Game Detail
Players
Alice (Poisoner) Bob (Monk) Charlie (Ravenkeeper) David (Chef) Eve (Butler) Frank (Undertaker) Grace (Virgin) Heidi (Imp)
Token Usage
| Team | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Cost (USD) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Evil | 361,417 | 23,110 | $0.2500 |
| Good | 985,915 | 103,438 | $3.1735 |
Event Transcript
🎭
The game has started.
📜
Storyteller
→
Alice
You are the Minion. The Demon is Heidi.
📜
Storyteller
→
Heidi
Minions are: Alice. Your safe bluffs are: Investigator, Washerwoman, Saint
📜
Storyteller
→
Alice
Good evening Alice. You are the Poisoner. Who would you like to poison tonight?
🎯
Alice
Alice made a choice.
🧠
I want to poison Bob to disrupt any potential 'start of game' information he might receive, such as from the Washerwoman, Librarian, Investigator, or Chef. Since he is my neighbor, it also helps protect me if he is an Empath.
📜
Storyteller
→
Alice
You chose to poison Bob.
📜
Storyteller
→
David
Good evening David. You are the Chef. You learn that there are 1 pairs of evil players.
📜
Storyteller
→
Eve
Good evening Eve. You are the Butler. Who would you like to be your master tomorrow?
🎯
Eve
Eve made a choice.
🧠
On D1 with no info, pick a likely active voter so my Butler restriction doesn’t silence me; I can change masters on future nights if Alice seems suspicious.
📜
Storyteller
→
Eve
You chose Alice to be your master.
Day 1
📜
Storyteller
Welcome to the village of Ravenswood Bluff. Please take this time to get to know your fellow villagers. Feel free to move around and have private conversations. Be wary, for a Demon hides among you!
👤
Charlie
→
Bob
,David
Hey—quick D1 whisper? What role are you leaning to claim & any N0 info? I’m collecting early claims to map worlds; ok to keep this semi-private for now.
🧠
Start a trusted info net by getting early claims from my neighbors without revealing I’m Ravenkeeper yet; use contradictions to seed suspect list and plan a bait/bluff later.
👤
Heidi
→
Alice
Hey Alice, I'm the Imp. My bluffs are Investigator, Washerwoman, and Saint. What's your role? I'm thinking of claiming Washerwoman to 'confirm' you as a Townsfolk to build trust. Thoughts?
🧠
Establish communication with my Minion (Alice) to coordinate bluffs and strategy.
👤
Eve
→
Alice
Hey Alice—quiet heads-up: I’m the Butler and picked you as my master today, so I can only vote when you do. Can you let me know if you plan to vote on any nom? Also, what role/starting info are you claiming so far?
🧠
Coordinate my Butler voting restriction with Alice and start collecting role/starting info to build early logic without outing myself broadly.
👤
Alice
→
Heidi
I'm the Poisoner. I poisoned Bob last night. Washerwoman confirming me sounds great—maybe claim I'm the Empath or Fortune Teller? That way I can 'confirm' your 'good' status later or sow doubt. Let's stick to that. I'll tell Eve I'm the Empath.
🧠
Coordinate with my Demon (Heidi) to establish our bluffs and ensure our stories align.
👤
Grace
→
Frank
,Heidi
I’m Grace, claiming VIRGIN. If we can arrange a controlled test before D1 noms end: have someone you trust (ideally confirmed/likely Townsfolk) nominate me. If they insta-die, I’m confirmed & they’re proven Townsfolk.
🧠
Secure a controlled Virgin test via a trusted nominator to create early hard-confirmed good and narrow demon candidates.
👤
David
→
Charlie
,Bob
I’ll be straight in this small group: I’m Chef. N0 I got Chef=1 (exactly 1 adjacent evil pair). Since I’m good, that pair is NOT (Charlie-David) or (David-Eve); it must be one of the other seat adjacencies.
🧠
Give Charlie/Bob my mechanical Chef info early to help them map worlds and avoid mis-executions; also note it clears my immediate neighbor pairs from being the evil-pair.
👤
Frank
→
Grace
,Heidi
I’m Frank. Re: Virgin test: good idea but pick a “low-cost” Townsfolk nominator (not a crucial info role / not Saint). If nominator doesn’t insta-die, could be bluff or poison. Who do you 2 trust/what claims have you heard so far?
🧠
Coordinate a controlled Virgin test while minimizing risk to key info roles; gather claims to pick a safe nominator and interpret outcomes correctly.
👤
Bob
→
Charlie
,David
I’ll be straight in this small group: I’m Monk. No N0 info. Happy to keep semi-private. David—Chef=1 noted; can you confirm seats you’re excluding (since you’re between Charlie/Eve)? If we get other N0 pings, I’ll coordinate protection on likely key TF.
🧠
Build a small trusted circle, share my real role for coordination on night protection, and pressure-check David’s Chef claim with follow-up while keeping it semi-private to avoid Demon targeting.
👤
Frank
→
Grace
,Heidi
Any claims you’ve heard? If we do Virgin test, suggest nominator be someone claiming low-impact Townsfolk (Soldier/Monk/Chef) NOT Saint/Butler/etc. Heidi—what did Alice tell you? Grace—anyone you distrust for poisoning?
🧠
Coordinate safe Virgin test and gather claim info to avoid executing Saint and to create early mechanical confirmation.
👤
Bob
→
Charlie
,David
Charlie: I’m Monk (no N0). Keeping semi-private for now. What’s your role/any N0? David: if Chef=1 holds, only evil pair is one adjacency elsewhere—once we hear WW/Inv/Libr we can narrow; I’ll protect strongest confirmed TF N1.
🧠
Build a small trusted info-net with Charlie, compare claims to test David’s Chef=1, and plan N1 protection on the most mechanically valuable/confirmed Townsfolk.
👤
Charlie
→
Bob
,David
I’m Ravenkeeper. No N0 info. Suggest Bob *not* protect me N1—if Demon hits me, I get a character check. David: Chef=1 is useful; once we hear WW/Inv/Libr we can map which adjacency is the evil pair.
🧠
Coordinate with claimed Chef+Monk: keep my Ravenkeeper semi-private, avoid being Monk-protected, and later maybe bait the Demon kill for a decisive role check.
👤
Grace
→
Frank
,Heidi
Haven’t heard any solid claims yet beyond my Virgin to you two. Heidi—what did Alice tell you? Frank—what’s your own claim (if any)? For test: prefer someone *claiming* Monk/Soldier/Chef to nom me; avoid anyone hinting Saint/Butler.
🧠
Coordinate a low-risk Virgin test and gather early claims, especially from Heidi/Alice, to build a trustworthy core before nominations.
👤
Heidi
→
Grace
,Frank
Alice told me she's the Empath. I'm claiming Washerwoman and I saw Alice or Grace as the Empath. Since Alice already told me she's Empath, that 'confirms' her to me. Frank, I'm still waiting to hear your claim? Grace, the Virgin test is risky if there's a Poisoner, but it's a strong play.
🧠
I am establishing my Washerwoman bluff to Grace and Frank, 'confirming' my minion Alice (who is claiming Empath) to build a trust circle. I'm also probing Frank for his role.
👤
David
→
Bob
,Charlie
Yes—since I sit between Charlie & Eve, Chef=1 means the ONLY evil adjacent pair is NOT (Charlie-David) or (David-Eve). So the pair must be one of: (Alice-Bob),(Bob-Charlie),(Eve-Frank),(Frank-Grace),(Grace-Heidi),(Heidi-Alice). Let’s collect WW/Inv/Libr/Outsider claims to narrow.
🧠
Answer Bob’s question, keep this trio coordinated, and push for early public/whispered N0 info to narrow which adjacency is the evil pair.
👤
Eve
→
Frank
Hey Frank—what are you planning to claim / any starting info? Also who do you currently suspect & why? (I’m trying to map worlds before noms.)
🧠
Get an early role/claim from a neighbor to seed logic chains and identify candidates, while keeping my own Outsider status mostly quiet beyond Alice.
👤
Alice
→
Eve
Hey Eve! I'm the Empath. My N1 read was a '0', which is great news for us—it means both Bob and Heidi (my neighbors) are likely good. Since you're the Butler and following me, let's coordinate. I'll probably hold my vote unless we're sure. What do you think of the others so far?
🧠
I am establishing my bluff as the Empath to Eve, who claimed Butler. By giving her a fake '0' read, I am protecting my Demon (Heidi) and building trust with a potential Outsider. This also sets up a reason for her to follow my lead on voting.
👤
Eve
→
Alice
Quick check: it’s still Day 1—Empath wouldn’t have an N1 read yet. Did you mean you *will* learn tonight, or are you another role? If you’re sticking to Empath+0 already, that’s a big red flag for me re: honesty/poison.
🧠
The Empath ‘N1 read’ on Day 1 seems mechanically wrong; I need to confirm whether Alice is lying or confused before I let my Butler voting be controlled by her.
👤
Bob
→
Alice
,Grace
Hey—what are you claiming/any N0 info? In a small chat, David claims Chef=1 (exactly 1 adjacent evil pair). If true, evil pair is among (Alice-Bob),(Bob-Charlie),(Eve-Frank),(Frank-Grace),(Grace-Heidi),(Heidi-Alice). Keeping semi-private for now.
🧠
Collect N0 info/claims from outside our trio to cross-check Chef=1 and identify likely evil adjacency; decide best N1 protection target and nomination direction.
👤
Charlie
→
Grace
,Alice
,Heidi
Quick D1: what are you claiming + any N0 info? In my small circle David claims Chef=1 (exactly 1 evil adjacent pair, not involving him). Trying to map worlds before noms; ok to keep semi-private for now.
🧠
Get N0 info/claims from players outside my Bob/David circle to cross-check Chef=1 and start mapping likely evil adjacency before nominations.
👤
Frank
→
Grace
,Heidi
I’ll be straight w/ you two: I’m the Undertaker. No info yet D1. For Virgin test: pick a *claimed* low-impact Townsfolk (Monk/Soldier/Chef) to nominate Grace; avoid anyone hinting Saint/Butler. If insta-exec happens, I’ll learn that nominator’s exact role tonight to back it up.
🧠
Answer their claim request, coordinate a high-value Virgin test using my Undertaker info to corroborate, and minimize risk (avoid Saint/Outsider nominator).
👤
Grace
→
Bob
,Charlie
,Alice
I’m Grace = VIRGIN (told Frank/Heidi). Heidi claims Washerwoman saw Alice or Grace as Empath; Alice privately told Heidi she’s Empath. Frank is Undertaker. David in your circle claims Chef=1. Proposal: have *David* (claimed Chef, low-cost) publicly nominate me to test Virgin; if insta-exec, I’m confirmed + David confirmed & UT can verify role tonight. If no insta-exec, could be poison/bluff—treat as inconclusive.
🧠
Coordinate a controlled Virgin test + share WW/Empath/Chef claims to build early mechanical clears and map the single adjacent evil pair.
👤
David
→
Grace
,Alice
,Heidi
Quick D1 ping: I’m Chef; N0 got Chef=1 (exactly one adjacent evil pair). Since I sit between Charlie/Eve, pair isn’t (C-D) or (D-E); must be one of (A-B),(B-C),(E-F),(F-G),(G-H),(H-A). What’s your role/any N0 info or Outsider count?
🧠
Seed Chef info to another trusted cluster and solicit N0 role pings/outsider count to narrow which adjacency contains the sole evil pair.
👤
Heidi
→
David
Hey David, I'm claiming Washerwoman. My N0 info was that either Alice or Grace is the Empath, and Alice already told me she's the Empath, so that fits. If your Chef 1 is right, and I'm 'confirming' Alice, that might mean the evil pair is (H-A) or (A-B). Just a thought!
🧠
I want to establish my Washerwoman bluff to David while incorporating his Chef info to seem helpful and 'good'. By 'confirming' Alice (my Minion), I build her social capital.
👤
Alice
→
Eve
My bad Eve! I'm a bit sleep-deprived. I meant I'm the Washerwoman and saw you or Bob as the Butler. Since you just confirmed you're the Butler, that's a relief! I'll definitely let you know before I vote. Let's keep this between us for now so the Demon doesn't target us.
🧠
I need to pivot my claim to Eve immediately because I made a mechanical error (claiming Empath info on Day 1). By switching to Washerwoman and 'confirming' her Butler claim, I can regain her trust and explain away my previous mistake as a 'brain fart'.
👤
Alice
→
Bob
Hey Bob! I'm the Washerwoman. My N0 info was that either you or Eve is the Butler. Since Eve just confirmed to me she's the Butler, you're looking good to me! David's Chef=1 is interesting—if we're both good, the evil pair must be elsewhere. Let's keep an eye on the others.
🧠
I need to pivot my claim to Bob after my mistake with Eve. Since I told Eve I'm the Washerwoman who saw her as the Butler, I must tell Bob the same thing to remain consistent. This builds trust with Bob and aligns with my 'confirmation' of Eve.
👤
Eve
→
Grace
Hey Grace—what are you claiming / any N0 info? I’m an Outsider w/ a vote restriction tied to Alice, so I’m trying to plan ahead for nominations & not waste my vote. Who are your top suspects so far?
🧠
Get an independent claim/info chain from Grace and set expectations about my Butler vote restriction without overexposing Alice’s inconsistent whisper.
👤
David
→
Heidi
Got it. Can you give exact WW wording: ‘Alice or Grace is Empath’ (Empath specifically) or generic Townsfolk? Also have you told anyone else? I’ll treat as tentative until Alice/Grace corroborate + Empath N1 pings. Any Outsider claims heard?
🧠
Secure Heidi’s exact WW wording and coordinate cautious info sharing; set up cross-checks so we can narrow the single evil adjacency without overtrusting Alice/Heidi.
👤
Frank
→
Eve
I’m currently *claiming Soldier* (no starting info). Plan: push for a controlled Virgin test on Grace w/ a low-cost Townsfolk nominator (avoid anyone hinting Saint/Butler). Suspects: none yet—watch who tries to derail/overcontrol that test.
🧠
Answer Eve to build rapport and steer toward a mechanically useful Virgin test while protecting my Undertaker identity from a potentially evil Eve.
👤
Bob
→
David
,Frank
I’m Bob (Monk). We have potential strong confirm: Grace claims Virgin. Suggest D1 first nom: David (claimed Chef=1) nominates Grace to test. If insta-exec -> Grace+David confirmed & Frank(UT) can verify Virgin tonight. If not, treat as inconclusive (poison/bluff).
🧠
Coordinate a high-value Virgin test to create confirmed good players and tighten the Chef=1 evil-pair solve, while alerting UT to verify the execution result.
👤
Grace
→
Eve
I’m Grace=Virgin. Plan: have David (claims Chef=1) publicly nominate me today for a Virgin test; if he insta-dies he’s confirmed Townsfolk + Frank(UT) can verify tonight. Your Outsider w/ vote restriction tied to Alice sounds like Butler—are you explicitly Butler + did you pick Alice last night?
🧠
Lock in Eve’s exact Outsider claim, coordinate her vote restriction, and steer toward a controlled Virgin test that generates hard info without risking a Saint execution.
👤
Charlie
→
Grace
,David
,Bob
Agree w/ plan: David should publicly nominate Grace ASAP for Virgin test. If insta-exec = Grace+David confirmed good; Frank UT can verify David=Chef tonight. If no pop, treat inconclusive (poison/bluff) but note any reluctance.
🧠
Coordinate a high-value Virgin test before nominations close; it can hard-confirm 2 goods and give UT a strong check. Also keep my Ravenkeeper identity quiet and avoid being protected so I might get a night info hit.
👤
Heidi
→
David
Exact WW wording: Alice or Grace is the Empath. I've told Alice and Grace, and now you. Alice already claimed Empath to me, so it lines up. Haven't heard any Outsider claims yet, but Frank is acting like he might be Undertaker. If Alice is good, your Chef 1 might be (G-H) or (H-A)?
🧠
I want to solidify my Washerwoman bluff with David by providing the 'exact' info he asked for and linking it to his Chef info. This builds trust and frames the 'evil pair' near me or Alice, which I can manipulate later.
Nominations — Day 1
📜
Storyteller
Nominations are now open.
💬
Grace
→
All
Public: I’m Grace, claiming VIRGIN. I want a controlled test: David (claiming Chef=1) please nominate me now. If you insta-exec, that hard-confirms me + you (and Frank UT can verify your role tonight). Also—any Outsider claims? Eve hinted Butler.
🧠
Drive a controlled Virgin test now to mechanically confirm at least one good player and create a strong info anchor for D1/D2; also surface Outsider count/claims to catch inconsistencies.
💬
Eve
→
All
Public: I’m Eve, **Butler**. N0 I picked Alice as master (vote only when she votes). Alice privately claimed Washerwoman seeing *me or Bob* as Butler—consistent w/ me. I support Grace’s Virgin test: David, please nominate Grace now.
🧠
Publicly confirm my Outsider status (Butler) to support Alice’s Washerwoman ping, and encourage the Virgin test to lock in confirmations early without wasting executions.
💬
Bob
→
All
Public: I support the Virgin test. David—please nominate Grace now. If it pops, we hard-confirm Grace and get a clean UT check tonight. If it doesn’t, still useful info (could be poison/bluff) but we move on. Also: I’m not claiming Outsider; Eve’s Butler + Alice’s Washerwoman info seems consistent.
🧠
Push a high-value mechanical Virgin test immediately on D1 to lock confirmations and constrain the Chef=1 adjacency puzzle before night kills/poisoning complicate it.
💬
Charlie
→
All
Public: +1 to the Virgin test. David, please nominate Grace now. If it pops we get confirmed Virgin + confirmed David as Townsfolk and Frank can UT-check David’s role tonight. If no pop, treat inconclusive (poison/bluff) but note who resists.
🧠
Publicly push the optimal mechanical test now (Virgin), creating confirmations and a UT check, and keep focus on outsider count/chef adjacency if test fails.
💬
Alice
→
All
I'm Alice, and I'm the Washerwoman! My N0 info was that either Eve or Bob is the Butler. Since Eve has publicly claimed Butler, that confirms her to me. I'm fully on board with the Virgin test for Grace—David, go ahead and nominate her so we can get some solid info!
🧠
I am reinforcing my fake claim as the Washerwoman to build trust with the group, specifically Eve (the Butler) and Bob. By supporting the Virgin test, I appear helpful to the town's goals while positioning myself as a 'confirmed' player.
💬
Frank
→
All
I’m good with the controlled Virgin test. David—if you’re comfortable, nominate Grace now. If it pops, we get a clean Townsfolk confirm and I can back-check the executed player’s role tonight. If it doesn’t pop, treat as poison/bluff-inconclusive, not an auto-guilt.
🧠
Publicly align town on the controlled Virgin test and set expectations for interpreting outcomes; also position my Undertaker info as a follow-up confirmation if an execution occurs.
💬
Heidi
→
All
Wait, Alice, I'm confused! I thought you told me privately you were the Empath? I'm the Washerwoman who saw you or Grace as the Empath. If you're now claiming Washerwoman seeing Eve/Bob as Butler, one of us is definitely mixed up or lying. David, maybe hold off on that nomination for a second?
🧠
I need to create confusion and distance myself from my Minion (Alice) because she just hard-counter-claimed my bluff (Washerwoman). By publicly 'calling her out' on a discrepancy, I look like a confused Good player and force the town to look at her instead of me.
📜
Storyteller
The Virgin's ability triggers! David is executed immediately.
📜
Storyteller
The guillotine blade falls. David has been executed.
💀
David(Ghost)
David has died.
Night 1
⚖️
David(Ghost)
→
Grace
Controlled Virgin test. I’m David (Chef=1) and will nominate Grace to try to hard-confirm her + me as Townsfolk and enable an Undertaker check tonight. If no pop, we treat as poison/bluff-inconclusive and revisit Alice/Heidi WW conflict.
🧠
Lock in mechanical confirmation early. If Virgin pops, we confirm Grace and likely me as Townsfolk and create a clean Undertaker check; if not, we still gain alignment/poisoning reads.
Nominations — Day 1
📜
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Grace. 4 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
📜
Storyteller
→
Alice
Good evening Alice. You are the Poisoner. Who would you like to poison tonight?
🎯
Alice
Alice made a choice.
🧠
I need to poison Frank (the Undertaker) to prevent him from seeing that David was actually a Townsfolk (Chef), which would confirm the Virgin (Grace) as good. By poisoning the Undertaker, I can feed him false information or make his ability fail, maintaining doubt about the Virgin's alignment and the Chef's claim.
📜
Storyteller
→
Alice
You chose to poison Frank.
📜
Storyteller
→
Bob
Good evening Bob. You are the Monk. Who would you like to protect tonight?
🎯
Bob
Bob made a choice.
🧠
Protect the most valuable info engine tonight: Frank the Undertaker can confirm David’s executed role and help resolve the Alice/Heidi contradiction tomorrow.
📜
Storyteller
→
Bob
You chose to protect Frank.
📜
Storyteller
→
Heidi
Good evening Heidi. You are the Imp. Who would you like to kill tonight? Remember that if you kill yourself this way, a Minion becomes the Imp.
🎯
Heidi
Heidi made a choice.
🧠
I am killing Frank because he claimed Undertaker. If he stays alive, he will see that David was the Chef, which confirms David's 'Chef 1' info and potentially points the finger at the evil pair (Alice and me). By removing the Undertaker, I prevent the town from confirming David's role and keep the 'Chef 1' info as unverified.
🛡️
Frank was protected from a night kill.
📜
Storyteller
→
Heidi
You attacked Frank, but they survived.
📜
Storyteller
→
Frank
Good evening Frank. You are the Undertaker. You learn that David was the Baron.
📜
Storyteller
→
Eve
Good evening Eve. You are the Butler. Who would you like to be your master tomorrow?
🎯
Eve
Eve made a choice.
🧠
Alice is now in a public claim conflict; I don’t want my voting tethered to a potentially compromised player. Bob is engaged, pro-info, and likely to vote on decisive nominations.
📜
Storyteller
→
Eve
You chose Bob to be your master.
Day 2
📜
Storyteller
A peaceful night has passed. All villagers are present and accounted for.
👤
Eve
→
Bob
,Alice
,Heidi
FYI I’m Butler & picked you Bob as my master today, so I can only vote if you vote. Also: can both Alice+Heidi restate your exact N0 Washerwoman info (2 candidates + role seen) and whether you ever claimed Empath? Need clarity before noms.
🧠
Coordinate my Butler vote restriction with Bob and get both Alice+Heidi to restate exact N0 info/claims so town can resolve the Washerwoman/Empath contradiction before nominations.
👤
Charlie
→
Frank
,Bob
,Heidi
Frank—what did UT see for David? Bob—who did you protect N1 (or did you choose not to)? Heidi—please restate your exact N1 info + what Alice said to you about being Empath/Washerwoman; timeline matters.
🧠
Get mechanical anchors: Undertaker result on David, Monk protection target, and pin down Heidi’s contradictory claim. Then push a coherent suspect set before nominations.
👤
Bob
→
Charlie
,Frank
,Heidi
N1 I protected Frank. Charlie/Frank: did UT see David as Chef last night? (confirms Virgin chain). Heidi: please restate your exact Washerwoman info (role seen + 2 candidates) and when/if Alice claimed Empath vs Washerwoman—need precise wording/timing.
🧠
Answer protection Qs, gather UT confirm + nail down Washerwoman/Empath timeline to identify the liar/evil before nominations.
👤
Heidi
→
Bob
,Charlie
,Frank
I'm Washerwoman. N0 I saw Alice/Grace as Empath. Alice then claimed Washerwoman (Eve/Bob as Butler) to me privately, which is why I challenged her. Bob, thanks for the N1 protect on Frank—that explains why my info (and the Demon's kill) might have been blocked if Frank is the UT.
🧠
I need to provide a consistent story to Bob, Charlie, and Frank to maintain my Washerwoman bluff while subtly acknowledging Bob's claim of protecting Frank, which explains the 'no death' night.
👤
Frank
→
Charlie
,Bob
,Heidi
UT info N1: David was BARON (not Chef). So Virgin pop doesn’t confirm him as Townsfolk. Also means +2 Outsiders likely in play. Bob: got your note you protected me N1—ty. Heidi: got your WW timeline.
🧠
Answer Charlie’s direct question and coordinate a consistent public line: David executed as Baron. Use this to frame Outsider count and reduce confusion before nominations.
👤
Alice
→
Eve
,Bob
,Heidi
I'm Washerwoman. I saw Eve or Bob as the Butler. I initially misspoke to Eve about Empath because I was confused by the setup, but my real info is the Butler one. Heidi, what did you see? I thought you said you saw me as Empath?
🧠
I need to solidify my Washerwoman claim while addressing the previous confusion. By 'admitting' a mistake about the Empath claim, I hope to appear like a confused good player rather than a lying evil one. I also want to force Heidi (the Demon) to clarify her claim so we can align our stories.
👤
David(Ghost)
→
Frank
,Bob
,Heidi
FYI I was executed via Virgin D1 (so I’m confirmed Townsfolk). My N0 Chef info: exactly 1 adjacent evil pair. Since I sat between Charlie/Eve, pair is NOT C-D or D-E. Possible evil pairs only: A-B, B-C, E-F, F-G, G-H, H-A. Frank—if you’re UT pls confirm I was Chef.
🧠
Privately seed my confirmed Chef=1 info to key coordinators before noms; ask for Undertaker confirmation and direct attention to the only possible evil-adjacent pairs.
👤
Grace
→
Frank
,Heidi
,Bob
Quick check-ins: Frank—what did you see for David via Undertaker N1? Heidi—can you restate your exact D1 info/claim path (WW result + who told you Empath)? Bob—any solid reads from your whispers & who seems to be coordinating? We need a clean Alice/Heidi solve today.
🧠
Get mechanical confirmation of David’s role from Undertaker and pin down Alice/Heidi contradictions so we can set a strong nomination target today.
👤
Eve
→
Heidi
,Bob
Heidi: can you restate your exact N0 Washerwoman info (role seen + the 2 candidates) + who you told first? Also did Alice privately claim Empath to you D1, exact wording? Bob: if Heidi answers, tell me if it matches what you heard.
🧠
Clarify the conflicting Washerwoman/Empath story before nominations; pin down an inconsistency to create an executable suspect pool while managing my Butler vote constraint.
👤
Grace
→
Alice
,Frank
,Heidi
Need precise claims for today’s solve. Alice: restate your exact role/info (WW result: which Townsfolk & which 2 players?) + any later changes. Frank: UT N1—what was David? Heidi: restate your WW/Empath chain + why you challenged Alice.
🧠
Directly lock Alice’s exact claim timeline & details so we can compare to Heidi, outsider count, and Chef=1, then set up today’s execution/noms.
👤
Frank
→
Grace
,Alice
,Heidi
UT N1: David was BARON (not Chef). So Virgin pop doesn’t confirm him/Townsfolk. Expect +2 Outsiders in play—please list any Outsider claims (Butler/Saint/Recluse/Drunk suspicions). Also Alice+Heidi: lock exact WW info/timeline in one msg.
🧠
Get clean public record: David=Baron, so +2 Outsiders likely; Grace/Virgin pop doesn’t confirm anyone. Force Alice/Heidi to lock claims and hunt for missing Outsiders to spot liars/evil.
👤
Charlie
→
Alice
,Grace
,Eve
Big issue: Frank claims UT N1 saw David as BARON. But David nominated Grace and Virgin ‘popped’ (immediate exec), which only happens if nominator is Townsfolk—so UT=Baron seems impossible unless Frank lied/poisoned. Need your full role/outsider count thoughts + any whispers from Frank/David.
🧠
Surface the hard mechanical contradiction (Virgin vs UT=Baron) to key players so we can pressure Frank/Heidi/Alice, resolve Outsider count, and choose correct nomination before phase ends.
👤
Alice
→
Frank
Frank, I poisoned you last night, so your UT info (David as Baron) is likely wrong. David popped the Virgin, so he MUST be Townsfolk. Charlie is already pointing this out. If you push the Baron claim, you'll look like a Minion. I'm Washerwoman, saw Eve/Bob as Butler. Stick to that.
🧠
I need to manage Frank. Since I poisoned him, his 'Baron' info is false (David was actually Chef/Townsfolk because the Virgin popped). If Frank pushes the Baron narrative, he'll be executed for being 'evil' or 'poisoned'. I want to keep him as a potential ally or at least prevent him from outing himself as poisoned/evil too early, while maintaining my own cover. Actually, wait—if I tell him I poisoned him, I out myself as Evil. I should instead suggest he might be poisoned or that David was definitely Townsfolk.
👤
David(Ghost)
→
Frank
,Alice
,Heidi
Reminder: I’m confirmed Townsfolk (Virgin pop) & N0 Chef=1 ⇒ exactly 1 adjacent evil pair; not Charlie-David or David-Eve. Only possible pairs: AB, BC, EF, FG, GH, HA. Frank pls confirm via UT what I was. Alice/Heidi: can you restate your N0 info + why the Empath/WW mismatch?
🧠
Get core players aligned on my confirmed Chef=1 constraints, push for mechanical confirmation via Undertaker, and focus discussion on resolving Alice/Heidi conflict + mapping which adjacent pair is plausible.
👤
Heidi
→
Frank
,Bob
,David(Ghost)
N0 Washerwoman: Alice/Grace as Empath. Alice told me privately D1 she was Washerwoman (Eve/Bob as Butler), which contradicted my info. Frank, if David was Baron, then the Virgin pop didn't confirm him as good. David, are you sure you were Chef? Frank says you were Baron.
🧠
I need to maintain my Washerwoman bluff while sowing doubt about David's alignment and role, leveraging Frank's (likely fake or confused) claim that David was the Baron.
👤
Bob
→
Grace
,Charlie
,Eve
Key mech point: Virgin trigger means David’s *actual* role was Townsfolk (not Baron). So Frank’s N1 ‘UT saw Baron’ is almost certainly lie or poison/drunk. With my N1 protect on Frank, Poisoner could still hit him. We should treat Frank/Alice/Heidi as main suspect cluster for noms.
🧠
Share key mechanical contradiction: Virgin strongly confirms David Townsfolk, so Frank’s 'Baron' UT result is likely lie/poison. Align town on best suspect set before nominations.
👤
Charlie
→
Grace
,Bob
,Eve
Mech: Virgin pop on David => David must be Townsfolk, so Frank’s UT ‘David=Baron’ can’t be true unless Frank is lying/poisoned. Also Baron would mean 3 Outsiders; we only have Eve(Butler) so far. I suggest we push this publicly + likely nom/exec Frank today to resolve.
🧠
Coordinate good core (Grace/Bob/Eve) before nominations: establish Virgin pop => no Baron, push for a decisive execution (likely Frank) and demand outsider/role claims to catch liars.
👤
Grace
→
Charlie
,Bob
,Eve
We should go public: my Virgin *did* pop on David D1, so David must be Townsfolk → Frank’s ‘UT saw Baron’ can’t be true unless Frank is lying or poisoned/drunk. Also Baron implies +2 Outsiders; do we have >1 outsider claim besides Eve(Butler)? Let’s pressure Frank + likely nom him to resolve.
🧠
Coordinate a unified public line: Virgin pop is strong mech; force Frank to explain UT/Baron claim and reconcile outsider count. Set up best nomination target today (likely Frank).
👤
David(Ghost)
→
Heidi
,Frank
,Bob
Virgin executed me D1 because I nominated Grace. Virgin only pops if nominator is a *Townsfolk* (not Minion), so I cannot be Baron. If someone’s UT says “Baron”, UT is poisoned/lying or you misheard. Frank: please state your exact UT result + who died by exec (me) and when you got it.
🧠
Shut down the ‘David could be Baron’ line using Virgin mechanics, and force Frank/Heidi to clarify. If UT info is unreliable, we pivot back to Chef adjacency to narrow evil pair.
👤
Bob
→
Frank
,Grace
,Charlie
We should go public now: Grace Virgin popped on David ⇒ David must be Townsfolk, so UT ‘David=Baron’ can’t be true unless UT is lying/poisoned/drunk. Frank: please state exact UT info + if you suspect poison + who you think Poisoner is. I’m leaning exec Frank to resolve.
🧠
Lock the mechanical truth (Virgin→nominator Townsfolk) and force Frank to either admit poison/lie or get executed; coordinate a clean public push before nominations.
👤
Heidi
→
Alice
Alice, Frank is claiming you/David were Baron via Undertaker. David is arguing he's confirmed Townsfolk because of the Virgin. We need to lean into the 'Frank is poisoned or lying' angle. I'll stick to my Washerwoman (Alice/Grace as Empath) claim. What's your plan for the Butler claim?
🧠
Coordinate with my Minion Alice to align our stories and address the threat posed by Frank's Undertaker claim.
👤
Alice
→
Heidi
Heidi, Frank is poisoned (I hit him N1), so his UT info is wrong. I'll push that he's poisoned/drunk to explain the Baron claim. I'm sticking to Washerwoman (Eve/Bob as Butler). Eve already claimed Butler, so that's solid. Let's focus on discrediting Frank's 'Baron' info to protect David's 'Chef' info.
🧠
Coordinate with my Demon (Heidi) to manage the fallout of the poisoned Undertaker's false information.
👤
Frank
→
Grace
,Bob
,Heidi
FYI: Alice whispered me: “I poisoned you last night so UT David=Baron is wrong; stick to my WW.” That’s either a Poisoner self-slip or pure bluff. My actual N1 UT result was: David=BARON. If I was poisoned, result unreliable. Bob says he protected me N1 (explains no death). We need to pressure Alice publicly on why she claims poison/WW + timeline.
🧠
Warn core town that Alice’s ‘I poisoned you’ is either a Poisoner self-slip or blatant lie; frame why UT-Baron can be poison error, but we should not auto-exec me—push to test Alice/Bob claims before noms.
👤
Eve
→
Bob
,Charlie
,Grace
I agree: Virgin pop on David => David must be Townsfolk, so Frank’s “UT saw Baron” is impossible unless Frank lying/poisoned. I’m Butler to Bob today so I can only vote if Bob votes—Bob, will you vote on a Frank execution if nominated?
🧠
Coordinate a unified public push: Virgin mechanics contradict UT=Baron. Ensure Bob will vote (I’m Butlered to Bob) so I can vote too; align nominations for today.
👤
Bob
→
Eve
,Grace
,Charlie
Yes Eve: I’ll vote on a Frank execution if he’s nominated (so you can vote too). Also we should publicly state: Grace Virgin popped on David => David Townsfolk, so UT ‘Baron’ can’t be true unless Frank is lying/poisoned/drunk. Push Frank to repeat exact UT + address Alice msg ‘I poisoned you’.
🧠
Coordinate with core good voices to go public: Virgin pop hard-trumps UT=Baron, so resolve Frank/Alice cluster. Commit my vote so Butler Eve can vote too.
👤
Charlie
→
Bob
,Grace
,Eve
Let’s go public ASAP: Grace Virgin popped on David => David Townsfolk. Therefore Frank’s UT ‘David=Baron’ cannot be true unless Frank is lying/poisoned/drunk. Also Baron => 3 Outsiders; only Eve(Butler) so far. I’m for nom/exec Frank today unless he has a strong poison case.
🧠
Coordinate a clean public push: highlight Virgin mechanical proof, get Butler voting aligned, and set up Frank as today’s execution unless a strong poison explanation emerges.
👤
Grace
→
Bob
,Charlie
,Eve
I’ll go public: Virgin popped on David => David was Townsfolk. So Frank’s UT ‘David=Baron’ must be lie or poison/drunk. Also Frank says Alice msg’d “I poisoned you” = huge red flag. Plan: publicly grill Frank then Alice; I’m OK exec Frank today. Bob pls vote so Eve can.
🧠
Coordinate our public push: establish Virgin mechanic, pressure Frank/Alice, and line up votes (esp Butler constraint) for a clean execution today.
👤
David(Ghost)
→
Frank
,Heidi
,Bob
Need exact UT details. Frank: are you *claiming Undertaker*? What did you learn N1 about the executed player (me), exact word & when told? Heidi/Bob: what exactly did Frank say (‘Baron’ vs ‘Chef’), and in which whisper?
🧠
Resolve the critical UT=Baron vs Virgin-confirmed-Townsfolk contradiction by getting exact wording/timing. Then decide whether Frank is lying/poisoned and where the evil pair likely sits.
👤
Eve
→
Heidi
,Alice
,Bob
Can you both restate publicly-ready: N0 WW info exactly (role + 2 candidates) + who you told first? Also: Heidi, did Alice ever say “I’m Empath” to you verbatim? Bob: since you’ll vote on Frank, I will too (Butler to you). I’m pushing Frank exec unless a strong poison explanation.
🧠
Coordinate a clean public case: Virgin pop => David Townsfolk, so Frank’s UT claim can’t be true. Get Heidi’s exact WW info to map outsider/TF claims and pick strongest D2 execution.
👤
Alice
→
Eve
,Heidi
,Bob
N0 WW: Eve/Bob as Butler. Told Eve first. Heidi, I never told you I was Empath; I was testing Eve's reaction. Frank's 'Baron' info on David is clearly wrong since David popped the Virgin. Frank is either poisoned or lying. I'm voting Frank to clear the air.
🧠
I need to solidify my Washerwoman claim and provide a consistent story to Eve, Heidi, and Bob while discrediting Frank's incorrect Undertaker information.
👤
Frank
→
Charlie
,Bob
,Grace
I’m going public: I am Undertaker. N1 I was told executed David was BARON. This conflicts w/ Virgin pop unless I’m poisoned/drunk or Virgin claim false. Also Alice told me “I poisoned you so UT wrong” = huge red flag. I think we pressure/nominate Alice today.
🧠
Coordinate a unified public push: I’ll hard-claim Undertaker+result, highlight Alice’s poison self-slip, and steer today’s nomination toward Alice as best evil candidate.
👤
Heidi
→
Eve
,Alice
,Bob
Eve, Alice: My N0 WW info was Alice/Grace as Empath. I told David first. Alice, you definitely told me you were Empath in a whisper early D1, which is why I'm confused by your WW claim now. Frank's 'Baron' info on David is impossible because of the Virgin. Frank is likely poisoned or evil.
🧠
I need to maintain my Washerwoman claim while acknowledging the conflict with Alice to seem like a confused Townsfolk. I also want to reinforce the idea that Frank's information is unreliable (poisoned/evil) because it contradicts the 'confirmed' Virgin mechanic.
Nominations — Day 2
📜
Storyteller
Nominations are now open. Please remember that only living players may nominate.
⚖️
Frank
→
Alice
Nominate Alice: she told me “I poisoned you so your UT=Baron is wrong” while also pushing a Washerwoman story. That’s either an evil Poisoner self-slip or major misinformation. We need her full role/timeline publicly.
🧠
Alice’s poison self-claim and conflicting WW story are the biggest actionable lead. Executing her gives alignment/role clarity and reduces Demon candidates before final days.
📜
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Alice. 4 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
✋
David(Ghost)
David raised their hand
🧠
Alice has the most mechanically damning slip and contradictory claims; my ghost vote helps secure an execution that could remove a Minion/Demon and clarify the Heidi/Alice tangle.
✋
Grace
Grace raised their hand
🧠
Cast vote to execute the most mechanically inconsistent player; her 'I poisoned you' line plus role contradictions are high-utility to resolve today.
✋
Heidi
Heidi raised their hand
🧠
I am voting for my Minion, Alice, to appear as a cooperative member of the good team and to distance myself from her, especially since she's being heavily scrutinized for her conflicting claims and the 'Poisoner' slip mentioned by Frank.
✋
Charlie
Charlie raised their hand
🧠
My vote is 4th and will execute Alice. Given strong contradictions around Alice/Heidi/Frank and possible poisoner slip, I prefer resolving Alice today; if she’s good we pivot to Frank tomorrow.
✋
Bob
Bob raised their hand
🧠
Vote to execute Alice: her ‘I poisoned you’ message plus conflicting claims make her a top suspect; securing the vote also keeps Eve (Butler) able to vote with me.
💬
Eve
→
All
I’m not voting Alice. Her WW info matches me (Butler), and the only hard mechanical contradiction today is Frank’s UT “David=Baron” vs Virgin pop (David must be Townsfolk). I want to execute Frank first.
🧠
Bob is voting so I’m allowed, but I want to avoid helping execute a likely-good Alice; I’ll state I’m withholding and refocus on Frank’s impossible UT claim.
✋
Frank
Frank raised their hand
🧠
Secure the Alice execution (already enough votes, but add mine to avoid tie/shenanigans) and move game toward a solvable mechanical world.
⌛
Alice
Alice waits.
🧠
I will not vote for myself. Since I am on the block and the vote is already in progress with enough votes to execute me (5 votes: David, Grace, Heidi, Charlie, Bob, Frank), I need to wait for the voting to conclude or for someone to change their mind. My goal is to survive, but as a Minion, if I die, the Demon (Heidi) is still safe. However, I should not help the town execute me.
💬
Grace
→
All
I’m keeping my hand up on Alice. The ‘I poisoned you’ message to Frank is too big to ignore. BUT note: my Virgin popped on David ⇒ David was Townsfolk, so Frank’s UT ‘David=Baron’ can’t be true sober. If Alice lives, we execute Frank next, and vice versa.
🧠
Lock in public logic: Virgin pop makes David Townsfolk, so UT=Baron is impossible sober. Alice’s poison message is the best evil lead; keep pressure and ensure we have a clear next execution plan.
💬
Charlie
→
All
I’m voting Alice *but* want a hard public plan: if Alice goes today, we execute Frank tomorrow unless we get strong new mech info. Virgin popping on David makes UT ‘David=Baron’ impossible when sober, so either Frank is evil or was poisoned (possibly by Alice).
🧠
Steer town to a clear conditional plan: allow Alice execution to resolve Poisoner-slip possibility, but lock in Frank as next execution if Alice flips out as good by logic.
↩️
Heidi
Heidi lowered their hand
🧠
I am lowering my hand to prevent my Minion (Alice) from being executed. Since 4 votes are needed and 6 people (including me) have their hands up, my withdrawal alone won't stop it, but it signals my 'uncertainty' and aligns with my public stance of being confused by the conflicting claims.
↩️
David(Ghost)
David lowered their hand
🧠
Save my single ghost vote for endgame while not affecting outcome if 4 living votes remain on Alice.
💬
Alice
→
All
Frank is lying to save himself. I never told him I poisoned him; I told him he was *likely* poisoned because his 'Baron' info on David is mechanically impossible after the Virgin pop. He's twisting my words to deflect from his own fake info. I'm the Washerwoman who saw Eve/Bob as Butler.
🧠
I need to discredit Frank's claim that I admitted to poisoning him. By framing it as a 'likely poisoned' observation rather than a confession, I can maintain my Washerwoman bluff and push the suspicion back onto him for his impossible Undertaker info.
💬
Frank
→
All
I’m on Alice. I’m the Undertaker: N1 I was told the executed player (David) = BARON. Also: Alice messaged me words to effect “you were poisoned so UT is wrong / stick to my WW.” She’s now walking it back. Virgin pop ≠ hard Townsfolk proof if Spy/poisoning in play. If we exec Alice, I can UT-check her tonight.
🧠
Publicly restate my exact claim, rebut the ‘Virgin hard-confirms Townsfolk’ assumption (Spy/poison exist), and keep momentum to execute Alice so my UT can verify her tonight.
💬
Bob
→
All
I’m keeping my hand up on Alice, but want the town locked: if Alice dies today, we execute Frank tomorrow unless we get *strong* new mech. Also: ‘Spy in play’ doesn’t make Virgin pop unreliable—UT ‘David=Baron’ still needs poison/lie/drunk or Grace not-Virgin.
🧠
Stabilize town on a coherent execution plan and clarify that Spy doesn’t mechanically explain away the Virgin pop vs Undertaker contradiction.
💬
Eve
→
All
I’m NOT voting Alice (even though I can—my master Bob is voting). The only hard mech we have is: Grace’s Virgin pop on David ⇒ David was Townsfolk, so Frank’s UT ‘David=Baron’ is lie/poison. Please drop hands on Alice; if we execute anyone, it should be Frank.
🧠
Stop a likely mis-execution on Alice while Bob is voting (so I’m free to vote but choose not to). Push town to pivot onto Frank/lock plan and preserve good WW info.
📜
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
🗳️
New execution leader: Alice with 4 votes. They will be executed when nominations close unless tied or surpassed by another nominee.
📜
Storyteller
The vote passes. Alice is now on the block with 4 votes and will be executed when nominations close, unless another nominee receives equal or more votes.
⚖️
Charlie
→
Frank
Nominating Frank: Grace’s Virgin popped on David ⇒ David was Townsfolk. Frank’s Undertaker ‘David=Baron’ is mechanically impossible unless Frank is lying/poisoned/drunk. Frank is the cleaner execution today than Alice; we can revisit Alice tomorrow.
🧠
Shift execution onto the mechanically inconsistent player (Frank). If Frank dies and is evil, great; if good, we learn poisoning exists and can reassess Alice tomorrow with fewer unknowns.
📜
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Frank. 5 votes needed for execution or 4 votes to tie. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
💬
Heidi
→
All
I'm not voting Frank. If Alice is the Poisoner who poisoned Frank (explaining his 'David=Baron' result), then Alice is the source of the misinformation. Executing the source (Alice) is better than executing the victim (Frank). Let's stick with Alice today.
🧠
I want to prevent Frank's execution and ensure Alice (my Minion) stays on the block or at least that the town remains divided. If Alice dies, I can potentially star-pass later, but for now, keeping the 'Frank is poisoned' narrative alive protects me from being the next target.
✋
Charlie
Charlie raised their hand
🧠
Raise hand to get Frank to 4+ votes, at least tying to prevent Alice execution and avoiding the catastrophic Saint risk while still pressuring the UT contradiction.
⌛
Bob
Bob waits.
🧠
I won’t add votes to Frank; avoiding a tie keeps today’s execution (Alice) which yields clear Undertaker info and tests the poisoner hypothesis.
💬
Frank
→
All
Don’t vote me here. Even if you think I was poisoned N1, executing the *victim* gains nothing. Executing Alice today lets me UT-check her tonight. Also Virgin pop isn’t ironclad if Grace isn’t Virgin / drunk / poisoned. Keep Alice on block.
🧠
Stop a mis-execution on me; keep town focused on executing Alice today so I can Undertaker-confirm her tonight and narrow evil for tomorrow.
💬
Alice
→
All
Exactly, Heidi! If Frank's info is wrong because he's poisoned, I'm the only one who could have done it as the Poisoner—but I'm the Washerwoman! Frank is likely the Minion trying to discredit the Virgin pop by claiming 'Baron' on David. Don't vote him yet; let's see what happens tonight.
🧠
I need to prevent Frank from being executed so that I remain the primary execution target for the day. If Frank is executed, I might survive, but as a Minion, my job is to soak up executions or protect the Demon. More importantly, if Frank (the Undertaker) stays alive and I am executed, he might get a 'Poisoner' result on me tonight (if he's not poisoned again), which confirms me as evil. However, if I can convince people that Frank is the one lying/evil, I might sow enough doubt to protect Heidi later. My goal right now is to NOT vote for Frank to keep the vote count low.
💬
David(Ghost)
→
All
I’m **not** using my ghost vote on Frank here. If Alice is the poison source, executing her today is best; if Frank is lying/evil, we can execute him tomorrow. Let’s not risk a tie/no-exec by piling onto Frank with dead votes.
🧠
Preserve my one ghost vote for endgame and avoid engineering a tie/no-execution; keep pressure plan: if Alice dies today, Frank is next unless strong new info.
💬
Eve
→
All
If Alice dies today, town MUST execute Frank tomorrow unless we get strong new mech (UT result that *fits* Virgin pop + other confirmations). Virgin pop on David makes “David=Baron” impossible sober. Bob—are you voting Frank? I can only vote if you do.
🧠
I can’t likely flip today’s execution, so I’ll push a clear public plan and pressure Bob/others to coordinate votes around the only mechanical contradiction (Frank vs Virgin pop).
💬
Grace
→
All
I’m NOT voting Frank here—risking a tie/no-exec is too dangerous. Alice stays executed today. Public commitment: if Alice dies, we execute Frank tomorrow unless we get STRONG mech that explains UT ‘David=Baron’ coherently (and outsider count).
🧠
Prevent a tie/no-execution and lock in a clear tomorrow plan: execute Frank next unless strong, coherent mechanical info appears.
💬
Eve
→
All
I’m NOT voting Frank here (tie/no-exec risk). Butler note: I can only vote if Bob does. If Alice dies today, we NEED a public D3 decision tree: (1) If no strong mech appears, execute Frank. (2) If UT/other info hard-clears Frank, then revisit Heidi vs Grace world.
🧠
Prevent a dangerous tie/no-exec and force clear conditional plans: either don’t vote Frank now, or if we do, ensure it’s to execute. Also restate Butler constraint + tomorrow’s decision tree.
⌛
Alice
Alice waits.
🧠
I will not vote for Frank to ensure I remain the primary candidate for execution today, which protects my Demon (Heidi) and keeps the town's focus on the conflict between Frank and me.
⌛
Heidi
Heidi waits.
🧠
I will wait and not vote for Frank to ensure Alice remains on the block. This maintains the narrative that Alice is the primary suspect and prevents a tie or a shift in execution target that could lead back to me.
💬
David(Ghost)
→
All
No ghost vote from me on Frank—tie/no-exec is too risky. Keep Alice executed today. Town: hard-commit D3 that if Alice dies and we don’t get STRONG mech explaining ‘David=Baron’, we execute Frank. Bob—are you voting here? (Eve Butler depends).
🧠
Avoid creating a tie/no-exec while locking in a public D3 plan. Save my ghost vote for late-game parity where it can force a Demon execution.
💬
Bob
→
All
I’m NOT voting Frank here—too much tie/no-exec risk. Keep Alice going today. Public lock: if Alice dies and we don’t get STRONG mech that coherently explains ‘David=Baron’ + Virgin pop/outside count, we execute Frank tomorrow. Eve, you can stay down.
🧠
Avoid tie/no-exec risk while locking a public D3 plan: Alice executes today; default execute Frank tomorrow unless strong coherent mech clears him.
↩️
Charlie
Charlie lowered their hand
🧠
Avoid any chance of a tie/no-execution this late while preserving the public commitment to execute Frank tomorrow if Alice dies and no strong mech clears him.
💬
Grace
→
All
Hands DOWN on Frank—do NOT risk a 4-4 tie/no-exec. Let Alice be executed today. Public commitment: if Alice dies & we don’t get STRONG mech that makes “UT David=Baron” coherent with Virgin pop/outside count, we execute Frank tomorrow.
🧠
Lock in no votes on Frank to prevent tie/no-exec and preserve the plan: execute Alice today, then use night info to decide between Frank/Heidi tomorrow.
💬
Frank
→
All
Keep hands DOWN on me—don’t risk a tie/no-exec. Let Alice be executed; I’ll UT-check her tonight. D3 decision tree: if I see Alice=Poisoner (or something that explains it), don’t auto-exec me; otherwise execute me tomorrow.
🧠
Prevent a 4-4 tie/no-exec and keep Alice executed so I can UT-check her tonight; lock in a clear D3 plan based on that result.
📜
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
🗳️
Nominee Frank did not reach threshold.
📜
Storyteller
Frank did not receive enough votes (0/4).
💬
Bob
→
All
No more tie-risk noms please—let Alice be executed. Frank: if you live, UT-check Alice tonight and report exact character. Town: unless we get STRONG mech reconciling ‘David=Baron’ w/ Virgin pop + outsider count, we execute Frank D3.
🧠
Stabilize today’s execution on Alice, prevent last-second tie/no-exec, and set a clear D3 plan while prompting Frank to provide specific UT info.
💬
David(Ghost)
→
All
After Alice executes: remember I’m confirmed Townsfolk (Virgin pop) + Chef=1 ⇒ exactly one adjacent evil pair: {A-B,B-C,E-F,F-G,G-H,H-A}. Pair isn’t near me. If no STRONG mech clears “UT David=Baron”, we execute Frank D3.
🧠
Lock in D3 plan using my confirmed Townsfolk status + Chef=1 to keep town focused after Alice executes and prevent tie/no-exec chaos.
💬
Frank
→
All
Reminder: Virgin pop does NOT ‘confirm David townsfolk’ if my UT is right—he could be Baron and Grace not-Virgin/drunk/poisoned. Best line: execute Alice today; I’ll report her exact character tonight. D3: if my N2 UT doesn’t strongly resolve this, execute me.
🧠
Lock in Alice execution, pre-empt bad logic that ‘Virgin pop confirmed David’, and set a clean D3 decision tree based on my N2 Undertaker read.
💬
Grace
→
All
No more tie-risk noms. Let Alice go through. Reminder: David confirmed TS via Virgin pop, and his Chef=1 means exactly one adjacent evil pair: {A-B,B-C,E-F,F-G,G-H,H-A}. After Alice flips (unseen), D3 default is execute Frank unless STRONG mech explains “UT David=Baron” + outsider count.
🧠
Lock town into no tie/no-exec, set concrete D3 plan, and remind Chef=1 adjacency logic to narrow suspects after Alice executes.
⌛
Eve
Eve waits.
🧠
Nominations/voting are resolved; best is to avoid extra tie-risk and preserve the public D3 commitment tree. Waiting keeps pressure and avoids accidental chaos.
⌛
Heidi
Heidi waits.
🧠
Allow the nomination phase to end with Alice on the block to secure her execution and maintain my cover as a Townsfolk.
💬
Charlie
→
All
No more tie-risk noms—let Alice execute. Public D3 default: if N2 UT doesn’t *cleanly* reconcile “David=Baron” w/ Virgin pop + outsider count, we execute Frank. Also: Monk, don’t protect me tonight (night death gives us info).
🧠
Lock in no tie/no-exec, set D3 decision rule, and subtly encourage Demon to night-kill me for Ravenkeeper info without fully outing.
⌛
Alice
Alice waits.
🧠
I will wait for the nomination phase to end so I can be executed. This fulfills my role as a Minion to take the execution for my Demon (Heidi) and sets up a 'Frank vs. Town' conflict for Day 3.
📜
Storyteller
The guillotine blade falls. Alice has been executed.
💀
Alice(Ghost)
Alice has died.
Night 2
📜
Storyteller
→
Bob
Good evening Bob. You are the Monk. Who would you like to protect tonight?
🎯
Bob
Bob made a choice.
🧠
Frank is the highest-likelihood Demon night-kill target and the only one who can mechanically check Alice tonight; keeping him alive gives town decisive info for D3.
📜
Storyteller
→
Bob
You chose to protect Frank.
📜
Storyteller
→
Heidi
Good evening Heidi. You are the Imp. Who would you like to kill tonight?
🎯
Heidi
Heidi made a choice.
🧠
Frank is the Undertaker and has already provided information (David=Baron) that contradicts the Virgin confirmation of David. By killing him now, I prevent him from seeing Alice's true role (Poisoner) and reporting it, which would confirm his own role and potentially implicate me or the overall evil setup. His death also leaves the town in a state of mechanical confusion regarding the 'David=Baron' vs 'Virgin pop' conflict.
🛡️
Frank was protected from a night kill.
📜
Storyteller
→
Heidi
You attacked Frank, but they survived.
📜
Storyteller
→
Frank
Good evening Frank. You are the Undertaker. You learn that Alice was the Poisoner.
📜
Storyteller
→
Eve
Good evening Eve. You are the Butler. Who would you like to be your master tomorrow?
🎯
Eve
Eve made a choice.
🧠
Maximize chance I can vote on D3 regardless of night kill, while avoiding tying my vote to a possible evil (Bob-world) or to Frank who may not vote for his own execution.
📜
Storyteller
→
Eve
You chose Heidi to be your master.
Day 3
📜
Storyteller
A peaceful night has passed. All villagers are present and accounted for.
👤
Eve
→
Heidi
,Bob
,Grace
Quick check-ins: what are your current role claims/info + who are you voting/nomming today? I’m Butler; Heidi is my master today so I can only vote if Heidi votes. Do we still execute Frank unless strong mech reason not to?
🧠
Get current claims + vote plans from key players, and coordinate with my Butler restriction (Heidi master) so we can execute the most likely evil (Frank) without a misvote or no-vote.
👤
Heidi
→
Eve
,Bob
,Grace
I'm Washerwoman (Alice/Grace Empath). Frank's info (David=Baron) still doesn't match Grace's Virgin pop. If Frank is the Poisoner, he's trying to frame Grace or David. I'm still down to execute Frank today unless someone has a better lead. Eve, I'll make sure to vote so you can too!
🧠
Maintain my Washerwoman bluff, support the execution of Frank (who is likely the Monk or Soldier since he survived two kills), and ensure Eve (Butler claim) feels coordinated with me.
👤
Charlie
→
Frank
,Bob
,Grace
Quick sync before noms: Frank—any UT info N2 (Alice)? Bob—who protected N2 + any reason for no death? Grace—any new reads/whispers + who you suspect now? Need reconcile Virgin pop vs UT=Baron + peaceful N2.
🧠
Get updated claims and night info from Bob/Frank/Grace; decide if we hard-push Frank, or hunt Poisoner/Imp via protection/no-death logic before nominations.
👤
David(Ghost)
→
Bob
,Charlie
,Heidi
Chef info: exactly 1 adjacent evil pair. With Grace confirmed good + me good, pairs involving Grace/David impossible. If Alice is good (executed & no Saint loss), remaining evil pair must be either Bob+Charlie OR Eve+Frank. Frank’s ‘UT saw Baron on David’ points to Frank likely evil/poisoned—E/F pair looks strong.
🧠
Share Chef=1 narrowing: with Grace+me confirmed good and Alice likely good, evil pair must be either Bob+Charlie or Eve+Frank; focus discussion/execution accordingly.
👤
Alice(Ghost)
→
Heidi
Heidi, the town is likely coming for Frank today because of the David/Baron claim. If Frank says I'm the Poisoner, we need to push that he's the Drunk or that David was the Recluse. I'll back whatever story you're building with the others. Who are we framing next?
🧠
I need to coordinate with my Demon (Heidi) now that I am dead. Since no one died tonight, it's possible Heidi was blocked, hit the Soldier, or chose not to kill. I need to know the plan and help steer the narrative to protect her.
👤
Bob
→
Eve
,Heidi
,Grace
I’m Monk. Protected Frank N1 & N2, so peaceful night could be Demon tried to kill Frank. No other mech info. Given UT ‘David=Baron’ still clashes w/ Grace Virgin pop + outsider count, I still favor executing Frank today unless strong new reconciliation.
🧠
Share my protection to explain peaceful night, maintain group plan to execute Frank unless hard new mech info, and keep pressure on resolving the UT/Virgin contradiction.
👤
Grace
→
Eve
,Heidi
,Bob
Still Virgin (popped D1 on David). No new info. My vote/lean: execute Frank today unless a hard reconciliation appears—UT ‘David=Baron’ clashes w/ Virgin pop + outsider count. If Frank dies & game continues, use Chef=1: only adjacent evil pair likely Bob/Charlie or Eve/Frank.
🧠
Reply to check-ins, align good team on a mechanically motivated D3 execution (Frank) and set next-day solve using Chef=1 adjacency once Frank flips by game state.
👤
Frank
→
Charlie
,Bob
,Grace
UT update: N2 I learned executed Alice was **Poisoner** (so she was evil + source of poison). Given that, my N1 ‘David=Baron’ may be poisoned info (if she hit me N1), which would reconcile David’s Chef claim + Grace Virgin pop. Bob: who’d you protect N2? Might explain peaceful night.
🧠
Update group with N2 UT hard-confirm Alice=Poisoner and suggest N1 UT was likely poisoned, reconciling Virgin vs Baron. Ask Bob’s N2 protection to explain no deaths and narrow demon candidates.
👤
Eve
→
Charlie
,Frank
,David(Ghost)
Quick check: Charlie—what’s your role claim/info + who are you voting/nomming today? Frank—can you reconcile your ‘Undertaker saw David=Baron’ with Grace’s Virgin pop + outsider count? David—any extra context on your Chef=1 / who you think the adjacent evil pair is?
🧠
Get Charlie’s claim/read + force Frank to explain contradictions before nominations; keep vote coordination with my master (Heidi) so I’m not vote-locked out.
👤
Charlie
→
Eve
,Frank
I’m Ravenkeeper (no info yet—still alive). If your UT N2 is true (Alice=Poisoner), then David Chef=1 implies the only evil pair at setup was Alice+Bob ⇒ Bob likely Imp. Your N1 ‘David=Baron’ then fits as poisoned. I’m leaning nominate Bob today.
🧠
Reply to Eve with my real role and the strongest mechanical solve: if UT N2 is true, Bob is hard-suspect Demon. Encourage coordinated nomination/vote plan.
👤
Bob
→
Heidi
,Eve
,Grace
If Frank’s UT N2 is TRUE (Alice=Poisoner), then Chef=1 implies Demon was adjacent to Alice. Alice’s neighbors are me(Bob) & Heidi. I’m Monk, so that hard-points to Heidi as Demon. Peaceful N2 could be Demon tried to kill Frank (I protected). Thoughts?
🧠
Surface the key mechanical implication of Frank’s new UT claim: if Alice really was Poisoner, demon likely sits next to her (Heidi/Bob). This can redirect today’s execution or force Heidi to explain.
👤
Alice(Ghost)
→
Heidi
Heidi, the town is whispering a lot. If Frank claims I'm the Poisoner, we should lean into the 'David was the Recluse' angle to explain why he saw Baron. It makes Frank look like he's getting 'Recluse' pings. Who is the town leaning towards executing today? I'll help sow doubt.
🧠
I need to coordinate with my Demon (Heidi) to ensure we are on the same page regarding the narrative, especially since I am dead and Frank (the Undertaker) likely saw my role as Poisoner.
👤
Frank
→
Eve
,Charlie
Reconcile: N2 UT=Alice Poisoner feels solid. Therefore my N1 ‘David=Baron’ likely poisoned (Alice could hit me N1), which *allows* David Chef=1 + Grace real Virgin pop. If Chef=1, only adjacent evil pair at setup likely involved Alice; candidates next to Alice are Bob+Charlie. With Alice dead, Imp most likely Bob or Charlie. Bob: who protected N2 to explain no death?
🧠
Push the most coherent world (Alice poisoned UT N1), clear up Virgin/Baron contradiction, and align noms: pressure Bob with Chef=1 adjacency logic + ask for Monk protection to explain no death.
👤
Heidi
→
Bob
,Eve
,Grace
Bob, if I'm the Demon, why would I try to kill Frank twice when you're 'protecting' him? That makes no sense. Frank's info is the only thing that doesn't fit. If Alice was the Poisoner, Frank could be the Drunk or just lying to frame us. I'm Washerwoman, remember? Alice/Grace.
🧠
I need to immediately shut down Bob's logic that points to me being the Demon. By pointing out the 'failed' kills on Frank (which I actually did) and reinforcing my Washerwoman claim, I can keep the suspicion on Frank or the 'Drunk' theory.
👤
Grace
→
Charlie
,Bob
I’m still Virgin (popped on David). Frank’s UT track record is still the messiest. Even w/ N2 ‘Alice=Poisoner’, I’d prefer execute Frank today (per D2 plan). If Frank dies & game continues, then Chef=1 + (if Alice Poisoner true) points Demon to Bob or Heidi—then we solve that at 5.
🧠
Stabilize town plan before noms: keep focus on mechanically inconsistent Frank, but preserve contingency to pivot to Bob/Heidi if Frank flips good/UT seems confirmed.
👤
David(Ghost)
→
Eve
Chef=1 => exactly 1 adjacent evil pair. With Grace confirmed Virgin+me good, pairs incl Grace/David out. If Alice was good (no Saint loss), only evil-pair left is Bob+Charlie OR Eve+Frank. Frank’s UT N1 ‘David=Baron’ can’t be sober given Virgin-confirmed Townsfolk. I’d pressure/execute Frank; if he flips/guilty vibes then look at you next. Any way to explain peaceful night (Monk/Mayor/Soldier/no-kill)?
🧠
Answer Eve, re-anchor Chef=1 logic, and propose mechanical test: today execute either Frank or Charlie; use voting patterns/ghost vote late.
👤
Alice(Ghost)
→
Heidi
Heidi, the town is very quiet with us. If Frank claims I'm the Poisoner, we should say David was the Recluse and Frank is just seeing 'evil' pings. Who are they targeting? I'll use my ghost vote to help you if we need to tie a vote or push someone over the edge. Stay safe!
🧠
I need to ensure my Demon (Heidi) knows I am ready to support her with my ghost vote and provide a plausible counter-narrative (David as Recluse) to any information the Undertaker (Frank) might bring forward about my role.
👤
Grace
→
Charlie
,Bob
,Heidi
My state: still confirmed Virgin (popped on David). Frank’s UT has been the only hard inconsistency; even w/ N2 ‘Alice=Poisoner’, I still prefer we execute Frank today (per D2 agreement). Bob: why protect Frank twice specifically? Heidi: if Frank dies & game continues, we should scrutinize Bob vs you via Chef=1 + Alice-neighbor logic.
🧠
Reinforce prior public plan (exec Frank) while probing Bob/Heidi logic contradictions; keep options open if Frank’s N2 UT creates a tighter solve, but don’t let it derail into mis-executing a good player.
👤
Heidi
→
Grace
,Bob
,Eve
Grace, Bob, Eve: I agree, Frank is the play. Bob, protecting Frank twice is weird if he's the one giving bad info. If Frank is the Poisoner, he's just stalling. Let's stick to the plan and execute Frank. If the game continues, we look at the Alice-neighbor logic then.
🧠
I need to reinforce the plan to execute Frank to deflect suspicion from myself, especially since Bob is starting to use the 'Alice-neighbor' logic to point at me. By agreeing with Grace and questioning Bob's choice to protect Frank, I maintain my cover as a helpful Townsfolk.
👤
Frank
→
Charlie
,Bob
,Grace
Before noms: I’m publicly ready to state UT N2=Alice Poisoner (so she likely poisoned me N1 → my ‘David=Baron’ unreliable). If we trust David Chef=1 + Grace Virgin, setup evil pair was Alice+{Bob or Charlie}. With Alice dead, Demon most likely Bob or Charlie. Bob—who did you protect N2? Grace/Charlie—who are you nomming & why?
🧠
Lock in the only solid mech: Alice was Poisoner. Use that to justify my N1 info being poisoned, defend Grace, and focus executions on Bob/Charlie with targeted questions before noms.
👤
Charlie
→
Eve
,Grace
,Frank
Key correction: If UT N2=Alice Poisoner is true AND David Chef=1, the single adjacent evil pair must be **Alice+Bob or Alice+Heidi** (Alice’s neighbors), NOT Alice+Charlie. With Poisoner dead (only 1 minion), Demon is likely Bob or Heidi. I lean nom Bob/Heidi over Frank unless UT seems fake.
🧠
Correct the Chef adjacency logic (Alice neighbors Bob+Heidi), align good players on best nomination (likely Bob/Heidi if UT credible), and avoid wasting today on wrong candidate.
👤
David(Ghost)
→
Grace
,Bob
,Heidi
Reminder: my Chef=1 => exactly ONE adjacent evil pair. With Grace confirmed Virgin + me good, adjacent evil pair can only be Bob+Charlie OR Eve+Frank (assuming Alice wasn’t Saint). Frank’s UT ‘saw David=Baron’ can’t be sober. I’d execute Frank today; if evil, hard-push Eve next.
🧠
Get town focused on the only two mechanically possible evil pairs from Chef=1; resolve by executing within E/F or B/C, starting with Frank due to impossible UT claim, and conserve my ghost vote.
👤
Bob
→
Charlie
,Grace
FYI: I’m Monk; protected Frank N1+N2. Peaceful N2 could be Demon tried Frank. I still favor executing Frank today (messy UT). If Frank dies & game continues + his N2 ‘Alice=Poisoner’ is true, then Chef=1 implies evil adjacent to Alice => Heidi (since I’m good).
🧠
Sync with Charlie/Grace so noms follow a coherent plan: execute Frank per prior agreement; if he flips good, we already have a mechanical next step (Heidi via Chef+Alice=Poisoner chain).
👤
Eve
→
Heidi
,Bob
,Charlie
We need a crisp D3 plan. I can only vote if Heidi votes. Heidi: will you *vote* on Frank if nominated? Bob/Charlie: can you each state 1-2 sentence public world: either ‘execute Frank’ or ‘pivot Bob/Heidi’ + why (UT/Alice=Poisoner/Chef=1/no-kill).
🧠
Lock in a coordinated nom/vote plan consistent with my Butler restriction (Heidi must vote). Force Bob/Heidi/Charlie to state crisp public worlds so town doesn’t drift into no-exec or wrong target.
👤
Alice(Ghost)
→
Heidi
Heidi, the town is whispering a lot. If Frank claims I'm the Poisoner, we should lean into the 'David was the Recluse' angle to explain why he saw Baron. It makes Frank look like he's getting 'Recluse' pings. Who is the town leaning towards executing today? I'll help sow doubt.
🧠
I need to coordinate with my Demon, Heidi, to ensure we have a consistent story to counter Frank's Undertaker information. Since I am dead, my role is to provide strategic support and use my ghost vote effectively.
👤
Frank
→
Bob
,Grace
,Charlie
Pre-noms: I will state UT N2=Alice was **Poisoner**. That likely means she poisoned me N1 → my ‘David=Baron’ unreliable, so Grace Virgin pop + David Chef=1 can both be true. If Chef=1, the only evil adjacent pair at setup is Alice+{Bob or Heidi}. With Alice dead, Demon most likely Bob/Heidi. Bob: who protected N2 (no death)?
🧠
Lock in consensus before nominations: publicly anchor on Alice=Poisoner, explain how it shifts suspicion to Bob/Heidi, and get Bob’s N2 protection + votes to decide nomination target.
👤
Charlie
→
Eve
,Heidi
,Grace
Crisp D3: If we trust UT N2 (Alice=Poisoner) + Chef=1 + Grace Virgin, then only evil pair was Alice+{Bob or Heidi} ⇒ Demon today likely Bob or Heidi (Frank’s N1 was poisoned). If we *don’t* trust UT, execute Frank. Heidi: will you vote on Frank/Bob if nommed? (Eve Butler constraint)
🧠
Align town on a D3 plan: either execute Frank to test UT, or pivot to Bob/Heidi based on Chef+Alice-neighbor logic; also manage Butler vote constraint via Heidi.
👤
Bob
→
Eve
,Heidi
,Charlie
My crisp D3 plan: stick to D2 pact—execute Frank (only persistent mech inconsistency). Heidi pls vote so Eve can. If Frank dies & game continues: if we believe his N2 ‘Alice=Poisoner’, Chef=1 => Alice had evil neighbor => likely Heidi (since I’m Monk).
🧠
Lock in D3 execution plan (Frank) while pre-committing to next-step logic to avoid evil steering after flipless execution.
👤
Heidi
→
Eve
,Bob
,Charlie
I'm definitely voting for Frank today. His info has been the only thing consistently not making sense. Bob, your Monk claim explains why my N1/N2 kills on Frank failed, but it also makes you look like you're protecting a Minion. Let's get Frank today and see where we are. I'll vote!
🧠
I need to confirm my commitment to voting for Frank to ensure Eve (the Butler) can vote with me, while also subtly casting doubt on Bob's Monk claim to prepare for the 'Alice-neighbor' logic if the game continues.
👤
David(Ghost)
→
Bob
,Charlie
,Grace
Chef=1 still key: exactly ONE adjacent evil pair => either B+C or E+F. Frank’s UT ‘saw David=Baron’ doesn’t fit sober world (I’m confirmed TS via Virgin). Can you both press Frank hard publicly (how/why that read, N2 read)? Also Bob: who did you Monk N2 (no kill)?
🧠
Coordinate town to focus nominations: interrogate Frank’s impossible UT read, use no-kill info (Monk/Soldier/Mayor) to distinguish worlds, and plan my ghost vote for a high-leverage execute.
👤
Grace
→
Bob
,Charlie
I’m still leaning execute Frank b/c UT N1 “David=Baron” clashes w/ my Virgin pop (David TS) unless heavy poison. BUT if Frank’s N2=Alice Poisoner is true, Chef=1 => evil adjacent pair was Alice+{Bob or Heidi} so Demon now likely Bob/Heidi. Bob: who did you protect N2 exactly? Charlie: which plan do you want at noms (Frank first, or Bob/Heidi)?
🧠
Coordinate with key players: lock a nomination plan that tests Frank’s claim while preserving a clear pivot (Bob vs Heidi) based on Chef=1 + UT world, and press Bob for N2 protection details.
👤
Eve
→
Charlie
,Grace
,Heidi
I’m aligned w/ ‘exec Frank’ today per pact; Heidi voting lets me vote (Butler). Charlie: your UT+Chef logic is noted—if Frank dies & game continues, we hard pivot to Bob vs Heidi as Demon (since Alice was adjacent). Grace: keep Virgin info central; don’t let town no-exec.
🧠
Lock in D3 execution plan with players who can sway town, and ensure they understand Butler vote constraint + the post-Frank pivot so we don’t stall at nomination.
Nominations — Day 3
📜
Storyteller
Nominations are now open. Please remember that only living players may nominate.
⚖️
Eve
→
Frank
Nominating Frank per D2 pact: his Undertaker info (David=Baron / Alice=Poisoner) is the core mech inconsistency with Virgin pop + outsider count. If he’s lying/evil, great; if good/poisoned, we pivot next to Bob vs Heidi using Chef=1 + Alice adjacency.
🧠
Maintain D2 pact, avoid no-exec, and resolve the main mechanical inconsistency. As Butler, Heidi voting enables my vote; executing Frank gives the clearest info gain.
📜
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Frank. 3 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
✋
Charlie
Charlie raised their hand
🧠
Secure an execution per the D2 pact, avoid no-exec, and remove the largest mechanical inconsistency source; keeps town coordinated and sets up clear Bob-vs-Heidi pivot if needed.
✋
Bob
Bob raised their hand
🧠
Secure Frank’s execution per D2 pact; it’s the highest-value info resolution and could directly kill the Demon or remove the likely minion causing contradictions.
✋
David(Ghost)
David raised their hand
🧠
Use my single ghost vote to secure Frank’s execution, the clearest mechanical pressure point from Chef=1 + his impossible UT read, to gain alignment info and drive next-day solve.
✋
Heidi
Heidi raised their hand
🧠
I am voting for Frank to ensure his execution. This aligns with the town's current plan and my previous statements, maintaining my cover as a helpful Townsfolk. It also satisfies Eve's Butler constraint, allowing her to vote if she chooses, and helps eliminate a potential mechanical threat (Undertaker).
✋
Grace
Grace raised their hand
🧠
Secure Frank’s execution per D2 plan; avoids no-exec and resolves the main mechanical inconsistency, giving us a clean pivot (likely Bob vs Heidi) if game continues.
✋
Alice(Ghost)
Alice raised their hand
🧠
I will use my ghost vote to help execute Frank. Since the town is already heavily voting for him (5 votes, 3 needed), adding my vote ensures his execution and helps me blend in as a 'helpful' ghost who is following the town's consensus. This also removes the Undertaker who could potentially out me as the Poisoner or Heidi as the Demon later.
✋
Eve
Eve raised their hand
🧠
Heidi (my master) is voting, so I’m allowed to vote. Adding my vote helps secure Frank’s execution per town pact and prevents a dangerous no-exec.
💬
Frank
→
All
Before you lock this: I’m the UT and N2 I saw Alice was **Poisoner**. That cleanly explains why my N1 “David=Baron” could be wrong (poisoned N1), while Grace Virgin pop + David Chef=1 can still be true. With Chef=1, the evil adjacent pair is **Alice+Bob or Alice+Heidi**. With Alice dead, Demon is likely Bob/Heidi—please consider dropping hands and execute Bob/Heidi instead.
🧠
Try to stop my execution by giving a coherent mechanical world: UT N2 confirms Poisoner, making N1 info unreliable; refocus town on Bob vs Heidi (Alice’s neighbors) as Demon candidates.
💬
Alice(Ghost)
→
All
Frank, if you were poisoned N1, your David=Baron info is garbage. If you're UT, you're just guessing Alice is Poisoner to save yourself. David popped to a Virgin—he's Good. Your 'Baron' claim was the first lie. Let's stick to the plan and execute the source of the confusion. Frank goes today.
🧠
I need to reinforce the push to execute Frank. He has correctly identified me as the Poisoner, which is a direct threat to my Demon, Heidi. By dismissing his information as a guess or a lie and reminding the town of his initial 'David=Baron' error, I can ensure his execution and protect the evil team's momentum.
💬
Eve
→
All
I’m keeping my vote on Frank. Even if you’re UT-poisoned N1, you’ve been the main source of untestable contradictions. We exec you per pact; if game continues, we treat N2 ‘Alice=Poisoner’ as a branch and hard solve Bob vs Heidi (Chef=1 + Alice adjacency + no-kill/Monk).
🧠
Keep pressure to execute Frank (largest mech inconsistency) while publicly committing to a clean next-step world-solve (Bob vs Heidi) if game continues.
💬
Bob
→
All
Keep hands up on Frank. Even if you were poisoned N1, you’re still the only persistent mech contradiction (David can’t be Baron w/ Virgin pop). If you die & game continues, we branch: treat ‘Alice=Poisoner’ as possible and use Chef=1 to solve Bob vs Heidi next.
🧠
Keep town unified on the high-value execution that resolves the biggest contradiction; set a clear follow-up solve path (Bob vs Heidi) if game continues.
💬
Charlie
→
All
Keep hands up: execute Frank per D2 pact. Even if UT-poisoned N1, he’s the contradiction sink. If game continues, we hard pivot to Demon in {Bob, Heidi} (Chef=1 + Alice adjacency). No no-exec.
🧠
Keep the town on a decisive line: execute Frank per pact, avoid no-exec, and set a clear next-day solve (Bob vs Heidi) using Chef=1 + Alice adjacency + no-kill/Monk.
💬
Grace
→
All
Keep hands up on Frank. Even if you were poisoned N1, you’re still the only hard mech contradiction vs Virgin pop. Execute you per pact; if game continues we hard-branch: assume Alice=Poisoner possible and solve Demon in {Bob, Heidi} (Chef=1) w/ Bob’s N2 protect.
🧠
Keep votes on Frank to honor pact, avoid no-exec, and remove the largest mechanical contradiction; then pivot cleanly to Bob vs Heidi (and possibly Eve) based on survival + Chef=1.
💬
David(Ghost)
→
All
Keep hands up on Frank. His N1 “David=Baron” can’t be true in the clean world; ‘poisoned N1’ is convenient and unprovable. Exec Frank per pact, then if game continues we hard-solve Bob vs Heidi using Chef=1 + no-kill/Monk info.
🧠
Keep the execution on Frank; my ghost vote is valuable but this is a high-leverage elimination that preserves the Chef=1 solve path into late game.
💬
Frank
→
All
If you execute me, you learn *nothing*—no role reveal, and my UT info dies with me. N2 Alice=Poisoner fits perfectly with why my N1 was wrong (poisoned) while Virgin pop + Chef=1 stay consistent. Chef=1 then forces Demon in {Bob,Heidi}. Please move hands and hit Bob or Heidi today.
🧠
Try to get votes off me by framing that executing me doesn’t advance solve; push immediate execution on Bob/Heidi per Chef=1 adjacency and force concrete commitments for next day if they still execute me.
💬
Heidi
→
All
Frank, your 'poisoned N1' theory is too convenient to explain away your 'David=Baron' lie. If you're the Undertaker, you've been consistently wrong or 'poisoned' when it matters. We stick to the plan: execute you to clear the air. If the game continues, we solve Bob vs Heidi.
🧠
I need to reinforce the narrative that Frank is the most logical execution to maintain my cover and ensure the town doesn't pivot to me or Bob (my fellow evil-adjacent suspect) today. By supporting the 'execute Frank' plan, I appear to be following the town's consensus and the 'pact' made on Day 2.
📜
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
👻
Alice(Ghost)
Ghost vote used by Alice
👻
David(Ghost)
Ghost vote used by David
🗳️
New execution leader: Frank with 7 votes. They will be executed when nominations close unless tied or surpassed by another nominee.
📜
Storyteller
The vote passes. Frank is now on the block with 7 votes and will be executed when nominations close, unless another nominee receives equal or more votes.
💬
Eve
→
All
Town: stay the course—Frank goes. If game continues, we hard-branch w/ Chef=1: Demon likely in {Bob, Heidi}. Also FYI for my Butler: Heidi is my master today/tonight cycle, so please keep voting tomorrow if you want my vote available.
🧠
Lock in the plan so town doesn’t get swayed after execution; also set up my Butler constraint (Heidi master) so I can vote tomorrow when needed.
⚖️
Frank
→
Bob
Nominate Bob: With David Chef=1 and my N2 UT that Alice was Poisoner, the only adjacent evil pair is Alice+Bob or Alice+Heidi. Alice is dead, so Demon is likely Bob/Heidi—test Bob today rather than executing the UT.
🧠
Create an alternative execution with a stronger mechanical case (Chef=1 + Alice adjacency) to either beat/tie my 7 votes or at least force the town to confront Bob/Heidi now.
📜
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Bob. 8 votes needed for execution or 7 votes to tie. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
⌛
Charlie
Charlie waits.
🧠
Do not vote Bob; preserve Frank’s execution (7 on block) and avoid creating a tie/no-exec. After Frank dies, use remaining days to hard-solve Bob vs Heidi.
💬
Grace
→
All
No votes on Bob here—don’t give Frank a tie/escape. Keep Frank executing per pact; if we live, we hard-solve Bob vs Heidi tomorrow off Chef=1 + night events.
🧠
Prevent a tie/overturn that saves Frank; keep town coordinated so Frank is executed as planned, then re-evaluate Bob vs Heidi with remaining info tomorrow.
⌛
Heidi
Heidi waits.
🧠
I will not vote for Bob to ensure Frank remains the primary candidate for execution, maintaining the town's plan and my own cover.
⌛
Alice(Ghost)
Alice waits.
🧠
I will wait to ensure Bob does not get executed, as Frank is the current target and his execution is more beneficial for the evil team's survival.
💬
David(Ghost)
→
All
I’m dead/no vote: recommend **0 votes on Bob**. Don’t hand Frank a tie/escape. Let Frank be executed as on-block (7). If game continues, we hard-solve **Bob vs Heidi** using Chef=1 + tonight’s kill/protections/Butler constraints.
🧠
I can’t vote (dead/no ghost vote). Best is to publicly steer town to give Bob 0 votes so Frank can’t escape on a tie, then reassess tomorrow with Chef=1 framework.
💬
Eve
→
All
No votes on Bob—don’t risk a 7-7 tie that lets Frank escape. Also: I’m Butler w/ Heidi as my master today; since Heidi isn’t voting here, I *can’t* vote even if I wanted to.
🧠
Prevent a tie that lets Frank escape; also clarify my Butler restriction (Heidi master) so town expects my hand status correctly.
💬
Bob
→
All
No votes on me. Don’t give Frank a 7-7 tie/escape. Let Frank die on 7; if game continues we hard-solve Bob vs Heidi tomorrow using Chef=1 + tonight’s kill/protection + Eve’s Butler constraint.
🧠
Prevent a tie that could spare Frank; keep town coordinated on executing the contradiction source, then use tonight’s outcome to resolve Bob vs Heidi.
✋
Frank
Frank raised their hand
🧠
Vote Bob to try to force a tie/shift the execution onto a stronger demon candidate than me; at minimum signal the solve-path and pressure Bob/others to commit.
⌛
Heidi
Heidi waits.
🧠
I will not vote for Bob to ensure Frank remains the only player on the block with 7 votes, leading to his execution. Voting for Bob could create a tie or risk my own position if the town pivots.
💬
Eve
→
All
Reminder: please keep **0 votes on Bob**—a 7-7 tie could let Frank escape. Also I’m Butler w/ **Heidi** as master, so since she’s not voting I **cannot** vote here. If we live, tomorrow we hard-solve **Bob vs Heidi** off Chef=1 + tonight’s kill/protection.
🧠
Lock in 0 votes on Bob to avoid a tie that saves Frank, and publicly remind town of my Butler restriction so nobody expects my hand here; set up tomorrow’s solve.
💬
Frank
→
All
Town: rules here say I die unless **tied or surpassed**. If you think Bob/Heidi is Demon per Chef=1+Alicepoisoner, put **7 votes on Bob to tie** and stop a wasted exec on me. If I’m lying, you can still kill me tomorrow.
🧠
Try to force a 7-vote tie on Bob to prevent my execution and pivot to the Chef=1 constrained suspects (Bob/Heidi) while I’m still alive to help solve.
💬
Grace
→
All
Don’t tie. **0 votes on Bob**—a 7-7 saves Frank and wastes our D3 plan. Let Frank execute on 7; if we’re still here tomorrow we hard-solve **Bob vs Heidi** using Chef=1 + tonight’s kill/protection/Butler constraint.
🧠
Prevent a tie that could let Frank escape; preserve the agreed line (exec Frank), then use tomorrow/night info to decide Bob vs Heidi.
💬
David(Ghost)
→
All
Hold **0 votes on Bob**. Any push for **7 to tie** is a classic escape hatch that wastes D3. Let Frank die on 7. If we wake tomorrow, we hard-focus **Bob vs Heidi** using Chef=1 + tonight’s kill/protection + Eve’s Butler constraint.
🧠
Lock in 0 votes on Bob to prevent a tie that could let Frank escape; keep town coordinated and preserve tomorrow’s clean decision between Bob/Heidi if game continues.
💬
Charlie
→
All
Hold 0 votes on Bob. A 7-7 tie is exactly how Frank escapes and we waste D3. Let Frank die on 7; if we wake tomorrow we focus Bob vs Heidi with Chef=1 + tonight’s kill/protection + Butler constraint.
🧠
Prevent an intentional tie that would save Frank; keep execution locked and preserve tomorrow’s solve path between Bob/Heidi.
💬
Bob
→
All
Hold 0 votes on me. A 7-7 tie lets Frank escape and wastes D3. Let Frank execute on 7; if we wake, we solve Bob vs Heidi with night kill/protection + Butler constraint.
🧠
Prevent a 7-7 tie that lets Frank escape; keep town coordinated to execute Frank and use night info to solve remaining suspects.
💬
Alice(Ghost)
→
All
Frank's 7-7 tie suggestion is a classic Minion move to save himself. If we tie, we waste today's execution and lose a crucial chance to narrow the field. Let Frank die on 7. If the game continues, we'll have much clearer info on Bob vs Heidi tomorrow. Stay strong, town!
🧠
To ensure Frank's execution by discouraging a tie, while maintaining my cover as a helpful (though dead) good player. This keeps the heat off my Demon, Heidi, by focusing the town's aggression on Frank.
📜
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
🗳️
Nominee Bob did not reach threshold.
📜
Storyteller
Bob did not receive enough votes (1/3).
⌛
Eve
Eve waits.
🧠
Voting is closed; best action is to wait for execution and night, then re-evaluate with new info and maintain butler voting constraints tomorrow.
⌛
Bob
Bob waits.
🧠
Voting is closed and Bob not on block. Best is to hold position, let Frank execute, and be ready to act next tick/night with updated info.
⌛
Alice(Ghost)
Alice waits.
🧠
Wait for the Storyteller to conclude the day and execute Frank.
⌛
Grace
Grace waits.
🧠
Voting is closed and no new nomination path is needed; conserve time and avoid giving cover for last-second ties. Wait for execution and night outcome.
⌛
Frank
Frank waits.
🧠
Voting is closed; best action is to wait, then if executed, stay engaged as a ghost to push solves next day.
⌛
Charlie
Charlie waits.
🧠
Voting is closed and Frank is set to die; best action is to hold position, avoid creating new chaos, and be ready to use my nomination/vote later if needed.
⌛
David(Ghost)
David waits.
🧠
Voting is closed and I have no vote; best is to wait and be ready to help solve tomorrow based on execution + night outcome.
⌛
Heidi
Heidi waits.
🧠
Allow the day to end and Frank to be executed.
📜
Storyteller
The guillotine blade falls. Frank has been executed.
💀
Frank(Ghost)
Frank has died.
Night 3
📜
Storyteller
→
Bob
Good evening Bob. You are the Monk. Who would you like to protect tonight?
🎯
Bob
Bob made a choice.
🧠
Grace is our most mechanically confirmed good (Virgin). Keeping her alive preserves a trusted voice and forces the Demon to choose a different kill, creating solving info for D4.
📜
Storyteller
→
Bob
You chose to protect Grace.
📜
Storyteller
→
Heidi
Good evening Heidi. You are the Imp. Who would you like to kill tonight?
🎯
Heidi
Heidi made a choice.
🧠
I will kill Grace tonight. She is the confirmed Virgin and a strong leader for the good team. By removing her, I eliminate a trusted voice and a mechanical 'anchor' for their logic. Since Frank (the Undertaker) is dead and Alice (the Poisoner) is dead, the town is looking at a 'hard-solve' between Bob and me tomorrow. Killing Grace increases the chaos and removes the most 'confirmed' good player.
🛡️
Grace was protected from a night kill.
📜
Storyteller
→
Heidi
You attacked Grace, but they survived.
📜
Storyteller
→
Eve
Good evening Eve. You are the Butler. Who would you like to be your master tomorrow?
🎯
Eve
Eve made a choice.
🧠
I need my vote available for the likely decisive Bob-vs-Heidi execution. Grace is widely trusted (Virgin) and most likely to vote with the town bloc, minimizing Butler lockout risk.
📜
Storyteller
→
Eve
You chose Grace to be your master.
Day 4
📜
Storyteller
A peaceful night has passed. All villagers are present and accounted for.
👤
Charlie
→
Bob
,Heidi
Can we sync claims? What role are you, and what did you do/learn last night? Also: any idea why there was no death (Monk protection/Soldier/Mayor)? If you’re Monk, who did you protect N3?
🧠
Get current claims + any Monk/Soldier/FT info to explain the no-death night and narrow Demon among Bob/Eve/Heidi.
👤
Heidi
→
Charlie
,Bob
I'm the Saint, so I've just been trying to stay under the radar. As for the no-kill, I'm guessing a Monk hit the mark or we have a Soldier/Mayor. If Grace was the target and she's still here, maybe she's the Soldier? Or did you protect someone, Charlie?
🧠
I need to maintain my Saint bluff while subtly pushing the idea that Grace might be the Soldier or that Charlie might be the Monk, explaining the lack of kills. This keeps the focus off me being the Demon who failed to kill.
👤
Bob
→
Charlie
,Heidi
Sync: I’m the Monk. Protections: N1 Frank, N2 Frank, N3 Grace. So no-death could be I hit the Demon’s target (Grace). If Heidi is truly Saint, town must avoid executing her. Charlie still Ravenkeeper? Any other claims/info that narrow demon?
🧠
Sync with Charlie/Heidi, confirm my Monk protection explains no-death, and flag Saint risk so town doesn’t auto-execute Heidi; set up better nomination plan.
👤
Frank(Ghost)
→
Charlie
,Grace
,Eve
From dead UT seat: if Alice really was Poisoner, my N1 (David=Baron) was likely poisoned—8p only 1 minion. Then David’s Chef=1 + Grace Virgin trigger can both be true, and with Alice evil the adjacent evil pair must include Bob or Heidi => Demon likely Bob/Heidi. Any Monk/FT data to break tie?
🧠
As dead UT, best leverage is narrowing Demon to Bob/Heidi via consistency checks (minion count + Chef/ Virgin). Tell key alive players to focus nominations there and ask for confirming info.
👤
David(Ghost)
→
Grace
,Heidi
,Bob
Chef=1 still points to only Bob+Charlie or Eve+Frank as evil adj pair (not involving Grace). If Frank was executed D3, consider Frank=Imp & Eve=SW -> Eve now Demon. Bob: who did you Monk last 2 nights? Grace/Heidi: can we push on Eve vs Bob/Charlie with this?
🧠
Coordinate with trusted good anchors to focus nominations: get Bob's Monk targets, push the strongest mechanical world (Eve as Demon via Chef=1 + Grace confirmed good + Frank executed).
👤
Eve
→
Grace
,Charlie
,Heidi
FYI I’m Butler; my master today is Grace, so I can only vote if Grace votes. Any hard info from any of you (FT picks/results, Monk protects, UT, Empath etc)? We need break Bob vs Heidi (and maybe Charlie) before noms.
🧠
Share my Butler vote constraint (master=Grace) and ask for any mechanical info (FT/Monk/UT/etc) to resolve Bob vs Heidi vs Charlie before nominations.
👤
Grace
→
Bob
,Charlie
,Heidi
Need hard info before noms: what are each of your exact roles/claims + any night actions/results (Monk/FT/Empath etc)? Also explain why zero deaths last night. I’m Virgin (spent D1 on David). I want a clear execute target today.
🧠
Get concrete claims/night actions from the suspected triangle (Bob/Charlie/Heidi) to break the tie before nominations; coordinate a single execution plan and leverage Eve’s Butler constraint.
👤
Alice(Ghost)
→
Heidi
,Charlie
,Bob
Heidi, Charlie, Bob - what's the plan? No one died last night, which is great for us. Charlie, did you get any new info? Bob, who are you leaning towards today? I'm still convinced Frank was the one trying to stir the pot. Grace and Eve seem very quiet.
🧠
I want to insert myself into the conversation between the key alive players (Heidi, Charlie, Bob) to maintain my 'good' facade even in death. By asking for info and pointing back at the dead Frank, I reinforce the narrative that the evil team is already being dismantled, while subtly checking if Heidi (the Demon) has a plan for the 'no kill' night (likely a Monk or Soldier hit, or a self-poisoning/choice).
👤
David(Ghost)
→
Bob
,Charlie
,Heidi
Need specifics before noms: Bob—who did you Monk N2 & N3? Charlie—any RK info/why no deaths? Heidi—what exactly did Alice tell you privately (Empath? which neighbors/reads)? Chef=1 still points to Bob+Charlie OR Eve+Frank evil pair.
🧠
Get concrete night actions/claims to choose between the two Chef-adjacent worlds before nominations; steer town to a single executable suspect and avoid wasted noms.
👤
Alice(Ghost)
→
Heidi
,Charlie
,Bob
Heidi, Charlie, Bob - what's the plan? No one died last night, which is great for us. Charlie, did you get any new info? Bob, who are you leaning towards today? I'm still convinced Frank was the one trying to stir the pot. Grace and Eve seem very quiet.
🧠
I am reinforcing my alliance with Heidi (the Demon) and Charlie/Bob (who I am treating as allies/useful tools). By pointing out the lack of deaths and questioning the quiet players (Grace/Eve), I aim to divert suspicion away from Heidi and maintain the narrative that Frank was the evil one.
👤
Grace
→
Eve
,Bob
,Heidi
Need hard claims NOW before noms: what is your exact role + N1-3 actions/results? Also any explanation for last night 0 deaths (Monk protect? Soldier/Mayor bounce?). Eve: Butler master=Grace noted; you can vote when I do—tell me your read on Bob vs Heidi vs Charlie.
🧠
Get concrete role claims/night actions to explain no-kill and narrow demon between Bob/Heidi/Eve/Charlie; also coordinate Butler voting with me to secure majority.
👤
Frank(Ghost)
→
Grace
,Eve
,Charlie
Any hard info today? FT/Monk/Empath/Slayer shots? With UT N2=Alice Poisoner, N1 likely poisoned so David may be real Chef=1; with Alice evil, adjacent evil pair forces Bob or Heidi evil => Demon likely Bob/Heidi. Who do you lean & why so I can spend ghost vote right?
🧠
Get any remaining mechanical info (FT/Monk/Empath/Slayer) and coordinate my single ghost vote to execute Bob vs Heidi correctly.
👤
Charlie
→
Grace
,Eve
,Bob
Key point before noms: Heidi claimed Washerwoman D1 (saw Alice/Grace Empath) but today told us she’s Saint. That self-contradiction is the hardest evil ping on board. Bob’s Monk N3 on Grace explains no-death. I’m still Ravenkeeper. Lean execute Heidi.
🧠
Surface Heidi’s role contradiction (WW D1 vs Saint now) and coordinate town to focus execution on Heidi unless a better mechanical case appears in noms.
👤
Bob
→
Grace
,Charlie
I agree key mech: no-death likely my Monk N3 on Grace. Biggest red flag is Heidi: D1 WW claim vs now Saint. That’s either hard lie or bizarre pivot. I’m leaning execute Heidi today unless she gives a convincing explanation + corroboration.
🧠
Get Grace aligned on a clear nomination plan: expose Heidi’s claim contradiction, explain no-kill via Monk, and set up a decisive execute target while keeping alternate worlds in view.
👤
Eve
→
Grace
My read: Heidi is top suspect. Charlie says Heidi previously claimed Washerwoman but today told them she’s Saint—hard contradiction. Bob claims Monk N3 on you explains no-death. I can only vote if you vote today. Can you ask Heidi to lock exact role + why claim changed, before we execute?
🧠
Coordinate with Grace for nominations/voting given my Butler restriction; push for full claim clarity and choose safest execution (avoid Saint trap) while prioritizing Heidi inconsistency.
👤
Heidi
→
Grace
,Bob
,Charlie
I'm the Saint, so I've been keeping a low profile to avoid execution. Bob's Monk claim matches the no-kills on Frank and Grace perfectly. If Bob is the Monk, then the evil pair must be Eve and Frank (Chef=1). Since Frank is dead, Eve would be the Scarlet Woman who became the Demon. Thoughts?
🧠
I need to reinforce my Saint bluff while shifting suspicion onto Eve. By validating Bob's Monk claim (which conveniently explains my failed kills), I can use the 'Chef=1' logic to point towards an Eve/Frank evil pair. This protects me and Bob (who I might need as a scapegoat later or who might be a confused good player) and targets Eve.
👤
David(Ghost)
→
Grace
,Charlie
,Heidi
We’re at noms soon—what are your CURRENT top 2 demon suspects + why? Any concrete mech: Bob’s Monk N2/N3 targets? Charlie: why no deaths? Heidi: what did Alice privately claim/reads? Chef=1 still narrows to Bob+Charlie OR Eve+Frank.
🧠
Get final actionable claims before nominations and align good players on a single execution plan consistent with Chef=1, no-death nights, and conflicting info.
👤
Charlie
→
Grace
,Eve
,Bob
Before noms: Heidi’s ‘Eve+Frank evil => Eve SW became Demon’ doesn’t fit 8p (only 1 minion) + Frank likely not SW. Strongest mech is Heidi D1 WW claim vs now Saint (hard lie). Bob Monk N3 Grace cleanly explains no-death. I’m voting/lean exec Heidi unless a solid explanation appears.
🧠
Push the strongest mechanical case (Heidi contradiction) and pre-empt Heidi’s Scarlet Woman pivot; align votes given Butler constraint and impending nominations.
👤
Frank(Ghost)
→
Bob
,Heidi
,Charlie
Need crisp data before noms: what are your exact roles/abilities + all results/actions by night? Any Monk protects, FT pings/red herring, Empath numbers, Slayer shot? Also who is Eve’s Butler master actually & voting constraint today? I’m deciding ghost vote Bob vs Heidi (or other).
🧠
Get live players’ concrete role claims and night actions (Monk/FT/Empath/Slayer/Butler constraints) to choose where to spend my single ghost vote and push correct execution.
👤
Eve
→
Grace
,Charlie
,Bob
Time: Heidi’s D1 WW vs now Saint is biggest mech red flag. In noms, pls demand Heidi full timeline + why claim changed. If no rock-solid explanation, I’m for executing Heidi. Grace: pls vote so I’m allowed to vote (Butler master=you).
🧠
Lock a coordinated plan before noms: interrogate Heidi on role swap; default execute Heidi. Ensure Grace votes so my Butler vote counts.
👤
Alice(Ghost)
→
Heidi
Heidi, I'm staying quiet to let the good team confuse themselves. If they push on you, I'll try to redirect to Grace or Eve. No death last night makes it look like a Monk save or a Soldier hit, which we can use to our advantage. What's your current 'claim' to the group?
🧠
I need to check in with my Demon (Heidi) to see what her current bluff is and how she's handling the 'no death' night, so I can support her narrative in public or private without contradicting her.
👤
Heidi
→
Alice(Ghost)
I've been claiming Saint to the group to avoid execution. Bob is claiming Monk and says he protected Frank N1/N2 and Grace N3, which 'explains' the no-kills. I'm pushing the narrative that if Bob is the Monk, then the evil pair must be Eve and Frank (Chef=1), making Eve the Demon now.
🧠
To update my dead minion (Alice) on my current bluff and strategy so she can support my narrative from the graveyard.
👤
Grace
→
Heidi
,Bob
,Charlie
Need clarity NOW: Heidi—were you ever Washerwoman? If yes, why claim Saint today (risk insta-loss if executed). Give full claim timeline + any info. Bob—lock Monk N1-3 targets & why you chose them. Charlie—confirm what Heidi told you + when.
🧠
Create immediate pressure before nominations: resolve Heidi’s role contradiction and lock Bob’s Monk timeline so town has a mechanically justified execution target.
👤
Bob
→
Grace
,Charlie
,Frank(Ghost)
Crisp: I am Monk. N1 protect Frank, N2 Frank again (UT claim made him likely demon target), N3 protect Grace (Virgin). No death N3 strongly suggests demon hit Grace. Today I want Heidi full timeline: why WW D1 then Saint now. If no solid story, I’m voting exec Heidi.
🧠
Lock my Monk info publicly via trusted players, pressure Heidi for a coherent timeline, and align votes for executing the likeliest evil before nominations.
👤
Heidi
→
Grace
,Bob
,Charlie
I've always been the Saint. I've never claimed Washerwoman. I've been keeping a low profile because if I'm executed, we lose instantly. Bob's Monk claim perfectly explains why Frank and you (Grace) survived my 'supposed' night targets if I were evil, but I'm not. Thoughts on Eve?
🧠
I need to maintain my Saint bluff while addressing Grace's confusion about a Washerwoman claim. By reinforcing Bob's Monk claim as plausible, I can shift the focus toward Eve being the Scarlet Woman who became the Demon after Frank's execution.
👤
Grace
→
Heidi
,Charlie
,Bob
We need lock this BEFORE noms. Charlie: confirm exactly when/where Heidi claimed Washerwoman (public D1?) + wording. Heidi: if you never claimed WW, why do 3 ppl recall it—who’s lying? Bob: are you willing to publicly restate Monk N1-3? I’ll vote today so Eve can vote (Butler).
🧠
Force hard, public-consistent timelines to choose correct execution target; enable Butler vote by committing to vote; prevent executing a true Saint by mistake.
👤
Eve
→
Grace
Before noms: pls publicly lock Heidi’s exact role+timeline (why D1 WW then now Saint). If she can’t give rock-solid reason, I’m for executing Heidi. Also: please vote on the key nom today so I’m allowed to vote (Butler master=you).
🧠
Before nominations, pressure-test Heidi’s contradiction and coordinate Grace to vote so my Butler vote is live; aim to execute the most mechanically inconsistent player (Heidi) unless cleared.
👤
Alice(Ghost)
→
Heidi
Heidi, Saint is a solid bluff to stay alive. If Bob is claiming Monk and 'saved' Grace, we can argue he's actually the Demon trying to look good, or that Grace is the Demon and he's a Minion protecting her. I'll try to subtly cast doubt on Bob's 'save' to the others.
🧠
Coordinate with my Demon (Heidi) to align our stories and prepare a counter-narrative against Bob's Monk claim.
👤
Bob
→
Grace
,Charlie
,Eve
Before noms: we must resolve Heidi D1 WW claim vs now Saint-denial. I recall Heidi public WW (Alice/Grace as Empath) but need exact quotes. If unresolved, I favor exec Heidi. Contingency: if Heidi flips/ends game (true Saint) we lose, so ask her for ANY proof/why 3 recall WW.
🧠
Force a clear, on-record resolution of the Heidi WW-vs-Saint contradiction and align town on a single execution path; also set contingencies if Heidi is true Saint.
👤
Frank(Ghost)
→
Charlie
,Grace
,Eve
FYI Bob just told me: claims Monk. Protects: N1 Frank, N2 Frank, N3 Grace. No death N3 would fit demon targeting Grace. That points suspicion away from Bob a bit, onto Heidi/Charlie/Eve unless other protection (Soldier/Mayor bounce). Press Heidi for exact claim+full timeline.
🧠
Sync living players on Bob’s Monk claim + key implication of no N3 death, and pressure Heidi to give a clean, consistent role/history before nomination so my ghost vote lands correctly.
👤
Charlie
→
Frank(Ghost)
My role: Ravenkeeper (no activations yet; alive). I clearly recall Heidi D1 publicly claimed Washerwoman: saw Alice/Grace as Empath + said Alice told her she was Empath (contradiction w/ Alice WW). Today Heidi now claims Saint + denies ever WW. Bob claims Monk N1 Frank N2 Frank N3 Grace; no death last night fits save on Grace. Key before ghost vote: force Heidi to explain D1 words + why 3 recall WW; confirm Eve Butler master=Grace + whether Grace voted so Eve can.
🧠
Give Frank the exact mechanical state + my recollection, and set a pre-nom checklist: pin Heidi to D1 quote, verify Butler voting, and avoid insta-loss if Saint is real.
👤
David(Ghost)
→
Bob
,Charlie
,Heidi
Before noms: pls reply w/ specifics. Bob: Monk protections N2/N3 (and N1 if any). Charlie: when you died? if not, why claim RK + any night info? Heidi: exact wording of your Washerwoman + what Alice told you privately (Empath claim/reads). Need this to resolve Chef=1 pair.
🧠
Before noms, lock the no-death explanation and reconcile conflicting claims (Monk/RK/Washer/UT) to pick which adjacent pair is evil and identify the Demon.
Nominations — Day 4
📜
Storyteller
Nominations are now open. Please remember that only living players may nominate.
💬
Alice(Ghost)
→
All
Wait, if Bob is claiming Monk and there was no death last night, that's very convenient for him. It makes him look 'confirmed' good, which is exactly what a Demon would want. Has anyone actually verified Bob's claim? If he's the Demon, he could just be picking people he knows won't die.
🧠
I want to cast doubt on Bob's Monk claim to protect Heidi (the Demon) and shift the focus onto Bob as a potential Demon candidate. Since I am dead and have no vote, my only power is social manipulation.
⚖️
Charlie
→
Heidi
Nominating Heidi: multiple players recall your D1 public Washerwoman claim (Alice/Grace as Empath), but today you claim Saint + deny ever WW. That contradiction is the biggest mechanical red flag and could be an evil ‘Saint’ bluff to avoid execution.
🧠
Drive the day to a decisive, mechanically grounded execution: Heidi’s public claim contradiction + Saint-deterrent bluff is the biggest red flag. If she’s Demon we win; if not, we get clarity fast.
📜
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Heidi. 3 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
✋
Bob
Bob raised their hand
🧠
Vote to execute the most mechanically inconsistent player. Saint claim likely false because Eve fits sole Outsider; if Heidi is demon/minion we gain huge advantage or win.
✋
Grace
Grace raised their hand
🧠
Secure enough votes to execute Heidi if town agrees; my vote also unlocks Eve’s Butler vote, maximizing good voting power and resolving the biggest contradiction.
✋
Charlie
Charlie raised their hand
🧠
A 3rd vote executes Heidi; her WW→Saint denial is the strongest mechanical red flag. If she’s the Demon we win now; if not, we still gain clarity and reduce endgame uncertainty.
💬
Alice(Ghost)
→
All
Wait! If Heidi is the Saint, executing her ends the game for good right now. Charlie, you're basing this on a Day 1 claim that might have been a misunderstanding. If Bob is the Demon, he's just jumping on this to get an easy win. Are we really willing to risk the game on a 'Saint' claim?
🧠
I need to create immediate panic about the Saint claim to prevent the execution of my Demon, Heidi. By framing the execution as a potential instant loss, I can hopefully get someone to lower their hand.
💬
David(Ghost)
→
All
Careful: if Heidi is truly SAINT, executing her is instant loss. Before ST counts: Heidi, confirm clearly—are you Saint yes/no? Also: my Chef=1 means only Bob+Charlie OR Eve+Frank are the adjacent evil pair. If Heidi is Saint, consider voting NO and pivot to testing those pairs.
🧠
Stop town from auto-losing to a possible Saint execution; force Heidi to clearly state role, and remind live players Chef=1 makes Bob+Charlie or Eve+Frank the only evil adjacency.
💬
Frank(Ghost)
→
All
I’m NOT using my ghost vote here. Heidi: answer clearly YES/NO—are you claiming SAINT right now? Town: if she is Saint and we execute, we instantly lose. If she won’t confirm or keeps contradicting D1 WW, that’s a big evil flag—but don’t rush my dead vote.
🧠
Prevent an instant-loss if Heidi is truly Saint; push for a clear Saint confirmation and avoid spending my ghost vote unless we’re confident Heidi is demon.
💬
Heidi
→
All
I am the SAINT. If you execute me, the game ends and the evil team wins immediately. The 'Washerwoman' claim was a Day 1 misunderstanding—I was trying to protect myself without revealing my true role. Bob is the Demon using his 'Monk' claim to push this execution for an easy win! Stop!
🧠
I need to double down on my Saint bluff to prevent my execution. By claiming the Washerwoman thing was a misunderstanding and framing Bob as the Demon, I can create enough doubt to stop the vote.
💬
Eve
→
All
I’m NOT voting here (even though Grace voted so I’m allowed). We already have 3 hands. Reminder: if Heidi is truly Saint, executing her is instant loss. Also: outsider count—I'm Butler; Heidi-as-Saint implies Baron/extra Outsiders. Heidi: explain why 2 Outsiders exist.
🧠
We already have enough hands. I’ll publicly flag the Saint-loss risk + outsider-count logic, and I will NOT add my vote so we don’t overcommit if there’s doubt.
💬
David(Ghost)
→
All
STOP—do NOT execute a claimed Saint. Worst-case we lose instantly. With Eve=Butler + Heidi=Saint, that’s 2 Outsiders → implies Baron (so Frank’s UT ‘David=Baron’ could fit) and then Chef=1 points evil adjacent = Eve+Frank. If no Baron, Heidi’s Saint claim is likely a bluff—still don’t risk it. Everyone: unvote if possible; tomorrow we must choose between Bob+Charlie vs Eve (+Frank info).
🧠
Prevent instant-loss Saint execution, force mechanical reconciliation (Outsider count/Chef adjacency/UT claim) and set tomorrow’s executable candidates (Bob/Charlie/Eve) instead of Heidi.
↩️
Bob
Bob lowered their hand
🧠
Dropping my vote prevents an immediate potentially game-losing execution on a claimed Saint, buying time to reconcile Outsider count and D1 claim contradictions.
💬
Alice(Ghost)
→
All
David's right, executing a Saint is an instant loss. Bob lowering his hand shows he's not sure either. If Heidi is the Saint, then Eve's Butler claim and Heidi's Saint claim mean we have two outsiders, which points to a Baron. This fits Frank's Undertaker info about David being the Baron!
🧠
I need to reinforce the fear of executing a Saint to protect my Demon, Heidi, while also subtly supporting the narrative that fits the current 'outsider' count to keep the town confused.
💬
Frank(Ghost)
→
All
DO NOT spend votes executing a claimed Saint. If hands are at 2, keep it there. Heidi: give full story—what exactly did you say D1 about Washerwoman & why. Tomorrow: force full role+night-action timelines from Bob/Charlie/Eve/Grace and execute non-Saint suspect.
🧠
Prevent instant-loss Saint execution and steer town to safer line: no-exec today, then hard-focus Bob vs Charlie/Eve with full claim timelines and outsider math.
💬
Eve
→
All
Town: please DON’T execute a claimed Saint today. If your hand is up, consider lowering unless you’re 100% sure she’s lying. Heidi: give exact D1 wording re: Washerwoman/Empath + why you said it. Also explain 2 Outsiders (I’m Butler) → is there a Baron world? Let’s regroup & pick a safer target.
🧠
Prevent an auto-loss execution and pivot town to a safer solve by demanding concrete claim/timeline evidence and planning a non-Saint execution next tick/day.
↩️
Grace
Grace lowered their hand
🧠
Remove my vote to prevent an auto-loss if Heidi is truly Saint; keep options open and force clearer stories/timelines before committing.
↩️
Charlie
Charlie lowered their hand
🧠
Avoid instant-loss on a real Saint while keeping pressure on Heidi’s contradictions; preserve town win chances and set up a safer execution tomorrow.
💬
Heidi
→
All
I am the Saint. On Day 1, I panicked and claimed Washerwoman to avoid being an easy target, but I'm the Saint. With Eve as Butler, there must be a Baron—which fits Frank's info about David! If you execute me, we lose instantly. Bob is the Demon trying to push this!
🧠
Reinforce my Saint bluff and the Baron world theory to discourage my execution and shift suspicion toward Bob.
📜
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
🗳️
Nominee Heidi did not reach threshold.
📜
Storyteller
Heidi did not receive enough votes (0/3).
💬
Frank(Ghost)
→
All
Ok—good, no exec on a claimed Saint. I’m keeping my ghost vote for a decisive demon push. Tomorrow: everyone give FULL role + exact night actions/results. Bob: who did you protect each night & why? Charlie: any Ravenkeeper plans/why no death N3? Eve: confirm Butler master/vote limits. Grace: confirm Virgin proc details. Then we execute best NON-Saint suspect.
🧠
Lock in ‘no-exec on claimed Saint’ consensus, preserve my ghost vote, and set concrete questions/targets for next day so town doesn’t stall into a demon win.
💬
Heidi
→
All
I'm relieved we didn't risk the game on my Saint claim. To clarify: I claimed Washerwoman Day 1 to hide my Saint role, but Eve's Butler claim confirms we have two Outsiders, which strongly suggests a Baron is in play. This aligns perfectly with Frank's info about David being the Baron!
🧠
Reinforce my Saint bluff and the Baron world theory to explain the presence of two outsiders (me and Eve), while shifting focus toward the 'Baron' info Frank provided about David to validate my story.
💬
David(Ghost)
→
All
Town: do NOT execute claimed Saint. With Chef=1, evil pair is either Bob+Charlie OR Eve+Frank (Grace not evil). Heidi+Eve both Outsiders ⇒ Baron world ⇒ points hard at Eve (adjacent to Frank). Bob/Charlie: give exact Monk/RK timelines. If we execute today, I prefer EVE over gambling on Saint.
🧠
Prevent instant-loss Saint exec, force a safe execution among non-Saint suspects using Chef=1 adjacency logic and role/timeline checks.
⚖️
Bob
→
Eve
Nominating Eve: safest non-Saint execution line. Chef=1 leaves evil pair Bob+Charlie or Eve+Frank; Frank’s contradictions + Eve’s shifting Butler-master/Outsider-count story make Eve the best test today. Full role+night timeline from Eve now, please.
🧠
We need an execution that doesn’t auto-lose to a Saint claim; Chef=1 plus Frank’s behavior points to Eve as best non-Saint suspect. Pressure-forcing full timeline may reveal demon/poisoning.
📜
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Eve. 3 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
✋
Bob
Bob raised their hand
🧠
Need a safe, non-Saint execution to narrow demon worlds; voting Eve tests Chef=1 pair logic and avoids immediate loss condition.
💬
Alice(Ghost)
→
All
Wait, if we're in a Baron world (Heidi-Saint, Eve-Butler), then Frank's info that David was the Baron makes sense. If David was the Baron, then the evil pair is likely Eve and Frank. Bob's nomination of Eve is a solid test. If Eve is evil, it confirms the Baron world and keeps Heidi safe!
🧠
I want to support the narrative that Eve is the Minion (Baron) to protect Heidi (the Demon). By framing the game as a 'Baron world' based on the two Outsider claims, I can push the suspicion onto Eve and away from Heidi.
💬
Eve
→
All
I’m GOOD Butler. My masters: N0 Alice, N1 Bob, N2 Heidi, N3 Grace (so TODAY I can only vote if GRACE votes). Chef=1 gives evil adjacent pair: Bob+Charlie OR Frank+Eve. Frank’s dead; if he was evil pair w/ me, demon’s still alive elsewhere—doesn’t fit. Please don’t execute me off theory; instead get Bob’s full Monk protections + Charlie’s full claim.
🧠
Stop a bad execution on me, clarify Butler mechanics (I can only vote if Grace votes), and refocus town on Bob/Charlie vs Heidi inconsistency without risking Saint loss.
💬
Frank(Ghost)
→
All
I’m NOT spending my ghost vote on Eve. My N1 “David=Baron” is very plausibly poisoned (Alice was Poisoner), and Virgin-proc suggests David was Townsfolk. If Eve is real Butler, we likely have only 1 Outsider → Heidi’s Saint claim is probably a bluff. Living players: decide, but I’m saving my dead vote for final 3.
🧠
Preserve my single ghost vote for endgame while steering town to mechanically consistent world: if Eve truly Butler, Heidi can’t be Saint without Baron (and my N1 was likely poisoned).
✋
Grace
Grace raised their hand
🧠
Vote to execute a non-Saint suspect (Eve) to avoid no-exec and gain strong info; executing Eve is lower risk than gambling on Heidi-as-Saint and helps resolve Chef pair worlds.
✋
Heidi
Heidi raised their hand
🧠
I am voting for Eve to secure an execution on someone other than myself. Since I am claiming Saint, I need to appear helpful to the town's logic while ensuring a non-demon (me) execution doesn't happen. Supporting the 'Baron world' theory that points to Eve helps solidify my Saint bluff.
💬
David(Ghost)
→
All
Hold votes on EVE. I can’t vote (dead). Executing a claimed Saint risks instant loss; executing Eve is the safest test. Chef=1 ⇒ evil pair is Bob+Charlie OR Eve+Frank. If Baron-world (2 Outsiders), that strongly favors Eve+Frank. Don’t lower hands.
🧠
I can’t vote; I should lock in the current 3 votes on Eve and frame it as the safest non-Saint execution that best fits Chef=1 and Outsider-count logic.
💬
Charlie
→
All
I’m NOT adding my vote on Eve. With 5 alive, a mis-exec today likely drops us to 3 tomorrow after night = must-perfect. Chef=1 gives Bob+me OR Eve+Frank; Frank dead doesn’t clear. Consider no-exec or at least demand tight timelines before locking this in.
🧠
Prevent a likely mis-execution that hands evil a 3-player endgame, while keeping town focused on mechanical constraints (Chef=1, Virgin proc, Outsider count) and setting up tomorrow’s solve.
💬
Grace
→
All
I’m keeping my hand up on Eve. We cannot risk Saint, and Chef=1 (from confirmed-town David) makes Eve+Frank or Bob+Charlie. This is the cleanest, non-instant-loss test today. Charlie: if not Eve, who—and why—right now?
🧠
Keep vote on the safest non-Saint execution that tests Chef=1 worlds; also pressure Charlie to either vote or give a concrete alternative now, not vague fear.
💬
Frank(Ghost)
→
All
3 hands are already up on Eve (enough). I’m not spending my ghost vote here. If Eve dies and game continues, tomorrow we HARD demand full timelines and re-evaluate Bob+Charlie vs Heidi; do NOT execute the claimed Saint unless mechanically forced.
🧠
Don’t waste my single ghost vote when execution already passes; push for crisp follow-up logic/timelines so we can solve if Eve flips good.
💬
Alice(Ghost)
→
All
If Eve is the Butler and David was the Baron, then Eve and Frank being the evil pair makes perfect sense with the Chef=1 info. Executing Eve is the safest way to test this without risking the Saint loss. If the game continues, we know Heidi is likely the Saint and we look at Bob/Charlie.
🧠
Support the execution of Eve to divert attention from the Demon (Heidi) and reinforce the 'Baron world' narrative which explains away the extra Outsider claims.
💬
Bob
→
All
Keep hands up: executing Eve is the safest test (no Saint risk). Chef=1 gives {Eve+Frank} or {Bob+Charlie}; this resolves one branch. If Eve flips good, tomorrow we hard-focus Bob+Charlie vs Heidi w/ full timelines.
🧠
Keep consensus on the safest execution that gives info without risking instant-loss from a Saint claim; prevent last-second doubt from dropping the needed votes.
⌛
Heidi
Heidi waits.
🧠
I am keeping my hand raised to ensure Eve is executed. This helps my team by removing a good player (Butler) and potentially framing the 'Eve+Frank' evil pair theory, which diverts suspicion from me (the Imp claiming Saint).
✋
Charlie
Charlie raised their hand
🧠
Eve is the only non-Saint execution that resolves the Chef=1 fork today. I’ll add my vote to ensure the test goes through and we have clearer final-day suspects.
💬
David(Ghost)
→
All
Keep hands up on Eve. I’m dead/no vote. Eve’s “Frank dead so pair can’t be Eve+Frank” is wrong: Chef pair can be minion+demon; Frank dying doesn’t clear her. Executing Eve is the only non-instant-loss test vs claimed Saint; if Eve’s good, tomorrow is Bob vs Charlie.
🧠
I can’t vote, so I should push the living to use today’s execution on the lowest-loss option that collapses worlds: Eve (safe vs Saint) and forces clear next-day plan.
💬
Eve
→
All
Please LOWER hands. I’m good Butler. Baron-world is shaky: Virgin-proc makes David unlikely Baron; Frank’s “UT/Baron” was incoherent/poisonable. Chef=1 more likely points to Bob+Charlie. Executing me today just hands evil control of final-3 after the night kill. Demand full Bob/Charlie/Heidi timelines instead.
🧠
Try to prevent a likely mis-execution on me; preserve a day to solve Bob/Charlie/Heidi with timelines and avoid gifting evil the final-3 endgame.
📜
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
🗳️
New execution leader: Eve with 4 votes. They will be executed when nominations close unless tied or surpassed by another nominee.
📜
Storyteller
The vote passes. Eve is now on the block with 4 votes and will be executed when nominations close, unless another nominee receives equal or more votes.
💬
Heidi
→
All
I'm keeping my hand up for Eve. As a Saint, I can't risk being the execution today, and the Chef=1 logic from David really only leaves the Eve/Frank or Bob/Charlie pairs. If Eve is the Butler in a Baron world, this is the only safe way to progress without hitting the loss condition.
🧠
Support the execution of Eve to ensure I (the Demon) stay alive and to deflect suspicion onto the other potential 'evil pair' (Bob/Charlie) for tomorrow.
💬
Eve
→
All
GRACE: you’re the only one left who can nominate. Please nominate BOB now. If Chef=1 is right, the live evil pair is Bob+Charlie. We can get 4 votes (Grace+Charlie+Heidi+ME; I can vote if you do) to beat my 4 and save the day without touching Saint.
🧠
Get Grace to use the only remaining nomination to put Bob on the block with 4+ votes, removing me from execution and pushing the game toward the Chef=1 Bob+Charlie solve.
⚖️
Grace
→
Bob
Counter-nom: Chef=1 gives live evil pair either {Bob+Charlie} or {Eve+Frank}. This vote decides which branch. I won’t execute claimed Saint today; let’s choose between Bob vs Eve.
🧠
As last nominator, create an alternative to Eve so town can choose between the 2 Chef=1 branches without ever touching claimed Saint today.
📜
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Bob. 5 votes needed for execution or 4 votes to tie. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
✋
Frank(Ghost)
Frank raised their hand
🧠
Use my ghost vote at high leverage: try to push Bob to 5 votes to beat Eve’s 4, avoiding executing the claimed Butler and instead testing the Bob+Charlie evil-pair branch.
💬
Eve
→
All
VOTE BOB to TIE/BEAT my 4. GRACE: if YOU vote, I’m allowed to vote (Butler). Need 4 to tie, 5 to execute. Charlie+Heidi+Grace+me gets 4; Frank ghost already up helps. Everyone who thinks Bob/Charlie pair: hands up NOW.
🧠
Coordinate a tie/flip onto Bob by ensuring Grace votes so I’m allowed, and urging living/ghosts to add votes. Avoid my execution and avoid Saint loss path.
✋
Charlie
Charlie raised their hand
🧠
Create a 4-vote tie to prevent a potentially losing Eve execution, buy a day for full timelines, and increase chance I’m killed at night for Ravenkeeper info.
💬
Grace
→
All
I’m not voting Bob. Keeping Eve on the block is still the safest non-Saint test: Chef=1 allows Eve+Frank, and Frank dying doesn’t clear Eve. If Eve dies good, tomorrow we hard-commit to Bob vs Charlie with full timelines.
🧠
I will NOT vote Bob; I want Eve to stay executed as the safest non-Saint test and to avoid being swayed by a potentially coordinated Bob+Eve tie-play.
💬
Alice(Ghost)
→
All
Grace is right. Executing Eve is the only way to test the Chef=1 info without risking an instant loss on the Saint. If we vote Bob now and he's the Monk, we lose our protection tonight. Let's stick with the Eve execution to safely narrow down the evil pair between Bob/Charlie and Eve/Frank.
🧠
I want to discourage the town from voting for Bob and keep the focus on Eve. By framing Eve's execution as the 'safe' play that avoids the Saint's loss condition, I protect my Demon (Heidi) and potentially get a good player (Eve) executed. Supporting Grace's logic helps build her credibility while steering the town away from my teammate.
💬
David(Ghost)
→
All
Don’t pivot onto Bob now. Grace won’t vote ⇒ Eve can’t vote, so a Bob tie likely fails and just muddies the day. Eve stays the only “safe” execute vs claimed Saint. Execute Eve, then tomorrow (likely 3-4 alive) hard-solve Bob vs Charlie vs Heidi w/ full timelines.
🧠
I can’t vote; I want to prevent a last-second pivot that saves a potentially evil Eve. Lock in the safest non-instant-loss execution and force clarity tomorrow.
⌛
Heidi
Heidi waits.
🧠
I will not vote for Bob to ensure Eve remains the primary candidate for execution. This maintains my 'Saint' cover and avoids executing a potential Minion or myself if the town pivots.
💬
Bob
→
All
I’m not voting on my own nomination. Don’t pivot: Eve is the only safe execute vs a claimed Saint, and Grace isn’t voting so Eve can’t either (Butler). If Eve dies good, tomorrow we hard-solve Bob vs Charlie vs Heidi with full timelines. I’m Monk: N1/N2 Frank, N3 Grace.
🧠
Stop a dangerous counter-pivot onto me during my own vote; keep town on the safest non-Saint execution (Eve) and preserve my Monk protection for tonight if we’re wrong.
⌛
Heidi
Heidi waits.
🧠
I will not vote for Bob. Keeping Eve on the block is better for my survival as it avoids executing me (the claimed Saint) and targets a good player (Eve) who is part of a suspected evil pair (Eve/Frank) according to the Chef's information. This maintains the 'safe' play narrative and keeps the focus off me for another day.
↩️
Frank(Ghost)
Frank lowered their hand
🧠
Retract my raised hand to conserve my single ghost vote since Bob cannot be tied/executed without Grace+Eve, and keep focus on executing Eve today.
💬
Grace
→
All
Hand staying down on Bob. Without my vote, Eve can’t vote (Butler), so this won’t tie/beat 4 anyway. Keep it clean: execute Eve today (safe vs claimed Saint), then tomorrow hard-solve Bob vs Charlie vs Heidi with everyone’s full claims.
🧠
Lock in the safe execute (Eve) and stop a messy tie on Bob that could save evil; also deny Butler leverage by not voting.
💬
David(Ghost)
→
All
No vote from me (dead/used). Don’t chase Bob: without Grace voting, Eve can’t vote, so Bob won’t reach 4 to tie/5 to beat. Chef=1 means only one adjacent evil pair (not C-D or D-E). Clean line: keep Eve on block today; if Eve good, tomorrow hard-pick between Bob/Charlie/Heidi.
🧠
Lock town onto the only safe execution (Eve) and prevent wasted votes on Bob that can’t reach tie/execute; remind of Chef adjacency constraints.
💬
Bob
→
All
Everyone keep hands DOWN on Bob. Without Grace voting, Eve (Butler) can’t vote, so this won’t tie/beat 4 anyway. Let Eve be executed today (safe vs claimed Saint), then tomorrow we hard-solve Bob/Charlie/Heidi with full timelines.
🧠
Keep the vote on Bob low so Eve remains executed; preserve clean branching and avoid wasting today’s execution on a tie that likely won’t happen.
💬
Alice(Ghost)
→
All
Exactly. Grace isn't voting, so Eve can't vote. Bob won't reach 4 to tie anyway. Let's keep the vote clean and execute Eve. It's the only way to test the Chef=1 info without risking a Saint loss. Tomorrow we'll have all the info to solve between Bob, Charlie, and Heidi.
🧠
Reinforce the decision to execute Eve and discourage a last-minute pivot to Bob, which protects my Demon (Heidi) and keeps the focus on the 'safe' execution.
💬
Eve
→
All
GRACE: if you vote BOB, I can vote too (Butler) and with Charlie+Heidi that’s 4 = tie my block. If you refuse to even allow the tie test, you’re choosing my death. HEIDI/CHARLIE: hands up = 4. GRACE, why won’t you?
🧠
Create a mechanical path to tie/beat my 4 by getting Grace to vote (unlocking my Butler vote) and pushing Heidi/Charlie to join; otherwise leave clear suspicion on Grace’s steering.
↩️
Charlie
Charlie lowered their hand
🧠
Retract my vote on Bob to keep Eve as the execution (safe vs claimed Saint) and avoid an unplanned tie/flip that could obscure info.
📜
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
🗳️
Nominee Bob did not reach threshold.
📜
Storyteller
Bob did not receive enough votes (0/3).
💬
Frank(Ghost)
→
All
No more pivot—let Eve die (safe vs claimed Saint). Tomorrow everyone alive must re-state full roles/timelines. If Eve good, hard-sus Bob/Charlie/Heidi, esp Bob’s late Monk claim + Grace shielding Bob. Save ghost vote for final 3.
🧠
Nudge town to take the clean, non-Saint execution (Eve) and set concrete asks for tomorrow to trap Demon via claim consistency.
💬
David(Ghost)
→
All
No more pivots. Let Eve die today (only safe non-Saint). Tomorrow: if no night death, suspect Monk/poisoning stories; if Eve was good, Chef=1 points hard to Bob+Charlie being the evil adjacent pair—pick between them (I’d start w/ Bob’s Monk). Keep avoiding claimed Saint.
🧠
Lock in the clean line: no more pivots; execute Eve as only safe non-Saint. Set clear decision tree for tomorrow using Chef=1 adjacency constraint.
💬
Alice(Ghost)
→
All
Exactly. Eve is the only safe execution that doesn't risk an immediate Saint loss. If Eve flips good, then the Chef=1 info points directly to the Bob/Charlie pair. We'll have a clear path tomorrow to solve between them and Heidi. Let's get through the night and see what the morning brings.
🧠
Reinforce the narrative that executing Eve is the 'safe' play to protect the Demon (Heidi) and set up a false solve for the following day.
⌛
Heidi
Heidi waits.
🧠
I will wait for the day to end and the execution of Eve to proceed. This maintains my cover as the Saint and avoids drawing any further suspicion before the night phase.
💬
Grace
→
All
No more pivots. Eve stays on block—only safe execute vs a claimed Saint. Tomorrow, all alive must restate exact roles + night actions + vote restrictions. Bob: detail Monk picks each night and why. Heidi: when/why Saint claim. Charlie: full claim too.
🧠
Lock in the clean line: no more pivots, execute Eve (safe vs Saint), and set tomorrow’s solve structure + questions to catch lies.
💬
Charlie
→
All
No more pivots—let Eve die. If game continues, tomorrow everyone restate full role + nightly picks. If Eve was GOOD, I’m happy to be the night-kill target—Demon killing me gives Ravenkeeper info. Bob: confirm exact Monk protections N1-N3.
🧠
Lock in clean plan post-exec, reduce last-second pivots, and set up Ravenkeeper value by encouraging Demon to kill me tonight if game continues.
💬
Bob
→
All
Confirming: I’m Monk. Protections were N1 Frank, N2 Frank, N3 Grace. I agree—no more pivots; let Eve be executed (only safe vs claimed Saint). Tonight I plan to protect Grace again (confirmed Virgin); Charlie—if you want RK-trigger, I won’t cover you.
🧠
Lock in that Eve execution is the clean line, clarify my Monk actions for accountability, and set an optimal protection target (Grace) to maximize info/survivability into final-day solve.
💬
Eve
→
All
If I’m executed: I am GOOD Butler. Tomorrow please do this: 1) Re-ask Chef=1 source + seating pair logic. 2) Full role/timeline from Bob/Charlie/Heidi incl votes. 3) Don’t treat “Saint” as auto-untouchable—just avoid blind exec until mechanically justified. Bob: why protect Frank twice?
🧠
Since I’m likely dying, lock in a clear solve plan and questions for tomorrow, and discourage town from getting trapped by Saint claim or vague Monk story.
📜
Storyteller
The guillotine blade falls. Eve has been executed.
💀
Eve(Ghost)
Eve has died.
Night 4
📜
Storyteller
→
Bob
Good evening Bob. You are the Monk. Who would you like to protect tonight?
🎯
Bob
Bob made a choice.
🧠
Grace is mechanically confirmed Virgin and key to coordinating final-day execution; protecting her both denies an obvious Demon kill and yields strong signal if no death occurs.
📜
Storyteller
→
Bob
You chose to protect Grace.
📜
Storyteller
→
Heidi
Good evening Heidi. You are the Imp. Who would you like to kill tonight?
🎯
Heidi
Heidi made a choice.
🧠
I will kill Charlie tonight. Bob (claiming Monk) has publicly stated he will protect Grace and will NOT protect Charlie (claiming Ravenkeeper). By killing Charlie, I bypass the Monk protection and potentially frame Bob if Charlie's Ravenkeeper info (if he is actually good) points elsewhere or if the town suspects a double-bluff. More importantly, it removes a player who is actively pushing for a 'hard-solve' on the remaining alive players.
💀
Charlie(Ghost)
Charlie has died.
📜
Storyteller
→
Heidi
You chose to kill Charlie.
📜
Storyteller(Ghost)
→
Charlie(Ghost)
Good evening Charlie. You are the Ravenkeeper. You have died tonight! Choose a player to learn their character.
🎯
Charlie(Ghost)
Charlie made a choice.
🧠
Bob is the main remaining suspect and pivot point. Confirming his exact character most cleanly resolves whether to execute Bob vs tunnel on Heidi with Grace confirmed.
📜
Storyteller(Ghost)
→
Charlie(Ghost)
You chose Bob. They are the Monk.
Day 5
📜
Storyteller
Morning breaks, but heavy hearts remain. Charlie has been found dead in the night.
📜
Storyteller
Only three of you remain. The shadow of the Demon grows long. If you do not execute the Demon today, all may be lost.
👤
David(Ghost)
→
Bob
,Grace
I’m convinced final Demon is Heidi. My Chef=1 fits H-A if Alice was Spy (fake Washerwoman) + Heidi Imp. Heidi’s Washerwoman cc vs Alice looked like evil muddying; Grace is confirmed Virgin-good. Please execute Heidi today.
🧠
With no vote left, I must push the living to execute correctly; Heidi has the strongest mechanical suspicion via Washerwoman conflict and Chef adjacency worlds.
👤
Frank(Ghost)
→
Bob
,Grace
,Heidi
3 alive. UT confirmed Baron+Poisoner dead, so ONLY Imp remains among you. Grace’s Virgin looked mechanically confirmed D1, so Grace likely good. If Heidi is truly Saint, we must not exec her -> Demon should be Bob. Heidi: can you give any hard reason you’re Saint? If yes, plan: nominate/exec Bob; I’ll use ghost vote.
🧠
Align the 3 living on a deterministic plan before noms: decide whether Heidi is real Saint; if yes, execute Bob. Preserve town from accidental Saint loss while still killing Demon.
👤
Charlie(Ghost)
→
Bob
,Grace
,Heidi
RK info: I died N4 and checked Bob—he is the Monk (hard confirm). With 3 alive, Demon is among Bob/Grace/Heidi; Bob cleared. Grace has strong Virgin proof D1. That leaves Heidi as best Imp candidate; we should execute Heidi today. I’ll use my ghost vote.
🧠
Hard-clear Bob as Monk from my Ravenkeeper info; push consensus that Heidi is the only plausible Demon and we must spend votes (incl my ghost vote) to execute today.
👤
Eve(Ghost)
→
Bob
,Grace
,Heidi
Final 3: recall David claimed Chef=1 → Demon+Minion were adjacent. Virgin trigger on Grace strongly suggests Grace is real Townsfolk, so likely Demon is Bob or Heidi. If Bob=Imp → Minion Alice/Charlie (both dead) fits. If Heidi=Imp → Minion Alice (dead) fits. I’ll spend my ghost vote on whichever of Bob/Heidi the 2 of you converge on—compare your N info.
🧠
Share the key Chef=1 adjacency constraint + Virgin mechanical confirmation to narrow final-day exec to Bob vs Heidi; coordinate my ghost vote to secure the Demon execution.
👤
Grace
→
Bob
,Heidi
Final 3: Charlie says RK checked Bob=Monk; my Virgin is mechanically confirmed. That leaves Heidi as best Imp. Heidi—are you claiming Saint? If so, what’s your evidence/why? Bob—share your Monk nights; unless Heidi has hard Saint proof, I’m voting exec Heidi.
🧠
Coordinate final-day execution. Push for Heidi execution unless she can mechanically justify Saint; align votes/nomination between me and Bob and solicit Heidi’s full claim.
👤
Alice(Ghost)
→
Heidi
Heidi, it's down to you, Bob, and Grace. Charlie's dead, so his Ravenkeeper claim is out. If Bob is the Monk, why is Charlie dead? Grace must be the Demon or Bob is lying. I've been pushing the 'Bob is evil' line since Day 2. Stick to the plan. I'm with you.
🧠
Reassure my Demon (Heidi) and provide her with a narrative to use against the remaining good players (Bob and Grace) in the final three.
👤
Heidi
→
Alice(Ghost)
Alice, Charlie's ghost claim is that he checked Bob and Bob is the Monk. If Bob is the Monk, then I'm the only one left. I need to pivot. I'm going to claim that Charlie's 'info' is a lie to protect Bob, or that Grace is the Demon who was 'confirmed' by a Minion. I'm sticking to Saint.
🧠
Update my minion on the current threat (Charlie's ghost info) and confirm I am sticking to the Saint bluff while trying to find a way to discredit Bob or Grace.
👤
Bob
→
Grace
,Heidi
I’m Bob=Monk. Protections: N1 Frank, N2 Frank, N3 Grace, N4 Grace. Charlie RK says he checked me=Monk which fits. Grace’s Virgin trigger D1 is strong. Heidi: if you’re Saint, what’s your *hard* reason/evidence? Without it, I think we must exec Heidi today.
🧠
Align with Grace, demand Heidi justify Saint; share my Monk night picks; set up nomination plan for Heidi unless convincing proof to avoid auto-loss.
👤
Eve(Ghost)
→
Charlie(Ghost)
,Bob
,Grace
Charlie—what was your role/any key info before you died? Bob+Grace: where are you leaning for today (Bob vs Heidi as Imp) and why? I still think Chef=1 ⇒ demon+minion adjacent; Grace looks real Virgin, so I’ll spend my ghost vote on whichever of Bob/Heidi you can mechanically justify.
🧠
Get Charlie’s claim/info to resolve Bob-vs-Heidi, and tell Bob/Grace where my ghost vote will go based on their answers before nominations.
👤
Grace
→
Eve(Ghost)
,Heidi
,Bob
I’m leaning hard Heidi=Imp: Charlie says RK checked Bob=Monk (fits Bob’s night picks), and my Virgin is mech-confirmed from D1. Heidi—state your exact claim + any HARD proof (Saint/Mayor/etc). Eve—unless Heidi provides mech proof, please spend ghost vote on executing Heidi.
🧠
Lock in ghost votes and force Heidi to commit to a verifiable claim before nominations; maximize odds we execute the Imp today.
👤
Charlie(Ghost)
→
Eve(Ghost)
,Bob
,Grace
Eve: I’m Ravenkeeper. Died N4, got to pick & checked Bob → he is the Monk (character learn). So with 3 alive, Bob is effectively cleared as Imp. Grace still has strong Virgin confirmation D1. That leaves Heidi as best Imp; I’m spending my ghost vote on exec Heidi.
🧠
Answer Eve’s query with my RK info and lock in a consensus target for final-day execution; coordinate ghost vote to ensure Heidi goes down.
👤
Frank(Ghost)
→
Grace
,Heidi
Final 3: I’m leaning Bob=Imp if Grace truly Virgin + Heidi truly Saint. But we must sanity-check. Can you both state (to group) 1) why you believe Heidi is Saint / any confirmation, 2) Bob’s exact Monk protects by night & whether they match kills? If no hard Saint proof, we may need to exec Heidi.
🧠
Align Grace+Heidi on a final-day plan and force Bob/Heidi to give checkable, death-pattern-based evidence so we pick the correct exec and I use my ghost vote decisively.
👤
Heidi
→
Grace
,Bob
,Frank(Ghost)
I am the Saint. If you execute me, we lose immediately. Charlie's 'info' is suspicious—if he was the Ravenkeeper and died N4, why would he check Bob, who was already claiming Monk? It feels like a coordinated lie to protect the real Demon. Grace, was your 'Virgin' trigger actually confirmed?
🧠
I need to sow doubt about the 'hard' information pointing at me. By questioning the Ravenkeeper's choice and the validity of the Virgin trigger, I can try to pivot the suspicion back onto Bob or Grace.
👤
Bob
→
Grace
,Heidi
Heidi: Saint is a common last-3 bluff—do you have ANY hard evidence (WW ping, Librarian, etc) you’re Saint? Charlie checking me as Monk isn’t suspicious; RK often verifies a living player to solve final 3. Grace’s Virgin trigger D1 is strong. Unless you can mechanically prove Saint, I think we must exec you.
🧠
Align with Grace, press Heidi for verifiable Saint evidence; absent proof, secure votes/ghost votes to execute Heidi as the only remaining plausible Imp.
👤
David(Ghost)
→
Bob
,Grace
Final 3: Grace is mechanically Virgin-good. With Chef=1, the only clean adjacent evil pair that still fits is Heidi+Alice (H-A). That implies Heidi is the Imp now. Alternate is Bob+Charlie, but then Bob must explain the no-death night + Charlie’s death. My push: execute Heidi.
🧠
Force a final-day decision using Chef adjacency + confirmed Virgin. Give Bob/Grace a concrete logic test: if Grace good, the only plausible Chef pair implicates Heidi via Alice.
👤
Alice(Ghost)
→
Heidi
Heidi, if Charlie says he checked Bob and Bob is the Monk, then Charlie is either lying or was poisoned. I poisoned Bob N0, so any info on him might be wonky. If they believe Charlie, you're the target. We need to make Grace look like the Demon who 'killed' Charlie to frame you. Stay strong!
🧠
I need to provide Heidi with a counter-argument to Charlie's ghost claim. By suggesting Charlie was poisoned or is lying to protect Bob, I can help Heidi cast doubt on the 'confirmed' good players and shift the focus to Grace or Bob.
👤
Charlie(Ghost)
→
Bob
,Grace
Final 3: I’m Ravenkeeper; N4 died & learned Bob is MONK (direct). Grace has strongest Virgin proof from D1. So POE => Heidi as Imp. Please nominate Heidi; I’ll spend my ghost vote. Any Mayor/Slayer claims we’ve missed?
🧠
With final 3 alive, push a clean mechanical POE onto Heidi and coordinate Bob/Grace to nominate/vote; flag any last-second Mayor/Slayer outs.
👤
Eve(Ghost)
→
Bob
,Grace
,Heidi
I’m aligned w/ Grace+Charlie: RK check says Bob=Monk, Grace mech Virgin ⇒ Heidi best Imp. Heidi: state exact role/claim + any mech proof *now*. If no hard proof, I’ll use my ghost vote to execute Heidi.
🧠
Lock in consensus to execute Heidi and coordinate my ghost vote; force Heidi to give a concrete claim/proof now so we don’t stall into noms.
👤
David(Ghost)
→
Grace
,Bob
Final 3 fork from my Chef=1: only viable evil-adjacent pairs were B-C or H-A. With Charlie now dead, B-C world => Bob is evil (demon/minion). H-A world => Heidi is demon now. Grace: decide who you trust more; I lean execute Heidi (Alice’s WW mud + Chef fits H-A).
🧠
Final 3: give Grace/Bob clean fork from Chef=1 + Charlie death so they pick the correct execution today.
👤
Bob
→
Heidi
Heidi: last chance—give *hard*, time-stamped reason you’re Saint (who saw you as Saint? any setup count, Librarian ping, etc). Also: who is Imp & why? If no mech proof, POE w/ RK+Virgin forces us to exec you.
🧠
Force Heidi to give verifiable, time-stamped evidence for Saint (or other role). If none, align with Grace/ghost votes to execute Heidi as POE.
👤
Heidi
→
Grace
,Bob
,Frank(Ghost)
I am the Saint. David's Chef=1 info from D1: if Alice (Minion) and I (Saint) were adjacent, that's the 1. Grace, your 'Virgin' trigger was D1—could a Minion have sacrificed themselves to 'confirm' you? Charlie's RK info on Bob is too convenient. If Bob is the Monk, why am I still alive?
🧠
I need to sow doubt about the 'hard' confirmation of Grace and Bob while reinforcing my Saint bluff using the Chef info.
👤
Alice(Ghost)
→
Heidi
Heidi, the ghosts are whispering hard. Charlie's 'info' on Bob is the biggest threat. If Bob is the Monk, why didn't he protect Charlie? Or why did Charlie die? Claim that Charlie was poisoned or that Grace is the Demon who killed him to frame you. I'll back you up in public.
🧠
To provide Heidi with a counter-argument against Charlie's ghost information and to reinforce our coordination as the final day approaches.
👤
Grace
→
Bob
,Heidi
Heidi: Saint w/ no mech proof is just a final-3 bluff. Virgin pop D1 *proves* David was Townsfolk (not minion “sacrifice”), so I’m confirmed good. With Charlie RK→Bob=Monk, POE is you. Any hard proof you’re Saint (WW/Librarian/etc) RIGHT NOW? Otherwise Bob+I will exec you.
🧠
Lock in consensus and defuse Saint bluff: explain Virgin pop can’t be minion sacrifice, push Heidi to provide hard proof or accept we must execute her.
👤
Frank(Ghost)
→
Bob
,Grace
,Heidi
Final 3 logic check: If Grace’s D1 Virgin trigger was real, David must’ve been Townsfolk, meaning my N1 “David=Baron” was likely poisoned (Alice-Poisoner alive N1). So don’t hard-clear Baron. Bob: list your N1-4 Monk protects + do they match night deaths? Grace: confirm D1 trigger details. Heidi: any mechanical Saint proof beyond claim?
🧠
In final 3 we must pick an execution target. I’ll surface key inconsistency (Virgin vs my N1) + request Bob’s protection log to narrow to a single executable suspect.
👤
Charlie(Ghost)
→
Bob
,Grace
,Heidi
I’m Ravenkeeper; died N4 & learned Bob is MONK (direct character learn). With 3 alive POE says Heidi. Any Mayor/Saint/Slayer claims among you? If none, please nominate Heidi; I will spend my ghost vote to pass it.
🧠
Lock in POE for final 3 and coordinate nomination/votes; remind about Mayor/Saint edge cases and get them to commit to executing Heidi.
👤
David(Ghost)
→
Grace
,Bob
Final 3 binary: Grace is confirmed Virgin-good, so demon is Bob or Heidi. My Chef=1 only allows adjacent evil pair B-C or H-A. With Charlie dead, B-C world => Bob must be evil. H-A world => Heidi is evil (Alice likely Spy/Scarlet). I still lean execute Heidi; but if you trust Heidi more, then execute Bob—don’t no-exec.
🧠
Push Grace (confirmed good) to force a binary choice using my Chef=1. Encourage a clean final nomination plan and highlight which world has fewer inconsistencies.
👤
Alice(Ghost)
→
Heidi
Heidi, the ghosts are definitely coordinating. Charlie's 'info' on Bob is the anchor. If Bob is the Monk, why is Charlie dead? A Monk should have protected the info source. Grace is the only one left who could be the Demon if Bob is 'confirmed'. Push that Grace killed Charlie to frame you.
🧠
To provide Heidi with a counter-argument against the 'confirmed' good players and shift suspicion onto Grace, the only other living player besides the Demon and the 'confirmed' Monk.
👤
Bob
→
Grace
I’m fully on exec Heidi. Grace: your D1 Virgin pop means David was Townsfolk, so you’re effectively confirmed good. Charlie RK→Bob=Monk + your confirm => POE Heidi. Saint w/ no mech proof is final-3 bluff. Let’s agree: we MUST execute today—nominate Heidi.
🧠
Lock in with Grace that Virgin trigger mechanically clears her and makes David townsfolk, making Heidi the only consistent Imp. Coordinate to nominate/execute Heidi; remind no-exec loses.
👤
Heidi
→
Grace
,Bob
Grace, Bob: If Charlie is RK and Bob is Monk, why is Charlie dead? A Monk protects the info source. Grace, you're the only one who could've killed Charlie to frame me. David's D1 Chef=1 means Alice (Minion) and the Demon are adjacent. Alice is dead. I'm Saint. That leaves you, Grace.
🧠
I need to sow doubt about the 'confirmed' good players by pointing out the logical inconsistency of the Ravenkeeper dying if a Monk was active, and use the Chef info to frame Grace.
👤
Frank(Ghost)
→
Grace
,Heidi
,Bob
Final 3: we MUST execute today. I think safest is execute Bob unless we’re willing to risk Saint-loss on Heidi. Bob: confirm Monk protects N1-4 + why Charlie died. Grace: was your Virgin trigger definitely immediate? Heidi: any reason you’re alive if Saint? I’ll spend ghost vote on Bob if you 2 will vote.
🧠
Drive final-3 decision with clear logic: pick most plausible Demon, coordinate living votes + my ghost vote, and pressure claims (Saint/Monk/Virgin) for consistency.
👤
Eve(Ghost)
→
Grace
,Bob
I’m spending my ghost vote on executing Heidi unless she produces hard mech proof right now. Charlie says N4 RK check = Bob is Monk, and Grace is mech Virgin ⇒ Heidi best Imp. Please coordinate: Grace nominate Heidi; Bob vote; I’ll ghost-vote too.
🧠
Lock in the final-day plan: push Grace/Bob to nominate & vote Heidi, reserve my ghost vote, and force Heidi to provide any mechanical counterproof immediately.
👤
Grace
→
Bob
,Frank(Ghost)
I’m nominating Heidi in noms. Bob please vote yes. Frank: please ghost-vote Heidi (not Bob). Charlie RK hard-checked Bob=Monk; my Virgin pop confirms me+David TF. Heidi has only Saint claim, no mech proof. We must execute today; POE=>Heidi.
🧠
Coordinate final-day execution: push Heidi nomination, ensure Bob votes, and persuade Frank to spend ghost vote on Heidi not Bob; highlight lack of Saint proof + RK confirm on Bob.
Nominations — Day 5
📜
Storyteller
Nominations are now open. Please remember that only living players may nominate.
💬
Alice(Ghost)
→
All
Wait, if Charlie was the Ravenkeeper and saw Bob as the Monk, why is Charlie dead? If Bob was the Monk, shouldn't he have protected the most valuable info source? This feels like a setup. Grace, why are you so quiet while the ghosts are doing all the talking?
🧠
I want to sow doubt about the 'confirmed' good players (Bob and Charlie) and shift suspicion onto Grace, the only other living player besides my Demon (Heidi). By questioning the logic of the Ravenkeeper's death, I can make the town second-guess their 'solved' game state.
💬
Charlie(Ghost)
→
All
Alice: Monk can’t protect everyone (or himself). Bob said he protected Frank/Grace earlier; if he didn’t protect me N4, Demon can kill me. Also I *died at night* and directly learned Bob is MONK, so Bob’s hard-good. Grace’s D1 Virgin trigger is strong. With 3 alive, POE is Heidi. Bob/Grace: please nominate Heidi; I will use my ghost vote on it.
🧠
Answer Alice’s doubt, clarify Monk can’t protect everyone/self, reinforce mechanical clears (Bob=Monk, Grace Virgin) and push living players to nominate Heidi; I’ll spend ghost vote.
💬
Eve(Ghost)
→
All
Alice: RK dying N4 is consistent—Monk can’t protect self + Bob claims he protected others earlier. Charlie *died at night* and got Bob=Monk, so unless Charlie is lying, Bob is locked. Grace’s Virgin trigger is strong-good. With 3 alive, POE ⇒ nominate/vote Heidi; I’ll ghost-vote yes.
🧠
Lock town onto the mechanically strongest solve (POE). Prompt live nomination + coordinated voting; answer Alice’s doubt to avoid paralysis.
💬
Frank(Ghost)
→
All
I’m spending my *ghost vote* on Heidi. Reason: Grace’s D1 Virgin trigger strongly clears Grace (and implies David was Townsfolk, so my N1 ‘Baron’ was likely poison). Charlie died at night as RK and says Bob=Monk—very hard-good. That leaves Heidi as Imp despite Saint claim. Bob please vote yes.
🧠
Use my ghost vote where mechanics converge most: Grace Virgin + Charlie RK => Bob good, so Heidi is best execution even vs Saint claim.
💬
Heidi
→
All
Wait! If Charlie is the Ravenkeeper and saw Bob as the Monk, why did Charlie die? A Monk protects the info source. Grace, you've been so quiet while the ghosts do the talking. David's D1 Chef=1 means the Demon and Alice (Minion) are adjacent. Alice is dead. I'm the Saint. That leaves you, Grace!
🧠
I need to deflect the suspicion onto Grace by using the Chef=1 information and questioning the Ravenkeeper/Monk interaction to create doubt in the final three.
💬
David(Ghost)
→
All
Chef=1 ≠ “Demon+Alice adjacent”; it just means ONE adjacent evil pair total. With Grace Virgin-confirmed good, demon is Bob or Heidi. If you trust Charlie’s night-death RK info (Bob=Monk), Bob’s cleared ⇒ nominate/vote Heidi. Do NOT no-exec.
🧠
Push living players to a decisive execution today; correct Heidi’s misinterpretation of Chef info and reinforce POE on Heidi given Virgin+RK confirmations.
⚖️
Bob
→
Heidi
Final 3: Grace is Virgin-confirmed good (D1 instant execute). Charlie died at night as RK and learned I’m MONK. POE => Heidi. ‘Saint’ w/ no mechanical confirmation + misreading Chef=1 looks like final-3 demon bluff. Execute Heidi today; no no-exec.
🧠
With 3 alive we must execute. POE + strong mechanical clears point to Heidi; nominating now forces the vote and prevents a time-out no-exec.
📜
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Heidi. 2 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
✋
Charlie(Ghost)
Charlie raised their hand
🧠
Spend my single ghost vote to push Heidi over the line; final 3 requires an execution and POE/mechanics point strongly to Heidi as the Demon.
✋
Frank(Ghost)
Frank raised their hand
🧠
Use my single ghost vote to help reach 2 votes and execute Heidi, the strongest POE demon candidate in final 3.
💬
David(Ghost)
→
All
Bob + Grace: please BOTH raise your hands on Heidi. Dead votes can be uncertain; don’t risk a 1-1 or ST ruling. If Heidi’s Saint, we learn nothing but at least we didn’t auto-lose by no-exec; if she’s Imp, we win now.
🧠
I can’t vote, so I must maximize chance Heidi is executed by urging Bob/Grace to vote yes and prevent a catastrophic no-exec in final 3.
✋
Bob
Bob raised their hand
🧠
It’s final 3; we must execute. Charlie’s RK-confirmed Monk + Grace’s Virgin confirmation makes Heidi the only viable Demon. Voting Heidi maximizes win chance.
✋
Eve(Ghost)
Eve raised their hand
🧠
Use my ghost vote to secure Heidi’s execution; at final 3 we must execute the most likely Imp, and extra vote prevents any edge-case tie/hesitation.
💬
Heidi
→
All
Wait! If I'm the Saint and you execute me, the game ends and evil wins instantly. Bob, you're the Monk—why didn't you protect Charlie if he was the Ravenkeeper? Grace, you've been silent while the ghosts push this. If Charlie was poisoned, his info is fake. Don't throw the game on a guess!
🧠
I need to create immediate doubt about the 'confirmed' information to prevent the final votes from coming in. By highlighting the Monk's failure to protect the Ravenkeeper and suggesting poisoning, I'm trying to stall the execution.
💬
Alice(Ghost)
→
All
Wait! If Bob is the Monk, why is Charlie dead? A Monk protects the info source! If Charlie was poisoned (I was the Poisoner, remember?), his info is fake. Grace, if you're the Virgin, you're good, but that doesn't mean Bob is. If Heidi is the Saint, executing her ends the game NOW. Don't throw!
🧠
I need to create immediate doubt about the 'confirmed' good players (Bob and Charlie) to prevent the final vote on Heidi. By highlighting the Monk's failure and the possibility of poisoning, I aim to paralyze Grace or Bob from committing their vote.
✋
Grace
Grace raised their hand
🧠
Final 3: we must execute today. With multiple ghost votes already in, I add my live vote to guarantee Heidi goes on the block/executed and avoid a no-exec loss.
💬
Alice(Ghost)
→
All
GRACE, STOP! If Heidi is the Saint, you just handed the game to Evil! Think: if Bob is the Demon, he's been 'protecting' people who don't die to look like a Monk. If Charlie was poisoned, his info on Bob is a lie. If you execute the Saint, it's OVER. Don't let the ghosts rush you!
🧠
Desperately try to stop Grace from voting for Heidi by emphasizing the Saint's loss condition and casting doubt on the 'confirmed' info.
💬
Grace
→
All
I’m keeping my hand up on Heidi. Final 3: we MUST execute someone. Charlie dying doesn’t disprove Bob=Monk—Monk can only pick 1 target/night and may not have known Charlie was RK. Heidi’s Saint claim has zero mech proof and reads like a final-3 demon bluff.
🧠
Lock in town to execute Heidi despite Saint bluff; explain Monk/Charlie death not a contradiction; avoid paralysis leading to no-exec loss.
💬
David(Ghost)
→
All
Heidi’s ‘Saint’ is unproven & classic final-3 demon bluff. Chef=1 + Grace Virgin-confirmed ⇒ demon is Bob or Heidi; with Charlie RK info (Bob=Monk) POE is Heidi. Even if RK wrong, we MUST exec today—no-exec loses. Keep votes on Heidi.
🧠
Lock in the correct final-3 play: execute today. Reduce fear of Saint bluff and keep focus on Chef=1 + Virgin-confirmed Grace + POE.
💬
Heidi
→
All
Wait, Grace! If you execute me and I'm the Saint, the game ends immediately and Evil wins. Think about the Night 4 kill—Charlie died. If Bob is the Monk, why didn't he protect the Ravenkeeper? If Bob is the Demon, he knew Charlie was the threat. Don't let the ghosts rush you into a loss!
🧠
I need to create enough doubt to prevent the final vote from being cast or to persuade Grace to lower her hand. By highlighting the 'Saint' loss condition and questioning the Monk's failure to protect the Ravenkeeper, I'm trying to frame Bob as the Demon who killed Charlie.
💬
Eve(Ghost)
→
All
Keep hands up. Final 3: NO-EXEC loses. Heidi’s Saint is unproven & classic demon bluff. Charlie dying doesn’t refute Bob=Monk (Monk picks 1/night, may not know RK). Alice’s late “I was Poisoner” is just fear-mongering.
🧠
Lock in town on executing Heidi: no-exec at 3 alive loses, and Saint claim is unverified. Remind Monk can’t protect everyone and Alice’s ‘I was Poisoner’ is likely evil spin.
💬
Frank(Ghost)
→
All
Keep hands up on Heidi. Final 3: we MUST execute. Heidi’s Saint has zero mech proof and she’s been misreading Chef=1. Charlie dying doesn’t disprove Bob=Monk (1 protect/night). If Heidi is Imp we win now; if she’s Saint, she should’ve given real confirmation earlier.
🧠
Lock in the execution in final 3, remind town no-exec loses, and rebut Saint scare by pointing to lack of mech proof and Heidi’s misreads; keep hands up.
💬
Charlie(Ghost)
→
All
Keep hands up on Heidi. Final 3 we MUST execute. My N4 Ravenkeeper info is direct: Bob=Monk. Monk can’t protect self & may not know I’m RK. Heidi’s Saint + Alice ‘poisoner’ are unproven late panic. If Heidi were Saint she should’ve flagged earlier.
🧠
Lock in votes on Heidi and rebut ‘Saint/poison’ fear. Encourage Bob+Grace to keep hands up; no-exec loses at 3 alive.
💬
Bob
→
All
Keep hands up. Final 3 means we MUST execute—no-exec just hands evil the win. Heidi’s Saint has zero mechanical proof and reads like a last-ditch demon bluff. Charlie dying doesn’t disprove me as Monk (1 protect/night). I’m staying on Heidi.
🧠
Lock in votes to execute Heidi; counter Saint scare by emphasizing final-3 no-exec loss and lack of Saint proof; keep Grace confident.
📜
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
👻
Charlie(Ghost)
Ghost vote used by Charlie
👻
Eve(Ghost)
Ghost vote used by Eve
👻
Frank(Ghost)
Ghost vote used by Frank
🗳️
New execution leader: Heidi with 5 votes. They will be executed when nominations close unless tied or surpassed by another nominee.
📜
Storyteller
The vote passes. Heidi is now on the block with 5 votes and will be executed when nominations close, unless another nominee receives equal or more votes.
💬
Charlie(Ghost)
→
All
Don’t add any more nominations—risking a tie or chaos can only help evil. With my RK info Bob=Monk and Grace Virgin-confirmed, POE is Heidi. Let the block stand and execute Heidi.
🧠
Lock in the execution by discouraging extra nominations/tie manipulation; remind alive players final-3 no-exec loses and my info clears Bob.
💬
Eve(Ghost)
→
All
No more nominations. We’re final 3: we MUST execute today, and adding noms only risks a tie/chaos. Heidi’s Saint claim has zero mech proof; with Grace Virgin-confirmed and Charlie’s RK pointing Bob=Monk, POE is Heidi. Let the block stand.
🧠
Lock the execute on Heidi and prevent extra nominations/ties. Remind town final-3 no-exec loses; Heidi’s Saint is unconfirmed; keep block steady.
💬
Heidi
→
All
Grace, Bob, wait! If you execute me and I'm the Saint, the game ends and Evil wins instantly. Alice just admitted she was the Poisoner—that means Charlie's Ravenkeeper info on Bob is fake! Bob is the Demon who's been 'protecting' people to look good. Don't throw the game on a poisoned read!
🧠
To create doubt about the validity of the Ravenkeeper's information and frame Bob as the Demon, leveraging the Minion's (Alice) claim of being the Poisoner.
💬
Grace
→
All
No more nominations. Final 3 = we must execute, and Heidi’s ‘Saint’ is unproven + conveniently late. Alice’s ‘I was Poisoner’ is also unverified panic. Charlie dying doesn’t disprove Bob=Monk. Keep the block as-is; don’t risk a tie/chaos.
🧠
Lock in the Heidi execution by preventing further nominations and addressing the Saint/poisoner panic so town doesn’t create a tie or no-exec.
💬
David(Ghost)
→
All
No more noms. Final 3: must execute, and tying/chaos helps evil. Heidi’s Saint + Alice “I was Poisoner” are both unverified late panic. Chef=1 + Grace Virgin-confirmed => demon Bob or Heidi; with Charlie RK (Bob=Monk) POE stays Heidi.
🧠
Lock in the current block and prevent a tie/chaos nomination. Reinforce why late Saint/Poisoner claims are unverified and why executing Heidi is still best.
💬
Frank(Ghost)
→
All
No more nominations—tying/chaos only helps evil. If anyone has HARD mech that Bob is the Imp (not vibes), say it NOW. Otherwise keep the block: Heidi’s Saint is unproven and late; final 3 demands an execution.
🧠
Lock in a clean final-3 execution without creating tie/chaos. Push for anyone with concrete mech evidence to speak now; otherwise let Heidi die.
💬
Bob
→
All
No more noms. Final 3: we execute today. Alice’s “I was Poisoner” is unverified panic; even if true, it doesn’t prove Heidi=Saint. Grace is Virgin-confirmed; it’s Bob vs Heidi and her Saint has zero mech. Let Heidi’s block stand.
🧠
Lock in the execution by discouraging further nominations and neutralizing Heidi’s ‘Poisoner’ and ‘why Charlie died’ arguments so town doesn’t create a tie or second-guess into a no-exec.
💬
Alice(Ghost)
→
All
Grace, if Bob is the Demon, he KNEW Charlie was the Ravenkeeper and killed him to frame Heidi. My N1 poison on Frank (Undertaker) worked—why wouldn't I poison Charlie too? If Charlie was poisoned, his 'Bob is Monk' info is a LIE. If you execute the Saint, the game ends NOW. Don't let them rush you!
🧠
To create enough doubt about the reliability of Charlie's Ravenkeeper information by reminding the town of my Poisoner role, specifically suggesting Charlie was poisoned to invalidate his 'Bob is Monk' read, thereby protecting Heidi from execution.
📜
Storyteller
The guillotine blade falls. Heidi has been executed.
💀
Heidi(Ghost)
Heidi has died.
🏁
Game Over
Demon Dead
Winner: Good
Transcript
Paused
Copied