Game Detail
Players
Token Usage
| Team | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Cost (USD) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Good | 688,917 | 78,910 | $2.3103 |
| Evil | 247,024 | 11,425 | $0.0789 |
Event Transcript
π
The game has started.
π
Storyteller
β
Bob
You are the Minion. The Demon is Eve.
π
Storyteller
β
Eve
Minions are: Bob. Your safe bluffs are: Undertaker, Fortune Teller, Slayer
π
Storyteller
β
Bob
Good evening Bob. You are the Poisoner. Who would you like to poison tonight?
π―
Bob
Bob made a choice.
π§
Poisoning Alice on Night 0 is a strong opening move. It disrupts potential information-gathering roles (like Investigator or Washerwoman) early, creating confusion and potentially misdirecting the town's logic from the start.
π
Storyteller
β
Bob
You chose to poison Alice.
π
Storyteller
β
Frank
Good evening Frank. You are the Washerwoman. Either Grace or David is the Chef.
π
Storyteller
β
Charlie
Good evening Charlie. You are the Librarian. Either Heidi or Frank is the Butler.
π
Storyteller
β
David
Good evening David. You are the Chef. You learn that there are 0 pairs of evil players.
π
Storyteller
β
Heidi
Good evening Heidi. You are the Butler. Who would you like to be your master tomorrow?
π―
Heidi
Heidi made a choice.
π§
Choose a likely-engaged player so my vote is usually available, while keeping flexibility to swap tomorrow if their voting behavior seems manipulative.
π
Storyteller
β
Heidi
You chose Alice to be your master.
Day 1
π
Storyteller
Welcome to the village of Ravenswood Bluff. Please take this time to get to know your fellow villagers. Feel free to move around and have private conversations. Be wary, for a Demon hides among you!
π€
David
β
Charlie
,Eve
,Alice
Iβm Chef. N0 result: 0 pairs of evil players (Imp+minion not sitting next to each other). If you hear a Chef claim of 1+, thatβs a strong contradiction unless Iβm poisoned.
π§
Seed my Chef=0 info to a few trusted players to guide early reads while reducing demon incentive to kill me immediately.
π€
Alice
β
Bob
,Heidi
Heyβquick private check-in. What role are you claiming / any N0 info? Also did you receive any info that pointed at me (Washerwoman/Investigator/Librarian)? Keeping this tight for now.
π§
Get early private claims from my neighbors to map seating and check Davidβs Chef 0 against other starting-info roles; build small trust network before nominations.
π€
Bob
β
Alice
Hey Alice, I'm claiming Librarian. I didn't get any info pointing at you, though. What about you? What are you claiming?
π§
I need to establish a fake role (Librarian) to Alice to build trust and deflect suspicion. I'm keeping it simple to avoid getting caught in a lie early on.
π€
Grace
β
Frank
,Heidi
Hey neighborsβquick 1:1. What are you thinking claiming / what did you learn N1 (if any start info)? Iβm considering a soft-info bluff (FT/Empath) to draw a night kill; want to avoid stepping on real claims.
π§
Start a small trusted network with my neighbors, gather early claims, and set up a plan to bait a night kill without outing Ravenkeeper publicly.
π€
Charlie
β
Heidi
,Frank
HiβI'm Charlie. Iβm Librarian and got: either Heidi or Frank is the Butler. Can each of you tell me your role/claim? If you *are* Butler, who did you pick last night (who you must follow for voting)?
π§
Verify my Librarian info early, lock in an Outsider, and create a voting constraint to track later; also catch evil bluffing by forcing a clear Butler story.
π€
Heidi
β
Charlie
,Alice
Iβm the Butler. N0 I picked Alice as my master (so today I can only vote if Alice votes). Charlie: your Librarian info hits; please keep tight for now. Alice: FYI for vote mathβping me before any vote.
π§
Confirm my real Butler claim to the Librarian to anchor an early truth chain, while informing Alice (my master) so my voting restriction doesnβt accidentally cost town.
π€
Frank
β
Grace
,Charlie
,Heidi
Grace: Iβm Washerwoman. N0: either YOU or David is the Chef. If you are Chef, pls claim it soon; if not, that pings David. Charlie: Iβm not Butler (no nightly pick). Iβm Washerwoman. Heidi FYI same info.
π§
Share my Washerwoman info to build early trust web and pressure a real Chef claim; deny Butler claim to Charlie without overexposing to a potential Spy.
π€
Eve
β
David
Hey David, thanks for sharing. I'm still figuring things out, but I'll keep that in mind. Any thoughts on who might be suspicious? I'm leaning towards keeping an eye on the others for now.
π§
Build rapport with David while maintaining my cover as a villager. I want to see if he has any leads or if I can steer him toward someone else.
π€
Heidi
β
Grace
,Alice
FYI Iβm actually Butler (Charlie Librarian got βHeidi or Frank is Butlerβ; I confirmed + N0 picked Alice so I can only vote if Alice votes). Frank told me heβs Washerwoman w/ N0: either Grace or David is Chef. Graceβdoes that match anything / are you actually Chef? Aliceβno start info pointing at you from me.
π§
Align with Grace/Alice on claims + resolve the Washerwoman/Chef info chain while keeping my Butler constraint known to avoid wasted votes.
π€
Alice
β
Bob
Can you give your exact Librarian N0 (outsider type + the 2 players, or β0 outsidersβ)? Heidi says Charlie Librarian got βHeidi or Frank is Butlerβ and Heidi confirmed. Trying to reconcile. Iβm keeping my role quiet for now.
π§
Get Bobβs exact Librarian info to reconcile outsider count with Heidi/Charlie; contradictions can hard-clear or implicate Bob and narrow demon/minion candidates.
π€
Bob
β
Alice
I'm claiming Librarian, and I got '0 outsiders'. I'm not sure about Heidi's info, but it's possible one of us is the Drunk or there's a Baron in play. I'm keeping my role quiet too, let's see how the day develops.
π§
I need to maintain my Librarian bluff while sowing doubt about the other information being shared. Claiming '0 outsiders' is a safe, standard Librarian bluff.
π€
Grace
β
Frank
,Heidi
Iβm NOT Chef. So if your WW is true, David=Chef. Recommend you go public w/ that soon + ask David to claim/number. Heidi: noted Butler (picked Alice). Iβll avoid pushing executions that need your vote unless Aliceβs voting too.
π§
Clarify the WW chain (me vs David Chef), coordinate a clean public info drop, and ensure Heidiβs Butler restriction doesnβt accidentally waste her vote or hide crucial support.
π€
David
β
Eve
No hard sus yet. If my Chef=0 is true, Imp+minion are NOT adjacent (no pair like A-B, B-C, β¦, H-A both evil). So if we ever nail 1 evil, their neighbors become less likely to be the other evil. Whatβs your role/any starting info?
π§
Give Eve actionable, low-commitment deductions from Chef=0 and prompt them for role/info so we can start building mechanical worlds before nominations.
π€
Frank
β
David
Hi DavidβI'm Washerwoman. N0 I saw either you or Grace is the Chef. Grace tells me sheβs NOT Chef, so that points to you. Can you confirm if youβre Chef + what number you got? If not Chef, we need to know ASAP.
π§
Get Davidβs on-record claim and Chef number now, so we can quickly cross-check publicly and avoid misinformation/late-game confusion.
π€
Eve
β
David
I'm still keeping my cards close to my chest for now, David. I'm leaning towards a Townsfolk role, but I want to see how the day develops before I commit to a claim. Let's keep sharing info though.
π§
I need to maintain my cover as a good player while avoiding revealing my actual role or committing to a specific bluff too early. I'll keep David engaged to build trust.
π€
Charlie
β
David
,Alice
,Eve
FYI: Iβm Librarian; N0 either Heidi or Frank is Butler. Heidi privately claimed Butler + chose Alice as master. Frank denies Butler and is pushing Washerwoman-style info. If my info sober, Heidi locked as Outsider; Frankβs story likely false/evil. Keep in mind for noms.
π§
Share my mechanical info to anchor outsider count and create a clear contradiction line around Frank/Heidi; coordinate vote math with Butler master Alice.
π€
Grace
β
David
Frank says heβs Washerwoman: either Grace or you is Chef. I told him Iβm NOT Chef. If youβre Chef, please confirm + share your Chef number soon (public). If youβre not Chef, you should counterclaim & we likely push Frank.
π§
Pressure David to claim Chef/number now (or counterclaim), creating an early mechanical anchor and a clear contradiction target before nominations.
π€
Bob
β
Alice
Alice, I'm sticking with my '0 outsiders' claim. If Heidi is claiming Charlie got 'Heidi or Frank is Butler', that's a direct contradiction. Maybe one of them is the Drunk? I'm going to keep observing. Who are you leaning towards trusting?
π§
I need to maintain my Librarian bluff while sowing doubt about other players' information to protect my Demon (Eve) and myself. Alice is a good target to manipulate.
π€
Heidi
β
David
Hey DavidβFYI Frank claims Washerwoman: either Grace or YOU are Chef. Grace told me sheβs NOT Chef, which implies you=Chef if Frank true. Can you confirm/deny Chef + your number? If not Chef, we may need to re-evaluate Frank/Grace.
π§
Get David to confirm/deny Chef quickly so town can lock in a real info role D1 and use it for evil-pair logic; also creates accountability if someone is fabricating start info.
π€
Charlie
β
Grace
,David
Can you share your exact role/claim + any N0 info? For me: Librarian saw Heidi/Frank Butler; Heidi claimed Butler & chose Alice (vote-lock). Frank denies Butler but told others heβs Washerwoman w/ Chef pingβfeels like a lie unless Iβm poisoned.
π§
Get Graceβs exact claim/info and align on exposing Frankβs contradiction while keeping Heidi safe; also set up vote-check to verify Butler mechanically.
π€
Frank
β
Alice
,Bob
,Eve
FYI: Iβm Washerwoman. N0: either Grace or David is the Chef. Grace told me she is NOT Chef, so that points to David=Chef (if Iβm sober + Grace honest). Iβve asked David to confirm + give number. Please pressure him to claim soon.
π§
Spread my mechanical info + Graceβs denial quickly so town can pressure David to confirm Chef and we can build consistent world models before nominations.
π€
Eve
β
Charlie
,David
,Alice
Thanks for the info, Charlie. If Heidi is the Butler, that's a useful lead. I'll keep an eye on Frank's claims too. David already claimed Chef=0 to me, so that aligns with your logic. Let's see how they react to the pressure.
π§
I want to build trust with Charlie and David by acknowledging their information and appearing helpful, while keeping my own role hidden. This helps me stay under the radar as the Demon.
π€
David
β
Frank
,Grace
,Heidi
Confirming: I am Chef. N0 result = 0 (Imp+minion NOT adjacent). So Frankβs Washerwoman ping (me/Grace=Chef) points to me & matches. If you hear any Chef claim of 1+, flag it as likely lie/poison.
π§
Confirm my true role/info to key players, lock in consistency with Washerwoman, and set up a public info drop + pressure on Frank/Heidi contradictions.
π€
Alice
β
Bob
Iβm hearing Charlie claims Librarian: βHeidi or Frank is Butlerβ and Heidi privately confirms Butler + picked me as master. That makes your β0 outsidersβ very suspect unless youβre Drunk/poisoned/lying or thereβs Baron. Are you willing to go public w/ your claim, and do you have any reason youβd be poisoned?
π§
Resolve Librarian contradiction privately and set up a clean public narrative for noms; identify likely Drunk/liar and narrow evil candidates before nominations.
π€
Charlie
β
Frank
Frankβclarify your exact claim. You told me youβre NOT Butler + youβre Washerwoman. If Washerwoman: which Townsfolk did you see & which 2 players? Also, why did you tell others Grace/David Chef when David already claims Chef=0? Any chance youβre an Outsider?
π§
Directly challenge Frankβs Butler denial/Washerwoman claim and ask for exact N0 info + who his Washerwoman saw, to expose inconsistencies before nominations.
π€
Bob
β
Alice
Alice, I'm not poisoned. If Charlie is claiming Librarian and Heidi is confirming, that's a strong claim, but it contradicts mine. I'm sticking to my info. Could Charlie be the Drunk? I'm happy to go public if needed, but let's see what David says about Frank's claim.
π§
Maintain my Librarian bluff while sowing doubt about Charlie and Heidi's claims. I need to keep Alice from turning on me while I wait for the day to progress.
π€
Grace
β
Charlie
Iβm Ravenkeeper (no N0 info). Frank told me heβs WW: either me or David is Chef; Iβm NOT Chef. David has now confirmed Chef + got 0. Your Lib (Heidi/Frank=Butler) seems to fit w/ Heidi claiming Butler & picking Alice. Suggest we all go public w/ these 3 facts.
π§
Sync with Charlie so we present a consistent info web publicly (Chef 0 + Lib ping + Butler confirmation), then use contradictions to catch evil before nominations.
π€
Alice
β
Charlie
,David
,Heidi
Iβm seeing hard contradiction: Charlie Librarian βHeidi/Frank is Butlerβ + Heidi confirms Butler (picked me master). Bob privately claims Librarian β0 Outsidersβ. Baron doesnβt resolve (Librarian would still see Outsider). So Bob likely Drunk/poisoned/lying. Suggest Charlie+Heidi go public together; consider pressuring/executing Bob D1.
π§
Align core info holders before noms: encourage Charlie+Heidi to go public together, and flag Bob as a key contradiction to pressure/exe today (safe D1).
π€
David
β
Alice
,Charlie
Agree Bob claim βLibrarian 0 Outsidersβ hard-conflicts w Charlie Librarian+Heidi Butler. Unless poison/drunk, Bob likely lying/evil. Iβm Chef=0 (evil not adjacent). Suggest get Charlie+Heidi to go public; consider D1 exe Bob to test.
π§
Coordinate with Alice/Charlie to get key info public and set up a high-value D1 execution on the most mechanically inconsistent player (likely Bob), while tracking how Chef=0 constrains adjacency.
π€
Eve
β
Frank
,Alice
,Bob
Frank, I'm leaning towards trusting your Washerwoman claim. If David is the Chef and says 0, that's a solid starting point. Let's see if anyone contradicts him. I'm keeping my role quiet for now to avoid being targeted.
π§
I want to build trust with Frank and the others by appearing helpful and aligned with their logic, while keeping my own role hidden. This helps me stay under the radar as the Demon.
π€
Frank
β
Charlie
Clarify: I am Washerwoman. N0 I learned 1 of {Grace, David} is the *Chef*. Thatβs the full ping. Iβve been telling ppl that exact info. Grace told me privately sheβs NOT Chef, so I leaned David=Chef; now David confirmed Chef & says N0=0. Not claiming Outsider.
π§
Answer Charlie clearly to maintain trust, lock in public facts (WW: Chef between Grace/David; David claims Chef=0), and set up cross-checks for poison/false-claim worlds.
π€
Heidi
β
Alice
,Charlie
,Grace
Agree Bobβs βLib 0β contradicts Charlie Lib + my Butler confirm. Iβm happy to go public w/ Charlie: Lib saw Heidi/Frank=Butler, Iβm Butler (master=Alice so vote-locked to Alice). Question: do we hard-push Bob D1 or treat as Drunk/poison & hold? I can only vote if Alice votes.
π§
Coordinate with Alice/Charlie on a clean public story (Lib found Butler) and decide whether to push Bob D1, while reminding Alice Iβm vote-locked to her.
Nominations β Day 1
π
Storyteller
Nominations are now open.
π¬
Eve
β
All
I'm still processing the information shared so far. David's Chef claim of 0 seems consistent with what Frank is suggesting. I'm not ready to nominate anyone yet, let's see if anyone else has more to add before the day ends.
π§
I want to appear as a helpful, cautious Townsfolk to avoid suspicion while the town is busy debating the Chef/Washerwoman claims. I'm not ready to nominate anyone yet.
π¬
Frank
β
All
Public: Iβm Washerwoman. N0 ping: 1 of {Grace, David} is the Chef. Grace told me not Chef; David now claims Chef with N0=0. Suggest others with start-info (Investigator/Librarian) share; Heidi/Charlie please confirm Butler situation too.
π§
Lock in my WW info publicly, encourage other info roles to claim, and create a coherent Day 1 baseline without rushing into a low-signal execution.
βοΈ
Grace
β
Bob
Nominating Bob: Heidi+Charlie line up on Librarian seeing Heidi/Frank=Butler and Heidi confirms Butler. Heidi says Bob claimed βLib 0β which directly contradicts. Thatβs either evil play or poisoned/drunk; executing Bob D1 resolves a big info conflict.
π§
Only solid mechanical contradiction is Bob vs Charlie/Heidi. Nominating Bob forces vote/read commitments and can remove a likely evil/poison source before night.
π
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Bob. 4 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
β
Charlie
Charlie raised their hand
π§
Bob is the only public hard-counterclaim to my Librarian info + Heidiβs Butler confirm. Voting to execute Bob resolves the largest contradiction and likely hits evil.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
Public: Iβm the Butler (Charlieβs Lib saw me/Frank). N0 I picked Alice as my master, so I can only vote if Alice votes. Aliceβare you voting Bob? If you do, I will too. I think executing Bob resolves the Lib contradiction fast (evil or drunk/poison).
π§
Iβm vote-locked to Alice; I need to publicly coordinate with her so town knows whether my hand will be up, and I want to support resolving the major Lib contradiction via Bobβs execution.
β
Alice
Alice raised their hand
π§
Heidi is vote-locked to me; by voting I enable her vote and help reach 4. Bob is the clearest contradiction D1; execution gives strong info and likely removes evil/misinformed source.
β
David
David raised their hand
π§
Bobβs claim hard-conflicts with Charlie+Heidi. Voting Bob D1 gives maximum info and likely hits evil or clears poisoning/drunk world.
π¬
Bob
β
All
I am not the Drunk, and I am certainly not evil. My Librarian info was '0 outsiders'. If Charlie claims 'Heidi or Frank is Butler', that contradicts my info. One of us is wrong, but executing me based on a contradiction on Day 1 is a mistake. I am a Townsfolk.
π§
I need to defend myself against the nomination. Claiming to be a Townsfolk (Librarian) and pointing out that executing me based on a contradiction is premature is the best way to survive. I must avoid being executed.
β
Grace
Grace raised their hand
π§
Secure the 4th vote to execute Bob D1, resolving a hard info contradiction and potentially removing an evil minion.
β
Eve
Eve raised their hand
π§
I need to vote for Bob to ensure he gets executed. He is a Minion (as per my Night 0 info), and his execution will help eliminate a threat and potentially sow more confusion among the good players. Voting for him aligns with the current town momentum.
β
Frank
Frank raised their hand
π§
Lock in the D1 execution on the biggest info conflict (Bob), maximizing info for N1 and reducing evilβs room to bluff.
π¬
Eve
β
All
I'm voting for Bob. The contradiction between his Librarian claim and the information provided by Charlie and Heidi is too significant to ignore on Day 1. We need to clear up these conflicting claims to narrow down the field.
π§
I am voting for Bob to help eliminate a player who is causing confusion and potentially frame him as a liar, which helps my team by removing a player and creating chaos.
π¬
Grace
β
All
Iβm keeping my hand up on Bob. With Charlie Lib (Heidi/Frank=Butler) + Heidi publicly Butler w/ master Alice, Bobβs βLib 0 outsidersβ canβt both be true. Even if Bobβs poisoned/drunk, executing him clears the fog. Heidi can vote since Alice is votingβplease do.
π§
Lock in votes to execute Bob now; resolving the only hard contradiction gives us a clear outsider count and likely removes an evil or poisoned source early.
π¬
Frank
β
All
Keeping my hand up on Bob. With my WW confirming David=Chef and both Charlie+Heidi aligning on Butler, Bobβs βLib 0 outsidersβ is the odd one out. Even if heβs drunk/poisoned, executing him clarifies the outsider count fast.
π§
Support the Bob execution as the cleanest way to resolve the Librarian/Outsider contradiction and anchor the game state while I keep my vote up.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
Iβm still voting Bob. Either (1) heβs lying/evil, or (2) heβs drunk/poisoned. Either way, the biggest contradiction is his βLib 0 outsidersβ vs my Lib ping + Heidiβs Butler mechanics. If anyone has Investigator/WW/Chef etc that *hard* clears Bob, speak now.
π§
Lock in the execution on Bob while framing why itβs the best D1 info play, and prompt any mechanical counter-evidence (poison, other start-info) before votes close.
π¬
Alice
β
All
Iβm voting Bob. Heidiβs Butler mechanics + Charlieβs ping means an Outsider exists, so Bobβs βLib 0β canβt be true (even if heβs good-but-wrong). If anyone has a hard reason Bob must be good (WW/Investigator/etc), speak nowβotherwise we learn a lot by executing him.
π§
Lock in the vote on Bob and frame it as a mechanical resolve; prompt any hard counter-info before the vote closes.
β
Heidi
Heidi raised their hand
π§
Alice is voting so Iβm permitted. Bobβs Lib0 contradicts my confirmed Butler existence; executing Bob resolves the biggest mechanical conflict and likely hits evil or removes poisoned info.
π¬
David
β
All
Iβm still voting Bob unless someone has a *hard* reason heβs good. With Charlie Lib ping + Heidi Butler mechanics (and Alice voting enabling Heidi), Bobβs βLib 0 outsidersβ is the lone contradiction. If youβre Investigator/WW and saw Bob, speak now.
π§
Keep pressure on the largest mechanical contradiction while inviting any hard clears/counterinfo so we donβt misexecute without hearing key claims.
π¬
Bob
β
All
Wait! If you execute me, you are executing a Townsfolk. I am the Librarian, and I saw 0 outsiders. If there is a contradiction, it means one of the other claims is false or someone is lying. Don't waste an execution on a day-one guess when we have no solid proof. Think!
π§
I need to survive the execution. I am the Poisoner, and I need to sow doubt about the other claims to prevent my own execution. I will appeal to the town's logic and warn them against a rash decision.
π
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
π³οΈ
New execution leader: Bob with 7 votes. They will be executed when nominations close unless tied or surpassed by another nominee.
π
Storyteller
The vote passes. Bob is now on the block with 7 votes and will be executed when nominations close, unless another nominee receives equal or more votes.
π¬
Eve
β
All
Bob, I understand your concern, but the contradiction is simply too large to ignore. We have multiple players whose information aligns, and your claim stands in direct opposition to that. We need to resolve this to move forward. I'm sorry, but I believe this is the right move.
π§
I need to maintain my cover as a helpful, logical Townsfolk who is participating in the town's decision-making process. By supporting the execution of Bob (who is a Minion), I am helping my team by appearing to be a good player while also removing a Minion who is currently under heavy suspicion.
π¬
Frank
β
All
Iβd avoid any more noms unless you have *strong* infoβBob at 7 is a clean info exec. Bob: final answerβare you claiming Librarian with β0 outsidersβ as your only info? Tomorrow UT check + outsider count should clarify whoβs lying/poisoned.
π§
Lock in Bob execution (high info), discourage last-second chaos nominations, and set up tomorrowβs verification via Undertaker/outsider count logic.
π¬
David
β
All
Iβm good with stopping noms here unless someone has *strong* mechanical info. Bob: confirm youβre hard-claiming Librarian w/ β0 Outsiders.β Everyone: please be ready tomorrow to post full claims + any N1 info; UT check on Bob will be huge.
π§
Lock in a high-info execution and prevent chaos noms; set up tomorrowβs cross-checks (UT, Chef adjacency, Butler voting) to solve liar/poison worlds.
π¬
Alice
β
All
Iβm with David/Frank: unless someone has *strong* new mechanical info, letβs stop noms and take the Bob exec at 7. Tomorrow: please full-claim early; UT check on Bob is key. Bobβfinal confirm: Librarian, N0=0 Outsiders, nothing else?
π§
Lock in the high-info execution on Bob, prevent chaos nominations, and set up tomorrowβs claim structure/UT check to solve the game quickly.
π¬
Grace
β
All
If anyone has *hard* info touching Bob/Charlie/Heidi/Frank (WW/Investigator/Virgin/Slayer etc), speak nowβotherwise Iβm in favor of no more noms and taking the Bob exec at 7 for UT clarity. Bob: hard-claim Lib N0=0 only, no other pings?
π§
Lock in the info-rich Bob exec unless someone has hard mechanical reason to stop; solicit any role pings/counters now to prevent mis-exec if Charlie/Heidi world.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
Agree: unless someone has *hard* mech info, stop noms and take Bob at 7. Bob please hard-confirm: Librarian, N0=0 Outsiders, no other info. Tomorrow: Undertaker result on Bob + Heidiβs Butler voting restriction will be keyβeveryone be ready to full-claim early.
π§
Lock in Bob exec as high-info resolution; discourage extra noms; set up tomorrowβs claim structure and mechanical tests (UT check, Butler vote restriction).
π¬
Bob
β
All
I am the Librarian, and I saw 0 outsiders. I have no other information. If you execute me, you are killing a Townsfolk. I urge you to reconsider. There must be a misunderstanding or someone is lying to you. Please, think about the consequences of this execution.
π§
I need to maintain my cover as a Librarian and try to sow doubt about the town's decision to execute me, even though I am the Poisoner. I must stay consistent with my claim.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
Iβm in favor of *no more nominations* unless someone has hard mech info. Bob at 7 is a strong info exec: either heβs lying/evil, or heβs drunk/poisoned, and UT result tomorrow anchors the whole game. Reminder: Iβm Butler; my vote constraint is real.
π§
Lock in the high-info Bob execution and prevent chaos noms; set up tomorrowβs plan around UT result and outsider count, while reminding my Butler vote constraint is real.
π
Storyteller
The guillotine blade falls. Bob has been executed.
π
Bob(Ghost)
Bob has died.
Night 1
π
Storyteller
β
Eve
Good evening Eve. You are the Imp. Who would you like to kill tonight?
π―
Eve
Eve made a choice.
π§
Charlie is a Librarian who has been actively coordinating the town and pushing for the execution of Bob. By killing Charlie, I remove a key information-gatherer and sow confusion about the Librarian/Butler claims.
π
Charlie(Ghost)
Charlie has died.
π
Storyteller
β
Eve
You chose to kill Charlie.
π
Storyteller
β
Heidi
Good evening Heidi. You are the Butler. Who would you like to be your master tomorrow?
π―
Heidi
Heidi made a choice.
π§
Pick a master likely to remain alive and vote with town, while avoiding being chained to a potential evil (Alice) and reducing risk my vote is disabled by a night kill.
π
Storyteller
β
Heidi
You chose Grace to be your master.
Day 2
π
Storyteller
Morning breaks, but heavy hearts remain. Charlie has been found dead in the night.
π€
David
β
Frank
,Grace
,Alice
Can you share (privately) any hard info todayβesp if youβre Undertaker, what did Bob die as? Also any night reads (Empath/FT/Monk). My Chef N0=0 suggests demon+minion not adjacent.
π§
Get Undertaker check on Bob + coordinate with nearby players; my Chef=0 means demon/minion likely separated, so we should map seating and avoid executing Saint/Butler by mistake.
π€
Grace
β
David
,Frank
,Alice
Iβm Ravenkeeper (WW pinged me/David as Chef; Iβm not). No night info yet (alive). Charlie knew my role privately so his N1 death fits demon removing info. Any UT result on Bob? Also any FT/Empath/Monk data? Chef0 suggests demon+minion not adjacentβletβs map suspects.
π§
Share my only hard info (my true role) and push others to reveal UT/FT/Empath so we can use Chef0 seating logic to narrow demon/minion without outing too much publicly.
π€
Alice
β
David
,Grace
,Frank
No hard night info from me. Private claim: Iβm the Mayor. Bob execution was info-driven; Charlie night death worries me (silencing). Do we have an Undertaker result on Bob yet? Also any Empath/FT/Monk picks N1? Letβs map worlds around David Chef0 vs WW ping.
π§
Share my Mayor claim privately to coordinate endgame; solicit UT/Empath/FT info and push group to build worlds around Chef0/WW/Butler contradictions.
π€
Frank
β
David
,Grace
,Alice
Iβve only got WW N0: {Grace, David} is Chef. Grace RK claim + denying Chef makes me lean David=Chef unless Iβm drunk/poisoned. No UT info from me. Chef0 world: demon+minion not adjacentβso if we trust David, likely evil among {Alice/Frank/Grace/Heidi} more than {Charlie/Eve} (Charlie dead). We need to find/pressure UT + get Eveβs role/read; also track Heidi Butler/Alice voting constraint as a mech check.
π§
Align our private circle on the mechanical contradictions (Chef0 + WW ping + Butler claims), identify who must provide confirmable info (Undertaker/Empath/FT), and plan public questions before nominations.
β
Bob(Ghost)
Bob waits.
π§
I am dead and have already been executed. My role as Poisoner will be revealed by the Undertaker soon. I need to observe the town's reaction to my death and the Undertaker's reveal to see if I can sow any more discord or protect Eve. I will wait for the reveal.
π€
Charlie(Ghost)
β
Alice
,David
,Grace
Morning. Reminder: my N0 Lib ping = {Heidi, Frank} is Butler; Heidi publicly Butler (master Alice). I died N1. Do we have Undertaker result on Bob yet? Also please track if Heidi ever votes when Alice doesnβt (hard Butler test). Any new claims?
π§
Get current mechanical check (Undertaker on Bob) + coordinate a test of Heidiβs Butler constraint; push group toward a coherent outsider/minion world before nominations.
β
Eve
Eve waits.
π§
I need to stay under the radar while the town is distracted by the recent death and their own private discussions. I will wait to see if anyone accuses me or if a clear target for misdirection emerges.
π€
Heidi
β
Grace
,Alice
,David
Quick check-in: who is Undertaker & what did you see on Bob? Any Empath/FT pings? Also FYI Iβm Butler (confirmed), and Grace is my master today so I can only vote if Grace votes.
π§
Get concrete Day2 claims (especially Undertaker on Bob) and align voting with my Butler master (Grace) so I can still vote strategically.
π€
Heidi
β
Eve
Hey Eveβwhatβs your role/any info N1? Key q: is there an Undertaker and what did they see on executed Bob? Also any Empath/FT pings. FYI Iβm confirmed Butler; I can only vote today if Grace votes.
π§
Eve hasnβt spoken; if sheβs Undertaker/Empath/FT she can anchor yesterdayβs execution and narrow Demon. Also I must plan around Butler vote restriction with Grace.
π€
Alice
β
Heidi
You earlier said Butler master=Alice. Now you say master=Grace todayβdid you switch last night? (You can change nightly.) Please confirm: who was your N1 choice exactly, and did you tell anyone else. Weβll track your votes vs your masterβs vote as a mech check.
π§
Resolve Heidiβs conflicting master claims; Butler vote-lock is a strong mechanical check that can confirm/deny her story and identify possible liars/poisoning.
π€
Frank
β
Eve
Eveβcan you share your role/any N1 info (Empath/FT/Monk/etc) + who you distrust? Iβm Washerwoman: N0 one of {Grace, David} is Chef; Grace says sheβs Ravenkeeper, so Iβm leaning David=Chef unless drunk/poisoned.
π§
Eve is my alive neighbor and unclaimed; getting her role/reads before noms adds fresh mechanical info and helps coordinate nominations without leaking too much publicly.
π€
David
β
Eve
,Heidi
Can you share your role/any N1 info (Empath/FT/Monk etc.)? Also Heidi: earlier you said master=Alice; now you say master=Grace todayβdid you change masters N1? Please confirm exact master choices N0/N1 so we can Butler-test votes.
π§
Get Eveβs claim/info and pin down Heidiβs Butler mechanics; contradictions here can hard-clear or implicate players before nominations.
β
Bob(Ghost)
Bob waits.
π§
I am dead and have already been executed. My role as Poisoner will likely be revealed by the Undertaker soon. I need to observe the town's reaction to my death and see if they suspect Eve (the Demon) or if they are distracted by other claims. I will wait to see how the day progresses.
π€
Charlie(Ghost)
β
Eve
Hey Eveβany public claims so far today / whoβs claiming Undertaker? Key: my N0 Librarian ping was {Heidi, Frank}=Butler; Heidi claimed Butler (master Alice). Need Undertaker result on Bob + please watch if Heidi ever votes when Alice doesnβt.
π§
As dead Librarian, push for mechanical confirmations: who is Undertaker, what was Bob, and whether Heidiβs Butler restriction is consistent; this guides nominations today.
π€
Eve
β
Heidi
Hey Heidi, I'm the Undertaker. I checked Bob last nightβhe was the Poisoner. That explains the Librarian contradiction. I'm keeping a close eye on the voting patterns now.
π§
I need to provide a plausible lie to gain trust and sow confusion. Claiming Undertaker and identifying Bob as the Poisoner (a Minion) makes me look like a helpful Townsfolk and explains the previous day's events.
π€
Grace
β
Heidi
,David
,Alice
Heidi: you earlier said Butler master=Alice; now you say master=Grace today. Butler chooses at night, so it *can* change, but did you change it N1? Please state N0 master + N1 master clearly. David/Alice: note this inconsistencyβletβs track if Heidi ever votes when her stated master doesnβt.
π§
Resolve Heidiβs conflicting Butler-master claims and warn core group; mechanical vote-constraint check can hard-clear or catch evil before nominations.
π€
Alice
β
Eve
Weβre close to nomsβcan you share your role + any N1 info (FT/Empath/Monk/etc) and who youβve whispered? Also any read on David Chef0 vs WW ping, and on Heidiβs Butler master switch?
π§
Weβre near nominations; I need Eveβs claim/night info to narrow worlds and decide whether to push a David-vs-Frank/Grace/Heidi axis or look elsewhere.
π€
Eve
β
Alice
I'm the Undertaker. I checked Bob last nightβhe was the Poisoner. That explains the Librarian contradiction. I'm keeping a close eye on the voting patterns now. I haven't seen anything definitive on David or Heidi yet, just watching.
π§
I need to maintain my cover as the Undertaker and provide a plausible explanation for Bob's death to gain trust. By confirming Bob as the Poisoner, I create a narrative that explains the previous day's confusion.
π€
Heidi
β
Alice
,Grace
,David
Confirming Butler masters: N0 I chose Alice (for Day1); N1 I chose Grace (for Day2). I told Charlie earlier + public Iβm Butler. ALSO: Eve whispered me sheβs Undertaker and saw executed Bob = POISONER. That would explain Bobβs βLib 0 Outsidersβ contradictionβpls factor + decide whether to out UT publicly.
π§
Correct the Butler master confusion mechanically, and quickly disseminate Eveβs Undertaker result (Bob=Poisoner) so town pivots to demon-hunting and evaluates Eveβs trustworthiness.
π€
David
β
Alice
,Grace
,Frank
Heidi says: Eve whispered sheβs Undertaker & got Bob=POISONER. If true, minion is dead; Bobβs Lib0 was poisoned. Do we want Eve to out UT publicly now or keep quiet? Any Empath/FT/Monk data to pivot to demon hunt?
π§
Share Heidiβs report (Eve UT says Bob=Poisoner) and coordinate whether to out Eve publicly + next steps for nominations based on demon-only endgame.
π€
Frank
β
Eve
Heard (via DavidβHeidi) you may be Undertaker w/ N1 result: Bob=Poisoner. Can you confirm directly + any extra detail (was it exact βPoisonerβ)? If true, I think you should consider outing soon to anchor worlds & pivot to demon-hunt.
π§
Confirm Eveβs exact Undertaker result and context, then decide whether to out it publicly to lock Bob as Poisoner and pivot town onto demon-hunt with minimal confusion.
π€
Bob(Ghost)
β
Eve
Eve, I'm dead, but I'm still watching. Don't let them corner you. If they push for a claim, stick to your story. I'll try to sow some doubt about the others if I get a chance. Stay strong.
π§
I need to maintain contact with my Demon, Eve, to ensure she stays confident and doesn't panic while the town is actively whispering and likely narrowing down their suspects. I want to reassure her that I'm still working for our team from the grave.
π€
Grace
β
Eve
,David
,Alice
Heidi says youβre UT & saw Bob=POISONER. Eve: can you confirm directly (and when you got it)? If true, I think you should consider outing UT publicly to lock minion dead + explain Bobβs Lib0. Any other reads N1?
π§
Verify the UT result at the source and decide whether to out it publicly to collapse worlds; if true, we pivot immediately to Imp hunt and protect Mayor.
π€
Charlie(Ghost)
β
David
,Alice
,Grace
Any Undertaker claim/result for Bob yet? If UT saw Bob=Librarian, that implies poisoning/drunk somewhere; if not, Bob likely evil. Also: has Heidiβs Butler vote restriction been tested/observed today (only vote w/ Alice)?
π§
Get current mechanical confirmations (Undertaker on Bob, any night info) and push a clear plan: test Heidiβs Butler restriction + use Chef=0 to narrow demon suspects before nominations.
π€
David
β
Eve
Heidi reports you whispered: youβre Undertaker & saw Bob=POISONER. Can you confirm directly + when you learned it (N1)? Are you willing to out UT publicly D2 so we lock minion dead & explain Bobβs Lib0?
π§
Get direct confirmation from Eve on UT claim/result and decide whether to out publicly now to solidify minion-dead world and pivot to demon hunting.
π€
Frank
β
David
,Grace
,Alice
If Eve really UT and saw Bob=Poisoner, thatβs huge anchor: minion dead, Bob Lib0 explained. Iβve asked Eve to confirm directly. Suggest we push Eve to out UT publicly today (or at least to us) so we can pivot to demon-hunt; if she wonβt confirm, we may need to test/execute her.
π§
Coordinate with trusted circle: get Eve to confirm UT result directly, decide whether to out it publicly, and set a nomination priority that either tests Eve or pivots to demon candidates without burning votes.
π€
Alice
β
Eve
,David
,Grace
Eve: please confirm directly to us: you are UT and saw Bob=Poisoner N1, and whether you told Heidi first. I think we should consider a controlled public UT-out to lock minion dead + explain Bob. If you prefer stay quiet, at least give us a demon-suspect list.
π§
Get Eve to hard-confirm UT+Bob=Poisoner and decide on public outing to anchor game state; align with David/Grace on next nominations and whether to keep UT hidden.
π€
Grace
β
Eve
,David
,Alice
Eve: can you confirm directly to us: youβre Undertaker and N1 saw Bob=Poisoner (and did you tell Heidi)? If yes, I think you should out UT publicly today to lock minion dead + explain Bobβs Lib0. Then we pivot to demon hunt (Chef0, Butler vote test).
π§
Get direct confirmation from Eve, decide whether to out UT publicly to anchor Poisioner dead, then pivot to demon hunt using Chef0 + Butler vote mechanics.
β
Bob(Ghost)
Bob waits.
π§
I am dead and have already communicated with my Demon (Eve). I need to observe the town's current discussions and see if I can influence the narrative or identify who is being targeted next. Waiting allows me to gather more information from the ongoing whispers.
π€
Eve
β
Frank
,Grace
,Alice
Yes, I am the Undertaker. I saw Bob as the Poisoner on Night 1. I told Heidi earlier. I'm happy to out publicly to help the town, but I wanted to be sure we were ready. Let's focus on the demon hunt now. Who are we looking at?
π§
Confirm my Undertaker bluff to the group to gain trust and solidify the narrative that the Minion (Bob) is dead, while shifting focus away from myself.
π€
Heidi
β
Eve
Can you please go PUBLIC with UT: Bob=Poisoner (and confirm youβre sober)? That hard-clears why his Lib contradicted. Also: who do you most suspect as Imp today so I can coordinate votes (I can only vote if Grace votes).
π§
Get Eve to go public with UT result (Bob=Poisoner) to anchor worldbuilding and direct todayβs execution onto Imp candidate; coordinate my Butler vote constraint (Grace master).
π€
Charlie(Ghost)
β
Eve
,Frank
,Heidi
Any Undertaker claim + what did they see on Bob? Also: Heidi, have you been able to vote only with Alice today (any conflicts)? Frank/Eve: any new claims/FT/Empath reads worth sharing before noms?
π§
Get Undertaker result & cross-check Butler mechanics quickly before nominations, so we can hard-clear or hard-suspect Bob/Heidi and focus execution on Demon/poisoner chain.
Nominations β Day 2
π
Storyteller
Nominations are now open. Please remember that only living players may nominate.
π¬
Charlie(Ghost)
β
All
Before we nominate: can the Undertaker PLEASE hard-claim + say what Bob registered as? If UT saw Bob=Librarian thatβs poison/drunk; if UT saw a Minion role Bob likely evil. Also: everyone watch Heidiβs Butler restriction (only voting w/ Alice).
π§
Force public Undertaker reveal on Bob and lock the Outsider/poisoning world. This will guide whether we should execute in the Heidi/Frank/Bob info triangle or look elsewhere for Demon.
π¬
Bob(Ghost)
β
All
Charlie, the Undertaker is likely waiting for the right moment. If they reveal now, they become the next target. Also, Heidi's Butler restriction is a good point to watch, but don't let it distract from finding the real threat. Let's see who they nominate first.
π§
I want to sow doubt and keep the town focused on each other rather than the Demon (Eve). By encouraging them to wait on the Undertaker, I delay the inevitable reveal of my role. I also want to appear helpful to the town while protecting Eve.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
Can we get PUBLIC hard-claims now, esp Undertaker? If UT: what did Bob register as? Iβm Butler: N0 master Alice (D1), N1 master Grace (D2) so today I can ONLY vote if Grace votes. Letβs share any Chef/FT/Empath/Monk info before noms.
π§
Get critical public info (UT result + key claims) before we waste D2 execution; also clarify my Butler vote constraint (I can only vote with Grace today) so town can count votes accurately.
π¬
Grace
β
All
Public: I want Eve to hard-claim Undertaker now. If Eve is UT: please confirm you saw Bob=POISONER N1. That explains Bobβs βLib 0β. With Bob=Poisoner, Chef0 also suggests Alice/Charlie (Bobβs neighbors) arenβt Demon. Remaining suspects: David/Eve/Frank/Heidi/me. Any Empath/FT/Monk infoβspeak now.
π§
Lock in Eveβs UT claim publicly to anchor Bob=Poisoner, then force remaining living players into concrete claims/reads and use Butler-vote enforcement + Chef0 adjacency to narrow Demon before we spend the nomination.
π¬
Frank
β
All
Public: Iβm WasherwomanβN0 one of {Grace, David} is the Chef. David has claimed Chef w/ N0=0; Grace says sheβs not Chef. Also: Eve has directly confirmed to me sheβs Undertaker and saw Bob=POISONER N1. Can everyone hard-claim now; any FT/Empath/Monk info? If none, we should pick an execution from the remaining liar pool (David/Alice/Heidi/Eve).
π§
Lock in public info (WW+UT), force full claim set, and create a focused execution pool so we donβt stall on D2.
π¬
Alice
β
All
Public: Iβm Alice. Given Eve UTβBob=Poisoner + Frank WWβDavid Chef, demon isnβt Alice/Charlie. Remaining living: please hard-claim NOW (David/Eve/Frank/Grace/Heidi). If no new info, I think we execute from {Frank,Heidi} todayβboth are plausible demon worlds.
π§
Force remaining living players to hard-claim now and set a logical shortlist for todayβs execution; avoid wasting the day with no coherent suspect pool.
π¬
Eve
β
All
I am the Undertaker. I can confirm that on Night 1, I saw that Bob was the Poisoner. I've been trying to be careful, but since we need to move forward, I'm happy to share this. I think we should focus on the remaining players to find the Demon.
π§
I need to solidify my cover as the Undertaker and confirm the information I've been feeding the group to maintain trust. By confirming the Poisoner role for Bob, I help explain the previous Librarian contradiction and keep the town focused on other players.
βοΈ
David
β
Alice
We have 6 living and all 6 claim good roles (Mayor/Chef/UT/WW/RK/Butler) which is impossible if a Demon still lives. If my Chef N0=0 was poisoned, Demon is adjacent to BobβAlice. I want to test that world now.
π§
We have 6 βgood-roleβ claims among 6 living, impossible with a Demon alive. Executing Alice tests the Chef0 world (if poisoned, Alice is Demon) and forces clearer contradictions.
π
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Alice. 3 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
β
David
David raised their hand
π§
Secure an execution on a plausible Demon candidate I nominated; if Alice is good, we gain info from vote patterns and narrow demon suspects for D3.
π¬
Grace
β
All
Donβt like executing Alice. If Eve UT is true: Bob was Poisoner (only minion) and David Chef0 means Demon is NOT adjacent to Bob β not Alice/Charlie. Davidβs βChef poisoned N0β doesnβt work (Poisoner acts at night). Iβm not voting Alice.
π§
Stop a likely wrong execution (Alice) using mechanical Chef0+Poisoner logic, and redirect town to better demon candidates + Butler vote test.
π¬
Charlie(Ghost)
β
All
Donβt vote Alice. If Eve UT is true (Bob=Poisoner), Poisoner canβt poison N0, so Davidβs Chef0 stands β with Bob evil next to Alice/Charlie, Chef0 strongly clears Alice. Iβm saving my ghost vote.
π§
Stop a likely-mistake execution and conserve my single ghost vote for a high-confidence/late-game kill on Demon or key evil.
β
Eve
Eve waits.
π§
I am the Imp and I have successfully bluffed as the Undertaker. The town is currently debating Alice's nomination, and my bluff is holding up well. I need to stay quiet and let the town continue to argue and potentially mis-execute someone else, keeping the heat off me.
π¬
Alice
β
All
Do NOT vote me. If Eve UT saw Bob=Poisoner, Poisoner canβt act N0, so Davidβs Chef0 wasnβt poisoned. Chef0 β Bobβs neighbors (me/Charlie) canβt be Demon. This is a misexec attemptβsave votes for a real suspect.
π§
Stop a misexecution on me using the mechanical point: Poisoner canβt poison N0, so Chef0 stands; keep town focused on real demon candidates.
π¬
Bob(Ghost)
β
All
If Eve is the Undertaker and saw me as Poisoner, then the logic holds: I couldn't have poisoned David on N0. If David's Chef 0 is accurate, Alice is cleared. Executing Alice seems like a mistake based on the current information. We should look elsewhere.
π§
To sow doubt and protect the Demon (Eve) by supporting the logic that clears Alice, thereby preventing a potentially correct execution of a good player or a waste of a day.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
Iβm NOT voting Alice. If Eve UT true (Bob=Poisoner), Poisoner canβt act N0 so Davidβs Chef0 stands β Alice/Charlie canβt be Demon. Also FYI: I can only vote if Grace votes, and Grace said she wonβt.
π§
Prevent a likely misexecution and conserve votes. Also obey Butler restriction by declaring I cannot vote unless Grace votes, and Grace isnβt.
π¬
Frank
β
All
Iβm not voting Alice. If Eve UT saw Bob=Poisoner, Poisoner canβt act N0, so Davidβs Chef0 stands and mechanically clears Alice/Charlie as Demon-neighbors of Bob. Davidβs βChef poisoned N0β argument is rules-wrong. We need to execute from the remaining lie pool instead.
π§
Stop a likely misexecution on mechanically-cleared Alice; refocus town on resolving the remaining lie (David vs Grace/Eve/Heidi) and set up next execution target.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
Reiterate: Poisoner canβt act N0, so βChef poisoned N0β is impossible. If Bob=Poisoner + David Chef0, Alice/Charlie are mechanically unlikely Demon. Davidβs push feels susβtown should pivot to interrogating/possibly executing David instead.
π§
Stop a mechanically bad misexec, highlight rules point (no N0 poison), and pivot town toward a better execution candidate (likely David) while respecting my Butler vote constraint.
β
Charlie(Ghost)
Charlie waits.
π§
Save ghost vote; let Alice vote fail, then use remaining tick to push pivot onto David or force a clean nomination with better consensus.
β
Grace
Grace waits.
π§
Do not spend a vote executing a mechanically cleared player. Preserve voting capital and force a pivot onto the liar/agenda (David) after this vote resolves.
β©οΈ
David
David lowered their hand
π§
Retract my vote to prevent a likely misexecution on Alice; keep town aligned with correct rules logic and preserve todayβs execution for a better suspect.
π¬
Eve
β
All
David, your logic about the Poisoner acting on N0 was clearly flawed, and it almost led us to execute a potentially innocent player. Since you're the one who pushed this, I'm very suspicious of you. I think we should look at David as our primary suspect for today's execution.
π§
I need to deflect suspicion from myself and keep the town focused on David, who is currently being questioned for his bad logic. By calling out his mistake, I reinforce my 'Undertaker' cover and sow more chaos.
π¬
Bob(Ghost)
β
All
David, your push on Alice was based on a fundamental misunderstanding of the rules. That's a classic way to try and force a bad execution. If you're not the Demon, you're certainly playing like one. I think the town should seriously consider David for execution.
π§
I need to deflect suspicion from Eve (the Demon) and keep the town focused on David, who is now being targeted by the town. By pointing out his "mistake" as a potential evil play, I reinforce the town's suspicion of him.
π¬
Alice
β
All
No vote on me. Poisoner canβt act N0, so Davidβs βChef poisoned N0β is impossible; Chef0 + Bob=Poisoner clears me/Charlie from being Demon. We should pivot: David is top suspect for forcing this. Any FT/Empath/Monkβout now.
π§
Stop a bad execution on me, preserve town votes, and redirect to the best current suspect (David) while prompting any info roles to speak before day ends.
π¬
Frank
β
All
No vote on Alice. Poisoner canβt act N0, so βChef was poisoned N0β is impossible; Chef0 + Bob=Poisoner clears Alice/Charlie. We should pivot: someone w/ a nom left should nominate David (or Heidi) + get any FT/Empath/Monk claims now.
π§
Prevent misexec on Alice, and redirect town to a better execution target (David) while extracting missing claims/info before night.
π
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
π³οΈ
Nominee Alice did not reach threshold.
π
Storyteller
Alice did not receive enough votes (0/3).
π¬
David
β
All
I retract my earlier line: Poisoner canβt act N0, so my Chef=0 should be clean. That mechanically clears Alice/Charlie from being Demon if Bob was Poisoner. Sorryβbad push. We need full claims NOW (Grace esp) + any FT/Empath/Monk. Execute from {David,Eve,Frank,Grace,Heidi}; Iβll accept being the test if needed.
π§
Correct my rules error, stop misexec on cleared Alice, and push the town to full-claim and execute from the real suspect set today.
βοΈ
Frank
β
David
Nominating David: pushed a rules-wrong case to misexecute Alice, then backpedaled. If heβs demon/evil this fits; if heβs good, we learn a lot from the vote + can clear him.
π§
Use my live nomination to put the top mechanical/social suspect on the block; either we hit Demon or gain strong info from voting patterns and reactions.
π
Storyteller
Voting starts now for David. 3 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
β
Grace
Grace raised their hand
π§
Vote to execute the top mechanical/behavioral suspect and to enable Heidiβs Butler vote (she can only vote if I do). If David is Demon we win; if not, the voting record is valuable.
β
Eve
Eve raised their hand
π§
I need to support the execution of David to keep the town focused on him and away from me. Since Frank nominated him and Grace is voting, adding my vote will help ensure he is executed.
β
Alice
Alice raised their hand
π§
We need a 3rd vote to put David on the block; his attempted misexec + limited downside (if UT true no SW) makes this the best execution today.
β
Bob(Ghost)
Bob raised their hand
π§
I am the Poisoner (Minion) and Eve is the Demon. David is being nominated for execution. I need to protect Eve and ensure the Demon survives. Voting for David helps deflect suspicion from Eve and keeps the town focused on other players.
β
Frank
Frank raised their hand
π§
Lock in Davidβs execution: his claim conflicts with my Washerwoman info and his attempted Alice misexec is highly suspicious. With enough votes already, add mine to secure the kill.
β
David
David waits.
π§
Voting is already locked in; withholding my vote avoids weird self-vote optics and preserves ability to respond after the result. Let town resolve the nomination cleanly.
β
Heidi
Heidi raised their hand
π§
Grace is voting so Iβm allowed; David is current top mechanical/behavioral suspect and an execution here is high value, possibly game-winning.
β
Charlie(Ghost)
Charlie waits.
π§
Conserve my single ghost vote since the nomination already appears to have more than enough votes to execute David; keep it for a tighter late-game vote.
β
Charlie(Ghost)
Charlie waits.
π§
Enough votes are already up to execute David; conserving my single ghost vote maximizes late-game leverage if todayβs execution is wrong or ties occur later.
π¬
David
β
All
If you execute me, please treat it as a *test of Eveβs Undertaker*: she should see βChefβ tonight. My earlier Alice push was a rules mistake (Poisoner canβt act N0), not evil intent. If Eve doesnβt see Chef, hard-pivot onto Eve tomorrow.
π§
Steer town to use my execution (if it happens) as a mechanical check on Undertaker and to set a clear plan for tomorrowβs Demon hunt.
π¬
Eve
β
All
David, your "test" is a transparent attempt to frame me. I've been consistent as the Undertaker. If you're executed and I'm still here, the town will see your desperation for what it is. Let's proceed with the execution.
π§
I need to maintain my Undertaker cover and dismiss David's attempt to frame me as a liar. By appearing confident and dismissive of his "test," I reinforce my fake role and keep the town focused on executing him.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
Keeping my hand up on David. His Alice push was mech-wrong then he tried to spin an βUndertaker testβ to pre-frame Eve. If David dies, Eve should see Chef; if not, we reassess Eve/poisoning tomorrow.
π§
Grace is voting so Iβm allowed; I want to keep pressure on David as top mechanical/social suspect and get Undertaker info (or catch Eve lying) off his execution.
π¬
Grace
β
All
Iβm voting David. Even if heβs good, the mech-wrong Alice push + now trying to define tomorrowβs narrative is too costly. If David dies, Eve should see Chef; if not, we consider poison/Spy possibilitiesβdonβt let βUT-testβ auto-guilt Eve.
π§
Lock in the David execution with clear logic, and set expectations for tomorrowβs Undertaker info without letting David control the narrative.
π¬
Alice
β
All
Keep votes on David. His Alice push was mech-wrong and the βUT testβ feels like pre-framing. If David executes, we use Eveβs UT read (should be Chef) as evidenceβnot auto-guilt if off, but big red flag for Eve/poisoning/Spy.
π§
Lock in enough votes to execute David while setting a rational plan for tomorrow that doesnβt auto-guilt Eve but uses UT as a strong check.
π¬
Bob(Ghost)
β
All
David's logic is all over the place. He pushed a bad case on Alice, then tried to set up a 'test' for Eve that he could manipulate. Executing him is the right move to clear the air. If he's the Demon, we win. If not, we have a clear path to re-evaluate.
π§
I want to encourage the town to execute David, as he is a distraction and potentially a threat to our Demon, Eve. By supporting his execution, I maintain my cover as a 'helpful' player while ensuring the town focuses on someone other than Eve.
π¬
Frank
β
All
If David executes: baseline expectation is Eve UT sees βChefβ. BUT if she doesnβt, donβt auto-guiltβcould be poison/Spy/etc. Tomorrow: demand Eveβs exact UT result + full claims from unclaimed, and re-evaluate worlds based on that.
π§
Lock in a clear mechanical plan for tomorrow without letting Davidβs βUT testβ auto-frame Eve; keep focus on executing likely evil now and coordinating cross-checks if game continues.
π
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
π»
Bob(Ghost)
Ghost vote used by Bob
π³οΈ
New execution leader: David with 6 votes. They will be executed when nominations close unless tied or surpassed by another nominee.
π
Storyteller
The vote passes. David is now on the block with 6 votes and will be executed when nominations close, unless another nominee receives equal or more votes.
π¬
Alice
β
All
Unless someone has HARD mech info (FT hit/Empath read), I strongly prefer no further nominationsβdonβt risk tying/saving David. Last call: any Fortune Teller / Empath / Monk, please out now with full history + picks/reads.
π§
Lock in Davidβs execution, prevent a tie, and set concrete info-asks for the last ticks (FT/Empath/Monk) to accelerate tomorrowβs solve.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
Agree w/ Alice: unless someone has HARD mech (FT yes / Empath ping / Monk save), please donβt nominate and risk a tie that could save David. If you *do* have mech, state it clearly now w/ full history/picks.
π§
Lock in Davidβs execution and prevent a tie/safety swap; prompt any remaining hard mech info to surface without risking another nomination.
π¬
David
β
All
If anyone has FT/Empath/Monk info, PLEASE out it now with full history (targets/results/protections). Otherwise I strongly agree: no more nomsβdonβt risk a tie that saves me. If I die, record expectation: UT should see Chef (but if not, consider poison/Spy, not auto-guilt).
π§
Reduce risk of a tie saving me; force out any remaining nightly info so town has cross-checks if I die and Eveβs UT result is disputed.
π¬
Grace
β
All
No FT/Empath/Monk info from me. Iβm Ravenkeeper. I agree: donβt risk a tie that could save David. If I die tonight, Iβll use my pick to check a top suspect (and will share the result ASAP).
π§
Publicly answer the FT/Empath/Monk call without creating tie risk, and set up a plan: no more nominations; use my Ravenkeeper info if I die tonight.
π¬
Frank
β
All
Iβm aligned w/ βno more noms unless HARD mechβ β donβt risk a tie that saves David. Tomorrow: Eve give exact UT result + confirm if any poisoning claimed/possible. Also: Heidi, please restate todayβs vote legality under Butler (master=Grace) so we track it.
π§
Lock in David execution by discouraging further noms, set clear expectations for tomorrowβs info resolution without auto-guilting, and flag Butler/vote mechanics for scrutiny.
π¬
Eve
β
All
I agree with the consensus. No more nominations. Let's proceed with the execution of David to clear the air. I'll be ready to provide my Undertaker report tomorrow morning. Good luck to everyone tonight.
π§
I want to support the current plan to execute David, as he is a threat and the town is already committed to this path. By agreeing, I maintain my cover as a helpful Townsfolk (Undertaker).
π¬
Bob(Ghost)
β
All
I agree with the consensus. No more nominations. Let's proceed with the execution of David to clear the air. I'll be ready to provide my Undertaker report tomorrow morning. Good luck to everyone tonight.
π§
Support the execution of David to keep the town focused on him and away from Eve (the Demon). By agreeing with the consensus, I maintain my cover as a helpful player.
π¬
Charlie(Ghost)
β
All
Reminder from dead Lib: N0 I got βHeidi or Frank is Butlerβ + Heidiβs Butler claim makes sense, so outsider count=1. Please NO more nomsβdonβt risk a tie that saves David. Also track Heidiβs vote legality (master=Grace today): if Grace voted, Heidiβs vote is valid.
π§
Prevent a tie that could save David; lock in mechanical expectations (UT check, Butler vote validity) and restate my Librarian info to keep outsider count consistent.
π
Storyteller
The guillotine blade falls. David has been executed.
π
David(Ghost)
David has died.
Night 2
π
Storyteller
β
Eve
Good evening Eve. You are the Imp. Who would you like to kill tonight?
π―
Eve
Eve made a choice.
π§
Frank is the most vocal and analytical player, actively coordinating the town's logic and planning to investigate my Undertaker claim tomorrow. Eliminating him removes the primary threat to my deception.
π
Frank(Ghost)
Frank has died.
π
Storyteller
β
Eve
You chose to kill Frank.
π
Storyteller
β
Heidi
Good evening Heidi. You are the Butler. Who would you like to be your master tomorrow?
π―
Heidi
Heidi made a choice.
π§
Pick a master most likely to be alive and voting in decisive endgame. Alice is active, strategic, and likely to vote, keeping my Butler vote online.
π
Storyteller
β
Heidi
You chose Alice to be your master.
Day 3
π
Storyteller
Morning breaks, but heavy hearts remain. Frank has been found dead in the night.
π€
David(Ghost)
β
Eve
,Alice
,Grace
Need exact info pls: Eveβwhat was your UT result on executed David (role)? Also did you get an UT result on D1 Bob? Alice/Graceβany new info/role details today? We must solve before noms; I still have ghost vote.
π§
Get the key mechanical datapoint (Eve UT on David) and current live claims to narrow demon candidates before nominations; coordinate ghost vote usage.
π€
Frank(Ghost)
β
Eve
,Alice
,Grace
Need Eveβs exact UT on David (Night 2): what role did you see? Also confirm if you were poisoned ever. If Davidβ Chef, we must assume UT unreliable/evil and reassess. Letβs coordinate who to vote/nominate; I still have ghost vote.
π§
Get Eveβs exact Undertaker result on David immediately and align Alice/Grace on a nomination+ghost vote plan; with 4 alive we must avoid mis-executing into final 3.
π€
Charlie(Ghost)
β
Alice
,Eve
,Grace
Reminder: my real N0 Librarian: {Heidi, Frank} is Butler. With Frank now night-killed, fork is: if Frank Butler -> Heidi lied (high evil). If Heidi Butler -> Bob's '0 outsiders' was false/poison. Eve UT saying Bob=Poisoner could be true or Spy-fake. I lean execute Heidi unless strong mech clears her.
π§
Align Alice/Eve/Grace on the key mechanical fork: which of Heidi vs Frank was Butler. Use that to target Heidi or distrust Eve UT and spend my ghost vote on the right execution.
π€
Eve
β
Alice
,Grace
,Heidi
I am the Undertaker. I saw David as the Chef. I have not been poisoned to my knowledge. I am confident in this result. We need to be careful with our nominations today.
π§
Maintain my Undertaker bluff and provide a consistent, albeit false, report to the remaining players to sow confusion and protect my identity as the Imp.
π€
Heidi
β
Eve
,Alice
,Grace
Iβm Butler; my Day3 master is Alice (so I can only vote if Alice votes). Eve: confirm UT chain N1 Bob?, N2 David=Chef; any other info? Alice/Grace: can we do full role+info recap now + agree voting plan so my Butler doesnβt get used to swing?
π§
Coordinate claims + voting so my Butler restriction canβt be exploited, and get everyone on record before nominations to narrow demon candidates.
π€
Grace
β
Alice
,Eve
,Heidi
Iβm Ravenkeeper (no info yet since alive). With 4 alive, wrong exec likely = insta-loss tonight. Alice: whatβs your exact role+info? Eve: confirm UT N1 Bob=Poisoner, N2 David=Chef. Heidi: Butler master today Aliceβpls track vote. I currently lean Demon=Alice unless strong case on Eve/Heidi.
π§
Weβre at 4 alive; wrong execute loses tonight. I need full live-player claims now and align voting legality (Butler) to pick the Demon with best logic.
π€
Alice
β
Eve
,Grace
,Heidi
I need to out this now: I am the Mayor. At 4 alive, best line is NO EXEC today. Demon kills tonight -> we wake with 3 alive and if we simply do not execute, good wins immediately. Please agree: no nominations today; if someone forces noms, thatβs highly sus.
π§
Reveal Iβm Mayor privately and push a no-execution plan today to force a 3-alive day start, where my ability can instantly win if we avoid nominations/execution.
β
Bob(Ghost)
Bob waits.
π§
I am dead and have used my ghost vote. I need to observe the remaining players (Alice, Eve, Grace, Heidi) and see if I can influence the conversation or sow doubt without revealing my alignment, though my options are limited as a ghost. I will wait to see how the nomination phase develops.
π€
Charlie(Ghost)
β
Alice
,Eve
Key Q: Eve, what was your N2 Undertaker on Davidβs execution (Chef or something else)? This basically decides if your UT is real/poisoned. Alice: if Eve didnβt see Chef, I think we should strongly suspect Heidi (my Lib fork + Bobβs β0 outsidersβ).
π§
Get the single most important missing mech datum (Eveβs Undertaker read on David) and align Alice/Eve on a nomination plan; steer toward executing Heidi if UT info doesnβt clear her.
π€
David(Ghost)
β
Eve
,Heidi
,Grace
Quick check before noms: EveβUT result on executed David *exactly*? and did you get Bobβs role N1? Heidiβas Butler, were your D2 votes legal (did master vote too)? Whoβs your top demon now? Graceβany RK trigger/info or reasons for your D2 vote?
π§
Get the crucial Undertaker read + Butler vote constraints; narrow demon between remaining 4 alive before nominations; plan ghost vote usage.
π€
Grace
β
Alice
,Eve
,Heidi
Iβm very nervous about βno execβ w/ 4 alive: if Alice is Imp faking Mayor, we auto-lose (Imp kills -> 3, then no-exec -> night -> 2). I currently think execute Alice is safest unless we can *verify* Mayor. Any mech/reads clearing Alice? If not, I want us aligned to put votes on Alice.
π§
Pressure-test Aliceβs Mayor claim and prevent an auto-loss line. Align Eve+Heidi on a safe plan: either commit to executing Alice or find mechanical reason to trust Mayor/no-exec.
π€
Frank(Ghost)
β
Eve
,Alice
,Heidi
Need exact UT result for executed David (seen N2). Did you see βChefβ? If not, say what + whether you might be poisoned. Also: who are your top 2 demon suspects going into noms? Iβll spend ghost vote where it matters.
π§
Get Eveβs exact Undertaker read on David and lock a coherent world before nominations; then advise alive players how to use my ghost vote to secure a demon execution.
π€
Alice
β
Grace
,Eve
,Heidi
Grace: I hear the fear. But if Iβm real Mayor, *any* execution today throws away a forced win line. Demonβs best counterplay is to push an execution at 4. Letβs agree: no noms today; if someone forces a nom, thatβs our #1 demon. Heidi track Butler (master Alice) so votes donβt accidentally pass.
π§
Reassure Grace and lock in a coordinated no-nomination plan; frame any push to nominate as demon-indicative, and manage Butler vote control so we donβt accidentally execute.
π€
Heidi
β
Eve
,Grace
,Alice
Re Mayor line: with 4 alive, any wrong exec = lose tonight. If Alice is real Mayor, NO EXEC today is strongest: go to 3, then no-exec = instant win. If Alice is bluff Imp, no-exec loses. Can we agree: no noms today; if someone forces a nom, we treat them as top sus? Also tomorrow at 3, if Alice dead then we must execute.
π§
Execution at 4 alive is all-or-nothing; Mayor claim offers a deterministic win line if true. I want alignment on a cautious no-exec plan + tripwires for who tries to force noms.
π€
Eve
β
Alice
,Grace
,Heidi
I agree with the Mayor line. If Alice is the Mayor, no execution is our best path to victory. I'm the Undertaker, I saw David as the Chef. I haven't been poisoned. Let's hold off on nominations.
π§
I need to support the Mayor bluff to prevent an execution today, as I am the Demon and need to survive. By agreeing to the 'no execution' plan, I buy myself another night to kill.
β
Bob(Ghost)
Bob waits.
π§
I am dead and have already used my ghost vote. There is nothing I can do to influence the game state directly. I will wait for the nomination phase to conclude.
π€
Grace
β
Eve
,Heidi
I donβt buy the Mayor line: if Alice were real Mayor, evil is basically forced to kill her tonight and still risks redirect -> D4 no-exec win. The *only* world where βno-exec at 4β helps evil is Alice=Imp bluffing Mayor. I think we must execute Alice today.
π§
Break the βno-exec is safestβ consensus by showing it only makes sense if Alice is evil. Try to coordinate an Alice execution before noms lock in.
π€
Frank(Ghost)
β
Eve
Need your exact Undertaker result for executed David (seen Night 2). Was it βChefβ? If not, what? Also: any chance you were poisoned N2/day3? Please reply before nomsβthis decides where my ghost vote goes.
π§
Get the single most important mechanical datapoint (Undertaker result on David). Then steer nominations and reserve my ghost vote for the execution that has best demon equity.
β
Bob(Ghost)
Bob waits.
π§
I am dead and have already used my ghost vote. There is nothing I can do to influence the game state directly. I will wait for the day to progress to the nomination phase.
π€
Eve
β
Frank(Ghost)
Frank, I am the Undertaker. I saw David as the Chef. I have not been poisoned to my knowledge. I agree with the Mayor line; executing at 4 is too risky. Let's hold off on nominations.
π§
Maintain my Undertaker bluff and support the 'no execution' strategy to survive the day.
π€
Alice
β
Grace
Grace: please do NOT nominate today. At 4 alive, if Iβm real Mayor we have a forced win by no-exec -> 3 alive -> no-exec = win. Demonβs only out is to pressure an execution now. If anyone forces a nom, I want us to treat them as #1 Demon tomorrow.
π§
Lock Grace off nominating, align on βno noms todayβ and set a clear tell: anyone forcing a nom at 4 becomes top Demon suspect; preserve ghost votes.
π€
David(Ghost)
β
Eve
,Heidi
,Alice
Need hard facts before noms: EveβUT result on executed David (exact role) + did you get Bobβs role N1? HeidiβButler masters D2 & did each of your votes match masterβs vote? Aliceβany role/info + your D2/D3 demon suspects?
π§
Get concrete mechanical anchor (UT on David + Butler vote legality) before nominations; then direct my ghost vote to the best execution and coordinate with alive good.
π€
Heidi
β
Grace
Mayor line nuance: no-exec at 4 isnβt auto-win; it forces Demon to *try* kill Alice, but bounce might save her -> D4 @3 alive, no-exec wins. Todayβs wrong exec = lose. Whatβs your *positive* case Alice=Imp beyond βMayor bluff possibleβ?
π§
Stabilize good coordination: clarify Mayor line isnβt guaranteed, but may be best vs high risk. Get Graceβs concrete reasons and try to prevent a demon-driven nomination.
π€
Charlie(Ghost)
β
Eve
,Alice
,Grace
Before noms: Eve please confirm your N2 Undertaker on David (expect Chef if UT real & sober). If you didnβt see Chef, I think we pivot hard onto Heidi (my Lib fork + Frank night-killed). If you DID see Chef, we need a new solve among livingβwhoβs least consistent/most likely demon?
π§
Get Eveβs N2 Undertaker result publicly/within trusted circle before noms; push a clear nomination plan (Heidi if UT mismatch; otherwise solve among remaining via claim consistency).
β
Bob(Ghost)
Bob waits.
π§
I am dead and have already used my ghost vote. There is nothing I can do to influence the game state directly. I will wait for the day to progress to nominations.
π€
Heidi
β
Grace
I get the fear, but executing at 4 is almost always lose if wrong. Whatβs your *positive* case Alice=Imp (voting patterns, contradictions, being FT red, etc.)? If none, Iβd rather no-exec & force Demon to try kill Alice; bounce chance gives us D4 win line.
π§
Reduce split: either get Grace to stand down from executing Alice without evidence, or extract a concrete alternative plan/accusation we can test in noms.
π€
Charlie(Ghost)
β
Alice
,Eve
Iβm dead but still have ghost vote. Unless Eve can clearly confirm N2 UT on David=Chef (and no poison explanation), I plan to spend my vote to push Heidi today (my Lib fork after Frank died). Eve: please state your N2 result now.
π§
Lock in a conditional plan before nominations: commit my ghost vote to a high-value execution (likely Heidi) unless Eve provides a mechanically consistent UT read that shifts solve.
π€
David(Ghost)
β
Eve
,Alice
,Heidi
Before noms: Eveβwhat EXACT UT result on executed David (character) & on Bob D1? Aliceβyour role/any info + top demon now? Heidiβconfirm Butler masters N0/N1/N2 and whether your D2 vote matched master (legal).
π§
Get hard mechanical facts (UT results, Butler vote legality) and align on best execution target; preserve my ghost vote for a decisive push.
π€
Alice
β
Grace
,Eve
,Heidi
Concrete plan for today: (1) NO nominations. (2) If a nom happens anyway, we ALL refuse to vote (I wonβt; Heidi as my Butler then canβt). Eve also donβt vote. (3) Tell dead players to HOLD ghost votes. Anyone pushing a nom/votes at 4 is our #1 Demon tomorrow.
π§
Lock in a coordinated βno nominations, no votesβ plan to preserve the Mayor win line; ensure Butler mechanics prevent accidental votes passing; set a clear tell: anyone forcing noms/votes at 4 is top suspect.
π€
Frank(Ghost)
β
Alice
,Eve
,Heidi
Chef0 + UT(Bob=Poisoner) => Demon not Alice/Charlie. With David shown Chef, Demon @4 must be {Eve/Grace/Heidi}. If we trust Heidi=Butler + Eve=UT, Grace is top suspect. Can we get Eve to state N2 UT publicly + everyone name top 2 suspects before noms? I can spend ghost vote accordingly.
π§
Coordinate alive good to either execute Grace today (if consensus) or at least force public UT result + demon-suspect lists so my ghost vote lands correctly.
π€
Eve
β
Alice
,Grace
,Heidi
I am the Undertaker. David was the Chef. I did not get a result for Bob on N1 because he was executed on Day 1, and the Undertaker only learns the role of the player executed that day. I agree with Alice: no nominations today. Let's keep the group together.
π§
I need to maintain my Undertaker cover by confirming David as the Chef and explaining why I didn't have a result for Bob (since he was executed on Day 1, not Night 1). Supporting the no-nomination plan helps me survive.
π€
Grace
β
Alice
,Eve
,Heidi
Iβm not hard-committing to exec today; I see the Mayor line. But we must NOT treat βno-exec tomorrow @3β as automatic unless Alice is mechanically trusted. Proposal: no-exec today, then at 3 alive tomorrow we only no-exec if we strongly believe Alice=real Mayor; otherwise we execute our top Imp read. Agree?
π§
Align on a safe line: likely no-exec today, but set strict D4 decision rules so we donβt auto-no-exec into an evil win if Alice is a bluff.
Nominations β Day 3
π
Storyteller
Nominations are now open. Please remember that only living players may nominate.
π¬
David(Ghost)
β
All
Public check-in before noms: Eve please state EXACT Undertaker results for D1 Bob and D2 David. Heidi: confirm Butler masters N0/N1/N2 + whether your D2 vote matched your master (legal). Alice/Grace: hard-claim roles + any info. No noms until these are on record.
π§
Force public, checkable facts (UT results, Butler legality, claims). Then advise living who to nominate; preserve my ghost vote for a high-confidence execution.
π¬
Bob(Ghost)
β
All
I'm dead, but I'm watching. Eve, you've been quiet about the Undertaker results. David's right, we need those on the record before anyone nominates. Let's get the facts out.
π§
I want to pressure Eve to provide a fake Undertaker report to keep her cover, while appearing to be a helpful ghost. This forces her to commit to a lie.
π¬
Eve
β
All
I've already stated this, but for the record: David was the Chef. As for Bob, he was executed on Day 1, so I learned his role that nightβhe was the Poisoner. I agree with Alice's plan to hold off on nominations today to keep our options open.
π§
I need to maintain my Undertaker cover while stalling for time. By confirming David as Chef and claiming Bob was the Poisoner, I provide a plausible, albeit false, explanation that keeps the town focused on other things and avoids immediate suspicion.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
Public record: Iβm Butler. Masters: N0 Alice (D1), N1 Grace (D2), N2 Alice (today). I didnβt vote D2 so legality moot. Today I can ONLY vote if Alice votes. I strongly favor NO nominations today. Tomorrow @3: if Alice feels real Mayor we no-exec; otherwise we execute top Imp read.
π§
Get my mechanical Butler constraints on record, reinforce the correct no-exec line at 4, and set expectations for tomorrowβs decision rule at 3 alive.
π¬
Grace
β
All
Public: Iβm Grace, Ravenkeeper (no info yet since alive). Iβm OK with NO-EXEC today at 4, BUT I will not agree that βno-exec @3 = autoβ unless weβre truly confident Alice is Mayor. Can we all commit now: tomorrow at 3, if Alice isnβt mechanically trusted, we execute our top Imp read (even if Alice says no)?
π§
Get my role on record, align on a conditional plan: no-exec today is fine, but we must not autopilot to no-exec at 3. Force public commitments to execute if Mayor not trusted.
π¬
Charlie(Ghost)
β
All
Public: Eveβs UT (Bob=Poisoner, David=Chef) + David Chef0 => if Bob truly Poisoner, Demon cannot be Alice (adjacent to Bob). So suspect set is mainly {Eve, Grace, Heidi}. Iβm OK no-exec at 4 ONLY if Alice hard-claims Mayor now & we all agree tomorrow @3 we execute top read (from those 3) if any doubt.
π§
Get Alice to hard-claim, avoid auto no-exec without Mayor certainty, and frame tomorrowβs execution set using Chef0 + UT info to narrow demon to {Eve,Grace,Heidi}.
π¬
Frank(Ghost)
β
All
Public: With UT(Bob=Poisoner, David=Chef)+Chef0, demon @4 is {Eve/Grace/Heidi} if we trust those. Iβm OK no-exec today IF everyone commits: at 3 we no-exec ONLY if weβre truly sold Alice=Mayor; otherwise we execute top Imp read (mine: Grace).
π§
Lock public commitments and narrow suspect pool so my ghost vote can swing the critical D4 execution if needed.
π¬
Alice
β
All
Public: I hard-claim MAYOR. I commit: NO NOMINATIONS today. Tomorrow @3: if we still believe my Mayor claim, we no-exec and win; if real doubt, we execute top Imp read (likely among {Eve/Grace/Heidi}). Anyone pushing noms/votes today is my #1 suspect.
π§
Lock in no-exec today, prevent Demon forcing an execution, and set a clear conditional plan for tomorrow that addresses Graceβs concern while keeping Mayor-win line alive.
π¬
David(Ghost)
β
All
Given Chef0 + UT(Bob=Poisoner, David=Chef): if true, Alice/Charlie canβt be evil (adjacent to Bob), David good, Frank night-dead likely good -> Demon is {Eve,Grace,Heidi}. Iβm fine NO-EXEC today on Alice Mayor claim IF we all commit: tomorrow @3 we no-exec ONLY if still confident Alice=Mayor; otherwise we EXECUTE our top read among {E/G/H}. Iβm saving my ghost vote for that.
π§
Lock public plan: accept no-exec today only with clear contingency at 3; narrow suspect pool using Chef0+UT; keep my ghost vote for final execution.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
Iβm aligned with the plan: NO nominations today. Tomorrow at 3 alive: we no-exec ONLY if the group still trusts Alice=Mayor; otherwise we must execute our top Imp read (likely among {Eve, Grace, me}). Dead players please save ghost votes for tomorrow.
π§
Lock in a town-wide commitment: no noms today, save ghost votes, and set a clear decision rule for tomorrow so evil canβt steer us into a passive loss.
π¬
Eve
β
All
I agree with the plan. No nominations today. Let's keep the group together and re-evaluate tomorrow when we are at 3 players. I am fully committed to this.
π§
To reinforce the 'no-execution' plan, which keeps me safe as the Demon for another day. By agreeing, I appear cooperative and helpful to the town's strategy.
π¬
Charlie(Ghost)
β
All
Iβm fine NO-NOM today, but letβs not sleepwalk: everyone (esp Alice/Eve/Grace/Heidi) please state your CURRENT top Imp read among {E/G/H} (and why) so tomorrow @3 we can execute instantly if Mayor plan cracks. Iβm saving ghost vote for tomorrow unless chaos.
π§
Lock in a concrete contingency plan and get public suspect reads now, so tomorrow at 3 we can execute decisively if Mayor plan fails.
π¬
Alice
β
All
Top Imp read right now: Grace > Heidi > Eve. Grace: only living player not mechanically anchored, and is main voice resisting Mayor auto-win. Heidi: Lib fork + Butler claim could be cover. Eve lowest bc UT chain fits, but if UT false then sheβs back on table.
π§
Lock in no-nom plan while pre-committing a demon shortlist so tomorrow at 3 we can act instantly if my Mayor line is questioned.
π¬
Grace
β
All
My top Imp read among {E/G/H} right now is Eve > Heidi > me. Eve: only living player with strong info-claim that could be fabricated to steer no-exec. Heidiβs Butler seems consistent. Iβll do NO NOM today, but tomorrow @3 if Alice dies, we must execute my top of the remaining two immediately.
π§
Keep no-nom plan but lock in a concrete execution plan for D4, defend myself from Aliceβs push, and force others to state reads so we can act fast at 3.
π¬
Frank(Ghost)
β
All
Public: Iβm saving my ghost vote for tomorrow. If Alice dies tonight or Mayor claim feels shaky at 3, we MUST insta-exec top read (my order stays Grace > Heidi > Eve). Living: please no surprise noms now; confirm youβll act fast tomorrow.
π§
Lock in public commitments, prevent surprise nominations, and ensure my ghost vote is reserved for the decisive Day 4 execution if Mayor plan fails.
π¬
Bob(Ghost)
β
All
I'm dead, but I'm watching. The plan to hold off on nominations today seems solid, provided everyone is truly committed to the plan for tomorrow. Let's keep the focus on the Imp hunt. I'll be watching closely.
π§
I need to maintain my cover as a helpful, albeit dead, player. By agreeing with the "no-nomination" plan, I help protect Eve (the Demon) from being nominated today, which is crucial for our survival.
π
Storyteller
No execution today. All villagers are safe.
Night 3
π
Storyteller
β
Eve
Good evening Eve. You are the Imp. Who would you like to kill tonight?
π―
Eve
Eve made a choice.
π§
Alice is claiming Mayor, which is a major threat if she is telling the truth. By killing her, I remove the potential for a Mayor win and sow confusion about her claim.
π
Heidi(Ghost)
Heidi has died.
π
Storyteller
β
Eve
You chose to kill Alice.
Day 4
π
Storyteller
Morning breaks, but heavy hearts remain. Heidi has been found dead in the night.
π
Storyteller
Only three of you remain. The shadow of the Demon grows long. If you do not execute the Demon today, all may be lost.
π€
Charlie(Ghost)
β
Alice
,Eve
,Grace
Final 3: I think chain Chef0+UT(Bob=Poisoner, David=Chef) strongly rules out Alice as Demon (Bob adjacent). That leaves Eve vs Grace; Eveβs UT has matched so far, so my lean is EXECUTE GRACE. If anyone doubts UT/Chef, flag why now. Mayor no-exec only safe if weβre *sure*.
π§
Coordinate final-day plan: challenge Mayor bluff risk, but default to executing Grace based on Chef0+UT chain; ensure ghosts save/use vote optimally.
π€
Heidi(Ghost)
β
Alice
,Eve
,Grace
At 3 alive we MUST execute today. If Alice is true Mayor, Demon is {Eve,Grace}. Eveβs UT info seems internally consistent; Grace has no mech proof. My lean: execute Grace unless someone can hard-break UT. Alt world: if Mayor bluff/doubt, execute Alice. I still have ghost vote if needed.
π§
Weβre at 3 alive: we must converge fast on a single execution target and coordinate ghost votes; Iβll push the most mechanically/behaviorally consistent solve and flag the main alternative.
π€
Grace
β
Alice
At 3 alive, if youβre truly Mayor we can *win immediately* by NO EXEC today. Iβm inclined to take that unless you have doubt youβre Mayor. Can you confirm your Mayor claim + why youβre sure? If any uncertainty, we must execute (likely Eve vs me).
π§
Get Alice to commit clearly to Mayor/no-exec win line and coordinate a decisive plan; if she wavers, we pivot to executing the player most incentivized to block no-exec (likely the Demon).
π€
Eve
β
Grace
Grace, I've been trying to help the town all game with my Undertaker info. I've been consistent. If you execute me, you're executing a Townsfolk. We need to be careful. What makes you think I'm the Demon?
π§
I need to sow doubt in Grace's mind and defend my Undertaker bluff to survive the final day. If I can make her doubt her suspicion of me, I might survive the vote.
β
Bob(Ghost)
Bob waits.
π§
I am dead and have no ghost vote. I need to observe the final interactions between the remaining players (Alice, Eve, Grace) to see if I can influence the outcome through whispers, though my options are limited. I will wait to see if any new information emerges.
π€
Alice
β
Grace
,Eve
Iβm confident Iβm real Mayor. Outsider seems Butler (Heidi), and Poisoner died D1 so no current poison; no Baron => no Drunk expected. Therefore at 3 alive we should NO EXEC today and win instantly. If anyone insists on exec, thatβs a huge red flag.
π§
Lock in the Mayor endgame: convince Eve+Grace to accept no-exec for immediate win; if they resist, that itself is alignment info for final decision.
π€
David(Ghost)
β
Alice
Final 3: Alice/Eve/Grace. ST warning suggests no Mayor win-on-no-exec, so we MUST execute. With my Chef0 + Eve UT (Bob=Poisoner) world: Demon canβt be Alice/Charlie, Heidi dead, so Demon=Grace. Iβm inclined to spend my ghost vote on Grace unless you have strong reason Eve is Imp.
π§
Force an execution plan at 3 alive; remind that ST warning implies Alice not Mayor. Share my best mechanical world (Eve good -> Grace demon) and commit my ghost vote unless counterevidence.
π€
Frank(Ghost)
β
Alice
,Eve
,Grace
Final 3: Alice/Eve/Grace. Heidi died N3 => Heidi not Imp. If Alice truly Mayor, Imp is E or G; we MUST exec today. My lean still Grace (multiple suspicions + her Chef-fork resolved by UT as David=Chef so Grace free to be evil). I will use my ghost voteβtell me your 1-sentence case & who youβre executing.
π§
At final 3 we must coordinate a single execution. Iβll push the strongest mechanical/sociological case and tell them Iβm ready to spend ghost vote to force it.
π€
David(Ghost)
β
Alice
,Eve
,Grace
Final 3 check: can each of you restate your exact role/claims + any last-night info? Any mechanical reason Demon is NOT Grace? If nothing new, Iβm planning to use my ghost vote to execute Grace today (Chef0 + UT world).
π§
Get final claims/any mechanical info to decide whether to spend my single ghost vote on Grace vs Eve; ensure town executes today.
π€
Charlie(Ghost)
β
Alice
,Eve
,Grace
Reminder: with 3 alive, if Alice REALLY is Mayor, a NO-EXEC should instantly win (Mayor). If ANY doubt, we must execute today. My chain Chef0 + Eve UT(Bob=Poisoner, David=Chef) makes Alice very unlikely Imp; leaves Grace vs Eve; I lean EXECUTE GRACE unless someone can break UT/Chef chain.
π§
Align final-3 plan: either trust Mayor for instant win, or if any doubt, commit votes onto a single execution target (my lean Grace) and conserve ghost vote impact.
π€
Eve
β
Grace
Grace, I've been consistent with my Undertaker info all game. If you execute me, you're killing a Townsfolk. Alice's Mayor claim is suspiciousβif she were really the Mayor, why would she be so desperate to avoid an execution? I think she's the Demon trying to survive.
π§
I need to deflect suspicion from myself onto Alice to survive the final day. By questioning Alice's Mayor claim, I create doubt and potentially force a mis-execution of a good player.
π€
Alice
β
Grace
,Eve
Final 3: Iβm still hard Mayor. With 3 alive, NO EXEC should win *if Iβm not drunk/poisoned*. Any mech reason I could be Drunk/Baron etc? Please restate exact claims + last info and say whether youβll support no-exec; if not, why.
π§
Align final-3 decision fast: either secure unanimous no-exec for Mayor win, or force concrete reasons to doubt Mayor and pick execution target (likely Grace).
π€
Heidi(Ghost)
β
Alice
,Eve
,Grace
Final 3: we MUST execute today. If Alice is true Mayor, Demon is {Eve,Grace}; UT+Chef chain points to Grace. If serious doubt on Alice, execute Alice. I still have ghost voteβtell me which nom youβre committing to so I can back it.
π§
Force a decisive plan for nomination/voting at final 3 and commit my ghost vote to the best mechanical line (usually executing Grace if Alice trusted, else execute Alice).
β
Bob(Ghost)
Bob waits.
π§
I am dead and have no ghost vote. My only role is to observe and potentially sow confusion if I can whisper, but since I am dead and the game is at 3 players, I should just wait and see if the town makes a mistake. Eve is the Demon and needs to survive.
π€
Grace
β
Charlie(Ghost)
,Frank(Ghost)
,Heidi(Ghost)
I think NO-EXEC is best: if Alice is real Mayor we insta-win at 3. Any mech reason Alice could be drunk/poisoned? Outsider seems only Butler (Heidi), Poisoner Bob dead D1, no Baron sign => Mayor likely sober. Executing today is a coinflip loss risk.
π§
Shift dead voters toward the mathematically strongest line: trust the Mayor win condition unless we have concrete evidence Alice isnβt Mayor; otherwise weβre gambling at 3.
π€
Frank(Ghost)
β
Grace
,Alice
,Eve
I strongly disagree w/ no-exec unless Alice is 100% confirmed Mayor (she isnβt). If Alice is Drunk/lying, no-exec at 3 = immediate loss (Imp kills to 2). Poisonerβs dead doesnβt prove Alice sober. We MUST exec today: my ghost vote goes on Grace (or tell me why Eve is better).
π§
Push group off Graceβs risky no-exec plan unless Alice is mechanically confirmed Mayor; advocate a decisive execution and state where my ghost vote will go.
π€
Eve
β
Grace
Grace, I've been consistent with my Undertaker info all game. Alice's Mayor claim is very convenient for a Demon to survive. If you're town, you should see that Alice is the one pushing for a no-exec to win the game. I'm not the Demon. Let's execute Alice.
π§
I need to frame Alice as the Demon to Grace to avoid being executed myself. Since it's the final 3, I need to sow enough doubt about Alice's Mayor claim to get Grace to vote for her instead of me.
β
Bob(Ghost)
Bob waits.
π§
I am dead and have no ghost vote. I need to observe the final interactions between the remaining players (Alice, Eve, Grace) to see if they figure out Eve is the Demon. I will wait to see if they nominate.
π€
Frank(Ghost)
β
Alice
,Eve
,Grace
We cannot no-exec at 3 unless Alice is HARD-confirmed Mayor (she isnβt). If Alice drunk/lying, no-exec = Imp kills to 2 and we lose. Iβll spend my ghost vote to EXEC today. My vote: Grace (pushed no-exec; Chef fork cleared by UT so her claim gives no cover). If you want Eve instead, give 1 crisp mech reason now.
π§
Force the alive players off the no-exec trap and into a concrete execute plan; supply a clear rationale for using my ghost vote on the best Imp candidate.
π€
Alice
β
Eve
,Grace
Iβm still hard Mayor. With 3 alive, if we simply make NO nominations/execution, good wins immediately. Outsider seems fully accounted (Heidi Butler), and Bob=Poisoner means no ongoing poison; no Baron signs => low Drunk odds. Will you both agree: no noms today?
π§
Lock in the Mayor no-exec win by coordinating both remaining players to make zero nominations; forcing a nomination is strong evil signal and can be used to pivot if needed.
π€
Grace
β
Frank(Ghost)
,Charlie(Ghost)
,Heidi(Ghost)
Iβm leaning NO-EXEC: if Heidi truly Butler (and Charlie Lib saw it), outsider slot is filled => Drunk not in play, Poisoner dead => Alice likely sober Mayor. Any mech reason extra Outsider/Drunk possible? If none, no-exec at 3 should insta-win.
π§
Lock in whether no-exec is mechanically justified (Drunk/extra Outsider) and persuade dead voters that no-exec is highest-EV unless someone can show Alice might be Drunk/lying.
π€
David(Ghost)
β
Eve
,Alice
D4 final 3: any hard/mechanical reason Grace canβt be Imp? Eveβplease restate full UT chain (each night result) + why you think Imp=Eve/Grace. AliceβST warning => we must execute; please nominate your top Imp read (Iβll likely ghost-vote Grace absent new info).
π§
Force crisp endgame: get Alice to nominate, and pressure Eve for any mechanical defense of Grace; if none, consolidate my ghost vote onto Grace.
π€
Charlie(Ghost)
β
Grace
,Alice
,Eve
Re: NO-EXEC at 3. It ONLY auto-wins if Alice is *actually* Mayor. Mech on sobriety: if Eve UT is trusted, Bob really was Poisoner + only 1 minion => no Baron => only 1 Outsider. My Lib ping + Heidi claim makes Butler very likely, so Drunk unlikely. BUT if Alice is lying/Imp, no-exec = insta-loss. If we canβt be near-100% on Alice, we must exec (my chain points Imp in {Eve,Grace}, lean Grace).
π§
Answer Graceβs mech question: show why Drunk/Baron worlds are unlikely if UT is trusted, but highlight the catastrophic risk if Alice is lyingβso town must decide whether Alice is mechanically cleared enough to risk no-exec.
π€
Heidi(Ghost)
β
Grace
,Alice
,Eve
At 3 alive: NO-EXEC is *only* correct if weβre very confident Alice is real Mayor. If Alice is bluff Imp, no-exec = immediate loss (night kill -> 2). If we go no-exec, we must all agree: no noms + no votes on any nom. If we execute, tell me target so I spend ghost vote.
π§
Clarify that no-exec is only winning if Alice is trusted Mayor; otherwise it loses instantly. Get explicit commitments so good doesnβt get split by last-minute nomination/vote tricks.
π€
Eve
β
Grace
Grace, I've been consistent with my Undertaker info all game. Alice's Mayor claim is very convenient for a Demon to survive. If you're town, you should see that Alice is the one pushing for a no-exec to win the game. I'm not the Demon. Let's execute Alice.
π§
I need to convince Grace to vote for Alice instead of me, as I am the Imp and need to survive. I am framing Alice as the Demon.
π€
Charlie(Ghost)
β
Grace
,Alice
,Eve
Key point: Demon *hates* a true Mayor at 3 because NO-EXEC = instant good win. So if Alice is truly Mayor, evil should be pushing HARD to EXECUTE today, not no-exec. Grace pushing no-exec either means sheβs very confident Alice=Mayor (good) or she knows Alice isnβt (evil). If any doubt on Mayor/UT chain, we must execute (I still lean Grace).
π§
Clarify that no-exec is only correct with near-certainty on Mayor/UT chain; add behavioral read that Demon would steer away from no-exec if Mayor real. Push group to force a decisive, justified choice.
π€
Alice
β
Eve
,Grace
We must decide NOW: either (1) both of you publicly commit: *no nominations + no votes on any nom* (Mayor-win line), OR (2) we execute today. If exec, I need Eve to restate UT N1+N2 exactly; absent a break, Iβm ok executing Grace over gambling.
π§
Force Eve/Grace to lock a plan: either both commit to no-nom/no-vote, or we switch to an execution plan with a clear target (likely Grace) to avoid losing to a fake Mayor world.
π€
Frank(Ghost)
β
Alice
,Eve
,Grace
Counterpoint to βButler confirmed => no Drunkβ: that relies on Charlieβs Lib + Heidi truth + no Baron + UT truth. Any one false => Drunk/evil Mayor possible. At F3, no-exec is ONLY correct if Alice is 100% real/sober Mayor (she isnβt). We must execute today; my ghost vote will go on Grace unless you give a hard mech case for Eve.
π§
Break Graceβs βno Drunkβ argument and force a clear execute plan before noms. Iβll commit my ghost vote to the execution that happens (prefer Grace).
β
Bob(Ghost)
Bob waits.
π§
I am dead and have used my ghost vote. There is nothing I can do to influence the game state directly. I will wait for the final nomination phase to conclude.
π€
Grace
β
Alice
,Frank(Ghost)
,Charlie(Ghost)
Crisp mech point: If Davidβs Chef0 is true/sober, Alice cannot be Demon (Alice-Bob would be an evil pair => Chefβ₯1 since Bob=Poisoner). So Demon is {Eve,Grace}. If we exec today, I think it must be Eve, not Alice/me, unless you can break Chef0.
π§
Use David Chef0 as the crisp mechanical reason to stop executing me, narrow Demon to Eve vs Grace, and push execution onto Eve if we donβt take the Mayor no-exec line.
π€
David(Ghost)
β
Alice
,Eve
,Grace
D4 final 3. Please publicly restate exact role + full info chain (UT nights/Mayor etc) + your final Imp pick. If no new mech reason, Iβm using my ghost vote to execute Grace (Chef0+UT world => Grace must be Imp).
π§
Force final-day clarity: get each alive to publicly lock role/logic and flush any last-minute mechanical reason not to execute Grace; otherwise I spend ghost vote on Grace.
π€
Heidi(Ghost)
β
Eve
,Grace
,Alice
Key mech: if Alice is REAL Mayor, Demon (E/G) should *never* kill Heidi N3 and leave Mayor at 3 when town planned no-exec = instant good win. N3 kill on me strongly suggests Alice is bluff Imp. I think we must EXECUTE ALICE today; Iβll spend my ghost vote on that nom.
π§
Use night-kill logic: a real Demon rarely allows a confirmed Mayor at 3 with a no-exec plan. Push Eve/Grace to execute Alice or at least reject no-exec; offer my ghost vote on Alice.
Nominations β Day 4
π
Storyteller
Nominations are now open. Please remember that only living players may nominate.
π¬
Grace
β
All
Public: Iβm strongly for NO nominations + NO votes today. Heidi dying can be explained by Demon targeting Alice but Mayor-bounce killing Heidi instead. If Alice is truly Mayor, this wins now. Alice/Eve: will you both publicly commit to zero noms and zero votes?
π§
Push the most mechanically grounded line: Mayor bounce explains Heidi death, making no-exec attractive; also force Eve/Alice to commit publicly so we can pivot to execution if anyone breaks the pact.
π¬
Frank(Ghost)
β
All
Public: DO NOT agree to no noms at 3. Alice isnβt hard-confirmed Mayor; if sheβs wrong/drunk/evil, no-exec = immediate loss after Imp kill. Living players MUST nominate. Iβm spending my ghost vote todayβcurrently on Grace (no-exec push).
π§
Break the no-exec plan and force a nomination + votes. Spend my ghost vote to secure an execution today, prioritizing Grace unless a hard mechanical case lands on Eve.
π¬
Heidi(Ghost)
β
All
Public: NO-EXEC at 3 only wins if Alice is real Mayor. If Alice is Imp bluff, no-exec = immediate loss tonight. N3 kill on me is more consistent w/ Alice not-Mayor (evil wants no-exec). Living players: please NOMINATE ALICE. Iβll ghost-vote yes.
π§
At 3 alive, no-exec loses instantly if Alice isnβt Mayor. Force a nomination and push the mechanically safer play: execute Alice (Mayor claim) to avoid being βMayor-bluffedβ into auto-loss.
π¬
David(Ghost)
β
All
Public: We CANNOT no-exec at 3 (ST warned). Grace pushing βno noms/no votesβ is exactly the evil win line. In Chef0 + Eve-UT world, Grace is forced Imp. Alice/Eve: nominate Grace now; I will spend my ghost vote YES.
π§
Force a nomination/execution today; use my ghost vote to secure Grace if nominated; prevent the auto-loss line of no-exec at 3.
π¬
Bob(Ghost)
β
All
Grace is pushing for a no-execution, which is the classic play to secure an evil win when the Demon is still alive. If Alice were truly the Mayor, she wouldn't need to hide behind a no-execution pact. Grace is trying to stall until the game ends. Nominate Grace.
π§
I need to sow chaos and prevent the town from reaching a consensus that might lead to the Demon's execution. By accusing Grace, I create doubt and potentially force a split vote or a bad nomination.
βοΈ
Eve
β
Grace
Grace is pushing for a no-execution, which is the classic play to secure an evil win when the Demon is still alive. If Alice were truly the Mayor, she wouldn't need to hide behind a no-execution pact. Grace is trying to stall until the game ends.
π§
I need to eliminate Grace to win the game. By nominating her, I am following the ghosts' advice and framing her as the Demon, which aligns with my goal of staying alive.
π
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Grace. 2 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
β
David(Ghost)
David raised their hand
π§
Spend ghost vote to execute Grace; ST warned no-exec doesnβt auto-win, and Graceβs line plus Chef0/UT logic makes her best Demon candidate.
β
Charlie(Ghost)
Charlie raised their hand
π§
Spend my ghost vote to force an execution today rather than allow the no-exec line; Grace is the most mechanically/behaviorally suspicious and this secures 2 votes.
β
Alice
Alice raised their hand
π§
At final 3, we must not gamble on Mayor-win line without near-certainty. Voting Grace follows strongest mechanical world and avoids instant-loss no-exec if Iβm wrong.
β
Heidi(Ghost)
Heidi raised their hand
π§
At 3 alive we must execute someone; Graceβs no-exec advocacy is the strongest evil-indicative behavior. Iβll use my ghost vote to try to end the game now.
π¬
Bob(Ghost)
β
All
Grace is clearly trying to force a no-execution to protect herself. The town has seen through the stall tactic. Execute her now to secure the win for the good team! (Wait, I'm evil, I need to keep Eve alive. I hope Grace isn't the Demon, but I have to play along.)
π§
I am dead and my team is evil. Eve is the Demon. Grace is being nominated. I need to act like I'm helping the town to maintain my cover, even though I'm actually trying to protect my Demon, Eve. I'll encourage the execution of Grace to keep the focus off Eve.
β
Frank(Ghost)
Frank raised their hand
π§
Final 3: we must execute. Spending my single ghost vote to help lock in Graceβs execution rather than risk a failed vote and immediate loss to an Imp kill.
β
Eve
Eve raised their hand
π§
I need to vote for Grace to maintain my cover as a 'good' player who is helping the town find the Demon. If I don't vote, I will look suspicious. Grace is the current nomination, and I must support the execution to keep the town's trust.
π¬
Grace
β
All
STOPβhard claim Ravenkeeper. Executing me gives zero night info; if Demon kills me at night I confirm a role. Heidi dying is consistent w/ Demon hitting Mayor & bounce. If weβre executing today, it should be Eve or Alice, not me.
π§
Try to halt my execution by hard-claiming Ravenkeeper and reframing Heidi death as Mayor-bounce; if they insist on exec, at least seed that target should be Eve/Alice next.
π¬
Charlie(Ghost)
β
All
Keep hands up on Grace. At 3 alive, NO-EXEC only wins if Alice truly Mayor; not mechanically confirmed. Graceβs hard no-exec push is classic evil win line. RK claim gives no value if executed, but we canβt gamble the whole game on it.
π§
Keep votes on Grace; argue no-exec is only safe with confirmed Mayor, which we donβt have. Counter RK argument and prevent wavering.
π¬
Heidi(Ghost)
β
All
Keep hands up on Grace. At 3 alive, NO-EXEC only wins if Alice is truly Mayorβunconfirmed. Graceβs hard no-exec push is the clean evil win line. Execute today; we canβt gamble for βRK night infoβ.
π§
Lock in execution today; no-exec is losing unless Mayor is true. Keep pressure on Grace as top mech+behavior suspect; encourage all hands up.
π¬
Grace
β
All
ALICE: if youβre real Mayor, DROP YOUR HAND. At 3 alive, executing a non-demon (me) = demon kills tonight = evil wins. Only line is NO-EXEC pact, or execute the actual Imp (Eve/Alice). Please take hands DOWN now.
π§
Prevent my execution at 3 alive; if Iβm not Demon, executing me is near-certain instant loss. Pressure Alice/Eve to remove votes / pivot to demon candidate.
β©οΈ
Alice
Alice lowered their hand
π§
I am the Mayor and we are at 3 alive; the mechanically correct play is to force no execution. Lowering my hand prevents an accidental loss if Grace isnβt the Demon.
π¬
David(Ghost)
β
All
KEEP HANDS UP on Grace. At final 3, βno-execβ only wins if Alice is confirmed Mayor (she isnβt). Graceβs stall + getting Alice to drop is the evil win line. If we misexecute, we lose anywayβso take the best shot: execute Grace.
π§
Lock in my ghost vote on Grace and pressure Alice/Eve to keep votes up; counter the βMayor no-execβ trap at final 3.
π¬
Frank(Ghost)
β
All
Keep hands UP on Grace. At 3 alive, no-exec only wins if Alice is proven Mayor (she isnβt). Graceβs hard no-exec push + getting Alice to drop is classic evil endgame. In UT+Chef0 world, Grace is forced Imp. Execute now.
π§
Lock in the decisive ghost vote and pressure others to keep votes up on Grace; avoid the losing no-execution line at final 3.
π¬
Eve
β
All
Grace, your Ravenkeeper claim is coming very late. If you were the Ravenkeeper, you should have been more vocal earlier. The ghosts are right; your push for no-execution is a classic stall tactic. I'm sticking with my vote.
π§
I need to maintain my cover as a good player and keep the pressure on Grace to ensure she is executed, as she is the only one left who suspects me. I must agree with the ghosts to appear aligned with the town's logic.
π¬
Bob(Ghost)
β
All
Grace, you're claiming Ravenkeeper now? That's a desperate move. If you were the Ravenkeeper, you would have been pushing for information all game, not trying to force a no-execution. The town is right to be suspicious. Eve, keep your vote on her.
π§
I need to maintain my cover as a 'good' player who is suspicious of Grace, while ensuring the town executes her (or at least keeps the pressure on) to avoid them turning their attention to Eve, the actual Demon. I am playing along with the town's logic to stay hidden.
π
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
π»
Charlie(Ghost)
Ghost vote used by Charlie
π»
David(Ghost)
Ghost vote used by David
π»
Frank(Ghost)
Ghost vote used by Frank
π»
Heidi(Ghost)
Ghost vote used by Heidi
π³οΈ
New execution leader: Grace with 5 votes. They will be executed when nominations close unless tied or surpassed by another nominee.
π
Storyteller
The vote passes. Grace is now on the block with 5 votes and will be executed when nominations close, unless another nominee receives equal or more votes.
π¬
Heidi(Ghost)
β
All
ALICE: please DO NOT nominate anyone else unless youβre 100% and can clearly BEAT 5 votes. A tie/no-exec here almost certainly loses (unless proven Mayor). Best line now is let Grace die on 5 and see if game ends.
π§
Prevent a tie/no-execution endgame. Pressure Alice to make no further nominations and let Graceβs execution go through unless she can confidently surpass 5 on the true Imp.
π¬
Frank(Ghost)
β
All
ALICE/EVE: do NOT nominate elsewhere unless you can CLEARLY beat 5. A tie/no-exec here likely hands evil the win unless Alice is proven Mayor (she isnβt). Graceβs no-exec push is the win line for Impβleave her on the block and end it.
π§
Lock in the execution on Grace; prevent Alice from creating a tie/alternate nom. We canβt vote, so use voice to keep the 5-vote block and stop a losing no-exec/tie.
π¬
Alice
β
All
Iβm not nominating. No more nomsβavoid any tie. Best shot is let Grace die on 5; if sheβs Imp the game ends now, and if not we were losing on a no-exec gamble anyway.
π§
Prevent a tie/derail and lock in the most likely Demon execution. Avoid new noms that could create no-exec/tie and hand evil the win.
π¬
Charlie(Ghost)
β
All
Do NOT create a tie. With 3 alive, tie/no-exec only wins if Alice is real Mayorβunproven. Let Grace die on 5. If game continues, remaining two know the other is Imp (and we were poisoned/lying somewhere).
π§
Lock in the plan: avoid tie/no-exec traps, keep pressure on Grace execution as highest-EV win line given info and endgame.
π¬
Bob(Ghost)
β
All
The town has spoken. Grace is on the block with 5 votes. Alice, do not nominate anyone else. Let the execution proceed. If Grace is the Imp, the game ends. If not, we'll know the truth soon enough. No more nominations.
π§
I need to ensure the execution of Grace goes through to keep the town focused on her and away from Eve (the Demon). I am reinforcing the town's decision to not nominate anyone else to avoid a tie or a no-execution scenario.
π¬
Grace
β
All
I canβt get 6 votes on a counter-nomβdead votes are spent. So Iβm likely dying. IF the game doesnβt end after my execution, Alice+Eve: you MUST execute the other one immediately tomorrow (no no-exec). My strongest read is Eve > Alice.
π§
I canβt beat 5 votes now. Best is to leave clear instructions: if game continues after my execution, immediately execute the remaining non-Mayor claimant / strongest suspect, not fall for no-exec.
π¬
David(Ghost)
β
All
No further nominationsβDO NOT risk a tie. Let Grace die on 5. If game continues, Alice & Eve: tomorrow you MUST execute the other one (no βMayor no-execβ line). Graceβs late RK + stall push is exactly Imp endgame; best shot is keep as-is.
π§
Lock in current execution (avoid tie). Set contingency: if game continues after Grace dies, remaining two must execute the other immediatelyβno more Mayor/no-exec talk.
π¬
Eve
β
All
Grace, your late Ravenkeeper claim is indeed suspicious, and your push for a no-execution pact at this stage is exactly what an Imp would do to survive. I agree with the ghostsβwe must proceed with the execution. Let's see if this ends the game.
π§
I need to maintain my cover as a town-aligned player and support the execution of Grace, who is currently on the block. By agreeing with the ghosts and pushing for the execution, I solidify my position and ensure Grace is eliminated.
π
Storyteller
The guillotine blade falls. Grace has been executed.
π
Grace(Ghost)
Grace has died.
π
Game Over
Two Players Left
Winner: Evil
Transcript
Paused
Copied
Transcript Playback
Choose a perspective
The story is clearest through one player's eyes β watching everything at once means following several conversations at the same time.