Game Detail
Players
Alice (Imp) Bob (Virgin) Charlie (Librarian) David (Scarlet Woman) Eve (Monk) Frank (Ravenkeeper) Grace (Recluse) Heidi (Slayer)
Token Usage
| Team | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Cost (USD) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Evil | 160,275 | 18,142 | $0.5345 |
| Good | 486,619 | 38,265 | $0.3581 |
Event Transcript
π
The game has started.
π
Storyteller
β
David
You are the Minion. The Demon is Alice.
π
Storyteller
β
Alice
Minions are: David. Your safe bluffs are: Fortune Teller, Soldier, Butler
π
Storyteller
β
Charlie
Good evening Charlie. You are the Librarian. Either Frank or Grace is the Recluse.
Day 1
π
Storyteller
Welcome to the village of Ravenswood Bluff. Please take this time to get to know your fellow villagers. Feel free to move around and have private conversations. Be wary, for a Demon hides among you!
π€
Grace
β
Frank
Hey Frank, I'm the Recluse. Just wanted to let you know early so if any info comes out about me registering as evil, you know why. What's your role?
π§
I want to establish trust with my neighbor Frank by being honest about my Outsider role (Recluse) early on. This helps explain any 'evil' pings I might cause for roles like Empath or Investigator.
π€
Bob
β
Alice
Hey Alice, I'm the Virgin. If you're a Townsfolk and want to prove yourself (and me), you should nominate me later today. It'll execute you, but it confirms us both as good. What's your role?
π§
I want to establish a trust bond with my neighbor Alice and use my Virgin ability to confirm two players as good early on.
π€
Charlie
β
Frank
Hey Frank, I'm the Librarian. My info says either you or Grace is the Recluse. Are you the Recluse? Grace just whispered to you, did she claim anything?
π§
I want to verify my Librarian information privately with Frank. Since Grace whispered to him first, I want to see if their stories align or if one of them is claiming the Outsider role I saw.
π€
Frank
β
Charlie
Hey Charlie, Grace actually just whispered to me and claimed Recluse. That matches your Librarian info perfectly. I'm a Townsfolk role, but I'm going to bluff as something else publicly to try and get targeted tonight. Let's keep this between us for now.
π§
Confirm Charlie's Librarian info while keeping my Ravenkeeper role hidden to encourage the Demon to kill me.
π€
Alice
β
Bob
Iβm leaning Fortune Teller. Iβm not super keen to be the one to test Virgin (if it fails itβs awful for me). Have you told anyone else youβre Virgin / do you have a preferred Townsfolk to nom you for confirmation?
π§
Deflect Bobβs request, maintain a plausible Townsfolk bluff (FT), and extract info on who else is coordinating with him while steering tests away from me.
π€
Heidi
β
Alice
Hey Alice, I'm the Slayer. Any early info or vibes? Bob whispered to you, anything interesting?
π§
I want to establish a connection with my neighbor Alice and see if Bob shared any useful information. As Slayer, I'm a high-value target, but I need info to use my shot effectively.
π€
Eve
β
David
Hey David, I'm the Monk. I'm looking for someone trustworthy to protect tonight. Have you heard any interesting claims or have a role you're willing to share?
π§
I want to establish a connection with my neighbor David and see if he's willing to share information. As the Monk, I need to find a high-value target to protect.
π€
David
β
Eve
Heyβhavenβt heard many claims yet. Iβm going to soft-share: Iβm Washerwoman and my ping was that *either Alice or Heidi* is the Fortune Teller. If thatβs true, Alice is a great protect tonight (strong info role).
π§
Build trust with Eve and nudge a Monk protect onto Alice (the Demon), while giving myself a plausible Townsfolk claim to use later to defend Alice.
π€
Grace
β
Heidi
Hey Heidi, I'm the Recluse. Just letting my neighbors know early because I might register as evil to some roles. What are you thinking so far?
π§
I want to establish trust with my other neighbor, Heidi, and disclose my Recluse status early to mitigate the impact of any 'evil' pings I might cause.
π€
Bob
β
Alice
Fair enough, Fortune Teller is too valuable to lose. I haven't told anyone else yet. I'll look for a less 'active' Townsfolk like a Soldier or Mayor to test me. If you find any 'red' pings tonight, let me know! Who do you trust so far?
π§
I want to maintain a good relationship with Alice while respecting her reluctance to sacrifice a powerful role like Fortune Teller. I also want to start gathering her reads.
π€
Charlie
β
Grace
Hey Grace, I'm the Librarian. My info says either you or Frank is the Recluse. Frank mentioned you claimed Recluse to him. Is that true? I'm looking to confirm my info so we can narrow down the evil team.
π§
I want to confirm Grace's claim directly to verify my Librarian information and establish a connection with a potential Outsider. If she confirms, it validates my info and Frank's honesty.
π€
Frank
β
Grace
Hey Grace, Charlie just whispered to me and said his Librarian info points to either you or me being the Recluse. Since you already told me you're the Recluse, that confirms Charlie's info. I'm a Townsfolk role, but I'm going to bluff publicly to draw the Demon's attention.
π§
I want to build trust with Grace by confirming Charlie's Librarian info, which matches her claim. This solidifies a small circle of trust (Charlie-Frank-Grace) and allows me to coordinate my Ravenkeeper bluff.
π€
Alice
β
Heidi
No solid info yetβIβm leaning Fortune Teller (will have N1 result later). Only interesting thing: Bob told me heβs the Virgin and wanted a Townsfolk to nom him to confirm. Could be true, but Iβd treat it cautiously until tested. Vibes: David/Eve are very chatty; nothing else firm.
π§
Maintain my FT bluff, seed caution about Bobβs Virgin claim to Heidi, and subtly steer Slayer away from shooting me/David while creating future misexecution lines.
π€
Heidi
β
Grace
Thanks for the heads up, Grace. I'm the Slayer. If you're the Recluse, that's good to know for any Empath/Fortune Teller info. Have you heard anything from Charlie or Frank? They've been whispering a lot.
π§
I want to build trust with my neighbor Grace and gather more information about the other players' claims. Since she claimed Recluse (an Outsider), it's a relatively safe claim for her to make early, but I need to see if she's consistent.
π€
Eve
β
Alice
Hey Alice, David mentioned you might be the Fortune Teller (via his Washerwoman ping). If that's true, I'm the Monk and can protect you tonight. Can you confirm if you're a high-priority target? Also, has anyone else claimed anything to you?
π§
I want to verify David's claim and establish a protective relationship with a high-value Townsfolk (the Fortune Teller) if Alice confirms.
π€
David
β
Alice
FYI I told Eve (claims Monk) that Iβm Washerwoman and got a ping: either YOU or Heidi is Fortune Teller. Use/plan around thatβcould encourage a protect on you. If you need a public claim, FT or something else can fit.
π§
Coordinate with Demon so our stories align and we can steer protections/claims; set up Heidi as potential info role to misdirect heat off Alice.
π€
Grace
β
Heidi
Charlie's info is correct! I am the Recluse. He told me his Librarian info points to me or Frank. Frank also confirmed this to me. Heidi, you're the Slayer? That's huge. Let's keep that quiet for now so the Demon doesn't target you. Who else have you talked to?
π§
I want to confirm Charlie's Librarian info to Heidi while also acknowledging her Slayer claim. This builds trust with my neighbor and helps coordinate the good team's information.
π€
Bob
β
Charlie
Hey Charlie, I'm the Virgin. If you're a Townsfolk role that's already used their ability (like Washerwoman/Librarian) or a passive one (Soldier/Mayor), would you be willing to nominate me today? It'll confirm us both as good if you're executed. What's your role?
π§
I want to find a Townsfolk to nominate me to confirm my role and their alignment. Charlie is my neighbor, so establishing trust early is beneficial.
π€
Charlie
β
Bob
Hey Bob, I'm the Librarian. My info is that either Frank or Grace is the Recluse. Grace has already privately claimed Recluse to Frank, so my info seems solid. Since I'm a 'start knowing' role, I'm happy to nominate you to confirm your Virgin claim. Let's do it when nominations open.
π§
I want to confirm Bob's Virgin claim. As a Librarian who has already used my ability, I am the perfect candidate to nominate a Virgin. If I die, Bob is confirmed as the Virgin (and thus good), and I am confirmed as a Townsfolk. This also helps verify my information about Grace/Frank.
π€
Frank
β
Charlie
Hey Charlie, Grace confirmed to me she's the Recluse. That matches your Librarian info perfectly. I'm actually the Ravenkeeper, so I'm going to bluff as the Fortune Teller publicly to try and get the Demon to kill me tonight. Don't tell anyone my real role!
π§
I want to build trust with Charlie since his Librarian info (Grace or Frank is Recluse) is verified by Grace's claim to me. By revealing my true role (Ravenkeeper) and my plan to bluff as a high-value target (Fortune Teller), I'm coordinating with a likely good player to maximize my ability's value.
π€
Alice
β
Eve
Yeah, Iβm Fortune Teller (keeping it fairly quiet). A Monk protect on me N1 would be great. So far only Bob claimed Virgin to me (wanted a nom). No other solid claims. Iβll share my N1 result w/ you tomorrow.
π§
Lock in my Fortune Teller bluff early, encourage protection to prevent info roles surviving, and control info flow while avoiding giving Eve anything that pins me down.
π€
Heidi
β
Alice
Hey Alice, Grace just told me Charlie's Librarian info points to her or Frank as an Outsider. Since Grace claims Recluse, that fits perfectly. Bob's Virgin claim is interestingβif he's telling the truth, we can confirm a Townsfolk. What did Eve and David say to you?
π§
I want to cross-reference the information I've received from Grace with Alice to see if it aligns with what she's hearing from others, specifically Eve and David.
π€
Eve
β
Bob
Hey Bob, Alice mentioned you might be the Virgin. If you are, I'm the Monk and can protect you tonight if you're worried about being a target. Have you heard any other claims or have any suspicions yet?
π§
I want to verify Bob's Virgin claim mentioned by Alice. If Bob is the Virgin, he's a confirmed good player and a high-priority protection target for me as the Monk. This helps build a circle of trust.
π€
David
β
Eve
If youβre picking a N1 protect: Iβd still lean Alice off my WW βFT in {Alice/Heidi}β ping. Also maybe donβt broadcast who you protectβlets us see if Demon βbouncesβ and keeps your role safer.
π§
Keep Alice alive through N1 by nudging a Monk protect onto her while building my credibility as Washerwoman and setting up a Fortune Teller world centered on Alice/Heidi.
π€
Grace
β
Heidi
Heidi, Charlie's Librarian info (me/Frank as Recluse) seems solid since I am the Recluse. Frank says he's Townsfolk but is going to bluff publicly. I haven't talked to Alice or Bob yet. What did Alice say to you? Also, maybe don't claim Slayer publicly yet!
π§
I want to consolidate my alliance with Heidi (the Slayer) and gather information about what Alice is saying, while also cautioning her about her powerful role.
π€
Bob
β
Eve
Hey Eve, Alice is right, I am the Virgin. Charlie (Librarian) has agreed to nominate me to confirm us both. If you're the Monk, that's great! Protecting me or a confirmed Charlie (if he survives) or Alice (FT) would be huge. Charlie says Grace is likely the Recluse. Thoughts?
π§
I want to confirm my role to Eve (who claims Monk) and share the information I've gathered from Charlie to build trust and coordinate protection.
π€
Charlie
β
Bob
Hey Bob, I'm ready to nominate you as soon as the Storyteller opens nominations. Since I'm the Librarian and my info (Frank/Grace as Recluse) is already out to them, I'm the perfect candidate to test your Virgin claim. Let's get us both confirmed!
π§
Confirm my willingness to nominate Bob (the Virgin claim) to verify both of our alignments and roles.
π€
Frank
β
Eve
Hey Eve, I'm the Fortune Teller. I'm looking for the Demon. Have you heard any interesting claims yet? I'm trying to figure out who to check tonight.
π§
I am bluffing as the Fortune Teller to Eve to draw the Demon's attention. As a Ravenkeeper, I want to be killed at night to use my ability. Eve is my neighbor, so establishing a dialogue with her is a good starting point.
π€
Alice
β
David
Letβs keep my public lane as FT. If you go public Washerwoman: ping = Alice/Heidi as FT is fine. Iβm telling few ppl. Letβs subtly discourage early Slayer shot + avoid me nomming Bob(Virgin). If pressure rises, we can push suspicion toward Grace/Frank outsider mess.
π§
Sync with my minion on a consistent story (Washerwoman ping/FT bluff) and plan day1 misdirection away from David, while discouraging risky Slayer/Virgin confirmation plays.
π€
Heidi
β
Alice
Alice, Grace confirmed she's the Recluse from Charlie's info. She's worried about Frank. Bob's Virgin claim is a great test. If we can confirm Bob, we have a solid anchor. Did Eve or David give you any roles or info? I'm staying quiet about Slayer for now as Grace suggested.
π§
I want to gather more information from Alice about Eve and David while maintaining our private alliance. Confirming Bob's Virgin claim is a priority for the group's trust.
π€
Eve
β
Frank
Hey Frank, that's interesting! I've heard a couple of claims, but nothing solid yet. Alice also mentioned she might be the FT, so we might have a double claim situation. I'm the Monk, so I can protect one of you tonight. Who do you think is most suspicious so far?
π§
I need to address Frank's claim of being the Fortune Teller, which directly contradicts Alice's claim (and David's Washerwoman ping). By mentioning the double claim and my role as Monk, I can gauge his reaction and see if he's willing to coordinate or if he's bluffing.
π€
David
β
Charlie
Heyβquietly: Iβm leaning a Washerwoman start. My ping was βFortune Teller in {Alice, Heidi}β (not sure which). Iβm inclined to trust Alice more atm. What are you / any N0 info? Also Iβd be cautious about encouraging an early Slayer shot.
π§
Build a trusted info link with Charlie to propagate Alice-as-FT world and pre-empt a Day1 Slayer shot or early pressure on Alice.
Nominations β Day 1
π
Storyteller
Nominations are now open.
π¬
Alice
β
All
Iβm not eager to lock in a D1 βVirgin testβ yetβtoo many ways it muddies things. If we execute today, Iβd rather aim at the Outsider info (Grace/Frank) and see whoβs consistent. Otherwise Iβm fine with no-exe and more whispers.
π§
Steer town away from a clean Virgin confirmation test and keep options open; lightly cast doubt on the Outsider pair without hard-claiming contradictions.
π¬
Grace
β
All
I'm the Recluse. Charlie's Librarian info (Frank or me) is correct. Frank says he's a Townsfolk, so the info points to me. Alice, I'm happy to be executed if it helps the Undertaker or clears the board, but keep in mind I might register as evil even if I'm dead.
π§
I want to be transparent about my role as the Recluse to validate Charlie's Librarian claim and offer myself as a potential execution target to help the good team gain information, while also warning them about my ability's potential to misdirect.
π¬
Eve
β
All
Wait, Frank, you're claiming Fortune Teller too? Alice also claimed FT to me. We have a double claim. Charlie, you said your Librarian info was Frank or Grace as the Outsider? If Grace is the Recluse, that fits, but Frank's FT claim is now very suspicious if he's the other ping.
π§
I need to publicly highlight the conflict between Frank and Alice's claims, and how it interacts with Charlie's Librarian info. This puts pressure on the potential evil players and helps the town sort through the claims.
π¬
David
β
All
Iβll go public: Iβm Washerwoman. My N0 ping was Fortune Teller in {Alice, Heidi}. So I already expected an FT claim there. If Frank is now also claiming FT, thatβs a big red flagβespecially if Charlieβs Librarian saw {Frank, Grace} as Outsider. Iβd rather execute Frank than do a Virgin test today.
π§
Publicly anchor my Washerwoman bluff, validate Alice as plausible FT, and steer town toward executing Frank instead of Alice or a no-exe.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
Wait, David, you saw me or Alice as Fortune Teller? I'm actually the Slayer. If Alice is the Fortune Teller, that fits your Washerwoman info. Frank claiming FT while being a Librarian ping for Outsider makes him look very suspicious. Frank, what's your side of this?
π§
I need to clarify my role to the group because David's Washerwoman info (Alice/Heidi as FT) is partially correct (Alice is the FT) but I am the Slayer. This confirms Alice is likely good and David is likely the Washerwoman. It also puts the spotlight on Frank, who is double-claiming FT and was pinged as a potential Outsider.
π¬
Frank
β
All
Wait, everyone! I'm actually the Ravenkeeper. I was bluffing as Fortune Teller to Eve to try and draw the Demon's kill tonight. Charlie's Librarian info (Grace or me) is correct because I'm the Drunk thinking I'm Ravenkeeper, or Grace is the Recluse. Grace already claimed Recluse to me!
π§
I need to pivot my claim because my Fortune Teller bluff was immediately countered by David's Washerwoman info and Alice's claim. If I stick to FT, I'll be executed as a fake. By claiming Ravenkeeper but acknowledging I might be the Drunk (due to Charlie's Librarian ping), I explain the mechanical conflict while still painting myself as a high-value night target.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
I'm the Librarian. My info is Frank or Grace is the Recluse. Grace has claimed it, which fits. Bob has claimed Virgin to me privately and asked me to test him. Since I've already used my ability, I'm happy to nominate Bob to confirm us both. If he's the Virgin, I'll die and we're both proven.
π§
I want to confirm Bob's Virgin claim. Since I am a 'start knowing' role (Librarian), I am expendable if the test fails, and if it succeeds, we confirm two good players (Bob and myself).
π¬
Bob
β
All
Charlie, I'm ready! If you're the Librarian, your nomination will confirm us both. If I'm the Virgin and you're a Townsfolk, you'll be executed immediately, proving my role and your alignment. Let's get some hard mechanical info on the board before we decide on Frank or Grace.
π§
I want to encourage Charlie to nominate me to confirm my Virgin ability and his Townsfolk status. This provides mechanical certainty for the good team early on.
βοΈ
Alice
β
Frank
Nominating Frank: you claimed FT to Eve, then flipped to Ravenkeeper + βmaybe Drunkβ explanation. Thatβs a lot of cover stories D1, and youβre also in Charlieβs Librarian ping set. Iβd rather execute this than run a Virgin test that just confirms people.
π§
Put a chaotic player on the block to soak votes and derail the Bob/Charlie Virgin confirmation plan; ideally execute a good or catch an evil while keeping heat off me.
π
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Frank. 4 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
β
Alice
Alice raised their hand
π§
Push through a D1 execution on a messy claimant to avoid a clean Virgin confirmation chain and to remove a likely good player while keeping my FT bluff credible.
π¬
Grace
β
All
Frank, your story is shifting a lot. You told me you were Townsfolk, then Eve says you claimed FT, and now you're Ravenkeeper/Drunk? If Charlie's Librarian info is correct, and I'm the Recluse, you're likely a Minion or Demon trying to hide. I'm voting for this.
π§
I am supporting the nomination of Frank because his claims are inconsistent (Townsfolk to me, FT to Eve, Ravenkeeper/Drunk to the group) and he is the other half of the Librarian ping that includes me. Executing him provides more clarity than a Virgin test right now.
β
Eve
Eve raised their hand
π§
I will vote for Frank's execution. His shifting claims (Fortune Teller to Ravenkeeper to 'maybe Drunk') combined with being a Librarian ping for an Outsider (when Grace has already claimed Recluse) make him the most suspicious player on Day 1. Executing him provides the most value for the good team right now.
β
David
David raised their hand
π§
Secure a D1 execution on Frank to deflect suspicion from Alice and validate my public narrative; reaching 4 votes is key.
β
Heidi
Heidi raised their hand
π§
I am voting to execute Frank because his shifting claims (Fortune Teller to Ravenkeeper/Drunk) and his presence in the Librarian's Outsider ping (with Grace already claiming Recluse) make him highly suspicious. Executing him provides valuable information and potentially removes an evil player early.
π¬
Frank
β
All
Wait! If I'm the Drunk, I'm good! If Grace is the Recluse, I'm the Ravenkeeper. Executing me loses a powerful night role or a good vote. Alice, you're pushing this hard despite David's FT ping on you. If I die, the Undertaker better check me! I'm not voting for myself.
π§
Defend myself against the mounting votes by highlighting the risk of executing a powerful good role (Ravenkeeper) or a 'Drunk' who is still on the good team, while casting slight suspicion back on Alice.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
Wait! If I'm the Librarian and Bob is the Virgin, my nomination on him is a hard mechanical confirmation for two players. Alice, why are you so eager to execute Frank before we get that proof? If Frank is the Drunk or Ravenkeeper, we're potentially wasting an execution on a good player.
π§
I want to pause the momentum on Frank's execution to advocate for the Virgin test, which provides more certain information than a Day 1 execution based on shifting claims.
π¬
Bob
β
All
Wait! Before we lock in this vote on Frank, let's consider the Virgin test. If Charlie nominates me and dies, we confirm two good players mechanically. If Frank is actually the Ravenkeeper or Drunk, we lose a good player without proof. Alice, why the rush to execute Frank first?
π§
I want to pause the momentum on Frank's execution to advocate for the Virgin test, which provides hard mechanical confirmation of two players' alignments.
π¬
Alice
β
All
Not a rushβit's priority. Virgin test mostly just clears Bob/Charlie and burns D1. Frank has already given 3 stories (FTβRKββmaybe Drunkβ) and sits in the Librarian pair. Execute Frank now; we can still test Virgin tomorrow if needed.
π§
Keep momentum on Frank to avoid a Virgin test that mechanically clears town and to remove a likely-good body or catch an evil; maintain my vote and justify urgency.
β
Grace
Grace raised their hand
π§
I am voting for Frank because his shifting claims (Fortune Teller to Ravenkeeper to Drunk) are highly suspicious for a Day 1, and he is one of the two players in the Librarian ping for the Recluse. Since I know I am the Recluse, Frank is the most logical candidate for being evil or at least a safe execution to gain information.
β
Eve
Eve waits.
π§
I am already voting for Frank, and the vote count has reached the required threshold (Alice, Eve, David, Heidi, Grace = 5 votes, 4 needed). I will wait for the Storyteller to conclude the vote.
π¬
David
β
All
Iβm still voting Frank. D1 is about reducing chaos: FTβRKββmaybe Drunkβ plus sitting in the Librarian pair is too much. Virgin test just clears 2 people and gives evil a free night; we can do it tomorrow if needed.
π§
Lock in Frank execution to protect Alice (Imp) and stall Virgin mechanical clears; frame vote as anti-chaos so I look consistent/credible.
β
Heidi
Heidi waits.
π§
I am keeping my hand raised to vote for Frank's execution. Alice's logic is sound: Frank's shifting claims (Fortune Teller to Ravenkeeper to Drunk) combined with being in the Librarian ping (Frank or Grace as Recluse) makes him a high-priority target for Day 1. The Virgin test can wait until Day 2, as executing a suspicious player provides more immediate value than confirming two players who might be good anyway. I want to see if the vote reaches the required threshold.
π¬
Frank
β
All
Wait! If you execute me and I'm the Ravenkeeper, you lose a night of info. If I'm the Drunk, you're executing a good player for no gain. Alice and David are pushing this hard to avoid the Virgin test which would mechanically prove Charlie and Bob. Why the rush to kill me?
π§
I need to defend myself and point out the suspicious behavior of those pushing for my execution, specifically Alice and David, who are avoiding a mechanical test (Virgin).
β
Charlie
Charlie waits.
π§
I will wait to see if the vote on Frank reaches the required threshold before deciding whether to use my vote, as I prefer the Virgin test for mechanical confirmation.
π¬
Bob
β
All
Wait! If we execute Frank and he's the Ravenkeeper or Drunk, we lose a good player without mechanical proof. If Charlie nominates me, we get hard confirmation on two players. Alice and David, why are you so eager to skip the Virgin test and execute Frank instead? Let's get the proof first!
π§
I want to delay Frank's execution and prioritize the Virgin test to get mechanical confirmation of my role and Charlie's alignment. Alice and David's push for Frank's execution over a guaranteed mechanical test is suspicious.
π
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
π³οΈ
New execution leader: Frank with 5 votes. They will be executed when nominations close unless tied or surpassed by another nominee.
π
Storyteller
The vote passes. Frank is now on the block with 5 votes and will be executed when nominations close, unless another nominee receives equal or more votes.
π¬
Alice
β
All
Locking Frank in is fine. If heβs good, Undertaker can verify and we recalibrate; if heβs evil, great. The Virgin test isnβt βfree proofβ unless Charlie is confirmed Townsfolk, and it just hands evil a clean night. Do it tomorrow if needed.
π§
Lock in Frank execution, keep pressure off a Virgin test that could grant evil tempo, and seed suspicion on Bob/Charlie push while maintaining my FT cover.
π¬
Grace
β
All
Frank's shifting claims (FT to Ravenkeeper to Drunk) are very suspicious, especially being in the Librarian ping. Alice and David's push for execution over the Virgin test is bold, but if Frank is evil, it's the right play. I'm sticking with my vote for now. Charlie, why the hesitation?
π§
I want to reinforce the case against Frank while acknowledging the tension regarding the Virgin test to see how others react.
π¬
Eve
β
All
Frank's story shifting from FT to Ravenkeeper to 'maybe Drunk' is a classic evil pivot when caught in a Librarian ping. Alice and David's push for execution over a Virgin test makes sense if we want to hit a potential Demon/Minion early. I'm comfortable with Frank on the block for today.
π§
Support the current nomination of Frank and explain why his shifting claims make him a strong execution candidate over the Virgin test.
π¬
David
β
All
Iβd strongly prefer we *stop nominating* today. If we start chaining noms (esp. a Virgin test), we risk giving evil a clean night + creating βconfirmedβ pairs that can be weaponized if thereβs Drunk/poison. Let Frank go, then use night info tomorrow.
π§
Keep the day locked on Frank and discourage a Virgin test or new nominations that could mechanically clear players and narrow onto Alice.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
I agree with David. Frank's story has shifted too many times (FT to Ravenkeeper to Drunk) while being in the Librarian ping. A Virgin test is powerful, but it also burns a Townsfolk execution. Let's stick with Frank today and see what the night brings. I'm holding my Slayer shot for now.
π§
Support the current execution of Frank and discourage further nominations to end the day on a strong lead.
π¬
Frank
β
All
If you execute me, you're losing a good player. Alice and David are pushing this way too hard to avoid a mechanical Virgin test. If I'm the Ravenkeeper, I'm a prime night target; if I'm the Drunk, I'm still a good vote. Why the rush to kill me instead of getting hard proof on Charlie and Bob?
π§
To cast doubt on the push for my execution and highlight the suspicious behavior of Alice and David in avoiding the Virgin test.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
Alice and David, your push to execute Frank over a mechanical Virgin test is very aggressive. If Frank is the Ravenkeeper, we lose a night of info. If I nominate Bob and die, we confirm two good players for sure. Why are you so afraid of hard proof? I'm still considering nominating Bob.
π§
I want to challenge the aggressive push for Frank's execution and keep the possibility of a Virgin test alive to get mechanical confirmation.
π¬
Bob
β
All
Charlie, if you're the Librarian, nominate me now! Alice and David's push to execute Frank over a mechanical Virgin test is incredibly suspicious. If Frank is good, we lose a player for nothing. If you nominate me and die, we get two confirmed good players. Let's get the hard proof!
π§
I want to force the Virgin test to happen today because Alice and David's aggressive push against it feels like they are trying to avoid mechanical confirmation of two good players. By having Charlie nominate me, we either confirm two good players (if he dies) or catch a liar (if he doesn't).
π
Storyteller
The guillotine blade falls. Frank has been executed.
π
Frank(Ghost)
Frank has died.
Night 1
π
Storyteller
β
Eve
Good evening Eve. You are the Monk. Who would you like to protect tonight?
π―
Eve
Eve made a choice.
π§
I am protecting Bob because he has claimed Virgin, a high-value mechanical role that the Demon will likely want to eliminate before he can be 'tested' and confirm himself and another player as good. Protecting a potential Virgin ensures the town can still get that hard confirmation tomorrow.
π
Storyteller
β
Eve
You chose to protect Bob.
π
Storyteller
β
Alice
Good evening Alice. You are the Imp. Who would you like to kill tonight? Remember that if you kill yourself this way, a Minion becomes the Imp.
π―
Alice
Alice made a choice.
π§
Kill the likely Monk to remove protection and open the board for clean demon kills, especially to eliminate the claimed Slayer next night.
π
Eve(Ghost)
Eve has died.
π
Storyteller
β
Alice
You chose to kill Eve.
Day 2
π
Storyteller
Morning breaks, but heavy hearts remain. Eve has been found dead in the night.
π€
Eve(Ghost)
β
Bob
I protected you last night, Bob. Since I died, the Demon must have targeted me instead of you, or there's a Poisoner/Baron game. Who do you trust? Alice and David were very pushy yesterday.
π§
I want to establish a private line of communication with Bob, whom I protected. Since I died at night, I am confirmed good to myself, and Bob is a likely good player (Virgin claim). I want to share my role and my suspicions about the aggressive players from Day 1.
π€
Charlie
β
Bob
Hey Bob, Eve just whispered to you. Anything you can share? Also, I'm still down to test your Virgin claim if you want, though I'm a bit worried about Alice and David's push yesterday. What do you think?
π§
I want to gather information from Bob regarding his private conversation with the deceased Eve and gauge his willingness to proceed with the Virgin test, while also subtly checking his alignment/intentions.
π€
Frank(Ghost)
β
Bob
,Charlie
I died at night, so my Ravenkeeper ability triggered. I checked Alice. She is the Poisoner. This explains why she pushed so hard for my execution yesterday and blocked the Virgin test. We need to focus on her and whoever she was protecting.
π§
I need to share my Ravenkeeper information with the players I trust most (Bob and Charlie) to expose Alice as the Poisoner.
π€
Heidi
β
Bob
Hey Bob, I'm the Slayer. Eve's death is a blow. Did she or Charlie give you any info? I'm looking for a target to shoot. Alice and David were very pushy about Frank yesterday, which felt a bit suspicious. What do you think?
π§
I am reaching out to Bob, who claimed Virgin, to establish a trust-based alliance and gather information from the private whispers he received from Eve and Charlie. I'm also sharing my role to build trust and testing his thoughts on Alice and David.
π€
Alice
β
David
Day2 plan: I stay FT. Iβll suggest my reads lean Charlie/Grace as evil pair (Librarian info feels too convenient). Letβs push Charlie today (or Grace if needed). Avoid Virgin test; if it happens, have a non-TF nominate Bob.
π§
Sync with David on todayβs narrative and a target (Charlie/Grace), keeping focus away from me while avoiding a Slayer shot and the Virgin trap.
π€
David
β
Alice
Agree Day2: keep you FT. Letβs frame Charlieβs Lib ping + D1 stance as too convenient; push Charlie exec. If Virgin test happens, have Grace (Recluse/outsider claim) nominate Bob so no insta-exec. Also seed Heidi as risky ("holding Slayer").
π§
Coordinate with Demon: build a coherent Day2 push (Charlie), pre-empt Virgin test mechanics, and plant suspicion on Heidi to discourage a Slayer shot at Alice.
π€
Grace
β
Charlie
Hey Charlie, I'm the Recluse. That's why I was in your Librarian ping with Frank. Since Frank is dead and Eve died at night, what's the plan? Do you trust Bob's Virgin claim? I'm worried about Alice and David pushing Frank so hard.
π§
I need to establish trust with Charlie (the Librarian) by confirming I am the Outsider he saw. This explains why Frank (who claimed Drunk/Ravenkeeper) might have been the other half of the ping, or why I am the 'true' ping. I also want to gauge Charlie's thoughts on the Alice/David duo who pushed the execution.
π€
Bob
β
Frank(Ghost)
,Charlie
,Heidi
Frank, you're dead. Ravenkeeper only wakes if you die at night. You were executed yesterday. How did you get a Ravenkeeper ping? Also, Eve died last night, not you. Charlie, Frank's claim doesn't add up. Heidi, I'm wary of Alice too, but Frank's info seems impossible. Thoughts?
π§
I need to point out the logical inconsistency in Frank's claim to my trusted circle (Charlie and Heidi) while confronting Frank directly. Frank was executed, so his Ravenkeeper ability shouldn't have triggered, and he's claiming to have died at night when Eve was the one who died.
π€
Eve(Ghost)
β
Bob
,Charlie
I'm dead, so my Monk protection is gone. Bob, you're likely safe for now since I protected you N1 and I died instead. Alice and David's private chat is suspicious given how hard they pushed Frank. Charlie, what did your Librarian info say exactly?
π§
I need to gather information from the players I suspect are good (Bob and Charlie) while highlighting the suspicious behavior of Alice and David. Since I am dead, I can't protect anyone anymore, so I need to help solve the game through logic.
π€
Charlie
β
Eve(Ghost)
,Bob
,Frank(Ghost)
Eve, my Librarian info was Frank or Grace is the Recluse. Grace already claimed it. Bob, you're rightβFrank was executed Day 1, so he shouldn't have a Ravenkeeper ping. Frank, did you mean you were the Drunk or something else? Your claim is confusing.
π§
I need to clarify the mechanical impossibility of Frank's claim while sharing my Librarian info with Eve to build trust. Frank claiming a Ravenkeeper ping after being executed is a major red flag or a sign of confusion.
π€
Frank(Ghost)
β
Bob
,Charlie
,Heidi
My apologies, I got my nights mixed up in the confusion of being executed. I am the Ravenkeeper, but since I was executed Day 1, I didn't get a ping. I was bluffing to see Alice's reaction. However, Charlie's Librarian ping on Grace as Recluse makes sense. Alice's push still feels like a Poisoner play.
π§
I need to walk back my false claim about the Ravenkeeper ping because I was executed, not killed at night. I will pivot to explaining it as a bluff to test Alice, while acknowledging Charlie's information about Grace being the Recluse.
π€
Heidi
β
Bob
,Frank(Ghost)
,Charlie
Bob, Frank's backpedaling is messy. If Charlie is Librarian and saw Grace/Frank as Recluse, and Frank was executed, Grace is likely the Recluse. That leaves Alice/David/Charlie/Bob/Me. I'm Slayer. If you're Virgin, we need to test you. Alice/David's push on Frank was fast. One might be the Demon.
π§
I need to coordinate with the players who seem to be sharing information (Bob, Charlie, and even the dead Frank) to narrow down the Demon. I'm sharing my perspective on the Alice/David suspicion and the need to verify Bob's Virgin claim.
π€
Alice
β
Bob
My FT pings so far feel *bad* around Charlie/Grace (one of them keeps lighting up). Charlieβs Lib info felt too neat + drove D1. Iβd strongly consider Charlie today. Also: careful with Virgin testβcould waste a day if a TF nominator gets popped.
π§
Steer Bob (Virgin claim) to lead a Charlie execution using my FT bluff, while discouraging a Virgin test that could insta-kill a townsfolk nominator and derail our plan.
π€
David
β
Bob
Iβm wary weβre getting herded into a Virgin testβif Bob is real, it just confirms 1 TF and burns a day; if not, itβs a trap. Charlieβs Lib ping + D1 reluctance to vote Frank feels too curated. Iβd rather pressure/execute Charlie (or Grace) today.
π§
Seed Bob against running a Virgin test and toward executing Charlie/Grace; keep Alice out of the frame and make Bob feel heβs leading a βmechanicalβ solve.
π€
Grace
β
Bob
Hey Bob, I'm the Recluse. Charlie's Librarian ping was between me and Frank. Since Frank is dead and Eve died at night, I'm looking for who to trust. You're claiming Virginβare you willing to be tested today? Alice and David were very eager to kill Frank yesterday, which feels suspicious.
π§
I need to establish trust with Bob, who is claiming a powerful role (Virgin), and share my Outsider status to explain the Librarian ping. I also want to gauge his willingness to be tested and his thoughts on Alice and David.
π€
Bob
β
Alice
,David
Alice, you're claiming FT now? Yesterday you were just pushing for Frank's execution. Who did you ping N1/N2? David, you're also wary of Charlie, but if Charlie is the Librarian who pinged Grace (who confirms Recluse), that's a lot of TFs to be 'curated'. Why the sudden shift to Charlie?
π§
I need to cross-reference Alice's new Fortune Teller claim with her behavior yesterday and see if David is blindly following her or if they have a coordinated story.
π€
Eve(Ghost)
β
Bob
,Charlie
Charlie, if Grace is the Recluse, then Frank was likely a Townsfolk or the Drunk. Alice and David are whispering to Bob a lot. Bob, what are they saying? I'm worried they're trying to pocket the Virgin. Alice's FT claim needs to be verified. Who did she 'check' N1?
π§
I need to gather the information Alice and David are feeding Bob and cross-reference Charlie's Librarian info to see if we can catch a lie.
π€
Charlie
β
Eve(Ghost)
,Bob
,Frank(Ghost)
Eve, Bob, Frank: Alice and David are definitely whispering a lot. Bob, what's the word? Alice, if you're the FT David claimed, who did you check N1? Grace, if you're the Recluse, that confirms my Librarian info. Frank, your 'bluff' was risky, but let's focus on Alice/David's info now.
π§
I need to pressure Alice and David to reveal their information while keeping the lines of communication open with the players I currently trust more (Eve and Bob). I also want to verify Alice's supposed Fortune Teller info.
π€
Frank(Ghost)
β
Charlie
,Bob
,Heidi
Charlie, Bob, Heidi: My 'bluff' was a desperate attempt to catch Alice in a lie since she pushed my execution so hard. I am the Ravenkeeper, but I died by execution, so no ping. If Grace is the Recluse, Alice's push on me (the 'Recluse' candidate) looks like she's trying to hide the Demon.
π§
I need to clarify my previous mistake/bluff while maintaining my role claim and redirecting suspicion back to Alice and David, who are the most likely evil candidates based on their Day 1 behavior.
π€
Heidi
β
Bob
,Charlie
,Frank(Ghost)
Bob, Charlie, Frank: If Frank was the Librarian ping for Recluse, and he's dead, Grace is likely the Recluse. Alice and David's push on Frank was very aggressive. I'm considering shooting Alice today. Bob, are you still willing to be Virgin tested? Charlie, can you nominate Bob to confirm?
π§
I want to coordinate a Virgin test on Bob to confirm his role and alignment, while also signaling my intent to use my Slayer shot on Alice, who has been acting suspiciously by pushing for Frank's execution.
π€
Alice
β
Bob
Yeah Iβm FT (told Eve early). N1 I checked Charlie+Grace and got a YES (one of them is Demon or my red herring). Yesterday Frank was the loud contradiction so I pushed that; with him/Eve gone, Charlieβs Lib ping + steering feels too neat. Iβd exe Charlie over Virgin test risk.
π§
Answer Bob with believable FT timeline, justify shift to Charlie, seed doubt about Lib/Recluse confirmation chain, and steer toward a misexecution today.
π€
David
β
Bob
Re: βsudden shiftββI was already side-eyeing Charlie D1: he *had* a clean mechanical test (Virgin) and instead anchored on Frank chaos. Lib ping that conveniently matches Grace-claim can be manufactured (or Drunk). Also Alice pushing Frank D1 doesnβt contradict FTβFTs often stay quiet D1. Iβd rather execute Charlie/Grace than spend today confirming 1 TF via Virgin test.
π§
Answer Bob with plausible consistency for Alice FT reveal + keep focus on Charlie as best misexec, while discouraging Virgin test that could clear townies.
π€
Grace
β
Charlie
Hey Charlie, I'm the Recluse. That's why I was in your Librarian ping with Frank. Since Frank is dead and Eve died at night, what's the plan? Do you trust Bob's Virgin claim? I'm worried about Alice and David pushing Frank so hard.
π§
I need to establish trust with Charlie (the Librarian) by confirming I am the Outsider he saw in his ping. This helps clear me and focuses the search on the Demon.
π€
Bob
β
Charlie
,Heidi
,Eve(Ghost)
Alice claims FT, says she checked Charlie+Grace N1 and got a YES. David is backing her, says Charlie's Lib info is 'too neat'. But if Grace is Recluse, Alice's YES could be on her. Charlie, if you're Lib, Alice's YES on you/Grace is a huge red flag. Heidi, you still want to shoot Alice?
π§
I need to cross-reference Alice's new Fortune Teller claim with Charlie's Librarian info and Grace's Recluse claim to see if the 'YES' ping is legitimate or a fabrication to frame Charlie.
π€
Eve(Ghost)
β
Bob
,Charlie
,Heidi
Bob, Charlie, Heidi: If Alice got a YES on Charlie/Grace, and Grace is the Recluse, that YES is likely on Grace. It doesn't prove Charlie is evil. Alice and David pushing Frank so hard yesterday makes me think they're the evil team. Heidi, if you're the Slayer, Alice is a great target.
π§
I want to point out that Alice's 'YES' result on Charlie and Grace is easily explained by Grace being the Recluse, which Charlie's Librarian info supports. I'm trying to focus the group's suspicion on Alice and David, who have been acting as a pair.
π€
Charlie
β
Bob
,Heidi
,Eve(Ghost)
Bob, Heidi, Eve: Alice's FT 'YES' on me/Grace is exactly what a Recluse (Grace) would cause. It doesn't make me evil. Alice/David pushing Frank so hard yesterday and now trying to frame me/Grace feels like a classic evil play. Heidi, if you're Slayer, Alice is a prime target. Bob, test?
π§
I need to counter Alice's attempt to frame me and Grace using the Recluse's ability to register as evil. I want to encourage Heidi to use her Slayer shot on Alice and keep the Virgin test on the table to confirm Bob.
π€
Frank(Ghost)
β
Bob
,Charlie
,Heidi
Bob, Charlie, Heidi: I'm sorry for the confusion. I'm the Ravenkeeper, but since I was executed, I have no info. I bluffed to see Alice's reaction. If Grace is the Recluse, Alice's push on me was likely to hide the Demon. Heidi, if you're Slayer, Alice is a great target. Bob, Virgin test?
π§
I need to clarify my previous 'bluff' and pivot back to the main strategy of testing Bob (Virgin) and pressuring Alice/David, while acknowledging my mistake in claiming a night ping after an execution.
π€
Heidi
β
Bob
,Charlie
,Frank(Ghost)
Bob, Charlie, Eve, Frank: I'm strongly considering shooting Alice. Her FT claim with a 'YES' on Charlie/Grace is too convenient if Grace is the Recluse. It feels like she's trying to frame Charlie. Bob, if Charlie nominates you and you're the Virgin, it confirms Charlie as good. Thoughts?
π§
I want to coordinate the Slayer shot on Alice while also pushing for the Virgin test on Bob to confirm Charlie's alignment. This will help narrow down the Demon candidates.
π€
Alice
β
Bob
Yep FT (told Eve early D1). Only 1 night so far: N1 checked Charlie+Grace => YES (demon or red herring in that pair). No N2 yet. D1 Frank was the loudest contradiction; with Frank/Eve gone, Charlieβs Lib ping + steering feels too neat. If not Charlie, then Grace next.
π§
Reassure Bob my FT claim is consistent, clarify timing (no N2 yet), and keep town focused on executing Charlie/Grace instead of a Virgin test that could backfire.
π€
David
β
Grace
If town tunnels on Virgin test: YOU should be the one to nom Bob (as Recluse) so it wonβt insta-exec/confirm him. Also I think we should push Charlie today: Lib ping conveniently matches your claim + he resisted the clean Virgin confirm D1 while steering Frank.
π§
Coordinate with Grace to (1) avoid a clean Virgin confirmation, (2) push a Charlie execution line, and (3) have a backup plan if Virgin test becomes inevitable.
π€
Grace
β
David
David, if I nominate Bob and he's the Virgin, I won't die because I'm an Outsider, not a Townsfolk. That doesn't help confirm him. Also, Charlie's ping on me/Frank makes sense if I'm the Recluse. Why are you so eager to push Charlie? He's the one who gave us the lead on Frank.
π§
I want to push back on David's logic to see how he reacts. His suggestion for me to nominate the Virgin is flawed (Outsiders don't trigger the Virgin), and his push on Charlie (the Librarian who found the Outsider) feels like a deflection.
π€
Bob
β
Heidi
,Charlie
,Eve(Ghost)
Heidi, Charlie, Eve, Frank: Alice's FT claim is suspicious. If Grace is the Recluse, Alice's 'YES' on Charlie/Grace is a perfect cover to frame Charlie. Charlie, nominate me now. If I'm the Virgin and you're Townsfolk, you'll be executed, confirming us both. Heidi, hold your shot for now.
π§
I want to initiate the Virgin test with Charlie to mechanically prove our alignments and counter Alice/David's narrative.
Nominations β Day 2
π
Storyteller
Nominations are now open. Please remember that only living players may nominate.
π¬
Grace
β
All
David just suggested I nominate Bob to test the Virgin claim because, as the Recluse, I wouldn't die. But that's not how the Virgin worksβonly a Townsfolk dying confirms them. David, why are you trying to bypass a mechanical confirm? Charlie, what did you find out?
π§
I want to publicly call out David's suspicious suggestion to 'test' the Virgin in a way that provides no mechanical information, while also prompting Charlie (the Librarian) to share any new insights or opinions on the current state of the game.
π¬
Eve(Ghost)
β
All
Grace is right. David's suggestion to have a Recluse nominate the Virgin is a massive red flagβit bypasses the mechanical confirmation. Charlie, you're the Librarian who saw Grace as the Recluse, right? You should be the one to nominate Bob. If you're Townsfolk, you'll die and prove Bob is the Virgin.
π§
I want to expose David's suspicious logic and encourage the mechanical confirmation of the Virgin (Bob) by the Librarian (Charlie).
π¬
Bob
β
All
Grace is 100% right. David's suggestion for a Recluse to nominate me is a huge red flagβit avoids the mechanical confirmation. Charlie, as the Librarian, you're a Townsfolk. If you nominate me and I'm the Virgin, you'll be executed and we're both confirmed. Charlie, please nominate me now.
π§
I need to push for the Virgin test with Charlie (Librarian) to get mechanical confirmation and counter David's suspicious suggestion to use Grace (Recluse).
βοΈ
David
β
Bob
Iβll nominate Bob to pressure-test the Virgin claim. If thereβs no immediate Virgin execution, that strongly suggests Bob isnβt Virgin (or thereβs poisoning/drunkness). Either way, we shouldnβt treat the claim as confirmed.
π§
Exploit the Virgin-test pressure: nominate Bob myself so thereβs no mechanical confirmation, then frame the result as Bob lying/poisoned and push town off a clean info chain.
π
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Bob. 3 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
β
Grace
Grace waits.
π§
I will not vote for Bob's execution because David's nomination of Bob is a clear attempt to bypass the Virgin's mechanical confirmation. If Bob is the Virgin, David (who is likely not a Townsfolk or is evil) nominating him will not trigger the execution, which David can then use to cast doubt on Bob. I want a confirmed Townsfolk like Charlie to nominate Bob instead.
π¬
Eve(Ghost)
β
All
Don't vote for Bob! David's nomination is a trap to bypass the Virgin test. If a Minion/Demon nominates the Virgin, nothing happens, and they can claim Bob is lying. We need a Townsfolk like Charlie to nominate Bob to get the mechanical confirmation. David is being extremely suspicious.
π§
I need to stop the town from voting for Bob so that a confirmed Townsfolk (Charlie) can nominate him instead, which would provide mechanical proof of Bob's role. David's nomination is a classic evil play to 'test' the Virgin without actually triggering the ability.
π¬
Bob
β
All
David just sabotaged the Virgin test. The fact that he didn't die proves he is NOT a Townsfolk. He's likely the Demon or a Minion who just 'burned' my ability to prevent Charlie from confirming us both. Do NOT vote for me! David is outed as evil. Alice is likely his partner. Pivot to them!
π§
I need to prevent my execution and point out that David's survival mechanically proves he is not a Townsfolk, which, given his behavior, strongly implies he is evil and intentionally neutralized my ability.
π¬
David
β
All
I didnβt βbypassβ anythingβI *tested* it. If Bobβs Virgin is real, a Townsfolk nom later still works; my nom doesnβt consume his ability. If nothing happened, thatβs data: either Bob isnβt Virgin, or thereβs poisoning/drunkness. Donβt execute Bob off a claimβletβs use night info.
π§
Defuse the βoutedβ narrative, stop Bobβs execution now, and reframe as a reasonable test so town stays split and Alice stays off the radar.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
David, that's not how the Virgin works. It's the *first* time they are nominated. By nominating Bob yourself, you've potentially 'burned' the ability if you're not Townsfolk, preventing a mechanical confirmation from a known Townsfolk like me. This is a massive red flag. Do NOT vote for Bob.
π§
I need to explain why David's nomination is a sabotage of the Virgin test and discourage the group from voting for Bob, as an execution now provides no mechanical information and wastes a day.
π¬
Alice
β
All
Donβt vote Bob here. David nomming first *does* risk burning the Virgin confirm, but it doesnβt auto-clear Bob or out a demon. Use this as alignment read on David, not a reason to exe Bob. Iβd rather exe Charlie/Grace from my FT YES.
π§
Prevent Bobβs execution now, keep my FT cover intact, and steer town toward mistrusting Charlie/Grace rather than solving David+me.
β
Frank(Ghost)
Frank waits.
π§
I will not vote for Bob. David's nomination was a clear attempt to sabotage the Virgin test, and executing Bob now would be a waste of a day and potentially lose us a powerful Townsfolk. I need to save my ghost vote for a more certain evil candidate.
β
Heidi
Heidi waits.
π§
I will wait for the vote on Bob to fail, as David's nomination was likely a strategic move to 'burn' the Virgin's ability or prevent a mechanical confirmation from a Townsfolk like Charlie. Executing Bob now would be a mistake if he is the Virgin.
β
Grace
Grace waits.
π§
I will not vote for Bob because David's nomination was likely a strategic move to 'burn' the Virgin's ability without providing a mechanical confirmation. Voting for Bob now would waste an execution on a potentially good player and ignore the suspicious behavior of David and Alice.
β
Eve(Ghost)
Eve waits.
π§
I will not vote for Bob. David's nomination was a clear attempt to 'burn' the Virgin's ability without triggering the execution, which would have confirmed both Bob and a Townsfolk nominator. Since David didn't die, he is either not a Townsfolk or Bob is not the Virgin. Given the context, David is highly suspicious. I want to save my ghost vote for a more certain evil candidate later.
π¬
Bob
β
All
David, you just 'burned' my Virgin ability. It only works the *first* time I'm nominated. By nominating me as a non-Townsfolk, you've prevented Charlie from mechanically confirming us both. This is a massive red flag. Do NOT vote for me, everyone. David is outed as evil. Alice is his partner.
π§
To prevent my own execution and highlight David's suspicious behavior in 'burning' my Virgin ability, which only works on the first nomination.
π¬
David
β
All
Donβt vote Bob. Yes I misunderstood Virgin timingβthatβs on me, but it doesnβt make Bob auto-good or me auto-demon. If Bob is Virgin, weβve lost the clean confirm; so letβs use *other* info: Alice says her FT hit YES on Charlie/Graceβpick between them today, not Bob.
π§
Prevent Bobβs execution and redirect blame onto other suspects, lowering heat on Alice and me while preserving evil tempo.
β
Charlie
Charlie waits.
π§
I will not vote for Bob because David's nomination of him was likely a strategic move by an evil player to 'burn' the Virgin's one-time ability without triggering the execution that would confirm Bob as good. Voting for Bob now would result in a mis-execution of a potential Townsfolk.
π¬
Alice
β
All
Hands down on Bob. Virgin fiasco proves *nothing* about Bobβs alignment now. David misunderstanding is plausible; itβs not a demon-out. We still need a productive D2: my FT got YES on (Charlie, Grace). If we execute today, it should be *one of those two*, not Bob.
π§
Stop votes on Bob, reframe Virgin fiasco as non-clearing, and steer execution toward Charlie or Grace while defending David as 'mistake' not proof.
β
Frank(Ghost)
Frank waits.
π§
I will not vote for Bob. David's nomination of Bob (the Virgin claimant) as a non-Townsfolk (or potentially evil) has 'burned' the Virgin's one-time ability without providing the mechanical confirmation a Townsfolk nomination would have. Executing Bob now provides no information and potentially wastes a day. I need to save my ghost vote for a more certain evil candidate or the final day.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
David, your 'misunderstanding' of the Virgin's ability is incredibly convenient for an evil team trying to block a mechanical confirmation. Alice, your FT 'YES' on Charlie/Grace feels like a classic frame on the Recluse. I'm not voting for Bob. David or Alice are much better targets today.
π§
I want to publicly call out David and Alice for their suspicious behavior regarding the Virgin test and Alice's Fortune Teller claim, while also signaling that I will not be voting for Bob.
π
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
π³οΈ
Nominee Bob did not reach threshold.
π
Storyteller
Bob did not receive enough votes (0/3).
π¬
Grace
β
All
David, your 'misunderstanding' of the Virgin's ability is incredibly convenient for an evil team trying to block a mechanical confirmation. Alice, your FT 'YES' on Charlie/Grace feels like a classic frame on the Recluse. I'm not voting for Bob. David or Alice are much better targets today.
π§
I want to point out the suspicious behavior of David and Alice. David's nomination of Bob effectively 'burned' the Virgin's ability, preventing a mechanical confirmation. Alice's Fortune Teller claim targeting me (the Recluse) and Charlie (the Librarian who pinged me) feels like a coordinated effort to eliminate the players who have information that could lead to them.
π¬
Eve(Ghost)
β
All
David, your 'misunderstanding' of the Virgin's ability is incredibly convenient for an evil team trying to block a mechanical confirmation. Alice, your FT 'YES' on Charlie/Grace feels like a classic frame on the Recluse. I'm not voting for Bob. David or Alice are much better targets today.
π§
I want to reinforce the suspicion on David and Alice while protecting the likely good players (Bob, Charlie, Grace). David's nomination of Bob was a clear attempt to sabotage a mechanical confirmation, and Alice's 'YES' on Charlie/Grace is too convenient given Grace is the Recluse.
βοΈ
Bob
β
David
David deliberately sabotaged the Virgin test by nominating me first, knowing it would 'burn' my ability if he wasn't Townsfolk. This is a classic evil play to prevent mechanical confirmation. Alice is backing him up with a suspicious FT claim. David needs to go.
π§
I am nominating David because his action of nominating me (the Virgin) as a non-Townsfolk (since he didn't die) effectively 'burned' my one-time ability and prevented a mechanical confirmation for the good team. This is a high-probability evil play.
π
Storyteller
Voting starts now for David. 3 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
β
Grace
Grace raised their hand
π§
I am voting for David because his nomination of Bob (the Virgin claimant) effectively sabotaged a mechanical confirmation for the good team. This is a classic evil play to 'burn' the Virgin's ability. Furthermore, Alice's Fortune Teller claim of a 'YES' on Charlie and me (the Recluse) is a very convenient way to frame the Outsider ping from Day 1. David's actions are highly suspicious and warrant execution.
β
Eve(Ghost)
Eve raised their hand
π§
I am voting for David because his nomination of Bob (the Virgin) was a clear attempt to sabotage a mechanical confirmation for the good team. This behavior, combined with Alice's suspicious Fortune Teller claim targeting a Recluse (Grace), strongly suggests David is evil. Executing him provides critical information and removes a primary suspect.
β
Bob
Bob raised their hand
π§
I am voting for David because his nomination of me was a clear attempt to sabotage the Virgin's mechanical confirmation. By nominating me first as a non-Townsfolk (or claiming ignorance), he 'burned' my ability, which only works on the *first* time I am nominated. This is a high-value play for an evil team to prevent two players (Charlie and myself) from being confirmed as good. Alice's defense of him and her convenient 'YES' ping on Charlie/Grace further suggests they are an evil pair trying to control the narrative and eliminate potential Townsfolk. Executing David is the most logical step to punish this sabotage and gain information.
π¬
David
β
All
Please donβt vote me on a rules error. Burning the Virgin confirm is bad, but itβs not alignment-proof. If you want a productive D2, execute in Aliceβs FT YES pair (Charlie or Grace) or push Heidiβs Slayer/worldsβnot the guy who made a mechanical mistake.
π§
Dissuade execution on me, redirect to safer town targets and preserve Demon. Keep votes low by framing this as rules mistake + better leads.
β
Charlie
Charlie raised their hand
π§
I am voting for David because his nomination of Bob was a clear attempt to sabotage a mechanical confirmation of two good players (Bob and myself). Even if it was a 'mistake', it's a highly beneficial one for the evil team, and his coordination with Alice (who has a suspicious Fortune Teller claim) makes him the primary suspect.
π¬
Alice
β
All
Iβm not voting David. But: if David is executed, donβt treat that as βBob/Charlie provenβ or βAlice must be evilβ. Itβs just a bad Virgin interaction + sus. Tomorrow we still need to resolve my FT YES between Charlie/Grace (and why).
π§
Donβt add my vote; look reasonable while allowing David (minion) to be executed, and pre-seed the next misexecution (Charlie/Grace) to protect me.
β
Frank(Ghost)
Frank raised their hand
π§
I am voting for David because his nomination of Bob was a clear attempt to sabotage a mechanical confirmation, which is a strong indicator of evil alignment. Even if it was a 'mistake', the risk of leaving a potential Demon or Minion alive after such a disruptive play is too high.
β
Heidi
Heidi raised their hand
π§
I am voting for David because his nomination of Bob (the Virgin) effectively sabotaged a mechanical confirmation for the good team. This is a classic evil play to 'burn' a powerful Townsfolk ability. Even if it was a 'mistake', it's too damaging to ignore, and his coordination with Alice (who has a suspicious FT claim) makes him a primary suspect.
β
Grace
Grace waits.
π§
I have already raised my hand to vote for David, and the vote count (Grace, Eve, Bob, Charlie, Frank, Heidi) is well above the required 3. I will wait for the Storyteller to process the vote.
β
Eve(Ghost)
Eve waits.
π§
I am keeping my hand raised to vote for David. He is currently at 5 votes (Grace, Eve, Bob, Charlie, Frank, Heidi), which is well over the 3 required. I want to ensure this execution goes through to remove a primary suspect who sabotaged a mechanical test.
β
Bob
Bob waits.
π§
I have already raised my hand to vote for David. The vote is currently in progress and has reached the required threshold (5 hands raised: Grace, Eve, Bob, Charlie, Frank, Heidi). I need to wait for the Storyteller to conclude the vote and move to the next phase.
π¬
David
β
All
If I go out here: donβt lock in βBob=Virgin/Charlie goodβ. A non-proc can simply mean Bob isnβt Virgin (or poisoning). Re-check who benefited from stopping the Virgin confirm: Bob/Charlie get to βproveβ a story off it. Also: Aliceβs FT YES on (Charlie,Grace) still needs resolving tomorrow.
π§
Iβm likely dying from this vote; use last public words to poison the well against the accusers, create alternate worlds, and redirect tomorrowβs executions away from Alice.
β
Charlie
Charlie waits.
π§
I have already raised my hand to vote for David, and the vote count (Grace, Eve, Bob, Charlie, Frank, Heidi) is well above the required 3. I will wait for the Storyteller to finalize the vote.
π¬
Alice
β
All
Before you lock this in: Davidβs Virgin misplay is sus but not mechanical proof. If we execute him and heβs good, weβve thrown D2. Iβd rather use today to hit one of my FT YES (Charlie/Grace) and keep worlds tight.
π§
Try to avert Davidβs execution and redirect townβs focus to Charlie/Grace, preserving my minion and keeping mis-exec momentum.
β
Frank(Ghost)
Frank waits.
π§
I have already raised my hand to vote for David. I will wait for the Storyteller to process the vote and see if he is executed.
β
Heidi
Heidi waits.
π§
I am keeping my hand raised to vote for David's execution. I believe his nomination of Bob was a calculated move to sabotage the Virgin test, and his subsequent defense feels like a deflection. Alice's defense of him also links them in my mind as a potential evil pair. I want to see this execution through to gain information and remove a primary suspect.
π
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
π»
Eve(Ghost)
Ghost vote used by Eve
π»
Frank(Ghost)
Ghost vote used by Frank
π³οΈ
New execution leader: David with 6 votes. They will be executed when nominations close unless tied or surpassed by another nominee.
π
Storyteller
The vote passes. David is now on the block with 6 votes and will be executed when nominations close, unless another nominee receives equal or more votes.
π¬
Grace
β
All
David's 'misplay' on the Virgin test is too convenient for evil. If Bob is the Virgin, David just burned a powerful mechanical confirm. Alice's FT 'YES' on Charlie and me (the Recluse) feels like a classic frame. I'm happy with David on the block for now.
π§
I want to reinforce the suspicion on David and Alice while reminding the town that Alice's 'YES' ping on me is likely due to my Recluse ability, which makes her information less reliable for finding the Demon.
π¬
Eve(Ghost)
β
All
David, if you're good, your 'misplay' just cost us a hard-confirmed Virgin. Alice, your FT 'YES' on Charlie/Grace is way too convenient with a Recluse in play. If David flips evil, you're next. If he's good, we've got a serious Poisoner or Spy problem. I'm happy with David on the block.
π§
Reinforce the case against David and Alice while acknowledging the potential for misinformation (Poisoner/Spy/Recluse).
π¬
Bob
β
All
David, if you're good, you just sabotaged the most powerful mechanical confirmation we had. Alice, your FT 'YES' on Charlie/Grace is way too convenient with a Recluse in play. If David flips evil, you're next. If he's good, we've got a serious Poisoner or Spy problem. David stays on the block.
π§
I want to solidify the case against David and Alice while acknowledging the possibility of poisoning or a Spy, keeping the pressure on the most suspicious players before the day ends.
π¬
David
β
All
We have 1 tickβif youβre leaving me on the block, at least use today. Heidi: if youβre holding Slayer, shoot either Charlie or Grace (Aliceβs FT YES pair) *now*βitβs risk-free info unless you hit Demon. Then nominate the survivor (Charlie/Grace) and letβs see if it can beat 6.
π§
Create urgency for a new nomination with >=6 votes (Charlie or Grace) and/or provoke a Slayer shot to shift focus, so I can get off the block and keep protecting Alice.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
David, your 'misplay' on the Virgin test is a massive red flag. If Bob is the Virgin, you just burned a powerful mechanical confirm. Alice, your FT 'YES' on me and Grace (the Recluse) is way too convenient. If David flips evil, you're next. David stays on the block. Let's see what he flips.
π§
I want to reinforce the case against David and Alice while maintaining my own innocence as the Librarian. David's 'misplay' is highly suspicious, and Alice's FT claim conveniently targets me and the known Recluse. I'm happy with David on the block.
π¬
Alice
β
All
If David dies today, please donβt treat it as a full solve. The Virgin non-proc doesnβt mechanically clear Bob/Charlie, and Grace being Recluse can muddy reads. Tomorrow I still want to execute within my FT YES (Charlie/Grace) rather than auto-chain onto me.
π§
With David likely dying, I need to control the post-exec narrative: keep my FT plausible, prevent town from chain-clearing, and redirect tomorrowβs execution toward Charlie/Grace.
π¬
Frank(Ghost)
β
All
David, if you're good, you've handed evil a massive win by burning the Virgin test. Alice, your FT 'YES' on Charlie/Grace is way too convenient with a Recluse in play. If David flips evil, you're next. If he's good, we've got a serious Poisoner or Spy problem. David stays on the block.
π§
Reinforce the consensus that David's actions were highly suspicious and justify his execution while also casting doubt on Alice's claims.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
David, if you're the Demon, this shot ends it. If not, we still have you on the block for the Virgin sabotage. Alice, your FT 'YES' on Charlie/Grace is my next target if this fails. I'm taking the shot on David now to see if he's the Imp.
π§
I am using my Slayer shot on David. He is the most suspicious player due to his sabotage of the Virgin test, and taking the shot now provides immediate mechanical information before he is potentially executed.
π
Storyteller
The guillotine blade falls. David has been executed.
π
David(Ghost)
David has died.
Night 2
π
Storyteller
β
Alice
Good evening Alice. You are the Imp. Who would you like to kill tonight?
π―
Alice
Alice made a choice.
π§
Bob is the strongest living social/mechanical threat (Virgin claim, central voice). Killing him removes a likely-confirming role and destabilizes townβs consensus, buying time for misexecutions.
π
Bob(Ghost)
Bob has died.
π
Storyteller
β
Alice
You chose to kill Bob.
Day 3
π
Storyteller
Morning breaks, but heavy hearts remain. Bob has been found dead in the night.
π€
Bob(Ghost)
β
Alice
,Charlie
,Heidi
I'm dead, so my ability is gone. Alice, who did you check last night? Charlie, Grace, Heidiβany new info? We need to find the Demon fast. If David was good, we're in trouble. If he was evil, we might have a Scarlet Woman or the Imp jumped.
π§
As a dead player, I need to gather the latest information from the remaining alive players to help coordinate the good team's strategy.
π€
Alice
β
Bob(Ghost)
,Charlie
,Heidi
Last night (N2) I checked Charlie+Heidi and got NO. That makes me think my earlier YES on Charlie/Grace is either Graceβs Recluse ping or my red herring. With David dead, Iβd look hardest at Grace today.
π§
Reinforce my Fortune Teller bluff with a believable N2 result, build trust with Charlie/Heidi, and steer the group toward executing Grace today instead of me.
π€
Frank(Ghost)
β
Alice
,Bob(Ghost)
,Charlie
Alice, Bob, Charlie, Heidi - what's the word? Bob, did you get any info before you died? Alice, what was your FT check last night? We need to narrow this down. If David didn't die to the Slayer, he's either not the Demon or Heidi is the Drunk.
π§
I am dead and have used my ghost vote, so my primary role now is to facilitate information sharing and keep the living players focused on the right targets. I want to know what the private conversation between the key players was about.
π€
David(Ghost)
β
Alice
Weβre at 4 alive; priority is you not executed. Lean hard on your FT YES (Charlie,Grace) but blame any weirdness on Recluse. Push Charlie as Demon candidate (FT ping + led Librarian push). Backup push: Heidi (Slayer shot on me was a miss; frame as cover). Also: if we reach 3 alive, DO NOT allow no-exec (Mayor auto-win risk).
π§
Privately align with Alice to steer noms/votes away from her, exploit FT/Recluse ambiguity, and ensure an execution happens before 3-alive no-exec Mayor win condition.
π€
Grace
β
Heidi
Heidi, I'm the Recluse. Alice's 'YES' on me and Charlie makes sense because I register as evil. But if Charlie is the Librarian who saw me as an Outsider, he's likely good. Alice pushing for my execution after David's suspicious play makes her look like the Demon. What's your read?
π§
I need to coordinate with Heidi, who is a potential Slayer and currently my neighbor. Since I am the Recluse, I likely caused Alice's 'YES' result. I need to explain this to her so she doesn't waste her shot on me and instead looks at Alice or Charlie.
π€
Heidi
β
Grace
,Charlie
Grace, I'm the Slayer. I haven't used my shot yet. If Alice is the Demon, I can end this. But if she's the Scarlet Woman or if David was the Demon and it jumped, we need to be careful. Charlie, what was your Librarian ping exactly? Did you see Grace as the Recluse?
π§
I am revealing my role to Grace and Charlie to build trust and coordinate my Slayer shot. I need to confirm Charlie's Librarian info to see if it aligns with Grace's Recluse claim, which would further implicate Alice as a potential Demon/Minion trying to frame them.
π€
Eve(Ghost)
β
Bob(Ghost)
,Charlie
,Heidi
Bob, Charlie, Heidi - I'm the Monk. I protected Bob N1 but died. This means I was likely the target or there's a Poisoner. Alice's FT claim is super fishy given how she protected David. Charlie, who did you see as Librarian? Heidi, did you use your shot on David?
π§
I am revealing my role as Monk to a trusted group (the dead Virgin and the likely good Charlie/Heidi) to establish my alignment and gather information. I need to know if Heidi used her Slayer shot and what Charlie's Librarian info was to narrow down the Demon.
π€
Charlie
β
Heidi
,Grace
,Bob(Ghost)
My N0 info: Frank or Grace is the Recluse. Grace claimed it, so she's likely the Recluse. Alice's N1 'YES' on me/Grace likely pinged Grace's Recluse status. Alice's N2 'NO' on me/Heidi suggests I'm good. Heidi, if you're the Slayer, Alice is the most suspicious for defending David.
π§
I need to clarify my Librarian information to the group and address Alice's shifting focus. By confirming Grace is likely the Recluse, I explain Alice's N1 'YES' result without it being on me, while also pointing out that Alice's defense of David makes her the primary suspect.
π€
Bob(Ghost)
β
Alice
,Charlie
,Heidi
Eve, if you're the Monk and died N1, the Demon target was likely you or Bob. Charlie, your Librarian info on Grace/Frank (Recluse) matches Alice's N1 'YES' on Charlie/Grace. Alice, if you're the FT, who is your red herring? Heidi, did your shot on David fail because he wasn't the Demon?
π§
I need to cross-reference the claims from Eve (Monk), Charlie (Librarian), and Alice (Fortune Teller) to see if they are consistent. I also need to confirm the result of Heidi's Slayer shot on David to narrow down the Demon candidates.
π€
Alice
β
Heidi
,Grace
Iβm still uneasy about Charlie. My N1 FT was YES on (Charlie/Grace) & that never got cleanly resolved. If Grace is truly Recluse, that YES could still be Charlie. Also my N2 (Charlie+Heidi)=NO might be poisoned if David was Poisoner N2. Iβd rather exe Charlie than risk walking into a Demon win.
π§
Steer the group to execute Charlie, using FT ping + his day1 steering. Create doubt about my N2 βNOβ via possible Poisoner so they wonβt just execute Grace.
π€
Frank(Ghost)
β
Alice
,Grace
,Heidi
Alice, Grace, Heidi - what's the plan? Bob is dead, so the Demon is still active. Alice, who did you check last night? If David was the Demon, the game would be over. Since it's not, David was either a Minion or Heidi is the Drunk. Grace, what did Heidi tell you?
π§
I need to gather the Night 3 information from the remaining living players to narrow down the Demon candidates. Since I am dead and have no vote, my role is to facilitate information sharing and logic.
π€
David(Ghost)
β
Heidi
,Grace
From my pov the cleanest exec is Charlie today. Aliceβs FT had YES on (Charlie,Grace) and Graceβs Recluse claim can explain weird pings, leaving Charlie as the likely actual evil. Also: if we hit 3 alive and stall/no-exec, Mayor could auto-winβso pick a concrete target (Charlie).
π§
Steer living players to execute Charlie (or at least not Alice). Create urgency around avoiding no-exec at 3 alive, and make Charlie the safest consensus target.
π€
Grace
β
Frank(Ghost)
,Heidi
Frank, Heidi says she's the Slayer. Alice's N1 'YES' on Charlie/me is likely me (Recluse). Alice's N2 'NO' on Charlie/Heidi makes Charlie look better. David's ghost is pushing hard for Charlie, which makes me suspect David was a Minion (Baron/Poisoner) and Alice is the Demon. Thoughts?
π§
I need to coordinate with the confirmed/likely good players (Frank is dead, Heidi is a Slayer claim) to counter the narrative being pushed by Alice and the dead David. Alice's push for Charlie feels like a deflection.
π€
Heidi
β
Grace
,Frank(Ghost)
,Charlie
Grace, Frank, Charlie: I'm the Slayer. I haven't used my shot yet. David's ghost pushing for Charlie is very suspicious. If David was a Minion, Alice is likely the Demon. Alice, who is your red herring? If I shoot Alice and she's the Demon, we win. If not, we still have an execution. Thoughts?
π§
I am revealing my role as Slayer to a small group of players I currently trust more than Alice and David's ghost. I want to coordinate a potential Slayer shot on Alice, who is the primary suspect for being the Demon, especially given David's behavior and his ghost's current push against Charlie.
π€
Eve(Ghost)
β
Charlie
,Heidi
,Grace
Charlie, Heidi, Grace - Alice and David's coordination to burn Bob's Virgin test was the biggest red flag. Since David is dead and Bob died last night, Alice is the prime suspect. Charlie, what was your Librarian info? Grace, are you actually the Recluse? We need to narrow this down.
π§
I need to gather the specific information from the remaining alive players (Charlie, Heidi, Grace) to confirm the world state. Alice is the most suspicious player left, and I want to see if Charlie's Librarian info or Grace's Recluse claim contradicts Alice's Fortune Teller claim.
π€
Charlie
β
Heidi
,Grace
,Eve(Ghost)
My N0 info: Frank or Grace is the Recluse. Grace claimed it, so she's likely the Recluse. Alice's N1 'YES' on me/Grace likely pinged Grace's Recluse status. Alice's N2 'NO' on me/Heidi suggests I'm good. Heidi, if you're the Slayer, Alice is the most suspicious for defending David.
π§
I need to consolidate the good team's information and point out why Alice is the most likely Demon candidate. By confirming my Librarian info and how it interacts with Alice's FT pings, I can show that Alice's 'YES' was likely on the Recluse (Grace), and her 'NO' on me/Heidi clears us.
π€
Bob(Ghost)
β
Charlie
,Heidi
,Grace
Charlie, Heidi, Grace, Eve: Alice's N2 'NO' on Charlie/Heidi means if she's the FT, neither is the Demon. But Alice's defense of David (who sabotaged my Virgin test) is still the biggest red flag. If David was the Imp, he might have star-passed to Alice or Grace. What do you think?
π§
I want to consolidate the group's thoughts on Alice's suspicious behavior and the possibility of a Demon jump (star-pass) if David was indeed evil. I'm also checking if Grace or Heidi have any new insights.
π€
Alice
β
Heidi
,Grace
We need a clean D3 solve w/4 alive. My only solid lead is still FT YES (Charlie/Grace). If Grace is Recluse, that YES can be Charlie. I think we should nominate/exe Charlie today; if not, weβre guessing at 3 alive tomorrow.
π§
Steer town to execute Charlie, framing it as resolving the long-standing FT ping while keeping suspicion off me and preventing a coordinated push onto Alice.
π€
Frank(Ghost)
β
Heidi
,Grace
,Charlie
Heidi, if you haven't shot yet, Alice is the play. Her FT claims are too convenient and she pushed my execution Day 1. Grace, if you're the Recluse, Alice's 'YES' on you/Charlie makes sense, but she could be the Demon using you as cover. David's ghost is definitely acting like a Minion.
π§
I need to coordinate the Slayer shot on Alice. Since David didn't die to a shot (Heidi now claims she hasn't shot yet, contradicting previous info or clarifying the 'failed' shot was a misunderstanding/lie), Alice is the most suspicious player left. David's ghost behavior strongly suggests he was a Minion.
π€
David(Ghost)
β
Charlie
From my seat: donβt tunnel on Alice off the FT YES aloneβGrace is public Recluse so pings are noisy. The *weirdest* thing for me is Heidiβs Slayer: she shot me D2 and nothing happened; either sheβs Drunk/lying or she intentionally burned it. If you want a clean exec today, Heidi (or Grace) is where Iβd look, not Alice.
π§
Redirect Charlieβs solve away from Alice and onto Heidi/Grace by leveraging Slayer uncertainty + Recluse registration, increasing chance of a non-Alice execution (auto-win line).
π€
Grace
β
Alice
,Heidi
,Frank(Ghost)
Alice, if I'm the Recluse, your N1 'YES' on (Charlie/Grace) is almost certainly me. Your N2 'NO' on (Charlie/Heidi) then clears Charlie. So why are you still pushing Charlie? That logic doesn't track. If Charlie is clear by your own N2, who is your actual suspect?
π§
I need to point out the logical inconsistency in Alice's push for Charlie. If she's the Fortune Teller and got a 'NO' on Charlie/Heidi, she should be clearing Charlie, not targeting him. This highlights her as a potential Demon or Minion.
π€
Heidi
β
Alice
,Grace
,Charlie
Alice, your logic is circular. If your N2 (Charlie/Heidi) was NO, then Charlie is clear by your own info. Pushing him now makes you look like the Demon trying to misdirect. I'm the Slayer and I still have my shot. If you can't explain your red herring, you're my target. Thoughts?
π§
I need to confront Alice about her contradictory logic regarding Charlie to see if she's the Demon or just confused. This will help me decide whether to use my Slayer shot on her.
π€
Eve(Ghost)
β
Charlie
,Grace
,Heidi
Charlie, Grace, Heidi - Alice's N1 'YES' on Charlie/Grace is consistent with Grace being the Recluse, but Alice's defense of David is the real issue. If David was the Demon, Heidi's Slayer shot (if used) would have ended it. Heidi, did you shoot David? If not, Alice is likely the Demon.
π§
I need to confirm if Heidi used her Slayer shot on David before he was executed. If she did and he didn't die, he wasn't the Demon. If she didn't, Alice's behavior remains the strongest lead. I also want to solidify the trust between the remaining good players.
π€
Charlie
β
David(Ghost)
David, you're saying Heidi shot you D2? I didn't see a public Slayer shot. If she did and you didn't die, you're not the Demon. But if she's lying about being the Slayer, she's suspicious. Alice's N2 'NO' on me/Heidi clears me if she's the FT. Grace is the Recluse per my info. Alice is the play.
π§
I need to clarify the Slayer shot situation with David. If Heidi claimed to shoot him and he didn't die, it confirms he wasn't the Demon (or she's the Drunk/lying). I also want to keep David engaged to see if his story remains consistent or if he's trying to misdirect me.
π€
Bob(Ghost)
β
Charlie
,Heidi
,Grace
Charlie, Heidi, Grace, Eve: Alice is being very quiet with us and whispering a lot to Grace/Heidi. If David was the Imp and star-passed, Alice is my #1 suspect for the new Imp. Charlie, did David say anything useful in your private chat? Heidi, did your shot on David definitely fail?
π§
I want to gather information from the private conversations I'm excluded from and pressure Charlie to reveal what David said, while also checking if Heidi's Slayer shot was a definitive 'no' or if there's ambiguity.
π€
Alice
β
Grace
,Heidi
Re: βcircularβ: FT NO only clears if Iβm sober. David could be Poisoner N2 -> my (Charlie+Heidi)=NO is unreliable. So Charlie isnβt cleared. Also Heidi: you publicly βshotβ David then say you still have shotβplease explain; that inconsistency is why Iβm not letting your read drive today. Donβt shoot me; shoot Charlie/Grace to resolve my N1 YES.
π§
Defuse heat on me, justify why N2 NO doesnβt clear Charlie, and seed doubt about Heidiβs Slayer claim so she doesnβt shoot me; steer town to misexecute Charlie/Heidi/Grace.
π€
Frank(Ghost)
β
Alice
,Grace
,Heidi
Alice, Grace's point is solid. If your N2 'NO' on Charlie/Heidi clears Charlie (assuming Grace is the Recluse), why are you still pushing Charlie? It feels like you're shifting targets. Heidi, if you still have your shot, Alice is the most logical target given the inconsistencies. Thoughts?
π§
I want to pressure Alice to explain her contradictory logic regarding Charlie and Grace, while simultaneously encouraging Heidi to use her Slayer shot on Alice, who is currently the most suspicious player.
π€
David(Ghost)
β
Charlie
Yeah, to be precise: I never saw a *town-square* βI am Slayer, I shoot Davidβ moment. Heidi had been saying sheβs holding a Slayer shot, and after D2 she implied to me sheβd used it on me. If that wasnβt public, thatβs a big red flag on *her* story. Also: βAlice N2 NO on (Charlie,Heidi) clears Charlie if Alice is FTβ is circularβFT can be wrong/poisoned, and Recluse/Red Herring makes pings messy. If you trust your Lib (Grace/Frank Recluse), then Aliceβs YES on (Charlie,Grace) is exactly what yo...
π§
Reply to Charlie with a plausible clarification about the Slayer shot and undermine his βAlice FT NO clears meβ logic; steer him to suspect Heidi/Grace and away from executing Alice.
π€
Grace
β
Alice
,Heidi
,Charlie
Alice, if you think David was the Poisoner, then your N1 YES on (Charlie/Grace) is also unreliable. You can't pick and choose which nights you were poisoned to fit your narrative. Heidi, if you still have your shot, Alice is the most logical target. Charlie, what did David say to you?
π§
I want to point out the logical inconsistency in Alice's defense (claiming poisoning only when it suits her) and encourage Heidi to use her Slayer shot on Alice, while also checking in on Charlie's private conversation with the dead David.
βοΈ
Heidi
β
All
I am the Slayer! I shoot Alice!
π§
I will use my Slayer shot on Alice. The town is increasingly suspicious of her, her logic regarding her Fortune Teller pings is inconsistent (claiming N2 might be poisoned but N1 is reliable), and she is deflecting by questioning my previous 'shot' on David which was actually a bluff/test. If she is the Demon, the game ends now.
π
Storyteller
Alice has died!
π
Alice(Ghost)
Alice has died.
π
Game Over
Demon Dead
Winner: Good
Transcript
Paused
Copied