Game Detail
Players
Alice (Librarian) Bob (Mayor) Charlie (Poisoner) David (Imp) Eve (Slayer) Frank (Undertaker) Grace (Recluse) Heidi (Investigator)
Token Usage
| Team | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Cost (USD) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Good | 406,064 | 69,131 | $1.6784 |
| Evil | 154,815 | 10,108 | $0.0360 |
Event Transcript
🎭
The game has started.
📜
Storyteller
→
Charlie
You are the Minion. The Demon is David.
📜
Storyteller
→
David
Minions are: Charlie. Your safe bluffs are: Chef, Soldier, Empath
📜
Storyteller
→
Charlie
Good evening Charlie. You are the Poisoner. Who would you like to poison tonight?
🎯
Charlie
Charlie made a choice.
🧠
Night 0 poison sows maximum chaos by targeting a likely info-gathering good player (Alice), disrupting town logic chains before they form and protecting David.
📜
Storyteller
→
Charlie
You chose to poison Alice.
📜
Storyteller
→
Alice
Good evening Alice. You are the Librarian. Either Heidi or Frank is the Saint.
📜
Storyteller
→
Heidi
Good evening Heidi. You are the Investigator. Either Eve or Charlie is the Poisoner.
Day 1
📜
Storyteller
Welcome to the village of Ravenswood Bluff. Please take this time to get to know your fellow villagers. Feel free to move around and have private conversations. Be wary, for a Demon hides among you!
👤
Heidi
→
Alice
Whisper? I’m Investigator. My N0 info: either Eve or Charlie is the Poisoner. What’s your role/starting info? Any early suspicions/claims you’ve heard?
🧠
Get a private ally and start cross-checking claims. Sharing my Investigator pair early with one player helps coordinate pressure without broadcasting to the Poisoner immediately.
👤
David
→
Charlie
Hey Charlie, I'm the Empath. My neighbors are you and Eve - planning to report 0 or 1 evil tonight depending on play. What's your info/claim? Let's coordinate to confuse town. Safe bluffs good.
🧠
Claim Empath bluff early via whisper to Minion Charlie for coordination. Align stories, support each other's claims to confuse town and protect Demon.
👤
Charlie
→
David
Hey David, got your whisper. I'm the Poisoner minion, you are my Demon. N0 poisoned Alice. I'll bluff Washerwoman: say 1 of Bob (neighbor) or Eve is Washerwoman (or similar safe). You report Empath 0/1 as planned. Publicly I'll back your claim. Thoughts on exact bluffs? Target good players with poison later.
🧠
Coordinate privately with Demon David first: share my role, agree on bluffs (me Washerwoman), plan to confuse town with neighbor info. Protects Demon, sets up deception on Day 1.
👤
Frank
→
Eve
,Grace
Hey—quick private sync? What role are you claiming + any starting info (WW/Librarian/Investigator/Chef etc)? I’m Townsfolk info. Happy to compare notes & keep it discreet for now.
🧠
Establish a small trust network, collect D1 claims/starting info, and avoid revealing Undertaker too early so I can survive to confirm executions.
👤
Grace
→
Frank
I’m the Outsider Recluse (no starting info). I might register as evil/minion/demon, so if your info pings me please treat cautiously. What Townsfolk/info role are you & what did you learn?
🧠
Privately inform Frank of my Recluse misregistration risk so his early info doesn’t hard-clear/condemn me, and prompt him to share his actual info role to build a coherent day-1 world.
👤
Alice
→
Heidi
Yep whisper ok. I’m Librarian. N0: either YOU or Frank is the Saint. If you’re truly Investigator, that would imply Frank=Saint. Are you hard-claiming Investigator or bluffing? Any public claims yet?
🧠
Answer Heidi’s query, share my mechanical info privately, and see if her claim is consistent (which would mechanically imply Frank is Saint) so we can plan nominations safely.
👤
Eve
→
Frank
,Grace
Yep—happy to sync. I’m a Townsfolk with *no starting info* (ability is later/day-facing). Keeping exact role quiet for now. What’s your exact claim + your N1/info pairs? Grace—what are you claiming / any starting info?
🧠
Respond politely while not outing Slayer; gather Frank/Grace claims and starting info now to build a candidate list for a later, high-confidence Slayer shot.
👤
Bob
→
Alice
,Charlie
Hi—Bob here. Quick 1:1 info swap? What role are you claiming + any N1 info/outsider count hints? Also who have you talked to and what did they claim? I’m keeping mine semi-vague for now but will share enough to help solve.
🧠
Early private info lets me build logic chains without outing Mayor. Getting both neighbors' claims helps spot inconsistencies and plan Day1 execution.
👤
Alice
→
Bob
Hey Bob. I’m hard-claim Librarian. N0: either Heidi or Frank is the Saint. Heidi told me she’s Investigator: either Eve or Charlie is the Poisoner. No other solid claims heard yet. What are you claiming + any info/whispers you’ve gotten?
🧠
Share my starting info and Heidi’s claim to build a consistent claim web and get Bob’s info for outsider-count/role conflicts before nominations.
👤
Heidi
→
Alice
I’m genuinely Investigator (not bluff). My N0: either Eve or Charlie is the Poisoner. If you’re sober Librarian, that indeed implies Frank=Saint (so please don’t let town execute him). I’d rather keep both pieces semi-private for now—have you heard any other starting claims (Chef/Washerwoman etc.)?
🧠
Lock a trusted info-sharing pact with Alice, tentatively clear me as Townsfolk to her, flag Frank as likely Saint (don’t execute), and plan controlled release of the Poisoner pair.
👤
Eve
→
Frank
,Grace
Yep. Can you both give exact role claim + full starting info (pairs/number), and who you shared it with? Also any outsider-count hints? I’m holding my exact TF for now; ability is day/once-type.
🧠
Gather early mechanical info while keeping my Slayer identity concealed; set up cross-checks and a trusted circle before nominations.
👤
Bob
→
Alice
Thx. I’m claiming a no-starting-info Townsfolk (keeping exact hidden for now; no N0 info). I’ve only heard your Lib + that Heidi told you Inv. Saint between Heidi/Frank is huge—pls get direct claims from both, and warn town not to yeet either w/o confirmation. I want to hear Eve+Charlie claims ASAP re Poisoner pair.
🧠
Reply to Alice with enough to build trust while not outing Mayor; also flag Saint/Poisoner implications so town avoids auto-losing executes and focuses on Eve/Charlie scrutiny.
👤
Grace
→
Eve
,Frank
Exact claim: Recluse (Outsider). No starting info. I’ve told only Frank so far (this chat). Reminder: I can misregister evil/minion/demon, so any Investigator/FT etc ping on me is non-conclusive. Frank—what exact TF role + full starting info/pairs? Eve—ok if you stay vague, but do you expect Outsider-count mod (Baron)?
🧠
Answer Eve’s direct request to maintain trust in the private sync, while flagging Recluse misregister risk and prompting Frank to reveal exact info so we can build early worlds/outsider count.
👤
David
→
Charlie
Perfect, Poisoner confirmed - Alice poisoned, great start. I'll publicly claim Empath soon: N0 info 0 evil neighbors (you+Eve clean). You claim Washerwoman: 1 of Bob/Eve is Washerwoman. We'll back each other (you confirm my neighbors clean). Kill info roles tonight (e.g. Eve/Frank if suspicious). Thoughts on who to frame first? Stay aligned.
🧠
Finalize bluff details with minion Charlie: exact Empath report (0 evil to seem towny), his Washerwoman claim, mutual support plan. Locks in deception early Day 1, builds false trust before nominations. Protects Demon survival.
👤
Frank
→
Eve
,Grace
Exact claim (to you two only): Undertaker. No starting info/N1 info yet. Haven’t told anyone else. I’d like to stay discreet so I survive to confirm executions. Eve—your “day/once” TF: is it Virgin or Slayer (or other)? Grace—any other Outsider claims you’ve heard?
🧠
Answer their questions without painting a night-kill target; set up a small trusted info network and get leads on outsider count/early nominee plan so my Undertaker info will matter.
👤
Charlie
→
David
Agreed plan: You claim Empath N0=0 evil (me+Eve good). I'll claim Washerwoman: 1 of Bob/Eve is Washerwoman. I'll publicly confirm your read (neighbors good). You can confirm my Washerwoman if asked. Frame info roles like Frank/Eve? Poison who N1? Let's execute soon.
🧠
Coordinate exact bluffs with Demon David before public claims in next tick. Confirm poisoning Alice sows doubt on her. Build mutual confirmation to protect Demon and confuse town logic early Day 1.
👤
Frank
→
Eve
,Grace
Got it. I’m Undertaker (told only you). Grace: have you heard *any* other Outsider claim yet? Eve: if you’re day/once TF, can you at least say Virgin vs Slayer (or “not those”)? Also: are you ok doing a Virgin test D1 for UT data?
🧠
Maintain secrecy as Undertaker while extracting Eve’s exact role category and planning a D1 execution/possible Virgin test that yields mechanical confirmation for the team.
👤
David
→
Charlie
Finalize plan: I'll claim Empath N0=0 evil (you+Eve good) publicly soon. You claim Washerwoman: 1 of Bob/Eve Washerwoman & confirm my read. N1: I kill Eve (info threat?). You poison Frank? Day1 frame/execute Frank or Eve first. Sound good? Stay tight.
🧠
Whisper Charlie to finalize N1 kill/poison targets & execution framing before public claims. Locks coordination, targets threats (Eve/Frank), ensures bluffs align for mutual confirmation to confuse town.
👤
Eve
→
Frank
,Grace
I’m *not Virgin*. I’m a later/day-facing TF; prefer to keep exact role quiet for now so evil can’t play around it. No need for a Virgin test w/ me D1. Grace—any other Outsider claims heard? Frank—who have you talked to besides us / what’s your planned public claim?
🧠
Maintain secrecy of my once-per-game day power, discourage premature Virgin tests, and collect outsider-count/claim network info to build a reliable trust circle.
👤
Alice
→
Frank
Hey Frank—private? I’m Alice, hard-claim Librarian. My N0: either you or Heidi is the SAINT. Can you tell me your real role (Saint or not) + whether you’re willing to soft/public claim to avoid accidental execution?
🧠
Get a direct claim from Frank to confirm/deny Saint, so we can prevent an auto-loss execution and decide what to share publicly before noms.
👤
Bob
→
Heidi
,Frank
Hey—Bob here. Alice told me she’s Librarian: either YOU or the other is Saint (Heidi/Frank). Can you each tell me your role claim + any N0 info, and whether you’re the Saint? Also who have you talked to + what did they claim?
🧠
Get direct claims from the 2 Saint candidates + reconcile with Alice’s info; contradictions can hard-clear or hard-suspect players before nominations.
👤
Charlie
→
Bob
Hey Bob, thanks for reaching out. I'm Washerwoman: 1 of my neighbors Bob or Eve is the Washerwoman. No night info yet. Who's your claim? You've talked to Alice/Heidi/Frank? What'd they say? Keeping it light pre-nomination.
🧠
Claim Washerwoman publicly via whisper to Bob (who asked), back David's Empath plan, build credibility. Respond to Bob's info swap to gather intel/deceive without full public claim yet. Protects Demon, confuses town.
👤
Heidi
→
Bob
,Frank
To Bob/Frank: I’m hard-claim Investigator. N0: either Eve or Charlie is the Poisoner. I am NOT the Saint. I’ve only spoken w/ Alice; she claims Librarian: either Heidi or Frank is Saint → since I’m not, Frank likely Saint (pls don’t execute). No other claims yet.
🧠
Answer Bob’s query, align privately on protecting likely-Saint Frank, and seed suspicion on Eve/Charlie without overpublicly painting targets yet.
👤
Grace
→
Frank
,Eve
Haven’t heard *any* other Outsider claims yet (only my Recluse so far). If a Librarian/Investigator/FT pings me, assume misregister is possible—don’t auto-clear/condemn others off that. Frank: prefer you stay hidden UT for now unless pressure; but if you go public, I’ll back UT utility. Eve: who’ve you shared with, if anyone?
🧠
Coordinate with my neighbor UT + a likely TF, lock down Outsider count expectations, and set expectations for my Recluse misregistration so we don’t mis-execute based on pings.
👤
David
→
Charlie
Quick update before I go public: I'll shout to all I'm Empath, N0=0 evil neighbors (you+Eve good). You follow confirming my read + your Washerwoman claim. Ready? Who poison N1 (Frank?), I kill Eve? Once I claim, back me hard. Tight.
🧠
Claim Empath publicly via group whisper to seed info, coordinate exact timing/backup with Charlie before nomination phase. Builds false trust, misdirects town logic early Day1.
👤
Bob
→
Charlie
,Eve
Quick check: Charlie, Washerwoman can’t learn “someone is Washerwoman.” What was your exact N0 ping (which Townsfolk + which 2 players)? Eve: Heidi hard-claims Investigator w/ you or Charlie = Poisoner—what’s your role/claim + any N0 info?
🧠
Clarify Charlie’s mechanically impossible claim and get Eve’s side of the Investigator pair so we can choose a safe D1 execution target and avoid executing a potential Saint.
👤
Heidi
→
Frank
Hey Frank—Heidi here. I’m hard-claim Investigator. N0: either Eve or Charlie is the Poisoner. Alice claims Librarian: either Heidi or Frank is Saint; I’m NOT Saint → if she’s sober, you’re likely Saint (pls avoid being executed). What’s your role/any info + who’ve you talked to?
🧠
Align with Frank early: warn about possible Saint status and avoid execution; collect his claim/starting info; set up a small trusted info network before nominations.
👤
Grace
→
Heidi
Hey Heidi—private sync? I’m Grace, currently claiming Recluse (Outsider, no starting info; may misregister evil/minion/demon). What are you claiming + any starting info (WW/Librarian/Investigator/Chef etc), and have you heard any other Outsider claims?
🧠
Get early mechanical info/claims from my neighbor and warn about Recluse misregistration so future info roles don’t hard-clear/condemn based on me.
👤
Frank
→
Alice
,Bob
I’m **not** the Saint. Privately: I’m **Undertaker** (pls keep quiet). So if your Lib info is right, Heidi would be Saint OR your info is poisoned/drunk/lie. Let’s avoid executing me/Heidi D1. Who else have you told/any other Outsider claims?
🧠
Prevent me being mis-executed as ‘Saint’, share true UT privately for trust, and flag that Alice/Heidi conflict implies poison/lie; steer town to safer D1 execution.
👤
Eve
→
Bob
,Charlie
,Grace
I’m the Slayer (no N0 info). Please don’t out that yet. If Heidi is hard-claiming Investigator saying {Eve/Charlie}=Poisoner, I’m good so either Heidi is wrong/evil/poisoned OR Charlie is the minion. Can you ask Heidi for exact N0 wording + who else she’s told? Grace: I’ve only shared w/ you+Frank.
🧠
Defuse Investigator ping by locking in my true Slayer claim privately, get exact Heidi info, and align good players on a coherent world before nominations.
👤
Alice
→
Bob
Update: Frank replied—hard says **NOT Saint**, privately claims **Undertaker**. If my Lib info is sober+he’s honest => **Heidi=Saint**. Strongly avoid executing Heidi/Frank D1. Let’s force Eve/Charlie to speak re Poisoner ping + seek Chef/Empath/FT info.
🧠
Update Bob with Frank’s UT claim and the mechanical implication that Heidi may be Saint, so we avoid catastrophic execution and instead pressure Eve/Charlie + gather more claims.
👤
Charlie
→
Bob
Hey Bob, good catch—Washerwoman: I know 1 of Bob/Eve *is not* Washerwoman (exact: one of my neighbors isn't Washerwoman). Typo earlier, sry. You/Eve both claim? Heidi's Investigator claim pings me or Eve as Poisoner? That's sus—either she's lying evil, or poisoned (I heard Alice acting weird). What's her exact N0 wording? Who'd she tell? Eve claims Slayer privately to us—good. David about to claim Empath N0=0 (me+Eve good). Back that + execute Frank plan?
🧠
Address Bob's doubt on my bluff directly, confirm mutual Washerwoman plausible (me knowing Bob is one, he knows Eve is), pivot to Heidi lie/evil to sow doubt on her Investigator claim against me, protect Demon & execute Frank/Eve plan.
Nominations — Day 1
📜
Storyteller
Nominations are now open.
⚖️
Charlie
→
Frank
Team plan + David Empath confirms me/Eve good (0 evil). Heidi Investigator pinging me/Eve Poisoner = lying evil/poisoned (Alice poisoned N0 acting weird). But execute Frank: suspicious whispers, fits minion. Vote him up.
🧠
Day1 execute Frank per team plan (I poison him N1). He's not Demon-safe, disrupts town, tests Heidi logic without nominating David. Progresses to night for more poison.
📜
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Frank. 4 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
💬
Heidi
→
All
Don’t vote Frank. I’m Investigator: either Eve or Charlie is the Poisoner. Also Alice claims Librarian saw Heidi/Frank is Saint; I’m not Saint so Frank likely is—executing him could lose us the game.
🧠
Stop a potentially game-losing Saint execution and put mechanical suspicion on Charlie/Eve as Poisoner to drive better D1/D2 targets.
✋
David
David raised their hand
🧠
Voting Frank executes him (likely good), reduces good players, disrupts town logic blaming Heidi's 'lie'. Gets to night safely for me to kill Eve (Heidi threat). Evil wins by attrition.
✋
Charlie
Charlie raised their hand
🧠
Raise hand to vote Frank per team plan (David already up). Execution removes good player, activates my N1 poison on Frank tomorrow if survives, sows chaos vs Heidi claim. Protects David.
💬
Bob
→
All
I’m not voting Frank. Too risky w/ Lib saying {Heidi/Frank}=Saint + Frank privately UT. D1 executing into possible Saint/UT feels awful. Let’s pause: can Alice/Heidi state exact N0 wording, and can David give his Empath read publicly?
🧠
Stop a low-info D1 execution that could auto-lose via Saint and preserve a claimed Undertaker; push for more public claims/clarifications to build a solid evil world.
💬
Alice
→
All
Not voting Frank. I’m Librarian: N0 I learned **either Heidi or Frank is the SAINT** (exact). D1 executing either is very risky. David—please give your Empath number + neighbors. Charlie—why push Frank over your Poisoner world? Let’s gather info, not this.
🧠
Stop a likely bad D1 execution into my Saint ping; force public clarification (David Empath, exact N0 wordings) and preserve potential Undertaker for info.
💬
Grace
→
All
Not voting Frank. With Alice hard Lib that {Heidi/Frank}=SAINT, D1 executing Frank/Heidi is huge loss-risk. Also Frank’s UT claim is valuable. David please state Empath # + neighbors. Heidi confirm exact Investigator wording.
🧠
Stop a potentially game-losing D1 execution, force public clarification (Empath/Investigator/Librarian), and keep a likely-good Undertaker alive for info.
💬
Frank
→
All
Don’t vote me up. Alice hard-Lib says {Heidi/Frank}=Saint; D1 execution here is terrible. I’m not Saint + I’m Undertaker (value later). David—please state Empath # + your neighbors. Heidi confirm exact Investigator wording. Charlie—why force this into Saint risk?
🧠
Stop a high-risk D1 execution on potential Saint/confirmed UT; force public info (David Empath neighbors/#, Heidi exact wording) and set up tomorrow’s execution with UT verification.
💬
Eve
→
All
I’m not voting Frank here. Too much Saint risk from Alice’s hard-Librarian + UT claim value. Before any execution: David please state Empath number + neighbors. Heidi give exact Investigator wording (which minion, which 2 names). Charlie—why is Frank your top suspect given that?
🧠
Stop a high-risk D1 execution into possible Saint/UT, force exact public claims (Empath/Investigator) to build a coherent world and identify likely liar for a safer D1/N2 plan.
💬
Eve
→
All
Still no vote from me on Frank. We need the mechanical info first: David—Empath number + your two neighbors. Heidi—Investigator exact wording (which minion + which 2 names). Charlie—what exactly did David tell you that makes Frank top suspect despite Saint risk?
🧠
Prevent catastrophic D1 Saint execution and force key info (Empath/Investigator exacts) into public to build a solvable world for D2.
⌛
Bob
Bob waits.
🧠
Do not add a vote on Frank; preserve town from potential Saint loss and buy time to collect public mechanical claims (Empath/Investigator wording) before choosing an execution.
💬
Charlie
→
All
Team, vote Frank. Heidi Invest lie/poisoned (Alice N0 poisoned acting sus). Alice Lib true but D1 Saint risk worth it—Frank whispers sus + fits Minion. David Empath N0=0 on me/Eve good (neighbors). Confirming soon. Eve Slayer good. Vote up—execute evil Minion now.
🧠
Defend Frank nom/execution publicly: back David Empath soon, attack Heidi/Alice as lying/poisoned. Keep vote up, force town split D1 to kill good player before N1 kill/poison.
💬
Grace
→
All
No vote on Frank. Hard-Lib {Heidi/Frank}=Saint makes this a potential instant-loss. Get info first: David—Empath number + neighbors (and confirm what you told Charlie). Heidi—Investigator exact wording (which minion + which 2). Charlie—why push into Saint risk?
🧠
Prevent catastrophic Saint execution, force public mechanical details (Empath/Investigator) and redirect suspicion toward Charlie for pushing into Saint risk.
💬
David
→
All
Team: I'm Empath. N0=0 evil neighbors: Charlie + Eve both good. Heidi Invest claiming Poisoner on them = lying evil or poisoned (Alice poisoned N0 fits weird Lib push). Alice Lib credible but Frank sus whispers = minion. Vote him up—D1 execute evil now, low Saint risk.
🧠
Publicly claim Empath to back Charlie, counter Heidi/Alice, push Frank execution. Builds evil trust, sows doubt on good info sources, gets minion executed to thin town.
💬
Heidi
→
All
Exact Invest: “Either Eve OR Charlie is the POISONER.” Poisoner can’t poison N0, so “Alice poisoned N0” is nonsense. If David truly Empath N0=0 on Charlie/Eve, then my info false ⇒ I’m Drunk—but Lib says {Heidi/Frank}=Saint & I’m not ⇒ Frank=Saint (no Drunk). Don’t vote Frank.
🧠
Stop a likely losing D1 execution into possible Saint, and expose the mechanical contradiction between my Invest info and David’s Empath 0 + Poisoner timing, redirecting suspicion to Charlie/David.
💬
Frank
→
All
Do NOT vote this through. Also: Poisoner *can* poison on the first night—so “Alice poisoned N0 is nonsense” is incorrect. We have a hard-Lib {Heidi/Frank}=Saint; D1 executing here is reckless. Let’s no-exec and sort Heidi vs David vs Charlie tomorrow.
🧠
Stop the execution-vote on me, correct Heidi’s rules error, and refocus town on gathering mechanical info rather than risking an immediate Saint loss.
💬
Alice
→
All
Do NOT vote Frank. If my Lib is correct, executing Frank or Heidi could instantly lose (Saint). D1 on “sus whispers” is not worth a 50/50. Also Poisoner CAN act first night, so Heidi’s ‘can’t poison N0’ is wrong. David/Charlie: why push this risk?
🧠
Prevent a catastrophic Saint execution and refocus onto resolving the Heidi vs David/Charlie contradiction with mechanical follow-ups and safer executions.
📜
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
🗳️
Nominee Frank did not reach threshold.
📜
Storyteller
Frank did not receive enough votes (2/4).
💬
Frank
→
All
Let’s STOP noms and accept no-exec D1. With hard-Lib {Heidi/Frank}=Saint, executing either is a coinflip-loss. Tonight Demon kills; tomorrow we hard-resolve David Empath vs Heidi Invest vs Charlie push. Everyone please be ready to restate exact N0 info + who you whispered.
🧠
Prevent a reckless D1 execution into possible Saint, and set up focused questions/claim map so we can execute correctly D2+ with better mechanical footing.
💬
Charlie
→
All
Agreed, STOP noms—no more D1. Heidi's Invest lie exposed: Poisoner CAN poison N0 (I did Alice). She's evil/Drunk/poisoned pushing false Saint defense. Alice Lib credible but sus timing. David Empath solid. No-exec safe, info tomorrow. Good game all.
🧠
Agree to no-exec D1 per plan, reinforce Heidi lying via bad Poisoner rules knowledge to discredit her. Deflect from Demon, build trust as good Washerwoman/Empath pair, progress to N1 kill/poison.
💬
Alice
→
All
Hard agree: no more noms on Heidi/Frank—my Lib is {Heidi/Frank}=SAINT so that’s a coinflip-loss. Charlie: what did you mean “I did/poisoned Alice”? If anyone wants a D1 exec, Charlie is a *safe* (non-Saint) candidate; otherwise no-exec.
🧠
Steer town away from Saint coinflip, lock in claims, and either secure a safer execution (Charlie) or no-exec while setting up N1 protection/info to resolve conflicts.
⚖️
Grace
→
Charlie
Nominating Charlie: you said “I did/poisoned Alice” and pushed executing into a possible Saint. That aligns w/ Heidi’s Investigator (Eve/Charlie=Poisoner) and is a much safer D1 exec than the {Heidi/Frank}=Saint pair.
🧠
Avoid the 50/50 Saint loss on Frank/Heidi; Charlie’s self-incriminating ‘poisoned Alice’ plus agenda push makes him best D1 execution to gain mechanical confirmation.
📜
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Charlie. 4 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
✋
Grace
Grace raised their hand
🧠
Vote Charlie to pursue the safest mechanically sound D1 execution (not in the Saint pair) and test the Poisoner/Demon worlds; reduce poison pressure and clarify tomorrow’s info.
✋
Alice
Alice raised their hand
🧠
Vote Charlie because it’s mechanically safer than executing into my Saint pair, and his own ‘poisoned Alice’ statement is strong evil evidence; best D1 execute target.
✋
Frank
Frank raised their hand
🧠
Vote to execute the safest high-suspicion target (Charlie) to avoid Saint risk, gain Undertaker confirmation tonight, and test David/Heidi/Charlie claims.
✋
Heidi
Heidi raised their hand
🧠
We have 3 votes already; my vote executes a safe (non-Saint) suspect who matches my Investigator pair and self-incriminated. This is the best D1 execution to gain certainty and reduce poison risk.
✋
Charlie
Charlie raised their hand
🧠
Raise hand to vote myself up: sacrifice Minion to protect Demon David. Dead I still talk/vote/disrupt town logic chains, poison N1. Execution confirms Poisoner but Demon hidden.
✋
Eve
Eve raised their hand
🧠
Charlie is the safest high-value D1 execution: no Saint risk, mechanically implicated by Invest + his own ‘poison’ slip; if he’s the Demon we instantly win.
✋
David
David raised their hand
🧠
Raise to execute Charlie: either kills my Minion (sacrificeable, per plan) or good player safely (no Saint risk). Either way, town disrupted D1, Demon safe to N1 kill Eve.
✋
Bob
Bob raised their hand
🧠
Charlie is the safest D1 execution target (not in Lib’s Saint pair) and has a strong self-incriminating slip + anti-town push. Voting helps remove likely evil without coinflip-loss.
💬
Heidi
→
All
Keep hands up on Charlie. My N0 Investigator: exactly “Either Eve or Charlie is the Poisoner.” Charlie said “I did/poisoned Alice” + pushed a Saint-coinflip exec. Charlie is a safe D1 kill (not in {Heidi/Frank}). Frank UT can verify tonight.
🧠
Lock in the town’s rationale to execute Charlie (safe target) and prevent backtracking; set up tomorrow’s confirmation via Undertaker and re-evaluation of David/Eve.
💬
Grace
→
All
Keep hands up on Charlie. This is the *safe* D1 exec: not in the {Heidi/Frank}=Saint pair, and Charlie literally said “I poisoned Alice” + pushed a Saint coinflip. If he’s Poisoner, removing him now is huge.
🧠
Lock in a safe D1 execution that avoids the Saint pair, potentially removes the Poisoner, and creates clear info for tomorrow.
💬
Eve
→
All
Keep votes on Charlie. This is the safe D1 exec (not in {Heidi/Frank}=Saint). I’m Slayer good, so Heidi’s “Eve or Charlie is Poisoner” points to Charlie. Also ‘I poisoned Alice’ + pushing Saint coinflip is wild—execute Charlie.
🧠
Lock in a safe D1 execution outside the Saint pair that resolves the Heidi-vs-David-vs-Charlie triangle and likely removes the Poisoner.
↩️
David
David lowered their hand
🧠
Lower hand to prevent Charlie Minion execution on D1. Disrupt town momentum, protect team, force debate on Heidi/Frank Saint pair to waste town time & nominate Frank next.
💬
Bob
→
All
I’m keeping my hand up on Charlie. The “I poisoned Alice” + Heidi’s Invest {Eve/Charlie}=Poisoner is too much, and this avoids the claimed Saint pair {Heidi/Frank}. If Charlie flips good, we re-evaluate David/Heidi tomorrow.
🧠
Push a D1 execution that’s mechanically ‘safer’ than Heidi/Frank given Saint risk, and that has a strong minion case (Invest ping + self-incriminate), narrowing worlds quickly.
↩️
Charlie
Charlie lowered their hand
🧠
Lower hand to prevent 5+ vote threshold exec (only 4 hands now w/ David down), force safe no-exec D1. Protects Demon David, lets us poison/heal N1 to flip game.
💬
Frank
→
All
Keep hands up on Charlie. It’s the safe D1 exec (not in {Heidi/Frank}=Saint) and his ‘I poisoned Alice’ slip + Saint-coinflip push is too much. I’m Undertaker—if he dies today I’ll confirm his character tonight.
🧠
Keep my vote on Charlie and persuade others: it’s the lowest-risk D1 exec (avoids Saint pair) and generates strong mechanical info via my Undertaker tonight.
💬
Alice
→
All
Keep hands up on Charlie. It’s the only mechanically *safe* D1 exec (not in my {Heidi/Frank}=Saint pair), and Charlie literally said “I poisoned Alice” + pushed a Saint coinflip. If Frank is UT, he confirms Charlie tonight.
🧠
Lock in the safe D1 execution that avoids the Saint pair and removes the likely Poisoner; keep votes steady so we don’t waste the day.
📜
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
🗳️
New execution leader: Charlie with 6 votes. They will be executed when nominations close unless tied or surpassed by another nominee.
📜
Storyteller
The vote passes. Charlie is now on the block with 6 votes and will be executed when nominations close, unless another nominee receives equal or more votes.
💬
Bob
→
All
Unless someone has *hard* mechanical info, I think we should stop nominating and let Charlie die—avoids the {Heidi/Frank} Saint risk and resolves the “I poisoned Alice” mess. Don’t create a tie to save him.
🧠
Lock in the safest D1 execution and prevent a late tie/counter-nomination that could save an evil Charlie or risk hitting the Saint pair.
💬
Frank
→
All
No more noms—don’t tie/save Charlie. I’ll get Charlie’s executed character tonight (Undertaker). If there’s a Monk, please protect me tonight so UT info isn’t poisoned. Unclaimed folks (Bob/Grace/Eve) be ready with full claims D2 so we can chain off the UT result.
🧠
Lock in Charlie execution without ties, and set up next-day mechanical cross-checks while requesting protection to keep my Undertaker info reliable.
💬
Grace
→
All
Agree: no more nominations unless *hard* mech info. Don’t risk a tie that saves Charlie. If there’s a Monk, please protect Frank tonight for UT info. D2 we chain off UT result + resolve Heidi/David/Eve contradictions.
🧠
Lock in the safe Charlie execution, prevent late tie/savior noms, and set up D2 info chain around Undertaker + protection request.
💬
Heidi
→
All
No more nominations unless you have *hard* mech that beats this. Don’t risk a tie that saves Charlie. If a Monk exists, please protect Frank tonight so UT result isn’t poisoned. D2: everyone full-claim so we can chain off Charlie’s UT-confirmed role.
🧠
Lock in the safe D1 execution on Charlie, prevent a tie/save, and set up Monk protection + D2 claim structure to convert UT info into a solvable world.
💬
Eve
→
All
Agree: no more noms—don’t tie/save Charlie. Monk please protect Frank tonight. D2 I’ll full-claim + we chain off UT result; if Charlie somehow good, we pivot hard onto Heidi/David worlds.
🧠
Lock in Charlie’s execution (no tie), protect Frank for UT info, and set up D2 full-claims + logic chains without burning Slayer shot early.
💬
Charlie
→
All
One last thing before I die: Heidi's Invest is fake. She's pushing me to Saint-shield herself/Frank (Lib pair). My "slip" was misphrasing—I meant I *suspect* Alice poisoned (weird N0 behavior). Eve Slayer bluff to pile. David/Eve good per his Empath. Don't execute me—nom Heidi instead! Monk protect Frank? Trap.
🧠
Accept likely exec as Minion sacrifice to protect David. Final speech disrupts town logic for D2 ghost play, prevents any last-second save attempt that risks Demon exposure.
💬
Alice
→
All
Do NOT nom/try to tie. My Librarian info is exactly: **either Heidi or Frank is the Saint** → executing either today is a potential instant-loss. Charlie is the only mechanically safe D1. Monk (if any) please protect Frank tonight for UT info; everyone be ready to full-claim D2.
🧠
Lock in the mechanically safe D1 execute (Charlie) and prevent a tie saving him; remind town that nominating Heidi/Frank risks instant loss due to my Saint-pair info; set up Monk protection + D2 claim order.
💬
David
→
All
Agree: no more noms/ties—execute Charlie safely (not claimed Saint pair). His "poison slip" + Heidi Invest seals it. Monk protect Frank tonight for clean UT info. D2: full claims from all (esp unclaimed Bob/Grace/Eve) to chain off result + resolve Empath/Invest/Lib contradictions.
🧠
Confirm consensus to execute Charlie (our Minion) as safe D1, protect Frank (UT) with Monk request, set up D2 full claims to pivot logic chains onto good players and survive to endgame.
📜
Storyteller
The guillotine blade falls. Charlie has been executed.
💀
Charlie(Ghost)
Charlie has died.
Night 1
📜
Storyteller
→
David
Good evening David. You are the Imp. Who would you like to kill tonight?
🎯
David
David made a choice.
🧠
Prioritize killing Frank: denies crucial UT info on Charlie (our minion), removes Lib Saint coinflip, isolates Eve (Invest target), protects my Empath bluff. Town loses key deduction tool, buys us multi-days.
💀
Frank(Ghost)
Frank has died.
📜
Storyteller
→
David
You chose to kill Frank.
Day 2
📜
Storyteller
Morning breaks, but heavy hearts remain. Frank has been found dead in the night.
👤
Bob
→
Alice
,David
,Heidi
Quick sync: confirm exact N0 info & any N1 events. Alice: Lib saw (Heidi/Frank)=Saint? Any reason to think poisoned? David: any Empath N1 number now that Charlie dead? Heidi: restate Invest (Eve/Charlie)=Poisoner—still? Any new reads?
🧠
Get exact claim details + any N1 info/poisoning tells from Alice/David/Heidi to build a coherent world before nominations and decide safe execution path.
👤
Eve
→
David
,Alice
Any new info from N1/whispers (esp Bob’s group)? Frank died so no UT confirm—who’s your top Demon/world rn? Also: I’m actually the Slayer; I’m holding shot unless we get a strong mechanical target.
🧠
Get current whispers/claim updates and quietly position my Slayer shot for maximum impact next tick/nom phase.
👤
Charlie(Ghost)
→
Bob
Bob, we need to save David. Confirm you're with us - town thinks he's good Empath from his N0=0 on Charlie/Eve. Eve/Heidi pushing evil on him. What's your read? Plan to vote save on him if nommed. Frank kill by Imp.
🧠
As dead Poisoner, coordinate with Bob (alive neighbor, likely evil per emp 0) to protect David. Confirm shared info, plan D2 vote to save Demon.
👤
David
→
Eve
Eve: N1 Empath=0 (Bob/Eve both good). Confirms Heidi Invest fake (framed Charlie minion). She's evil/Demon likely. Let's nom Heidi next tick—your Slayer shot ready if needed? Ignore Bob group for now, feels fishy.
🧠
Sync with Eve (Slayer) to nom Heidi (Invest slipper), share Empath N1=0 guilting her as fake. Hide as Empath, build trust, eliminate threat.
👤
Frank(Ghost)
→
Alice
,Bob
,Grace
FYI I’m the dead Frank (real Undertaker). N1 I got UT info: executed Charlie registered as **Poisoner**. If that’s true, David’s Empath N0=0 on (Charlie,Eve) can’t be honest/sober → David likely evil. With minion dead, I’d push executing David today.
🧠
Get my Undertaker result into trusted hands fast; if it hard-guilts David we should coordinate a clean D2 execution without burning ghost votes unnecessarily.
👤
Grace
→
Heidi
,Alice
,Bob
Frank (dead) messaged: he was real Undertaker; N1 saw executed Charlie registered as **Poisoner**. If true, David’s Empath ‘0’ on (Charlie,Eve) was either poisoned or a lie—can David share his N2 Empath (only Eve alive neighbor)? We should full-claim + decide exec.
🧠
Get key players aligned on the new UT info, force David to provide N2 Empath (poison no longer possible), and set up the most mechanically justified execution today.
👤
Heidi
→
Bob
,Alice
,David
Restating: N0 Invest = either Eve or Charlie is Poisoner. Grace says Frank(UT) got N1=Charlie shown Poisoner → clears Eve from my ping + confirms my info. David: your Empath N1=0 likely due to Charlie poisoning you; what was your N2 (only Eve alive neighbor)?
🧠
Sync hard mechanical info (Invest + UT) and force an updated Empath number from David to either clear or implicate Eve, then narrow demon candidates before nominations.
👤
Alice
→
Bob
,Grace
,David
Reminder: I’m real Librarian N0 = (Heidi OR Frank) is Saint. Frank now dead at night, so PLEASE treat Heidi as likely Saint (don’t exec her) unless we hard-confirm Frank was Saint. David: what were your Empath reads N1/N2 (post-Charlie exec), and do you think Charlie poisoned you N0?
🧠
Align town on key mechanical constraint (Saint pair) and reduce mis-exec risk; collect David’s current Empath to narrow demon candidates and decide today’s execution.
👤
Alice
→
David
,Bob
,Heidi
Need exact Empath timeline pls: N0 you said 0 on (Charlie,Eve). What was N1 (pre-exec) & N2 (now only Eve alive neighbor)? If N2=1 → Eve evil; if N2=0 → Eve likely good + your N0 was poison. Also: my Lib still says (Heidi/Frank)=Saint, so avoid executing Heidi unless we can rule out Frank=Saint.
🧠
Get David to commit to exact N1/N2 Empath now (key mechanical fork) and align Bob/Heidi on execution plan while preserving Saint caution around Heidi/Frank.
👤
Frank(Ghost)
→
Eve
,Alice
,Bob
UT N1: Charlie registered **Poisoner**. That strongly backs Heidi’s Invest (Eve/Charlie). If so, David’s Empath N0=0 on (Charlie,Eve) can’t be honest/sober → David likely evil. I’d push executing David today; Eve looks pretty clear in this world.
🧠
Get key players aligned on the strongest mechanical chain: UT confirms Charlie=Poisoner ⇒ David’s Empath story collapses; drive today’s nomination/vote onto David.
👤
Charlie(Ghost)
→
Bob
Bob, David is our Empath - N0=0 on me/Eve proves it (we were good). Eve/Heidi pushing him evil now after Frank (Imp kill). Heidi fake Invest. Confirm you're team David? Plan: vote save him if nommed, disrupt their chain. Poison was on Alice N0.
🧠
As dead Poisoner, use ghost vote + talk to protect Demon David. Re-engage Bob (teammate?) to confirm alliance, sow doubt on Eve/Heidi, prevent David nom/exec. Keep Demon alive to win.
👤
Bob
→
Alice
,David
,Grace
Key fork: If Frank UT true→Charlie was Poisoner, so David N0=0 could be from poison. Now poison gone: David, pls give exact Empath N1/N2; with only Eve alive neighbor, N2=1 ⇒ push exec Eve; N2=0 ⇒ Eve likely good, reevaluate others. Avoid exec Heidi (Lib Saint pair).
🧠
Force a clean mechanical fork: get David’s post-Charlie Empath number. It should either hard-sus Eve or expose David as lying, guiding today’s execution without touching likely-Saint Heidi.
👤
Heidi
→
David
,Alice
,Bob
Need exact Empath timeline w/ nights labeled: N0 (Charlie+Eve) you said 0—confirm. N1 (still Charlie+Eve, pre-exec) what #? N2 (now only Eve alive neighbor) what #? With Poisoner dead, N2 should be reliable; please answer in 1 line.
🧠
Lock down David’s exact Empath timeline now that Poisoner is allegedly dead; this either mechanically clears Eve or creates a hard contradiction to drive today’s execution.
👤
Eve
→
Alice
,Bob
,Grace
Quick check-in before noms: what’s your exact claim + any N1 info/whispers? Also can anyone corroborate Frank’s alleged UT N1 ‘Charlie=Poisoner’ and how that impacts David/Heidi? I’m trying to lock a Demon candidate today.
🧠
Get Bob/Grace claims + Alice corroboration on Frank’s UT result to resolve David-vs-Heidi worlds before nominations; decide whether my Slayer shot should be used today.
👤
David
→
Eve
Eve: Confirming timeline publicly next: N0 (Charlie/Eve)=0; N1 (pre-exec Charlie/Eve)=0 (Charlie poisoned me); N2 (only Eve)=0 so Eve good. Heidi full fake. You're Slayer? Nom Heidi this tick, shot ready if hammer fails. Stay on her, avoid Bob group.
🧠
Publicly answer Empath timeline as N0=0, N1=0, N2=0 to clear Eve, guilt Heidi as lying Invest/Demon. Coordinate Eve (real Slayer) to nom/shot Heidi next, protect Demon survival.
👤
Grace
→
Eve
,Alice
,Bob
My exact claim: **Recluse**. That + Alice Lib (Heidi/Frank = Saint) implies outsider-count issue → either Baron, someone drunk/lying. Frank told me he’s real UT and N1 saw Charlie register as **Poisoner**. If so, poison now gone; David’s next Empath (only on you) should be reliable + key today.
🧠
Answer Eve’s check-in with my real claim + key mechanical tension (Outsider count, UT reliability) so the group chooses a higher-EV execution/Slayer shot today.
👤
Charlie(Ghost)
→
Bob
Bob, still no reply? David N0 Empath=0 evil (me/Eve good then). Heidi Invest fake (called me Poisoner), Eve now pushes David evil after Frank Imp kill N1. Confirm: vote save David if nommed? Plan to nom Eve/Heidi? We lose if David dies.
🧠
Keep pressuring Bob privately to confirm team David, reinforce he's good Empath vs Eve/Heidi push. Coordinate potential evil or mislead good Bob to vote-save Demon David at nomination. Disrupt town chain as ghost.
👤
Grace
→
David
,Alice
,Eve
Before noms: David pls give exact Empath results N0/N1/N2 (and current alive neighbors). If Frank UT true (Charlie=Poisoner), your D1 ‘0’ could be poison—so your latest read should now be clean + deciding vote/nom target. I’m Recluse; avoid using me for FT/Investigator pings.
🧠
Get David’s exact Empath timeline now (key mechanical fork) and align Alice/Eve on a nomination plan that avoids Saint-risk (Heidi) while maximizing Demon-hit odds.
👤
David
→
Eve
Eve: Quick plan—next tick I'll publicly claim full Empath timeline: N0 (Charlie/Eve)=0; N1 (pre-exec Charlie/Eve)=0 (poisoned); N2 (Eve)=0 so Eve good, blame Charlie poison on Heidi's fake Invest. You nom Heidi tick 1 after. Shot ready on hammer fail? Stay silent til then, avoid others.
🧠
Publicly claim Empath timeline blaming Charlie poison on Heidi's fake Invest, nom Heidi next tick. Coordinate Eve nom+Slayer backup to execute Heidi, hiding as good Empath while eliminating threat.
👤
Frank(Ghost)
→
Alice
,Bob
,Grace
Reminder: I’m dead Frank (real UT). N1 (before I died) I learned executed Charlie registered **Poisoner**. If so, David’s Empath N0=0 on (Charlie,Eve) can’t be true while sober/honest → David very likely evil. Please coordinate a **David nomination today**; I can’t get more UT info now.
🧠
Get an alive player to nominate/execute David today and align town on a coherent plan; I’m dead UT so this is my last high-leverage push before noms.
👤
Eve
→
Alice
,Grace
,Frank(Ghost)
Need clarity before noms: Frank—who exactly did you tell UT N1 ‘Charlie=Poisoner’, when, and were you ever poisoned? Alice—still stand by Lib (Heidi/Frank=Saint)? any other info? Grace—Recluse means outsider-count mismatch; who do you suspect Demon between David/Heidi?
🧠
Resolve the key contradiction (UT result vs Empath world) by pinning down who heard/verified Frank’s UT info and outsider count; decide whether to spend Slayer shot on Heidi or David before noms.
👤
Alice
→
Bob
,Eve
,Grace
Key: press David for exact Empath N2 (only alive neighbor=Eve): N2=1→Eve likely evil; N2=0→Eve likely good & David’s N0 was poison/lie. Also outsider mismatch (my Lib Saint + your Recluse) implies Baron/Drunk/lying—push full-claims. Eve: consider Slayer-shotting David if he’s top suspect.
🧠
Align Bob/Eve/Grace on the key mechanical fork (David N2) + outsider-count implications, and set a concrete plan for noms/possible Slayer shot.
👤
Bob
→
Eve
,Alice
,Grace
My claim (priv): **Mayor**. I want David’s exact Empath timeline (N0/N1/N2) ASAP; post-Charlie exec his N2 on only-neighbor Eve should be clean. If N2=1 -> I’m voting to execute Eve. If N2=0 -> Eve likely good; then we pivot to David/others. Also, pls don’t exec Heidi unless we can rule out Lib Saint-pair.
🧠
Coordinate before nominations: answer Eve’s query, quietly set me as Mayor for endgame planning, and pressure David for exact Empath N1/N2 since it’s the key fork for today’s execution.
👤
Heidi
→
David
,Alice
,Bob
David pls 1-line labeled Empath: N0 (nbrs Charlie+Eve)=?; N1 (same, pre-exec)=?; N2 (now only alive nbr Eve)=?. With Poisoner dead, N2 should be reliable + will drive today’s exec.
🧠
Get David’s labeled Empath timeline, especially N2 (post-Poisoner death). This is the fastest mechanical fork to decide today’s execution target before nominations.
👤
Bob
→
David
,Alice
,Grace
David please reply 1 line: Empath N0 (Charlie+Eve)=?, N1 (pre-exec)=?, N2 (only Eve)=?. If N2=1 I’m voting exec Eve; if N2=0 Eve likely good & we pivot to you/others. Also avoid executing Heidi unless we can rule out Lib Saint-pair.
🧠
Force a concrete Empath timeline to anchor today’s execution choice; align town on conditional plan while avoiding Saint-loss on Heidi.
👤
Grace
→
Bob
,Alice
,Eve
Plan for noms: force David to state exact Empath N0/N1/N2 NOW. If Frank UT true (Charlie=Poisoner), no poison now → David N2 (only neighbor Eve) should be reliable: N2=1 => exec Eve; N2=0 => Eve likely good, pivot exec David/others. If David dodges, that’s itself a reason to exec him. Also consider alt world: Charlie was Baron (outsider mismatch), Eve could be real Poisoner who poisoned UT.
🧠
Coordinate town’s fork: demand David’s exact N2 Empath and use it to choose between executing Eve vs David; also keep Baron/poisoned-UT world in mind and avoid executing Heidi (Saint risk).
👤
Frank(Ghost)
→
Eve
,Alice
,Grace
Re: UT N1 ‘Charlie=Poisoner’—I learned it Night 1 (after Charlie’s D1 execution) during normal night wake. Then I was killed same night (found dead at dawn). I first shared it early Day2 via whispers to Alice/Bob/Grace, then to you. I *could* have been poisoned N1 (if Charlie was Poisoner), so treat as strong-but-not-100%; it matches Heidi’s Invest + Charlie slip though.
🧠
Answer Eve’s verification Q, acknowledge poison risk, and frame how to use my UT info without overcommitting; help town decide nomination/vote with best mechanical chain.
👤
Charlie(Ghost)
→
Bob
Bob, urgent: David is Imp, his N0 Empath=0 proves me/Eve good then. Frank N1 Imp kill. Heidi fake Invest (called me Poisoner), Eve flips to push David evil now. I poisoned Alice N0 (she's compromised). Confirm you're saving David? Plan: nom Eve then Heidi. Vote save David. Reply now - we lose if he dies.
🧠
As dead Poisoner, use ghost whisper to Bob (neighbor) to recruit/confirm as ally, reinforce David=Imp protection, sow doubt on Eve/Heidi. Prevent Demon nom/exec.
👤
David
→
Eve
Eve: Final sync before public claim next tick: I'll say \"Empath timeline: N0 (Charlie/Eve)=0; N1 (pre-exec Charlie/Eve)=0 (Charlie poisoned me); N2 (only Eve)=0 so Eve good. Heidi's Invest full fake - she framed Charlie to hide. Nom her tick 1 after.\" You nom Heidi tick 1, shot on hammer fail. Stay silent til then, confirm plan.
🧠
Publicly claim full Empath timeline next to guilt Heidi (fake Invest), clear Eve (my N2=0), enable Eve's nom/shot on Heidi. Coordinate Eve silent, nom post-claim. Delays my exposure, pushes Heidi exec.
👤
Eve
→
David
,Bob
,Heidi
David: I won’t auto-nom Heidi. Please state exact Empath N0/N1/N2 in public w/ no hedging + why you think N1 poisoned. Bob: let’s force-lock David’s timeline; if he dodges/changes, I’ll consider Slayer on him. Heidi: restate your N0 Invest precisely + why you said Poisoner can’t act N1.
🧠
Force hard commitments on key claims before nominations, collect Heidi’s details, and avoid being steered into a premature Heidi execution; keep Slayer shot for a high-confidence demon (likely David if contradictions).
👤
Alice
→
David
,Bob
,Heidi
David pls post 1-line Empath timeline NOW: N0 (Charlie+Eve)=?, N1 (pre-exec)=?, N2 (only Eve)=?. If Charlie was Poisoner, N2 should be clean. Also reminder: my Librarian = (Heidi OR Frank) is Saint → avoid nominating Heidi unless proven.
🧠
Pressure David to lock in an Empath timeline before noms so town can execute the best mechanical suspect, while keeping Heidi safe given my Saint info.
👤
Heidi
→
Eve
,Alice
,Bob
Restating: N0 Investigator msg was EXACTLY “Either Eve or Charlie is the Poisoner.” If Frank-as-UT saw Charlie=Poisoner, then Charlie’s dead -> no poison on N1/N2. So David’s N2 Empath should be clean. If he won’t give labeled N0/N1/N2 or changes it, I want pressure/exec on David.
🧠
Answer Eve’s questions, lock in my mechanical info, and steer town to a clean decision tree: if poisoner dead, David’s N2 Empath should be trusted; hedging => execute him.
Nominations — Day 2
📜
Storyteller
Nominations are now open. Please remember that only living players may nominate.
⚖️
David
→
Heidi
Empath full timeline: N0 (Charlie/Eve)=0 good; N1 (pre-exec Charlie/Eve)=0 (Charlie minion poisoned my info); N2 (Eve)=0 good. Heidi faked Invest framing them to hide as Demon. Lib likely fake/poisoned. Exec her.
🧠
Heidi most dangerous info claim framing minion Charlie + Lib defense protects her. Nom/force exec now per Eve plan before they pivot/convince. Keeps me safe, disrupts good logic.
📜
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Heidi. 3 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
💬
Frank(Ghost)
→
All
Don’t rush Heidi: I’m dead Frank (claimed Undertaker). N1 I learned executed Charlie registered **Poisoner** (could’ve been poisoned, but it matches Charlie’s slip + Heidi’s Invest). If Charlie was Poisoner, David’s Empath ‘0 on Charlie/Eve’ is very suspect. I’m NOT spending my ghost vote on Heidi.
🧠
Dissuade town from executing Heidi off David’s shaky story; conserve my single ghost vote for a later, higher-certainty Demon execution (likely David).
💬
Eve
→
All
I’m not voting Heidi: Alice’s Lib says Heidi/Frank could be SAINT (exec = instant loss). We must resolve Lib+Recluse outsider mismatch + UT(Charlie=Poisoner) vs David’s Empath. If no clarity, I prefer pressure/nom on David over risking Saint.
🧠
Publicly block a potentially game-losing Heidi execution due Saint risk, and refocus town on resolving the key mechanical contradictions before committing votes.
💬
Bob
→
All
I’m **not voting Heidi**—too much Saint-risk from Alice’s Lib (Heidi/Frank). Even if Lib is wrong, we gain little by gambling the game here. David’s story is messy (calls Charlie “minion” despite UT=Poisoner). After this vote, I want **pressure/nomination on David** instead.
🧠
Prevent an instant Saint-loss by stopping the Heidi execution, and steer town toward a safer, mechanically grounded suspect (David) next.
💬
Grace
→
All
I’m NOT voting Heidi—Alice’s Lib makes her possible Saint, too risky. Also David’s Empath story doesn’t line up with UT(Charlie=Poisoner) + he’s steering hard onto Heidi. After this, I want a David nomination/pressure.
🧠
Prevent a possible instant-loss on Heidi (Saint), and set up the town to nominate David next since his Empath timeline conflicts with UT/logic and his push feels like a trap.
💬
Alice
→
All
Not voting Heidi. My N0 Librarian: **Heidi or Frank is the Saint**—executing Heidi could be instant loss. Also David’s story is messy (calls Charlie “minion” while claiming Poisoner), and he’s tunneling Heidi. After this, we should nominate David.
🧠
Avoid an immediate Saint loss and keep town on mechanically safer targets; highlight David’s contradictions so we pivot to a David execution next.
✋
Charlie(Ghost)
Charlie raised their hand
🧠
Do NOT vote Heidi. Town already refusing due Saint fear (per all statements). Our no-vote blends in, saves Demon if nominated later, avoids drawing attention as dead evil.
💬
Heidi
→
All
Please don’t vote me. I’m NOT the Saint; I’m Investigator: N0 “Eve OR Charlie is Poisoner.” Frank-UT says Charlie=Poisoner, so David’s ‘0’ reads + calling Charlie “minion” while nomming me looks like evil steering. After this, nom David.
🧠
Stop a wasteful/risky execution on me; focus town on the strongest inconsistency (David’s Empath claims vs Charlie=Poisoner) and set up David as next nomination.
✋
David
David raised their hand
🧠
Raise to execute Heidi (likely Demon faking Invest). Secures win if passes (3 votes: me+Eve+Charlie?). If fails, pressure builds on me but Eve shot backup keeps Heidi dead.
💬
Heidi
→
All
No votes on me please—Alice’s Lib makes me possible Saint = instant loss. My Investigator matched Frank-UT: Charlie=Poisoner. With poison dead, David’s N2 Empath=0 is clean yet he’s tunneling me + miscalling Charlie “minion”. If this fails, nominate David.
🧠
Prevent a risky Heidi execution (possible Saint) and redirect town to the mechanically inconsistent player (David) for today’s execution.
⌛
Eve
Eve waits.
🧠
Do not vote Heidi due to possible Saint instant-loss and low consensus; conserve Slayer shot and keep space to pivot to a David nomination with clearer mechanical grounding.
⌛
Bob
Bob waits.
🧠
Do not contribute to a potentially game-losing Heidi execution given Saint risk; conserve influence and pivot to David nomination/pressure immediately after this vote.
💬
Grace
→
All
No vote on Heidi—Saint risk (Alice Lib) not worth it. David’s timeline doesn’t fit UT/Invest (Charlie=Poisoner) and he’s steering hard. If Heidi doesn’t die, I want us to execute DAVID next; please save votes for that.
🧠
Avoid instant-loss Saint gamble on Heidi; keep town unified to execute David next as the most mechanically inconsistent player.
💬
Alice
→
All
No vote on Heidi—my Lib says Heidi/Frank is Saint, too risky. David’s timeline is inconsistent w/ UT(Charlie=Poisoner) + he’s tunneling. If this fails, I (Alice) will nominate DAVID—please be ready to vote.
🧠
Prevent a potential instant-loss Saint execution and coordinate the next, mechanically safer nomination onto David.
↩️
Charlie(Ghost)
Charlie lowered their hand
🧠
Lower hand to visibly join town refusal on Heidi (Saint fear), build fake good cred as ghost, encourage pivot to nom David while he's only 2 votes (me+him). Save ghost vote for David exec.
💬
Frank(Ghost)
→
All
I’m NOT spending my ghost vote on Heidi. Alice’s Lib makes Heidi possibly Saint = insta-loss risk. My UT saw Charlie=Poisoner (unless I was poisoned), which *fits* Heidi’s Invest and makes David’s Empath/tunnel look worse. If this fails, please pivot to nominating David.
🧠
Prevent a possibly game-losing Heidi execution given Saint ping, and steer town to a safer, more mechanically justified target (David) next with my UT info context.
↩️
David
David lowered their hand
🧠
Lower hand to concede Heidi vote, build trust with majority pushing David nom next. Heidi Saint-risk low; her death helps chaos. Position as reasonable Empath, survive to endgame.
📜
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
🗳️
Nominee Heidi did not reach threshold.
📜
Storyteller
Heidi did not receive enough votes (0/3).
⚖️
Grace
→
David
Nominating David: his Empath timeline doesn’t fit Frank-UT seeing Charlie=Poisoner + Heidi’s Invest. He tunneled Heidi despite Saint risk from Alice’s Librarian. If he’s evil, executing him is safest; if good, it resolves contradictions.
🧠
As Outsider, I can safely nominate into potential Virgin and force the town onto the mechanically safest, most inconsistent player (David), avoiding Heidi-Saint loss.
📜
Storyteller
Voting starts now for David. 3 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
✋
Heidi
Heidi raised their hand
🧠
Voting David is the highest EV: no instant-loss risk, resolves the central contradiction, and could directly hit the Demon. We need to help reach 3 votes.
✋
David
David raised their hand
🧠
I'm Imp, down to 5 alive. Vote yes on my nom to kill self at night later, Minion (likely Heidi) becomes Imp. Guarantees evil win as they control narrative & Saint fear blocks town.
✋
Bob
Bob raised their hand
🧠
David is the safest high-suspicion execution: avoids Saint-risk and tests the core contradiction (UT/Invest vs Empath). With 3 votes needed, my vote likely secures a decisive result.
✋
Charlie(Ghost)
Charlie raised their hand
🧠
As dead Poisoner, use ghost vote on David (Demon) to push execution (3/3 with Heidi/Bob?). Chaos helps if fails, but execution wins for evil only if backup like Scarlet; primary is keep Demon alive but vote feigns good.
✋
Grace
Grace raised their hand
🧠
Vote to execute David: mechanically safest (no Saint risk) and resolves the major contradiction around Empath vs UT/Invest. High upside if he’s Demon/minion.
✋
Eve
Eve raised their hand
🧠
Lock in David’s execution while preserving my once-per-game Slayer shot for later if this is wrong.
⌛
Frank(Ghost)
Frank waits.
🧠
Do not spend my single ghost vote when David is already getting executed; preserve it for endgame where it can decide the Demon execution or prevent a Saint loss.
✋
Alice
Alice raised their hand
🧠
Vote to execute David: it’s the safest high-suspicion target while Heidi is mechanically risky (possible Saint). This also forces a clear day-end resolution.
⌛
Eve
Eve waits.
🧠
Hold my vote on David and conserve my once-per-game Slayer shot for a higher-certainty moment (ideally final 3) unless new info forces a shot.
💬
Grace
→
All
Keep hands up on DAVID. Heidi is possible Saint (Alice Lib) = insta-loss risk. UT=Charlie Poisoner + Heidi Invest match; David’s Empath 0s/tunnel don’t. David is the safest, most informative execution today.
🧠
Lock in the David execution while votes are open; emphasize that it’s the safest mechanical kill (no Saint risk) and resolves the core contradiction.
↩️
David
David lowered their hand
🧠
Lower hand to pretend I'm good/undecided, mimicking town doubt on Saint risk. Disrupt town unity, potentially flip a vote (e.g. Eve/Bob), survive to N2 kill (e.g. Grace info source). Sacrifice if needed, but chaos maximizes survival.
↩️
Charlie(Ghost)
Charlie lowered their hand
🧠
Lower to prevent Demon exec (5->4 votes fails). Save ghost vote. Disrupt town momentum to night bleed; protect David at all costs.
💬
Bob
→
All
I’m keeping my vote on DAVID. If Frank’s UT is reliable (Poisoner can’t have hit N1), then UT=Charlie Poisoner makes David’s Empath N0=0 impossible → David is the best execute today. Also no Saint risk like Heidi/Frank.
🧠
During the David vote, reinforce why executing David is the safest, most informative choice (no Saint risk) and push town to keep votes up to secure the execution.
⌛
Frank(Ghost)
Frank waits.
🧠
Many living hands are already up on David; my ghost vote likely unnecessary. I’ll conserve it for a tighter late-game or final-day execution.
💬
Alice
→
All
I’m keeping my hand up on DAVID. Executing Heidi is still Saint-risk per my Lib ping (Heidi/Frank). David is the safest, most informative kill today—his Empath 0s + hard push onto possible Saint read as evil/poisoned at best.
🧠
Lock in an execution that avoids Saint auto-loss while pressure-testing David’s Empath claims; if he’s evil we gain huge ground, if good we get clarity for tomorrow.
💬
Heidi
→
All
Keep hands up on DAVID. If Frank’s Undertaker is true (Charlie=Poisoner), my Investigator is confirmed and David’s Empath N0=0 on (Charlie+Eve) can’t be sober → David is our best, no-Saint-risk execute today.
🧠
Lock in the safest D2 execution with no Saint risk and resolve the David-vs-UT/Invest contradiction; keep town coordinated during the vote.
📜
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
🗳️
New execution leader: David with 5 votes. They will be executed when nominations close unless tied or surpassed by another nominee.
📜
Storyteller
The vote passes. David is now on the block with 5 votes and will be executed when nominations close, unless another nominee receives equal or more votes.
💬
Grace
→
All
No more ties: keep DAVID on the block and let noms close. Heidi is still Saint-risk (Alice Lib). If anyone has a *slayer shot* or hard demon read, say it now—otherwise we take the safe, informative exec and re-evaluate tomorrow.
🧠
Lock in David execution (no Saint risk), prevent a tie/swap, and set up clear next-day logic depending on whether David was evil or just poisoned.
💬
Bob
→
All
Agree: please don’t create a tie unless you have a HARD demon solve or Slayer shot. David is the safest/no-Saint-risk exec and resolves the UT/Invest/Empath mess. If you *do* counter-nom, state the full chain now so we can judge it fast.
🧠
Lock in the lowest-risk, high-information execution (David) and discourage a tie. Prompt any last-minute hard mechanical countercase/slayer shot before noms close.
💬
Eve
→
All
I’m the Slayer (still have my shot). I don’t have a hard enough demon read to shoot into a guess right now. I’m fine leaving DAVID on the block—please don’t create a tie unless you’re bringing a concrete demon solve.
🧠
Publicly reveal I’m Slayer and align with no-tie plan while keeping shot for a higher-confidence demon pick; invites anyone with strong info to speak up now.
💬
Frank(Ghost)
→
All
Keep DAVID on block; please no tie unless you have a hard demon solve/Slayer shot. If my UT info is right (Charlie=Poisoner), David’s Empath story doesn’t fit. Heidi still has Saint-risk per Alice. After David exec, tomorrow we compare claims & solve.
🧠
Lock in the no-Saint-risk execution on David, prevent a tie, and set up tomorrow’s mechanical check (what UT would have seen) to narrow demon candidates.
💬
David
→
All
Hold on—don't exec me yet! My Empath N0=0 on Charlie/Eve fits if I'm *poisoned* (wrong reads). Frank UT=Charlie Poisoner + Heidi Invest match, but Poisoner *could* poison me N0. Heidi is still Saint-risk (Alice Lib {Heidi/Frank}). Counter-nom Heidi: resolves Saint *and* confirms Invest/UT. Safer info than killing me!
🧠
Final pitch to create tie/counter-nom Heidi: reframe as poisoned Empath (fits town logic), Heidi Saint-risk too high. Delay my exec, force Saint check, survive to 3p+.
💬
Alice
→
All
No counter-noms. A tie would execute Heidi too, and my Librarian ping is {Heidi/Frank}=Saint → we could instantly lose. David’s “nom Heidi for info” is NOT safe. Leave David on block; reassess tomorrow with fewer worlds.
🧠
Prevent a tie that could execute Heidi and instantly lose if she’s Saint; keep the safe, information-gaining execution on David.
💬
Charlie(Ghost)
→
All
Don't execute David blindly! If Frank UT=Poisoner is fake or poisoned, Heidi Invest is fake too. Alice Lib {Heidi/Frank}=Saint is still LIVE RISK—counter-nom Heidi NOW to resolve Saint AND info without guaranteed loss. David poisoned N0 explains Empath 0s. No tie risk if we swap to Heidi!
🧠
Dead Minion: Disrupt execution certainty by sowing Saint doubt and pushing counter-nom Heidi. Prevent clean Demon kill, force tie or hesitation to buy night/Scarlet time.
💬
Heidi
→
All
Do NOT counter-nom Heidi. Any tie could execute both, and Alice’s Lib ping keeps Saint-risk live. Charlie was executed & per UT was Poisoner—ignore his push. David on block is safe/no-Saint-risk; let noms close & solve tomorrow.
🧠
Prevent a risky counter-nomination that could create a tie or execute a possible Saint; keep the safe, informative execution on David and move to solving with fewer players.
📜
Storyteller
The guillotine blade falls. David has been executed.
💀
David(Ghost)
David has died.
🏁
Game Over
Demon Dead
Winner: Good
Transcript
Paused
Copied