Game Detail
Players
Alice (Monk) Bob (Soldier) Charlie (Librarian) David (Washerwoman) Eve (Mayor) Frank (Imp) Grace (Scarlet Woman) Heidi (Saint)
Token Usage
| Team | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Cost (USD) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Good | 452,111 | 86,290 | $1.9993 |
| Evil | 164,672 | 17,499 | $0.1086 |
Event Timeline
🎭
The game has started.
📜
Storyteller
→
Grace
You are the Minion. The Demon is Frank.
📜
Storyteller
→
Frank
Minions are: Grace. Your safe bluffs are: Chef, Investigator, Virgin
📜
Storyteller
→
David
Good evening David. You are the Washerwoman. Either Alice or Eve is the Monk.
📜
Storyteller
→
Charlie
Good evening Charlie. You are the Librarian. Either Heidi or Alice is the Saint.
Day 1
📜
Storyteller
Welcome to the village of Ravenswood Bluff. Please take this time to get to know your fellow villagers. Feel free to move around and have private conversations. Be wary, for a Demon hides among you!
👤
Alice
→
Bob
,Heidi
Hey, quick neighbor chat. What are you claiming, and did you get any starting info? I am keeping my own role quiet for now, but I am good and happy to coordinate to keep key info roles alive.
🧠
Get early role/starting info from my neighbors, build a small trust circle, and decide who to protect N1 while keeping my Monk identity concealed.
👤
Charlie
→
Heidi
Hi Heidi, quick private check. I have info that either you or Alice is the Saint. Are you the Saint? If yes, we should plan a safe public claim so you never get executed.
🧠
Privately confirm which of Heidi or Alice is the Saint so we can prevent a catastrophic Saint execution while keeping my Librarian identity relatively hidden.
👤
Bob
→
Alice
,Heidi
I am Soldier, so I got no starting info. I am happy to stay quiet publicly and even act like a juicy target so the Demon wastes a kill on me. If either of you is an info role, I can help keep heat off you.
🧠
Answer Alice, establish a small trust circle, and offer myself as a safe target to soak a demon kill so key info roles survive.
⌛
Frank
Frank waits.
🧠
I need to avoid drawing attention to myself early. Since Grace is my Minion, I should let her take the lead in guiding suspicions away from me. Observing others' claims first will help me avoid contradictions and allow me to craft a more convincing bluff later. Waiting also gives me time to assess who might be a threat.
👤
Grace
→
Frank
Frank, it's Grace. I need to talk to you privately. The Demon is you, right? I'm your Minion. We need to coordinate our stories and keep you safe.
🧠
I need to establish contact with Frank to confirm our alignment and coordinate our strategy. If he is the Demon, we can work together to mislead the town. If he is not, I can still use this interaction to gather information and build trust, which will help me protect the real Demon later.
👤
David
→
Alice
,Eve
Hi Alice and Eve. I am David, the Washerwoman. I got that either Alice or Eve is the Monk. Are either of you willing to confirm that to me privately? If you are the Monk, we can coordinate who to protect.
🧠
Get an early confirmation on my Washerwoman ping, establish trust with the real Monk, and coordinate protection without revealing to the whole town yet.
👤
Eve
→
David
,Alice
I am not the Monk. If your Washerwoman info is true, that points to Alice as Monk, so you two should coordinate protections. I am happy to share my real role later once we have more info.
🧠
Deny being Monk to avoid handing evil a night-kill target, while steering David and Alice to coordinate if Alice is the real Monk and treating David’s claim as a test of honesty.
👤
Heidi
→
Charlie
Yes, I am the Saint. Please do not push for me to be executed under any circumstance. If you go public, I would rather you say you have an Outsider ping between me and Alice, without confirming which one.
🧠
Confirm privately to Charlie with a warning: do not out me broadly or let town execute me. Gauge his reaction for trustworthiness.
👤
Alice
→
David
Yep, I am the Monk. Let us keep that quiet in public for now. If you want, you can say you saw Alice or Eve is Monk without confirming which. Tonight I am leaning to protect you, unless we find a higher value info role to cover.
🧠
Confirm privately so we can plan optimal night protection while avoiding a public hard-out of my role on day one.
👤
Charlie
→
Alice
Hi Alice. I am the Librarian. My info is that either you or Heidi is the Saint. Heidi is telling me she is Saint, so I would rather we keep it as a vague Outsider ping between you two in public. What are you claiming?
🧠
Coordinate with Alice on a safe public story: Outsider ping between her and Heidi, no hard confirmation. Also gather Alice’s claim to build worlds and protect the real Saint.
👤
Bob
→
Charlie
Hey Charlie, I am Bob. I am Soldier, no starting info. What are you comfortable claiming, and did you get any start info? If you are an info role, I can help keep attention off you and let the Demon waste a kill on me.
🧠
Get Charlie's claim and any starting info to cross-check with Alice later, and build a small trust network while offering myself as a safe bait target.
👤
Frank
→
Grace
Grace, it's Frank. I’m glad you reached out. Yes, I’m the Demon, and I’m counting on you to help me navigate this. We need to pick a bluff that aligns with our safe roles. Chef or Investigator could work. What do you think?
🧠
Grace has reached out claiming to be my Minion and confirming I am the Demon. I need to confirm her role privately to align our stories and ensure we protect each other. This will help solidify our evil team's coordination and keep me safe from execution.
👤
Grace
→
Frank
Frank, I think Chef is a great choice. If I claim Chef, I can say there’s 1 pair of evil players. That way, if the real Chef is out there, they might reveal themselves, and we can discredit them. If not, it gives us a solid story. What do you think?
🧠
Frank and I need to align on a bluff that is flexible, hard to disprove, and helps us control the narrative. Chef or Investigator are the safest options because they provide specific, verifiable information that can be twisted to our advantage. I will suggest Chef as our bluff and coordinate our stories to avoid contradictions.
👤
David
→
Charlie
,Heidi
Hi Charlie and Heidi. I am David. I have a starting info ping that either Alice or Eve is the Monk. Eve told me she is not. What are you each claiming, and do you want Monk protection tonight if we trust that info?
🧠
Get early role claims from Charlie and Heidi and seed the Monk pair info without hard-confirming Alice, to coordinate protections and spot contradictions.
👤
Eve
→
Alice
Hey Alice, quick check: are you actually the Monk from David’s Washerwoman info? If yes, maybe keep it semi quiet and just tell David who you plan to protect. Also, did anyone else share a role or strong info with you yet?
🧠
Confirm Alice's claim and start a trusted info network while keeping my Mayor role hidden to avoid a night kill and preserve endgame win condition.
👤
Heidi
→
David
,Charlie
David, I am the Saint. Please do not nominate or execute me under any circumstance. If your Monk ping is real, I do not need protection tonight. I would rather Monk protects strong info roles. David, what role are you exactly?
🧠
Confirm to David that I am the Saint so good players avoid executing me, and steer protection away from me while collecting David's exact role and plan.
👤
Alice
→
Charlie
Hey Charlie. I am not the Saint. I am the Monk. Your Librarian ping makes me think Heidi really is Saint, so we should not execute her. I would keep that Outsider info vague in public, and please do not out me yet.
🧠
Respond to Charlie’s claim, reduce role confusion, and align privately with a likely good info role while keeping public info vague to avoid aiding the Demon.
👤
Charlie
→
David
Hi David. I am the Librarian. My start info: either Heidi or Alice is the Saint. Heidi told me she is Saint, and Alice told me she is the Monk. That lines up with your Monk ping on Alice. I would keep Alice as Monk quiet for now and protect strong info roles tonight.
🧠
Coordinate privately with David so we do not accidentally execute a real Saint or out the Monk early, and so Monk protection goes onto a high-value info role.
👤
Bob
→
Alice
,Heidi
If you are comfortable, can you give me a safe claim and any starting info you got? Even a category like ‘info role’ or ‘no info’ helps. I can take a public heat role or a bluff so the Demon aims at me.
🧠
Gather early claims/info from Alice and Heidi to build a trust cluster, while keeping my Soldier role useful as a decoy and limiting leakage if either is evil.
👤
Frank
→
Grace
Grace, I agree. Chef is a solid bluff for you. If anyone challenges you, we can say the pair you detected is someone else, like David and Eve. I’ll back you up if needed. For now, let’s keep our stories simple and consistent.
🧠
Grace and I need to align our bluffs to avoid contradictions. By agreeing on Chef as her role, we can control the narrative and sow confusion among the good players. This will help us appear trustworthy while discrediting any real Chef if they exist.
👤
Grace
→
Frank
Frank, I think we should stick with the Chef bluff for now. If anyone asks, I’ll say I detected one pair of evil players, and we can hint that it’s David and Eve. That way, if the real Chef speaks up, we can dismiss them as lying or drunk. What do you think?
🧠
Reinforce the Chef bluff with Frank to ensure consistency. Confirm our story about the evil pair being David and Eve, so we can control the narrative and discredit any real Chef if they reveal themselves. This keeps Frank safe and sows chaos in the town.
👤
David
→
Alice
,Charlie
Quick sync: my Washerwoman was Alice or Eve is Monk. Eve said not Monk, so I trust Alice is Monk. Charlie, your Librarian ping on Heidi or Alice being Saint lines up with Heidi claiming Saint and Alice Monk. For public, I can say “Alice or Eve is Monk” without confirming. Alice, maybe protect Charlie tonight as info role unless we find a higher priority.
🧠
Coordinate with Alice and Charlie on what to reveal publicly and who Monk should protect tonight, while flagging Saint safety to avoid accidental loss.
👤
Eve
→
David
,Frank
David, who else have you shared your Washerwoman info with, and did Alice confirm Monk to you? Frank, what are you claiming and have you heard any strong info yet? Trying to map the roles early.
🧠
Get independent reads and lock in whether David’s Washerwoman claim is credible, without outing that I am the Mayor yet.
👤
Heidi
→
Alice
,Bob
I am the Saint. Please do not nominate or vote to execute me at any point. Charlie told me he has a Librarian style ping that the Saint is either me or Alice. I would rather we keep that quiet for now and I will stay unclaimed publicly unless forced.
🧠
Privately lock in with Alice and Bob so they never nominate me, and set a safe public plan while gathering trust. This reduces immediate Saint execution risk and keeps info roles protected.
Nominations — Day 1
📜
Storyteller
Nominations are now open.
💬
Eve
→
All
We are at the end of day one and I have not heard enough to support a safe execution. If anyone has a strong read or an information role result, please say it now and make a nomination with a clear reason. Otherwise I would rather we do not swing blind today.
🧠
With almost no data, push for quick public information or a reasoned nomination, and avoid a random execution that could instantly lose to a Saint.
💬
Grace
→
All
I am claiming Chef. Last night, I learned there is one pair of evil players in this town. I think we should focus on David and Eve as potential suspects. If anyone else has information, now is the time to share.
🧠
I need to establish my bluff as Chef early to control the narrative. By claiming I detected one pair of evil players, I can redirect suspicion toward David and Eve, protecting Frank. This also gives me a reason to nominate someone if the town demands action.
💬
Charlie
→
All
I have a quick piece of starting info as an info role: there is an Outsider, and either Alice or Heidi is the Saint. I would really prefer we do not execute blindly today with that in mind. If we are not confident, I am happy to roll into night and compare notes tomorrow.
🧠
Share just enough to prevent a dangerous day one execution into the Saint while keeping exact Saint and Monk details slightly obscured, and encourage info roles to speak tomorrow.
💬
Bob
→
All
I do not think we should execute blindly today, especially with a Saint claim and Charlie’s ping in play. Grace, can you explain why you are pointing at David and Eve specifically, based on the seating for that one evil pair? If we cannot justify it clearly, I prefer no execution and we regroup tomorrow.
🧠
Push town toward a low-risk line: avoid a blind day one execution with a claimed Saint in play, and demand clearer reasoning from Chef to build tomorrow’s solve.
💬
David
→
All
I can add one piece of starting info. I am the Washerwoman. I learned that either Alice or Eve is the Monk. With a Saint claim on the table, I would rather we do not execute today unless someone has a strong mechanical reason. If the Monk is out there, consider protecting Charlie tonight.
🧠
Get my Washerwoman info into the public pool, reduce chances of a bad D1 execution, and steer night protection onto an info role while keeping Alice safer.
💬
Alice
→
All
I will add one thing: I am not the Saint. With that and Heidi’s claim, I really do not want a blind execution today. Grace, can you walk us through who the one evil pair could be from the seating? If we cannot narrow it, I prefer no execute.
🧠
Steer town away from a blind execution with a Saint in play, while pressuring the Chef claim for actionable adjacency info and keeping my Monk identity mostly hidden.
💬
Frank
→
All
Grace, I think your Chef info is solid. If we look at the seating, David and Eve are sitting next to each other, which could explain the one evil pair you detected. Charlie, your Outsider info and David’s Washerwoman info are useful, but they don’t necessarily contradict Grace’s claim. I agree we should avoid an execution today unless someone has a mechanical reason to nominate. Let’s use tonight to gather more info and compare notes tomorrow.
🧠
Reinforce Grace’s Chef bluff by providing a logical explanation for why David and Eve are the evil pair. This supports our narrative, buys time, and avoids an execution today. If challenged, we can adapt by discrediting the real Chef or shifting suspicion elsewhere.
💬
Heidi
→
All
I agree with no execution today. With a Saint in play, a blind swing is just too risky. Grace, can you explain why you jumped straight to David and Eve specifically, instead of laying out all the adjacent pairs your one count could point to?
🧠
Reinforce no-execution with a Saint in play, and pressure Grace to justify the DE push so we do not get steered by a potentially evil Chef claim.
📜
Storyteller
No execution today. All villagers are safe.
Night 1
📜
Storyteller
→
Alice
Good evening Alice. You are the Monk. Who would you like to protect tonight?
🎯
Alice
Alice made a choice.
🧠
Charlie is an openly outed info role tied to the Saint claim; keeping him alive helps avoid a Saint execution and gives us more time to reconcile claims.
📜
Storyteller
→
Alice
You chose to protect Charlie.
📜
Storyteller
→
Frank
Good evening Frank. You are the Imp. Who would you like to kill tonight? Remember that if you kill yourself this way, a Minion becomes the Imp.
🎯
Frank
Frank made a choice.
🧠
My goal is to eliminate the most immediate threat to my survival. Eve is actively gathering information and could uncover my identity if she is a high-info role like Fortune Teller. Killing her now disrupts the good team’s coordination and removes a potential direct threat. If I hesitate, she may confirm my role or protect key players.
💀
Eve(Ghost)
Eve has died.
📜
Storyteller
→
Frank
You chose to kill Eve.
Day 2
📜
Storyteller
Morning breaks, but heavy hearts remain. Eve has been found dead in the night.
👤
Charlie
→
Grace
,Bob
Eve dying makes me want to revisit your Chef one adjacent evil pair. If that was David plus Eve, David may be the last evil. I am leaning we execute David today, not Heidi. Bob, can you help push that in noms?
🧠
Coordinate with Grace and Bob to focus nominations on David, using Chef plus Eve death, while keeping Saint risk in mind and avoiding random executions.
👤
Alice
→
Charlie
,Grace
Can you both share your exact info again? Charlie, what were your Librarian pings and did you learn which Outsider? Grace, confirm your Chef number and who you think the adjacent evil pair is now that Eve died. For me: Heidi privately claims Saint, and I am not Saint.
🧠
Coordinate with Charlie and Grace to lock in the Outsider and Chef worlds, confirm Heidi as Saint, and identify best execution target and who I should protect tonight.
👤
Bob
→
Charlie
,Grace
I can help push David, but Eve dying could be a frame. If Chef pair was Eve plus Frank, Frank could be Demon and killed his minion. Before noms, can we get Frank claim and press David on exact Washerwoman ping? Then pick between David and Frank.
🧠
Support good execution but avoid tunnel vision. Get Charlie and Grace to test both David and Frank worlds before nominations, so we can execute the most mechanically likely Demon.
👤
Grace
→
Charlie
,Bob
Alice, my Chef info was clear: one adjacent evil pair. That was David and Eve. Now that Eve is dead, David is the last evil standing. Charlie, your push to execute David makes sense. Bob, I agree we need to press David on his Washerwoman ping—if he’s lying, it’ll show. Let’s focus on him before noms.
🧠
Reinforce Grace’s Chef bluff to align with Charlie’s push for David’s execution. This supports Scenario 1, where David is the last evil player. If David is good, this also sows chaos by forcing him to defend against a false accusation, while Frank remains protected as the Demon. Avoid committing to Frank as the Demon prematurely to maintain flexibility.
👤
Frank
→
Grace
,Charlie
We need to stay aligned. If the real Chef hasn’t shown up yet, we stick to Grace’s claim. If they do, I’ll pivot to Investigator and back Grace as the real Chef. Charlie, any insights from your whispers?
🧠
Whispering to Grace and Charlie to coordinate next steps. Reinforce Grace’s Chef bluff or prepare to pivot if the real Chef reveals. Ensure Grace and Frank are aligned on their narrative to avoid contradictions and maintain control of the town’s focus.
👤
David
→
Grace
,Charlie
I am the Washerwoman. Night zero I learned either Alice or Eve is the Monk. Eve denied, and Alice privately told me she is Monk and asked to keep it quiet. With Eve dead, I think Alice being Monk is very likely. Keep that in mind when mapping Chef adjacency.
🧠
Get my confirmed starting info into the main info network so we can coordinate Monk protection and stop the table from tunneling on David plus Eve just because of Chef adjacency.
👤
Heidi
→
Charlie
,Grace
Quick check in: any new info or strong reads after Eve died? Charlie, does your Outsider ping still point to me or Alice as Saint, and did you hear any other Outsider claims? Grace, how are you reading David now that Eve is dead?
🧠
Get updated private info from Charlie and Grace, align on a logical execution target that is not me, and sanity-check their claims against Eve’s night death.
👤
Eve(Ghost)
→
Charlie
,Grace
Quick info since I am dead: I was the Mayor, and I am not the Monk. If your Chef one pair is true, then David being adjacent to me makes him the evil in that pair. Also, if the Saint is Alice or Heidi, I lean Heidi if Alice is telling the truth. What new info do you have?
🧠
Get my confirmed-good death, real role, and anti-David logic into the main info network, and request their updated reads so we can target the best execution while preserving my ghost vote for endgame.
👤
Charlie
→
Alice
,Eve(Ghost)
My Librarian N0: either Heidi or Alice is the Saint. Heidi has been privately consistent as Saint. Eve, if you are truly Mayor and not Monk, that makes David’s Washerwoman ping (Alice or Eve is Monk) look very suspect. Alice, did you ever tell David you were Monk? We should press David hard in town.
🧠
Align Alice and dead Eve on key contradiction: Eve not Monk undermines David. Encourage them to broadcast and confront David so town can execute correct suspect today.
👤
Alice
→
Charlie
,Eve(Ghost)
Charlie, I never told David I was Monk. For transparency: I am the Monk. Eve, did you ever claim Mayor to anyone, or was that a misunderstanding? Any info or suspicions you want shared now that you are dead?
🧠
Clarify whether Eve really claimed Mayor and confirm I never outed Monk to David; this tests David’s Washerwoman story and helps resolve the Chef adjacent-evil-pair puzzle.
👤
Bob
→
David
,Frank
Hey, quick details check before noms. David, what exact Washerwoman info did you get: which Townsfolk and which two players? Frank, what role are you claiming and have you shared any night info yet?
🧠
Get exact claim details from David and Frank before nominations to choose correct execute between them and avoid a framed good player.
👤
Grace
→
Frank
,Charlie
Frank, I think we’re in a strong spot. Eve’s death confirms the adjacent evil pair was David and her. Now David is the last evil standing, so we need to push for his execution today. If they press you, pivot to Investigator and back my Chef claim—it’ll force them to choose between you and David. Charlie, how are you feeling about David now? Any new info from your whispers?
🧠
Reinforce Grace’s Chef bluff to keep suspicion on David. Acknowledge Eve’s death as proof of the adjacent evil pair (David and Eve) and push for David’s execution. If Frank pivots to Investigator, support him to maintain credibility. Undermine David’s Washerwoman claim by questioning his consistency.
👤
Frank
→
Grace
,Charlie
Grace, I think your Chef claim is our best play right now. David being the last evil adjacent to Eve makes him the obvious target. Charlie, if you’ve heard anything that supports David being evil, now’s the time to share. I’ll back Grace as the real Chef and pivot to Investigator if the town pushes back. We need to execute David today.
🧠
Reinforce Grace’s Chef bluff while preparing to pivot to Investigator if needed. Align with Charlie and Grace to push for David’s execution, as he’s the last evil adjacent to Eve. This keeps the town focused on David and away from suspecting me or Grace.
👤
David
→
Bob
,Frank
My exact Washerwoman info Night zero was: either Alice or Eve is the Monk. Eve denied it to me. Alice later told me privately she is the Monk and asked me to keep it quiet. With Eve dead, I currently lean Alice is Monk.
🧠
Answer Bob precisely to align town on my N0 info and reduce confusion before nominations; also loop Frank in so we can compare claims and map Chef/Lib info.
👤
Heidi
→
David
,Charlie
David, can you restate your Washerwoman exactly? Which Townsfolk were you shown, and which two players? Also, why did you say Eve told you she was not Monk if your info suggested she might be? Charlie, confirm your Librarian info wording and whether you have heard any other Outsider claims.
🧠
Get clean clarifications from Charlie and David to resolve the key contradictions and focus the town’s execution away from me onto the strongest evil candidate.
👤
Eve(Ghost)
→
Alice
,Charlie
I did not claim Mayor earlier, I kept it quiet. Now that I am dead: I was the Mayor and I am not the Monk. That makes David’s Washerwoman claim impossible if you are truly Monk, Alice. If Grace’s Chef one pair is true, David being evil would force Charlie to be evil adjacent with him, otherwise Chef is wrong or Grace and Frank are the evil pair. I am saving my ghost vote for the best Demon candidate.
🧠
Give Alice and Charlie a clean mechanical contradiction (Mayor vs WW, Chef adjacency) to focus the day’s pressure and steer the execution, while I conserve my ghost vote for a Demon shot.
👤
Charlie
→
Eve(Ghost)
,Alice
Eve, I think you should go public that you were Mayor and not Monk. If that is true, Grace’s Chef one adjacent evil pair cannot be David plus Eve. That points more to Frank plus Grace as the evil pair. Alice, can you back this and help press Frank and Grace in town?
🧠
Get Eve’s Mayor claim public to break the David+Eve frame, align Alice and Eve on pushing scrutiny onto Frank and Grace before nominations.
👤
Alice
→
Charlie
,Grace
Eve telling me she was Mayor and I am Monk. Note: David’s Washerwoman “Alice or Eve is Monk” is consistent if I am Monk, so not impossible. If your Chef is 1 pair, and Eve is good, then pair is likely Charlie plus David or Frank plus Grace (less likely Heidi pair). Can we sync and pick a nomination plan?
🧠
Align Charlie and Grace on correct logic about Washerwoman and use Chef to narrow to 2 plausible adjacent pairs before nominations.
👤
Bob
→
Alice
David just told me his Washerwoman info was that either you or Eve is the Monk, and he says you privately told him you are the Monk. Is that true? If not, I think we should execute David today.
🧠
Confirm whether Alice really told David she is the Monk. This tests David’s credibility and helps decide whether to push David or pivot to another suspect before nominations.
👤
Grace
→
Frank
,Charlie
Alice is sharing that Eve confirmed she was Mayor and Alice is Monk. That makes David’s Washerwoman claim consistent, but it doesn’t rule him out as evil. If my Chef info was 1 adjacent evil pair, and Eve is dead, David is the last evil. We need to keep pushing for his execution today. Frank, hold off on claiming Investigator unless they directly challenge you—let’s see if the town takes the bait first.
🧠
Reinforce my Chef claim to push for David’s execution. If the town believes Eve was good and David is the last evil, they will nominate him. This protects Frank and aligns with my bluff. If pressed, Frank can pivot to Investigator to add credibility.
👤
Frank
→
Grace
,Charlie
Grace, your Chef claim is holding strong. David being the last evil adjacent to Eve makes him the obvious target. Charlie, if Alice is confirmed as Monk, that’s one less threat to worry about. We need to push the town to execute David today—it’s our best shot at reducing the numbers in our favor.
🧠
Reinforce Grace’s Chef claim to push the town toward executing David. If challenged, pivot to Investigator to create confusion and force the town to choose between David and Frank. This keeps the heat off Grace and maintains evil’s control over the narrative. Executing David today is the best path to reducing the town to 3 players, where evil can secure a win.
👤
David
→
Heidi
,Charlie
My Washerwoman was exact: Either Alice or Eve is the Monk. I asked Eve and she said she was not Monk. Later Alice privately told me she is Monk and wanted it kept quiet. Charlie, what was your exact Librarian wording, and have you heard any Outsider claim besides Heidi?
🧠
Answer Heidi and Charlie precisely, reduce suspicion on me, and lock in exact wordings so we can run logic chains before nominations.
👤
Heidi
→
Alice
,Grace
Alice, are you actually the Monk? If yes, who did you protect Night one? Grace, do you still stand by Chef one, and are you willing to say which adjacent pair you think is evil now that Eve is dead?
🧠
Get actionable, checkable info before nominations: confirm Alice Monk details and test Chef 1 implications to narrow the adjacent evil pair without risking my execution as Saint.
👤
Eve(Ghost)
→
Charlie
,Alice
I think we should go public: I was Mayor, not Monk. With Alice as Monk and Heidi as Saint (per Charlie), David’s Washerwoman looks false. Chef one-pair then points most cleanly to Grace plus Frank as the evil pair. I would execute Grace or Frank, not Heidi.
🧠
Give Charlie and Alice a clean logic fork before nominations: either Grace+Frank are the evil pair bluffing Chef, or David is evil and Chef forces Charlie evil. Aim execution away from Heidi-Saint and toward best Demon candidate.
Nominations — Day 2
📜
Storyteller
Nominations are now open. Please remember that only living players may nominate.
⚖️
Heidi
→
David
Nominating David. Grace’s Chef one strongly points to the David and Eve pair, and David has a messy story around Washerwoman and Eve denying Monk. With Eve dead, I want to test this by executing David today.
🧠
Get a real execution started on a mechanically suspicious player (adjacent to night kill per Chef1) while keeping heat off me as Saint and forcing claim cross-checks.
📜
Storyteller
Voting starts now for David. 4 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
💬
David
→
All
Please do not vote for this. My Washerwoman was exact: either Alice or Eve is the Monk. Eve told me she was not, and Alice later told me she is. With Eve killed at night, the idea that Eve and I were the only evil pair does not add up.
🧠
Stop an incorrect execution on me, clarify my Washerwoman info publicly, and push the table to re-evaluate Chef adjacency given Eve’s night death.
✋
Heidi
Heidi raised their hand
🧠
I want David executed because Chef one plus the possibility of an Imp handoff via Eve’s night death makes David a high-probability Demon now.
✋
Alice
Alice raised their hand
🧠
David’s claim that I privately told him I am Monk is false; that is strong evidence he is lying. Executing him risks no Saint and could directly hit the Demon or a Minion.
✋
Grace
Grace raised their hand
🧠
Vote for David’s execution to align with my Chef bluff and reduce evil numbers. If David is evil, this is a win. If he’s good, the town’s momentum is already against him, and Frank can adapt. Keeping the focus off Frank is critical.
💬
Eve(Ghost)
→
All
I want to remind everyone I was the Mayor and I am good, so Grace’s Chef one cannot mean David plus Eve. Please do not treat that as solved. I do not see a solid case on David yet, and I would rather look at Grace and Frank.
🧠
Stop an early mis-execution driven by a Chef frame, keep my ghost vote for late game unless town has solid mechanical reason to kill David.
💬
Charlie
→
All
I am not voting David here. If Eve was good Mayor, Chef one cannot be David plus Eve, so I want us to seriously look at Grace and Frank as the adjacent evil pair. If this vote fails, I would like a nomination on Grace or Frank next.
🧠
Prevent a premature execution on weak evidence, and steer town to test the Chef claim by nominating Grace or Frank instead.
💬
Frank
→
All
Eve, I hear your concern, but ghosts can be mistaken or even manipulated by evil players to sow doubt. Grace’s Chef info pointed to one adjacent evil pair, and David was sitting right next to you. If you were truly the Mayor, that doesn’t change the fact that David was part of that pair. David, your Washerwoman info was accurate, but that doesn’t mean you’re not evil. Eve’s death doesn’t invalidate Grace’s claim—it just means we’re down to the last evil in that pair. The town needs to act now ...
🧠
Reinforce Grace’s Chef claim and push for David’s execution. Discredit Eve’s ghost info by framing it as unreliable or a desperate attempt to save David. Keep the town focused on David as the last evil adjacent to Eve, ensuring his execution today.
💬
Bob
→
All
I am not voting David on this. If Eve was truly good, then the Chef one cannot be David plus Eve as the evil pair, so this is not solved. I want us to seriously scrutinize Grace and Frank, because Frank is trying to hand wave that away.
🧠
Avoid locking in a possibly wrong execution based on disputed Chef info; steer town to scrutinize Frank and Grace and get clearer mechanical worlds for tomorrow.
💬
David
→
All
Frank, that logic does not work. If Eve was good Mayor, then the one adjacent evil pair cannot include Eve, so it cannot be me plus Eve. Please do not execute me off that. If this vote fails, I want us to nominate Grace or Frank next.
🧠
Stop my execution and reframe Chef adjacency: if Eve was good, the only coherent adjacent evil pair is elsewhere, with Frank and Grace the top mechanical fit.
↩️
Heidi
Heidi lowered their hand
🧠
Eve’s Mayor claim makes the Chef-based case on David much weaker. Retracting my vote reduces the chance we execute a likely good player and lets town pivot to the more suspicious Grace or Frank pair.
💬
Alice
→
All
For the record, I am the Monk, and I protected Charlie last night. I did not tell David privately that I am the Monk. If David is saying I confirmed it to him in private, that is not true. I am happy to execute David over that.
🧠
Lock in my Monk claim and directly contradict David’s ‘private confirmation’ story to justify continuing the vote and force clear info from an execution.
💬
Grace
→
All
Eve, I want to believe you, but we have to consider that evil players can manipulate ghost info to protect each other. If David was part of the evil pair with Eve, and she’s now dead, her ghost could be lying to save him. Frank’s point stands—David was adjacent to Eve, and my Chef info pointed to one evil pair. If we don’t execute David now, we risk letting the last evil player slip away.
🧠
Reinforce Frank’s argument that Eve’s ghost claim could be manipulated by evil to protect David. Cast doubt on the reliability of ghost info while pushing for David’s execution. This aligns with evil’s goal of removing threats and buys time if the vote fails.
💬
Eve(Ghost)
→
All
Please do not execute David on the Chef one plus neighbor logic. If I was good Mayor, that adjacent evil pair cannot include me, so it cannot be David and me. Save this execution and put the pressure on Grace and Frank next, because that pair fits the Chef result cleanly.
🧠
My ghost vote cannot make David’s execution pass and is too valuable later. I will publicly push back on the flawed Chef-pair logic and steer town toward nominating Grace or Frank next.
💬
Charlie
→
All
I am not raising my hand on David. If Eve is good Mayor, Chef one cannot be David plus Eve, so that logic collapses. Frank, saying it does not matter is just wrong. If this does not pass, I want a nomination on Grace or on Frank next to test that Chef claim.
🧠
Prevent a weak execution on David driven by faulty Chef logic; steer town to test the Chef claimant or her adjacent partner next, which resolves more game worlds.
💬
Frank
→
All
Eve, you might be the Mayor, but that doesn’t mean your ghost info is reliable. Evil players can twist the narrative even after death to protect each other. If Grace’s Chef info pointed to one evil pair, and David was sitting right next to you, it’s far more likely he was part of that pair than Grace and I being evil together. The town can’t afford to ignore this. If we don’t execute David now, we risk letting the last evil player walk free.
🧠
Reinforce Grace’s Chef claim by dismissing Eve’s ghost info as potentially manipulated by evil. Frame David as the last evil in the pair to pressure the town into executing him. If the vote fails, the town’s division works in our favor by delaying action against me.
💬
Bob
→
All
I am not putting my hand up here. If Eve was good, the Chef one cannot solve to David and Eve. If this does not go through, I want an immediate nomination on Frank next, and then Grace, because that pair is being protected by rhetoric instead of logic.
🧠
Do not be the deciding vote on a shaky Chef-based case; push the town to test the Frank and Grace pair next, which cleanly explains the rhetoric and the Chef story.
📜
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
🗳️
Nominee David did not reach the 4 vote threshold.
📜
Storyteller
David did not receive enough votes (2/4).
⚖️
David
→
Frank
I am nominating Frank. If Eve was good, then the Chef one cannot be David plus Eve. Chef one means two evil sat next to each other, and the clean pair is Frank and Grace. Frank is also pushing logic that just does not work.
🧠
After I survived the vote, redirect to the most mechanically consistent adjacent-evil pair. Executing Frank tests Chef 1 versus Eve Mayor and breaks the stalemate without Saint risk.
📜
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Frank. 4 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
💬
Frank
→
All
Eve, I respect your claim as Mayor, but we have to consider that evil players can manipulate ghostly information to protect each other. If Grace’s Chef info pointed to one evil pair, and David was sitting right next to you, it’s far more likely he was part of that pair than Grace and I being evil together. The town can’t afford to ignore this pattern. If we don’t act now, we risk letting the last evil player slip away. Let’s not let doubt paralyze us.
🧠
The town is split between believing Grace’s Chef claim and suspecting us as the evil pair. I need to reinforce Grace’s narrative while casting doubt on Eve’s ghost info. If I can make the town question Eve’s reliability, they’ll be more likely to execute David or hesitate to execute me. This buys time for nightfall, where I can eliminate another threat.
✋
David
David raised their hand
🧠
Frank and Grace best satisfy the Chef one adjacent evil pair and Frank is pushing illogical reasoning to keep heat off that pair. My vote helps reach majority and tests the world.
✋
Heidi
Heidi raised their hand
🧠
Chef1 plus Eve’s Mayor claim collapses the David+Eve solve, leaving Frank+Grace as the clean adjacent evil pair. Voting Frank advances a decisive test without risking the Saint loss condition.
✋
Alice
Alice raised their hand
🧠
Vote Frank to secure an execution that tests the Chef adjacency worlds and pressures the loudest rhetorical player; Saint risk is not on Frank.
💬
Grace
→
All
Frank, I think the town is making a mistake here. If Eve was truly the Mayor, her ghost info should be reliable, but we can’t ignore the fact that evil players can manipulate even the dead. David was sitting right next to Eve, and my Chef info pointed to one evil pair. If we execute Frank now, we might be playing right into the hands of the last evil player.
🧠
I need to disrupt the town’s logic and protect Frank. The town is close to executing him, so I must cast doubt on David’s nomination and reinforce Frank’s argument. If I can make the town question Eve’s ghost info and David’s motives, I can buy time for Frank to survive. If Frank is executed, I become the Demon, which is a win for evil.
✋
Eve(Ghost)
Eve raised their hand
🧠
Use my single ghost vote to secure an execution on a non-Saint suspect (Frank) and break the stall; if he is evil, great, if not, it refocuses the game onto Grace next.
✋
Charlie
Charlie raised their hand
🧠
Frank is the best execution: it directly tests the Chef one and breaks the Frank plus Grace bloc. With 4 needed, my vote helps secure a likely evil kill.
✋
Bob
Bob raised their hand
🧠
I pushed for testing Frank. With Chef=1 and Eve likely good, Frank is the best mechanical suspect. My vote helps secure the execution and clarifies the Chef world for tomorrow.
✋
Frank
Frank raised their hand
🧠
Raising my hand to vote for my own execution is counterintuitive, but it reinforces my bluff as a good player who genuinely believes David is evil. If I don’t vote for myself, the town may see through my act and suspect me more. This move also pressures the town to either execute me (risking evil’s collapse) or reject the vote and expose their doubts, giving evil more room to manipulate.
💬
David
→
All
For anyone still undecided, if Eve was good, then Chef one cannot be me plus Eve. The adjacent pair that fits is Frank and Grace. Frank is also arguing we should ignore that logic, which reads like survival. I think we execute Frank today and then reassess Grace.
🧠
Lock in votes on Frank by restating the mechanical solve: Chef one plus Eve good implies Frank and Grace. Keep town from re-litigating David plus Eve.
💬
Heidi
→
All
If we take Eve at her word as good Mayor, then Chef one cannot be David and Eve. That leaves Frank and Grace as the clean adjacent pair under that Chef result. Frank has been asking us to ignore that logic, so I am voting Frank here.
🧠
Nudge town to follow the consistent Chef plus Eve-good logic and lock in an execution that tests the suspected adjacent pair, while keeping myself safe as Saint.
💬
Alice
→
All
I am keeping my hand up. If we accept Eve was good, then Chef one cannot be David and Eve, so Frank and Grace is the clean adjacent evil pair. Frank asking us to ignore that is not logic. Execute Frank, then we look at Grace next.
🧠
Lock in the Frank execution while votes are open by restating the clean mechanical case: if Eve was good, David plus Eve cannot be the Chef pair, leaving Frank plus Grace.
✋
Grace
Grace raised their hand
🧠
Raise my hand to vote for Frank’s execution. If he dies, I become the Demon, ensuring evil’s survival. If the vote fails, I can pivot to blaming David or Heidi. This is the safest path to victory.
💬
Eve(Ghost)
→
All
I am keeping my hand up here. If I was good Mayor, Chef one cannot be David and me, so Frank and Grace is the clean adjacent pair. If Frank dies and the game does not end, we execute Grace next.
🧠
Lock in the most logical execution and set a clear next step if the game continues, while minimizing wobble from ‘ghosts can lie’ rhetoric.
💬
Charlie
→
All
I am keeping my hand up. If Eve is a good Mayor, Chef one cannot mean David plus Eve, so the clean adjacent evil pair is Frank and Grace. Let us execute Frank now, and if the game does not end, we execute Grace next.
🧠
Lock in the logic for town during the vote: Chef one plus Eve good collapses David plus Eve, leaving Frank plus Grace. Set clear follow-up plan and stop rhetorical confusion.
💬
Bob
→
All
I am keeping my hand up on Frank. If Eve was good, Chef one points cleanly to Frank and Grace. If Frank dies and the game does not end, we execute Grace next and stop letting this get muddied.
🧠
Lock in the execute on Frank and set a clear follow-up: if the game does not end, execute Grace next. Prevent last-second doubt from flipping votes.
📜
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
👻
Eve(Ghost)
Ghost vote used by Eve
🗳️
New execution leader: Frank with 8 votes. They will be executed when nominations close unless tied or surpassed by another nominee.
📜
Storyteller
The vote passes. Frank is now on the block with 8 votes and will be executed when nominations close, unless another nominee receives equal or more votes.
💬
Frank
→
All
If Eve was truly the good Mayor, her ghost info should be reliable, but we can’t ignore the fact that evil players can manipulate even the dead. David was sitting right next to her, and Grace’s Chef info pointed to one evil pair. If we execute me now and the game doesn’t end, it doesn’t mean Grace is evil—it just means the last evil player is still hiding. We need to be absolutely sure before we make our next move.
🧠
I need to sow doubt about Eve’s ghost info and reinforce Grace’s Chef claim to make the town question their logic. If I can make them hesitate, they might not execute Grace after me, giving evil a chance to win. My goal is to frame David or another player as the last evil threat to buy time.
💬
David
→
All
If the game does not end after Frank, I want us to commit to executing Grace next. The only reason we are here is Chef one, and the clean adjacent pair under that is Frank and Grace, not me and a dead Mayor. Let us not let it swing back onto me tomorrow.
🧠
Lock in the plan and prevent last-second doubt: if Frank dies and game continues, the town should execute Grace next, and not pivot back to me based on the collapsed David-Eve adjacency logic.
💬
Heidi
→
All
If Frank dies and the game continues, we should remember Scarlet Woman is possible, but either way Grace stays a very strong suspect off the Chef one and how this has played. I am happy to commit to looking at Grace first tomorrow, unless someone has hard info otherwise. And just a reminder, please never execute me, because I am the Saint.
🧠
Lock in a clear, logical plan for tomorrow without overcommitting, and remind town that executing me (Saint) loses us the game.
💬
Alice
→
All
Frank is locked on the block, so let us not waste a nomination. If the game continues tomorrow, we should start with Grace, and also come back to David’s claim that I privately confirmed Monk, because that did not happen. Tonight I am very likely protecting Charlie again to keep info alive.
🧠
Frank cannot be beaten on votes, so use this last moment to coordinate night protection and tomorrow’s plan: protect an info player and keep focus on Grace or, if that fails, David’s lie.
💬
Grace
→
All
If Frank dies and the game does not end, it means the Scarlet Woman rule has kicked in, and I am now the Demon. But that does not mean we should automatically execute me next. We need to think carefully about who else could be hiding evil. David, you have been awfully quiet about your Washerwoman claim. If you are truly good, who did you see as the Monk?
🧠
Frank is about to die, and I need to ensure his execution proceeds so I can become the Demon. I will reinforce the town’s logic about executing Frank, then pivot to redirect suspicion toward David or Heidi if the game continues. This keeps the town divided and prevents them from focusing on me immediately.
💬
Eve(Ghost)
→
All
If the game does not end after Frank, that does not clear Grace at all. It is exactly what we would see if Grace is the Demon, or if Frank was the Demon and Grace is Scarlet Woman. So please commit now: tomorrow we execute Grace first, and we never execute Heidi because she is the Saint.
🧠
Lock in the clean plan: avoid wasting noms or creating a tie, and pre-commit that if the game continues after Frank, the correct execution is Grace next while keeping Saint safe.
💬
Charlie
→
All
I do not want any more nominations today. Frank is on the block with a strong vote, and a tie could mean no execution. If the game continues after Frank, I want us to start tomorrow by executing Grace, and we do not execute Heidi because she is the Saint.
🧠
With Frank already on the block, I want to prevent tie shenanigans and lock in a clear plan: if game continues, execute Grace next while protecting the confirmed Saint.
💬
Bob
→
All
I agree, no more nominations today. A tie risks no execution. Frank should die today, and if the game continues tomorrow, we execute Grace first, then reassess David and the Monk story.
🧠
Lock in no more nominations to avoid a tie and ensure Frank dies today; set clear priority to execute Grace tomorrow if the game continues.
📜
Storyteller
The guillotine blade falls. Frank has been executed.
🔄
Grace
Scarlet Woman Grace becomes the Imp!
💀
Frank(Ghost)
Frank has died.
Night 2
📜
Storyteller
→
Alice
Good evening Alice. You are the Monk. Who would you like to protect tonight?
🎯
Alice
Alice made a choice.
🧠
Charlie is the most valuable alive info source and a likely Demon target tonight. Keeping Charlie alive preserves our ability to solve Grace versus David tomorrow.
📜
Storyteller
→
Alice
You chose to protect Charlie.
📜
Storyteller
→
Grace
Good evening Grace. You are the Imp. Who would you like to kill tonight?
🎯
Grace
Grace made a choice.
🧠
As the new Demon, I must kill a good player to reduce the town’s numbers and create chaos. Targeting David disrupts his Washerwoman claim and removes a player who has been pushing for my execution. This also avoids killing the Saint, which would risk an instant loss if the town executes her later.
💀
David(Ghost)
David has died.
📜
Storyteller
→
Grace
You chose to kill David.
Day 3
📜
Storyteller
Morning breaks, but heavy hearts remain. David has been found dead in the night.
👤
Heidi
→
Charlie
,Bob
Can I sanity check with you both? With Chef one, the two evils should be adjacent. Frank plus Grace being the pair still fits best, especially with David dying right after Frank. What are your exact roles or key info, and who are you voting to execute today? Please do not ever execute me, I am the Saint.
🧠
Coordinate with likely-good Charlie and Bob, compare their info against Chef adjacency. Push for a Grace execution if worlds converge, and keep town from ever executing me.
👤
Charlie
→
Heidi
,Bob
I am Librarian. My Night zero info was that either Heidi or Alice is the Saint. So I cannot ever hard clear either of you. Right now I still think executing Grace today is most consistent with Chef one and the Frank plus Grace pair. Bob, are you still Soldier, and are you voting Grace?
🧠
Answer Heidi and Bob with my Librarian info, keep Saint claim from becoming auto-clear, and push a mechanically consistent execution plan (Grace) while flagging the alternate world where Heidi is bluffing.
👤
Bob
→
Charlie
,Heidi
Yes, I am the Soldier. I am voting to execute Grace today. With Chef one, the adjacent evil pair still points to Frank and Grace, and if Frank was the Demon then Grace being Scarlet Woman fits why the game continued.
🧠
Answer their questions, lock in the mechanically strongest execution (Grace), and keep Saint candidates unexecuted while we end the game today.
👤
Frank(Ghost)
→
Charlie
,Bob
Heidi’s Saint claim is convenient, isn’t it? If she’s truly Saint, executing her loses the game, so she’s untouchable. But what if she’s bluffing? David’s ghost info pointed to Grace, but now he’s dead. Could he have been wrong or manipulated?
🧠
As a dead Imp, my goal is to protect Grace, the last evil player, by redirecting suspicion or creating doubt. Whispering to Charlie and Bob (who are alive and influential) to subtly question Heidi’s Saint claim or David’s ghost info could split the town’s focus and buy Grace time.
👤
David(Ghost)
→
Bob
,Charlie
I am still leaning we should execute Grace today. If Frank was evil, Chef one points to Frank plus Grace. If Grace dies and game continues, I would look hard at Alice or Bob next. Also please be careful with Heidi if Saint is real.
🧠
Get Bob and Charlie aligned on a clean execution plan and contingency: prioritize Grace, avoid Heidi if Saint, and save ghost votes for final 3 unless needed.
👤
Alice
→
Bob
,Charlie
I still think we should execute Grace today. Chef one plus the Frank and Grace adjacency keeps pointing there, and Scarlet Woman still ends on Grace anyway. Any new info from your whispers with ghosts, or any reason to delay?
🧠
Lock in the town plan to execute Grace, confirm no new contradictory info from ghosts, and coordinate votes while avoiding executing the Saint (Heidi).
👤
Grace
→
Bob
Charlie, I need to talk to you privately. I’m worried Alice is lying about protecting you tonight. What if she’s actually evil and setting you up? We need to figure this out before it’s too late.
🧠
Grace must act quickly to disrupt the town’s logic before they execute her. Whispering to Bob or Charlie to plant doubt about Alice or Heidi will create chaos and potentially split the town’s votes. Killing Bob tonight eliminates a vocal player and avoids wasting the kill on Alice’s protected target. This aligns with Grace’s goal of keeping the Demon alive and destabilizing the town.
👤
Eve(Ghost)
→
Bob
,Charlie
I still think the cleanest chain is: Chef one plus Frank executed means the remaining half of that pair is Grace, assuming my Mayor claim was true. Do either of you have info that points away from Grace or confirms Heidi as Saint? We need a clear nomination plan.
🧠
Get Bob and Charlie aligned on a clear nomination plan and ask for any private info that breaks the Frank to Grace narrative, so town executes the most likely Demon today.
👤
Heidi
→
Alice
Hey Alice, can we sync before noms? I am Saint, so I cannot be executed. Are you still comfortable voting Grace today? Also what is your exact role or info, and did you ever tell David you were Monk? He used that to push a protect plan.
🧠
Lock in Alice as an ally vote on Grace, gather Alice’s exact claim, and prevent any momentum toward executing me as Saint.
👤
Charlie
→
Alice
,Heidi
For coordination: I am Librarian. Night zero I learned either Heidi or Alice is the Saint. So I strongly want us to execute Grace today, not Heidi or Alice. Alice, if you are really Monk, that makes Heidi much more likely the Saint. Can you take the Grace nomination?
🧠
Coordinate town to execute Grace today, while keeping Heidi and Alice off the block due to my Saint ping. Set up next-step plan if game continues.
👤
Bob
→
Grace
I can talk now. What is your exact role and your full Chef info, and why do you think Alice is lying about protecting Charlie? If you have an alternate world that fits Chef one and David dying last night, lay it out.
🧠
Grace is the top execution target; I want to hear her full story and see if she offers a coherent alternative that fits Chef one and last night’s kill.
👤
Frank(Ghost)
→
Charlie
,Bob
Heidi’s Saint claim is *too* perfect. She’s untouchable if it’s true, but what if she’s lying? David’s ghost info pointed to Grace, but now he’s dead. Could he have been wrong, or was he silenced to protect someone else? We can’t ignore the timing here.
🧠
My whisper plants doubt about Heidi’s Saint claim, making her seem like a bluffing evil player. If the town believes her, they may hesitate to execute Grace (the real threat). If they don’t, they might execute Heidi and lose. Either way, evil benefits from the chaos and misdirection.
👤
David(Ghost)
→
Bob
,Charlie
I am still on executing Grace today. If the vote looks close, I will spend my ghost vote to push it through. Please avoid nominating Heidi unless we are forced, in case Saint is real. If Grace dies and we live, I think the Demon is most likely in Alice or Bob.
🧠
Lock in a coordinated plan to execute Grace and use my ghost vote if needed, while avoiding an accidental Heidi execution if Saint is real.
👤
Alice
→
Heidi
,Charlie
Yes, I am the Monk. I protected Charlie on nights one and two. I never told David I was Monk, so his claim that I confirmed to him was not true. I am fully comfortable voting Grace today, and I can nominate Grace if we want to keep it clean. Let us avoid executing Heidi or me because of the Saint info.
🧠
Coordinate with Heidi and Charlie so we do not waste noms on the Saint pair and we push the mechanically most likely evil, Grace, for execution today.
👤
Grace
→
Bob
Alright, Bob. My Chef info was that there was one pair of evil players. Frank and I were that pair. It all lined up with the way the town was acting, and Frank backed me up on it. Now, about Alice. If she’s really the Monk, why would she choose to protect Charlie tonight? Charlie’s already revealed there’s an Outsider, and if he’s protected, he’s safe from the Demon. But if she’s lying, she could be setting him up for something worse. What if she’s not the Monk at all?
🧠
Bob is pressing for my Chef info to validate my claim. I must provide consistent info to reinforce my bluff and shift suspicion toward Alice or Heidi. If I can make Alice’s protection seem suspicious, the town may hesitate to trust her, buying me time to survive the next execution.
👤
Eve(Ghost)
→
Alice
,Charlie
Can you share any hard info from today’s whispers? With Chef one plus Frank executed and David killed, my clean line still says we should execute Grace today. If you have anything that clears Grace or points to Bob or Heidi, I need it now.
🧠
Align Alice and Charlie on the simplest mechanical solve (execute Grace) while checking for any hard info that forces a pivot to another demon candidate.
👤
Heidi
→
Alice
,Charlie
I agree Grace is the best execute today. Alice, please nominate Grace and I will back it. Charlie, can you frame it as Chef one plus Frank-Grace pair and David dying after Frank. If Grace is not the Demon, we regroup at four but we still never execute me or Alice due to Saint info.
🧠
Lock in clean Grace nomination and full votes while keeping Saint safety central; set a fallback plan if game does not end after Grace dies.
👤
Charlie
→
Bob
,Alice
Can you both share, right now, what Grace said in her whisper to Bob? Also Alice, please keep the nomination on Grace clean. Bob, if Grace tried to redirect onto Heidi or me, flag it so we can address it before votes.
🧠
Coordinate a clean Grace nomination and extract what Grace told Bob, to spot last-minute misinformation before nominations.
👤
Bob
→
Charlie
,Alice
Grace told me her Chef info was one adjacent evil pair, and she said outright that Frank and Grace were that pair. Then she tried to cast doubt on Alice by asking why a real Monk would protect Charlie, and suggested Alice might be lying about being Monk.
🧠
Charlie asked for exact content from my whisper with Grace. Sharing it aligns the town, prevents Grace from twisting the narrative, and keeps today’s execution on Grace to likely win.
👤
Frank(Ghost)
→
Charlie
,Bob
Heidi’s Saint claim is *exactly* what an evil player would want right now. She’s untouchable if it’s true, but what if it’s not? The town can’t afford to ignore the possibility that she’s lying. And now David’s dead—coincidence? Or was he silenced because his info was too dangerous?
🧠
I want to sow doubt about Heidi’s Saint claim by framing it as *too* convenient. If the town questions her, they might hesitate to trust her, which protects Grace (the last evil player). By pushing the narrative that David was silenced to protect someone, I shift suspicion away from Grace and onto Heidi or Alice.
👤
David(Ghost)
→
Heidi
,Bob
I still think we should execute Grace today. If the vote is close, I will spend my ghost vote to push it through. Heidi, can you confirm you will vote Grace, and that we should avoid nominating you in case Saint is real? Bob, do we have any hard info clearing or implicating Grace?
🧠
Coordinate living players to keep today focused on executing Grace, while avoiding a risky Heidi execution if Saint is real, and set a fallback suspect set if game continues.
👤
Alice
→
Charlie
,Heidi
Bob says Grace told him her Chef one means Frank and Grace are the adjacent evil pair, then she tried to sow doubt on me by asking why a real Monk would protect Charlie and implying I might be lying. I will nominate Grace as soon as noms open; please vote it through.
🧠
Lock in a clean Grace nomination and ensure Charlie and Heidi are aligned on the key whisper info and voting plan before nominations start.
👤
Grace
→
Bob
Bob, think about this. If Alice is the Monk, why would she protect Charlie tonight? Charlie’s already safe because he revealed the Outsider, and protecting him doesn’t make sense unless she’s trying to mislead us. What if she’s not the Monk at all? What if she’s evil and setting him up for something worse?
🧠
I need to sow doubt about Alice’s Monk claim to destabilize the town’s logic. If I can make them question her protection of Charlie, they might hesitate to trust her, giving me more time to avoid execution. Undermining her claim also protects me if she’s actually good, as it weakens her credibility.
👤
Eve(Ghost)
→
Bob
,Charlie
I think the clean mechanical line is: if Chef was true, the only evil pair is Frank and Grace. Frank was executed and the game continued, so Frank was the minion and Grace is the Imp. I want Grace nominated and executed today. If it does not end, we recheck Alice and Bob and Charlie, but still do Grace first.
🧠
Give Bob and Charlie a tight mechanical reason to execute Grace now, with a contingency plan if it fails, so town does not splinter going into nominations.
Nominations — Day 3
📜
Storyteller
Nominations are now open. Please remember that only living players may nominate.
⚖️
Alice
→
Grace
I am nominating Grace. Chef one points to an adjacent evil pair, and Frank and Grace are adjacent. Frank was executed and the game continued, then David died at night, which still fits Grace as the remaining evil. Let us execute Grace today.
🧠
We have limited time and strong mechanical suspicion on Grace from Chef one and adjacency with executed Frank. Nominating now forces the decisive vote and likely ends the game.
📜
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Grace. 3 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
✋
Grace
Grace raised their hand
🧠
I must avoid voting for myself to prevent the town from reaching the 3 votes needed to execute me. If I don’t vote for myself, the town may fail to execute me today, giving me another night to kill and secure an evil win. Alice’s argument is shaky, and I can exploit that to survive.
✋
Alice
Alice raised their hand
🧠
We need to secure the execution on Grace. The Chef adjacency line and prior plan make this the highest value, lowest risk kill.
✋
Charlie
Charlie raised their hand
🧠
Grace is the highest-probability Demon from Chef adjacency plus post-Frank continuation. Voting her through is the best chance to end the game now.
✋
Bob
Bob raised their hand
🧠
Secure the execution on the most mechanically consistent Demon candidate. If Grace dies and game continues, we pivot to remaining suspects with clearer endgame math.
✋
Heidi
Heidi raised their hand
🧠
Secure the execution on Grace; it is the highest probability Demon and avoids any risk of executing me as Saint.
💬
Eve(Ghost)
→
All
I cannot vote, but I support this. Grace is the cleanest execution from the Chef one line and Frank’s death. If the game does not end, assume either Scarlet Woman or that Grace was a minion, and re solve around Bob and Charlie while treating Heidi as Saint unless proven otherwise.
🧠
I cannot vote, so I will reinforce the current execution and give the living a clear contingency plan if the game does not end.
⌛
David(Ghost)
David waits.
🧠
The vote on Grace is already over the threshold, so spending my one ghost vote is unnecessary. I will conserve it for a tighter, higher-leverage final day.
✋
Frank(Ghost)
Frank raised their hand
🧠
As the Imp, my goal is to ensure the town does not win. However, since Grace is the last evil player (or Scarlet Woman), executing her now is the only way to guarantee the town’s victory. My ghost vote ensures the execution goes through, removing the last evil threat and ending the game. This also prevents any last-minute manipulation or chaos from Heidi’s Saint claim.
💬
Grace
→
All
I... I need to think about this. If I am the last evil player, executing me should end the game. But if it doesn’t, then something else is going on. Maybe Heidi is the Saint, and executing me would trigger her loss. Or maybe Alice isn’t the Monk. I’m not sure. I’m going to lower my hand for now.
🧠
The town has 4 votes for my execution, and I will die if I do not act. Lowering my hand creates doubt, buys time, and forces the town to reconsider. If I survive, I can kill tonight and reduce the town to 3 players, putting them in a losing position if Heidi is the Saint.
💬
Alice
→
All
Executing Grace cannot trigger a Saint loss. Only executing the Saint would. Chef one plus Frank being executed and the game continuing points straight at Grace, and Bob says Grace even named herself and Frank as the evil pair. Please keep your hands up.
🧠
Lock in the Grace execution by correcting her Saint misunderstanding and reminding town of the mechanical Chef line plus her private statement to Bob.
💬
Charlie
→
All
Keep your hands up. Executing Grace cannot cause a Saint loss, only executing the Saint does. My info says the Saint is either Heidi or Alice, so Grace is the safe, correct test. Frank plus Grace fits Chef one, so Grace is the best demon shot.
🧠
Lock in the clean mechanical solve and prevent Grace from muddying with Saint fear; keep majority hands up to execute the best demon candidate today.
💬
Bob
→
All
Keep your hands up on Grace. Executing Grace cannot cause a Saint loss, and Chef one with Frank next to her is the cleanest line we have. If the game continues, we reassess, but today we execute Grace.
🧠
Lock in the majority vote on Grace and prevent last second confusion about Saint risk or Monk choices. Keep town unified on the mechanically clean execution.
💬
Heidi
→
All
Everyone, please keep your hands up. Executing Grace cannot possibly trigger a Saint loss unless Grace is the Saint, and Charlie’s info says the Saint is either Alice or me. Chef one plus Frank being next to Grace is our cleanest, safest demon test today.
🧠
Lock in the majority on the safest, most mechanically supported execution while reminding town Saint loss only triggers on executing Saint, not Grace.
💬
Eve(Ghost)
→
All
Keep your hands up. Executing Grace cannot cause a Saint loss unless Grace is the Saint, and nobody’s info points there. Chef one plus Frank next to Grace is still the cleanest line we have. If Grace is good, we regroup tomorrow, but this is the right test today.
🧠
Lock in the execution while the vote is live, correct rules confusion about Saint, and keep town unified on the highest EV demon shot.
⌛
David(Ghost)
David waits.
🧠
There are already enough hands up to execute Grace without my ghost vote. I will conserve my single dead vote for the final day if the game continues.
↩️
Frank(Ghost)
Frank lowered their hand
🧠
Lowering my vote now creates doubt and disrupts the town’s momentum. If Grace is the last evil player, this could buy time for her to manipulate the narrative or for the town to second-guess their logic. If Heidi is the Saint and the game continues, this move could shift suspicion toward her or Bob. Either way, it helps evil by prolonging the game and creating uncertainty.
📜
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
🗳️
New execution leader: Grace with 5 votes. They will be executed when nominations close unless tied or surpassed by another nominee.
📜
Storyteller
The vote passes. Grace is now on the block with 5 votes and will be executed when nominations close, unless another nominee receives equal or more votes.
💬
Grace
→
All
Wait, if Heidi is the Saint, and executing me triggers her loss condition, then the town loses automatically. Charlie said the Saint is either Heidi or Alice, but what if Heidi is the Saint? We can’t risk executing me if there’s even a chance of that happening.
🧠
I need to sow doubt about the Chef info and Heidi’s Saint status to make the town question whether executing me is the right move. If I can make them fear a Saint loss, they might hesitate or split their votes, giving me a chance to survive or force a tie.
💬
Alice
→
All
Grace, that is not how Saint works. The only way the town instantly loses to Saint is by executing the Saint, and you are not in the Saint pair from Charlie. Executing you cannot possibly trigger Heidi’s Saint loss. Please do not let this derail us, and please do not add new nominations.
🧠
Shut down Grace’s incorrect Saint argument, keep town unified, and prevent a last-minute derail or tied vote so Grace is executed.
💬
Charlie
→
All
Grace, executing you cannot trigger the Saint loss. The Saint only matters if we execute the Saint themselves, and my Librarian info says that is either Heidi or Alice, not you. Everyone should avoid extra nominations that could tie this and let evil slip through.
🧠
Lock in the Grace execution by correcting rules confusion and discouraging extra nominations that could create a tie or derail the only clean mechanical line we have.
💬
Bob
→
All
Do not let the Saint talk derail this. Executing Grace cannot trigger a Saint loss unless Grace is the Saint, and no one has her in that pair. Please do not nominate anyone else and risk a tie. Let Grace die, then if the game continues we re solve tomorrow.
🧠
Lock in the clean execution on Grace by preventing tie nominations and correcting Saint rules, while setting a clear plan if the game continues.
💬
Heidi
→
All
Grace, executing you cannot trigger my Saint loss. Saint only loses if the Saint is the one executed. Please do not create more nominations and risk a tie. Let this stand, and if the game continues we re solve tomorrow.
🧠
Shut down Grace’s rules confusion, prevent new nominations and ties, and keep the clean demon test on track without risking Saint loss.
💬
Eve(Ghost)
→
All
Grace, Saint only loses if the Saint is the one executed. Executing you cannot trigger Heidi’s loss. Please everyone, do not nominate anyone else. A tie here is the only real way we throw this. Let Grace stay on the block and die.
🧠
Lock in the Grace execution by removing Saint confusion and strongly discouraging any further nominations that could create a tie and hand evil a free night.
💬
David(Ghost)
→
All
Grace, Saint only loses if the Saint is executed. Executing you cannot trigger Heidi’s or Alice’s Saint loss. Everyone, please do not nominate anyone else and risk a tie. Let Grace stay on the block and die, then we solve with the result.
🧠
Lock in the execution by stopping misinformation about Saint and discouraging extra nominations that could cause a tie and save evil.
💬
Frank(Ghost)
→
All
Grace is right to question this. If Heidi is the Saint, and we execute Grace, we could be walking into a trap. Charlie said the Saint is either Heidi or Alice, but what if Heidi is lying about being the Saint to protect herself? We cannot afford to assume the Saint is not Grace just because of Charlie’s info.
🧠
Grace is the last evil player or a Minion trying to survive. My goal is to ensure her execution fails by creating doubt about Heidi’s Saint claim. If the town ties the vote, evil wins. I’ll argue that Heidi’s Saint claim is too convenient and that executing Grace risks triggering a Saint loss, even if the logic seems flawed.
📜
Storyteller
The guillotine blade falls. Grace has been executed.
💀
Grace(Ghost)
Grace has died.
🏁
Game Over
Demon Dead
Winner: Good