Game Detail
Players
Alice (Undertaker) Bob (Monk) Charlie (Imp) David (Poisoner) Eve (Washerwoman) Frank (Chef) Grace (Butler) Heidi (Librarian)
Token Usage
| Team | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Cost (USD) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Evil | 102,838 | 7,535 | $0.0740 |
| Good | 293,071 | 41,403 | $1.0925 |
Event Transcript
π
The game has started.
π
Storyteller
β
David
You are the Minion. The Demon is Charlie.
π
Storyteller
β
Charlie
Minions are: David. Your safe bluffs are: Recluse, Slayer, Saint
π
Storyteller
β
David
Good evening David. You are the Poisoner. Who would you like to poison tonight?
π―
David
David made a choice.
π§
I want to poison a player who is likely to have powerful Night 0 information, such as an Investigator, Librarian, or Washerwoman, to disrupt the good team's early logic. Alice is a safe first target.
π
Storyteller
β
David
You chose to poison Alice.
π
Storyteller
β
Eve
Good evening Eve. You are the Washerwoman. Either David or Bob is the Monk.
π
Storyteller
β
Heidi
Good evening Heidi. You are the Librarian. Either David or Grace is the Butler.
π
Storyteller
β
Frank
Good evening Frank. You are the Chef. You learn that there are 1 pairs of evil players.
π
Storyteller
β
Grace
Good evening Grace. You are the Butler. Who would you like to be your master tomorrow?
π―
Grace
Grace made a choice.
π§
Pick a nearby, likely-engaged player so my voting restriction is manageable and I can immediately start coordinating and reading vote behavior tomorrow.
π
Storyteller
β
Grace
You chose Frank to be your master.
Day 1
π
Storyteller
Welcome to the village of Ravenswood Bluff. Please take this time to get to know your fellow villagers. Feel free to move around and have private conversations. Be wary, for a Demon hides among you!
π€
Grace
β
Frank
,Alice
Hi both. Frank, I am the Butler and I picked you as my master today, so I can only vote if you vote too. What are you claiming so far? Alice, do you have any Night zero info or a role claim yet?
π§
Coordinate my forced voting with Frank today while collecting early info from another player to start building logic and cross-checks.
π€
Frank
β
Grace
,Alice
Hi both. I am the Chef. My night zero number is one, so there is exactly one pair of adjacent evil players somewhere. Grace, I can vote with you today if needed since you picked me. Alice, what did you learn night zero and who were your names?
π§
Respond to Graceβs question, establish voting coordination, and solicit Aliceβs N0 info while cautiously sharing my Chef information to start building an adjacency-based evil map.
π€
Charlie
β
David
Hey David, got any early thoughts? I'm thinking of claiming Slayer or Saint to keep them off my back. What's your role, and what are you planning to bluff? Also, did you see who the other minion might be, or is it just us?
π§
Establish contact with my Minion, David, to coordinate bluffs and gather information about the game state.
π€
Alice
β
Grace
,Frank
I have no night zero info. I am the Undertaker, so starting tomorrow night I will learn the role of whoever we execute. If you two are good, keep that quiet for now and let us aim for a clean day one execution so I can confirm a claim.
π§
Answer their question, build a small trust circle, and set up an execution that I can verify with Undertaker info to lock in worlds and narrow the adjacent-evil pair.
π€
Bob
β
Alice
,Charlie
Hey, quick check in. What role are you claiming and what info did you get, if any? I am trying to map worlds early and figure out who might need night protection.
π§
Gather early role claims and any starting info from my neighbors so I can plan night protection and build logic chains before nominations.
π€
Heidi
β
David
Hi David, I am Heidi. I have an early info ping that you might be the Butler. Are you Butler, or do you have a different role? If you are Butler, who would you plan to pick tonight?
π§
Privately check Davidβs claim against my Librarian info and set up a later public reveal that anchors an Outsider, narrowing Demon suspects.
π€
David
β
Charlie
Hey Charlie, I am the Poisoner. I poisoned Alice last night. Since there are eight of us, it is just you and me as the evil team. I think claiming Slayer is a strong move for you; it gives you a lot of control. I might bluff Monk or Ravenkeeper to explain why I am still alive later.
π§
I need to coordinate with my Demon, Charlie, and clarify the team size. Since it's an 8-player game, there is only 1 Minion (me) and 1 Demon (Charlie). I'm also confirming my role and plan.
π€
Eve
β
Bob
Hi Bob, I am the Washerwoman. I got that either you or David is the Monk. Are you the Monk? If yes, we should keep it fairly quiet and coordinate who you protect tonight.
π§
Privately test Bob for the Monk claim and set up coordination without publicly outing the Monk to the Demon.
π€
Grace
β
Heidi
,David
Hi. Quick check in. What are you claiming, and did you get any night zero info? I heard a Chef one, meaning exactly one adjacent evil pair. Any info that points to a particular neighbor pair?
π§
Get more early claims and info to build a seat-based evil map around Chef one and detect bluffing; keep my Butler status mostly private while coordinating.
π€
Frank
β
Eve
,Bob
Hi Eve and Bob, quick check in. Any night zero info or role claim you are sharing today? I have a single setup number that points to exactly one adjacent evil pair, so neighbor reads matter.
π§
Collect more claims and N0 info to map possible adjacent evil pair locations from my Chef 1, without overcommitting publicly yet.
π€
Charlie
β
Bob
,Alice
Hey Bob, I am leaning toward Slayer. I have not used my shot yet, obviously, but I am keeping an eye out. What about you? Alice and I were just chatting, but I would love to know what you are thinking.
π§
I need to establish my bluff early to Bob and Alice to build trust and control the narrative. Claiming Slayer matches my safe bluffs and gives me an excuse to survive and potentially 'miss' a shot later to frame someone.
π€
Alice
β
Bob
,Charlie
I have no night zero info. I am the Undertaker, so tomorrow night I learn the role of whoever we execute today. I would like a clean day one execution on a willing claim so we can confirm something. Bob, what are you claiming so far?
π§
Give Bob enough to plan while keeping my role semi-quiet. Coordinate for a day one execution that maximizes my Undertaker confirmation value.
π€
Bob
β
Eve
,Alice
Yes, I am the Monk. Let us keep that fairly quiet. Alice, if you want, I can protect you tonight since Undertaker info is big tomorrow. Eve, tell me if you learn of any other key info role that needs protection more.
π§
Confirm Monk privately to the Washerwoman to build a trust chain, and loop in the Undertaker so I can protect her tonight and we can plan a useful day one execution.
π€
Heidi
β
Grace
,David
Hi Grace. I am Librarian. Night zero I learned either David or Grace is the Butler. That is my only info. Who specifically claimed Chef one, and have they named which neighbor pair they suspect?
π§
Answer Graceβs direct question, establish my real role and Butler ping, and prompt confirmations so we can lock in Outsider info and evaluate the Chef-1 claim.
π€
David
β
Grace
,Heidi
Hi Grace and Heidi. Actually, I am the Butler. I was planning to pick Charlie or Eve to follow tonight. Since Heidi saw me as Butler in her Librarian ping, that makes sense. Grace, who did you hear the Chef one from? That's really important info for finding the Demon's position.
π§
I'm confirming Heidi's 'Librarian' claim that I'm the Butler. This builds trust with both Heidi and Grace, making me look like a helpful Outsider. By asking Grace about the Chef info, I'm acting like a good player trying to solve the game.
π€
Eve
β
Frank
I have Night zero info but would rather not blast it publicly yet. I am Washerwoman: either Bob or David is the Monk, and Bob just claimed Monk to me. So assume Bob is our protection. Your Chef one adjacent evil pair is very useful for neighbor mapping.
π§
Reply to Frank with useful but low-risk info, keep Monk protected, and start mapping Chef=1 adjacency possibilities around the circle.
π€
Grace
β
Heidi
,David
I am actually the Butler. I was told Night zero and I picked Frank as my master today. So Heidiβs Librarian ping fits me, and Davidβs Butler claim is a conflict. Chef one came from Frank.
π§
Resolve the Butler role conflict early, share Chef info, and push suspicion onto the liar (likely David) so town has a clear Day 1 execution path.
π€
Frank
β
Bob
,Eve
Thanks. I am Chef: my number is one, so the Demon and Minion are sitting next to each other. Bob, if you are Monk, I suggest you protect Alice tonight so her Undertaker info starts rolling. Also, who are each of your immediate neighbors, and do either feel suspicious yet?
π§
Coordinate with Bob and Eve: confirm Chef number, suggest Monk protection target, and start mapping which adjacent pair could be the evil duo; set up future Undertaker-confirmed executions.
π€
Charlie
β
Bob
,Alice
Alice, an Undertaker claim is super helpful. Bob, what about you? I'm leaning Slayer like I said, but if we have a Saint or Recluse, they might be a better Day 1 execute for Alice to confirm. David is my neighbor, I'll see if he's willing to help out or if he has a solid role.
π§
I want to appear helpful and cooperative with the 'Undertaker' (Alice) to build trust, while also fishing for Bob's role and setting up potential targets for execution that aren't me.
π€
Alice
β
Bob
,Charlie
Bob, if you are really Monk, please protect me tonight so I can get Undertaker info. For context: Grace is claiming Butler with Frank as master, and Frank claims Chef with a one. Charlie, I think we should push a willing Day one execute to give me a clean confirm.
π§
Coordinate with Bob/Charlie: confirm key roles, request Monk protection so I can get Undertaker info N1, and propose a safe D1 execution target to maximize mechanical confirmation.
π€
Bob
β
Frank
,Eve
My neighbors are Alice and Charlie. I do not have strong suspicions yet. If your Chef one is right, the evil pair cannot involve me, so it must be elsewhere around the circle. I plan to protect Alice tonight for Undertaker info.
π§
Answer Frank, share neighbor info and key deduction from Chef 1 to narrow the evil pair. Coordinate N1 protection on Alice and align with Eve/Frank for D1 execution planning.
π€
Heidi
β
Frank
Hi Frank, I am Heidi. I am the Librarian: I learned either David or Grace is the Butler. Both are claiming Butler to me, so there is a conflict. Did you really get Chef one? Also, did Grace tell you she picked you as her Butler master today?
π§
Verify Frankβs Chef claim and whether Grace named him as her Butler master; then I can publicly frame the David versus Grace Butler conflict and use Chef 1 to narrow the evil pair.
π€
David
β
Charlie
Hey Charlie, Grace is double-claiming Butler against me. Heidi is claiming Librarian and says she saw one of us as Butler. Grace says she's the Butler and picked Frank. I'm sticking to the Butler bluff to keep the heat on her. What's your cover story looking like?
π§
Update the Demon on the current claim conflict and coordinate our stories before nominations begin.
π€
Eve
β
David
Hi David, quick check in. What are you claiming, and do you have any night zero info you are sharing today? Also, are you planning to push any particular execution on day one?
π§
Get a clean claim from David without leaking my Washerwoman info, to see if there is a Monk double-claim and to build a trustworthy info web before nominations.
Nominations β Day 1
π
Storyteller
Nominations are now open.
β
Eve
Eve waits.
π§
It is the last tick of nominations and we have no solid execute. Waiting avoids prematurely outing the Monk and gives time for stronger public info and coordinated nominations later.
βοΈ
Grace
β
David
I am the Butler and I chose Frank as my master today. Heidiβs Librarian ping said David or I is the Butler, so David claiming Butler is a direct conflict. I think we should execute David to resolve this and let the Undertaker confirm tonight.
π§
Force resolution of the Butler claim conflict and leverage Undertaker confirmation; David is the highest-value Day 1 execution to narrow demon pair using Chef one.
π
Storyteller
Voting starts now for David. 4 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
π¬
David
β
All
Wait, Grace, you're the one lying! I'm the actual Butler, and I chose Charlie as my master. Heidi's ping confirms one of us is telling the truth, and it's me. You're trying to frame a Townsfolk on day one. Why would I fake such a low-impact role like Butler?
π§
Defend myself against the nomination by reinforcing my Butler bluff and casting doubt on Grace's claim.
β
Eve
Eve raised their hand
π§
I want the Day 1 execution to resolve the Butler conflict; my Washerwoman info plus Bobβs Monk claim makes David less likely Monk, so I support executing David.
π¬
Grace
β
All
I told multiple people earlier today that I am the Butler, and that I picked Frank as my master. David only claimed Butler after Heidiβs info came out. Frank, if you are happy with this, please vote so I am allowed to vote too. Everyone else, this is the cleanest day one execute to resolve the direct role conflict.
π§
Push enough votes onto David by highlighting the direct Butler claim conflict and my early claim, and coordinate with Frank since my vote depends on his.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
Wait, David says he picked me as his master? I did not know that. If Heidi's Librarian ping says one of them is the Butler, then we definitely have a direct conflict here. David, why did you wait so long to claim? Grace was pretty open about it earlier.
π§
I need to appear skeptical of my Minion (David) to maintain my own cover as a good player, while also highlighting the conflict to see how the town reacts. Strategy: Distance myself slightly but keep the focus on the 'Butler' conflict.
β
Heidi
Heidi raised their hand
π§
My info guarantees at least one of David or Grace is lying about Butler. Davidβs claim came after the ping and his master choice surprised Charlie, so I will support executing David to resolve the conflict.
β
Bob
Bob raised their hand
π§
Lock in a D1 execution on a direct role conflict to generate confirmable Undertaker info and likely hit evil or force evil to defend a liar.
β
Frank
Frank raised their hand
π§
We have a direct Butler conflict and likely no Saint risk. My vote reaches the 4 needed, resolves the conflict via Undertaker, and advances the game with minimal downside.
β
Alice
Alice raised their hand
π§
We need a Day 1 execution for my Undertaker info and this Butler conflict is the cleanest. Voting secures the kill even if someone hesitates.
π¬
David
β
All
Charlie, I told you I was the Butler early on because I needed to know if I could vote! Grace is the one who jumped on Heidi's info to try and look good. If you execute me, you're just losing a good vote. Why would a Minion ever bluff Butler? It's the most useless role!
π§
I need to defend myself against the mounting votes by pointing out the absurdity of a Minion bluffing a low-impact role like Butler, while subtly reminding Charlie (the Demon) that I'm on his side without outing him.
π¬
Eve
β
All
I am fine executing David here. This is a clean direct conflict with a Librarian ping, and it gives the Undertaker a solid confirmation tonight. If David lives, we learn almost nothing today.
π§
Push the group to follow through on the cleanest day one execute that produces hard Undertaker info, while I keep my vote up and avoid muddying with my Monk ping.
β
Grace
Grace raised their hand
π§
Frank is voting so I am allowed; I want to secure the majority to execute David and resolve the direct Butler conflict with maximum mechanical clarity for night info.
β
Charlie
Charlie raised their hand
π§
I will vote for my Minion, David, to blend in with the majority and gain trust as a good player, especially since he is already at the required threshold for execution.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
Just to confirm publicly, I am the Librarian and I got that either David or Grace is the Butler. Since they are both claiming it, I am happy executing David today to resolve the conflict and see who still makes sense tomorrow.
π§
Publicly confirm my Librarian info and support executing one of the two Butler claimants to resolve the direct conflict and set up strong reads for Day 2.
π¬
Bob
β
All
I am good with executing David here. It is a clean role conflict with Heidiβs Librarian info, and it gives Alice a solid Undertaker check tonight. If David is not the Butler, then Grace becomes very suspicious tomorrow. I will protect Alice tonight.
π§
Lock in a clean Day 1 execution that resolves the direct Butler conflict and gives Undertaker a check tonight; also signal my night protection plan for Alice.
π¬
Frank
β
All
I can confirm Grace told me earlier today that she is the Butler and that she picked me as her master. I am voting here, and I am fine executing David to resolve this clean conflict and give the Undertaker a solid check tonight.
π§
Publicly confirm Graceβs prior Butler claim and that I am voting (to enable her vote), and frame the execution as information-positive while keeping attention on adjacency logic from Chef=1.
π¬
Alice
β
All
I am voting to execute David. It is a clean direct conflict with Heidiβs Librarian info, and it gives me an Undertaker read tonight. Bob, please do protect me, and tomorrow I will report exactly what role David died as.
π§
Publicly support the execution as a clean D1 data point for my Undertaker info, and lock in protection so I can report a reliable result tomorrow.
π
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
π³οΈ
New execution leader: David with 7 votes. They will be executed when nominations close unless tied or surpassed by another nominee.
π
Storyteller
The vote passes. David is now on the block with 7 votes and will be executed when nominations close, unless another nominee receives equal or more votes.
π¬
David
β
All
Wait, everyone, think about this! If you execute me and I'm the Butler, you've just wasted a day and potentially a Saint if Grace is bluffing. Why is Grace so eager to die or kill me? Charlie, I literally whispered my role to you earlier! Don't let them rail-road a good player like this.
π§
I am trying to sow doubt and shift the focus away from my execution by highlighting the risk of executing a 'good' player and questioning Grace's motives.
π¬
Eve
β
All
I would prefer we do not add more nominations unless someone has a stronger mechanical reason than this direct conflict. Charlie, can you confirm whether David told you Butler before Heidi spoke? If we execute David, Alice can give us a hard Undertaker result tomorrow and we pivot from there.
π§
Lock in the clean information play: keep David on the block unless someone has a stronger mechanical case, and get clarity on claim timing so we can read reactions tomorrow.
π¬
Grace
β
All
Charlie, simple question: did David tell you he was Butler before Heidi spoke publicly, yes or no? If not, this looks like a reaction claim. I think we should stop here and take the clean David execute so Alice can confirm his role tonight.
π§
Keep town from wasting extra nominations, push for Charlie timeline clarity, and lock in that David execute yields the best mechanical info for day one.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
Honestly, David, you didn't tell me you were the Butler until after things started getting heated with Grace and Heidi. It did feel a bit like a reaction to me, which is why I'm comfortable with this execution to get Alice some solid information tonight.
π§
I need to distance myself from my Minion, David, to appear as a trustworthy Townsfolk. By confirming his claim was late/reactive, I support the town's current narrative for his execution.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
I agree with ending nominations here. This is the cleanest mechanical conflict we have, and Aliceβs Undertaker result tomorrow should clarify whether David was actually the Butler. If it comes back not Butler, then Grace is basically confirmed as my Butler.
π§
Keep the day clean: do not split votes with extra nominations. Lock in the David execution to resolve my Librarian pair, then use Aliceβs Undertaker result tomorrow to pivot decisively.
π¬
Bob
β
All
I am with ending nominations here. We have a clean Butler conflict plus Heidiβs Librarian, and Alice should get a strong Undertaker check tonight. Please do not pile on extra nominees unless you have something strictly better.
π§
Keep nominations closed on the clean mechanical conflict and ensure we get the Undertaker data by protecting Alice tonight.
π¬
Frank
β
All
I would like to end nominations here and take the David execution for the Undertaker check. One reminder for tomorrow: my Chef number is one, so the two evils are seated next to each other. If David is evil, the other evil must be Charlie or Eve.
π§
Steer town to stop extra nominations, lock in the clean execute, and set up tomorrowβs logical branches using my Chef adjacency info.
π¬
Alice
β
All
I agree we should end nominations here. Tomorrow I will share exactly what I learn from Davidβs execution. Also keep Frankβs Chef one in mind: the two evils are seated next to each other, so David being evil would implicate Charlie or Eve.
π§
Lock in the clean David execution to generate a strong Undertaker datapoint, discourage extra nominations, and set up tomorrowβs deduction using Chef adjacency and the Butler conflict.
π
Storyteller
The guillotine blade falls. David has been executed.
π
David(Ghost)
David has died.
Night 1
π
Storyteller
β
Bob
Good evening Bob. You are the Monk. Who would you like to protect tonight?
π―
Bob
Bob made a choice.
π§
Alice is our best mechanical confirmation tomorrow via Undertaker and multiple players requested I protect her; preventing her death keeps the game solvable and constrains evil.
π
Storyteller
β
Bob
You chose to protect Alice.
π
Storyteller
β
Charlie
Good evening Charlie. You are the Imp. Who would you like to kill tonight?
π―
Charlie
Charlie made a choice.
π§
I am killing Alice, the Undertaker claim, to prevent her from seeing that David was a Minion (Poisoner). This protects my fellow evil player's identity and prevents the town from confirming the Chef info or the Librarian's reliability.
π‘οΈ
Alice was protected from a night kill.
π
Storyteller
β
Charlie
You attacked Alice, but they survived.
π
Storyteller
β
Alice
Good evening Alice. You are the Undertaker. You learn that David was the Poisoner.
π
Storyteller
β
Grace
Good evening Grace. You are the Butler. Who would you like to be your master tomorrow?
π―
Grace
Grace made a choice.
π§
Choose a master who is likely to stay alive and vote with the town, while avoiding being chained to my neighbor Frank if he is secretly evil.
π
Storyteller
β
Grace
You chose Bob to be your master.
Day 2
π
Storyteller
A peaceful night has passed. All villagers are present and accounted for.
π€
David(Ghost)
β
Charlie
Charlie, they didn't kill Alice. Bob might actually be the Monk or Alice is poisoned. If Alice is the Undertaker, she'll see me as the Poisoner. I need to know what you want me to say. Should I keep acting like a disgruntled Butler or try something else?
π§
I need to coordinate with my Demon (Charlie) because Alice is still alive, which means the town will likely trust her Undertaker result if she isn't poisoned or if she's the Drunk.
π€
Grace
β
Alice
Hey Alice, what did your Undertaker show for David after the day one execution? That will really shape who we push today.
π§
Get the Undertaker read on David to mechanically anchor day 2 world-building and narrow demon/minion candidates before nominations.
π€
Charlie
β
David(Ghost)
David, stick to the Butler story for now. If Alice says you're the Poisoner, we'll claim she's the Drunk or I was poisoned. I tried to kill Alice but she lived, so Bob probably is the Monk. We need to discredit Alice's info today.
π§
I need to coordinate with my Minion, David, who was executed yesterday. Since the kill on Alice failed and she's claiming Undertaker, she will likely reveal David as the Poisoner. I need him to maintain his bluff to create doubt.
π€
Bob
β
Alice
Hey Alice, what did your Undertaker show for David last night? Also, since nobody died, do you think the Demon tried to kill you and my Monk protection worked?
π§
Get Alice's Undertaker result on David and coordinate what the no-death implies, so town can resolve the Butler conflict and narrow demon candidates before nominations.
π€
Eve
β
Alice
Hey Alice, quick check: are you really the Undertaker, and what did you learn last night about Davidβs character? Also, my Washerwoman info is that either David or Bob is the Monk, so if you saw David as something else that points hard at Bob.
π§
Get the key mechanical check: what Alice saw for David. That resolves a major conflict and narrows demon candidates before nominations.
π€
Frank
β
Alice
,Heidi
I am Chef. I got exactly one adjacent evil pair. Alice, what did your Undertaker see on David last night? Heidi, can you restate your Librarian info on the Butler pair? If David was evil or good, my info points different directions.
π§
Get the Undertaker result on David and lock in whether David was good. Combining that with my Chef 1-pair info should narrow evil to a specific adjacent pair before nominations.
π€
Heidi
β
Frank
,Alice
My Librarian info N0 was: either David or Grace is the Butler. Both claimed it, so one was lying. Grace looked consistent and Frank confirmed she told him early; David felt reactive. Alice, what did Undertaker see on David? That will anchor Frankβs Chef read.
π§
Give Frank and Alice my precise Librarian info and my read on the Butler conflict so we can combine with Undertaker and Chef to narrow evil candidates before nominations.
π€
Alice
β
Frank
,Heidi
My Undertaker last night saw David died as the Poisoner. So David was evil. If your Chef one is right, the other evil is adjacent to David, so likely Charlie or Eve. Also that makes Grace very likely the real Butler from your Librarian ping.
π§
Confirm my Undertaker info privately to the key info hubs so they can steer todayβs solve toward Charlie versus Eve, while limiting public exposure.
π€
David(Ghost)
β
Charlie
Charlie, if Alice says I am the Poisoner, I will say I must be the Drunk and my real role was Butler. That way, her info looks 'correct' to the town but my 'true' role is still Butler. It might make her look like she is the one who is drunk or poisoned if we play it right.
π§
Coordinate a backup plan with the Demon (Charlie) in case Alice (Undertaker) correctly identifies me as the Poisoner.
π€
Grace
β
Bob
Hey Bob, quick check in. I am the Butler and I picked you as my master today, so I can only vote if you vote. What is your role, and did you act on Alice last night? No death seems important.
π§
Coordinate with my Day 2 master for voting restrictions, get Bob's role and night action details, and compare to peaceful night to narrow Demon suspects.
π€
Charlie
β
David(Ghost)
That sounds like a plan. If she outs you as Poisoner, lean into the 'I must be the Drunk' line. It keeps the Butler claim alive and muddies the water. I'll support you and suggest Alice might be getting false info because of a Poisonerβironicallyβor that she is the Drunk herself.
π§
Coordinate a backup plan with my minion David to handle the likely outcome of the Undertaker's information.
π€
Bob
β
Grace
Hey Grace. I am the Monk, and yes, I protected Alice last night. If you really picked me as your master for today, tell me who you picked yesterday and why you switched. Also, what do you think about the no death?
π§
Maintain a voting plan if she is real Butler, but probe inconsistencies and avoid giving her extra leverage. Confirm I protected Alice; ask about her previous master and other info.
π€
Eve
β
Frank
,Heidi
Can you share what Alice told you just now, especially if she is really Undertaker and what she saw for David? Also, Frank, are you still confident in Chef one? I am Washerwoman and got Bob or David is the Monk.
π§
Get consolidated info from Frank and Heidi, especially what Alice said and how Chef1/Librarian/Undertaker line up, to narrow suspects before nominations.
π€
Frank
β
Eve
,Charlie
Alice told me privately her Undertaker saw David as the Poisoner last night. If that is true, then with my Chef one adjacent evil pair, the other evil must be next to David, so it is either you, Charlie, or you, Eve. I am still Chef one.
π§
Share anchored info with Eve and Charlie to force public discussion and narrow Demon between Charlie and Eve, while watching for evasive reactions.
π€
Heidi
β
Eve
Yes. Alice told me and Frank that her Undertaker saw David as the Poisoner, so David was evil. My Librarian N0 was that either David or Grace is the Butler, so with David evil that strongly points to Grace being the real Butler. If Frankβs Chef one is right, other evil is Charlie or you.
π§
Eve asked; sharing anchored info helps coordinate todayβs nominations and lets us test her Washerwoman claim against the solved Poisoner and Chef adjacency.
π€
Alice
β
Grace
,Bob
My Undertaker showed David died as the Poisoner, so he was evil. Grace, that makes you very likely the real Butler. Bob, did you protect me last night? If so, the no death could fit, but it also means we should look hard at Charlie or Eve as the other evil.
π§
Confirm David was Poisoner to trusted-seeming players, align on suspect pool (Charlie/Eve), and test Bobβs Monk claim by asking about protection/no-kill.
β
David(Ghost)
David waits.
π§
I've coordinated with my Demon, Charlie, to pivot to a 'Drunk' claim if Alice identifies me as the Poisoner. Now I need to see what information Alice is sharing with the rest of the town before I make my next move.
π€
Grace
β
Bob
,Alice
For Bob: yesterday my master was Frank, switched to you today because you seem trusted and I want my vote tied to you. With David confirmed Poisoner plus Frank Chef one, exactly one of Charlie or Eve is evil. No death fits you blocking an Imp kill on Alice.
π§
Confirm master chain with Bob, coordinate my restricted vote, and push the strongest mechanical solve: with David evil and Chef 1, exactly one of Charlie or Eve is evil, so we focus there.
π€
Charlie
β
Frank
,Eve
Frank, if Alice says David is the Poisoner, then your Chef one makes sense. But if David was the Poisoner, he could have poisoned Alice or you last night. If he poisoned Alice, her info is wrong. If he poisoned you, your count is wrong. We should be careful.
π§
To create doubt about the reliability of Alice's Undertaker information and Frank's Chef information by using the 'Poisoner' threat that they themselves are now considering.
π€
Bob
β
Frank
,Heidi
Alice says UT saw David as Poisoner, so he was evil. With your Chef one, Demon must be adjacent to David, so it is either Charlie or Eve. We should execute one of them today, then the other tomorrow if needed. Do you have a preference so we do not split votes?
π§
Lock the table onto the mechanical solve (Demon is Charlie or Eve) and coordinate votes so we get an execution today without splitting, starting with the more suspicious target.
π€
Eve
β
Alice
,Bob
If your Undertaker saw David as the Poisoner, note he died before night one, so he could not poison anyone after that. If Frank is really Chef one, the only adjacent evil pair must include David, so the Demon is either Charlie or me. I am Washerwoman with Bob or David as Monk, so I strongly think Charlie is the Demon. Can we push Charlie today? Bob, please protect Alice or Heidi tonight.
π§
Share the cleanest mechanical solve: if UT and Chef are trusted, Charlie is boxed into being the Demon. Align Alice and Bob on pushing Charlie in noms while Bob protects a key info role.
π€
Frank
β
Bob
,Alice
I think we should push Charlie today. If your Undertaker is true and David was Poisoner, my Chef one forces the Demon to be either Charlie or Eve, and Charlie feels more reactiony. Alice, please consider sharing your Undertaker result publicly so we can unify.
π§
Coordinate town to execute the most likely Demon between Charlie and Eve, and get Alice to go public with her Undertaker result to anchor todayβs vote.
π€
Heidi
β
Bob
,Frank
I lean Charlie first today. David being Poisoner plus Chef one makes Demon Charlie or Eve, and Charlie felt more coordinated with David and has not anchored a solid claim. If we miss on Charlie, I am happy to go straight to Eve tomorrow.
π§
Coordinate votes so we execute one of the two candidates today, ideally the more suspicious, and avoid splitting the town.
π€
Alice
β
Charlie
Charlie, quick private check. I am the Undertaker and I saw David died as the Poisoner. If Frank is really Chef with one adjacent evil pair, that makes the other evil either you or Eve. What is your role and info, and do you see any reason Chef could be wrong?
π§
Pressure Charlie for a concrete claim and reasoning under the Chef plus Undertaker constraint, to decide whether to push Charlie or Eve in nominations.
Nominations β Day 2
π
Storyteller
Nominations are now open. Please remember that only living players may nominate.
βοΈ
Eve
β
Charlie
Based on Alice seeing David as Poisoner and Frankβs Chef one, the only adjacent evil pair must include David, so the Demon is Charlie or Eve. I am Washerwoman and believe Bob is the Monk, so I am good. That points to Charlie as the Demon.
π§
We have limited time and need a decisive execution. If the UT and Chef info are true, Charlie is the Demon. Executing Charlie today either wins or forces us to reassess the chain immediately.
π
Storyteller
Voting starts now for Charlie. 4 votes needed for execution. Raise your hand if you want to vote for them.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
Wait, Eve! If David was the Poisoner, he likely poisoned Frank or Alice. If Frank is poisoned, his Chef info is wrong. If Alice is poisoned, her Undertaker info is false. We're rushing to execute based on potentially compromised information from a known evil player's last act!
π§
I need to cast doubt on the 'Chef 1' and 'Undertaker' logic that points directly to me as the Demon, by suggesting the Poisoner (David) interfered with their information.
β
Eve
Eve raised their hand
π§
Secure Charlieβs execution and demonstrate commitment; his claim that dead Poisoner could poison last night is mechanically false, so I want the vote to go through.
π¬
Bob
β
All
Charlie, David died before night one, so he could not poison Frank or Alice after that. So the Chef one and Undertaker result are not compromised by David. With Chef one, the Demon is either you or Eve, and today we should execute you first.
π§
Correct Charlie's poison argument and unify the vote on Charlie using the clean timing: David died before the first night he could poison.
β
Heidi
Heidi raised their hand
π§
Charlie is the highest-probability Demon from Chef one plus David evil adjacency, and his pushback is weak. Voting now avoids split and sets up a clear Eve execution tomorrow if needed.
β
David(Ghost)
David waits.
π§
I am waiting to see if the vote reaches a majority without my help. As Charlie is my Demon, I must not vote for him unless it's a strategic necessity to look 'good', but since I am already dead and known to be the Poisoner (per Alice's claim), my vote won't buy me much credibility. Keeping my ghost vote for a more critical moment is better.
β
Frank
Frank raised their hand
π§
We need to unify votes to execute Charlie today; with UT Poisoner and Chef=1, Charlie is one of two forced demon candidates, and his poisoning argument is mechanically incorrect.
β
Alice
Alice raised their hand
π§
Secure the 4th vote to execute Charlie, the top demon suspect under the strongest mechanical world (Chef 1 + confirmed Poisoner), and avoid losing tempo.
π¬
Grace
β
All
Charlie, Poisoner could only have messed with Chef on night zero, not Aliceβs Undertaker last night. Alice seeing David as Poisoner should be solid. I am the Butler and Bob is my master today, so I can only vote if he votes too, but I am fine executing Charlie here.
π§
Clarify poisoning timing, reinforce Undertaker reliability, and signal my Butler vote constraint while supporting executing Charlie as the best pressure test today.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
If Alice saw David as the Poisoner, then Frank's Chef one could be from Night Zero! If I'm the Demon and David was my Minion, the 'pair' is me and David. But thinkβif David was the Poisoner, who did he poison Night Zero? If he poisoned Frank, that one is fake!
π§
Attempt to discredit the Chef's information by suggesting the Poisoner (David) targeted him on Night Zero, creating a false positive for the 'evil pair' count.
π¬
Eve
β
All
Charlie, David died before night one, so he could not poison Alice or Frank last night. The only possible poison was night zero, and we have multiple lines pointing to David being evil already. If we are wrong and you die good, then execute me tomorrow. For today, keep your hands up on Charlie.
π§
Keep votes on Charlie by dismantling the Poisoner timing argument and framing the decision tree: if Charlie lives, we lose a key execution chance; if Charlie dies good, I become prime suspect next.
β
Bob
Bob raised their hand
π§
Secure Charlieβs execution and allow Grace to vote as Butler tied to me, maximizing chance we remove the Demon today or set up a clean Eve execution tomorrow.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
Charlie, David could only have poisoned one person on night zero, and Aliceβs Undertaker read on David should be clean. With Chef one, the evil pair is either David and you or David and Eve, so executing you today is the clean test. If you are good, we execute Eve tomorrow.
π§
Keep the vote unified on Charlie and neutralize the poisoner doubt so we do not stall and waste the day.
π¬
David(Ghost)
β
All
If I was the Poisoner, wouldn't I have poisoned Frank on night zero to mess with the Chef count? You're all assuming Frank's "1" is a real result, but if I hit him, that number is totally unreliable. We could be executing the Demon's neighbor based on a fake ping.
π§
I want to cast doubt on the Chef's information by suggesting I poisoned Frank on Night 0, thereby protecting Charlie from a consensus execution.
π¬
Frank
β
All
Charlie, Poisoner timing matters. If David poisoned on night zero, that poison does not reach night one, so Aliceβs Undertaker read on David should be clean. My Chef could be wrong, but David being evil still stands. I am keeping my vote on you, and if you die good we execute Eve tomorrow.
π§
Lock in the key rules point that N0 poison cannot affect Aliceβs Undertaker on Night 1, keep votes unified on Charlie, and set a clear next-day plan if Charlie is not the Demon.
π¬
Alice
β
All
Charlie, David could only have poisoned on night zero, and he was executed day one, so he could not have poisoned my Undertaker read. Even if Frank was poisoned and Chef is wrong, we still need to test you versus Eve, and you are the clean execution today. If you die and the game does not end, we execute Eve tomorrow.
π§
Lock in correct poison-timing logic, justify keeping vote on Charlie, and set clear plan: if Charlie is not demon, execute Eve next.
β
Grace
Grace raised their hand
π§
Bob, my master, is voting, so I can vote. Charlie is the clean test between Charlie and Eve given Chef=1 and David confirmed Poisoner; this maximizes chance to hit the Demon or set up tomorrow.
π
Storyteller
Voting is now closed.
π³οΈ
New execution leader: Charlie with 6 votes. They will be executed when nominations close unless tied or surpassed by another nominee.
π
Storyteller
The vote passes. Charlie is now on the block with 6 votes and will be executed when nominations close, unless another nominee receives equal or more votes.
π¬
Charlie
β
All
If David was the Poisoner, he could have poisoned Bob on night zero, meaning the Monk protection on Alice was fake. I attacked Alice last night, and if she survived, it might be because of a Soldier or Mayor bounce, not a Monk! We are basing everything on a chain of info that could be entirely false!
π§
Cast doubt on the reliability of the Monk's protection and the overall logic chain to avoid execution.
π¬
Eve
β
All
Charlie cannot blame night one poisoning, because David died day one. The only poison was night zero, and that cannot touch Aliceβs Undertaker last night. Today is still a clean Charlie versus me test. Please do not create a tie; let Charlie die, then if the game continues we execute me tomorrow.
π§
Lock in the Charlie execution, prevent last second confusion or tie nominations, and set a clear contingency plan for tomorrow based on whether the game ends.
π¬
Bob
β
All
Do not get distracted by the night zero poison talk. Aliceβs Undertaker last night cannot be poisoned by David, since he died day one. Let us not create a tie. Execute Charlie today, and if the game continues we execute Eve tomorrow.
π§
Prevent a tie, reinforce poison timing logic, and lock in the clean Charlie execution today with a clear plan for tomorrow if needed.
π¬
Heidi
β
All
Please do not create a tie. David dying day one means Aliceβs Undertaker on David should be clean, so David being Poisoner is solid. Even if Chef was poisoned on night zero, today is still a clean Charlie versus Eve test. Let Charlie die, and if the game continues we execute Eve tomorrow.
π§
Lock in the plan, prevent a tie, and keep town focused on the clean Charlie then Eve sequence while noting Davidβs poison cannot affect Undertaker.
π¬
David(Ghost)
β
All
Wait, if I was the Poisoner and I died Day 1, my poison from Night 0 would have lasted through Day 1. If Frank is the Chef and I poisoned him Night 0, his info is definitely suspect. You're all rushing to kill Charlie based on "clean" info that might be a total mess.
π§
I want to reinforce the idea that the information the town is relying on (Frank's Chef ping) could be false, even if I am the Poisoner, to create doubt about Charlie's execution.
π¬
Frank
β
All
David, poison from night zero lasts through day one, not into night one. So your night zero poison cannot affect Aliceβs Undertaker last night. Even if my Chef number was poisoned, David being the Poisoner makes today a clean Charlie versus Eve test. Please do not create a tie.
π§
Lock in the clean timing argument, stop late-game chaos nominations, and keep focus on the Charlie execution without a tie.
π¬
Alice
β
All
Please do not nominate anyone else or try to force a tie. Let Charlie be executed, and I will confirm what he was tonight with Undertaker. If the game continues, we execute Eve tomorrow.
π§
Lock in the clean Charlie versus Eve test by discouraging new nominations or ties, and set expectation that my Undertaker will confirm Charlie tonight to guide tomorrow.
β
Grace
Grace waits.
π§
Voting is closed and Charlie is on the block. Any further action, especially a nomination, could create a tie and help evil. I will hold and let the execution resolve Charlie versus Eve cleanly.
π
Storyteller
The guillotine blade falls. Charlie has been executed.
π
Charlie(Ghost)
Charlie has died.
π
Game Over
Demon Dead
Winner: Good
Transcript
Paused
Copied