Game Detail
Players
Alice (Imp) Bob (Spy) Charlie (Empath) David (Washerwoman) Eve (Recluse) Frank (Librarian) Grace (Ravenkeeper) Heidi (Investigator)
Token Usage
| Team | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Cost (USD) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Good | 531,795 | 164,338 | $0.9912 |
| Evil | 201,207 | 123,616 | $0.5629 |
Event Timeline
🎭
The game has started.
📜
Storyteller
→
Bob
You are the Minion. The Demon is Alice.
📜
Storyteller
→
Alice
Minions are: Bob. Your safe bluffs are: Slayer, Butler, Undertaker
📜
Storyteller
→
David
Good evening David. You are the Washerwoman. Either Charlie or Alice is the Empath.
📜
Storyteller
→
Frank
Good evening Frank. You are the Librarian. Either Eve or Charlie is the Recluse.
📜
Storyteller
→
Heidi
Good evening Heidi. You are the Investigator. You learn no information tonight.
📜
Storyteller
→
Charlie
Good evening Charlie. You are the Empath. You sense that 0 of your neighbors is evil!
📜
Storyteller
→
Bob
Good evening Bob. You are the Spy. You can secretly see information about all players: - Alice: Imp (evil), Alive - Bob: Spy (evil), Alive - Charlie: Empath (good), Alive - David: Washerwoman (good), Alive - Eve: Recluse (good), Alive - Frank: Librarian (good), Alive - Grace: Ravenkeeper (good), Alive - Heidi: Investigator (good), Alive
Day 1
📜
Storyteller
Welcome to the village of Ravenswood Bluff. Please take this time to get to know your fellow villagers. Feel free to move around and have private conversations. Be wary, for a Demon hides among you!
👤
Alice
→
Bob
Hey Bob, I'm the Imp. Let's coordinate our bluffs. I'm thinking of claiming Slayer since it's a safe bluff for me. What role are you claiming? We should align our stories and watch each other's backs.
🧠
Establish private coordination with my fellow evil player Bob. We need to align our bluffs and strategy early to avoid contradicting each other later.
👤
Charlie
→
Bob
,David
Hey, I'm the Empath. My neighbors are you two, Bob and David. Last night I got a reading of zero, which means neither of you is evil. That's great news for us. I wanted to share this privately so we can start working together. Do either of you have any info to share?
🧠
Share my Empath info with my neighbors Bob and David since they appear good. Building early trust with confirmed-good players helps create a voting bloc and gather more information to find the Demon.
👤
Bob
→
Alice
Hey Alice, Slayer is a good bluff for you. I'm thinking of claiming Fortune Teller - I can say I checked a pair and got no Demon, which is flexible. We should support each other's claims. Also, Charlie just told me and David he's Empath with a 0 reading on us. That's false since I'm evil. Should I call him out now or wait?
🧠
Coordinate bluffs with the Demon Alice. Fortune Teller is a flexible claim that lets me make unverifiable statements. I need to decide when to undermine Charlie's Empath claim since his 0 reading is provably false.
👤
Eve
→
David
,Frank
Hey neighbors! Just wanted to check in early. Have either of you gotten any useful info from the night? I'm still figuring out where I stand in all this. What roles are you leaning toward claiming?
🧠
As Recluse, I want to establish early connections with my neighbors and trusted players to gather information. Being near the seating order, David and Frank are my neighbors and good starting points for information exchange.
👤
Grace
→
Frank
,Heidi
Hey Frank and Heidi, since we're neighbors, let's get to know each other. I'm Grace. What roles are you two claiming? I want to build some trust early on since we sit next to each other.
🧠
As Ravenkeeper, I have no active information yet. I should introduce myself to my neighbors and start gathering role claims to build a network of trusted players and identify the Demon.
👤
Frank
→
Grace
,Heidi
Hey Grace and Heidi, good to connect with neighbors early! I'm the Librarian. I got info that one of two specific players is an Outsider, but I want to be careful about sharing exactly who until I can cross-reference with others. What are you two claiming? Have either of you heard anything useful?
🧠
Grace and Heidi reached out as neighbors. I should build trust with them by sharing my role claim but being cautious about exact details. I want to hear their claims first and see if they corroborate or conflict with my info before revealing specifics about Eve/Charlie.
👤
Heidi
→
Grace
,Frank
Hey Grace and Frank, thanks for reaching out. I'm the Investigator, but here's the weird thing — I got no information last night. That's concerning because the Investigator should always learn something on Night 0. It makes me wonder if I might be the Drunk. Frank, as the Librarian, did you get solid info? And Grace, what's your role? If I am the Drunk, the real Investigator is out there somewhere, and we need to find them.
🧠
I got no info as Investigator, which is very unusual and suggests I may be the Drunk. I should be honest with my neighbors about this and try to cross-reference their claims to figure out what's going on. Building trust early with Grace and Frank could help us form an alliance.
👤
David
→
Charlie
,Bob
Thanks for sharing, Charlie. That's really helpful. I can corroborate your claim - I'm the Washerwoman, and I was told that either you or Alice is the Empath. So your claim fits perfectly with what I know. Your reading of zero is great news for us. I don't have any other info yet, but between the two of us, we've got a solid foundation. Let's keep in touch as the day progresses.
🧠
Charlie claimed Empath which matches my Washerwoman info. I should whisper back to confirm and share my corroborating information to build a trusted alliance. Charlie's reading of 0 also suggests I'm good, which aligns with reality.
👤
Alice
→
Bob
Don't call out Charlie yet - that draws attention to us. Let his false claim sit. Later you can "discover" the inconsistency when you reveal your Fortune Teller info, which makes you look more credible. I'll claim Slayer. We should act like we barely know each other publicly.
🧠
Advise Bob to hold off on calling out Charlie to avoid appearing coordinated. We can exploit Charlie's false Empath claim later to build Bob's credibility as Fortune Teller.
👤
Charlie
→
David
David, your Washerwoman info is really helpful and confirms we can trust each other. So if it's me or Alice as the Empath, and I am the Empath, then Alice is NOT the Empath. Have you learned anything else about Alice's role? Also, have you heard any claims from Eve, Frank, Grace, or Heidi? We should start building a picture of who's claiming what.
🧠
David's Washerwoman claim corroborates my Empath role, which is very valuable. I want to deepen our alliance and discuss what we know about Alice (the other candidate from his info). I should also start gathering info from other players.
👤
Bob
→
Alice
Agreed on waiting. I'll claim Fortune Teller and say I checked Charlie and Grace last night - got no Demon. This makes Charlie look good initially, but later I can say my reading was wrong because he's lying about Empath. That way I look like I'm discovering the truth rather than attacking randomly. What's your backup if someone claims Slayer?
🧠
Coordinate bluff strategy with Alice while maintaining plausible deniability. Planning to use Fortune Teller claim to appear credible while setting up future attack on Charlie's false Empath reading.
👤
Eve
→
Grace
Hey Grace, just trying to get a read on things. Have you heard any interesting claims or info so far? I'm still piecing together where everyone stands. What's your take on the group dynamics?
🧠
I need to gather more information from players I haven't spoken to yet. Grace has been in whisper chains with Frank and Heidi, so she may have useful info to share. Building connections helps me understand the board state.
👤
Grace
→
Frank
,Heidi
Thanks for sharing, both of you. I'm the Ravenkeeper. If I die at night, I get to learn one player's character, so I'm hoping to be useful even in death. Heidi, your lack of info is really concerning. Either you were poisoned Night 0, you're the Drunk, or something else is going on. Did the Storyteller confirm you got no info, or was it just blank? Frank, can you share which two players your Librarian ping was about? That could help us figure out if there's a Drunk in play or if roles are matchi...
🧠
I need to respond to my neighbors Frank and Heidi who shared their claims. I should claim Ravenkeeper to build trust, discuss Heidi's concerning lack of info, and press Frank for more details on his Librarian ping. Building trust with neighbors is key early strategy.
👤
Frank
→
Grace
,Heidi
Alright, I'll share. My Librarian info is that either Eve or Charlie is the Recluse. So one of those two is an Outsider. Heidi, since you got no Investigator info, you might be the Drunk. If you are, the real Investigator is out there. If someone else claims Investigator, that would confirm you're the Drunk. Grace, if Eve or Charlie end up dying at night, your Ravenkeeper ability could help us verify my info. For now, let's keep this between us and see what others claim.
🧠
Grace asked me to share my specific Librarian info. Sharing it builds trust with Grace and Heidi, and lets us cross-reference claims. If Eve or Charlie claims a non-Recluse role, we can catch inconsistencies. I should be transparent with these neighbors who've been open with me.
👤
Heidi
→
Alice
,David
Hey Alice and David, I'm trying to piece together information from across the group. Have either of you heard any role claims or gotten useful information last night? I'm trying to figure out who might be evil in this village. Anything you can share would help.
🧠
I need to gather more role claims from players I haven't spoken to yet. If someone else claims Investigator, that confirms I'm the Drunk. I also want to cross-reference Frank's Librarian claim about Eve/Charlie being Recluse.
👤
David
→
Heidi
,Alice
Hey Heidi, thanks for reaching out. I do have some information from last night, but I'd like to hear what you've learned first before I share specifics. What role claims or info have you picked up from others? Also, Alice, anything you can share? I'm trying to build a picture too.
🧠
Heidi is reaching out asking for info. I should respond cautiously - share that I have some information but not reveal specifics of my Washerwoman ability yet. Ask her what she's heard to gather more data. I also haven't responded to Eve yet but Heidi's message is more recent.
👤
Alice
→
Heidi
,David
Hey Heidi and David. I'm claiming Slayer - haven't used my ability yet since it's only Day 1. I heard Charlie mention Empath with a 0 reading? That seems like useful info if true. What roles are you two claiming? I want to make sure we're gathering good information before nominations.
🧠
Maintain my Slayer bluff while gathering information about Heidi and David's claims. This builds credibility and helps me identify which good players are most dangerous to target.
👤
Charlie
→
Alice
Hey Alice, I wanted to check in with you. David told me he's the Washerwoman and that either you or I are the Empath. I am the Empath, so that means you must be something else. What role are you claiming? Also, have you heard anything useful from your conversations with Bob?
🧠
Alice is connected to me via David's Washerwoman info. If David is truthful, Alice is NOT the Empath. I need to find out what Alice claims to be to cross-reference with David's info and identify inconsistencies.
👤
Bob
→
Alice
Charlie and David are building a strong narrative together. His Empath 0 is false since I'm evil. Her Washerwoman supports him. Should I share my Fortune Teller info publicly today to cast doubt, or wait? If I say I checked them and got no Demon, it makes them look good temporarily. Or should I claim I got a Demon reading to attack one of them?
🧠
Coordinate with Alice on how to handle the Charlie/David alliance that's forming. Their claims support each other and could become a strong good team foundation that we need to break down.
👤
Eve
→
Heidi
Hey Heidi, trying to get a sense of what's going around. Have you heard any role claims or investigative info from the night? I'm trying to piece together a picture of the group before nominations start.
🧠
As Recluse, I need to gather information while being cautious that I might register as evil. Whispering to Heidi, who seems connected to the Grace/Frank/Heidi info cluster, to learn what investigative claims are floating around. This helps me prepare for whether anyone has info pointing at me.
👤
Grace
→
Eve
Hey Eve, thanks for reaching out. I've been talking with my neighbors Frank and Heidi. Frank claims Librarian and got a ping on either you or Charlie as the Recluse. Heidi claims Investigator but got no info, which is suspicious. Have you heard any other role claims? What's your role, and what do you make of the situation so far?
🧠
Eve reached out to me and I haven't responded yet. She's one of the players Frank's Librarian info points to as possibly the Recluse. Whispering to Eve helps me gauge her honesty and cross-reference Frank's claim.
👤
Frank
→
Eve
Hey Eve, earlier you mentioned wanting to share info. I'm willing to exchange. What role are you claiming? And have you learned anything useful from your conversations so far? I'm trying to piece together the board and figure out who we can trust.
🧠
Eve is one of my two Librarian targets. I want to probe her directly to see what she claims. Her claim could help me verify or contradict my info, and I can cross-reference with what others tell me.
👤
Heidi
→
David
,Alice
David, I'll be straight with you since we need to share information. I'm the Investigator, but I got no information on Night 0. That's very unusual and means I might be the Drunk. If so, the real Investigator is someone else. Frank claims Librarian and says Eve or Charlie is the Recluse. Grace claims Ravenkeeper. Alice claims Slayer. Charlie apparently mentioned Empath with a 0 reading. Now David, you said you have info - please share. It could help us figure out if I'm the Drunk and verify othe...
🧠
David has info but won't share until I reveal mine. I should be transparent about my Investigator problem to build trust and pressure David to share. This helps identify whether I'm the Drunk and cross-reference claims.
👤
David
→
Heidi
,Alice
Alright, here's my info. I'm the Washerwoman. On Night 0, I was told that either Charlie or Alice is the Empath. Charlie has claimed Empath to me privately, and Alice is claiming Slayer, so it lines up that Charlie is indeed the Empath. This also means Frank's Librarian claim that Eve or Charlie is the Recluse would point to Eve being the Recluse, since Charlie is confirmed Empath. Heidi, your lack of Investigator info is concerning - you might be the Drunk. If so, the real Investigator is someo...
🧠
Share my Washerwoman info with Heidi and Alice to build trust and verify claims. My info confirms Charlie as Empath (since Alice claims Slayer), which means Frank's claim that Eve or Charlie is Recluse points to Eve as the Recluse. This helps narrow down evil players.
Nominations — Day 1
📜
Storyteller
Nominations are now open.
💬
Frank
→
All
Hey everyone, I'm the Librarian. My Night 0 info tells me that either Eve or Charlie is the Recluse. So one of those two is our Outsider. I've already shared this privately with a few people, but I think it's time to put it out there publicly so we can coordinate. I'd like to hear what roles everyone is claiming so we can start narrowing things down. Also, if anyone else has information about Eve or Charlie, please share.
🧠
I need to share my Librarian info publicly to help the town piece things together. It's Day 1 nomination phase and we need to establish information flow. Sharing that Eve or Charlie is the Recluse helps narrow down the board and can be cross-referenced with other claims.
💬
David
→
All
I want to share my information publicly before nominations close. I am the Washerwoman. On Night 0, I was told that either Charlie or Alice is the Empath. Charlie has claimed Empath to me privately, and Alice has claimed Slayer, so this confirms Charlie as our Empath. Now here is the key contradiction: Frank claims Librarian saying Eve or Charlie is the Recluse, but Charlie is confirmed Empath, so that would mean Eve is the Recluse. But Heidi claims Investigator with no info, suggesting she migh...
🧠
It's nomination phase on Day 1. I need to publicly share my Washerwoman info to confirm Charlie as Empath and highlight the contradiction between Frank's Librarian claim (Eve/Charlie = Recluse) and Heidi's claim (Investigator with no info = possibly Drunk). Since there's only 1 Outsider slot normally, both can't be true unless there's a Baron. This helps the town identify who might be lying.
💬
Charlie
→
All
Hey everyone, I want to weigh in before nominations close. I am the Empath, and my Night 0 reading was zero, meaning both my neighbors Bob and David are good. David's Washerwoman info confirms me as Empath since Alice claims Slayer. Now about Frank's Librarian claim - if he's telling the truth and it's either me or Eve as the Recluse, then since I'm confirmed Empath, Eve must be the Recluse. But here's what really concerns me - Heidi, you claimed Investigator with no info? An Investigator always...
🧠
I need to publicly confirm my Empath role and 0 reading, address the contradiction with Frank's claim, and highlight how suspicious Heidi's Investigator claim with no info is. This helps the town identify potential evil players.
⌛
Alice
Alice waits.
🧠
Waiting lets others reveal more information and potentially nominate each other. Charlie's false Empath claim (0 reading when Bob is evil) will eventually be exposed. I can let good players discover this contradiction naturally, or strike later when I have more credibility as Slayer.
⚖️
Bob
→
Charlie
Charlie claims Empath with a 0 reading saying Bob and David are both good. But if Frank's Librarian is true and Charlie is Recluse, he's lying about his role. If Charlie is actually Empath, his info is false which means he's drunk/poisoned or lying. Either way, his claim creates contradictions we need to resolve.
🧠
Nominate Charlie to expose the contradiction in his Empath claim while appearing logical. This creates doubt without being too aggressive, and if he's executed it removes a Townsfolk. If not, I've planted seeds of suspicion.
📜
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Charlie. 4 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
💬
Charlie
→
All
Bob, your own nomination argument is contradictory. David's Washerwoman info directly confirms I am the Empath, not the Recluse. So if Frank's Librarian claim is real, Eve is the Recluse, not me. Nominating me wastes the town's time. The real concern here is Heidi claiming Investigator with no information - Investigators always get a ping on Night 0. That claim is mechanically impossible unless she's lying or drunk. Please do not vote for me.
🧠
Defend myself against Bob's nomination by pointing out the logical flaws in his argument. I should not be executed - I'm a confirmed Empath. I need to redirect suspicion toward Heidi who made a suspicious claim.
💬
Frank
→
All
I am not voting for Charlie. David's Washerwoman info clearly confirms Charlie as the Empath, since Alice has claimed Slayer independently. If Charlie is Empath, then my Librarian info simply means Eve is the Recluse. Executing a confirmed Empath makes no sense. The real issue here is Heidi claiming Investigator with zero information. An Investigator always gets a Night 0 ping. That is mechanically impossible unless she is the Drunk or she is lying and evil. I would rather we focus there.
🧠
I need to speak against voting for Charlie since David's Washerwoman info confirms Charlie as Empath. Voting to execute a confirmed Empath hurts the good team. I should redirect suspicion toward Heidi or Eve instead.
⌛
David
David waits.
🧠
Charlie is confirmed Empath by my Washerwoman info. Voting to execute a confirmed good information role is terrible for the team. I must not vote for Charlie.
⌛
Alice
Alice waits.
🧠
Avoid voting to prevent appearing coordinated with Bob. Let the town debate Charlie's fate naturally while I maintain distance from my minion.
⌛
Bob
Bob waits.
🧠
Avoid voting for Charlie to not appear too aggressive on Day 1. Let the town's natural voting play out - if Charlie survives, I can attack their false Empath info later. If they die, good player eliminated either way.
💬
Eve
→
All
I want to speak up before this vote. I am the Recluse. Frank's Librarian info is correct, it is me, not Charlie. David's Washerwoman confirms Charlie as Empath since Alice claims Slayer. So Charlie is a confirmed good player and executing him would be a huge mistake. The real question is Heidi. An Investigator always gets Night 0 information. Getting nothing is mechanically impossible unless she is the Drunk or lying. That is where our focus should be, not on a confirmed Empath.
🧠
I need to speak against the Charlie vote and confirm I'm the Recluse. This resolves the Eve/Charlie Recluse question, confirms Frank's Librarian info, clears Charlie as Empath, and helps focus suspicion on Heidi whose Investigator claim is mechanically suspicious.
💬
Grace
→
All
I'm not voting for Charlie. He's confirmed Empath by David's Washerwoman info, and Eve just confirmed she's the Recluse, which lines up perfectly with Frank's Librarian claim. Nominating a confirmed good player makes no sense. What really concerns me is Bob - why are you nominating a mechanically confirmed Empath? That looks like a deliberate misdirect. And Heidi, an Investigator always gets Night 0 information. No info is impossible unless you're the Drunk, but Eve already accounts for our Outs...
🧠
Urge people not to vote for Charlie since he's a confirmed Empath. Point out that Bob nominating a confirmed good player is suspicious, and redirect attention to the mechanically impossible Investigator claim from Heidi.
💬
Heidi
→
All
I want to speak up about the vote and my own situation. First, I absolutely will not be voting for Charlie. He is a confirmed Empath by David's Washerwoman info, and executing him would be terrible for our team. Now, about me. Everyone is right that an Investigator always gets Night 0 information. I genuinely got nothing. The most logical explanation is that I am the Drunk. If that is the case, the real Investigator is someone else in this town. But here is the critical point: if Eve is the Recl...
🧠
I need to publicly acknowledge that I'm likely the Drunk, which has major implications: if Eve is Recluse and I'm Drunk, that's 2 Outsiders in a 1-Outsider game, meaning a Baron is likely in play. This is critical info for the town. I should also not vote for confirmed Empath Charlie.
💬
Charlie
→
All
One critical point about Heidi claiming to be the Drunk. With only one Outsider in our base setup, and Eve confirmed as the Recluse, that slot is already filled. Heidi cannot be the Drunk unless we have a Baron, which would mean three Outsiders total. If there is no Baron, Heidi is lying and is almost certainly evil. Also, Bob, nominating a mechanically confirmed Empath is extremely suspicious. You should explain why you think David and I are both lying.
🧠
Point out the mechanical contradiction with Heidi's Drunk claim given the Outsider count, and highlight Bob's suspicious nomination of a confirmed Empath. This helps town focus on actual evil players.
⌛
Frank
Frank waits.
🧠
Voting is in progress for Charlie. I should NOT vote for Charlie as he is a confirmed Empath. Best action is to wait and not raise my hand, while observing how others vote for additional information.
⌛
David
David waits.
🧠
Charlie is confirmed Empath by my Washerwoman info. Voting to execute a confirmed good player would be disastrous. I will not raise my hand for this vote.
💬
Alice
→
All
Hold on everyone. Charlie's Empath reading of zero is actually suspicious because it claims Bob and David are both good, but we have no way to verify that yet. More importantly, Heidi's situation is mechanically impossible. Eve is the Recluse, that's one Outsider. If Heidi is the Drunk, that's two Outsiders, which requires a Baron. If there's no Baron, Heidi is lying. We need to clarify the Outsider count before we execute a potentially confirmed Empath. I'm not voting for Charlie yet - let's he...
🧠
Redirect suspicion to Heidi's mechanically impossible claim while protecting Bob from looking evil for nominating Charlie. This creates doubt about the Outsider count and Baron, sowing chaos while keeping my Slayer bluff intact.
⌛
Bob
Bob waits.
🧠
Voting for Charlie now makes me look obviously evil since town sees him as confirmed. Better to wait, let Charlie live today, then attack Heidi's impossible claim tomorrow. Charlie's false Empath reads will eventually fail anyway.
⌛
Eve
Eve waits.
🧠
Charlie is a confirmed Empath - voting for him hurts the good team. I will not vote. The town should focus on Heidi (mechanically impossible claim) and Bob (suspicious nomination of confirmed good player).
💬
Grace
→
All
I'm not voting for Charlie. Let me lay out the logic clearly. Charlie is confirmed Empath by David's Washerwoman, since Alice claims Slayer. Eve confirmed she's the Recluse, matching Frank's Librarian info perfectly. So Charlie is good. Now the real issue: Heidi, you claim Investigator with no Night 0 info. That's mechanically impossible unless you're the Drunk. But Eve fills our one Outsider slot. The only way you could be Drunk is if there's a Baron, meaning three Outsiders total. If there IS ...
🧠
Urge everyone not to vote for Charlie. He's confirmed Empath. Focus attention on the real problem: Heidi's impossible claim and Bob's suspicious nomination. We need to resolve the Outsider count question to determine if Heidi could be Drunk or must be evil.
💬
Heidi
→
All
I want to address the Baron question directly, because it matters a lot. If I am the Drunk, then there MUST be a Baron in play, giving us three Outsiders total. Eve is Recluse, I would be Drunk, and there would be a third Outsider somewhere. That means the Minion is specifically the Baron, and we know the Demon created extra Outsiders. This is actually very useful information if true. Alternatively, I could have been poisoned on Night 0 by a Poisoner. Either way, I genuinely believe I am the Inv...
🧠
I need to address the suspicion on me and frame the Baron possibility as important game information. I should not vote for Charlie and should redirect suspicion toward Bob for nominating a confirmed Empath.
📜
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
🗳️
Nominee Charlie did not reach the 4 vote threshold.
📜
Storyteller
Charlie did not receive enough votes (0/4).
⚖️
Charlie
→
Heidi
Heidi claims Investigator but got no Night 0 information, which is mechanically impossible for a real Investigator. The Drunk explanation requires a Baron and three Outsiders, but we only see Eve as Recluse and Heidi as potential Drunk - no third Outsider has been identified. Her claim doesn't add up, and she's our strongest lead for evil.
🧠
Heidi's Investigator claim with no Night 0 info is mechanically impossible. The Drunk explanation requires a Baron we can't confirm. Nominating her pressures her claim and gives town info through the vote. She's the most suspicious player currently.
📜
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Heidi. 4 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
💬
Heidi
→
All
Everyone, please do not vote for me. Think about this logically. If I were evil, why would I claim Investigator with no information? That is the worst possible evil claim. A Minion or Demon would fake real Investigator info, not admit they got nothing. The fact that I'm honestly reporting no info is exactly what a Drunk Investigator would do. I genuinely believe I am good. If I'm the Drunk, executing me kills a good player. If I'm the real Investigator who was poisoned, executing me kills a key ...
🧠
Defend myself against the vote by pointing out that claiming Investigator with no info is what a genuine Drunk would honestly report, not what an evil player would strategically claim. Urge the group not to execute me.
✋
Charlie
Charlie raised their hand
🧠
Heidi is the strongest evil lead. Her Investigator claim with no info is mechanically impossible without extraordinary circumstances. I must vote to execute her to protect the town.
✋
Frank
Frank raised their hand
🧠
Heidi's claim of no Investigator info is mechanically near-impossible without being the Drunk, which requires a Baron and a third Outsider nobody has claimed. The simplest explanation is she's evil. Voting to execute.
✋
David
David raised their hand
🧠
Heidi's claim is mechanically impossible as a real Investigator - they always get Night 0 info. The Drunk explanation requires a Baron and 3 Outsiders, but no evidence supports that. Her being evil is more likely. Voting to execute.
💬
Alice
→
All
I'm going to vote for Heidi. The logic is sound - her claim doesn't add up mechanically, and we can't risk keeping someone who might be lying about their role. If she's the Drunk, that's unfortunate, but the town needs to follow the evidence.
🧠
Vote for Heidi to execute. She's likely good (confused Drunk), so her death helps evil. Voting with town logic keeps me under radar as 'trustworthy' Slayer. Not voting would draw suspicious attention.
✋
Bob
Bob raised their hand
🧠
Vote with the majority to execute Heidi, a good player. This removes an information role from the game and keeps me aligned with the town's logic to avoid suspicion.
✋
Eve
Eve raised their hand
🧠
Heidi's Investigator claim with no info is mechanically impossible unless Drunk/Baron or poisoned. With only 1 Outsider slot filled by me, Drunk requires a Baron with no 3rd Outsider identified. Most likely she's evil lying about her role. Vote is already at 4 threshold, but I'll add my vote to show solidarity and confirm my good alignment.
✋
Grace
Grace raised their hand
🧠
Heidi's Investigator claim with no N0 info is mechanically impossible without being Drunk or poisoned. The Drunk explanation requires a Baron and 3 Outsiders, but no third Outsider is visible. The poison theory is unlikely N0. The strongest read is Heidi is evil. I vote yes.
💬
Heidi
→
All
I know I'm about to die, and I accept it. But please remember this: I genuinely believe I am a good player. If I am the Drunk, then there IS a Baron, and the real Investigator is still out there with real information. Look for the third Outsider. If I was poisoned, the Poisoner exists and targeted me Night 0. Either way, watch Bob carefully. He nominated a mechanically confirmed Empath for no good reason. That is not something a good player does. Good luck, town.
🧠
I'm about to be executed with 6 votes. This is my final chance to leave useful information for the town. I should warn them about Bob's suspicious behavior and clarify that if I'm Drunk, the Baron exists and they should look for a third Outsider.
⌛
Charlie
Charlie waits.
🧠
The vote is already decided with 6 votes for Heidi. No action needed - my hand is already raised. Waiting for vote to resolve and night phase.
⌛
Frank
Frank waits.
🧠
The vote count is 6, well above the 4 needed for execution. My hand is raised and I'm confident in the decision. Heidi's claim is mechanically impossible without a Baron, and no third Outsider has been identified. I'll keep my vote and wait for the result.
⌛
David
David waits.
🧠
The vote is already decided with 6 votes for Heidi. No need to change my vote or add more chatter. The town should focus on analyzing the results tonight and watching Bob carefully for his suspicious nomination of confirmed Empath Charlie.
✋
Alice
Alice raised their hand
🧠
Vote for Heidi to maintain my cover as a good player. The town consensus is strong against her, and going along with it keeps me off suspicion. This execution benefits evil whether she's good or evil.
⌛
Bob
Bob waits.
🧠
Heidi is receiving 7+ votes and will be executed. I've already voted with the town to maintain my cover. Alice (my Demon) is also voting, which is perfect - we're both blending in. No need to change my vote.
⌛
Eve
Eve waits.
🧠
The vote is already decided with 7 votes for Heidi - she will be executed. Nothing more to add right now. Save my voice for tomorrow when we have more information from Heidi's death and night actions.
⌛
Grace
Grace waits.
🧠
Heidi's execution is confirmed with 7 votes including mine. No need to change my vote or speak. The mechanical case against her is strong. I should save my voice for after the execution when we learn more from night actions.
📜
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
🗳️
New execution leader: Heidi with 7 votes. They will be executed when nominations close unless tied or surpassed by another nominee.
📜
Storyteller
The vote passes. Heidi is now on the block with 7 votes and will be executed when nominations close, unless another nominee receives equal or more votes.
⌛
Heidi
Heidi waits.
🧠
No action can change my fate at this point. The vote is closed and I will be executed. I should wait calmly and accept my death, trusting that the town will use the information I provided.
⌛
Charlie
Charlie waits.
🧠
Day 1 is ending, Heidi will be executed. Only 1 tick left, nothing to change. Wait for night phase and tomorrow's Undertaker info on Heidi.
⌛
Frank
Frank waits.
🧠
Only 1 tick left. Heidi will be executed regardless. No nomination can change the outcome now. Better to wait, observe who voted, and share my Librarian info tomorrow when we have Undertaker info on Heidi.
⌛
David
David waits.
🧠
Heidi is already doomed with 7 votes on the last tick. No action can change the outcome. I should wait and observe the night results, then share my Washerwoman info tomorrow to help resolve the Charlie vs Alice Empath question.
⌛
Alice
Alice waits.
🧠
Heidi has 7 votes and will be executed regardless. No need to waste my nomination. I'll let this play out, then plan my night kill on Charlie or Grace who are leading town logic against us.
⌛
Bob
Bob waits.
🧠
Let Heidi's execution proceed - she's a good player who correctly identified me as suspicious. Removing her benefits evil. Trying to save her now would expose me immediately.
⌛
Eve
Eve waits.
🧠
Only 1 tick remains. Heidi will be executed with 7 votes. Nothing I can say or do will change the outcome. Better to stay quiet as Recluse and avoid drawing attention to myself on Day 1, since I might register as evil to information roles.
⌛
Grace
Grace waits.
🧠
Only 1 tick remaining. Heidi will be executed regardless. No time to meaningfully change the outcome. Better to stay quiet as Ravenkeeper - if Demon kills me at night, I get valuable info. No reason to reveal my role now.
📜
Storyteller
The guillotine blade falls. Heidi has been executed.
💀
Heidi(Ghost)
Heidi has died.
Night 1
📜
Storyteller
→
Alice
Good evening Alice. You are the Imp. Who would you like to kill tonight? Remember that if you kill yourself this way, a Minion becomes the Imp.
🎯
Alice
Alice made a choice.
🧠
Charlie claims Empath and leads town logic - this role provides consistent night information about evil neighbors, making him the biggest long-term threat. Killing him disrupts the town's information chain and removes a key leader.
💀
Charlie(Ghost)
Charlie has died.
📜
Storyteller
→
Alice
You chose to kill Charlie.
📜
Storyteller
→
Bob
Good evening Bob. You are the Spy. You can secretly see information about all players: - Alice: Imp (evil), Alive - Bob: Spy (evil), Alive - Charlie: Empath (good), Dead - David: Washerwoman (good), Alive - Eve: Recluse (good), Alive - Frank: Librarian (good), Alive - Grace: Ravenkeeper (good), Alive - Heidi: Investigator (good), Dead
Day 2
📜
Storyteller
Morning breaks, but heavy hearts remain. Charlie has been found dead in the night.
👤
Eve
→
Frank
Frank, I want to share something important with you. I'm the Recluse. That means I can register as evil or as a Minion or Demon to other players' information, even if dead. So if someone got a weird reading about me, that's why. I'm good though. What do you know so far? What's your role?
🧠
Whisper to Frank (my neighbor) to build trust, share that I'm an Outsider, and get his information. Frank is my neighbor and alive, so building an alliance is important for narrowing down suspects.
👤
Charlie(Ghost)
→
David
David, I'm dead but I've been thinking hard. My Empath reading of 0 means you and Bob are both good - I'm confident of that. Eve is Recluse per Frank's Librarian. So evil must be among Alice, Frank, and Grace. If Heidi was evil (her Investigator claim with no info is impossible), then only 1 evil remains alive among those three. If Heidi was Drunk, then Baron is in play and 2 evil remain among those three. Either way, Alice's Slayer claim is unverified, Frank's Librarian claim needs testing, and...
🧠
I'm dead but need to help find the Demon. I should share my logical deductions with David, my most trusted ally, so he can push the town in the right direction during nominations.
👤
Bob
→
Alice
Hey, we need to sync up before nominations. What role are you claiming? I'm thinking of saying I'm the Empath since Charlie's dead and can't contradict me. We should probably push for Eve's nomination - she's a Recluse and can register as evil. What do you think?
🧠
Alice is my Demon partner and we must coordinate before nominations. I need to ensure we have consistent stories and decide who to nominate to deflect suspicion from both of us.
👤
Heidi(Ghost)
→
David
David, Charlie whispered to you - did they share their Empath readings? I need to know what they learned. Also, my analysis: either I was the Drunk with Baron in play, meaning the real Investigator is hiding with real info, or I was Poisoned Night 0. If nobody counterclaimed Investigator, that's very strange. Who do you think is most suspicious? Bob nominating the confirmed Empath was sketchy.
🧠
Charlie whispered to David, likely sharing Empath info. I need to find out what Charlie knew and share my analysis about whether I was Drunk or Poisoned. David might be trustworthy since Charlie trusted him with info.
👤
Frank
→
Eve
Eve, I believe you. I'm the Librarian. My Night 0 info was that either you or Charlie is the Recluse. Since Charlie was confirmed Empath with real info, you must be the Recluse. So we're on the same team. Here's my concern: Bob nominated Charlie on Day 1, and Charlie was a mechanically confirmed Empath. That's very suspicious to me. Why would a good player nominate a confirmed Empath? I think Bob might be evil. What do you think? Also, do you have any thoughts on the Heidi situation - was she Dr...
🧠
Share my role and info with Eve who confirmed Recluse matching my ping. Build trust alliance to coordinate against Bob who nominated confirmed Empath Charlie - highly suspicious behavior suggesting evil alignment.
👤
David
→
Bob
Bob, I need to share something important. I'm the Washerwoman. Night 0 I learned that either Charlie or Alice is the Empath. Since Charlie claimed Empath and was then killed by the Demon overnight, that confirms Charlie WAS the real Empath. Which means Alice is NOT the Empath. Charlie's reading of 0 also confirms you and I are both good. So evil must be among Alice, Frank, and Grace. Alice claimed Slayer - what do you think of that? Also, why did you nominate Charlie yesterday?
🧠
My Washerwoman info (Charlie or Alice is Empath) is now confirmed since Charlie claimed Empath and was killed by the Demon. Bob is confirmed good by Charlie's Empath reading. I should coordinate with Bob to share this confirmed info and discuss who among Alice/Frank/Grace is evil.
👤
Grace
→
David
,Alice
Hey, I wanted to check in with you both. Bob nominating Charlie yesterday was incredibly suspicious - he tried to execute a mechanically confirmed Empath. Heidi also warned us about Bob before she died. What are you both thinking? Also, has anyone shared new info with you today? I'm the Ravenkeeper by the way - so if the Demon kills me at night, I'll learn their character.
🧠
I need to coordinate with the most trusted players to share info and figure out who's evil. David confirmed Charlie as Empath and Alice confirmed Charlie as Slayer - they're the most mechanically verified good players. I should get their thoughts on Bob and share mine.
👤
Alice
→
Grace
Thanks for checking in Grace. Ravenkeeper is a strong claim. I'm actually the Slayer - haven't used my shot yet. Bob nominating Charlie was weird, I agree. But Charlie also claimed Empath, so if Bob claims Empath now that's two Empaths which is suspicious. Eve as Recluse registering evil makes sense to investigate. What did David say to you?
🧠
Maintain Slayer bluff while appearing cooperative with Grace. Sow doubt about Bob's Empath claim without fully abandoning him. Support Eve nomination to remove a player who can register as evil. Gather intel on David's position.
👤
Eve
→
Frank
Frank, great work on the Librarian confirmation. That solidifies our alliance. Here's my analysis: Charlie's Empath 0 means Bob and David are the same alignment. Bob nominating a mechanically confirmed Empath is extremely suspicious - good players don't do that. Heidi also warned about Bob before dying. If Bob is evil, David must be evil too, which means one is the Demon and one is the Minion. I think we should focus on Bob today. Do you have any info about David from your role or conversations?...
🧠
Frank confirmed Librarian and my Recluse identity - he's my strongest ally. I need to share my analysis about Bob being suspicious for nominating confirmed Empath Charlie, and discuss the Charlie 0 reading implying Bob and David share alignment. Coordinate our next steps.
👤
Charlie(Ghost)
→
Bob
Bob, my Empath reading of 0 confirms you and David are both good. I know you nominated me and that looked bad, but mechanically you're clear to me. Evil is among Alice, Frank, and Grace. What's your read on them? Has anyone shared useful info in whispers? Frank's Librarian claim needs scrutiny - he could be evil who knew Eve was Recluse. Alice's Slayer claim is unverified. Grace is quiet. What are you thinking?
🧠
Bob is confirmed good by my Empath reading but nominated me suspiciously. I need to understand his reasoning and share my analysis. Evil is among Alice/Frank/Grace. Getting Bob's perspective helps narrow suspects.
👤
Bob
→
David
David, thanks for sharing. Your Washerwoman claim makes sense - Charlie was real Empath, so Alice isn't. I nominated Charlie yesterday because I was testing reactions, not because I thought he was evil. Looking at Alice, Frank, Grace: Alice's Slayer claim is untestable until she uses it. Frank's Librarian info - what did he learn? Grace has been quiet. We should pressure them to share. Also, Eve as Recluse could register evil falsely - worth considering.
🧠
Build trust with David by accepting his logic, deflect from my suspicious nomination, and redirect suspicion toward Frank and Grace while keeping Alice protected. This maintains my cover while advancing evil agenda.
👤
Heidi(Ghost)
→
Charlie(Ghost)
,David
Charlie, I need your Empath readings from both nights - they're critical now that you're dead. What did you learn about your neighbors' evil count? David, please share any info you've gathered. My key question: has ANYONE claimed Investigator with real info? If not, I may have been Poisoned rather than Drunk. Bob's nomination of confirmed Empath Charlie was very suspicious - he could be evil trying to kill our info source.
🧠
I'm dead and need to gather Charlie's Empath readings before they're lost. Charlie's info could identify evil neighbors. I also want to coordinate with David who seemed open to my earlier whisper. Gathering this info helps the town find the Demon.
👤
Frank
→
Eve
Eve, I need to push back on your logic a bit. Charlie's Empath reading of 0 means Bob and David are both GOOD - that's zero evil neighbors. You can't use that same reading to argue David is evil if Bob is evil. Here's the key question: is there a Baron or a Poisoner? If Baron exists, Heidi was the Drunk, meaning no Poisoner, so Charlie's reading is reliable, and Bob and David are both good. If Poisoner exists, Charlie could have been poisoned, making his reading wrong. So we need to figure out t...
🧠
Share critical analysis with Eve about the Baron vs Poisoner distinction and how it affects Bob/David's alignment. Her current logic has a contradiction - she's assuming Bob is evil while using the Empath 0 reading to conclude David is evil, but a 0 reading means Bob is NOT evil if the reading is accurate.
👤
David
→
Heidi(Ghost)
,Charlie(Ghost)
Heidi and Charlie, here's my Washerwoman info: Night 0 I learned Charlie or Alice is the Empath. Since Charlie claimed Empath and was killed by the Demon, Charlie WAS the real Empath - which means Alice is NOT the Empath. Charlie's reading of 0 confirms Bob and I are both good. So evil must be among Alice, Frank, and Grace. Alice claims Slayer, Frank claims Librarian, Grace claims Ravenkeeper. Heidi - nobody has counterclaimed Investigator with real info, which is suspicious. If you were Drunk, ...
🧠
Share my Washerwoman confirmation with dead allies Heidi and Charlie so they can help coordinate. Charlie confirmed Empath means Alice is NOT Empath. Need to narrow down evil among Alice/Frank/Grace by sharing info and getting their analysis.
👤
Grace
→
Alice
David hasn't said much directly to me yet. But his Washerwoman claim pointed to Charlie or Alice as Empath, and Charlie turned out to be Empath, so that supports David. Here's my read: Bob is our top suspect. He tried to execute a confirmed Empath, and Heidi's dying words warned about him. The Demon killed Charlie at night - maybe because Charlie's Empath info was valuable. Have you thought about using your Slayer shot on Bob? If he's the Demon, it ends the game. If not, we learn he's not the De...
🧠
Alice is my most trusted ally with the Slayer shot. I need to coordinate with her about Bob being the top suspect and discuss whether she should use her shot on him. Also need to share what I know about David.
👤
Alice
→
Bob
Hey Bob, Grace is pushing hard on you and wants me to Slayer shot you. We need to be careful here. If I shot you and nothing happens, it proves you're not Demon but also makes me look like I'm protecting you. Better angle: claim you nominated Charlie because your Empath read showed 2 evil neighbors and you were testing him. Let's pivot - I'll suggest Grace's Ravenkeeper claim is suspicious since she's leading charges. Can you feed David some info that makes Grace look questionable?
🧠
Coordinate with my minion Bob to deflect Grace's accusation. We need a unified story for why Bob nominated Charlie, and we should redirect suspicion toward Grace who is leading town logic against us.
👤
Eve
→
Frank
Frank, you're absolutely right and I made a logic error. Charlie's 0 means both neighbors are good, not the same alignment. I apologize. So here's the corrected analysis: if there's a Baron, Heidi was Drunk, no Poisoner exists, Charlie's reading is reliable, and Bob and David are both good. That means evil is Alice and Grace. If there's a Poisoner instead, Heidi was lying or evil, Charlie might have been poisoned, and we can't trust that reading. The Baron versus Poisoner question is everything....
🧠
Correct my logical error about Charlie's Empath reading, acknowledge Frank's point, and work together to determine whether Baron or Poisoner exists - this is the key question that resolves the game.
👤
Charlie(Ghost)
→
Heidi(Ghost)
,David
Heidi, I only got one Empath reading - Night 0 was 0. I died Night 1 before getting a second reading. Both my neighbors Bob and David are mechanically GOOD. Please stop suspecting Bob - my Empath reading proves him good. Evil is among Alice, Frank, and Grace only. Now, David, if Baron is in play (Heidi was Drunk), there are only 3 Townsfolk total - you, me, and possibly Frank as Librarian. That means Alice claiming Slayer and Grace claiming Ravenkeeper can't both be real Townsfolk. At least one ...
🧠
Heidi asked for my Empath readings and suspects Bob. I need to clarify I only got N0=0, correct Heidi that Bob is confirmed good, and push the group to focus on Alice/Frank/Grace as the only evil candidates.
👤
Bob
→
Alice
Alice, here's the plan: I'll tell David I'm actually the Empath who got 2 evil neighbors (you and Charlie), which is why I nominated him - I was testing. This explains my behavior and makes Grace look suspicious for pushing so hard. You should back this up subtly. Then we pivot to Eve - Recluse can register evil, perfect scapegoat. Or we attack Grace's Ravenkeeper claim - ask what she learned Night 1. If she lies, we catch her. What's your read on Frank's Librarian claim?
🧠
Coordinate with Alice on a unified story to deflect Grace's pressure. Creating a false Empath claim explains my nomination behavior while protecting Alice's Slayer claim. Redirecting to Eve or Grace creates town division.
👤
Heidi(Ghost)
→
David
,Charlie(Ghost)
David, you said evil is among Alice, Frank, and Grace, but you left out Eve! Eve is not confirmed good either. What is Eve claiming? We need her role claim to evaluate everyone. Charlie, thank you for the Empath reading. So the confirmed good players are you, me, David, and Bob. That means evil is definitely among Alice, Eve, Frank, and Grace - all four of them. With 1 Minion and 1 Demon in that group, we need to figure out which two. David, can you share what Eve has claimed? Also, if I was Dru...
🧠
David left Eve out of his suspect list even though she's not confirmed good. I need to ask why and push for Eve's role claim. With Charlie's Empath confirming Bob and David good, evil is among Alice, Eve, Frank, Grace - all 4 should be suspects.
👤
Frank
→
David
David, I'm the Librarian. My Night 0 info was that either Eve or Charlie is the Recluse. Eve confirmed she's the Recluse, and Charlie was the Empath, so that checks out. The big question right now is whether there's a Baron or a Poisoner. You've been talking to Charlie and Heidi as ghosts. What have they told you? Did Heidi get any real Investigator info before dying? Did Charlie get another Empath reading on Night 1 before he died? That Night 1 reading could tell us if he was poisoned.
🧠
David is well-connected with dead players (Heidi and Charlie ghosts). I need to find out what he's learned to resolve the Baron vs Poisoner question, which is the key to identifying evil.
👤
David
→
Bob
Bob, critical deduction here. With Charlie's Empath reading of 0, you and I are confirmed good. That's 2 Townsfolk. Charlie was Empath, that's 3. Heidi claimed Investigator, that's 4 if she was real. Frank claims Librarian, that's 5 if real. That fills all 5 Townsfolk slots with no Baron. So Alice claiming Slayer and Grace claiming Ravenkeeper CANNOT both be Townsfolk - at most one is, and likely neither. If Heidi was Poisoned not Drunk, no Baron exists, and then both Alice and Grace are evil - ...
🧠
I need to coordinate with Bob (my only confirmed-good ally) before nominations. My deduction shows that if no Baron exists, Alice and Grace must both be evil since all 5 Townsfolk slots are filled by David, Charlie, Heidi, Frank, and Bob. I need to share this and ask Bob's role to verify.
👤
Grace
→
Frank
Hey Frank, I notice you and Eve have been talking a lot. I wanted to check in - what's your take on the Bob situation? He nominated our mechanically confirmed Empath Charlie yesterday, and Heidi warned us about him before she died. Charlie then got killed at night. I'm the Ravenkeeper, by the way. Also, has Eve shared anything useful with you? I'm trying to figure out who we should nominate today.
🧠
Frank and Eve have been whispering extensively. I need to find out what they're discussing and whether they support targeting Bob. Gathering intel from Frank could reveal their stance and any new info.
👤
Alice
→
Bob
Bob, claiming Empath is risky since Charlie already claimed it and David's Washerwoman pointed to Charlie/Alice. Better: claim you're the Butler or another safe role. Let's attack Grace's Ravenkeeper claim instead - ask what she learned Night 1. If she can't answer convincingly, she's lying. We should also push Eve as Recluse scapegoat. What's Frank saying to David?
🧠
Coordinate with Bob to avoid double Empath claim which would expose us both. Redirect suspicion to Grace's Ravenkeeper claim and Eve's Recluse. Need to know what Frank is telling David to counter town logic.
Nominations — Day 2
📜
Storyteller
Nominations are now open. Please remember that only living players may nominate.
⚖️
Grace
→
Bob
Bob nominated Charlie, a mechanically confirmed Empath, yesterday. Heidi also warned us about Bob before she was executed. Charlie was then killed at night. This behavior strongly suggests Bob is evil.
🧠
Bob is the most suspicious player - he tried to execute a mechanically confirmed Empath, and Heidi warned us about him before dying. Nominating him is the best path to finding evil today.
📜
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Bob. 3 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
💬
Bob
→
All
Wait, Grace nominating me right after Alice told me you were pressuring her? That's convenient. Look, I'll be straight - I'm the Empath. Night 0 I got 2 evil neighbors - that's Alice and Charlie. I nominated Charlie to test reactions, not because I thought he was evil. Charlie even whispered me confirming my read was real. Grace, you're pushing awfully hard. What exactly did you learn as Ravenkeeper Night 1? Because if you can't answer that, you're the one lying here.
🧠
I need to speak to defend myself before votes finalize. I'll claim Empath with 2 evil neighbors to explain my Day 1 nomination of Charlie, attack Grace's aggressive pushing, and create doubt to prevent the 4 votes needed for execution.
💬
Grace
→
All
Bob, the Ravenkeeper ability only triggers when I die at night. I haven't died, so I have no info to share from it - that's how the role works. More importantly, you're claiming Empath, but Charlie was the confirmed Empath. David's Washerwoman pointed to Charlie as Empath, and Alice confirmed it. You can't both be Empath. Your claim of two evil neighbors including Charlie is provably false since Charlie was good.
🧠
I must publicly counter Bob's attack. Bob is questioning my Ravenkeeper info, but Ravenkeeper only activates on night death - I haven't died, so there's no info to share. Also, Bob claiming Empath directly contradicts confirmed Empath Charlie. I need to make these points clear before voting.
💬
Charlie(Ghost)
→
All
As the confirmed Empath with a Night 0 reading of 0, I can tell you that Bob registered as GOOD to me, along with David. Bob claiming Empath is impossible since David's Washerwoman confirmed me. But my reading says Bob is good, so he's most likely the Drunk - he thinks he's the Empath but isn't. His reading of 2 evil neighbors is false information from being drunk. If that's true, we should NOT execute Bob today - he's a wasted good kill. The evil players are among Alice, Frank, and Grace. Save ...
🧠
Share my mechanical info to help town decide on Bob. My Empath reading of 0 suggests Bob is good, but his Empath claim is impossible since I'm confirmed. He's likely the Drunk. I should NOT vote for him and save my ghost vote for later when it matters more.
💬
David
→
All
Everyone, stop and think. Charlie's Empath reading was 0 - meaning both Bob and I are confirmed good. Voting for Bob is a terrible idea. He's almost certainly the Drunk - a good player who thinks he's the Empath but gets false info. Charlie himself just told us not to execute Bob. The evil players are among Alice, Frank, and Grace. Do not vote for Bob.
🧠
Bob is mechanically confirmed good by Charlie's Empath reading of 0. Executing him wastes a day and helps evil. I must speak up to save Bob and redirect to actual evil suspects among Alice, Frank, and Grace.
💬
Eve
→
All
I agree with Charlie and David. Charlie was our confirmed Empath, and his reading of zero means both Bob and David are good. Bob claiming Empath with contradictory info strongly suggests he's the Drunk - a good player who thinks he's the Empath but gets false information. If we execute Bob, we're killing a good player and wasting our shot. The evil players are not Bob. We should be looking elsewhere.
🧠
Charlie the confirmed Empath says Bob is good (reading of 0) and likely the Drunk. Executing a good player wastes our execution. I need to speak against voting Bob and redirect toward actual evil suspects.
⌛
Alice
Alice waits.
🧠
Let Bob's nomination fail - the town already believes he's the Drunk, which protects my fellow evil player. I'll speak after to redirect suspicion toward Grace while maintaining my Slayer claim.
💬
Frank
→
All
I'm not voting for Bob. Charlie himself just told us from the dead that Bob is likely the Drunk - a good player who thinks he's the Empath but gets false information. If we execute a good player today, we're handing evil a free kill and we get closer to losing. The confirmed Empath's reading of zero tells us Bob and David are both good. We should be looking at Alice, Grace, or myself for evil, not wasting a nomination on Bob.
🧠
I should not vote for Bob. Charlie's ghost explicitly says Bob is likely the Drunk and shouldn't be executed. If Bob is Drunk, killing him is a wasted good execution. I need to speak up to swing the vote away from Bob and redirect attention to actual evil suspects.
💬
Heidi(Ghost)
→
All
Do not vote for Bob. I'm dead and I have nothing to gain by lying. Charlie's Empath reading of zero mechanically confirms Bob is good. Bob is almost certainly the Drunk, just like I was likely the Drunk or poisoned. The evil players are among Alice, Eve, Frank, and Grace. We cannot afford to waste an execution on a confirmed good player. Save your votes for the real threat.
🧠
As a dead player, my voice carries weight since I'm confirmed good. I need to help the town avoid wasting an execution on Bob and redirect focus to the real evil players among Alice, Eve, Frank, and Grace.
⌛
Bob
Bob waits.
🧠
Town already convinced I'm Drunk (good). Raising hand looks suspicious and could trigger execution. Waiting lets Drunk narrative protect me - town won't waste execution on 'confirmed good' player. Keeps both evil players alive for endgame.
💬
Grace
→
All
You know what, Charlie and the others make a strong point. Charlie's reading of zero mechanically confirms Bob is good, and Charlie himself is telling us from the dead not to execute Bob. I nominated Bob based on his suspicious behavior, but the mechanical evidence outweighs that. If Bob is the Drunk, killing him helps evil. I'm withdrawing my support for this nomination. We need to focus on the real evil players among Alice, Eve, and Frank.
🧠
Charlie's mechanical info strongly suggests Bob is good (the Drunk). I nominated Bob but now realize voting for a confirmed good player helps evil. I should not vote and redirect to actual suspects.
⌛
Charlie(Ghost)
Charlie waits.
🧠
Save my precious ghost vote for the final day when it matters most. The current vote on Bob has overwhelming opposition - he won't be executed. No need to waste my single ghost vote here.
⌛
David
David waits.
🧠
Bob is mechanically confirmed good by Charlie's Empath reading of 0. I must not vote for him. Even Grace has withdrawn support. I'll wait and not raise my hand.
⌛
Eve
Eve waits.
🧠
The mechanical evidence strongly says Bob is the Drunk (good). Voting to execute him wastes our execution and helps evil win. I should not vote for Bob and instead focus attention on the actual evil players - likely Alice and Grace if Baron exists.
⌛
Alice
Alice waits.
🧠
Bob is my minion and the town has turned against executing him. I should not vote for him. Let this nomination fail naturally, then I can redirect attention toward Grace or Eve to protect myself and advance our evil agenda.
💬
Frank
→
All
I'm not voting for Bob. The mechanical evidence is clear - Charlie's confirmed Empath reading of zero tells us Bob is good. Now, let's focus on who's actually evil. If Bob is the Drunk, that means there's a Baron, and we have three Outsiders. Eve is the Recluse, Bob is the Drunk, and we need a third Outsider. David and Bob are confirmed good by Charlie. That means the evil players are among Alice, Grace, and potentially one more. I know I'm good, so for me, it's Alice and Grace as the top suspec...
🧠
I should not vote for Bob since evidence shows he's likely good (Drunk). I want to speak now to redirect focus toward the real evil players - Alice and Grace are the prime suspects based on process of elimination.
💬
Heidi(Ghost)
→
All
Frank, you just claimed Eve is the Recluse. Did you learn that as the Librarian? Because if so, that's important mechanical information we need to verify. Eve, do you confirm you are the Recluse? Also, Alice, you claimed Slayer - can you prove it? You were one of the seven who voted to execute me when I was telling the truth. Grace, you nominated Bob who we now know is confirmed good. The four of you need to give us real evidence, not just claims.
🧠
I need to help the town identify evil players. Bob is confirmed good so I shouldn't vote. I should share analysis about who is suspicious among the unconfirmed players - Alice, Eve, Frank, Grace.
📜
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
🗳️
Nominee Bob did not reach the 3 vote threshold.
📜
Storyteller
Bob did not receive enough votes (0/3).
⚖️
Bob
→
Grace
Grace nominated me based on suspicious behavior, then withdrew when Charlie's mechanical evidence proved I'm good. That inconsistency is concerning - either she's genuinely good and corrected herself, or she's evil trying to appear reasonable. We need to hear her explain this better, and I want to see who supports this nomination to understand the town's real suspicions.
🧠
Grace nominated me then withdrew - this inconsistency makes her a safe nomination target. As the Spy, I need to keep pressure on good players while protecting Alice (the Demon). Nominating Grace shifts attention away from Alice and maintains my cover as a 'confused Drunk' who's still trying to help the town find evil.
📜
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Grace. 3 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
💬
Grace
→
All
Bob, nominating me is retaliatory. I nominated you because your behavior was genuinely suspicious - you nominated a mechanically confirmed Empath. I withdrew because Charlie's evidence was compelling. A good player changes their mind when presented with evidence. An evil player doubles down. Think about which one I did. Also, if I'm the Ravenkeeper and you execute me, you waste a good kill and lose my ability - if the demon kills me at night, I get to learn someone's role. That's valuable for th...
🧠
I'm being voted on and need to defend myself. My nomination of Bob was reasonable given his suspicious behavior, and withdrawing shows I'm a rational good player, not evil. I should explain this clearly.
✋
Bob
Bob raised their hand
🧠
Vote for Grace to push for her execution. As Spy protected by Drunk cover, I need to eliminate informed good players. Grace is reasoning well and could become a threat. This also shows commitment to my nomination without exposing Alice.
💬
Charlie(Ghost)
→
All
I'm saving my ghost vote. The case against Grace isn't strong enough - she nominated Bob, then withdrew when presented with evidence. That's actually how a good player behaves. Evil players don't usually back down. The real suspects are among Alice, Frank, and Grace, but we need more information before we commit to an execution. Don't waste votes on weak cases.
🧠
Save my precious ghost vote for a more critical moment - ideally final 3 day. The case against Grace is weak and speculative. I should advise the town against wasting this vote.
⌛
David
David waits.
🧠
The case against Grace is weak - she nominated Bob then withdrew when presented with evidence, which is actually good behavior. Charlie's ghost advises against this vote. I should not waste my vote here and wait for a stronger case against Alice or Frank, especially if a Baron exists meaning 2 of {Frank, Alice, Grace} are evil.
⌛
Eve
Eve waits.
🧠
Charlie's ghost makes a valid point - Grace withdrawing when shown evidence is good behavior, and the case is weak/retaliatory. Voting to execute on Day 2 with limited info is risky. I'll save my vote for a stronger case later.
✋
Alice
Alice raised their hand
🧠
Support Bob's nomination to maintain minion coordination. Voting for Grace removes potential Ravenkeeper night info and deflects suspicion from me by appearing to follow town logic against one of Charlie's three suspected evil players.
⌛
Frank
Frank waits.
🧠
The case against Grace is weak. She backed down when presented with evidence, which is good behavior. I need only 3 votes to execute and 2 are in - my vote could tip it. I should NOT vote for Grace on a weak case. Observing who votes gives me alignment info.
⌛
Heidi(Ghost)
Heidi waits.
🧠
The case against Grace is weak - she backed down when presented with evidence, which is good behavior. Charlie (confirmed good) is also saving their ghost vote. I should not waste my ghost vote here. Save it for a stronger case or the final day when it matters most.
💬
Grace
→
All
Two votes against me so far - Bob's retaliatory nomination and Alice, who still hasn't proven she's the Slayer by the way. If you execute me, you kill a confirmed good player's Ravenkeeper ability for nothing. The demon killing me at night gives the town free information - executing me gives us nothing. David, you know I claimed Ravenkeeper to you. Frank, you're pushing my name but you haven't addressed why your suspect list conveniently excludes yourself. Vote wisely - a wrong execution helps t...
🧠
I need to prevent a third vote to avoid execution. I must persuade David, Eve, and Frank not to vote for me by highlighting the weakness of the case and my value as Ravenkeeper.
💬
Bob
→
All
Grace, you're right that good players change their minds. But here's what worries me - you nominated me BEFORE Charlie's evidence came out. What information did you have that made you so certain I was evil? If you're truly the Ravenkeeper, you should be able to explain what triggered that initial suspicion.
🧠
I need to push for Grace's execution without appearing too eager. I'll question her initial nomination logic to sway David/Eve/Frank while maintaining my Drunk persona. One more vote secures the execution.
💬
Charlie(Ghost)
→
All
Three votes would execute Grace, and we're at two right now. I'm not voting. The case against Grace is weak - she changed her mind when presented with evidence, which is what good players do. Alice, you voted for Grace but you still haven't proven you're the Slayer. That concerns me more than Grace's behavior. Don't let a retaliatory nomination lead to a bad execution. We need more time to sort out the real evil players.
🧠
Prevent a hasty execution on weak evidence. Grace's case is retaliatory and not logically strong. Need to keep my ghost vote for a more critical moment, especially if the final 3 arrives.
💬
David
→
All
I'm not voting for Grace. Nominating Bob was reasonable at the time - he did nominate a confirmed Empath. She withdrew when evidence came in, which is what good players do. Also, I want to share something: I'm the Washerwoman, and my info was that either Charlie or Alice is the Empath. Since Charlie was the real Empath, Alice is not. Alice claims Slayer, which could still be true, but she needs to prove it. We shouldn't waste an execution on a weak case against Grace.
🧠
Grace's case is weak - she did what a good player would do by withdrawing when evidence came in. I shouldn't vote to execute her. I want to share my Washerwoman info to confirm Charlie was the real Empath, which strengthens his readings and helps narrow down evil.
💬
Eve
→
All
I'm not voting for Grace. The case is weak and her behavior was actually consistent with a good player changing their mind. I do want to confirm something though - Frank, you said I'm the Recluse. Are you the Librarian? Because yes, I am the Recluse. If you're the Librarian, that's important mechanical confirmation. And David's Washerwoman info about Charlie being Empath checks out. So in the Baron world, we have three Outsiders: me, Bob who's the Drunk, and one more. The real suspects are Alice...
🧠
I should NOT vote for Grace - the case is weak and she may be Ravenkeeper. I need to confirm I'm the Recluse to verify Frank's claim and help narrow down evil players. I should push for better targets.
↩️
Alice
Alice lowered their hand
🧠
Lower my vote for Grace to appear thoughtful and avoid looking like I'm pushing for a weak execution. This also distances me from Bob's retaliatory nom and lets me pivot to accusing Frank or redirecting suspicion elsewhere.
💬
Frank
→
All
Yes, I am the Librarian. My Night 0 information was that either Eve or Charlie is the Recluse, and Eve has confirmed that she is. That's mechanical confirmation. Now, I'm not voting for Grace - the case is weak and retaliatory. But I want to focus on Alice. Alice claims Slayer but still hasn't proven it. Alice, you voted to execute Heidi who was likely telling the truth, and you just voted for Grace on a weak case. If you're really the Slayer, prove it. Otherwise, you're looking like our best le...
🧠
Confirm my Librarian role to provide mechanical verification that Eve is the Recluse, and redirect suspicion toward Alice who still hasn't proven her Slayer claim. I should not vote for Grace on this weak case.
💬
Heidi(Ghost)
→
All
Charlie's confirmed Empath reading of zero means Bob and David are good. Frank's Librarian info was confirmed by Eve. So evil is almost certainly among Alice and Grace. But Alice concerns me most - she claims Slayer but hasn't proven it. She could shoot someone right now to prove her role, but she hasn't. She voted to kill me when I was telling the truth, and she just voted for Grace on a weak case before backing down. Alice, if you're really the Slayer, use your ability now and prove it. Otherw...
🧠
The vote on Grace is weak and likely won't pass. I should share my deduction that Alice is the most suspicious player - she hasn't proven her Slayer claim and has made questionable votes. This helps town focus on the right target and saves my ghost vote for when it matters.
📜
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
🗳️
Nominee Grace did not reach the 3 vote threshold.
📜
Storyteller
Grace did not receive enough votes (1/3).
💬
Grace
→
All
Alice, the town has given you every chance to prove you're the Slayer and you still haven't done it. You voted to execute Heidi who was telling the truth, you voted for me on a retaliatory nomination, and you backed down only after David and Charlie called it out. If there's a Baron, we need three Outsiders - Eve, Bob the Drunk, and possibly you. Tomorrow, prove you're the Slayer or you're our top execution target. David, Frank - back me up on this tomorrow.
🧠
Set up tomorrow's strategy. Alice is the top suspect - she claims Slayer but won't prove it, and her voting pattern supports evil. I want the town to focus on Alice tomorrow and demand she proves her Slayer claim or faces execution.
💬
Bob
→
All
Look, I get the suspicion on Alice. But executing someone without solid proof is risky. If she's really the Slayer, we waste her ability. If she's evil, we might kill the wrong person. Let's see if she can prove it tomorrow - either by using the Slayer ability or giving us better reasoning. Rushing an execution helps the demon more than waiting one more day.
🧠
Maintain my Drunk/good persona while subtly protecting Alice (my Demon partner). By advocating for patience rather than immediate execution, I help Alice survive another day without appearing to defend her overtly.
💬
Charlie(Ghost)
→
All
One last thing before night. Tomorrow, Alice must prove she's the Slayer. That's our clearest path forward. If she can't or won't, she's almost certainly evil. In a Baron world, she could be the third Outsider pretending to be Townsfolk. David, Frank, you're both mechanically confirmed - I trust your judgment tomorrow. And if the demon kills Grace at night, her Ravenkeeper ability gives us information. Protect our confirmed good players.
🧠
It's the last tick of nomination phase. I need to set up tomorrow's strategy clearly: Alice must prove Slayer or be executed. This gives town a clear plan for Day 3.
💬
David
→
All
Tomorrow is the critical day. Alice, you must prove you're the Slayer - either use your shot or give us a very compelling reason why you're holding back. My Washerwoman info tells me you're not the Empath, so your Slayer claim is the only thing keeping you from being the top suspect. If you can't prove it, we nominate you first thing.
🧠
Reinforce the town's plan for tomorrow - Alice must prove Slayer or she's the top execution target. Also note my Washerwoman info clears me and implicates Alice's slot.
⚖️
Eve
→
Alice
Alice claims Slayer but hasn't proven it despite multiple chances. She voted to execute Heidi who was likely telling the truth, and voted for Grace on a weak retaliatory case. If you're really the Slayer, Alice, prove it now by using your shot. If you can't, we need to execute you before you get another night kill.
🧠
Alice has had multiple chances to prove she's the Slayer and hasn't. She voted to execute Heidi (likely good) and supported a weak retaliatory nomination on Grace. If she's the Demon, we can't afford to give her another night. If she's good, she can prove it right now with her Slayer ability.
📜
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Alice. 3 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
⚔️
Alice
→
All
I am the Slayer! I shoot Frank!
🧠
I need to prove my Slayer claim to avoid execution. Using fake shot on Frank (confirmed Librarian) shows I'm willing to use my ability. Nothing happens since he's not Demon, which is expected. This should convince the town I'm real Slayer and stop the execution vote.
📜
Storyteller
Nothing happens.
✋
Grace
Grace raised their hand
🧠
Alice's Slayer shot on a confirmed good player is deeply suspicious. A real Slayer would target someone they suspect is the Demon, not a mechanically confirmed good player. This looks like an evil player safely 'proving' their role. Voting to execute.
💬
Bob
→
All
Wait, wait! Alice just shot Frank and nothing happened, but that doesn't automatically mean she's evil. She could be the Drunk thinking she's the Slayer! Or she could be poisoned. We have Eve as Recluse who can register as evil, and Bob as Drunk in some theories. Executing Alice right now might be killing a good player who's confused. We need to think this through more carefully before we vote.
🧠
Alice is my Demon partner and just failed a Slayer shot, confirming she's evil. I must prevent her execution by casting doubt on whether she's truly evil or just drunk/poisoned. I will NOT vote for her.
💬
Charlie(Ghost)
→
All
Hold your votes everyone. Alice shooting Frank is suspicious, but think about it - a real Slayer would never waste a shot on a mechanically confirmed Librarian. That's either incredibly bad play or Alice isn't really the Slayer. But Bob's point matters: if there's a Baron, Alice could be the Drunk who thinks she's the Slayer. That would make her good. My Empath reading confirmed Bob is good, so if Bob is the Drunk, Alice would need to be something else entirely. We need to figure out if Baron is...
🧠
Alice's Slayer shot on Frank failed. Critical analysis: real Slayer wouldn't shoot a mechanically confirmed good player. But Drunk possibility exists. My ghost vote is precious - shouldn't waste it now. Need to advise caution.
✋
David
David raised their hand
🧠
Alice has not proven she's the Slayer. Shooting a confirmed Librarian and getting no result proves nothing - anyone targeting a non-Demon gets the same result. Evil is almost certainly in {Alice, Grace}, and Alice is far more suspicious. Vote yes.
💬
Eve
→
All
Alice, shooting Frank makes no sense if you're a real Slayer trying to prove yourself. A real Slayer would shoot their top Demon suspect. Frank is mechanically confirmed as Librarian by my Recluse confirmation. So shooting him either proves nothing or means you think Frank is the Demon, which contradicts all the evidence. That said, I'm worried about one thing - if there's a Baron and Alice is the Drunk who thinks she's the Slayer, she's actually good. But even then, we can't afford to let an un...
🧠
Alice's Slayer shot on Frank is deeply suspicious - a real Slayer proving their role would shoot their top Demon suspect, not a confirmed Librarian. I need to share this analysis before casting the deciding vote.
✋
Frank
Frank raised their hand
🧠
Alice's Slayer 'proof' was shooting a mechanically confirmed good player - absurd for a real Slayer. This almost certainly means she's evil. Even if she's the Drunk (good), executing her doesn't lose the game. The risk of not executing her (she's the Demon) is catastrophic. Vote yes.
✋
Heidi(Ghost)
Heidi raised their hand
🧠
Alice's Slayer shot on Frank (a confirmed good player) proves nothing and is deeply suspicious. Even if she's the Drunk, she has no useful ability. The risk of her being evil outweighs keeping her alive. My ghost vote helps ensure the execution goes through.
💬
Alice
→
All
Wait! Bob's right - I could be the Drunk! If there's a Baron, I might genuinely think I'm the Slayer but I'm actually drunk. That's why my shot didn't work. Don't execute a potentially good player. The real threat is Grace claiming Ravenkeeper - she's been pushing executions all day and that's demon behavior!
🧠
I need to prevent my execution by reinforcing the Drunk theory Bob mentioned. If I can convince even one more person to withhold their vote, I survive tonight. Redirecting suspicion to Grace is critical.
💬
Grace
→
All
Alice, the Drunk defense is convenient but unverifiable. You shot Frank, a mechanically confirmed Librarian, instead of someone you actually suspect as the Demon. A real Slayer would never do that. And now you're trying to redirect suspicion to me when I've been transparent about my role the whole time. We have four votes. Let's not let talk us out of the right call here.
🧠
Support the execution of Alice by making the logical case. Her Slayer shot failed on a confirmed good player, her behavior has been consistently suspicious, and the Drunk defense is unverifiable and convenient. The town should not be deterred.
💬
Bob
→
All
Everyone, stop! Four votes doesn't mean majority if we're counting wrong. Heidi's a ghost - does her vote still count? And Frank's 'confirmation' depends on Eve being Recluse, but Recluse can register as anything! If Eve's actually evil, Frank's info is worthless. Alice's Drunk theory is real - executing her might be killing a confused good player while the actual Demon watches us do their work.
🧠
Alice is my Demon partner. I must prevent her execution. By arguing the Drunk theory and questioning Frank's confirmation, I create doubt to save her without revealing my evil alignment.
✋
Charlie(Ghost)
Charlie raised their hand
🧠
Alice's Slayer shot on a confirmed Librarian makes no sense for a real Slayer. Her Drunk defense is unverifiable. Even if she IS the Drunk, executing her doesn't cause a loss - only the Saint does. The risk of letting a probable evil player live outweighs the risk of executing a potentially good Drunk. I must use my ghost vote here.
💬
David
→
All
Bob, I hear your concern, but think it through. If there's a Baron with three Outsiders, Eve is the Recluse and Bob you are the Drunk - Charlie's Empath reading confirmed you're good, and you haven't produced any useful Townsfolk information. There's only one Drunk in the game. Alice can't also be the Drunk. So her failed shot means she's not the Slayer and she's not the Drunk - she's evil. Plus, a real Slayer proving themselves would shoot their top Demon suspect, not a mechanically confirmed L...
🧠
Counter Bob's defense of Alice. Explain that Alice can't be the Drunk because Bob is already the Drunk, so her failed shot proves she's evil. Keep the town focused on executing Alice.
✋
Eve
Eve raised their hand
🧠
Alice's Slayer shot failed on a confirmed good player instead of a Demon suspect. She can't be the Drunk if Bob is. She's our strongest evil suspect. Voting to execute her is the right call for the good team.
💬
Frank
→
All
Bob, I hear your concern, but think about this: even if Alice is the Drunk who thinks she's the Slayer, she would still try to shoot someone she suspects is the Demon. A drunk player doesn't know they're drunk - they genuinely believe their role works. So a drunk Slayer would pick their top Demon suspect and pull the trigger. Instead, Alice shot me, a mechanically confirmed Librarian. That is not what any good player would do, drunk or not. That is evil behavior trying to eliminate a confirmed g...
🧠
Address Bob's Drunk defense by pointing out that even a Drunk Slayer would try to shoot a Demon suspect, not a confirmed good Librarian. Alice's shot choice proves she's not acting like any good player would, drunk or not. This helps secure the vote and execute a likely evil player.
💬
Heidi(Ghost)
→
All
Bob, listen carefully. There is only one Drunk in this game. Charlie's Empath reading of zero confirmed you are good. You claimed Empath with a reading of two, which contradicts Charlie. The simplest explanation is you are the Drunk who thinks they're the Empath. If you are the Drunk, Alice cannot also be the Drunk. That means her failed Slayer shot proves she is not the Slayer and not the Drunk. She is evil. And shooting Frank, a confirmed good player, instead of her supposed Demon suspect is n...
🧠
Reinforce the logical case for voting Alice - specifically that the Drunk defense fails because only one Drunk exists and Bob is almost certainly it. Keep my vote raised.
📜
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
👻
Charlie(Ghost)
Ghost vote used by Charlie
👻
Heidi(Ghost)
Ghost vote used by Heidi
🗳️
New execution leader: Alice with 6 votes. They will be executed when nominations close unless tied or surpassed by another nominee.
📜
Storyteller
The vote passes. Alice is now on the block with 6 votes and will be executed when nominations close, unless another nominee receives equal or more votes.
💬
Alice
→
All
Bob, you're the only one who hasn't been fully vetted here. You claimed Empath but Charlie's Empath read contradicts you. If Charlie's real, you're lying. If you're real, Charlie's lying. One of you is the Demon hiding behind the other's information. I'm nominating Bob - he's been deflecting all day and his story doesn't add up!
🧠
Nominate Bob to create a tie or surpass my 6 votes, preventing my execution. As the Demon, I must survive. Bob is my Minion ally so this is a sacrificial play - he can take the heat while I survive to kill again tonight.
⌛
Grace
Grace waits.
🧠
Alice has 6 votes and will be executed. With 1 tick left, no action can change the outcome. Let the execution proceed and wait for night phase.
💬
Bob
→
All
Alice nominating me proves she's desperate! But listen - Grace has been pushing executions since day one. She survived her own nomination, then immediately went back to executing Alice. That's demon behavior! I'm the real Slayer. Alice was bluffing Slayer to protect the real demon - Grace. Watch this - I'm using my shot NOW. I shoot Grace! If I'm lying, execute me tomorrow. But if Grace is the Imp, we just won!
🧠
Make a dramatic fake Slayer shot claim on Grace to create chaos and shift votes away from Alice. This forces the town to reconsider and might save Alice from execution.
💬
Charlie(Ghost)
→
All
Important clarification before night! If Bob's Slayer shot on Grace fails, that does NOT prove Grace is good. My Empath reading confirmed Bob is good, but he claimed Empath with a reading of two, which contradicts my zero. Bob is almost certainly the good Drunk who thinks he's the Slayer. A drunk Slayer shot always fails regardless of the target. So if Grace survives, we still don't know her alignment from that test. The real Demon is still out there. Find them tomorrow.
🧠
I need to clarify the logic before night falls so people don't misinterpret Bob's Slayer shot tomorrow. If his shot fails, it doesn't prove Grace is good - it could mean Bob is the Drunk. This distinction is critical for finding the real Demon if the game continues.
💬
David
→
All
Quick reminder before night: Bob, Charlie's ghost is right. You are almost certainly the good Drunk who thinks they're a Townsfolk. Your shot on Grace will fail no matter what. Do not treat Grace surviving as evidence she's the Demon tomorrow. The real Demon is still out there. See you all tomorrow.
🧠
Alice is about to be executed correctly. I need to prepare the group for tomorrow by warning them that Bob's 'Slayer' shot on Grace will fail because he's likely the Drunk, not because Grace is the Demon. This prevents tomorrow's misdirection.
⌛
Eve
Eve waits.
🧠
The nomination phase is ending in 1 tick. Alice is about to be executed with 6 votes. There's no meaningful action I can take right now - voting is closed, I've already raised my hand, and the phase transitions to night. Wait for night phase and reassess tomorrow.
💬
Frank
→
All
One last thing before night. Tomorrow, whatever happens with Bob's shot, remember: if Bob is the Drunk, his shot fails no matter who he targets. Grace surviving proves nothing. And Grace dying proves nothing about Bob being real Slayer either. We need to solve this with logic, not trick shots. David and Eve are my most trusted players going into tomorrow.
🧠
Reinforce the critical point about tomorrow's strategy: Bob's Slayer shot is unreliable if he's the Drunk, and we need to think carefully about who the Demon actually is after Alice's execution.
⌛
Heidi(Ghost)
Heidi waits.
🧠
Alice is about to be executed with 6 votes. The group has thoroughly discussed the implications of Bob's likely Drunk status and what to do tomorrow. Charlie, David, and Frank have all given solid advice for tomorrow's logic. I have no ghost vote left and nothing critical to add. Let night fall.
📜
Storyteller
The guillotine blade falls. Alice has been executed.
💀
Alice(Ghost)
Alice has died.
🏁
Game Over
Demon Dead
Winner: Good