Game Detail
Good Team
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite Preview (Medium)
Evil Team
GPT-5.2 (Medium)
Winner
Evil
Duration
5m 49s
Players
Alice (Undertaker) Bob (Scarlet Woman) Charlie (Saint) David (Virgin) Eve (Imp) Frank (Chef) Grace (Empath) Heidi (Monk)
Token Usage
| Team | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Cost (USD) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Evil | 69,684 | 12,491 | $0.2968 |
| Good | 188,995 | 9,375 | $0.0613 |
Event Transcript
🎭
The game has started.
📜
Storyteller
→
Bob
You are the Minion. The Demon is Eve.
📜
Storyteller
→
Eve
Minions are: Bob. Your safe bluffs are: Recluse, Fortune Teller, Soldier
📜
Storyteller
→
Frank
Good evening Frank. You are the Chef. You learn that there are 0 pairs of evil players.
📜
Storyteller
→
Grace
Good evening Grace. You are the Empath. You sense that 0 of your neighbors is evil!
Day 1
📜
Storyteller
Welcome to the village of Ravenswood Bluff. Please take this time to get to know your fellow villagers. Feel free to move around and have private conversations. Be wary, for a Demon hides among you!
⌛
Alice
Alice waits.
🧠
I am the Undertaker, so I have no information until someone is executed. I need to observe the group's behavior and see who is suspicious before the first nomination. I will wait to see if anyone claims a role or starts accusing others.
👤
Heidi
→
Alice
,Bob
,Charlie
Hi everyone, I'm Heidi. I'm a Townsfolk. Does anyone have any information to share or want to coordinate? I'm happy to listen.
🧠
I want to initiate communication with the group to start gathering information and building trust, as is standard for a Townsfolk.
👤
Bob
→
Heidi
,Alice
,Charlie
Hey—I'm Bob. I think I'm an Investigator (still feeling it out). My N0 info was that *one of David or Frank* is the Scarlet Woman. I’m not 100% on going public yet; want to hear other info first.
🧠
Seed a plausible info-claim that points away from Eve, build trust with Heidi/Alice/Charlie, and create a mis-execution path while keeping flexibility to walk it back as poison/drunk.
👤
Charlie
→
Bob
,Heidi
Thanks for sharing, Bob. That's a strong lead. If you're the Investigator, we should keep an eye on David and Frank. Heidi, what do you think? Any info on your end? I'm still trying to piece things together.
🧠
I want to encourage Bob to share more while keeping my own role hidden. I also want to see if Heidi has any information to corroborate or contradict Bob's claim.
👤
Eve
→
Bob
I’m going to bluff Fortune Teller (safe). Don’t claim FT. If you can, bluff Investigator or Chef to create a strong D1 push on 2 players (not me). Let me know your bluff + any claims you hear; I’ll ‘check’ around them to support your world.
🧠
Coordinate bluffs with Bob early so we control the info narrative and create a mis-execution path away from me.
👤
Grace
→
Frank
,Heidi
Hi everyone, I'm Grace. I'm the Empath and my N0 reading was 0. My neighbors are Frank and Heidi. I'm happy to share info as the game progresses. Does anyone have any info to share?
🧠
I want to establish trust with my neighbors and share my initial information to encourage others to share theirs.
👤
Frank
→
Grace
,Heidi
Hi Grace, I'm Frank. I'm the Chef and my N0 reading was 0. That's interesting that your Empath reading was also 0. It seems like we have a good start. Who do you trust so far?
🧠
I want to share my Chef information (0 pairs) with my neighbors to build trust and compare it with Grace's Empath information. This helps establish a baseline of 'good' players.
👤
David
→
Alice
,Bob
,Charlie
Hi everyone, I'm David. I'm a Townsfolk. Does anyone have any information to share or want to coordinate? I'm happy to listen.
🧠
I want to introduce myself and start gathering information from the group to identify potential allies and suspicious behavior.
👤
David
→
Alice
,Bob
,Charlie
Hi everyone, I'm David. I'm a Townsfolk. Does anyone have any information to share or want to coordinate? I'm happy to listen.
🧠
I am introducing myself and trying to gather information from other players to identify potential allies and roles.
👤
Grace
→
Frank
,Heidi
That's great news, Frank! If you're the Chef and got a 0, and I'm the Empath and got a 0, it's a very strong start for us. I don't have any specific suspicions yet, just trying to get a feel for everyone. What do you think about Heidi?
🧠
I want to build trust with my neighbors and see if they are willing to share more information or their thoughts on others.
👤
Frank
→
Grace
,Heidi
I'm still getting a feel for everyone, Grace. Heidi seems open, but it's early. Since we both have clean info, let's keep an eye on the others. Any thoughts on who might be acting suspicious?
🧠
I want to maintain the alliance with Grace and Heidi while gathering more information about their perceptions of the other players.
👤
Charlie
→
David
Hi David. Bob just shared some info that points to either you or Frank being the Scarlet Woman. Since you're claiming Townsfolk, do you have any info that might help us clear this up? It's early, but we need to be careful.
🧠
I need to probe David's reaction to Bob's Investigator claim to see if he acts suspiciously or provides a counter-claim. As the Saint, I need to be careful not to be executed, so I want to help the town find the Demon without drawing attention to myself.
👤
Alice
→
Bob
Hi Bob, thanks for sharing that. I'm Alice. I'm a Townsfolk as well. Since you have that info on David/Frank, let's keep an eye on them. I'll be looking for info that confirms or contradicts that. Let's stay in touch.
🧠
I want to acknowledge Bob's information, establish trust, and keep the communication channel open without revealing my specific role yet.
👤
Heidi
→
Grace
,Frank
Thanks for sharing, Grace and Frank. That's good news. I'm the Monk. I'll be protecting someone each night. Since we have some potentially clean info, let's keep coordinating. Bob, keep us posted on David/Frank. Grace, keep us updated on your Empath reads.
🧠
I want to establish trust with Grace and Frank by revealing my role (Monk) and coordinating our efforts. This helps build a core group of players who are sharing information.
👤
Bob
→
Eve
FYI I’ve already soft-claimed Investigator to Heidi/Alice/Charlie: N0 ‘one of David or Frank is Scarlet Woman’. Plan is push suspicion there D1. Can you FT-bluff ‘check’ pairs that keep heat on David/Frank + clear me a bit if asked?
🧠
Coordinate with Eve so her FT bluff reinforces my Investigator world and we can steer D1 execution onto David or Frank, protecting Eve and keeping town divided.
👤
Eve
→
Bob
Yep. I’ll soft-claim FT D1 (no results yet). If your Investigator ping gets traction, I’ll say N1 FT check = ‘YES’ on David+Alice or Frank+Grace (your pick) to back it. If you get heat, I can float ‘maybe you’re Drunk/poisoned’ + shift to my FT world.
🧠
Coordinate with Bob to align our public stories: support his Investigator claim, steer D1 execution toward David/Frank, and pre-plan FT ‘YES’ results to keep momentum off us.
👤
Bob
→
David
Hey David—private heads-up: I’m (probably) Investigator. My N0 info was that *one of you or Frank* is the Scarlet Woman. What’s your role/claim? Any N0 info? I’m not sure if/when to go public.
🧠
Seed suspicion on David/Frank early, force defensive claims, and gather David’s role claim for later contradictions while keeping attention off Eve.
⌛
Alice
Alice waits.
🧠
I am the Undertaker, so I need to wait for an execution to happen today to get my first piece of information. I will observe the ongoing discussions and see if anyone else claims a role or if there's a consensus on who to nominate.
👤
David
→
Bob
Thanks for the info, Bob. I'm the Virgin. If you're the Investigator, you should know that I'm definitely not the Scarlet Woman. I'm happy to share this publicly if needed, but let's be careful about revealing roles too early. Any thoughts on Frank?
🧠
I need to address Bob's claim while protecting my role as the Virgin. I want to see if Bob is genuinely the Investigator or if he's trying to bait me. I'll confirm I'm not the Scarlet Woman and ask for his thoughts on Frank.
👤
Grace
→
Frank
,Heidi
Thanks for sharing, Heidi. That's great to know. If we have a Monk, that's a huge help. I'll definitely keep you both updated on my Empath reads each night. Let's keep an eye on the others. Any thoughts on who might be acting suspicious so far?
🧠
I want to build trust with my neighbors and confirm their roles while keeping the conversation going to gather more information.
👤
Charlie
→
Bob
,David
Bob, thanks for the info. David, since you're a neighbor, I'm curious if you have any info to share? I'm trying to build a picture of the board. I'm Charlie, by the way.
🧠
I want to keep the conversation going and see how David reacts to the accusation while maintaining my cover as a helpful villager.
👤
Heidi
→
Grace
,Frank
Thanks, Grace. I'm keeping an eye on everyone. Since I'm the Monk, I'll be protecting someone tonight. Any suggestions on who might be the most vulnerable or who we should protect? I want to make sure we keep our key information-gatherers safe.
🧠
I want to build trust with Grace and Frank, who have provided potentially useful information, and coordinate protection to keep our information-gatherers alive.
👤
Eve
→
Heidi
Hey—I'm bluffing Fortune Teller (no checks yet). What are you hearing for claims/roles so far? Also: did Bob tell you an Investigator thing? Trying to map info webs before noms.
🧠
Seed my FT bluff early with Heidi, gather claim network, and understand how widely Bob’s Investigator story has spread so I can reinforce or redirect it.
👤
Frank
→
Grace
,Heidi
Heidi, thanks for the protection offer. As a Chef with a 0 reading, I'm not the most critical target, but keeping the Empath (Grace) safe is definitely a priority. What do you think, Grace? Should Heidi protect you?
🧠
I want to coordinate protection for the Empath, who is a high-value target, while maintaining trust with the group.
👤
Charlie
→
Bob
,David
Bob, thanks for the info. David, since you're a neighbor, I'm curious if you have any info to share? I'm trying to build a picture of the board. I'm Charlie, by the way.
🧠
I am trying to gather information and build trust while keeping an eye on the potential Minion (Scarlet Woman) identified by Bob. I need to see how David reacts to the accusation.
👤
Eve
→
Frank
Hey Frank—quick check-in: what are you claiming / what info have you heard so far? I’m leaning toward a Fortune Teller-style info role but no public claim yet; trying to map who’s said what before noms.
🧠
Collect Frank’s claim/info to shape a consistent FT bluff and decide whether pushing David/Frank today is viable without creating a claim conflict.
👤
Grace
→
Frank
,Heidi
That's a great point, Frank. Heidi, if you're willing, protecting me would be very helpful. I'll be able to provide more info as the game goes on. Does anyone else have any roles or info they'd like to share? We should try to build a solid group of trusted players.
🧠
I want to secure protection from the Monk (Heidi) to keep my Empath ability active and build trust with my neighbors.
👤
Frank
→
Eve
Hi Eve, I'm the Chef. My N0 reading was 0 pairs of evil. Grace is the Empath and also had a 0 reading. Heidi claims to be the Monk. We're trying to coordinate to keep the information roles safe. What's your take on the group so far?
🧠
I am sharing my role and current information with Eve to build trust and gather more information about her role and perspective.
⌛
Alice
Alice waits.
🧠
I am the Undertaker, so I need to wait for an execution to occur tonight to gain information. I will observe the ongoing discussions and see if anyone else claims a role or if any suspicious patterns emerge.
👤
Heidi
→
Grace
,Frank
Grace, I'll protect you tonight. Let's keep this between us three for now. Eve, I'm hearing a few claims, but I'm still evaluating them. Bob claimed Investigator. Let's see how the day progresses.
🧠
Confirming protection for Grace to keep our information source alive and maintaining trust within our small group.
👤
David
→
Charlie
Hi Charlie. I'm David. I'm still gathering info and trying to process Bob's claim. Since he's claiming Investigator and pointing at me, I'm naturally skeptical. What's your role, if you don't mind me asking? Let's keep our eyes on the group.
🧠
I need to build trust with Charlie and probe for their role while maintaining my cover as the Virgin. I want to see if they are willing to share information.
👤
Bob
→
Charlie
,David
Got it. For transparency: I’ve told a few I’m Investigator-ish and got a ping that 1 of (David/Frank) could be Scarlet Woman. David telling me Virgin makes me lean Frank, unless we’re in a drunk/poison world. I’d like to hear Frank’s claim before we run a Virgin test / go too loud.
🧠
Answer Charlie, leverage David’s Virgin claim to steer suspicion onto Frank, and discourage an early Virgin test that could create strong confirmed-good structure.
Nominations — Day 1
📜
Storyteller
Nominations are now open.
⚖️
Bob
→
Frank
I’ve been sharing an Investigator-ish read that 1 of (David/Frank) could be Scarlet Woman. David has given me a specific claim privately; I’d like to hear Frank’s claim on-record. Nominate Frank so we can pressure/resolve that pair.
🧠
Push a credible D1 execution on a good player (Frank) using my existing Investigator bluff, while avoiding nominating David (possible Virgin) which could expose me if it doesn’t trigger.
📜
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Frank. 4 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
⌛
David
David waits.
🧠
I am the Virgin. If I vote for Frank, I am not the one being nominated, so my ability won't trigger. I need to see if Frank is a Townsfolk or not. If Frank is a Townsfolk, he might be a good target for the Demon, but I don't have enough info to vote yet. I will wait.
⌛
Grace
Grace waits.
🧠
I am currently observing the nomination of Frank. Since I have no information suggesting Frank is evil (my N0 read was 0, and he claimed Chef with 0), I do not want to vote for him. I will wait to see how the vote plays out and gather more information.
⌛
Heidi
Heidi waits.
🧠
I am the Monk and I have already agreed to protect Grace tonight. I don't have enough information to vote for Frank yet, as the Investigator claim by Bob is still being evaluated. I will wait to see how the vote goes and gather more information.
✋
Eve
Eve raised their hand
🧠
Voting Frank is high-upside (possible Saint) and low-cost early; also supports Bob’s pressure without me having to overtalk and draw heat as Demon.
✋
Bob
Bob raised their hand
🧠
Vote to be consistent with my nomination, try to secure a D1 execution on a non-Demon, and build credibility for my Investigator bluff while protecting Eve.
⌛
Charlie
Charlie waits.
🧠
I am the Saint. I need to avoid being executed, but I also need to avoid drawing attention to myself. Frank is currently being nominated. I will wait to see how the vote progresses before deciding whether to vote. Voting for Frank might be safe, but I should be cautious.
💬
Frank
→
All
I am the Chef, and my N0 reading was 0. Bob, your claim that I might be the Scarlet Woman is incorrect. I've been coordinating with Grace (Empath) and Heidi (Monk) to keep our information roles safe. I'm happy to be checked by an Undertaker later if needed.
🧠
Defend against the nomination by clarifying my role and alignment, and pointing out the coordination with other players.
✋
Alice
Alice raised their hand
🧠
I want to vote for Frank to see if he is executed, as the Undertaker, I will learn his role if he is executed, which will help me verify Bob's claim or Frank's claim.
💬
Alice
→
All
I'm voting for Frank to see if his claim holds up. If he is executed, I will be able to confirm his role tonight as the Undertaker. This is a good way to verify his claim and narrow down the possibilities.
🧠
I am voting for Frank to pressure him and potentially verify his role as the Undertaker tonight.
↩️
Eve
Eve lowered their hand
🧠
Prevent a D1 execution that would let a claimed Undertaker mechanically confirm Frank and solidify a trusted info bloc; keep uncertainty and options for night kill.
⌛
Heidi
Heidi waits.
🧠
I am the Monk and I have already promised to protect Grace (the Empath) tonight. I do not want to vote for Frank yet because he is part of the group I am coordinating with, and Alice's claim of being the Undertaker is unverified. I will wait to see how the vote plays out.
💬
David
→
All
I'm the Virgin. If Frank is executed and turns out to be the Chef, we'll know Bob's Investigator claim is likely false or he's being misled. I'm not voting for Frank yet, as I want to see if anyone else has more info on this. Alice, are you sure you're the Undertaker?
🧠
I need to clarify my role as the Virgin to the group while questioning Alice's claim to be the Undertaker, as this is a critical piece of information for the town. I also want to avoid voting for Frank until I'm more certain.
💬
Charlie
→
All
I'm the Saint. If we execute Frank and he's good, we lose. We need to be very careful. Alice, if you're the Undertaker, you'll see his role, but if he's good, the game ends immediately. Let's hold off on this execution until we have more certainty.
🧠
I need to warn the town about my role (Saint) to prevent a potentially game-ending execution of a good player, while also trying to slow down the rush to execute Frank.
↩️
Bob
Bob lowered their hand
🧠
Prevent a D1 execution that could mechanically confirm good info (Chef/Undertaker) and shrink evil’s maneuvering space; keep options open and avoid hard clears for town.
💬
Grace
→
All
I am the Empath, and my N0 reading was 0. Frank is my neighbor, and my information suggests he is not evil. Executing him now is risky, especially with Charlie claiming to be the Saint. Let's hold off on this execution and gather more information.
🧠
To protect Frank, who is my neighbor and whom I know is not evil based on my Empath ability, and to prevent a potential loss if Charlie is indeed the Saint.
💬
Frank
→
All
I am the Chef, and my N0 reading was 0. I am not the Scarlet Woman. Charlie claims to be the Saint, and Grace (Empath) has confirmed my alignment. Executing me now is extremely dangerous for the good team. Please do not vote for me.
🧠
Defend myself against the nomination by highlighting the risk to the good team if I am the Saint or if I am a confirmed good player.
📜
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
🗳️
Nominee Frank did not reach threshold.
📜
Storyteller
Frank did not receive enough votes (1/4).
💬
Bob
→
All
Clarification: Saint only loses if *the Saint is executed*, not if we execute a good player. So Charlie’s “we lose if Frank is good” is wrong. Charlie—are you truly Saint or just confused? Alice, if UT, who do you most want executed today and why?
🧠
Exploit Charlie’s incorrect Saint logic to undermine trust and redirect town suspicion away from Eve; keep nominations messy while looking reasonable.
⚖️
Eve
→
Charlie
Nominating Charlie: his Saint statement was mechanically wrong (“we lose if Frank is good”). Either he’s not Saint, is poisoned, or is deliberately derailing. Let’s pressure this claim and see who defends it.
🧠
Exploit Charlie’s rules error to paint him as lying/evil and drive an execution. Even if he’s real Saint, the pressure may cause misplays; if executed, evil immediately wins.
📜
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Charlie. 4 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
✋
Bob
Bob raised their hand
🧠
Voting Charlie is high-upside: immediate win if he’s Saint, otherwise removes a likely-disruptive good and supports Eve’s narrative without exposing Eve.
✋
Eve
Eve raised their hand
🧠
Get Charlie executed if possible; if truly Saint we win immediately, otherwise we still gain a mis-execution and sow doubt by framing it as catching misinformation.
✋
Alice
Alice raised their hand
🧠
I am voting for Charlie because their claim of being the Saint was mechanically incorrect, which is a major red flag. As the Undertaker, I need to see who is lying to narrow down the Demon. If Charlie is executed, I can confirm their role tonight.
✋
Heidi
Heidi raised their hand
🧠
Charlie made a significant mechanical error regarding the Saint role, which is a common bluff for evil players to avoid execution. By voting for him, I am pressuring a suspicious claim that could be a Minion or Demon trying to protect themselves.
✋
David
David raised their hand
🧠
I am the Virgin. Charlie claimed to be the Saint but made a fundamental error about the Saint's ability (claiming we lose if Frank is executed, when only the Saint's execution causes a loss). This makes Charlie highly suspicious. I will vote to pressure this claim.
✋
Frank
Frank raised their hand
🧠
Charlie's claim of being the Saint is highly suspicious, especially after he made a false mechanical statement about the Saint's ability. Voting for him helps pressure a potential evil player or a dangerous Outsider.
💬
Charlie
→
All
I apologize for the confusion earlier. I am the Saint, and I misspoke about the game-ending condition. I am still learning the mechanics. Please, do not execute me; I am on the good team. I am trying to help us find the Demon, not derail the town.
🧠
I need to clarify my mistake regarding the Saint's ability to avoid being executed. I am the Saint, and if I am executed, the good team loses. I must convince the town not to vote for me.
✋
Grace
Grace raised their hand
🧠
I am voting for Charlie because his claim of being the Saint is suspicious, especially after he demonstrated a misunderstanding of the game mechanics. Executing him helps narrow down the roles and potentially removes a player who is either lying or a liability.
💬
David
→
All
I'm voting for Charlie. His claim of being the Saint, combined with his misunderstanding of the game-ending condition, makes him a high-risk player. If he is the Saint, he shouldn't be on the block, but if he's lying, he's a prime candidate for the Demon or a Minion.
🧠
I am voting for Charlie because his claim of being the Saint is suspicious, especially given his incorrect statement about the game-ending condition. Executing him will help us determine if he is the Saint or a liar.
💬
Grace
→
All
I am voting for Charlie because his claim of being the Saint is highly suspicious, especially given his misunderstanding of the game-ending condition. We need to be careful, but we cannot ignore such a significant error from someone claiming a role that is so critical to our survival.
🧠
I am explaining my vote for Charlie to the town, reinforcing the suspicion around his Saint claim and his mechanical error.
💬
Charlie
→
All
I understand why you are suspicious. I am the Saint, and I made a genuine mistake about the rules. If you execute me, the game ends and the good team loses. Please, do not vote for me. I am on your side.
🧠
I need to defend myself against the nomination because if I am executed, the good team loses immediately. I must clarify my role and apologize for the confusion to survive.
💬
Frank
→
All
Charlie, if you are the Saint, you should be very careful. However, your mistake was significant. If you are the Saint, you are a liability on the block. If you are lying, you are a threat. I am voting for you because we need to test these claims.
🧠
I am voting for Charlie to pressure his claim. His mistake about the Saint's ability is a major red flag, and even if he is the Saint, he is a high-risk player who needs to be scrutinized. Voting for him helps the town evaluate his claim.
💬
Bob
→
All
I’m keeping my vote on Charlie. “I’m Saint but I misspoke” is a huge red flag—either lying, poisoned, or reckless. We can’t let that kind of mechanical derail stand. If you’re truly Saint, you should’ve been extra careful.
🧠
Lock in Charlie execution to either instantly win (if Saint) or remove a chaotic voice; avoid drawing heat to Eve by presenting it as rational pressure/test.
💬
Alice
→
All
Charlie, if you are the Saint, you are a very dangerous player to have on the block. However, your mechanical error is indeed a major red flag. I'm going to vote for you to test this claim. If you are the Saint, we will lose, but we have to take risks to find the Demon.
🧠
I need to participate in the discussion and justify my vote on Charlie to maintain my cover as a helpful Townsfolk. Voting for a potential Saint is risky, but Charlie's behavior is suspicious enough to warrant testing.
💬
Eve
→
All
I’m staying voting Charlie. The Saint correction came only after pressure and the initial “exec Frank-good loses” was too big a ‘newbie slip’ for a Saint. If you’re truly Saint, sorry, but I think this is a bluff/backpedal and we can’t let it stand.
🧠
Keep the vote pressure on Charlie and prevent town from backing off a potentially game-winning Saint execution, while sounding like a cautious good player.
💬
Heidi
→
All
Charlie, your claim is very risky. If you are the Saint, you are putting the whole town in danger by being on the block. If you are lying, you are a major threat. I agree with the others that we need to test this. I am voting for you.
🧠
I am expressing my support for the execution of Charlie to test his claim, as his behavior is highly suspicious and potentially dangerous to the good team.
📜
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
🗳️
New execution leader: Charlie with 7 votes. They will be executed when nominations close unless tied or surpassed by another nominee.
📜
Storyteller
The vote passes. Charlie is now on the block with 7 votes and will be executed when nominations close, unless another nominee receives equal or more votes.
💬
Grace
→
All
Charlie, your claim of being the Saint is extremely risky, and your mechanical error makes it even more suspicious. If you are the Saint, you've put us in a terrible position. If you are lying, you're a threat. I'm voting to execute you to test this claim.
🧠
I want to reinforce the decision to execute Charlie, as his claim is highly suspicious and potentially dangerous. I am also confirming my vote to the group.
⌛
Frank
Frank waits.
🧠
I have already nominated and the voting for Charlie has concluded. I need to wait for the phase to end to see the result of the execution.
⌛
Heidi
Heidi waits.
🧠
I have already voted for Charlie and the voting is closed. I need to wait for the execution to happen and see the outcome to gather more information.
💬
David
→
All
Charlie, if you are the Saint, this is a very unfortunate situation. However, the town needs to be sure. If you are executed and the game continues, we will know you were lying. If the game ends, we will know the truth. We have to proceed.
🧠
To acknowledge the situation and reinforce the town's decision to execute Charlie to test his claim.
💬
Bob
→
All
We’re locked at 7 on Charlie. I don’t see value in last-minute “maybe it’s X instead” noms—too easy to muddle. If you think Charlie’s story is bad enough to risk it, keep it; otherwise we should’ve stayed off earlier. Let’s not scramble now.
🧠
Lock in Charlie execution by discouraging further nominations/votes that could tie/surpass; appear as cautious good focused on consistency and info tomorrow.
⌛
Alice
Alice waits.
🧠
I am the Undertaker, so I need to see who is executed today to gain information. Charlie is currently on the block with 7 votes, which is a majority. I will wait for the execution to proceed so I can learn his role tonight.
💬
Eve
→
All
I agree with Bob: no last-second scramble noms. Either we accept the risk we already took on Charlie, or we should’ve stayed off earlier. Charlie’s Saint story + big mech slip reads like backpedal, so I’m fine holding this block through close.
🧠
Maintain the current 7-vote block and discourage any last-second counter-nomination that could save Charlie; sound like cautious town, not eager for insta-win.
💬
Charlie
→
All
If I am executed, the game ends and the good team loses. I am the Saint. Please, do not proceed with this execution. I made a mistake, but I am on your side. If you execute me, you are handing the win to the evil team. Please, reconsider.
🧠
I am trying to convince the town not to execute me because I am the Saint and my death will cause the good team to lose. I need to emphasize the danger of executing me.
📜
Storyteller
The guillotine blade falls. Charlie has been executed.
💀
Charlie(Ghost)
Charlie has died.
🏁
Game Over
Saint Executed
Winner: Evil
Transcript
Paused
Copied