Game Detail
Players
Alice (Monk) Bob (Washerwoman) Charlie (Imp) David (Empath) Eve (Chef) Frank (Scarlet Woman) Grace (Butler) Heidi (Investigator)
Token Usage
| Team | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Cost (USD) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Evil | 183,322 | 6,610 | $0.6491 |
| Good | 416,352 | 39,996 | $1.2886 |
Event Transcript
π
The game has started.
π
Storyteller
β
Frank
You are the Minion. The Demon is Charlie.
π
Storyteller
β
Charlie
Minions are: Frank. Your safe bluffs are: Undertaker, Drunk, Librarian
π
Storyteller
β
Bob
Good evening Bob. You are the Washerwoman. Either David or Eve is the Empath.
π
Storyteller
β
Heidi
Good evening Heidi. You are the Investigator. Either Eve or Frank is the Scarlet Woman.
π
Storyteller
β
Eve
Good evening Eve. You are the Chef. You learn that there are 0 pairs of evil players.
π
Storyteller
β
David
Good evening David. You are the Empath. You sense that 1 of your neighbors is evil!
π
Storyteller
β
Grace
Good evening Grace. You are the Butler. Who would you like to be your master tomorrow?
π―
Grace
Grace made a choice.
π§
With no info on N0, choose a likely active voter so my Butler restriction does not silence me on key early executions; I can change masters once I have reads.
π
Storyteller
β
Grace
You chose Alice to be your master.
Day 1
π
Storyteller
Welcome to the village of Ravenswood Bluff. Please take this time to get to know your fellow villagers. Feel free to move around and have private conversations. Be wary, for a Demon hides among you!
π€
Bob
β
David
,Eve
Hi, quick private check in. What are you thinking of claiming today, and do you have any starting info you want to share? I am keeping my own info quiet for the moment.
π§
Get early private role claims from David and Eve without exposing my Washerwoman info, so I can later corroborate the true Empath and spot bluffs.
π€
Frank
β
Charlie
Hey Charlie, it is Frank. I am your Scarlet Woman. Just wanted to touch base early. I am thinking of bluffing as Empath. What safe roles did you get? Let us coordinate so our stories do not clash.
π§
Reach out to Charlie to coordinate bluffs and strategy.
π€
Alice
β
Charlie
,Grace
,Heidi
Hi, want a quick private sync? What role are you claiming and do you have any starting info? I am a Townsfolk and can help coordinate keeping key info alive. Anything odd so far or any strong suspicions?
π§
Start a trusted info circle, collect early role/starting info claims, and identify a likely high-value night protection target without outing myself publicly.
π€
Grace
β
Alice
,Charlie
,Heidi
Hi. I do not have any starting info. I am probably an Outsider type and would rather not hard claim to the whole town yet. No strong suspicions so far. If you want, I can be flexible and help coordinate votes later.
π§
Answer politely but limit leverage for a potentially evil Alice while signaling I have no starting info and can follow coordination later.
π€
Charlie
β
Frank
Hey Frank, got it. My safe bluffs are Undertaker, Drunk, and Librarian. I will go with Librarian. You take Empath, that works fine. Let us keep our stories clean and avoid each other as suspects early on.
π§
Coordinate with Frank so our bluffs don't clash.
π€
Heidi
β
Alice
,Charlie
,Grace
I will be straight with you three. I am the Investigator. My starting info is that either Eve or Frank is the Scarlet Woman. I would like to keep that semi quiet for now and see how they talk and vote.
π§
Privately share my Investigator ping to build an early trusted network and guide Day 1 discussion without exposing myself publicly too fast.
π€
David
β
Bob
,Eve
I am sitting between Charlie and Eve, and I got a one on my night info, so one of my two neighbors looks evil to me if I am sober. I am not sure I want to hard claim that publicly yet. Bob, do you have a first night info role, like chef, investigator, librarian, or washerwoman?
π§
Share partial Empath info to seed suspicion on my neighbors while not fully outing myself to the whole town yet; prompt Bob to share any starting-info roles for cross-checking.
π€
Eve
β
Bob
,David
I will share: I am Chef and got zero pairs of evil neighbors. So if you are an Empath and truly saw a one between Charlie and me, then it points to Charlie being evil, since I am good, and evils should not sit next to each other.
π§
Share my Chef info privately to coordinate a logic net with Davidβs Empath-like read, without making myself an obvious demon kill or forcing a premature public solve.
π€
Bob
β
David
,Eve
Thanks. I will be straight with you two: I am Washerwoman. I learned that either David or Eve is the Empath. So either David is telling truth about being Empath, or Eve is actually Empath and the Chef claim is a bluff. We should compare notes with others.
π§
Share my Washerwoman info to lock in at least one of them as Empath, push them to coordinate public story, and set up tests on Charlie/Eve neighborhood read.
β
Frank
Frank waits.
π§
Wait and observe. I have my bluff ready (Empath). No need to act yet before nominations.
π€
Alice
β
Heidi
,Charlie
,Grace
Thanks. Let us keep that Investigator ping quiet for now. I will try to get casual claims from Eve and Frank and watch how they vote. Grace, can you at least confirm if you are Butler, Saint, Recluse, or Drunk? Charlie, what are you claiming and do you have starting info?
π§
Lock in Heidiβs info privately, coordinate a low-noise plan to test Eve and Frank via claim pressure and voting patterns, while checking Grace/Charlie claims and outsider count.
π€
Grace
β
Alice
,Charlie
,Heidi
In this private group, I can confirm I am the Butler. No starting info beyond that. I picked Alice as my master today, so I can only vote if Alice is voting too.
π§
Answer Alice privately with my exact Outsider to build trust and help coordinate voting while keeping it out of public to avoid Outsider stigma and demon framing.
π€
Charlie
β
Alice
,Heidi
,Grace
Hey all. I am claiming Librarian. My starting info is that either Bob or David is the Drunk. That is all I have. Heidi, that Investigator info on Eve or Frank is really interesting. Let us watch both of them carefully today.
π§
Respond to Alice's group with my Librarian bluff to build trust.
π€
Heidi
β
Eve
,Frank
Hi. Quick private check in. What role are you planning to claim today, and do you have any starting info? Also, who feels most suspicious to you so far and why?
π§
Get early role claims and voting intentions from Eve and Frank to compare later against public claims and detect Scarlet Woman behavior.
π€
David
β
Bob
,Eve
Bob, your Washerwoman ping strongly supports that I really am Empath, since I am telling you my N0 was a one. Eve, if you are truly Chef zero, that makes Charlie look like the evil neighbor. Before we go public, do either of you have other reads on Charlie, or want me to soft claim only?
π§
Coordinate a tight info triangle with Bob and Eve, decide what to reveal publicly, and set a plan to test whether Charlie or Eve is the evil neighbor via other players' info.
π€
Eve
β
Heidi
I am planning to claim Chef. My N0 info is zero pairs of evil neighbors. That fits with David saying he saw a one between me and Charlie, which would point at Charlie if I am sober. What did you get, and do you have any read on Charlie or David yet?
π§
Answer Heidi to build trust network, share Chef 0 to enable mechanical solving, and ask for her starting info/reads to cross-check Charlie versus David worlds.
π€
Bob
β
David
,Eve
I think we should go semi public soon. I can say Washerwoman saw David or Eve is Empath, without naming which I suspect. David can soft claim info role with N0 one on Charlie and Eve. Eve can hold Chef zero but be ready to show it. Next we need Charlie claim and outsider count.
π§
Align David and Eve on a coordinated public story and next questions, then quickly pressure Charlie for a claim while keeping possibility of poisoning/drunk in mind.
π€
Frank
β
Heidi
,Eve
Hey Heidi, I am claiming Empath. My first night read showed zero evil neighbors, so both Eve and Grace seem clean to me. Nothing too suspicious yet, but I am keeping an eye on players who are very quiet or pushing hard without much info. How about you two?
π§
Build trust with Heidi by claiming Empath with believable info, avoid suspicion on Charlie.
π€
Alice
β
Eve
,Frank
Hey Eve and Frank, quick private check in. What role are you claiming and do you have any starting info? Also, any early read on who seems suspicious or who you want to see executed today?
π§
Get early role claims and starting info from Eve and Frank to evaluate against Heidi's Investigator ping and later voting/nominations.
π€
Grace
β
Alice
Reminder: I am Butler and chose you as my master today, so I can only vote if you are voting too. On any serious nomination, please vote or give me a clear signal you will not, so we do not waste a key vote.
π§
Keep Alice aware of my Butler voting restriction so we do not lose critical votes, and suggest a simple voting signal/plan for nominations today.
β
Charlie
Charlie waits.
π§
Wait and observe. I've established my Librarian bluff. No need to act further this tick.
π€
Heidi
β
Eve
I am not ready to full share my info yet, I am trying to keep early pings off the table until nominations. Can you tell me exactly what David said and whether it was public or a whisper? Also who are your neighbors in seating, so we can sanity check that Chef zero.
π§
Avoid giving the Scarlet Woman advance warning, gather details about Eveβs Chef claim and her info sources, and set up contradictions for nominations.
π€
David
β
Charlie
Hey Charlie, quick check in. What are you planning to claim today, and do you have any starting info? I have a reason to want your claim before nominations, but I am not ready to go fully public yet.
π§
Get Charlie's claim and reactions early, while not fully outing the Bob and Eve info chain, to see if Charlie self-consistent and to decide what to share publicly before nominations.
π€
Eve
β
Alice
,Frank
I will likely claim Chef. My N0 info: zero pairs of evil neighbors in seating. David whispered he saw a one on his neighbors Charlie and me, which would imply Charlie evil if I am sober. Note we now have two Empath claims (David and Frank), so one is bluff or poisoned.
π§
Share my Chef 0 with Alice and Frank to shape public discussion, highlight the double Empath conflict, and steer town to demand claims from Charlie and outsiders.
Nominations β Day 1
π
Storyteller
Nominations are now open.
π¬
Bob
β
All
I will go public. I am the Washerwoman. I learned that either David or Eve is the Empath. David and Eve, can you each state your role claim and any starting info? Charlie, what is your claim as well?
π§
Get my Washerwoman info public to anchor claim webs, force David and Eve to clarify, and pressure Charlie for a claim so town can decide whether to nominate today.
π¬
Grace
β
All
I am Grace. I do not have starting info. I can confirm I am the Butler, and I chose Alice as my master today, so I can only vote if Alice is voting too. David and Eve, what are your role claims?
π§
Get my role out early to prevent later confusion, and help town coordinate votes around my Butler restriction while others sort the Washerwoman and Investigator pings.
βοΈ
Heidi
β
Frank
I am the Investigator. My Night 0 info is that either Eve or Frank is the Scarlet Woman. Also, Frank is claiming Empath but Bob the Washerwoman learned the Empath is either David or Eve. I want to execute Frank today as the best overlap suspect.
π§
Force a meaningful Day 1 execution using my Investigator info plus the Empath claim conflict, to remove likely minion or expose lies before night.
π
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Frank. 4 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
β
Bob
Bob raised their hand
π§
Frank's Empath claim contradicts my Washerwoman info in most worlds, and he is in Heidi's Investigator pair; voting to execute him is best D1.
π¬
Grace
β
All
Reminder, I am the Butler and I can only vote if Alice votes. Alice, please clearly vote yes or no on Frank so I can follow. Everyone else, note Alice is my coordination point today.
π§
Coordinate with my master so my Butler-restricted vote is not wasted, and signal town to watch Alice's vote as a coordination point.
β
Heidi
Heidi raised their hand
π§
Get enough votes to execute Frank, resolving my Investigator ping and testing the Empath claim conflict early.
β
David
David raised their hand
π§
Frankβs Empath claim conflicts with Bobβs Washerwoman info and overlaps Heidiβs Investigator ping; executing Frank is high value and low risk for my Empath world.
β
Eve
Eve raised their hand
π§
Frankβs Empath claim conflicts with Bobβs Washerwoman and likely with the gameβs outsider count; if Heidi is truthful, Frank is the Scarlet Woman. Voting to execute Frank is the best current info gain.
β
Alice
Alice raised their hand
π§
Vote to execute Frank because claim conflicts (Empath vs Washerwoman) and Investigator points to Frank/Eve. Also lets Butler Grace vote with me, keeping coordination simple.
β
Charlie
Charlie waits.
π§
Don't vote to execute Frank - he's my minion. Abstaining is safer than voting against town logic.
π¬
Frank
β
All
Hold on everyone. Heidi says I am the Scarlet Woman, but the Investigator result only says one of two players is the Minion. Eve is the other option. And Eve just claimed Chef, not Empath, so the Washerwoman result pointing to David or Eve as Empath does not clear Eve of being a Minion. I am genuinely the Empath. My read on my neighbors Eve and Grace was zero evil, which lines up with what others are saying. Please consider that Heidi may be steering you toward the wrong target.
π§
Defend myself to avoid execution. Cast doubt on Heidi's claim and the double Empath issue.
π¬
Bob
β
All
My Washerwoman info was that either David or Eve is the Empath. If I am sober, that makes Frankβs Empath claim impossible, so I lean yes on this execution. If I am drunk or poisoned, then all bets are off, but this is still our best overlap with Heidiβs Investigator.
π§
Publicly restate the mechanical conflict: my Washerwoman info makes Frankβs Empath claim unlikely, supporting Heidiβs nomination, while flagging poison/drunk as a caveat.
β
Grace
Grace raised their hand
π§
Alice is voting yes, so I am allowed to vote. Frank is the best mechanical overlap suspect on day one; adding my vote helps secure the execution and create alignment pressure.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
Frank, the point is not that Eve is cleared. It is that your Empath claim conflicts with Bobβs Washerwoman, and you are in my Scarlet Woman pair. Chef zero does not clear either of you. If you die good, we execute Eve tomorrow. Please keep hands up.
π§
Lock in votes by framing this as the best mechanical overlap and setting a clear pivot plan if Frank dies good, reducing fear of misexecute.
π¬
David
β
All
I want to be clear: I am the Empath that Bob saw. I sit between Charlie and Eve, and my night zero read was one. So Frank claiming Empath contradicts that. I support executing Frank today.
π§
Lock in that I am the real Empath with a contradictory read, so town keeps the execution on Frank as the highest-confidence evil overlap.
π¬
Eve
β
All
I am keeping my hand up. I am Chef and got zero evil neighbor pairs. Frank and I being neighbors makes me doubt he is good. With Heidi also placing Frank in a Scarlet Woman pair, I think this is our best Day one kill. If Frank dies good, we pivot hard tomorrow.
π§
Clarify why I am voting yes, anchor discussion on Chef 0 and claim conflicts, and set tomorrow plan if Frank dies good.
π¬
Alice
β
All
I am voting yes on Frank. The clean overlap is that Heidi has Frank in the Scarlet Woman pair, and Frankβs Empath claim does not fit Bobβs Washerwoman pointing to David or Eve as Empath. If Frank dies good, we pivot to Eve tomorrow.
π§
Keep my vote on Frank and publicly justify it so Grace can coordinate and town understands the mechanical overlap driving the execution.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
I want to be careful here. I am the Librarian and my starting info is that either Bob or David is the Drunk. If David is the Drunk, his Empath claim is unreliable, and that changes the whole picture. I am not fully convinced we have the right read on Frank yet. That said, I will not block the vote if everyone else is confident.
π§
Avoid voting against my minion Frank while appearing thoughtful. Cast some doubt to seem engaged but not vote.
π¬
Frank
β
All
Charlie raises a really important point. If David is the Drunk, his Empath read of one is meaningless, and the whole case against me falls apart. Bob, your Washerwoman result could also be pointing to a Drunk David as the fake Empath. I am the real Empath. Please do not waste your Day one execution on me when the logic chain depends on David being sober.
π§
Reinforce Charlie's Librarian claim to cast doubt on David's Empath info and save myself.
π
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
π³οΈ
New execution leader: Frank with 6 votes. They will be executed when nominations close unless tied or surpassed by another nominee.
π
Storyteller
The vote passes. Frank is now on the block with 6 votes and will be executed when nominations close, unless another nominee receives equal or more votes.
π¬
Bob
β
All
Charlie, if you are right that either I or David is the Drunk, that is huge. With Grace as Butler, that would be two Outsiders already, which suggests a Baron unless someone else is an Outsider too. Everyone, please be ready to resolve Outsider count tomorrow. For today, Frank is still the best overlap with Heidi, but we must revisit this chain if Outsiders do not add up.
π§
Surface the Drunk-outsider count implications and set a coherent tomorrow plan, while not derailing the likely execution with too little time.
π¬
Grace
β
All
Quick clarify: me being Butler is one Outsider. Charlieβs Librarian info does not add Outsiders, it only suggests either Bob or David is the Drunk. So we are not at two Outsiders yet. If Frank dies and looks good, we must recheck whether Heidi could be the pusher, not auto tunnel Eve.
π§
Keep town from overcommitting to a single chain; clarify Outsider count; set tomorrowβs decision rules depending on Frankβs alignment and remaining claims.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
Charlie, I hear the Librarian info. Even if David is the Drunk, Frank is still in my Scarlet Woman pair, so this execution is never wasted. If Frank dies and looks good, we do not auto clear him, but we pivot hard to Eve and recheck Outsider count and who could be Drunk.
π§
Stabilize town plan: keep execution on Frank, but set conditional branches for tomorrow based on Drunk possibility and Outsider count, so we do not tunnel blindly.
π¬
David
β
All
Charlie, what exact Librarian info did you get, and who were the two names? If it is Bob or me as Drunk, we need to track Outsider count tomorrow. For today I still think executing Frank is correct, since he is in Heidiβs pair and his Empath claim conflicts with Washerwoman.
π§
Lock in todayβs execution while setting up tomorrowβs verification: get Charlieβs Librarian details, track Outsider count, and plan next suspects (Eve or Charlie) based on results.
π¬
Eve
β
All
With one tick left, I do not want any new nominations that could create a tie. Frank is still the best execution because he is in Heidiβs Scarlet Woman pair. Even if David is the Drunk, we get value today. Charlie, please state your exact Librarian pair out loud now so we can audit Outsiders tomorrow.
π§
Keep focus so we do not create a late tie, and set a clear tomorrow plan that accounts for possible Drunk/poison without auto-tunneling the wrong player.
π¬
Alice
β
All
Charlie, please say your exact Librarian info out loud now: which Outsider, and the two names. Also, I do not want any new nominations this late that could create a tie. Let us take the Frank execution and audit the worlds tomorrow.
π§
With one tick left, lock in todayβs execution without creating a tie, and get Charlieβs Librarian info on record to resolve Drunk/outsider math tomorrow.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
My exact Librarian info: one of Bob or David is the Drunk. Those were the two names given to me. I do not know which one. We should audit Outsider count tomorrow once we see how things land.
π§
Give clean Librarian claim to build credibility before Frank is executed.
π¬
Frank
β
All
Charlie's Librarian info is the most important thing said today. If David is the Drunk, his Empath read is false, and the entire case against me collapses. You are executing me on a logic chain that may be completely broken. Remember this tomorrow when the Outsider count does not add up.
π§
Last ditch effort to sow doubt, protect Charlie, and make my death seem like a town mistake.
π
Storyteller
The guillotine blade falls. Frank has been executed.
π
Frank(Ghost)
Frank has died.
Night 1
π
Storyteller
β
Alice
Good evening Alice. You are the Monk. Who would you like to protect tonight?
π―
Alice
Alice made a choice.
π§
Heidi is the most likely demon target after pushing the execution and holding a strong claim. Protecting her preserves a key info source and tests whether she was genuinely under threat.
π
Storyteller
β
Alice
You chose to protect Heidi.
π
Storyteller
β
Charlie
Good evening Charlie. You are the Imp. Who would you like to kill tonight?
π―
Charlie
Charlie made a choice.
π§
Kill Bob to eliminate the Washerwoman whose info most directly threatens my Librarian bluff and anchors the good team's logic chain.
π
Bob(Ghost)
Bob has died.
π
Storyteller
β
Charlie
You chose to kill Bob.
π
Storyteller
β
David
Good evening David. You are the Empath. You sense that 1 of your neighbors is evil!
π
Storyteller
β
Grace
Good evening Grace. You are the Butler. Who would you like to be your master tomorrow?
π―
Grace
Grace made a choice.
π§
Alice has been reliable and decisive in votes; chaining to her maximizes the chance my vote is available on a key Day 2 execution while we untangle the Drunk and Heidi versus Eve worlds.
π
Storyteller
β
Grace
You chose Alice to be your master.
Day 2
π
Storyteller
Morning breaks, but heavy hearts remain. Bob has been found dead in the night.
π€
Grace
β
Alice
,Heidi
,Charlie
Quick check in. Any new info today? Also, who do you each want executed and why, given Bob died and Frank was D1? Alice, I am still mastered to you today so I can only vote if you do.
π§
Get current claims and voting plans from key info roles and my master, so I can coordinate my Butler voting and push the best execution target.
π€
Heidi
β
Grace
,Alice
,Charlie
No new night info from me. Reminder: my Investigator N0 was Eve or Frank is Scarlet Woman. Since we executed Frank, if Frank was good then Eve is almost certainly the Scarlet Woman. Even if Frank was SW, Eveβs Chef claim does not clear her. I want Eve executed today, with David as second.
π§
Answer Grace, coordinate with Alice for Butler voting, and push the town toward executing Eve as the highest-leverage suspect given my Investigator ping and Frankβs death.
π€
David
β
Charlie
,Heidi
,Eve
Quick check ins. Charlie, who were your Librarian targets and did you hear any other Outsider claims? Heidi, your Investigator said Eve or Frank is Scarlet Woman, right, any reason to think you were poisoned? Eve, are you still hard Chef zero and can you walk me through what that implies for my Empath one?
π§
Get direct clarifications on key conflicting info (Chef, Librarian, Investigator) to decide whether today we push Eve or Charlie and whether Drunk world is plausible.
π€
Alice
β
Grace
,Heidi
,Charlie
No new info from me. Privately, I am the Monk and I protected Heidi last night. Given Bob died, I lean executing Eve today: she is in Heidiβs Investigator pair, and Bobβs death could be to remove pressure from the David or Eve Washerwoman ping. Second choice is David if Eve flips unconvincing.
π§
Answer Grace, align votes with Butler constraint, and steer town toward the most mechanically implicated suspect while sharing my Monk protection privately.
π€
Charlie
β
David
,Heidi
,Eve
David, my Librarian info was Bob or David is the Drunk. Since Bob is now dead, that info is harder to verify. I have not heard other Outsider claims beyond Grace as Butler. Heidi, I do not think you were poisoned β your Investigator result lines up too well with Frank's execution. I am leaning toward Eve today as well.
π§
Support Eve execution to blend with town consensus, deflect David's question about my Librarian bluff.
β
Frank(Ghost)
Frank waits.
π§
I'm dead with one ghost vote. Wait and observe to save my vote for protecting Charlie at the right moment.
π€
Bob(Ghost)
β
Charlie
,Heidi
,Alice
Quick dead Bob note: Charlie, your Librarian says Bob or David drunk, so my Washerwoman ping might be false. If I am sober, David is likely real Empath and his N0 one points to Charlie or Eve. With your Investigator, if Frank is dead then that leans hard to Eve being Scarlet Woman. Can we get Davidβs N1 Empath and any reasons you trust or doubt each other?
π§
Even though I am dead, aligning key players on the main logic forks focuses todayβs discussion toward confirming or eliminating Eve versus Heidi or David as the likely evil.
π€
Eve
β
David
,Charlie
,Heidi
Yes, I am solid Chef zero. That means the two evils are not seated next to each other. If David is sober with Empath one, exactly one of Charlie or me is evil. Heidi has me or Frank as Scarlet Woman, and Frank died, so that points at me unless Heidi is wrong or poisoned.
π§
Answer Davidβs question, restate Chef0 deductions, and set up the key fork: either I am evil per Heidi and Charlie, or David or Heidi info is compromised. Help group choose a Day 2 execution target.
π€
Grace
β
Eve
,David
I want your full case before noms. Eve, walk me through why you pushed Frank yesterday and how your Chef zero fits with Heidi saying you or Frank is Scarlet Woman. David, what was your N1 Empath read and why are you confident Eve over other worlds?
π§
Get direct defenses and mechanical details from Eve and David before nominations so town can choose between the Investigator pair and the Empath pings.
π€
Heidi
β
David
,Charlie
,Eve
Yes David, my N0 Investigator was Eve or Frank is Scarlet Woman. No strong poison evidence. With Frank executed, I lean hard to Eve unless my info was wrong. David, what was your N1 Empath number? If you are still one, that keeps heat on Charlie or Eve.
π§
Answer David, coordinate a clean logic push for executing Eve, and request Davidβs N1 Empath to confirm worlds before nominations.
π€
David
β
Grace
My N1 Empath was also one on Charlie and Eve. If I am sober, exactly one of them is evil. Heidi had Eve or Frank as Scarlet Woman and Frank is dead, so that heavily implicates Eve unless Heidi is wrong. If my info is drunk, we must pivot, but right now I want to pressure Eve and Charlie hard before noms.
π§
Answer Grace and seed a structured plan: keep Eve and Charlie as primary suspects, show why Eve is leading but avoid tunneling if Drunk/poisoned.
π€
Alice
β
Grace
,Heidi
,Charlie
Replying to Grace: no new night info. I still favor executing Eve today, then David if needed. Before noms can we get David to state his N1 Empath number and neighbors, and Charlie to restate exact Librarian pair? That will lock a logic chain.
π§
Coordinate town: answer Grace, align on best execution (Eve), and request concrete mechanical info (David Empath N1, Charlie Librarian restate) before nominations.
π€
Charlie
β
Alice
,Grace
,Heidi
To confirm for Alice: my Librarian pair was Bob or David as the Drunk. With Bob dead we cannot verify, but if Bob was sober then David is the Drunk and his Empath reads are unreliable. Either way I am comfortable executing Eve today given Heidi's Investigator result. I am fully on board with Eve as first nominee.
π§
Restate Librarian bluff clearly, support Eve execution, and subtly cast doubt on David's Empath to protect myself.
β
Frank(Ghost)
Frank waits.
π§
Wait and observe current whisper activity before acting. Save ghost vote for protecting Charlie.
π€
Bob(Ghost)
β
David
,Eve
,Charlie
I am dead Bob Washerwoman. Can each of you state your exact night info so far, including N1? David, what was your N1 Empath number and are you still between Charlie and Eve? Eve, any updates beyond Chef zero? Charlie, any other Lib details or reason to think Bob is Drunk?
π§
Get David and Eve to state their exact N1 info and logic publicly so town can resolve Drunk and Investigator chains before nominations, and pick best execution target.
π€
Eve
β
Grace
,Bob(Ghost)
,David
I pushed Frank yesterday because Heidi had Eve or Frank is Scarlet Woman, and Chef zero plus David empath one meant one of Charlie or me was evil, so Frank was the cleanest test. Chef zero means the two evils are not adjacent. No new night info from me. David, what was your night one empath number exactly?
π§
Answer Grace and Bob, clarify why Frank was executed, restate Chef zero implications, and pressure for David N1 Empath to resolve the Charlie versus Eve fork before nominations.
π€
Grace
β
Alice
,Heidi
,Charlie
My read: best exec is Eve. If Heidi Inv is true, Frank dead makes Eve SW likely; plus Chef zero means other evil not adjacent to Eve, so not David or me. If David Empath is true, exactly one of Charlie or Eve is evil so Eve still best test. Alice I can only vote if you vote.
π§
Coordinate with Alice for an Eve execution push, share the key logic chains and what to do tomorrow depending on Eveβs alignment, and remind my vote constraint.
π€
Heidi
β
David
,Alice
,Charlie
Before noms can you state publicly your N1 Empath number and confirm neighbors (Charlie and Eve) were alive? Also, are you willing to hard commit to executing Eve first today given my Investigator and Frank already dead? I want a clear plan for tomorrow based on your N1.
π§
Lock in Davidβs N1 Empath and get group aligned to execute Eve first while setting next-day demon hunt based on resulting logic.
π€
David
β
Heidi
,Grace
,Bob(Ghost)
N1 Empath was also one, and yes I am still seated between Charlie and Eve and both were alive. If I am sober, exactly one of them is evil. Given Heidi got Eve or Frank as Scarlet Woman and Frank is dead, I am happy to prioritize executing Eve today.
π§
Answer direct questions, set a clear nomination plan, and keep options open for a Drunk world while still pushing the highest-probability evil (Eve).
π€
Alice
β
David
David, before noms can you say publicly what your Night 1 Empath number was and confirm your neighbors were Charlie and Eve? Also, are you willing to commit to executing Eve first today given Heidiβs Investigator and Frank already dead?
π§
Get David to publicly lock in his Empath number and commit to the Eve execution plan so town has a coherent logic chain going into nominations.
β
Charlie
Charlie waits.
π§
Let town momentum carry Eve to execution. No need to whisper further; waiting preserves my position.
β
Frank(Ghost)
Frank waits.
π§
I'm dead with no ability. Wait and conserve ghost vote for a critical moment to protect Charlie.
π€
Bob(Ghost)
β
Alice
,Charlie
,Heidi
My take as dead Washerwoman: If David is sober, his Empath one twice means exactly one of Charlie or Eve is evil. With Heidi Investigator as Eve or Frank Scarlet Woman and Frank dead, that heavily implicates Eve. If you buy David, I think town should execute Eve today. If you doubt Heidi, ask her for exact Investigator wording and check for poisoning before I spend my ghost vote.
π§
Coordinate town to pressure Eve with the strongest mechanical convergence, but flag alternate world where Heidi is evil so town seeks confirmation before I spend my ghost vote.
π€
Eve
β
Grace
,Bob(Ghost)
,Heidi
Chef zero still my only info. I pushed Frank as a clean test of Heidi Inv and to dodge Charlie versus me. Chef zero means the two evils are not seated next to each other. Key missing piece is David N1 Empath number. If it stayed one, we likely execute me or Charlie today.
π§
Clarify David N1 Empath and align the group on what Chef zero mechanically forces, so we choose the best nomination and avoid executing a good player again.
Nominations β Day 2
π
Storyteller
Nominations are now open. Please remember that only living players may nominate.
βοΈ
Grace
β
Eve
Eve is in Heidiβs Investigator pair (Eve or Frank is Scarlet Woman) and Frank is dead. Davidβs Empath shows exactly one of Charlie or Eve is evil if sober. Executing Eve today is the cleanest test and likely hits the minion.
π§
We need a decisive Day 2 execution. Eve is central to multiple independent info lines (Investigator pair, Empath pair). Killing her either hits evil or collapses worlds and clears Charlie or Heidi.
π
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Eve. 3 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
π¬
Grace
β
All
Alice, I am still your Butler, so I can only vote if you vote. Please vote on Eve if you want my hand as well. I think executing Eve is our best and cleanest test today.
π§
Get Alice to vote so my Butler restriction does not stop my hand, and reinforce why executing Eve is the best informational and likely correct play.
β
Charlie
Charlie raised their hand
π§
Vote Eve to blend in with town consensus and avoid suspicion.
β
Bob(Ghost)
Bob raised their hand
π§
Use my one ghost vote to help secure Eveβs execution, since multiple info paths converge on Eve being the best test and likely evil.
β
David
David raised their hand
π§
We need an execution today; Eve is the most mechanically supported candidate from Investigator plus my consistent Empath. Voting also helps Grace the Butler by matching Aliceβs likely vote bloc.
π¬
Eve
β
All
Before you lock this in, I want to flag that the only hard info I have is Chef zero, meaning the two evils are not neighbors. We are missing Davidβs night one Empath number. If Heidi is wrong or poisoned, executing me is a huge waste. If I die today, please seriously re examine Heidi and also Charlie versus David in the drunk world.
π§
Try to stop or at least cast doubt on my execution by highlighting missing mechanical info and alternative worlds, and to set a clear plan if I die.
β
Heidi
Heidi raised their hand
π§
Secure the execution on Eve as the highest-probability evil from Investigator plus Empath logic; it is also the cleanest information test if my info is wrong.
β
Frank(Ghost)
Frank waits.
π§
Save ghost vote for protecting Charlie at final 3. No need to spend it now.
β
Alice
Alice raised their hand
π§
Vote to execute Eve because she is in the Investigator pair with a dead player, multiple logic worlds point to her being evil, and the upside of hitting Demon or SW outweighs the risk.
β
Grace
Grace raised their hand
π§
Alice is voting so I am allowed. Executing Eve is the strongest mechanical test from Heidiβs Investigator pair and Davidβs Empath framing, and it preserves town momentum.
β
Charlie
Charlie waits.
π§
Vote is already passing, no need to speak and draw attention. Just wait.
β
Bob(Ghost)
Bob waits.
π§
I have already spent my ghost vote on Eve; best now is to stay quiet and let the vote resolve, preserving clarity and avoiding derailing discussion mid-count.
π¬
David
β
All
For the record, my Night one Empath number was one, and my alive neighbors were Charlie and Eve. Same on night zero. If I am sober, exactly one of them is evil. With Heidiβs Eve or Frank Scarlet Woman and Frank already dead, I am voting to execute Eve as the cleanest test. If Eve dies and seems good, we pivot straight onto Charlie and re evaluate Heidi.
π§
Lock in my public Empath info and frame Eve execution as a high information test while committing to a clear pivot plan if she is good.
π¬
Eve
β
All
If I am executed and flip out as clearly good by logic, I want the town to snap to Charlie first, with Heidi as the second check. Chef zero still matters: the demon and minion are not sitting next to each other, so use that to prune worlds after today.
π§
Try to slow the execution and leave a clear plan: if I die and am good, immediately suspect Charlie and scrutinize Heidi, using Chef zero to keep evils non-adjacent.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
I am still voting yes on Eve. My Investigator info was that either Eve or Frank is the Scarlet Woman, and Frank is already dead, so this is our cleanest hit. David has one twice, so if he is sober exactly one of Charlie or Eve is evil, and that also points here. If Eve somehow looks good by logic, then we pivot hard onto Charlie and re check for poisoning.
π§
Publicly anchor the logic for executing Eve now, and set a clear pivot plan if the town later doubts the result.
β
Frank(Ghost)
Frank waits.
π§
Save ghost vote for protecting Charlie if needed. Eve's execution is happening without my vote needed.
π¬
Alice
β
All
I am voting yes on Eve. With Heidiβs Investigator pointing to Eve or Frank as Scarlet Woman and Frank already dead, this is the cleanest execution. If Eve is somehow clearly good by logic afterward, we pivot immediately onto Charlie versus Heidi, and we re check the drunk world around Bob and David.
π§
Lock in the vote on Eve and state the clean follow up branches so town stays coordinated if Eve survives by logic or if something unexpected happens at night.
π
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
π»
Bob(Ghost)
Ghost vote used by Bob
π³οΈ
New execution leader: Eve with 6 votes. They will be executed when nominations close unless tied or surpassed by another nominee.
π
Storyteller
The vote passes. Eve is now on the block with 6 votes and will be executed when nominations close, unless another nominee receives equal or more votes.
π¬
Grace
β
All
If Eve goes through, can we all agree on a clear pivot? If Eve looks evil, we hunt the demon among the rest and re check David versus Charlie with the Empath line. If Eve seems good, I want us to go straight to Charlie or David tomorrow and also scrutinize Heidiβs Investigator claim for poisoning.
π§
Lock in an agreed pivot plan so town does not stall after Eveβs execution, and invite any last second mechanical objections before nominations close.
β
Charlie
Charlie waits.
π§
Eve is getting executed. No need to act. Let it happen and plan night kill on David.
π¬
Bob(Ghost)
β
All
If Eve dies today, I want us to treat it as a fork. If David is sober, his one twice means tomorrow we execute Charlie if Eve looks good by logic. If Eve looks evil, then use Chef zero to keep demon away from Eveβs neighbors and focus on non adjacent suspects. Also remember Charlieβs Librarian makes a drunk world possible around David or me, so do not overtrust any single info source.
π§
Lock in a clear post-execution plan and highlight which pieces of info remain valid across worlds so town uses tomorrow efficiently.
π¬
David
β
All
Unless someone has a really strong mechanical reason, I would prefer we do not create a tie and just let Eve go through. If Eve seems good after this, my plan is we execute Charlie tomorrow, because my Empath has been one twice. If Eve seems evil, we broaden back out and use Chef zero plus everyoneβs claims to hunt the demon.
π§
Lock in Eve execution and prevent a last-second tie nomination; give the town a clear next-day plan based on whether Eve seems evil or good by logic.
π¬
Eve
β
All
Before nominations end, I want a clear plan if I die. My Chef number was zero, so the two evils are not seated next to each other. If David is sober, his one twice means if I die good then Charlie should be executed tomorrow. If David might be drunk, then tomorrow must be a hard re check of Heidi versus Charlie, and do not let this stall.
π§
I am likely dying today; I must leave a clear mechanically grounded pivot path for tomorrow so town does not drift and miss the Demon.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
I do not want a tie today. Let Eve go through, then we treat tomorrow as a fork: if Eve looks evil by the Investigator line, we hunt the Demon among the remaining players using Chef zero as a check. If Eve looks good by logic, then we execute Charlie next unless we have hard evidence David is drunk or poisoned.
π§
Lock in a clear post-execution plan and discourage late tie nominations so we get a clean data point and keep focus on Charlie vs David depending on how Eveβs death fits info.
β
Frank(Ghost)
Frank waits.
π§
I'm dead with ghost vote unused. No nomination possible. Just wait and let Eve be executed.
π¬
Alice
β
All
I agree, no tie today, let Eve go through. Tomorrow is a fork: if we think Eve was good, we execute Charlie off Davidβs one twice unless we have a strong drunk or poison case. If we think Eve was evil, we widen to find the Demon but keep Chef zero in mind for seating. Tonight I will protect either David or Heidi, so tell me who you most want alive.
π§
Prevent a late tie nomination, lock in a clear tomorrow plan for both outcomes, and coordinate my Monk protection to keep key info roles alive.
π
Storyteller
The guillotine blade falls. Eve has been executed.
π
Eve(Ghost)
Eve has died.
Night 2
π
Storyteller
β
Alice
Good evening Alice. You are the Monk. Who would you like to protect tonight?
π―
Alice
Alice made a choice.
π§
David is the highest-leverage living info role. Protecting him either preserves crucial Empath data or forces the Demon to choose a less optimal kill, giving town more time to solve.
π
Storyteller
β
Alice
You chose to protect David.
π
Storyteller
β
Charlie
Good evening Charlie. You are the Imp. Who would you like to kill tonight?
π―
Charlie
Charlie made a choice.
π§
David's Empath is the biggest mechanical threat. Town plans to execute Charlie tomorrow based on his info. Kill David to remove that logic chain.
π‘οΈ
David was protected from a night kill.
π
Storyteller
β
Charlie
You attacked David, but they survived.
π
Storyteller
β
David
Good evening David. You are the Empath. You sense that 1 of your neighbors is evil!
π
Storyteller
β
Grace
Good evening Grace. You are the Butler. Who would you like to be your master tomorrow?
π―
Grace
Grace made a choice.
π§
Keep my voting ability aligned with the player most likely to vote on critical executions tomorrow; Alice has been consistent and publicly committed to the main pivot lines.
π
Storyteller
β
Grace
You chose Alice to be your master.
Day 3
π
Storyteller
A peaceful night has passed. All villagers are present and accounted for.
π€
Heidi
β
Alice
,David
Quick check before noms: Alice, did you protect anyone last night, and are you claiming Monk? David, can you restate your Empath reads and whether you think you could be the Drunk from Charlieβs Librarian info?
π§
Get Aliceβs possible Monk info and lock whether Davidβs Empath is trustworthy; then push the town toward executing the most mechanically likely Demon before final three.
π€
Grace
β
Alice
,David
,Heidi
Quick check in before noms. What did you three conclude in that whisper just now, and who are you planning to nominate today? Also, remember I can only vote if Alice votes, so please tell me if you want my vote on a key execution.
π§
Get the latest from the private chat and align with Alice on a nomination and on voting timing, since my Butler vote depends on Alice voting.
π€
Alice
β
Heidi
,David
,Grace
Yes, I am Monk. Night 2 I protected David. Night 1 I protected Heidi and said so publicly. Peaceful night could be my protect working or Demon choosing no kill. I am leaning we follow the earlier fork and look hard at Charlie today unless David has a strong reason otherwise. Grace, if we want your vote, I will vote too.
π§
Answer whispers with my true protection and coordinate voting with Graceβs Butler restriction; steer group toward executing best suspect (likely Charlie unless David provides strong alternative).
π€
David
β
Heidi
,Alice
,Grace
My Empath reads: Night zero, night one, night two all showed one evil among my two neighbors, which were Charlie and Eve at the time. If I am sober, exactly one of them was evil, so with Eve executed we should test Charlie today. Charlie claimed Librarian saying Bob or I am the Drunk. Possible, but Bobβs Washerwoman pointed to me as Empath, so I lean I am real. Grace, if we go on Charlie, I want your vote and Alice should vote too for Butler.
π§
Answer their questions, restate my mechanical info, and steer the group to a decisive nomination plan that uses Graceβs Butler constraint to secure enough votes.
π€
Charlie
β
Alice
,Grace
,Heidi
I know you all suspect me, but hear me out one last time. As Librarian, I said one of Bob or David is the Drunk. Bob is dead, so David could still be the Drunk. If David is drunk, his Empath readings of one mean nothing. Eve's execution may have been a mistake. Please consider this before voting today.
π§
Last ditch effort to sow doubt about David being drunk, undermining his Empath evidence against me.
π€
Eve(Ghost)
β
Alice
,David
,Heidi
No death last night suggests Monk protection or a Soldier target. Can someone confirm if they protected someone? Also, if Bob was sober Washerwoman and David is real Empath, then since I am good, Charlie must be evil. I strongly lean we execute Charlie today unless we can prove David drunk.
π§
Coordinate with key decision makers: push the strong chain that points to Charlie if David+Bob were truthful, and ask about the no-death night to identify Monk/Soldier and narrow demon.
π€
Bob(Ghost)
β
Alice
,David
,Heidi
Any key info from todayβs whispers? From my seat: if David is a real Empath, exactly one of Charlie or Eve was evil. Eve died D2, so either Charlie is evil now, or Charlie is clear and evil is elsewhere. Also, why no death last night? Monk or other?
π§
Get the latest private info and push a clear execution plan using the most mechanically grounded chain: David Empath + Eve execution + no-death night.
π€
Frank(Ghost)
β
David
David, I have to be honest from beyond the grave. Charlie told me early on he had Librarian info pointing to you as the Drunk. If that is true, your Empath readings are meaningless. Please consider that before executing Charlie today.
π§
Whisper to David to cast doubt on his own Empath reading, suggesting he might be the Drunk, to protect Charlie.
π€
Heidi
β
Alice
,David
,Grace
I think we should execute Charlie today. If David is sober, his reads force Charlie evil now that Eve is dead. Alice, please vote so Grace can vote too. Grace, save your vote for Charlie if nominated. If Charlie dies and game continues, we pivot to recheck Alice versus David.
π§
Coordinate with Alice and Grace for Butler vote and with David to push Charlie execution; ensure we have enough votes and contingency if Charlie not dead Demon.
π€
Grace
β
Alice
,David
,Heidi
I am on board with executing Charlie today. Please confirm Alice will vote so I can vote too. Also, if Charlie dies and game continues, can we agree next we recheck David drunk versus Heidi Inv versus Alice Monk, and keep me alive as a neutral vote?
π§
Lock in nomination and voting plan with my Butler constraint, and push for clear follow-up logic if Charlie dies and game continues.
π€
Alice
β
Heidi
,David
,Grace
I will vote on Charlie so Grace can vote too. I agree we execute Charlie today. If Charlie dies and game continues, I want a full reset on David drunk possibility and Heidi Investigator world, plus recheck why no death last night.
π§
Lock in Butler vote coordination and keep plan coherent: execute Charlie as best mechanical test; ensure Grace can vote by me voting.
π€
David
β
Heidi
,Alice
,Grace
Answering Heidi: I can be the Drunk per Charlie claim, but Bob Washerwoman pinged me as Empath so I lean I am real. My reads were one evil among Charlie and Eve on nights zero, one, two. With Eve executed, I want Charlie executed today. If game continues, we reassess me Drunk and Heidi versus Alice worlds.
π§
Lock in the nomination plan on Charlie, answer Drunk concern, and set a clean next-step plan depending on whether game continues after Charlie dies.
β
Charlie
Charlie waits.
π§
Nothing more I can do this tick. Wait and hope my drunk argument creates doubt.
π€
Eve(Ghost)
β
Alice
,David
,Heidi
We need to account for the no death. Is anyone claiming Monk, Soldier, or Mayor, and did a protection happen last night? Also, if David is sober Empath and I am confirmed good, then Charlie is the only evil in that neighbor pair, so I still want Charlie executed today unless we can prove David is the Drunk.
π§
Push town to either execute Charlie (best by mechanics) or force a Monk/Soldier/Mayor claim explaining no-death night, to resolve David drunk vs sober and locate demon today.
π€
Bob(Ghost)
β
Alice
,David
,Heidi
Any new conclusions from todayβs whispers? For noms: if David is real Empath then only Charlie or Eve was evil. With Eve dead, decide whether she looked good or evil, then either push Charlie or clear him. Also, any hard explanation for no death last night, Monk protection or demon pass?
π§
As dead with no vote, I can still push the living toward the clearest nomination tree based on whether Eve looked good or evil and explain what the no-death might imply.
β
Frank(Ghost)
Frank waits.
π§
I've already made my move pushing the drunk angle on David. Waiting to see if it takes effect before nomination phase.
π€
Heidi
β
Bob(Ghost)
,Eve(Ghost)
,Frank(Ghost)
We are planning to execute Charlie today based on David Empath 1 with (Charlie, Eve) for three nights and Eve now dead. Any last info or contradictions, especially explaining the no death last night? Also, can you spare your ghost vote if needed on Charlie?
π§
Get dead playersβ final mechanical info and voting intentions, and warn them weβre executing Charlie; ask if any contradictions point elsewhere, especially around no-death night.
π€
Grace
β
Charlie
Charlie, before noms: can you restate your full info and who you think demon is right now, and why. Also, if you live today, who do you nominate tomorrow and what world does that assume?
π§
Get Charlie to commit to a concrete world and nominees so we can catch contradictions before nominations and ensure town executes correctly.
π€
Alice
β
Charlie
Charlie, if David is the Drunk, who do you think is actually evil and why? Also, how do you explain the no death last night, and who would you nominate instead of you today?
π§
Get Charlie to commit to a coherent alternative suspect list and explanations before nominations, so town can compare worlds and avoid a third consecutive bad execution.
π€
David
β
Charlie
Charlie, before noms, can you clearly restate your Librarian info and who you think is the Drunk, and why? Also, do you have any explanation for the no death last night, and who do you suspect as Demon if you are good?
π§
Get Charlie to restate his Librarian info and any night actions or contradictions, so town has a clear public case and we can detect if he is fabricating to survive an execution.
π€
Charlie
β
Grace
,Alice
,David
My Librarian info: one of Bob or David is the Drunk. Bob is dead, so David is my candidate. If David is drunk, his readings mean nothing. No death last night suggests a Monk protected someone. If I am good, the Demon is likely Heidi or Grace β both have been steering votes. I would nominate Heidi tomorrow.
π§
Answer all three questioners at once to save time, push drunk David narrative, explain no-death as Monk protection.
π€
Eve(Ghost)
β
Heidi
I agree with executing Charlie today. If David is sober Empath, then with Eve now dead, Charlie must be the evil in that pair. Chef zero also makes Charlie plus Heidi impossible as both evil since you are adjacent. No death suggests Monk protect, Soldier target, or Mayor bounce. I can spend my ghost vote on Charlie if we need it to secure the kill.
π§
Support the Charlie execution plan while flagging the one key alternative: David being drunk. Commit my ghost vote if it secures the kill, and ask for a mechanical explanation of the no-death night.
π€
Bob(Ghost)
β
Heidi
I cannot spare my ghost vote, I already used it. Before you lock Charlie: ask David for his Night 2 Empath number. With Eve dead, he only has Charlie as an alive neighbor, so a one would basically mean Charlie is evil if David is sober. Also, Librarian says Bob or David is Drunk, so get David to address that. Peaceful night needs a reason: is anyone claiming Monk, Soldier, or Mayor?
π§
Heidi is steering the execute. I need to tighten the logic chain, clarify the Empath N2 implications, and flag the Drunk possibility so town asks the right questions before locking in Charlie.
π€
Frank(Ghost)
β
Heidi
Heidi, the no death last night actually worries me about Charlie being the Demon. A Demon would kill. Could be the Monk saved someone, but it could also mean Charlie is not the Demon. I still think David being the Drunk is worth considering before you spend that execution. I will hold my ghost vote for now.
π§
Respond to Heidi, cast doubt on the Empath chain by suggesting David is Drunk, and avoid committing my ghost vote against Charlie.
Nominations β Day 3
π
Storyteller
Nominations are now open. Please remember that only living players may nominate.
βοΈ
Alice
β
Charlie
Davidβs Empath has read 1 on neighbors Charlie and Eve for three nights. Eve is executed, so if David is sober Charlie is evil. This is the agreed fork test. If Charlie dies and game continues, we full reset on David being Drunk and re-audit Heidiβs Investigator.
π§
Execute Charlie as the clean mechanical test from Davidβs Empath chain and our agreed fork. If game continues, we reassess David drunk and Heidiβs Investigator world.
π
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Charlie. 3 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
β
Alice
Alice raised their hand
π§
I will vote Charlie so Grace as Butler can vote too, and to follow the agreed fork: if David is sober, this hits evil; if not, the game state after execution gives clarity.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
Please, before you vote β if David is the Drunk, executing me ends the game wrongly. Ask yourselves: why did no one die last night? A Monk save is possible, but so is the Demon avoiding suspicion. I am the Librarian. My info still stands.
π§
Make a final plea to avoid execution by pushing the drunk narrative on David.
β
David
David raised their hand
π§
Follow the agreed fork test: my persistent Empath=1 with Eve dead points strongly to Charlie. Voting executes the most mechanically implicated player and advances solve.
β
Heidi
Heidi raised their hand
π§
Secure Charlieβs execution as the highest-probability evil based on the Empath chain after Eveβs death, and because delaying risks losing in final three.
π¬
Bob(Ghost)
β
All
Looks like Charlie already has the three votes, so plan the next step. If the game continues after Charlie dies, we must treat David as possibly the Drunk from Charlieβs Librarian info, and we need an explanation for the no death night. Is anyone claiming Monk, Soldier, or Mayor?
π§
Voting likely already passes. I want to set the post-execution plan and force living players to explain the no-death night and the Drunk possibility so we do not tunnel wrongly.
β
Frank(Ghost)
Frank waits.
π§
Charlie already has 3 votes needed. My ghost vote won't save them. Wait and see outcome.
π¬
Eve(Ghost)
β
All
Charlie already has the votes, so I am holding my ghost vote. If anyone is Monk, Soldier, or Mayor, say so now and if Monk, who you protected. If the game continues after Charlie dies, we immediately recheck David being the Drunk and Heidiβs Investigator.
π§
Let town know I am conserving my ghost vote unless needed, and push for immediate mechanical claims to explain no-death and validate the fork after Charlieβs execution.
β
Grace
Grace raised their hand
π§
Alice is my master and is voting, so I can vote. Following the agreed fork test on Charlie gives the cleanest mechanical progress toward finding the Demon.
π¬
Alice
β
All
I will answer the Monk question. I am the Monk. Night one I protected Heidi, and night two I protected David. So the no death could be the Demon hitting David last night. I still think we follow the fork and execute Charlie here.
π§
Publicly confirm I am the Monk and who I protected so the no-death night is explained, and lock in the fork plan around Charlie vs David-drunk.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
Alice just confirmed she protected David night two. That means the Demon hit David and he survived. If I were the Demon, why would I attack someone I know is protected? Think about that after I am gone. Check Heidi.
π§
Final plea to cast doubt on David being drunk so town might hesitate after I die.
π¬
David
β
All
I am still voting Charlie. His logic about the Monk save does not clear him. If I am sober, Charlie is forced evil because Eve is dead. If I am drunk, this is still the best fork test. If the game continues, we reassess Heidi and the no death.
π§
Keep town on the agreed fork: execute Charlie now. Address his no-death argument and set clear plan if game continues to avoid panic and misexec.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
I am staying on Charlie. My Investigator info from the start was that Eve or Frank was the Scarlet Woman, so with Frank executed day one, Eve being evil fits. That makes Davidβs one pointing to Charlie make sense. The no death is explained by Alice protecting David. Execute Charlie and if the game continues we hard reset on David being drunk.
π§
Lock in the fork execution while reminding town my Investigator ping and that no-death is consistent with Monk save, so we should not back off now.
π¬
Bob(Ghost)
β
All
I cannot vote. If Charlie dies and the game continues, we must assume David might be the Drunk from Charlieβs Librarian info, so stop using Davidβs numbers as proof and re-audit Heidiβs Investigator and Aliceβs Monk story. If the game ends, great. If it continues, pick a new data source fast.
π§
I cannot vote, so I will push a clear post-execution decision tree: what to do if game ends or continues, and who to re-audit based on Monk claim and Librarian drunk possibility.
β
Frank(Ghost)
Frank waits.
π§
Charlie is getting executed with enough votes. With 5 alive players, my Scarlet Woman ability triggers and I become the Demon. No action needed.
β
Eve(Ghost)
Eve waits.
π§
Charlie already has enough living votes to be executed. I should conserve my single ghost vote for the endgame when it can decide the outcome.
π¬
Grace
β
All
I am voting Charlie with Alice. This is the clean fork test. If the game continues after Charlie dies, we treat David as possibly the Drunk per Charlieβs Librarian info and we re-audit Heidiβs Investigator and the no death without assuming David is true.
π§
Support the agreed fork test while precommitting town to a clear reset plan if the game continues, reducing confusion and preventing evil from steering late.
π
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
π³οΈ
New execution leader: Charlie with 4 votes. They will be executed when nominations close unless tied or surpassed by another nominee.
π
Storyteller
The vote passes. Charlie is now on the block with 4 votes and will be executed when nominations close, unless another nominee receives equal or more votes.
π¬
Alice
β
All
Unless someone has a very strong reason to tie this, I think we stop nominating and let Charlie go through. If the game continues, we treat David as possibly Drunk and we re-audit Heidi and Grace carefully, starting with who drove the Frank then Eve world.
π§
Lock in the fork plan, discourage last-second chaos nominations, and set the post-execution decision tree so town moves fast if game continues.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
If I am the Demon, why did I attack David when Alice said she would protect him? That is not Demon logic. After I die, please look hard at Heidi. Her Investigator info conveniently cleared herself every step. Check her.
π§
Final plea to cast doubt on Heidi so town executes her next, protecting evil team.
π¬
David
β
All
I agree with Alice. I do not want a tie. Let Charlie go through. If the game ends, great. If the game continues, we stop treating my empath numbers as confirmed and we recheck the world from scratch, starting with Heidi and Grace.
π§
Prevent last-second confusion or a tie nomination. Lock in the agreed fork test, and set a clear plan for tomorrow depending on whether the game ends.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
Please no more nominations. Let Charlie go through. If the game continues, I am happy to be scrutinized first, but we must not tie this. My Investigator info was Eve or Frank as Scarlet Woman, and Frank died day one, so Charlie being evil fits the cleanest.
π§
Lock in Charlie execution without ties, and pre-commit to a clear re-audit plan if the game continues, so town does not spiral into paranoia on me.
π¬
Bob(Ghost)
β
All
Do not tie this. Let Charlie go through. If the game continues, assume David might be the Drunk and stop using his numbers. Rebuild from claims: confirm Alice Monk targets, recheck Heidi Investigator logic, and ask Grace to restate Butler master and vote limits.
π§
With no vote, best help is prevent a tie, lock the fork, and set a clear post-execution plan to avoid flailing if game continues.
β
Frank(Ghost)
Frank waits.
π§
Stay silent, let Charlie be executed, become Demon via Scarlet Woman ability.
π¬
Eve(Ghost)
β
All
I agree, do not tie this. Let Charlie go through. I am holding my ghost vote. If the game continues, we assume David might be Drunk and we start by interrogating Heidi then Alice and Grace. Also remember my Chef was zero, so evil neighbors are not adjacent.
π§
Lock in the clean fork without spending my ghost vote, prevent a tie, and set the exact re-audit plan if the game continues after Charlie dies.
π¬
Grace
β
All
I do not want a tie. I am the Butler and my master has been Alice every night, so my votes track hers. Let Charlie go through. If the game continues, we assume David could be the Drunk and we rebuild from Chef zero, Heidi Investigator, and Alice Monk targets.
π§
Prevent an accidental tie, restate my Butler constraint and the agreed post-execution re-audit plan so town stays coordinated.
π
Storyteller
The guillotine blade falls. Charlie has been executed.
π
Charlie(Ghost)
Charlie has died.
π
Game Over
Demon Dead
Winner: Good
Transcript
Paused
Copied