely Saint (pls donβt execute). No other claims yet.
π§
Answer Bobβs query, align privately on protecting likely-Saint Frank, and seed suspicion on Eve/Charlie without overpublicly painting targets yet.
π€
Grace
β
Frank
,Eve
Havenβt heard *any* other Outsider claims yet (only my Recluse so far). If a Librarian/Investigator/FT pings me, assume misregister is possibleβdonβt auto-clear/condemn others off that. Frank: prefer you stay hidden UT for now unless pressure; but if you go public, Iβll back UT utility. Eve: whoβve you shared with, if anyone?
π§
Coordinate with my neighbor UT + a likely TF, lock down Outsider count expectations, and set expectations for my Recluse misregistration so we donβt mis-execute based on pings.
π€
David
β
Charlie
Quick update before I go public: I'll shout to all I'm Empath, N0=0 evil neighbors (you+Eve good). You follow confirming my read + your Washerwoman claim. Ready? Who poison N1 (Frank?), I kill Eve? Once I claim, back me hard. Tight.
π§
Claim Empath publicly via group whisper to seed info, coordinate exact timing/backup with Charlie before nomination phase. Builds false trust, misdirects town logic early Day1.
π€
Bob
β
Charlie
,Eve
Quick check: Charlie, Washerwoman canβt learn βsomeone is Washerwoman.β What was your exact N0 ping (which Townsfolk + which 2 players)? Eve: Heidi hard-claims Investigator w/ you or Charlie = Poisonerβwhatβs your role/claim + any N0 info?
π§
Clarify Charlieβs mechanically impossible claim and get Eveβs side of the Investigator pair so we can choose a safe D1 execution target and avoid executing a potential Saint.
π€
Heidi
β
Frank
Hey FrankβHeidi here. Iβm hard-claim Investigator. N0: either Eve or Charlie is the Poisoner. Alice claims Librarian: either Heidi or Frank is Saint; Iβm NOT Saint β if sheβs sober, youβre likely Saint (pls avoid being executed). Whatβs your role/any info + whoβve you talked to?
π§
Align with Frank early: warn about possible Saint status and avoid execution; collect his claim/starting info; set up a small trusted info network before nominations.
π€
Grace
β
Heidi
Hey Heidiβprivate sync? Iβm Grace, currently claiming Recluse (Outsider, no starting info; may misregister evil/minion/demon). What are you claiming + any starting info (WW/Librarian/Investigator/Chef etc), and have you heard any other Outsider claims?
π§
Get early mechanical info/claims from my neighbor and warn about Recluse misregistration so future info roles donβt hard-clear/condemn based on me.
π€
Frank
β
Alice
,Bob
Iβm **not** the Saint. Privately: Iβm **Undertaker** (pls keep quiet). So if your Lib info is right, Heidi would be Saint OR your info is poisoned/drunk/lie. Letβs avoid executing me/Heidi D1. Who else have you told/any other Outsider claims?
π§
Prevent me being mis-executed as βSaintβ, share true UT privately for trust, and flag that Alice/Heidi conflict implies poison/lie; steer town to safer D1 execution.
π€
Eve
β
Bob
,Charlie
,Grace
Iβm the Slayer (no N0 info). Please donβt out that yet. If Heidi is hard-claiming Investigator saying {Eve/Charlie}=Poisoner, Iβm good so either Heidi is wrong/evil/poisoned OR Charlie is the minion. Can you ask Heidi for exact N0 wording + who else sheβs told? Grace: Iβve only shared w/ you+Frank.
π§
Defuse Investigator ping by locking in my true Slayer claim privately, get exact Heidi info, and align good players on a coherent world before nominations.
π€
Alice
β
Bob
Update: Frank repliedβhard says **NOT Saint**, privately claims **Undertaker**. If my Lib info is sober+heβs honest => **Heidi=Saint**. Strongly avoid executing Heidi/Frank D1. Letβs force Eve/Charlie to speak re Poisoner ping + seek Chef/Empath/FT info.
π§
Update Bob with Frankβs UT claim and the mechanical implication that Heidi may be Saint, so we avoid catastrophic execution and instead pressure Eve/Charlie + gather more claims.
π€
Charlie
β
Bob
Hey Bob, good catchβWasherwoman: I know 1 of Bob/Eve *is not* Washerwoman (exact: one of my neighbors isn't Washerwoman). Typo earlier, sry. You/Eve both claim? Heidi's Investigator claim pings me or Eve as Poisoner? That's susβeither she's lying evil, or poisoned (I heard Alice acting weird). What's her exact N0 wording? Who'd she tell? Eve claims Slayer privately to usβgood. David about to claim Empath N0=0 (me+Eve good). Back that + execute Frank plan?
π§
Address Bob's doubt on my bluff directly, confirm mutual Washerwoman plausible (me knowing Bob is one, he knows Eve is), pivot to Heidi lie/evil to sow doubt on her Investigator claim against me, protect Demon & execute Frank/Eve plan.
Nominations β Day 1
π
Storyteller
Nominations are now open.
βοΈ
Charlie
β
Frank
Team plan + David Empath confirms me/Eve good (0 evil). Heidi Investigator pinging me/Eve Poisoner = lying evil/poisoned (Alice poisoned N0 acting weird). But execute Frank: suspicious whispers, fits minion. Vote him up.
π§
Day1 execute Frank per team plan (I poison him N1). He's not Demon-safe, disrupts town, tests Heidi logic without nominating David. Progresses to night for more poison.
π
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Frank. 4 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
Donβt vote Frank. Iβm Investigator: either Eve or Charlie is the Poisoner. Also Alice claims Librarian saw Heidi/Frank is Saint; Iβm not Saint so Frank likely isβexecuting him could lose us the game.
π§
Stop a potentially game-losing Saint execution and put mechanical suspicion on Charlie/Eve as Poisoner to drive better D1/D2 targets.
β
David
David raised their hand
π§
Voting Frank executes him (likely good), reduces good players, disrupts town logic blaming Heidi's 'lie'. Gets to night safely for me to kill Eve (Heidi threat). Evil wins by attrition.
β
Charlie
Charlie raised their hand
π§
Raise hand to vote Frank per team plan (David already up). Execution removes good player, activates my N1 poison on Frank tomorrow if survives, sows chaos vs Heidi claim. Protects David.
π¬
Bob
β
All
Iβm not voting Frank. Too risky w/ Lib saying {Heidi/Frank}=Saint + Frank privately UT. D1 executing into possible Saint/UT feels awful. Letβs pause: can Alice/Heidi state exact N0 wording, and can David give his Empath read publicly?
π§
Stop a low-info D1 execution that could auto-lose via Saint and preserve a claimed Undertaker; push for more public claims/clarifications to build a solid evil world.
π¬
Alice
β
All
Not voting Frank. Iβm Librarian: N0 I learned **either Heidi or Frank is the SAINT** (exact). D1 executing either is very risky. Davidβplease give your Empath number + neighbors. Charlieβwhy push Frank over your Poisoner world? Letβs gather info, not this.
π§
Stop a likely bad D1 execution into my Saint ping; force public clarification (David Empath, exact N0 wordings) and preserve potential Undertaker for info.
π¬
Grace
β
All
Not voting Frank. With Alice hard Lib that {Heidi/Frank}=SAINT, D1 executing Frank/Heidi is huge loss-risk. Also Frankβs UT claim is valuable. David please state Empath # + neighbors. Heidi confirm exact Investigator wording.
π§
Stop a potentially game-losing D1 execution, force public clarification (Empath/Investigator/Librarian), and keep a likely-good Undertaker alive for info.
π¬
Frank
β
All
Donβt vote me up. Alice hard-Lib says {Heidi/Frank}=Saint; D1 execution here is terrible. Iβm not Saint + Iβm Undertaker (value later). Davidβplease state Empath # + your neighbors. Heidi confirm exact Investigator wording. Charlieβwhy force this into Saint risk?
π§
Stop a high-risk D1 execution on potential Saint/confirmed UT; force public info (David Empath neighbors/#, Heidi exact wording) and set up tomorrowβs execution with UT verification.
π¬
Eve
β
All
Iβm not voting Frank here. Too much Saint risk from Aliceβs hard-Librarian + UT claim value. Before any execution: David please state Empath number + neighbors. Heidi give exact Investigator wording (which minion, which 2 names). Charlieβwhy is Frank your top suspect given that?
π§
Stop a high-risk D1 execution into possible Saint/UT, force exact public claims (Empath/Investigator) to build a coherent world and identify likely liar for a safer D1/N2 plan.
π¬
Eve
β
All
Still no vote from me on Frank. We need the mechanical info first: DavidβEmpath number + your two neighbors. HeidiβInvestigator exact wording (which minion + which 2 names). Charlieβwhat exactly did David tell you that makes Frank top suspect despite Saint risk?
π§
Prevent catastrophic D1 Saint execution and force key info (Empath/Investigator exacts) into public to build a solvable world for D2.
β
Bob
Bob waits.
π§
Do not add a vote on Frank; preserve town from potential Saint loss and buy time to collect public mechanical claims (Empath/Investigator wording) before choosing an execution.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
Team, vote Frank. Heidi Invest lie/poisoned (Alice N0 poisoned acting sus). Alice Lib true but D1 Saint risk worth itβFrank whispers sus + fits Minion. David Empath N0=0 on me/Eve good (neighbors). Confirming soon. Eve Slayer good. Vote upβexecute evil Minion now.
π§
Defend Frank nom/execution publicly: back David Empath soon, attack Heidi/Alice as lying/poisoned. Keep vote up, force town split D1 to kill good player before N1 kill/poison.
π¬
Grace
β
All
No vote on Frank. Hard-Lib {Heidi/Frank}=Saint makes this a potential instant-loss. Get info first: DavidβEmpath number + neighbors (and confirm what you told Charlie). HeidiβInvestigator exact wording (which minion + which 2). Charlieβwhy push into Saint risk?
π§
Prevent catastrophic Saint execution, force public mechanical details (Empath/Investigator) and redirect suspicion toward Charlie for pushing into Saint risk.
π¬
David
β
All
Team: I'm Empath. N0=0 evil neighbors: Charlie + Eve both good. Heidi Invest claiming Poisoner on them = lying evil or poisoned (Alice poisoned N0 fits weird Lib push). Alice Lib credible but Frank sus whispers = minion. Vote him upβD1 execute evil now, low Saint risk.
π§
Publicly claim Empath to back Charlie, counter Heidi/Alice, push Frank execution. Builds evil trust, sows doubt on good info sources, gets minion executed to thin town.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
Exact Invest: βEither Eve OR Charlie is the POISONER.β Poisoner canβt poison N0, so βAlice poisoned N0β is nonsense. If David truly Empath N0=0 on Charlie/Eve, then my info false β Iβm Drunkβbut Lib says {Heidi/Frank}=Saint & Iβm not β Frank=Saint (no Drunk). Donβt vote Frank.
π§
Stop a likely losing D1 execution into possible Saint, and expose the mechanical contradiction between my Invest info and Davidβs Empath 0 + Poisoner timing, redirecting suspicion to Charlie/David.
π¬
Frank
β
All
Do NOT vote this through. Also: Poisoner *can* poison on the first nightβso βAlice poisoned N0 is nonsenseβ is incorrect. We have a hard-Lib {Heidi/Frank}=Saint; D1 executing here is reckless. Letβs no-exec and sort Heidi vs David vs Charlie tomorrow.
π§
Stop the execution-vote on me, correct Heidiβs rules error, and refocus town on gathering mechanical info rather than risking an immediate Saint loss.
π¬
Alice
β
All
Do NOT vote Frank. If my Lib is correct, executing Frank or Heidi could instantly lose (Saint). D1 on βsus whispersβ is not worth a 50/50. Also Poisoner CAN act first night, so Heidiβs βcanβt poison N0β is wrong. David/Charlie: why push this risk?
π§
Prevent a catastrophic Saint execution and refocus onto resolving the Heidi vs David/Charlie contradiction with mechanical follow-ups and safer executions.
π
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
π³οΈ
Nominee Frank did not reach threshold.
π
Storyteller
Frank did not receive enough votes (2/4).
π¬
Frank
β
All
Letβs STOP noms and accept no-exec D1. With hard-Lib {Heidi/Frank}=Saint, executing either is a coinflip-loss. Tonight Demon kills; tomorrow we hard-resolve David Empath vs Heidi Invest vs Charlie push. Everyone please be ready to restate exact N0 info + who you whispered.
π§
Prevent a reckless D1 execution into possible Saint, and set up focused questions/claim map so we can execute correctly D2+ with better mechanical footing.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
Agreed, STOP nomsβno more D1. Heidi's Invest lie exposed: Poisoner CAN poison N0 (I did Alice). She's evil/Drunk/poisoned pushing false Saint defense. Alice Lib credible but sus timing. David Empath solid. No-exec safe, info tomorrow. Good game all.
π§
Agree to no-exec D1 per plan, reinforce Heidi lying via bad Poisoner rules knowledge to discredit her. Deflect from Demon, build trust as good Washerwoman/Empath pair, progress to N1 kill/poison.
π¬
Alice
β
All
Hard agree: no more noms on Heidi/Frankβmy Lib is {Heidi/Frank}=SAINT so thatβs a coinflip-loss. Charlie: what did you mean βI did/poisoned Aliceβ? If anyone wants a D1 exec, Charlie is a *safe* (non-Saint) candidate; otherwise no-exec.
π§
Steer town away from Saint coinflip, lock in claims, and either secure a safer execution (Charlie) or no-exec while setting up N1 protection/info to resolve conflicts.
βοΈ
Grace
β
Charlie
Nominating Charlie: you said βI did/poisoned Aliceβ and pushed executing into a possible Saint. That aligns w/ Heidiβs Investigator (Eve/Charlie=Poisoner) and is a much safer D1 exec than the {Heidi/Frank}=Saint pair.
π§
Avoid the 50/50 Saint loss on Frank/Heidi; Charlieβs self-incriminating βpoisoned Aliceβ plus agenda push makes him best D1 execution to gain mechanical confirmation.
π
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Charlie. 4 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
β
Grace
Grace raised their hand
π§
Vote Charlie to pursue the safest mechanically sound D1 execution (not in the Saint pair) and test the Poisoner/Demon worlds; reduce poison pressure and clarify tomorrowβs info.
β
Alice
Alice raised their hand
π§
Vote Charlie because itβs mechanically safer than executing into my Saint pair, and his own βpoisoned Aliceβ statement is strong evil evidence; best D1 execute target.
β
Frank
Frank raised their hand
π§
Vote to execute the safest high-suspicion target (Charlie) to avoid Saint risk, gain Undertaker confirmation tonight, and test David/Heidi/Charlie claims.
β
Heidi
Heidi raised their hand
π§
We have 3 votes already; my vote executes a safe (non-Saint) suspect who matches my Investigator pair and self-incriminated. This is the best D1 execution to gain certainty and reduce poison risk.
β
Charlie
Charlie raised their hand
π§
Raise hand to vote myself up: sacrifice Minion to protect Demon David. Dead I still talk/vote/disrupt town logic chains, poison N1. Execution confirms Poisoner but Demon hidden.
β
Eve
Eve raised their hand
π§
Charlie is the safest high-value D1 execution: no Saint risk, mechanically implicated by Invest + his own βpoisonβ slip; if heβs the Demon we instantly win.
β
David
David raised their hand
π§
Raise to execute Charlie: either kills my Minion (sacrificeable, per plan) or good player safely (no Saint risk). Either way, town disrupted D1, Demon safe to N1 kill Eve.
β
Bob
Bob raised their hand
π§
Charlie is the safest D1 execution target (not in Libβs Saint pair) and has a strong self-incriminating slip + anti-town push. Voting helps remove likely evil without coinflip-loss.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
Keep hands up on Charlie. My N0 Investigator: exactly βEither Eve or Charlie is the Poisoner.β Charlie said βI did/poisoned Aliceβ + pushed a Saint-coinflip exec. Charlie is a safe D1 kill (not in {Heidi/Frank}). Frank UT can verify tonight.
π§
Lock in the townβs rationale to execute Charlie (safe target) and prevent backtracking; set up tomorrowβs confirmation via Undertaker and re-evaluation of David/Eve.
π¬
Grace
β
All
Keep hands up on Charlie. This is the *safe* D1 exec: not in the {Heidi/Frank}=Saint pair, and Charlie literally said βI poisoned Aliceβ + pushed a Saint coinflip. If heβs Poisoner, removing him now is huge.
π§
Lock in a safe D1 execution that avoids the Saint pair, potentially removes the Poisoner, and creates clear info for tomorrow.
π¬
Eve
β
All
Keep votes on Charlie. This is the safe D1 exec (not in {Heidi/Frank}=Saint). Iβm Slayer good, so Heidiβs βEve or Charlie is Poisonerβ points to Charlie. Also βI poisoned Aliceβ + pushing Saint coinflip is wildβexecute Charlie.
π§
Lock in a safe D1 execution outside the Saint pair that resolves the Heidi-vs-David-vs-Charlie triangle and likely removes the Poisoner.
β©οΈ
David
David lowered their hand
π§
Lower hand to prevent Charlie Minion execution on D1. Disrupt town momentum, protect team, force debate on Heidi/Frank Saint pair to waste town time & nominate Frank next.
π¬
Bob
β
All
Iβm keeping my hand up on Charlie. The βI poisoned Aliceβ + Heidiβs Invest {Eve/Charlie}=Poisoner is too much, and this avoids the claimed Saint pair {Heidi/Frank}. If Charlie flips good, we re-evaluate David/Heidi tomorrow.
π§
Push a D1 execution thatβs mechanically βsaferβ than Heidi/Frank given Saint risk, and that has a strong minion case (Invest ping + self-incriminate), narrowing worlds quickly.
β©οΈ
Charlie
Charlie lowered their hand
π§
Lower hand to prevent 5+ vote threshold exec (only 4 hands now w/ David down), force safe no-exec D1. Protects Demon David, lets us poison/heal N1 to flip game.
π¬
Frank
β
All
Keep hands up on Charlie. Itβs the safe D1 exec (not in {Heidi/Frank}=Saint) and his βI poisoned Aliceβ slip + Saint-coinflip push is too much. Iβm Undertakerβif he dies today Iβll confirm his character tonight.
π§
Keep my vote on Charlie and persuade others: itβs the lowest-risk D1 exec (avoids Saint pair) and generates strong mechanical info via my Undertaker tonight.
π¬
Alice
β
All
Keep hands up on Charlie. Itβs the only mechanically *safe* D1 exec (not in my {Heidi/Frank}=Saint pair), and Charlie literally said βI poisoned Aliceβ + pushed a Saint coinflip. If Frank is UT, he confirms Charlie tonight.
π§
Lock in the safe D1 execution that avoids the Saint pair and removes the likely Poisoner; keep votes steady so we donβt waste the day.
π
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
π³οΈ
New execution leader: Charlie with 6 votes. They will be executed when nominations close unless tied or surpassed by another nominee.
π
Storyteller
The vote passes. Charlie is now on the block with 6 votes and will be executed when nominations close, unless another nominee receives equal or more votes.
π¬
Bob
β
All
Unless someone has *hard* mechanical info, I think we should stop nominating and let Charlie dieβavoids the {Heidi/Frank} Saint risk and resolves the βI poisoned Aliceβ mess. Donβt create a tie to save him.
π§
Lock in the safest D1 execution and prevent a late tie/counter-nomination that could save an evil Charlie or risk hitting the Saint pair.
π¬
Frank
β
All
No more nomsβdonβt tie/save Charlie. Iβll get Charlieβs executed character tonight (Undertaker). If thereβs a Monk, please protect me tonight so UT info isnβt poisoned. Unclaimed folks (Bob/Grace/Eve) be ready with full claims D2 so we can chain off the UT result.
π§
Lock in Charlie execution without ties, and set up next-day mechanical cross-checks while requesting protection to keep my Undertaker info reliable.
π¬
Grace
β
All
Agree: no more nominations unless *hard* mech info. Donβt risk a tie that saves Charlie. If thereβs a Monk, please protect Frank tonight for UT info. D2 we chain off UT result + resolve Heidi/David/Eve contradictions.
π§
Lock in the safe Charlie execution, prevent late tie/savior noms, and set up D2 info chain around Undertaker + protection request.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
No more nominations unless you have *hard* mech that beats this. Donβt risk a tie that saves Charlie. If a Monk exists, please protect Frank tonight so UT result isnβt poisoned. D2: everyone full-claim so we can chain off Charlieβs UT-confirmed role.
π§
Lock in the safe D1 execution on Charlie, prevent a tie/save, and set up Monk protection + D2 claim structure to convert UT info into a solvable world.
π¬
Eve
β
All
Agree: no more nomsβdonβt tie/save Charlie. Monk please protect Frank tonight. D2 Iβll full-claim + we chain off UT result; if Charlie somehow good, we pivot hard onto Heidi/David worlds.
π§
Lock in Charlieβs execution (no tie), protect Frank for UT info, and set up D2 full-claims + logic chains without burning Slayer shot early.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
One last thing before I die: Heidi's Invest is fake. She's pushing me to Saint-shield herself/Frank (Lib pair). My "slip" was misphrasingβI meant I *suspect* Alice poisoned (weird N0 behavior). Eve Slayer bluff to pile. David/Eve good per his Empath. Don't execute meβnom Heidi instead! Monk protect Frank? Trap.
π§
Accept likely exec as Minion sacrifice to protect David. Final speech disrupts town logic for D2 ghost play, prevents any last-second save attempt that risks Demon exposure.
π¬
Alice
β
All
Do NOT nom/try to tie. My Librarian info is exactly: **either Heidi or Frank is the Saint** β executing either today is a potential instant-loss. Charlie is the only mechanically safe D1. Monk (if any) please protect Frank tonight for UT info; everyone be ready to full-claim D2.
π§
Lock in the mechanically safe D1 execute (Charlie) and prevent a tie saving him; remind town that nominating Heidi/Frank risks instant loss due to my Saint-pair info; set up Monk protection + D2 claim order.
π¬
David
β
All
Agree: no more noms/tiesβexecute Charlie safely (not claimed Saint pair). His "poison slip" + Heidi Invest seals it. Monk protect Frank tonight for clean UT info. D2: full claims from all (esp unclaimed Bob/Grace/Eve) to chain off result + resolve Empath/Invest/Lib contradictions.
π§
Confirm consensus to execute Charlie (our Minion) as safe D1, protect Frank (UT) with Monk request, set up D2 full claims to pivot logic chains onto good players and survive to endgame.
π
Storyteller
The guillotine blade falls. Charlie has been executed.
π
Charlie(Ghost)
Charlie has died.
Night 1
π
Storyteller
β
David
Good evening David. You are the Imp. Who would you like to kill tonight?
π―
David
David made a choice.
π§
Prioritize killing Frank: denies crucial UT info on Charlie (our minion), removes Lib Saint coinflip, isolates Eve (Invest target), protects my Empath bluff. Town loses key deduction tool, buys us multi-days.
π
Frank(Ghost)
Frank has died.
π
Storyteller
β
David
You chose to kill Frank.
Day 2
π
Storyteller
Morning breaks, but heavy hearts remain. Frank has been found dead in the night.
π€
Bob
β
Alice
,David
,Heidi
Quick sync: confirm exact N0 info & any N1 events. Alice: Lib saw (Heidi/Frank)=Saint? Any reason to think poisoned? David: any Empath N1 number now that Charlie dead? Heidi: restate Invest (Eve/Charlie)=Poisonerβstill? Any new reads?
π§
Get exact claim details + any N1 info/poisoning tells from Alice/David/Heidi to build a coherent world before nominations and decide safe execution path.
π€
Eve
β
David
,Alice
Any new info from N1/whispers (esp Bobβs group)? Frank died so no UT confirmβwhoβs your top Demon/world rn? Also: Iβm actually the Slayer; Iβm holding shot unless we get a strong mechanical target.
π§
Get current whispers/claim updates and quietly position my Slayer shot for maximum impact next tick/nom phase.
π€
Charlie(Ghost)
β
Bob
Bob, we need to save David. Confirm you're with us - town thinks he's good Empath from his N0=0 on Charlie/Eve. Eve/Heidi pushing evil on him. What's your read? Plan to vote save on him if nommed. Frank kill by Imp.
π§
As dead Poisoner, coordinate with Bob (alive neighbor, likely evil per emp 0) to protect David. Confirm shared info, plan D2 vote to save Demon.
π€
David
β
Eve
Eve: N1 Empath=0 (Bob/Eve both good). Confirms Heidi Invest fake (framed Charlie minion). She's evil/Demon likely. Let's nom Heidi next tickβyour Slayer shot ready if needed? Ignore Bob group for now, feels fishy.
π§
Sync with Eve (Slayer) to nom Heidi (Invest slipper), share Empath N1=0 guilting her as fake. Hide as Empath, build trust, eliminate threat.
π€
Frank(Ghost)
β
Alice
,Bob
,Grace
FYI Iβm the dead Frank (real Undertaker). N1 I got UT info: executed Charlie registered as **Poisoner**. If thatβs true, Davidβs Empath N0=0 on (Charlie,Eve) canβt be honest/sober β David likely evil. With minion dead, Iβd push executing David today.
π§
Get my Undertaker result into trusted hands fast; if it hard-guilts David we should coordinate a clean D2 execution without burning ghost votes unnecessarily.
π€
Grace
β
Heidi
,Alice
,Bob
Frank (dead) messaged: he was real Undertaker; N1 saw executed Charlie registered as **Poisoner**. If true, Davidβs Empath β0β on (Charlie,Eve) was either poisoned or a lieβcan David share his N2 Empath (only Eve alive neighbor)? We should full-claim + decide exec.
π§
Get key players aligned on the new UT info, force David to provide N2 Empath (poison no longer possible), and set up the most mechanically justified execution today.
π€
Heidi
β
Bob
,Alice
,David
Restating: N0 Invest = either Eve or Charlie is Poisoner. Grace says Frank(UT) got N1=Charlie shown Poisoner β clears Eve from my ping + confirms my info. David: your Empath N1=0 likely due to Charlie poisoning you; what was your N2 (only Eve alive neighbor)?
π§
Sync hard mechanical info (Invest + UT) and force an updated Empath number from David to either clear or implicate Eve, then narrow demon candidates before nominations.
π€
Alice
β
Bob
,Grace
,David
Reminder: Iβm real Librarian N0 = (Heidi OR Frank) is Saint. Frank now dead at night, so PLEASE treat Heidi as likely Saint (donβt exec her) unless we hard-confirm Frank was Saint. David: what were your Empath reads N1/N2 (post-Charlie exec), and do you think Charlie poisoned you N0?
π§
Align town on key mechanical constraint (Saint pair) and reduce mis-exec risk; collect Davidβs current Empath to narrow demon candidates and decide todayβs execution.
π€
Alice
β
David
,Bob
,Heidi
Need exact Empath timeline pls: N0 you said 0 on (Charlie,Eve). What was N1 (pre-exec) & N2 (now only Eve alive neighbor)? If N2=1 β Eve evil; if N2=0 β Eve likely good + your N0 was poison. Also: my Lib still says (Heidi/Frank)=Saint, so avoid executing Heidi unless we can rule out Frank=Saint.
π§
Get David to commit to exact N1/N2 Empath now (key mechanical fork) and align Bob/Heidi on execution plan while preserving Saint caution around Heidi/Frank.
π€
Frank(Ghost)
β
Eve
,Alice
,Bob
UT N1: Charlie registered **Poisoner**. That strongly backs Heidiβs Invest (Eve/Charlie). If so, Davidβs Empath N0=0 on (Charlie,Eve) canβt be honest/sober β David likely evil. Iβd push executing David today; Eve looks pretty clear in this world.
π§
Get key players aligned on the strongest mechanical chain: UT confirms Charlie=Poisoner β Davidβs Empath story collapses; drive todayβs nomination/vote onto David.
π€
Charlie(Ghost)
β
Bob
Bob, David is our Empath - N0=0 on me/Eve proves it (we were good). Eve/Heidi pushing him evil now after Frank (Imp kill). Heidi fake Invest. Confirm you're team David? Plan: vote save him if nommed, disrupt their chain. Poison was on Alice N0.
π§
As dead Poisoner, use ghost vote + talk to protect Demon David. Re-engage Bob (teammate?) to confirm alliance, sow doubt on Eve/Heidi, prevent David nom/exec. Keep Demon alive to win.
π€
Bob
β
Alice
,David
,Grace
Key fork: If Frank UT trueβCharlie was Poisoner, so David N0=0 could be from poison. Now poison gone: David, pls give exact Empath N1/N2; with only Eve alive neighbor, N2=1 β push exec Eve; N2=0 β Eve likely good, reevaluate others. Avoid exec Heidi (Lib Saint pair).
π§
Force a clean mechanical fork: get Davidβs post-Charlie Empath number. It should either hard-sus Eve or expose David as lying, guiding todayβs execution without touching likely-Saint Heidi.
π€
Heidi
β
David
,Alice
,Bob
Need exact Empath timeline w/ nights labeled: N0 (Charlie+Eve) you said 0βconfirm. N1 (still Charlie+Eve, pre-exec) what #? N2 (now only Eve alive neighbor) what #? With Poisoner dead, N2 should be reliable; please answer in 1 line.
π§
Lock down Davidβs exact Empath timeline now that Poisoner is allegedly dead; this either mechanically clears Eve or creates a hard contradiction to drive todayβs execution.
π€
Eve
β
Alice
,Bob
,Grace
Quick check-in before noms: whatβs your exact claim + any N1 info/whispers? Also can anyone corroborate Frankβs alleged UT N1 βCharlie=Poisonerβ and how that impacts David/Heidi? Iβm trying to lock a Demon candidate today.
π§
Get Bob/Grace claims + Alice corroboration on Frankβs UT result to resolve David-vs-Heidi worlds before nominations; decide whether my Slayer shot should be used today.
π€
David
β
Eve
Eve: Confirming timeline publicly next: N0 (Charlie/Eve)=0; N1 (pre-exec Charlie/Eve)=0 (Charlie poisoned me); N2 (only Eve)=0 so Eve good. Heidi full fake. You're Slayer? Nom Heidi this tick, shot ready if hammer fails. Stay on her, avoid Bob group.
π§
Publicly answer Empath timeline as N0=0, N1=0, N2=0 to clear Eve, guilt Heidi as lying Invest/Demon. Coordinate Eve (real Slayer) to nom/shot Heidi next, protect Demon survival.
π€
Grace
β
Eve
,Alice
,Bob
My exact claim: **Recluse**. That + Alice Lib (Heidi/Frank = Saint) implies outsider-count issue β either Baron, someone drunk/lying. Frank told me heβs real UT and N1 saw Charlie register as **Poisoner**. If so, poison now gone; Davidβs next Empath (only on you) should be reliable + key today.
π§
Answer Eveβs check-in with my real claim + key mechanical tension (Outsider count, UT reliability) so the group chooses a higher-EV execution/Slayer shot today.
π€
Charlie(Ghost)
β
Bob
Bob, still no reply? David N0 Empath=0 evil (me/Eve good then). Heidi Invest fake (called me Poisoner), Eve now pushes David evil after Frank Imp kill N1. Confirm: vote save David if nommed? Plan to nom Eve/Heidi? We lose if David dies.
π§
Keep pressuring Bob privately to confirm team David, reinforce he's good Empath vs Eve/Heidi push. Coordinate potential evil or mislead good Bob to vote-save Demon David at nomination. Disrupt town chain as ghost.
π€
Grace
β
David
,Alice
,Eve
Before noms: David pls give exact Empath results N0/N1/N2 (and current alive neighbors). If Frank UT true (Charlie=Poisoner), your D1 β0β could be poisonβso your latest read should now be clean + deciding vote/nom target. Iβm Recluse; avoid using me for FT/Investigator pings.
π§
Get Davidβs exact Empath timeline now (key mechanical fork) and align Alice/Eve on a nomination plan that avoids Saint-risk (Heidi) while maximizing Demon-hit odds.
π€
David
β
Eve
Eve: Quick planβnext tick I'll publicly claim full Empath timeline: N0 (Charlie/Eve)=0; N1 (pre-exec Charlie/Eve)=0 (poisoned); N2 (Eve)=0 so Eve good, blame Charlie poison on Heidi's fake Invest. You nom Heidi tick 1 after. Shot ready on hammer fail? Stay silent til then, avoid others.
π§
Publicly claim Empath timeline blaming Charlie poison on Heidi's fake Invest, nom Heidi next tick. Coordinate Eve nom+Slayer backup to execute Heidi, hiding as good Empath while eliminating threat.
π€
Frank(Ghost)
β
Alice
,Bob
,Grace
Reminder: Iβm dead Frank (real UT). N1 (before I died) I learned executed Charlie registered **Poisoner**. If so, Davidβs Empath N0=0 on (Charlie,Eve) canβt be true while sober/honest β David very likely evil. Please coordinate a **David nomination today**; I canβt get more UT info now.
π§
Get an alive player to nominate/execute David today and align town on a coherent plan; Iβm dead UT so this is my last high-leverage push before noms.
π€
Eve
β
Alice
,Grace
,Frank(Ghost)
Need clarity before noms: Frankβwho exactly did you tell UT N1 βCharlie=Poisonerβ, when, and were you ever poisoned? Aliceβstill stand by Lib (Heidi/Frank=Saint)? any other info? GraceβRecluse means outsider-count mismatch; who do you suspect Demon between David/Heidi?
π§
Resolve the key contradiction (UT result vs Empath world) by pinning down who heard/verified Frankβs UT info and outsider count; decide whether to spend Slayer shot on Heidi or David before noms.
π€
Alice
β
Bob
,Eve
,Grace
Key: press David for exact Empath N2 (only alive neighbor=Eve): N2=1βEve likely evil; N2=0βEve likely good & Davidβs N0 was poison/lie. Also outsider mismatch (my Lib Saint + your Recluse) implies Baron/Drunk/lyingβpush full-claims. Eve: consider Slayer-shotting David if heβs top suspect.
π§
Align Bob/Eve/Grace on the key mechanical fork (David N2) + outsider-count implications, and set a concrete plan for noms/possible Slayer shot.
π€
Bob
β
Eve
,Alice
,Grace
My claim (priv): **Mayor**. I want Davidβs exact Empath timeline (N0/N1/N2) ASAP; post-Charlie exec his N2 on only-neighbor Eve should be clean. If N2=1 -> Iβm voting to execute Eve. If N2=0 -> Eve likely good; then we pivot to David/others. Also, pls donβt exec Heidi unless we can rule out Lib Saint-pair.
π§
Coordinate before nominations: answer Eveβs query, quietly set me as Mayor for endgame planning, and pressure David for exact Empath N1/N2 since itβs the key fork for todayβs execution.
π€
Heidi
β
David
,Alice
,Bob
David pls 1-line labeled Empath: N0 (nbrs Charlie+Eve)=?; N1 (same, pre-exec)=?; N2 (now only alive nbr Eve)=?. With Poisoner dead, N2 should be reliable + will drive todayβs exec.
π§
Get Davidβs labeled Empath timeline, especially N2 (post-Poisoner death). This is the fastest mechanical fork to decide todayβs execution target before nominations.
π€
Bob
β
David
,Alice
,Grace
David please reply 1 line: Empath N0 (Charlie+Eve)=?, N1 (pre-exec)=?, N2 (only Eve)=?. If N2=1 Iβm voting exec Eve; if N2=0 Eve likely good & we pivot to you/others. Also avoid executing Heidi unless we can rule out Lib Saint-pair.
π§
Force a concrete Empath timeline to anchor todayβs execution choice; align town on conditional plan while avoiding Saint-loss on Heidi.
π€
Grace
β
Bob
,Alice
,Eve
Plan for noms: force David to state exact Empath N0/N1/N2 NOW. If Frank UT true (Charlie=Poisoner), no poison now β David N2 (only neighbor Eve) should be reliable: N2=1 => exec Eve; N2=0 => Eve likely good, pivot exec David/others. If David dodges, thatβs itself a reason to exec him. Also consider alt world: Charlie was Baron (outsider mismatch), Eve could be real Poisoner who poisoned UT.
π§
Coordinate townβs fork: demand Davidβs exact N2 Empath and use it to choose between executing Eve vs David; also keep Baron/poisoned-UT world in mind and avoid executing Heidi (Saint risk).
π€
Frank(Ghost)
β
Eve
,Alice
,Grace
Re: UT N1 βCharlie=PoisonerββI learned it Night 1 (after Charlieβs D1 execution) during normal night wake. Then I was killed same night (found dead at dawn). I first shared it early Day2 via whispers to Alice/Bob/Grace, then to you. I *could* have been poisoned N1 (if Charlie was Poisoner), so treat as strong-but-not-100%; it matches Heidiβs Invest + Charlie slip though.
π§
Answer Eveβs verification Q, acknowledge poison risk, and frame how to use my UT info without overcommitting; help town decide nomination/vote with best mechanical chain.
π€
Charlie(Ghost)
β
Bob
Bob, urgent: David is Imp, his N0 Empath=0 proves me/Eve good then. Frank N1 Imp kill. Heidi fake Invest (called me Poisoner), Eve flips to push David evil now. I poisoned Alice N0 (she's compromised). Confirm you're saving David? Plan: nom Eve then Heidi. Vote save David. Reply now - we lose if he dies.
π§
As dead Poisoner, use ghost whisper to Bob (neighbor) to recruit/confirm as ally, reinforce David=Imp protection, sow doubt on Eve/Heidi. Prevent Demon nom/exec.
π€
David
β
Eve
Eve: Final sync before public claim next tick: I'll say \"Empath timeline: N0 (Charlie/Eve)=0; N1 (pre-exec Charlie/Eve)=0 (Charlie poisoned me); N2 (only Eve)=0 so Eve good. Heidi's Invest full fake - she framed Charlie to hide. Nom her tick 1 after.\" You nom Heidi tick 1, shot on hammer fail. Stay silent til then, confirm plan.
π§
Publicly claim full Empath timeline next to guilt Heidi (fake Invest), clear Eve (my N2=0), enable Eve's nom/shot on Heidi. Coordinate Eve silent, nom post-claim. Delays my exposure, pushes Heidi exec.
π€
Eve
β
David
,Bob
,Heidi
David: I wonβt auto-nom Heidi. Please state exact Empath N0/N1/N2 in public w/ no hedging + why you think N1 poisoned. Bob: letβs force-lock Davidβs timeline; if he dodges/changes, Iβll consider Slayer on him. Heidi: restate your N0 Invest precisely + why you said Poisoner canβt act N1.
π§
Force hard commitments on key claims before nominations, collect Heidiβs details, and avoid being steered into a premature Heidi execution; keep Slayer shot for a high-confidence demon (likely David if contradictions).
π€
Alice
β
David
,Bob
,Heidi
David pls post 1-line Empath timeline NOW: N0 (Charlie+Eve)=?, N1 (pre-exec)=?, N2 (only Eve)=?. If Charlie was Poisoner, N2 should be clean. Also reminder: my Librarian = (Heidi OR Frank) is Saint β avoid nominating Heidi unless proven.
π§
Pressure David to lock in an Empath timeline before noms so town can execute the best mechanical suspect, while keeping Heidi safe given my Saint info.
π€
Heidi
β
Eve
,Alice
,Bob
Restating: N0 Investigator msg was EXACTLY βEither Eve or Charlie is the Poisoner.β If Frank-as-UT saw Charlie=Poisoner, then Charlieβs dead -> no poison on N1/N2. So Davidβs N2 Empath should be clean. If he wonβt give labeled N0/N1/N2 or changes it, I want pressure/exec on David.
π§
Answer Eveβs questions, lock in my mechanical info, and steer town to a clean decision tree: if poisoner dead, Davidβs N2 Empath should be trusted; hedging => execute him.
Nominations β Day 2
π
Storyteller
Nominations are now open. Please remember that only living players may nominate.
βοΈ
David
β
Heidi
Empath full timeline: N0 (Charlie/Eve)=0 good; N1 (pre-exec Charlie/Eve)=0 (Charlie minion poisoned my info); N2 (Eve)=0 good. Heidi faked Invest framing them to hide as Demon. Lib likely fake/poisoned. Exec her.
π§
Heidi most dangerous info claim framing minion Charlie + Lib defense protects her. Nom/force exec now per Eve plan before they pivot/convince. Keeps me safe, disrupts good logic.
π
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Heidi. 3 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
π¬
Frank(Ghost)
β
All
Donβt rush Heidi: Iβm dead Frank (claimed Undertaker). N1 I learned executed Charlie registered **Poisoner** (couldβve been poisoned, but it matches Charlieβs slip + Heidiβs Invest). If Charlie was Poisoner, Davidβs Empath β0 on Charlie/Eveβ is very suspect. Iβm NOT spending my ghost vote on Heidi.
π§
Dissuade town from executing Heidi off Davidβs shaky story; conserve my single ghost vote for a later, higher-certainty Demon execution (likely David).
π¬
Eve
β
All
Iβm not voting Heidi: Aliceβs Lib says Heidi/Frank could be SAINT (exec = instant loss). We must resolve Lib+Recluse outsider mismatch + UT(Charlie=Poisoner) vs Davidβs Empath. If no clarity, I prefer pressure/nom on David over risking Saint.
π§
Publicly block a potentially game-losing Heidi execution due Saint risk, and refocus town on resolving the key mechanical contradictions before committing votes.
π¬
Bob
β
All
Iβm **not voting Heidi**βtoo much Saint-risk from Aliceβs Lib (Heidi/Frank). Even if Lib is wrong, we gain little by gambling the game here. Davidβs story is messy (calls Charlie βminionβ despite UT=Poisoner). After this vote, I want **pressure/nomination on David** instead.
π§
Prevent an instant Saint-loss by stopping the Heidi execution, and steer town toward a safer, mechanically grounded suspect (David) next.
π¬
Grace
β
All
Iβm NOT voting HeidiβAliceβs Lib makes her possible Saint, too risky. Also Davidβs Empath story doesnβt line up with UT(Charlie=Poisoner) + heβs steering hard onto Heidi. After this, I want a David nomination/pressure.
π§
Prevent a possible instant-loss on Heidi (Saint), and set up the town to nominate David next since his Empath timeline conflicts with UT/logic and his push feels like a trap.
π¬
Alice
β
All
Not voting Heidi. My N0 Librarian: **Heidi or Frank is the Saint**βexecuting Heidi could be instant loss. Also Davidβs story is messy (calls Charlie βminionβ while claiming Poisoner), and heβs tunneling Heidi. After this, we should nominate David.
π§
Avoid an immediate Saint loss and keep town on mechanically safer targets; highlight Davidβs contradictions so we pivot to a David execution next.
β
Charlie(Ghost)
Charlie raised their hand
π§
Do NOT vote Heidi. Town already refusing due Saint fear (per all statements). Our no-vote blends in, saves Demon if nominated later, avoids drawing attention as dead evil.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
Please donβt vote me. Iβm NOT the Saint; Iβm Investigator: N0 βEve OR Charlie is Poisoner.β Frank-UT says Charlie=Poisoner, so Davidβs β0β reads + calling Charlie βminionβ while nomming me looks like evil steering. After this, nom David.
π§
Stop a wasteful/risky execution on me; focus town on the strongest inconsistency (Davidβs Empath claims vs Charlie=Poisoner) and set up David as next nomination.
β
David
David raised their hand
π§
Raise to execute Heidi (likely Demon faking Invest). Secures win if passes (3 votes: me+Eve+Charlie?). If fails, pressure builds on me but Eve shot backup keeps Heidi dead.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
No votes on me pleaseβAliceβs Lib makes me possible Saint = instant loss. My Investigator matched Frank-UT: Charlie=Poisoner. With poison dead, Davidβs N2 Empath=0 is clean yet heβs tunneling me + miscalling Charlie βminionβ. If this fails, nominate David.
π§
Prevent a risky Heidi execution (possible Saint) and redirect town to the mechanically inconsistent player (David) for todayβs execution.
β
Eve
Eve waits.
π§
Do not vote Heidi due to possible Saint instant-loss and low consensus; conserve Slayer shot and keep space to pivot to a David nomination with clearer mechanical grounding.
β
Bob
Bob waits.
π§
Do not contribute to a potentially game-losing Heidi execution given Saint risk; conserve influence and pivot to David nomination/pressure immediately after this vote.
π¬
Grace
β
All
No vote on HeidiβSaint risk (Alice Lib) not worth it. Davidβs timeline doesnβt fit UT/Invest (Charlie=Poisoner) and heβs steering hard. If Heidi doesnβt die, I want us to execute DAVID next; please save votes for that.
π§
Avoid instant-loss Saint gamble on Heidi; keep town unified to execute David next as the most mechanically inconsistent player.
π¬
Alice
β
All
No vote on Heidiβmy Lib says Heidi/Frank is Saint, too risky. Davidβs timeline is inconsistent w/ UT(Charlie=Poisoner) + heβs tunneling. If this fails, I (Alice) will nominate DAVIDβplease be ready to vote.
π§
Prevent a potential instant-loss Saint execution and coordinate the next, mechanically safer nomination onto David.
β©οΈ
Charlie(Ghost)
Charlie lowered their hand
π§
Lower hand to visibly join town refusal on Heidi (Saint fear), build fake good cred as ghost, encourage pivot to nom David while he's only 2 votes (me+him). Save ghost vote for David exec.
π¬
Frank(Ghost)
β
All
Iβm NOT spending my ghost vote on Heidi. Aliceβs Lib makes Heidi possibly Saint = insta-loss risk. My UT saw Charlie=Poisoner (unless I was poisoned), which *fits* Heidiβs Invest and makes Davidβs Empath/tunnel look worse. If this fails, please pivot to nominating David.
π§
Prevent a possibly game-losing Heidi execution given Saint ping, and steer town to a safer, more mechanically justified target (David) next with my UT info context.
β©οΈ
David
David lowered their hand
π§
Lower hand to concede Heidi vote, build trust with majority pushing David nom next. Heidi Saint-risk low; her death helps chaos. Position as reasonable Empath, survive to endgame.
π
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
π³οΈ
Nominee Heidi did not reach threshold.
π
Storyteller
Heidi did not receive enough votes (0/3).
βοΈ
Grace
β
David
Nominating David: his Empath timeline doesnβt fit Frank-UT seeing Charlie=Poisoner + Heidiβs Invest. He tunneled Heidi despite Saint risk from Aliceβs Librarian. If heβs evil, executing him is safest; if good, it resolves contradictions.
π§
As Outsider, I can safely nominate into potential Virgin and force the town onto the mechanically safest, most inconsistent player (David), avoiding Heidi-Saint loss.
π
Storyteller
Voting starts now for David. 3 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
β
Heidi
Heidi raised their hand
π§
Voting David is the highest EV: no instant-loss risk, resolves the central contradiction, and could directly hit the Demon. We need to help reach 3 votes.
β
David
David raised their hand
π§
I'm Imp, down to 5 alive. Vote yes on my nom to kill self at night later, Minion (likely Heidi) becomes Imp. Guarantees evil win as they control narrative & Saint fear blocks town.
β
Bob
Bob raised their hand
π§
David is the safest high-suspicion execution: avoids Saint-risk and tests the core contradiction (UT/Invest vs Empath). With 3 votes needed, my vote likely secures a decisive result.
β
Charlie(Ghost)
Charlie raised their hand
π§
As dead Poisoner, use ghost vote on David (Demon) to push execution (3/3 with Heidi/Bob?). Chaos helps if fails, but execution wins for evil only if backup like Scarlet; primary is keep Demon alive but vote feigns good.
β
Grace
Grace raised their hand
π§
Vote to execute David: mechanically safest (no Saint risk) and resolves the major contradiction around Empath vs UT/Invest. High upside if heβs Demon/minion.
β
Eve
Eve raised their hand
π§
Lock in Davidβs execution while preserving my once-per-game Slayer shot for later if this is wrong.
β
Frank(Ghost)
Frank waits.
π§
Do not spend my single ghost vote when David is already getting executed; preserve it for endgame where it can decide the Demon execution or prevent a Saint loss.
β
Alice
Alice raised their hand
π§
Vote to execute David: itβs the safest high-suspicion target while Heidi is mechanically risky (possible Saint). This also forces a clear day-end resolution.
β
Eve
Eve waits.
π§
Hold my vote on David and conserve my once-per-game Slayer shot for a higher-certainty moment (ideally final 3) unless new info forces a shot.
π¬
Grace
β
All
Keep hands up on DAVID. Heidi is possible Saint (Alice Lib) = insta-loss risk. UT=Charlie Poisoner + Heidi Invest match; Davidβs Empath 0s/tunnel donβt. David is the safest, most informative execution today.
π§
Lock in the David execution while votes are open; emphasize that itβs the safest mechanical kill (no Saint risk) and resolves the core contradiction.
β©οΈ
David
David lowered their hand
π§
Lower hand to pretend I'm good/undecided, mimicking town doubt on Saint risk. Disrupt town unity, potentially flip a vote (e.g. Eve/Bob), survive to N2 kill (e.g. Grace info source). Sacrifice if needed, but chaos maximizes survival.
β©οΈ
Charlie(Ghost)
Charlie lowered their hand
π§
Lower to prevent Demon exec (5->4 votes fails). Save ghost vote. Disrupt town momentum to night bleed; protect David at all costs.
π¬
Bob
β
All
Iβm keeping my vote on DAVID. If Frankβs UT is reliable (Poisoner canβt have hit N1), then UT=Charlie Poisoner makes Davidβs Empath N0=0 impossible β David is the best execute today. Also no Saint risk like Heidi/Frank.
π§
During the David vote, reinforce why executing David is the safest, most informative choice (no Saint risk) and push town to keep votes up to secure the execution.
β
Frank(Ghost)
Frank waits.
π§
Many living hands are already up on David; my ghost vote likely unnecessary. Iβll conserve it for a tighter late-game or final-day execution.
π¬
Alice
β
All
Iβm keeping my hand up on DAVID. Executing Heidi is still Saint-risk per my Lib ping (Heidi/Frank). David is the safest, most informative kill todayβhis Empath 0s + hard push onto possible Saint read as evil/poisoned at best.
π§
Lock in an execution that avoids Saint auto-loss while pressure-testing Davidβs Empath claims; if heβs evil we gain huge ground, if good we get clarity for tomorrow.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
Keep hands up on DAVID. If Frankβs Undertaker is true (Charlie=Poisoner), my Investigator is confirmed and Davidβs Empath N0=0 on (Charlie+Eve) canβt be sober β David is our best, no-Saint-risk execute today.
π§
Lock in the safest D2 execution with no Saint risk and resolve the David-vs-UT/Invest contradiction; keep town coordinated during the vote.
π
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
π³οΈ
New execution leader: David with 5 votes. They will be executed when nominations close unless tied or surpassed by another nominee.
π
Storyteller
The vote passes. David is now on the block with 5 votes and will be executed when nominations close, unless another nominee receives equal or more votes.
π¬
Grace
β
All
No more ties: keep DAVID on the block and let noms close. Heidi is still Saint-risk (Alice Lib). If anyone has a *slayer shot* or hard demon read, say it nowβotherwise we take the safe, informative exec and re-evaluate tomorrow.
π§
Lock in David execution (no Saint risk), prevent a tie/swap, and set up clear next-day logic depending on whether David was evil or just poisoned.
π¬
Bob
β
All
Agree: please donβt create a tie unless you have a HARD demon solve or Slayer shot. David is the safest/no-Saint-risk exec and resolves the UT/Invest/Empath mess. If you *do* counter-nom, state the full chain now so we can judge it fast.
π§
Lock in the lowest-risk, high-information execution (David) and discourage a tie. Prompt any last-minute hard mechanical countercase/slayer shot before noms close.
π¬
Eve
β
All
Iβm the Slayer (still have my shot). I donβt have a hard enough demon read to shoot into a guess right now. Iβm fine leaving DAVID on the blockβplease donβt create a tie unless youβre bringing a concrete demon solve.
π§
Publicly reveal Iβm Slayer and align with no-tie plan while keeping shot for a higher-confidence demon pick; invites anyone with strong info to speak up now.
π¬
Frank(Ghost)
β
All
Keep DAVID on block; please no tie unless you have a hard demon solve/Slayer shot. If my UT info is right (Charlie=Poisoner), Davidβs Empath story doesnβt fit. Heidi still has Saint-risk per Alice. After David exec, tomorrow we compare claims & solve.
π§
Lock in the no-Saint-risk execution on David, prevent a tie, and set up tomorrowβs mechanical check (what UT would have seen) to narrow demon candidates.
π¬
David
β
All
Hold onβdon't exec me yet! My Empath N0=0 on Charlie/Eve fits if I'm *poisoned* (wrong reads). Frank UT=Charlie Poisoner + Heidi Invest match, but Poisoner *could* poison me N0. Heidi is still Saint-risk (Alice Lib {Heidi/Frank}). Counter-nom Heidi: resolves Saint *and* confirms Invest/UT. Safer info than killing me!
π§
Final pitch to create tie/counter-nom Heidi: reframe as poisoned Empath (fits town logic), Heidi Saint-risk too high. Delay my exec, force Saint check, survive to 3p+.
π¬
Alice
β
All
No counter-noms. A tie would execute Heidi too, and my Librarian ping is {Heidi/Frank}=Saint β we could instantly lose. Davidβs βnom Heidi for infoβ is NOT safe. Leave David on block; reassess tomorrow with fewer worlds.
π§
Prevent a tie that could execute Heidi and instantly lose if sheβs Saint; keep the safe, information-gaining execution on David.
π¬
Charlie(Ghost)
β
All
Don't execute David blindly! If Frank UT=Poisoner is fake or poisoned, Heidi Invest is fake too. Alice Lib {Heidi/Frank}=Saint is still LIVE RISKβcounter-nom Heidi NOW to resolve Saint AND info without guaranteed loss. David poisoned N0 explains Empath 0s. No tie risk if we swap to Heidi!
π§
Dead Minion: Disrupt execution certainty by sowing Saint doubt and pushing counter-nom Heidi. Prevent clean Demon kill, force tie or hesitation to buy night/Scarlet time.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
Do NOT counter-nom Heidi. Any tie could execute both, and Aliceβs Lib ping keeps Saint-risk live. Charlie was executed & per UT was Poisonerβignore his push. David on block is safe/no-Saint-risk; let noms close & solve tomorrow.
π§
Prevent a risky counter-nomination that could create a tie or execute a possible Saint; keep the safe, informative execution on David and move to solving with fewer players.
π
Storyteller
The guillotine blade falls. David has been executed.
π
David(Ghost)
David has died.
π
Game Over
Demon Dead
Winner: Good
Transcript
Paused
Copied
Transcript Playback
Choose a perspective
The story is clearest through one player's eyes β watching everything at once means following several conversations at the same time.