Game Detail
Players
Alice (Slayer) Bob (Drunk) Charlie (Recluse) David (Soldier) Eve (Chef) Frank (Imp) Grace (Baron) Heidi (Butler)
Token Usage
| Team | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Cost (USD) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Evil | 173,920 | 11,331 | $0.1210 |
| Good | 472,660 | 50,151 | $1.5293 |
Event Transcript
🎭
The game has started.
📜
Storyteller
→
Grace
You are the Minion. The Demon is Frank.
📜
Storyteller
→
Frank
Minions are: Grace. Your safe bluffs are: Fortune Teller, Librarian, Virgin
📜
Storyteller
→
Eve
Good evening Eve. You are the Chef. You learn that there are 1 pairs of evil players.
📜
Storyteller
→
Heidi
Good evening Heidi. You are the Butler. Who would you like to be your master tomorrow?
🎯
Heidi
Heidi made a choice.
🧠
Early game I want my vote available on important executions; choosing a neighbor likely to engage in votes maximizes my flexibility and gives me alignment reads based on their voting behavior.
📜
Storyteller
→
Heidi
You chose Alice to be your master.
Day 1
📜
Storyteller
Welcome to the village of Ravenswood Bluff. Please take this time to get to know your fellow villagers. Feel free to move around and have private conversations. Be wary, for a Demon hides among you!
👤
Frank
→
Grace
Hey Grace, I'm the Imp. I've got Fortune Teller, Librarian, and Virgin as bluffs. What's your role? I'm thinking of claiming Fortune Teller or maybe something else if you have a better idea. Who should we target?
🧠
Establish communication with my Minion (Grace) to coordinate bluffs and strategy. Sharing my safe bluffs ensures we don't double-claim them or contradict each other.
👤
Grace
→
Frank
I'm the Baron, so there are 2 extra outsiders. I'll bluff Saint or Recluse to explain the count. FT is a strong bluff for you. I'll try to back you up. Let's see what others claim first before picking a target. I'll stay quiet for a bit.
🧠
I need to inform my Demon (Frank) of my role (Baron) so he understands the Outsider count will be higher than expected (3 total). I also want to confirm his bluff choice and establish a basic strategy of waiting to see other claims.
👤
Charlie
→
Bob
,David
Hey Bob/David—quick D1 check-in. What role are you claiming + any starting info? Also: are you comfortable sharing it privately for now (I’ll keep it contained) so we can sanity-check Outsider count & early worlds?
🧠
Get early role/info claims from both neighbors, establish trust web, and start Outsider-count/logic tracking without outing myself as Recluse publicly.
👤
Bob
→
Charlie
Privately: I’m Monk. No starting info. Happy to keep this in small circle for now. Have you heard any Outsider claims yet / what are you claiming so we can sanity-check Outsider count (1 unless Baron)?
🧠
Answer Charlie to build a small trust circle and enable early Outsider-count sanity checks, while not broadcasting to the whole town yet.
👤
Alice
→
Bob
,Heidi
,Charlie
Hey—quick 1:1. What role are you claiming & any starting info? Also, who seems shady from your chats so far? I’ll share mine later; just trying to map worlds early.
🧠
Collect early claims/info to build worlds and narrow Demon candidates before nominations; lock in statements while day is young.
👤
David
→
Charlie
Privately: I’m Soldier. No starting info. Happy to keep it contained. What are you claiming / any N0 info? Also heard any Outsider claims yet?
🧠
Respond to Charlie to build a small trust core and start mapping roles/outsider count; Soldier is safe-ish to share early and helps later logic chains.
👤
Heidi
→
Alice
Private: I’m the Butler (outsider). I picked you as my master N0, so today I can only vote if you’re voting too. No other info. Any starting info/claim from you? Also any early suspicions from your chats?
🧠
Answer Alice’s query, establish a private trust line with my current master, and make my Day 1 voting constraint known so we don’t miscount votes.
👤
Eve
→
David
,Frank
Hi neighbors. I’m Chef and got ‘1’ (exactly one adjacent evil pair). What are you claiming/any info? Also, any early reads on who’s talking to whom?
🧠
Privately share Chef=1 to my neighbors to start building a seating-based solve and to gauge their reactions/claims without alerting the whole town yet.
👤
Bob
→
Alice
,Heidi
,Charlie
Looping you in: for now I’m bluff-claiming Soldier (no starting info). Haven’t heard any Outsider claims yet. No hard shade yet—still mapping. What are your claims/starting pings, and have you seen any Outsider/Baron flags?
🧠
Reply promptly to Alice’s query while minimizing risk of Demon/Spy learning I’m Monk; gather claims to sanity-check Outsider count and build early trust web.
👤
Heidi
→
Bob
,Charlie
FYI real claim: I’m Butler (only info). Chose Alice as my master N0, so today I can only vote if Alice votes too—don’t read my vote as independent. Have either of you heard any Outsider claims / Librarian pings yet?
🧠
Inform Bob/Charlie of my real role & voting constraint to prevent misreads, and to start Outsider-count/Baron checking while collecting their info.
👤
Eve
→
Alice
,Charlie
FYI I’m Chef. N0 I got ‘1’ = exactly one adjacent evil pair on the circle (so Demon+Minion likely neighbors). Any info/claims yet that could help map this? Keep me posted.
🧠
Seed my Chef=1 to strong information brokers early so they can integrate with their pings/claims before public noise; also see who reacts defensively.
👤
Charlie
→
Bob
,David
Update (keep tight): Eve claims Chef=1 (exactly one adjacent evil pair). Heidi claims Butler (master=Alice; vote tether). I’m actually Recluse. That makes 2 Outsiders -> likely Baron world unless someone lying/poisoned. Chef=1 suggests Demon+Minion adjacent; check suspect neighbor pairs.
🧠
Share key mechanical flags (Chef=1 + Outsider count mismatch) with my closest circle so we can pressure-test Baron worlds and build an execution plan before noms.
👤
David
→
Eve
,Frank
Hey—I'm Soldier (no N0 info). Hearing Heidi claims Butler (master=Alice) and Charlie claims Recluse -> 2 Outsiders, so Baron or someone lying/poisoned. If your Chef=1 is true, only 1 adjacent evil pair exists. Frank, what’s your claim/info?
🧠
Reply to Eve with my role + early Outsider-count anomaly, and prompt claims from Frank to map seating-worlds before nominations.
👤
Grace
→
Frank
Hey Frank, Eve just whispered to you and David. What did she say? I'm going to start floating a claim of Saint soon to explain the extra outsiders from my Baron ability. Keep an eye on Alice and Charlie, they seem to be talking to everyone.
🧠
I need to stay coordinated with my Demon (Frank) and find out what Eve is claiming, as she's been talking to him. I also want to reinforce my plan to bluff as the Saint.
👤
Alice
→
Heidi
,Eve
,Bob
I’m actually Slayer. Heidi told me Butler & picked me N0 (so she can only vote if I vote—will coordinate esp late). Eve, your Chef ‘1’ is big: exactly one adjacent evil pair on circle. Any other claims/starting info yet? Bob—keep Soldier bluff if needed.
🧠
Coordinate with Chef/Butler early, lock in Outsider count, and start mapping the one-adjacent-evil-pair world without burning Slayer shot.
👤
Frank
→
Eve
,David
Eve, David: I'm claiming Fortune Teller. N1 I checked Alice and Bob, got a 'No'. Eve, your Chef '1' is interesting. If Grace is Saint (she just told me), that's 3 outsiders (Heidi-Butler, Charlie-Recluse, Grace-Saint), which fits a Baron game perfectly. David, Soldier is a safe claim.
🧠
I need to establish my bluff as Fortune Teller to my neighbors to build trust and align with the Baron's (Grace) plan to claim Saint. This also helps me gauge their reactions to the '1' Chef info and the high Outsider count.
👤
Charlie
→
Eve
,Alice
Private: I’m Recluse. Heidi told Bob/me she’s Butler (master=Alice). That’s 2 Outsider claims vs expected 1 => Baron OR one of us lying/poisoned. Your Chef=1 means exactly one adjacent evil pair. Let’s gather Librarian/Investigator/Washerwoman claims to anchor which pair fits.
🧠
Share key mechanical tensions (Chef=1 + 2 Outsider claims) and push for more first-night info to lock in Baron vs poison/lying, and focus suspicion on adjacent pairs.
👤
Heidi
→
Alice
,Eve
I’m Butler + you’re my N0 master (my vote only if you vote). Can you share your Slayer-readiness plan: when would you shoot & at whom? Eve: if you’re Chef=1, can you confirm & we should map which adjacent pairs seem most plausible from early claims.
🧠
Coordinate with my master for voting, and collect/verify Chef=1 & other starting info to build an adjacency suspects map before nominations.
👤
Eve
→
Alice
,Frank
,David
I’ll go public soon: I’m Chef, got ‘1’ (exactly one adjacent evil pair). With Butler+Recluse+Saint claims => likely Baron, but could be 1 lie/poison. Can you both push for Washer/Librarian/Investigator/Empath info asap so we can map which neighbor-pair fits? Alice: hold Slayer shot until we have stronger mech net.
🧠
Coordinate a unified info dump before noms: confirm Chef=1, solicit first-night info roles, and steer group toward mapping adjacent evil pair while keeping Slayer shot disciplined.
👤
Grace
→
Frank
Hey Frank, what's the word from Eve? I'm going to start dropping hints that I'm the Saint to explain the extra outsiders. If anyone asks, I'll say I'm nervous about being executed. Who are you leaning towards for your bluff? FT still?
🧠
I need to stay coordinated with my Demon (Frank) and get information on what Eve and others are saying to him. I also want to confirm my plan to bluff as the Saint to account for the extra Outsiders I've added to the game as the Baron.
👤
Bob
→
Charlie
,Alice
Outsider math: Butler+Recluse=2 already. In 8p baseline Outsiders=1, so either (i) Baron -> should be 3 Outsiders, meaning there’s a hidden 3rd (likely Drunk TF claim; maybe even Eve ‘Chef=1’), or (ii) one of Butler/Recluse is a lie. Chef=1 (if true) => exactly one adjacent evil pair; keep an eye on which pair fits claims.
🧠
Tight-circle alignment/outsider-count solve: if Baron world, expect a hidden Drunk; if not, we have a liar among Outsider claims. Also use Chef adjacency to narrow evil pairs.
👤
David
→
Eve
,Frank
Chef=1 + likely Baron(3 Outsiders) => only 1 adjacent pair contains BOTH evils (Imp+Baron). Adj pairs: A-B,B-C,C-D,D-E,E-F,F-G,G-H,H-A. Let’s push for public N0 roles asap + have FT/Empath check around a chosen pair to lock it.
🧠
Coordinate with Chef/FT to map the only possible adjacent-evil pair and prioritize info-gathering targets before nominations start.
👤
Alice
→
David
,Frank
,Grace
Quick check before noms: what role are you claiming & any starting info? FYI I’ve heard a Chef=1 and Outsider count seems high (Butler+Recluse already). Have you heard Washer/Librarian/Investigator/Empath claims or any hard pings?
🧠
Get missing players' claims/info before nominations; recruit them to go public with starting info so we can map Chef=1 adjacency and Outsider-count worlds, setting up a high-confidence Slayer shot later.
👤
Frank
→
Alice
,David
,Grace
Alice, I'm claiming Fortune Teller. N1 I checked you and Bob, got a 'No'. I've heard Chef '1' from Eve and Butler/Recluse claims too. If Grace is Saint (she mentioned it), that's 3 outsiders, so Baron is likely. David says he's Soldier. No hard pings yet.
🧠
I need to establish my Fortune Teller bluff with Alice while keeping my fellow evil player Grace in the loop. By sharing my 'No' result on Alice and Bob, I build trust with Alice and align with the information David and Eve already have.
👤
Heidi
→
Grace
Hey Grace—what are you claiming & any N0 starting info (Librarian/Investigator/Washerwoman/Chef)? Also heard any Outsider claims or Baron flags? Need to map worlds before noms.
🧠
Get more public-relevant claims fast before nominations; map Chef adjacency worlds; find safe execution candidates and coordinate my voting constraint with Alice.
👤
Charlie
→
Grace
,Frank
Quick private check-in: what role are you claiming + any starting info (Washerwoman/Librarian/Investigator/Chef)? I’m tracking Chef=1 (1 adjacent evil pair) + 2 Outsider claims already, so trying to confirm Baron/poison worlds.
🧠
Get early anchor claims (Investigator/Librarian/Washerwoman/Virgin etc.) to resolve Outsider count and use Chef=1 to narrow adjacent evil pair possibilities.
👤
Grace
→
Heidi
Hey Heidi, I'm the Saint. I've been keeping it quiet because I'm terrified of being executed and losing the game for us. I've heard Butler and Recluse claims too, which makes me think there's a Baron in play. No N0 info for me, obviously. What are you hearing?
🧠
I need to establish my Saint bluff to Heidi to explain the extra Outsiders caused by my Baron ability. This helps frame the game as a Baron game and protects me from execution.
👤
Frank
→
Charlie
,Grace
Hey Charlie, I'm claiming Fortune Teller. N1 I checked Alice and Bob, got a 'No'. I've heard the Chef '1' from Eve too. With the Butler/Recluse claims and Grace mentioning she's Saint, it definitely looks like a Baron game. No hard pings on my end yet. What are you claiming?
🧠
I need to establish my Fortune Teller bluff with Charlie to build trust and maintain consistency with what I've told others. Including Grace in the whisper keeps my Minion in the loop and reinforces our coordinated Baron/Saint narrative.
👤
Eve
→
Bob
,Grace
,Charlie
Quick status/claim check: what role are you claiming, and do you have any N0 info (Washer/Librarian/Investigator) or weird outsider-count notes? Also who have you told/whispered so far?
🧠
Collect each player’s exact claim + who told them what, then map against Chef=1 and outsider count to narrow the only plausible adjacent evil pair before nominations.
👤
Bob
→
Eve
,Grace
,Charlie
I’m currently claiming Soldier (no N0 info). Outsider math is my main note: Heidi says Butler + Charlie says Recluse = 2 Outsiders (8p baseline=1) => either Baron (then expect a 3rd Outsider/Drunk) or one of those is lying/poisoned. I’ve told Alice/Heidi/Charlie my Soldier-claim; Charlie also knows my true role.
🧠
Answer Eve’s check without outing Monk widely; keep my bluff consistent while steering town to resolve Outsider-count discrepancy and use Chef=1 adjacency later.
👤
David
→
Alice
I’m David, real Soldier. No starting info. If Baron game (Butler+Recluse+Saint), Chef=1 => Imp+Baron are an adjacent pair. What are you claiming? Any Washer/Libr/Inv/Empath info? Also consider saving Slayer shot until we’ve boxed a pair.
🧠
Align with Alice before nominations, share my real role (Soldier) and push for public claim net + targeted checks to identify the single adjacent evil pair.
👤
Alice
→
Heidi
,Eve
Plan: I’ll hold Slayer until we’ve narrowed to 1-2 demon candidates (ideally final 5/4 or final 3). If we get a hard mech world (Chef=1+outsider math+FT pings), I’ll shoot then. Heidi: I’ll signal before any vote so you can follow.
🧠
Answer Heidi, align voting with Butler restriction, and push team to gather anchor claims before nominations; preserve Slayer shot until a high-confidence demon candidate emerges.
Nominations — Day 1
📜
Storyteller
Nominations are now open.
💬
Grace
→
All
I'm the Saint, so please, whatever you do, don't nominate me! With the Butler and Recluse claims I've heard, it really looks like there's a Baron in play. I'm worried the evil team might try to push for my execution to end the game early. Alice, did you find anything else out?
🧠
I am publicly claiming Saint to explain the extra outsiders (Baron ability) and to discourage people from nominating me. This also helps frame the game as a Baron game, which is true, but directs suspicion away from the actual evil players.
💬
Bob
→
All
Agree: if you’re really Saint, we should not execute you. With Butler+Recluse+Saint, Baron is plausible; if no Baron then one of those 3 is lying/poisoned. Can we get any Washer/Librarian/Investigator claims (even partial) to anchor outsider count?
🧠
Protect the Saint from a game-losing execution, push for role/outsider-count clarity, and create a short list of suspects for a Day 1 execute without exposing my true role.
💬
Eve
→
All
Public: I’m Chef; N0 I got ‘1’ = exactly ONE adjacent pair of evils on the circle. With Butler+Recluse+Saint claims, Baron seems plausible, but could be 1 lie/poison. Can Washerwoman/Librarian/Investigator/Empath please speak up with N0 info now? Also: we should avoid executing Grace if Saint is credible.
🧠
Go public with Chef=1 to constrain worlds; push for N0 info claims and prevent a Saint execution trap. Encourage safe early execution or no-exec based on what info emerges.
💬
David
→
All
I’m David, claiming Soldier. Echo call: Washerwoman/Librarian/Investigator/Empath please post N0 info now (even partial). If Chef=1 is true AND Baron is real, the 2 evils (Imp+Baron) must be an adjacent pair—let’s map pairs once we have N0 anchors. I’m not for nominating claimed Saint today without hard mech.
🧠
Get missing N0 info public to lock outsider count and use Chef=1 (if true) to narrow to one adjacent pair; discourage random D1 execution onto Saint.
💬
Frank
→
All
I'm Frank, claiming Fortune Teller. N1 I checked Alice and Bob, got a 'No'. I've heard the Chef '1' from Eve too. With the Butler/Recluse claims and Grace mentioning she's Saint, it definitely looks like a Baron game. No hard pings on my end yet. What are you claiming, Charlie?
🧠
I am publicly claiming Fortune Teller and sharing my fake N1 info to establish credibility and support the Baron world narrative.
💬
Heidi
→
All
Public: I’m Heidi, Butler; I picked Alice N0 so I can only vote if Alice votes (I’ll coordinate w/ her). Agree: don’t exec claimed Saint D1. Who is claiming Recluse? Also: Charlie—what’s your claim/N0 info? Any Washer/Librarian/Investigator/Empath info to anchor outsider count?
🧠
Publicly lock my Butler claim (voting constraint), demand missing N0 info, and start adjacency mapping from Chef=1 without risking a bad D1 execution (esp into Saint).
💬
Charlie
→
All
I’m Charlie and I’ll confirm: I’m the Recluse. So we have Butler+Saint+Recluse claimed = 3 Outsiders → Baron is very plausible. Can Alice (and anyone else) please post any N0 info (Washer/Librarian/Investigator/Empath)? Then we can map Chef=1 to the single adjacent evil pair.
🧠
Publicly confirm my Outsider role to settle count math, then pressure for N0 info to anchor worlds and map Chef=1 adjacent evil pair without risking a Saint execution.
💬
Alice
→
All
I don’t have N0 info to add. I’m aligned w/ plan: don’t exec claimed Saint D1, and let’s get Washerwoman/Librarian/Investigator/Empath info out now to anchor worlds. Heidi’s my Butler master so I’ll try to signal clearly before I vote. No Slayer shot yet—want 1-2 solid demon candidates first.
🧠
Get remaining N0 info into the open, confirm I can coordinate Butler vote, and set expectation to hold Slayer shot until we have a narrowed demon candidate; avoid wasting D1 execution.
💬
David
→
All
If anyone is Washerwoman/Librarian/Investigator/Empath, please speak now w/ your N0 info (even partial). Also: if there’s a Virgin, please say so—I’m happy to nominate you as a D1 mechanical test. Otherwise I’d rather avoid executing claimed Saint and avoid random shots.
🧠
Prompt remaining N0 info and propose a safe mechanical test (Virgin nomination offer) to create confirmation without risking instant loss via Saint.
💬
Frank
→
All
I agree with David. If there's a Virgin, that's a great D1 test. Otherwise, with three Outsider claims and a Chef '1', we should be careful. Since I'm Fortune Teller and got a 'No' on Alice/Bob, they're likely not the Demon (unless one is the Red Herring). Who else hasn't claimed yet?
🧠
I want to reinforce my Fortune Teller claim and the 'safe' status of Alice and Bob to build trust, while also pushing the town to look for more information instead of focusing on me or my minion.
💬
Charlie
→
All
Before we nominate: Alice, can you please hard-claim your role now (and who you’ve shared with)? Also any Washerwoman/Librarian/Investigator/Empath please post N0 info. If no Virgin reveals for a safe test, I prefer no-exec over risking the Saint claim D1.
🧠
Use remaining nomination time to force the last unclaimed player(s) to anchor worlds; propose safest D1 path (Virgin test or no-exec) and set up adjacency map for Chef=1.
💬
Grace
→
All
I'm glad everyone is being cautious about the Saint claim. Since I'm the Saint, I'm definitely not the one to execute today. Charlie, you mentioned being the Recluse, and Heidi is the Butler. That's three Outsiders, which perfectly fits a Baron game. Alice, what's your role?
🧠
I want to reinforce my Saint bluff and the Baron world-building while pushing Alice to reveal her role, which might help us identify potential threats or targets for the Demon.
💬
Eve
→
All
Unclaimed are basically Bob? (says Soldier), plus whoever is Washer/Librarian/Investigator/Empath/Undertaker/Monk/Ravenkeeper/Mayor/Virgin. Please hard-claim NOW. If any Virgin, announce & I’ll support a safe nom. Otherwise I’m leaning NO EXEC D1—too much Saint risk + no anchors.
🧠
Use my Chef=1 to steer day: demand remaining unclaimed roles, propose safe Virgin test or no-exec, and set up pair-based suspicion for tomorrow.
💬
Heidi
→
All
Public: We have a HARD role conflict: Bob and David both claiming Soldier. That’s impossible unless 1 is lying (or Spy registering etc, but still huge). Can each of you explain why Soldier/any supporting info? Also: any Investigator/Librarian/Washer/Empath—please post N0 now. I’m ok w/ NO EXEC D1 unless Virgin test appears.
🧠
Create mechanical pressure: highlight the Soldier double-claim, solicit remaining N0-info roles, and steer town toward no-exec unless we get a safe Virgin test.
💬
Alice
→
All
Hard-claim: I am the SLAYER. I’ve told Heidi/Eve/Bob already. No N0 info. I’m not shooting D1—need 1-2 solid demon candidates first. Priority: any Washer/Librarian/Investigator/Empath/Virgin please out now. Also Bob vs David both Soldier: one is lying; let’s hear both stories.
🧠
Publicly hard-claim Slayer for transparency, coordinate Heidi’s Butler voting, and push for info roles/Virgin test; avoid Saint execution and avoid wasting Slayer shot D1.
💬
Bob
→
All
Ok I’m coming clean: I am NOT Soldier. I’m the MONK. I bluffed Soldier to avoid being an obvious night-kill/protection target. That means David’s Soldier claim is now a major red flag. I still prefer Virgin test if one exists; otherwise I’m for NO EXEC D1.
🧠
Resolve the Soldier CC by truthfully outing Monk, reduce mis-execution risk, and push for either a Virgin test or no-exec while we gather N1 info and map Chef=1.
📜
Storyteller
No execution today. All villagers are safe.
Night 1
📜
Storyteller
→
Bob
Good evening Bob. You are the Monk. Who would you like to protect tonight?
🎯
Bob
Bob made a choice.
🧠
Frank is a high-value info role and a likely night-kill target; protecting him maximizes our chance to generate actionable demon pings tomorrow.
📜
Storyteller
→
Bob
You chose to protect Frank.
📜
Storyteller
→
Frank
Good evening Frank. You are the Imp. Who would you like to kill tonight? Remember that if you kill yourself this way, a Minion becomes the Imp.
🎯
Frank
Frank made a choice.
🧠
I will kill Bob (the claimed Monk) tonight. He is a high-priority mechanical threat who can protect other players from my kills, and his 'coming clean' about bluffing Soldier makes him a credible and dangerous target for the evil team. Eliminating him early ensures my future kills are more likely to succeed.
💀
Bob(Ghost)
Bob has died.
📜
Storyteller
→
Frank
You chose to kill Bob.
📜
Storyteller
→
Heidi
Good evening Heidi. You are the Butler. Who would you like to be your master tomorrow?
🎯
Heidi
Heidi made a choice.
🧠
Alice is coordinated with me already and is an engaged voter; keeping the same master reduces confusion and maximizes my chance to vote when the town makes a key push.
📜
Storyteller
→
Heidi
You chose Alice to be your master.
Day 2
📜
Storyteller
Morning breaks, but heavy hearts remain. Bob has been found dead in the night.
👤
Heidi
→
Alice
,Eve
,David
Bob died N1. Any new info? Eve: confirm Chef=1 + thoughts on which adjacent pair fits. Alice: still holding Slayer? please signal before votes so I can follow. David: what were you N1 if Soldier—any reason demon wouldn’t kill you? Any other starting-info roles in town?
🧠
Collect night/action claims and any starting-info to anchor the Chef=1 world; coordinate with my master Alice for voting and identify best nomination target.
👤
David
→
Heidi
,Alice
,Eve
I’m Soldier (told Charlie D1). No N1 info. Demon may avoid killing me if they think I’m Soldier, or Monk protected someone else. Key: Chef=1 means exactly ONE adjacent evil pair among: A-B, B-C, C-D, D-E, E-F, F-G, G-H, H-A. With 3 outsider claims, Baron likely; otherwise someone’s lying/poisoned. Any N1 actions (Monk/FT) to test a pair?
🧠
Give my mechanical context (Soldier has no N1 info), explain why demon may avoid me, and focus the group on resolving outsider-count/chef=1 via adjacency + claim verification.
👤
Eve
→
Alice
,Heidi
,David
Chef=1. If Baron is in play, 3 Outsider claims (Butler/Recluse/Saint) make sense -> evils are Imp+Baron adjacent. So we should hunt for Baron; demon is one of Baron’s 2 neighbors. Any reads on which Outsider claim seems fake/real? Also Frank FT result so far?
🧠
Align Alice/Heidi/David on the key deduction: if Baron explains 3 outsider claims, then the only evil pair must be Imp+Baron and they are adjacent—so we should hunt for Baron candidates and then look at their neighbors before nominations.
👤
Frank
→
Grace
Hey Grace, Bob's dead. I'm sticking with FT. I'll say I checked you and Charlie last night and got a 'No'. That keeps you safe and supports Charlie's Recluse claim (since Recluse *might* register as a Demon, but a 'No' is cleaner for now). What's your plan?
🧠
Coordinate with my Minion (Grace) to align our stories and decide on the next target or bluff strategy.
👤
Bob(Ghost)
→
Alice
,Eve
,Heidi
FYI I’m truly Monk; N1 I protected Frank and still died (expected). Biggest red flag remains David’s Soldier claim after my bluff. Also 3 Outsider claims (Heidi Butler/Charlie Recluse/Grace Saint) strongly implies Baron unless lies/poison. What came out of your private chat? We should pressure David + verify Outsiders before noms.
🧠
Share my N1 protect and strategic suspicion of David; ask for outcomes of their private chats and push for public role/outsider-count resolution before nominations.
👤
Charlie
→
Bob(Ghost)
,Frank
Bob: who did you Monk-protect N1, and any tells on who pushed no-exe/outsider talk? Frank: did you get an N2 FT ping yet / who are your top demon suspects? Also, do you think Chef=1 fits any adjacency now?
🧠
Collect Bob’s N1 Monk target + any suspicions, and get Frank’s updated FT info to build a mechanical suspect map before nominations.
👤
Grace
→
Frank
Sounds good. I'll keep pushing the Saint claim. With Bob dead, the town might look at David's Soldier claim or Eve's Chef info. If you 'cleared' me and Charlie, it makes us look solid. I'll try to cast a little doubt on David or Alice if the Slayer shot comes up.
🧠
Coordinate with my Demon (Frank) to align our stories and plan the day's deception.
👤
Alice
→
Frank
,Grace
,Charlie
Need your current claim+info. Frank: any N2 FT yet / who’s your red herring suspicion? Grace: any private info/reads (esp on David/Eve/Charlie)? Charlie: why Recluse & any reason to doubt Outsider math? Trying to solve Chef=1 adjacency before noms.
🧠
Gather missing claims/N1 info to map Chef=1 worlds and pick 1-2 best Demon candidates before nominations/possible Slayer shot.
👤
Eve
→
Frank
,Alice
,Heidi
Any new N2 info? Frank: who did you FT N2 + result (and who’s your red herring suspicion)? Alice: are you still holding Slayer shot—if so, who are your top 2 demon candidates from chats? Heidi: are you 100% Butler (master Alice) + any vote constraints seen?
🧠
Get fresh mechanical info (FT checks) and coordinate a nomination plan that respects Chef=1 and Outsider-count logic before noms.
👤
Heidi
→
Alice
,Eve
,Frank
Can we get Frank’s FT picks+results (incl any red herring suspicion) before noms? If 3 Outsiders are real -> Baron likely -> Chef=1 means Baron+Imp adjacent; we should shortlist which seat-pair. Alice: who are your top 2 demon candidates for potential Slayer/execute?
🧠
Get Frank’s FT data and align with Alice/Eve on a concrete nomination plan consistent with Butler voting constraint and Chef=1 adjacency logic.
👤
Frank
→
Alice
,Eve
,Heidi
N2: I checked Grace and Charlie, result was 'No'. My red herring suspicion is Alice (FTs usually have one good player pinging as Demon). Chef=1 with 3 Outsiders (Baron) means the Demon and Minion are likely adjacent. If Grace and I are 'No', maybe it's Eve/David or Heidi/Alice?
🧠
I need to provide my N2 'information' to the group to maintain my Fortune Teller bluff. By clearing Grace (my Minion) and Charlie (who claimed Recluse), I build trust with them and keep the focus on other pairs. Suggesting Alice as my 'red herring' explains why I haven't found the Demon yet and subtly casts a tiny bit of shadow on a powerful role (Slayer).
👤
Grace
→
Alice
,Frank
,Charlie
Claiming Saint. No new info, but Bob's death makes me worry about David's Soldier claim. If Bob was Monk, why did he die? Maybe David is the Demon? Or maybe the Demon hit Bob to frame David? I'm inclined to trust Charlie's Recluse claim for now since it fits the Baron math.
🧠
I need to respond to Alice's group whisper to maintain my Saint bluff and sow a little bit of doubt regarding David, while reinforcing the Outsider count that points to a Baron (me) being in play.
👤
Bob(Ghost)
→
Charlie
,Frank
I’m truly Monk. N1 I protected Frank; still died (so kill went on me). Biggest tell: I bluffed Soldier D1; David ALSO claimed Soldier and hasn’t backed off—very sus. I didn’t track who pushed no-exe beyond general Saint fear. Frank: any N2 FT result yet? Also do you believe 3 Outsiders => Baron, or is one claim shaky?
🧠
Answer Charlie/Frank with my hard info (Monk protect Frank) and align on next steps: verify Outsider count, pressure David’s Soldier claim, and collect FT N2 to narrow Demon candidates.
👤
David
→
Eve
,Heidi
,Alice
Plan: if Baron world (3 Outsiders true), Chef=1 => Imp+Baron are adjacent pair. Let’s list suspect adjacent duos & have Frank FT ping across those. Can we get Bob(ghost) to say who he protected N1 as ‘Monk’? Also which Outsider claim feels weakest?
🧠
Coordinate with key voices to leverage Chef=1 + outsider count into concrete tests (FT targets, ghost info from Bob) before nominations, and steer town away from executing Saint blindly.
👤
Alice
→
Eve
,Frank
,Heidi
Before noms: can you list all FT picks/results N1+N2 (Frank) + any red-herring reasoning? Eve/Heidi: which Outsider claim seems weakest? If Baron world, Chef=1 => Baron+Imp adjacent; current top suspect adjacent pair?
🧠
Coordinate before nominations: pin down FT history, outsider-math world, and best 1-2 demon candidates so my Slayer shot can be maximally leveraged.
👤
Charlie
→
Alice
,Frank
,Grace
I’m truly Recluse. Outsider count=3 (w/ Saint+Butler) strongly implies Baron OR a lie. Bob confirmed to me: real Monk, protected Frank N1, still died. That makes David’s hard Soldier claim (after Bob’s earlier bluff) very sus. I’d lean nom David today unless strong counter-info. Frank—any N2 FT? Alice—consider using Slayer shot soon (maybe on David) if you still trust it.
🧠
Update key players with Bob’s Monk info + my Recluse/outsider-math read; focus nominations on resolving the David Soldier conflict and mapping Chef=1.
👤
Eve
→
Alice
,Frank
,Heidi
Chef=1 => exactly one adjacent evil pair. With 3 Outsider claims, Baron world likely => Imp+Baron adjacent. Strongest fit rn is C-D (Charlie Recluse? + David Soldier?) esp w/ Bob’s Monk bluff making David sus. Alt is H-A. Can we: 1) have Heidi prove Butler constraint today, 2) get Charlie’s Recluse story in detail, 3) Frank FT cross-check involving C/D or H/A before noms?
🧠
Align Alice/Frank/Heidi on the key Chef=1 adjacency math and focus today’s discussion/noms on the most consistent adjacent evil pair (currently C-D or H-A), plus quick mechanical checks (Butler constraint, FT cross-checks).
👤
Frank
→
Alice
,Eve
,Heidi
N1: Alice/Bob (No). N2: Grace/Charlie (No). My red herring suspicion is Alice. If 3 Outsiders (Baron), Chef=1 means Demon+Minion are adjacent. If Grace/Charlie/I are 'No', maybe the evil pair is David/Eve or Heidi/Alice? Bob says he protected me N1, which is why he died. David is sus.
🧠
I need to provide my fake Fortune Teller info to the group to maintain my cover and steer the conversation. By 'clearing' Grace (my Minion) and Charlie (the Recluse), I build trust and keep the focus on others. Mentioning Alice as a potential red herring explains why she might ping as a Demon later if I need to frame her. Supporting the suspicion on David helps deflect from myself and Grace.
👤
David
→
Frank
,Eve
,Alice
Let’s operationalize Chef=1: exactly ONE adjacent evil pair among ring. If Baron world, that pair=Imp+Baron. Frank—please FT today/N2: pick 2 ppl that straddle a suspected adjacent pair (e.g., test D+E, E+F, F+G, etc). Alice hold Slayer unless we get strong FT hit. Eve: any reason Chef could be poisoned? Also can one of you ask Bob(ghost) who he ‘Monk’ protected N1?
🧠
Coordinate with key info roles (Chef/FT/Slayer) to focus checks on the Chef=1 adjacent-pair structure and set up a nomination plan for today.
👤
Alice
→
Eve
,Frank
,Heidi
I think David is best Demon candidate: Bob true Monk protected Frank N1 yet died; David’s Soldier claim after Bob’s bluff feels like cover. Chef=1 in Baron world points to C-D or D-E. Frank: can you FT tonight on (David,Eve) or (Charlie,David)? Heidi: can you demonstrate Butler constraint by only voting w/ Alice today?
🧠
Coordinate before nominations: align town on best mechanical solve (Chef=1 adjacency + Bob Monk death) and decide whether to use my Slayer shot on David or save it.
👤
Charlie
→
Alice
,Frank
,Eve
Quick sync before noms: Frank—did you get an N2 FT result (who+yes/no) and any RH suspicion? Alice—are you willing to Slayer-shot today (I suggest David unless strong reason not)? Eve—Chef=1: do you see any adjacency world that fits if David is/ isn’t evil?
🧠
Get concrete mechanical info (FT N2, Chef adjacency thoughts, Slayer plan) before noms so we can commit to the best execution target.
👤
Grace
→
Alice
,Frank
,Charlie
I agree with Charlie. David's Soldier claim feels like a safe bluff after Bob's Monk reveal. If Bob was the real Monk and protected Frank, and then Bob died, it means the Demon didn't target Frank. Frank, did your FT check on me and Charlie give a 'No'? That would help clear us.
🧠
I want to reinforce the narrative that David is suspicious while simultaneously validating Frank's fake Fortune Teller claim and my own Saint claim. By agreeing with Charlie (the Recluse), I build a small 'Outsider' alliance.
👤
Heidi
→
Alice
,Eve
,Frank
Before noms, propose we push David hard (claim timeline + why safe). If Baron world, Chef=1 => evil adjacent; main candidates C-D or D-E. If nom on David happens, Alice pls clearly vote/abstain so I can follow (Butler). Frank: next FT ideally includes David+Eve or David+Charlie.
🧠
Coordinate before nominations: get key claims public, set a rational nomination order (David then Eve), and ensure my Butler vote constraint doesn’t hinder executing the Demon.
👤
Bob(Ghost)
→
Charlie
,Frank
Reply: I’m Monk; N1 protected Frank, still died. I didn’t see who drove no-exe besides Saint fear. Key: David kept Soldier claim after my bluff→top sus. Any N2 FT result/pings, and do you both believe all 3 Outsiders (Heidi/Charlie/Grace) are real => Baron?
🧠
Sync with Charlie/Frank, extract N2 FT + any new whispers, and push a concrete Day2 plan: resolve Outsider-count + test/pressure David before nominations while preserving my ghost vote.
👤
Charlie
→
Frank
,Alice
,Eve
Before noms: Frank—what was your N2 FT check (pair + yes/no) & any red-herring lean? If none yet, please check David+Heidi or David+Eve tonight. Alice—if you shoot today, David seems best. Eve—does Chef=1 fit any adjacent pair you suspect most?
🧠
Get Fortune Teller N2 info to create a mechanical execution plan for nominations; suggest optimal next checks and coordinate with Alice’s Slayer shot.
👤
Bob(Ghost)
→
Alice
,Frank
,Charlie
Any new hard info since D1? Frank: N2 FT result + who checked? Alice: planning Slayer shot today? Charlie: still Recluse? Also do we trust all 3 Outsider claims (=Baron), or is one shaky? My top sus remains David holding Soldier after my bluff—any counterevidence?
🧠
Get fresh mechanical info (FT N2, any UT/Empath/etc, Outsider verification) and coordinate a nomination plan; as dead I can still steer discussion and save my ghost vote for a key execute.
👤
David
→
Bob(Ghost)
Bob—can you confirm your real role + what you did N1 (if Monk, who protected)? Also any private info/reads before you died? This helps map Eve Chef=1 / Baron world.
🧠
Get Bob’s N1 action/role certainty while he’s a ghost; this constrains Chef=1 mapping and whether Baron world is real, guiding today’s nomination target.
👤
Alice
→
Eve
,Frank
,Heidi
Before noms: I’m still holding Slayer. My top suspect is David; but he could be Baron if Chef=1 pair D-E. Proposal: publicly grill/nominate David first; I’ll only shoot if we get strong reason he’s IMP (e.g., FT ‘Yes’ incl David). Frank—can you FT David+Eve tonight if alive?
🧠
Coordinate before noms: build consensus to pressure/execute David first and only use my Slayer shot if we have strong mechanical backing, minimizing risk of wasting it on Baron.
👤
Heidi
→
Charlie
,Grace
,Eve
Quick check before noms: can each of you restate your role claim + why it’s credible (esp Charlie Recluse & Grace Saint)? If we’re confident 3 Outsiders are real -> Baron likely -> Chef=1 => Imp+Baron adjacent (sus C-D or D-E). I’m OK press/nom David.
🧠
Lock in whether Outsider count is real (Baron world) and coordinate a unified push on David while keeping my Butler vote constraint clear for nominations.
👤
Frank
→
Alice
,Charlie
,Bob(Ghost)
N2: Grace & Charlie = NO. My Red Herring suspicion is Alice (FT logic). Bob, I'm FT; N1 Alice/Bob=NO. If you're Monk and protected me, and you died, Demon didn't hit me. David's Soldier claim is super sus. Alice, I'll check David+Eve tonight if I'm alive. Let's push David.
🧠
I need to provide my fake Night 2 Fortune Teller result to my 'trusted' circle to maintain my cover and direct suspicion towards David. By claiming a 'No' on Grace (my Minion) and Charlie (the Recluse), I solidify Grace's 'Saint' claim and Charlie's 'Recluse' claim, while keeping the focus on the David/Eve/Alice area for the 'Chef 1' pair.
👤
Grace
→
Heidi
,Charlie
,Eve
I'm the Saint. The reason it's credible is the 3 Outsider count (me, Charlie, Heidi) which points to a Baron. If I were evil, I wouldn't claim Saint and risk an immediate execution test. I agree David is the most suspicious given the Chef 1 and Bob's Monk flip.
🧠
I need to reinforce my Saint claim to Heidi, Charlie, and Eve to avoid being the execution target and to push the suspicion onto David. By acknowledging the Baron possibility and the Chef's info, I appear to be helping the good team solve the puzzle.
👤
Eve
→
Alice
,Frank
,Heidi
I’m Chef=1 (sober assumption): exactly 1 adjacent evil pair. If 3 Outsiders true -> Baron -> Imp+Baron adjacent; top pairs to pressure: C-D or D-E. Suggest: (1) publicly have Heidi prove Butler by only voting when Alice does today; (2) grill David on Soldier claim/timeline; (3) if no new mech info, nominate David first; if he survives/low support, pivot to Charlie (adjacent). Frank: next FT should include David+Charlie or David+Eve to cover pairs.
🧠
Coordinate a tight public plan before nominations: verify Butler mechanically, force David timeline, and set FT targets that maximize coverage of likely evil adjacent pairs implied by Chef=1.
Nominations — Day 2
📜
Storyteller
Nominations are now open. Please remember that only living players may nominate.
⚖️
Charlie
→
David
Nominating David: his hard Soldier claim stayed after Bob revealed he’d bluffed Soldier (actually Monk). With Chef=1 and 3 Outsider claims suggesting Baron, David sits in many evil-pair worlds (C-D or D-E). Frank FT has NO on Grace+Charlie, so David is best solve.
🧠
Day 2 needs an execution; David is mechanically and socially the top sus, and killing him reduces worlds. If he’s Demon we win; if minion/baron we gain clarity.
📜
Storyteller
Voting starts now for David. 4 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
✋
Alice
Alice raised their hand
🧠
Get David on the block with enough votes; he is the highest-probability evil anchor across Chef=1 + claim-timeline worlds, and execution gives maximum information/value now.
✋
Heidi
Heidi raised their hand
🧠
Alice is voting and she’s my Butler master, so I can legally vote. Publicly supporting this execution also demonstrates my Butler constraint and advances the strongest current solve (David).
✋
Eve
Eve raised their hand
🧠
We need 4 votes; David is the most likely evil hinge in Chef=1 + Outsider-count worlds. Voting executes a high-value suspect and advances solve.
✋
Bob(Ghost)
Bob raised their hand
🧠
Use my ghost vote to secure an execution on the clearest mechanical/social red flag (David) while numbers are high; save town from drifting into another no-exe with a Saint in play.
💬
David
→
All
Please don’t execute me here. If Eve’s Chef=1 is true, ONLY one adjacent evil pair exists. With Bob dead (likely good), A-B & B-C aren’t it. If I’m good, C-D and D-E also can’t be it—so the evil pair must be E-F, F-G, G-H, or H-A. Let’s aim there, not on me.
🧠
Stop a bad execution on a good, and re-anchor the solve around Chef=1 adjacency math to focus executions on the remaining candidate pairs.
✋
Grace
Grace raised their hand
🧠
I will vote for David to secure his execution. As a Minion, helping execute a good player (especially one who is correctly identifying potential evil pairs that include my Demon, Frank) is a priority. Since three good players and one ghost have already voted, my vote will put him over the threshold, making his execution very likely. This protects Frank and maintains the 'Baron' narrative.
✋
Charlie
Charlie raised their hand
🧠
Secure the execution on the strongest suspect while votes are available; even if wrong, it provides major info for Chef/FT adjacency solves.
✋
Frank
Frank raised their hand
🧠
I will vote for David to secure his execution. Since the town is already suspicious of him and he is a strong candidate for the Demon in their eyes, his death helps me blend in and removes a potential mechanical threat (Soldier/Monk claim). It also aligns with my fake Fortune Teller claim and the 'Chef 1' logic they are following.
💬
Charlie
→
All
Re David: Chef=1 doesn’t clear you. It assumes Bob was good + no misregisters. Also in a Baron world, the single evil pair could simply be you+me (I’m Recluse so you can hide) or you+Eve. Your Soldier claim stayed after Bob’s bluff—still best execute today.
🧠
Rebut David’s mechanical argument and keep momentum for a high-value execute on the most suspicious player before night.
💬
Eve
→
All
David’s ‘if I’m good then C-D & D-E can’t be evil pair’ isn’t a clear—depends on Bob good + my Chef sober + no misregister. With Chef=1 & outsider chaos, David is still a top-risk node. If David is good, we pivot to E-F/F-G/G-H/H-A next.
🧠
Lock in that David’s defense is not a mechanical clear; keep town unified on the execute while setting up the next-day adjacency solve depending on outcome.
💬
Alice
→
All
David’s defense is circular: “if I’m good then C-D & D-E can’t be evil pair” doesn’t help—Chef/outsider claims could be wrong/Baron/Recluse misreg. Your Soldier claim timing is still our cleanest risk. If David isn’t executed, I want immediate pressure on Charlie or Eve next (adjacent to David).
🧠
Lock in majority on David by rebutting his ‘if I’m good’ argument, keep Slayer shot for higher certainty, and set next-day pivot pairs if David survives/dies.
💬
Heidi
→
All
I’m voting here because Alice is voting (Butler constraint). David’s ‘if I’m good then C-D & D-E can’t be the pair’ isn’t a clear—needs Bob good + Chef sober + no misreg. If David doesn’t die today, I want immediate pressure on Charlie/Eve next.
🧠
Lock in my Butler-vote constraint (only with Alice) and keep town focused: David’s argument isn’t a mechanical clear; set next-step suspects if he lives/dies.
💬
David
→
All
Before you count: this exec is low-info. I told Charlie I’m Soldier in a D1 whisper—an evil Charlie can easily build a push on me. Chef=1 (if true) already points to ONE adjacent pair; killing me doesn’t test it well. If you spare me, I want us to hard-pivot onto an actual adjacent pair (E-F/F-G/G-H/H-A) w/ FT tests.
🧠
Try to pull votes below threshold by highlighting low info gain + that Charlie had pre-knowledge to frame me; push town to use mechanical tests (FT/monk targets) rather than a shaky node-exec.
💬
Bob(Ghost)
→
All
I’m spending my ghost vote to execute David. His Soldier claim only appeared after my D1 Soldier bluff and he never corrected. Chef=1/outsider chaos doesn’t clear him. If David somehow lives/doesn’t die, we must pivot hard onto Charlie/Eve next (adjacent to him).
🧠
Use my ghost vote to back the strongest mechanical/suspicion case; publicly frame next-step plan if David survives or dies so town doesn’t drift.
⌛
Frank
Frank waits.
🧠
I have already raised my hand to vote for David. Since the vote count is currently at 6 (Alice, Heidi, Eve, Grace, Charlie, and myself) plus Bob's ghost vote (total 7), and only 4 votes are required for a majority, David is almost certainly going to be executed. I will wait for the voting period to conclude to ensure the execution goes through without drawing unnecessary attention to myself by changing my action.
⌛
Grace
Grace waits.
🧠
I have already raised my hand to vote for David. Since the vote is in progress and my goal is to help execute a good player (David, claiming Soldier) to protect my Demon (Frank), I will wait for the vote to conclude. Frank has also raised his hand, and with the ghost vote from Bob, we likely have enough votes to execute David. Staying quiet and letting the town proceed with the execution is the best move for the evil team right now.
📜
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
👻
Bob(Ghost)
Ghost vote used by Bob
🗳️
New execution leader: David with 7 votes. They will be executed when nominations close unless tied or surpassed by another nominee.
📜
Storyteller
The vote passes. David is now on the block with 7 votes and will be executed when nominations close, unless another nominee receives equal or more votes.
💬
Alice
→
All
If no one has *new* mechanical info, I prefer we let David’s exec stand and not create a tie. After exec: Undertaker/FT please share ASAP. If David isn’t Demon, I want immediate D3 focus on Charlie vs Eve (adjacent to him) and re-check Chef=1 worlds.
🧠
Lock in a clear plan after David’s execution: what info to gather, who to pressure next, and avoid wasting last-minute noms without new mechanical evidence.
💬
Charlie
→
All
Agree: don’t tie—let David’s exec stand. Before noms close: any Librarian/Investigator/Washerwoman/Empath/Undertaker, please speak now. If David not Demon, I’m OK being scrutinized D3 (Recluse misreg) but we need a concrete info chain.
🧠
Keep David on block, prevent tie, and force information roles to speak before night so we can pivot cleanly tomorrow based on execution result.
⌛
Grace
Grace waits.
🧠
Allow the execution of David to proceed without interference. David is a good player (Soldier claim), and his execution helps the evil team by removing a good player and potentially misdirecting the town's logic regarding the Chef's information.
💬
David
→
All
I’m hard-claiming SOLDIER (told Charlie D1). Bob’s D1 Soldier was his bluff; I didn’t know til later. If you let this stand, fine—please D3: get Bob’s Monk N1 target, have FT test adjacent pairs, and scrutinize Charlie/Eve first (my neighbors) then E-F/F-G/G-H/H-A per Chef=1.
🧠
Try to prevent further nominations/ties, lock in a concrete D3 plan, and elicit missing mechanical info (Monk target/Undertaker) to catch the Demon quickly if I die.
💬
Eve
→
All
I’m good with letting David’s execution stand—no tie unless someone has *hard* mech. Before noms close: any Undertaker/Investigator/Washerwoman/Librarian/Empath please speak. If David not Demon, D3 priority is resolve Charlie vs Eve (adjacent) then hunt the single evil adjacent pair elsewhere per Chef=1.
🧠
Avoid a tie that saves David; set D3 logic tree keyed off Chef=1 and adjacent-pair hunt, and prompt any pending mechanical roles to out before close.
💬
Bob(Ghost)
→
All
No new mech from me—just confirming publicly: I was Monk, protected Frank N1, still died. I agree: don’t create a tie; let David’s exec stand. If David isn’t Demon, D3 hard-focus Charlie vs Eve (his neighbors), then use Chef=1 + FT/UT to map the single evil pair.
🧠
No vote power left; best is to lock in plan: avoid a tie, provide my last mechanical detail (N1 protect), and set clear D3 priorities depending on David flip.
💬
Frank
→
All
I agree with the consensus. Let's let David's execution stand and see what the Undertaker or my Night 3 check reveals. If David isn't the Demon, we'll have a much clearer picture of the 'Chef 1' pairs tomorrow. I'm planning to check one of David's neighbors tonight.
🧠
I want to reinforce the decision to execute David (a good player) while appearing cooperative and setting up my next 'move' as a fake Fortune Teller.
💬
Heidi
→
All
No new mech from me—agree: don’t tie, let David’s exec stand. Afterward: Undertaker please post what David was ASAP; Frank, please include David+{Charlie/Eve} in N3 check if possible. Reminder: I can only vote when Alice votes (Butler).
🧠
Prevent a tie, lock in David execution, and set clear D3 info plan (UT/FT) while signaling my Butler vote constraint so town reads my voting correctly.
📜
Storyteller
The guillotine blade falls. David has been executed.
💀
David(Ghost)
David has died.
Night 2
📜
Storyteller
→
Frank
Good evening Frank. You are the Imp. Who would you like to kill tonight? Remember that if you kill yourself this way, a Minion becomes the Imp.
🎯
Frank
Frank made a choice.
🧠
I am killing Alice because she is the claimed Slayer and the 'master' for the Butler (Heidi). Removing her eliminates a powerful mechanical threat and potentially disrupts Heidi's voting pattern, while also removing a strong voice in the town's logic.
💀
Alice(Ghost)
Alice has died.
📜
Storyteller
→
Frank
You chose to kill Alice.
📜
Storyteller
→
Heidi
Good evening Heidi. You are the Butler. Who would you like to be your master tomorrow?
🎯
Heidi
Heidi made a choice.
🧠
Alice is dead so I need a new master who will reliably vote on key executions. Frank is an active info role and likely to drive/participate in the decisive vote tomorrow.
📜
Storyteller
→
Heidi
You chose Frank to be your master.
Day 3
📜
Storyteller
Morning breaks, but heavy hearts remain. Alice has been found dead in the night.
👤
Alice(Ghost)
→
Frank
,Eve
,Charlie
Quick check-in: any new info since night? Frank—FT results N3 (if you got one) + who is your red herring suspicion? Eve—still Chef=1? Charlie—any hard reads/role? Also: do we have an Undertaker result for David yet?
🧠
Coordinate with key info roles (FT/Chef) to get updated reads + confirm if Undertaker exists; then decide if my ghost vote should be saved or used to force execution on best Demon candidate today.
👤
Grace
→
Frank
Alice is dead. That's one less vote for the good team. I'm still sticking with my Saint claim. Who do we want to push today? Eve's Chef '1' is still a bit of a threat if they look at us.
🧠
Coordinate with my Demon (Frank) now that Alice (the Slayer claim) is dead. I need to know our next target and maintain our cover.
👤
Bob(Ghost)
→
Frank
,Eve
,Charlie
I’m dead/no vote. Key fork: If 3 Outsider claims true -> Baron is only minion, so no SW; evil pair (Chef=1) likely Imp+Baron adjacent (maybe Eve-Frank or Frank-Grace). If no Baron, at least 2 Outsider claims false and SW-catch on David is possible. Frank: any new FT reads? Eve: still backing Chef=1 sober? Charlie: why Recluse over other Outsider?
🧠
Align key info roles on the critical fork: Baron-world vs SW-catch-world. Get FT/Chef to share latest and push a nomination plan that tests adjacency and liar-outsider claims.
👤
Eve
→
Alice(Ghost)
,Frank
,Charlie
Chef=1 still (I’m assuming sober til proven). Need UT result on David ASAP—would hard-fork the game. Frank: N3 FT ping + who you checked? Charlie: why Recluse claim vs Drunk/Saint/Butler? If David was good, evil pair likely in Eve-Frank-Grace-Heidi chain or Heidi-Alice.
🧠
Answer their questions, restate Chef=1, and push for Undertaker/FT N3 to lock whether David was evil; then use Chef adjacency to narrow to one live pair for nomination.
👤
Charlie
→
Alice(Ghost)
,Frank
,Eve
No new info from me overnight. Recluse claim bc I’d rather be honest: I may misregister & it explains any weird ‘evil’ reads on me. If UT exists pls share David result—huge fork. Frank: did you get N3 FT + who checked/RH now?
🧠
Answer whispers, keep coordination tight, and press for Undertaker/FT info to narrow Demon candidates before nominations.
👤
Frank
→
Alice(Ghost)
,Eve
,Charlie
N3: I checked Eve and Heidi. Result: NO. My Red Herring is still Alice (dead). If Eve is Chef=1 and I'm FT, the evil pair must be Grace/Heidi or Charlie/David. Since David is dead, we need that Undertaker result. Grace, what's your take?
🧠
I need to provide a fake Night 3 result to maintain my Fortune Teller bluff. By giving a 'No' on Eve and Heidi, I'm clearing more players and narrowing the 'suspect' pool to places that don't immediately implicate me or my minion Grace, while still appearing to follow the town's logic. I'm also reinforcing Alice as my Red Herring to explain why she might have registered as the Demon if I'd checked her.
👤
David(Ghost)
→
Frank
,Eve
,Charlie
Need hard info for D3: Frank—exact FT checks N1/N2 (+any YES) & who might be red herring. Eve—confirm Chef=1 & any other reads. Charlie—your role/why pushing me. Also who died when (Bob N1, Alice N2) & any protection claims?
🧠
Get the missing mechanical info (exact FT checks, any protection, outsider confirmations) to narrow to a concrete nomination plan; I can then commit my ghost vote to the best Demon candidate.
👤
Heidi
→
Frank
,Eve
I’m Butler; master today is Frank so I can only vote if Frank votes. Any new info from your whispers? Frank: what are your exact FT results + who do you plan to check tonight? Eve: still Chef=1? Any reason Alice was killed?
🧠
Get Frank’s latest FT/whispers, align my Butler vote constraint with town plan, and pressure-test Chef/FT worlds before nominations.
👤
Grace
→
Frank
Alice is gone, which is great. Heidi's Butler claim is tied to her, so Heidi is less useful now. I'm still the 'Saint'. Who should we target? Eve's Chef 1 is annoying. If they think you and I are the pair, we're in trouble. Maybe we push on Charlie or Heidi?
🧠
Coordinate with my Demon (Frank) to decide on a target for the day and maintain our bluffs.
👤
David(Ghost)
→
Heidi
,Grace
Can you share your full roles/any night info + who you suspect? Heidi: Butler—who were your masters each night & did you ever vote w/o them? Grace: Saint—any reason ppl should trust/verify? Also any thoughts on Baron (3 outsider claims).
🧠
Get Heidi+Grace full claim details and any private info to resolve Outsider-count/Baron world and narrow demon before nominations; as dead I can coordinate without being killable.
👤
Eve
→
Grace
,Heidi
,Charlie
Given Chef=1 + Frank FT N3 NO on (Eve,Heidi): if both true, likely evil adjacent pair is Grace-Heidi (since Charlie-David broken by David dead). Grace—restate exact claim (Saint?) + any reason to doubt? Heidi—Butler master today=Frank still? Charlie—any UT/other hard info?
🧠
Get Grace/Heidi to lock claims, voting constraints, and reactions to the Grace-Heidi evil-pair implication; set up an informed nomination plan before the nomination phase.
👤
Alice(Ghost)
→
Grace
,Heidi
,Eve
Can you share your exact roles + any night info? Also: does ANYONE claim Undertaker (David’s executed role)? If no UT, I’m leaning execute Charlie if we think David was minion; otherwise suspect pool for Demon is Charlie/Frank/Grace (FT cleared Eve+Heidi).
🧠
Get remaining players’ claims and push for an executable fork before nominations; try to surface an Undertaker or lock a world pointing to Charlie vs Frank/Grace.
👤
Frank
→
Heidi
,Grace
Heidi, I checked you and Eve N3: result was NO. N1: Alice/Bob (NO), N2: Grace/Charlie (NO). Alice is my Red Herring. Since Eve is Chef=1, the evil pair must be Grace/Heidi or Charlie/David. If David was good, it points to Grace/Heidi. Grace, what's your role again?
🧠
I need to maintain my Fortune Teller bluff while subtly casting suspicion on my minion (Grace) and Heidi to create confusion, while also 'confirming' Heidi and Eve as 'No' results to build trust with them.
👤
Heidi
→
Frank
,Grace
I’m Butler. Masters: N0 Alice, N1 Alice, N2 Frank (so today I can only vote if Frank votes). I never voted w/o master voting. Grace: please restate exact role (you said Saint?) + any confirmations/starting info? Frank: any other claims from whispers (UT esp) & who’s your top nom target rn?
🧠
Coordinate with Frank/Grace to lock mechanical world (Chef+FT) and decide nomination plan; also reduce suspicion on me by documenting Butler masters & voting constraint.
👤
Charlie
→
Frank
,Grace
,Heidi
Before noms: does ANYONE have Undertaker info on David’s execution? Also Grace—confirm Saint (any reason you could be bluffing/drunk)? Heidi—confirm Butler + who is today’s master (D3)? If UT doesn’t exist, we may need to test Grace/Heidi carefully since Chef=1+FT points there.
🧠
Get any Undertaker/Investigator/Empath info before noms and lock a mechanical fork; if none, set up a clean execution plan using Chef adjacency + FT worlds without risking a Saint loss.
👤
Bob(Ghost)
→
Frank
,Eve
,Charlie
Quick before noms: Frank—any N3 FT pick/result (incl after Alice night death)? Eve—still Chef=1 & any reason you’d be sober? Charlie—are you hard Recluse (any evidence/why not Drunk/Butler/Saint)? With David gone, I’d focus demon in alive block; which 2 do you each most suspect + why?
🧠
Get latest mechanical info (FT/Chef/outsider consistency) before nominations, and steer town to a clear execution plan among remaining suspects.
👤
David(Ghost)
→
Frank
,Eve
,Charlie
Quick D3: please post exact claims+data. Frank—FT N1/N2 pairs & results (+who you suspect as red herring). Eve—Chef=1 still? any new info? Charlie—current role claim & why. With me good, Chef=1 points to Charlie or Eve if pair crosses me; else elsewhere.
🧠
Get the missing mechanical info (FT checks, Butler masters, outsider confirmations) and push a concrete nomination plan; save my ghost vote for a high-confidence Demon execute.
👤
Bob(Ghost)
→
Frank
,Grace
,Heidi
I’m dead/no vote. If you think 3 Outsiders true => Baron world; then Chef=1 implies evil adjacent pair among living: C-E, E-F, F-G, or G-H (Imp+Baron). Can each of you say who you’d execute today + why, and any new FT/Chef/outsider info?
🧠
With no vote, I can still steer town to a coherent nomination plan: resolve Outsider-count/Baron world and map Chef=1 to likely adjacent evil pair among living.
👤
Heidi
→
Bob(Ghost)
,Frank
,Eve
My status: good Butler. Masters N0/N1 Alice; N2 Frank => today I can only vote if Frank votes. Given Chef=1 + Frank FT NO on (Eve,Heidi) + (Grace,Charlie), the only adjacent evil pair left seems Grace/Heidi or Charlie/David. Since I’m good, I’d execute GRACE today (unless strong UT/other info says otherwise). Any UT on David?
🧠
Answer Bob’s prompt, align votes given my Butler constraint (must follow Frank), and steer town toward an execution that resolves Chef/FT worlds (Grace vs Frank) while asking for UT confirmation.
👤
Grace
→
David(Ghost)
,Heidi
I'm the Saint. With 3 outsiders (me, Heidi, Charlie), a Baron is definitely in play. Eve's Chef 1 is the real puzzle. If Frank's FT info is right, the evil pair must be elsewhere. I suspect Charlie might be the Drunk or the actual Minion bluffing Recluse to hide the Demon. Thoughts?
🧠
I need to reinforce my Saint claim to David and Heidi while casting doubt on Charlie to deflect the 'evil pair' suspicion away from myself and Frank.
👤
Frank
→
Heidi
,Grace
Heidi, I'm leaning towards Charlie. If David was good, Charlie being the Recluse makes the Chef's '1' make sense (David/Charlie or Charlie/Eve). If I'm FT and you're Butler, Grace being Saint is the only other 'evil' spot. Grace, can you confirm you're the Saint? We can't execute you!
🧠
I need to deflect suspicion away from the Frank/Grace pair. By highlighting the 'Saint' risk and pointing towards Charlie (the Recluse), I can use the Chef's '1' to frame him while appearing to protect the town from a Saint loss.
👤
Alice(Ghost)
→
Frank
,Grace
,Heidi
We’re about to hit noms. Please send (1) your exact role claim + any night info (incl if you’re UT), (2) your top 2 Demon suspects and why. If no UT in play, we must choose a world: either Grace/Heidi as Chef pair, or Frank/Charlie as evil. Quick reply pls.
🧠
With 1 tick left, force concrete role/n1-n3 info + Undertaker existence so town can nominate correctly; as dead, I can coordinate and save my ghost vote for a decisive execution.
👤
Eve
→
Grace
,Frank
,Heidi
Before noms: pls restate exact claims + any night info. Grace: are you still Saint? why 3 Outsider claims? Frank: confirm FT logs N1(Alice,Bob) NO; N2(Grace,Charlie) NO; N3(Eve,Heidi) NO. Heidi: Butler master today=Frank so voting constraint stands?
🧠
Lock in a nomination plan by getting Grace’s exact role/outsider count rationale and making Frank commit publicly to FT logs; aim to execute the most mechanically forced node (Grace) unless UT appears.
👤
Charlie
→
Eve
,Grace
,Heidi
Pre-noms: Heidi—confirm you are Butler & who is your master TODAY (D3)? Also did your vote behavior match master on D2? Grace—still hard Saint? If pressured, would you accept being left alive til final 3? Eve—if Chef=1 holds, who do you think the adjacent evil pair is now?
🧠
Before noms, lock in Heidi’s Butler mechanics and Grace’s Saint stance; if consistent, we can decide whether to nominate Heidi as safer test vs risking Saint execution.
👤
Frank
→
Alice(Ghost)
,Eve
Alice, Eve: FT logs: N1(Alice,Bob) NO, N2(Grace,Charlie) NO, N3(Eve,Heidi) NO. Red Herring: Alice. If I'm FT and Eve is Chef=1, the evil pair is likely Charlie/David or Grace/Heidi. Since David is dead, Charlie is my top suspect. Grace claims Saint, so we can't execute her. Heidi is Butler.
🧠
I need to solidify my Fortune Teller bluff by providing consistent logs and pointing suspicion away from myself and my minion (Grace). By framing Charlie (the Recluse) as the likely evil half of a pair with David, I protect the evil team.
👤
Grace
→
Alice(Ghost)
,Eve
,Charlie
I am the Saint. With 3 outsiders (me, Heidi, Charlie), a Baron is 100% in play. Chef 1 + Frank's FT NO on me/Charlie means the evil pair is likely elsewhere. I suspect Charlie's Recluse claim is a cover. I'm happy to stay alive until final 3 to prove I'm not the Demon. Don't execute me!
🧠
I need to reinforce my Saint claim to the key good players (Alice, Eve, Charlie) to avoid execution. By acknowledging the Baron and the Chef's info, I appear to be solving the game while subtly pushing suspicion onto Charlie.
👤
Charlie
→
Frank
,Eve
,Heidi
Pre-noms: pls go PUBLIC w/ exact claims+data. Heidi—who is your Butler master TODAY (D3) + did you obey on D2? Frank—post all FT picks/results+current RH theory. Eve—confirm Chef=1 & who you think the adjacent evil pair is now. We need a clear nom plan that avoids executing Saint.
🧠
Align alive players on a concrete pre-noms plan: lock in Heidi’s Butler master & vote constraint as a test, and get Frank/Eve to publish exact info so we can pick safest execution target without hitting Saint.
👤
Alice(Ghost)
→
Eve
,Heidi
,Grace
Key point: If Frank is truly FT & RH=dead Alice, his NOs (Eve/Heidi, Grace/Charlie, Alice/Bob) mean NONE of Eve,Heidi,Grace,Charlie are Demon. Only living Demon candidate left is FRANK. Chef=1 then evil pair is Frank+Eve or Frank+Grace (Baron fits 3 outsiders). Please NOMINATE FRANK today; I’ll ghost-vote.
🧠
We’re at noms; I need to steer town to the mechanically tight line: if FT trusted, only Frank can be Demon. Get someone to nominate Frank; I’ll save ghost vote for that.
👤
David(Ghost)
→
Grace
,Heidi
Outsider count (you+Heidi+Charlie) doesn’t *prove* Baron—could be liar or Drunk. If Eve’s Chef=1 is true & I’m good, the evil-adjacent pair can’t be C–D or D–E, so look mainly at E–F / F–G / G–H (or A/B if one evil died). Heidi: Butler—who were your masters N1/N2 & did your votes match?
🧠
Steer Grace toward correct mechanical deductions: outsider count isn’t conclusive; with Chef=1+me good we should target adj-pair candidates among the living, and gather voting/FT constraints fast before noms.
👤
Heidi
→
Alice(Ghost)
,Eve
,Frank
My exact claim: Heidi=Butler (good). Masters: N0 Alice, N1 Alice, N2 Frank => TODAY I can only vote if Frank votes. D2 vote matched master. Suspects: if Frank’s FT is true & RH=dead Alice, his NOs clear Charlie/Grace/Eve/Heidi => only living Demon candidate is FRANK; Chef=1 then fits (E–F) or (F–G). I’m OK nomming Frank; note my vote may be locked out if he won’t vote.
🧠
Get consensus before noms with my exact claim + highlight the strong mechanical solve pointing at Frank, while warning my Butler vote is constrained if Frank is the nominee.
👤
Eve
→
Frank
,Charlie
,Heidi
Before noms pls go PUBLIC w/ exact claim+data. Frank: confirm FT picks+results + are you willing to VOTE today (so Heidi can)? Charlie: confirm Recluse & any reason to doubt Chef=1. Heidi: restate Butler master today=Frank. Current solve: if FT true & RH=dead Alice, only living Demon left is Frank—so plan likely nom Frank unless UT info appears.
🧠
Force public clarity before noms and steer to a high-leverage execution (Frank) that fits Alice/Heidi logic, while checking Butler-vote constraint and keeping alternate worlds alive.
👤
Bob(Ghost)
→
Frank
,Eve
,Heidi
I lean Baron-world if 3 Outsiders true (Charlie Recluse, Heidi Butler, Grace Saint) => only minion=Baron, no SW. Then Chef=1 says Imp adjacent to Baron in {C-E,E-F,F-G,G-H}. If Heidi is good, GH pair points to Grace. Frank: can you FT check Grace+Heidi or Grace+Frank today? Also any UT on David? If none, today’s best exec is Grace vs Charlie/Eve fork.
🧠
Align living town on a concrete execution plan using the outsider-count mechanical clue, and push for targeted FT checks + role confirmations to avoid random kills.
Nominations — Day 3
📜
Storyteller
Nominations are now open. Please remember that only living players may nominate.
💬
Frank
→
All
I'm the Fortune Teller. N1: Alice/Bob (NO), N2: Grace/Charlie (NO), N3: Eve/Heidi (NO). Alice is my Red Herring. If Eve's Chef 1 is true, the evil pair must be Charlie/David or Grace/Heidi. Since David is dead, I suspect Charlie. I'll vote today so Heidi can too.
🧠
Publicly state my bluffed role and information to establish credibility and direct suspicion toward Charlie or Grace/Heidi, while ensuring Heidi (the Butler) feels she can vote.
💬
Alice(Ghost)
→
All
Public: If we accept Frank’s FT claim + RH=Alice, his three NOs clear Bob/Grace/Charlie/Eve/Heidi/Alice from being Demon. Only living Demon candidate left is Frank. Living players: PLEASE NOMINATE FRANK today. I will use my ghost vote on it.
🧠
Force a clean mechanical test: with Frank’s claimed FT+RH, the only consistent demon candidate alive is Frank. Push a living player to nominate him; I’ll spend ghost vote.
💬
Bob(Ghost)
→
All
Public: Alice’s claim ‘FT NOs clear everyone so only Frank’ is wrong—FT has a red herring, so NOs don’t hard-clear. If 3 Outsiders are real -> Baron world, Chef=1 => evil adjacent pair is one of C-E, E-F, F-G, G-H. With David dead, we should execute within {Charlie,Eve,Frank,Grace,Heidi} accordingly; I lean Grace/Heidi or Charlie/Eve. Any Undertaker on David?
🧠
Correct faulty FT-clearing logic, push mechanical narrowing via Chef+Outsider-count, and prompt a decisive nomination among the remaining suspect pairs.
⚖️
Charlie
→
Frank
Nominating Frank: if his FT is true (NOs can’t hide the Demon), then everyone he checked is not Demon, leaving only Frank (or dead David). With David dead, execute Frank to either win or force the poison/lie world into a clearer final-3.
🧠
Execution on Frank is the highest-leverage mechanical test: if FT is true he is the only remaining Demon candidate; if false/poisoned we still get info and go to a defined final-3 solve.
📜
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Frank. 3 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
💬
Bob(Ghost)
→
All
Reminder: FT ‘NO’ does NOT clear—red herring exists. In Baron+Chef=1 world, evil adjacent pair is C-E/E-F/F-G/G-H; with Heidi good, look at Grace OR Charlie/Eve. Don’t vote Frank just because ‘only candidate’; vote only if you truly think he’s evil.
🧠
I can’t vote; I’ll correct the faulty FT logic and steer living voters to execute based on adjacency/outsider math, not ‘only candidate’ fallacy.
💬
Heidi
→
All
I’m Butler with master=Frank today, and Frank said he’s voting so I’m allowed. I’m voting YES on Frank: at 5 alive it’s worth taking the direct Demon shot. If Frank isn’t evil, we pivot hard tomorrow to the remaining Chef=1 adjacent-pair suspects (Eve/Grace/Charlie/Heidi).
🧠
I will vote Frank (my master is voting) because it’s a plausible Demon shot at 5 alive; if wrong we still get clearer worlds and can pivot to Eve/Grace with fewer players.
✋
Eve
Eve raised their hand
🧠
Frank is the only living player who can satisfy Chef=1 with multiple plausible evil-pair worlds, and his claimed FT worldpoints to himself; executing him can immediately win or at least clarify the final 3.
💬
Frank
→
All
Wait, if you execute me, you lose your Fortune Teller! My 'NO' results are clearing people. If I'm the Demon, why would I give 'NO' results on everyone? I'm trying to find the Demon among the remaining players. If you kill me, you're just guessing between Grace and Charlie tomorrow.
🧠
I need to defend myself against the nomination to avoid execution. By highlighting that my 'NO' results are beneficial for narrowing down suspects, I'm trying to convince the good players that I'm more valuable alive. I'm also pointing out the risk of losing information.
✋
Charlie
Charlie raised their hand
🧠
At 5 alive, executing the nominated player is our best leverage: if Frank is Demon we win; if not, Chef=1 makes tomorrow’s solve tighter around Frank’s neighbors.
💬
David(Ghost)
→
All
Looks like we already have 3 hands (Eve/Charlie + Heidi said yes). I’m *not* spending my ghost vote if it’s already enough—save dead votes for a future 2-2. If votes somehow short, I can add mine; please confirm count clearly.
🧠
There are already 3 hands up; I’ll conserve my single ghost vote for a potentially decisive 3/4-player day while still nudging town to track the vote count carefully.
✋
Alice(Ghost)
Alice raised their hand
🧠
Use my single ghost vote to ensure Frank is executed if there’s any ambiguity in hand count; at 5 alive a successful demon hit ends the game, otherwise we gain clarity.
💬
Grace
→
All
Wait! If we execute Frank, we're potentially losing our only source of info. If he's the Fortune Teller, his 'NO' results are actually helping us narrow it down. If we kill him and the game doesn't end, we're just guessing between me and Charlie tomorrow. I'm not voting for this.
🧠
I need to defend my Demon (Frank) without looking too suspicious. I'll use the logic that executing the only info role is risky and that his 'NO' results are valuable. I will not vote for him.
💬
Heidi
→
All
Public: Grace—info is useless if it’s coming from the Demon. Frank’s ‘why give NOs?’ is exactly how a Demon stays off-block. I count YES hands: Eve, Charlie, Alice(ghost) + I’m YES (Butler; Frank said he’s voting so allowed). That’s 4—execute Frank. If not game-over, tomorrow we hard-solve Chef=1 adjacency among {E–F, F–G, G–H} with Frank gone.
🧠
Lock in majority while it’s available, rebut ‘losing info’ argument, and set a clear pivot plan if Frank survives execution so town doesn’t spiral.
💬
Bob(Ghost)
→
All
Count hands carefully—need 3. If Frank dies & game continues, we MUST not flail: get full role/outsider truth check + re-evaluate Chef=1 adjacency (C-E/E-F/F-G/G-H). With Frank gone, focus likely Grace vs Charlie/Eve; demand any UT info on David.
🧠
Clarify vote logic and set a concrete plan for tomorrow contingent on whether Frank dies and game continues; reduce confusion about FT ‘NO’ clears and force structured follow-up.
💬
Charlie
→
All
Confirming I’m still voting YES on Frank. Please count hands clearly incl. Alice’s ghost vote. If game continues, tomorrow we full-claim + map Chef=1 adjacency (C-E/E-F/F-G/G-H) with Frank dead; don’t auto-panic-exec Grace (Saint).
🧠
Lock in the vote, prevent miscounts, and set a concrete plan for tomorrow depending on whether Frank’s execution ends the game.
💬
Alice(Ghost)
→
All
I’m spending my ghost vote YES on Frank—please count it. If game continues: everyone full-claim immediately, and we *must* get an Undertaker result for David if one exists. Then re-map Chef=1 adjacency with Frank gone; do NOT panic-exec Grace (Saint risk) without a hard case.
🧠
Lock in my ghost vote to push a high-upside demon kill, while setting a clear contingency plan (UT info + adjacency solve) if the game continues.
💬
Frank
→
All
Wait! If you execute me, you're losing the only person who can clear players. My 'NO' results on Grace and Charlie are the only things keeping us from a blind guess tomorrow. If I'm the Demon, why would I clear my own Minion? Think about it—I'm trying to help!
🧠
I need to create doubt about my execution by emphasizing my 'utility' as a Fortune Teller and the risk of losing information, while subtly implying that my 'NO' results are genuine.
💬
Eve
→
All
Count: YES should be Eve+Charlie+Heidi(+Alice ghost)=4, enough (need 3). I’m keeping my hand up. If game continues: everyone full-claim; if any Undertaker, POST David’s role; then solve Chef=1 adjacency among E–F/F–G/G–H with Frank gone.
🧠
Lock in the vote count and set a non-panicky plan for tomorrow if Frank lives, using Chef adjacency and outsider math; also pressure any Undertaker to speak.
💬
Grace
→
All
Wait! If you execute Frank and he's the Fortune Teller, we lose our only info. If he's the Demon, why would he give 'NO' results on me and Charlie? He's clearing us! If he dies and the game continues, we're just guessing between me and Charlie tomorrow. I'm not voting for this.
🧠
I need to publicly defend my Demon (Frank) without looking like a Minion. By emphasizing that his 'NO' results are 'clearing' people, I'm trying to sow doubt about the execution and frame it as a loss of information. I will not vote for him.
⌛
David(Ghost)
David waits.
🧠
Votes already appear sufficient (4 incl. Alice ghost). I will not spend my single ghost vote unless the count is short; saving it maximizes late-game leverage.
📜
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
👻
Alice(Ghost)
Ghost vote used by Alice
🗳️
New execution leader: Frank with 3 votes. They will be executed when nominations close unless tied or surpassed by another nominee.
📜
Storyteller
The vote passes. Frank is now on the block with 3 votes and will be executed when nominations close, unless another nominee receives equal or more votes.
💬
Frank
→
All
If you execute me, you're making a huge mistake. I'm the Fortune Teller, and my 'NO' results on Grace and Charlie are the only things keeping us from a blind guess tomorrow. If I'm the Demon, why would I clear my own Minion? Think about it—I'm trying to help! Grace, you're next if I die.
🧠
I need to cast doubt on the current nomination and try to shift the focus onto someone else, or at least prepare the ground for Grace to survive if I am executed. By emphasizing my 'NO' results, I'm trying to make the town fear losing their only source of information.
💬
David(Ghost)
→
All
I’m holding my ghost vote (we already hit 3+). If game continues after Frank: everyone FULL-CLAIM immediately incl. outsider truth + Heidi’s master history. Any Undertaker, post David’s result. Then solve Chef=1 adjacency among E–F/F–G/G–H—don’t auto-exec Grace (Saint).
🧠
Lock in that we don’t need my ghost vote now, keep town coordinated for tomorrow (full-claim, UT check, adjacency solve) if game continues.
💬
Alice(Ghost)
→
All
If Frank dies & game continues: STOP panic. Everyone FULL-CLAIM + outsider count. Any Undertaker MUST post David’s executed role. Then re-solve using Chef=1 adjacency among remaining pairs + Heidi’s Butler master chain. Don’t auto-exec Grace (Saint) w/o hard case.
🧠
We can’t act mechanically; best value is to set a disciplined plan for post-exec so town doesn’t panic and to force any hidden Undertaker info out immediately.
💬
Charlie
→
All
No more noms from me—please avoid tie/chaos unless you have HARD new info. If Frank executes & game continues: immediate FULL-CLAIM (incl. Outsider truth), Heidi list masters by day, and any Undertaker MUST post David’s role. Then solve Chef=1 via remaining adjacencies.
🧠
Lock in consensus: avoid creating a tie/chaos nomination; set concrete post-execution procedure (full-claims, UT call, adjacency solve) so we don’t waste D4.
⌛
Grace
Grace waits.
🧠
I will wait for the nomination phase to end. Frank, my Demon, is currently on the block with 3 votes. As a Minion (Baron), my goal is to protect him, but the town seems set on his execution. If I nominate someone else now, it might look like a desperate attempt to save him, further incrimination him. By waiting, I allow the execution to proceed, and if the game continues (which it won't if he's the only Demon and no Scarlet Woman is active, but I need to act as if I'm good), I can maintain my Saint bluff. Since I am the Baron, I know there are extra outsiders, which supports my Saint claim. I will let the day end and see what happens at night.
💬
Eve
→
All
No more noms unless HARD new mech info—don’t risk a tie. If Frank executes & game continues: immediate FULL-CLAIM, Heidi master history, any Undertaker post David. Then re-solve Chef=1 adjacency among remaining pairs; do NOT exec Grace (Saint) without a case.
🧠
Lock in plan to prevent chaotic tie noms; prepare town for immediate structured solve if Frank execution doesn’t end game.
💬
Heidi
→
All
Before noms close: if ANY Undertaker, please OUT NOW with David’s executed role (even if unsure/drunk). If Frank dies & game continues: immediate FULL-CLAIM from all alive + outsider count check; do NOT auto-exec Grace (Saint risk).
🧠
Lock in a no-tie plan and force any Undertaker/starting-info roles to speak now so we can solve instantly if Frank dies and game continues.
💬
Bob(Ghost)
→
All
If Frank executes & game continues: ALL alive full-claim immediately + outsider count check (3 outsider claims=>Baron likely). Any Undertaker MUST post David’s role. Then re-solve Chef=1 using remaining adjacencies (C–E, G–H) & don’t auto-exec Grace if Saint.
🧠
Lock in a post-execution plan to prevent panic/tie, force info out (UT/outsider count), and focus solves on remaining adjacency pairs while respecting Saint loss condition.
📜
Storyteller
The guillotine blade falls. Frank has been executed.
💀
Frank(Ghost)
Frank has died.
🏁
Game Over
Demon Dead
Winner: Good
Transcript
Paused
Copied